You are on page 1of 7

Historical Experience and Challenges of Proceedings of 13th Baltic Sea Geotechnical Conference

Geotechnical Problems in Baltic Sea Region ISSN 2424-5968 / ISBN 978-609-457-957-8


Lithuanian Geotechnical Society eISSN 2424-5976 / eISBN 978-609-457-956-1
Lithuania, 2224 September 2016 DOI: http://doi.org/10.3846/13bsgc.2016.025

Soil Improvement Using Rigid Large Elements


in the Engineering Practice of the Republic of Belarus

Vladimir Kravtsov1, Valery Seskov1, Pavel Lapatin1, Sergey Yakunenko1


RUE Institute BelNIIS, Minsk, Belarus
E-mail: 1f3@belniis.by (corresponding author)
Abstract. The results of research and development of methods for the calculation, design and practical application of
a method for technique of improvement soft soil bases for slab foundations with the use of rigid large elements are re-
ported. The optimal percentage of rigid elements, structural characteristics of improved soils (increment and diameter
of rigid elements) are presented and principles for their calculation and design are given. As exemplified by a specific
construction site, it is demonstrated that technological schemes for the arrangement of improved soils, developed by
RUE Institute BelNIIS, reduce the deformability of soft soil bases by four times and more.
Keywords: soft soil base ( 7 MPa), soil improvement with the use of rigid elements, research, direct shear box
test, plate loading tests (PLT), deformation modulus, calculation, design.
Conference topic: Design experiences and theoretical solutions.

Introduction Methods and results of the research


At the present time, the technology of strengthening of The research was performed in laboratory and field
soft soil base by means of rigid large elements followed conditions, using standard soil testing methods to de-
by the construction of slab foundation on top of it has termine soil characteristics (E, , s) before and after
become a frequent practice in foundation engineering in improvement. The evaluation of strength and defor-
the Republic of Belarus. The improvement of soft soil mation characteristics of improved soils with different
bases with the use of rigid large elements is much more percentages of rigid elements was performed in the
cost-effective than vibration methods (heavy tamping, laboratory by analyzing the results of a series of consol-
vibratory rollers), and slab foundations installed on top idated direct shear box and odometer compressibility
of such improved bases are more economically viable tests.
than deep foundations (Seskov 2010; Kravtsov 2013; Based on the experimental design (Adler 1969
Mirsoyapov 2005). etc.), the main factors affecting the strength and defor-
This technique allows to strengthen foundation mation properties of soils were determined and the re-
slab base to the desired properties (E, , c) using inex- sults obtained were analyzed using mathematical statis-
pensive prefabricated elements both in the form of driv- tics methods and STATISTIKA 10.0 software suite.
en (precast) and cast-in-place piles, including the use of The first stage of the research was carried out us-
local materials (gravel, large sand, soil-concrete), which ing homogeneous pre-dried soil samples (sand, clay
are arranged in previously drilled, drilled and expanded soil). The obtained results were used as a reference.
or punctured holes. This is particularly effective in con- During the second stage, the samples were formed
strained urban environment, where dynamic impact from a mixture with a given mass content and the prop-
methods are not allowed. Given the fact that there were erties of the original soil and rigid elements with the
no reliable methods for the calculation and design of percentages of elements in the main soil of 8%, 16%
improved bases with due regard to all special aspects of and 30% (Fig. 1).
their construction and performance (increment and di- In order to ensure the comparability of test results,
ameter of rigid elements, the degree of strengthening, soil samples with homogeneous composition and ele-
etc.), RUE Institute BelNIIS performed a relevant re- ments were grouped as follows.
search to study the specifics of strengthening of soft According to the experimental design matrix, a se-
soils by means of rigid elements using both driven and ries of test samples of soils (sand, clay) with the volume
cast-in-place piles (Seskov et al. 2011). The aim of this of V = Ah (where A is the area of the sample in cm2
research was the development of an effective technolo- and h is the height of the sample in cm) with predeter-
gy for the arrangement of improved soil bases, methods mined baseline characteristics: density 0, humidity 0,
for its calculation and design ensuring cost savings of deformation module 0 were prepared and subjected to
up to 30% as compared to traditional soil improvement direct shear box and odometer compressibility tests. The
methods (rolling, tamping, including soil reinforce- subsequent series of test samples were prepared from
ment). the test soil with characteristics similar to control sam-
ples, but with a different percentage of rigid elements

