You are on page 1of 30

THERE ARE 6 PAGES OF DATA INPUT

DATA INPUT SHEET - HYDROHELP

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK Estimate date 12-Nov-08

Fixed options for design of all alternatives of powerplant and conduit.


6 Currency, Canadian $ = 1, USA $ = 2. 1
7 Project design standard Industrial (1) or Utility design (2) -------- 1 Comment
8 Industrial generator (1) or utility generator (2). ---------------------- 1 Comment
9 De-sander required at intake, yes = 1, no = 0. --------------------- 0 Comment
10 Dam design for extreme flood, no = 1, yes = 2. ------------------- 1 Comment
11
12 Turbine and powerhouse characteristics.
13 Total powerplant flow, m3/s. 2.60 Comment
14 Desired number of units in powerplant. 2 Comment Comment
15 Rated head ( Iterate to = F6 ), m. 454.86
= Calc head = 454.86
16 Estimated powerplant utilization factor. 0.4600 Comment 1.196
17 Normal tailwater elevation m. 317.00 Water use in m3/s per year
18 Powerhouse flood tailwater level, m. 322.00 Comment
19 Average rock level at powerhouse, m. 325.00 --- Must be > 323.87
20
21 Generator characteristics.
22 System frequency, Hz. 60.00 Comment
23 Generator power factor. (Range 0.9 to 1.0) 0.90 Comment
24 Generator inertia ratio to normal, "J". 1.00 Comment
25
26 Horizontal axis, 2 jet, 1runner impulse
RECOMMENDED TURBINE TYPE
27 turbine.
28
29 Turbine type Suitability Comment Cost $M
30 Horiz. axis, 1 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine. ----YES ---- 1 9.420
31 Horiz. axis, 2 jet, 1runner impulse turbine. ----YES ---- 1 6.114
32 Horiz. axis, 1 jet, 2 runner impulse turbine. ----YES ---- 1 7.405
33 Horiz. axis, 2 jet/r, 2 run. impulse turbine. -------------- 1 0.000
34 Vert. axis, 1 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine. -------------- 1 0.000
35 Vert. axis, 2 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine. ----YES ---- 1 7.657
36 Vert. axis, 3 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine. ----YES ---- 1 7.800
37 Vert. axis, 4 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine. -------------- 1 0.000
38 Vert. axis, 5 jet, 1 run. impulse turbine. -------------- 1 0.000
39 Vert. axis, 6 jet, 1 run. impulse turbine. -------------- 1 0.000
40 Horiz. axis, 1 jet, 1 turgo runer turbine. -------------- 1 0.000
41 Horiz. axis, 2 jet, 1 turgo runner turbine. -------------- 1 0.000
42 Horiz. axis BANKI (Ossberger) turbine. -------------- 1 0.000
43
44 Project hydraulics.
45 Normal +ve waterhammer design for penstock % 15 Allowable waterhammer
46 Allowable negative waterhammer on penstock % 38 calculated by program.
47
48 Side stream intakes and stream crossings.
49 Side stream intakes, ratio of flow to main intake flow. 0 Comment
50 Stream crossings under/over pipe/penstock. 0
51 Input page 1.

1
52 BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK Estimate date 12-Nov-08
53
54 Surge tank. Tank hgt, m. 0.0
55 Surge tank used, (1), not used (0). 0 Comment
56 Surge tank in steel =1, in rock exc. = 2 2 Comment Tank cost $M.
57 If in rock, conc lining (1), no lining, (0) 1 Comment 0.000
58 Elevation rock at top of tank, if in rock, m. 800 Comment
59 Elevation at surge tank tee, meters . 710 Comment
60 Tank diameter based on min for stability (1), or larger, (2) 2 0.8
61 If tank diameter is larger, select diameter, m. 3.0 Comment
62
63 Main concrete weir dam.
64 Design maximum (1/1000?) flood flow, m3/s. 300 Deck level, m. 847.60
65 Design weir + LL outlet flood flow (1/200?), m3/s. 300 Comment
66 Crest length between abutments at damsite, m. 100 Comment
67 River bed level, m. 840.0 Comment
68
69 Weir spillway. Coefficient of discharge = 1.4
70 Spillway sill level, m. 845.00
71 Required depth of spill over weir, m. 2.30 Comment
72 Required number of inflatable rubber dams 2 Comment
73
74 De-sander design. 2.2 Must be =< 3.4
75 Basin volume ratio. 160 Comment
76 Design particle size, range 0.1mm to 0.4mm. 0.25 Comment
77
78 Embankment dams - main dam.
79 Normal tailwater level at dam, m. 840.00 Must be > 840.00
80 Design acceleration for earthquake, g. 0.25 = 1/1000 DBE Comment
81 River or lowest ground level at dam, m. 840.00
82 Embankment material factor for dam stability 1.20 Comment
83 Foundation material factor for dam stability 1.20 Comment
84 Rip-rap design.
85 Effective fetch, km. 1 Comment
86 Design wind speed, km/hour. 100 or m/sec = 27.8
87 Dam quantity calculation. Comment
88 Dam crest length, m. 20 Crest El. m= 848.97
89 River width, m. 5
90 Average depth of overburden excavation, m. 2
91 Valley shape factor (0.5 to 1.0) 0.7 Comment
92 Length of cutoff excavation, m. 30
93 Average depth of cutoff to impervious material, m. 8 Comment
94 Concrete or slurry wall length, m. 30 Comment
95 Maximum depth of concrete or slurry wall to impervious material, m. 8
96 Slurry wall valley shape factor (0.25 to 0.75). 0.5 Comment
97
98 Embankment dams - side dam.
99 Name of side dam. 1A
100 River or lowest ground level at dam, m. 840.00
101 Embankment material factor for dam stability 1.65 Comment
102 Foundation material factor for dam stability 1.60 Comment
103 Input page 2.

2
104 BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK Estimate date 12-Nov-08
105
106 Rip-rap design.
107 Effective fetch, km. 3 Comment
108 Design wind speed, km/hour. 100 or m/sec = 27.8
109 Side dam 1A quantity calculation.
110 Dam crest length, m. 0 Crest El. m= 849.75
111 River width at dam, m. 0
112 Average depth of overburden excavation, m. 0
113 Valley shape factor (0.5 to 1.0) 0.5 Comment
114 Length of cutoff excavation, m. 0 Comment
115 Average depth of cutoff to impervious material, m. 0 Comment
116 Concrete or slurry wall length, m. 0 Comment
117 Maximum depth of concrete or slurry wall to impervious material, m. 0
118 Slurry wall valley shape factor (0.25 to 0.75). 0.5 Comment
119
120 Conduit from reservoir to powerhouse. Comment
121 Number of conduits intake to powerhouse. 1 L/H ratio = 10.6
122 Automatic (1) or manual (2) optimization. 1 Comment
123 Select pipe diam (m) for manual optimization. 10.000 Comment. <<< NOTE
124 Select penstock diam (m) for manual optimiz. 8.000
125 Penstock steel ultimate strength, Mpa. 482.5 Comment
126 Penstock steel yield strength, Mpa. 344.7 Comment
127
128 Intake.
129 Length of intake channel, meters. 5.0 Comment
130 Average level of rock at intake, meters. 842.0 Should be > 840.76
131 Average depth of overburden excavation at intake, meters. 2.0
132 Normal FSL at trashracks, m. (by program) 847.30 Trashr. LSL, m 844.00
133 Water cleanliness factor. ( 0.5 to 1.0 ) 0.90 Comment
134 Percentage of reservoir cleared. ( 10% to 100% ) 0 Comment
135 Approach flow angle to racks. (45 to 0 degrees) 10 Comment
136 Rack inclination to horizontal. (60 to 90 deg. ) 80 Comment
137 Rack blockage ratio. ( 0.0 to 0.25) 0.2 Comment
138 Intake pipeline concrete encased length, m. 5 Comment
139
140 Pipeline intake to surge tank.
141 Pipeline on surface (1) or buried (2). 2 Comment
142 Pipe length in rock sidehill, m. 1100
143 Pipe length in earth sidehill, m. 2580
144 Elevation of end of pipeline, m. 660 Comment Read comment
145 Average sidehill slope in rock, hor. to 1 vert. 2.1 Comment
146 Average sidehill earth slope, horiz. to 1 vert. 2.3 Comment
147 Sideslope roughness factor. (1.5 to 3.0) 1.5 Comment
148
149 Low pressure tunnel size and cost calculation.
150 Low pressure tunnel length, m. 0 Min. length
151 Adit length, m. 0 tunnel liner,
152 Ratio of length tunnel lined with concrete. 1 Comment meters
153 Length of tunnel lined with steel, m. 0 Comment 78.8
154
155 Input page 3.

