Professional Documents
Culture Documents
x
First published online 24 August 2006
Microreview
Constantin F. Urban, Sebastian Lourido and and cytoplasmic granules containing host-defence mol-
Arturo Zychlinsky* ecules (Stengel et al., 1905). Elie Metchnikoff discovered
Department of Cellular Microbiology, Max Planck the function of neutrophils and macrophages as migrating
Institute for Infection Biology, Charitplatz 1, 10117 and phagocytosing cells (Metchnikoff, 1968). Neutrophils
Berlin, Germany. are the first immune cells recruited from the bloodstream to
a site of inflammation. They are terminally differentiated
cells synthesizing low amounts of RNA and protein and
Summary
have a short life span of only a few hours. Neutrophils
Many microbial pathogens evolved to circumvent the emerge from pluripotent haematopoietic stem cells in the
attack of neutrophils, which are essential effector bone marrow. Leaving the bone marrow, neutrophils are
cells of the innate immune system. Here we review six equipped with their antimicrobial arsenal to fight invading
major strategies that pathogenic bacteria and fungi microbes. Upon contact, neutrophils engulf the microbes
use to evade neutrophil defences: (i) turning on sur- into a phagocytic vacuole, called a phagosome. Subse-
vival and stress responses, (ii) avoiding contact, (iii) quently, intracellular granules fuse with the phagosome
preventing phagocytosis, (iv) surviving intracellu- and discharge their contents to form a phagolysosome
larly, (v) inducing cell death and (vi) evading killing by (Fig. 1A and B). In these phagolysosomes, microbes are
neutrophil extracellular traps. For each category we killed by combination of non-oxidative and oxidative
give examples and further focus on one particular mechanisms (Nathan, 2006). The oxygen-independent
pathogenic microbe in more detail. Pathogens effectors are stored in three different neutrophil granule
include Candida albicans, Cryptococcus neoformans, subsets. The granules to be discharged first are the spe-
Yersinia ssp., Helicobacter pylori, Staphylococcus cific granules (also named secondary granules) and the
aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus gelatinase granules (also named tertiary granules). These
pneumoniae. granules contain an overlapping set of antimicrobial pro-
teins, such as lactoferrin, lipocalin, lysozyme and gelati-
nase as well as metalloproteases important in tissue
Neutrophils: how do they work?
breakdown, which facilitates neutrophil migration and
The immune system protects the body from microbes that action (Faurschou and Borregaard, 2003). Next, the azuro-
invade and harm the host. Neutrophils play a pivotal role philic granules (also named primary granules) are dis-
in the resolution of microbial infections (Nathan, 2006). To charged. These peroxidase-positive granules contain
fulfil this function neutrophils have a large antimicrobial small antimicrobial peptides, a-defensins, and seproci-
arsenal at their disposal. The aim of this article is to review dins, antibiotic proteases, namely cathepsin G, proteinase
the strategies pathogenic bacteria and fungi have evolved 3 and neutrophil elastase. Azurophilic granules also
to evade this arsenal. harbour bacterial permeability increasing protein and
In humans roughly 100 billion neutrophils enter and myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Borregaard and Cowland,
leave circulating blood every day (Gallin and Snyderman, 1997).
1999). Acquired or inherited neutropenia as well as neu- The oxygen-dependent mechanism involves a non-
trophil malfunction result in recurrent, life-threatening mitochondrial generation of reactive oxygen species
infections with bacteria and fungi (Kaufmann and Steward, (ROS) and is known as the respiratory burst. A diverse set
2005). This underscores the importance of neutrophils as a of ROS are formed during this process (Klebanoff, 2005).
