Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Plaintiffs,
COMPLAINT
vs.
Defendants.
1. This is an action for money damages arising out of the tragic death of Ruth Berg in a
PARTIES
2. Plaintiffs Brittany Bergstrom and JoAnn Fricano, the surviving daughter and mother of
Ruth Berg, respectively, were lawfully appointed as co-trustees, by an Order from Hennepin
County District Court on September 6, 2017, for the purpose of maintaining this wrongful death
Minnesota mechanical contracting corporation with principal executive offices located at 1027
utility holding company with principal executive offices located at 1111 Louisiana Street,
operates by and through its direct and indirect subsidiaries including Defendants CenterPoint
in the State of Minnesota, where it operates as a supplier of natural gas and also offers related
through its operating subsidiaries, including Defendant CenterPoint Energy Services, Inc.
CERC is incorporated in the State of Delaware with principal executive offices located at 1111
Inc. Defendant CES is authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota, where it operates as
a supplier of natural gas and also offers related energy-management services for commercial,
industrial, and wholesale customers. CES is incorporated in the State of Delaware with principal
a natural gas distribution system throughout the State of Minnesota, where CenterPoint is the
8. At all material times herein, CenterPoint distributed, supplied, operated, sold and
performed services relating to natural gas, gas piping and gas meters at Minnehaha Academy,
Minnesota.
2
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
9. Jurisdiction and venue lie in Hennepin County District Court because Defendants were
authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota and all damages and events giving rise to
10. The damages sought herein by Plaintiffs are within the jurisdictional limits of this Court.
FACTS
12. On August 2, 2017 at approximately 10:22 a.m., a building located on the North
Campus of the Minnehaha Academy campus was destroyed by a natural gas explosion. Two
people were killed and many more were injured. One of the dead was Plaintiffs decedent, Ruth
Berg.
13. At the time of the explosion, employees of Defendant Master Mechanical, acting within
the course and scope of their employment, were in the process of removing a gas meter from
the inside of one of the Minnehaha Academy buildings and re-piping and relocating it to the
14. The work being performed at Minnehaha Academy by Master Mechanical was part of
Defendant CenterPoints plan to move gas meters outside for easier access.
15. The work being performed at Minnehaha Academy involved the gas service line, gas
meters and regulators, as well as other apparatus used in the delivery of gas to Minnehaha
Academy.
16. The design, method and manner of installation of the gas service line was solely
determined by, and subject to the exclusive control of, Defendant CenterPoint and its agents.
17. The gas service line in question was constructed and installed only by Defendant
18. The gas service line in question was maintained only by Defendant CenterPoint and its
agents.
3
19. The installation and maintenance of the gas service line in question was required to
satisfy all of the safety requirements imposed by statutes and regulations as well as the safety
20. In addition to the gas service lines, Defendants, and each of them, had sole and
exclusive control and discretion regarding the detachment, removal, repair and replacement of
gas meters, regulators, and other apparatus used in the delivery of gas to Minnehaha Academy.
21. Defendants, and each of them, also had the right and obligation to specify the type, kind,
and size of any gas meters used in the delivery of gas to Minnehaha Academy.
22. Defendants, and each of them, also had the right and obligation to specify and approve
23. The installation and maintenance of the gas meters, regulators and any other apparatus
used in the delivery of gas to Minnehaha Academy was required to satisfy all safety
requirements imposed by statutes and regulations, as well as the safety rules and regulations
24. Upon information and belief, CenterPoint recruited, hired, trained, supervised, inspected,
directed, controlled and had the right to control mechanical contractors and their employees,
including Master Mechanical, while performing the meter relocation project of which the work at
25. On August 2, 2017, Master Mechanical personnel who were working at Minnehaha
Academy were employees and agents of CenterPoint and were acting within the course and
scope of their employment. As a result, CenterPoint is vicariously liable for the acts (or failures
26. Alternatively, at the time and place of the aforesaid explosion, Master Mechanical, by
and through its employees and Defendant CenterPoint, by and through its employees acting
within the course and scope of their employment, were engaged in a joint enterprise, as each of
the Defendants and their employees had a mutual understanding of the common purpose of
4
relocating gas meters and each had a voice in the direction and control of the means to carry
27. Alternatively, at the time and place of the aforesaid explosion, Master Mechanical, by
and through its employees and CenterPoint, by and through its employees acting within the
course and scope of their employment, were engaged in a joint venture insofar as both
Defendants combined their money, property, time or skill in performing the meter relocation
work; each of the Defendants owned property and equipment used in performing the meter
relocation work and each had the mutual right of control over the property and equipment used
in performing the meter relocation work; and both Defendants had an agreement to share some
28. According to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)s Preliminary Report
regarding the August 2, 2017 explosion, At the time of the explosion, two workers were
installing new piping to support the relocation of gas meters from the basement of the building to
the outside. Two new meters mounted on a wall were ready for the new piping to be connected.