3
156 BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK Estimate date 12-Nov-08
157
158 Conduit surge tank to powerhouse.
159 Vertical bore.
160 Bore length, m. 0
161 Ratio of length bore lined with concrete. 0 Comment
162 High pressure tunnel.
163 Total high pressure tunnel length, m. 0
164 Adit length, m. 0
165 Ratio of length tunnel lined with concrete. 1 Comment
166 Tunnel steel lined section length, m. 0 Comment
167 Buried steel Penstock.
168 Elevation at upper end of liner/penstock, m. 660.00 Must be <= 660.0
169 Penstock sideslope length in rock cut, m. 569
170 Penstock sideslope length in earth cut, m. 569
171 Average sidehill slope in rock, hor. to 1 vert. 10.0 Comment
172 Average sidehill earth slope, horiz. to 1 vert. 10.0 Comment
173 Sideslope roughness factor. (1.5 to 3.0) 1.5 Comment
174 Surface steel penstock.
175 Surface penstock length, m. 0
176 Earth overburden average depth of cut, m. 1
L/H ratio 10.6
177 Average excavation depth in rock, m. 2
178
179 Tailrace.
180 Tailrace channel length, meters. 50 Tailrace channel invert
181 Tailrace ch. rock level at powerhouse DT exit, m. 325 level, m. 322.33
182 Tailrace channel average overburden depth, m. 5 Flow depth, m. 0.86
183 Tailrace Manning friction factor. 0.032
184
185 Mechanical equipment
186 Spillway stoplogs for gate adjacent to intake.
187 Sets of stoplogs. 0
188 Monorail hoists. 0 Gantries. 0
189 Spillway gate - adjacent to intake. Comment
190 Type of gate, flat roller (1) tainter (2) 0 # of gates. 1
191 Intake stoplogs or bulkhead gates.
192 Sets of bulkhead gates. 1
193 Sets of stoplogs. 0
194 Monorail hoists. 0 Gantries. 0
195 Intake gates, guides and hoists.
196 Hoist on tower (1) or on deck (0) 0
197 Trashracks.
198 Type of racks, sectioned (2) or single (1). 2 Comment
199
200 Transmission.
201 Transmission line length, km. 1
202 Transmission line voltage, kV 24
203 Main transmission difficulty factor. 2 Comment
204 Local trans to intake, length, km. 6
205 Local transmission voltage, kV. 4
206 Local transmission to intake, difficulty factor. 2 Comment
207 Input page 4.

4
208 BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK Estimate date 12-Nov-08
209
210 Site access and conditions.
211 Access road length, km. 1.2
212 Main access road difficulty factor. 1.3 Comment
213 Local access road length, km. 8
214 Local accsss road difficulty factor. 1.5 Comment
215 Temporary bridge over river, span, m. 0
216 Frost days at site, from a world Atlas. 120 Comment
217 Union (2) or non-union (1) labour at site. 1
218
219 Suggested unit
220 Work item. Unit cost. cost, based on
221 quantity of
222 Earthwork and clearing. Comment work.
223 Clearing, per hectare, $/H $7,404.09 $7,404.09
224 Unit cost of overburden excavation, m3. $13.04 $13.04
225 Unit cost of rock excavation, $/m3. $52.17 $52.17
226 Unit cost of found excav in sand or gravel for cutoff, $/m3. $31.95 $31.95
227 Rock excavation in tunnels, $/m3. $0.00 $0.00
228 Impervious fill in cofferdams, $/m3. $0.00 $0.00
229 Rock fill in cofferdams, $/m3. $73.85 $73.85
230 Impervious fill in dams, $/m3. $33.43 $33.43
231 Filter material in dams, $/m3. $44.16 $44.16
232 Rock or embankment material in dams, $/m3. $58.81 $58.81
233 Rock rip-rap, $/m3. $182.01 $182.01
234 Sidehill rock excavation for pipeline, $/m3. $39.22 $39.22
235 Sidehill overburden excavation for pipeline, $/m3. $13.04 $13.04
236 Side creek crossing, cost per crossing. $0.00 $0.00
237
238 Concrete work.
239 Concrete including forms and re-bars, $/m3. $1,022.64 $1,022.64
240 Concrete only, excluding forms and re-bars, $/m3. $670.25 $670.25
241 Concrete formwork, $/m2. $94.77 $94.77
242 Reinforcing bars, $/kg. $7.99 $7.99
243 Concrete in tunnel linings, $/m3. $0.00 $0.00
244 Dental concrete on rock in dam foundations, $/m3. $0.00 $0.00
245 Concrete or slurry wall, $/m3. $1,870.58 $1,870.58
246
247 Steelwork and powerhouse superstructure.
248 Trashrack steel cost, $/kg. $6.32 $6.32
249 Pipeline steel cost, $/ton. $5,492.57 $5,492.57
250 Tunnel steel lining cost, $/ton. $0.00 $0.00
251 Powerhouse superstructure steel cost $/ton. $7,038.09 $7,038.09
252 Powerhouse siding, $/m2. $157.67 $157.67
253 Powerhouse roofing, $/m2. $222.99 $222.99
254 Temporary steel pile bridge over river, cost per m. $0.00 $0.00
255
256 Ratio of Sclairpipe cost to equivalent steel pipe cost. 0.50 Comment
257
258 Inflation factor, 2008 to present. 1.001
259 Input page 5.

5
260 BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK Estimate date 12-Nov-08
261
262 Indirect costs. % of direct Estimated indirect
263 cost Cost $M.
264 Feasibility studies and site investigations. 2.0 Change % to 0.501
265 Environmental work. 2.0 suit, based on 0.511
266 Detailed designs and contract documents. 2.0 0.522
estimated
267 Site supervision work. 4.0 1.064
costs in
268 Contingencies on civil and overheads. 20.0 4.059
Column F
269 Contingencies on electromechanical work. 8.0 0.590
270
271 Interest rate % 6 Interest = 1.035
272
273 Value of generation in cents/kWh. 8.0
274 Operating staff manhour cost per hour, $. 80 Comment
275
276
277 Summary of program output.
278 Turbine output at rated head and flow, MW. 5.13
279 Powerplant output at rated head and flow, MW. 9.83 Head iterated OK in auto
280 Turbine rated net head, m. 454.86 mode.
281 Conduit average diameter, m. 0.92 Number of generating
282 Powerplant average annual generation, GWh. 42.34 units = 2
283 Overburden excavation, cubic meters. 28,907
284 Rock excavation, m3. 5,459
285 Rock tunnel excavation, cubic meters. 0
286 Steel penstock and tunnel liner weight, tonnes. 689
287 Total concrete volume, cubic meters. 2,630
288 Powerhouse footprint, width and length, m. 8.1 Length, m 22.4
289 Overall turbine + generator + transformer + conduit efficiency at full load, %. 71.07
290 Average overall project efficiency, excl transmission, for energy calc. % 78.76
291 Head loss in conduit as a % of rated net head on turbine. ------------------------- > 14.98
292 Speed regulation on an isolated system. Absolutely no speed regulation capability.
293 Estimated time required for construction, months. ----------------------------------- > 14
294 Horizontal axis, 2 jet, 1runner impulse
Turbine type selected by program.
295 turbine.
296
297
298 Total project cost, including interest during
299
construction, $M.
$33.4
300
301
302
303
304
Estimated project payback in years 12.0
305
306
307
308 Worth further analysis, but proceed cautiously.
309
310
311 Input page 6.

END OF DATA INPUT

6
OUTPUT STARTS WITH A COVER PAGE

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK

12-Nov-08

CAN $
$33.3

Cost from intake to high voltage end of transmission line, including interest.

Powerplant average annual generation, GWh.


42.34

Powerplant output at rated head and flow, MW.


9.8

Power conduit and powerhouse generation, costs and dimensions developed with
HydroHelp 3 Impulse
An EXCEL program for optimizing hydro powerhouse capacity and conduit size.

7
FOLLOWED BY A SUMMARY PAGE

HydroHelp 3 Impulse
An EXCEL program for optimizing hydro powerhouse capacity and conduit size.

