INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT & REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee: ___ SATURNINO Q. BAYBAYAN JR. Name of Rater: Oliver B. Talaoc
Position: Principal Position: ASDS
Review Period: May, 2016 - April, 2017 Date of Review: April, 2017
School: BAKALAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMEL WEIGHT PERFORMANCE IN
/ KRA Obj. QUALITY
Instructional supervision Instructional Performs instructional supervision June- 5- 3pts & above increased of NAT6 or 80% & above
performed Leadership 38%
to all teachers to achieve learning NAT 6 MPS
outcomes at the end of the school
April 5% 4- 2pts increased of NAT6 or 75% - 79% NAT 6 MPS
year.
3- 1.5 pt. increased of NAT6
2- 1pt. increased of NAT6
1- 0.5pt.& below increased of NAT6

5% 5- 5pts & above increased of ELLNA result

4- 4pts increased of ELLNA result

3- 3pt. increased of ELLNA result

2- 2pt. increased of ELLNA result
1- 1pt.& below increased of ELLNA result

5% 5- 3 points increased from GSA baseline

4- 2.5 points increased from GSA baseline
3- 2 points increased from GSA baseline.
2- 1.5 point increased from GSA baseline.
1 - 1 point and below increased from GSA baseline
Classroom observation &
monitoring conducted
Conducts and submits 100
classroom observation and
monitoring at the end of the
school year.
Instructional
supervisionperformed
Performs instructional supervision
to enhance curriculum
implementation within the school
year
5- 100% of the required claassroom observation
10%
following STAR model w/ agreement conducted.
4- 80-99% of the required classroom observation
following STAR model w/ agreement conducted.
3- 60-79% of the required classroom observation
following STAR model w/ agreement conducted.
2- 40-59% of the required classroom observation
following STAR model w/ agreement conducted.
1- 39% & below of the required classroom
observation following STAR model w/ agreement
conducted.
5- Collected, analyzed and utilized data to identify
5%
and plan
needed curriculum interventions.
Organizes projects teams to plan and implement curri
Recommended localized curriculum (MTB) for instruct
Organizes appropriate classes to diverse students ne
Adopts ADM & flexible learning options
4- 4 of 5 requirements satisfied (with evidences)
3- 3 of 5 requirements satisfied (with evidences)
2- Some requirements satisfied but w/out evidences
1- requirements and reports largely missing

Inspects DLL of teachers
5-100% of the teachers DLL w/ corresponding
8%
instructional materials inspected.
4-80% to 99% of the teachers DLL with
corresponding IM's inspected.
3-60% to 79% of the tchrs DLL w/ corresponding
IM's inspected
2- 65% to 74% of the teachers DLL with
corresponding IM's inspected
1-64% % below of the teachers DLL with
corresponding IM's inspected.

Child Friendly School Learning

Systems established Implements systems for safe and 10% 5- 100% and above accomplishments on the following
Environment

child friendly school. 5% (supported by evidence such as school policy, reports,

materials,advocacy activities, regular meetings, inven

Adhered to CFSS,
Institutionalized Child protection mechanisms& proce
Has clear SDRRM mobilization plans
Practice Solid Waste Mgt.
GAD
4- 4 out of 5 mechanisms implemented
3- 3 out of 5 mechanisms implemented
2 - 2 out of 5 mechanisms implemented
1 - 1 out of 5 mechanisms implemented
Physical environment
improved Improves physical environment for
5% 5- 100% of the classrooms' conduciveness improved
student learning

4- 80%-99% of the classrooms' conduciveness

improved
3- 60%-79% of the classrooms' conduciveness
improved
2- 40%-59%of the classrooms' conduciveness
improved
1- 39% & below of the classrooms' conduciveness
improved
INSET & LAC conducted Human Conducts TNA-based in-service 15% 5% 5- Conducted 2 or more INSET's with TD & TCR.
Resource Mgt. trainings and learning action cell
& (LAC) to improve instructional
Development competence of teachers 4- Conducted 2 INSET's with TD & TCR.

3- Conducted 1 INSET with TD & TCR.

2- Conducted 1 INSET with out TD & TCR.

1- No INSET conducted.

5% 5- Conducted 20 LAC sessions during the school year

4-Conducted 15 LAC sessions during the school year

3- Conducted 10 LAC sessions during the school year

2- Conducted 5 LAC sessions during the school year w

1- Conducted 3 LAC sessions during the school year w

5- 100% of qualified tchrs. Assisted for ERF/ Step

5%
Provides assistance to teachrs in increment / Promotion / Service credits
the reclassification of item
positions.
4- 80-99% of qualified tchrs. Assisted for ERF/ Step
increment / Promotion / Service credits

3- 60-79%of qualified tchrs. Assisted for ERF/ Step

increment / Promotion / Service credits

2- 40-59% of qualified tchrs. Assisted for ERF/ Step

increment / Promotion / Service credits

1- 39% & below of qualified tchrs. Assisted for ERF/

Step increment / Promotion / Service credits
School's stakeholders Parents'
partnership established Generates support of
Involvement & stakeholders. 5% 5- 5 programs/ projects supported by stakeholders
 Involvement &
Community
Partnership 5% 4- 4 programs/ projects supported by stakeholders