While workers were removing the existing piping, a full-flow natural gas line at pressure was
opened.
29. The meter relocation project being performed at the time of the explosion was a
hazardous and abnormally dangerous operation that required, among other things, considerable
30. Employees performing meter relocation work must be well-trained and equipped, highly
experienced, and well-supervised. They must employ and follow company and industry
standards and accepted safety precautions including but not limited to devising and following an
effective safety plan, identifying, closing and purging valves and gas lines, cordoning off and
evacuating people from areas in which escaping gas may explode, have plans and procedures
in place to warn people of impending explosions and otherwise take all reasonable and
appropriate precautions to prevent people from being harmed or killed by escaping gas.
5
THE EXPLOSION OF AUGUST 2, 2017
31. At all relevant times before and during the meter relocation process on August 2, 2017,
employees and agents of the Defendants, and each of them, were in exclusive control of the
gas supply line and attachments located downstream of the main line.
32. At all relevant times, Defendant CenterPoint had a duty to monitor, inspect, repair and
maintain all components of the natural gas distribution system downstream of the main line at
Minnehaha Academy, including but not limited to the gas lines, pipes, meters, and regulators
33. Defendant CenterPoint represented to the public that it monitored the operation of its
34. The gas supply line and attachments in question were not located on public property;
rather they were on property owned by Minnehaha Academy over which the Defendants, and
each of them, had full and exclusive control for purposes of the meter relocation project.
35. The supply line and attachments in question were in good working order and had not
been damaged, broken, cracked or otherwise disturbed prior to the meter relocation project.
36. Immediately prior to the explosion, employees and agents of the Defendants, and each
of them, were in the pit area inside the building in the process of disconnecting the service line
37. While employees and agents of the Defendants, and each of them, were in the pit area
inside the building, in the process of disconnecting the service line from the old meter,
Minnehaha Academy staff, including Plaintiffs decedent, Ruth Berg, were working inside the
building, a short distance from the blast site. Minnehaha Academy officials and employees had
no idea such highly-dangerous work was being performed, as Defendants did not inform
officials and employees of the high degree of danger posed by the abnormally dangerous
6
38. Prior to disconnecting the service line from the old meter, employees and agents of the
Defendants, and each of them, failed to inspect and safely close shut-off valves upstream from
the meter.
39. The failure to safely close shut-off valves upstream from the meter meant that as soon
as employees and agents of the Defendants, and each of them, disconnected the supply line
from the meter, gas under operating pressure would immediately flow out of the supply pipe into
40. In addition, CenterPoint had failed to install an Excess Flow Valve (EFV) or curb valve
on the service line of the gas piping system, which would have prevented the release of an
explosive level of natural gas by instantaneously shutting off the flow of gas.
41. Upon disconnecting the supply line from the meter, employees and agents of the
Defendants, and each of them, immediately realized that explosive conditions existed. However,
rather than alerting building occupants and people in the vicinity of the building of the danger
and the need to take immediate action, the employees and agents of the Defendants, and each
of them, ran to save themselves and ignored the safety of others, including Plaintiffs decedent,
Ruth Berg.
A school maintenance worker heard and smelled the natural gas release and
went to its source in the basement meter room where the workers had been. As
he exited the basement, he made an announcement over his hand-held radio
that there was gas in the building and to evacuate immediately. As he made his
radio announcement, he ran up the stairs and searched for occupants. Less than
1 minute later, the building exploded.
