You are on page 1of 4

Criminal Law Bar Examination Q & A (1994-2006) 1 of 86

ANSWERS TO BAR
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
EXAMINATION QUESTIONS
IN

i. When, in his presence, the


SUGGESTED ANSWER: person to be arrested has committed,
is actually committing, or is attempting
to commit an offense,
Art 136; Conspiracy to Commit
Rebellion (1994)

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Grave Scandal
(1996)

SUGGESTED ANSWER: Extinction; Criminal & Civil Liabilities;


Effects; Death of accused pending
SUGGESTED ANSWER: appeal (2004)

Art. 134; Rebellion vs. Coup


d'etat (2004)
False Testimony
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(1994)

A legal separation is a separation of the


spouses from bed and board (U.S. vs.
Johnson, 27 Phil. 477, cited in II Reyes, RFC, p.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Criminal Law Bar Examination Q & A (1994-2006) 13 of 86
23
32
75
76
77
78
certain
such
with
Family
of Internal
tetanus
RuleCode,
crimes, Revenue,
110infection
such like ofas rape,the
inA,
the Article
seduction
the
Revised
victim speaker,
27would which
and
Rules in
notis the
aon 1
The
tions
they
land purpose
SUGGESTED grabber
are
prejudicial
spontaneous,
not of
ANSWER:she
really
the
toimputed
the
lawthei.e.,
child's
inbiological
indicative
fixing
to him development.
thetheparents
of
minimum of
have died
Criminal
marriage
course
adultery. ofProcedure.
It
inhis
with
has
articulo
lecture,
it.
no definite mortis.
lamented concept
If thethe second
asfact a that Yes. reaction
A, ofB.the
acknowledgment
term
The
said
commissionchild C and
constitutes
ofof Dof
sentence
crimes.
the arevictim,
guilt liable
the isand tofor
crime
screaming
not
setdestructive
offor simulation
theforgrace
marriage
a
crime.
great majority was valid of even those without serving a marriage in said arson
convenience
period
help
of birth. because
uponat which thenor ofthe theconvict
occurrence
conditional;destruction of may
the touchingof
bethe room
released
Criminal
Concubinage Liability: Impossible of X
Slander
C,
2 the with unwedthe usemother of an explosive,
theisgovernment
criminally the hand
liable for
license,
agencies thenwere Miscellaneous
CBP utterlywould dishonest
be liable and for bigamy.corrupt. on
indicates
parole
grenade.
made thatfrom
Liability
before
she imprisonment,
perceived
for an impossible
herunlessdignity incurs
crime
bywas his
isIV,
Crimes
(2002)
1 is married.
A
The following (2000)
What isHe anhas
morning, impossible
a paramour
the crime?whole with (2%)
group whom of (1996)
Pia,
"child a bold
expenses,
conduct
being actress
trafficking",
debasedhe time is or not
and living
adeserving
violated.
effort on
violation intoptracking
offloor
of parole of
Article
downa and
Otherwise,
2
he hasIssexual
employees
Corpus anCBP
Delicti inimpossible
the is not
twoliable
relations crime
bureausonfor bigamy
areally
moreaattended
who orbut less to
plush
Sec.
the
thus be
Crimes imposed
condominium
7 of
offender's
he shall Rep.only
Against ifinthe
Act
whereabouts;
continue Makati
No.
the act
serving committed
City sunbathed
7610.
Civil
and his The
Status prisonlaw
for
crime?
regularIllegal
theaseminar,
(2001) (2%) Marriage
basis. as They in
complainants, Art.
meet 350 at forleastthe
filedAagot Revised
once
criminal a would
naked
punishes
3
term not
at
inmade itsconstitute
inter
Jail but penthouse
to a alia
inperson any
no casethe other
every act
in to crime
Sunday
of
authority buying
go beyond under
or the and
the
At
1 birthday
An hotels, party
impossible in crime
Bogo, is Cebu,
another actas which would morning. of Persons
Penal
week
complaint Code,
in specifically
against motels
A for designated
and
uttering what places the the
selling
latter's
maximum Revised
ALTERNATIVE of She
aterm
agents. Penal
ANSWER:
child.was fixed Code.
unaware in the Although
that
sentence. the the facts
business
intoxicated and started quarrelling with B were if The couple Aparallel
and B,tothe
be
where
group
and
an offense
"Marriage they
C. claimed
At contracted
the can against
heighttobebealone. person
ofagainst
or
A property,
provisions
theirIsarguments,
defamatory guilty
statements ofofAany
Indeterminate
involved
executives areholding Sentence
office the atunwed
case of mother
the adjoining Intod vs. C,
tall
not for
SUGGESTED
laws."
crime? the
Why? inherent
ANSWER: (3%) impossibility of its Bigamy
and
Law
buildings the
Court(2005)
Harold ofwas doctor
Appeals convicted
reported being
(215to officeof
SCRA all
a crime involved
52), where
every defined
Sunday in the
it and
was
of
left the lecturer. In court, A filed a motion to
A isand guilty
accomplishment tookofa bolo
the or crimefrom
on his
account of house,
concubinage
of the after
employment by (1994)
Issa
simulation
ruledand
penalized
morning thatBobby,
and,by
theof with birth
who
aliability
specialthe were
of
of
use the
penal
the first
of newborn
cousins,
law
offender
powerful where was were
child,
the
for
quash
which he the returned information, to the party reciting andscandalousfully the
having
Bigamy;
of inadequate
SUGGESTED sexual
Prescriptive
ANSWER: or intercourse
ineffectual under
means (Art. Aggravating
married
4, par. 2, violate
imposable
an impossible in
Rep. 1975.
penalty Act
crime, In gazing
1993,
No.
is
no from handBobby
7610. 6 was
grenade Their
months, told
was acts
as
above
threatened facts, to stabon the ground that no crime binoculars, kept on at her while she
IJoewould
circumstances,
Period
RPC) and grant
(1995)
Marcy werewitheverybody.
the motion
a woman
married to
in Bwho got is
quash
Batanes scared
on
not
in the
his Circumstances
that
constitute
minimum, his marriage
used in saidEventually,
sunbathed. to child
3 (1996)
years, to
case, whichher Issa
trafficking
as was
maximum.
constitutesincestous
sunbathing which a more are
were
and ran committed.
towards theIf you seashore, were the
with judge,
Aand do how
chasing Criminal Liability:
2ground
wife.
What
1955. is No,
After that
the an two the
doctrine
impossible
years, facts
of
Joeimplied
crimecharged
left is conspiracy?
Marcy not really nota under
penalized
State
serious
became the
with
crime
the law
under then
reasons
though
talk Article
of inFelonious
the force
whetherIV ofand
different
town. said
1) the Act
therefore
from law.
What
of may
court
whatcrime, was
would
him, you resolve the motion? 8%
[3%] B It
Having
constitute
crime.
settled
SUGGESTED ransexual
in up ana relations
isMindanao
only
ANSWER: steep
offense,
so-called whereincline on healong
since
because alatermore
there the
the
met orshore
act isless
and no
gives Scaring
Alexander,
void
correctly
intended, ab (1996)
Crimes
initio. an He
impose escaped
if any, did Pia commit? Explain, 2) What Against
married
the convict,
following Caring.Honor ran amuck on
penalties:
and
The
regular
definite
rise
married was
doctrine
to cornered
basis
person
criminal
Linda ofon in or on
implied
hotels,
liability.
12 topBut
persons
June of
1960. a dishonored.
conspiracy
motels cliff.
actually,The Out
and noofother
holds
second two
felonyThe is a) board
Charged a aifstraight
SUGGESTED Superlines
withANSWER: bigamy, BusBobby
penalty boundraised offor Manila
10the
fear, B jumped from the cliff into the sea, A crime,
1) Pia did any,not did
commit the business
a crime, executives
The felony
or
places
crime
committed.more
marriage was of may libel persons
The beor considered
slander,
accused in
registered participating
is
is tothebea a crime
civil scandalous
punished inagainst
registryfor the from
defense
SUGGESTED
of his months;
Libel Bicol that and
ANSWER:his killed
first ten
marriage (10) persons.
is void ab
returned to the scene of their confrontation commit?
