CIVIL PROCEDURE

TAKE HOME QUIZ (INDIVIDUAL)

Instruction. Use long ruled paper (Choose any color that suits you). Pass on
November 30, 2017.

A. Extract and write down the important doctrines (only) in the following cases.
(But do yourself a favor and be familiar with the facts so you will know how
to apply the doctrines):

1. Intervention:
LORENZA C. ONGCO vs.VALERIANA UNGCO DALISAY
G.R. No. 190810 July 18, 2012

2. Modes of discovery
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES (PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION ON GOOD
GOVERNMENT) vs. SANDIGANBAYAN, BIENVENIDO R. TANTOCO, JR. And
DOMINADOR R. SANTIAGO
G.R. No. 90478 November 21, 1991

SPOUSES VICENTE AFULUGENCIA and LETICIA AFULUGENCIA, vs.

METROPOLITAN BANK & TRUST CO. And EMMANUEL L. ORTEGA, Clerk of
Court, Regional Trial Court and Ex-Officio Sheriff, Province of Bulacan
G.R. No. 185145 February 5, 2014

3. Consolidation:
ROMEO TESTON, represented by Conrado Colarina vs. DEVELOPMENT
BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES, LAND BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES, and
SECRETARY OF AGRARIAN REFORM
G.R. NO. 144374 November 11, 2005

4. Demurrer:
CASENT REALTY DEVELOPMENT CORP. Vs. PHILBANKING CORPORATION
G.R. No. 150731 September 14, 2007

5. Judgment based on compromise:

NESTOR T. GADRINAB vs. NORAT. SALAMANCA, ANTONIO TALAO AND
ELENA LOPEZ
G.R. No. 194560 June 11, 2014

6. Interlocutory order:
METROPOLITAN BANK & TRUST COMPANY vs. COURT OF APPEALS and
ALFONSO ROXAS CHUA
 G.R. No. 110147 April 17, 2001

7. Remedy against judgment:

DOMINGO NEYPES, LUZ FAUSTINO, ROGELIO FAUSTINO, LOLITO
VICTORIANO, JACOB OBANIA AND DOMINGO CABACUNGAN vs.
HON. COURT OF APPEALS, HEIRS OF BERNARDO DEL MUNDO, namely: FE,
CORAZON, JOSEFA, SALVADOR and CARMEN, all surnamed DEL MUNDO,
LAND BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES AND HON. ANTONIO N. ROSALES,
Presiding Judge, Branch 43, Regional Trial Court, Roxas, Oriental Mindoro
G.R. No. 141524 September 14, 2005

8. Remedy against judgment:

WOOD TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, CHI TIM CORDOVA AND ROBERT

TIONG KING YOUNG vs. EQUITABLE BANKING CORPORATION
G.R. No. 153867 February 17, 2005

9. Remedy against judgment:

JULIET VITUG MADARANG and ROMEO BARTOLOME, represented by his
attorneys-in-fact and acting in their personal capacities, RODOLFO and
RUBY BARTOLOME vs. SPOUSES JESUS D. MORALES and CAROLINA N.
MORALES
G.R. No. 199283 June 9, 2014

10. Remedy against judgment:

PINAUSUKAN SEAFOOD HOUSE, ROXAS BOULEVARD, INC., PETITIONER,
VS. FAR EAST BANK & TRUST COMPANY, NOW BANK OF THE PHILIPPINE
ISLANDS AND HECTOR IL. GALURA, RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 159926, January 20, 2014

11. Provisional remedies:

DAVAO LIGHT & POWER CO., INC. Vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS,
QUEENSLAND HOTEL or MOTEL or QUEENSLAND TOURIST INN, and
TEODORICO ADARNA
G.R. No. 93262 December 29, 1991

12. Bond, James Bond :

THOMAS YANG vs. THE HONORABLE MARCELINO R. VALDEZ, Presiding
Judge, Regional Trial Court, 11th Judicial Region, Branch XXII, General
Santos City, SPS. RICARDO MORANTE and MILAGROS MORANTE
G.R. No. 73317 August 31, 1989

