@J

62752
Public Disclosure Authorized

Islamic Republic of Pakistan

United Nations Development Program
The World Bank

WATER SECTOR INVESTMENT

PLANNING STUDY
Public Disclosure Authorized

Guide to
Public Disclosure Authorized

The Indus Basin Model Revised

January 1990
Public Disclosure Authorized

FILE COpy

Environment Operations and Strategy Division

The World Bank

WATER SECTOR INVESTMENT

PLANNING STUDY

Guide to
The Indus Basin Model Revised

January 1990

Prepared by: Uasood Ahmad

Anthony Brooke
Gary Kutcher
 Preface

Developmental work on the original Indus Basin Model (IBM) began in

1976 and culminated in 1982 with the publication of several research papers.
In an operational setting the model has been periodically "revived" and
adapted to the analysis of several World Bank sponsored projects in Pakistan.
In 1986 the model was revised extensively and updated for the analysis of the
proposed Kalabagh Dam. For several reasons, the IBM heretofore has not been
transferred to the Government of Pakistan. First, the model, particularly in
its early manifestations. was so large and cumbersome that it required the
very latest computer technology to solve - technology that was only available
in the U.S. Second, the software system in which the model was defined was a
highly complex. specialized routine which only a handful of experts could
operate. Third, there had been no provision for training Pakistani staff in
the understanding and use of the model.

Recent dramatic advances in computational hardware. the advent of the

General Algebraic Modeling System (GAHS), and the opportunities afforded by
the Water Sector Investment Planning Study (WSIPS) now make the transfer of
the model, currently known as the Indus Basin Model Revised (IBHR). to the
Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) of the GOP.

The WSIPS is funded by United Nations Development Program (UNOP),

with the World Bank acting as the executing agency. Incorporated in the WSIPS
budget was provision for a further update and streamlining of the model so
that it may assist in the analysis of projects within the context of that
study, and for two workshops. The United States Agency for International
Development has generously provided a MicroVax computer with the capabilities
of solving the model and managing its data base. As part of the Kalabagh
work, the model was re-written in GAHS so that staff with a minimum of
computer skills can understand it.

The first workshop was held at WAPDA in March 1989. Sixteen

participants from WAPDA and other agencies of the Federal and Provincial
governments were trained in computer fundamentals. agricultural and water
resources modeling techniques, and introduced to GAHS. An earlier version of
this guide was the primary course material for the second workshop, which
covered the structure of the IBHR, its data base, and how to solve it and
interpret the results. The second workshop was held in August 1989, again at
WAPDA. The sixteen participants were joined by selected staff carrying out the
WSIPS.

The first chapter is addressed to the general reader. Later

material, however, assumes that the reader has a solid background in modeling
and GAHS such as that provided in the first workshop which used GAHS: A User's
Guide and Agricultural Modeling for Policy and Project Analysis as texts.
 - i

Table of Contents

Page

No.

I. Background and Overview . . 1

The Indus Basin Model 1

The Indus Basin Model Revised (IBMR) 1

Overview of the IBMR 2

The Zone Models . . . 5

The Province Models . 6

A Note on Algorithms 7

A Note on GAMS 7

Description of Agro-climatic Zones 8

II. Structure of the Indus Basin Models 11

Philosophy Behind the Structure . 11

The Embedded Farm Models 12

Cropping Activities and Inputs 12

Livestock Activities . . . . 15

Outputs: Crop and Livestock Commodities 16

Constraints: Land, Labor, and Water 18

Objective Function 19

Input Prices 21

The ACZ Models 22

The Zonal Labor Market . . . . 22

The Supply of Water . 24

Commodity Markets . . . 24

The Demand Functions 25

The Zonal Objective Function 26

International Trade 28

The Surface Water Model 28

The Concept of a Network 28

An Illustrative Network Model 29

The Complete Indus Basin Model 30

A Note on Project Analysis 33

III. Input Data . . . . . 35

Background and Data Sources . 35

Agronomic Data. . 37
 - ii
Crop Calendar (TABLE LAND) . . 38

Draft Power Requirements (TABLE BULLOCK) 38

Tractor Requirements (TABLE TRACTOR) 38

Labor Requirements (TABLE LABOR) 38

Water Requirements (TABLE WATER) . 39

Fertilizer Inputs (TABLE FERT) 39

Seed Inputs (TABLE SYLDS) . . . . . 40

Yields of Crop and Crop By-products (TABLE NATYIELD) 40

Livestock Data . . . . . . . . . . . 41

Livestock Input-Output Data (TABLE IOLIVE) 41

Miscellaneous Livestock Parameters 42

Economic Data . .
42

Price and Cost Data . .

42

Production and Consumption Data

43

Resource Inventory 44

Irrigation System Data 44

Aggregating Information to ACZ 44

Disaggregation of Canal Commands 44

Aggregation of Sub-Areas and Other Inputs to ACZ 45

Canal Command Characteristics . . . . 45

Culturable Commanded Area (CCA) 45

Canal Capacity at Head (CCAP) . . 45

Canal Delivery Efficiency . . . . . . . 49

Watercourse Command Efficiency 49

Data for Storage Reservoirs. 49

Data for Surface Water Routing. 50

Water Inputs . . . . . . . . . . 52

Historic Canal Diversions . 52

Evaporation of Groundwater. 55

Subirrigation . . 59

Groundwater Balance . . . 59

Rainfall data. . 59

Recharge to Groundwater from Rain . 60

Government Tubewell Pumpage. . . . . . . . 60

Surface Water Inflows to the System . 60

Computing Inflows for the Model From Historic Records 62

Other data 63

IV. A Guide to the GAMS Statements. 67

Sets and Data Organization. .

67

Variables
73

Equations
74

Bounds
86

Model Selection
87

 - iii

Solving the Model . .

88
Reports on the Solution
89

V. Model Applications . 95

Validation 95
Validation Criteria . 95
Cropping Patterns . 96
Input Use . 98
Constraining Factors '. 98

Applications 103

The Surface Water Allocation Issue 103

Global Optimality . 103
Pareto-Optimality . . . 104
Optimality within Provinces 104

Project Analysis with the IBMR: Raised Mangla 108

The Jalalpur Canal Project . . . . 113

The Project .............. .
113
Modelling the Project . 114
The JCP Solutions 115
Economic Analysis of JCP 117

Bibliography 121

Appendix A. GAMS Listing of Data and Models . 123

Introduction . 125
Data and Basic Model Specification 131
Water Allocation Base Case, Including Report 231
Water Allocation Models 337
Raised Mangla Models . . 343
Jalalpur Canal Extension Models 369
 - iv
Tables

Table 2.1: Crop and Livestock Outputs 17

Table 2.2: Hypothetical Project Analysis . 34

Table 3.1:Recommended Fertilizer Application (KG/Acre) 40

Table 3.2:Zone-District Mapping . . . . . . . 46

Table 3.3:Canal Command to Sub-Area Mapping ..... 47

Table 3.4:Agroclimatic Zone - Canal Mapping . . . . . . 48

Table 3.5:Names and Numbers of Canals in the WRM Lists 54

Table 3.6:Canal Diversions; 1976-1988 Average (MAF) 58

Table 3.7:Available Rim Station Records . . . . 61

Table 3.8:Available Tributary Records . . . . . . 61

Table 3.9:Computations of 50% Probability Inflows For Indus

above Tarbela, Rabi Season . . . . 63

Table 3.10: Rim Station Inflows, 50% Probability (MAF) 64

Table 3.11 : Tributary Inflows, 50% Probability (MAF) 65

Table 4.1 : Variable List 74

Table 5.1: 1987-88 Cropping Pattern Model Simulation vs. Estimated Actual 97

Table 5.2: Statistical Analysis of Simulated Cropping Pattern . . . . . 97

Table 5.3: Livestock Population: Model Simulation vs. Estimated Actual 99

Table 5.4: Fertilizer Use: Model Simulation vs. Actual 1986-87 99

Table 5.5: Land Use, 1987-88 Base Case . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100

Table 5.6: Report on Groundwater Balance (1988 Model Simulation) 102

Table 5.7: Potential Gains from Water Allocation Policies

1987-88 Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . 106

Table 5.8: Projects Included in the Year 2000 Scenarios 109

Table 5.9: Benefits from Raising Mangla Dam

Solutions for the Year 2000 111

Table 5.10: Raising Mangla: Rate of Return Analysis . 112

Table 5.11: Jalalpur Project Cropping Patterns . . . 116

Table 5.12: Benefit Calculations for Ja1a1pur Canal Project 117

Table 5.13 : Jalalpur Project Rate of Return Calculations . . 118

Table A.1 : List of input and Output Files for the runs made for WSIS 128

Table A.2 : List of Files listed in this Appendix . . . . . 129

Figures

Figure 2.1: Typical Cropping Activity 13

Figure 2.2: Farm-level Objective Function 21

Figure 2.3: Typical Farm Model . . . . . 23

Figure 2.4: Typical Supply-Demand Relationship 26

Figure 2.5: Illustrative Network Model . . . 31

Figure 2.6: Water Sector Investment Planning Study 32

Figure 3.1: Average Inflow and Canal Diversions 56

Figure 3.2: Groundwater Evaporation and Watertable

Depth Relation, after Fireman,

Gardner and LIP Studies . . . . . 57

 I. Background and OVerview

1. The Indus Basin Model

1.1 In 1976, the World Bank's Development Research Center, in

collaboration with the Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA), began
developing a large scale linear programming model of Pakistan's irrigated
agriculture. The resulting model (Duloy and O'Mara [1984]), completed in
1981-82, combined standard agricultural modelling techniques popularized by
the Chac study of Mexico (Goreux and Manne [1973], with a network model of the
surface water storage and distribution network. Additional complexities
introduced had to do with the existence of fresh and saline groundwater areas
and the conjunctive use of surface and groundwater in the fresh areas.

1.2 In its complete version the model, referred to as the Indus Basin
Model (IBM) totaled about 8,000 equations. It proved valuable as a research
tool in investigating water-related projects and agricultural policies where
important externalities with respect to groundwater quality and the depth to
the water table existed. However, its sheer size prevented the researchers
from obtaining more than a handful of solutions.

1.3 In the 1980's it was recognized that components of the model could
be highly useful for the analysis of particular projects in Pakistan. These
components were usually defined on a specific project area and took the
applicable production activities and resource constraints from the large
model. By altering the production technologies and/or resource availabilities
according to the project's objective, the impact of the project on cropping
patterns, resource use, and farmers incomes could be simulated. The Left Bank
Outfall Drain and the On Farm Water Management Projects were two examples of
these project applications.

2. The Indus Basin Model Revised (IBMR)

1.4 In 1985 it was realized that partial analytic techniques were

proving inadequate to address the proposed Kalabagh Dam Project. Because of
the inter-connectedness of virtually the entire irrigation system, a tool
which could simultaneously evaluate the benefits of additional water
throughout the agro-climatic zones and among the major crops was desired.
Clearly, the IBM was a candidate, if it could be streamlined to a
cost-effective size and modified for the purpose.

1.5 A team from the Bank's Development Research Department and

consultants undertook the task. The model's data were updated where possible,
and several structural modifications permitted a vast reduction in size.
Among these were: abandonment of the IBM's spatial structure based on 53
groundwater-homogeneous "polygons in favor of the nine agro-climatic zones
defined in the Revised Action Plan (RAP); deletion of a large number of
constraints imposing groundwater equilibrium in favor of an accounting system
which monitors groundwater disequilibria to alert decision makers to potential
problem areas; replacement of farm-level linear expenditure system-based
consumption functions with a price-endogenous demand structure which simulates
market equilibrium by equating demand and supply for the major consumption
crops; and re-writing the model in the General Algebraic Modelling System
 - 2

(GAMS) language, the most up-to-date technology for constructing and operating
such types of models.

1.6 The resulting model, called the Indus Basin Model Revised (IBMR)
contains about 2,500 equations yet retains all of the IBM's detail on the
production side as well as the surface storage and distribution network
(Ahmad, Meeraus, and Kutcher [1986]). It solves readily on many mainframe
computers on which GAMS and a suitable linear programming solver have been
installed (typical cost per solution: $200). An additional feature introduced
for the Kalabagh work and essential to all project work is the ability to
project the model forward in time. By varying those parameters for which
future estimates are available (growth in demand. yields. growth in input use,
effects of projects on the resource base), snapshots of agricultural
performance may be made for future years. In the case of Kalabagh, this
feature was used to simulate the agricultural economy of 2000 with and without
the dam.

3. Overview of the IBMR

1.7 Agricultural production and consumption is simulated within the

above-mentioned nine agro-climatic zones. They are listed in Table 3.2
together with their component Districts, together with their size in terms of
canal-commanded (cultivable) areas distinguished by fresh and saline
groundwater. and are shown on the accompanying map, IBRD 21611.

1.8 The canals which feed each zone are listed in Table 3.4. Although
it is unfortunate that the zones do not correspond to strict aggregations of
either Districts or canal commands, it must be recognized that homogeneity of
agricultural activity combined with identifiable sources of water control are
critical to keeping aggregation bias to a minimum.

1.9 Within each zone there are production possibilities for up to

fifteen crops (wheat, Basmati and Irri rice, cotton, sugarcane, gur. maize,
rape and mustard seeds, gram, onions, potatoes, chillies, orchard, and Kharif
and Rabi fodders) and three livestock products (cow and buffalo milk, beef).
A typical crop production possibility takes the form of an input-output vector
(a column in a linear programming tableau) representing the cultivation of one
acre of land in the crop. The vector contains elements for the primary crop
output (the yield), and usually a by-product of animal feed. Various inputs
required for the cultivation are also accounted for as elements in the vector
or column: land, irrigation water, labor, bullock draft power, tractor
services, fertilizer, seeds, and any other purchased inputs which may be
required.

1.10 For all crops except orchard, two technology choices are given:
bullock and semi-mechanized. The bullock technology relies primarily on
manual labor and bullock power; the semi-mechanized one uses a combination of
labor, bullocks, and tractors with the tractors used typically for plowing and
sometimes harvesting. Depending on the relative costs of maintaining bullocks
versus hiring or using tractors, the model will make the technology choice
endogenously. For wheat. additional techniques are given differentiated by
planting and harvesting dates, and water stress levels.
 - 3

1.11 The inputs or resources are either constrained in availability,

charged a price, or both. Land is strictly constrained in availability by
month. Surface water is both constrained by the canal diversions to the zone
and priced at the canal water rate charged each crop/acre. Bullocks are not
constrained (except for historical solutions or near-term scenarios in which
the herd size can be safely predicted), but their maintenance is charged via
feeding requirement constraints. In each crop season. a sufficient supply of
nutrients (carbohydrates. protein and green fodder) must be met through a
combination of fodder crops and straws and by-products of other crops. The
same holds for the stock of cows and buffaloes which have different nutrient
requirements and produce milk and meat instead of draft services. Tractor
services. fertilizers. and seeds are charged their respective prices. In some
versions these inputs are constrained in supply; in others, supply is assumed
to be infinitely elastic. Farm-level investment options have been introduced
in some versions for tractors and tubewe11s. Labor is available from farm
household sources up to a limit. Beyond that, activities which hire off-farm
labor may be activated depending on the return to additional labor and the
wage rate.

1.12 Each crop requires water in different quantities and at different

times. To be consistent with land, labor. bullock and tractor power, the
chosen time dimension is monthly. The actual water requirements are reduced
by the expected rainfall and that available from subirrigation. Both sources
differ by zone. and subirrigation differs by the fresh/saline distinction
within each zone because the depths to water table differ. Mixing of
subirrigation supplies with surface water is enforced in saline areas. The
remaining crop requirements must be met from surface water, supplemented in
fresh areas by private tubewe11 operations up to the limit of the installed
capacity. Where applicable, government tubewe11 operations are simulated to
augment the surface supplies. Within a zone. the surface flows from the canal
heads are reduced for canal losses and again for watercourse and field losses
prior to reaching the crops. It is easy to see how the model is used. for
example, to simulate a project irrigation system rehabilitation: the loss
coefficients are reduced allowing more water to reach the crops and lowering
recharges. The benefits are endogenously generated and reflected in a higher
objective function.
1.13 Groundwater inflows and outflows are also tabulated so that the
net impact on the water table. by zone, and separately for fresh and saline
areas within a zone. is obtained from each solution. Inflows comprise
recharge from rainfall, river reaches and seepage losses in the water delivery
system. Outflows are public and private tubewe11 pumpage. river bank
recharge. and evaporation from the groundwater.
1.14 The input data for the Indus Basin Model has been refined over the
years. This is most particularly true for the technical coefficients (i.e.
the land, labor, draft power and water requirements), which are not readily
obtainable from published sources or from surveys. The information base for
these data starts with the 1976 XAES Survey of Irrigated Agriculture. It was
supplemented by the Agricultural and Livestock Censuses and by the Farm Re
survey of 1988. The current data base also reflects the cumulative knowledge
acquired during the project studies, such as On Farm Water Management, Left
 - 4
Bank Outfall Drain and Kalabagh Agricultural Impact study.

1.15 Much of the data, however, is readily available. Statistics on

cropped area, crop production, total fertilizer use, canal diversions, and
river inflows are extracted from publications and transformed as needed for
the model. Yields, and prices of outputs and inputs, are obtained from the
most recent sources. Changes to parameters describing the endowment of
physical resources are made on the basis of information obtained from
projects. For the Kalabagh version, the data base was made consistent to 1980
to the extent possible, then projected to 2000. For the WSIPS version, the
data base has been updated to 1987-88 using the 1988 survey, recent issues of
Agricultural Statistics of Pakistan, and WAPDA-supplied irrigation data.

1.16 The nine zone models are linked together via the surface storage
and distribution model (Kutcher [1976]). This model contains storage nodes
for Tarbela, Mangla, Chasma (and in some versions, Kalabagh) reservoirs.
Surface water enters the system at the rim stations. Flows along river
reaches are simulated with losses and gains from river bank storage. Water
may be stored for later release in the reservoirs or allowed to flow down
river. At each control point (usually a barrage), decisions are simulated to
allow diversions for use within the adjacent production zones or release for
downstream use. The entire system of river reaches and main canals is
contained in the model, using months as the time period of reference.

1.17 The diversion decisions. together with the reservoir operating

rules, may be left flexible within the physical constraints of the storage and
distribution system and the needs of power generation - in which case the
model will distribute water optimally for agricultural production. For
realistic cases, however, constraints are inserted which reflect existing
policy on how the water is to be allocated. Typical allocation rules
simulated are canal-wise diversions proportional to those of the post-Tarbela
period, and the so-called Ad Hoc allocations adopted over the past few years.
Of course. the IBMR is uniquely suited for simulating the impacts of changes
in the allocation system.

1.18 After a model has been solved, power generation at Mangla and
Tarbela reservoirs is computed. This is done using the model's determination
of monthly storage levels and outflows, and is tabulated in the solution
report. The value of power generated has no direct bearing on model's
decisions with regard to storage or releases from the reservoirs. (Power
considerations were taken into account by the engineers who set the operating
rule curves for the reservoirs. The rule curves also ensure safe operating
conditions for the reservoirs, and are exogenous to the model.)

1.19 The linear programming format of the IBMR permits specification of

several alternative objective functions. The maximization of value added in
agriculture is one example. Another is the minimization of some resource, say
water, subject to achievement of given production targets. The maximization
of rural employment is one often desired by policy makers. However, unless
the agricultural economy being simulated is centrally planned and controlled
to the extent that the decisions of both farmers and consumers are dictated,
then economic theory permits only one objective function at the sector level:
 - 5

the maximization of the sum of consumers and producers surpluses. Use of

this objective function ensures that farmers will choose cropping patterns and
input usage which maximizes their incomes while at the same time equating
consumer demands with supplies via adjustment in market prices. Thus a
solution to the IBMR gives not only a simulated water distribution pattern,
production by crop, technology, and zone, and the input use required for that
production, but market-clearing prices and hence farm income as well.
Furthermore, every solution is assured to be feasible with respect to the
available resources.

1.20 Use of this objective function, called NSP (net social product)
does not preclude tabulation of other aggregates of interest. Value added,
employment, exports and imports of agricultural commodities are just some of
those produced by a solution to the model. For most project analysis, value
added measured in economic prices is required to compute benefits. This
measure is produced automatically in all solutions of the IBMR.

4. The Zone Models

1.21 Given a set of water allocations from the full IBMR or from hand
computation, the zone models may be solved independently. Each zone model
contains less that 200 equations and is solvable on an IBM AT-type personal
computer with the PC version of GAMS (A 386-based machine with extended memory
is preferred). Hence they are cost-effective for localized project analysis,
and are useful for indicative policy analysis as well so long as assumptions
of constant surface water diversions are valid and provided an aggregation to
national totals of production and resource use are not required.

1.22 Application of a given zone model requires an assumption about the

market pertaining in the zone. At one extreme, one might assume that the zone
is small, and trade among neighboring zones is free and costless. If so,
output prices may be taken as given and unalterable by any prospective
simulation of the model. This assumption obviously applies to any given farm.
No single farmer is large enough to influence market prices, and presumably he
may trade among neighboring farms at little cost. If so, he will probably
specialize in those crops in which he has a comparative advantage, trade the
excess over his family's consumption needs with neighboring farmers, and, if
he is large enough, export some produce to the rest of the zone. country, or
the world.

1.23 Thus, if prices are fixed, and the objective function is one
involving some measure of farm income, then the zone model in effect simulates
a representative farm of the zone. Only the scale will differ, and even this
difference can be eliminated either through scaling down the resources given
to the zone model or scaling down the reported outcome of the model's
solution.

1.24 There are two difficulties with this approach. First, when prices
are fixed, the solution usually shows a good deal of specialization in the
cropping pattern, as was speculated above for the individual farmer. If one
observes twelve crops being grown in non-negligible quantities in a zone. the
fixed-price model might produce only four of them. In this case the farm
 - 6

model is not representative at all, and the results are not aggregable in any
meaningful sense. Second, farm sizes usually make a substantial difference in
output patterns and input use, so that if farm level results are required. a
disaggregation of farm sizes or types is called for. This would involve
submodels of different farm types and require survey data stratified by farm
size (Kutcher and Scandizzo [1981]).

1.25 One method often used to improve the "fit" of the solution is to
incorporate the fact that farm families typically produce most if not all of
their food consumption needs. The 1988 survey allowed us to estimate the
proportions of the production consumed on the farm, and hence to estimate the
actual on-farm consumption. Current versions of the zone models and the full
IBMR require that the farms embedded in the zone models meet consumption needs
first, and then market any excess. For projects and policies which might
significantly increase farm incomes, a method is given whereby the consumption
may be linked to income levels.

1.26 The objective function structure used in the zone models is

similar to the sector NSP, but scaled down to the zone level. In this case,
the objectives of farmers and consumers within the zone are modelled in. What
happens within the delimitation of the zone model can affect prices. Of
course, those effects must be limited because if prices rise too much goods
will flow in from neighboring zones, or if prices drop much below those in
neighboring zones, "exports" will occur.

1.27 This is the structure adopted for the zone models: for production
beyond the minimum consumption requirement, downward-sloping demand functions
are derived for each zone model so that changes in production leads to changes
in zone-level prices. Scaling down the solution to a representative farm is
still possible, and indeed, more realistic, because the representative farm
will in fact be an average of the zone in all respects. Hence some results,
such as cropping patterns and production, will be presented at the zone level,
while other information, particularly the components of farm income and costs.
will be given for a representative farm.

5. The Province Models

1.28 Just as the full IBMR is a collection of zone models, models of

the three main provinces irrigated by Indus waters may be constructed by
grouping the appropriate zone models. The NWFP zone model in fact corresponds
to the canal-irrigated area of the entire NWFP Province. A model of the
Punjab consists of the zone models PCW, PRW, PMW, and PSW linked together. A
model of the Sind consists of SCWN, sews, SRWN, and SRWS. Because some of the
zone models do not correspond exactly to the province to which they are
"attached", a one-to-one correspond with actual provincial boundaries is not
possible, and this discrepancy must be kept in mind in data work - both in
preparing the input data from provincial-level statistics, and in interpreting
results at the level of a province. Thus, for example, results from the
"Sind" model will include that part of canal-irrigated Baluchistan which lies
in the zone model SRWN.

1.29 Just as zone models require assumptions about the canal water
 - 7
allocated to them in each month, so do the province models (because water is a
scarce national resource which must be shared by the provinces, it would make
no sense to solve a provincial model without an allocation first being
assumed). However, there is some flexibility in how the allocation is made:
one could assume that the allocations by canal continue to hold (in which case
the solution to the province model would simply amount to the sum of the
component models), or one could allow endogenous re-allocation among the
canals but within the overall provincial constraints. Such flexibility, of
course, would be subject to the physical capacities of the surface storage and
distribution system within the province being studied. In the Kalabagh study,
it was found that there was a good deal of room for efficiency gains from
within province re-allocations because the marginal productivity of water
varies greatly from zone to zone.

6. A Rote on Algorithms

1.30 All price-endogenous models are essentially nonlinear in objective

functions because the area under a downward-sloping demand function is a
non-linear function of quantity demanded. In the IBMR, as with all large
agricultural sector models, the non-linearities are handled via segmentation
so that a linear programming algorithm may be used. Resulting prices will
vary discretely, not continuously. This generally does not pose a problem:
unless finely-tuned pricing policy is the aim of the model, an approximation
of prices is sufficient. Moreover, the approximation can be made as close as
desired by increasing the number of segments in the neighborhood of the
expected equilibrium price.

1.31 The zone models, however, are sufficiently small that such
approximations are not necessary: they may be solved with a nonlinear
programming algorithm. Such an algorithm (MINOS5) is available with all
versions of GAMS.

7. A Rote on CAMS

1.32 GAMS (Brooke, Kendrick and Meeraus [1988]) has been chosen as the
way to implement the IBMR. We will list the advantages we see in this choice.

o A GAMS model is essentially independent of the computer being used

(provided, of course, that the GAMS software is available on it). This
means that a large and powerful machine can be used where needed, on the
basin-wide model, for example, while less expensive machines such as DOS
based personal computers, can be used with components (the zone models).

o A GAMS model is not specific to the details of one particular class of

optimization problem. This means that a switch can be made from linear
to nonlinear methods by changing a few details in the program.

o A GAMS model allows the specification of large and complex models

succinctly, because the data and the equations are naturally separated,
and because indexed operations allow one statement to be automatically
generalized to all members of one (or more) sets.
 - 8

o All information needed to run, or understand. a GAMS model is collected

in one place. This model statement is designed to be as easily
interpreted by humans as by computers. It can contain extensive
documentation, and can be understood by technically oriented people who
are not computer specialists.

1.33 Finally we should mention that the Indus basin models have been
crucial test models for GAMS itself. The standard large and difficult model
for testing each new improvement in GAMS has always been the largest and most
difficult model of the Indus Basin of Pakistan.

8. Description of Agro-climatic Zones

1.34 The Indus Basin Irrigation system is divided into nine Agro-climatic
zones. Map IBRD 21611 shows these zones and a brief description follows.

NWFP (North-West Frontier Province). The ACZ NWFP comprises only

the canal commanded areas of Peshawar and Mardan districts. It is
the only ACZ that cannot be supplied by the Indus surface
distribution system. as it receives surface water from the Swat and
Kabul rivers before they reach the Indus. Water shortages can
largely be traced to limited canal capacities. Groundwater is
usable throughout most of the area. Cropping is dominated by
sugarcane, maize, and wheat.

PMW (Punjab Mixed-Wheat, called "ThaI Doab in the RAP) contains

ff

nearly two million canal commanded acres, mostly on the left bank of
the Indus below the Jinnah barrage but also including the Paharpur
and Chasma Right Bank canal command areas in the NWFP Province. The
topography is rough, soils are sandy and seepage is high, resulting
in low cropping intensities and yields. The fresh groundwater and
localized waterlogging in most of the ACZ imply that the potential
for tubewell development is favorable.

PRW (Punjab Rice-Wheat) contains about 2.8 million acres, virtually

all of which is underlain by fresh groundwater. This has spurred
intense private tubewell development. As a result, cropping
intensities are among the highest in the Punjab, with Basmati rice
being the dominant cash crop. Relatively high returns to farming
combined with a (reported) shortage of labor has led to rapid
mechanization; this zone has more tractors per acre than any other.

PSW (Punjab Sugarcane-Wheat, called nPunjab Mixed Cropn in the RAP)

lies between PMW and PRW, and contains about 4.4 million acres.
Wheat and sugarcane are the principal crops. About one-third of the
zone is saline, but farmers make extensive use of groundwater in the
rest. Water shortages do exist, and are largely attributable to low
watercourse efficiencies.

PCW (Punjab Cotton-Wheat) is by far the largest ACZ in the Basin,

comprising over 11 million acres on the left bank of the Indus
between Sind Province. India. and the other Punjab ACZs. Cotton and
 - 9

wheat, the main crops, have some of the highest yields in Pakistan.
About one fourth of the ACZ suffers from severe waterlogging and
salinity. Groundwater is extensively used in the rest of the zone,
but adequate water remains an overall constraint.

SCWN and SCWS (Sind Cotton-Wheat North and South), each of which
covers over three million acres, are disaggregations of the Sind
Cotton-Wheat zone. Nearly half of the north, and most of the south
is saline and/or waterlogged. Yields on areas remaining in use are
favorable. Groundwater use is minimal, and surface water supplies
are hampered by high losses, particularly at the watercourse level.

SRWN and SRWS (Sind Rice-Wheat North and South) are the right and
left bank delineations of the Sind Rice-Wheat zone. About two
thirds of the 4.4 million acres in the north are saline and all of
the south is similarly classified. Soils are favorable for rice,
the dominant crop. Because of the high water table (at saturation
level in many areas) yields for other crops are poor, and cropping
intensities, particularly in the south, are the lowest in the Basin.
The XAES found that surface water supplies were adequate, although
other inputs, such as fertilizer, are used sparingly.
 - 10

(This page is intentionally blank)

 II. Structure of the Indus Basin Models

1. Philosophy Behind the Structure

2.1 In this section we will describe. in general terms but focussing on

the economic aspects. the structure of the Indus Basin Models. At the end of
this section we will describe how the entire system fits together. but first,
some general comments about the philosophy behind the structure.

2.2 In any large scale model. we believe that it is extremely important

that a) the underlying components fit together in a logical fashion. and b)
that the performance of the components remain "visible" and the results they
produce make economic and agronomic sense. In other words. if we cannot
understand and explain the performance of the components of a large scale
model, we can have little hope of understanding and explaining the performance
of the full model. These comments are particularly true of the IBMR because
it cuts across several disciplines: agronomy. irrigation, water resources
engineering. and economics.

2.3 The smallest component of the IBMR is the representative farm, which
we discuss first. The fact the IBMR contains representative farms sets it
apart from most typical irrigation/water resources planning models: in farm
models, cropping patterns and many other variables are endogenous. In most
irrigation models, cropping patterns are given or assumed. and the exercise
boils down to one of operating the irrigation system and/or designing
investment packages which best meet those fixed demands for water. The IBMR
recognizes that water demands are derived demands - derived from the end
product of irrigation activities - the supply of agricultural products.

2.4 After all, it is the value of these products which make irrigation
water valuable. and it is changes in the value of agricultural products which
induce changes in the value of irrigation water. If the value of cotton,
wheat, rice, etc., were to suddenly drop, then the value of the irrigation
water which makes their production possible would also drop.

2.5 On the other hand. the supply of irrigation water can, and strongly
does. affect supplies and prices of agricultural commodities. A major
irrigation product which permits. say. the expansion of area under wheat,
might induce a fall in the price of wheat because farms can grow more of it.
This implies that, in reality, demands for water are not fixed, but that there
is a closely intertwined relation between the supply and demand for water and
the supply and demand of agricultural commodities.

2.6 Ultimately, it is the farmers who choose what to grow. and how much
water to use on each crop. They do so through complex decision-making
involving all of the parameters under which they operate: crop choices,
technology choices, cost and availability of inputs. their own resource
availabilities, and last, but possibly most important: the market
opportunities for their produce.
 - 12
2. The Embedded Far.m Models

2.7 From any solution of the IBMR or of any component (any ACZ or
collection of ACZ models) it is possible to deduce the operations of the
embedded farm models and the constraints upon them which prohibit expansion of
agricultural production. It is also possible, by varying the assumption
associated with that solution, to estimate how the embedded "farmer" might
react to say, more or less water, changes in prices of outputs or inputs, or
the availability of an alternative technology.

2.8 It would be simple to construct a model of an individual farm from

any of the ACZ models by reducing the resource availabilities to that of the
farm under consideration, but this is seldom necessary or desirable. It is
the combined operations of many farms which significantly change output
levels, prices, and make projects attractive, not just a single farm. Thus we
will speak of representative farms and representative farm models which will
act as a surrogate for each of the thousands of actual farms in the area we
are studying. The representative farm may not even exist in reality, but the
representative farm model ought to reproduce fairly closely the combined
operations of the group.

Cropping Activities and Inputs

2.9 Recall from linear programming terminology that an activity is a

column vector in the linear programming matrix. Associated with an activity
is a variable which indicates the level or intensity at which the activity is
operated. Each activity takes its name from that of the associated variable.

2.10 The most prevalent and most influential activities in the IBMR are
cropping activities - those which "produce" some crop. They are defined as
the cultivation of one acre of a given crop by a given technology in a given
area at a given time with a given application of irrigation water. A typical
activity appears as in Figure 2.1. Those familiar with input-output analysis
will recognize the similarity: a cropping activity produces one or more
outputs and requires several types of inputs to do so. (The signs on the
entries, positive for outputs and negative for inputs, are only illustrative;
actual model entries may vary.)

2.11 Every cropping activity produces a primary crop output. Since the
activity is defined in terms of acres, the output is the yield in kilograms
per acre. Of course the yield will vary as most of the items in the previous
paragraph vary: farms located in different areas will have different yields
because soils, climate, and water quality vary. Technology may (but does not
in the IBMR) result in different yields. Certainly, timing of the crop and
level of irrigation application affect yields.