3- 3 programs/ projects supported by stakeholders

2- 2 programs/ projects supported by stakeholders

1- 1 program/ project supported by stakeholders

Data-based strategic School
planning performed 5-100% of plans,programs & projects based on data
Leadership 23%
Mgt. & Leads in the formulation & to improve
Operations implementation of School
Improvement Plan (SIP) schools performance captured in SIP/AIP
5%
implemented with evidences

4-80%-99% of plans,programs & projects based on

data to improve schools

performance captured in SIP/AIP implemented with

evidences

3-60%-79% of plans,programs & projects based on

data to improve schools

perforamce captured in SIP/AIP implemented with

evidences
2-40%-59% of plans,programs & projects to improve
school performance

captured in SIP/AIP implemented w/ evidences

1-39% & below of plans,programs & projects to

improve school performance

captured in SIP/AIP implemented with evidences

Sound school leadership &
management performed 5- 100% of the identified sch prog & operationss
5%
Performs School Leadership performed: enrolment, physical plant &
Management & Operations
 Management & Operations
Functions facilities, quarterly assessment, brigada eskwela,
early reg., health & nut., academiic/

sports/scouting, sch prog/celebrations, PGO/PTA/

other req. org, campus journalism,)

4 - 9 out of 10 prog. & operations Performed

3- 8 out of 10 prog & operations performed

2- 7 out of 10 prog. & operation performed

1- 6 & below prog & operation performed.

Disburses school funds according 5% 5- 100% of sch funds & resources disbursed judiciously..
to existing accounting rules &
regulations 4- 80%-99% of sch funds & resources disbursed
judiciously
3- 60% to 79%of sch funds & resources disbursed
judiciously.
2- 40%-59% of sch funds & resources disbursed
judiciously
1- 39& and below of sch funds & resources
disbursed judiciously.
School performance Improve school performance
improved
in the ff. areas: 5- 100% of the target met per indicator
Enrolment rate 2.00% 4- 86-99% of the target met per indicator
Promotion rate 2.00% 3- 75%-85% of the target met per indicator
Failure 2.00% 2- 65%-74% of the target met per indicator
Drop-out rate 2.00% 1- 64% & below of the target met per indicator
Technical 5- facilitated 5 trainings in the dist./ 2 in the div. / 1
Assistance Facilitates training in Dist./ 4%
region
Division / Regional level 2.0% 4-facilitated 4 trainings / 1 div.
3-facilitated 3 trainings
2-facilitated 2 trainings
1-facilitated 1 training
 Acts chair./member of a 2.0% 5- acted as chair/member of 5 working committee
committee in the dist. /div./ 4- acted as chair/member of 4 working committee
region 3- acted as chair/member of 3 working committee
2- acted as chair/member of 2 working committee
1- acted as chair/member of 1 working committee
Research Conducts action research during 5- 1 action research/ CI conducted w/ documentation
5% 5%
the year on completion of intervention.
4- 1 action research / CI submitted and approved by
the dist. committee

3- 1 action research/ CI on development.

2- 1 action research conceptualized

1- No initiative on action research

100%

Ratee: SATURNINO Q. BAYBAYAN JR. Rater: OLIVER B. TALAOC ED.D.

Elem. School Principal - II OIC, Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
CE COMMITMENT & REVIEW FORM

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE

EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T Ave

5- 100% of K - Grade 6 teachers 4 4 4 0.2 1.503

given appropriate & timely instructional assistance

4- 80%-99% of k to grade 6 teachers

given appropriate & timely instructional assistance
3- 60%-79% of k to grade 6 teachers
given appropriate & timely instructional assistance
2- 40%-59% of K to grade 6 teachers
given appropriate & timely instructional assistance
1- 39% & below of K to grade 6 teachers
given appropriate & timely instructional assistance
5- 100% of K - Grade 3 teachers 4 4 4 0.2

given appropriate & timely instructional assistance

4- 80%-99% of k to grade 3 teachers

given appropriate & timely instructional assistance
3- 60%-79% of k to grade 3 teachers
given appropriate & timely instructional assistance
2- 40%-59% of K to grade 3 teachers
given appropriate & timely instructional assistance
1- 39% & below of K to grade 3 teachers
given appropriate & timely instructional assistance
5- 100% of K to grade 6 teachers 4 4 4 0.2
given appropriate & timely instructional assistance
4- 80%-99% of K to grade 6 teachers
given appropriate & timely instructional assistance
given appropriate & timely instructional assistance
3- 60%-79% of k to grade 6 teachers
given appropriate & timely instructional assistance
2- 40%-59% of K to grade 6 teachers
given appropriate & timely instructional assistance
1- 39% & below of K to grade 6 teachers
given appropriate & timely instructional assistance
5- Curriculum intervention implemented
based on apprroved budget.
4- Curriculum intervention implemented
exceeded 5% of approved budget
3-Curriculum intervention implemented
exceeded 10% of approved budget
2-Curriculum intervention implemented
exceeded 15% of approved budget
1- Curriculum intervention implemented
exceeded 20% of approved budget
5- Classroom observation submitted 0.4
4 4 4
before due date.
4- Classroom observation submitted
on due date
3- Classroom observation submitted
1-3 days late
2- Classroom observation submitted
4-6 days late
1- Classroom observation submitted 7
and above days late
5-Curriculum intervention plans 4 4 3 3.67 0.183
implemented based on scheduled time
4- Curriculum intervention plans
implemented 1- 2 weeks after due
date.
3- Curriculum intervention plans
implemented 3-4 weeks afteer due
date.
2- Curriculum intervention plans
implemented 5-6 weeks after due
date.
1- Curriculum intervention plans
implemented 7-8 weeks after due
date.
5- Teacher's DLL inspected once a week 4 4 4 0.32