first line of defence in innate immunity. Paul Ehrlich first Upon activation of neutrophils the transmembrane and
described neutrophils as polymorphonuclear leukocytes cytosolic subunits of the large NADPH-oxidase complex
when new fixation techniques revealed lobulated nuclei assemble at the phagosomal membrane and transfer
electrons to molecular oxygen producing superoxide
Received 14 June, 2006; revised 10 July, 2006; accepted 11 July,
2006. *For correspondence. E-mail zychlinsky@mpiib-berlin.mpg.de; (O2). Superoxide spontaneously or through catalysis by
Tel. (+49) 30 28460300; Fax (+49) 30 28460301. superoxide dismutase (SOD) reacts to H2O2, which in
2006 Max-Planck Institute for Infection Biology
Journal compilation 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
1688 C. F. Urban, S. Lourido and A. Zychlinsky
Fig. 1. Killing mechanisms of neutrophils: phagocytosis (A and B) and NETs (C). Electron micrograph of a human neutrophil that has engulfed
a bacterium (A). The two lobes of the polymorphous nucleus displayed in the section contain hetero- and euchromatin (dark and light grey
respectively). Arrows point at cytoplasmic granules. The white frame encloses an engulfed bacterium surrounded by the phagosomal
membrane. Inset of (A) indicated by the white frame (B). Arrows point at areas where granules are discharging their content into the
phagosome. Scanning electron micrograph of a neutrophil extracellular trap capturing C. albicans (C). The fibres surround the budding yeast
cells and contain smooth and granular stretches.
turn is the substrate of MPO to form hypochlorous acid new results suggest that voltage-gated proton channels
(HOCl). MPO mainly produces hypochlorous acid in addi- are crucial for charge compensation (Femling et al., 2006).
tion to hypobromous and hypoiodous acid. HOCl is the Another study compared the superoxide-production,
most bactericidal oxidant in neutrophils (Hampton et al., membrane potential and K+-flux together with bacterial
1998). The chlorination of bacterial targets can inactivate, killing (Rada et al., 2004). At low levels of superoxide-
for example, iron-sulphur proteins, membrane proteins production (at the onset of phagolysosomal killing) K+-flux
and the origin of replication site for DNA synthesis dominates and the phagosome is transiently alkalinized.
(Hampton et al., 1998). Furthermore, chloramines gener- At later stages, protons take over, compensating pH and
ated are also microbicidal. charge. Increasing superoxide-production to more than
Besides ROS reactive nitrogen species, mainly nitric 20% of the maximum does not alter either the membrane
oxide and peroxynitrite, are also potent antimicrobials. potential or K+-flux any further. The additional superoxide,
Mouse macrophages produce nitric oxide upon stimula- however, dramatically increases the killing efficiency.
tion with cytokines. However, it is still unknown whether Therefore, Rada et al. proposed that electrophysiological
human neutrophils produce these substances and if so, changes as well as ROS directly contribute to killing.
what their contribution may be. Further research will determine the contribution of ion
In addition, ROS have been implicated in the activation fluxes through different channels in neutrophil function.
of granule proteases (Reeves et al., 2002; Ahluwalia et al., In addition to the intracellular killing mechanisms
2004). As the NADPH oxidase transfers electrons across described above activated neutrophils release granule
the phagosomal membrane, the resulting charge depolar- proteins and chromatin. Together, these components form
izes the membrane. Charge compensation is required to fibres called neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). The
maintain function of the NADPH oxidase. It is controversial presence of microbes is sufficient to induce the
whether large conductance K+-channels (BK channels) NET-release. NETs are able to bind and kill bacteria (Gram-
transport potassium ions into the phagosome to compen- positive and negative) and a pathogenic yeast (Brink-
sate, at least partially, for the charge differences (Reeves mann et al., 2004; Urban et al., 2006). The major
et al., 2002; Ahluwalia et al., 2004). Phagosomal ROS- components of the NETs are DNA and associated histones
production and K+-influx may be crucial to solubilize the (H1, H2A, H2B, H3 and H4). They contain smooth
cationic granule proteases by releasing them from the stretches of 1517 nm in diameter, thought to consist of
anionic sulphated proteoglycan granule matrix. The solu- naked DNA and globular domains of around 25 nm where
bilized proteases, in turn can become active. Blocking BK chromatin is present (Fig. 1C). The antimicrobial activity of
channels reduced killing of Staphylococcus aureus and histones is well established (Hirsch, 1958). Moreover,
Candida albicans, albeit functional phagocytosis and NETs contain granule proteins from azurophilic, specific
oxidase activity. This emphasizes an essential role of BK and gelatinase granules. The NETs may possibly facilitate
channels in the function of phagocytes. However, the killing of microbes in two ways: (i) concentrate the antimi-
existence of BK channels in neutrophils is in question and crobial arsenal to the site of infection and (ii) prevent the
Fig. 2. Summary of strategies bacteria and fungi use to evade neutrophil killing. Pathogens (red) apply six different modes: They launch a
general stress response upon neutrophil attack (not shown in this figure); they avoid contact (A) with neutrophils by hiding in inaccessible
regions (e.g. in host epithelial cells) (A1) or by inhibiting neutrophil migration to the site of infection (A2); they prevent phagocytosis (for different
mechanisms see text) (B); they survive intracellularly (C) either by restraining the phagolysosomal fusion (C1), by resisting phagolysosomal
killing (C2) or by escaping into the cytoplasm (C3); they lyse neutrophils (D) and they evade killing in neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) (E).
