Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
The following report focuses upon a Stage 4 unit of work, Struggle to Survive. The unit
was original designed for the selective stream at Parramatta High. This report offers
Parramatta High. The unit has been reconstructed using the Understanding by Design
learning, literacy development, the developing of personal and social capabilities and
assessment.
1
Monica Sharpe 18795006
Table of Contents
Background Information p. 3
Original Unit p. 4
Reconstructed Unit p. 7
Comparative Table p. 13
References p. 24
2
Monica Sharpe 18795006
Background Information
This unit has been designed for and taught at Parramatta High in Western Sydney.
Parramatta High is a public, co-educational high school that has both comprehensive
and selective streams. The school population is extremely diverse, with 91% of students
coming from a language background other than English. Socioeconomically, the school
population is also extremely varied. There are also a much larger amount of male
students compared to female students at Parramatta High.
The Stage 4 Struggle to Survive unit was originally taught to a Year 8 selective class at
Parramatta High. This class was made up of gifted and talented students, with the
majority coming from immigrant backgrounds. The class was extremely diverse in
terms of race and nationality. The class, like the rest of the school, has a larger
proportion of male students compared to female students.
The recommendations that will follow in this report relate to the unit being taught in a
comprehensive class, rather than selective class, at Parramatta High. Students within
the comprehensive classes at the school are of a mixed academic ability. In a typical
comprehensive class at Parramatta High there will be several students of a refugee
background, several students with additional learning needs and several students with
socio-emotional challenges. As such, the recommendations suggested within this report
focus upon differentiation and addressing literacy concerns, as well as improving
assessment and sequencing.
* Statistics from MySchool website. Retrieved
https://www.myschool.edu.au/SchoolProfile/Index/105171/ParramattaHighSchool/41804/2016
3
Monica Sharpe 18795006
Students widen their understanding of the world and language through a range of Term 1 11 weeks
texts connected to the idea of humans struggling to survive. In addition, students will
understand the cultural significance of documenting this aspect of the human
condition.
4
Monica Sharpe 18795006
Develop a school culture and practice that respects and responds to every
student needs at all stages of learning
Learning Across the Curriculum Literacy (including FOR) Cross Curriculum Priorities Other Areas
General Capabilities Numeracy Personal and social capability Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander histories and Civics and Citizenship
Critical and Creative Thinking Information and communication technology cultures Difference and diversity
Ethical Understanding Intercultural Understanding Asia and Australias engagement with Asia Work and Enterprise
Sustainability
5
Monica Sharpe 18795006
EXTENSION
Students research a true life story of survival, past or present. E.g. Structure- for text response- context/text Examples of text response
Holocaust, Sept 11, Tsunami, Titanic, New Orleans, Pearl Harbour OR Description/evaluation
Research a person that they know of who has experience a struggle to Extracts from other non-fiction
survive- create PowerPoint of own story. Structures of news report texts- A fortunate Life/I can jump
Students write a 5 step survival guide for tourists visiting a dangerous Current affairs program- format Puddles
environment. Interview
Writing tasks- diary or newspaper report/eyewitness-breaking news
report detailing a persons struggle for survival
Class oral task on topic- speech/TV panel/talk shown- OR research on
teacher directed list of famous people who experienced struggle to
survive.
Create a poster to demonstrate a comparison between the main character
of set text as a survivor and that of a true-life survivor.
6
Monica Sharpe 18795006
This unit focuses on a range of short texts in a variety of different text types, connected by This unit focuses upon the film, Rabbit Proof Fence. It is a continuation of the
representations of Australia. Students will focus on close analysis of a range of different Representations of Australia unit.
texts, and explore how texts create a sense of national identity. Assessments: Class Speech (20%)
Focus outcomes: EN4-2A, EN4-2A, EN4-6C, EN4- 7D, EN4-8D Focus outcomes: EN4-2A, EN4-2A, EN4- 7D, EN4-8D
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10
Persuasive Writing Online Magazine
Students explore the role of different types of persuasive writing in society, including newspaper articles, Students design, develop and publish an online magazine for a teenage
Term 2
opinion pieces and speeches. They explore the elements of effective persuasive texts and construct their audience. This is a continuation of the Persuasive Writing unit, and
own. involves students using the persuasive devices they have discovered in
Assessment: Persuasive Writing task (10%) other texts.