2.12 Most crops produce a usable by-product. Only by-products which are
fed to livestock are included in the IBMR. The most notable is straw from
wheat. Others include rice straw, maize leaves, and sugar cane refuse.

2.13 Inputs are included if they are either necessary for crop production
or their cost is sufficient to influence production levels. The former
 - 13

Figure 2.1: Typical Cropping Activity

Outputs:
crop yield +

by-product yield +

Inputs:

Land

labor

water

traction power

fertilizers

seeds

category includes land, labor, water, and seeds. The latter includes
fertilizer and insecticides and pesticides.

2.14 Land is of particular importance as it determines the absolute

limits to cultivation as well as defining the various rotations of different
crops which are possible. Because different crops occupy the land at
different times of the year, land is dimensioned on a monthly basis. The
units are the proportion of a month which the crop occupies the land. Wheat,
for example, occupies the entire month of January everywhere in the Basin, so
wheat can always be expected to require one unit of January land. In months
when the crop is being planted or harvested, the corresponding coefficient
will vary between zero and one. If cultivation of wheat begins, on average,
in mid-November on the representative farm, then the land occupation (land
 - 14
requirement) coefficient is .5. Variations in scheduling will cause the land
requirement coefficients to shift forward or backward in time. A late wheat
may not come on the land until December, in which case the November
coefficient will be zero, and the December coefficient 1. or .15. Viewing
these coefficients in the data input enables the analyst to determine the
underlying crop calendar assumed. An annual crop such as orchard or sugarcane
will have unity coefficients in all months.

2.15 Labor requirements are also dimensioned by month, and given in units
of man-days per acre in the given month. Time-dimensioning of labor is
necessary because labor demands are highly seasonal, and different crops have
labor demands wpeakingW in different months. This leads to crop
diversification to smooth out labor demands so that they do not exceed the
available supply (discussed below). For example, even though cotton may be
the most profitable crop by far in a given area, farmers probably do not
cultivate their entire area in cotton because experience has taught them that
the labor necessary to pick it is not always available.

2.16 Water requirements are given in acre-feet per month. These numbers
have evolved after analyzing the theoretical consumptive use requirements,
survey data, and model experiments for water balance of the whole basin. In
the cropping activities, only the total requirement needs to be considered;
questions of source of supply (surface, tubewell, subirrigation, etc.) are
dealt with elsewhere in the model.

2.11 Traction power is one of the more complex components of the farm
model. Most cropping activities in the Basin require a combination of tractor
and draft animal (bullock) power for land preparation, planting, weeding, and
harvesting. For most crops, two technology choices are given: semi-mechanized
and bullock (traditional). The two differ in the relative intensity at which
tractors and bullocks are employed for the critical operations of land
preparation and harvesting.

2.18 As was the case with land, labor, and water, traction power
requirements need to be time-dimensioned (again by month) because of the
seasonality of their use. Thus for each cropping activity there is a vector
of tractor requirements (hours per acre in each month) and a vector of bullock
requirements (bullock-pair hours in each month). Of course, many of the
elements of each vector will be zero.

2.19 Fertilizer requirements are given in kilograms of the nutrients

nitrogen (N) and phosphates (P). No time dimension is needed even though
fertilizer application may be undertaken at different times over the crop's
growing season. The data will be used for two purposes: 1) to charge the cost
of fertilizers to the objective function, and 2) to register the total use of
each nutrient for planning purposes.

2.20 Seeds and other inputs such as insecticides and pesticides are
registered in the cropping activities only because their costs may affect the
objective function (and hence the relative profitability of the crops). Seed
requirements are given in kilograms for the particular crop, and the cost is
 - 15
tallied elsewhere. The other items are totaled under a miscellaneous cost
category.

2.21 This completes the entries in the cropping activities. The reader
may have guessed that the cropping activities are constructed in such a manner
that they "demand" the various inputs, and total input demand for the domain
of the model (farm, ACZ, or whatever) is obtained by summing over all of the
cropping activities. This summing up will be discussed below when we discuss
the equations of the embedded farm model.

Livestock Activities

2.22 Livestock comprise the second category of production activities in

the embedded farm model. Three types of animals are included: bullocks, cows.
and buffaloes. A livestock activity is again a column vector which may be
interpreted as maintaining one animal wunit W of the given type for the year
the model covers. The term animal "unit W is used to reflect the fact that the
data pertain to an average of the breed, taking into consideration age and sex
composition of the observed herd. Activities for other animals such as goats.
sheep, and chickens may be included for specialized types of analysis.

2.23 Each of the three livestock activities will have different outputs
according to the animal type. All three contribute meat as an output. Cows
and buffaloes contribute milk. Bullocks provide draft power services as an
output of the livestock activity which becomes an input to cropping draft
power requirements.

2.24 The primary inputs required by the livestock activities are fodder.
distinguished by season. Fodder is supplied as by-products of several crops
as described above. as well as the two specialized crops. Rabi-fodder
(berseem) and Kharif-fodder (usually sorghum or maize). Weeds provide an
additional source of nutrient depending on the crops grown. Each source of
fodder supplies nutrients measured in total digestible nutrient (TON) and
digestible protein (OP). The requirements of TON and OP per season appear in
the livestock activities. Animals also require inputs not usually produced on
the farm such as veterinary services. and protein and other supplements.
These are treated as fixed costs per animal. and their total, in monetary
units, also appear in the livestock activities. Finally. livestock
maintenance requires labor in each month, and this need constitutes the
remaining entries in the livestock activities.

2.25 Although the livestock activities have variables which are

endogenous in the same manner as cropping activities are, restrictions on the
range of variability may be necessary, depending on the use of the model. For
short run uses of the model, say to capture the nature of constraints for this
year, it is realistic to fix the size and composition of the herds. Only if
the planning horizon is sufficiently long (say, ten years) to allow complete
adjustment of the herd size should the livestock activities be allowed to vary
without bound. If the intention is to focus on a particular farm instead of a
representative farm, then the livestock variables ought to be restricted to
integer values only.
 - 16
Outputs: Crop and Livestock Commodities

2.26 Table 2.1 lists all the crops and livestock possibilities in the
Indus Basin models together with their primary and secondary outputs.

2.27 In the interests of keeping the models as small as possible, we have

attempted to maintain a one-to-one correspondence between crops and their
primary outputs (commodities). Thus the crop wheat produces the output wheat
grain, maize produces maize grain, etc. Difficulties in interpretation may
arise in several cases. Maize produced for fodder is not called maize in the
cropping activities, but Kharif fodder. Because of their similarities in
production, there is only one cropping activity for Rape & Mustard, the output
of which is "oilseed". Sugar cane may be refined into white sugar in sugar
mills or into gur locally. In the models, there are two separate cropping
activities for cane depending on which method of refining will be used. The
technical coefficients are identical, but differences arise in processing and
marketing (discussed below). The product of orchards depends on the location
of the embedded farm: it is assumed to be banana in the Sind, and citrus
elsewhere.

2.28 Note briefly some of the interactions between crops and livestock
which the models contain. In order to produce virtually any crop under
current technology, draft power is needed. But to maintain the bullocks to
supply the power, fodder is needed in both Kharif and Rabi. The fodder crops
may be used to supply the entire needs, or certain crops such as wheat and
sugar cane may substitute for the fodder through their by-products. One task
the model will perform is to optimize the cropping pattern while maintaining a
balance between the fodder supplies and by-products so that the livestock
feeding requirements are met.

2.29 Manure, although another important interaction, is not explicitly

included for the following reason: reported crop yields (which the models
use) are obviously obtained using the available manure from the existing
livestock population. Unless the model's results in terms of animals
maintained varies greatly from the observed numbers, then the effect of manure
upon yields is automatically included. Only if the models were used to
simulate complete mechanization of agriculture and a virtual elimination of
livestock would the manure-yield relationship need to be included.
 - 17

Table 2.1: Crop and Livestock Outputs

Primary Secondary
Output Output Weeds

!tabi crops:
wheat wheat straw yes
!tabi fodder fodder no
gram gram straw yes
mustard & rapeseed oilseed straw yes
potatoes potatoes no
onions onions no
chilli chilli no

Kharif crops:
Basmati rice fine rice straw no
Irri rice coarse rice straw no
cotton seed cotton yes
maize maize grain leaves, yes
stalks
Kharif fodder fodder no

Annual crops:
Sugar cane refined sugar, gur cane tops yes
Orchards fruit yes

Other:
fallow land none none yes

Livestock:
Bullocks draft power meat
Cows milk meat
Buffaloes milk meat
 - 18

Constraints: Landt Labor. and Vater

2.30 As noted above, the cropping activities require land, labor. and
water because. without them, agricultural production would be impossible. On
the other hand, it is the scarcity of these key inputs which constrain the
level of total production. In this section we describe how the constraints
operate to capture this scarcity.

2.31 Although many resources are strictly limited in supply, others have
more than one source of supply. or a primary source which may be augmented.
In general, we will attempt to impose a balance between the demands for each
resource. and the supplies from the various sources. The concept of a balance
is useful because it automatically generates a consistent accounting framework
as well as prohibiting unrealistic solutions (infeasibilities, in linear
programming terms).

2.32 Land is an exception. and is the simplest type of constraint in the

models. Because the only use for agricultural land is to grow crops, and the
only source of supply is the available cultivable area, then the land
constraints could simply sum over the crops and over all the ways of growing
the crops so that the total land used in any month is less-than-or-equal-to
the available supply. However, one complication requires a slight divergence
from the above structure: the practice of allowing animals to graze on the
weeds on fallow, or unused, land. If we consider fallow, or slack, land as a
use alternative to crops, then slack land can be considered in the same manner
as a cropping activity. Of course, it would require no inputs (except land)
and "produce- only weeds which. nevertheless, have some value to livestock.
With these slack land variables, the land constraints become strict equalities
balancing all uses (crops plus slack) against available cultivable area.

2.33 The demand side of the labor balance sums over all crop labor
requirements and livestock maintenance labor in each month. The demand is met
first and foremost by farm family labor, both in the embedded farm model and
in all others versions. The availability of farm family labor is derived from
the number of family workers times the number of days they work in each month
for the embedded farm model. For models of larger domain. the resulting
number is multiplied by the number of farms in the domain.

2.34 In those months for which the demands for labor exceed the supply
from the farm family. the constraint is augmented by hiring from the pool of
labor available for hire. The size of the pool is unlimited for the
individual farm, but is limited to the agricultural labor force in larger
domains.

2.35 The water constraints are the most complex of this section because
of the multitude of sources of supply. In the simplest case, where
groundwater is saline and subirrigation can be ignored. the water constraints
would simply restrict the sum of the demands from crops net of rainfall in
each month to be less-than-or-equal-to the available supplies from the surface
distribution system. Although this treatment would suffice for many farm
models, the emphasis placed on irrigation system issues by the IBMR requires a
more detailed treatment.
 - 19

2.36 First, subirrigation is an important factor in many parts of the

Basin, particularly where water tables are high. The gross crop water
requirements need to netted out for the available sub irrigation, which is done
in the IBMR models. Depending on where the farm is located, this factor may
be almost negligible, or may supply all of the required water for some crops
in some months. If the groundwater is highly saline, it is unrealistic to
assume that most or all of a crop's requirements may be met from saline
subirrigation, so a "mixing" constraint may be imposed. These constraints
specify the minimum proportion of fresh water that must be applied to mix with
the subirrigation supplies.

2.37 Second, farms in fresh groundwater areas often own tubewells with
which they supplement surface water supplies. If such is the case, then an
activity which utilizes the tubewell completes the water balance equation for
the embedded farm model. In sum, the equations state that, in each month, the
sum of crop water requirements less the requirements supplied by rainfall and
subirrigation must be less-than-or-equal-to the available surface supplies
plus that which is pumped from tubewells. The tubewell activity will require
an additional constraint or bound to reflect its capacity.

2.38 For domains larger than the farm, the water equations become more
complex, as will be described under the ACZ model section.

Objective Function

2.39 Recall that a linear programming model is comprised of a number of

choices (activities) subject to a number of constraints, or equations which
must be satisfied. Typically, the number of choices is much larger than the
number of equations, making the problem one of selection - which crops, how
much of each, which technology, what source of irrigation, how to allocate
family labor, how many bullocks to keep, etc. If the problem is feasible (if
it is not, then we have made a major error in the specification of the
equations or the data), then it is likely to have a very large number of
possible solutions. Which solution is optimal, or the best according to the
criteria we desire, depends on the objective function we specify.

2.40 In the ACZ and larger models, it is the overall objective function
which determines which farm-level choices are optimal. Because one model can
have only one objective operating per solution, this implies that the embedded
farm models do not have objective functions of their own. If a representative
farm model or an individual farm model is to be solved in isolation, then an
objective function must be specified. As will become more clear later, the
market-oriented objective functions imply a farm-level objective function
which is essentially profit maximization. In what follows. we will first
assume that we are dealing with a farm model isolation.

2.41 The basic premise in the farm level objective function is profit
maximization. Given prices of his outputs and inputs. the farmer makes the
above-mentioned choices in an attempt to maximize his profits over the
agricultural year. Algebraically, the definition of simple profit is the sum
 - 20

over commodities of the output of each times the farm gate price received less
the sum of his inputs times the price he must pay for each.

2.42 There are methodological issues surrounding both the revenue and
cost side of the above profit function. On the revenue side, the main
question is how to value output which is not sold in the market, but is used
or consumed on the farm. Fodder crops, for example. are not usually marketed,
but fed to animals on the farm. In this case. it is proper to ignore the
value of fodder crops because it shows up in the final products of meat and
milk. and/or in the contribution the bullocks make in producing other crops
which are marketed and thus valued.

2.43 The practice of farm families. particularly of smaller farms. to

consume a large proportion of their output. cannot be ignored. The literature
on farm household economics is in agreement that the production decisions
cannot be separated from consumption decisions. but are jointly determined
within the framework of farm household utility maximization. There is little
agreement, however. on how to model farm family consumption.

2.44 The original IBM had linear expenditure system relationships built
in each embedded farm model. These related consumption (which had to be
matched by production or market purchases) to farm income levels. As income
as simulated by the model rose (fell). the consumption of all consumables was
required to rise (fall). This procedure works well for models of individual
small farms. but is not. we feel. appropriate for larger. investment planning
oriented models. The reason has to do with valuing investments at the margin.
As argued earlier. it is the value of the crop output which ultimately
determines the value of a water resources investment. Standard project
analysis procedures require that the incremental output be valued at border
prices. whether or not the commodities are traded. If the incremental output
from a project is say. rice or cotton. then there is no problem. But if we
require part of the incremental to be gram, for example. the valuation of the
project will be distorted downward.

2.45 To circumvent this problem yet recognize that a large proportion of

crop output is consumed on the farm, we have adopted the following treatment:
for the consumption crops (Basmati. Irri. gram, maize. mustard & rapeseed.
gur, wheat, onions, potatoes. and chilli). we require the embedded farm models
to produce and consume at least as much as they did in the base period
(observed) case. Depending on the crop. the percentage of total output
consumed varies from about 10% to 50%. Once they have met their consumption
requirements. they are free to produce for the market, export. or whatever.
This treatment ensures an undistorted marginal valuation of production and
hence any investments designed to promote production.

2.46 With this modification. the farm level objective function becomes
the value of crop and livestock production in excess of that consumed on the
farm less the costs of production. Figure 2.2 shows this objective function
graphically for one crop (the entire objective function is summed over all
crops, of course).
 - 21

Figure 2.2: Farm-level Objective Function

output price

,.------------------5 2
PO~------~------+I--------------------
51~------~------~

o quantity supplied

2.47 Because prices are fixed for an individual farmer, the horizontal
line at Po is the demand function. 51 and 52 are two segments of the farmer's
supply function indicating alternative technologies at different costs. At
the point Qm' he runs out of the input required by 51 (say, bullock power),
and must switch to the higher cost alternative. Qc is his family's
consumption requirement. The objective function, or area to be maximized, is
then the hatched area between Qc and Qm and below Po but above 51' It is easy
to see that the optimality conditions for profit maximization are still met
with this structure since price (Po) equals marginal cost (supply) at the
optimum quantity produced (Qm)'

Input Prices
2.48 Most of the cost items the farmer pays and are charged to the
objective are clear cut: fertilizers, tractor rental costs, seeds, hired
labor wage rates, animal feed supplements etc., are all available in well
functioning markets. He must pay water charges determined by the irrigation
authorities. Methodological issues arise only in the pricing of farm family
labor and land. Consider land first. If land had uses other than for
agricultural production, then it would be appropriate to charge a shadow rent
to the objective function. If so, then the farmer would maximize income over
and above the rental value; otherwise he would give up farming and become a
renter. We assume that there is no alternative use for land other than
farming, so land is priced at zero.

2.49 The same reasoning holds true for farm family labor. If the farmer
had opportunities which paid him more than farming, presumably he would give
up farming and become a worker or merchant. The fact that he does not implies
that farming is his best opportunity. This implies that no shadow wage be
charged to farm family labor. However, there is a difference. Leisure has an
opportunity cost, and we assume that the farmer must make a minimum income
through farming, otherwise it would not be worth his while. The assumed
 - 22
shadow or reservation wage is one-half of the hired labor wage. If profit
from farming is less than half the hired labor wage, the farmer would give up
and go join the labor force.

2.50 By charging this reservation wage, the objective becomes: max~m~ze

farm income over and above the family's consumption needs and over and above
the opportunity cost of the farmer's leisure.

2.51 Figure 2.3 shows the structure of a typical embedded farm model.

3. '!'he ACZ Models

2.52 As discussed elsewhere, the Basin is divided into nine Agro-climatic

zones (ACZ's) as defined for the Revised Action Plan. See Table 3.4 for the
descriptions and map IBRD 21611. The original intent was to divide the Basin
along lines of similar climate, soils, and cropping patterns. Each ACZ model
has one or two embedded farm models depending on the number of groundwater
types (fresh or saline). An ACZ model could have (and probably ought to have,
if model size limitations were not present) more than two farm level models.
Additional farm models could account for differences in farm sizes (small,
medium, and large), different technology levels, and different specialties
(livestock, orchard. cash crops). However. the full IBMR with more than the
eighteen embedded farm models already present would tax available
computing facilities. and a zone model with more than two farms would be
beyond the capacity of the personal computer.

2.53 Essentially. an ACZ model is one or two farm level models "blown up"
to the size of the ACZ. By blown up we mean that the vector of resource
availabilities, instead of reflecting one farm, represents all of the farms in
the ACZ (or all of the farms with the particular groundwater type in the ACZ).
However, when we go from the farm level to the level of an ACZ (containing
say, 3,000 farms), there are some important differences to take into
consideration. These differences revolve around the labor market, the supply
of water, and the market for farm commodities. We discuss each in turn.

The Zonal Labor Market

2.54 The individual farmer, and a model of his farm, does not need to
worry about the labor market from which he draws his employees. No matter how
intensely how farms, he is too small to cause a labor shortage, or to be held
responsible for unemployment. At the level of the ACZ, though, where
thousands of farms may be competing for the available labor, shortages or
surpluses must be addressed. When we sum over all the farms in the ACZ, we
get the total labor demand (by month). This can be compared to, and
constrained by, the number of laborers available in the region. These
additional labor constraints must therefore be added at the ACZ level.
 Figure 2.3: Typical Farm Model

(8) (8) (8) (8)

Cropping Activities Live.tack Activiti.. Tractor tubewell slack ---Labor .upply-- on-farm market mi.c.
bullocks cows buffaloes u.e use land family hired con.umption sal.. co.t. right-hand-.id.
,-
Objective function
(farm income) + + (max)
J
Commodity balances + + + + + + + + + =0- 0

By-product balance. + + + + + -0- 0

+ + + +
Land balances + + + + + + -E= 0
+ + + + + +

+ + +
Labor balances + + + + + -L- 0
+ + + + +
---------
+ + + - canal
Water balances + + + + + =L- water
+ + + + + .upplie. N
W
Tractor power + + + + + + -S- 0
-- ----- ---
Bullock power + + + + + + + -Lx 0
--
Protein supplement + + + -E= 0
-- ----
Fertilizer (N , PI + + + + + + + ::E- 0

Seeda + + + + + + + -8- 0
---
Hiac. cost + + + + + + + + + + =It- 0

(8): bounded variables

 - 24

2.55 It turns out, in the IBMR and most similar models, that the demand
for labor seldom exceeds the supply. There are a variety of reasons, the main
one being that these models do not account for all of the uses of labor.
Recall from the embedded farm models that labor demands come only from the
cropping and livestock maintenance activities. This needs to be remembered if
the ACZ models show an unrealistic level of unemployment.

The Supply of Vater

2.56 At the farm level, we need only be concerned with the farm's
allocation of surface water reaching him from the watercourse, and his
tubewell capacity, if he has one. At the ACZ level. we need to ensure that
what the farms are using is physically supplied. Whereas one farm cannot hope
to exhaust the ACZ's water supply, all of them taken together can and usually
do exhaust it, at least in Rabi. As with labor, we need ACZ-wide surface
water constraints. The values for the constraints (the monthly water
allocations) are built up from the surface distribution model given an
allocation rule and canal losses, and then mapped to the zones (see next
section). The result is a surface water allocation, by month, for the entire
zone.

2.57 Ordinarily. the surface water allocations would be less-than-or

equal-to type constraints. However. with severe water-logging problems
plaguing parts of the Basin. we wish to monitor the excess (if any) of surface
water supplied over that which is needed for crop consumptive use. For this
reason we build in a slack variable for each zone, groundwater type, and month
rather than have the linear programming algorithm generate it automatically.
This means that the monthly water equations are equal-to type balances, with
the slack water variables picking up the slack, if any. In this manner we can
monitor excess surface supplies and calculate their impact on water tables.
2.58 If the zone has fresh groundwater areas, then two additional sources
of water are included: pumping by private tubewells (as described in the
embedded farm level models) and pumping from public or government-controlled
tubewells. The complete zone-level water balance thus is: the sum over crops
of the crop water requirements net of rainfall and subirrigation plus any
slack water must be equal to canal diversions net of losses plus any
government tubewell supplies plus any private tubewell supplies for each area
differentiated by fresh or saline groundwater.

Commodity Markets

:~.59 Recall that at the farm level some of the crop output was consumed
on the farm, and any excess was marketed at fixed farm-gate prices. Thus an
individual farmer cannot influence market prices. When we increase the domain
of the models to areas as large as the zones, provinces, and nation, the
assumption of fixed market prices is no longer valid. One can conceive of
many policy and project uses of the model which could have a sufficiently
large impact on production and/or incomes so that market prices would change.
At what point the fixed-price assumption becomes invalid depends on the size
 - 25
of the area being modeled, its relative isolation, and its share of the
national market. Clearly, provinces are sufficiently large and transport
costs are sufficiently high that prices do vary between them. The same can be
said of some of the zones.

2.60 In one version of the IBMR prices are assumed to be determined at

the national level, the result of the interaction of national demand functions
and supply functions built up from all of the ACZ's. This version would be
acceptable for uses of the model whose impact is truly national is scope,
e.g., a project the size of Kalabagh. It would be unacceptable in the sense
that it would not prohibit complete specialization within the ACZ's. For
example, all of the gram might be produced in NWFP if the model determined
that NWFP had a strong comparative advantage.

2.61 Another version assumed that prices are determined at the provincial
level. Each province has its own demand functions, and prices are determined
through the interaction of provincial demand and supply from the ACZ's
belonging to the province. This version would be preferred if it could be
assumed that transport is costless within provinces, which it is not.

2.62 The version prepared for the WSIPS assumes that prices are
determined at the level of the ACZ. That is, each ACZ will have its own
demand functions which interact with its supply functions to determine local
prices. The strong advantage of this approach is that the solutions are
additive: given a surface water allocation to each of the zones, the solution
to the national IBMR can be added up from the solutions of the ACZ models.
The full IBMR would thus only be needed for simulations involving variations
in zonal water allocations. The disadvantage is that prices between zones can
theoretically vary without limit. However, when two or more ACZ models are
solved together, limits in price variation can be included either explicitly
(through constraints, since prices can be variables) or implicitly through
product transportation activities whose costs reflect actual transport
charges.

2.63 In words, the zonal commodity markets work as follows: the

collection of farms in each groundwater area must first produce their
consumption requirements. Any excess goes to the zonal market, where prices
are determined by the intersection of zonal demand and zonal supply.

The Demand Functions

2.64 Figure 2.4 shows a typical zonal supply-demand relationship for an

individual crop commodity.

2.65 The supply function, 55'. is built up from the embedded farm models.
The first segment represents the most efficient production
technology/groundwater type, e.g., semi-mechanized with fresh groundwater.
The next segment dominates when a constraint is hit on the first segment's
producers, e.g., tubewell capacity. Equilibrium is reached when price falls
to the point at which it equals marginal costs (the vertical intercept of the
embedded supply function. Below this price it is advantageous to expand
production. Above it, a loss is incurred.
 - 26

Figure 2.4: Typical Supply-Demand Relationship

market price
D

Ql quantity (zone total)

The Zonal Objective Function

2.66 A somewhat artificial means of obtaining equilibrium between demand

and supply is to maximize the shaded area in Figure 2.4. Doing so achieves
the desired ends of equating supply and demand at the zone level. and insuring
that price equals marginal cost for each commodity - the economic criterion
for efficiency in a competitive market.

2.67 It is easy to see that the supply function SSt is indeed a cost
function. and its integral. or area beneath it. is total cost. Consider point
Ql' The marginal cost at Ql is Pl' because the farmers would be breaking
even. If marginal cost were less than Pl' profit maximizing behavior would
dictate that they should supply more than Ql' If it were greater. they would
not supply Ql because they would be incurring a loss. Thus every point on SS'
is indeed the marginal cost at the given Q. and the area under SSt is the
total costs.

2.68 The demand function, DD. slopes downward to reflect the fact that
the more that farmers as a group wish to sell. the lower the price that they
must accept. The demand curve is drawn linear. and this is the form used in
the models. Linear demand functions are not required. although they are
preferred by modelers for their simplicity. They can be specified with
minimal information: the base (observed) equilibrium quantity. price, and an
estimate of the price elasticity (percentage change in price divided by the
percentage in quantity).
 - 27
2.69 Algebraically, we desire the demand function

P =a + bQ (b < 0)

and we are given a Po and a Qo and the elasticity

e = dQdP*P/Q.
We can solve for the slope

b = dP/dQ = (Po/Qo)/e
and the intercept

2.70 Maximization of the shaded area in Figure 2.4 is achieved by

maximizing the area under the demand curve minus the area under the supply
curve. The area under the demand curve is its integral:

and the area under the supply curve is total costs, a function of Q, c(Q).
The objective is thus

Z = aQ + bQ2/2 -c(Q).

It is easy to see that maximizing Z achieves the competitive equilibrium of

price equaling marginal costs. The derivative of Z with respect to Q is

a + bQ - c' (Q) .

2.71 The left two terms constitute the definition of price, and the right
term is marginal cost.

2.72 The Z function is, of course, non-linear (quadratic), implying that

we cannot use a linear programming solver directly. We can use a non-linear
algorithm (which we often do), or we can use grid linearization techniques to
segment the area under the demand function (See Agricultural Modeling for
Policy and Project Analysis, Appendix to Chapter 10).

2.73 As drawn, the demand curve is limited only the by its intercept, a,
and zero. In reality, prices cannot fluctuate this much because of the
opportunity for trade, both between zones and between countries. For this
reason the zonal demand curves are truncated at 2P o and .5po on the assumption
that outside these limits (if not before) inter-zonal trade will take place to
limit price movements. Of course, simulated price movements of this
magnitude, unless explainable by substantial changes in simulated policies or
investments, probably indicate an error in the model.
 - 28
2.74 Note that the truncation of the demand curves implies implicit
inter-zonal trade, but does not actually simulate such trade. If two or more
adjacent ACZ models are to be solved together for a project analysis involving
them both, then such trade ought to be explicit through the inclusion of
transport activities.

International Trade

2.75 International trade is properly the domain of full sector models

which, having national demand and supply functions, can simulate the optimal
pattern of exports and imports and track changes in the balance of trade given
changes in domestic policies. We do not have these capabilities at the zone
level, but we nevertheless need to take export and import possibilities into
account to the extent they affect the zone.

2.76 From national trade data we know that sugar is currently imported,
and rice (both varieties), cotton and possibly wheat are exported. (Oilseeds
are also imported, but the local varieties of rape and mustard in the model
are assumed to face separate markets). From zonal production patterns we know
which ACZ's have a comparative advantage and excess capacity in the export
crops, and which are likely to require sugar imports. From these data we can
estimate, and place limits on, the exports and imports for each zone in a
given year.

2.77 Exports, bounded by the above limits, are added to the objective
function as additional activities contributing the export price. Imports,
also bounded at the expected levels, and cost" the import price. Both types
of activities have entries in the commodity balance equations with opposite
signs.

4. The Surface Water Model

2.78 The Surface Water Model (SWM) is a linear programming fo~ of a

network simulation model for the Indus Basin. It was originally patterned
from COMSYM for the express purpose of tying the ACZ models together in a
Basin-level optimization framework. Although its primary use is to route
water through the system and operate the reservoirs and barrages in a manner
which optimizes the sum of the ACZ objective functions, it can be, and has
been, used as a stand alone model to minimize water shortages if demands are
known.

The Concept of a Network

2.79 A network is a set of junction points called "nodes" with certain

pairs of the nodes joined by lines called "arcs. A directed flow occurs
between the paired nodes, across the arcs. Decisions at the nodes are
simulated so that some overall objective of the system is satisfied, such as
satisfaction of needs at the "sinks", or tenninal nodes. Network analysis is
popular in electronics and transportation routing, and it is easy to see why
it has been adopted for river/canal distribution systems.
 - 29

2.80 A network lends itself to easy conversion to a linear programme.

The decisions at the nodes (to direct flows to the connected arcs) can be
readily interpreted as variables, and balance requirements at each node
correspond to equations. If an objective function is specified, the programme
proceeds to an optimum directly, not by trial-an-error as in a simulation
model. Of course. the deterministic linear programme cannot substitute for a
simulation model designed to explore the stochasticity of a system.

An Illustrative Network Model

2.81 The functions of the SWM can be illustrated with a highly simplified
illustration of the Basin as shown in Figure 2.5. Rim station inflows begin
at points A and B and flow downward toward the sea. The reservoir. C, and the
barrages. 1, 2. and 3. are "nodes" or control points at which the model must
choose to store (reservoir) or release, and in which direction (barrages).
All such decisions are made on a monthly basis and may be restricted by the
physical capacities of the reservoir and canals. Additional inflows to the
system may come from tributaries such as the one pictured above barrage 1, and
rainfall which is measured at all nodes. Artificial nodes may be present at
the intersection of rivers or at the terminus of a link canal to complete the
accounting framework.

2.82 Releases from the reservoir are restricted by an imposed rule curve
to take into account the needs of power generation. Accumulated unreleased
water is constrained by the live storage capacity. Arrows marked D through I
are "sinks" (destinations) representing the water-demanding ACZs. Any water
not diverted to the sinks or lost en route will flow to the sea.

2.83 Losses may occur throughout the system. and the functional form
depends on the type of arc. Losses and gains in river reaches are estimated
using river routing coefficients as a function of flow during current and
previous months.

2.84 Link canals. such as the one from barrage 1 to node J, redirect
water through the system with losses proportional to flow. Irrigation canals,
such as the arc 3H are also subject to losses proportional to flow.
Evaporation losses net of rainfall are specified for each reservoir for each
month.

2.85 The operation of the SWM can be summarized by following the sequence
of endogenous decisions involved. Inflows from A to the reservoir C may
either be stored or released in each month subject to the limitations of
storage capacity and rule curves. Released water arrives at barrage 1 less
losses or plus river bank storage return where it is either a) diverted to D
and E for irrigation, b) allowed to flow downriver to barrage 3, or diverted
to the other river via the link canal 1J. Barrage 2 must take as given the
inflows from B and the link, and either divert it to F and G for irrigation,
or allow it to flow on to barrage 3. Water reaching barrage 3 will be
diverted for irrigation up to the limits of the canals or demands, and any
remainder will flow on to the sea.
 - 30

2.86 The resulting model easily lends itself to policy and project
simulation. Inter-regional water allocation policies can be simulated by
placing minimum bounds on the flows to certain nodes or collections of nodes,
or by making flows to different sinks proportional to one another.
Investments in the system such as canal lining or expansion affect the
parameters associated with the arcs so that more water can be delivered. Even
expansion of reservoirs or construction of entirely new ones can be
accommodated, as was illustrated in the Kalabagh study.

2.87 The complete Indus surface network is shown in Figure 2.6. The
component nodes and arcs are described in Part III and IV.

5. The Complete Indus Basin Model

2.88 The current version of the complete IBMR consists of the ACZ models
linked by SWM. The linkages occur at the sinks of the SWM (the points of
irrigation water demand) which, instead of being fixed demands as indicated
above, are surface water diversion variables which enter the water balance
equations of each ACZ. Thus the stand alone SWM must be given estimates of
ACZ water demands, and the stand alone ACZ's must be given water allocations.
Together, water can be allocated to maximize some function of the crop and
livestock production of the ACZ's while maintaining feasibility with respect
to the physical limitations of the surface system and with respect to any
politically-imposed restrictions on water allocations. The function to be
maximized is the above-discussed sum of ACZ objectives: consumers' plus
producers' surpluses net of costs of production plus the value of exports and
less the cost of imports.

2.89 Although handled through the report routine and not an integral part
of the IBMR. several other features of the full model need to be noted.

2.90 An extensive accounting framework provides information from each

solution about:
Vater: source and use by node, losses, gains,
operations of reservoirs, water balances at
canal heads, watercourse heads and root zones.

Labor: employment by month and source of labor,

reported by ACZ, province, and total irrigated
area.

Cropping Patterns: acreage by ACZ, technology, and groundwater

type; aggregated to provinces and total
irrigated area.

Production: by crop and livestock commodity, by ACZ and

groundwater type; aggregated to provinces and
total irrigated area.