2016 The Authors. Published by VGTU Press. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Com-
mons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original
author and source are credited.
Kravtsov, V.; Seskov, V.; Jakunenko, S.; Lapatin, P. 2016. Soil improvement using rigid large elements in the engi-
neering practice of the Republic of Belarus

(8 to 30% by weight). The equivalent density of these Based on the results of these tests, the values of
samples was established based on the following as- modulus of constrained and total deformation E. in the
sumptions: pressure range of 0 to 600 kPa and the values of the
angle of internal friction were obtained (Figs 1, 2).
(V n V ) 0 + V = V , (1)

where n is the number of rigid elements in pcs.; V,


are the volume and the density of rigid elements in
g/cm3; is the equivalent density of reinforced soil in
g/cm3.
After expressing in the formula (1) the volumes V
and V through their area A, A, height h and dividing
all the terms by samples height, the following equation
is obtained: Fig. 1. General view of samples of fine sand for shear tests
with different percentage of reinforcement elements ranging
h( A n A ) 0 + n A h = A h, (2) from 8 to 30% (Series 3)

it allows to determine the equivalent density required In order to assess the reliability of experimental
for the formation of samples and design of improved findings obtained from test results, the values of E and
soil bases: were compared to respective deformation and strength
( A n A ) 0 + n A characteristics obtained by means of finite-element
= . (3) modelling.
A After determining the optimal percentage of rigid
A solution for the equivalent modulus of soil de- elements in test soils, small-scale model bench tests of
formation E was obtained by a similar analytical improved sand and clay bases were carried out (Fig. 3).
method: The methodology and the results of bench tests are giv-
en in Kravtsov (2013), Yakunenko (2013), etc.
E0 A A The results of laboratory study of the properties of
E = k E (1 + ) , (4)
k E A A improved soil and bench tests of small-scale models
demonstrated that:
where , 0 are the modulus of elasticity of rigid ele- improved soil bases by rigid elements performs
ments and the modulus of deformation of soil, MPa; not as a piled foundation, but rather as a rein-
k is the coefficient, which makes allowances for forced (consolidated) base with equivalent char-
the variability of properties of rigid elemenets. acteristics (, , ) surpassing the respective
The mixtures, formed in this manner, were sub- values in non-improved soils by not less than 2
jected to consolidated direct shear box and odometer 3 times, and is characterized, as compared to
compressibility tests according to the standard proce- natural soils, by pronounced strength and stress-
dure established by GOST 12248 (GOST 12248-2010 induced anisotropy and the presence of the arch
2013), the physical characteristics of rigid elements effect.
were determined in accordance with GOST 5180.

Fig. 2. Representative curve of changing of drained angle of internal friction for the fine sand samples with various percent of
reinforcement (i = 830%, see the graphs)

173
Kravtsov, V.; Seskov, V.; Jakunenko, S.; Lapatin, P. 2016. Soil improvement using rigid large elements in the engi-
neering practice of the Republic of Belarus