spread of microbes from the initial site of infection. NETs strategies can be divided into six categories: Launching a
are presumably formed after phagocytic killing mecha- general survival response, avoiding contact (Fig. 2A), pre-
nisms are exhausted because NET-formation is initiated venting phagocytosis (Fig. 2B), surviving inside the neu-
after in vitro infection whereas neutrophils phagocytose trophil (Fig. 2C), inducing cell death and (Fig. 2D),
microbes within the first minutes of contact (Urban et al., avoiding killing in NETs (Fig. 2E). In this review we will
2006). highlight one microbe out of each category, either a patho-
A report investigating the transcriptional response of genic bacterium or fungus, and will emphasize on recent
neutrophils to bacterial phagocytosis revealed that engulf- findings.
ment of pathogens results in neutrophil apoptosis (Koba-
yashi et al., 2003). The authors suggested that neutrophil
General responses by pathogens to neutrophils
apoptosis is crucial to resolve infections and that
pathogen-induced premature apoptosis is an evasion Recent transcriptional analyses using whole genome
mechanism for microbes. To distinguish between the con- microarrays of pathogens attacked by neutrophils give
tribution of neutrophil apoptosis and NETs in host new insights into microbial responses (Rubin-Bejerano
defence, we first need to understand the mechanism of et al., 2003; Voyich et al., 2003; 2005; Fradin et al., 2005).
NET-formation in order to determine how the different A common feature of engulfed C. albicans, S. aureus and
fates of neutrophils contribute to their function. S. pyogenes is the upregulation of genes crucial for resis-
tance to oxidative stress. Indeed, mutant strains of, for
example, C. albicans (Martchenko et al., 2004) or
How do pathogens fight back?
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Lau et al., 2005) lacking oxi-
Pathogenic bacteria and fungi have evolved efficient strat- dative stress genes are less virulent. This highlights the
egies to outfox the weaponry of neutrophils. The main importance of ROS in microbial killing and can be applied
to both models discussed: (i) ROS kill microbes or (ii) (Pizarro-Cerda and Cossart, 2006). Second, many patho-
ROS activate antimicrobial proteases. genic bacteria and fungi are able to prevent recruitment of
Candida albicans is a commensal ascomycetous neutrophils to the site of infection (Fig. 2A2): For example,
yeast that colonizes the skin and mucosae of healthy the fungus Blastomyces dermatitis avoids provoking an
individuals. However, in immunocompromised patients inflammatory response by reducing the production of
C. albicans can cause severe life-threatening infections tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-a), a proinflammatory
(Romani, 2004). One of its major virulence traits is the cytokine, by host cells (Finkel-Jimenez et al., 2002). Thus,
ability to reversibly switch morphology from singular TNF-a-induced activation and recruitment of neutrophils
budding cells to filamentous forms. C. albicans engulfed and monocytes is inhibited. S. aureus secrets the chemo-
by macrophages can evade killing by inducing hyphal taxis inhibitory protein (CHIPS) that binds to the formyl
growth inside the phagosome (Mansour and Levitz, peptide receptor and to the C5a receptor on neutrophils.
2002) resulting in the destruction of the macrophage and This binding blocks signalling cascades which are acti-
the escape of C. albicans. In contrast, C. albicans vated in neutrophils upon contact with the bacteria and
cannot form filaments in neutrophil phagosomes, and is are crucial for neutrophil migration to the site of infection
therefore arrested in growth and eventually killed. (de Haas et al., 2004).