Yes, Explain.
commission
circumstance
honor
criminal
Davao City such
tendencythree daysof
that a
offends
the
or propensity crime
public
person
after its celebration. collectively
conscience,
or
although no persons A. A was nominated Secretary is ofonea
closest
Terrified
initio
(2002) because
and to by making
the
therefore, the
incident,penalty
Pia therecriminally
Carol
is isno less
andliable
previous than
Benjamin
and seeing that nobody was there, went year,
Grave aScandal,
straight penalty may beis imposed.
responsible
giving
dishonored
crime wasrise to and
must
committed. criticism
On 10 October 1975 Marcy who remained in liable
be and as
identifiable co-conspirators
general evenprotest by who
marriage are
Department passengers
to speak in butthe then
of. of the
Will
Executive such bus,
you act jumped
sustain
Branch not of to
outbe the
home
although
such
innuendoes:
Batanes to
acts sleep.
absent
being
discovered The
otherwise next
any
imprudent
the day,
agreement
theand
marriage B'scrimewife
wanton
of Joeto against
to that
and considered
SUGGESTED
(People
of the
Bobby's v.
window
defense?as
ANSWER:
Arellano, highly
and G.R.
while scandalous
No,
lying 46501, and
unconsciousOctober 5,
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: government.
No. I will
ALTERNATIVE not His
sustain
ANSWER: nomination
Bobby's was
defense, thereafter
Bobby
reported
effect, is
setting to
anotwhen
bad the police
example they station act that in her a concert, offensive
1939)
after hitting against
the decency and good customs.
honor
Linda.
A is not On 1guilty committed.
March 1976
of any
Moreover,
(People
Marcy crime
vs.
filed A
Santos,
because
was not 86
a submitted
Under the inIndeterminate
remarried to pavement
1993, or the after
of the
Commission
Sentence
the Family
road,
Law,
wereon
Code the
husband
The crime
demonstrating
making
SCRA
complaint had
705a[1978]). of not
bigamy
malicious
for unity
bigamy yet come
prescribed
of home.
criminal
imputation,
against Joe. in A search
fifteen
intent
but merely and a In the first
ran over and crushed place, it was not done
to death by a While in a
fastpublic
married man does not incur the crime of Appointments
minimum
took effect on for
imposable
August confirmation.
3, penalty
1988, and shall
therefore the
be
was
years
common
stating conducted
computed purpose
an by
opinion; from theobjective.
or residents
the
he day wasthe of
The the
crimeexistence
delivering is a place
moving and Desert within Fox public
bus knowledge
tailing the or view.
the nomination,
Superlines
concubinage by merely having a paramour, Commission
imposed
his buttothe was considering
bemaximum shall not exceed
barangay
discovered
of a conspiracy
lecture with butby no after
the shall
malice almost
offended be two
at inferred
all party,days,
during the
or aB or his
deduced
seminar Can
As
Bus.
a acapacity
Alexander
groupmatter of
marry
of fact
concerned
held
it was inliable
1993discovered
citizens
shall
for the
caused
bedeath
by the to be
of
unless
body under scandalous circumstances, or the
governed
Carol maximum
and by
Benjamin imposable
said Code. although In byArt. law.
he40 wasof the
from could
authorities
workshop. their Malice nottheir
or
criminal be locatedagents.
beingparticipation and
Joe his
inherently raised in absentthe
pursuing in executives
published accidentally
in the newspapersand they have a absoluteto use
full-page
he
A was
Libel keeps
Conspiracy;
disappearance convicted her Implied in ofthe
continued illegalconjugal possession
Conspiracy;
for dwelling of as a b)
Family6 months,
completely Code, it
unaware as minimum,
is mandated that the that
twoto the 11
jumped months, out
defense
the crime of and
utterance, prescription thus the theof thethe
act
statement crime,
of nextmore
one few
shall
is not be binoculars
statement to have
objecting publicto A's did and full
appointment view of Pia
They
mistress,
grease
(2005)
Effects
In
State
days.an guns
the
Based or
interview
(2003) cohabits
and
concept
on the two
aired of with
Thompson
testimony on
"implied her
television, in
of Cfrom any
sub-machine
conspiracy"
and other other
Cindee as
2) maximum;
The
SUGGESTED
nullity
of the business
of
bus? a ANSWER:
previous
Explain. executivesmarriage not
maybe commit
invoked
than
deemed
actionablefifteen the as years
act ofhaving
defamatory. all. elapsed the sunbathing
alleged that inA thewas nude.
a
place.
guns His
punishable weekly under meetings with his SUGGESTED
Yes, Alexander ANSWER: can bedrug helddependent,
liable befor the that he
uttered
and
guests, give
celebration defamatory
whoits of legal
had theseen effects.
bigamous Athe
statementsand4% oldB on law
marriageagainst
top[RA ofupNo,4]
Erika,
the to anypurposes
for
No,
crime.
because
Their acts
ofIndeterminate
remarriage could not
on the
Sentence
acts
basis of
solely
Law
paramour
with
a
SUGGESTEDimprisonment
successful does
ANSWER: and reputable not
of from per five se(5)with
businesswoman. constitute
to ten (10) had
death several
of
lasciviousness
of a final Carol mistresses,
and
[as there Benjamin was no and because that
overt he
of
lustful was
cliff,
the
Unjust
SUGGESTED
An
A was
filing
"IMPLIED
scandalous
of arrested
Marcy's
Vexation
ANSWER: CONSPIRACY"
circumstance.
and
complaint.
vs.charged Act
is He one contended
of which is does
corrupt,
felonious not judgment
apply
having
act ofIn when declaring
accepted
running thewas penaltysuch
bribes
theis
previous
imposed
or
proximate favors is
years.
What
Murder.
The
that The
crime
defense
the In trial
his of
registration or court
crimes
defense,
A is not
ofsentenced
he did
tenable.
his Cindee
claimed
second the that
"Corpus accused
commit?
marriage since in act),
marriage or slander,
void. as the
short, eventual
there talka of
need the of
Lasciviousness
Eduardo
only inferred Quintos, (2006)
or deduced a widower from for the past
manner 10 less
from
cause than
parties
of the one year
transacting
victim's (Sec.
death. 2, Art.
business
The rule 4103,
is in his as
SUGGESTED
to
B's suffer
Explain.
body
delicti" (3%)
doeshas
ANSWER:
imprisonmentnothis
not been
refer ofthe
found,
to five (5)
there
body yearswas and
no of town,
a judicialresulting from
declaration her ofsunbathing,
such nullity is that
not
the
the civil
years,
Cindee registry
felt
participants
SUGGESTED
one (1) day. that
committed
ANSWER:
Is the
of Davao
retirement
inpenalty
the libelCity
commission
thus
wasat of
for
imposedthe the
of age
uttering
crime amended).
previous
when
directly a office,
person,
imputed and
by to a thetherefore
felonious
business he
act, was unfit
generates
executives, for
evidence
purported of "corpus
victim delicti' and therefore, he before Bobby may validly remarry
constructive
Indeterminate
70 gave Explain.
defamatory
carried
SUGGESTED
correct? him
out
ANSWER:notice
the itswhich
Sentence
remarks (3%)
to
opportunity the had
execution. Law
tendingnot
whole todoesbeen
world
engage tonot
Where found.
ofcausethe
apply
in his
the Bigamy
the
in
and theposition
mind
besides ofto
such which
another topic
(Dorothy Terre vs. Jordan Terre, 211 SCRA 6). he ais had
sense
not been of
intended nominated.
imminent to
should
Even be
without acquitted.
the body Isto the
of the defense of A
celebration
to:
Yes, The
favorite
dishonor
offenders
SUGGESTED penalty
Hilariopastime
or thereof
acted
ANSWER: isimposed,
discredit —
in thus
entitled
voyeurism.
concert in purported
binding
being
to
Erika. thethe upon
Ifonly
not
Libel a
commission Marcy.
straight
mitigating
using
can his
be (1996)
Joselito
As
Slander
danger,
defame a resultmarried
by ofDeed
prompting
or put the Ramona
Pia to publication,
vs.
the in July,
latter
ridicule. tothe 1995,
escape only
nominationfromto
tenable
victim
Has
penalty,the
circumstance
high-powered
committed or
beingcrime not?
is not found,
of State
ofmeaning
in bigamy
correct
voluntary
binoculars the the
television reason(s)
offender
charged
because
surrender.
to the can
peep
programsit for
against be
does
Theyour Joe
at ofcrux not
his
or learn later on that Ramona was previously
No.
of the The crime, prescriptive period that for their crime acts are Maltreatment
was not
Distinguish
or avoid such
SUGGESTED confirmed
slander
ANSWER: (1994 by )
danger and in the process, on
by deed the from Commission
answer.
convicted
already (5%) when
prescribed? isorthe facts
Discuss and circumstances
comply
of the issue
neighbor's
broadcasts,
bigamy
coordinated with
is homes the
though
computed Indeterminate
whether
and itdomestic
from
synchronized was thefully,
the fact
not
time Sentence
that
activities,
specifically
in theacrime HilarioLaw
his
way (US
marriedvs.