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK Date -- 12-Nov-08

6 Project parameters determined by program.


7 Turbine output at rated head and flow, MW. 5.13
8 Powerplant output at rated head and flow, MW. 9.83
9 Turbine rated net head, m. 454.86
Executive summary
10 Conduit average diameter, m. 0.922
11 Powerplant average annual generation, GWh. 42.3
12 Estimated cost, in millions of dollars. $33.3 CAN $
13
14 Summary of input data for project.
15 Number of turbines and flow in m3. 2 Flow, m3 2.60
16 Access road and transmission lengths, km. 1.2
17 Headpond full supply level, m. (FSL) 847.30 LSL = 844.00
18 Normal tailwater level at powerhouse, m. 317.00 Trans. km. 1
19 Number of water conduits to powerhouse. 1 Length to head
20 Conduit length, intake to powerhouse, m. 4,823 ratio ------ > 10.6
21
22 Summary of program output for some parameters. Powerplant utilization
23 Overburden excavation, cubic meters. 28,907 factor, % 46.0
24 Rock tunnel excavation, cubic meters. 0 Rock Ex. m3. 5,459
25 Steel penstock and tunnel liner weight, tonnes. 689 Turbine runner outside
26 Total concrete volume, cubic meters. 2,630 diameter, m. 1.19
27 Turbine type selected by program. Horizontal axis, 2 jet, 1runner impulse
28 turbine.
Turbine type eliminated from consideration during
None.
29 operation of program.
30 Powerhouse footprint, width and length, m. 8.1 Length, m 22.4
31 Overall turbine + generator + transformer + conduit efficiency at full load, %. 71.07
32 Average overall project efficiency, excluding transmission, for energy calc. % 78.76
33 Head loss in conduit as a % of rated net head on turbine --------- > 14.98 Comment
34 Speed regulation on an isolated system. Absolutely no speed regulation capability.
35 Estimated time required for construction, months. -------------------------------------- > 14
36
37 Data input and options selected during data input, may vary for each alternative.
38 Surge tank on conduit. No Diam., m. 0.00
39 Turbine equipped with inlet valve. Yes Diam., m. 0.395
40 Conduit optimization option. By program
41
42 Fixed options for design of all alternatives of powerplant and conduit.
43 Currency, Canadian $ = 1, USA $ = 2. -------------------------------- 1
44 Industrial design (1) or Utility design (2) -------------------------------- 1 Comment
45 Industrial generator (1) or utility generator (2). ---------------------- 1
46 De-sander required at intake, yes = 1, no = 0. --------------------- 0
47 Dam design for extreme flood, no = 1, yes = 2. ------------------- 1
Page 1.

8
THERE ARE 22 PAGES OF DETAILED OUTPUT
BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK

2
TURBINE SELECTION
3 Input data
4 Total powerplant flow, m3/s. = 2.60 Comment
5 Desired number of units in powerplant. = 2.00 Comment
6 Rated head ( Iterate to = F6 ), m. =454.86 Calc head = 454.86
7 System frequency, Hz. = 60.00 Comment
8 Generator power factor. (Range 0.9 to 1.0) = 0.90 Comment
9 Generator inertia ratio to normal, "J". 1.00 Comment
10 Estimated powerplant utilization factor. 0.46
11 Normal tailwater elevation m. 317.00
12 Powerhouse flood tailwater level, m. 322.00
13 Average rock level at powerhouse, m. 325.00 --------- Must be > 323.9
14
RECOMMENDED TURBINE
15
16 Horizontal axis, 2 jet, 1runner impulse turbine.
17
18 TOTAL POWERPLANT RATED OUTPUT, MW. 9.8
19 Rated flow per unit ( cubic meters / sec. ) 1.30
20 Number of runners per unit 1.00 Runner CL El. 323.19
21 # jets per turbine 2.00 Draft tube
22 System frequency ( Hz ) 60.00 sill Elev. 320.13
23 Calculated flow per jet, cubic meters/sec. 0.65
24 Turbo-generator shaft alignment. HORIZONTAL Runaway
25 Calculated synchronous rotational speed ( rpm ) 900.00 speed, rpm = 1620
26 Turbine inlet spherical valve diameter, m. 0.40 Unit spacing, m. 8.56
27 Calculated runner pitch circle diameter ( m ) 0.93 0.00
28 Calculated outside runner diameter ( m ) 1.19
29 Calculated jet diameter ( m ) 0.09 0.00
30 Calculated peak efficiency, all jets operating, %. 0.89
31 Peak efficiency flow/jet. m3/s. 0.98
32 Peak efficiency flow as % of full load flow. 75.00
33 Turbine full load efficiency, % 88.51
34 Calculated turbine full load output ( MW ) 5.13
35 Calculated generator full load efficiency, %. 95.78
36 Calculated generator full load output ( MW ) 4.92
37 Calculated water to wire cost, excluding substation, millions. 6.11
38
39 GENERATOR DATA
40 Generator inertia, metric GD2. 7.48 Tonnes meters squared.
41 Generator inertia, Imperial WR2. 44,373 Pounds feet squared.
42 Generator electrical "H" value. 1.52 kW-secs/kVA
43 Generator MVA 5.46
44 Mechanical start time for unit, secs. ( Tm.) 3.38 Absolutely no speed
45 Generator full load efficiency, % 0.964 regulation capability.
46 Generator speed, rpm. 900.0
47 Page 2

9
48 BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK # of units 2
49
50 Powerhouse and crane data.
51 Powerhouse crane capacity, tonnes. 20.86 # of cranes 1
52 Powerhouse crane span, with crane over valve, m. 7.42
53 Powerhouse length, m. 22.40
54 Powerhouse width, m. 8.14 Walls, m2 401
55 Powerhouse height, repair bay floor to roof, m. 6.57 Roof, m2. 182
56 Powerhouse roof elevation, m. 329.07
57 Powerhouse concrete volume, m3. 265.78 PH Vol, m3. 1198
58 Powerhouse formwork, m2. 318.94
59 Powerhouse structural steel weight, tonnes. 53.41
60 Powerhouse repair bay floor level, m. 322.50
61 Distance between unit centerlines, m. 8.56
62
63 Comment on water to wire cost estimate. Total W/W Total generator Peak turbine
64 Turbine axis, jet and runner configuration. Cost US$m. capacity, MW efficiency
65 Comment Comment
66 Horiz. axis, 1 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine. 9.420 9.879 0.895
67 Combination of capacity, head and flow is suitable for this type of turbine. Reject
68 Horiz. axis, 2 jet, 1runner impulse turbine. 6.114 9.833 0.890
69 Combination of capacity, head and flow is suitable for this type of turbine. SELECT
70 Horiz. axis, 1 jet/r, 2 run. impulse turbine. 7.405 11.744 0.899
71 Combination of capacity, head and flow is suitable for this type of turbine. Reject
72 Comment
73 Horiz. axis, 2 jet/r, 2 run. impulse turbine. 0.000 9.976 0.903
74 Combination of capacity, head and flow NOT suitable for this type of turbine. Reject
75 Vert. axis, 1 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine. 0.000 9.862 0.893
76 Combination of capacity, head and flow NOT suitable for this type of turbine. Reject
77 Vert. axis, 2 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine. 7.657 9.854 0.892
78 Combination of capacity, head and flow is suitable for this type of turbine. Reject
79 Vert. axis, 3 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine. 7.800 11.900 0.911
80 Combination of capacity, head and flow is suitable for this type of turbine. Reject
81 Vert. axis, 4 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine. 0.000 9.992 0.912
82 Combination of capacity, head and flow NOT suitable for this type of turbine. Reject
83 Vert. axis, 5 jet, 1 run. impulse turbine. 0.000 9.982 0.911
84 Combination of capacity, head and flow NOT suitable for this type of turbine. Reject
85 Vert. axis, 6 jet, 1 run. impulse turbine. 0.000 9.975 0.910
86 Combination of capacity, head and flow NOT suitable for this type of turbine. Reject
87 Horiz. axis, 1 jet, 1 turgo runer turbine. 0.000 8.309 0.854
88 Combination of capacity, head and flow NOT suitable for this type of turbine. Reject
89 Horiz. axis, 2 jet, 1 turgo runner turbine. 0.000 9.517 0.803
90 Combination of capacity, head and flow NOT suitable for this type of turbine. Reject
91 Horiz. axis BANKI (Ossberger) turbine. 0.000 97.369 0.586
92 Combination of capacity, head and flow NOT suitable for this type of turbine. Reject
93 Comment
94 Vertical axis Francis turbine. 0.000 10.168 0.912
95 Combination of capacity, head and flow NOT suitable for this type of turbine. -----------------
96
97 Page 3

