Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Login | Register
Newsline Features Events & Talking Machinery & Corporate Directory Home
Exhibitions Point Accessories Updates
Clip this Page | Discuss this Page | Email this Page | Print this Page
Processing, Dyeing & Finishing
Cotton stickiness
The contaminants are mainly sugar deposits produced either by the cotton plant itself
(physiological sugars) or by feeding insects (entomological sugars), with the latter being the
most common source of stickiness. The main honeydew-producing insects that infest cotton
plants are cotton whitefly, Bemisia Tabaci (Gennadius) and the cotton Aphid Aphis Gossypii
(Glover).
During yarn formation the cotton fibres are exposed to friction forces that elevate the
temperature of some mechanical parts, which affects the temperature-dependent
properties of the sugars present. If one or more of the sugars melt, stickiness results.
Obviously moisture will cause sugars to change from a crystalline state (non-sticky) to an
amorphous state (sticky). In particular, the relative humidity in the manufacturing
environment may affect the moisture-dependent properties of the sugars present.
Sticky cotton tends to clog/choke the ginning machines. Stickiness reduces roller gin production by 10 to 15 pounds of lint
per hour. It also causes additional financial losses due to frequent replacement of blades/saws.
Stickiness will cause lint to stick to card clothing and draft rollers in subsequent processes.
Sticky fibres even if they pass through the spinning back process will create extra
centrifugal forces during ballooning, causing the yarn to break.
In the OE frames stickiness will clog the turbine. No matter how we look at stickiness it will
reduce efficiency and production to a considerable extent during spinning.
Low humidity will dry the sugars and they will cease to be sticky. If however, humidity is
allowed to rise, sugars will become sticky again.
Stickiness has minimal effect on warp as it is usually sized and the sugar present gets either dissolved in the hot size mix or
is covered by it. However, in weft, sugar starts building up in shuttle, gripper or air jet and weaving efficiency drops to a
level where it becomes uneconomic to continue weaving. Frequent cleaning of wefts passage would, therefore, be required.
This is time consuming and expensive
Economics of stickiness
To growers, stickiness means higher costs for insect control and reduced cotton marketability. Cotton price is reduced for
stickiness by the market at a rate proportional to the perception of risk.
To ginners, stickiness may mean special handling and processing requirements. Sticky cotton can reduce cotton gin output
(in bales/hr) by up to 25%.
At the textile mill, stickiness means reduced processing efficiency, lower yarn quality, excessive wear and increased
maintenance of machinery may occur even with slightly sticky cotton. For everyone concerned, stickiness means reduced
profitability.
The degree of stickiness depends on chemical identity, quantity, and distribution of the
sugars, the ambient conditions during processingespecially humidity and the
machinery itself. Stickiness is therefore difficult to measure. Nonetheless, methods for
measuring sugars on fibre have been and are being developed. These measurements may
be correlated with sticking of contaminated lint to moving machine parts. The physical and
chemical attributes of the lint and sugars that are correlated with stickiness have been
measured in many ways, each with differing efficiency and precision.
During cultivation:
The most efficient way now to prevent stickiness is by managing sugar sources in the field. These honeydew-producing
insects may be managed by avoiding conditions leading to outbreaks, carefully sampling pest populations, and using
effective insecticides when populations reach predetermined thresholds. The risk of having excessive plant sugars can be
minimized by harvesting mature seed cotton
In ginning:
If stickiness is a problem while ginning, the ginning rate of honeydew contaminated cotton can be increased by increasing
the heat of the drying towers to reduce humidity.
At the textile mill, stickiness may be managed by blending bales and by reducing humidity during carding. A lubricant in fog
form may be introduced at the end of the hopper conveyor, and card crush rolls may be sprayed sparingly with a lubricant
to minimize sticking.
Conclusion
Stickiness is a complex, three-component interaction that involves the source sugars, harvested seed cotton, and
processing equipment. Stickiness caused by honeydew contamination has been reported to cause residue build-up on textile
machinery, which may cause subsequent irregularities or yarn breakage. The complexity of this interaction indicates the
need for an integrated solution that includes prevention, in-field mitigation, and processing adjustments.
References
1. Eric Hequet and Noureddine Abidi: Processing Sticky Cotton: Implication of Trehalulose in Residue Build-up, The Journal
of Cotton Science 6:77-90 (2002).
2. Sticky Cotton -- Sources and Solutions -- Cooperative Extension IPM Series No. 13, University of Arizona.
3. Mian Iftkhar Afzal: Cotton Stickiness A Marketing and Processing Problem, Proceedings of the Seminar, July 4-7, 2001,
Lille, France.
4. Eric F Hequet, Noureddine Abidi1, and Dean Ethridge: Processing Sticky Cotton: Effect of Stickiness on Yarn Quality,
Textile Res J, 75(5), 402410 (2005) DOI: 10.1177/0040514505053953.
Note: For detailed version of this article please refer the print version of The Indian Textile Journal June 2008
issue.
R Senthil Kumar,
Department of Textile Technology,
IIT, Hauz-khas,
New delhi-110016.
Email: sen29iit@yahoo.co.in
Subscribe to ITJ | Write to the Editor | Rate Card | ITJ Ads | Tell A Friend | About Us | Contact Us | Login | Register | Home
Associated Portals: www.bypd.in | www.ipfonline.com | www.automotiveproductsfinder.com
2010 IPFonline Ltd., All rights reserved. Copyright & Disclaimer IPFonline Ltd.,
Best viewed on Internet Explorer 5.0 or above at a screen resolution of 1024 X 768 pixels.