Professional Documents
Culture Documents
As also explained in Muller, The Court finds Benjamin Not even an ownership in
the time-honored principle to no right to nullify the trust is allowed.
is that he who seeks equity Agreement of Lease
5
PERSONS CASE Digests: SYSTEM OF ABSOLUTE COMMUNITY
must do equity, and he between Joselyn and the Besides, where the
who comes into equity petitioner. purchase is made in
must come with clean violation of an existing
hands. Benjamin is not the owner statute and in evasion of
of the property but Joselyn. its express provision, NO
Conversely stated, he who This is so because he is TRUST CAN RESULT IN
has done inequity shall not barred to own said FAVOR OF THE PARTY WHO
be accorded equity. property because of the IS GUILTY OF THE FRAUD.
constitutional ban that is
Thus, a litigant may be the Constitution absolutely To hold otherwise would
denied relief by a court of prohibited from acquiring allow the circumvention of
equity on the ground that any public or private the constitutional
his conduct has been domain any land of the prohibition.
inequitable, unfair and Philippines.
dishonest, or fraudulent, or B.
deceitful. Considering that Joselyn
appeared to be the Invoking the principle that
B. designated vendee in a court is not only a court
the Deed of Sale of said of law but also a court of
The Court cannot as well property, she acquired equity, is likewise
even on the grounds of sole ownership thereto. misplaced.
equity, grant
reimbursement to This is true even if we It has been held that equity
petitioner given that he sustain Benjamins claim as a rule will follow the
acquired no right that he provided the funds law and will not permit
whatsoever over the for the acquisition of such that to be done indirectly
subject properties by property. By entering into which, because of public
virtue of its such contract knowing that policy, cannot be done
unconstitutional purchase. it was illegal, no implied directly.
trust was created in his
It is well established that favor; no reimbursement HE WHO SEEK EQUITY
equity as a rule will follow for his expenses can be MUUST COME WITH
the law and will not permit allowed; and no CLEAN HANDS.
that to be done indirectly declaration can be made
which, because of public that the subject property HE WHO HAS DONE
policy, cannot be done was part of the INEQUITY SHALL NOT HAVE
directly. EQUITY.
6
PERSONS CASE Digests: SYSTEM OF ABSOLUTE COMMUNITY
conjugal/community In the instant case,
A contract that violates the property of the spouses. respondent cannot seek
Constitution and the law IS reimbursement on the
NULL and VOID, VESTS NO In any event, he has no ground of equity where it is
RIGHTS, CREATES NO capacity or personality to clear that he willingly and
OBLIGATIONS, and question the subsequent knowingly bought the
PRODUCES NO LEGAL lease of the Boracay property despite the
EFFECT AT ALL. property by his wife on the constitutional prohibition.
theory that in so doing, he
Under ARTICLE 1412 of the was merely exercising the C.
Civil Code, petitioner prerogative of a husband in
cannot have the subject respect of conjugal The distinction made
properties deeded to him property. between transfer of
or allow him to recover the To sustain such a theory ownership as opposed to
money he had spent for would countenance recovery of funds is a futile
the purchase thereof. indirect controversion of exercise on respondents
the constitutional part.
The law will not aid either prohibition.
party to an illegal contract To allow reimbursement
or agreement; IT LEAVES B. What is the effect if the would in effect permit
THE PARTIES WHERE IT property is to be declared respondent to enjoy the
FINDS THEM. conjugal? fruits of a property which
he is not allowed to own.
One CANNOT SALVAGE If the property were to be
ANY RIGHTS FROM AN declared conjugal, this
UNCONSTITUTIONAL would accord the alien
TRANSACTION husband a substantial
KNOWINGLY ENTERED interest and right over the
INTO. land, as he would then
have a decisive vote as to
C. its transfer or disposition.
Precisely, it is the
Constitution itself which
demarcates the rights of
citizens and non-citizens in
owning Philippine land.