Assessments: Online magazine (15%)
Focus outcomes: EN4-2A, EN4-3B, EN 4-4B, EN4-5C Focus outcomes: EN4-1A, EN4-2A, EN4-3B, EN4-4B, EN4-5C, EN4-9E
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10
Struggle to Survive
This unit focuses on representations of the human struggle to survive through a set novel, and a range of other short texts. Students will widen their understanding of themselves and the
Term 3
world through this study. In addition, students will understand the cultural significance of documenting this aspect of the human condition. They will also compose their own
imaginative texts focused upon a struggle to survive.
Assessments: Class Listening Task (10%)
Class Writing Task (10%)
Focus outcomes: EN4-1A, EN4-2A, EN4-3B, EN4-5C, EN4-6C, EN4-7D, EN4-8D
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10
Fractured Fairytales Drama
Term 4
This unit of work focuses upon the idea of fractured fairytales. Students explore the idea of Students experience play reading, learning about dramatic techniques, and performance
textual appropriation, and the effect of context upon representations of a variety of themes, of a scene in groups. This unit includes peer and self-assessment.
including gender roles. Students compose their own fractured fairytales. Assessments: Drama performance (15%)
End of year exam (25%)
Focus outcomes: EN4-2A, EN4-4B, EN4-5C, EN4-8D, EN4-9E Focus outcomes: EN4-1A, EN4-2A, EN4-5C, EN4-7D, EN4-9E
* This scope and sequence was based upon the recommended scope and sequence provided by NESA. Retrieved from
https://syllabus.nesa.nsw.edu.au/assets/global/files/english_s4_sampless1.pdf
7
Monica Sharpe 18795006
Parramatta High School Faculty: English UNIT TITLE: Struggle to Survive Stage 4
Unit Overview
Students widen their understanding of the world and language through a range of texts connected to the idea of humans struggling to survive. In addition, students will
understand the cultural significance of documenting this aspect of the human condition.
Learning Across the Curriculum Literacy (including FOR) Cross Curriculum Priorities Other Areas
General Capabilities Numeracy Personal and social capability Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander histories and Civics and Citizenship
Critical and Creative Thinking Information and communication technology cultures Difference and diversity
Ethical Understanding Intercultural Understanding Asia and Australias engagement with Asia Work and Enterprise
Sustainability
9
Monica Sharpe 18795006
10
Monica Sharpe 18795006
Rights. This task will be completed in groups of three, and the final
product should be uploaded to the online process portfolio.
Students develop their creative writing skills by practicing the techniques
used by the author of the set text. Students are given a range of stimuli to
practice their creative writing. Focus: character development, setting,
imagery, descriptive writing, language techniques, sentence structure,
tension, narrative arc, voice, structure
Writing tasks- diary or newspaper report/eyewitness-breaking news
report detailing a persons struggle for survival
11
Monica Sharpe 18795006
12
Monica Sharpe 18795006
The original unit of work did not contain To better integrate formative assessment and Research has demonstrated that timely, effective
formative assessment methods or opportunities effective feedback into this unit an online feedback focused upon the process of student
for effective feedback for students throughout process portfolio has now been added as a learning is extremely effective in raising student
the unit of work. hurdle task within the unit. This task involves achievement (Hattie, 2009; CESE, 2014).
students uploading weekly reflections and pieces Including the online process portfolio creates a
of work onto an online portfolio. The teacher will system by which this feedback can be delivered.
offer feedback on this work each week. The task Research conducted by Fernsten (2009)
will be marked Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory demonstrates that portfolio assessments are
at the conclusion of the unit. particularly effective as formative assessment as
they provide an avenue of communication
between the teacher and the student and allow
students a structured way to evaluate their own
work and learning. Furthermore, research has
discovered that formative assessment is also
effective as a differentiation tool (Doubet, 2012).
As this unit of work is being re-designed for a
comprehensive, rather than selective, class,
differentiation is particularly important. Doubet
found that formative assessment allows teachers
in a differentiated classroom to make weekly
assessment of students progress, and readiness
for particular tasks, as well as increasing student
achievement.