10
98 BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK
99
100
101 If the recommended turbine is not satisfactory, a second recommendation (based on cost) can be
102 obtained by eliminating the recommended turbine from consideration with a zero (0) placed opposite
103 the recommended turbine in Column D. Suitable turbines are shown in Column E
104
105 Turbine type Suitability
106 Horiz. axis, 1 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine. ----YES ---- 1
107 Horiz. axis, 2 jet, 1runner impulse turbine. ----YES ---- 1
108 Horiz. axis, 1 jet, 2 runner impulse turbine. ----YES ---- 1
109 Horiz. axis, 2 jet/r, 2 run. impulse turbine. -------------- 1
110 Vert. axis, 1 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine. -------------- 1
111 Vert. axis, 2 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine. ----YES ---- 1
112 Vert. axis, 3 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine. ----YES ---- 1
113 Vert. axis, 4 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine. -------------- 1
114 Vert. axis, 5 jet, 1 run. impulse turbine. -------------- 1
115 Vert. axis, 6 jet, 1 run. impulse turbine. -------------- 1
116 Horiz. axis, 1 jet, 1 turgo runer turbine. -------------- 1
117 Horiz. axis, 2 jet, 1 turgo runner turbine. -------------- 1
118 Horiz. axis BANKI (Ossberger) turbine. -------------- 1
119
120
0.8 SPEED REGULATION CHARACTERISTIC
121
122 Selected Selected
123 0.6 Rapid load offTm/Te
LV/gHTe with
time / governor
Penstock start

124 Deflector close deflector, slow load on


2.09 1.69
125 0.4 Valve open with spear
0.24valves. 0.19
time

126
Good above 1.0, poor below .
127 0.2
128 Mechanical start time / governor time
129 .
0.0
130
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
131
132
133
OVERALL PROJECT EFFICIENCY
134
135 Overall project efficiency 78.76
136 90
137 20 9.27 83.4
138 30 9.25 83.3
EFFICIENCY %

80
139 40 9.17 82.5
140 50 8.99 80.9
141 70 60 8.84 79.6
142 70 8.67 78.0
143 80 8.45 76.1
60 FLOW RATIO %
144 90 8.20 73.8
145 20 30 40 50 60 70100 80 90
7.92 100
71.2
146 0 0.000
147 0 0.000
148 Page 4

11
BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK
149
150 Powerhouse plan dimensions.
151 Total length, m. 22.40
Unit shaft alignment is
152 Full width including piping and control rooms, m. 8.14 HORIZONTAL
153 Length of repair bay, m. 4.28 As selected by program.
154 Distance between unit centerlines, m. 8.56
155 Powerhouse height, above repair bay floor, m. 13.51
156 Vertical axis unit Crane span. 0.00 0.00
157 Crane capacity in tonnes. 0.0
158
159 0.00
160 0.00
161 El.
162 0.00
163
164 0.00 0.00
165
166 El. 0.00
167
168 0.00
169 Repair
170 bay floor
171 0.00 Top of El. 0.00
ogenerator
172
173 0.00
174 El. 0.00
175
176 Flood TWL
177 elevation
178 0.00
179 322.71
180 TWL. El, m.
181 0.00
182
183 0.00
184 0.000 Valve diameter, m.
185 0.00
186
187
188 Runner removal passage width, m. 0.00
189 Note - Impulse units MUST be set above flood level. They cannot operate submerged, unless
190 tailwater depressed by compressed air, and this is very expensive due to high demand for air.
191 Air demand is high due to loss from enrtainment as water falls off runner.
192
193 Powerhouse superstructure perimeter, m. 61.08
194 Powerhouse wall area, m2. 825
195 Powerhouse roof area, m2. 182
196 Powerhouse clearing, Ha. 0.2
197
198
199 Page 5

12
BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK
200
201
202
203 Crane capacity in tonnes. 21.9
Horizontal axis unit.
204 1.63
205 3.07
206 El., m. 336.44
207
208 7.14
209 4.49 Crane span
210 8.14
211 4.02
212 El., m. 323.19
213
214 6.19 El., m. 322.93
215
216
217 Flood TWL
218 m. 322.00
219
220 El., m. 317.00
221
222 El., m. 320.13
223
224
225 Valve diameter, m. 0.40
226 Turbine runner pitch circle diameter, m. 0.935
227

228 Site access and transmission. Comment


229 Access road length, km. 1.2 Cost, $M. 1.018
230 Access road difficulty factor. 1.3
231
232 Local access road length, km. 8 Cost, $M. 6.805
233 Local accsss difficulty factor. 1.5
234
235 Temporary steel pile bridge over river, total length, m. 0 Cost, $M. 0.000
236
237 Transmission line length, km. 1 Transmission kV 24
238 Transmission line difficulty factor. 2 Cost, $M. 0.415
239
240 Local transmission to intake, length, km.. 6 Local Trans kV 4
241 Local transmission to intake, difficulty factor. 2 Cost, $M. 0.895
242
243 Calculated switchyard cost $M 0.124

Page 6

13
BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK
Dam weir, de-sanding chamber and access roads.

If there are side stream intakes, ratio of flows to main intake flow. 0 Comment

Main Dam.
7 Design maximum (1/1000) flood flow, m3/s. 300 Deck level, m. 847.60
8 Design weir flood (1/200) flow, m3/s. 300
9 Required height of dam to accommodate low level sluice below trashracks, m. 7.70
10 Crest length between abutments at damsite, m. 100 Comment 81.1
11 River bed level, m. 840
12 Low level sluice capacity, m3/s. 2.6 Comment
13 Spillway sill level, m. 845.00
14 Required depth of spill over weir, m. 2.30 Comment
15 Required number of inflatable rubber dams 2 Comment
16
17 Inflatable rubber Dam.
18 Selected flood for weir design, m3/s. 300 From cover, line 47
19 Length of one rubber dam, including sloped section, m. 34.8 Maximum ----- > 45.19
20 Rubber dam cost, installed. $millions. 0.783
21
22 Concrete weir. Coefficient of discharge = 1.4 Total crest length, dams
23 Length of flat weir crest (upstream-downstream) , m. 12.8 and weirs, m. 101
24 Low level sluice sill elev. Top just at trashrack sill, m. 840.20
25 Low level sluice width and height, m. 0.5 Height, m 0.6
26 Total length of spillway including end piers, m. 76
27 Total length of weir and intake, between abutments, m. 81.1
28 Concrete volume, m3. 2240 Depth of flow over
29 Normal flood level for 1/200 flood, m. 847.3 weir at extreme
30 Approximate extreme flood level, 1/1000 flood. 847.3 flood, m. --- > 2.3
31
32 De-sander design.
33 Design flow, m3/s. 2.600 Head loss, m. 0.71
34 Basin volume ratio. 160 Iterate until
35 Basin volume, m3. 416
36 Basin water depth, m. (semi-circular basin section) 2.2 Must be < 3.4
37 Basin length, m. 43.6 Basin width, m. 4.4
38 Design particle size, range 0.1mm to 0.4mm. 0.25
39 Particle transit time, secs. 125 Clearing for desander,
40 Sander weir crest width upstream of trashracks, m. 3.1 Ha. ------------ > 0.09
41 Low level sluice from de-sander, width, height, m. 0.00 Height, m. 0.00
42 Average depth of excavation at intake/weir, m. 0.1
43 Particle drop distance in basin, m. 3.4
44 Flow Velocity, m/s. 0.3 A desander is very
45 Part drop rate, m/s. 0.027 expensive. Would be located
46 Concrete volume, m3. 0 downstream of dam.
47 Flow depth,m 0.7 Arrangement depends on
48 Height, m= 0.00 topograpy, and is not shown.
49 Exc. vol, m3. 0
50 Page 7

14
51 BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK Dam and weir
52 Schematic showing arrangement of dam, weir and low level sluice.
53 Elevation top of gate hoist tower, m. 851.67 Number rubber dams.
54 Extreme flood (1/1000) level, m. 847.30 2
55 Total length spillway including piers, m. 75.67 Dam crest elevation, m.
56 847.60
57 Flood level, m.
58 847.30 Rubber dam crest elevation, m.
59 847.30
60 Full supply
61 level, m. Rubber dam sill elevation, m.
62 847.30 2m 845.00
63 Low supply
64 level, m. 34.8
65 844.00 2.30
66 Trashrack 30.23
67 top elev, m.
68 842.45 Low level outlet gate top, m.
69 1.55 840.76
70 Trashrack
71 sill level, m. Low level outlet gate sill, m.
72 840.76 840.20
73 0.57
74 Right angle at blue line. Expanded elevation to show intake at right angle to dam-weir centerline.
75
76 Total length of desander basin, m. 87.2 Width, m. 5.3
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86 Active settling
87 length.
88 Plan typical double desander. If industrial design, 1 43.6
89 basin, if utility design, there should be 2 basins. Number of desander basins. 1
90
91 Radius R, m. Nominal wall thickness, m. 0.48
92 2.2
93 Concrete area in section, m2 7.63
94
95 Concrete volume in desander,
96 cubic meters. 666
97
98 Typical section through De-sander required at intake. No
99 desander. Section B - B
100 Page 8

