Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A single participant was interviewed on the stage 5 science topic Earth Science 2 (ES2) to
determine their ideas on the subject. In ES2, students learn that the theory of plate tectonics
explains geological activity, global patterns and continental movement. Two specific outcomes
1. (b) relate movements of the Earths plates to mantle convection currents and
2. (c) outline how the theory of plate tectonics explains earthquakes, volcanic
The interviewee was a twenty-three year old female with limited background in geology. To
protect the interviewees identity, the pseudonym Inga will be used throughout this report. In
order to elicit Ingas ideas about these concepts, the phenomena chosen was volcanoes. The idea
was to first probe Ingas understanding of why more volcanoes form in some parts of the world
then others. The interview then aimed to see if this information could then be related to tectonic
plate existence and movements. During the protocol, an idea of how Inga thought plate
movement occurred was gathered alongside her conception of how plate movement and land
formation were related. The full interview protocol can be seen in figure 1. A partial written
transcript of the interview has been provided to demonstrate Ingas understanding on the topic.
1
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
- near a fault line More volcanoes result from more Most places have mountains, which
- mention tectonic plates tectonic plates are the same as volcanoes
- hot spots (volcanoes with the tops cut off)
2
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
Researcher: When talking about this, do you think new landforms could be formed?
Inga: Yes, well new forms, with lowering of sea levels, land is formed. Underground mountains
and plateaus exposed. Is that what you mean? Exposing new landforms? Or erosion creating
new like the wearing down of mountains.
R: In terms of how you were talking before about plate tectonics, and how the newer things were
more closely located to the fault line - how do you think that plate tectonics plays into the
formation of new land forms?
I: Plate tectonics, because its very active areas. It um.. I dont know.. squash the land and make it
into different mountains.
R: When these new land forms occur, what do you think forces the plates to squish together?
I: I dont know, thats a good question! I suppose, theyre just moving moving around, you
know. The underground volcanic forces
I: Volcanic force is you know one thinks of volcanoes as being like pimples ... Large amounts of
molten rock produce large amounts of energy which create you know movement and explosions
when they meet and come up to the surface in certain spots. Theres certain spots where molten
core comes through to the surface and thats what causes volcanoes.
R: Great thank you. So if we were to talk about this but with earthquakes and their frequency
why are earthquakes more frequent in some areas rather then others?
I: Well they seem to be associated with volcanoes, active, on the edges of thewe do get
earthquakes as well but there must be some other aspects to them but not the bad ones. The bad
ones are all around the edges of the plates arent they.
I: Yes I do.
R: In what way?
3
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
I: Well, because theres a lot of action. Well earthquakes seem to be what they call the
epicenter... well theres some sort of explosion or release of energy in a particular spot and they
seem to happen more around the edges of the plate. Two edges of plates theres a lot of friction, a
lot of force causing problems.
R: Ok so talking about the plates motion before you were talking about continental drift - what
did you mean by that? Is it related to this?
I: I mean that continents are all moving in different directions. A few cm this way and a few cm
that way. Isnt it that North America is about 50m or something further away then when
Columbus? He would have had to have gone a bit further
R: Do you think there is a difference between continental drift and plate tectonics?
I: Well theyre connected really I think. The continents connect to rocks, which we cant see that
are moving under the ground.
R: So, if you wanted to find a plate, to touch one, how would you do that?
I: Oh ummm I think youd probably fall down a great big crevice. Thats my imagination; Ive
got no idea really. Ive just got this big picture of all these big rocks underneath with edges and
moving under the ground creating [friction noise] and creating [banging sound].
R: How do you think that is related to the oceans? So how do oceans differ to continents?
4
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
After the first question, Inga immediately brought up the concept of fault lines quickly
identifying that Japan and New Zealand are closer to fault lines then Australia and therefore have
more volcanoes. She also quickly brought up the terminology of plate tectonics. She stated that
Australia is older then Japan and that the age was related to this phenomena. However, when
probed on how this age could be related to plate tectonics in regards to the creation of new
landforms, she didnt understand the process exactly. Her response was that the plates squash
together to form mountains with no mention of volcanoes. Whilst not scientifically articulate it
does show knowledge of the fundamental processes behind mountain formation. Similarly, she
had an understanding that the plates were moving to force this squishing. However, when
probed on her beliefs regarding the mechanism behind movement, she did not know. She
answered with volcanic forces where large amounts of molten rock produce large amounts of
energy which createmovement. Whilst not accurate, this idea is reminiscent of the idea behind
convection current theory that the heat energy of rocks below the surface causes movement.