The original unit does not provide opportunities Within each learning sequence within the unit, Research suggests that in order to demonstrate
for collaborative learning or the development of collaborative learning tasks will be added. The understanding students need to be given
personal and social capabilities. most substantial is a collaborative, project-based opportunities to make sense of their learning
learning task included as a part of the final through engagement with others (Wiggens &
learning sequence of the unit. This task requires McTighe, 2005). It is through a collaborative
students to write a report to the United Nations exploration of knowledge and content that
exploring whether the living conditions of the students develop their ability to transfer
13
Monica Sharpe 18795006
characters in their set novel conform to the UN learning to new a different contexts (Wiggens &
Declaration of Human Rights. Students are to McTighe, 2005). For this reason it is important
construct this report in groups of three. for students to be given opportunities to
collaborate with peers. Moreover, research has
demonstrated that collaborative learning helps
students develop social capabilities. Laal &
Ghodsi (2011) suggest that collaborative
learning helps develop a social support network
for learning, develops empathy and builds an
understanding of diversity. Furthermore,
Ibrahim et al (2015) argue that collaborative
learning is particularly beneficial in
comprehensive classrooms that include students
with language backgrounds other than English.
In these classrooms Ibrahim et al demonstrate
that collaborative learning acts as a
differentiation method, increases student
motivation and forces students to rely on one
another.
The unit is not framed around learning The unit will be structured in three learning Wiggens and McTighe (2005) emphasise the
intentions, goals or essential questions. sequences with clear learning intentions and importance of having clear learning intentions
Currently the unit is only structured around essential questions for each section. An and essential questions to ensure that content is
core, and extension tasks, which is inadequate. approximate amount of weeks will be given for not aimless and that tasks are connected by big,
each learning sequence, however it will be up to transferrable ideas and skills. Essential
the individual teacher to assess how long his/her questions are effective in framing learning
class need for each sequence. around inquiry and student discovery.
Furthermore Hattie (2012) demonstrates that
when learning is visible in the classroom, that is
when the learning goal is clear and explicit, then
students are more likely to achieve at a higher
level. The learning intentions of each sequence of
the unit will be discussed with the students so
that they understand the purpose of their
learning. Data from PISA found that students
14
Monica Sharpe 18795006
There was not a strong focus on direct During the second learning sequence in the unit Students who receive explicit teaching, which
instruction or teaching scaffolding within the a series of activities will be added that uses includes direct instruction as well as teacher
original unit of work. explicit instruction and teacher modeling to modeling and scaffolding, perform better than
teach language analysis and the writing of SEAL students who do not (CESE, 2014). Research has
paragraphs. This approach to the teaching of also demonstrates that explicit teaching is
writing will be used in activities throughout the particularly beneficial for lower ability learners
rest of the unit. and those from low socio-economic areas
(Education Consumers Foundation, 2011). In a
comprehensive classroom this change is
therefore particularly important. Furthermore, it
is well established that teacher scaffolding is
effective in teaching writing to students,
especially those who struggle with low levels of
literacy (Griffith 2012; Gannon, 2010). Research
by Dooley & Thangapeumal (2011) and Olsen,
Land, Anselmi & AuBuchon (2010) found that
explicit instruction and teacher modeling was
effective in allowing students with a refugee
background and students with a language
background other than English, to develop the
literacy skills needed to write analytical essays
in secondary English classrooms. This research
is especially important in justifying this change
in the unit, as in a comprehensive class at
Parramatta High it is highly likely these students
will be present.
15
Monica Sharpe 18795006
The original unit does not include a scope and A scope and sequence has been included which Wiggins & McTighe (2005) suggest that one of
sequence. Although the outline does identity that demonstrates the sequence of units for Year 8. the factors in creating a learning environment
the unit will be taught in Term 1 for 11 weeks, This unit has also been moved from Term 1 to aimed at understanding is that units of work are
the absence of a scope and sequence means that Term 3, to allow some of the transferrable skills sequenced so that they are a bit of a larger
there is no evidence of how the unit will fit into needed to complete this unit to be developed coherent framework of a program. For learning
the overall learning sequence for Year 8. during the Term 1 and Term 2 units. to be effective, units cannot be isolated from one
another but rather involve the development of
skills and knowledge that are transferrable from
one to the next. Furthermore, research by CESE
(2014) indicates that a systematic and
sequenced approach to teaching is necessary for
student success. Students require a strong
foundation of key literacy concepts before they
can move on to higher order thinking skills. In
the case of this scope and sequence, this unit
requires students to understand basics of textual
analysis (covered in Representations of Australia-
Term 1) and the aspects of persuasive writing
(covered in Persuasive Writing- Term 2).
