Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INDEPENDENT ACTION
FOR RELIEF FROM GOVERNMENT CRIMES, CORRUPTION,
FACIALLY FRAUDULENT WRIT OF EXECUTION,
AND FORGED AND VOID judgments and orders
____________________________________________________________________________/
b. Where to pay said $24.30 final money judgment, Doc. # 365, 2:2007-cv-00228;
c. How to pay said $24.30 final money judgment, Doc. # 365, 2:2007-cv-00228.
2
AND the Grantors hereby covenant with said Grantees that the Grantors are lawfully
seized of said riparian upland and adjoining riparian street land on the Gulf of
Mexico in fee simple; that the Grantors have good right and lawful authority to sell
and convey said riparian Gulf-front upland and street land on said Gulf as legally
described in reference to said private 1912 Subdivision Plat; that the Grantors
hereby fully warrant the unimpeachable record title to said riparian accreted street and
up-lands on the Gulf of Mexico and pursuant to the Lee County, State of Florida, and
Federal Public Records have defended and will defend their marketable record title
against the lawful and unlawful claims of all persons whomsoever, and in particular,
against the prima facie unlawful and criminal claims of Lee County, the State of
Florida, and the United States of America, and their corrupt Agents, Officials of
record, and the Defendants in their private individual capacities of record such as,
e.g., Joel F. Dubina, Charlene E. Honeywell, Sheri Polster Chappell, Gerald B.
Tjoflat, John E. Steele, Stanley F. Birch, Jr., Tony West; and that said accreted
riparian street and up-lands on the Gulf of Mexico are free of any legitimate and valid
encumbrances and/or judgments, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31,
2010; zoning, building code and other restrictions legitimately imposed by lawful
governmental authority; outstanding oil, gas, mineral, and or any other interests of
record, if any; and private riparian water-front easements of record, restrictions, if
any, and unimpeachable private implied street and alley easements of record as
conveyed in reference to said 1912 Plat.”
DEF. WILSON’S ADMISSION OF INCOMPETENCE & OBJECTIVE PARTIALITY
4. Doc. # 67, mailed on 08/19/2010, indisputably proved that Def. objectively partial and
Crooked Judge Thomas G. Wilson “had no familiarity with any of the facts.”
3
5. The Plaintiff Government corruption & crime victims object to Defendant Crooked
b. Fraudulent concealment of, e.g., Def. Officials’ extortion, fraud, obstruction of justice;
d. Extortion of Plaintiffs’ Lot 15A, Cayo Costa, and money under fraudulent pretenses.
6. The Plaintiff unimpeachable record owners of and title holders to Lot 15A contest
a. Corruption;
d. Dishonesty;
e. Objective partiality;
f. Incompetence;
7. For criminal purposes of, e.g., case fixing, obstruction of justice, and extortion, Defendant
4
Here, the Money Judgment in the amount of $24.30, Mandate, and Opinion of the U.S. Court
of Appeals could be found at docket entry # 365, Case 2:2007-cv-00228. Here, the Federal
Courts had fraudulently pretended the purported “lack of jurisdiction” and thus not
reached the merits. Said Case is under appeal, and no “final judgment on the merits” could
Here, Def. Wilson extended the pattern and policy of organized judicial crime & corruption:
8. It is a hackneyed truism that “res judicata does not preclude a litigant from making a
direct attack upon the judgment before the court which renders it. 1B J. Moore, Federal
Practice, § 0.407, at 282 (2d ed. 1991). In other words, a party may introduce evidence,
normally extrinsic in nature, "with the direct and primary objective of modifying, setting
aside, canceling or vacating, or enjoining the enforcement of the judgment.” C. Wright &
A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure at § 4406 (citing Intermill v. Nash, 94 Utah 271,
9. Here, absolutely nothing barred Plaintiffs’ direct attack of, e.g., the facially void
judgments, fraud on the Courts since 2006, organized Government crime and
corruption, racketeering and fraud. Here, Def. Wilson deceived the Court:
“In view of prior dismissals, this complaint is barred by the doctrine of res judicata.”
