Shared democratic tyranny

Tyrannies are characterized by being dogmatic, by the excessive

force of their repressive organs, by exerting too much influence on
the voters to obtain almost unanimity in their favor. Under
tyrannies, the mainstream media match the criteria of the
majority parties. Protests are limited to when, how and where
they are assigned by repressive forces. The laws that are created
respond more to particular interests than those of the nation.

The tyrannies (thanks to the power reached by man in many

aspects of nature) violate laws that are independent of the will of
human beings. These are economic, social, biological and
ecological laws. Humanism and human rights are more about
publicity than to real measures taken.

The absolutist and totalitarian tyrannies are much more

repressive, abusive and ferocious to stay in power; they are the
worst; the individual lacks defense, has no rights.

Democratic tyrannies better cover appearances: the individual has

the right to defense and other rights; its citizens can express freely
about the defects of the system, but if it is a public person, they
will always find a way to override him/her. For the easy
domination, the major part of population has been alienated, to
divide it, more by feelings than by reasoning, in political parties,
diversity of beliefs, musical fanatics and of the art. Also in areas
such as sports, and other diverse ways to be stand out, such as the
ridiculous Guinness awards, economic position, race, gender and
others, although the publicity denies it.

There is an unequivocal demonstration that one lives under a

democratic tyranny: when the votes and expressions of the
members of each of the main political parties are almost
unanimous. The most appropriate laws for the benefit of the
nation, by elementary logic, should have no more than 60% of the
members of each party voting in favor. But what is being seen in
this country is that almost unanimously the Democrats vote
against Republicans and vice versa.

This can be called Shared Democratic Tyranny by economic clans,

each represented by a political party. Although there are clans
common to the two main parties; then the votes are
overwhelming in the interests of those economic groups, such as
the clan of war supplies. This was demonstrated by the vote of the
congressmen in favor of the War against Iraq, whenever they
knew the former chief inspector in that US country had publicly
said that Iraq had no weapons of mass extermination, that Bush if
he wanted to attack it was for others reasons, but not for that.