Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rationale
The lesson sequence that follows aims to develop Stage 5 students ability to craft
engaging narrative voice in their own creative writing. By the end of this lesson
strategies that can be employed to craft narrative voice through studying a range of
different short texts. They should also be able to demonstrate evidence of using a
number of these strategies in their own extended piece of imaginative writing. This
lesson sequence aims for a writing-rich classroom in which students feel supported and
writing as a process and foster the ability to be self-reflective about their own writing.
argument in her Creative Writing chapter in Charged with Meaning. Gannon argues
secondary English classrooms. Teachers and students alike are less confident with
appreciation of creative writing as a craft (Gannon, 2010). This lesson sequence aims to
address those concerns by prioritizing close work with language focusing upon its
focus upon creating engaging narrative voice as an aspect of creative writing within
these lessons. This element of creative writing has been chosen because it is one of the
primary aesthetic aspects of imaginative texts that students must learn to sustain. From
my experience, it is also one of the more challenging aspects for students to craft
effectively, possibly because it is more conceptual than some other aspects, for example
descriptive imagery, which is more easily identifiable within writing. As this lesson
sequence is aimed at Stage 5, tackling this more challenging aspect of creative writing is
appropriate. The activities within these lessons have also been designed to directly
address a number of Outcome and Content points in the Stage 5 syllabus (BOSTES,
2012).
The teaching and learning activities within Lesson 1 of this sequence are based upon the
idea of using model texts to teach creative writing. Gannon (2010) argues that students
creative writing practice is improved when they spend time engaged in close analysis of
the language of texts, and how that language has been crafted to position readers. This
first lesson is dedicated to this process, with the teacher first modeling how to conduct
this kind of close analysis, and then students engaging in this analysis in groups. The
choice to begin with teacher modeling, and then having students work collaboratively is
based upon the gradual release of responsibility teaching model which has been
that have been chosen as model texts are diverse and offer students a range of textual
strategies to imitate and experiment with in their own writing. These activities directly
address content from Outcome 1 of the Syllabus that requires students to appreciate,
explain and respond to the aesthetic qualities and the power of language in an
The idea of a pre-writing phase, as well as the gradual release of responsibility model,
has been used to structure Lesson 2. Gannon (2010) suggests that to move students
past the paralysis of the blank page (p. 228) a non-confrontational pre-writing phase is
important. For this reason, a group task in which students respond to a character
stimulus in the form of a photograph, begins this lesson. Gannon also advocates the
importance of teacher modeling of the creative writing process. Within this lesson the
teacher models how to construct a lune, and then turn it into prose, and is encouraged
the lesson follow the gradual release of responsibility model as the class jointly
practice. The gradual release of responsibility model has been chosen as a structure for
this lesson because it has been demonstrated to improve student confidence in creative
writing and also function as an effective differentiation technique (Griffin, 2010). During
this lesson the teacher will consistently draw attention to textual strategies that were
used in the model texts from Lesson 1, and how she is employing them in her own
creative writing for the purpose of creating an engaging narrative voice. The activities in
this lesson therefore address content from Outcome 3 that requires students to create
literary texts with a sustained voice, selecting and adapting appropriate text
The final lesson in this sequence is structured around a mini-lesson and teacher
conferencing. Nancie Atwell (1987) suggests that the mini-lesson is an effective way to
teacher a writing skill or craft aspect of writing with which the class has been
struggling. She emphasises that to be effective they should be brief and teacher-
centered, guidelines that have been replicated in this mini-lesson on dialogue. The mini-
this time the lesson plan emphasises that teachers should avoid marking student work,
but rather they should be asking questions and offering verbal suggestions for student
writing. Gannon (2010) also argues that students need to be given extended periods of
time to write within class and that not all writing should be assessable. This influenced
the choice to dedicate such a large portion of the last lesson to independent writing, and
also not to have the writing collected at the end of the lesson.
This lesson sequence also requires students to jointly construct a set of success criteria
for an engaging narrative voice, and then in the final lesson use this criteria in order to
self and peer assess their own, and others creative writing. This activity was included
to give students ownership over their own writing, and a specific focus for their writing.
