You are on page 1of 3

Open Access

Austin Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Case Report

Negative Pressure Pulmonary Edema: A Rare


Complication Following Extubation
Arruda BA1, Miranda DB2*, Amorim MAS1,
Bezerra DM1, Bastos MMA2 and Fagury AEA1 Abstract
1
Department of Anesthesiology, Santa Casa de We describe a case of Negative Pressure Pulmonary Edema (NPPE)
Misericrdia de Goinia Hospital, Brazil followed by laryngospasm occurred immediately after extubation. A 24-year-old
2
Department of Medicine, Catholic University of Gois, man underwent a surgical correction of unilateral inguinal hernia by laparoscopy.
Brazil The tracheal intubation was easy with grade 1 of Cormack-Lehane classification.
*Corresponding author: Miranda DB, Department of Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane 2, 5%. After fully awake extubation,
Medicine, Catholic University of Gois, Brazil nearly total upper airway obstruction due to severe laryngospasm was observed
by a decrease in oxygen saturation and the presence of large amount frothy
Received: December 29, 2016; Accepted: January 10, pink sputum, suggestive of acute pulmonary edema. A nasal airway was
2017; Published: January 12, 2017 inserted, but face mask ventilation was difficult. Oxygenation of the airway was
maintained with support of non invasive ventilation for twenty four hours, with
SpO2 of 92-96 %. 48 hours later, the pulmonary edema disappeared and the
patient was discharged without complications (SpO2 96% and ambient air).
Keywords: General anesthesia; Post-extubation; Laryngospasm; Negative
pressure pulmonary edema

Abbreviations pressure, oxygen saturation (SpO2) and a peripheral vein was


catheterized for infusion and drug administration. Anesthesia was
NPPE: Negative Pressure Pulmonary Edema; SpO2: Oxygen induced with intravenously propofol (150mg), fentanyl (250mcg) and
Saturation; NIMV: Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation atracurium (35mg). The endotracheal intubation using tube 8.0mm
Introduction was easy with grade 1 of Cormack-Lehane classification. Anesthesia
was maintained with sevoflurane (2.0-2.5%). Surgery lasted about one
Negative pressure pulmonary edema (NPPE) is a non common hour and during that time vital signs were normal. Patient recovered
complication of general anesthesia [1]. The incidence of NPPE is 0.05 from surgery and was extubated successfully.
to 0.1% in healthy adults who underwent general anesthesia [2,3].
It is even less common with the use of a laryngeal mask airway [2]. Immediately after extubation, the patient developed inspiratory
It is usually seen during emergence from anesthesia having a multi stridor with severe laryngospasm followed by a decrease in oxygen
factorial pathogenesis. The most common causes of NPPE are upper saturation, increase in respiratory rate (around 25/minute) and
airway infection, tumor and laryngospasm [4]. In adults about 50% increase in heart rate (about 120/min). There was large amount of
of NPPE occurrences are due to postoperative laryngospasm [5,6]. frothy pink sputum. Chest auscultation revealed bilateral generalized
The implications of acute NPPE can be severe with mortality as high coarse crackles. Immediate diagnosis of NPPE secondary to post
as 11 to 40% [7]. However, if diagnosed and treated early, these rates extubation laryngospasm was made. A nasal airway was inserted, but
decrease. Previous recognition and institution of appropriate Non- face mask ventilation was difficult. The patient was moved to post
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (NIMV) is important to ensure anesthetic care unit. oxygenation of the airway was maintained with
successful outcomes [8]. We report a case of a previously healthy support of non invasive ventilation for twenty four hours and SpO2
male who developed NPPE secondary to laryngospasm shortly after ranged between 92-96% in the intensive care unit.
extubation following general anesthesia. Computed tomography of the chest at the time showed foci of
Case Presentation
A 24 year old man 72kg, with no past history of any significant
illness or allergy was admitted in the day care surgery for a correction
of unilateral inguinal hernia by laparoscopy under general anesthesia.
Patient was perfectly well before surgery, routine laboratory
findings were normal, haemodynamically stable with no respiratory
complaints. He denied previous problems with general anesthesia
and his baseline peripheral oxygen saturation was 99% in ambient
air. The patient was accepted to operation room after he was informed
and asked to sign consent form for anesthesia and surgery.
He was monitored with electrocardiogram, non-invasive blood Figure 1: Computed tomography of the chest in the immediate postoperative.

