Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LECTURE 1
Aristotle (Poetics)
Mimesis related to truth and likelihood (not to truth/ falsehood) Mimesis = a
representational model of reality (not a mere, perfect imitation/copy of reality).
The writers job is not to relate what actually happened, but rather the kind of thing
that would happen, either necessarily or probably. In addition, (s)he tells about truths
that, even if not necessarily in the philosophical sense, are universal in their
application to human nature. Literature is supposed to teach lessons based on necessity
or probability. (Kenny 2013: xxvii, xxviii)
Both indirect narrative and direct representation become varieties of mimesis.
1
Forms of mimesis distinctions in terms of their medium (epic, drama, painting,
sculpture, dancing and music), their object (people in action), and their mode of
representation (the narrative/epic and the dramatic) (Poetics. I. Various Kinds of
Poetry) the first plot and character typologies.
The written text = a representational model which may turn out to be more or less faithful
to the represented reality.
Until the end of the nineteenth century, writers and critics have drawn upon the Aristotelian
theory of mimesis, showing more concern with the extent to which literary works managed to
comply with the constantly debated upon and redefined principle of verisimilitude. There
have been, of course, some who, more or less explicitly, have investigated different aspects of
narrative structure, calling into question the pre-established conventions of novel writing and
challenging the readers expectations. (e.g. Cervantes, Diderot, Sterne, etc.). Nevertheless, it
is only from the nineteenth century on that narrative techniques become the subject of more
systematic analysis and Flaubert or Henry James are among the first to pave the way for the
development of narratology as a well-defined approach to narratives.
2
(3) The queen died, no one knew why, until it was discovered that it was through
grief at the death of the king.
Story: a narrative of events arranged in their time-sequence (1).
Plot: a narrative of events, the emphasis falling on causality (2); a narrative of events with
more mystery in it, with the time-sequence suspended and capable of further high
development (3). (Forster in Scholes 1966: 221)
Booth does not see the author as the only person involved in creating a work of fiction.
Instead, he sees this creation as comprised of both author and reader with a narrator to
guide the reader through the maze of the text. For Booth, the reader and the author cannot be
separated because of the power both author and reader exert on the text and the power the text
exerts on the author and reader. Booth argues that the author constructs an implied author
and a narrator, both of whom connect to a specific reading community. implied author
(the authors official scribe or second self) whom the reader invents by deduction from
the attitudes articulated in the fiction.
The implied author chooses, consciously or unconsciously, what we read; we infer him
as an ideal, literary, created version of the real man; he is the sum of his own choices in:
style (providing insight into the authors norms);
tone (through which the author implies his judgment of the material presented);
technique (the artistry of the author).
It is only by distinguishing between the author and his implied image that we can avoid
pointless and unverifiable talk about such qualities as sincerity or seriousness in the
author. (Booth 1983: 74-5)
The author also creates an implied/postulated reader whose values and background
represent the ideal reader: The author creates, in short, an image of himself and another image
of his reader; he makes his reader, as he makes his second self, and the most successful reading is
one in which the created selves, author and reader, can find complete agreement. (138)
3
Narrator typologies (1):
Undramatized narrators (that are not given personal characteristics): In so far as
a novel does not refer directly to this [implied] author, there will be no distinction
between him and the implied, undramatized narrator. (151)
Dramatized narrators: () even the most reticent narrator has been dramatized
as soon as he refers to himself as I. The range of dramatized narrators is usually
wide, from vivid narrator-characters, disguised narrator-characters telling the
audience what it needs to know or seemingly acting out their roles to third-person
centers of consciousness through whom authors have filtered their narratives.
Hence the further distinction between mere observers and narrator-agents (who
produce measurable effect on the course of events). (152-3)
4
References
Abrams, M. H. (1999) A Glossary of Literary Terms, Boston: Heinle & Heinle. Thomson Learning
Aristotle (2013) Poetics, translated with an introduction and notes by Anthony Kenny, Oxford: Oxford
University Press
Booth, Wayne (1983) The Rhetoric of Fiction, Second edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Leech, Geoffrey and Michael Short (1985) Style in Fiction, Longman, London & New York
Lintvelt, Jaap (1994) Punctul de vedere. ncercare de tipologie narativ, Bucureti: Editura Univers
Meister, Jan Christoph (2011-2014) The Living Handbook of Narratology, Hamburg: Hamburg
University Press [online], available from http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/
Mitchell, W. J. T. (1995) Representation. In Lentricchia, Frank and McLaughlin, Thomas
(eds.), Critical Terms for Literary Study, Second edition, Chicago: The University of Chicago
Press, 11-22
Scholes, Robert (1966) Approaches to the Novel. Materials for a Poetics, Scranton, Pennsylvania:
Chandler Publishing Company