The tests were performed in improved sandy and


clay soils strengthened with shallow cast-in-place soil-
concrete piles (in drilled, drilled and expanded, stamped
or punctured holes) with the diameter of 100200 mm
and the length of 1.53 m and precast driven micropiles
with the diameter of 150200 mm and the length of 1.5
5.0 m. The basic results of field tests are presented in
the articles (Seskov 2010; Kravtsov 2013; Yakunenko
2013, etc.) and in Section 3 of this paper.
The results of full-scale field tests confirmed the
data obtained under laboratory conditions and provided
evidence of the efficiency of developed solution for
Fig. 3. General view of low scale simulation tray tests strengthening slab foundation bases by means of soil
improvement technique with the use of compacting
the destruction of improved soil bases by rigid piles (rigid elements), and served as basic material for
elements under ultimate load occurs according the elaboration of a method for their calculation and
to the following patterns: recommendations regarding the design (calculation) and
a upheaval of the buffer layer from under the arrangement of improved slab foundation bases (RUE
foundation, if its thickness exceeds the limiting thick- Stroytechnorm 2014) (see Section 2 of this paper).
ness (ht > 0.75b, where b is the width of the foundation
or 20 MPa);
Methods for the calculation of improved soil bases
b frictional sliding (squeezing) of reinforcement
with the use of rigid elements
elements relative to the natural soil under more critical
loads on the base p0 0.8R or in the absence of the This method was developed on the basis of experi-
buffer layer; mental data, basic assumptions of Section 1, basic pro-
c loss of stability of improved soil, as evidenced visions of soil mechanics for slab foundations with the
by explicit relatively rectilinear sliding surfaces. base pressure of not more than 0.3 MPa and reads as
Thus, it is quite obvious that in order to assess the follows:
stability and to study the conditions for the emergence 1 an allowable amount of settlement of slab
of any displacements in slab foundation base, it is pos- foundation su in cm is determined for the designed
sible to apply the general theory of soil mechanics, spe- structure. It is inserted in the formula (1), and the value
cifically rock equilibrium theory, discussed in the works of the minimum equivalent deformation modulus .min
of K. Tertsagi, B. V. Bakholdin, V. L. Berezantsev, of rigid elements, ensuring the allowable settlement of
V. A. Florin, etc. the structure, is determined.
equivalent modulus of deformation E and cohe- pmax H c
sion are increased by several times with the E.min = , (5)
increase of percentage of rigid elements in the su
soil of up to 30%, with a slight change in angle where is a non-dimensionalized coefficient equal to: at
of internal friction , whereupon any further in- pmax of up to 0.2 MPa = 1; at pmax of 0.2 to
crease in reinforcement percentage yields virtu- 0.3 MPa = 0.70.8; pmax the maximum pressure of
ally no increase in soil strength; slab foundation transmitted to the base, MPa; su is the
predominantly vertical deformation of the base allowable ultimate settlement of slab foundation base
occurs within the improved soil up to the critical according to the design or technological regulations in
load. m (not more than 8 cm, su 5 cm for administrative and
A complex of full-scale (field) tests was carried
residential buildings); Hc = pmax/m is the conditional
out at 9 test plots in order to validate the results of la-
minimum depth of compressible zone in m, where
boratory tests, as well as to test the developed equip-
see above; m is the average specific weight of soil be-
ment and different methods of arrangement of improved
low the foundation bottom within the depth equal to not
soil bases.
less than two of its widths, N/m3.
Field tests of soil bases carried out at test plots
2 using the dependency between the modulus of
both before and after soil strengthening with consolidat-
total deformation 0 (or compressibility factor 0) and
ing piles with the determination of soil characteristics
porosity factor (compression dependency or the results
by means of standard field and laboratory methods.
of field tests with the use of a stamp), the required po-
Improved soil bases was tested in situ by means of
rosity factor , . of the improved soil base with
standard (SPT), cone (CPT) penetration tests as per
piles is determined for .min, which is the main indica-
GOST 19912-2001 (2004) and by a rigid stamp (a
tor for the development of the design of a such bases,
fragment of foundation) with an area of A 5,000 cm2
but not less than e.min e0mvpmax, where e0 is the
as per GOST 20276-99 (2000) (PLT).
porosity factor of soil prior to its improvement, mv = 1.

174
Kravtsov, V.; Seskov, V.; Jakunenko, S.; Lapatin, P. 2016. Soil improvement using rigid large elements in the engi-
neering practice of the Republic of Belarus