These criteria also draw attention to the aesthetic quality of writing, , as well as giving
students access to the metalanguage required to reflect on their own writing. This is a
appropriate metalanguage (BOSTES, 2012, p.98). Engaging in self and peer assessment
also emphasises the process approach to creative writing, suggesting that writing can
be improved and advanced past the stage of the first draft. Finishing the lesson
sequence with a reflective activity also assisting in drawing students attention to the
process of creative writing, and will hopefully allow them to transfer the skills gained in
this lesson sequence to other creative writing experiences. The self and peer editing
section of this lesson also addresses content from Outcome 2, specifically content that
requires students to review, edit and refine students own and others texts for control
Atwell, N. (1987) In the middle: writing, reading and learning with adolescents. New
Hampshire: Boynton/Cook
Board of Studies NSW (2012) English Years 7-10. English K-10 Syllabus Vol. 2. Sydney:
Gannon, S. (2010) Creative Writing. In. S. Gannon, M. Howie and W. Sawyer (Eds)
Charged with Meaning: Re-Viewing English: Third Edition (p. 223-230) Sydney:
Phoenix Education
Griffith, R. (2010) Students Learn to Read Like Writers: A Framework for Teachers of
http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au
Lesson One: Creating engaging narrative voices
Lesson Focus This lesson introduces students to the idea of engaging narrative
voices through the analysis of a range of texts.
By the end of the lesson students will have developed a success
criteria for the elements of an engaging narrative voice.
Teacher Objectives Effectively model close textual analysis
Manage different forms of group work successfully
Outcomes and Content Outcome 1: responds to and composes increasingly sophisticated
and sustained texts for understanding, interpretation, critical
analysis, imaginative expression and pleasure
Content: Appreciate, explain and respond to aesthetic
qualities and the power of language in an increasingly
sophisticated range of texts
Outcome 9: purposefully reflects on, assesses and adapts their
individual and collaborative skills with increasing independence and
effectiveness.
Content: understand and apply appropriate metalanguage to
reflect on their learning experiences
Resources SmartBoard, Youtube clips, PowerPoint slides, copies of text extracts
for expert group task, copies of success criteria template for all
students
Students are each given three post its notes, and instructed
to write down the distinctive qualities of the voices and
then stick them around that persons name on the wall.
Teacher briefly introduces students to the idea that
distinctive voices exist not only in spoken texts but also in
written texts, where they are known as narrative voice. In
this creative writing unit we will be developing our ability
as writers to create unique and engaging narrative voices.
Think-Pair-Share
Evaluation/Extension
The teaching and learning activities address the content points around which this
lesson has been designed. The analysis activity, both the teacher-modeled analysis and
group task, advance students towards being able to explain and respond to the aesthetic
qualities of a wide range of texts. The decision to include several sophisticated texts was
also important in fulfilling the requirements of this content point. The success criteria
activity requires students to use the appropriate metalanguage to reflect on what they
have learnt during their analysis of the texts.
Teacher can informally assess students learning through observation and targeted
questioning in the expert group task and in the whole class discussion surrounding the
criteria. These informal forms of assessment should be used to assess students ability
to meet both content points the lesson addresses.
Both the expert group task, and the think-pair-share at the conclusion of the lesson, act
as differentiation techniques that allow all students to contribute at their own level of
ability and understanding.
In retrospect
Following this lesson, I would reflect on whether the students were able to not only
identify the language devices that created the narrative voice within the texts, but also
the effect of these devices. Although this is modeled in the teacher example, if the
students were not engaging in this level of analysis during the expert group task, it may
need to be taught more explicitly.
Board of Studies NSW (2012) English Years 7-10. English K-10 Syllabus Vol. 2. Sydney:
Kardashian and Jenner sisters argue who has the best app interview [Video file]
Lanagan, M. (2017) Singing my sister down. In. Singing my sister down & other stories.
Pitch Perfect: Fat Amy Quotes and Best Bits. [Video file] Retrieved 5 August 2017.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48HqBv5Ropo
Simsion, G. (2013) The Rosie Project. Melbourne: The Text Publishing Company.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Wn9YiQEMtI
Resources SmartBoard, Success criteria from last lesson, Black and white
photographs,
A3 paper, Lune worksheet, Example lune, whiteboard
5 minutes Whole class Briefly revise with students the elements of an engaging
narrative voice that were put into the success criteria
worksheet from previous lesson.
15 Group work Break students into groups of 4-5. Each group is given an A3
minutes piece of paper with a different black and white photograph
in the middle. (Appendix A). Around the picture students
brainstorm together different features of what the character
might be like. Some things students could brainstorm
include;
Who the character is?
What the character might do?
How they would talk?
Where are they from?
Who is a character they might interact with?
