Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JOB HUTT
Accused,
X---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
Plaintiff, People of the Philippines, through counsel, and unto this Honorable Court, most
humbly and respectfully files this Opposition to Motion to Quash and states that:
Crimes should be taken into immediate action for justice to prevail. The warrantless arrest was
valid because the crime had just been committed, and witness thereof is certain that the crime
was committed by the accused.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
On February 8, 2016, Amy Gala was murdered but a witness named Jan Go went to the police
office on February 9 to identify the murderer. Jan Go identified Job Hutt, as the shooter of Amy
Gala. On February 10, 2016, Job Hutt got arrested by the police office without securing a warrant
of arrest since the offense had just been committed and there was a probable cause to believe
based on the personal knowledge of the witness of the facts or circumstances that Job Hutt had
committed the crime.
ISSUE
In view of all the foregoing, Plaintiff submit that the warrantless arrest of Job Hutt was lawful
because it is in accordance under Section 5, Rule 113 of the Revised Rules of Court.
PRAYER
The Above Premises Considered, Plaintiff, People of the Philippines, respectfully prays to the
Honorable Court to oppose to quash the information filed by the Defendant, and pursue the
criminal charge against him.
People of the Philippines respectfully prays for other just and equitable relief.
Cebu City, Philippines. April 4, 2016.