43. The employees and agents of the Defendants, and each of them, who were responsible
for the meter relocation project (which included the aforesaid disconnection of the supply line
from the meter) committed a series of blatantly unsafe, unreasonable and otherwise highly
dangerous acts with deliberate disregard for the rights or safety of others, including Plaintiffs
7
44. As a direct and proximate result of the aforesaid acts and omissions committed by the
employees and agents of the Defendants, and each of them, a massive explosion occurred at
Minnehaha Academy on August 2, 2017, which destroyed and essentially leveled a large
portion of the building in which Plaintiffs decedent, Ruth Berg, was working.
45. As a direct and proximate result of the August 2, 2017 explosion, Plaintiffs decedent,
46. As a direct and proximate result of the explosion which killed Ruth Berg, her heirs and
next of kin, including Plaintiffs herein, are entitled to compensation for all of their pecuniary
COUNT ONE
NEGLIGENCE AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS
49. Defendants were responsible for the installation of the gas meter at Minnehaha
Academy on August 2, 2017 and had a duty to exercise reasonable care in doing so and to do
so properly.
50. Defendant Master Mechanical, and its agents and employees, had a duty to prevent the
escape of natural gas while installing the gas meter and also to protect the public from
51. Defendant CenterPoint, and its agents and employees, had a duty to make reasonable
inspections to ensure that the gas system at Minnehaha Academy was safe for the
transportation of gas and to properly monitor, survey, clean, upgrade, maintain or replace the
gas supply system at Minnehaha Academy (and/or its component parts) to discover any
problems and deficiencies in or regarding the gas supply system and to warn of any such
problems.
8
52. Defendant CenterPoints duty to exercise due care in carrying out its duties and
obligations was non-delegable, subjecting CenterPoint to liability for the negligence of its agents
53. All Defendants herein had a duty to give adequate warning to persons at Minnehaha
Academy of the foreseeable dangers inherent in natural gas and of the failings and resultant
dangers associated with common natural gas piping fittings and fixtures, especially when
conducting high-risk activities such as the relocation and installation of a natural gas meter.
54. Persons of ordinary care and prudence, particularly when dealing with the relocation and
installation of a natural gas meter, would or should have ensured that competent and qualified
individuals were involved in the installation and ensured that the natural gas line was properly
and safely shut off prior to doing so. Defendants breached their duty regarding this critical
responsibility and failed to act with ordinary care and prudence in relocating and installing the
55. The death of Ruth Berg was directly and proximately caused by the negligence and
each of them, with sufficient tools and equipment to safely carry out the meter
relocation project;
Failure to communicate with and warn people working in the building and
adjacent areas about the hazardous and abnormally dangerous operation being
conducted;
9
Failure to evacuate people working in the building and adjacent areas
Failure to safely and effectively shut-off the supply of gas at the shut-off
valve just upstream from the meter prior to disconnecting the service line from
the meter;
Failure to properly inspect the shut-off valve just upstream from the meter
Failure to safely and effectively shut off the supply of gas at the shut-off
Failure to properly bleed off or purge gas downstream from the shut-off
valve or valves which employees and agents of the Defendants, and each of
them, assumed were closed (and which, had they done so, would have alerted
them to the fact that the line was still fully pressurized);
to automatically shut off the gas when the gas flow exceeds design limits;
occupants, including decedent Ruth Berg, after employees and agents of the
Defendants, and each of them, knew of the escaping gas caused by the
the associated dangers related to the escape of natural gas in the distribution
system; and
56. These negligent acts and omissions were a direct and proximate cause of the explosion
10
57. As a direct and proximate result of the combined negligence of Defendants, Ruth Berg
was killed in the explosion of August 2, 2017 and her heirs and next of kin are entitled to all
such damages as set forth in Minnesota Stat. 573.02 et. seq. Specifically, her heirs and next
of kin have suffered the loss of means of support, guidance, counsel, aid, advice, comfort,
assistance, companionship and protection, which would have been provided had she lived, and
have otherwise sustained pecuniary loss consisting of general and special damages in an
determined at trial.
COUNT TWO
STRICT LIABILITY AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS
59. Natural gas, in its normal and customary use in gas distribution systems, is a dangerous
60. The distribution, delivery, and handling of natural gas, as well as the performance of
work on gas piping systems and related instrumentalities, are abnormally dangerous activities
61. The installation, servicing and repair of gas piping systems, including the closing and
purging of valves and gas lines, presents a high risk of harm to persons in the vicinity.
