Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Objectives
High and stable economic growth.
Low unemployment.
Low inflation.
The avoidance of balance of payments deficits and
excessive exchange rate fluctuations.
Complementary or in conflict?
Economic growth & low inflation In conflict
Economic growth & low unemployment Complements
Economic growth & balance of payments In conflict
Nominal GDP and constant-price GDP, UK 19502012
Nominal
1.500
GDP at constant 2006 prices
750
500
250
0
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Note: Years 2011 and 2012 figures based on forecasts
Source: Based on data from UK Economic Accounts, (Office for National Statistics)
Economic growth (average % per annum),
Unemployment (average %), Inflation (average % per annum)
France Germany Japan UK USA EU (12) OECD Brazil Malaysia Singapore China
Growth
19609 5.6 4.4 10.4 2.9 4.3 5.8 5.5 5.9 6.5 9.5 3.0
19709 4.1 3.1 5.4 2.4 3.3 3.8 3.7 8.5 7.7 9.2 7.4
19809 2.3 2.0 3.7 2.4 3.1 2.3 2.9 3.0 5.9 7.5 9.8
19909 1.9 2.3 1.5 2.1 3.1 2.2 2.5 1.6 7.2 7.6 10.0
20009 1.4 0.9 0.7 1.7 1.8 1.3 1.8 3.3 4.8 5.1 10.3
Unemployment
19609 1.5 0.9 1.3 2.2 4.1 2.5 2.5 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
19709 3.7 2.3 1.7 4.5 6.1 4.0 4.3 n.a. n.a. 3.6 n.a.
19809 8.9 7.0 2.5 10.2 7.3 9.3 7.2 3.9 7.2 3.7 2.6
19909 11.1 8.1 3.1 8.1 5.8 10.5 7.0 6.9 3.3 2.8 2.8
20009 8.8 8.6 4.7 5.4 5.5 8.4 6.7 9.9 3.4 2.9 4.0
Inflation
19609 3.8 3.2 5.5 3.8 2.4 3.7 3.1 46.1 0.8 1.2 n.a.
19709 8.9 5.0 9.1 12.6 7.1 9.5 9.2 30.6 5.5 5.9 n.a.
19809 7.4 2.9 2.5 7.4 5.6 6.5 8.9 354.5 3.7 2.8 7.5
19909 1.9 2.4 1.2 3.7 3.0 2.9 4.4 843.3 3.7 1.9 7.8
20009 1.7 1.6 0.3 1.8 2.6 1.9 2.7 6.9 2.1 1.5 1.9
The scope of macroeconomics
Economic
Growth
Unemployment
Aggregated Inflation
Demand
Balance of
Payments
The circular flow of income
investments (I),
Thus AD = C + I + G + X M,
or AD= Cd + I + G + X.
The circular flow of income
Firms
Households
The circular flow of income
net saving
net taxes
import expenditure
Injections: Expenditure on the production of domestic firms coming from
outside the inner flow of the circular flow of income.
investment
government expenditure
export expenditure
The circular flow of income
INJECTIONS
Export
expenditure (X)
Investment (I)
Government
expenditure (G)
Consumption of
Factor domestically
BANKS, etc GOV. ABROAD
payments produced goods
and services (Cd)
Import
Net expenditure (M)
Net taxes (T)
saving (S)
WITHDRAWALS
Equilibrium Level of National Income
Higher Higher
Production Payments
Higher
e.g Higher expenditures Aggregated Demand
2. Not all incomes get passed on directly round the inner flow.
Some is withdrawn in the form of net saving, some is paid in net
taxes, and some goes abroad as expenditure on imports.
