BIBLID 0254-4466(2017)35:1 pp.

225-260
35 1 106 3

------------------------------------------
2015 9 10 2016 4 6 2017 3 6

225
226 35 1

1


738-839 904-975

1987
2

3

4

5

------------------------------------------
1
44.2(1996.3): 170-172(L) John Makeham, ed.,
Transforming Consciousness: Yogcra Thought in Modern China (New York: Oxford
University Press, 2014).
2 1982
1(1987.3): 41
1987 185-236
3 Jennifer Eichman, Humanizing the Study of Late Ming
Buddhism, Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal 26(2013.6): 169-172.
4

7 2001 291-439
5
2002
191-207 2009 414-419
12 2010 403-414

 227

7


8

1549-1613

------------------------------------------
6
2012

2013 280-293
2013


55.2(2015.4): 96-123
7
8 1752
5 1



228 35 1

10

11

1355-1436
12

13

1500-
14
1584
1546-1623
------------------------------------------
9
81 1993 304a
10 5 1-2
11 372
12 134 393a



2014 124-136
13




5 3


14
2014.3(2014.9):

36-41
 229

1545-1608

15
1506-1584
1544-1604
1535-1615

16

17

18
1566-1621
------------------------------------------
15
24(1998.12): 215-258




5 4-5
16
39 2013 159



2010 4
17

81
503a
18
230 35 1

1565-1624
19

20

1599-1699

21

1071-1128
22

23

------------------------------------------

6 3-4
19
28(2014.12): 143-190
20 127 30 679a
21
82 145c
22 137 562b
23

2008
105-150
 231

1560-1609
24
1564-16361525-1590

25


1580-1650

26

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

1.
2.
3.
4.

------------------------------------------
24

70 2006 9 242
25 147b
26
11 2015
217-237
232 35 1

5.
6.
27
7.

CBETA

8 17

------------------------------------------
27
 233

1603

9
17

1521-16011589

1740-1796

28

------------------------------------------
28 2014 391
 234 35 1

29

30

1602


1603
1583

------------------------------------------
29 1(1987.3): 12-13

374-375
30
1603
5-6
 235

31

10 20

Ernest B.

Brewster


32

1612

33

------------------------------------------
31 396.3111


32
1612
3
779 1 10 17-46
33

236 35 1

34

35


36

1596
1590

------------------------------------------


146c




34 147b-c
35 9 242
36 27 1987

8 497c
 237

37

38

1558-

39

10 20
40

1628

------------------------------------------
37 9 242-243
38

1(1987.3): 12
39 4
20
11
40

238 35 1

41

42

1562-1609

43

1569

44
1570-1626
45 46
1555-1612

------------------------------------------
41 6 10-11
42
94
191a
43 58
1989 136
44 127
29 671b
45


1989 1184
46
256
 239

47

48 49

50

1592
11 21 1592

1591
1583

------------------------------------------
47

2013.10.12-13
48 3




49
19962013
2013.11.30-12.2
50


1(1987.3): 811
16
240 35 1

51

52

1581
53

-1639

------------------------------------------
51

1628 2-4
52 671b
53



1592 1-2
 241

54

55

56
10 20 1632
57 58
1574-1636

1630

4
1535-1612
23
1587-1638

59

60

------------------------------------------
54 36 1 253b
55 176-178
56 6
57


58


59
60 36
1 253b
2
242 35 1

61

62

63

64

15 16

------------------------------------------
2014.2(2014.4): 64-65
61 108
2000 500
62
1632 5-7
63 1
64 33 21 149b
 243

6 11

65

66
1595-1645

1633

1631

67

1545-1628

1602
68

69

------------------------------------------
65


66

67 3 17
1985 203
68
2014.10.28
69
244 35 1

70

1582-1639
71

72

73

------------------------------------------

43 25 532
70

71 29 5 491b
72 Jiang Wu, Enlightenment in Dispute: The Reinvention of Chan
Buddhism in Seventeenth-Century China (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 35,
38, 39
2011.3(2011.6): 92-97
73

1

 245

74

75

76

77

1670

1876-1954

78
10 20
------------------------------------------
74
1633 1-7
75 377
76 1(1987.3): 7
77 25 532
78

