Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Se a rch:
Judge Wilson is located in Tampa, and his term is due to expire April 8, 2011. Judge Pizzo is also
located in Tampa, and his term is set to expire May 21, 2011. Judge Chappell is located in Ft.
Myers, and her term is set to expire April 20, 2011. Judge Richardson serves in Jacksonville, and his
term is due to expire June 1, 2011.
The United States district court is required by law to establish a panel of citizens to consider
reappointment of the magistrate judge to a new term.
Comments from members of the Bar and public are invited, as to whether these incumbent
magistrate judges should be recommended by the panel for reappointment by the court, and should
be directed to Sheryl L. Loesch, Clerk of Court, United States District Court for the Middle District
of Florida, Attn: Magistrate Judge Reappointment Comments, 401 W. Central Blvd., Suite 2100,
Orlando 32801-0210. These comments must be received no later than September 8.
Ne ws HO ME
[Revised: 08-26-2010 ]
floridabar.org/…/a9e0384bac92d6828… 1/1
PUBLIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL CORRUPTION & CRIMES
2
EXTENSION OF RECORD EXTORTION, FRAUD, DELIBERATE DEPRIVATIONS
9. Defendants’ facially frivolous allegations of said sham “land parcels” were
a. Legally incomprehensible;
b. NOT any valid defense or genuine claim;
c. For criminal purposes of, e.g., racketeering, retaliation, extortion, and fraud;
d. Controverted by the Lee County Real Property Grantor/Grantee Index.
e. Prohibited under
“Upon reading of the complaint, I have no concrete idea what happened.” Id., p. 3.
“Other defendants had something to do with the record of title to the property.” Id., p. 2.
13. Here, the Plaintiff record owners and holders of indisputable Warranty Deed, Lot 15A, can
only live in further fear of injury from, e.g., said publicly recorded judicial
a. Corruption;
b. Idiocy;
c. Ignorance;
d. Irrationality;
e. Recklessness.
3
FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF U.S.A. Ex Rel. et al. v. U.S.A. et al.
14. In their independent action for relief from, e.g., extrinsic fraud, fraud on the Court,
racketeering, retaliation, extortion, obstruction of justice, the Plaintiff record owners of Lot
15A attacked the prima facie nullity, illegality, and criminality of judicial determinations
regarding the record ownership of private “land” fraudulently “claimed as public land” under
facially false and deceptive pretenses of fake “law” and/or ”resolution”, scam “O.R.
569/875”. See U.S.A. Ex Rel. et al. v. U.S.A. et al., 1:10-cv-321-JL, U.S. District Court,
District of New Hampshire.
15. Here, Def. Wilson concealed the most elementary legal principle that any involuntary
alienation could not have possibly been a legislative function, and that the fraudulent “land-
transfer-by-resolution-scam” was a hoax and extortion scheme…
DEFENDANT WILKINSON FILED “RULE 27-4 motion [frivolous motion]”, DOC. # 386
4
Case 2:10-cv-00089-CEH-TGW Document 67 Filed 08/18/10 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:10-cv-00089-CEH-TGW Document 67 Filed 08/18/10 Page 2 of 10
Case 2:10-cv-00089-CEH-TGW Document 67 Filed 08/18/10 Page 3 of 10
Case 2:10-cv-00089-CEH-TGW Document 67 Filed 08/18/10 Page 4 of 10
Case 2:10-cv-00089-CEH-TGW Document 67 Filed 08/18/10 Page 5 of 10
Case 2:10-cv-00089-CEH-TGW Document 67 Filed 08/18/10 Page 6 of 10
Case 2:10-cv-00089-CEH-TGW Document 67 Filed 08/18/10 Page 7 of 10
Case 2:10-cv-00089-CEH-TGW Document 67 Filed 08/18/10 Page 8 of 10
Case 2:10-cv-00089-CEH-TGW Document 67 Filed 08/18/10 Page 9 of 10
Case 2:10-cv-00089-CEH-TGW Document 67 Filed 08/18/10 Page 10 of 10