government services
ownership of dwellings
taxes and subsidies on products
UK GVA (product-based measure): 2009
Agriculture, forestry and fishing 8909
Mining, energy and water supply 47 658
Manufacturing
139 889
Construction 72 994
Manufacturing
139 889 11.1
Percentage of GVA
Hotels and restaurants 35 100 2.8
Transport and communication 87 410 7.0
Manufacturing
139 889 11.1
Percentage of GVA
Hotels and restaurants 35 100 2.8
Transport and communication 87 410 7.0
GVA= SUM(Revenues from sales- Costs)= SUM(Wages, salaries, interests and profits)=SUM(Income)
UK GVA by category of income: 2009
Compensation of employees
(wages and salaries)
769 779
Operating surplus
(gross profit, rent and interest of firms
government and other institutions)
385 755
Mixed incomes
84 189
Tax less subsidies on production
(other than those on products) plus
statistical discrepancy 16 001
Total GVA 1 255 724
UK GVA by category of income: 2009
Compensation of employees
(wages and salaries)
769 779
Percentage of GVA
Operating surplus
(gross profit, rent and interest of firms
government and other institutions)
385 755
Mixed incomes
84 189
Tax less subsidies on production
(other than those on products) plus
statistical discrepancy 16 001
Total GVA 1 255 724
UK GVA by category of income: 2009
Compensation of employees
(wages and salaries) 61.3
769 779
Percentage of GVA
Operating surplus
(gross profit, rent and interest of firms
government and other institutions) 30.7
385 755
Nominal GDP
1.500
Real GDP at constant 2006
prices
1.250
Question: Does an increase of 10% in GDP means that
the average person is better off?
1.000
billions
750
500
250
0
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Note: Years 2011 and 2012 figures based on forecasts
Source: Based on data from UK Economic Accounts, (Office for National Statistics)
GDP per head as a percentage of the EU15 average: 2012
GDP per head GDP (PPS) per head
Australia
Canada
Czech Republic
Denmark
France
Germany
Greece
Ireland
Italy
Japan
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Spain
Sweden
UK
USA
GDP per head as a percentage of the EU15 average: 2012
GDP per head GDP (PPS) per head
Australia 181.3
Canada 119.0
Czech Republic 51.7
Denmark 150.4
France 105.5
Germany 108.8
Greece 66.7
Ireland 120.8
Italy 89.4
Japan 114.1
Luxembourg 286.9
Netherlands 123.9
Poland 35.8
Portugal 54.3
Spain 78.9
Sweden 138.4
UK 96.3
USA 117.5
GDP per head as a percentage of the EU15 average: 2012
GDP per head GDP (PPS) per head
Australia 181.3 134.5
Canada 119.0 111.4
Czech Republic 51.7 75.1
Denmark 150.4 106.8
France 105.5 96.5
Germany 108.8 109.4
Greece 66.7 74.7
Ireland 120.8 113.7
Italy 89.4 90.4
Japan 114.1 95.9
Luxembourg 286.9 245.9
Netherlands 123.9 117.2
Poland Question: which 35.8 59.1
Portugal countries actual 54.3 68.5
Spain exchange rates would 78.9 91.3
Sweden seem to understate the 138.4 115.2
UK purchasing power of 96.3 105.2
USA their currency? 117.5 132.5
Measuring national income
Is there a measurement problem if you get pleasure from the do-it-yourself activity
itself as well as from its outcome?
Contributions to the Index of Sustainable Economic
Welfare (ISEW) ( per capita, 1990 prices)
Year 1950 1973 1996
90
80
ISEW: maximum = 100
70
60
50
40
30
20
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995
ISEW 1950-96 (maximum = 100)
100
90
80
ISEW: maximum = 100
UK
70
60
50
40
30
20
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995
ISEW 1950-96 (maximum = 100)
100
90
80
ISEW: maximum = 100
UK
70
60
USA
50
40
30
20
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995
ISEW 1950-96 (maximum = 100)
100
90
80
ISEW: maximum = 100
UK
70
Netherlands
60
USA
50
40
30
20
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995
Section Summary
4.Even if it is, there are still problems in using national income statistics for
comparative purposes. Certain items will not be included: items such as
non-marketed products, services in the family and activities in the
underground economy. Moreover, the statistics include certain bads and
ignore externalities, and they also ignore questions of the distribution of
income.