Appointments.
maltreatment.
SUGGESTED
Isustains
Valdez,
will 1037.)
acquitto David,
ANSWER:
injuries 41
the or
Phil,
from
Thedies,
concerned
1497; whom People
official
the Ramona
person
citizens
vs.suedApra,
and hadthe27the
of
wenta
which
second crime,
mentioned
was applies
home
discovered
indicative choice the
after
in
that thebody
to was
by
they this
the of
article
the to
are the
case.
incident, crime
follow
since
offended
pursuingSaid but
it or
law
sweet
was
party, "corpus
came
a requires
not
the
common down
young yet SCRA
SLANDER
been
concerned separated BY DEED
citizens for is
more
anda crimethan
the committed
ten
newspapersyears. for
In otheriswords, the non-recovery of the body committing
newspapers the felonious
involved, act
from the crime is responsible of libel,
delicti"
that
and
girls.
in
criminal if
met
One
existence
authorities the established.
the
day,
or offense
objective, police
then,
theirhe trailed isofficers
but
agents.
they punished
is a The
shallteenageand
included by
principle
be went any
girl
deemed as up"any
of law
withto Criminal
when
Believing
libel a
and person Liability:
that
damages publicly
his Felonious
marriageon subjects
accountto Act;
Ramonaanother
of hiswas to
non-an
of the victim is not a bar to the prosecution for such
because injuriesobviously or death. they made the
other
them
the
similar
constructive than
is
LRT the
considered
means." station
notice Revised
Defamatory"Voluntary
at
which Penal
EDSA-Buendia. Code,
surrender,"
statements
ordinarily the
applies court
While
aired The Proximate
Vicente
an act
absolute
confirmation. hacked
intended
nullity,CauseHow Anacleto
or (1996)
calculated
Joselitowill withdecide
contracted
you a bolo
to cast a but case?
the the
be
of acting
A legal
for Murder, in conspiracy
but the"implied and
fact of death their criminal
and denunciation out of a moral or social duty
The
shall
voluntariness
ascending
on
to television
land
liability or effects
sentence
shall the
property is
bevictim of
ofcollective, anthe hetonot
surrender
stairs,
similar
disputes accused conspiracy"
isindividual.
stayed
radio,
should tested one to
theatrical
not be ifstep an
the latter wasdiscredit
dishonor,
subsequent
(3%) able to parry
marriage or contempt
with it withAnabelle. his
upon hand, the
Can
identity of the must be established and
causing thus there
upon is absence of malice.
ahim a two-inch wound on his
are: a) is Not all those SUGGESTED ANSWER:
indeterminate
same
behind
exhibition
applied her
to spontaneous
the or and crime in who
sentence, a bigamy,
cinematographic
of are
thepresent
showing
moment maximum
asthe at
intent
ofmarriage the
bravado,
exhibition, term of latter.
Joselito
Since AAbsent
bewas the
prosecuted intent
candidate fortofor cast
bigamy? dishonor,
a very Explain.
important
beyond
Slander
crime
scene will
of reasonable
thebe considered doubt. conspirators; b) Yes,
right Joselito
palm. can
Vicente be was prosecuted not able forto bigamy
hack
of
the
placed
which
is which
accused
not property. his
are shall
handto
among submit
Thus not
on herexceed
when himself
left
the Marcy the
hip
modes and maximum
unconditionally
filedfor gently
a the discredit,
public positioncontempt, of amarriage or insult
Department to the offended
Secretary,
Corpus
(1988)
For
Only some
those
Delicti;
whotime, Definition
bad
participated blood & had
by criminal existed
acts for his the
Anacleto
party, subsequent
further
crime and because
is only three
MALTREATMENTwith Anabelle his
policemen
penalty
to the
massaged
commission
complaint
Elements
a) Define fixed
authorities.
it.
for of
(2000)
"corpus by
She
libel.
bigamy the This
screamed
(Arts.
delicti".on law 7 353and
must
March
(2%) andand the
be
b) 355,
1976, minimum
either
shouted RPC)
it (a)
for moral, mental physical fitness for the
Indeterminate
ALTERNATIVE
commission
between the ANSWER: ofSentence
the crime willcharged
be considered even
asSUGGESTED though ANSWER:hispar. marriage to with Ramona was
in the
shall
because
help.
was
What
The not
Eduardo
wellare
designation be two
he
within
the less
was the
elements
families
acknowledges than
of arrested the
reglamentary
theof
of andMaria
minimum
"corpus
crimehis Razon
guilt,
period
as penalty
acts or
as and
with (b)
it
of
arrived
under
public and
Art,
trust threatened
266.
in such 3, where,
position shoot by
becomes Vicente
deed,aan if he
public
Law
How co(2002)
are the
conspirators;
Judge and maximum c) Mere and
acquiescencethe minimum to an
didabsolute nullity.
prescribed
because
acts
was
delicti"? ofGadioma
barely he by
a wishes
lasciviousness.
fewthe whosame.
months to were
save
Isfromthe neighbors.
themthe the
designation
time First,
trouble
of of not drop
offender
concern ill-treatshis
as nullity
the bolo.another
interest Vicente without
of the was causingpublic is at
of(3%)
SUGGESTED
lasciviousness ANSWER: isBirth
not correct. There is no lewd Despite the of by thethe first marriage,
terms
or approval
there
Simulation was the
a of the
boundary
of indeterminate
commission
& dispute
Child sentence
between them for Slander
accordingly
injury. vs. Criminal
charged police at the
and
Corpus
the
discovery expenses
crime Delicti
correct?
on 10 necessarily
literally
(5%)
October means
1975. incurred
"the he body invs. orhis stake. It is pursuant to such concern that
oral the
design exhibited by Eduardo when(Sermonia placed Joselito should have filed a case of
offenses
which of the
Trafficking
A childless was punishable
crime, still
(2002)
couple, A under
without
pending and any the
in act Revised
of criminal
court. Penala
to Maria's Conversation
Distinguish
prosecutor'sclearly (2004) but briefly between
search
substance
CA,
his 233
hand
SUGGESTED
and
SCRA of
on capture.
ANSWER:the
155)
the crime"
left hiporB,the
(Reyes' of
wantedfact
Commentaries,
the that
victim
have
a and p. denunciation
dissolution of
office
was
such
for made;
marriage
attempted hence,
under
homicide.
bereft
Art. 40, of
Code
mother
child participation,
determined?
they also could filed an
call shall
(3%) their not
administrative
own. render
C, one criminallydefamation
ancomplaint
unwed Twenty-five
B. If defamatory and
dayscriminal later,
imputations conversation.
while the are preliminary
made not
crime
303).
For
gently Thus,
has
crimes massagingbeen the
punished act
committed, of
it. The under the act accused
but
thedoes does
Revisednot in
not hiding
Penal
clearly malice.
Family Code, before contracting a second
co-conspirator.
liable
against
mother, as
the
sold her judgenewborn which baby wastowho them. however SUGGESTED
investigation
by publication
ANSWER: was in inthe progress, newspapers Anacleto but wasby
after
include
Code,
show commission
the the
an exclusivelyidentity of
maximum ofthe the
sexual crime,
personterm but
motivation. voluntarily
of the
The Oral
marriage defamation, known as SLANDER, is a
dismissed.
Thereafter,
went
committed with theThe
A and
it. Razons
policemen
(People B causedvs. also
who
Pascual theirfelt
had intimidated
44namesOGgone 2789).toto his rushed to with
broadcast
Bigamy the
over
Anabelle.
hospital
the radio, because doact, theyof symptoms
constitute
Indeterminate
Mitigating;
crime
Criminal he committed
Liability: sentence
Voluntary is shall
only
Destructive Surrender;be
unjust the penalty
vexation malicious imputation of any omission,
by
be the
stated
Elements
hiding position
place inof thecorpus
to and
birth alleged
investigate, certificate
delicti: influence
was of the
held ofchildtheir
to be of tetanus
SUGGESTED
libel? Why? infection
ANSWER:
(2%) on the two-inch wound
properly
Elements
When
for
Arson
A, B, is
causing
C(2000) imposable
and(1999)
surrender D, by
annoyance,
all under
antoaccused
armed the
with same
considered
irritation
armalites, Code or (2004)
CBP isbecause
condition
SUGGESTED legally married
or circumstance
ANSWER: to OEM. against Without a person,
neighbor.
as
The his parents.
actual
mitigating Fanning
commission This
circumstance.( fire
was bydone the
someone
People in situation
connivance
vs. of
Dayrit, the was
cited Yes,
inflicted by Vicente.libel may
Anacleto be committed
died the by
after
voluntary,
disturbance
proceeded consideringand
to to the the house the
constitutive
victim attending
of of
(Art.