5
10. Here, the Plaintiff unimpeachable record title holders to riparian Gulf-front Lot 15A
directly attacked publicly recorded organized judicial crime and corruption in Florida
Courts.
a. Here, the original Federal Case, 2:2007-cv-00228, is under appeal and attack for, e.g.,
publicly recorded Government racketeering, retaliation, extortion, fraud, fraud on
the Courts, and deliberate deprivations, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242;
b. Here, the purported “factual findings” by Crooked Magistrate Wilson are under direct
attack, 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), and conclusively controverted by U.S., Florida, and Lee
County Public Records;
c. Government corruption and crimes did not, and could not have possibly, created
“finality” but voided record deception, trickery, and fraud on the Courts since 2006.
11. Here under fraudulent and facially false pretenses of “res judicata”, Defendant Corrupt
a. Perversion of publicly recorded marketable title and ownership evidence, Ch. 712, F.S.;
“RES PERVERTA”
13. On the public record, Def. Wilson is confusing “res perverta” and “res judicata”. Just like
criminal Catholic Church Officials conspired to “create finality”, cover up, and conceal
6
organized Church crime and corruption, here Def. Wilson conspired to conceal rape of the
“With the federal defendants dismissed, and no federal claim having been alleged, the
court should not exercise …”, Doc. # 67, p. 9.
With the rapists dismissed, and rape having been proven, the victims bleeding.
the Church and court should now cover up, conceal, and continue their charade.
Here, Def. Wilson conspired with other Crooked Officials to pervert the law and “res
judicata”. Here as a matter of law, res judicata could not have possibly applied, because
14. Here, neither the publicly recorded fraud on the Courts nor the Plaintiff record title
holders and tax payers, Lot 15A, will go away. Here, objectively partial and corrupt Def.
Wilson conspired to keep the Plaintiffs away from the Court for illegal purposes of
obstructing any opportunity of justice and meaningful court access. See 28 U.S.C. § 455.
15. Here, Defendant Crooked Judge Wilson lacked any “authority” to “report and recommend”,
a. Government corruption;
7
b. Organized Government crime;
c. Cover-up;
d. Coercion of the Plaintiffs to refrain from prosecution and defense of their perfect title;
e. Government malfeasance;
a. The falsified elements of purported “res judicata” could not have possibly been present;
b. The Plaintiff property tax payers were entitled to own Lot 15A, Cayo Costa;
c. Plaintiff record Lot owners had the fundamental rights to exclude Governments from
their riparian Lot 15A and redress their Government grievances, 1st, 14th 4th, 5th, 7th U.S.
Const. Amendments;
d. Def. Judges J. E. Steele and S. P. Chappell had violated their own Local Rule 4.02;
e. § 86.011 Jurisdiction of trial court had entitled the Plaintiffs to the following:
8
may also demand additional, alternative, coercive, subsequent, or supplemental relief
in the same action.
17. Here, Def. Wilson concealed and conspired to conceal the judicial Defendants’ alteration
of official records and documents for criminal and illegal purposes of racketeering and
extorting Lot 15A and Def. Wilkinson’s falsified fictitious “$5,000 attorney fees” without
any authority. Here in particular, Def, Steele and Chappell perpetrated fraud on the Court
when they removed BUSSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA from the Lee County Circuit Court to
LOCAL RULE 4.02 REMOVAL OF CASES FROM STATE COURT [FLA. M.D.]
(a) All cases removed to this Court from the courts of the State of Florida shall be docketed
and assigned, in accordance with Rule 1.03 of these rules, in the Division encompassing the
county of the State in which the case was pending.
(b) The party effecting removal shall file with the notice of removal a true and legible copy of
all process, pleadings, orders, and other papers or exhibits of every kind, including
depositions, then on file in the state court.
(c) When a case is removed to this Court with pending motions on which briefs or
legal memoranda have not been submitted, the moving party shall file and serve a
supporting brief within fourteen (14) days after the removal in accordance with Rule
3.01(a) of these rules, and the party or parties opposing the motion shall then comply
with Rule 3.01(b) of these rules.