4- Teacher's DLL inspected once in two weeks.

3- Teacher''s DLL inspected once in three week.

2- Teacher's DLL inspected once in four weeks

1- Teacher's DLL inspected once in five weeks

5-Systems prepared 1 week before 0.375

5- 5 Systems prepared within 1 month
implementation
4-Systems prepared during 0.2
4- 4 Systems prepared within 1 month 4 4 4 4
implementation
3- 3 Systems prepared within 1 month 3-Systems prepared 1 week late
2- 2 Systems prepared within 1 month 2-Systems prepared 2 weeks late
1- 1 System preparedwithin 1 month 1-Systems prepared 3 weeks late

5- 1 week before the opening of

4 3 3.5 0.175
classes

4- 3 days before the opening of

classes.
3 2- days before the opening of
classes.

2- during the opening of classes.

1- a day after the opening of classes.

5- Conducted based on implemented & approved
5- Conducted on scheduled date. 4 4 4 3.67 0.183 0.566
budget.
4-Conducted but exceeded 1-5% of the approved 4- Conducted a day after the
budget. scheduled date.
3-Conducted but exceeded 6-10% of the approved 3- Conducted 2 days after the
budget. scheduled date
2-Conducted but exceeded 11-15% of the approved 2- Conducted 3 days after the
budget. scheduled date
1- Conducted but exceeded 16-20% of the approved
1- No INSET conducted.
budget.
5- Conducted based on implemented & approved
5- Conducted on scheduled date. 4 4 3 3.67 0.183
budget.
4-Conducted but exceeded 1-5% of the approved 4- Conducted a day after the
budget. scheduled date.
3-Conducted but exceeded 6-10% of the approved 3- Conducted 2 days after the
budget. scheduled date
2-Conducted but exceeded 11-15% of the approved 2- Conducted 3 days after the
budget. scheduled date
1- Conducted but exceeded 16-20% of the approved
1- No LAC session conducted.
budget.

5- ERF/ STEP
INCREMENT/Promotion submitted 4 4 4 4 0.2
weeks before the due date.

4- submitted 3 weeks before the due

date

3- submitted 2 weeks before the due

date

2- submitted 1 weeks before the due

date

1- submitted on due date.

5- 5 prog/proj. supported 5 days 0.2 0.2

4 4 4
before the implementation
4- 5 prog/proj. supported 4 days
before the implementation
3- 5 prog/proj. supported 3 days
before the implementation
2- 5 prog/proj. supported 2 days
before the implementation
1- 5 prog/proj. supported 1 day before
the implementation

5- All programs & projects 0.87

implemented within target schedule.

4 - All programs & projects

implemented 1 week after the 4 3 3.5 0.175
schedule.
3- All programs & projects
implemented 2 weeks after the
schedule.
2- All programs & projects
implemented 3 weeks after the
schedule.
1- All Programs & projects
implemented 4 weeks after the
schedule.

5- All prog. & operations performed as

4 3 3.5 0.175
scheduled
4- All prog. & operations performed 1
day after the scheduled date

3- All prog. & operations performed 2

days after the scheduled date

2- All prog. & operations performed 3

days after the scheduled date

1- All prog. & operations performed 4

days after the scheduled date

5- Liquidated before scheduled date 4 3 3.5 0.175

4- Liquidated on the scheduled date

3- Liquidated 1 week after the

scheduled date.
2- Liquidated 2 weeks after the
scheduled date.
1- Liquidated 3 weeks after the
scheduled date

4 0.08
4 0.08
4 0.08
4 0.08

0.16

4 0.08
 4 0.08

5- Completed one month before the

5- Conducted based on plan & approved budget. 4 4 3 3.67 0.183 0.183
end of the rating period.
4-Conducted but exceeded 1-5% of the approved 4- Completed 3 weeks before the end
budget. of the rating period
3-Conducted but exceeded 6-10% of the approved 3- Completed 2 weeks before the end
budget. of the rating period
2-Conducted but exceeded 11-15% of the approved 2- Completed 1 week before the end
budget. of the rating period
1- Conducted but exceeded 16-20% of the approved
1- Completed on the rating period.
budget.

3.857 / Very Satisfactory

Approved: FELIX ROMY A. TRIAMBULO, CESE Overall Rating
OIC, Schools Division Superintendent Descriptive Rating