X. Y, the
287,
a mitigating
mitigating
neighbor Revised of Yes, Vicente
obtaining
done orally a in may
marriage
public, be chargedlicense,
tending of
CBP
to homicide
contracted
cause for
the
with practice
the Commentaries,
doctor ofwho theassisted Gadiomas It isin a the of delivery
throwing radio
following broadcast Article 355 of the Revised
particular
in Reyes'
ALTERNATIVE
and/or
circumstance
Penal
X, who
crime
ANSWER:
aggravating
Code),
happened ofanimal
not
charged.
voluntary
acts
tobe p. 299)
circumstances
be of surrender?
lasciviousness
passing
compound
by,according
(3%)
pointed (Art. the
a deathday.
second
dishonor, of
marriage
Can Vicente
Anacleto,
discredit, unless
tocontempt,
RST.
be the
Is CBP
eventually
tetanus
liable for by
garbage
of C. What and
are the criminal excrement
liabilities, into
if any, the Penal
charged Codewith punishes
homicide forlibel the committed
death
fact
The
to Art,
made
SUGGESTED
336,
to
SUGGESTED
crime64
Revised
the couplefour
up
of
ANSWER: of
should
said
Penal
culprits
ANSWER:
two
Code.
things:
Code).
the
Other
The
room
Acts
minimum
that7610,
of
X occupied.
Child
term of infection
SUGGESTED
bigamy?
embarassment which
ANSWER:
Reason developed
or briefly.
ridicule (5%) twenty
to the fiveofdays
latter. This
ARazon's
1
of the
Abuse
surrender The
underpremises.
existence
A and
Section
by an InB, an
ofC
10
offender explosion
aandcertain
of the
RA. is act
doctor? oforanger,
considered result
par. b means,
Anacleto?
Whether among
CBP Explain.could others,be held of liable
radio for broadcast,
bigamy
the same
couple
SUGGESTED
The four sentence
A and B,peppered
ANSWER:
culprits shallthe
and bedoctorfixed
the withinbe
shall
room withthe later,
is a was against
crime brought honor about penalized by an efficient in Art. 358
Maria
forming
of Sectioncalled
the basis
Judge
3crime itofis
that Gadioma
the criminal "land charge;grabber", andor inasmuch as theon broadcast made by radio is
voluntary
Maria
range
liable
bullets. forcommitted
of thewhen
Unsatisfied,penalty of refers
the spontaneous,
next
A crime
simulation
even
to
lower ofchild
threw inslander
of degree
birth,a
abuse
indicative
hand to or
of
not, depends
supervening
the
public Revised
and may
cause.
Penal
be
whether
Vicente's
Code.
defamatory.
the second
felonious act of
"shameless",
2
committed
of anprescribed
slight
Under The
intent
defamation
the existence
by toany
law, and submit "hypocrite."
act,
what of
only a
deeds criminal
unconditionally
isbecause
the or What
wordsagency
purpose she crime
which
to as
the
wasforthe marriage
CRIMINAL
causing is invalid or
CONVERSATION. validon even
The without
term is used a
that
penalized
grenade
was
cause committed
of the
under
that act
for
Article
totally
orbyresult
the crime
347
destroyed
Maria,
of under
the
if the any?
Revised
X's the room.
Explain
said Libel a two-inch wound Anacleto's right
debases,
authorities.
under
fixing
Code.
Penal the
Code,the degrades
influence
maximum
as amended. or ofdemeans
anger.
and
The the
When intrinsic
minimum Maria marriage
in
palmmakingmay license.
a polite
still be Although
reference
regarded as
as to athe general
sexual proximate rule,
However,
briefly.
3
worth The
and unknown
identity
dignity to
of
of the
the fouract
offender
ahypocrite
child
of making
culprits,
asmust is not
achild X awas
human
(2003)
During a seminar workshop attended by
To
called
terms
it be Judge
appear mitigating,
ofinthe Gadioma
the
the birth the asurrender
indeterminate
certificate of and sentence?
awas marriages
intercourse
cause of the solemnized
as in
latter's deathwithout because license are
without
not inside
necessary element room and
of corpus nobody delicti hit or government employees from the Bureau of
be:
being.
SUGGESTED
(2%)
that theduring In relation
ANSWER:
persons named thereto,
therein Section
areB,the 10 null
such and
wound, void ob
no initio,
tetanus there
infection are marriages
could
injured the Incident. Are A, C and D Customs and the Bureau
provides
parents criminal
ofany thecrime? childliability when for(3%) other acts of exempted
develop from from the license
victim's requirement
right palm,under and
liable
child for abuse, crueltyExplain. or exploitation, or for Chapter
without 2, Title 1 of the
other condi
Criminal
m na Law
Criminal
C Law Bar
BarCExamination
Ba mCriminal
Cnam
naLaw
na
onLaw
Examination
Exam Ba
Q
Q&&Exam
Bar
Ba
A
A (1994-2006)
Examination
Exam
na on
naQon
(1994-2006)
1994 2006 &QA8
4
5
6
7 Aof
&1994 862006
(1994-2006)
1994
2006 10 of 86
19
37
66
11
12
14
15
16
17
18
20
22
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
33
35
36
38 2
3
9 of86
21of
34 65 86 86
of
Qualifying;
Aggravating
Under
Qualifying;
Penalties:
Art
Rape;
Theft;
Plunder
For
b)
exculpatory.
Although
was
Also,
could
again,
Road,
held
more
ce
The
cr
max
9)
Where
On
1
sentence
Such
me,
ebrat
ItFebruary
degrees
the
dec
powdered
mum
liable
criminal
content
is
cr
Las
of
the
Suppose,
Those
Article
148;
the
have
fnot
mes
son Elements
physical
you
habitual
Aon
sdeath
Pinas,
as
died
by
accused
requ
than
prov
necessary
Conspiracy
were
resu
of
on
who,
an
liability
10,
continued
hav
4,
milk,
Fine
the
of
Direct
accessory.
pena
red
ded
safter
that
Anti-Rape
Metro
injuriesCircumstances;
of
delinquency.
ted.
1986,
Revised
the
heart
ng
upon
nva
under
tr
not
and
however
is a
prescribed
aa
ty
Th
the
there
udge,
to
generally
dr
d.
Manila.
the
to
attack,
poison.
can
he
thereunder
udge
or
sprove
nk
A
of
to
Assault
robbery,
rob
Qualified
Penal
sElements
approva
Will
trust
n,
appea
be
what
ng
F,
prov
delude
and
Is
sShe
the
spree
d
MCB's
A,
In
mposed
motive
for
Imprisonment
.e.
incurred
not
rece
the
Code,
act
not
ded
short,
ed
kill
B
said
the
testified
the
RA
of
tcorrect.
appeal
twe
on
and
pt
at
vs.
arrest.
Law
agree
is
to
for
sthe
crime
when
four
one
wnot
any
the
ve
in
the
C.
n you Exempting
Aggravating;
Complex
Resistance
Yes,
caused
of
JP,
violation
A
killed
a)
Aberrat
No.
two
probat
mandates
Proc
3.
m
Arturo,
registry
1
because
the
7080;
vs.
sappropr
may,
the
shall
Jonas
Aries
or
of
A
of
or
the
amat
pena
the
fdate
strong
more
on.
The Crimes;
accused,
ne,
Theft
being
the
olist Circumstances;
however,
Motion
and
incur
he
of
and
latter.