TARNISHED REPUTATION AS JUDICIAL CRIMINAL(S) – COURT OF FAKES
18. Florida Middle District Judges, and including Def. Wilson, who cover up for other crooked
Def. Judges tarnished the reputation of this Court as a judicial crime and corruption
9
DEF. WILSON CONCEALED DESTRUCTION OF OFFICIAL RECORDS
19. Here, Defendant Wilson concealed and conspired to conceal that the 11th Circuit destroyed
and discarded Plaintiff(s)’ records and official documents pursuant to its orders in violation
of the law.
20. Hereby, the Plaintiff record indisputable title holders, land owners, and tax payers, riparian
d. Def. Wilson’s concealment of Government extortion of Lot 15A & money ($5,048.60).
21. “Striking” the publicly recorded Government scandal as “scandalous” has been for illegal
and criminal purposes of concealing the record extortion of money & Plaintiffs’ Lot 15A:
“In light of that circumstance, the allegations of fraud, bribery, and conspiracy
should be stricken as impertinent and scandalous.” Doc. # 67, p. 3.
In light of that circumstance, we shall agree that the patently clear proof of rape
should be concealed and covered up; otherwise the scandal will strike the Judges
and priests in our crime organization.
10
22. With intent to, and for criminal purposes of, case fixing and obstruction of justice,
“A dismissal for failure to state a claim for relief … will not do, since such a
dismissal typically warrants an opportunity to amend. Rather it is fitting [for the
criminal purposes of case-fixing and obstruction of justice] to consider dismissal
on the dispositive ground of res judicata…” See Doc. # 67, p. 4.
Here on the public record, Def. Wilson expressed his criminal intent to obstruct any
“opportunity” of justice and perpetrated fraud on the Court. Here with intent to
deliberately deprive and defraud, Wilson chose his “conclusion” independent of the
material facts and law, but with the criminal objective of case-fixing, obstructing justice,
23. Here, accepting Plaintiffs’ conclusively proven allegations within the four corners of their
Complaint as true would have necessarily resulted in just and speedy adjudication in favor
24. In particular, Defendant Wilson conspired with other Officials and Defendants to conceal,
e.g.:
See Case 2:2007-cv-00228; see Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25 (1912) on file.
25. Def. Wilson knew that he or any intelligent, fit, and honest person in Wilson’s shoes could
11
a. NOT find facially forged “land parcel” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”;\
c. NOT find any “Lee County” title to forged “land parcel” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”;
d. NOT find any “Lee County” title to forged “land parcel” “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”;
26. Plain and short, the attached 1912 Cayo Costa Subdivision Plat of Survey
Here, Def. Wilson knew that as a matter of law the fraudulently pretended conveyance of
said fake “land parcels” in reference to said 1912 Plat had been legally and factually
impossible.
27. Florida law prohibits fraudulent fabrication of a fake interest in fictitious “land parcels”.
FLORIDA CONSTITUTION, 1st, 14th, 7th, 4th, 5th U.S. CONST. AMEND.
"[n]o person shall be deprived of . . . property without due process of law . . . ."
12
Art. I, s. 2, Fla. Const. states that
Here, the Plaintiffs had the fundamental equal rights to own their Lot 15A, Cayo Costa,
and exclude Defendant Governments from their riparian Gulf-front street and uplands, PB 3
PG 25, U.S. Constitutional Amendments. The Plaintiff record real property tax payers, Lot
15A, and title holders were entitled to defend their perfected unencumbered marketable
deprivations, and obstruction of justice under fraudulent pretenses and color of office.
29. Defendants’ facially frivolous allegations of said sham “land parcels” were
a. Legally incomprehensible;
c. For criminal purposes of, e.g., racketeering, retaliation, extortion, and fraud;
e. Prohibited under
“The property may have been taken over by Lee County in some way.” Id., p.