Input use: fertilizer use by type, ACZ, province and

total irrigated area.
 - 31

Figure 2.5: I11u$trative Network Model

\] Reservoir

~ Barrage
Canal ConmJ"\d
...... LinkCinal

SEA
 Figure 2.6

PAKISTAN
WA'IER SECTOR INVESTMENT PLANNING STI.."DY

Indus Basin Model Component

l..1NKCANAt..S
o H!:AOWORKS
MAIN CANAU BARRAGE
RESERYOIRS..
RIVERS
PROPOSED
_ ...... 'NTERNATIONAl.. 80UNDARV
EXISTING
UNDER CONSTRUCTION

fj.TARBELA
. .MadhOOtJr

K.bul R.

T1'v,mtD ,.., o..t pt~ bJI

Thtl wona 8at'* J sf.' c~
'OIN~. of IfW
rdftt.fI/1d". ~fat",.
lfJlen\Iti . . . olr".WfCI!84rIwr
.nd ",. h,,,,,,bone# FlfIMtCa
Cat)C)r." The ~aonI
IJNd IIf'(J ""~, IIhOwn
()tt .... tnaDaoMl~ Ott ....

.,,.,,,.1t(JI\I/_"sallll"",,""
twfol ",.
F....rtc. CaJ:)or.hOtt

--
oII'lV ~ on 1M '-filii .t ..,.
ot.,."t~OI""
MI07""'" 01 ,,"tP'anc. 01
 - 33
Technology: acreage of each crop according to semi
mechanized or bullock technique.

Farm Incomes: gross and net income per farm by ACZ,

groundwater type, and province.

Shadow prices: on all fixed physical resources such as land,

tractors, tubewells, and capacities of
irrigation structures.
Power Generation: BKWHs at Mangla and Tarbela by month.

6. A Note on Project Analysis

2.91 The linkage between the surface water supplies and the endogenous
ACZ demands and the objective function provide the key to the power of the
IBMR to analyze projects. Without this linkage, either water demands must be
assumed (derived from fixed cropping patterns) or water supplies must be
assumed (derived from a given allocation pattern). With the linkage and the
objective function driving the system to optimality, the built-in flexibility
permits optimal use of the project's resources. Consider a water-supplying
project. In the end, the return on the project depends on where the water is
allocated, and how it is used. Given the vast number of choices (canals.
ACZ's, groundwater types, crops, technologies, etc.) it is a formidable, if
not impossible task to select an optimal configuration without such a model.
Furthermore, the configuration assumed for the project analysis is quite
likely to be infeasible without the benefit of a consistency framework such as
that provided by the model.

2.92 The model, however, is not a method for directly analyzing projects;
instead it is a tool to assist in their analysis. In what follows we will
describe how this tool may be used for a hypothetical project.

2.93 First, it must be noted that all prices in the model discussed so
far have been financial prices except for the reservation wage on farm family
labor. Second. the shadow prices produced by the model are measured not only
in financial prices, but are determined by the consumers' plus producers'
surplus objective function. Hence they do not correspond to recognizable
measures of the marginal value of resources, and should only be used relative
to one another. Thus a shadow price on the tubewell stock in ACZ X cannot be
used to derive an investment program for X, but can indicate the relative
shortage of tubewells in X relative to another ACZ, Y. Thus the shadow prices
are useful only for determining directions of resource allocation, and the
need for investment.

2.94 For project analysis, economic prices must be used because of the
distortions found in financial prices in all countries. The models carry, or
the reports generate, a parallel objective function measured in these economic
prices. It is called VAEP, for value added in economic prices. It is similar
to the fixed price objective described for the farm models except that all
output is valued in constant economic prices, and all inputs are priced at
 - 34
their economic costs. VAEP may not be used realistically as the objective
function for the simple reason that the prices and costs it contains are not
those on which the farmers make their decisions. But VAEP, when compared from
two different solutions, gives the net change, or benefit, between them.

2.95 How is this useful in project analysis? Assume we have an up-to

date, valid model of a province. Its solution reports VAEP of, say,
100,000,000 - the base or without project case. We note that one of the
canals has a very high shadow price on its capacity constraint relative to the
others. A project has been proposed which remodels the canal so that it can
provide x cubic meters per second more, at a cost of 400,000.

2.96 We revise the input data to reflect the higher capacity of the canal
as a result of the project, but nothing else (unless there were other
components of the project such as land-leveling which would increase yields,
or lining, which would reduce the losses). The new solution - the with
project case - ought to show a higher VAEP as more water is delivered through
the canal to produce more wheat. cotton. or whatever. The difference between
the two measures of VAEP, say, 80,000, is the net annual (since it is an
annual model) benefit of the project measured in economic prices as desired.
We may then use the net benefit data and the cost data to calculate the
internal rate of return and the net present value. Lotus 1-2-3 or a similar
spreadsheet does this readily, as shown in Table 2.2, which assume a 20-year
project life with full benefits beginning to accrue in the second year.

Table 2.2: Hypothetical Project Analysis

Year Benefit Cost B-C

1 -400000 -400000
2 80000 80000
3 80000 80000
4 80000 80000

18 80000 80000
19 80000 80000
20 80000 80000

present value of benefits at 10%: 669193.6

internal rate of return: 19.30%

2.97 In addition to providing the input to such an analysis, the model

also provides information about changes in the cropping pattern induced by the
project, the impact on farm incomes, etc. - all of the items listed in the
previous section.
 111. Input Data

Background and Data Sources

3.1 Because the Indus Basin Models encompass several disciplines

(agronomy, irrigation, economics) no single data source can provide the
necessary information.

3.2 The input data for the original Indus Basin Model was provided by the
1976 Extended Agricultural Economics Survey (XAES) supplemented by the 1972
Pakistan Census of Agriculture (PCA) , the 1976 Livestock Census (LC), and
various studies undertaken for the Revised Action Plan (RAP). WAPDA provided
many published and unpublished data on the irrigation system.

3.3 More recent versions have benefited from the 1980 PCA, a Census of
Agricultural Machinery in 1984 (CAM), the 1986 LC, Crops, Vegetables, and
Fruits in Pakistan (CVF) (a 1986 study by the Food and Agriculture Division of
the Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Co-operatives), and annual versions of
Agricultural Statistics of Pakistan (ASP), the most recent of which is 1987
88. In 1988 WAPDA undertook a re-survey of 500 farms of the XAES. Detailed
work on several projects has provided additional project-level data. In
addition, price information is continually updated by the Agricultural Prices
Commission (APCOM).

3.4 The current data base of the IBMR draws on all these sources, and as
additional information, censuses, and other data become available, they are
incorporated if they are relevant. As will become evident, the data available
are not complete, and some estimation procedures are required to fill in
missing values. The consistency checks imposed by the model's structure
reveal inconsistencies within the data, particularly when they come from
different sources, and adjustments will sometimes become necessary.

3.5 Statistics on cropped area, crop production, total fertilizer use,

canal diversions, and river inflows are available from publications; for these
information is extracted and transformed as needed for the model. Some of the
required information (for example the amount of livestock nutrient available
through casual grazing, crop yield by variety, fertilizer input to each crop.
and draft power requirements by crop) is not available from the official
statistics. Such data has been collected through surveys and expert judgments
and updated during the validation runs. The information base for agronomic
data starts with the 1976 XAES Survey. It was supplemented by the
Agricultural and Livestock Census and by the Farm Survey of 1988. The current
data base also reflects the cumulative knowledge acquired during the project
studies, such as On Farm Water Management, Left Bank Outfall Drain and
Kalabagh Agricultural Impact study.

3.6 We should emphasize that the judgments and analysis presented here
have been made for evaluating specific projects using data available at the
time. There is nothing sacred about these data or the assumptions that have
been made in collecting it into a consistent whole. In fact the data must be
updated as prices, practices and technology change, and as more records are
accumulated by the Irrigation Departments and WAPDA. It is also likely that
 - 36

the data needs of particular projects may be highly specific to local

conditions: in this case it is essential that changes are made.

3.7 It is worth making two other comments before we begin. There are
certainly errors contained in the data set for IBMR. But we believe that
taken as a whole it provides a consistent description of the agriculture and
irrigation in the Indus basin. To run optimizing models of the entire basin,
that produce cropping patterns. animal populations. and gross output levels
that are in good agreement with observation is a demanding test of the model.
The predictions made about the groundwater imbalance are also consistent with
observation. which adds more confidence that the treatment of water delivery
and consumption are consistent.

3.8 The maintenance and verification and updating of these data is a

tedious task. Technological advances so far offer little help: errors are
easy to make and hard to find. Ultimately the validity of the data depends on
the dedication. honesty and experience of the people who maintain it. And the
usefulness and credibility of any modelling exercises undertaken depends
directly on the quality of the data.

3.9 We now proceed with the main piece of this section: a discussion of
the input data for the IBMR under the following headings:

1. Agronomic data.
Information about the cropping activities in the basin. This covers
the cropping calendar. required inputs such as labor. draft power,
water. and fertilizer as well as yields of crops and by-products.
There are 15 crops in the model. most of which can be grown in
different ways. called technology variants. Also. the cropping
calendars and yields are different in different parts of the Basin,
called agro-climatic zones. This information is entered in the model
separately for each zone-crop-technology combination.

2. Livestock Data.
This covers labor and feed requirements and output from the livestock
animals. There are three types of animals in the model: buffaloes,
cows and bullock. The outputs produced are draft power (needed for
plowing), meat and milk.

3. Economic Data.
Data needed to estimate the demand for the crop and livestock
outputs. and financial and economic prices of inputs and outputs.

4. aesources Inventory.
Inventory of resources available. except for water which is treated
separately. Resources include the number of: agricultural workers,
tractors, private tubewells, households and animals. and the total
irrigated area.

s. Irrigationsystems data.

Physical characteristics of canal commands (CCA. delivery

efficiencies). river system (water routing coefficients) and

reservoirs.

 - 37

6. Water Inputs.

Historical data on canal diversions. surface water inflows,

subirrigation. rainfall, and public tubewell pumpage.

7. Other data.

Miscellaneous parameters.

1. Agronomic Data.

3.10 Each of the fifteen crops can be grown with one of several
technologies. Technology means cultural practices, for example variations in
the growing period or type of inputs used to grow the crops. The intent is to
capture the most important different ways of growing the crop. taking into
account both the ~ of scarce resources and the production of outputs. In
the IBMR there are three main technology variants; they are the type of draft
power used, the time of sowing and harvesting and the amount of water provided
to the crop. The table below gives examples of the naming conventions used to
describe different technologies.

Example of Wheat Technologies

Type of Draft Water

Power used Timing Application

Wheat 1 Bullock 1 Standard 1 Standard

2 Semi-mechanized 2 Late Planting 2 Light stress
3 Early Planting 3 Heavy stress
4 Quick Harvesting 4 January stress

3.11 The water variant is described in terms of water stress applied in

comparison with the standard applications. The stressed technologies use less
water. and produce less output. They also require less labor at harvest time.

3.12 The draft power teChnology that uses tractors is called semi-
mechanized because some of the operations are done using tractors and some
(rice threshing, for example) still require bullocks.

3.13 As with water, the timing variants are described with respect to the
standard growing calendar. The accelerated variants produce smaller yields,
but require land for less of the year.

3.14 The total number of technologies is obtained by enumerating all

combinations of variants. Using the wheat example, we see that combining 2
draft power variants with 4 timing possibilities and 4 water schedules
produces 32 possible technologies. These have to be specified for all crops
and all zones, which leads to a formidable amount of data. Luckily not all
possibilities are needed, since in practice not all are used. (For wheat,
 - 38
early planting is not used, therefore, a total of 24 (2*3*4) variants are
specified in the model.) It is essential however to adequately capture the
entire range of possibilities for both current and future agricultural
practice.

3.15 The components of the agronomic data are explained in more detail
below in the sequence in which they generally appear in the GAMS model. The
references in parentheses are to the GAMS arrays containing the data.

Crop Calendar (TABLE LAND)

3.16 This table provides information about when the crops occupy the land.
This information is entered by month for each technology and planting sequence
in each zone. The entries, varying between zero and one. are the proportion
of each month for which a particular crop occupies land. As an example. if
rice is planted in the middle of May and harvested in the middle of November.
then 0.5 will be entered for May and November and 1 for June to October.
These data are given in the GAMS table LAND. The blank entries in the table
(for December. and January to April in the rice example) contain implied
zeroes. Land is not needed for a particular crop-zone-technology combination
in a month where the entry is zero.

3.17 A convenient cross-check for these data are given in the calendars of
the Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan. Note. however. that if any
changes are made to TABLE LAND. corresponding changes must be made in the
following four tables. The sequencing of all application of water. labor. and
the use of tractors and bullocks depends, of course. on the timing of the
growing cycle.

Draft Power Requirements (TABLE BULLOCK)

3.18 As explained above the model uses two sources of draft power.
bullocks and tractors. Draft power requirements are entered in terms of hours
required per acre of crop for one bullock or a tractor for each technology by
month when required in each zone. Bullock requirements are given in GAMS
table BULLOCK. Because bullocks always work in teams, these data are then
converted to bullock-pair hours by doubling them in a GAMS assign statement.
These data enter the draft power balances as demands which must be supplied by
the available stock of animals. The source for these data was the XAES and
the 1988 re-survey.

Tractor Requirements (TABLE TRACTOR)

3.19 Complementing, and substituting for bullock power across

iechnologies. are tractor requirements in hours per acre per month given in
GAMS table TRACTOR. These data are used in the tractor power balances. The
number of tractors required to meet the demands will be constrained by the
number of tractors available, and the total hours used will be used to drive
the tractor costs variable. The source for these data was the XAES and the
1988 re-survey.
 - 39
Labor Requirements (TABLE LABOR)
3.20 Labor requirements are specified as man hours per acre of crop for
each technology by month and zone. These data are given in GAMS Table LABOR
and they are used in the labor and cost constraints of the model. They were
obtained from the XAES by constructing detailed diaries of the time required
and the frequency and timing of occurrence for all operations needed to grow
and harvest a particular crop (including technology variations). The total
time needed per month was then calculated. In practice the model's results
are not particularly sensitive to these data since the availability of land
and water are over-riding constraints.

Vater Requirements (TABLE ~TER)

3.21 Water requirements are expressed as feet of water required by one

acre of each crop by month, technology and zone. These data are listed in
GAMS table WATER; they are used in the water balance constraints of the model.
These requirements are measured at the crop root zone and may be supplied by a
combination of rainfall, subirrigation, surface irrigation, or tubewell
pumpage. These data are among the most critical in the model, although they
are rarely measured directly. The numbers used have evolved after analyzing
the theoretical consumptive requirements, survey data, and model experiments
for the water balance of the entire basin.

Fertilizer Inputs (TABLE FERT)

3.22 Application of the two primary nutrients, nitrogen (N) and
phosphorous (P) are given in GAMS table FERT. The units are Kgs of nutrients
required per acre for each crop, technology and zone. These data are among
the most difficult to estimate because they have been changing rapidly and
fanners' practices often depart from what is recommended. Consistency checks
showed that the XAES fertilizer data is now hopelessly out-of-date, and the
re-survey provided too few observations for valid estimation. The following
procedure was employed: We begin with recommended applications derived from
the Crops, Vegetables, and Fruits study (CVF) as shown in Table 3.1. Missing
from this source are data for several minor crops included in the model, and
of course, the zonal variation. The missing crop data was constructed from
the XAES data extrapolated to the present using growth rates of total
fertilizer use over the period 1976-88. Zonal variation was taken directly
from the XAES, supplemented by the re-survey.
3.23 The resulting requirements were then extrapolated to the national
level using 1987-88 cropping patterns. The results were then compared with
national supply totals from domestic production and imports. This experiment
showed that the requirements were too high, particularly for phosphates. A
-balancing- procedure was then employed to adjust the requirements downward
until national consistency was achieved. The entries in TABLE FERT will thus
approximate total fertilizer use if the simulated cropping pattern
approximates the actual. It is always tempting to use recommended fertilizer
use data when they become available. But they should be used only after the
above-described consistency checks are made because of the lag in fanners'
response to recommendations. Fertilizer requirements for future years are
projected by applying a compound annual growth rate. These rates are given in
GAMS table FERTGR in percent by crop and zone.
 - 40

Table 3.1: Recommended Fertilizer Application (KG/Acre)

Province: NWFP Punjab Sind

Nutrient: N P N P N P

Wheat 46.6 22.3 46.6 22.3 46.6 22.3

Irri 49.0 23.5 49.0 23.5
Basmati 23.3 9.1
Maize 46.6 22.3 46.6 22.3 46.6 22.3
Kharif Fodder 34.9 16.7 34.9 16.7 34.9 16.7
Cotton 44.5 20.2 44.5 20.2 44.5 20.2
Sugarcane 46.6 22.0 69.8 33.4 46.6 22.0

Seed Inputs (TABLE SYLDS)

3.24 Seed input, in units of Kgs of seed per acre of crop. are given in
table SLYDS under the label SEED. The cost of fertilizer and seed is used in
the cost constraint of the model. The source of these data are the XAES.
updated from CVF and the re-survey.

Yields of Crop and Crop By-products

3.25 Yields require special treatment because they are constantly
changing, and there is a great deal of variability built in the model because
of the variety of zones, technologies, planting sequences, and water stress
levels. Yield data come out annually (in the ASP) by crop and by province.
The method in which the yield data are entered was designed for ease of
updating.

3.26 GAMS table NATYIELD contains the latest national average yields by
crop, in kilograms per acre. These are the only data that must be updated
annually.

3.27 Table YLDPRPV, which follows, contains proportions which distribute

the national yields to the provinces. For example, the Punjab yield of wheat
is about 97.8% of the national yield. Zero entries imply the crop choice is
not included in the model because of its minor importance. The provincial
yield data from the ASP could be used directly, but there appears to be
considerable noise in the year-to-year variations. For this reason, table
YLDPRPV is based on a three-year average of the provincial variations. Note
that this table provides a ready reference for provincial comparative
advantage among crops.
 - 41
3.28 Given a provincial yield for each province, the yields by zone are
determined by the proportions in the GAHS table YLDPRZS. E.g., the yield of
cotton in PCW is 110% of the Punjab average cotton yield. These proportions
are derived from the XAES and the re-survey. Finally, table YLDPRZO is used
to determine yields of non-standard technologies and sequences.

3.29 To estimate yields for future years a compound annual growth rate is
applied to these yields. These rates are given in GAHS table GROWTHCY in
percent by crop and zone. The growth in yields are assumed to be in response
to changes in inputs and improved practices. The growth rates have been
calculated based on recent history (five-years). Care must be taken, and the
growth rates revised, for projections of more than a few years.

3.30 Only those crop by-products which are fed to the animals are
specified in the model; others are ignored. By-product yields are specified
as a ratio of the yield of the main product, and are entered in the column
STRAW-YLD in GAHS table SLDS. For those crops with no by-products (cotton
crops and orchard) a blank, meaning zero, is entered.

3.31 In addition to the by-products explicitly captured, animals graze on

weeds that grow in and around the crops, and in fallow areas. The amount of
such grazing has been estimated, and is given in the GAHS tables WEEDY and
GRAZ in metric tons per acre. WEEDY is by crop and zone; GRAZ is by zone and
season.

3.32 Yield data are used in the crop commodity, fodder, and demand
constraints. They are obviously very important in determining the gross level
of production, given known resource inputs. In general there is less
uncertainty about the validity of the numbers used, since yields are routinely
and accurately measured.

2. Livestock Data

Livestock Input-Output Data (TABLE IOLIVE)

3.33 There are three types of animals in the model: cows, buffaloes and

bullocks. Cows and buffaloes are for meat and milk production and bullocks

provide draft power. Bullocks also produce meat as a by product. Feed

requirements for these animals are specified in terms of total digestible

nutrients (TDN) and digestible protein (DP). There is also a green fodder

constraint, which requires that a certain proportion of the TDN be green feed

rather than straw. These data are in metric tons by season for each zone.

They are given in GAHS table IOLIVE under the labels TDN and DP. Labor

requirements for each animal type are given under label LABOR, and are in man

hours per animal per month. Milk and meat yields in liters and kgs are listed

in the same table. The annual fixed cost for maintaining an animal in rupees

per year is under label FIX-COST. Included are veterinary costs and dietary

supplements. This fixed cost is small, and is assumed to be constant over

time.

3.34 Much uncertainty surrounds the feeding requirement numbers.

Estimates obtained from livestock specialists are very generous compared with

 - 42

actual practice (which may be estimated from reported livestock populations

and fodder acreages). The numbers in the model are the result of an exercise
using the 1980 PCA in which the number of animals of each type was compared
with the TDN and DP available from the cropping pattern of that year. A large
part of the uncertainty arises from the use of non-irrigated land for pasture,
and the impossible problem of mapping the livestock population to irrigated
and non-irrigated areas. This even makes validation difficult: if the model
reveals too few animals, it is difficult to determine if the TDN and DP data
are incorrect, or if the livestock population or irrigated are data are
incorrect.

Miscellaneous Livestock Parameters

3.35 The parameter REPCO (for reproductive coefficient) is used to
maintain a balance between cows and bullocks.

3.36 Draft power available from each bullock is specified in parameter BP.
It is in bullock hours per month and varies over the seasons less draft
power is available from a given animal in the hot months.

3.37 The conversion from output of fodder crops or straw to inputs of TDN
and DP uses factors given in GAMS table SCONV. These factors only depend on
the crop products. but the table is formulated by season to indicate when the
nutrient is available. For example wheat is a Rabi crop and its straw is
available in Kharif. Weeds are converted to nutrients using the factors for
Rabi fodder.

3.38 GROWTHQ is the assumed growth in meat and milk yields used when the
model is projected forward in time.

3. Economic Data
3.39 Economic data include prices and demand parameters and are critical
to the performance of the model as they define the objective function.

Price and Cost Data

3.40 The most important of these are the financial and economic prices of
the outputs which appear in table PRICES. The first contains financial prices
in rupees per kilogram. These are the prices the farmers face. and are used
to fix the price axes of the demand functions (see Section 11.3). These data
are available from APCOM, the ASP. and even local newspapers. The economic
prices in the second column are the same as those used in project analysis and
are, in fact, obtained from recent World Bank project documents related to
Pakistan. They represent the true, undistorted value of the outputs. Export
and import prices are used in the international trade activities, and
approximate the F.O.B. and C.I.F. prices which farmers receive and consumers
pay for exports and imports, respectively.

3.41 Financial and economic prices (costs) of inputs follow table PRICES.
FINSDWTPR contains seed costs, WAPDA water charges, and miscellaneous costs
(insecticides, herbicides), all per acre. ECNSDWTPR contains economic prices
for the same items. Table PRll contains prices for miscellaneous cost items:
 - 43
fertilizers, protein supplements, tubewell operating costs (TWOPC) and tractor
operating costs (TROPC). Table WAGEPS gives wage rates. Note that they vary
by month due to the peaking of labor demand.

Production and Consumption Data

3.42 Following the prices are production, consumption, and demand data.
Table TOTPROD contains estimated total production in the base year, 1987-88.
These numbers do not enter the model directly, but are used for comparing the
simulated production with the actual, and for deriving the consumption and
demand data. Expected production is obtained by mUltiplying the standard
yields by zone and crop by the expected crop area. Note the column titled sc
HILL is total expected production of cane.

3.43 Table FARMCONS contains the on-farm consumption requirements

described in Chapter 11.3. These were obtained by mUltiplying the data in
TOTPROD by the proportions of produce consumed on the farm from the 1988 re
survey. Because the size of the farm population is relatively stable, these
data need not be modified unless dramatic shifts in farm incomes are expected.
Note that SC-GUR is that part of total cane production which has been
converted to gur at an assumed recovery rate of .0778. We assume that all gur
comes under on-farm consumption, and all refined sugar enters the market
demand function. Because consumption takes place on both fresh and saline
farms, the FARMSCONS data must distributed. The proportions in table
CONSRATIO are used to accomplish this.

3.44 Table DEMAND is the residual of production less on-farm consumption

and is used to fix the quantity axis of the demand functions. SC-HILL has
been adjusted for the 750,000 metric tons of refined sugar imported in the
latest year based on the Pakistan-wide conversion ratio of .0865. BASMATI,
IRRI. and ONIONS have been adjusted for the latest year's exports.

3.45 For future years. the above procedure (for which a spreadsheet
analysis was employed) may be repeated if desired. but a simpler method is to
apply growth rates to DEMAND. Growth in demand is a function of both
population and income growth. The combined rate of growth is given in table
GROWTHRD.

3.46 Parameter ELAST contains the price elasticities of demand which are
used to define the slope of the demand functions. These data should not be
changed unless updates are available from a consumption study.

3.47 Tables EXPV and EXPZO give proportions to distribute the export
limits defined in parameter NATEXP to the zones. International markets for
cotton, rice, and onions are limited in the short run. and we therefore cannot
allow the model to export much beyond the current levels. The zonal
distributions are somewhat arbitrary but based on zonal comparative advantage.
They are necessary if the zone models are solved in isolation and are expected
to aggregate to the full IBMR.
 - 44
4. Resource Inventory

3.48 These data are presented in tables RES88 , CROPAREA and the parameter
SMILLCAP, and are for year 1988. They are used variously in constraints in
the model, for validation runs, or for reporting purposes. The numbers of
tractors and tubewells are used to provide limits on tractor and tubewell
usage in the model. Similarly farm population is used to compute the labor
availability. The capacity of all sugar factories, which is used to limit the
amount of cane grown for milling, is given by zone in SMILLCAP.

3.49 Animal populations are used in validation runs to check fodder

demands and draft power availability. Farm households and cropped areas are
used for reports and validation.

3.50 Growth rates for these resources are given in GAMS table GROWTHRES
and are used to compute inventories for future years.

3.51 Most of these resource data are published in censuses by political

districts, and were converted to zones by using the mapping provided in Table
3.2.

5. Irrigation System Data

Aggregating Information to ACZ

3.52 For modelling agricultural practices, the Indus basin has been
divided into nine Agroclimatic zones (ACZ) , in each of which cropping patterns
and associated technologies are broadly similar. An ACZ may cut across canal
command boundaries and need not be geographically contiguous, and there will
be areas of fresh and saline groundwater that must be treated separately:
tubewell pumping is allowed in fresh but not in saline.

3.53 When modelling the irrigation system, on the other hand, the basic
unit of area is the canal command, which is the area that can be irrigated by
a single canal. All the data on availability of irrigation water from canals
is specified by canal command, and so must be transformed to the aggregation
level of the agricultural model, i.e. the Agroclimatic zone, while still
preserving the separation of fresh and saline areas. In this section we will
explain how this transformation is carried out.

Disaggregation of Canal Commands

3.54 Each canal command in the system is divided into sub-areas based on
the following principles: Each sub-area

1. is a contiguous area located within one canal command,

2. has similar climate, cropping patterns and agricultural practices,
3. has similar groundwater quality -- that is, whether the groundwater
is usable for irrigation or not.

3.55 This division ends up giving 63 sub-areas derived from the 43 canal
commands in the system, with between one and four sub-areas per canal command.
 - 45

This disaggregation is given in tabular form in the GAMS table SUBDEF(SA,CNL)

and is shown here as Table 3.3. In this Table the percentage of total
Culturable Commanded Area (CCA) in each sub-area is specified. Inputs such as
canal diversions are allocated proportionally to each sub-area.

Aggregation of Sub-Areas and Other Inputs to ACZ

3.56 With the above disaggregation each sub-area is assigned to one ACZ
and is either fresh or saline. The sub-area is identified with the canal
label and sub-area label, e.g. the second sub-area in Rohri canal will be 39
ROB, S2. In set ZSA(Z,CNL,SA) all the sub-areas for each ACZ are listed and
this set is the main source of mapping information. Resulting canal to ACZ
mapping is provided in Table 3.4. Similarly all the sub-areas which are fresh
are listed in set GWF(CNL,SA), and areas not in this set are saline by
default.

3.57 For quantities which can be summed, such as CCA and diversions, the
value for each sub-area is added to make the ACZ total. Others, for example
rainfall and evaporation, which are specified per unit area, are weighted by
the ratio of CCA of the sub-area to the total CCA of zone. Summation over
fresh and saline sub-areas respectively gives the totals for the fresh and
saline components of the zone. The fresh and saline portion together
constitute the total ACZ.

3.58 Quantities such as public tubewell pumpage which are relevant only
in the fresh sub-areas are mapped to the fresh component of ACZ. If data is
available by canal command then it is allocated to the sub-area based on the
fresh CCA of the canal command. Similarly when aggregating to the ACZ, the
weight for the sub-areas is computed by taking the ratio CCA of the sub-area
to the fresh area of the ACZ.

Canal Command Characteristics

I
3.59 Other relevant physical data describing the canal command include
Culturable Commanded Area (CCA) , Canal CAPacity at head (CCAP), Canal
EFFiciency (CEFF), Watercourse Command Efficiencies, and FieLD Efficiencies
(FLDE) are entered in the GAMS table COMDEF(IS,DC,CNL). A description of
these items is provided below.

Culturable Commanded Area (CCA)

3.60 This is the total area which can be cropped to which canals can
supply irrigation water. It includes the area served by all downstream branch
canals, distributories, minors and watercourses. In the COMDEF table it is
given in millions of acres. For present conditions it is taken from the RAP
supporting report, Irrigation Drainage and Flood Management (IDFM). Canal
extension and development projects will change these numbers.

Canal Capacity at head (CCAl)

3.61 This is the delivery capacity of the canal, i.e. a measure of the
maximum instantaneous flow. Capacities are normally given as rates, for
example, cubic feet per second. In the GAMS table they are entered in the
 - 46
Table 3.2: Zone-District Mapping

Agro- CCA Agro- CCA

climatic (Million Component climatic (Million Component
Zone Acres) Districts Zone Acres) Districts

NWFP .628 Peshawar SCWN 3.594 Sukkur

(.675) Mardan (3.594) Khairpur
Nawabshah
PRW 2.782 Lahore SCWS 2.791 .9 Hyderabad
(2.782) Sheikhupura (2.791) .6 Badin
Gujranwala Tharparkar
Sialkot Sangar
PMW 2.413 .3 Sarghoda SRWN 4.395 Dadu
(2.413) .55 Mianwali (4.535) Larkana
.6 Muzaffgarh Jacobabad
.25 D.!. Khan Shikarpur
Nasirabad
PCW 11.245 Multan SRWS 2.775 .1 Hyderabad
(11.568) Vehari (2.775) .4 Badin
Sahiwal Thatta
.4 Muzaffgarh Karachi
D. G. Khan
Bahalwalpur
Rahimyarkhan
Cholistan
Kasur
PSW 4.398 Jhang
(4.471) Faisalabad
Gujrat
.7 Sargodha

Sources: RAP; Project estimates.

Figures in ( ) are for the year 2000.

 - 47
Table 3.3: Canal Command to Subarea Mapping

Canal Canal Name Sub-Areas with Portion

Label of Canal Command CCA
Sl S2 S3 S4

01-UD Upper Dipalpur 1

02-CBD Central Bari Doab canal .5 .5
03-RAY Raya canal 1
04-UC Upper Chenab canal 1
05-MR Marala Ravi canal 1
06-SAD Sadiqia canal 1
07-FOR Fordwah canal 1
08-PAK Upper Pakpattan+ 1
Upper Bahawal+Upper Mailsi+Qaim
09-LD Lower Dipalpur canal 1
10-LBD Lower Dari Doab canal .5 .5
ll-JHA Jhang canal (Lcc) .32 .49 .19
12-GUG Gugera Branch canal (Lcc) .26 .53 .21
13-UJ Upper Jehlum canal 1
14-LJ Lower Jehlum canal .64 .36
15-BAH Bahawal canal .8 .2
16-MA1 Lower Mailsi+lower Pakpattan canal .65 .35
17-S1D Sidhnai canal 1
18-HAV Havel! canal 1
19-RAN Rangpur canal 1
20-PAN Panjnad canal .7 .3
21-ABB Abbasia canal 1
22-USW Lower Swat canal 1
23-LSW Upper Swat canal 1
24-WAR Warsak canal 1
25-KAB Kabul River canal 1
26-THA Thal canal .35 .17 .30 .18
27-PAH Paharpur/CRBC canal 1
28-MUZ Muzffgarh canal .25 .75
29-DGK Dera Ghazi Khan canal 1
31-P+D Pat + Desert canal 1
32-BEG Begari canal .5 .5
33-GHO Ghotki canal .5 .5
34-NW North West canal 1
35-R1C Rice canal 1
36-DAD Dadu canal 1
37-KW Khairpur West canal 1
38-KE Khairpur East canal 1
39-ROH Rohri canal .39 .20 .16 .25
41-NAR Nara canal .2 .8
42-KAL Kalri canal 1
43-LCH Lined channel 1
44-FUL Fuleli canal 1
45-P1N Pinyari canal 1
 - 48
Table 3.4; Agroclimatic Zone - Canal Mapping

Agroclimatic Zone Canals Agroclimatic Zone Canals

NWFP 22-USW PMW 26-THA

23-LSW 27-PAH
24-WAR .25 28-MUZ
25-KAB

PCW 01-UD PSW .68 ll-JHA

.50 02-CBD .74 12-GUG
06-SAD 13-UJ
07-FOR 14-LJ
08-PAK 18-HAV
09-LD
10-LBD PRW .50 02-CBD
IS-BAH 03-RAY
16-MAL 04-UC
17-SID 05-MR
19-RAN .32 II-JHA
20-PAN .26 12-GUG
21-ABB
.75 28-MUZ
29-DGK

SCWN 33-GHO SCWS .41 39-ROH

37-KW .80 41-NAR
38-KE
.59 39-ROH
.20 41-NAR

SRWN 31-P+D SRWS 42-KAL

32-BEG 43-LCH
34-NW 44-FUL
35-RIC 45-PIN
36-DAD
 - 49

model's units, million acre feet (MAF) per month. In some cases historic
diversions may be greater than the design capacities. This most often occurs
when channels are run slightly over their design capacity: adjustment
(scouring) takes place after about 20 days. A more dramatic increase can
occur if what is referred to as a canal is actually a collection of
distributories (typically taking off from a link canal). Then each channel
has extra head board, and if they are all run over capacity the proportional
increase can be much larger.