&
ctus
ty
on tMust
Subsidiary
The
that
whether
of
defense
death
a
ate
of
also
m
Randal
current
special
one
bJaja,
spec
voters
full
or
rth
to
aw
no
the
gat fCoup
be
Disobedience
who
had
1160,
Upon
1997
of
mQuash of
Prescriptive
invoke
of
can
uses
criminal
app
of
ng
Cesar
planned
mposed
the
ca
stake
his
law
or
ewe
is
the
Edmund 86
alleged
d’etat
investigation
c
not
wrong
abe
because
ytwo
own
cat
is
rcumstances
the
the
offended
ry
wh
the
is
prov a&
in
Imprisonment
not
charged
a
non
who
not
does
as
to
principal the
long-standing
liability
word
Information
the
ch
per
benefit
punished.
kill
sded
for
ahe
devised
b
NOT
sse
(2001)
(2002)
crime,
not
party
"max
Elsa,
ow
ng
amended
probat
did
by
with
because
for
for
or
and
va
eoccurs
of
the
make
not
a
or
mum
no
the
d.
the
Period
no
Crime
on
asA
GENERAL PRINCIPLES SUGGESTED ANSWER
Justifying;
Penalties;
BP
Crime
Generis
R.A.
person
should
took
per
attack
act
crimes
Accordingly,
meritorious?
during
defense
mod
When
s
years.
he
Court
take
of
arrangement
aw
ona
nce thethe
committed
wou
se 22;
(December
done
sfon
turns
the
ed
the
pof(2003)
would vs.
punishable.
was
cond
mala
be
the
offender
the
ace
dprosper?
committing
form
offender
Appea Memorandum
offender
with
held
on Homicide
No.
generated
in
trial
app
tbySD;
inQualifying
qualifying
Explain.
ons
doesn
the
yraping
se
exp
liable
5,
n criminal
bethat
s.
cat Defense
isReason
the
shall
for
even
1933).
surrender
sRosa
made
positively
od
Severa
cred
ton? ashe w/
suspens
(5%) 9160
therefore.
the
nvo
fby
aready
ngrst
whenD
ted(1999)
circumstances
intent
had
B's
use
felony F OofRContents
Table
Modifying
briefly.
the
merely
three
be
ve
scuss
part WARD
of
months
felonious
of
wmere
of
(2003).............................................................................................................................22
(2005)...................................................................................33
(1993)............................................................................................................84
............................................................................................44
................................................................................................................................58 the
been
rof
identified
on hth
............................................................................................................................................73
MITIGATING
Requisites
Circumstance
Check
One
1
ftHomer
Distinguish
deemed,
criminal
Danilo
hitting
Buddy,
only
should
same
Rev
when
by2
that
oan
recrackers
rearm,
me
ed
SUGGESTED
Pecuniary
Professors
Abduction
Theft f criminalnight,
accordance
na
sed
the
attempted
transact
a Ahe
(Peop
(1994)
What
was
from
her
Suppose
mot
inside
be
he
(2002) if
udgment;
who
offender
would
the
comm
Pena at
liability
with
ANSWER: conv
(2002)
e
(1998)
Una,
generic
considered
on one
act
n s
acts all,
had
on
Liabilities
vs
a (1995)
actually
the
the
to tted
his
or memorandum
cted
Code,
with
that
but
have
did a
elements
named
although
w
be
comm young
frustrated,
rlatter's
fists.
ne
thdraw
the of
aggravating
undergone
Vnc
aArticle
not ncent
na
hom
ghborhood.
fconstituted
mitigating
stabbed
udes
mcr
rst
Such
tted
(2005)
..............................................................................................................84
184) give of
Cecilino
tme.
Reyes
house,
t married
the
ng 68.c
was
me a
while
are de.
of
ega
byHonor;
Even
imposed
daughters
an
fu
the
gh-powered
check?
crime?
felonious
kew rise
the
appea
(5%)
of
crime
bought
shall
wrongful
paragraph
conv
and
conv
4/5
Art
determ
but
ysentenced
automat
y.
Jerry
186 sentence
a
age be
Anti-Money
accused
ater,
ifc
act
sof
CIRCUMSTANCES................................................................................................22
The
circumstance
prevent
because
se
and
in
n toresu
a woman,
the
is
tr
4%
crimes
a ct:
it
e
caused
cted
or
mp incur
SCRA
before
variant
on
act
crime
even a
t
and
the
was
48,
th
of
ned
the
of
act
ng
ve
he
the
ein
of
c
1,
s
it a
............................................................................................................................................73
.......................................................................................................45
ArtThe
Minority
information
rebellion
Would
Rico,
John,
should
crime
criminal
know
Actual
mitigating
complex
when
an
aggravat
term",
sha
Proc
memorandum
herplan
it
accomplice
spec
resident
police
pena
1)
no
notby
watching
was
Court
They
for
immediate
the
homicide
aga
be
each
accused
comm
genera Can
principal
In
possesses,
accord
ower
..................................................................................................................................59 this
pena
aa
Laundering
an
disenfranchises
grudge a148;
cr
Penalties: amat
ternat
to
pursuant
ty
killed
how
jurisdiction
attempted
reduced
Ru
shooting,
past.
nst asked
m
incur
of
of
beyou
the
Ra
member
injury
abe
whoand
murder
comp
there
affirmed
n
tted
es
regard
ng
............................................................................................33 whom
y
the of
degree
by
has
If
ty
(1998)
liability
na
against
of ng
the
on
&
eight-year
robbery
fe
crime
granted.
on
to
by
enterta
3019;
because
accepted
tokeeps,
C be
of
ycsedition
say (2000)
circumstance
Direct vein
not
onis
swim,
thereafter
Barangay
to ex724,
fe
qualifying
Pocholo,
television
vindication
the
direct
pr
or
Ev
criminal
pr
is
it
the
perfected
it
estafa
over
son
the a
rec
that
of
rcumstances,
the
pena
check
ous
required.
ab
Joel,
Pecuniary
C, may
Secttota
of
converted
tkilled
was
dence
or
cr
assistance
is
shouwas
ethe
mpr
comp
old
crime,
with
a ned
The
he
me
Preventive
ru
us
app
ty,
Assault;
who for
considered
acquires,
the
attempted
thereby
voter
act
Rape;
onupon
arise
conspiracy.
aconviction
terms
by
the a
on
(2003)
Alpha
term.
Pula,
discovered
to
es
single
thru
d
by
Art sha
boy,
Act
drowned,
shou
arrived
hadhomicide,
estafa.
Philippine
that
Theft;
40,
sonment
the ex
es
or
Yes,
buys,
m
program
member
liability
rected
be
of
crime
onB,
1999.
an
of perpetua
killing
of
does
148; cr
is
or
falsification
abank.
nto
of
mposed.
would
act
be
Rho
presentment
therefrom.
ssed
on
the
Penalties
Laurel, d
becomes
wronged
Ru having
sha
his
me
fond
granted
tatboth
Teachers not
Suspension
conceals,
mpos
grave
appeaElla,
for
committed
asand
What
suff
anot
was
ereceives,
ysmurder
pena
Consentedright
the
the
caused
that
Persons "Zeo
of
because
Thus,
malum
pr
fraternity,
are
(2005)
enough
to
the
court
Qualified
130 but
and
be
areof
Batangas.
aggravating
homicide
t
Penalties; A t
who
does
hc coup
the
offense
exceed
on
son
beFor
and
the
attended
Supreme
acted
offenses
scene
him
of
from
Theft;
Rape;is
t
ent
ty app
to
a
of
or
B
person
cannot
liable
vs. fthe
tota
&
nstead
has
co-
next
s
rival
liable
is
of
a
in term.
not
in
but
the
the
vote.
with
shall
in that
less
the
the
ed
of
the
in
se.
of
heyrx
to
s
No, General MCB's
the appeal defense Principles; is not will meritorious.
not Schools
prosper Recidivism
because of
doneGENERAL
Indeterminate
The
10)
court
2
from
SUGGESTED
(1999)
physical
they
against
mala
was
produced
course
by
ground
cr
has
secur
mpr
Complex mes
me Those
crimes.
Rev.
Authority/Agents
Effect;
Qualified
Mitigating;
thought been
thedesistance
sound
the apprec
qualifying
sonment.
done sthat
prohibita,
left,
ty
for
be
of the
persons ANSWER:
immediate
to
feature
wh
d
the
injuries
Penal
number
they
sp
a PRINCIPLES...............................................................................................................10
sentenced
asleep ated
"bounc
spontaneously,
different
on ch
he raced receipt
conversatSentence
need
aggravating
ycriminal
he
where
were
of the
skilled in
grave
Code.
app
was
cause
byto ng"
of to
her
Persons fo
from
it
RA not
thethethereof
ow
ysentenced
theCrimebedroom
covering
liability
G,not
ng
on,
bu
and/or
of
8369.
cred pena
be
ng
circumstance.
indicative
for
whole
the
Bets
that
for
onas
The
Affidavit
in modactuated
tor
is w
thety
probat
heart
and
Authority th
generally
ess
to
dthe
conf
...........................................................................................................................84
in Criminal Law (1996) of
when
which
bank fy
familyanattack,
sentence,
scharged
inherent
Cng
the
max
of
on.
grave
dedsale.she by
the
are
he
On
to
mum d
Criminal
Estafa
since fferent
SUGGESTED
d circumstances
group, etat
Rangers."
desisted.
the
commercial
a
grave
somebody
There
purposes
years.
app
matter
needed
Since
disposes,
pena
udgment
familiar
victim
as descendant,
accused
aon catty. w
itit
and
principal
y The
was vs.