31. Any “involuntary alienation” of property in Florida is strictly and necessarily a judicial
function and must follow due judicial process, Chapters 73, 74, 95, Fla. Stat. Here, no judge
13
had ever ordered any “title transfer”, Lot 15A, against the Plaintiffs’ will. Here, no eminent
32. On the public record, Doc. # 67, Defendant Wilson asserted his “guessing” game and judicial
charade:
“Upon reading of the complaint, I have no concrete idea what happened.” Id., p. 3.
“Other defendants had something to do with the record of title to the property.” Id., p. 2.
Here, Def. Government idiot T. G. Wilson “played so dumb” that he confused, e.g.:
a. Causes of action;
c. Parties;
d. Actions.
33. Here, the Plaintiff record owners and holders of indisputable Warranty Deed, Lot 15A, can
only live in further fear of injury from, e.g., said publicly recorded judicial
a. Corruption;
b. Idiocy;
c. Ignorance;
d. Irrationality;
14
e. Recklessness.
34. In their independent action for relief from, e.g., extrinsic fraud, fraud on the Court,
racketeering, retaliation, extortion, obstruction of justice, the Plaintiff record owners of Lot
15A attacked the prima facie nullity, illegality, and criminality of judicial determinations
regarding the record ownership of private “land” fraudulently “claimed as public land” under
facially false and deceptive pretenses of fake “law” and/or ”resolution”, scam “O.R.
569/875”. See U.S.A. Ex Rel. et al. v. U.S.A. et al., 1:10-cv-321-JL, U.S. District Court,
35. Here, Def. Wilson concealed the most elementary legal principle that any involuntary
alienation could not have possibly been a legislative function, and that the fraudulent “land-
WILSON KNEW THAT WILKINSON ADMITTEDLY DID NOT file Rule 38 motion
36. Here admittedly, Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson, Crooked Lee County Property
Appraiser, had filed a “Motion for Sanctions pursuant to Eleventh Circuit Rule 27-4”.
Here, Defendant Crooked Magistrate Wilson knew, fraudulently concealed, and conspired
with other Government Agents to conceal that Def. Wilkinson did not file a “Rule 38” or
DEFENDANT WILKINSON FILED “RULE 27-4 motion [frivolous motion]”, DOC. # 386
15
See Doc. # 386, 11/30/2009, p. 2, Case 2:2007-cv-00228.
37. In the record absence of a “rule 38 motion”, the Defendant U.S. Appellate Court Judges,
11th Circuit, conspired with other Defendant Officials to fake and “grant” a non-existent
“rule 38 motion”, which they knew Defendant Wilkinson had admittedly not filed.
38. In the record absence of any “rule 38 motion” (“frivolous appeal”), Defendant Wilson
conspired to
16
39. Here, Def. Wilson knew Def. Lee County Property Appraiser’s claim of fictitious
“$5,000.00 for attorney’s fees” to be facially fraudulent and deceptive. Here, there was
trickery and extortion, because by his own assertions, Def. Wilkinson had not filed a “rule 38
40. Def. Wilson knew that Plaintiff(s)’ Third Amended Complaint, Doc. # 282, 288, had been
d. Was fully supported by the indisputable and conclusive public record evidence on file.
41. In the record absence of any “rule 38 motion” (“frivolous appeal”), Defendant Wilson knew
and concealed that Def. Lee County Property Appraiser Wilkinson had
c. Never been holder of any money judgment other than for $24.30, Case 2:2007-cv-00228,
under appeal:
42. Defendant Wilson knew and fraudulently concealed that Defendant Marshal Richard Jessup
had threatened the Plaintiffs in Naples, Florida, and coerced them to refrain from
prosecution of the Defendant Officials. Therefore, Def. Jessup was of course not entitled to
immunity.