16
Monica Sharpe 18795006
The Stage 4 Struggle to Survive unit has been used successfully at Parramatta High for
several years. The following report outlines some recommendations for improvement
to the unit based upon the Understanding by Design (UbD) approach to unit design. One
of the key tenants of UbD is that units must be evaluated and reviewed frequently to
ensure they remain effective. As it has been several years since our department has
evaluated the Struggle to Survive unit, this report will act as a catalyst for a
professional discussion about the unit in the department. The report focuses upon
ensuring that the unit is appropriate for the comprehensive stream, rather than the
selective stream, within the school. The recommendations that follow seek to improve
the Struggle to Survive unit in the areas of learning sequencing, literacy development,
Sequencing of Learning
The UbD framework suggests that effective teaching and learning such be focused upon
deep understanding and the transfer of skills and learning (Wiggens & McTighe, 2005).
The framework suggests that this can best be achieved through designing programs and
units backwards through first identifying the desired results of the learning and then
planning for those results. Wiggens and McTighe (2005) who constructed the UdB
framework advocate that within a learning program, units of work should be sequenced
within a coherent program. As such units are not isolated from one another, but rather
involve the development of skills and knowledge that are transferrable. Educational
research has provided support for this framework by demonstrating that student
17
Monica Sharpe 18795006
concept development (CESE, 2014). This involves building a strong foundation of key
concepts needed within a subject that are then developed and built upon in subsequent
units.
Based upon this educational framework, the first recommendation for the unit involves
the inclusion of a scope and sequence and the moving of the Struggle to Survive unit
from Term 1 to Term 3 in Year 8. Including the scope and sequence at the beginning of
the units ensures that planning for the year is holistic and assists teachers to see the
process of concept development across the whole year. As advocated within UbD, the
scope and sequence will demonstrate that units are connected, rather than isolated. It is
recommended that the Struggle to Survive unit be moved to Term 3 to allow some of
the skills and English concept knowledge required to complete this unit to be gained in
the first two terms of year 8. The Struggle to Survive unit requires students to engage
in close textual analysis and construct their own persuasive writing. Both of these skills
are developed within units in Term 1 and 2 in the revised scope and sequence. To
encourage student success within the Struggle to Survive unit is would be preferable
for students to complete the unit having already begun to develop these skills. This is
comprehensive classes at Parramatta High. While the selective class may have been
The original Struggle to Survive unit also lacked clear internal sequencing and
intentionality. One of the aspects of units designed using the UbD framework is the
18
Monica Sharpe 18795006
inclusion of clear learning intentions and essential questions within the unit. These
intentions and questions assist in framing learning around big ideas and concepts, and
ensuring that learning activities are not aimless (Wiggens & McTighe, 2005). This idea is
also supported by research into visible learning. Hattie (2012) discovered that when
the intention of the learning is visible to both the teacher and the student then students
are more academically successful. This was also supported by data collected by PISA
(2009) that when the processes and intentions of learning are explicit to students, they
three learning sequences, each of which has clear learning intentions and essential
questions. The learning sequences have been designed so as to build logically, one from
another, so as to align with the tenants of UbD. The learning intentions and essential
questions have been devised so as to relate directly to the suggested learning activities
within the learning sequences. Within the reconstructed unit there is also an
approximate weekly duration given for each of the sequences. As the unit is being
Literacy Development
In a school context that has 91% of students from a language background other than
English, it is extremely important that literacy development is a strong feature within all
also likely that there will be students from a refugee background, as well as other
19
Monica Sharpe 18795006
students with low levels of literacy. Research by Dooley & Thangapeumal (2011) and
Olsen et al (2010) found that direct instruction and teacher scaffolding was effective in
developing literacy and writing skills for students with low levels of literacy.