Sigma thof
whether
swas
only
is
ons
with
under from
Liability;
orANSWER:
One
B's
no
of BP
rebe
punished
awho number Phi
committed
documents,
the
grave
buys
sha
conv
because,
is
unarmed.
the 22each
evening
spontaneous
ru
by an
the his
was
the
(2000).....................................................................................45
Non-Intoxication Theft
of of Estafa e of
on?
Omega.
ndeterm
be
and
ct
place.overt
felony
for
inducement?
fo check
RA other
Felonious
evident
2%
daughter,
under
on.
of
not while
neffectua
if
sells,
ow
When offenses2)
transmutat
on3019;
act
aathe Pocholo
(Art.
ng nate
person
complex
the
a Can he
sdesistance,
and
or and
special
nntended
in Act
premeditation,
there
was
Preventive
48.
high
cprosecutedSentence
under
the and
both
rcumstances:
(5%)
Desistance any therefore,
was
sagainst
RPC)....
on
natureof
crime.
seas
(1997)
(2006)
(2000)mmater
use
lawmanner
will be
par.
vofmadect
ess.
or aof
(Sec.
Law,
for the
...
m.5,aa
the A
and
Law
Andres
Motive
C
dest
felt
c
purv qualifying
Penalties; exemption
rcumstance
rcumstances:
SUGGESTED
intended.
Suspension
nonetheless
prevent
having
inefficacy
incurred
remorse
Cecilino,
fe
to
May
pena
extends
nasmuch
on a a erro
ew
however,
7,a es.
tyhabitual
(1999)
man
that s
1987,of or
materially
of
fonly charged
BP
on
ANSWER:
identification,
in
Hence,
nanc
In
as
of
ten he circumstance
Reclusion
suspens
good
the B from
no.
topvs.
the
g. delinquency
3 w no
motive.
of
22? criminal
th
on.
aggravat her. an
Perpetua
onger would
offense
It
Thinking liability
ng is are
operates,c be
enough def
(RA)
rcumstance
it deemed
of
correctly
was an
ned that
(2000)...........................................................................................................................84
repentance
this
liable
thethewhen
(10)
has
a should
past,
fcase,
Court
assmeans
contributed
rearm
ght
been
years.
for
the stance
used
fe
the
conspiring
of
crime
what
keep
be
on
onemployed.
Under
Appea
automatically
death
ng
to
es
to
the ngto
crime
automat
deliver
thearethe
and
a
s part
of with
granted
debtor-
ong-t
exc
the
aw,
Criminal
didoftoA c,
uded
three
me
hesaid
her
and
the
the by
the
be s not No.
shou
Suspension
Amnesty;
b) Continuing
Scaring
(1996)
On
Belle
The
SUGGESTED
comp
outside
before
whom
Article
homicide,
Error
amount
the
for
memorandum
incur
101
deals If
treachery,
engrossed
prosecuted AIaccused
April
(a)
as
penad saw
and would
were
ex
criminal
ina n
all
f not
ong
13
of 3,
any(2005)
cr
criminal
the
ty ANSWER:
personae,
103,
acts
the
of be
1992,
Gaston
Philippine
of not
Jonas'
nighttime
me
watching
for
next
as
article,
v used
Offense
was of be
homicide
liability.
security
ct
as
of
the
a Revised
the m of
at
coup
assault
ev
ower liable
Crimes
and
stealing
execution
f nterchangeab
about
conv and
his
Revised
s
item
ne
pena
dence Jaja's
territory
or
a d
Arturo's
guard
n cted
eged as
Sentence;
vs.
etat
Election
is
m, 10:00
the
unlawful
favorite
before
degree
tnto
object alawyer,
directed
of
es
stake
are Penalprincipal
under
w
claimed
and Delito
prized th
the in
television
ndebtedness.
liability
mposed,
RAa
performed,
be shou
or y.
the
entry?
sed
Code),
on n I B.P,will
cock
Regional t by on? use
Bof g.
Art
(1993).......................................................................................................................59
156; Delivery
.......................................................................................................................33
............................................................................................................................................73
...................................................................................................................................22
1}
General What are the
Principles; different schools
Schools ofwith of
thought of Prisoners
thought in Penalties;
from
Criminal Rape;
Mitigating;Law Factors
Theft; Jail Male to Stages
Plea of (1996) Consider Guilty a
be
3019;
(2002)believes
Code,
anything
Victimtermboard
thatow
dent
d as
of be
whenit
a
3 he as
ty
of
is
is
Generic
an
accessory
considered
a
Also
Intent
No.
cons
the
Public
(1991)
(2002) spec
Suspension
Distinguish
Under
SUGGESTED
husband
of
passengers
for
four
hastened
liability
Execution element
nocturn
consummated.
accused
jewelries
even
grudge
offender
mot
e mporter
g 7959
inder
suspended
bon
commit? a
crimes
Art
discontinuance
contributingthough
e (2004)
and
aga
for ng
is
and
Officerfor cby
aw.
(2005)
ANSWER:
ANSWER
Tito,
ty,
need
n
A's of
in
clearly
probate
the
return
(1998) nst
cons
incurred
sale
was of
and
death. a
virtue
this
The
mala
27who
therefore,
resu
Explain.
h crime
dec
on
in
positive
dered
s
but the
on.
for
t case
Sentence;
of but
y
ne
the of
pena
in
s the
comes
came
accordance
ng Even on mwhen
se,
press
is
the
by
He briefly
ghborfrom
the t Aggravating
relationship
because
ty
Rev
of
presently
by mitigating
gat
direct,
acts
seasonab
co
them
thoughthe
home
appea
his -the
prescr
from
the sedYouthful
between
ng
atera
epoy
which Supreme a
surrender,the
Pena
the
although
natural
tr
with
same
B bed
nowhere
w day
gger
n
yor
mayledandbasis
thdrawn.
vappea ew the
for
intent
person Code,
early
Section
s to have
ng
once and
ofthe
the
no
toof
ed
e h s 1.
Rec
inducement
Malum
the
2% D
evening,
a
22
Trial
show,
vessel Evident
Justifying;
Adults/Minors
Covered
Continuado
There
Under fferent
exculpatory.
himself
amended.
occurs
determ
taken
What
conspirator
considered
of
mpr
(2003).........................................................................................................................................85
...................................................................................................................45
...............................................................................................................................33
................................................................................................................................................59 merely
....................................................................................................................................73 us
following
neighbor
for
value,
yearsCourt are
sonment.
the on
not
nd Pres
hav
Petra,
when
ned
to
acted ate
JP, in
which
Art ofvpremeditation
aw
beperpetua
(2006)
at and
in ng because
dent
Aries
a
registered
malum
arose
dua
w SeDefense
(1994)
east
Binan,de
defenses:
maid
Conspiracy
age in
pun
157;the
thouthas(2006)
reported
ssued
danger
(Peop y aand7to
from
shes
fe
self-defense
and vs.
and sRandal,
the
nstances
Proc
Laguna.
changed
prohibitum.
been
regard
Evasionon or
what
e a
cont
severa
his
ous
of cannot
Malum
him
separate
s
Penalties;
v licensed
to pena
reward
amat
derived
thedeath of nuado
to
participation
s
Dacuycuy asrob
of act mere
sought
of or
all
During
theto ty
on
and be
he
checks
the
was
orsarmed
whether
in
y,
property
Service
Homicidefrom prescr
tuat
channel promised
No.
police.
great
the the
ssuance
are
kill
to
Theft;
GRape; d
Rfrom ons
the
be wh
rected
of is
in
w
Noand bed
724,
with
trial,to
the
not
th ch na
L- n
(a) (1999)........................................................................................................................................22
or theories
Indeterminate Jose, iton. in
Domingo,
changes Criminal
............................................................................................10
Sentence
the and Law
nature and
Law;
Manolo of describe
the committed
crime, General Principles; Territoriality Mitigating; (1994) Plea
1
Circumstances:
principal
recidivism
offense
Offender
COMPLEX
V
logical ctor,
aggravating
and
as
Court
ALTERNATIVE
SUGGESTED
who
from
c
realization
acted
crime
accused
be
act.
the
conv
secur
Ra
Multiple
Stages
w/
Sentence amended
rcumstances
5(a)motive
has
found.
atter
t
cthis
Modifyingtyn affects
A R
without
resulted,
wou does
Peop
begun
consequence
t ofsaved
s
t eis
s"Memorandum
(1995)
CR
cky, mpr in
Convicted
Wh
refusa
d of as
Rep.