3 the required strength characteristics of im- s Eb Aa


proved soil (internal friction angle .(II), deg., and htb = (11)
pmax
,
cohesion ., MP) ensuring the stability of foundation
base at . = 1.2 are determined; where pmax see above, MPa; the area of heads
4 the required minimum soil porosity factor of all rigid elements in m2; is the modulus of defor-
(sand, clay) is established using the known dependence mation of compacted intermediate buffer layer depend-
of strength characteristics on density and moisture, using ing on the material. It should be not less than: for medi-
the formula (6) for sand soils and (7) for clay soils: um-grained sand 20 MPa; for coarse sand and lime
en.min = e I D (e e0 ); (6) gravel 25 MPa; for crushed granite 40 MPa; in case
of other materials can be determined based on the
s condition that the settlement does not exceed su
e. min = ( p + 0.5I p ), (7) 15 mm;
100
8 Improved soil bases by rigid elements designed
where 0, max are, respectively, porosity factors in natu- as per paragraphs 17 and its structural elements are
ral sand (prior to reinforcement) and extremely dense checked in terms of strength of the materials, settlement
conditions; ID = 0.70.8 is the index of relative density; and strength of the subsoil zpi < R. The modulus of
wp and Ip are, respectively, humidity at the limit of plas- elasticity of rigid elements should be not less than
ticity and the index of plasticity; s, w are, respectively, 20 MPa.
specific weight of particles of soil and water in kN/m3.
In the event that porosity factor . required
Evaluation of research results in production envi-
for the calculation as per (6) and (7) exceeds the mini-
ronment
mum value of calculated porosity factor of reinforced
soil .min as per formulas in Paragraph 2 above, the The proposed methods for the design of improved slab
application of reinforcing elements is effective, if less foundation bases with the use of rigid elements were
it is ineffective. evaluated during the construction of administrative
5 the increment and the distance between rigid building at refuelling station under reconstruction man-
elements, in case of their checkboard arrangement, are aged by OOO Geo Plus and located at Kolodischi
determined using equations (8) and (9): agricultural settlement in Minsk Raion (hereinafter re-
ferred to as the facility).
0
amax = d a ; (8)
3.5( . 0 ) Baseline information of the facility

lmax = amax / 2 cos 45, (9) The designed facility is a large block one-storey build-
ing, the walls are made from LECA blocks, belt-type
where d is the diameter of reinforcement elements foundations are made of standard concrete blocks with
in m; .. is the required specific weight of soil after the width of 400 mm, the distributed load on foundation
reinforcement as per (10) in kN/m3; 0 is the specific base amounts to 0.158 MPa. A complicating factor in
weight of soil prior to reinforcement in kN/m3; the construction of foundation is the presence of loose,
non-uniform filled soil compressible in vertical and
( A n Aa ) 0 + n Aa a
. = , (10) horizontal directions with the elements of construction
A debris and plant residues (Fig. 4). This conditioned the
where , is the area of improved soil base and rigid necessity of developing the design and technology for
elements in m2; n is the number of rigid elements in strengthening the upper part of foundation base.
1 m2, n = A/A((e0 e.min)/(1+ e0)) in pcs.; 0, is the Rigid elements was placed only under strip foun-
specific weight of soil in kN/m3, respectively, before dations as per recommendations in RUE Stroytech-
and after improvement (for concrete = 23 kN/m3). norm (2014). Proceeding from the capabilities of the
6 the length of rigid elements L in m shall be local construction company, driven soil-concrete piles
taken as equal to not less than its compressed width Hc arranged in drilled and expanded holes were used as
in saturated clay soils, in other cases, as a rule, up to the rigid elements without soil excavation (Fig. 5). The
mark, where additional vertical specific pressure on holes were made with a 250 mm metal pilot bore
subsoil below the bottom of improved soil does not manufactured according to the drawings of RUE Insti-
exceed its design strength R, but not less than two tute BelNIIS. It was installed instead of a helical screw
widths for column-type, and three to four widths for on a UGB-PVS truck-mounted drilling rig (without any
belt-type slab foundations; additional alterations of the joint). The wells were filled
7 a buffer layer made of sand and gravel mix with soil-concrete as per Recommendations for design-
compacted to a density factor of com 0.98 is arranged ing and arranging soil-concrete piles in drilled and ex-
between the rigid elements and the bottom of slab foun- panded holes (Ministry of Architecture 2005), the
dation. Its thickness htb is determined as per formula (7), proportion of local soil to M150 cement in the mixture
but should not be more than 1/5 of the width of slab being 5:1.
foundation b and not less than 0.15 m.