3.62 Canal rehabilitation and remodelling projects may also cause changes
in the capacity of the canal.

Canal Delivery Efficiency

3.63 This efficiency is used to account for average losses in transit

from the canal head to the head of the watercourses. It is specified as the
proportion of water at the head that reaches the watercourse, and accounts for
losses in the main canal, branch canals, distributaries and minors. A
detailed discussion of canal losses is given in Section 111-91 of the IDFM
report. A portion of the canal losses seeps into the groundwater; it is
assumed that 70% of the lost water in these channels contributes to the
groundwater recharge.

Watercourse Command Efficiency

3.64 These efficiencies are used to compute the water available at the
root zone for a given amount of water at the watercourse head. Again this is
an average number: in practice farms at the head of the watercourse suffer
less loss, and those at the tail, more. Included are the losses from the head
of the watercourse to the root zone, which includes government watercourse,
farm channel and field losses. Watercourse efficiencies are specified by
season (Rabi and Kharif), on the assumption that water use behavior depends on
the relative scarcity of water, which is likely to be more pronounced in Rabi
than in Kharif. Field efficiencies are taken the same for all year as they
depend on how level the fields are. These efficiencies are used for canal and
public tubewell water. Private tubewells are assumed to be closer to the
fields where the water is used, and the watercourse losses are therefore
halved and but the same field losses are used. Seepage from watercourses and
fields contributes to the groundwater recharge. The amount is assumed to be
80% of the total losses.

3.65 Most of these canal characteristics data are provided in the IDFM
report. It is emphasized here that most of the command area development
projects impact on one or more of the above characteristics, and so the
relevant numbers should be updated when projects are evaluated.

Data for Storage Reservoirs

3.66 Currently the three main storage reservoirs included in the model
are Mangla, Tarbela and Chasma. However, the model is constructed in such a
way that any node can be converted to a reservoir by specifying a nonzero
capacity at that node. (The concept of nodes and arcs was explained in the
surface water routing section.) For each reservoir in the system, live
capacity, operating rule and evaporation loss (net of rain) has to be
 - 50

specified. Live capacity (capacity which can be released) is specified in MAF

in the model. Operating rules are specified in the form of upper and lower
rule curves, i.e. upper and lower limits on end of the month contents as a
proportion of the live capacity.

3.67 The live capacities for all three reservoirs are given in the GAMS
table RRCAP, for a number of different years. These capacities were computed
using the sedimentation rates suggested in the IDFM report. The rule curves
are in GAMS tables RULELO and RULEUP. They were provided by Water Resource
Management Directorate (WRM) of WAPDA and Kalabagh design report. Evaporation
from the reservoir (net of rain) is given in GAMS table REVAP and varies by
month. It is estimated based on the average surface area of the reservoirs
using the operating rules.

3.68 To compute power generation from the reservoirs, three relationships

are entered in the model: elevation-gross storage, elevation-generation
capacity and elevation-generation per unit discahrge. Reservoir elevation
capacity relation is then adjusted for live storage(instead of gross} and
sedimentation. Elevation is specified in feet above mean sea level, reservoir
capacity in HAF. generation capacity in MW and generation in KWF/AF. These
relations are entered in tabular form using 27 segments given in GAMS table
POWERCHAR. Segment 27 has same values as 26 and is used in case the dam is
raised. This data was provided by WRM WAPDA from recent hydrograhic surveys
of Tarbela and Mangla reservoirs.

3.69 The reservoir data must be updated if the model is to be executed

for a future scenario: sedimentation has to be accounted for and the
reSUlting new capacities determined. If the operating criteria of the
reservoirs are changed the rule curves will need corresponding changes.
Evaporation losses from the reservoirs are small compared to the inflows, and
can probably be left unchanged. or even neglected.

Data for Surface Water Routing

3.70 The Indus basin canal system is represented in the IBMR as a
network. Before going into details, we will discuss briefly the
characteristics of this representation. This material is amplified in the
discussion of the node balance equations in Part IV. The network describes
the rivers. reservoirs and link canals. and in the model keeps track of the
flows of water from where they enter the network (the rim stations) to where
they leave (canal offtakes at barrages, or the sea). A network consists of
two basic components: nodes and arcs. A node is a point at which flows join
(e.g. where two rivers join) or split (e.g. a barrage). Unless the node has
storage capacity. the sum of inflows in each time period (month) must equal
the sum of outflows. If the node is a reservoir, then in each month the
inflow must equal outflow plus the change in storage (including losses).
provided the amount of storage always remains within the rule curves. Water
travels (in one direction only) between pairs of nodes along arcs, which
represent either river reaches or link canals. A complete description of the
network consists of the following:

(a) A list of all the nodes (Set N)

(b) A list of the storage nodes (Table RRCAP)
 - 51
(c) All the arcs. specified by listing all pairs of nodes that
are directly connected (Set NN)
(d) A list matching river inflows with nodes (Set NI)
(e) A list matching outflows to canal commands (Parameter NCAP)
(f) Specification of losses in the system. discussed below

3.71 Several simplifications have been made in making these lists. in

order to keep the number of nodes within reasonable limits. Sometimes a
junction is moved to avoid creating an extra node -- for example the Sutlej is
assumed to join the Indus at Gudu. instead of upstream as it actually does.
In other cases many distributories are located along a link canal. To
simplify the network. this is represented as a link canal and a canal command
both receiving water from the upstream node. An example is at node A2: the
flow splits into Upper Chenab link. and the BRBD link. A third component is
added: the Upper Chenab internal. which consists of the water diverted along
the UC Link canal. By judicious use of these sorts of simplifications. the
complete network is represented by 37 nodes.

3.72 There is no specific distinction in the formulation between river

reaches and link canals except the procedure used to compute water available
at the downstream node. Link canals have an upper bound to their capacity.
and a transfer efficiency is applied to get flows at the downstream node.
There are 27 such arcs in the model. The capacities of these arcs in MAF per
month are given in the GAMS parameter NCAP. If a particular arc has a nonzero
entry in NCAP. then it is a link canal. Loss rates are specified in the GAMS
table LLOSS; efficiency is then available as 1.-LLOSS. For some very short
arcs there are effectively no losses. and the entry in LL088 is blank.

3.73 River reaches are treated differently. Flow at the downstream end
of the reach is determined using incoming flows for the current and the
previous month in the following formula:

Downstream(M) = B*Upstream(M) + C*Upstream(M-l) + D*Trib(M)

[1] [2] [3]
3.74 The term [1] is repeated for all the contributing inflows. For term
[2] all the upstream flows for previous months are summed. Term [3] accounts
for any distributory flows. For example the flow at Gudu in December will be
computed using the flows at Taunsa and Panjnad downstream as:

Gudu(Dec) = Bl*Taunsa(Dec) + B2*Panjnad(Dec) +

C*( Taunsa(Nov) + Panjnad(Nov) )

3.75 Negative flows are set to zero. The coefficients B are given in
GAMS table RIVERB, and C and D are in RIVERCD. They were derived
statistically using the historic flows at barrages. Because of the difficulty
of interpreting a constant term in the regression (especially a negative one),
we forced the constant to be zero. This had a very small effect on the
correlation coefficient.
 - 52
6. Vater Inputs

Historic Canal Diversions

3.76 Historic canal diversions are used in two ways in the model. If the
model at hand is for one or more zones, as might be the case in evaluating a
particular project area, the diversions are used to provide the amount of
available surface water for crops (after netting out the losses as discussed
above). If the model is of the entire basin, then the historical diversions
serve as indicators for various allocation schemes. For example, in the
'strictly proportional' allocation scheme each canal's share is determined by
taking the ratio of historic diversions to the canal to total diversions in
the system. A complication is that the pattern of diversions has changed as
additional reservoirs and link canals have been added. But since Tarbela has
been in operation the pattern has been stable: therefore the mean post
Tarbela diversions (in MAF, by month and canal command) are used as for
historical diversions. These means are taken over the period 1976 to 1987.
They are the entries in GAMS Table DIVPOST(CNL,M).

3.77 These data were derived as follows. The Water Resource Management
Directorate (WRMD) of the Planning Division of WAPDA publishes the historic
discharge data in a yearly publication called wIndus Basin Irrigation System,
Historic Rivers and Canals, Discharge Data W This contains all the canal
diversions in thousands of cusec for each 10-day period. A list of discharge
data extracted from this WRM publication is provided in Table 3.5. The lO-day
data are then converted to monthly MAF and rearranged to match with the canal
commands in the model.

3.78 These transformations to the model's canal commands are outlined

below. They will be easier to understand if the schematic diagram of the
canal system is handy for reference. The IBMR canal commands are given in the
style "number-abbreviation" (e.g. UC-04 for Upper Chenab internal use). They
are all listed in the model in Set CNL. The WRMD canals have been assigned
numbers for brevity, for example WNo. 2". The matching of names with these
numbers is given in Table 3.5.

3.79 04-UC Upper Chenab Canal. Data for canal No.2 (Upper Chenab Canal
Internal Use) in the data book are computed by subtracting BRBD link at head
and UCC at the tail, therefore the losses in the UCC link canal are included
in the internal use. The model has two Upper Chenab canals, one an Irrigation
canal serving the command area and the other a link canal. The link canal is
used to transfer water whenever needed, and losses are computed based on the
flow in the canal. A separate accounting is made for losses and diversions
for crop use, called 04-UC.

3.80 The following transformation is done to estimate the diversions for

this canal:

04-UC No.2 - (No.7/0.9295 - No.7)

Here 0.9295 is the link canal efficiency used in the model, so that
the term in parenthesis computes the losses in the link canal which
are then subtracted from the Internal use.
 - 53

OS-HR canal in the model consists of all the irrigation

distributaries and channels which take off from the Marala Ravi link
canal. Discharge for this canal is:

05-MR = No.9 - No.11/0.9925 - No.10/0.9647

Here 0.9925 and 0.9647 are the efficiencies to route water from
sub-link and MR tail to the head which is then subtracted from the
discharge at head to compute water diverted for irrigation along the
MR link called MR canal in the model.

OS-PAX Pakpattan canal is sum of 4 canals:

08-PAX = No.19 + No.24 + No.23 + No.22
11-JBA and 12-GUG Discharge data for Jhang and Gugera canals is
computed by splitting the No.3 Lower Chenab link canal as below:

11-JHA = No.3 * 0.471123

12-GUG = No.3 - (ll-JHA)

No. 3 canal is the total discharge of LCC and LCC feeder. The
factor 0.471123 is determined from the discharges tabulated for
these canals in the RAP - IDFM report.

13-UJ The diversions for 13-UJ Upper Jehlum canal are computed by
subtracting Rasul Power channel and UJ link at head from the UJ at
Skya. The link canal efficiency used to determine the discharge at
the head is 0.901.

13-UJ = No.4 - No.6 - No.5/0.901

1S-HAV Losses in the Haveli link are subtracted from the Haveli
internal use. 0.0355 is the loss factor used in the model:

18-HAV = No.14 - No.13 * 0.0355

16-MAI Mailsi canal in the model consists of lower Mailsi and
lower Bahawal canals:

16-MAI=No.26 + No.25

24-VAR Warsak canal in the model is the sum ofWarsak Gravity (right
Bank). Warsak lift canal and Warsak Left Bank:

24-WAR = No.51 + No.52 + No.53

3.81 The remainder of the canals are directly assigned without mapping as
shown below.

Ol-UD = No.28 21-ABB = No.17 34-NW = No.42

02-CBD = No.18 22-US = No.48 35-RIC = No.40
03-RAY = No.8 23-LS = No.49 36-DAD = No.41
07-FOR = No.21 25-KAB = No.50 37-KW = No.39
 - 54

Table 3.5: Names and Numbers of Canals in the WRM Lists

No. Name No. Name

1 Lower Jhelum canal 28 Upper Dipalpur

2 Upper Chenab - Internal 29 Lower Dipalpur
3 Lower Chenab 30 Thal
4 Upper Jhelum at Skya 31 Paharpur/CRBC
5 Upper Jhelum link at Tail 32 Dera Ghazi Khan
6 Rasul Power Channel 33 Muzaffargarh
7 Upper Chenab link at Tail 34 Begari Sind feeder
8 BRBD - Internal 35 Desert-Pat feeder
9 Marala-Ravi link at Head 36 Ghotki feeder
10 Marala-Ravi link at Tail 37 Rohri
11 Marala-Ravi Sub-link 38 Khairpur East
12 Rangpur 39 Khairpur West
13 HaveU at Head 40 Rice
14 HaveU Internal 41 Dadu
15 Sidhnai 42 North Western
16 Panjnad 43 Eastern Nara
17 Abbassia 44 Panyari
18 Central Bari Doab 45 Kalari-Baghar feeder
19 Upper Pakpattan 46 Lined channel
20 Eastern Sadiqua 47 Fuleli
21 Fordwah 48 Swat - Upper
22 Upper Mailsi 49 Swat - Lower
23 Qaimpur 50 Kabul river
24 Upper Bahawal 51 Warsak Gravity
25 Lower Pakpattan 52 Warsak Lift
26 Lower Mailsi 53 Warsak Left Bank
27 Lower Bahawal 54 Lower Bari Doab

09-LD = No.29 26-THA = No.30 38-KE = No.38

10-LBD == No.54 27-PAH = No.31 39-ROH ., No.37
14-LJ = No.1 28-MOZ ... No.33 41-NAR No.43
::;:

15-BAH = No.27 29-DGK - No.32 42-KAL = No.45

17-SID ... No.15 31-PD ... No.35 43-LCH = No.46
19=RAN - No.12 32-BEG = No.34 44-FUL = No.47
20-PAN ... NO.16 33-GHO ... No.36 45-PIN = No.44
 - 55

3.82 A summary of the average historic diversions by major sections of

the system is presented in the Table 3.6. Figure 3.1 shows the variation in
the flows over the year, and diversions compared with the total inflows to the
system. It is obvious that from this graph that there is extra water
available in the system from April to August. Diversions are more than the
system inflows in the months of October to March: during these months water
is released from the storage reservoirs.

Evaporation of Groundwater

3.83 Because of capillary action in the soil, water rises towards the
root zone or surface from the water table and evaporates. A portion of this
evaporation is absorbed by the root system of crops, and contributes towards
their water requirements. This is often called subirrigation from the
groundwater. If the water table is close to the surface, say within 3 feet,
the evaporation rate is effectively the same as the pan evaporation. At
depths greater than 6 feet, it is less than 10% of pan evaporation. So it is
within the 3 to 6 foot zone that subirrigation is important and sensitive to
water table depth. Several studies have been made to estimate the amount of
evaporation from the groundwater for different levels of water table and for
different soil types. Most of them try to relate the potential evaporation
from a free water surface to the depth to groundwater table. Some of these
studies have been done in Pakistan, and these are summarized in Section V-338
of the IDFM report.

3.84 The method used in IBMR is based on the results of studies by

Gardner and Fireman [1958]. They gave a relation for evaporation from soil
columns having different water table depths. In the Lower Indus Project (LIP)
studies were done of evaporation from different water table depths for an
actual case within the region and compared with the Fireman-Gardner and
various other curves. LIP presented the results as a relation between depth
to water table and proportion of free water surface evaporation, making the
relation transportable to other areas. For IBMR an exponential equation was
fitted to the data values read from this curve. This relation and the
original curve are shown in Figure 3.2.
GWEVAP = EVAP*10.637/(DEPTH**2.558)
3.85 Here, GWEVAP is the evaporation from groundwater, EVAP is
evaporation from a free surface (pan evaporation) and DEPTH is the depth to
water table in feet. The data needed to estimate evaporation from the
groundwater is therefore (a) depth to water table and (b) the potential
evaporation in the area. Evaporation data for each canal command was
extracted from the DELTA computer program. It represents long term average
evaporation by month in each canal command. Data collected during the period
1950 to 1970 were used as a basis. For more details on this data the user is
referred to the User's Guide of the DELTA program or the IDFM report. The
depth to water table was estimated using IDFM data April 1977 to June 1978.
These estimates have been modified to take into account drainage projects and
 - 56

Inflows to the Indus River system

. .In AlvtnI ana Total

"

III

24

20
18
1.
14
1.
10

..

:a
0
Iv ~ ..kin Jul

I nclUi + .....hl UII

Total Inflows and canal Diversions

"

!2
III

1M
Z2

IIG

1.
1.
14
,.

10

I
.

iii
Iv " ..kin Jul

C c:an.1 Dlvr81D,.

Figure 3.1: Average Inflows and Canal Diversions

 - 57

Firerran and Gardner Curve (FGJ

I.owr I ncII.a Project. 1"orm

1.1

c D.S
~

i
D.a
0.7

!
15
D.!

D.::S

11.4
!
I 0.3

0.2

0.1

0
2 .. 6 II 10
Dlpt.n to water" Tlllble C~..t:J

C O!Ita from FG cal"v. + 10.saiVDept~.::S511

Figure 3.2: Groundwater Evaporation and Watertable Depth Relation,

after Fireman, Gardner and LIP Studies
 - 58

Table 3.6: Canal Diversions; 1976-1988 Average (MAF)

Marala Mangla Upper Lower Kabul Total

Canals Canals Indus Indus Swat
Canals Canals Canals

April 0.251 2.018 1.318 2.081 0.256 5.925

May 0.553 2.785 2.209 3.276 0.305 9.129
June 0.734 2.872 2.452 6.075 0.312 12.444
July 0.865 2.837 2.459 6.955 0.298 13.413
August 0.823 2.777 2.393 5.926 0.271 12.190
September 0.756 2.854 2.460 5.432 0.294 11.797
October 0.482 2.542 2.126 4.113 0.299 9.562
November 0.250 2.092 1.302 2.710 0.247 6.601
December 0.165 1.973 1.116 2.376 0.224 5.853
January 0.114 0.931 0.682 1.698 0.092 3.518
February 0.198 1.584 0.974 2.297 0.150 5.203
March 0.203 1.961 1.261 2.305 0.214 5.944

Rabi 1.412 11.083 7.461 15.499 1.225 36.680

Kharif 3.982 16.144 13.291 29.746 1. 736 64.899

Annual 5.394 27.227 20.752 45.244 2.961 101. 578

Marala Canals 01-UD, 02-CBD, 03-RAY, 04-UC, 05-MR

Mangla Canals 06-SAD. 07-FOR, 08-PAK. 09-LD, 10-LBD

11-JHA, 12-GUG, 13-UJ, 14-LJ,

Upper Indus Canals IS-BAH, 16-MAI, 17-SID, 18-HAV, 19-RAN,

20-PAN, 21-ABB, 26-THA, 27-PAH, 28-MUZ, 29-DGK

Lower Indus Canals 31-P+D, 32-BEG, 33-GHO, 34-NW, 35-RIC, 36-DAD

37-KW', 38-KE, 39-ROH, 41-NAR, 42-KAL,
43-LCH, 44-FUL, 45-PIN

Kabul-Swat Canals 22-USW, 23-LSW. 24-WAR, 25-KAB

 - 59
the practice of impounding and releasing water for rice crops. The aim was to
produce estimates consistent with the situation in 1988. The evaporation data
are entered in EVAP(CNL,M). The units are feet per month. The depth to water
table are in DEP1(CN) and DEP2(CNL,M). DEP2 contains the data on canals with
high rice intensity. Because of large variations in the water table over the
year data for these are specified by month.

3.86 GWEVAP is then computed using the formula given above. In the
current version of the IBMR evapotranspiration is used in two ways. A portion
of it is available as water supply to crops. Secondly, in IBMR accounting is
done of all inflows and outflows from the groundwater. Evaporation is an
outflow. Both these effects are discussed briefly below.

Subirrigation

3.87 It is assumed that 60% of the evaporation from groundwater can be

absorbed by the crops and that the remainder is lost as evaporation to the
atmosphere. Using this assumption, the subirrigation supply available per
acre is computed for all the canals by month (depth and evaporation are
entered by canal). The required water applications for crops are then
adjusted so that they are net of this available subirrigation supply. In
addition a set of equations in the model provide safeguards against
unrealistic results: a proper mixture of surface and subirrigation water must
be maintained.

Groundwater Balance

3.88 After the model solution a report on the total inflows and outflows
to the groundwater is prepared using the diversion and pumping decisions made
by the model. In this report evaporation from GW is given as outflow and for
areas with high water tables it is considerable. The entire evaporation given
by GWEVAP is taken and converted to MAF using area.

Rainfall Data

3.89 Most of the rainfall occurs in the monsoon months, June through
August. Rain data is used to estimate the irrigation requirements and
recharge to the groundwater due to the rainfall. Mean monthly rainfall in
inches by canal command is entered in the GAMS table RAIN(CNL,M). It is
assumed that 15% of the rain is lost to direct runoff, that some is lost in
the fields and that the remainder is available for consumptive use. Field
losses are estimated using the field efficiencies given in table COMDEF.
Effective rain fall in feet per acre is therefore calculated (by month for
each canal) using the following equation:

EFR = (1.0 - direct runoff - loss in the fields) * Rain/12.0

3.90 This amount is mapped to zone, and (like the subirrigation) is

subtracted from the total monthly water requirements for each crop. The crop
water requirements used in the water balance equations are thus net of
rainfall and subirrigation, i.e. they represent the amount of canal and
tubewell water that must be applied. On fallow land this rainfall is not
used: it evaporates or is consumed by the weeds.
 - 60

Recharge to Groundwater from Rain

3.91 A proportion. assumed to be 80%, of the field losses seeps and
contributes to groundwater. The groundwater balance reporting keeps track of
this. Groundwater recharge from rain is computed from the entire commanded
area (CCA) , not just the cropped area.

Government Tubewell Pumpage

3.92 Public tubewell pumpage is an alternative source of water supply in

the fresh groundwater areas. Historic records of public pumpage were taken
from the IDFM report. These data are entered in table GWT(CNL.M) in thousand
acre feet by canal and by month. It is assumed that the public pumps are at
the watercourse head so that watercourse command efficiencies are used to
determine the water available from these pumps at the root zone. This amount
is then mapped to zones using only fresh groundwater CCA for the weights. It
is available as a right-hand-side constant in the water balance at the root
zone.

Surface Vater Inflows to the System

3.93 Surface water inflows to the system are required when running the
complete system model. In the model these inflows are grouped in two
categories, rim station inflows and tributary inflows. Rim stations are
points where rivers enter Pakistan or key locations such as reservoir sites
upstream of the irrigated areas. Tributaries enter into river reaches
laterally below the rim stations. In the model tributary flows are added at
the most convenient node, usually at the lower end of the river reach.
Tributary flows represent onlya part of the lateral flows, and are the only
ones for which numbers are available. The others are inferred as a by-product
of the water routing procedures.

3.94 The model usually uses 50% probability flows. If the system's
response to low flows is of interest, then 80% probability flows have been
computed, and they can be used. By 50% probability. we mean that there is a
50% chance in any given year that the flows will be at least equal to what we
have assumed. More details of exactly what this means and how these flows
have been derived is given below. In a similar way, the 80% probability flows
are such that in four years out of five the flow will be equal to or greater
than the given flow. Both these sets of flows have been calculated using the
available historic record for each rimstation and tributary. They are entered
in the GAHS table INFL5080. The measuring stations, availability of historic
records in the database and the method of calculating these flows is described
in the following sections.

3.95 The river stations and the availability of records are shown in
tables 3.7 and 3.8.
 - 61
Table 3.7: Available Rim Station Records

River/Station Type Record Available

1- Indus at Tarbela above Rim station Oct 1936 - March 1988

2. Jehlum at Mangla above Rim Station Apr 1922 - March 1988
3. Chenab at Marala above Rim station Apr 1922 - March 1988
4. Ravi above MR-Tail Rim station Apr 1966 - March 1988
5. Sutlej below Ferozepur Rim station Apr 1966 - March 1988
6. Swat at Chakdara above Rim station Apr 1966 - March 1976
7. Kabul at Warsak Dam above Rim station Apr 1966 - March 1976
8. Haro at Ghariala Rim station Apr 1966 - March 1976
9. Soan at Dhok Pattan Rim station Apr 1966 - March 1976

Notes to Table 3.7

1. Data for stations 1 through 5 are published by WRMD and for others are
given in the IDFM report.

2. The Sutlej below Ferozepore is actually Sutlej component computed at the

Sulemenki (above) by subtracting Balloki Sidhnai link I (BS-I) and BS-II
link at tail from the Sulemanki above. BS-I and BS-II are computed by
subtracting lower Dipalpur canal and losses in the link from the discharge
at head.

3. The Ravi inflow is computed by determining Ravi component at Balloki which

is Balloki above - UCC link tail - MR link tail - QB link tail.

Table 3.8: Available Tributary Records

River Reach Type Records Available

Chenab Marala-Khanki Tributary Apr 1966 - March 1976

Jehlum Mangla-Rasul Tributary It It It It

Ravi Balloki-Sidhnai Tributary It It

Swat Amandara-Munda Tributary It It It It

Munda-Kabul river Tributary It It It

Kabul Warsak-Nowshera Tributary It It It It

Indus Tarbela-Kalabagh Tributary It It It It

Including Nowshera
To attock
Chasma-Taunsa Tributary It . It

Data for all the tributary inflows are taken from the IDFM report.
 - 62

Computing Inflows for the Model Fram Historic Records

3.96 As explained above certain level (50% or 80%) of flows are computed
from the historic records and entered in the model. Computation of these
flows from historic records is explained using the example of Indus river
above Tarbela. In this case monthly observations covering the years 1936 to
1988 are available.

Step 1. All the data are converted into monthly MAF.

Step 2. Data for each month is sorted in ascending order.

Step 3. Select a season. We will take Rabi for this example. For each month
in the season, the year with the median flow is selected. Here we
have 52 observations, so in each case the 27th is selected from the
sorted lists. Tabulate the discharge for all these months. In Table
3.9, column 2 we show the years selected. The corresponding flows
are in column 3. The seasonal total for these flows would be 8.157
MAF.

Step 4. Notice that the discharge for each month is from a different year.
In river discharges there is a correlation between flows in adjacent
months, i.e. the discharge in one month is predictable to some extent
from the previous month's discharge. If we use the discharge pattern
computed in step 3 we will ignore any correlation. To correct for
this problem we pick monthly breakdown for the season which has the
median seasonal flow. This turns out to be the Rabi of year 85-86.
The monthly discharge pattern for this season is listed in column 4:
the seasonal total is 8.124 MAF.

Step 5. Column 5 is computed by adjusting the flows in column 4 by a ratio of

8.157/8.124. In this process we have kept the pattern of flows as in
Rabi 85-86 but adjusted the whole to give the 50% probability flows.

Step 6. Same procedure is repeated for the Kharif season.

3.97 If the sample is large, then the difference in 50% flows by month or
by season is not great, especially for the river Indus which has large and
well observed flows. However, when looking at patterns when the flows are
unusually high or low it is important to use the procedure as outlined above.
 - 63

Table 3.9: Computations of 50% Probability Inflows

For Indus above Tarbela, Rabi Season

Month Year Flow(MAF) Rabi Season Computed

85-86 Flows
1 2 3 4 5

Oct 60-61 2.435 2.288 2.297

Nov 79-80 1.412 1.273 1.278
Dec 68-69 1.142 1.183 1.188
Jan 38-39 .990 .948 .952
Feb 60-61 .927 .970 .974
Mar 81-82 1.251 1.462 1.468

Total 8.157 8.124 8.157

3.98 Flows based on 50% probability are used in the model in most of the
experiments. These flows are presented in Tables 3.10 and 3.11. and shown
graphically in Figure 3.1. Total inflow to the system. river and tributaries
is 147.04 MAF of which 138.690 is main rivers at the rim station. Figure 3.1
also shows the seasonal variations in the flow. 85% of the flow is in Kharif
and 15% is in Rabi. About 90% of the flow is contributed by Indus, Jeh1um.
Chenab and Kabul rivers. The Ravi and Sut1ej currently contribute only 6%.
For runs representing future years. the flows in these two rivers are set to
zero.

7. Other data
3.99 Several factors are used in the model for converting the inputs to
make the equations homogenous in dimensions. Examples are the conversion from
number of tubewe11s to the total discharge capacity in acre feet per month or
from number of tractors to available tractor hours per month.

3.100 Some data are used only in reporting. for example the contribution of
river and link canal seepage to the groundwater of each zone.
 - 64

Table 3.10: Rim Station Inflows, 50% Probability (MAF)

River
Name Apr Hay Jun Jul Aug Sep Kharif

Indus 1.931 3.984 7.191 16.148 17.437 6.196 52.887

Jehlum 3.826 4.355 2.993 3.429 2.236 0.846 17.685
Chenab 1.361 2.281 4.036 5.279 5.097 2.540 20.594
Ravi 0.226 0.161 0.038 1.089 1.732 0.841 4.087
Sutlej 0.031 0.045 0.052 0.483 1.003 1.198 2.812
Haro 0.016 0.013 0.014 0.048 0.204 0.073 0.368
Soan 0.012 0.007 0.090 0.225 0.426 0.068 0.828
Swat 0.483 0.636 1.049 0.863 0.642 0.346 4.019
Kabul 1.512 1.883 3.467 3.490 2.619 0.975 13.946

Total 9.398 13.365 18.930 31.054 31.396 13.083 117.226

River
Name Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Rabi Annual

Indus 2.297 1.279 1.188 0.952 0.973 1.468 8.157 61.044

Jehlum 0.988 0.521 0.412 0.460 0.621 1.417 4.419 22.104
Chenab 0.728 0.487 0.407 0.480 0.711 1.079 3.892 24.486
Ravi 0.188 0.134 0.131 0.090 0.026 0.455 1.024 5.111
Sutlej 0.129 0.009 0.004 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.202 3.014
Haro 0.037 0.020 0.016 0.019 0.019 0.051 0.162 0.530
Soan 0.010 0.005 0.020 0.022 0.028 0.043 0.128 0.956
Swat 0.195 0.122 0.088 0.079 0.068 0.140 0.692 4.711
Kabul 0.523 0.405 0.354 0.379 0.440 0.687 2.788 16.734

Total 5.095 2.982 2.620 2.541 2.886 5.340 21.464 138.690

 - 65

Table 3.11: Tributary Inflows. 50% Probability (MAP)

River Reach Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Kharif

Marala-Khanki 0.004 0.006 0.023 0.120 0.240 0.056 0.449

Mangla-Rasul 0.120 0.180 0.150 0.170 0.320 0.210 1.150
Chasma-Taunsa 0.051 0.013 0.021 0.048 0.021 0.012 0.166
Tarbela-Kalabagh 0.041 0.087 0.182 0.350 0.602 0.180 1.442
Balloki-Sidhnai 0.000 0.001 0.009 0.096 0.206 0.041 0.353
Amandara-Munda 0.036 0.337 0.637 0.854 0.544 0.062 2.470
Maunda-Kabul 0.015 0.013 0.005 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.054
Warsak-Nowshehra 0.126 0.102 0.059 0.070 0.056 0.056 0.469

Total 0.393 0.739 1.086 1. 716 1.996 0.624 6.553

River Reach Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Rabi Annual

Marala-Khanki 0.017 0.007 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.007 0.052 0.501

Mangla-Rasul 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.060 1.210
Chasma-Taunsa 0.004 0.005 0.010 0.006 0.015 0.026 0.065 0.231
Tarbela-Kalabagh 0.100 0.064 0.038 0.055 0.052 0.130 0.439 1.881
Balloki-Sidhnai 0.002 0.003 0.008 0.005 0.007 0.006 0.030 0.383
Amandara-Munda 0.133 0.153 0.150 0.119 0.119 0.221 0.894 3.364
Maunda-Kabul 0.003 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.009 0.028 0.082
Warsak-Nowshehra 0.024 0.027 0.035 0.035 0.038 0.070 0.229 0.698

Total 0.343 0.262 0.253 0.231 0.241 0.469 1. 797 8.350

 - 66

(This page is intentionally blank)

 IV. A Guide to the GAMS Statements

4.1 In this chapter we will describe the GAMS implementation of the Indus
Basin Model Revised (IBMa). This discussion assumes an understanding of the
fundamentals of GAMS. and of the previous section on the sources and content
of the data.

4.2 For convenience with personal computers. two types of extracts have
been made of the full lBMa. The first is the class of zone models. This
means a model of a particular zone: it only includes the data needed for that
zone. and requires that canal water available be specified as part of the
mode1's data. These models are much smaller than the full lBMa. and can be
solved on properly equipped personal computers. The other type of model
extract is the surface water modu1e-. often called SWM. This contains all
the detail of the water network but none of the agricultural activities. It
is particularly useful for investigating whether a proposed water allocation
schedule is possible under various different water supply regimes. The supply
variations may involve. for example. differences in inflows or link canal
capacities or reservoir siltation. SWM can also be solved on personal
computers.

4.3 In this part we discuss explicitly the full lBMa. and not either of
the above mentioned extracts. Everything in the extracts is contained in the
full model.

4.4 A very useful aid in understanding the computer representation of the

lBMa is the symbol listing that comes after the program listing on the output
file. This shows all the GAMS symbols (sets. variables, etc.) along with the
line numbers in the program where these symbols are defined. or referenced. or
changed. In the program listing the lines are numbered, so it is easy to move
from one to the other.

4.5 For operating convenience. the lBMa program has been broken into
three pieces. containing respectively the data. the model setup and solve. and
the report. This is convenient because the solve piece needs changes with
almost every run. while the data and report do not. In Appendix A (which
contains a listing of the standard model) the three pieces are referred to as
WSlSD1. WSlSMl and WSlSR1. There is a map at the end of each of the listings.
each one showing only the symbols referenced in that piece. Page numbers
continue sequentially through the three listings.