15
BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK MAIN DAM

Dam design.
Flood level at dam, meters. 847.30
5 Normal full supply level at trashracks, m. 847.30
6 Normal low supply level at trashracks, m. 844.00
7 Normal tailwater level at dam, m. 840.00 Must be > 317.00
8 Design acceleration for earthquake, g. 0.25 = 1/1000 DBE
9 River or lowest ground level at dam, m. 840.00
10 Embankment material factor for dam stability 1.20 Comment
11 Foundation material factor for dam stability 1.20 Comment
12 Dam type - rock fill central core (1) or homogeneous (2) 2 Comment
13 Dam crest elevation, m. 848.97 Dam downstream
14 Dam slope (x)/1 Upstream. x= 2.14 slope (x)/1 1.64
15 Dam height, crest to river/lowest bed level, m. 8.97 =Crest
16 Dam base width at river level, m. 38 width, m. 5.3
17
18 Rip-rap design.
19 Effective fetch, km. 1 Comment
20 Design wind speed, km/hour. 100 or m/sec = 27.8
21 Max. wave height, m. And period, secs. 1.1 Secs = 2.6
22 Wave length, m. And slope a/l 10.8 a/l = 0.11
23 Wave run-up on dam. 1.20
24 Minimum freeboard, m. 1.67
25 Weight D50kg rip-rap and average size, Dm. D50kg = 144 Dm = 0.38
26 Rip-rap thickness (m). 0.7
27
28 Dam quantity calculation.
29 Dam crest length, m. 20
30 River width, m. 5
31 Valley shape factor (0.5 to 1.0) 0.7 Comment
32 Average depth of overburden excavation, m. 2
33 Length of cutoff excavation, m. 30
34 Average depth of cutoff to impervious material, m. 8 Comment
35 Concrete or slurry wall length, m. 30 Comment
36 Maximum depth of concrete or slurry wall to impervious material, m. 8
37 Slurry wall valley shape factor (0.25 to 0.75). 0.5 Comment
38 Total embankment vol. above river bed level, m3 = 2,519 excluding cutoff
39 Rip-rap volume (m3) and average size, (m). 158 d50, m. 0.38
40 Cutoff excavation and fill volume, m3. 4,725 Cutoff excavation
41 Compacted rock fill 189 slope = 1.4
42 Filter transition zone A 83 Filt. Zone B 83
43 Rip - rap bedding gravel, m3. 79 Clearing for dam,
44 Till core 2,007 Hectares= 0.2
45 Foundation rock excavation for core contact, m3. 0 Overburden excavation
46 Dental concrete for core contact, m3. 6 vol, m3. 757
47
48 Slurry or concrete cut-off wall. Elev. Top of wall, m. 842.00 Bottom El 834.00
49 Concrete or slurry wall area, m2. 120 Width, m. 0.60
50 Concrete or slurry wall volume, m3. 72
51 Page 9

16
52 BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK MAIN DAM
53
54 Crest elevation, m. 0.00 Width, m. 0.0
55 Upstream and downstream slopes Height, m. 0.0
56 0.00 0.00 Wall top El 842.00
57 0.00 0.0 Wall bot El 834.00
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71 Upstream cofferdam - option.
72 Dam type 1 - rock fill with central core.
73
74 Slurry wall option Cut-off depth, m. 0.0
75 Cut-off slope, x:1 = 0.0
76 0.0 <--Width at impervious contact, m.
77
78 Crest elevation, m. 848.97 Width, m. 5.30
79 Upstream and downstream slopes Height, m. 8.97
80 2.14 1.64 845.98
81 842.86 5.30
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95 Dam type 2 ------------- homogeneous
96 Upstream cofferdam option
97 not shown, see above.
98 Slurry wall option. For level, see above. Cut-off depth, m. 8.0
99 8.5 <-- Width at impervious contact, m.
100 11.2 Height of rock fill toe, m. 2.99
101
102 Page 10

17
BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK SIDE DAM # 1A

Dam design.
Flood level at dam, meters. 847.30
5 Normal full supply level at trashracks, m. 847.30
6 Normal low supply level at trashracks, m. 844.00
7 Normal tailwater level at dam, m. 840.00
8 Design acceleration for earthquake, g. 0.25 = 1/1000 DBE
9 River or lowest ground level at dam, m. 840.00
10 Embankment material factor for dam stability 1.65 Comment
11 Foundation material factor for dam stability 1.60 Comment
12 Dam type - rock fill central core (1) or homogeneous (2) 2 Comment
13 Dam crest elevation, m. 849.75 Dam downstream
14 Dam slope (x)/1 Upstream. x= 2.84 slope (x)/1 2.34
15 Dam height, crest to river/lowest bed level, m. 9.75 =Crest
16 Dam base width at river level, m. 55 width, m. 5.4
17
18 Rip-rap design.
19 Effective fetch, km. 3 Comment
20 Design wind speed, km/hour. 100 or m/sec = 27.8
21 Max. wave height, m. And period, secs. 1.9 Secs = 3.6
22 Wave length, m. And slope a/l 19.9 a/l = 0.10
23 Wave run-up on dam. 1.12
24 Minimum freeboard, m. 2.45
25 Weight D50kg rip-rap and average size, Dm. D50kg = 507 Dm = 0.58
26 Rip-rap thickness (m). 1.0
27
28 Dam quantity calculation.
29 Dam crest length, m. 0
30 River width, m. 0
31 Valley shape factor (0.5 to 1.0) 0.5 Comment
32 Average depth of overburden excavation, m. 0
33 Length of cutoff excavation, m. 0
34 Average depth of cutoff to impervious material, m. 0 Comment
35 Concrete or slurry wall length, m. 0 Comment
36 Maximum depth of concrete or slurry wall to impervious material, m. 0
37 Slurry wall valley shape factor (0.25 to 0.75). 0.5 Comment
38 Total embankment vol. above river bed level, m3 = 0 excluding cutoff
39 Rip-rap volume (m3) and average size, (m). 0 d50, m. 0.58
40 Cutoff excavation and fill volume, m3. 0 Cutoff excavation
41 Compacted rock fill 0 slope = 2.0
42 Filter transition zone A 0 Filt. Zone B 0
43 Rip - rap bedding gravel, m3. 0 Clearing for dam,
44 Till core 0 Hectares= 0.0
45 Foundation rock excavation for core contact, m3. 0 Overburden excavation
46 Dental concrete for core contact, m3. 0 vol, m3. 0
47
48 Slurry or concrete cut-off wall. Elev. Top of wall, m. 0.00 Bottom El 0.00
49 Concrete or slurry wall area, m2. 0 Width, m. 0.60
50 Concrete or slurry wall volume, m3. 0
51 Page 11

18
52 BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK SIDE DAM # 1A
53
54 Crest elevation, m. 0.00 Width, m. 0.0
55 Upstream and downstream slopes Height, m. 0.0
56 0.00 0.00 Wall top El 0.00
57 0.00 0.0 Wall bot El 0.00
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71 Upstream cofferdam - option.
72 Dam type 1 - rock fill with central core.
73
74 Slurry wall option Cut-off depth, m. 0.0
75 380.13 Cut-off slope, x:1 = 0.0
76 0.0 <--Width at impervious contact, m.
77
78 Crest elevation, m. 849.75 Width, m. 5.42
79 Upstream and downstream slopes Height, m. 9.75
80 2.84 2.34 846.50
81 842.09 5.42
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95 Dam type 2 ------------- homogeneous
96 Upstream cofferdam option
97 not shown, see above.
98 Slurry wall option. For level, see above. Cut-off depth, m. 0.0
99 4.9 <-- Width at impervious contact, m.
100 0.0 Height of rock fill toe, m. 3.25
101
102 Page 12

