Panopticism
‘pom Discipline and Punish)
Disp” may be denied neither wit an nsttaton
for with an apparatus if a ype of power, « modality for its
cee shaping whol St of ferment, techies,
eric of aplation targets ties“ physs” oan
ra we ech ay be kn or
cine spate nsuhasne ie peitentrieso “hose
sesecliot of tc rane centr) ory instaions at
oie es an eseena instrument fora pata end choos,
Spat by pressing utortes hat find im eae
we een of onnsng neal mechanisms ower
(enelny ne should how how tte reltinsesentally
(ore cenerclden cl have become ciple,” abot
nant he css! age extra! smal, fst eduaonl
seg ary, then medial, paysite. paycholopel, which
Mate Tune ela the pinged es of emergence for he
"Wipe question of te portal and the abnormal, o By
seins that have made dip the pincpe of teral
seine he ccplnassaton ofthe amnistbve 4p
‘Risizom he Nopueenic pro) or Sal by sate spare
‘Thon naar notexlase,fmchontrt au hat iscpne
Tens owersocey ava whole he Pac).
‘a the whole, there, oe can apenk of the formation of
a ascplnay soy ints ovement hatches om the
SSE Rpne voto socal “guaran,” tan inde
stiey generate machismo panoptigsm.” Notbemsse
MSE Einar modality of power bas replsced all the others
‘rteeaact Ratt he others, sometimes dering
inant serving as an infeneiary been them, inking
ther opti evening hem and above all making pose
206
Parepticon «207
sible to bring the effets of power tothe most minute and distant
flements. It assures an innitesimal distribution ofthe power
relations
“The formation ofthe disciplinary society is connected with
1 number of broad historical processes—economic,jurdico
political and, lastly siento which forms part
1. Generally speaking i might be sad thatthe dscipines are
{techniques for assuring the ordering of human multiplicities. It
{is true that thee is nothing exceptional or even characteristic in
this every system of power i presented with the same problem
But the peculiarity ofthe disciplines is that they ty to deine in
relation to the multiplicities a tactics of power that fulfils three
‘itera frst, 0 obtain the exerise of ower at the lowest pos
sible cost (economically, bythe low expenditure it involves; po-
ically, by is discretion, its low exteiozation, its relative
Anis, the ite resistance it arouses); second, to bring the
cefects ofthis social power to their maximum intensity and to
‘extend them as far as possible, without either failure or interval:
thi, to link this “economic” growth of power with the output
‘ofthe apparatuses (educational, mltary, industrial, or medical)
Within which itis exercised In short to ncreaseboth the docity
And the utlty ofall the elements ofthe system. Tis tiple
‘objective ofthe disciplines corresponds toa wellknown histor:
ical conjuncture. One aspect ofthis conjuncture was the large
demographic trust of the eighteenth century; an inerease in the
eating population (ane of the primary abject of discipline is
to fix; san antinomadic technique) change of quantiative
scale in the groups to be supervised or manipulated (fom the
beginning of the seventeenth century to the eve of the French
Revolution, the school population had been increasing rapidly,
as had no doubt the hospital population; by the end of the
eighteenth century, the peacatine army exceeded 200,00 me).
‘The other aspect ofthe conjuncture was the growth in the ap
paratus of production, which was becoming more and mare
fxtended and complex; was alo becoming more cosy and
its profitability had to be increased. The development of the
disciplinary methods corresponded hese two processes, oF
rather, no doubt, to the new need 0 adjust thelr correlation,208 + Pts and Ksullge
[Neither the residual forms of feudal power nor the structures,
‘of the administrative monarchy, nor the local mechanisms of
Supervision, nor the unstable, tangled mass they all formed to-
tether, could carry out this role they Were hindered fom doing
by the regular and inadequate extension of their network,
by their often conlicting fantioning, but above all bythe “east”
nature of the power that was exercised in them. It was costly
in several senses: because directly it cost a great deal to the
treasury, because the system of comspt offices and farmed-out
taxes weighted indirely, but very heavily, on the population;
because the resistance it encountered forced it into a eyee of|
[perpetual reinforcement: because it proceeded essentially by
levying (levying om money or products by royal, seignioral,
‘cclesasial tonation levying on men or time by caroes of press
‘ganging, by locking wp or Banishing vagabond). The devel
pment ofthe dacplines marks the appearance of elementary
techniques belonging toa quite different economy’: mechanisms
‘of power which, instead of proceeding by deduction, ate inte
trated into the productive efficiency ofthe apparatuses from
‘within, into the growth of this efficiency and into the use of
‘what it produces, For the old principle of “levying violence,”
‘which governed the economy of power, the disciplines subst
tute the principle of "mildness-production profi.” These are
the techniques that make t possible fo adjust the multiplicity of
ten and the multiplication of the apparatuses of production
Gnd this mesns not only “production” im the strict sense, but
tlto the production of knowledge and skis in the school, the
production of healt in the hospitals, the production of desruc-
Eve force in the army),
In this task of achustment, discipline had to solve a number
of problems for sehich the old economy of power was not suf-
ficentlyequlpped. Itcould reduce the ineffiencyof mass phe-
rnomena: reduce what, in a multiplicity, makes it much less
manageable than a unity; reduce what is opposed tothe use of
tech ofits elements and of their sum; reduce everything that
nay counter the advantages of number. That i why discipline
fixes: it arests or regulates movements t eas up confusion;
it dissipates compact groupings of individuals wandering about
the country in unpredictable ways; it establishes calculated dis-
Poplin + 209
tributions. It must also master all the forces that are formed
fom the very constitution of an organized multiplicity; i must
neutralize the effects of eounterpower that spring from them
find which form a resistance to the power that wishes to dom
inate it agitations, revolts, spontaneous organizations, col
fions—anything that may’ establish horizontal conjunctions
Hence the fact that the disciplines use procedures of parioning
and vertcality; that they introduce, between the diferent ele
‘ments atthe same level, a solid separations as possible; that
they define compact hierarchical networks; in short, that they
‘oppose tothe intrnsl, adverse force of mulliplcly the tech
rique ofthe continuous, individualizng pyramid. They must
Also increase the particular utity of each element ofthe mul-
Uplicty, but by means that are the most rapid and the least
costly, that is to say, by using the mulphty itself as an in-
Strument of this growth, Hence, it order o extract fom bodies
the maximum time and force, the use of those overall methods
known as timetables, collective taining, exercises, total and de-
tilled surveillance. Furthermore, the dsciplines rust incense
the effect of utility proper tothe multiplies, so that each is
made more useful than the simple sum of ts elements: ts in
‘order to increase the utlizable effets of the mallple thatthe
disciplines define tactics of distribution; reciprocal adjustment
of bodies, gestures, and rhythms; diferentation of expaciies
‘proc cordination in relation to apparatuses or tasks. Lastly,
the disciplines have to bring ito play the power relations, not
above but inside the very texture ofthe muliplicy, as discreetly
88 possible, as well articulated onthe other functions ofthese
‘multiplicities and also in the lest expensive way possible: [0
this correspond anonymous instruments of power, coextensive
with the multiplicity that they regiment, such as hierarchical
Surveillance, contindous registration, perpetual assessment and
asifiaton. In short, to substitute for a power that Is mani
fested through the billance of those who exercise Il, 2 power
that insidiously objectfes those om whom it applied to form
‘body of knowledge about these individuals, rather than to
Seploy the ostentatious signs of sovereignty. In a word, the