1. Sets and Data Organization.

4.6 The sets provide the basic building blocks of the model. As an
example, the set definitions are where we list all the crops, and zones, and
technologies. Logically the sets must come before the data that depends on
their membership, and therefore we discuss the sets and the organization of
the data together.
 - 68

4.7 The general principles listed below were used in laying out the
model.

o Each class of data is organized in one place. immediately preceded by

the sets needed to define it. Each logical section may be recognized
by the "subtitle" on the second line of each output page.

o All data for all zones in the Basin are specified. Data are entered
in their most elementary fonn, and any transformations needed for the
model's purposes are written explicitly immediately following. For
instance. if fertilizer application growth rates are to be applied to
historic data. this will be done following the tables containing the
historic data.

o In many places reporting statements are provided to produce well

organized tabulations of the data. These statements are often
disabled by turning them into comments. This is because they produce
voluminous listings. and these reports are really only needed for
reference or when a major data revision is done.

o Only after all the data needed for the model's equations have been
entered. and transfonned as needed. are the equations and variables
themselves defined and specified. The equation and variable
definitions are general. All the relationships needed for either the
full basin model, or for any combination of the nine zone models. are
specified.

o Then comes the solution part. This is where the model to be solved
is defined. i.e. where choices are made from the general framework
provided by all the equations and variables. This means, for
example, that a choice must be made as to the extent of the model
(whole basin or one or more zones). and which of the objective
function specifications (nonlinear or linearized segmented) will be
used. It is common to solve more than one model within a program:
the models may differ in specification or they may use different
data.

o Last of all comes the reporting on the solution(s). Often there is a

need for specially tailored reports for the particular requirements
of the study being done. If more than one solution has been made.
the report will naturally concentrate on the differences between
them.

4.8 We will now discuss the components of the model using the "subtitle"
groupings as headings.
 - 69

Set Definitions.
4.9 This section contains the basic sets needed to define the structure
of the model. These rarely need to be changed. Two important extensions of
the basic set are also used here.

Subsets are used if there are groupings within a set. The first
example is of consumable commodities, CC(CQ). This is a subset of all
commodities, CQ. The reason for the distinction is that the consumption
relationships deal only with consumables.

Mapping sets are used to define relationships between two ordinary

sets. For example most of the cropping constraints are specified by month
(set M). However, much of the livestock activity data is seasonal (set SEA).
The mapping set SEAM(SEA,M) then relates months to seasons. Similarly,
PVZ(PV,Z) specifies which zones (Z) are contained within which provinces (PV).

This section ends with a specification of which year is being modelled. The
scalar BASEYEAR is a number used in various calculations using growth rates
(crop yields, fertilizer application rates, etc.). The set ISR contains only
one member, and gives a choice of which irrigation scenarios are used.

Crop data.

4.10 This large section contains the technical coefficients for cropping.
Most of it is the monthly tables discussed in the data section. These are
LAND, BULLOCK, LABOR, WATER, and TRACTOR. They are all indexed over the sets
C (crop), Z (zone), T (cultivation technology), S (sequencing variant), W
(water stress), and M (month). Following are tables of straw yield and seed
data, fertilizer application rates, and growth rates. over time, of
fertilizer usage by crop. The section ends with a statement that calculates
fertilizer rates for the year being modelled.

Crop Yields

4.11 The next section contains crop yields. These are based on national
yields (NATYIELD(C, and adjustment factors that follow (YLDPRPV(C.PV) and
YLDPR2S(C.Z are used to convert to provincial and zone yields. For the
timing and water stress technology variants. a further set of adjustment
factors are used (YLDPR20). Estimates of yield growth per year (in percent)
are in GROWTHCY(C,Z). Finally a set of calculations are done, producing the
final yield values in YIELD(C,T,S,W,Z). Notice that, as we would expect, all
the sets involved in the definition of LAND. BULLOCK etc, except time (M), are
needed to the specify yields.

Following is a reporting section. This is almost always ftcommented

outft. Comments are either lines starting with asterisks, ft*ft, or lines
without linenumbers on a program listing. In the program itself, these block
comments start with a line that reads ft$ONTEXT ft and end with ft$OFFTEXT ft
 - 70

Livestock Data
4.12 This short section contains the livestock input and output
coefficients by zone. and the factors used to convert fodder and crop by
product quantities to animal nutrient.

Canal and Agroclimatic Zone Data

4.13 This section contains data that define the spatial structure of the
basin and of the irrigation system. The set CNL defines the 43 canal
commands. (Note that the numbers 30 and 40 do not appear in the labels).
Following is the mapping set PVCNL(PV.CNL). which specifies the identity of
these canals by province.

Canal Command Data

4.14 Table COMDEF contains basic canal command data: canal capacity and
commanded area. and watercourse and field efficiencies. Following is the
disaggregation of canal commands into fresh and saline subareas (table
SUBDEF(SA.CNL and the mapping from subareas to zones (set ZSA(Z,CNL.SA.
Also, and important, set GWF(CNL,SA) specifying which of the subareas in each
canal command has fresh groundwater.

Climatic Data

4.15 Climatic data consist of the monthly evaporation and rainfall data by
canal, in tables EVAP(CNL,M) and RAIN(CNL,M).

Historical Canal Diversions

4.16 These are in table DIVPOST: the mean diversions by month and by
canal for the post-Tarbela period, 1976-7 to 1987-8.

Government Tubewe11 Pumpage and Depth to Water Table

4.17 Historic government tubewell pumpage is given in table GWT(CNL,M).

As explained in Chapter 3, table DEP1 contains water table depths for non-rice
growing areas. in which the depth may be regarded as essentially constant over
the year. Table DEP2 contains estimates by month for the 10 rice growing
canals. Following the tables. these data are used to calculate subirrigation
and evaporation from the aquifer. Also given in this section is SUBIRRFAC(Z),
the minimum mixing ratio for surface and subirrigation supplies in saline
areas.

Network Nodes and Arc Definitions

4.18 This very important section defines the river and link canal network.
This network has been described in some detail in the previous chapter. The
set N consists of a list of all nodes. 37 of them. Ten of them are
ftartificials ft i.e. no recognizable place names correspond to these: they are
named A1 to A10 for convenience. Comments describe the location of these.
 - 71

The set Nl is an "alias for N. which means it contains the same members. It
is sometimes necessary to use two names for the same set when specifying maps.
Set I specifies the rivers. and the mapping set NI(N.I) specifies. for each
river. the node at which the flow enters the system. Set NC(N.CNL) describes
node to canal mapping: i.e. a specification of the nodes from which each of
the canals draw their water. The set NN(N.Nl) defines the river and link
canal network. The meaning here is. that if a given pair of nodes are
specified in this set. then an arc. or flow path exists between them. The
sense of the flow is that the first named node receives water from the second.
For example. the lower Indus is represented as shown below. (This is an
incomplete fragment. and presented just to give the idea.)

GUDU-B (PANJNAD-B.TAUNSA-B)
SUKKUR-B.GUDU-B
KOTRI-B .SUKKUR-B
A-SEA .KOTRI-B

So water flows to Gudu from both Panjnad (on the Sutlej) and Taunsa (on the
Indus). and from Suhkur to Kotri. and so on. The flows to canal commands are
not here: they have already been entered in the node to canal map. set
NC(N.CNL). The set NB(N) is a subset that contains all members of N except A
SEA (the Arabian Sea). This is because no equation balancing in- and outflows
is needed at this terminal node.

Capacities for link canal arcs are given in parameter NCAP(N,Nl). and loss
factors in LLOSS(N,Nl).

Flow Routing Coefficients

4.19 This section contains the statistically estimated coefficients

(RIVERB and RIVERCD) for calculating river and tributary flows at a particular
node, given flows at the upstream node(s) in the current and previous months.

Rt. Station and Tributary Inflows

4.20 This section contains the 50% and 80% flows for rivers and for
tributaries, which were described in detail in Part 3. Statements following
the tables select which of these two sets of data will be used.

Reservoir Characteristics

4.21 This section contains rule curves, capacities (for various years) and
evaporation losses for the reservoirs.

Prices

4.22 This section contains various prices for inputs and outputs, all for
the reference period 1987-88. The outputs produced are treated in the
greatest detail. The model's objective function is valued in the prices the
farmers face and react to, financial prices. However. as mentioned earlier.
project analysis often involves valuing output at economic prices, so these
 - 72

are provided for later reporting on solutions. Export and import prices are
also given. because they are needed to value trade.

Financial and economic prices are also needed for inputs: labor, fertilizer,
seed, tractor and tubewell operating and investment costs. The water prices
given are actually per acre crop water rates.

Demand and Consumption Data

4.23 This section begins with tables containing historical data on

production. consumption, and demand of farm products. Following are estimates
of demand elasticities. and tabulations of exports. Exports are broken down
to the zone and province level.

Data Transformation to Zones

4.24 This section contains statements to transform many of the quantities

that were entered by canal to a zonal basis. This is done by using areas as
weights. The example below gives the flavor. First we need some definitions:

COMDEF(ISR."CCA",CNL) is the commanded area of a particular canal. The year

(ISR) means that over time. some commands have undergone alterations.
SUBDEF(SA.CNL) is the proportion of the canal in each of the subareas.
Remember that there are between one and four subareas per canal.
ZSA(Z,CNL,SA) is the mapping set that specifies. for each subarea of each
canal. which zone it belongs to.
GWFG(CNL,SA,G) identifies each subarea as to goundwater quality. G is a set
which contains the members "FRESH" and "SALINE".
RESOURCE(Z,G,Rl) contains various attributes of a particular zone,
differentiated by groundwater quality, G, including the area, which
is RESOURCE(Z,G."CCA"). The total area of each zone is then
SUM(G, RESOURCE(Z,G,"CCA".
ZWT(Z,CNL.SA) is the weighting factor to map various items from canal to zone.

ZWT and RESOURCE are calculated using the following statements;

LOOP(ISR,

RESOURCE(Z.G.SR1) = SUMCNL,SA)$ZSA(Z,CNL.SA)$GWFG(CNL,SA,G),
COMDEF(ISR,SR1,CNL)*SUBDEF(SA,CNL);

ZWT(Z,CNL,SA)$ZSA(Z,CNL,SA) = COMDEF(ISR,"CCA",CNL)*SUBDEF(SA,CNL) I
SUM(G,RESOURCE(Z,G."CCA")
);

Here. the LOOP is used to specify the year of interest (set ISR has only one
member)

The first statement sums various attributes. including area "CCA" over all
canals and subareas provided they are members of the zone of interest (the
 - 73

$ZSA ter:m restricts the sum in this way). The $GWFG ter:m then differentiates
between the two groundwater quality types.

The second statement calculates weights that will be used to transfor:m water
table depths, rainfall and efficiencies. This weight is just the proportion
of the area of each zone contributed by each of its component subareas. Note
that there is no G dependence in the weights.

Resource Stocks
4.25 This section contains tables of resources available: people,
tractors. tubewells. animals, by zone. Following are annual percentage growth
rates for those items which are expected to increase.

Model Setup
4.26 As explained earlier, the IBMR is written in a very general way.
Many choices exist as to what area is modelled in a particular run, how
demands are modelled in the objective function, treatment of canal water, and
so on. This last data section is used to make many of those choices. For
example, IiMR can be run for one or more zones, or for all. The set Zl(Z) is
used to specify the zones that will be included in the current run.
Similarly, set CN(CQ) is used to pick the commodities which will have
endogenous prices.

In this same section, selections are made from all the prices entered for
those to be used in the model. Some choices are deferred until later. These
are the ones involving which of the defined equations will be used: the linear
segmented or the nonlinear demand system, for example.

2. Variables

4.27 Variables are the unknown quantities whose values will be deter:mined
when the model is optimized. They are all listed, with an explanation of
their function, in the variable definition section starting around line 3250.
We list them all again in Table 4.1 below for use while reading the equations.

4.28 An important attribute of a variable is its bounds. At definition

time default bounds are assigned to all variables. If a variable is declared
as a POSITIVE VARIABLE, then it is constrained to take only positive values,
or be zero. Most of the variables in the IBMR are of this type, because they
describe quantities and negative values are therefore meaningless. On the
other hand, if the POSITIVE keyword is left out, the variable may take any
value.

4.29 Later either of the default bounds (upper or lower) will be changed
if necessary. For example, the reservoir capacities in each month must lie
within the rule curves, the canal diversions cannot exceed the canal capacity,
 - 74 -

and so on. These types of restrictions are accomplished using bounds on

variables.

Table 4.1: Variable List

VARIABLES
CPS Con.umer. Plu. Produc.r. Surplu.
(million rupe)
POSITIVE VARIABLES
ACOST(Z,Q)
F.rm co.t
(million rupee.)
PPC(Z,Q,SEA)
Purch of protein conc.ntr.te.
(thound metric ton.)
X(Z,G,C, T,S,W)
Cropped .r by technology (thound .cr)
ANIMAL(Z,G,A)
Production of livtock type (thou.and.)
PRODT(Z,G,Cq)
Production (crop co.. 000 metric ton. livtock co.. mill. kg. or lit.rs)
PRODA(Z,G,CQ )
Artifici.1 .upply
IMPORT (Z , CQ )
Import of co..oditi (crop co... 000 mt. livtock mill. kg. or liter.)
EXPORT (Z , CQ )
Export of commoditi (000 metric tonn.)
CONSUMP(Z,G,Cq)
On f.rm con.umption (000 metric tonn.)
FAMILYL(Z,G,M)
F.mily I.bor u.ed (million m.n hour.)
HIREDL(Z,G,M)
Hired I.bor u.ed (million m.n hour.)
ITWCZ)
Invtment in incred priv.te tubew.11 c.p.city (k.f per month)

TW(Z,)
Priv.te tubew.11 w.ter u.ed by month m (kaf)

ITR(Z,G)
Invtment in incred tr.ctor c.p.city (000 tr-hr. p.r month)

TS(Z,O,M)
Priv.t. tr.ctor rvic u by month (thound hr.)

F(N,N1,M)
Flow to nod. n from nod. n1 (MAF)

RCONT(N,M)
End of the month rrvoir content. (MAF)

CANALDIV(CNL,M)
C.nal div.r.ion .t the c.n.1 hd (MAF)

CNLDIVSEA(CNL,SEA)
C.n.1 div.r.ion by on (MAF)

PRSEA (PV2 ,SEA)

C.n.1 dlv.r.ion by provine. (Sind and Punj.b) (MAF)

TCDIVSEA(SEA)
Tot. I c.n.1 div.r.ion in Sind .nd Punj.b by on (WAF)

WDIVRZ(Zl,G,M)
Surf.c. w.ter div.r.ion .t the root zone (k.f)

SU<LAND(Z,O,M)
SI.ck I.nd (thous.nd .cr)

SU<WATER(Z,O,M)
SI.ck w.ter .t the root zone (kaf)

ARTFOD(Zl,O,SEA)
Artiflci.1 fodd.r .upply .qulv.l.nt of r.b-fod (000 tonns)

ARTWATER(Z,Q,M)
Wat.r from imaginary sourc. a~ ~he roo~ zone (kaf)
ARTWATERND (N, 1.1)
Wat.r from imaginary source a~ nodes (MAF)
NAT(CQ,Z,P)
Provincial demand lin rized
NATN(CQ,Z)
Provinci.1 demand non-lin r

3. Equations

4.30 The equations are the heart of the model. This is where the
relationships that must hold in any solution are specified: for example the
crops must use only the available land, the profit from growing crops must be
net of all costs, and so on. The names of the equations are listed as for the
variables, but following are given the definitions. We will concentrate on
these.
 - 75

4.31 Equation definitions take the general for.m:

name part . algebraic relationship;

The name part includes the "domain of definition" of the equation. i.e. how
many individual relationships will be actually be produced. Consider as an
example the COST equation. It starts out as

COST(Zl.G)$EX(Zl.G)

The first ter.m means that there is a cost equation for each combination of
zone and groundwater type included in the model. The $ condition then
restricts this domain to only those combinations that actually occur: if. for
example. there are no saline subareas in a particular zone. then only one
constraint will be generated for it.

4.32 We will now go through the equations in order. To make the meaning
clearer. names of EQUATIONS and VARIABLES are in uppercase. while given data
are in lower case. The names and meanings of all variables have been given
earlier. in Table 4.1.

4.33 We start with the objective functions. These are among the most
lengthy and difficult in the model: later equations are much easier to read
and understand. There are four of them, for linearized and nonlinear demand
systems. and for zone models and for models that include the water network.

4.34 OBJZ

CPS =E=

sum(zl, sum(g$ex(zl.g). sum(ncn. fsalep(ncn)*PRODT(Zl.G.NCN)

- ACOST(Zl,G) - sum(sea. ARTFOD(Zl.G.SEA * pafod

- sum(m. ARTWATER(Zl,G.M * pawat

- sum(cq$techc(zl,cq), PRODA(Zl,G,CQ) * big
- sum(zl. sum(cm$techc(zl.cm). IMPORT(Zl.CM)*importp(cm

+ sum(zl. sum(ce$techc(zl.ce), EXPORT(Zl.CE)*exportp(ce

+ sum(zl. sumcn,p)$techc(zl,cn). NAT(CN,Zl.P)*ws(cn.z1.p

OBJZ (OBjective Zone) is the objective function for the linear demand
-- zone model combination. The model will maximize the value of CPS,
(consumers' and producers' surplus). In OBJZ. CPS is the value of production
of a subset of the crops, minus all production costs, plus the value of
production net of onfarm consumption for the other crops. plus the value of
exports. minus the value of imports. Net production is valued at a price that
 - 76

depends on the demand. There are some other terms in the relation above
involving "artificial activities".

It is useful to go through the algebra above, line by line. The sum

in PRODT gives the gross value of production, over all zones in the model, at
the fixed price FSALEP, of the "fixed price" crops. (These are the crops for
which production levels can not be changed quickly, for example fruit and
meat.) On the next line, ACOST is the total cost of production. The next
three terms, in ARTFOD, ARTWATER and PRODA are all "artificial activities",
Then come the value of imports, for the crops imported, and of exports, for
the crops exported. Prices are fixed for both. The final term is the value
of the producers' surplus, i.e. of production after subtracting on-farm
consumption. A technical difficulty is that both price and quantity can not
both be variables in a linear model, so an artifice is adopted. The demand
curve is segmented, and the values of WS are chosen to represent the price at
discrete demand levels. The linear combination shown allows us to interpolate
between the fixed points, giving a segmented demand function that effectively
allows a continuum of WS, within the limits fixed by the discrete points. The
convexity constraint CONV(CN,Zl) ensures proper interpolation.

"Artificial activities" are included in the equation system to

prevent infeasibilities when using fixed water allocations, or fixed cropping
patterns. Under such circumstances, the values of these artificials provide
an immediate measure of the amount of imbalance in the system: for example if
not enough water is available to replicate the observed cropping patterns (and
there are several reasons why this might happen), then the values of ARTWATER
tells us quickly if we have a minor numerical problem or a more fundamental
difficulty. These artificial activities are included in the objective
functions with very high prices, designed to keep them from being used unless
there really are infeasibilities.

4.35 OBJZN

CPS =E=

sum(zl, sum(g$ex(zl,g), sum(ncn, fsalep(ncn)*PRODT(Zl,G,NCN) )

- ACOST(Zl,G) - sum(sea, ARTFOD(Zl,G,SEA*pafod

- sum(m, ARTWATER(Zl,G,M*pawat

- sum(cq$techc(zl,cq), PRODA(Zl,G,CQ )*big

- sum(zl, sum(cm$techc(zl,cm), IMPORT(Zl,CM) *importp(cm

+ sum(zl, sum(ce$techc(zl,ce), EXPORT(Zl,CE)*exportp(ce )

+ sum(zl, sum(cn$techc(zl,cn), alpha(cn,zl)*NATN(CN,Zl

+ betaf*beta(cn,zl )*SQR(NATN(CN,Zl )
 - 77

OBJN (OBJective Zone Nonlinear) is the zonal objective function for

use with the nonlinear demand system. It differs from OBJZ only in the
replacement of the term in NAT(CN,Zl,P) with those in NATN(CN,Zl). Here we
have fitted a quadratic function to represent areas under the linear demand
curve. Net production is given by NATN. and the squared term makes the whole
equation nonlinear. The model using this formulation is smaller than the
linear one, but is more difficult to solve. The convexity constraint is not
needed in the nonlinear model.

4.36 OBJN

CPS =E=

sum(zl, sum(g$ex(zl,g), sum(ncn, fsalep(ncn)*PRODT(Zl,G,NCN)

- ACOST(Zl,G) - sum(sea, ARTFOD(Zl,G,SEA*pafod

- sum(m, ARTWATER(Zl,G,M*pawat

- sum(cq$techc(zl,cq), PRODA(Zl,G,CQ )*big

- sum(zl, sum(cm$techc(zl,cm), IMPORT(Zl,CM)*importp(cm

+ sum(zl, sum(ce$techc(zl,ce), EXPORT(Zl,CE)*exportp(ce

+ sum(zl, sumcn,p)$techc(zl,cn), NAT(CN,Zl.P)*ws(cn.zl .p

+ sumn,m), - ARTWATERND(N,M)*pawat + rval(n)*RCONT(N,M)$rcap(n)

+ rval(fta-seaft)*F(ftA-SEAft,"KOTRI-Bft,M) ) ;

OBJN (OBJective Network) is the objective used with linearized models

that include the surface water distribution module. The additional terms have
to do with what happens to water not required by crops. (Such water may be as
a result of using proportional allocation policies in the model, or may appear
in peak inflow months.) The structure of the model makes it indifferent as to
how this water is routed. The terms in RCONT(N,M) and F(ftA-SEA",ftKOTRI-Bft)
are inserted to induce the model to keep the reservoirs as full as possible,
and route further surplus to the sea. The term in ARTWATERND another artifact
to prevent the "node balance artificials ft from being used, if possible.
 - 78

4.37 OBJNN ..

CPS =E=

sum(zl, sum(g$ex(zl,g), sum(ncn, fsalep(ncn)*PRODT(Zl.G,NCN) )

- ACOST(Zl,G) - sum(sea. ARTFOD(Zl.G.SEA*pafod

- sum(m, ARTWATER(Zl.G.M*pawat

- sum(cq$techc(zl.cq). PRODA(Zl,G,CQ )*big )

- sum(zl. sum(cm$techc(zl.cm). IMPORT(Zl ,CM) *importp(cm )

+ sum(zl, sum(ce$techc(zl,ce). EXPORT(Zl .CE) *exportp(ce )

+ sum(zl. sum(cn$techc(zl.cn). alpha(cn,zl )*NATN(CN,Zl )

+ betaf*beta(cn.zl )*SQR(NATN(CN,Zl )

+ sumn.m), - ARTWATERND(N,M)*pawat + rval(n)*RCONT(N.M)$rcap(n)

+ rval("a-sea")*F("A-SEA","KOTRI-B",M) )

OBJNN (OBjective Network Nonlinear) is the nonlinear objective used

with the surface water distribution module. It contains the nonlinear demand
curves, and the terms needed for surplus water routing.

4.38 DEMNAT(CQ.Zl)$techc(zl.cq)

sum(g$ex(zl.g).

PRODT(Zl.G.Cq) - CONSUMP(Zl.G.CQ)$cc(cq) + PRODA(Zl.G,CQ) )

EXPORT(Zl.CQ)$ce(cq) + IMPORT(Zl.CQ)$cm(cq) =G=

sum(p, NAT(CQ.Zl,P)*qs(cq.zl.p$cn(cq);

DEMNATN(CQ.Zl)$techc(zl.cq) .

sum(g$ex(zl.g).

PRODT(Zl.G.CQ) - CONSUMP(Zl.G,CQ)$cc(cq) + PRODA(Zl.G,CQ) )

EXPORT(Zl.CQ)$ce(cq) + IMPORT(Z,CQ)$cm(cq) =G=

NATN(CQ,Zl)$cn(cq) ;

These are the zonal demand balance equations: the linear segmented
(DEMNAT) and the nonlinear (DEMNATN). Only one of these is used in a model,
 - 79

depending on the objective function chosen. They calculate, for each zone,
the net production of each consumption commodity produced in the zone. Net
production is given by total production less on farm consumption, plus imports
minus exports. In the nonlinear case this is accumulated in the single
variable NATN(CQ,Zl). In the segmented case. demand is given by the sum of
the segmented pieces. Notice, that if the price is set by market forces, then
net production and consumer demand are equal.

The artificial production activity PRODA is included in this

constraint, as it is in CONSBAL. discussed below. It is used only for
resolving problems during calibration runs. In evaluation runs it should be
fixed to zero. or checked for nonzero values, which would indicate problems.

4.39 COST(Zl,G)$ex(zl.g) .

ACOST(Zl,G) =E=

(sumc.t.s,w)$tech(zl.c.t.s.w). (sum(p2. fert(p2.c.z1)*misc(p2 +

miscct(c)+seedp(c)*sylds(c.z1.t,s,w, "seed") )*X(Zl,G.C.T.S.W) ) +

sum(m, misc("twopc")*TW(Zl,M)$gf(g) + misc("tropc")*TS(Zl,G,M) ) +

misc("twinvt")*ITW(Zl)$gf(g) + misc("trinvt")*ITR(Zl.G) +

sum(a, iolive(a.z1."fix-cost")*ANIMAL(Zl,G,A )/1000 +

sum(sea, pp*PPC(Zl,G,SEA +

sum(m, (FAMILYL(Zl,G,M)*labfac + HIREDL(Zl,G,M*wage(m) ) ;

This equation calculates the cost of agricultural activities, and

accumulates it in the variable ACOST(Zl,G). This type of equation is often
known as an accounting equation: it sums many contributions into one
variable. The term in X represents the cost of cropping activities: it
includes fertilizer. seed. and miscellaneous cash costs. Then follows cost of
tubewe11 pumping (for sweet groundwater areas only) and the cost of operating
tractors. Then come terms for investing in additional tractor and tubewell
capacity. The investment activities (ITW and ITR) may be fixed at zero if
desired. The term in ANIMAL is the direct cost associated with livestock.
Then comes the cost of protein concentrates for animals (the amount, PPC,
being determined in the animal protein balance, PROTEIN). Finally the cost of
family and hired labor is included, as wage rates multiplied by labor used.

4.40 CONV(CN,Zl)$techc(zl,cn) .

sum(p, NAT(CN,Zl,P =L= 1;

 - 80

This is the convexity constraint for segmented demands. It is only

used with the linearized demand system. It ensures correct interpolation
between adjacent segments.

4.41 CCOMBAL(Zl,G,C)$(cnf(c)$ex(zl,g

sumt,s,w)$tech(zl,c,t,s,w), yie1d(c,t,s,w,zl)*X(Zl,G,C,T,S,W

=E= PRODT(Zl,G,C);

The is the crop commodity balance. It accumulates the total

production of each crop commodity (given by area multiplied by yield) in
PRODT(Zl,G,C).

4.42 QCOMBAL(Zl,G,Q)$ex(zl,g) .

SUM(a, io1ive(a,zl,q)*ANIMAL(zl,g,a) ) /1000 =E= PRODT(Zl,G,Q);

This is the livestock commodity balance. It accumulates the total

production of each livestock commodity (given by yield per animal multiplied
by number of animals) in PRODQ(Zl,G,Q).

4.43 CONSBAL(Zl.G,CC)$(ex(zl.g)$techc(zl.cc) ) .

PRODT(Zl,G,CC) + PRODA(Zl,G,CC) =G= CONSUMP(Zl,G,CC)

The is the consumption balance. It states that, if a consumption

commodity is produced locally, then production must be at least equal to
consumption.

An additional term called "artificial production" (PRODA) is included

to make sure that this balance is never violated. This is for convenience
during model calibration when consumption figures are being estimated. In all
solutions PRODA should be examined to make sure it is never positive, or else
PRODA should be fixed to zero.

4.44 LABORC(Zl,G,M)$ex(zl,g)

(sum( (c,t,s,w)$tech(zl,c,t,s,w), labor(c,zl,t,s,w,m)*X(Zl,G.C.T.S,W) ) +

sum( a, io1ive(a,zl,"labor")*ANlMAL(Zl,G,A)/1000 =L=

FAMILYL(Zl,G,M) + HIREDL(Zl,G,M);

This is the monthly labor constraint. It states that in any month.

the use of labor must never exceed the supply of family labor plus the amount
of casual labor hired in. Since there is no bound on the amount of hired
 - 81

labor available, this means that there is no limit (in the model) on the
amount of labor available.

The amount of family labor available is limited, and the reservation

wage is less than the cost of hiring casual labor. This implies that family
labor supplies will always be exhausted before casual labor is hired.

4.45 FOOOER(Zl,G,SEA)$ex(zl,g)

sum(a, iolive(a,zl,"tdn")*ANIMAL(Zl,G,A -L

sumc,t,s,w)$tech(zl,c,t,s,w),

(yield(c,t,s,w,zl)*sylds(c,zl,t,s,w, "straw-yld")*sconv ("tdn",sea,c) +

weedyCzl,sea,c)*sconvC"tdn","rabi","rab-fod") ) * X(Zl,G,C,T,S,W) ) +

sumCm$seam(sea,m), SLKLANO(Zl,G,M*graz(zl,sea)*sconvC"tdn", "rabi", "rab-fod ")

+ ARTFOO(Zl,G.SEA)*sconv("tdn","rabi","rab-fod");

This is the seasonal TON (total digestible nutrient) balance for

livestock. It states that. in each season, sufficient TON must be available
from local sources to feed the animal population. The sources include crop by
products. fodder grown, weeds and fallow land grazing. As with consumption
there is an artificial fodder supply to ensure that solutions are always
obtained, but which should never be used.

4.46 PROTEIN(Zl,G,SEA)$ex(zl,g) ..

sum(a, iolive(a,zl,"dp")*ANIMAL(Zl,G,A) ) -L- PPC(Zl,G,SEA) +

sum( (c,t,s,w)$tech(zl.c,t,s,w),

(yield(c.t.s.w.zl)*sylds(c.z1.t.s.w."straw-yld")*sconv("dp".sea.c) +
weedy(zl,sea,c)*sconv("dp","rabi","rab-fod") )*X(Zl,G,C,T,S,W) ) +

sum(m$seam(sea,m),SLKLANO(Zl,G,M*graz(zl,sea)*sconv("dp","rabi","rab-fod")

+ ARTFOO(Zl,G,SEA)*sconv("dp" , "rabi", "rab-fod");

This is the seasonal OP (digestible protein) balance for livestock.

Its structure is as for TON, except that the possibility of purchasing protein
concentrates is included.
 - 82

4.47 GRNFDR(Zl,G,SEA)$ex(zl,g)

gr*sum(a, iolive(a,zl,"tdn")*ANIMAL(Zl,G,A) ) -L

sum( (cf,t,s,w)$tech(zl,cf,t,s,w),

yield(cf,t,s,w,zl)*sconv("tdnft,sea,cf)*X(Zl,G,CF,T,S,W) ) +

sum( (c,t,s,w)$tech(zl,c,t,s,w),

weedy(zl,sea,c)*sconv("tdn ft , ftrabi" , "rab-fodft)*X(Zl,G,C ,T,S,W) ) +

ARTFOD(Zl,G,SEA)*sconv(fttdnft,"rabift,ftrab-fod");

This is the seasonal green fodder balance for livestock. Its purpose
is to ensure that the livestock feed contains an adequate proportion of green
fodder. Its structure is the same as that of FODDER, except that straw and
fallow land grazing are not included in supplies, and requirements are scaled
down by the ratio GR.

4.48 BDRAFT(Zl,G,M)$ex(zl,g)

sumc,t,s,w)$tech(zl,c,t,s,w), bullock(c,zl,t,s,w,m)*X(Zl,G,C,T,S,W) )

=L= bp(m)*ANIMAL(Zl,G,"BULLOCK ft ) ;

This is the monthly bullock draft power constraint. It states that

enough bullocks must be available to produce all the bullock power required by
the cropping activities.

4.49 BREPCO(Zl,G)$ex(zl,g) .
ANIMAL(Zl,G,WBULLOCK W)

This is the bullock-cow ratio constraint. It ensures that the model

does not produce solutions with bullocks but no cows. The idea is that a
certain proportion of cows is needed to maintain a stable bullock population.

4.50 BULLOCKC(Zl)

sum(g$ex(zl,g), ANIMAL(Zl,G,"BULLOCK ft =L- res88( bullocks ft ,zl)

ft

This bullock constraint limits the number of bullocks to observed

numbers. It is used only in calibration runs, i.e. of the current year.
 - 83

4.51 TDRAPT(Zl,G,M)$ex(zl,g) .

sumc.t,s,w)$tech(zl,c,t,s.w), tractor(c,zl,t,s,w,m)*X(Zl,G,C,T,S,W) )

-E- TS(Zl,G,M)

This is the monthly tractor power services balance. It accumulates the

tractor services needed by the level of semi-mechanized cropping activities in
the variable TS(Zl,G,M).

4.52 TRCAPC(Zl,M)

sum(g$ex(zl,g), TS(Zl,G,M -L= sum(g$ex(zl,g),

(resource(zl.g,"tractors")/1000 + ITR(Zl,G) )*trcap ) ;

This is the tractor power capacity constraint. It ensures that, in all

months, the tractor services needed, TS, are available from a combination of
existing tractor stocks and possible investment in new tractors (ITR).

4.53 TWCAPC(Zl,M)$ex(zl,"fresh")

TW(Zl,M) -L= resource(zl, "fresh", "twc") + ntwucap*ITW(Zl)

This is the tubewell capacity constraint, which is used only in sweet

groundwater areas. As with the tractor capacity constraint, it ensures that
sufficient tubewell capacity (existing and new) is available to meet the pumping
activity needed by the water balance. TW(Zl,G,M) is the monthly tubewell
pumping activity.

4.54 LANDC(Zl.G,M)$ex(zl,g)

sumc,t.s,w)$tech(zl,c,t,s,w), land(c,zl,t,s,w,m)*X(Zl,G,C,T,S,W +

SLKLAND(Zl,G,M) -E- resource(zl,g,"cca")*1000 ;

This is the monthly land balance. It ensures that sufficient land is

available to accommodate the cropping activities chosen by the model. The
fallow land is captured explicitly in SLKLAND for use in the livestock grazing
calculations.