However, C. albicans evolved a response that is trig- Cryptococcus neoformans, a yeast-like, encapsulated
gered upon phagocytosis and renders the organism fungus, also prevents neutrophil migration by secreting
more resistant to neutrophil killing (Rubin-Bejerano capsular components. C. neoformans can cause severe
et al., 2003). Upon contact with neutrophils, but not with disseminated infections, such as cryptococcal meningitis,
other blood cells (Fradin et al., 2005), C. albicans predominantly in immunocompromised individuals
increases expression of several oxidative stress genes, (Diamond and Erickson, 1982). Although sera of patients
such as superoxide dismutases (SOD), catalases (CAT) with disseminated cryptococcosis have high titres of
and glutathione peroxidases (GPX) (Rubin-Bejerano C. neoformans products, the infiltration of leukocytes to
et al., 2003) which neutralize the oxidative neutrophil the infection site is minimal. The secreted capsular com-
arsenal. We may conclude from these studies that ponent glucuronoxylomannan (GXM) reduces leukocyte
pathogens with a high oxidative stress tolerance are chemotaxis in an infection model (Dong and Murphy,
also more resistant to neutrophil killing. Therefore, scav- 1995). GXM activates microglia to produce interleukin-8,
enging ROS produced by the neutrophil NADPH oxidase however, chemotaxis of neutrophils is still decreased
is a virulence mechanism to evade host immune (Lipovsky et al., 1998). This was explained by two find-
responses. This is consistent with the recent finding that ings: On the one hand, GXM reduces L-selectin (CD62L)
the major pigment of S. aureus, a ROS-scavenger, on the neutrophil surface in humans with disseminated
increases survival in neutrophils and promotes virulence cryptococcosis (Dong and Murphy, 1996). As CD62L is
(Liu et al., 2005). essential for leukocyte extravasation from the blood-
Transcriptional profiling of C. albicans also revealed stream by mediating attachment to inflamed endothelial
that genes of the methionine and arginine biosynthetic cells, neutrophil migration is impaired. On the other
pathway are induced upon phagocytosis by neutrophils hand, GXM restrained neutrophil rolling on the endothe-
(Rubin-Bejerano et al., 2003; Fradin et al., 2005). Growing lium (Ellerbroek et al., 2004). In addition, capsular com-
C. albicans under amino acid deprivation mimicks this ponents of C. neoformans can induce loss of tumour
response, suggesting that neutrophil vacuoles are defi- necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) on neutrophils. This loss
cient in amino acids. Indeed, amino acid transporters in of TNFR desensitizes neutrophils to TNF-a and is
the phagosomal membrane, which is derived from the another strategy employed by the fungus to avoid
plasma membrane in neutrophils, might be (Rubin- contact with phagocytes (Dong and Murphy, 1996; Coen-
Bejerano et al., 2003) oriented to pump amioacids out of jaerts et al., 2001). These findings demonstrate that
the phagosome. Whether low concentrations of amino while C. neoformans is susceptible to phagocytosis and
acids in the neutrophil phagosome is the trigger for the killing of human neutrophils (Miller and Mitchell, 1991), it
transcriptional activation of C. albicans remains to be can evade neutrophils altogether by suppressing their
determined. migration.
glutamate capsules, that prevent recognition by phago- Surviving inside the neutrophil
cytes, (ii) interfere with opsonization, for example, by
Many bacteria and fungi survive in neutrophils after
precluding complement activation and (iii) inhibit the actin
phagocytosis (Table 1). Anaplasma phagocytophilum, like
cytoskeleton required for engulfment.
other Ehrlichia species use neutrophils as a host cell and
Uropathogenic Escherichia coli e.g. employs the first
evolved fascinating strategies to survive within this hostile
approach. The capsular antigens O75 and K5 increase
environment. New findings about these Gram-negative
the resistance to phagocytosis (Burns and Hull, 1999). As
bacteria causing tick borne fever-like illness are summa-
an example of the second approach S. aureus secrets the
rized in recent reviews (Carlyon and Fikrig, 2003; Dumler
complement inhibitor SCIN that decreases comple-
et al., 2005; Rikihisa, 2006).
ment-mediated phagocytosis (Rooijakkers et al., 2005).