19
BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK
2 Project hydraulics.
3 Flood level at dam, meters. 847.30
4 Normal full supply level at trashracks, m. 847.30
5 Low supply level at trashracks, m. 844.00
6 Design reservoir level for turbine rating, m. 846.2
7 Number of conduits intake to powerhouse. 1 L/H ratio = 10.6
8 Number of turbines on each conduit. 2 L = Total conduit length, m.
9 Calculated rated flow per conduit, m3/s. 2.60 H = turbine rated head, m.
10 Automatic (1) or manual (2) optimization. 1 Comment
11 Target automatic conduit head loss ratio % 15.85 Comment
12 Calculated head loss % 14.98 Comment
13 Calculated average diam of upstream and downstream steel pipes, m. 0.89 Comment
14 Select pipe diam (m) for manual optimization. 10.000 Comment. <<< NOTE
15 Program nominal pipe diam for manual optimize, m. 10.000 Penst. Diam,m 8.00
16 Penstock steel ultimate strength, Mpa. 482.5 Comment
17 Penstock steel yield strength, Mpa. 344.7
18 Calculated conduit head loss at rated flow, meters. 68.2 Comment
19 Rated net head (m) - must equal calc. net head. 454.86 <---
= iterated cell.
20 Calculated net head on turbine, m. 454.86 Comment
21
22 Intake. ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
23 Length of intake channel, meters. 5.0 Intake channel clearing,
24 Average level of rock at intake, meters. 842.0 Ha. ----- > 0.01
25 Average depth of overburden excavation at intake, meters. 2.0
26 Intake and channel overburden excavation, m3. 65
27 Intake and channel rock excavation volume. m3. 13
28 Intake gate width and height, meters. Width = 1.021 Gate height 1.276
29 Head on intake gate to mid-point, m. 6.535 Intake deck
30 Intake gate flow velocity, m/sec. 2.00 elevation, m. 847.60
31 Submergence to top of intake gate, meters. 0.99
32 Intake gate sill elevation, meters. (maximum elev.) 840.76
33 Bulkhead gate width and height, m. Width = 1.123 Gate height 1.531
34 Head on bulkhead gate, to mid-point, m. 6.535
35 Water cleanliness factor. ( 0.5 to 1.0 ) 0.90 Comment
36 Percentage of reservoir cleared. ( 10% to 100% ) 0
37 Trashrack gross flow velocity, m/sec. 1.00 Intake clearing,
38 Trashrack area, square meters. 2.60 Ha ------- > 0.01
39 Trashrack height, meters. 1.68
40 Total trashrack width, meters. Per intake. 1.55 Comment
41 Trashrack width between piers, meters. 1.55 Clear spacing between rack
42 Total trashrack weight, kg, all intakes. 398 bars, mm. = 19
43 Maximum unsupported bar length, meters. 0.593 Comment
44 Approach flow angle to racks. (45 to 0 degrees) 10 Comment
45 Rack inclination to horizontal. (60 to 90 deg. ) 80 Comment
46 Rack blockage ratio. ( 0.0 to 0.25) 0.2 Comment
47 Head loss through racks, meters. 0.97 Trashrack sill
48 Head loss through intake, meters. 0.03 elevation, m. 840.76
49 Intake height, gate sill to deck, m. 7.54
50 Total intake(s) concrete volume, cubic meters. 114
51 Page 13

20
52 BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK
53 Side stream total cost, included in intake and equipment costs. 0.000
54
55 Conduit intake to surge tank. ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
56 Intake pipeline concrete encased length, m. 5 Note - pipeline steel cost
57 Pipeline on surface (1) or buried (2). 2 has been reduced to
58 Pipe length in rock sidehill, m. 1100 72 % based on
59 Pipe length in earth sidehill, m. 2580 use of some Sclairpipe.
60 Elevation of end of pipeline, m. 660
61 Total pipeline length, meters. 3685 Comment Pipe vel, m/s.
62 Pipeline diameter, meters. 0.974 Comment 3.49
63 Pipeline steel thickness, millimeters. 7.0 Comment
64 Pipeline(s) steel weight, kg. 468,838 PVC pipe is suitable for this
65 Pipeline(s) total conc casing pier+anchor volume, m3. 4 application.
66 Length of Sclairpipe used instead of steel, m. 2,031
67 Average sidehill slope in rock, hor. to 1 vert. 2.1 Comment
68 Average sidehill earth slope, horiz. to 1 vert. 2.3 Comment
69 Sideslope roughness factor. (1.5 to 3.0) 1.5 Comment
70 Rock excavation for pipeline(s), m3. 2,590 Slope fact= 0.54
71 Overburden excavation for pipeline(s), m3. 20,040 Slope fact= 0.77
72 Pipeline and penstock clearing width. Pipe, m. 5 Penstock, m. 3
73 Pipeline and penstock(s) clearing hectares. 48.2
74
75 Low pressure tunnel size and cost calculation. ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
76 Low pressure tunnel length, m. 0 Adit L, m = 0
77 Tunnel rock diameter, m. 2.400
78 Ratio of length tunnel lined with concrete. 1 Conc lined 0
79 Length of tunnel lined with steel, m. 0
80 Tunnel(s) excavation volume, including adit, m3. 0 Adit vol m3= 0
81 Tunnel(s) concrete lining volume incl. Adit plug, m3. 0 Adit plug m3 0
82 Tunnel lined section diameter, m. 1.824
83 Liner min. thickness for buckling/handling, mm. 8.2 Steel liner, kg. 0
84
85 Surge tank size and cost calculation. ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
86 Surge tank used, (1), not used (0). 0 Comment
87 Design acceleration for earthquake, g. 0.25 = 1/1000 DBE
88 Surge tank in steel =1, in rock exc. = 2 2
89 If in rock, conc lining (1), no lining, (0) 1
90 Elevation rock at top of tank, if in rock, m. 800 Comment
91 Elevation of surge tank tee, or conduit "knee", m. 710 Comment IMPORTANT
92 Tank diameter based on min for stability (1), or larger, (2) 2
93 Tank min. diam for stability, m. 0.8 Tank cost $M 0.000
94 If tank diameter is larger, select diameter, m. 3.0 Comment
95 Turbine rated head, m. 454.9 NOTE
96 Upstream conduit length, meters. 3685
97 Acceleration head loss to tank, m. 47.98 Surge in tank as a % of
98 Retardation head loss to tank, m. 32.85 turbine head 0.0
99 Elevation of top of tank, meters. 848.3 Should be less than 8%.
100 Elevation of bottom of tank, meters. 749.8 Preferably less than 5%.
101 Tank height, top to bottom, and T to roof, meters. 98.5 T to roof, m= 138.3
102 Page 14

21
103 BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK
104 Conduit surge tank to powerhouse. ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
105 Vertical bore size and quantity calculation.
106 Bore length, m. 0 Bore diam, m. 1.171
107 Ratio of length bore lined with concrete. 0
108 Bore excavation volume, m3. 0 Bore lined section
109 Bore concrete lining volume, m3. 0 diameter, m. 0.890
110
111 High pressure tunnel. ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
112 Total high pressure tunnel length, m. 0
113 Adit L, m = 0
114 Tunnel diameter, m. 2.300
115 Ratio of length tunnel lined with concrete. 1
116 Tunnel excavation volume, including adit, m3. 0 Adit vol m3= 0
117 Tunnel concrete lining volume incl. adit plug, m3. 0 Adit plug m3 0
118 Tunnel concrete lined section diameter, m. 1.748
119 Tunnel steel lined section length, m. 0 Tunnel d. m 2.748
120 Calc. liner thickness ups. end for buckling, mm. 15.1 Liner d. m.= 1.748
121 Tunnel lined section excavation volume, m3. 0
122 Concrete around liner, m3. 0 Steel liner kg. 0
123
124 Buried steel Penstock. ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
125 Elevation at upper end of liner/penstock, m. 660.00
126 Penstock length and sideslope in rock cut, m. 569.00
127 Penstock length and sideslope in earth cut, m. 569.00
128 Average sidehill slope in rock, hor. to 1 vert. 10.00 Slope fact= 0.1
129 Average sidehill earth slope, horiz. to 1 vert. 10.00 Slope fact= 0.1
130 Sideslope roughness factor. (1.5 to 3.0) 1.50 Comment
131 Penstock rock excavation, m3. 724 Earth exc, m3. 1,358
132 Surface steel penstock. ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
133 Surface penstock length, m. 0
134 Earth overburden average depth of cut, m. 1
135 Average excavation depth in rock, m. 2
136 Penstock rock excavation, m3. 0 Earth exc, m3. 0
137 Conc. anchor & ring girder pier volume, m3. Anchor = 0 Pier vol, m3 0
138 Penstock data. ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
139 Total penstock/tunnel liner length, meters. 1,138 Comment
140 Penstock diameter, meters. 0.798
141 Maximum penstock steel thickness, millimeters. 11.9 Comment
142 Penstock steel weight, kg. 220,148
143
144 Tailrace. ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
145 Tailrace channel length, meters. 50 Tailrace channel invert
146 Tailrace ch. rock level at powerhouse DT exit, m. 325 level, m. = 322.33
147 Tailrace channel average overburden depth, m. 5 Flow depth 0.86
148 Tailrace channel overburden excavation volume, m3. 3,222
149 Tailrace rock excavation volume, m3. 177
150 Tailrace Manning friction factor. 0.032
151 Approximate head loss in tailrace channel, m. 0.36 Note - not in conduit losses.
152
153 Number of side stream crossings over penstock. 0
Page 15