4.55 ORCHAREAC(Zl)

sum ( (g,t,s,w)$ex(zl,g), X(Zl,G,ORCHARD",T,S,W)$tech(zl,"orchard",t.s,w

=L- orcharea(zl);
 - 84

This constraint limits the area of orchard to observed values. The

idea is that fruit orchard is a long cycle crop, and that rapid changes in the
area under fruit trees is not possible.

4.56 SCMILLC(Zl)

sum(g$ex(zl,g), PRODT(Zl,G,"SC-MILL" =L~ scmillcap(zl)

This is the sugar mill capacity constraint. It ensures that the

production of sugar cane for milling does not exceed the installed sugar mill
capacity.

4.57 WATERBALN(Zl,G,M)$ex(zl,g) .

sumc,t,s,w)$tech(zl,c,t,s,w),

max ( (wnr(c,zl,t,s,w,m)-subirrz(zl,m)*land(c,zl,t,s,w,m , 0.0) *

X(Zl,G,C,T,S,W + SLKWATER(Zl,G,M) =E=

tweffz(zl,m)*TW(Zl,M)$gf(g) + gwtl(zl,g,m) + ARTWATER(Zl,G,M) +

WDIVRZ(Zl,G,M) ;

Next comes the water balance at the root zone. The term within max(
is the per acre crop requirement at the root zone, after subtracting out
rainfall and subirrigation. X(Zl,G,C,T,S,W) is the area planted of a crop
technology combination, and so the whole term measures net demand for irrigation
water. Any water supplied in excess of demand will be measured by
SLKWATER(Zl,G,M). The sources of water follow the =E= symbol: private and
public tubewell pumping and canal diversions (The variable WDIVRZ(Zl,G,M) is
canal water available at the root zone, i.e. after allowing for losses.)
Another artificial variable, ARTWATER, is included to measure water shortages
that may occur while doing calibration runs with fixed diversions. In
evaluation runs ARTWATER should never be nonzero.

4.58 WATALCZ(Zl,G,M)$ex(zl,g)

WDIVRZ(Zl,G,M) =E= sum( (cnl,sa)$(zsa(zl,cnl,sa)$gwfg(cnl,sa,g) ),

cneff(cnl)*wceff(cnl,m)*CANALDIV(CNL,M)*subdef(sa,cnl)*lO00 ) ;

This equation relates canal water at the root zone to supplies at the
canal head, by applying the canal and watercourse-field efficiency factors.
CANALDIV(CNL,M) is the amount of water to be used by canal CNL in month M. If
the model at hand is a zone model, its value will be fixed. For a full basin
model its value may be set in various ways, as outlined below.
 - 85

4.59 DIVCNLSEA(CNL,SEA)

CNLDIVSEA(CNL,SEA) =E= sum(m$seam(sea,m), CANALDIV(CNL,M;

PRSEAW(PV2,SEA)

PRSEA(PV2,SEA) =E= sum(cnll$pvcnl(pv2,cnll), CNLDIVSEA(CNL1,SEA

DIVSEA(SEA)

TCDIVSEA(SEA) =E= sum(pv2, PRSEA(PV2,SEA) )

WATALCSEA(CNL1.SEA)

protarb(cnll.sea)*(l-tolcnl)*TCDIVSEA(SEA) =L= CNLDIVSEA(CNL1.SEA)

WATALCPRO(PV2,SEA) .

protarb(pv2. sea)* (l-tolpr)*TCDIVSEA(SEA) =L= PRSEA(PV2,SEA)

NWFPALC(M) ..

(l-tolnwfp)*divnwfp(m) =G= sum(cnl$pvcnl(ftnwfpft.cnl), CANALDIV(CNL,M ;

This group of constraints are only used in basinwide models. They are
used to handle various water distribution scenarios. These may be fixed
allocations by canal by month, or provincial allocations by season, or lower
limits on provincial or canal allocations, with the model allocating any excess.

For Punjab and Sind, any provincial allocations are specified by

season. (The set PV2 contains only Punjab and Sind.) NWFP is handled
differently, for two reasons. Because NWFP is upstream of storage nodes,
allocations must be handled monthly. Further, the flows in the rivers serving
the Kabul and Swat group of canals are large compared with the canal capacities,
and it is the capacities of these canals that effectively prevent more water
being delivered to the area.

The bounding or fixing of variables such as CANALDIV(CNL,M). and the

values assigned to tolerances TOLPR. TOLCNL and TOLNWFP provide the flexibility
needed for all the allocation schemes. Note that if TOLCNL, TOLPR or TOLNWFP are
set to 1, then the equations they appear in have no effect on the model.

4.60 SUBIRRC(Zl,G,M)$(ex(zl,g)$gs(g .

WDIVRZ(Zl,G,M) =G= (l-subirrfac(zl*sumc.t,s,w)$tech(zl,c.t,s,w),

wnr(c,zl,t,s,w.m)*X(Zl,G,C,T,S,W;
 - 86

This constraint ensures that at least a certain proportion of crop

water demand is canal water in saline areas, i.e. that crops do not use
subirrigation supplies exclusively.

4.61 NBAL(N,M)$nb(n)

sum(i$ni(n,i), inflow(i,m +

sum(n1, rivercd(n."d")*trib(n1.n.m)+rivercd(n,c)*trib(n1.n,m--1) ) +

sum(nl$nn(n,n1).

F(N,N1,M)*lceff(n1,n)$lceff(n1,n) +

(riverb(n.n1)*F(N.N1.M)+rivercd(n."c)*F(N.N1.M--1$(lceff(n1,n) eq 0

sum(n1$nn(n1.n), F(Nl,N,M

sum(cnl$nc(n.cnl), CANALDIV(CNL,M + ARTWATERND(N,M) +

(RCONT(N,M--1) - RCONT(N,M) - revapl(n,m)/1000)$rcap(n) =E= 0 ;

This is the node balance equation of the surface water distribution

model. It equates inflows, outflows and storage changes at all the nodes
(except the Arabian Sea) in the system. Taking the sums in order, they
represent (a) river inflows, (b) tributary inflows, (c) flows in along river
reaches and link canals. (d) flows out to other nodes (e) flows to canals and
(f) net flows out of reservoirs. Note that the ter.m inflows to canals contains
another artificial flow used to note infeasibi1ities in calibration runs.

4. Bounds

4.62 As mentioned previously, the IBMR contains some variables which must be
constrained to narrower ranges than their default, which is zero to infinity.
We use excerpts from the program to show them, and give examples. First we show
the bounds that are required as part of the normal structure. Notice that only
the link arcs are bounded in the network model. The others, the river reaches,
are not.

*- Bounds for the network link canal capacities.

F.UP(N.N1.M) = INF ;

F.UP(N.Nl,M)$( ncap(n1,n) ne 0 ) = ncap(nl,n);

* Irrigation canal capacity bounds

CANALDIV.UP(CNL,M) - sum(isr, comdef(isr,"ccap",cnl)

 - 87

*- Bounds on family labor

FAMILYL.UP(Zl,G,M) = resource(zl,g,"far:mpop")*lstd/1000

4.63 Second, examples of bounds that depend on the particular modelling

task at hand. The last statements in this group are not actually bound
assignments, but statements that make changes to previously entered data.
This type of change is typical of the way the model is used. This particular
run was testing if the mean post-Tarbela allocations are feasible with the
reduced inflows that can be expected in the future. Setting TOLNWFP to 1
effectively disables the equation NWFPALC(M).

* Consumption bounds

CONSUMP.FX(Zl,G,CQ) = farmcons(zl,cq)*consratio(zl,g)

EXPORT.UP(Zl,CE) = explimit(zl,ce) ;

* Fix tractor, tubewell investment to zero.

ITR.FX(Zl,G) = 0;
ITW.FX(Zl,G) = 0;
*
* Canal diversions -- fix at post Tarbela means

CANALDIV.FX(CNL,M) = divpost(cnl.m)
* Reservoir operating rule bounds
*
RCONT.LO(N,M) - rulelo(n.m)*rcap(n)/lOO
RCONT.UP(N.M) = ruleup(n,m)*rcap(n)/lOO
*
*- River flow tests

tolnwfp =1 ;

trib(ftchasma-r","taunsa-bft,m) = 0

trib("tarbela-r","kalabagh-r",m) =0

inflow("haro",m) = 0;

inflow("soan",m) = 0 ;

S. Model Selection.

4.64 The definition of the model to be solved involves choosing the

equations that will be included in it. There are four models that are
naturally defined using the equations available with the IBMR. The
specification in the program is easy to read and understandable, and is shown
below. Each equation name has a fixed place, and the "holes" show where
defined equations have not been used.
 - 88

*
MODEL WSISZ AGROCLIMATIC ZONES MODEL LINEAR OBJECTIVE I

OBJZ, COST, CONV, DEMNAT, CCOMBAL, QCOMBAL,

CONSBAL, LABORC, FODDER, PROTEIN, GRNFDR, BDRAFT,

BREPCO, TDRAFT, TRCAPC, TWCAPC, LANDC, ORCHAREAC,

SCMILLC, WATERBALN, WATALCZ, SUBIRRC I

MODEL WSISZN AGROCLIMATIC ZONES MODEL NON-LINEAR OBJECTIVE I

OBJZN, COST, DEMNATN. CCOMBAL. QCOMBAL,

CONSBAL. LABORC. FODDER. PROTEIN. GRNFDR. BDRAFT.

BREPCO. TDRAFT. TRCAPC. TWCAPC. LANDC. ORCHAREAC.

SCMILLC. WATERBALN. WATALCZ. SUBIRRC I

MODEL WSISN IBMR MODEL WITH RIVER NETWORK LINEAR I

OBJN. COST. CONV, DEMNAT. CCOMBAL. QCOMBAL,

CONSBAL. LABORC, FODDER. PROTEIN. GRNFDR. BDRAFT.

BREPCO, TDRAFT. TRCAPC. TWCAPC. LANDC. ORCHAREAC.

WATERBALN. WATALCZ. SUBIRRC.

DIVCNLSEA. PRSEAW. DIVSEA. WATALCSEA. WATALCPRO. NWFPALC.
NBAL I

MODEL WSISNN IBMR MODEL WITH RIVER NETWORK NON-LINEAR I

OBJNN. COST. DEMNATN. CCOMBAL. QCOMBAL.

CONSBAL. LABORC. FODDER. PROTEIN. GRNFDR. BDRAFT.

BREPCO. TDRAFT. TRCAPC. TWCAPC. LANDC. ORCHAREAC.

WATERBALN. WATALCZ. SUBIRRC.

DIVCNLSEA. PRSEAW. DIVSEA, WATALCSEA. WATALCPRO. NWFPALC.
NBAL I

4.65 Model selection also requires a specification of water distribution

patterns. Two common ones are:

o Proportional allocation means that water is allocated to canals in

each season in strict proportion to the mean post-Tarbela seasonal
allocations. Some water will not be distributed. since canal
capacities limit deliveries.

o Pareto optimal allocation means that each canal will get at least the
proportional allocation. All the remaining water is distributed by
the model (within the limits of the canal capacity) so as to maximize
the value of its objective function.

6. Solving the Model.

4.66 Solving the model is now simply a matter of specifying which of the
models defined previously should be used. This is done in the SOLVE
statement: we give an example below. The OPTION statements preceding are
used to control the solution process. The first two give the solver a big
 - 89

iteration limit, and a big time limit. The second two suppress the listings
of rows and columns that are normally produced (as debugging aids). This
saves paper once the model is behaving as expected.

OPTION ITERLIM = 25000; OPTION RESLIM = 900

OPTION LIMROW=O; OPTION LIMCOL=O

SOLVE WSISZ MAXIMIZING CPS USING LP

7. Reports on the Solution

4.67 The solution of the IBMR contains a great detail of information, but
the solution listings are not well organized for comprehending the details and
relationships contained in them. Therefore detailed reports have been prepared
in which the content and layout of the information have been designed for ease
of understanding the results, and to highlight key relationships. Of course
different or more detailed reports can be produced easily: there are many
different possibilities in arranging and aggregating the available
information.

4.68 Reporting is essentially a matter of manipulating the solution values

and possibly combining them with input data, then laying out tables in the
most convenient way. If the model is saved after the solution is obtained,
the reports can be designed quickly and cheaply. No decisions are made by the
model at this stage, although (as always) programming mistakes can produce
incorrect results. In the following paragraphs we will discuss the standard
reports, concentrating on their content.

Data Recap

4.69 The first report is REP45, which is a report on data. The columns of
the table are, first the zones, and then the provinces Sind and Punjab
(obtained by summing the appropriate zones) and lastly the whole Basin
(labelled Pakistan), which is obtained by adding the provinces. Since the
province NWFP is represented by a single zone, there are three aggregation
levels presented: zone, province, and Basin. The rows contain various pieces
of data, broken down into the land classes fresh, saline and total.
Immediately before this table is an explanation of the labels and of the units
used.

Land Use

4.70 The next report is CAT, cropped area by technology. This is a report
on the model solution. The columns are, as before, zones, provinces and basin.
The rows contain area of each crop by mechanization class (bullock or semi
mechanized). Notice that there are actually three separate tables in this
report: one for fresh, one for saline, and one for total.
 - 90

4.71 The next table, REP46 , is slack land by month, i.e. irrigated land
not used for the model's cropping activities. In this case the columns are
months, and the rows are zones, provinces and Basin, separately for fresh,
saline and total.

4.72 Following is REP47, land use by month. The layout is the same as the
previous table.

4.73 Next come three tables of cropped area, from the model and actual.
The first is CAG, cropped area by groundwater quality. The columns are
labelled "M-NWFP" etc, meaning model result for NWFP. The acreages are given
for all crops separately for fresh, saline and total.

4.74 The next table is CA, cropped area from the model and actual. Here
the areas from the model are arranged next to the actual, or observed, areas.
The column "M-NWFP" is followed by "A-NWFP" , and so on for all zones,
provinces and the whole basin. The rows are (a) areas of individual crops, (b)
seasonal and total area ("RABI", "KHARIF" "TOTAL") and (c) seasonal and annual
cropping intensities ("R-INT", "K-INT" and "A-INT").

4.75 The next table is CADIFF, the differences between model and actual
areas for each crop. Again the columns are for zones, provinces and the entire
basin. Cropping intensities are not given in this table.

4.76 The next table is REP48 , fertilizer nutrients used. The columns are
zone, province and basin. The rows are crops and total, for each of the
nutrients nitrogen and phosphorous.

4.77 Then follows the table WYC, weighted crop yield. The rows are the
crops, the columns zones, provinces and basin. The yields (metric tonnes per
acre) are the yields of the appropriate technology variants weighted by area.

Production. Consumption and Trade

4.78 REP49A gives total production by the model. The units are thousand
tonnes, or million liters for milk. The columns of the table are the
commodities, and the rows are zones, provinces and basin, separately for
fresh, saline and total.

4.79 REP49B gives a production comparison, with "actual" and "model"

columns reported side by side, as with the areas.

4.80 REP49C gives on-farm consumption, i.e the amount of total production
that is consumed by farm families.

4.81 REP49D contains the models results on imports and exports. This is a
small table as only a few commodities are traded.
 - 91 -

Incame, Value Added and Costs

4.82 The next report. REP50. gives a detailed breakdown of the value of
production, income and costs. all in financial prices. The columns are zones,
provinces and whole basin. The rows are done separately for fresh, saline and
total. The first line for each grouping (GPV) is value of production and the
next (FARM-INC) is income. Following are all the components of farm cost.
Note that family labor is not a true cost, and is not used in calculating
income given the value of production.

4.83 The next report, REP54 , contains details of value of production,

income and farm costs per farm household. There is not as much detail about
costs as there was in the previous table.

4.84 REP59 gives details of labor use, both family and hired. in millions
of hours worked. Notice that if a column would be filled with blanks, as for
example hired labor in NWFP, then the entire column and its heading vanish
from the report.

Water Supply and Demand

There are two types of water supply balance reports. The first are those at
the field root zone and at the watercourse head. These reports are useful for
all models. The second are reports about balance at various parts of the canal
water supply network (upstream of the barrages). These second types of reports
will be empty or meaningless if zone models are being solved, since the canal
water distribution system is not included as part of the zone models.

4.85 The next report, REP60, contains detail about the components of water
supplied to the crop root zone. The units are million acre-feet (MAF). There
is one sub-table for each zone, province, and the basin, making for a large
report. The columns are months, seasons (obtained by adding the appropriate
months) and total. The rows are, separately for fresh saline and total, the
requirements of the planted crops (WATER-REQ), the components of supply
(rainfall, canal water etc), slack water (SLKWATER) and total supply (TOT
SUPPLY).

4.86 Then follows REP70, a similar (very large) report on water balance at
the watercourse head.

4.87 REP72 contains detail of the canal diversions used by the model,
measured at the canal head (barrage). The columns are again months, seasons
and total. The rows are provinces, the whole basin, then each canal.

4.88 REP72A provides a different way of organizing the diversions, by

commanded regions. These include NWFP, Marala, Mangla, Upper Indus and Lower
Indus.

4.89 REP73 lists average post-Tarbela diversions at the canal head. This
is data, not model results.
 - 92

4.90 REP74 shows the difference between the canal diversions used by the
model and the historical post-Tarbela diversions: i.e. this report contains
(REP72-REP73). If the model has actually used the post-Tarbela diversions,
this report will just contain the words ( ALL ZERO ).

4.91 REP77 contains detail of node to node flows in the surface water
network. If the model at hand is of one or more zones, this table will be
empty.

4.92 LINKLOSS contains detail of link canal losses. It will be empty for
zone models.

4.93 The report in REP77A is of river losses and gains. Gains are from
river bank recharge. It will be empty for zone models.

4.94 The next report. labelled RCONT.L, shows the reservoir levels at the
end of each month. It will also be empty for zone models.

4.95 REP75 contains surface water diversions at the canal head by zone,
i.e. this report takes the numbers in REP70 and maps them from canal to zone,
separately for fresh, saline and total subareas.

Power Generation

4.96 Hydro-power generated (BKWHs) at Mangla and Tarbela reservoirs is

computed after each solution and is displayed as REP79. This report provides
average reservoir elevation, contents, generation capacity, generation per
acre foot (AF) of discharge, total discharge, energy generation and energy
spilled during each month. GAMS table POWERCHAR provides basic information to
produce this report. Average contents are computed by averaging the reservoir
contents at the beginning and end of the month. Reservoir elevation,
generation capacity and generation per AF are then computed for the average
reservoir contents using a table look up procedure. Generation per unit
discharge is multiplied by total outflow from the reservoir to compute total
generation, which is then compared with the capacity to estimate the energy
spilled.

Groundwater Balance

4.97 The next report, REPB2, reports on the inflows and outflows from the
subterranean aquifer. Extensive comments before the body of the table explain
the labels used on the headings. The entries are in MAF, and the tabulations
are annual. The balance row (which measures the imbalance between inflows and
outflows is labelled BALANCE. As we might expect, the numbers are positive for
SALINE (meaning net inflows) and most often negative for FRESH (meaning net
outflows due to pumping).

4.98 REP85 provides a summary of groundwater balance per commanded acre.

This measures the imbalance per unit area, which is a better measure of
relative imbalance than the total flows.
 - 93

Livestock Population and Production

4.99 REP95 gives animal populations, from the model and from the livestock
census. As before, "H-NWFP" means model results for NWFP, while ftA_NWFp means
actual, or census, numbers from NWFP. Census numbers are not available by
fresh and saline areas, so we can only compare the totals.

4.100 REP90 provides aggregates of livestock commodity production: milk and

meat.

Prices

4.101 The financial prices generated endogenously by the model are

calculated and displayed in ENDPRlCE. These may be compared with the tabulated
commodity financial prices in FSALEP. Economic prices (ESALEP, ESEEDP etc) are
also given in this section, as are trade prices (IHPORTP and EXPORTP). These
are all data, not results.

Artificial Variables

4.102 The final tables show values of the "artificial variables". These are
in REP100, REP110, and in PRODA, ARTWATER, ARTWATERND and ARTFOD. These should
all be ( ALL ZERO ) unless something has gone wrong.
 - 94

(This page is intentionally blank)

 V. Model Applications

1. Validation

5.1 A substantial amount of effort has been put in to updating and

validating the model for 1987-88 - the latest year for which a comprehensive
data base is available. This effort was necessary for two reasons: 1) to
ensure that the data updates produce a consistent picture of the irrigated
agricultural economy, and 2) provide a base from which to project those
factors which will change in future scenarios.

5.2 When a model is first constructed, or has been substantially revised,

it must be validated against the available data to ensure that it simulates
the actual with respect to the critical variables and constraint pattern
before it is used to simulate policy and project options. An extensive
validation was performed on the 1980 version of the IBMR before it was
projected forward in time to analyze Kalabagh (See The Agricultural Impact of
Kalabagh Dam). Because an agricultural census was available for 1980, it was
the last year for which a truly comprehensive data base was available. The
data for validating the new 1987-88 base are considerably more sketchy, but
because we have made several data updates including yields, prices,
consumption, and irrigation system parameters, some validation checks are
called for.

Validation Criteria

5.3 Since the aim of validation is to establish confidence in the tool

with respect to intended use, no universal criteria are available; each
modelling situation is unique. The criteria adopted for this exercise are:

Cropping Patterns must be relatively close to the observed. Since crops

account for the vast bulk of value added from irrigation water, and their
output value per unit of water varies widely, a distorted cropping pattern
will distort both water demands and the valuation placed on additional water.

Livestock Populations likewise should approximate the observed, although

because they account for a far smaller part of water end use and are
relatively insensitive to changes in its availability, a less precise fit is
required. This is particularly true of models, like the IBMR, which cover
only part of a larger sector.

The Pattern of Input Use should match independent estimates of actual use when
available.

The Constraining Resources should be identified by the model and square with
observed characteristics of the system. In Pakistan, this means that land and
labor are not expected to be highly binding constraints, but irrigation water
is. For items of equipment, such as tractors and tubewell, which have been
observed to be growing rapidly through private investment, the expected
constraint pattern is ambiguous.
 - 96

Canal Diversions, combined with the cropping pattern and water requirements
input, should yield a consistent total. The key output of the model in this
test will be the cropping intensity. Disequilibria in groundwater balances
should also be captured by the model. In areas of rising water tables, the
net inflows should be positive; in areas of falling tables. negative.

5.4 For the validation tests, a canal diversion pattern equal to the
post-Tarbela average is used.

Cropping Patterns

5.5 Table 5.1 reports the cropping patterns by province as projected from
the 1980 PCA and the recent Agricultural Statistics of Pakistan, and as
simulated by the model. Some minor definitional problems are worth noting:
actual areas of individual crops refer to areas under all types of irrigation.
whereas the model covers only canal commanded areas. In the Sind, 2.8% of all
irrigated land was irrigated from non-canal sources in 1980: in the Punjab.
the figure was 18.75%. It is indeterminable, however, how much of this area
is irrigated by tubewell and is in fact included in the model's CCA. The
problem is much more serious in NWFP where most of production occurs on
rainfed land or irrigated land outside of the canal system. Recall from the
last chapter that "Sind" includes part of Baluchistan irrigated by the Indus
canals, and "Punjab" includes part of D.I. Khan in NWFP. "Pakistan" includes
both the above and the ACZ called "NWFP". In all definitions, only canal
commanded, irrigated areas are included.

5.6 The fodder areas reported undoubtedly include un-irrigated areas. It

is extremely difficult to estimate what irrigated fodder areas actually are,
as well as what proportions of the livestock population are attached to
irrigated areas.

5.7 Overall, the "fit" is surprisingly good for this type of agricultural
model (all crop areas except orchards are endogenous; no artificial bounds are
employed to improve the fit). Table 5.2 reports a simple statistical analysis
on the fit as suggested in Agricultural Modelling for Policy and Project
Analysis. The correlation coefficients between the actual and simulated areas
are .997 for the Sind, and .987 for the Punjab. NWFP is much poorer at .849.
Here the largest differences are in gram, maize, and the fodders. crops which
we suspect have the above-mentioned data mapping problems.

5.8 A somewhat more rigorous regression test is also reported in Table

5.2. The actual was regressed on the simulated cropping areas. If the fit is
acceptable, the intercept should not be statistically significantly different
from zero, and the slope should not be statistically significantly different
from 1. The model passes the test on both coefficients for all provinces.

5.9 Of the cash crops, which we expect to largely determine the value of
additional water, rice and wheat are very close, but a bias appears against
sugarcane and in favor of cotton, particularly in the Punjab. For these
crops, the model is picking up the recent rapid increases in cotton
productivity, and the declining comparative advantage of sugarcane. The most
 - 97

Table 5.1: 1987-88 Cropping Pattern Model Simulation vs. Estimated Actual
(OOO's acres)

NWFP Punjab Sind Pakistan

Model Actual Model Actual Model Actual Model Actual

BASMATI 2188.7 2001 2188.7 2001

IRRI 415.8 620 1534.7 1491 1950.5 2111
COTTON 7027.0 4782 1654.8 1555 8681.8 6337
RAB-FOD 68.5 47 1618.4 2513 487.6 415 2174.5 2975
GRAM 97.0 132 1225.0 1586 215.6 218 1537.6 1936
MAIZE 197.4 78 302.5 101 1.8 501. 7 179
MUS+RAP 35.1 52 364.9 385 209.9 225 609.9 662
KHA-FOD 52.4 14 1037.9 2732 210.5 142 1300.8 2888
SC-MILL 165.9 143 927.8 1396 489.6 542 1583.3 2081
WHEAT 223.0 224 11690.8 12321 2595.0 2616 14508.8 15161
ORCHARD 27.0 27 691.0 691 200.0 200 918.0 918
POTATOES 9.1 8 123.6 113 39.9 38 172.6 159
ONION 5.8 6 98.0 89 33.1 29 136.9 124
CHILI 10.9 9 146.1 123 40.6 41 197.6 173

RAB-INT 100.5 101.8 80.3 91.6 31.8 31.9 61.9 68.7

KHA-INT 72.2 43.2 61.1 59.7 30.2 29.0 49.3 47.5
ANN-INT 172.8 144.9 141.4 151.4 62.0 60.9 111.3 116.2

Table 5.2: Statistical Analysis of Simulated Cropping Pattern

NWFP Punjab Sind

Correlation Coefficient 0.849 0.987 0.998

Intercept 16.22 -90.63 11.23

Standard Error 42.25 883.98 44.47

Slope 0.964' 0.989 1.007

Standard Error 0.188 0.076 0.016

R-squared 0.744 0.934 0.997

 - 98

serious biases occur with the fodders. Rabi fodder is close in both NWFP and
Sind provinces, but is only about two-thirds the actual in Punjab. Kharif
fodder is erratically different, but much less than the actual for the country
as a whole, pointing up the problems of identifying and quantifying the
sources of animal nutrients. The areas of irrigated kharif fodder reported by
the census are not separated from total kharif fodder, so this may explain why
the model grows less in Punjab and in total.

5.10 Seasonal and annual cropping intensities are reported at the bottom
of Table 5.1. The model produces a lower intensity in Rabi in the Punjab, and
a much higher Kharif intensity in NWFP. Otherwise, the intensities are
remarkably close. We may be underestimating either tubewell capacities and/or
Rabi surface diversions in the Punjab. The NWFP discrepancy is probably due
to data mapping uncertainties.

5.11 Table 5.3 reports the simulated vs. actual livestock populations.
Recall that the model's structure implies that bullocks will be kept primarily
for draft power, and secondarily for meat. The model chooses to maintain
about 14% fewer bullocks in total than the estimated actual population, the
biggest difference appearing in the Punjab. There are two possible
explanations for this discrepancy. First, the model may be picking up the
trend toward more intensive mechanization under which fewer bullocks are
required. Second, the mapping of the bullocks to the canal-irrigated areas
may be incorrect, i.e. we may be wrong in expecting to find 5.253 million
bullocks in the model's domain as many are kept outside of the canal-irrigated
areas.

5.12 The cow and buffalo populations are completely endogenous, depending
only on the model's desire to produce fodders in lieu of other crops to obtain
revenue from meat and milk sales. The "actual" figures in the table are
adjusted from LS totals to reflect independent evidence that only half the
cows are maintained on irrigated areas, and 70% of the buffaloes. The model
still chooses about 35% fewer cows and about 41% fewer buffaloes. Again, this
may be a mapping problem, or in fact a true bias against livestock. Perhaps
the competition of cash crops for land is squeezing the livestock population,
as evidenced by the low figures on simulated fodder area described above.
Regardless, this topic requires further investigation.

Input Use
5.13 The most important cash input which can be easily validated is
fertilizer. Table 5.4 reports the model's use of Nand P by province compared
with the actual. Except for NWFP, where a large proportion of fertilizer is
probably used on non-canal-irrigated land, the simulations are remarkably
close, justifying the extensive fertilizer data manipulation described in
Chapter 3. The N:P ratios are exactly duplicated except for NWFP.

Constraining Factors
5.14 The pattern of land use is shown in Table 5.5 which highlights the
under-utilization of land in a slightly different manner than did the cropping
 - 99

Table 5.3: Livestock Population: Model Simulation vs. Estimated Actual

(000' s animals)

NWFP Punjab Sind Pakistan

Model Actual Model Actual Model Actual Model Actual

Bullocks 60.9 151. 0 3114.3 3630.0 1335.7 1472.0 4510.9 5253.0

Cows 130.3 252.5 1282.7 2465.0 953.9 949.0 2366.9 3666.5
Buffaloes 121.3 255.2 4102.1 7858.4 1515.0 1581.6 5738.4 9695.2

Source for actual: Agricultural Statistics of Pakistan, 1987-88.

Table 5.4: Fertilizer U se: Model Simulation vs. Actual 1986-87

(OOO's tons)

NWFP Punjab Sind Pakistan

Model Actual Model Actual Model Actual Model Actual

Nitrogen 33.4 79.6 923.9 916.7 373.6 323.9 1330.9 1332.4

Phosphates 16.5 23.4 288.0 289.6 102.8 90.9 407.3 408.8

ratio 2.0 3.4 3.2 3.2 3.6 3.6 3.3 3.3

Source for Actual: Agricultural Statistics of Pakistan, 1987-88.

Note: Actual includes non-irrigated area.
 - 100

Table 5.5: Land Use, 1987-88 Base Case

(OOO's acres)

CCA Cultivated % Labor Hire?

NWFP fresh 628.0 628.0 100.00% no

PMW fresh 1838.9 1838.9 100.00% yes

saline 574.4 312.7 54.44% no
PCW fresh 8795.5 8795.5 100.00% yes
saline 2449.8 900.3 36.75% no
PSW fresh 3065.3 3065.3 100.00% no
saline 1332.8 515.4 38.67% no
PRW fresh 2782.4 2782.4 100.00% no

Punjab 20839.0 18210.4 87.39%

SCWN fresh 1844.8 1394.4 75.59% yes

saline 1749.4 796.2 45.51% yes
SRWN fresh 1576.0 756.1 47.98% yes
saline 2819.0 904.9 32.10% no
SCWS fresh 409.8 409.8 100.00% yes
saline 2381.1 1045.9 43.92% no
SRWS saline 2775.0 807.0 29.08% yes

Sind 13555.0 6114.2 45.11%

Pakistan 35022.0 24952.6 71.25%

 - 101

intensity figures. Land is cropped fully (in at least one month of the year)
in only the fresh areas of NWFP, the Punjab, and SCWS in Sind. Over 50% of
land in the Sind is never cropped, as is nearly 30% for all of irrigated
Pakistan. The model clearly confirms that arable land is not a constraint.

5.15 Casual observation has revealed that labor, if it is a constraint, is

so only on a local and seasonal basis. The model produces a pattern of labor
demand such that family labor can supply all of the needs in NWFP and the
Punjab except for the fresh areas of PMW and PCW. Labor hire is used in most
of the Sind, but at moderate levels. In no month or zone does the demand for
non-farm labor approach the limits of availability. The model confirms that
labor availability is not a constraint on irrigated Pakistani agriculture.

5.16 The tractor stock as estimated is adequate in all ACZ's. This result
corresponds with the observed rapid buildup of tractor stocks in the past few
years.

5.17 Although all fresh subareas make use of private tubewells in the
solution, the available capacity is only binding in NWFP and SCWN. Thus the
model indicates that private tubewell investment in new capacity has probably
reached the exhaustion stage in canal-irrigated areas.

5.lB If the model has not revealed any of the above inputs or resources to
be universally binding, it clearly does so with respect to surface irrigation
water. With canal diversions set at post-Tarbela average levels, the supply
of canal water is binding in most months in all canals and thus in all
subareas. This means that more surface water can be usefully absorbed in all
parts of the Basin served by the canal system. Furthermore, the model
produces shadow values of additional water supplied up to nearly Rs 69 per
acre foot measured in financial returns to farmers, 19BB prices.

5.19 The final item to be validated is the groundwater balance, or more

precisely, imbalance. Table 5.6 reports how the various inflows and
withdrawals add up at the level of the Province, by fresh and saline division.
(Consult GAMS report REPB5 for the breakdown by ACZ). The Sind fresh area is
very close to being in balance (.147 acre feet/year/acre net gain), but a
rapidly falling water table is implied for the fresh areas of Punjab (.657
acre feet/year/acre net loss). Saline areas in both Sind and Punjab show
serious imbalances (gains of .7BO and 1.244 respectively). In all saline
subareas, there is net inflow even for those parts of the Sind which are
already saturated and evaporation is at a maximum. The aggregate for the Sind
masks the fact that the problem was so severe it can't deteriorate much
further. In the Punjab saline areas. the more than one acre foot per acre of
excess inflows indicates a problem either existed or was rapidly developing.

5.20 Although the absolute magnitudes cannot be validated. the trends

certainly match perceived reality as evidenced by the intensity and location
of ongoing and planned drainage projects. The projected impact of these
projects is addressed in the next chapter.