Individual Students now write their own lunes based of the characters
they created during the group work activity.
25 Lune to Prose
minutes Whole class
Students now use their lunes as the basis for the beginning
of a piece of prose, with a focus on engaging narrative voice.
Evaluation/Extension
During this lesson the teacher should assess students understanding using targeted
questioning and careful observation during both the group tasks and whole class
activities. To ensure the students are meeting the learning outcome of the lesson, the
teacher should confirm that students are able to make links between the text analysis
they completed in the previous lesson and the imaginative writing they are attempting
in this lesson. The teacher asking explicit questions around this during the process of
joint construction could especially achieve this. As the students begin their individual or
pair work, it would be important for the teacher to walk around and observe every
students work to ensure their understanding.
In retrospect
Following this lesson, I would reflect on whether the students found the lune to prose
activity helpful in getting their writing started. If this activity did not work for this class,
another pre-writing activity should be attempted.
Resources for Lesson 2
Appendix A (photographs)
(Retrieved from
https://au.pinterest.com/quietthunder8/get-a-load-of-that-face/?lp=true)
(Retrieved from
https://au.pinterest.com/quietthunder8/get-a-load-of-that-face/?lp=true)
(Retrieved from
http://c1.peakpx.com/wallpaper/319/24/949/black-and-white-photography-face-
wallpaper.jpg)
LUNE
LUNE
http://c1.peakpx.com/wallpaper/319/24/949/black-and-white-photography-face-
wallpaper.jpg
Black and white portraits of homeless people. [Image] Retrieved 5th August 2017. https://s-
media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/07/af/11/07af11dba6f62b284d85e55128a80122-
-digital-photography-photography-portraits.jpg
Board of Studies NSW (2012) English Years 7-10. English K-10 Syllabus Vol. 2. Sydney: Board of
Studies NSW
a-load-of-that-face/?lp=true
of-that-face/?lp=true
https://au.pinterest.com/quietthunder8/get-a-load-of-that-face/?lp=true
Lesson 3: Creating an engaging narrative voice
Lesson Focus This lesson is primarily focused upon giving students enough writing
time to develop their creative writing in a teacher-supported
environment. The final part of the lesson is spent in structured self
and peer editing and reflection
Teacher Objectives Perform Atwells, conferencing approach effectively
Run a mini-lesson effectively
Outcomes and Content Outcome 3: selects and uses language forms, features and structures
of texts appropriate to a range of purposes, audiences and contexts,
describing and explaining their effects on meaning
create literary texts with a sustained voice, selecting and
adapting appropriate text structures, literary devices,
language, auditory and visual structures and features for a
specific purpose and intended audience.
Outcome 2: effectively uses and critically assesses a wide range of
processes, skills, strategies and knowledge for responding to and
composing a wide range of texts in different media and technologies
review, edit and refine students' own and others' texts for
control of content, organisation, sentence structure,
vocabulary, and/or visual features to achieve particular
purposes and effects
25 Individual Inform students that they will now spend time working
minutes individually on the prose pieces they started in the previous
lesson. The teacher should remind students to look at the
engaging narrative voice criteria that the class had
constructed in the previous lessons.
During this time, the teacher circulates and offers assistance
to students, but she should avoid marking student word.
Instead she should engage students in discussion about
their work and ask deliberate questions to help students
develop their ideas. Students can call on the teacher at any
time during this period, and the teacher should attempt to
only spend a couple of minutes with each student. As the
teacher conferences with students, she should record
informal notes about students individual progress.
Evaluation/Extension
The teacher can assess students understanding during this lesson during the sustained,
silent writing time. In this time, the teacher will have small conferences with students,
and should take their own informal notes during this time, about individual students
progress, especially in regards to the content point of Outcome 3. During the self and
peer editing activity the teacher can informally assess students understanding through
observation and questioning.
The final reflection is the only piece formally collected by the teacher during this three-
lesson sequence. This is deliberate as the lesson sequence aims to have students take
personal ownership and pleasure in their creative writing. The final reflection can be
used by the teacher as an informal, summative piece of assessment to assess students
conceptual learning over the entire lesson sequence.
In retrospect
After teaching this lesson, I would reflect on the amount of time that was given for
sustained, silent writing. Depending on the class they may need more or less time.
Resources for Lesson 3
Board of Studies NSW (2012) English Years 7-10. English K-10 Syllabus Vol. 2. Sydney: Board
of Studies NSW