175
Kravtsov, V.; Seskov, V.; Jakunenko, S.; Lapatin, P. 2016. Soil improvement using rigid large elements in the engi-
neering practice of the Republic of Belarus

Fig. 4. Layout of foundation on base reinforced by piles. 1 filled soil of up to 3.5 m thick ( = 16.4 kN/m3, = 11 MPa);
2 medium coarse sand of medium strength ( = 17.3 kN/m3, = 36, = 0.001 MPa, = 34 MPa)

The required equivalent density of reinforced soil, According to the formulas (2)(7) and Paragraph 2
the thickness of buffer layer and the increment of rein- it was determined:
forcing elements were calculated as per recommenda-
tions in RUE Stroytechnorm (2014) using formulas ( A n Aa ) 0 + n Aa a
. = =
(5)(11) for 1 m2 of the area of slab foundation base in A
the following sequence. (1 2 0, 05) 16, 4 + 2 0, 05 23
According to the formula (1) at pmax = 0.158 MPa, = = 17, 06 kN/m3 .
1
settlement s = 5 cm and the depth of compressible zone
Hc = pmax/ = 1 * 0.158 / 0.0164 = 9.63 m, it was de- e. = e0 mv pmax = 0.7 1 0.158 = 0.54.
termined:
e0 e. 1 0, 7 0,54
pmax H c 0,158 9,63 n = A( ) / Aa = ( )=
E.min = = 1 = 30, 43MPa. 1 + e0 0, 05 1 + 0, 7
su 0,05
= 2 pcs./m 2 .

0
amax = d a =
3.5( . 0 )
3,14 16, 4
0.25 = = 1,17 m.
3,5(17, 06 16, 4)

lmax = amax / 2 cos 45 = 1.17 / 2 0.71 = 0.82 0.9 m.


The design concept makes provisions for the ar-
rangement of two rigid elements per 1 m of the length
of strip foundation.
The required thickness of sand buffer layer be-
tween the foundation and rigid elements is calculated as
follows:

Fig. 5. Process of making the reinforcing elements at the s Eb Aa 0, 015 20 0,1


htb = = 20 cm.
buildings construction site pmax 0,158

176
Kravtsov, V.; Seskov, V.; Jakunenko, S.; Lapatin, P. 2016. Soil improvement using rigid large elements in the engi-
neering practice of the Republic of Belarus

1, 2, 3 graphs of s = f(p) at TP1-TP3 test plots prior to vertical reinforcement, respectively, with the modulus of deformation
01= 12.6 MPa, 02= 9.5 MPa, 01= 9.7 MPa; 1, 2, 3 same, but after vertical reinforcement, respectively, with
1= 38.3 MPa, 2= 32.4 MPa, 1= 27.6 MPa
Fig. 6. Results of stamp testing of vertically-reinforced foundation base at the test facility. Graphs of dependency of stamp settle-
ment s = f(p) at TP1, TP2, TP3 test plots before and after strengthening

Examination of vertically reinforced foundation base of 2. The reliability and efficiency of research results,
the test facility developed methods for the calculation of the proposed
improvement technique with the use of consolidating
The base was tested with the use of a 2,500 cm2 stamp
piles were confirmed by means of experiments. For
in accordance with the standard procedure as per GOST
example, the mean value of the modulus of deformation
20276-99 (2000) in order to evaluate the effectiveness
of bulk loose soil after improvement, based on the re-
of design solutions on strengthening the foundation
sults of PLT tests, was = 33 MPa, while the initial
base. The tests were conducted before and after the
value was 0 = 11 MPa, thus proving 3.3 fold strength
arrangement of improved soil base.
increase. Furthermore, the deviation of actual modulus
The load was applied with the help of a hydraulic
from the modulus E = 30.4 MPa calculated ac-
jack with the capacity of 500 kN. Reactive forces were
cording to the formula (1) does not exceed 10%.
received by a steel beam attached with screw anchors.
Breaking stress for the load of = 0.5 MPa was
PLT test results are given in Figure 6.
not reached on the load-and-settlement s = f() graph,
The results of field in-situ tests of improved soil
i. e. the bearing capacity of improved soil will be en-
bases designed as per recommendations (RUE
sured in case of construction of 2 additional storeys with
Stroytechnorm 2014) confirm the reliability of the
the load on the base of 3 0.158 = 0.47 < 0.5 MPa.
developed calculation method (see Section 2) and effec-
3. The research results and the Recommendations
tiveness of vertical reinforcement of strip foundation
for the design and construction of improved slab foun-
base using soil-concrete consolidating piles.
dation bases with the use of rigid elements (RUE
Stroytechnorm 2014) developed on their basis served
Conclusions as a cause for active introduction of the proposed soil
strengthening technique in the Republic of Belarus, thus
1. Methods for the design, construction and the ensuring a reduction in material consumption and labour
technology for the arrangement of improved soil base of intensity in the construction of slab foundations in the
soil with the use of compaction piles were proposed, amount of not less than 30% as compared to vibro-
researched and tested in a production environment. percussion or pile underpinning methods without any
deterioration in reliability.