62. Due to this extreme risk, Defendants, who were performing such activities, had a duty to
the public of exercising a degree of care and diligence proportionate to the danger of explosion,
which Defendants knew could not be completely eliminated by the use of reasonable care.
63. Among other things, Defendants actions in disconnecting a service line when the
upstream shut-off valves had not been safely closed, constituted an ultra-hazardous activity
64. As a direct and proximate result of the above ultra-hazardous activities, the escape of
natural gas caused an explosion which killed Ruth Berg and her heirs and next of kin are
11
entitled to all such damages as set forth in Minnesota Stat. 573.02 et. seq. Specifically, her
heirs and next of kin have suffered the loss of means of support, guidance, counsel, aid, advice,
comfort, assistance, companionship and protection, which would have been provided had she
lived, and have otherwise sustained pecuniary loss consisting of general and special damages
determined at trial.
COUNT THREE
NEGLIGENCE PER SE AGAINST DEFENDANT CENTERPOINT
66. Defendant CenterPoint is a regulated natural gas utility in the State of Minnesota.
67. At all times relevant hereto, Defendant CenterPoint was obligated to comply with safety
requirements applying to natural gas distribution systems which were established by statutes,
regulations, rules, and other requirements, including but not limited to the rules, regulations, and
68. Those statutes, regulations, rules, and other requirements applying to natural gas
distribution systems were designed, enacted, adopted and implemented to prevent explosions,
to enhance public safety, and to provide protection to members of the public, including but not
69. Upon information and belief, Defendant CenterPoint violated one or more safety
requirements established by statutes, regulations, rules, and other requirements governing the
design, construction, maintenance, and operation of the gas distribution system that is the
70. Defendant CenterPoints failure to comply with such statutes, regulations, rules, and
71. Defendant CenterPoints negligence per se was a direct and proximate cause of the
12
72. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence per se of Defendant CenterPoint, Ruth
Berg was killed in the explosion of August 2, 2017 and her heirs and next of kin are entitled to
all such damages as set forth in Minnesota Stat. 573.02 et. seq. Specifically, her heirs and
next of kin have suffered the loss of means of support, guidance, counsel, aid, advice, comfort,
assistance, companionship and protection, which would have been provided had she lived, and
have otherwise sustained pecuniary loss consisting of general and special damages in an
determined at trial.
COUNT FOUR
RES IPSA LOQUITUR AGAINST DEFENDANT CENTERPOINT
74. The gas piping and distribution system that is the subject of this matter was in the
exclusive control of Defendant CenterPoint and was outside the control of the Plaintiffs and
75. At all material times herein, Defendant CenterPoint had a non-delegable duty to
reasonably maintain and inspect the gas piping system at Minnehaha Academy.
76. The explosion of August 2, 2017 was of a kind which ordinarily does not occur in the
absence of negligence.
77. The injuries and damages of the Plaintiffs, as a result of the death of Ruth Berg, were
caused by the negligent and improper acts and omissions of Defendant CenterPoint and its
78. Defendant CenterPoint is liable for such injuries as a consequence of the doctrine of res
ipsa loquitur and Ruth Bergs heirs and next of kin are entitled to all such damages as set forth
in Minnesota Stat. 573.02 et. seq. Specifically, her heirs and next of kin have suffered the loss
of means of support, guidance, counsel, aid, advice, comfort, assistance, companionship and
protection, which would have been provided had she lived, and have otherwise sustained
13
pecuniary loss consisting of general and special damages in an amount significantly in excess
COUNT FIVE
VICARIOUS LIABILITY AGAINST DEFENDANT CENTERPOINT
80. Defendant CenterPoint is vicariously liable, under the doctrine of respondeat superior,
for the negligent acts of its agents, employees, and representatives performed within the course
81. All of the acts and omissions alleged herein of Defendant Master Mechanical, and its
agents or employees, were committed while within the course and scope of employment or
agency.
82. As a result, Defendant CenterPoint is liable for the damages sustained by Plaintiffs as
A. As to all counts, for judgment against Defendants, and each of them, for special and
general damages in an amount significantly in excess of Fifty Thousand and no/100 Dollars
($50,000.00);
B. For costs, disbursements and reasonable attorneys fees incurred herein pursuant to
statute;
D. For such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and equitable, including any
injunctive relief and/or other equitable remedies the Court deems appropriate.
14
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
and
15