22
154 BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK Dam and spillway.
155 Minimum elevation top of hoisthouse, m. 851.67
156 Flood level, m. Deck level, m.
157 847.30 847.60
158 Total height of
159 Full supply concrete intake
160 level, m. rock to deck, m
161 847.30 7.59
162 Low supply
163 level, m. Intake gate
164 844.00 lintel elev, m.
165 Rack top, m. 842.04
166 842.45
167 Rack height, m. Intake gate
168 1.68 sill elev, m,.
169 Stoplog height, m. 840.76
170 1.53
171 Gate height, m.
172 1.28
173 Rack sill elev, m.
174 840.76
175
176
177 Section elevation through center of intake and pipe.
178
179 Rack width, m. 1.55
180 Tunnel or
181 Stoplog width, m. 1.12 pipe diam, m.
182 0.974
183 Gate width, m. 1.02
184
185
186
187 Total rack width 1.55
188 Plan through intake at pipe level A - A
189
190 Minimum distance racks to Deck width, m. 2.88 (minimum)
191 gate, m. 2.50 Deck length, m 3.95 (minimum)
192 Pier width, m. 0.00
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201 Plan section B - B Plan at deck level C - C
202
203
204 Page 16

23
205 BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK
206 Surge tank height, from
207 Surge tank dimensions. pipe/riser "T" to roof, m. 0.0
208 El, m. Surge tank diameter, m. 0.00 m. Tank top, m.
209 0.0 El, m. 0.0
210
211 FSL Surge rise, m.
212 El, m. 0.0
213 0.0
214 Friction drop, m.
215 LSL 0.0
216 El, m.
217 0.0 Surge drop, m.
218 0.0
219
220 Tank bottom, m.
221 El, m. 0.0
222
223 Upstream Riser diam, m.
224 conduit length, m. 0.0
225 0
226 Level surge
227 tank T, m.
228 0.0
229
230
231 Penstock and conduit hydraulics.
232 Allowable waterhammer at turbine on valve closure, %. 15
233 Upstream pipeline or tunnel LV, m2/s. 3588
234 Penstock pipe or tunnel LV, m2/s. 5917 Surge tank used on
235 Average velocity in conduit intake to turbine, m/s. 3.89 conduit ----------No
>
236 Valve times in seconds. Close (total) --> 130.4 Open (total) --- 29.1
>
237
238 Top of tank or Maximum waterhammer
239 FSL at dam. level at turbine, m.
240 0.0 925.92
241 Bottom of tank or Max waterhammer head, m.
242 LSL at dam. 602.73
243 0.0
244 Negative waterhammer Minimum waterhammer
245 Schematic gradient level at turbine, m.
246 showing 670.53
247 waterhammer Min waterhammer head, m.
248 conditions on 347.34
249 penstock or
250 pipeline. Turbine inlet elevation, m.
251 323.19
252 Maximum tailwater elev, m.
253 322.00

Page 17

24
BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK

Mechanical equipment cost.

5 Frost days at site, from a world Atlas. 120 Frost factor. 0.72
6 Union (2) or non-union (1) labour at site. 1 Labor factor. 1.00
7 Site installation work cost factor ---------> 0.72
8
9
10 Gates, gantries, monorail hoists, stoplogs,
11
12 If there are side stream intakes, sum of ratio of flows to main intake 0.4
13
14 Spillway stoplogs for gate adjacent to intake. Width, = 0.45 Height, = 0.57
15 Number of openings. 1 W^2Hh = 0
16 Sets of stoplogs. 0 Monorail hoists. 0
17 Hoist capacity, tonnes. 0.500 Gantries. 0
18 Supply. Install.
19 Stoplogs. 0.000 0.000
20 Guides. 0.000 0.000
21 Hoist. 0.000 0.000
22 Total. 0.000 0.000
23 Total cost of spillway stoplog equipment. 0.000
24
25 Spillway gate - adjacent to intake. Width, = 0.45 Height, = 0.57
26 Number of openings. 1 W^2Hh = 0.0328349
27 Type of gate, flat roller (1) tainter (2) 0
28 Supply. Install.
29 Gates guides and hoists. 0.000 0.000
30 Total cost of spillway gate equipment. 0.000
31
32 Intake stoplogs or bulkhead gates. Width = 1.123 Height = 1.531
33 Number of openings. 1
34 Head to sill for stoplogs/bulkhead. 6.535 W^2Hh = 13
35 Sets of bulkhead gates. 1 Monorail hoists. 0
36 Sets of stoplogs. 0 Gantries. 0
37 Hoist capacity for bulkheads. 3.3 Hoist cap. for stoplogs. 0.0
38 Supply. Install.
39 Stoplogs or bulkhead gates. 0.010 0.001
40 Guides. 0.000 0.000
41 Hoist. 0.000 0.000
42 Total. 0.010 0.001
43 Total cost of intake stoplog and/or bulkhead gate equipment. 0.011
44
45 Intake gates, guides and hoists. Width, =1.021 Height, = 1.276
46 Number of openings. 1 W^2Hh = 9
47 Head to sill. 6.535
48 Hoist on tower (1) or on deck (0) 0
49 Supply. Install.
50 Total cost of intake gate equipment. 0.013 0.003
51 Total cost of intake gate guides and hoist equipment. 0.016
52 Page 18

25
53 BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK
54 Powerhouse crane. Number of cranes. 1
55 Capacity of main hook. 21 Nominal capacity = 21.9
56 Capacity of auxiliary hook. 2.1
57 Span. 7.4 WL1.5 = 443
58 Supply. Install.
59 Total. 0.231 0.017
60 Total cost of powerhouse crane. 0.248
61
62 Trashracks. Width = 1.546 Height = 1.68
63 Number of openings. 1 WH = 3
64 Height to sill 7.54 W2Hh = 27
65 Type of racks, sectioned (2) or single (1). 2 Wt. factor 1
66 Estimated weight of racks in tonnes. 0.4
67 Supply. Install.
68 Total. 0.003 0.000
69 Total cost of trashrack equipment. 0.003
70
71 De-sander sluice gate.
72 Low level outlet gates. Width, = 0.00 Height, = 0.00
73 Head to sill. 3.27 W^2Hh = 0.00
74 Supply. Install.
75 Total. 0.000 0.000
76 Total cost of low level outlet gate equipment. 0.000
77
78 Powerhouse ancillary mechanical and electrical systems.
79 Rated flow per unit, m3/s. 1.30 Number of units. 2
80 Generator rated MVA. 5.5 Generator rpm. 900.0
81 Supply. Install.
82 Dewatering pumps and piping. 0.000 0.000
83 Cooling water pumps, filters and piping. 0.024 0.011
84 Compressed air, 100psi. 0.020 0.009
85 Heating, ventilating, lighting. 0.011 0.009
86 Total. 0.045 0.019
87 Total powerhouse ancilliary mechanical systems. 0.064
88
89
90 Cost of major mechanical equipment, summary.
91
92 In millions of CAN $
93 Total cost of spillway stoplog equipment. 0.000
94 Total cost of spillway gate equipment. 0.001
95 Total cost of trashrack equipment. 0.004
96 Total cost of intake stoplog and/or bulkhead gate equipment. 0.015
97 Total cost of intake gate guides and hoist equipment. 0.022
98 Total cost of low level de-sander gate. 0.000
99 Total cost of powerhouse crane. 0.248
100 Total powerhouse ancilliary mechanical systems. 0.064
101 Total cost of major mechanical equipment,
102 except turbines.----- ---------------------------------------------> $0.353
103
104 Page 19

26
BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK

Unit prices used in cost estimate.


Fill in unit prices (blue column) before entering data in other pages. Return to this page after
completing all data entry to see if unit prices are compatible with quantities shown in column
F.

Estimated Suggested
Work item. Unit cost. unit cost,
quantity.
based on
quantity of
Earthwork and clearing. Comment work.
10 Clearing, per hectare, $/H $7,404.09 48.6 $7,404.09
11 Unit cost of overburden excavation, m3. $13.04 7,509 $13.04
12 Unit cost of rock excavation, $/m3. $52.17 2,145 $52.17
13 Unit cost of found excav in sand or gravel for cutoff, $/m3. $31.95 4,725 $31.95
14 Rock excavation in tunnels, $/m3. $0.00 0 $0.00
15 Impervious fill in cofferdams, $/m3. $0.00 0 $0.00
16 Rock fill in cofferdams, $/m3. $73.85 189 $73.85
17 Impervious fill in dams, $/m3. $33.43 2,007 $33.43
18 Filter material in dams, $/m3. $44.16 244 $44.16
19 Rock or embankment material in dams, $/m3. $58.81 189 $58.81
20 Rock rip-rap, $/m3. d50 size, m. = 0.38 $182.01 158 $182.01
21 Sidehill rock excavation for pipeline, $/m3. $39.22 3,314 $39.22
22 Sidehill overburden excavation for pipeline, $/m3. $13.04 21,399 $13.04
23 Side creek crossing, cost per crossing. $0.00 0 $0.00
24
25 Concrete work.
26 Concrete including forms and re-bars, $/m3. $1,022.64 2,358 $1,022.64
27 Concrete only, excluding forms and re-bars, $/m3. $670.25 266 $670.25
28 Concrete formwork, $/m2. $94.77 319 $94.77
29 Reinforcing bars, $/kg. $7.99 19,770 $7.99
30 Concrete in tunnel linings, $/m3. $0.00 0 $0.00
31 Dental concrete on rock in dam foundations, $/m3. $0.00 0 $0.00
32 Concrete or slurry wall, $/m3. $1,870.58 72 $1,870.58
33
34 Steelwork and powerhouse superstructure.
35 Trashrack steel cost, $/kg. $6.32 458 $6.32
36 Pipeline steel cost, $/ton. $5,492.57 689 $5,492.57
37 Tunnel steel lining cost, $/ton. $0.00 0 $0.00
38 Powerhouse superstructure steel cost $/ton. $7,038.09 53 $7,038.09
39 Powerhouse siding, $/m2. $157.67 825 $157.67
40 Powerhouse roofing, $/m2. $222.99 182 $222.99
41 Temporary steel pile bridge over river, cost per m. $0.00 0 $0.00
42
43 Ratio of overburden excavation to dam impervious fill -------- > 0.00
44 Ratio of Sclairpipe cost to equivalent steel pipe cost. 0.50