Intracellular survival strategies can be categorized into
The third approach is used by three pathogenic
(i) inhibition of phagosome lysosome fusion (Fig. 2C1), (ii)
Gram-negative bacteria Yersinia pestis (bulbonic and
survival inside the phagolysosome (Fig. 2C2), and (iii)
pneumonic plaque), Yersinia pseudotuberculosis (gastro-
escape into the cytoplasm (Fig. 2C3).
enteritis) and Yersinia enterocolitica (gastroenteritis and
Streptococcus pyogenes, a Gram-positive bacterium
mesenteric adenitis). Upon contact of the bacteria with a
(Group A Streptococcus), is able to use each of these
host cell the bacterial type III secretion apparatus injects
strategies. S. pyogenes is one of the most common
effector proteins into the cytoplasm of the host cell. In
human pathogens causing pharyngitis, impetigo, scarlet
vivo, the main target cells for Yersinia effector proteins are
fever and also severe systemic disease (Cunningham,
dendritic cells, macrophages and neutrophils (Marketon
2000). First, streptococcal M and M-like proteins are able
et al., 2005). Four of those proteins YopE, YopH, YopT and
to prevent degranulation as well as phagosomal fusion of
YopO inhibit the actin cytoskeleton (Gruenheid and Finlay,
azurophilic granules (Staali et al., 2006). Second, proteins
2003).
H and M mediate survival of S. pyogenes inside the
YopH and YopE both decrease phagocytosis by neutro-
phagolysosome of neutrophils despite a strong oxidative
phils (Grosdent et al., 2002) and increase virulence
burst following internalization (Staali et al., 2003). During
(Viboud and Bliska, 2005). YopH is a tyrosine phos-
infections S. pyogenes seem to use neutrophils to hide
phatase (Zhang et al., 1992). Tyrosine phosphorylation is
from immune responses. Neutrophils from infected
involved in actin cytoskeletal signalling pathways. YopH-
murine spleens are sufficient to cause infections after
mediated dephosphorylation at the site of phagocytosis
inoculating naive mice (Medina et al., 2003). Third, the
blocks a Ca2+-influx which is crucial for actin rearrange-
S. pyogenes capsule may enable the bacterium to escape
ments (Persson et al., 1999). YopE acts on Rho GTPases
the neutrophil phagosome into the cytoplasm as revealed
that are also involved in actin rearrangements (Black and
by electron micrographs of infected neutrophils (Medina
Bliska, 2000; Von Pawel-Rammingen et al., 2000). In vivo,
et al., 2003). The bacterium forms large capsules after
YopE predominantely targets the GTPase Rac-1 (Black
incubation with host phagocytic cells resulting in
and Bliska, 2000; Von Pawel-Rammingen et al., 2000; Aili
increased virulence and resistance against phagocytic
et al., 2006) which is particularly implicated in the uptake
killing.
of unopsonized bacteria (Gruenheid and Finlay, 2003).
Another strategy that enables survival inside the
Notably, several strains carrying single amino acid substi-
phagolysosome is applied by Helicobacter pylori (Allen
tutions in YopE are avirulent in mice. These mutants
et al., 2005). The Gram-negative bacterium subverts the
express and translocate higher amounts of YopE than
action of neutrophil NADPH oxidase. H. pylori colonizes
parental strains suggesting that YopE may also regulate
the gastric mucosa of humans and causes gastritis, which
the level of effector translocation during infection (Aili
in some cases can progress to gastric cancer. Although
et al., 2006).
H. pylori induces a respiratory burst in neutrophils the
The effectors YopT and YopO, which also target Rho
bacterium can direct a large proportion of the ROS to the
GTPases, reduce neutrophil uptake (Grosdent et al.,
extracellular space (Allen et al., 2005). H. pylori is most
2002) but are not crucial for virulence (Juris et al., 2002;
likely able to redirect the assembly of the NADPH-oxidase
Trulzsch et al., 2004). This might indicate that function-
complex to the plasma membrane and to exclude the
ally redundant effectors exist. The regulation of phago-
phagosomal membranes that surround the bacterium.
cytosis by Yersinia effectors is likely to be even more
The underlying mechanism still needs to be elucidated.