Austin J Anesthesia and Analgesia - Volume 5 Issue 1 - 2017 Citation: Arruda BA, Miranda DB, Amorim MAS, Bezerra DM, Bastos MMA and Fagury AEA. Negative Pressure
ISSN : 2381-893X | www.austinpublishinggroup.com Pulmonary Edema: A Rare Complication Following Extubation. Austin J Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2017; 5(1):
Miranda et al. All rights are reserved 1052.
Miranda DB Austin Publishing Group

(as mentioned in most by laryngospasm), increasing inspiratory


efforts (50-100 cm H2O, when normal is 3-10 cm of H2O) to overcome
the obstruction for generate pleural and very negatives alveolar
pressures. The pressure gradient difference causes the fluid to move
out of the pulmonary capillaries and flood the interstitial and alveolar
spaces. There are four primary mechanisms: interstitial fluid in the
capillary bed of the lungs or, (conversely, a decrease in pressure in
the interstitium) decreased the plasma osmotic pressure, increased
membrane permeability and decreased fluid to return through the
lymphatic route [3,7].
The intra thoracic negative pressures cause an increase in systemic
venous return to the heart with a decreased cardiac output. Sudden
increase in pulmonary capillary pressure causes fluid to move rapidly
in interstitial and alveolar spaces and edema persists even after the
Figure 2: Chest X-ray 24 hours postoperative. relief airway obstruction [8]. This generates a hypoxemia increasing
of pulmonary vascular resistance pre and post capillary which in turn
consolidation with confluent aspect in frosted glass in the upper precipitate hyper adrenergic state, mimcking neurogenic pulmonary
lobes of both lungs in the middle lobe and lingula, consistent with edema [8].
the diagnosis of pulmonary edema (Figure 1). Patient gradually
started improving; after six hours was moved to intensive care unit Pulmonary edema presents with snores and rales on auscultation,
dyspnea, cyanosis and pink puff secretion [5]. The differential
with SpO2 up to 96% in NIMV and the crackles on his chest markedly
diagnosis includes hidden heart disease, fluid overload and
decreased. Patient continued to improve during the next 24 hours
anaphylaxis. Fast and effective radiography simple chest shows edema
and was completely asymptomatic at this time. A comparison
with alveolar-interstitial pattern diffuse, in their bilateral majority,
between the chest X-ray after extubation and about 24 hours after
centralized with pulmonary pedicle extended and cardiac normal.
the event showed marked improvement; however, residual interstitial
Unilateral pulmonary edema is rarely found and has been associated
infiltrate persisted with small alveolar consolidations (Figure 2). He
with the positioning of the patient when the gravitational effects
was discharged from the hospital within 48 hours of the event.
could interfere the presentation of the table [10,12]. In the absence of
Discussion these differential diagnoses and evidence of acute obstruction of the
upper airways is with the opportune diagnosis of NPPE [3,5].
The incidence of NPPE is around 0.05-0.1 % of all anesthetic
procedures [5,9]. This statistic increases to 11% when considering all It is essential to re establish ventilation of the patient, consisting in
patients requiring intervention for acute upper airway obstruction [5]. most cases NIMV or re intubation [13]. Early relief of laryngospasm
The same statistics are shared by different authors [10,11]. Its more and assistance in new intubation can be achieved at the expense of
common in healthy and young males who are more pre disposed to neuromuscular blockers. The succinylcholine and rocuronium in
major negative pressure differences [3,10]. In adults, 50% of cases are double rates could favor this role [11,12,14]. The use of diuretics
due to laryngospasm postoperatively, but can also occur by occlusion remains controversial as well as steroids [5,13].
of the endotracheal tube by biting and less frequently after foreign
Prevention is not easy but one should know the clinical and
body aspiration, oropharyngeal surgery or residual neuromuscular
associated factors for an accurate diagnosis and prompt treatment.
blockade [5].
The extubation in deep plan could be associated with prevention,
Post-extubation NPPE is associated with a higher incidence but some studies have shown that the incidence of laryngospasm
of cases, which are mostly due to laryngospasm. Laryngospasm in children is higher in the anesthetized group as compared to the
is defined as glottic occlusion, secondary to laryngeal constrictor awaken group[15]. In most case reports in this age group, the tracheal
muscles contraction (interarytenoids, lateral cricoarytenoids and tube had been removed before the awakening [16,17].
internal and external thyroarytenoids), in response to a stimulus Most cases present resolution within 24 hours and these patients
[3]. Laryngospasm and bronchospasm are manifestations of upper should be observed for a longer period of post-anesthetic recovery.
airways and lungs defensive reflex system. During laryngospasm, NIMV is an important strategy to prevent/treat acute respiratory
spasm is a response to mechanical or chemical stimulation intrinsic failure by NPPE and reduce the chance of intubation, length of
or extrinsic to painful stimulation, involving all laryngeal and hospital stay, morbidity and mortality [5].
chest wall muscles and tracheobronchial tree smooth muscles. This
protective reflex is mediated by the vagus nerve [2]. Laryngospasm is Conclusion
more often seen in anesthetic emergence during extubation [2], both In conclusion, although a frequently benign condition, NPPE
with tracheal tubes and laryngeal mask [5]. However, it may be less secondary to laryngospasm is an important cause of morbidity,
frequent when there is a major noxious stimulation in the surgical hospitalization in intensive care unit and occasionally mortality
site during anesthesia recovery. This may generate high intra pleural in young and healthy individuals. It is a well-described clinical
negative pressure levels and cause pulmonary edema [1]. syndrome, but probably under-recognized, with the exact mechanism
NPPE begins with a significant obstruction of the upper airway still unclear. Early recognition of the disease was a key point that