246 35 1

1806
1841
79
1865-1921 1919

80

81
-1654

82

83


------------------------------------------
79




80

1919 5-6
81

5
82 2011.12.25
83 10
20
 247

84

1804

85

86 87
1792-1841 1767-1838
88

------------------------------------------
84
85 2
86


1996 283-292
87 1721-1799
1735-18151740-17961789-1840


2010 120
88
190
248 35 1

89

90

1609-1669

10
91
20

1859-1934

------------------------------------------
89
90

287293-294
91

 249

92
1635

93

94

95

------------------------------------------
92 78

2006 75-77
93
10

1993 3
94


95


250 35 1

96

97

98

------------------------------------------
96

3
118-122
97



98
2009 69 1575
 251

99 100

------------------------------------------
99 5 121
100






5 125-126
252 35 1

101

102

103

------------------------------------------
101 91b
102 93a-94a
103 94a-b
 253

104

105

106

107

108

------------------------------------------
104 95a
105 95b
106 379
107
108 1(1987.3): 26
254 35 1

109

110

------------------------------------------
109 17
110 2013


 255

* 1. 1.
2.
2.
1. 1.
2.
2.
1. 1.
2. 2.
3. 3.



1. 1.
2. 2.
3.
3.




*

137 1993

1603

1989
2010
43

2000
256 35 1

108
2000
1612

82 1993

134 1993

81 1993

39
2013

1633

94 1993
1628

1592

33 1987

81 1993
36 1987

27 1987
1632
127
1993

2010

3 17
1985
2014

10 1993

78
2006

2009

1752

1919

 257

29 1987

2013
2014
1989 58

2009
2002


191-207
2015
55.
2(2015.4): 96-123
2011

2011.3(2011.6): 92-97
2006 70

2011 2011.12.25
2001
7

2014
2014.2(2014.4):
57-66
2014
2014.3(2014.9):
36-41
1998
24(1998.12): 215-258

1996
44.2(1996.3): 170-172(L)
2013

2013.10.12-13
2013
2013
2013.11.30-12.2
2013

258 35 1

2012 280-293
2008

105-150
2010 12
2014 28
(2014.12): 143-190
2015
11 217-237
2014

2014.10.28
1987 1(1987.3): 1-41
1987
1996

1996
283-292
Eichman, Jennifer. 2013. Humanizing the Study of Late Ming Buddhism. Chung-Hwa
Buddhist Journal 26(2013.6): 153-185.
Makeham, John, ed. 2014. Transforming Consciousness: Yogcra Thought in Modern
China. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wu, Jiang. 2008. Enlightenment in Dispute: The Reinvention of Chan Buddhism in
Seventeenth-Century China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 259

A Forgotten Tradition: The Lesser Known Late-Ming

and Early-Qing Annotations of the Cheng Weishi Lun

Chien Kai-ting

Abstract

In the late Qing-early Republican period, the reintroduction from Japan of

Yogcra classics such as the Cheng weishi lun shuji (Annotated Treatise on
Consciousness-Only) sparked an intense interest in studying the Yogcra. The
history of early modern Buddhism records a similar phenomenon in the late
Ming: a group of Buddhist laity and monastics attempted to understand the
doctrinal implications of Yogcra classics such as the Cheng weishi lun
, Yinming ruzheng lilun , and Guan suoyuan yuan lun
on the basis of later works such as the Huayenjing shuchao
by Chingliang Chengguan , Zongjing lu by Yongming
Yanshou , and Weishi kaimeng wenda by Tongji
Yunfeng . This vigorous scholarly interest lasted until the early Qing
dynasty. Contemporary scholars in this field, such as Sheng Yen and
Chang Chi-chiang , rely heavily on Buddhist scriptures in general
circulation; there is still, however, a great deal of related literature lying
scattered and relatively neglected in libraries across China and elsewhere.
Systematic collation and analysis of these materials provide us with a more
solid documentary foundation for a comprehensive study of Yogcras
development during the late Ming and early Qing period, helping us identify

------------------------------------------
Chien Kai-ting is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Chinese Literature at National
Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu.
260 35 1

its ideological features, orientation and contribution. The Cheng weishi lun
was the primary object of Yogcra scholarship throughout that period.
Accordingly, this article not only presents textual research specifically on the
seven lesser known annotations of the Cheng weishi lun that the author has
found in various libraries, but also elaborates on the potential value and
significance of these annotations for the pedagogic history of Yogcra in that
period. It is hoped that further scholarly attention will be given to this subject
in future.

Keywords: Late-Ming Yogcra, Cheng weishi lun , Bianyin Daji

, Yuan Zhengui , Chaizi Shengshi