177
Kravtsov, V.; Seskov, V.; Jakunenko, S.; Lapatin, P. 2016. Soil improvement using rigid large elements in the engi-
neering practice of the Republic of Belarus

References RUE Stroytechnorm. 2014. 1.02.133-2014 Recommenda-


tions for designing and arranging the vertically rein-
Adler, Y. P. 1969. Introduction into design of experiment. forced bases (geotechnical masses) of slab foundations
M.: Metallurgy. 155 p. of buildings and structures in soil conditions of the Re-
GOST 12248-2010. Laboratory methods for determining the public of Belarus. Minsk: RUE Stroytechnorm. 28 p.
strength and strain characteristics. State Committee for Seskov, V. E. 2010. Strengthening of bases by method of
Standardization of the Republic of Belarus, Minsk, vertical reinforcement with soil-concrete micropiles in
2013. 83 p. punched holes, in V. E. Seskov, V. N. Kravtsov, S. A.
GOST 19912-2001. Soils. Field test methods by static and Yakunenko. Topical Issues of Geotechnical Engineering
dynamic sounding. Ministry of Architecture and Con- when Solving Complicated Tasks of New Construction
struction of the Republic of Belarus, Minsk, 2004. 25 p. and Reconstruction: Collected Papers of the Interna-
GOST 20276-99. Soils. Field methods for determining the tional Conference, 1012 November 2010, St. Peters-
strength and strain characteristics. Ministry of Archi- burg State Architectural and Construction University, St.
tecture and Construction of the Republic of Belarus, Petersburg, Russia, 295300.
Minsk, 2000. 25 p. Seskov, V. E.; Kravtsov, V. N.; Lobastov, N. S.; Leb-
Kravtsov, V. N. 2013. Designing of vertically reinforced slab edik, V. P. 2011. Buildings foundation built on artifi-
foundations bases, in Proceedings of the International cially reinforced weak or soft soil and method of its
Geotechnical Engineering Conference Geotechnical building: patent 18688 of the Republic of Belarus, pub-
Engineering in Belarus: Science and Practice, 2325 lished in official bulletin of National Center of Intellec-
October 2013, Belarusian National Technical Universi- tual Property.
ty, Minsk, Belarus. 9 p. Yakunenko, S. A. 2013. Experimental researches of slab
Ministry of Architecture and Construction of the Republic of foundations bases reinforced with soil-concrete micro-
Belarus. 2005. Recommendations for designing and ar- piles, in S. A. Yakunenko. Problems of modern concrete
ranging soil-concrete piles in drilled and expanded and reinforced concrete: Collection of research papers.
holes. Ministry of Architecture and Construction of the Minsk: RUE Institute BelNIIS, 379387.
Republic of Belarus, Minsk, 2005. 51 p.
Mirsoyapov, I. T. 2005. Study of strength and deformability of
collapsing ground bases reinforced with vertical ele-
ments, in I. T. Mirsoyapov, V. R. Moustakimov. Pro-
ceedings of the International Geotechnical Engineering
Conference Interaction of Structures and Bases: Meth-
ods of Calculation and Engineering Practice, 2628
May 2005, Petersburg State Transport University, St.
Petersburg, Russia, 2: 4045.

178

You might also like