Of interest is that despite her immediate knowledge of the existence of plates, she did not know
how you would touch one. When asked, she answered that you would have to fall down a great
big crevice, as she imagined the plates as big rocks not just below but separate to the Earths
surface. This idea was emphasised when asked whether she thought it was the same between
land and oceans. She stated that there is a, surface of land and a surface of water and all the
action is going on under the surface. This was similar to the findings of Ford and Taylor (2006, p.
39), who showed that some students believe plates to exist below the Earths surface whilst
current scientific understanding tells us that the Earths crust is in fact a part of the plate (Smith &
The interview elicited a number of interesting ideas held by Inga on the concepts surrounding
plate tectonics and movement and was therefore reasonably successful. However, more skill
5
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
would have allowed the researcher to better discover and highlight Ingas conceptions and
misconceptions. There were times in the interview when it perhaps would have been better to
continue questioning a certain topic, but instead the topic was changed so as to understand
Ingas idea on something related but different. This is evident upon re-reading the transcript
surrounding Ingas conceptions of volcanic forces, where Inga provided their conception of
volcanic forces but was not asked to explore it further. Instead, the topic was changed to
earthquakes. This was partially due to the researchers confusion on how the questioning should
As the conceived purpose of this interview was solely to gather information, the researcher
decided not to engage in any discussion that could give answers away and instead moved
between topics. The ability to elicit information without providing Inga with extra information or
prompts is a skill that would have improved this particular interview process. This is a skill
highlighted by Ford and Taylor (2006, p. 40) who note the importance of developing activities
6
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
Major areas of difficulty for students when learning about this topic
According to a study by Ford and Taylor (2006, p. 41) there are a multitude of misconceptions in
high school aged students related to areas they find difficult to understand. Four major areas for
these misconceptions were highlighted: (i) plates, (ii) plate movement and plate interaction, (iii)
plate interactions result in events and features, and (iv) recycling of plate material. Related to
misconceptions surrounding plates, students demonstrated that they thought plates were
somehow below and not really related to the Earths surface. On one topic, students showed
opposite misconceptions, as some believed that a continent was a plate whilst others believed
continents have no relationships to plates. The conflation between continents and plates has
been demonstrated elsewhere in the literature (Dolphin & Benoit, 2016, p. 285).
Regarding plate movement and plate interaction, students held multiple misconceptions. These
included the ideas that; earthquakes caused Pangea to break apart, plate movement cannot be
measured because it is so slow, plates now are the same size and shape that they have always
been, when plates move towards each other they fill a gap between the plates, and that if plates
are moving apart at a rate of 2cm per year the distance moved is too insignificant to notice (Ford
Further areas of difficulty were understanding how plate interactions resulted in events and
features. This included misconceptions such as; earthquakes are caused by plates crashing
together (the bigger the crash, the bigger the earthquake), erosion is the only process that
changes the appearance of the Earth, when two plates come together non-volcanic mountains
always form, earthquakes cause all volcanic eruption (and vice versa), and mountains form when
7
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
These findings indicate difficulty in understanding what constitutes a plate and what happens at
plate boundaries. The concept of elasticity within plates is also difficult for students, who view
rocks as brittle, not elastic. Students therefore have difficulty conceptualising the occurrence of
earthquakes as being a mechanism of these elastic properties (Dolphin & Benoit, 2016, p. 285).
The everyday meaning and experience of a plate reinforces student perceptions of an inelastic,
brittle plate (Dolphin & Benoit, 2016, p. 285). In addition to being unable to understand the
dynamics of plate motions, students do not understand that most earthquake energy release
When interviewing university geology students, Smith and Bermea (2012, p. 355) noted that
knowledge. They found similar results to Ford and Taylor (2006) in that students had a
misunderstanding of what properties define a plate, noting a persistent conception that the crust
The difficulties presented by students in the literature mirror some of the difficulties experienced
by Inga. Inga demonstrated her belief that tectonic plates are somehow separate to the crust as
evidenced by her belief that in order to touch a plate a person would need to throw him or
herself down a crevice. The students in Smith and Bermea (2012, p. 355) likewise did not have
the scientific understanding that the crust is a part of the lithosphere and therefore part of a
plate.
With many misconceptions articulated in the literature, Inga had the right idea she knew that
plates and continents were not the same thing and that continents were attached to plates. She
was quite well versed in the knowledge that tectonic plate boundaries are related to volcanic
activity and earthquakes. However, she did have difficulty in expressing what that meant exactly.