17
DEF. WILSON CONCEALED DEF. JACK NEIL PETERSON’S PERJURY
43. Here, Defendants Jessup and Wilson conspired to conceal perjury and the falsification of a
non-existent “July 29, 2009, judgment”, Doc. # 432-2, 05/21/2010, Case 2:2007-cv-00228:
44. Here, Def. Wilson brazenly perverted the indisputable facts and law. Here, there were
a. NO frivolity;
c. NO “$5,048.60 judgment”;
d. NO “rule 38 motion”;
e. NO “frivolous appeal”;
f. NO “lien”;
45. Here, Def. Wilson brazenly perverted the indisputable public record, Doc. # 365:
18
46. Here, Def. Wilson perverted the indisputable facts and law and brazenly concealed that
a. The “writ of execution” was falsified, Doc. # 425, and had expired;
b. The “writ”, Doc. # 425, was a prima facie fraud and extortion scheme;
c. NOT based on any authentic lien or judgment under Ch. 55, Fla. Stat.;
47. Here, there was a pattern and policy of organized Government crime and corruption.
Here year after year, judge after judge, in layer after layer of Government deception, new
claims arose in this organized crime scheme and judicial corruption machine. Here, Def.
Wilson is merely the latest “edition” and/or “perpetrator” of unchecked judicial crime.
19
48. Def. Wilson’s “report and recommendation”, Doc. # 67, is rambling incomprehensible
nonsense without any factual support. Here, Florida law did not recognize
51. Fake colorless “land claim” in violation of Ch. 95; 73, 74, Fla. Stat.;
5. An Order forwarding this Notice of Appeal to Sheryl L. Loesch, Clerk of Court, ATTN:
7. An Order taking judicial notice of CH. 712; 95; 73, 74; 55; §§ 695.26, 695.09, 689.01,
a. Art. I, s. 10, Fla. Const., stating that "No . . . law impairing the obligation of contracts
shall be passed.";
b. Art. I, s. 2, Fla. Const. stating that "[a]ll natural persons are equal before the law. . .";
20
c. Article I, s. 9, Fla. Const., stating that "[n]o person shall be deprived of . . . property
See fake “lien”, fake “writ”; fake “land parcels”; fake “resolution/law”; fake “judgment”.
9. An Order declaring the facially fraudulent “writ of execution”, Doc. # 425, violative of
10. An Order declaring the lack of any genuine authentic foreign (out-of-Florida) judgment;
11. An Order declaring the falsified “writ of execution”, Doc. # 425, 2:07-cv-228, null and void;
12. An Order recusing and disqualifying Defendant Crooked and objectively partial Judge
13. An Order recusing Def. Crooked Charlene E. Honeywell because of publicly recorded
organized crime, racketeering, corruption, bribery, retaliation against the Plaintiffs, and
extortion of said money and Lot 15A in violation of Florida and Federal law;
14. An Order vacating and/or setting aside the prima facie unconstitutional and null and void
“pre-filing injunction”, Doc. # 245, which was for criminal and illegal purposes of, e.g.,
cover-up, concealment, and conspiracy to extort said money and land, Lot 15A;
15. An Order recusing Def. Crooked S. Polster Chappell, because she conspired to conceal
16. An Order vacating and/or setting aside any and all orders by Defendants Sheri Polster
Chappell and Charlene Edwards Honeywell, because they were procured through fraud,
and falsification and destruction of official records, documents, and conclusive evidence;
17. An Order declaring that Defendant K. M. Wilkinson did NOT “have any lien”;
18. An Order declaring that Defendant Wilkinson did NOT “hold any $5,048.60 judgment” as
falsely pretended and falsified by said Defendant Wilkinson and Defendant Crooked
21
Attorney JACK N. PETERSON [see falsified, fraudulent and deceptive “affidavits”
asserting a fake “July 29, 2009 judgment” in the Collier and Lee County Public Records;
proceedings on any illegal and criminal execution in violation of, e.g., Chapters 55 and 56,
Fla. Stat., and the 4th, 14th, 1st, and 7th U.S. Const. Amendments, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 – 1968;
20. An Order sanctioning Defendant Attorney JACK N. PETERSON for recorded perjury and
conspiring with Def. Wilkinson and other Government Officials to extort, racketeer,
retaliate, and deliberately deprive Dr. Jorg Busse and Jennifer Franklin Prescott;
21. An Order declaring the final record mandate in the amount of $24.30 paid;
22. An Order vacating and setting aside the facially oppressive and unconstitutional “pre-filing
injunction”, Doc. # 245, Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791, which on its face was for criminal and
the organized Criminals and criminal Defendants in this Court and the 11th Circuit;
23. An Order restraining and preventing the record violations of section 1962 under the RICO
civil provisions;
24. An Order declaring the lack of any recorded mandate and/or money judgment other than the
$24.30, which was “issued as mandate on June 11, 2009” and recorded on June 15, 2009
pursuant to the certified Docket, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, U.S. District Court, M.D.