13. Replevin:
TERLYNGRACE RIVERA vs. FLORENCIO L. VARGAS
 G.R. No. 165895 June 5, 2009

14. Injunction:
BP PHILIPPINES, INC. (FORMERLY BURMAH CASTROL PHILIPPINES, INC.)
Vs.
CLARK TRADING CORPORATION
G.R. No. 175284 September 19, 2012

15. Support pendente lite:

SUSAN LIM-LUA vs. DANILO Y. LUA
G.R. Nos. 175279-80 June 5, 2013

16. Receivership:
GORGONIO PANDES vs. HON. JOSE TEODORO, SR., Judge of the Court of
First Instance of Negros Occidental, JOSE AZCONA, Ex-Officio Provincial
Sheriff of Negros Occidental, and UY TIONG OH
G.R. No. L-6666 May 12, 1954
.

17. Res judicata

P.L.UY REALTY CORPORATION vs. ALS MANAGEMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and ANTONIO S. LITONJUA
G.R. No. 166462 October 24, 2012

18. Conclusiveness of judgment:

ANDREW TAN vs. COURT OF APPEALS and WU SEN WOEI, respondents.
G.R. No. 142401 August 20, 2001

19. Execution pending appeal:

FLEXO MANUFACTURING CORPORATION vs. COLUMBUS FOODS,
INCORPORATED and PACIFIC MEAT COMPANY, INCORPORATED
G.R. No. 164857. April 11, 2005

ROSENDO T. UY, MEDRING SIOCO, BOBBY BERNARD S. UY and LUISA T.

UY vs.
HONORABLE PEDRO T. SANTIAGO, as Judge of Branch 101, Regional Trial
Court of Quezon City; BENITO PALOMADO, PIO BERMEJO and SANTOS
NGALIO
G.R. No. 131237 July 31, 2000

20. Execution:
DOUGLAS F. ANAMA vs. PHILIPPINE SAVINGS BANK, SPOUSES
SATURNINA BARIA &TOMAS CO and THE REGISTER OF DEEDS, METRO
MANILA, DISTRICT II
G.R. No. 187021 January 25, 2012
 21. Garnishment:
BANK OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS vs. CARLITO LEE
G.R. No. 190144 August 1, 2012
.
22. Revival of judgment:
RUFA A. RUBIO, BARTOLOME BANTOTO, LEON ALAGADMO, RODRIGO
DELICTA, and ADRIANO ALABATA vs. LOURDES ALABATA
G.R. No. 203947 February 26, 2014

23. Certiorari:
AGRARIAN REFORM BENEFICIARIES ASSOCIATION (ARBA), represented
by JOSEPHINE B. OMICTIN vs.LORETO G. NICOLAS and OLIMPIO CRUZ
G.R. No. 168394 October 6, 2008
.
24. Expropriation
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, represented by the DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS (DPWH) vs.BANK OF THE PHILIPPINE
ISLANDS (BPI)
G.R. No. 203039 September 11, 2013

25. Contempt
ISABELO ESPERIDA, LORENZO HIPOLITO, and ROMEO DE BELEN vs.
FRANCO K. JURADO, JR.,
G.R. No. 172538 April 25, 2012

26. NESTOR T. GADRINAB vs. NORAT. SALAMANCA, ANTONIO TALAO AND

ELENA LOPEZ G.R. No. 194560 June 11, 2014

27. CITY GOVERNMENT OF BAGUIO, HEREIN REPRESENTED BY CITY MAYOR

REINALDO A. BAUTISTA, JR., vs.ATTY. BRAIN S. MASWENG
G.R. No. 188913 February 19, 2014

28. Interpleader:
WACK WACK GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB, INC. Vs.
LEE E. WON alias RAMON LEE and BIENVENIDO A. TAN
G.R. No. L-23851 March 26, 1976

29. Foreclosure:
ARTURO SARTE FLORES vs. SPOUSES LINDO
G.R. No. 183984 April 13, 2011

B. Tabulate your answers:

1. Make an outline on the different special civil actions by stating what they are, when,
why and how should they be availed of.
2. Make an outline on the different remedies against a judgment by stating what they
are, when, why and how should they be availed of.
3. Make an outline on the different provisional remedies by stating what they are,
when, why and how should they be availed of.
4. Make an outline on the different modes of appeal by stating what they are, when,
why and how should they be availed of.

------no motions for extension please.-----------------