Inga when asked how volcanoes form said that the squishing of plates resulted in mountains,
without mentioning volcanoes. This could indicate confusion between her existing ideas. She
8
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
knew that volcanoes cluster at plate boundaries but that mountains form when plate boundaries
meet and plate material is pushed upwards. Inga may have been trying to resolve the difficulty
some students face as they believe that non-volcanic mountains always form when two plates
Her understanding of plate tectonic movement and its relationship to land formation was less
well established. When initially questioned, she brought up that Japan is newer then Australia,
indicating an understanding that landforms are constantly changing and therefore that some are
newer then others. However, she did not put these two concepts together when questioned and
instead immediately went to the concept of erosion. This ties into the difficulties experienced by
students in the literature, who thought that erosion was the only process by which landforms are
Smith and Burmea (2012, p. 355) suggest that the mental model of compositional layering
developed by students during earlier years makes it hard for them to subsequently accommodate
assimilation in conceptual change, students assimilate new knowledge into their pre-existing
model to construct understanding (Robinson, 2013, p. 9). In this case, students assign the
asthenosphere and lithosphere to layers wholly within the mantle (Smith & Burmea, 2012, p.
355). Similarly, students learn about their environment through concrete, embodied experiences
and project meaning from these experiences onto abstract concepts. When learning abstract
topics such as plate tectonics, areas of difficulty arose when the concepts moved beyond the
These theories can be applied to the findings by Ford and Taylor (2006, p. 43), who highlighted
that students may have some correct knowledge but dont understand the processes to apply
them accurately. For instance, students knew that plates moved very slowly, but misinterpreted
this information to mean that plates move too slowly for their interactions to have any significant
9
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
impact. Such conceptualization has been noted in the literature, as students can struggle with
conceptualising geologic processes due to the large scales of space and time through which they
occur (Dolphin & Benoit, 2016, p. 277). In addition to this, many critical pieces of evidence for
tectonics plates are inferred within the Earths interior rather than directly observed (Smith &
Burmea, 2012). From this knowledge the necessity to integrate new knowledge with existing
Another noted misconception was the idea that erosion is the only process altering the
appearance of the Earth (Ford & Taylor, 2006). In Australia, this misconception may occur
because erosion is taught repeatedly throughout the syllabus in stages 1, 2 and 4 well before
plate tectonics in stage 5 (BOSTES, 2016). A greater link between plate tectonics and land
10
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
Lesson Plan
The Earths crust is split up into separate tectonic plates that move. There are two different types
of plates: continental (CP) and oceanic (OP), with OP denser then CP. The movement of plates
causes earthquakes and new land formation at tectonic plate boundaries. Volcanoes are also
formed at boundaries but can also be formed in the middle of plates at hot spots. There are three
types of plate boundaries: convergent, divergent and transform. Convergent boundaries exist
where plates collide, causing the subduction of one plate under the other. If it is CP-CP then
mountains form, OP-OP mountains and volcanoes form as one OP is subducted under the other,
OP-CP then the denser OP is subducted under the CP forming volcanoes and mountains.
Divergent boundaries are where plates move apart, causing see floor spreading and ridges.
Transform boundaries are when two plates slide alongside each other, causing earthquakes and
faults. Students will be able to develop an idea of what constitutes a tectonic plate by recognizing
its structure. They will also be able to recognize that plate movements are related to volcanoes,
earthquakes and land formation.
Stage 5, ES2: The theory of plate tectonics explains global patterns of geological activity and
continental movement.
Students:
c. Outline how the theory of plate tectonics explains earthquakes, volcanic activity and formation
of new landforms
Stage 5, WS6.e. Reporting data and information, evidence and findings, with accuracy and
honesty
Lesson Objectives
The student will:
Predict movement of the cream when the biscuits are moved in particular ways
Recognise the relationship between specific plate boundaries and volcanic activity,
earthquakes and land formation
Identify the structure of tectonic plates.
Materials and Preparation Before Class Safety Issues Addressed
Materials for students: Salada crackers, Potential choking hazard with Saladas.
whipped cream, plastic plates, plastic
spoon, tap water, butchers paper, texters Provide drinking water so that they can eat the
Saladas after wetted tell students not to wet
Desks oriented so that students are sitting crackers using water from the taps at the lab
in groups of 4-6. workbenches. Potential chemical hazard if
11
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
12
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
materials are.
Ask questions
If you wanted to touch a
plate, how would you do Engage in class discussion
that?
What happens between the
plates at the boundaries?
13
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
14
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
Curriculum materials
Name__________________________________
SNACK TECTONICS!
Aim:
Background Information:
Materials:
Salada biscuits
Cream
Water
Plastic plate
Plastic spoon
15
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
4. Gently put the wet Salada piece and a dry Salada piece on the layer of cream.
5. Push the wet cracker and a dry cracker together.
Prediction:
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. Place two dry crackers at opposite ends of the cream. Push them together.
Prediction:
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. Take the same two dry pieces and push them down (not too hard) and apart at the same
time.