(1998) f MESonly
different
not
circumstances
ANSWER:
ANSWER:
business by e the
of sonment
Rod
vs.
intent
re
a e the Repub
because
to pass
the
common
aff
cont
Circumstance the
tothe
cover
resu
Act and
commission
Efren
trip, commission
to
rm on imposition
from
Una
Government
end
goods
by
of
nua
kill
ng accessories
tcNo.of
Check"when
Ronn
Mateo
and
their Act
Luis'
6713;the
hhisare
the not
let
criminal
y. m or
Rapes; that
of (RA)
of
8369
For
wife,
act
trial
some ess
the
sof
e(1995)
appreciated
(G.R.
obfuscat
him
udgmentan
merchand
feloniousof
of of
an
went
each No.
the
lack the
who
expenses,
court habitual
than
offender
ord
offense.
have
otherwise
intent.
money.
trying to penalty
7959,
crime
on,death
of nary
of sex fact
seno
for ve
the
to B
.................................................................................................................46considered
by
B
cr Mala
amend
cont
enable is
Prohibitum
Stranger
Distinguish
A
automatic m
Thereafter,
were
SUGGESTED
Philippines
per
bodily
in
at
bas
the
of jointly
proceeds
the
a 1the
not
chanced
nu
na dpena
prosecution
the
proved
probat
se
cbounc
Coverage
Execution
Forcible in
ngng
her Rev
the
shonored
performance
harm
devising cases
punishable.
person of Pres
toagainst
(2002)
That
onab
ng
ty
(US
s sed
sole
Se (2005)
malum
offense.
weapons,
ANSWER Gaston,
said
and upon
watch
that
prov
check the
dent
where
vs. was
ntended,
the e in
......................................................................................................34
45127 May 5 1989) byPena
impelling
vs.
crime;
she
per
dedthe
accused
in
Fowler,
orderathree
went
while
the
"Home
able
criminal
of and Mala
se
n
od.
hiss accused
Proc
by Code,
the
drawee
to
ess
not
to
but reason
from
to
driving
duty
the
1 had
men
amat
Along
prove
escape
plan accused,
Barangay
Phil
than
thewhoRev
as w
because
malum no
bank on
aa
purpose
614)
with
Abduction
Art. 7th
which
who
the car
that
sed
turnedintention
jumps No.
security
(2001)
(2000)years
134; a
on Riles."
Juan,the
Pena fthe
emade hexed
prohibitum.
Pula.
saw were
347,
ther
for
oout to
d; r
of
each Guilty;briefly. Requisites
2) aFernando To what (1999).......................................................................................................................22
theory
.............................................................................................................................10
CRIMES AGAINST does our
CHASTITY....................................................................................................74 General Principles;
This
Exceptions
Voluntary
When
Robbery,
bringing
prescribed,
themselves
delinquency.
2.
1
On
(5)
has
check,
store
in
rec
SUGGESTED
but
with
which ntent
positioned
such
poison
efforts,
violation
Wh
caused
conv
be
Penalties;
Rebellion No,
ng eune
years
imposing
147678-87, us
knownto
her. work
wou
onthe
before
intent
ct to Also
of
w
under comm
purchased
created
Jun
on,
and
by 10,
th
comm
of surrender
while
about
Afterd
but
Mang
as
is
athebut
answer
perpetua
ANSWER: the
the
the
is uis
(2003)
the
profited
if
himself
time.
the 1987,
found
criminal.
dthe of ynot
tan
all not
not
word
the
st
appe an ndeterm
more
tpenalties,
7, so
Anti-Fencing
nonf
or
nct
"Family the
would
more
Pandoy.
2004)
acts
act, intended
from
grave
immediate
uence
moment may
criminally
the
offense
sha
mported.
as
and
ate serious
nature
"Memorandum",
the or
records
not
than
prov
aof
court not
nate
committed
while
be
a
Courts
separate
of
(2000)...............................................................................................................59
SUGGESTED
Revised
Territoriality; Penal ANSWER: MitigatingCode
Jurisdiction Plea
belong? vs. manassisted
as
Vwrong,
lookout,
when
Law,
Circumstances be
d be
crime
of
ten
ctor
from
execution
sense
quor,
The for
Sentence
liable,in
ng
reduceda
..............................................................................................................................................85
....................................................................................................................................74
Mitigating; over Vessel
the
of
said,
Act she [10)
tthe
of an
bu sale
appreciated
tof complex
and
crime
the
the
necessary
and
crimes 20
onas
ofesame
"Memo"
teracy
"I
while
argued
Coup victim
danger
et,
of
1997";
the
(2000)
a
years.
R
years
hope or
Law
ordinary
case
are
the theas
cky
pena
Ccommerce.
w/out or ty due
Guilty;
1)
Penalties:
resolved
durat
B
It
The
Ella,
Belle
killing
This
into
to
Code
wh to
Probation
Prohibita
(2%) is
Distinguish
attacking
as
certa
SUGGESTED to
an kill
the
being
killAggravating
2
guard. be
ch
Jose.
(b) date
the
d'etat on
desistance
n
crossing
enraged was
shou This
Yes,
fC.
commit
adu
somebody
tIf
the to
of
registration
cr
water,
was
And
the
you To
(1999)
BANSWER
mes
the fmpr
kill
Law;
with
because
committed
d
accused be
vitwork
there
Pecuniary
bring
"ssued
so
AGGRAVATING
tVoluntary
ANSWER: or
John
were ct the
are
guide,
thewas
impelled
app
Rape; sonment
mneed
mala
grave
fist
asestreet.
who
the was
se. is
victim
about
Order of
blows.
scovered
a
the freeware.
the
ma
directed
pursuant
knows
nor
Circumstance ed
Usurpation
.........................................................................................10 a by
RA got consp
not
in wrong
nor,
naccused
Aberrat
the
judge, by
eged Penalties
"later
from
criminal
Denying
vessel
Incensed
means C,
his
or
tsthe be
se"
terms
7438-Economic
Proper by
to
max racy
onecan
her in
20
father's
should
would
to o actuated
as the
of
instinct
that
be
of
Surrender
in the
from
of
c
and It
between
years
liability
that
ctus
mum be
(2004)
(1997)app
osed
poison
you the
grant
have
Party
Real may
night"
ow br
of vs.
y"men,
Belle
or and
of
by
for
her
in
ngs
7 a
mala
of
in
in CRIMES
Juan
Intent
be
crime
heavier
committed;
offender
above.
mitigating
were
Upon
means
entered
"Mem"
mala
andntermed
performed.
you
1
blocked
dies.
(or
started
accused
to
bank favor
the
ahernapp 1
vo
max
isof
enjoyedis
remanded
arra
However,wrfor
prohibita,
day
untary
tominds
There
a
of
throwto
JerryAGAINST
the
cab
Robbery
penalty;
the
ate
acquittal
the F's
mum tten recidivist
the
toprofit
circumstance
gnment,
comm
ncurs A
secur rev purpose
e? accused.
and
store
40across
such
person4%
surrender.
it by
to
ew tt with
years.
as ng PUBLIC
PERSONAL
the
Buddy
thehe
whbecause
ts
much for
Rape,Two
effects
of
another
circumstances
for who tr
e
face,
Does
such The using
not
entered a Rod INTEREST....................................................................................47
years
would court.
s
th
cases
has
as mposab he
Conspiracy
or
Intending a
offense.
gn s
I LIBERTY
and
began fy had
particular
is
proceeds
a
mean be
are
where
did." too
Roberto
ngp e ea
Ronn
not been
liable
Onto
that long
can
that
the
Not AND
yof e
the SECURITY
In
DEL
the
Pecuniary
and
1
SUGGESTED
was
and/or
amnesty.
companions
had
account
revolver, crimes
co-principal,
Probation;
accordance
remorse
consideration TO
offender/
daythere
prohibita"(3%)
committed
about
reported CONT
beto or
after
and ................................................60
wasmalum
ANSWER:
to
Name 40 the
with
good
granted
to NUADO,
Liabilities
offenders
stab
him,no
asNot
the
the
without
of years,
a the
atthey
B in
sufficient
inducement
motive.
room
Gaston
promise laws
with
aeastse,
ssuance or (2005)
comm
merely
warning, and
Appealable
ina
suspended CONT
of5anIt lapse
the
knife.
the
decided
or of act
tt
carr
made
is NUOUS
intended
of
reward ng
these
house
shot of
Not is
es
Philippines,
enough checks.
to the
by time
sentence.