5.21 To sum up. the model as revised closely approximates the cropping
patterns and intensities except for fodder areas, the pattern of input use,
 - 102

Table 6.6: Report on Groundwater Balance (1988 Uodel Simulation)

(acre f ..t per acre of CCA)

Fresh Areas
PunJaS Sind PaRI stan

Seepage So.u rce

Rain 0.080 0.039 0.073
Private Tubewells 0 ... 41 0.261 0.396
Government Tubewells 0.148 0.0"2 0.12"
Uain Canals, Branch Canals
Distributaries and Uinors 0."92 0."32 0."87
Watercourses and fields 0.663 0.979 0.726
Link Canals 0.108 0.086
Rivers -.077 0.122 -.038
Pumpage
Private Tubewells 1.920 0.918 1.696
Govenment Tubewells 0."10 0.096 0.3"0
Totals
Inflows 1.8..6 1.866 1.861
Outflows 2.330 1.10" 2.036
Inflows-Outflows - ... 8.. 0.861 -.18"
Potential Evaporation 0.208 0.704 0.276
Estimated Evaporation 0.173 0.704 0.276
Groundwater Balance -.667 0.1"7 - ...60

Sal ine Areas

PunJaS Sind PaRl.tan

Seepage Source
Rain 0.077 0.061 0.069
Main Canal., Branch Canals
Di.tributaries and Minors 0.667 0."68 0."96
Watercourses and fields 0.773 0.997 0.927
Link Canals 0.106 0.033
River. -.0"1 0.07" 0.038
Totals
Inflow. 1. ..71 1.690 1.663
Outflow.
Inflow.-Outflows 1...71 1.690 1.663
Potential Evaporation 0.227 0.810 0.629
Estimated Evaporation 0.227 0.810 0.629
Groundwater Balance 1.2.... 0.780 0.92"

Averaje
Punjab Ina PaRlstan

Seepage Source
Rain 0.079 0.0"8 0.067
Private Tubewells 0.3"8 0.071 0.237
Government Tubewells 0.117 0.012 0.07"
Main Canals, Branch Canal.
Distributaries and Minors 0.606 0."68 0."90
Watercour.e. and fields 0.678 0.992 0.806
Link Canals 0.108 0.06"
Rivers -.069 0.088 -.007
Pumpage
Private Tubewells 1.618 0.269 1.01"
Govenment Tubewell. 0.32" 0.027 0.20"
Total.
Inflow. 1.767 1.667 1.731
Outflows 1.8"3 0.287 1.217
Inf low.-Outf low. -.076 1.381 0.614
Potential Evaporation 0.212 0.780 0 ... 3..
Estimated Evaporation 0.186 0.780 0.418
Groundwater Balance -.260 0.601 0.096
 - 103

and identifies the overriding constraint as surface water. The only problem
area identified is the fodder areas and livestock population which may be
traceable to an external data problem; not a problem within the model.

Applications

5.22 In this section we will demonstrate how the IBMR is used for policy
and project experiments. First. we will address the surface water allocation
issue. and second, show how the model can be used to assist in the analysis of
a major water supply project - raising Mangla Dam. Finally, we consider a
more traditional. localized project: adding the proposed Jalalpur Canal. It
must be emphasized that these experiments are for illustration only; the
model's use in actual policy and project analysis requires far more detailed
work than presented here.

2. The Surface Water Allocation Issue

5.23 The problem of how to best allocate Indus waters among canals and
provinces has been unresolved ever since the Indus Waters Treaty. It is a
classic problem of equity vs. efficiency, and as such has been the focal point
for much discussion. In the absence of hard agreements. water allocation
policies have evolved as flexible compromises. Flexibility is required
because of the variability of surface water supplies. Compromise is necessary
because either a truly equitable distribution may be economically inefficient.
or an efficient distribution may be politically unacceptable.

5.24 In the base version of the IBMR, average diversions based on the
post-Tarbela period (1976-88) were taken as the norm. These diversions.
given canal-by-canal. were then mapped to the ACZ's and hence to the
provinces. This pattern of diversions did not exhaust the available supply
because a) the model has perfect foresight over the entire year, and b) there
are no uncertainties in the model. Farmers, policy makers and system
operators do not have these luxuries, so it not surprising that the model
performs somewhat better than reality. Rather than waste the additional water
available from these sources, we chose to allocate it proportional to the
post-Tarbela averages. This base case solution is reported in its entirety in
the Appendix C. and is summarized in Table 5.7 as column (3).

5.25 One can conceive of an almost infinite number of allocation schemes

as variants to this base case. Several are worth noting for reference
purposes.

Global Optimality

5.26 This is the pure efficiency case. Surface water is allocated toward
its optimum use as defined by the model's objective function without regard to
past history or previous agreements. written or unwritten. Because it is
unrealistic. this case is not attempted.
 - 104

Pareto-Optimality
5.27 This may be defined as "optimality at the margin". Given an
allocation pattern, pareto-optimality requires that it be respected, but
allocates any additional water optimally. This criterion is popular because
it respects tradition and protects rights already in existence.

Optimality within Provinces

5.28 This case takes as given any provincial allocations then re-a11ocates
within the provinces on purely efficiency grounds. It is thus a combination
of global and pareto-optimal as it is pareto-optimal with respect to
provinces, but globally optimal within provinces.

5.29 The truly interesting cases arise when a new source of water is
"created", usually from a storage project. This case was described in the
Kalabagh report where the additional Rabi supplies were allocated under a
number of schemes, with substantial impact on the project's rate-of-return.
But even without a new source, we can test the model's flexibility to
allocation schemes, and speculate on the possible impact of those schemes.

5.30 Four simulations were undertaken for this purpose, and they are
summarized in Table 5.7. Column (3) is the above-described base case: post
Tarbe1a average diversions in each month with the excess distributed to the
canals in proportion to their historical allocations.

5.31 Column (4) distributes the excess optimally within provinces. Using
value added measured in economic prices (VAEP) as our main criterion of
efficiency, we see that the difference is relatively small, 0.98%. To put
this and the other gains in perspective, we compare it to a hypothetical
project which would produce this benefit, and ask "how much would such a
project cost if it yielded a 12% return and had a life of 50 years?" The
answer is given in the "Project Cost" row, and is approximately 7.15 billion
Rs or $US358 million. In this perspective, water allocation, even involving
small quantities at the margin, is an extremely important decision.

5.32 In the middle part of Table 5.7 we see the behavior of VAEP by
province in absolute and percentage terms. NWFP allocations are held constant
because its canals are not fed by Indus Waters. Both Sind and Punjab gain
from the "optimality" experiment. Punjab's gain is absolutely greater by a
small amount, but Sind, being the smaller province in terms of CCA, has a
larger percentage gain.

5.33 The result of this experiment is simple: both provinces can benefit
if additional water is allocated to its most efficient use.

5.34 The bottom part of the Table reports how canal diversions change by
region, the quantity of "slack water" by province and season, and the amount
"wasted" in that it flows to the sea.
 - 105
5.35 Diversions in all regions are greater under the pareto-optimal
scenario than the proportional, which means that both provinces are better
off. The slack water tally is of interest because of the severe waterlogging
and salinity problems in much of the Sind. This variable measures water
applied at the root zone which cannot be consumptively used, and thus
exacerbates the waterlogging problem. The total for Sind is about 1 MAF
greater in (4) than (3), because total diversions are much greater.

5.36 The quantity flowing to the sea is a measure of the efficiency of the
system in using water. Note that in (4), this variable falls by about 3.8 MAF
and diversions to canals increase by 4.4 MAr. Thus this policy change results
in the effective use of water which would otherwise be lost to the system.

5.37 In the next three experiments, columns (5) through (7), we depart
from the base case's average post-Tarbela diversions (GAMS TABLE DIVPOST) and
instead work from the 80% of the average diversion. In other words each canal
must receive at least 80% of average diversions in each month.

5.38 In column (5) the excess over the 80% diversions are allocated
according to the global optimality criterion. Basin-wide VAEP gains amount to
2.14%, equivalent to a project costing nearly $US785 million. Of course,
compared to column (3), some areas served by canals will suffer losses in
water and income as they receive only the minimum under the 80% diversion
rule. But again, the provinces both benefit: Punjab gains 1.50% in VAEP and
Sind, 4.39%. Thus far, the results suggest that efficiency and equity are not
the conflicting goals that some might argue; efficiency gains may well be
distributed in an equitable manner.

5.39 An additional benefit from (5) is that slack water in the Sind drops
by more than half. This result follows from the optimality component: if
water is not needed, it is not supplied (as it sometimes is in the
proportional case), and thus does not seep into groundwater.

5.40 In column (6) we repeat the last experiment but ensure that equity
considerations are met: each province's allocations are held to the average
diversion minimum (pareto-optimality among provinces) but optimality within
provinces is obtained using the excess water from the 80% diversion by canal.
In other words provinces are given allocations proportional to the base case,
and penmitted to optimize over and above the 80% diversion pattern.

5.41 Surprisingly, the results vary only minutely (0.12%) from column (5).
This means that the within province potential gains from efficiency are far
more important than the potential gains from across province allocation gains.
This result arises from the fact that within each province the variability in
returns to water far exceeds the variability between provinces. Viewed in
this manner, the model suggests that perhaps much of the rhetoric surrounding
the water allocation issue is mis-focused. Policy makers can be less
concerned about inter-provincial allocations issues, but ought to be more
concerned with how water is used once it is allocated to a particular
 - 106

Table 5.7: Potential Gains from Water Allocation Policies

1987-88 Solutions

(millions of rupees)

Run Number (3) (4) (5) (6) (7 )

Ave. P.T. Ave. P.T. 8 P.T. 8 P.T .8 P.T .
BASE; Prop Extra P.OP. Extra G.O. Extra P.OP. No R.C.

VAEP

VAEP 88197.3 89058.3 90088.6 89981.1 90619.0

Change 0.98% 2.14% 2.02% 2.75%
Gain 861.0 1891.3 1783.8 2421.7
"Project Cost" 7150 15706 14814 20111
in 1988 SUS 358 785 741 1006

VAEP by Zone

NWFP 1053.7 1053.7 1031.6 1031.6 1031.6

Punjab 66273.1 66812.3 67269.3 67342.2 67262.8
Sind 20870.5 21192.2 21787.7 21607.3 22324.6

Gain by zone:
Punjab 539.2 996.2 1069.1 989.7
Sind 321.7 917.2 736.8 1454.1

% change:
Punjab 0.81% 1.50% 1.61% 1.49%
Sind 1.54% 4.39% 3.53% 6.97%

Surface Diversions: (HAP at Canal Heads)

Region:
NWFP 3.05 3.05 2.88 2.88 2.88
Marala 6.20 6.93 6.90 6.98 6.97
Hangla 30.93 31.30 30.86 31.60 30.87
Upper Indus 24.23 25.42 25.32 25.01 25.33
Lower Indus 51.39 53.48 45.37 53.47 47.25

Total 115.8 120.2 111.3 119.9 113.3

 - 107

Table 5.7 (Continued)

Run Number (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)

Ave. P.T. Ave. P.T. .8 P.T. .8 P.T. .8 P.T.
BASE; prop Extra P.OP. Extra G.O. Extra P.OP. No R.C.

Slacltwater: (MAP at Root Zone)

Punjab-Rabi .057 .073 .0 .0 .0

Punjab-Kharif 1.683 1.403 .754 .705 .753

Punjab-Total 1. 740 1.476 .754 .705 .753

Sind-Rabi 0.525 0.526 0.198 0.224 0.211

Sind-Kharif 5.907 7.072 2.632 7.136 2.579

Sind-Total 6.432 7.598 2.830 7.360 2.790

To Sea: (MAP)

Rabi 0.54 0.33 0.52 0.35 0.38

Kharif 40.88 37.30 45.30 37.74 43.43
Total 41.42 37.63 45.82 38.09 43.81

Run Number: 3. Average post-Tarbela (ave. P.T.) diversions as m1n1IDum in

each month, extra water allocated proportionally, 4.

4. Average post-Tarbela as minimum in each month, extra water

allocated optimally within the provincial shares (P.OP.).

5. 80% of average post-Tarbela diversions in each month, extra

water allocated optimally over the basin. (Global Optimal
G.O.).

6. #5 and optimality within Provinces.

7. #5 with reservoir operation for irrigation only (No R.C.).

 - 108
province. However, the increase in slack water that accompanies this policy
has adverse implications for the groundwater. This is caused by the increased
diversions in the Lower Indus.

5.42 Finally, column (7) looks at potential gains from relaxing the rule
curves on the reservoirs. Analysis of rule curves is common with respect to
hydro-power generation potential, but without a framework such as the IBMR, is
has been difficult to assess the gains or losses to irrigation from changes in
the rule curves. In column (7) we relax the rule curves and operate the
reservoirs solely from an irrigation perspective using the global optimality
allocation rule of column (5). This produces a gain of 2.25% over the base
case, and a gain of .6% over column (5). The absolute difference is 530
million Rs in real terms, a figure which can be compared with the loss of
power generation incurred from this experiment. Total power generation at
Mangla and Tarbela is 5.669 and 10.847 BKWHs in case 5 and 5.679 and 10.363 in
case 7. It shows a slight reduction in total power generation at Tarbela and a
different pattern of monthly generation in both power houses.

3. Project Analysis with the IBHR: Raised Hangla

5.43 When Mangla dam was built in 1967
future if additional storage was needed at
this option has been re-evaluated, and the
demonstrate the flexibility of the IBMR in
we simulate this investment option here.
it was designed to be raised in the
relatively low cost. Periodically,
cost estimates revised. Mainly to
evaluating alternative investments,

5.44 When last examined in the RAP (1979), the project cost was estimated
at Rupees 3.148 billion including power component (excluding power equipment).
If this figure is inflated at an annual rate of 10%, the 1990 (11 years) cost
would be Rs8.981 billion to raise the normal pool elevation by 48 feet to
accommodate an additional 3.6 MAF live storage. An additional generation unit
of 120 MW capacity would also be added to the power house. In estimating IRR
for the irrigation component we allocated 70% of the cost to irrigation and
30% to power.

5.45 In order to estimate the benefits of this project with the IBMR, we
first need to project the model forward in time to a year in which the project
can be expected to reach full maturity. 2000 is taken for this example as it
is one of the future scenarios for which we have already made assumptions
about the irrigation system (recall the discussions of Chapters 3 and 4 on
future scenarios). The effects captured are many, most notable being
population growth (and hence growth in demand for farmer's products) and yield
increases as a result of improved varieties and practices.

5.46 In addition several water projects affecting the irrigation system

were included for the year 2000 scenarios. A list of such projects is
provided in the Table 5.8. These projects effect several aspects of the
system, most notably increasing commanded area (CCA) , storage capacities and
canal capacities, or improving delivery efficiencies and water table depths.
Estimates of these effects are given in GAMS table COMDEF under year 2000. In
addition, the capacity of the existing reservoirs is reduced using the
 - 109
estimated sedimentation rates, and the flows from Ravi and Sutlej rivers is
assumed to be zero. For 2000 scenarios minimum water allocations are
specified by season instead of by month as in 1988. This is because it is
difficult to envisage the monthly distribution in year 2000.

5.47 Because the structures required to use additional Mangla water are
already in place. and the project would not be expected to generate any
fundamental changes other than provide additional Rabi water, it will probably
reach maturity much earlier, but 2000 will suffice.

5.48 The first two columns of Table 5.9 report two solutions for the year
2000 under the proportional (column 11) and Pareto-optimal (global) (column
12) allocation policies discussed above. As an aside, VAEP grows at 3.50%
compounded under the proportional case, and 3.48% under the Pareto-optimal
case. Both the absolute and relative gain from switching allocation

Table 5.8: Projects Included in the Year 2000 Scenarios

Left Bank Outfall Drain (LBOD)

SCARP V
Shorkot Kamalia Drainage
Fordwah Sadiqia Drainage
Pandoki Drain
Kotri Surface Drain
North Dadu Drain
South Rohri Drain
Larkana Shikarpur Drainage
Command Water management Project
On Farm Water Management (OFWM)-II and OFWM-ADB
Ghotki Fresh Groundwater
Irrigation System Rehabilitation
Pat Feeder Canal Project
Dajal Branch
Jalapur Canal
Pehur High level
Makhi Faresh link
South Rohri (ADB)
Rohri Remodelling

policies falls in the 2000 scenarios. This is due to the lack of flow from
the Ravi and Sutlej and sedimentation in the main reservoirs. These effects
combine to reduce total canal diversions (at the head) by 2 MAF, which also
reduces the amount of extra water available for optimal allocation.
 - 110

5.49 Because Mangla is already a ~node~ in the surface water distribution

model, the project is simulated simply by changing the RCAP parameter
everything else held constant.

5.50 Column (13) summarizes the raised Mangla under the proportional
allocation case. Compared to column (11), VAEP rises by 0.78%, Rs 1.044
billion. Despite Mangla being located in the Punjab, the gain in the Sind is
twice as much as the gain in the Punjab. This has to do with the
proportionality requirement, and the fact that some of the Punjab canals are
at or near capacity without the raised Mangla. Under this scenario, Mangla in
effect replaces water which otherwise flows down the Indus to the Sind. Much
of the additional water is wasted.

5.51 Column (14) is the same experiment except performed with the Pareto-
optimal allocation rule. The gain is more than double that of the
proportional case (Rs 2.37 billion, 1.78%) but part of this is a policy gain
(discussed below). Under this scenario, Sind still benefits from raising
Mangla, and even by a larger absolute amount, although the relative benefit is
smaller. This solution is far more efficient in utilizing water.

5.52 A rate of return analysis based on the above simulations is

summarized in Table 5.10. The top part separates the above-mentioned project
gains from the policy gains. Under the with project column, the gain from the
project is 1043.6 under the proportional allocation. This is a pure project
gain, since the allocation policies are held constant. The 2370 gain
corresponding to the pareto-optimal allocation is not a pure project gain as a
policy switch is involved: the pure gain in this case is 1470.6. The astute
reader will note that a policy-project synergism is evident: the gain from
the combined policy-project change (2370) is substantially greater than the
policy plus project gains (899.4 + 1043.6 = 1943). Clearly, projects not only
offer the opportunity for beneficial policy changes, but their return will be
greatly enhanced by such changes.

5.53 In the bottom part of Table 5.10 we reproduce part of the spreadsheet
used to calculate the internal rate of return. We already have the cost
(6.286 - 70% of total cost) and the annual benefits (1.043, 1.476 and 2370
respectively), but need to make some assumptions about the timing of costs and
the accrual of benefits. Arbitrarily we have assumed that the project costs
would be split between the calendar years 1990 and 1991, and full benefits
would begin accruing a year later. Other schedules are a simple matter to
investigate once the data are transferred to a spreadsheet, and such
investigations form a part of sensitivity analysis.

5.54 Under these assumptions the rate of return under proportional

allocation of raised Mangla waters is a respectable 15.40%. but under the
Pareto-optimal allocation, an impressive 21.15%. Combined rate of return for
policy and project is 32.44%

5.55 There is not always sufficient flow in the Jhelum to fill a raised
Mangla. Some estimate that once in four or five years this would be the case.
 - 111

Table 5.9: Benefits from Raising Mangla Dam

Solutions for the Year 2000

(millions of rupees)

Run number: (11) (12) (13) (14)

Wo Wo With With
Project Project Project Project
Proportional Pareto- Proportional Pareto-
Allocation rule: Optimal. Optimal.

VAEP

VAEP 133311.6 134211.0 134355.2 135681.6

Change from Base 0.67% 0.78% 1.78%
Gain 899.40 1043.6 2370.0

VAEP by Zone

NWFP 1729.1 1704.4 1704.4 1704.4

Punjab 100221.8 101086.6 100734.1 101997.5
Sind 31360.7 31419.9 31916.8 31979.7

Gain by Zone:
Punjab 864.8 512.3 1775.7
Sind 59.2 556.1 619.0

% Change:
Punjab 0.86% 0.51% 1. 77%
Sind 0.19% 1. 77% 1.97%

Surface Diversions (MAF at Canal Beads)

Region:

NWFP 3.00 2.75 2.75 2.75

Marala 6.04 6.51 6.22 6.79
Mangla 30.26 31.23 31.68 33.79
Upper Indus 23.84 26.47 24.82 28.98
Lower Indus 50.45 52.01 52.44 52.83

Total 113.59 118.97 117.91 125.14

 - 112

Table 5.10: Raising Mangla: Rate of Return Analysis

(millions of rupees)

VAEP and RR.

Without With Gain Due to Rate of

Allocation: Project Project Project Return

Proportional 133311.6 134355.2 1043.6 15.40%

Pareto-optimal. 134211.0 135681.6 1470.6 21.15%
Gain due to Policy 899.4 1326.4 2370.0 32.44%

Rate of Return Calculations

_Proportional_ _Pareto-Optimal_ _ _Pareto-Optimal_

and Project
Year Cost Benefit B-C Benefit (B-C) Benefit (B-C)
(C) (B) (B) (B)

1.990 31.43 -31.43.0 -3143.0 -3143.0

1991 3143 -3143.0 -3143.0 -3143.0
1992 1043.6 1043.6 1470.6 1470.6 2370.0 2370.0
1993 1043.6 1043.6 1470.6 1470.6 2370.0 2370.0
1994 1043.6 1043.6 1470.6 1470.6 2370.0 2370.0
1995 1043.6 1043.6 1470.6 1470.6 2370.0 2370.0

2040 1043.6 1043.6 1470.6 1470.6 2370.0 2370.0

 - 113

The benefits ought to be adjusted downward given a proba~ility distribution of

the additional water. Hence our deter:ministic estimate is an upper bound on
the true benefits. On the other hand the existing capacity would be reducing
due to siltation and additional 3.6 MAl would provide more benefits than
estimated.

5.56 Power generation at Mangla increased from 5.678 to 6.50 BKWHs in the
pareto-optimal case. This increase is due to an additional power unit and
higher head for existing units. Energy spilled on the other hand also
increased by .061 BKWHs suggesting that additional power capacity could be
installed - especially if the dead storage level is raised.

4. Jalalpur Canal Project1

5.57 The Raised Mangla Project required the full IBMR for its analysis
because the amount of water it supplied led to ramifications for most parts of
the Basin, including induced changes in cropping patterns. Most projects,
however, affect only a small part of the system, supply or demand only a small
part of the total water available, and do not induce production effects large
enough to alter prices. Thus most projects may be analyzed with a smaller
model, e.g., province, ACZ, or a component of an ACZ model.

5.58 In this section we wish to demonstrate project analysis with a

smaller model, one derived from an existing ACZ model, and which can be solved
easily on a personal computer. We selected the Jalalpur Canal Project (JCP)
because it fits these requirements, and also has a substantial rainfed
(barani) component, a complication not addressed elsewhere in this volume.

the Project

5.59 JCP is located on the right side of the river Jhelum below Rasul
Barrage. It includes parts of the Districts Jhelum and Sargoda, and thus lies
within the PSW ACZ. The project will irrigate an area of 159,370 acres by
means of a new gravity-fed, non-perennial canal offtaking from the Rasul
Barrage for a distance of 72 miles. About 72,700 acres are classified as good
(fresh groundwater) and the remainder is saline. Existing agriculture relies
almost entirely on uncertain rainfall, supporting a population of 282,000
(1961 figure, but growing very slowly due to the lack of irrigation). A
relatively small number of tubewells supplement rainfall in the fresh area.
5.60 The pre-project cropping intensity is estimated to be 60%, 30% in
Kharif and 30% in Rabi. Wheat is the dominant crop, followed by other grains
and fodders. All of the above are barani-cultivated and exhibit low yields.
A small area of irrigated rice and sugarcane is cultivated with the
available rainfall and tube-and open wells.

1Based on Jalalpur Canal Project, Por:m PC-I, Government of the Punjab,

Irrigation and Power Department, Sargodha Zone, Chief Engineer Irrigation,
LyaUpur, 1973.
 - 114

5.61 Area development is to proceed in six phases. In the first phase.

the non-saline area is to be immediately brought to an intensity of 135%, 90%
in Kharif and 45% in Rabi. Rice in to dominate the Kharif crops. followed by
maize, cotton and fodders. Wheat will continue to dominate the Rabi cropping
pattern, plus fodders. The saline area will require heavy leaching and
application of gypsum, and it is felt that only rice will thrive in the first
phase, occupying 80% of the small cultivated area. Rabi intensity will
increase marginally due to residual soil moisture. Succeeding phases will
reclaim more and more of the saline area, and spread cultivation in the fresh
area until the entire project area achieves a 135% intensity. Yields are
expected to equal those in nearby irrigated areas.

5.62 The economic analysis contained in the PC-I arrived at a benefit/cost

ratio of 1.90, but reported an internal rate of return of just 0.97% (pp. 48,
48A). The RAP estimated the IRR at 8%; the reason for the difference
presumably traceable to the definition of project costs used (discussed
below). The cropping pattern upon which the benefits were based was obtained
by assumption, and it was also assumed that 60% of gross production value was
costs, and the remaining 40%, benefits. The IBMR framework will be able to
generate an endogenous cropping based on the assumption that farmers in the
project area will maximize profits. and will automatically compute benefits
based on the economic values of the outputs and the economic costs involved.
It will be interesting to see if the model can improve on the above results.

Modeling the Project

5.63 In modeling the JCP. we took the PSW ACZ model. scaled it down to the
size of the project area, and modified the assumptions according to the
available information about the project. The with- and without project cases
are differentiated by whether or not the area has a canal water allocation.
As with other projects or policies. the net annual benefits will be the
difference in value added, measured in economic prices, between the with- and
without cases. One particular advantage of using a model in this manner is
that all of the assumptions going into the analysis are explicitly contained
in the GAMS statement of the model. We now refer to the GAMS statement,
annexed in Appendix A, to see exactly what was involved.

5.64 In the SETS section, the crops which are not expected to be grown in
the project area are eliminated from set CQ. and the corresponding data
removed from the TABLES and PARAMETERS. This not only prevents crops which do
not pertain to the project area from entering the solution, but reduces the
model's size and solution time as well. All but the STANDARD sequence has
been deleted because these primarily dealt with irrigated wheat, and wheat is
only a barani crop in the JCP.

5.65 W. which refers to the water stress level in the full IBMR, has been
modified to handle the irrigated-barani distinction. We no longer need the
stress levels, which again referred to wheat, but we do need to introduce
barani cultivation. Where possible, it is easier to use an existing set such
as W, because to introduce a new set would require re-coding a substantial
number of GAMS statements referring to crop technologies.
 - 115

5.66 TABLE COMDEF gives the project's CCA, the capacity of the new canal,
and the canal, watercourse, and field efficiencies assumed. These latter data
are equal to PSW-wide data from the full IBMR. TABLE CANALWATER gives the
monthly allocations to fresh and saline areas as derived from the PC-I.

5.67 TABLE RES88 has been modified to account for the number of people in
the project, and assumptions about the number of tractors and tubewells they
have available. The latter are guessed at, although the number of tubewells
is set to provide five KAF per month, a figure which meets the irrigation
needs in the absence of canal water.

5.68 The transformations required to introduce rainfed technologies begin

on line 474. The first four lines state that the land occupation. bullock,
tractor, and labor requirements will be the same for both irrigated and
rainfed technologies. Next, the water requirements, which of course refer to
irrigation water, are set to zero for the rainfed technologies. Then the
fertilizer requirements for rainfed are assumed to be one-third those of
irrigated, and the yields are assumed to be one-half. The latter is an
approximation in the absence of firm data. However, recent issues of
Agricultural Statistics of Pakistan show rainfed wheat yields are 53% of
irrigated yields. All of the above assumptions are tentative and probably
overstate the actual input usage on rainfed land. It is easy to vary them,
however, if better information becomes available.

5.69 The remainder of the GAMS statement is the same as that for the
typical ACZ model except that in lines 652 - 656 the with- and without project
cases are permitted as a simple option: for the without case, we set canal
diversions and canal water charges to zero.

The JCP Solutions

5.70 Table 5.11 reports the cropping pattern for the with- and without
project cases.

5.71 Because of the age and scarcity of the without project data (existing
situation), validation is virtually impossible. However, the crops grown in
the model are roughly the same as those indicated in the PC-I. No rice
appears in the without case, and the available tube- and open wells are used
to produce modest areas of cotton and wheat in the fresh areas. Barani crops
are limited to fodders, maize, and wheat as expected.

5.72 The cropping intensities in the without case are much higher than
expected from the PC-I (60%). This is because intensities are not limited by
water availability in rainfed areas. It is possible that our rainfed yields
are too high or our costs too low. For this demonstration model we will keep
these figures, recognizing that a lower initial intensity will serve to raise
the net gain from the project.

5.73 In the with project case, all production in fresh areas becomes
irrigated, with dramatic increases in cotton and wheat acreage. In the saline
 - 116
Table 5.11: Jalalpur Project Cropping Patterns

(000 Acres)

Without Project

Fresh Saline
=----:--- -:---::--:'
Irrigated Rainfed Irrigated Rainfed

Basmati
Cotton 9.55
RAB-FOD 18.66 22.18
Maize 32.88 43.01
KHA-FOD 9.59 28.23
Wheat 8.20 24.53 43.01

Totals 17.75 85.65 0.00 136.43

Intensity Fresh 142% Saline 157%

With Project

Fresh Saline

Irrigated Rainfed Irrigated Rainfed

Basmati 18.25
Cotton 49.20
RAB-FOD 23.48 17.61
Maize 36.67
KHA-FOD 23.48 24.06
Wheat 37.46 46.58

Totals 133.61 0.00 18.25 124.93

Intensity Fresh 184% Saline 165%

 - 117
area, only basmati is produced with the canal water, and the other production
remains barani. Intensities improve sharply in the fresh area, and marginally
in the saline area.

5.74 It should be pointed out that part of the gain in the fresh area is
due to investment in tubewells, an option available to farmers in all versions
of the IBMR. In fact, at project maturity as simulated by the model,
installed capacity grows by about seven-fold due to this investment. In the
absence of canal water, further investment in tubewells is not profitable to
the farmers. Thus the project is seen to induce private investment. Fresh
area farmers also increase their tractor stock substantially.

Economic Analysis of JCP

5.75 Table 5.12 reports the benefit calculations obtained from a report on
the model's solutions. Value added, the preferred measure of a project's
benefits, is the difference between the gross value of production measured in
economic prices, and the total costs of inputs, priced in economic costs. It
is seen to grow from 184.9 without the project, to 369.2, with the project.
The gain, or annual benefit, is 184.3. Because this exercise is for
demonstration purposes only, we did not bother to solve the model for the
different phases of the project as described above. Thus this gain may be
considered the full benefit at project maturity.

Table 5.12: Benefit Calculations for Jalalpur Canal Project

(Millions of 1988 Rupees measured in economic prices)

Without Project

Fresh Saline Total

Value of Production 158.5 136.0 294.4
Economic Costs 58.6 51.0 109.5
Value Added 99.9 85.0 184.9

With Project

Fresh Saline Total

Value of Production 388.3 178.8 567.1
Economic Costs 134.0 63.9 197.9
Value Added 254.3 114.9 369.2

Net Annual Benefit 369.2 - 184.9 = 184.3

 - 118

5.76 Table 5.13 is part of the spreadsheet used to estimate the internal
rate of return. The column titled "1973 cost" is the

Table 5.13: Jalalpur Project Rate of Return Calculations

(Million of rupees)

LR.R.= 14.07%

1973 1988 Benefits Benefits - Cost

Cost Cost

1991 23.2 96.9 -96.9

1992 44.0 183.8 -183.8
1993 55.0 229.7 -229.7
1994 49.5 206.8 -206.8
1995 49.5 206.8 -206.8
1996 10.7 44.6 169.4 139.7
1997 2.5 10.5 169.4 173.8
1998 2.1 8.7 169.4 175.6
1999 2.1 8.7 169.4 175.6
2000 2.1 8.7 169.4 175.6
2001 2.1 8.8 177 .5 175.5
2002 177 .5 184.3

2046 184.3 184.3

raw capital cost data from the PC-I. Following standard project analysis
procedure, we do not include as cost items the annual maintenance charges and
the amortization fees - which partly explains why the PC-I reports an I.R.R.
of less than 1%. The RAP report uses a cost figure of Rs 454 million, which
can be arrived at by inflating the PC-I capital cost figures by 11% per annum
from the period 1973-1979. Thus it appears that RAP used only the capital
cost data, and that is how it arrived at a more realistic 8% I.R.R.

5.77 In the second column we inflate the capital cost figures by 10% for
the entire period 1973-1988. The third column is the benefit obtained from
the model, which is assumed to begin in the fifth year and continue to the
fiftieth year. Note that we have phased in the benefits based on information
in the PC-I: the 169.4 figure reflects the fact that only the fresh area is to
be developed in the first phase. After year five, about 56% of the saline
area is to be developed, and after year 10, the entire area. This adjustment
is a short cut to avoid solving three different versions of the model. "B-C"
is the benefit-cost stream, which produces a rate of return of 14%.
 - 119

5.78 There are several possible reasons why the model produces a higher
I.R.R. than that of the RAP or the PC-I, apart from the cost definition.
First, the cropping pattern is endogenous, permitting the simulated farmers to
optimize income from production. Second, the model includes investment
options, and the increased tubewell capacity, induced by the availability of
canal water, is a major factor in increasing production in the fresh area.
Both of these features are inherent in the model, but are outside of the
ability of a more traditional project analysis technique.
 - 120

(This page is intentionally blank)

 - 121 -
BibliographY

Agricultural Statistics of Pakistan various issues. Ministry of Food,

Agriculture, and Cooperatives, Food and Agriculture Division (Planning
Unit). Islamabad.

Ahmad, M., Kutcher, G. P., and Meeraus, A. 1986. The Agricultural Impact of
Kalabagh Dam (As simulated by the Indus Basin Model Revised) Report No.
6884 PAK. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.

Brooke, A., Kendrick, D., and Meeraus, A. 1988. GAHS: A User's Guide.
Redwood City, CA: The Scientific Press.

Crops, Fruits, and Vegetables in Pakistan. 1986. Ministry of Food,

Agriculture, and Cooperatives, Food and Agriculture Division (Planning
Unit, R&CF Section). Islamabad.