complex. For example, a recent proteomic approach
identified eight novel effector proteins, one of which,
YspP, is a tyrosine phosphatase (Matsumoto and
Inducing cell death
Young, 2006). Taken together, Yersinia evolved several
effector proteins that inhibit phagocytosis and make it Streptococcus pyogenes (Sierig et al., 2003; Miyoshi-
virulent. Akiyama et al., 2005), Clostridium perfrigens (Stevens
Gram-negative bacteria
Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans C, D Permpanich et al. (2006)
Bordetella pertussis C Steed et al. (1991)
Brucella abortus C Elzer et al. (1996)
Burkholderia ssp. (B. pseudomallei, B. cenocepacia) A, C Bylund et al. (2006)
Chlamydia ssp. (C. pneumoniae, C. trachomatis) C Register et al. (1986)
Ehrlichia ssp. (Anaplasma phagocytophilum) GR, C Rikihisa (2006)
Escherichia coli B Burns and Hull (1999)
Francisella tularensis C Lofgren et al. (1983)
Haemophilus ssp. (H. somnus, H. influenzae) C Czuprynski and Hamilton (1985)
Klebsiella pneumoniae B Domenico et al. (1994)
Legionella pneumophila C Horwitz and Silverstein (1981)
Neisseria gonorrhoeae C Simons et al. (2005)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa GR, B, C Bayer et al. (1991)
Rickettsia tsutsugamushi C Rikihisa and Ito (1979)
Salmonella ssp. (S. typi, S. typhimurium) D Chiu and Ou (1999)
Yersinia ssp. (Y. pestis, Y. enterolytica) B Viboud and Bliska (2005)
Mycobacteria
Mycobacterium ssp. (M. leprae, M. tuberculosis) C Holzer et al. (1986)
Gram-positive bacteria
Bacillus anthracis A During et al. (2005)
Clostridium perfringens A, D Stevens et al. (1987)
Enterococcus (E. faecalis, E. faecium) C Rakita et al. (1999)
Staphylococcus (S. aureus, S. epidermidis) GR, A, B, C, D Foster (2005)
Streptococcus (S. pyogenes, S. pneumoniae) GR, A, B, C, D, E Voyich et al. (2004)
Fungi
Blastomyces dermatitidis A, C Schaffner et al. (1986)
Cryptococcus neoformans A, B Diamond and Erickson (1982)
Histoplasma capsulatum C Kurita et al. (1991)
Paracoccidioides brasiliensis C Schaffner et al. (1986)
Sporothrix schnekii C Schaffner et al. (1986)
Trichosporon beigelii B, C Lyman et al. (1994)
GR, general survival response; AE, different categories of evasion strategies as displayed in Fig. 2.
et al., 1987) and S. aureus secrete toxins which lyse 2006). Whereas a-toxin is present in most of the
neutrophils and other host cells. The presence of these sequenced S. aureus strains only 12% express PVL
toxins strongly correlates with the virulence of these (Peacock et al., 2002; Foster, 2005). However, PVL is
strains (OReilly et al., 1986; Patel et al., 1987). S. aureus found predominantly in strains causing severe skin infec-
is a Gram-positive bacterium which is responsible for a tions and recurrent furunculosis (Prevost et al., 1995).
wide variety of community- and hospital-acquired Moreover PVL has been correlated to community
infections. This opportunistic pathogen has evolved acquired multiresistant strains causing necrotizing pneu-
several immune evasion mechanisms such as the secre- monia (Gillet et al., 2002). PVL localizes to neutrophils
tion of pore-forming toxins (PFTs). S. aureus expresses and epithelial cells in the lungs of patients with necrotizing
two types of PFTs a-toxin, also known as a-haemolysin pneumonia (Genestier et al., 2005). In neutrophils the
and bicomponent leukotoxins (Luk). Alpha-toxin forms toxin induces either necrosis at high toxin concentration or
homo-oligomers whereas bicomponent Luk have two dis- apoptosis at low concentration (Genestier et al., 2005).
tinct subunits that oligomerize into hexa- or heptameric The authors showed that PVL directly targets the mito-
forms (Foster, 2005). Four different types of bicomponent chondria of neutrophils, activates Caspase-9 and hence
Luk exist in S. aureus the g-toxins or g-haemolysins, leu- causes apoptosis.
kocidin E/D, leukocidin M/PV-like and Panton-Valentine
leukocidin (PVL) (Menestrina et al., 2001). All S. aureus
Avoiding killing in NETs
toxins apply a similar mode of action. The water soluble
monomeric forms bind the plasma membrane of target In addition to phagocytosis and intracellular killing, neu-
cells, and oligomerize into a ring structure to form a trans- trophils release NETs that capture and kill microbes in the
membrane pore (Menestrina et al., 2001). The N-terminus extracellular space (Brinkmann et al., 2004; Urban et al.,
of a-toxin is necessary to prevent the premature oligomer- 2006). Nucleases can degrade NETs indicating that the
ization of the complex in solution but is not required for chromatin functions as a scaffold and is a major compo-
oligomerization and pore-formation (Jayasinghe et al., nent of the fibres. Interestingly, extracellular nucleases