Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3. Distinguish jurisdiction over the subject matter from jurisdiction over the person of the accused.
Suggested Answer:
Jurisdiction over the subject matter refers to the authority of the court to hear and
determine a particular criminal case. Jurisdiction over the subject matter is conferred by
law. It is this kind of jurisdiction which cannot be stipulated by the parties nor can it be
conferred upon the court by the accused either through an express waiver or otherwise.
Jurisdiction over the person of the accused refers to the authority of the court, not over
the subject matter of the criminal litigation, but over the person charged. This kind of
jurisdiction requires that "the person charged with the offense must have been brought
in to its forum for trial, forcibly by warrant of arrest or upon his voluntary submission to
the court"
7. When A loaned a sum of money to B, A typed a single copy of a promissory note which they both
signed. A made two photocopies of the promissory note, he gave 1 copy to B and retaining the
other copy. A entrusted the type written copy to his counsel. The copy with A was destroyed when
the law office was burned. As counsel of A how will you prove the loan given to A by B?
Suggested Answer:
The loan given by A to B may be proved by secondary evidence through the xeroxed
copies of the promissory note. The rules provide that when the original document is lost
or destroyed, or cannot be produced in court, the offerer, upon proof of its execution or
existence and the cause of its unavailability without bad faith on his part, may prove its
contents by a copy, or by a recital of its contents in some authentic document, or by the
testimony of witnesses in the order stated. (Sec. 5 of Rule 130).
8. A was accused of having raped X. Rule on the admissibility of the following piece of evidence: A
pair of short pants allegedly left by A at the crime which the court, over the objection of A,
required him to put on, and when he did, it fit him well.
Suggested Answer:
The pair of short pants, which fit the accused well, is circumstantial evidence of his guilt,
although standing alone it cannot be the basis of conviction. The accused cannot object
to the court requiring him to put the short pants on. It is not part of his right against self-
incrimination because it is a mere physical act.
9. Fallen by a bullet upon being fired at, Santos before expiring told Romero, a passerby who came
to his rescue, I was shot by Pablo, our neighbor. May Romeros testimony on what was told to
him by Santos be offered and admitted in the separate civil action for damages brought by the
heirs against Pablo?
Suggested Answer:
The statement is admissible. A dying declaration, as in the facts in the case at bar, may be
offered in a civil case provided that the cause and circumstances of the death of the
declarant are the subjects of inquiry.
10. The prosecution presented in evidence a newspaper clipping of the report of a reporter during
the press conference stating that X admitted the robbery. Is the newspaper clipping admissible
against X?
Suggested Answer:
Yes. It is a non-hearsay evidence if offered for the purpose of showing X indeed made
such statement to the reporter regardless of the truth or falsity of the statement. Such
evidence then would fall under the classification of an independent relevant statement.
However, it would be hearsay if offered to prove the truth that X was indeed the robber.