Prediction:
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
16
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. Place two dry crackers side by side on the cream. Slide them past each other.
Prediction:
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
If the crackers are moving against each other get stuck, what would happen? What does
this model?
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
17
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
Curriculum material 2: Images and gifs for Students during presentation (Pass My Exams,
2016)
Convergent Boundary:
Oceanic to continental:
Oceanic to oceanic:
Continental to continental:
Divergent Boundary:
Seafloor spreading:
18
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
Rift valleys:
Transform Boundary:
19
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
20
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
How teaching this science practical will help students confront, re-think, and/or expand
From the research presented in Part B alongside the evidence gained through the interview from
Part A, it could be seen that a major misconception was the structure of a plate. This practical is
designed to help students understand how the plates fit into the Earths structure by initially
getting them to build upon what they learned of the Earths structure in Stage 4. In doing this,
they will assimilate the new knowledge into their existing memory schemas and hopefully
understand what constitutes a plate and how that fits in with the rest of the Earth. Students
would then hopefully learn that they do not need to jump into a crevice to touch one, as Inga
imagined in Part A.
plate boundaries. It was noted in Part B that students may have trouble visualizing the processes
as they occur over such long periods of time and the plates are so massive (Ford & Taylor, 2006;
Dolphin & Benoit, 2016). As a result, this practical was selected as it simply and clearly models
the different types of plate boundaries and gives the students a good visualization of causal
(Smith & Burmea, 2012), the plan aims to prevent alternate conceptions being formed by
When working to build student mental models, getting the students to participate in this
modeling activity allows them to build an understanding of the model of the Earth. Students
mental models on this topic are incomplete, so it is better to get them to answer what questions
rather then why questions as they accrete knowledge of the model. Once the students have a
solid foundation of understanding on the structure of a tectonic plate, they can move on to
further their understanding of the processes the model represents (Dolphin & Benoit, 2016, p.
287). It is for this reason that the lesson primarily works on showing structures and what the
structures look like when they interact. From here, students can then build their understanding
21
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
of why the plates move in certain ways, including plate density, convection currents and
gravitational forces.
How teaching this science practical connects to best practices in science teaching and
learning
Over the last three decades, best practice initiatives in science education have shifted from
teacher driven to student driven instruction. This practical provides student driven instruction
communication (Areepattamannil, Freeman, & Klinger, 2011, p. 236). The elements of scientific
inquiry present include that students must make predictions, direct their investigation and
engage in a hands-on activity. However, this activity does require a level of trust with the
students, implying that when left reasonably independent the students will complete their work
without eating all the food first. In a circumstance where the teacher does not believe this is
possible, a teacher driven model can be adapted whereby the teacher works through the
motivation occurs through emotional attachment and enjoyment in the learning, allowing
Klinger, 2011, p. 234). Using the food and making the task socially collaborative makes the
Finally, the collaborative and social nature of the work makes the activity a constructivist
informed practice, allowing all students the opportunity to participate in discussion, put forward
and explore ideas, and communicate with peers. It has been shown that incorporating dialogic
22
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
References
Alfa Image. (2016). Earth Core Diagram Showing Lithosphere. Retrieved August 13, 2016, from
Areepattamannil, S., Freeman, J. G., & Klinger, D. A. (2011). Influence of motivation, self-beliefs,
https://syllabus.bostes.nsw.edu.au/science/science-k10/content/
BOSTES. (2016). Earth and Space. Retrieved August 9, 2016, from Board of Studies Teaching &
k10/content/988/
Disaster Girl. (2011). Pangaea, Earth Crust Displacement and Continental Drifts. Retrieved August
earth-crust-displacement-and.html
Dolphin, G., & Benoit, W. (2016). Students' mental model development during historically
contextualised inquiry: how the 'Tectonic Plate' metaphor impeded the process.
Ford, B., & Taylor, M. (2006). Investigating Students' Ideas about Plate Tectonics. Science Scope,
30(1), 38-43.
Pass My Exams. (2016). Tectonic plate motion. Retrieved August 12, 2016, from Pass my exams:
http://www.passmyexams.co.uk/GCSE/physics/tectonic-plate-motion.html
Poarch, M. (2006). Graham Cracker Plate Tectonics. Retrieved August 11, 2016, from Hilldale
Public Schools:
http://www.hilldale.k12.ok.us/vimages/shared/vnews/stories/51cdb994a4edf/Graha
m%20Cracker%20Plate%20Tectonics%20Lab.pdf
23
102087 Assignment 1 Student Number: 18616763
Smith, G. A., & Burmea, S. B. (2012). Using Students' Sketches to Recognize Alternative
24