Professional Documents
Culture Documents
should be concealed and covered up; otherwise the scandal will strike the Judges
and priests in our crime organization.
“RES PERVERTA”
7. On the public record, Def. Wilson is confusing “res perverta” and “res judicata”. Just like
criminal Catholic Church Officials conspired to “create finality”, cover up, and conceal
organized Church crime and corruption, here Def. Wilson conspired to conceal rape of the
law under fraudulent pretenses of “res judicata” and color of office.
“With the federal defendants dismissed, and no federal claim having been alleged, the
court should not exercise …”, Doc. # 67, p. 9.
With the rapists dismissed, and rape having been proven, the victims bleeding.
the Church and court should now cover up, conceal, and continue their charade.
Here, Def. Wilson conspired with other Crooked Officials to pervert the law and “res
judicata”. Here as a matter of law, res judicata could not have possibly applied, because
a. The causes of action and claims for relief were DIFFERENT;
b. The causes of action could NOT have possibly arisen in the past;
c. The parties were DIFFERENT;
d. The U.S. Courts had DENIED jurisdiction, Case 2:2007-cv-00228, under APPEAL;
e. Pending APPEAL, there was of course NO “final judgment on the merits” and the issues
of the prima facie criminality and nullity of, e.g.:
Fake “land parcels”;
Fake “lot” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”
Fake “block” “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”;
Fake “park”; see PB 3 PG 25 (1912);
Falsified “plat”;
Fabricated “rule 38 motion”;
2
Falsified “$5,000 attorney’s fees”;
Fictitious “July 29, 2009, judgment”.
f. The Crooked Judges perpetrated FRAUD ON THE COURT.
8. Here, neither the publicly recorded fraud on the Courts nor the Plaintiff record title
holders and tax payers, Lot 15A, will go away. Here, objectively partial and corrupt Def.
Wilson conspired to keep the Plaintiffs away from the Court for illegal purposes of
obstructing any opportunity of justice and meaningful court access. See 28 U.S.C. § 455.
RECORD LACK OF “authority”, LOCAL RULE 6, 6.02
9. Here, Defendant Crooked Judge Wilson lacked any “authority” to “report and recommend”,
e.g. (Doc. # 67):
a. Government corruption;
b. Organized Government crime;
c. Cover-up;
d. Coercion of the Plaintiffs to refrain from prosecution and defense of their perfect title;
e. Government malfeasance;
f. Perversion of the law;
g. Fabrication of “factual findings”.
“In light of that circumstance, the allegations of fraud, bribery, and conspiracy
should be stricken as impertinent and scandalous.” Doc. # 67, p. 3.
In light of that circumstance, we shall agree that the patently clear proof of rape
should be concealed and covered up; otherwise the scandal will strike the Judges
and priests in our crime organization.
3
Here on the public record, Def. Wilson expressed his criminal intent to obstruct any
“opportunity” of justice and perpetrated fraud on the Court. Here with intent to
deliberately deprive and defraud, Wilson chose his “conclusion” independent of the
material facts and law, but with the criminal objective of case-fixing, obstructing justice,
and injuring the Plaintiffs.
13. Here, accepting Plaintiffs’ conclusively proven allegations within the four corners of their
Complaint as true would have necessarily resulted in just and speedy adjudication in favor
of the Plaintiff record owners.
4
e. Article I, s. 2, Florida Constitution;
f. Article I, s. 9, Florida Constitution;
g. The recorded fraudulent violations of Florida Statutes and Constitution;
h. Def. K. M. Wilkinson’s publicly recorded fabrications and fraud on the Court.
5
“Upon reading of the complaint, I have no concrete idea what happened.” Id., p. 3.
“Other defendants had something to do with the record of title to the property.” Id., p. 2.
Here, Def. Government idiot T. G. Wilson “played so dumb” that he confused, e.g.:
a. Causes of action;
b. Claims for relief;
c. Parties;
d. Actions.
23. Here, the Plaintiff record owners and holders of indisputable Warranty Deed, Lot 15A, can
only live in further fear of injury from, e.g., said publicly recorded judicial
a. Corruption;
b. Idiocy;
c. Ignorance;
d. Irrationality;
e. Recklessness.
DEFENDANT WILKINSON FILED “RULE 27-4 motion [frivolous motion]”, DOC. # 386
6
See Doc. # 386, 11/30/2009, p. 2, Case 2:2007-cv-00228.