Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Environmental Science
View Article Online
COMMUNICATION View Journal | View Issue
DOI: 10.1039/c3ee40810h
www.rsc.org/ees
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013 Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 17391743 | 1739
View Article Online
In the previous reports of perovskite-based solar cells the To optimize devices based on the low-temperature pro-
porous electron-transporting12,13,16 or inert17 metal oxides, which cessed alumina scaold, we varied the thickness of this layer
support and structure the absorber layer, required sintering at to assess the impact on solar cell performance. SEM images of
500 C. Reducing the processing temperature is important for device cross-sections incorporating standard 400 nm
lowering cost, enabling processing on dierent substrates, and alumina scaolds similar to the published MSSC,17 thin 80 nm
processing on other device layers, in for instance multi-junction scaolds, and devices without any mesoporous scaold are
solar cells.18 Low-temperature processable mesoporous metal shown in Fig. 1ac. The perovskite coating conditions were
oxides have been developed for DSSCs,1922 however, to date, the kept constant for all scaold thicknesses. For the thicker
most ecient cells still require two 500 C sintering steps.9
Published on 28 March 2013. Downloaded by St. Petersburg State University on 03/02/2014 14:44:59.
1740 | Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 17391743 This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
View Article Online
are given in Fig. S5. Starting from the thin-lm pin hetero-
junction solar cell without alumina, the photocurrent is
remarkably high. The mean short-circuit current density ( Jsc) is
13.9 0.9 mA cm2, illustrating ecient charge generation and
ambipolar charge-transport of both electrons and holes through
the 350 nm thick solid perovskite lm. The Jsc increases to
16.9 1.9 mA cm2 for extremely thin alumina layers (80 nm)
where a thick solid perovskite lm is still present, similar to the
SEM image in Fig. 1d. The Jsc then slowly decreases with
increasing alumina thickness.
To quantify the dierences in generating and collecting
charge more accurately, the cumulative light extinction
(absorption + reection) through the layers of the solar cells was
measured. A detailed discussion of optical losses in these cells
can be found in the ESI. An example spectrum for a device with
a 400 nm scaold is shown in Fig. 3a. By integrating the
fractional light absorbed in the active layer (see Fig. S6a) over
the solar spectrum, and comparing this to the measured
photocurrents, we estimate a wavelength-averaged internal
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013 Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 17391743 | 1741
View Article Online
heterojunction solar cells.2426 It has also been demonstrated shown in Fig. 4. The power conversion eciency of this device
that a similar perovskite can sustain long range hole transport was 12.3% which is superior to that of the best reported e-
and collection, but with the electron being transferred to mes- ciency for the high-temperature processed MSSC,17 and matches
oporous TiO2.16 Here, the devices exhibiting near 100% IQE are the highest reported eciency for liquid electrolyte DSSCs.9 A
predominantly composed of solid perovskite lms, indicating histogram of eciencies for identically fabricated cells is given
for the rst time that a solid thin-lm of the highly crystalline in Fig. S7. Devices with the low-temperature processed Al2O3
perovskite is both capable of ambipolar charge collection and show much improved reproducibility, with the average e-
preferable to the mesostructured composites. We observe that ciency increased to 9% compared to 6% in the previous
the crystal size in the as formed perovskite lms reduces from
Published on 28 March 2013. Downloaded by St. Petersburg State University on 03/02/2014 14:44:59.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by EPSRC, the European Commission,
under the SANS project (grant agreement number 246124), and
ERC StG HYPER (project reference 279881). We would like to
thank Ed Crossland for discussions and experimental
assistance.
1742 | Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 17391743 This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
View Article Online
5 C. J. Hibberd, E. Chassaing, W. Liu, D. B. Mitzi, D. Lincot and 17 M. M. Lee, J. Teuscher, T. Miyasaka, T. N. Murakami and
A. N. Tiwari, Prog. Photovoltaics, 2010, 18, 434452. H. J. Snaith, Science, 2012, 338, 643647.
6 M. Graetzel, R. A. J. Janssen, D. B. Mitzi and E. H. Sargent, 18 Z. M. Beiley and M. D. McGehee, Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5,
Nature, 2012, 488, 304312. 91739179.
7 V. Fthenakis, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 2009, 13, 19 P. Zhang, C. Wu, Y. Han, T. Jin, B. Chi, J. Pu and L. Jian,
27462750. J. Am.Ceram. Soc., 2012, 95, 13721377.
8 E. H. Sargent, Nat. Photonics, 2012, 6, 133135. 20 T. Miyasaka, M. Ikegami and Y. Kijitori, J. Electrochem. Soc.,
9 A. Yella, H.-W. Lee, H. N. Tsao, C. Yi, A. K. Chandiran, 2007, 154, A455A461.
Published on 28 March 2013. Downloaded by St. Petersburg State University on 03/02/2014 14:44:59.
M. K. Nazeeruddin, E. W.-G. Diau, C.-Y. Yeh, 21 C. Y. Jiang, W. L. Koh, M. Y. Leung, S. Y. Chiam, J. S. Wu and
S. M. Zakeeruddin and M. Gratzel, Science, 2011, 334, 629634. J. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2012, 100, 113901.
10 Y. Liang, Z. Xu, J. Xia, S.-T. Tsai, Y. Wu, G. Li, C. Ray and 22 E. J. W. Crossland, N. Noel, V. Sivaram, T. Leijtens,
L. Yu, Adv. Mater., 2010, 22, E135E138. J. A. Alexander-Webber and H. J. Snaith, Nature, 2013, 495,
11 R. F. Service, Science, 2011, 332, 293. 215219.
12 J.-H. Im, C.-R. Lee, J.-W. Lee, S.-W. Park and N.-G. Park, 23 K. Tanaka, T. Takahashi, T. Ban, T. Kondo, K. Uchida and
Nanoscale, 2011, 3, 40884093. N. Miura, Solid State Commun., 2003, 127, 619623.
13 H.-S. Kim, C.-R. Lee, J.-H. Im, K.-B. Lee, T. Moehl, 24 J. J. M. Halls, C. A. Walsh, N. C. Greenham, E. A. Marseglia,
A. Marchioro, S.-J. Moon, R. Humphry-Baker, J.-H. Yum, R. H. Friend, S. C. Moratti and A. B. Holmes, Nature, 1995,
J. E. Moser, M. Gratzel and N.-G. Park, Sci. Rep., 2012, 2, 591. 376, 498500.
14 A. Kojima, K. Teshima, Y. Shirai and T. Miyasaka, J. Am. 25 G. Yu, J. Gao, J. C. Hummelen, F. Wudl and A. J. Heeger,
Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 60506051. Science, 1995, 270, 17891791.
15 I. Chung, B. Lee, J. He, R. P. H. Chang and M. G. Kanatzidis, 26 B. O'Regan and M. Gratzel, Nature, 1991, 353, 737740.
Nature, 2012, 485, 486489. 27 P. Docampo and H. J. Snaith, Nanotechnology, 2011, 22,
16 L. Etgar, P. Gao, Z. Xue, Q. Peng, A. K. Chandiran, B. Liu, 225403.
M. K. Nazeeruddin and M. Gratzel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 28 H. J. Snaith, N. C. Greenham and R. H. Friend, Adv. Mater.,
134, 1739617399. 2004, 16, 16401645.
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013 Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 17391743 | 1743