Inflation factor, 2008 to present. 1.001


Page 20

27
1 BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK
2
3 Approximate cost by quantities in millions $. CAN $
4 Civil work item and unit of measure. Cost $/unit. Quantity. Cost $ Millions
5 Clearing for all structures. Ha. $7,404.09 48.6 0.360
6 Access roads and bridge cost. 7.823
7
8 Embankment dam.
9 Damsite and spillway overburden exc. cost. (m3) $13.04 757 0.010
10 Damsite(s) rock excavation cost. (m3) $52.17 0 0.000
11 Cutoff trench sand/gravel excavation cost. (m3) $31.95 4,725 0.151
12 Impervious fill dam and cofferdam from borrow. (m3) $33.43 2,007 0.067
13 Filter material cost. (m3) processed from exc. $44.16 244 0.011
14 Rock embankment material cost. (m3) from exc. $58.81 189 0.011
15 Rip-rap cost. (m3) selected from excavations $182.01 158 0.029
16 Dental concrete for core contact, m3. $0.00 6 0.000
17 Concrete or slurry wall volume, m3. $1,870.58 72 0.135
18 Sub-total cost of embankment dam. ----------------------------------------------> 0.413
19
20 Side stream approx. total cost, including intake and equip. costs 0.000
21 Intake, de-sander and weir spillway.
22 Intake and channel overburden excavation cost. (m3) $13.04 65 0.001
23 Intake and channel rock excavation cost. (m3) $52.17 13 0.001
24 Intake+weir+desander structure concrete cost. (m3) $1,022.64 2,354 2.407
25 Trashrack supports and guides cost, kg. $6.32 60 0.000
26 Sub-total intake civil work cost. ------------------------------------------------------------ > 2.409
27
28 Tunnels and vertical bore.
29 Tunnel rock excavation cost. (m3) $0.00 0 0.000
30 Tunnel concrete lining cost. (m3) $0.00 0 0.000
31 Bore rock excavation cost. (m3) $0.00 0 0.000
32 Bore concrete lining cost. (m3) $0.00 0 0.000
33 Low pressure tunnel steel lining cost, installed, ton. $0.00 0 0.000
34 High pressure tunnel steel lining cost, installed, ton. $0.00 0 0.000
35 Sub-total underground work cost. --------------------------------------------------------- > 0.000
36
37 Surge tank cost, if required. Lump sum. 0.000
38
39 Steel pipelines and penstocks.
40 Number of side creek crossings, cost per crossing. $0.00 0 0.000
41 Pipeline rock excavation cost. (m3) $52.17 3,314 0.173
42 Pipeline earth excavation cost. (m3) $13.04 21,399 0.279
43 Pipeline concrete casing cost. (m3) $1,022.64 4 0.004
44 Penstock anchor and pier concrete, m3. $1,533.96 0 0.000
45 Pipeline/penstock steel cost, installed, ton. $5,492.57 689 3.784
46 Sub-total pipelines and penstocks. -------------------------------------------------------- > 4.240
47
48 Tailrace.
49 Tailrace overburden excavation cost. (m3). $13.04 3222 0.042
50 Tailrace rock excavation cost. (m3). $52.17 177 0.009
51 Sub-total tailrace excavation work. ------------------------------------------------------- > 0.051
52 Page 21

28
53 BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK
54
55 Powerhouse.
56 Overburden excavation, m3. $13.04 3,464 45
57 Rock excavation, m3. $52.17 1,955 102
58 Concrete, m3. (Excluding forms, re-bar) $670.25 266 178
59 Formwork, m2. $94.77 319 30
60 Reinforcing, kg. $7.99 19,770 158
61 Powerhouse superstructure steel weight, tonnes. $7,038.09 53 376
62 Wall area, m2. $157.67 825 130
63 Roof area, m2. $222.99 182 41
64 Total powerhouse civil work cost. ---------------------------------------------------------- > 1.060
65
66 Total civil work cost, millions $ ------------------------------------------------------- > $16.357
67
68 Cost of major mechanical equipment, summary.
69 Total cost of trashrack equipment. 0.004
70 Total cost of intake stoplog and gate equipment. 0.037
71 Total cost of spillway low level gate and bulkhead equipment. 0.001
72 Total cost of low level de-sander gate. 0.000
73 Total cost of powerhouse crane. 0.248
74 Total cost rubber dams. 0.783
75 Total powerhouse ancilliary mechanical systems. 0.064
76 Sub-total cost of major mechanical equipment, except generators and valves. 1.136
77
78 Generating equipment, transmission and substation at powerplant.
79 Substation cost, disconnects and transformer. 0.124
80 Transmission lines cost. 1.309
81 Station service. 0.028
82 W/W cost of generating equipment, inlet valve, switchgear and controls. 6.114
83 Sub-total cost of W/W equipment, including valve(s) and transmission. 7.575
84
85 Total electromechanical+transmission work cost, millions $ ---------- > $8.711
86
87 Total direct cost, millions $ ------------------------------------------------------------ > $25.068
88
89 Indirect costs. % of direct Sub-total
90 cost for %
91 Feasibility studies and site investigations. 2.0 25.068 0.501
92 Environmental work. 2.0 25.570 0.511
93 Detailed designs and contract documents. 2.0 26.081 0.522
94 Site supervision work. 4.0 26.603 1.064
95 Civil contingencies and unforseen cost allowance. 20.0 20.293 4.059
96 Electromechanical contingencies 8.0 7.374 0.590
97 Sub-total indirect costs. 7.247
98
99
Cost of development including transmission, no interest $32.3
100
101
102 Page 22

29
103 BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK
104
105 Estimated construction time, months. 14
106 Interest rate % 6
107 Interest during construction, $M. 1.035
108
109
Total project cost, including interest during
110
construction, $M.
$33.4
111
112
113 Summary of principal project statistics.
114 Total installed capacity, MW 9.8
115 Estimated annual generation, GWh. Head iterated OK in auto 42.3
116 Manhours per annum for operation. mode. 879
117 Total overheads as % of total cost. 22.4
118
119 Summary of principal civil work quantities.
120 Total length of conduit from intake to powerhouse, m. 4,823
121 Length of pipe substituted with PVC pipe, m. Type Sclairpipe 2031
122 Overburden excavation, cubic meters. 28,907
123 Rock excavation, cubic meters. 5,459
124 Rock tunnel excavation, cubic meters. 0
125 Concrete, cubic meters. 2,630
126 Steel penstock and tunnel liners, tonnes. 689
127 Powerhouse superstructure steel, tonnes. 53
128

129
Project screening - calculation to determine whether project worth
130 further analysis.
131 Site revenue calculation.
132 Operating staff manhours. 879
133 Operating staff manhour cost per hour, $. 80
134 Annual manhour cost $M. 0.070
135 Total generation capacity (from page 1) --- MW. 9.8
136 Estimated plant annual average load factor. 0.46
137 Average overall project efficiency, excluding transmission, for energy calc. % 78.76
138 Calculated annual generation. (GWh) 42.3
139 Value of generation in cents/kWh. 8.0
140 Calculated annual value of generation $(m) 3.2
141 Calculated opearation & maintenance cost $(m) 0.401
142 Calculated annual net revenue before taxes, interest and amortization. $(m) 2.769
143
144 Estimated project payback in years 12.0
145
146 Comments on whether project worth further investigation:-
147
148
149 Worth further analysis, but proceed cautiously.
150

Page 23

END OF DETAILED OUTPUT

30

You might also like