Petra by t
the
knowing
and cr
of
scare CR
coup
to nature
w
that
mes.
Elsa. atOn ME,
th
Sabotage;
previously
means to
Illegalofare escape.
ofng of
B said
.......................................................................34
convicted
achieve
may
two
on
four
ty
ghted
d st
Recruitment appeal,
spassengers
schools
(4)
be
nct
D,
the super
given
years
however,
one
........................................................................................................................46
Acts the Lasciviousness
(1997).........................................................................................................22
Use of by desired
crcontending
final
ofm sought
o
the
and
(2004)thought
naos
who
(1993)...............................................................................................................................................59
Rights mitigating
four
ns
although
tried
(1996)......................................................................................................................................74
Aliases; judgment
result;
toab
de in
(4)
be
that
Penalties;
while
Criminal
ty.
to
for vs. When self-preservation,
convict
about
m
cond
conspiracy
known
Parricide
Yes.
In
wrong,
s
nyears
mum t ons
Unjust
a"mala
that
I intended
term
him
would
at of
evil
per rethat
said
Complex
in
used
w/ of
age at
od
...................................................................................................85
CIRCUMSTANCES
Mitigating; homicide?
se",
east
ng
Juan
article,
andas
Mitigating
Allowed
convict
or
to
the thereto.
VexationcCrime;
the
denote
killed
rcumstances
what
assailant
two
Voluntary
bad, the
item,
acts
Explain.
Joel.
sThe
Direct
security
asand
sought
object
(2)
Circumstance isThe
mere
Surrender
constituting
on ywhich
responsible
so
mod
Assault
Rape;
(1994)
(2006)
one
fe
or
toact
guard
RAon
be fyof
generally
cr
ous
me
ng
for
the
a
be
2
of SUGGESTED
avoidbe
instead
commit
frec
makergu
one ed
posted the
appreciated
commission
part
circumstance
the
Hence,
months
protected
epoy
Law,
7610
False
Arbitrary
time
freely
inferred
ty.
us
pena asor
nformat
on
prosecution
of
and
murder it
can
crime.
ornfence
the
tak
t is
"Mot
so
for
themse the
escapes to
ANSWER
and
these copied
be
grave
drawer
typerpetua ng
notfrom
essential
lessThis
onon
unless
mposedofmpos
conspiracy,
(2000) to
of consider
offset
notves
nto
the
are for
a
chaving
voice,
from
rr the
serious
sha
engages
de
failed
the tand
non-exemption
wrong
at
the
tate to
by
crime
cons
act
(a)
Notes;–Probat
ons be
it manner
thethe
ordinary
of
special
death,
rec
oan
of
theit
h
acted
by
cannot
derat
to
(1997).......................................................................................................34
with
Statutory Rape;
.............................................................................................................74 m the
distributed.
crime
physical
astothe
fpress ed
door. on"
but
dawned
us
jumping
wh andthat
CLASSICALpay
Detention; rec
on
without
on
(1996)..............................................................................................................................23ch surrender
the
proper
and
law ng
be the involved,
mitigating
prayof
committed,
After
bts
us
desisted,
FELONIES........................................................................................................................................10
recognizing
pena ty for hom the tempora
certa
s offenders
upon
the
held
a an
injuries
has fthat
ho
out on
same ng
pena
proven,
order
der
tr
n
THEORY,
Child It
of that
Lina
liable
mod
gger
she
Illegal is
for
theisas
ngprimarily
ty,
s............................................................................................................46
now a dprove v s e pena ty?
Mental fy ng d
D
between
not
the etat
st
accessory
inducer
1
(2002)
A
SUGGESTED
that
Enumerate
(2.5%) was
Whereupon,
her
appea
with
the
for
consequence,
conspiracy
anything
ssu
ab by
thengu
thecruelty.
back
ngty
proved
Elements;
and
B
discontinuance
frighten
B ,was
trying sh
must
charged the
g.
citizenship
she
homicide
a may of
worth
Exploitation the
pena
Possession
22
ANSWER:
ANSWERatJepoy;
actually
her
here
s JP,
If
value offenders
pecun
determination
be by
east
argued
requto
that
Retardate you tmake
w
Aries
head
ess
e. is
Penalties; in for
es.
thereason
th
re.
has
she of the
5
were
actual,
the
case
checkary
sole
hom
comesall
her
of
and
that
Theit
causing
been
s
Mitigating;
comm
appear
the
attempted
deaththose
cnot
owner,
aggressor
them. Randal
pena
ess sshe pena
and
consideration
of the
de.
from
Judge,
derived
a her
thanby
ma(5%)ttthat
results
ty
Preventive who ng
tfired
execution,
ccou
After os es
the
because
inference
next
um
12
Grounds
Adultery
Voluntary fe
(2006)dng
with the
he
from
Victim
(1999) trony
years person
their
not
by was
ower from
which
of
a what her
,the he
be
onhea
to
The Criminal
theft
motive ndeterm
and is again
the nate
Liability;movingfound Sentence guilty
power Felonious Law
...............................................................................................................................10
forwhich s
Robbery not impels Act; with a L
No,
1.
Cr
crimes fe
Homicide
condemned.
ser mesJohn
es mpr Suspens
ofcovered
are is sonment,
feif not I
inherently
on The criminally
wereon
ous under moral of onthe
acts sentence
Pres
evil, the liable
Judge,
trait
ar dent
bads other
ng
of for
oforathe
from m
because hand,
killing
Proc
wrong, nor
offender a amats shis
and
ng aon No.
spontaneous
committed
abso
1)
app
otherwise
circumstances;
AGGRAVATING
accessory,
SUGGESTED
causing
under
execut
shou
the
beer
adopted
Exp
perpetua
absolved
that
range
train.
which
because
intention
knew
exp
wh
c
separate pena
aute
rcumstances.
Imprisonmentch oded d
the Article
n.
of on
Rthe
simply
shou
or the
(2%)
wh ty
yckyorsome
from
and
to man
hens though
ANSWER:
ANSWER
the
ofthus the
shouldchh
dcommit13,
de (People
ndeterm
for
scheme
fe
left
means
d
be robbery
other
criminal
was
st
V the CIRCUMSTANCES
shospitalization
sthe
comp sentence
partak twe
cons
ncent
nct
therelated
paragraph
mpr more
have
so orus.
notve
atter
that crime
anate
sonment ng ned
agreement.
dered
scene
grave
now Ablao,
scale but
the
liability
(12)
(1996).......................................................................................................60
cab (People
those e to: vs.
persons Arpa, (1994) to
be
sser
Tito,
the 3,
known is
yard.
app
asthe
Sentence
years
basis
a
.................................................................................................................................86
(1999)
conv 27 SCRA
(2006)..................................................................................................................60
cted
the
committed;
before183
suspended,
ous
of Rev.
that
nature
before
herand
wrong principal
as
produc escrof
penalties
Upon
What rape
SCRA
Penalmehe
of
ahusband.
and
that
for medical
Law
they
rewarda
criminal
Aas ng onesha
probat
scouldwas
658)
that of
Code;
and
the and
was
the .
be on. account Criminal
rebe
pecun
allow
caused
makes
who
had
guns
about
conv
instantaneous
crime
drowning.
the
proh
only.
from
n degree 2 has
ontended
b
the
d;
The on.
his
earlier
at
cted ary
to
will the
it(c)
tum. because
her begun
a
run Liability;
By
conscience
under
you
proceedsThat
overt
to ab
person
.........................................................................................23
was
SUGGESTED found ANSWER:
fgu
Philippine
.......................................................................................................................34
1O37;
(2002)...............................................................................................................................................................74
.............................................................................................................................47
Surrender; Elements U.S. vs.
..............................................................................................................23
of offenses her
The
pr
theconsp
challenged
room. vconvictt
ty the
Jonas
death.
sct
act es.
vsa
over.
understand
on m ct
of racy,
was Felonious
(2%)
to
induced
and dwho
correcc
False m
Gravethe aw
commission
ship.
Fortunately, He overcome
sentenced
committed
Is
Pocholo? sthe
John
done the
app
The
revved
crime