25. An Order declaring that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit had lost jurisdiction
on 06/11/2009, as had also been evidenced by its own Case Docket, 08-13170-BB];
22
26. An Order sanctioning and punishing Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson for the publicly
recorded falsifications of, e.g., said fake “judgment”, “land parcels”, fake “resolution”,
27. An Order declaring INSTRUMENT 4371834, O.R. 4517 PG 1914, Collier County Public
Records, and the equally fraudulent filing in Lee County part of a racketeering, extortion,
28. An Order restraining any further racketeering by Defendant Government Officials and in
particular the illegal forced selling of Plaintiffs’ said riparian Cayo Costa property, Lot 15A,
29. An Order dissolving and/or reorganizing the corrupt Government enterprise under, e.g., civil
30. An Order removing the publicly recorded corrupting influence and make due provision for
said express fundamental rights of innocent persons under the Florida and Federal
Constitutions and, e.g., the 14th, 1st, 7th, 4th, 5th, and 11th U.S. Constitutional Amendments;
31. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant Crooked, Objectively Partial, and Unfit
32. An Order making the Government enterprise of record subject of injunctive relief, because it
is designed to aid the illegal enterprise of, e.g., obstructing justice, retaliating and
33. An Order enjoining said U.S. Courts from retaliating against the Plaintiffs because they
blew the whistle on Government crimes & corruption, rather than punishing the Defendant
Racketeers of record and providing remedies and relief to the Plaintiff racketeering and
corruption victims;
23
34. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant Crooked and Objectively Partial and Unfit
Judge C. E. Honeywell;
35. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant Corrupt and Objectively Partial and Unfit
37. An Order declaring Plaintiffs’ record title to Lot 15A, Cayo Costa, free & clear and
unencumbered;
00001.0000” falsified and prima facie forgeries as conclusively evidenced by the 1912
39. An Order for EMERGENCY relief from the publicly recorded public corruption, extortion,
42. An Order for triple punitive damages under, e.g., Civil RICO, 18 U.S.C. § 1964, 1964(c);
44. An Order enjoining any and all Governments and the Defendants and Officials from any
trespass onto the private undedicated “Cayo Costa” “Subdivision” as legally described in
45. An Order declaring the prima facie forgeries of non-existent “land parcels” “12-44-20-01-
46. An Order permanently enjoining any and all entries and publications of any “resolution
569/875”, “O.R. 569/875”, “legislative act 569/875”, and non-existent “land parcels” “12-
24
44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000” from any and all Government
47. An Order permanently enjoining any and all Governments and Defendants from fraudulently
“claiming” “asserting” “publishing” Government ownership of the street lands along the
Gulf of Mexico as legally described and conveyed in reference to the Plat of the prima facie
48. An Order enjoining and restraining any extortion of property and money and foreclosure
fraud by Defendants Eugene C. Turner, Richard D. DeBoest, II, Chene M. Thompson, and
Hugh D. Hayes.
___________________________
/s/Jorg Busse, M.D., M.M., M.B.A.
Private Attorney General; Plaintiff public corruption & racketeering victim
10 Benning ST # 135
West Lebanon, NH 03784-3402, U.S.A.
c/o International Court of Justice
Peace Palace
The Hague, Netherlands
_____________________
[/s/Jennifer Franklin Prescott]
Private Attorney General; Plaintiff Government racketeering & corruption victim
10 Benning Street # 135
West Lebanon, NH 03784-3402, U.S.A.
c/o International Court of Justice
Peace Palace
The Hague, Netherlands
25