Submit your Manuscript | www.austinpublishinggroup.com Austin J Anesthesia and Analgesia 5(1): id1052 (2017) - Page - 02
Miranda DB Austin Publishing Group

allowed the immediate application of positive airway pressure 8. Pelosi P, Jaber S. Noninvasive respiratory support in the perioperative period.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010; 23: 233238.
leading to a rapid resolution of the frame, thus ensuring the favorable
developments in this case. We encourage our colleagues to be vigilant 9. McConkey PP. Postobstructive pulmonary oedema: a case series and
in recognizing NPPE in the presence of laryngospasm. review. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2000; 28: 7276.

10. Deepika K, Kenaan CA, Barrocas AM, Fonseca JJ, Bikazi GB. Negative
References pressure pulmonary edema after acute upper airway obstruction. J Clin
1. Postac A, Saan , Ylmaz AN, rnek D, Alay GH, G N. Negative Anesth. 1997; 9: 403408.
pressure pulmonary edema during laryngeal mask use: a case report. Med J
Bakirkoy. 2016; 12: 54. 11. Oswalt CE, Gates GA, Holmstrom MG. Pulmonary edema as a complication
of acute airway obstruction. JAMA. 1977; 238: 18331835.
2. Vandse R, Kothari DS, Tripathi RS, Lopez L, Stawicki SPA, Papadimos
TJ. Negative pressure pulmonary edema with laryngeal mask airway use: 12. Devys JM, Balleau C, Jayr C, Bourgain JL. Biting the laryngeal mask: an
recognition, pathophysiology and treatment modalities. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. unusual cause of negative pressure pulmonary edema. Can J Anaesth. 2000;
2012; 2: 98103. 47: 176178.

3. Krodel DJ, Bittner EA, Abdulnour R, Brown R, Eikermann M. Case scenario: 13. Salem MR, Candido KD, Khorasani A. Acute postoperative negative:
acute postoperative negative pressure pulmonary edema. Anesthesiology. pressure pulmonary edema. Anesthesiology. 2011; 114: 461.
2010; 113: 200207. 14. Ware LB, Matthay MA. Clinical practice. Acute pulmonary edema. N Engl J
4. Bhattacharya M, Kallet RH, Ware LB, Matthay MA. Negative pressure Med. 2005; 353: 27882796.
pulmonary edema. Chest. 2016; S0012-3692. 15. Tenorio SB, Oliverira GS, Floriano KMS, Zanneti AO, Namba E, Edson N,
5. Bhaskar B, Fraser JF. Negative pressure pulmonary edema revisited: patho et al. Laringoespasmo e extubao traqueal em plano anestsico: estudo
physiology and review of management. Saudi J Anaesth. 2011; 5: 308313. comparativo em crianas. Rev Bras Anestesiol.1993; 43: 293-296.

6. Goli AK, Goli SA, Byrd RP, Roy TM. Spontaneous negative pressure 16. Brandom BW, Pulmonary edema after airway obstruction. Int Anesthesiol
changes: an unusual cause of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema. J Ky Med Clin. 1997; 35: 75-84.
Assoc. 2003; 101: 317320. 17. Lee KW, Downes JJ. Pulmonary edema secondary to laryngospasm in
7. Goldenberg JD, Portugal LG, Wenig BL, Weingarten RT. Negative-pressure children. Anesthesiology. 1983; 59: 347-349.
pulmonary edema in the otolaryngology patient. Otolaryngol Head Neck
Surg. 1997; 117: 6266.

Austin J Anesthesia and Analgesia - Volume 5 Issue 1 - 2017 Citation: Arruda BA, Miranda DB, Amorim MAS, Bezerra DM, Bastos MMA and Fagury AEA. Negative Pressure
ISSN : 2381-893X | www.austinpublishinggroup.com Pulmonary Edema: A Rare Complication Following Extubation. Austin J Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2017; 5(1):
Miranda et al. All rights are reserved 1052.

Submit your Manuscript | www.austinpublishinggroup.com Austin J Anesthesia and Analgesia 5(1): id1052 (2017) - Page - 03

You might also like