SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF 7000TLC FLOATING DOCK (FD) BUILDING ARRANGEMENT PLANNING AT TRIYARDS SSY

Updated: 11th May, 2017

No. Description Option 01 Option 02 Option 03 Option 04
C.L of FD to be offseted 6.6m comparison with C.L C.L of FD to be in line with C.L of LOB during FD to be devided two parts, load out part by part and joint FD to be built at old Jetty
of LOB during Load out Load out together underwater with Cofferdam
1 Advantage
1.1 Almost structute (blocks) to be erected Almost structute (blocks) to be erected All structute (blocks) to be erected Almost structute (blocks) to be erected
onshore before launch. (Considering onshore before launch. (Can be erected almost onshore before launch onshore before launch. (Considering
Sideshell-wall blocks at one side will erect after blocks at two sideshells) Sideshell-wall blocks at one side will erect after launching due
launching due to ballast/stability condition of LOB to ballast/stability condition of LOB during load out
during load out
1.2 C.L of FD to be in line with C.L of LOB during No need to remov 02 caissons of LOB and add new Cost saving for Load out (Just invest 48m new launching roller)
Load out, therefore we have a better control of structure IWO there to blank off (Area: 210 m2) - 04 lines x 39m
Ballasting
1.3 No need to add the strong point structure Cost saving for Load out (Just invest 48m new launching roller) No need to add the strong point structure
to arrange the pulling Padeye - 03 lines x 52m to arrange the pulling Padeye
1.4 No need to add the new platform for operation No ballasting/Stability concern during Load out & Float off No need to fabricating new Cofferdam (Area 280m2) to join
during Load out if using the airbag two parts underwater

1.5
1.6
2 Disadvantage
2.1 Removing 02 caissons of LOB, adding new
structure IWO there to blank off (Area: 210 m2)
2.2 Ballasting/Stability concern during Load out
due to C.L of FD to be offseted
2.3 Ballasting/Stability concern during Float off
due to removed 02 caissons of LOB (lost
buoyance)
2.4 Need to rent the airbag for Load out or
need to invest 180m new Launching rolller
(our one is not enough)-03 lines x 96m
2.5 Need to add the strong point structure
to arrange the pulling Padeye
2.6 Need to add the new platform for operation
during Load out if using the airbag
2.7
Removing 02 caissons of LOB, adding new
structure IWO there to blank off (Area: 210 m2) 280m2) to join two parts underwater
Overhang too much (50 m)
Ballasting/Stability concern during Float off
due to removed 02 caissons of LOB (lost
buoyance)
Need to rent the airbag for Load out or
need to investigate the Launching rolller
(our one is not enough)
No need to add the strong point structure
to arrange the pulling Padeye
No need to add the new platform for operation during Load
out if using the airbag
Fabricating new Cofferdam (L42m x B2.4m x H5m, Area
Lacking of experience during joining two parts underwater
(Design & Installation Cofferdam, Welding & Paiting
underwater (inside Cofferdam))
No need to add the new platform for operation during Load
out if using the airbag
Removing 02 caissons of LOB, adding new
structure IWO there to blank off (Area: 210 m2)
Ballasting/Stability concern during Load out
due to C.L of FD to be offseted
Ballasting/Stability concern during Float off
due to removed 02 caissons of LOB (lost buoyance)
Crane lifting limiation during blocks erection and big
equipment installation
Basic design should be always ready to build the blocks by
sequence from AFT to Fwd (or from Fwd to AFT) to solve Crane
lifting limitation problem during blocks erection
Big equipment should be always ready to install to follow the
blocks building sequence from AFT to Fwd (or from Fwd to
AFT) to solve Crane lifting limitation problem
All the Old Jetty to be locked during FD construction building
(5.5 months)

Note:
1- Airbag Launching : 25USD/ton Total Cost : 5600 tons x 25$ = 140,000$
2- Investment Cost for Launching roller: 1200USD/m Total Cost : 180 m x 1200$ = 216,000$
3- Launching roller available: 108m