Furthermore research has found that students in classrooms that include direct
(CESE, 2014).
Within the original Struggle to Survive unit there was no inclusion of direct instruction
or teacher modeling. The original unit was entirely student-centered. Based on the
teacher modeling, especially in relation to literacy skills be integrated into the unit. In
the reconstructed unit an additional section has been added to the second learning
sequence to encourage this approach. In this section teachers explicitly instruct on close
language analysis and model how to construct a SEAL paragraph. This will focus upon
sentence structure, vocabulary and paragraphing skills. While this activity has been
specifically included to encourage the use of direct instruction and teacher modeling, it
One of the general capabilities that the Australian curriculum requires be developed
within students is personal and social capabilities. Although the original unit does
personal capabilities, there are few opportunities for the development of social
20
Monica Sharpe 18795006
capabilities. Research has found that collaborative learning can assist in the
communication skills and the development of empathy (Laal & Ghodsi, 2011).
have been shown to assist lower-ability students and aid in creating both social and
Another recommendation for the Struggle to Survive unit is therefore the inclusion of
tasks will have the dual effect of acting as a differentiation tool and an avenue for the
the unit is an example of how collaborative learning could be included within a Struggle
to Survive. This requires students to work in groups of three to write a report to the UN
in response to their set text. Other collaborative learning tasks have been included in
the reconstructed unit, and it is recommended that teachers integrate this approach
Timely feedback that is given frequently has been shown to greatly improve student
achievement (Hattie, 2009; CESE, 2014). Research has demonstrated that the most
effective form of feedback is that which is given about the process of student learning
21
Monica Sharpe 18795006
(CESE, 2014). One way to integrate feedback practices within the classroom is through
learning both increases student achievement overall, and acts as a differentiation tool to
effective way of teachers quickly gathering data about their students progress, so they
While there are opportunities for summative assessment within the original unit, there
were no opportunities for formative assessment or frequent feedback. For this reason, it
has been recommended that a formative assessment task be added to be unit, in the
form of an online process portfolio. To complete this portfolio students will upload
pieces of work and reflections on their learning each week, and teachers will provide
feedback on these entries. This will allow the teacher to quickly and easily assess
student progress and understanding, and alter their teaching practices accordingly. In a
comprehensive class where students may be working at different levels this would be
particularly advantageous.
Conclusion
While the Struggle to Survive unit has been used successfully for several years at
Parramatta High is it prudent to assess and evaluate the unit to ensure that it aligns
with current educational research. As Parramatta High has both selective and
comprehensive streams, it is particularly important to ensure that units are suitable for
both. This report has evaluated the unit in terms of its suitability for a comprehensive
class. Using the UbD framework, recommendations have been made in the categories of
22
Monica Sharpe 18795006
lesson sequencing, literacy instruction, personal and social capabilities and feedback
and assessment practices. It is the hope of the author that this report will be used as a
catalyst for further professional discussion with the aim of improving the learning of all
students.
23
Monica Sharpe 18795006
References
Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation (2014) What works best: evidence-based
http://www.jstor.org/stable/23074857.
Education Consumers Foundation (2011). Direct instruction: What the research says.
http://www.education.com/reference/article/portfolio-assessment
Gannon, S. (2010) Creative Writing. In. S. Gannon, M. Howie and W. Sawyer (Eds)
Charged with Meaning: Re-Viewing English: Third Edition (p. 223-230) Sydney:
Phoenix Education
Griffith, R. (2010) Students Learn to Read Like Writers: A Framework for Teachers of
http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au
24
Monica Sharpe 18795006
Ibrahim, N., Shak, M., Mohd, T., Ismail, N., Permumal, P., Saidi, A. & Yasin, S. (2015) The
Laal, M. & Ghodski, S. (2012) Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia- Social and
Olsen, C., Land, R., Anselmi, T. & AuBuchon, C. (2010). Teaching secondary English
https://search-proquest-
com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/docview/817784494?accountid=36155&rfr_id=info%
3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding By Design, USA: ASCD Publications.
25