Duloy, J. H.~ and O'Mara, G. T. 1984. Issues of Efficiency and Interdependence

in Water Resource Investments: Lessons from the Indus Basin of Pakistan.
World Bank Staff Working Paper Number 665. Washington D.C.: The World
Bank.

Goreux, L.M., and Manne, A.S. 1973. Multi-Level Planning: Case Studies in
Mexico. Amsterdam: North Holland.

Indus Basin Irrigation System, Historic Rivers and Canals Discharge Data,
yearly publications of Water Resource Management Directorate, WAPDA.

Irrigation Drainage and Flood Management 1979, supporting report to the

Revised Action Program, Water Planning and Review Division, WAPDA.

Kutcher, G. P., 1976. nA Model of the Indus Basin Distribution System:

Preliminary Report". mimeo. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
Kutcher, G. P., Meeraus, A., and O'Mara, G. T. 1989. Agricultural
Modeling for Policy and Project Analysis (using the GAMS Modeling
System). Washington D.C.: The World Bank.

Kutcher, G. P., and Scandizzo, P.L. 1981. The Agricultural Economy of

Northeast Brazil. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
 - 122

(This page is intentionally blank)

 Appendix A

GAMS Listing of

Data and Models

 - 124

(This page is intentionally blank)

 Appendix A

GAMS Listing of Data and Models

Introduction

A.I The IBMR has been implemented using the General Algebraic Modelling
System (GAMS). This is a computer language that allows mathematical models to
be concisely represented and easily transferred between different types of
computers. GAMS is available on most of the widely used machines, including
DOS based personal computers, IBM mainframes, and the DEC line of mini- and
super-mini computers. The experiments documented in this manual were executed
on an IBM-3090 mainframe under the VM/CMS operating system. They have also
been tested on the MicroVax donated to WAPDA by USAID under the WSIS project.

A.2 As described in Chapter 4, the program defining the IBMR has been
broken into three pieces, containing respectively the data (file WSISD1), the
model setup and solve (file WSISM1), and the report (WSISRI). A separate model
file is usually created for each experiment. It contains the data and model
changes needed to modify the original model and solve statement for the
purposes of the particular experiment. The GAMS "restart" option (see the GAMS
User's Guide for details) is then used to execute the experiment, and the
results are saved using the ~save~ option. The report program is then
executed using these saved results to tabulate the results. Although the
report programs are substantially the same for all experiments, for the sake
of proper documentation a separate report file was created for each. This
makes one model and one report file for each experiment. Table A.I lists the
input, output and work files for each experiment.

A.3 In addition to the full IBMR, a separate model was created for each
agroc1imatic zone. The zonal models are broken into two pieces. The first
contains set definitions, data, model specification and solve statement. The
second reports on the solution. The data for each zone were extracted from the
full IBMR (file WSISD1) by displaying data from using the GAMS DISPLAY
statement. The displayed results were then edited for inclusion into the zonal
model. The sets and model specifications are the same for each zone so these
parts were added to the data to complete the zone model file. Each zonal
model is substantively the same as in the IBMR except (a) it does not include
the surface water network; (b) the data are only for that zone, and (c) the
zone index in the equations is dropped. There are nine files, one for each
agroclimatic zone, and one report program that reports on any of the zone
model solutions. Unlike the full basin-wide IBMR, the zone models are not too
large to be executed on a personal computer. The zone models are not listed in
this manual.

A.4 In a similar way, a surface water network model was created by

extracting data from the WSISDl and WSISM1. This model routes water from rim
station to the canal heads. It includes the complete specification (as in
IBMR) of the surface water system: the reservoirs, river reaches and link
canals. This is used to test the feasibility (in the strict mathematical
sense) of a pattern of canal diversions. It also is small enough to be
executed on a personal computer. ~other version of this model includes the
 - 126

ground water operation in conjunction with the surface water and tries to
supply a specified pattern of water demands at the canal head. This model is
also broken into two pieces. The first contains the data, network, model
specification and solve. The second does a detailed water balance report on
each diversion point. These files are not listed in this document.

Description of Experiments:
A.5 Several IBMR runs were made for model validation and to demonstrate
the use of model. The results of these runs were discussed in detail in
Chapter 5. A brief description of each run is given below for quick reference.
Run 1 is a validation run, runs 3 through 7 simulate water allocation
scenarios. and runs 11 through 14 evaluate the raised Mangla project. To
evaluate the Jalapur canal project. a separate model was prepared using data
from the Punjab Sugar-Wheat zone (PSW) and the PC-I project document. This
model was then executed without project (run JALALI) and with project (run
JALAL2) .

Run 1. This run simulates 1987-88 conditions and is used to validate the
model. The linearized model for all agroclimatic zones (model
WSISZ) was solved for this run. Canal water diversions were fixed to
the historic average for each canal in every month. Because surface
water availability for each canal is fixed. the network equations
were excluded and all nine agroclimatic zones were solved
simultaneously. New investments in tractors, and tubewells were not
allowed. This was a restart from file WSISD1 in which data setup was
for 1987-88.

Run 1a. The surface network system was added to the specifications of Run 1.
Model was configured to use the 50 percent probability inflows.

Run 2. The results of this run are not reported in this manual. This is
nonlinear version of run 1. It was used to check the effects of
linearization of the demand functions on the results.

Run 3. This run is the base case for the water allocation experiments. It
simulates 1987-88 scenario with proportional water allocation. This
means that each canal receives at least the historical average
diversion in each month. Any extra water in the system is allocated
proportional to the historical share determined on a seasonal basis.
Relative shares are strictly maintained in this case, which means
that if one canal is at capacity, extra water is allowed to flow to
the sea. The model is configured to allow investment in new
tubewells and tractors, and export limits for wheat are relaxed.
Model WSISN was solved using a restart from run 1. The report from
this run is listed in xxx.

Run 4. This run modifies the water allocations of run 3, so that water is
allocated optimally while observing the provincial shares. This
scenario is called "pareto-optimal within the provinces", Each canal
is guaranteed the historical average; any extra is allocated
optimally. and provincial shares (on a seasonal basis) are strictly
 - 127 -

maintained. Model WSISN was re-solved after changing parameters

TOLCNL and TOLPR and restarting from run 3.

Run S. In this run only 80% of the historic average diversions are
guaranteed in each month for every canal. and extra water is
allocated optimally over the whole basin. This is called the "global
optimal" case. Model WSISN is solved. restarting from run 3.

Run 6. This runs is same as run 5, except that provincial shares are
observed.

Run 7. This is the same as run 5, except that the rule curves for the
reservoirs are relaxed. This means that power (and safety)
considerations are not taken into account when emptying the
reservoirs, which are thus run to maximize irrigation benefits.

(Runs 8 through 10 are not discussed here.)

Run 11. This is first of the year 2000 runs and provides the without project
case for the evaluation of the raised Mangla project. Data for year
2000 are established by executing file WSISD2. This is the same as
WSISD1. except the irrigation scenario is specified as year 2000 and
all the data are projected forward using growth rates as described
in Chapter 3. Proportional water allocations were made in this
scenario. Water shares were determined from average historic
allocation on the seasonal basis.

Run 12. This is year 2000 without raised Mangla but with the pareto-optimal
within the provinces" allocation.

Run 13. This is as run 11 but including raised Mangla.

Run 14. This is as run 12 but including raised Mangla.

JALAL1. This run simulates the base case for Jalalpur project. It is without
the proposed Jalpur canal. Crop coefficients were taken from PSW
zone and modified specially for rainfed technology.

JALAL2. This is a with project case in which the Jalapur canal is added to
the JALAL1 experiment.
 - 128

Table A.l List of input and output files for the runs made for WSIS.

Run Input file Output file Work File

Number Name Name Input Output

l. WSISDI WSISDI Listing WSISDI

WSISMI WSISMI Listing WSISDI WSISMI
WSISRI WSISRI Listing WSISMI

lao WSISMIA WSISM1A Listing WSISD1 WSISM1A

WSISR1A WSISR1A Listing WSISM1A

2. WSISM2 WSISM2 Listing WSISMI WSISM2

WSISR2 WSISR2 Listing WSISM2

3. WSISM3 WSISM3 Listing WSISM1 WSISM3

WSISR3 WSISR3 Listing WSISM3

4. WSISM4 WSISM4 Listing WSISM3 WSISM4

WSISR4 WSISR4 Listing WSISM4

S. WSISMS WSISMS Listing WSISM3 WSISMS

WSISRS WSISRS Listing WSISMS

6. WSISM6 WSISM6 Listing WSISM3 WSISM6

WSISR6 WSISR6 Listing WSISM6

7. WSISM7 WSISM7 Listing WSISM3 WSISM7

WSISR7 WSISR7 Listing WSISM7

11. WSISD2 WSISD2 Listing WSISD2

WSISM11 WSISMll Listing WSISD2 WSISM11
WSISRll WSISRll Listing WSISMll

12. WSISM12 WSISM12 Listing WSISMll WSISM12

WSISR12 WSISR12 Listing WSISM12

13. WSISM13 WSISM13 Listing WSISMll WSISM13

WSISR13 WSISR13 Listing WSISM13

14. WSISM14 WSISM14 Listing WSISMll WSISM14

WSISR14 WSISR14 Listing WSISM14
 - 129 -
JALALl JALALl JALALl Listing JALALl
JALALRl JALALRl Listing JALALl
JALAL2 JALAL2 JALAL2 Listing JALAL2
JALALR2 JALALR2 Listing JALAL2

Table A.2 Listing of files listed in this Appendix

Section A.2 Data and basic model specification.

Section A.3 Water allocation base case, including report.

Section A.4 Water allocation models.

Section A.s Raised Mangla models.

Section A.6 Jalalpur Canal extension models.

Section File name Pages Listing type

A.2 WSISDl 133-208 Program listing

WSISMl 209-228 Program listing

A.3 WSISM3 233 Program listing

WSISR3 234-335 Listing of program and results

A.4 WSISM4 339 Program listing

WSISMs 340 Program listing
WSISM6 341 Program listing
WSISM7 342 Program listing

A.s WSISMll 345-365 Program listing

WSISM12 366 Program listing
WSISM13 367 Program listing
WSISM14 368 Program listing

A.6 JALALl 371-383 Program listing

JALAL2 384 Program listing
JALALRl 385-388 Program listing
 - 130

(This page is intentionally blank)

 Appendix A.2

Data and Basic Model Specification

File WSISD1 Page 133

File WSISM1 Page 209

 - 132

(This page is intentionally blank)

INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME;WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE
GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

July 10. 1989

This file contains the basic data and definition of the surface water
system. Data is complete for year 1988. Some parameters could be
computed for future years using growth rates provided in this file.
Others has to be estimated and entered.
Enters the year for which the setup is desired in set ISR. Set ISR
should have only one entry in it.

Changes for Year 2000 runs

Growth of crop yields set to a maximum of 3 %
Insert this 1 ine after growthcy parameter
growthcy(c,z)$(growthcy(c.z) gt 3) = 3.0 :

....
IA

IA

INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 2

SET DEFINITION GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

~9 SETS
20 Z AGROCLIMATIC ZONES /
21 NWFP NORTHwEST FROINTIER MIXED CROPPING
22 PMW PUNJAB WHEAT-MIXED CROPPING
23 PCW PUNJAB COTTON-WHEAT
24 PSW PUNJAB SUGARCANE-WHEAT
25 PRW PUNJAB RICE-WHEAT
26 SCWN SIND COTTON-WHEAT NORTH
27 SRWN SIND RICE-WHEAT NORTH
28 SCWS SIND COTTON WHEAT SOUTH
29 SRWS SIND RICE-WHEAT SOUTH /
30 PV PROVINCES AND COUNTRY /NWFP, PUNJAB, SIND, PAKISTAN /
31 PV1(PV) PROVINCES /NWFP, PUNJAB. SIND/
32 PV2(PV) PUNJAB AND SIND /PUNJAB, SIND/
33 PVZ(PV,Z) PROVINCE TO ZONE MAP /NWFP.NWFP
34 PUNJAB. (PMW.PCW.PSW.PRW)
35 SIND. (SCWN,SCWS.SRWN.SRWS) /
36 CQ CROP AND LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS
37 /BASMATI. IRRI, COTTON, RAB-FOD.
38 GRAM. MAIZE, MUS+RAP, KHA-FOD.
39 SC-MILL, SC-GUR, WHEAT, ORCHARD,
40 POTATOES. ONIONS, CHILLI
41 COW-MILK, BUFF-MILK. MEAT /
42 CC(CQ) CONSUMABLE COMODITIES /
43 BASMATI, IRRI, GRAM
44 MAIZE MUS+RAP, SC-GUR ...,
I-'

45
46
WHEAT
CHILLI /
POTATOES, ONIONS "'"
47 C(CQ) CROPS /
48 BASMATI RICE CROP
49 IRRI RICE CROP
50 COTTON
51 RAB-FOD FODDER CROP
52 GRAM
53 MAIZE
54 MUS+RAP
55 KHA FOD FODDER CROP
56 SC-GUR SUGARCANE PROCESSED AT THE FARM
57 SC-MILL SUGARCANE FOR MILL
58 WHEAT
59 ORCHARD
60 POTATOES
61 ONIONS
62 CHILLI /
63 CF(C) FODDER CROPS /RAB-FOD, KHA-FOD /
64 CNF(C) NON-FODDER CROPS
65
66 T TECHNOLOGY /BULLOCK, SEMI-MECH /
67 S SEQUENCE /STANDARD STANDARD SEQUENCE
68 LA PLANT LATE PLANTING
69 EL PLANT EARLY PLANTING
70 QK-HARV QUICK HARVESTING /
71 W WATER STRESS LEVEL /
72 STANDARD NO STRESS
73 LIGHT LIGHT STRESS
74 HEAVY HEAVY STRESS
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 3
SET DEFINITION GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

75 JANUARY WATER STRESS IN JANUARY/

76 G GROUND WATER QUALITY TYPES/ FRESH, SALINE/

77 GF(G) FRESH GROUND WATER SUB-ZONE/FRESH /

78 GS(G) SALINE GROUND WATER SUB-ZONE/SALINE/

79 T1 SUB ZONES BY GW QUALITY/ FRESH, SALINE, TOTAL /

80 R1 RESOURCES /

81 CCA CULTURABLE COMMANDED AREA OF THE CANAL

82 CCAP CANAL CAPACITY AT THE CANAL HEAD

83 CEFF CANAL EFFICIENCY FROM BARRAGE TO THE WATER COURSE HEAD

84 WCE-R WATER COURSE COMMAND EFFICINECY IN RABI SEASON

85 WCE-K WATER COURSE COMMAND EFFICINECY IN KHARIF SEASON

86 FLOE FIELD EFFICIENCY

87 FARMPOP FARM POPULATION IN THE IRRIGATED

88 FARMHH NUMBER OF AGRICULTURAL HOUSEHOLDS

89 TRACTORS TRACTOR POPULATION IN THE IRRIGATED AREA

90 TUBEWELLS NUMBER OF TUBEWELLS

91 TWC EXISTING PRIVATE TUBEWELL CAPACITY

92 BULLOCKS

93 COWS

94 BUFFALOS /

95 DC(R1) CHARACTERISTICS OF CANAL COMMAND /

96 CCA CULTURABLE COMMANDED AREA OF THE CANAL

97 CCAP CANAL CAPACITY AT THE CANAL HEAD

98 CEFF CANAL EFFICIENCY FROM BARRAGE TO THE WATER COURSE HEAD

99 WCE-R WATER COURSE COMMAND EFFICINECY IN RABI SEASON .....

tJJ
100 WCE-K WATER COURSE COMMAND EFFICINECY IN KHARIF SEASON 1II
101 FLOE FIELD EFFICIENCY /
102 SA SUBAREAS /S1*S4/
103 WCE(DC) WATERCOURSE EFFECIENCIES /WCE-R, WCE-K /
104 M1 MONTHS AND SEASONS /JAN,FEB,MAR,APR,MAY,JUN,
105 JUL,AUG,SEP,OCT,NOV,DEC,RABI,KHARIF,ANNUAL/
106 M(M1) MONTHS /JAN,FEB,MAR,APR,MAY,JUN
107 JUL,AUG,SEP,OCT,NOV,DEC/
108 WCEM(WCE,M) MAPPING FROM SEASON TO MONTHS FOR WATERCOURSE EFFICIENCES /
109 WCE-R. (OCT,NOV,DEC,JAN,FEB,MAR)
110 WCE-K. (APR,MAY,JUN,JUL,AUG,SEP)/
111 SEA(M1) SEASONS /RABI, KHARIF /
112 SEAM(SEA,M) MAPPING FROM SEASONS TO MONTHS/
113 RABI. (OCT,NOV,DEC,JAN,FEB,MAR)
114 KHARIF.(APR,MAY,JUN,JUL,AUG,SEP)/
115 SEA1 /RABI, KHARIF, ANNUAL/
116 SEA1M(SEA1,M) /RABI. (OCT,NOV,DEC,JAN,FEB,MAR)
117 KHARIF.(APR,MAY,JUN,JUL,AUG,SEP)/
118 CI CROP INPUT OUTPUTS / STRAW-YLD, NITROGEN, PHOSPHATE. SEED /
119 P2(CI) / NITROGEN, PHOSPHATE /
120 A ANIMAL TYPES / COW, BULLOCK, BUFFALO /
121 AI ANIMALS INPUT OUTPUT /TDN. DP, LABOR, COW-MILK, BUFF-MILK, MEAT /
122 O(CQ) LIVESTOCK CDMDDITIES /COW-MILK MILK FROM CATTLE COW
123 BUFF-MILK MILK FROM BUFFALE COW
124 MEAT FROM COWS BUFFALOES AND BULLOCKS/
125 NT NUTRIENTS FOR ANIMALS /TDN TOTAL DIGESTABLE NUTRIENTS
126 DP DIGESTABLE PROTEIN /
127 IS IRRIGATION SYSTEM SCENARIOS /1980*2000 /
128 PS PRICE SECENARIOS / 87-88 /
129 *-
130 * CHANGE THE SET ISR TO SETUP DATA FOR DESIRED YEAR.
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 4
SET DEF INI nON GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

131 *
132 ISR(IS) IRRIGATION SYSTEM SCENARIO FOR THIS RUN /1988 /
133 ;
134 SCALAR BASEYEAR BASE YEAR FOR CROP YIELDS /1988/;
135
136 CNF(C) = YES; CNF(CF) = NO
137 PVZ("PAKISTAN",Z) YES;
138 SEA1M("ANNUAL",M) YES;
139
140 * PARAMETERS TO EXPORT DATA FOR ZONE MOOEL
141 *&&Z SET SET1 /TDN,DP,LABOR,COW-MILK,BUFF-MILK,MEAT,FIX-COST/
142 *&&Z ;
143 * FOLLOWING PARAMETERS ARE TO STORE DATA FOR EXPORT TO THE ZONE MODELS.
144 *&&Z PARAMETER
145 *&&Z ZONE1XXXXX(Z,C,T,S,W,M) BULLOCK REQUREMENTS (BULLOCK PAIR HRS PER MONTH)
146 *&&Z ZDNE2XXXXX(Z,A,SET1) INPUT OUTPUT COEFFICIENTS FOR LIVESTOCK
147 *&&Z ZONE3XXXXX(Z,CQ, * ) DEMAND DATA
148 *&&Z ZONE4XXXXX(Z,C.CI) CROP INPUT OUTPUT
149 *&&Z

I-'
W
0\
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 5
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

151
152 TABLE LAND(C,Z,T,S.W,M) LAND OCCUPATION BY MONTH
153
154 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
155 (BASMATI,IRRI).(PMW,PCW,PSW.PRW).(BULLOCK,
156 SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .5
157 IRRI. SCWN.(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD 1
158 IRRI SRWN.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .5 .5
159 IRRI. SCWS.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .5 1
160 IRRI. SRWS.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD
161
162 MAIZE. NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 1
163 MAIZE. (PCW,PSW,PRW).BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD .5 .5
164 MAIZE. (PCW.PSW,PRW).SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. STANDARD 1 .5
165 MAIZE. SCWN. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH). STANDARD. STANDARD .5 .5
166 MAIZE. SCWS. (BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .5 1 .5
167 MAIZE. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD .5
168
169 MUS+RAP.NWFP.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH). STANDARD. STANDARD
170 MUS+RAP.(PMW,PCW).(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH). STANDARD. STANDARD 1 1
171 MUS+RAP. PSW. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH). STANDARD. STANDARD 1 .5 .5
172 MUS+RAP. PRW. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH). STANDARD. STANDARD .5 1
173 MUS+RAP.(SCWN,SRWN.SRWS).(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD 1 .5 1
174 MUS+RAP.SCWS.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH). STANDARD. STANDARD 1 1 .5
175 I-'
176 (SC-GUR,SC-MILL).(NWFP,PMW.PCW,PSW.PRW, SCWN,SRWN.SCWS,SRWS). I.<)
....,
177 (BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD 1 1 1 1 1

178 KHA-FOD.(NWFP,PMW,PCW).(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .5 .5 .5 1 .5 .5

179 KHA-FOD.PSW.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH). STANDARD. STANDARD .5 .5 .5 .5 .5

180 KHA-FOD.PRW.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH). STANDARD. STANDARD .5 .5 .5 1 .5 .5

181 KHA-FOD. (SCWN). (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .5 .5 1 .5 1 .75

182 KHA-FOD.SCWS. (BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .5 .5 1 .5 1 1

183 KHA-FOD. (SRWN,SRWS). (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STAND ARD .5 .5 1 1 1

184 KHA-FOD.SRWS.(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH). LA-PLANT. STANDARD 1 1 1

185

186 RAB-FOD.NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD .5

187 RAB-FOD.(NWFP.PCW).SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. STANDARD 1 .25

188 RAB-FOD.PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 1

189 RAB-FOD.PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 1 .5

190 RAB-FOD.PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD .5

191 RAB-FOD.PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 1

192 RAB-FOD.SCWN.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH). STANDARD. STANDARD 1 .5

193 RAB-FOD.SRWN.(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH). STANDARD. STANDARD .75 .5

194 RAB-FOD.SCWS.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH). STANDARD. STANDARD 1 .25 .5 1

195 RAB-FOD.SRWS.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH). STANDARD. STANDARD 1 .5 .5 1

196 RAB-FOD.PMW. SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. STANDARD 1 1 1

197 RAB-FOD.PSW. SEMI -MECH. STANDARD. STANDARD 1 .5 .25

198 RAB-FOD.PRW. SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. STANDARD 1 1 .5

199 RAB-FOD.(SRWN,SRWS).(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.HEAVY .5 1

200 RAB-FOD. (SRWN,SRWS). (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. LIGHT .5 1

201

202 COTTON. PMW.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH). STANDARD. STANDARD .5

203 COTTON. (PCW,PSW,PRW).(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .5

204 COTTON. SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD .5 .5

205 COTTON. SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 1

206 COTTON. SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD .5

INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBNR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 6

CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

207 COTTON. SCWN.SENI-MECH.

STANDARD. STANDARD .5
208 COTTON. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.
STANDARD. STANDARD .5
209 COTTON. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.
STANDARD. STANDARD
210 COTTON. PCW. BULLOCK. EL-PLANT.
STANDARD .5 .5
211 COTTON. PCW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.
STANDARD .5
212
213 GRAM. (NWFP,PMW,PCW).BULLOCK.
STANDARD. STANDARD .5
214 GRAM. (NWFP,PMW,PCW).SEMI-MECH.
STANDARD. STANDARD .25 1
215 GRAM. (PSW,PRW).BULLOCK.
STANDARD. STANDARD .5
216 GRAM. (PSW,PRW).SEMI-MECH.
STANDARD. STANDARD .25
217 GRAM. (SCWN,SRWN,SCWS,SRWS). (BULLOCK,SENI-NECH).STANDAR D.STANDARD .25 1
218
219 WHEAT. (NWFP,PMW,PCW,PSW).BULLOCK.LA-PLANT.(STANDARD,LIGHT,

220 HEAVY ,JANUARY)

1

221 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. (STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY,JANUARY) 1

222 WHEAT. (SCWN,SRWN).BULLOCK.LA-PLANT.(STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY,JANUARY) .5

223 WHEAT. (SCWS,SRWS).BULLOCK.LA-PLANT.(STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY,JANUARY) .25
224 WHEAT. (NWFP,PMW,PCW,PSW).BULLOCK.QK-HARV.
225 (STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY,JANUARY) .5 .5
226
227 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV.(STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY,JANUARY)
.5 .5
228 WHEAT. (SCWN,SRWN,SCWS,SRWS).BULLOCK.QK-HARV.(STANDARD,LIGHT,

229 HEAVY,JANUARY)
.5
230 ....
w
231 WHEAT. (NWFP,PMW,PCW,PSW).BULLOCK.STANDARD.(STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY,
00
232 JANUARY) 1 .5
233 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. (STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY,JANUARY) 1 .5
234 WHEAT. (SCWN,SRWN).BULLOCK.STANDARD.(STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY,JANUARY) .5 .5
235 WHEAT. (SCWS,SRWS).BULLOCK.STANDARD.(STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY,JANUARY) .25 .5
236
237 WHEAT. (NWFP,PMW,PCW,PSW).SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.(STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY)
238 WHEAT. (NWFP,PMW,PSW).SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.JANUARY
239 WHEAT. PCW.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.JANUARY
240 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.(STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY,JANUARY)
241 WHEAT. (SCWN,SRWN).SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.
242 (STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY,JANUARY) .5 .5
243 WHEAT. (SCWS,SRWS).SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.
244 (STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY,JANUARY) .25 .5
245
246 WHEAT (NWFP,PMW,PSW).SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV.

247 (STANDARD,LIGHT ,HEAVY ,JANUARY)

.5 .25
248 WHEAT. (PCW,PRW).SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV.

249 (STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY,JANUARY)
.5 .5
250 WHEAT. (SCWN,SRWN,SCWS,SRWS).SEMI-MECH.

251 QK-HARV.(STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY,JANUARY)
252
253 WHEAT. (NWFP,PMW,PSW).SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.
254 (STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY,JANUARY) .5
255
256 WHEAT. (PCW,PRW) SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.(STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY,JANUARY) 1 .5
257 WHEAT. (SCWN,SRWN).SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. (STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY,JANUARY) .5 1
258 WHEAT. (SCWS,SRWS).SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. (STANDARD,LIGHT,H EAVY,JANUARY) .25 1
259 (ORCHARD). (NWFP,PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW, SCWN,SRWN,SCWS,SRWS).
260 (BULLOCK,SEMI-NECH).STANDARD.STANDARD 1
261 POTATOES. (SCWN,SCWS,SRWN,SRWS) .SEMI-NECH.STANDARD.STANDARD .5
262 POTATOES. (NWFP,PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW).SEMI-NECH.STANDARD.STA NDARD
INDUS
BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 7
CROP
DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

263 ONIONS. (NWFP,PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW).SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD

264 ONIONS. (SCWN,SCWS,SRWN,SRWS). SEMI-MECH.STANDARD STANDARD 1
265 CHILLI. (NWFP,PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW).SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD .5 1 .5
266 CHILLI. (SCWN,SCWS,SRWN,SRWS). SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1 .5 .5
267 ,
268 SET TECH(Z,C,T,S,W) TECHNOLOGY AVAILABILITY INDICATOR
269 TECH(Z,C,T,S,W)$SUM(M, LAND(C,Z,T,S,W,M = YES;
270

I-'

Ul

\0
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 8
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

272 TABLE BULLOCK(C,Z,T,S,W,M) BULLOCK POWER REQUIREMENTS(BULLOCK PAIR HOURS PER MONTH)
273
274 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
275 BASMATI.PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 22.0 17.2 2.0 15.6
276 BASMATI.PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 22.0 17.2 2.0 15.6
277 BASMATI.PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 22.6 17.3 2.0 17.4
278 BASMATI.PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 32.5 24.6 2.0 23.0
279 BASMATI . PMW . SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. STANDARD 13.6
280 BASMATI. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 13.6
281 BASMATI.PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 15.4
282 BASMATI.PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 20.0
283
284 RAB-FOD.NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 8.0 17.9 2.0 2.0
285 RAB-FOD.PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 17.9 7.6 2.0
286 RAB-FOD.PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 10.1 13.0 7.6 2.0
287 RAB-FOD.PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 16.5 9.7 2.0
288 RAB-FOD.PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 12.7 9.4 2.0
289 RAB-FOD.SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 9.6 16.4 2.0 2.0
290 RAB-FOD.SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 8.9 14.8 2.0 2.0
291 RAB-FOD.SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 10.3 18.4 2.0 2.0
292 RAB-FOD.SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 10.7 18.3 2.0 2.0
293 RAB-FOD.SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
294 RAB-FOD.SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
295 RAB-FOD.SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
296 RAB-FOD.SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 ~
297 COTTON. PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 14. 1 6 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 .I:
0
298 COTTON. PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 17 . 1 15.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
299 COTTON. PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 9.0 13.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
300 COTTON. PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 10.317.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
301 COTTON. SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 7.4 19.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 4.0
302 COTTON. SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 26.0 5.0 2.0 4.0
303 COTTON. SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 9.3 21.4 5.0 2.0 4.0
304 COTTON. (SCWN,SCWS,SRWS).SEMI-MECH.
305 STANDARD. STANDARD 5.0
306 COTTON. PCW. BULLOCK. EL-PLANT. STANDARD 16.0 4.0 12.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
307 GRAM. NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 7.0 8.9 14.5
308 GRAM. PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 7.0 10.7 5.6
309 GRAM. PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 7.0 10.8 5.6
310 GRAM. PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 7.0 10.2 5.2
311 GRAM. PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 7.0 10.3 5.3
312 GRAM. SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 4.0 5.7 6.4 8.1
313 GRAM. SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 4.0 5.7 6.4 8.1
314 GRAM. SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 4.9 6.4 7.1 9.3
315 GRAM. SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 4.9 6.4 7 1 9.3
316
317 IRRI. PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 18.9 1jL2 1.5 18.4
318 IRRI. PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 18.9 19.2 1.5 18.4
319 IRRI. PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 16.3 18.4 1.5 20.2
320 IRRI. PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 32.6 24.0 1.5 22.0
321 IRRI. SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 10.5 18.3 3.5 18.4
322 IRRI. SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 10.7 18.6 13.4 10.0
323 IRRI. SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 9. 1 10.317.1 3.6 14.7
324 IRRI. SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 19.0 17.5 3.7 10.0 10.0
325 IRRI. PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 16.4
326 IRRI. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 16.4
327 IRRI. PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 18.2
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 9
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

328 IRRI. PRW. SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. STANDARD 20.0

329 IRRI. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 16.4
330 IRRI. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 10.0 10.0
331 IRRI. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 12.7
332 IRRI. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 10.0 10.0
333
334 MAIZE. NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 41.4 5.0
335 MAIZE. PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 10.8 4.5 14.2 5.0
336 MAIZE. PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 10.2 4. 1 13.4 5.0
337 MAIZE. PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 10.2 4. 1 13.4 5.0
338 MAIZE. SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 15.1 23.9 3.0
339 MAIZE. SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 14.3 21.7 3.5
340 MAIZE. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.5
341 MAIZE. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.0
342 MAIZE. PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.0
343 MAIZE. PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.0
344 MAIZE. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.0
345 MAIZE. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.5
346
347 MUS+RAP.NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 7.4 8.0 14.5 1.0 1.0 1.0
348 MUS+RAP.PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 1.0 1.0 1.5 15.6 6.2 1.0
349 MUS+RAP.PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 1.0 1.0 1.0 10.8 10.1 1.0
350 MUS+RAP.PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 1.0 1.0 1.0 10.2 9.3 1.0 1.0
351 MUS+RAP.PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 1.0 1.0 15.6 1.0 1.0 1.0
352 MUS+RAP.SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 1.0 1.0 1.0 12.9 8.1 1.0 1.0
~
353 MUS+RAP.SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 1.0 1.0 1.0 13.7 7.5 1.0 1.0
354
355
MUS+RAP.SRWS.BULLOCK.
MUS+RAP.SCWS.BULLOCK.
STANDARD. STANDARD
STANDARD. STANDARD
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
13.7
12.8
7.5 1.0
6.9 1.0
1.0
1.0
""
~

356
357 SC-GUR. NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD STANDARD 14.6 11.3 11.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 11.0 14.0 18.0
358 SC-GUR. (PMW.PCW.PSW.PRW).BULLOCK.
359 STANDARD. STANDARD 17.8 11.6 8.2 1.8 1.8 11.5 13.5
360 SC-GUR. SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 8.2 6.1 10.9 4.9
361 SC-GUR. SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 8.5 6.3 11.2 5.6
362 SC-GUR. SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 9.1 7.4 12.1 5.8
363 SC-GUR. SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 9.3 7.2 12.5 5.7
364 SC-GUR. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 7.0 8.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 10.5 6.0 14.0 11.0
365 SC-GUR. (PMW.PCW,PSW.PRW).SEMI-MECH.
366 STANDARD. STANDARD 11.0 6.5 2.5 1.8 1.8 11.5 11.0
367 SC-GUR. SCWN.SEMI-MECH STANDARD. STANDARD 4.9
368 SC-GUR. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 5.6
369 SC-GUR. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 5.8
370 SC-GUR. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 5.7
371
372 SC-MILL.NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 18.0 18.0 14.0 12.0 15.9 20.0 15.0 16.0
373 SC-MILL.(PMW,PCW,PSW.PRW).BULLOCK.
374 STANDARD. STANDARD 16.8 15.1 15.2 12.0 8.0 1.8 10.0 12.5
375 SC-MILL.SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 8.2 6.0 10.9 4.9
376 SC-MILL.SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 8.5 6.3 11.2 5.6
377 SC-MILL.SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 9.1 7.4 12.1 5.8
378 SC-MILL.SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 9.3 7.2 12.5 5.7
379 SC-MILL.NWFP. SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. STANDARD 2.0 2.0 3.0
380 SC-MILL.(PMW,PCW,PSW.PRW).SEMI-MECH.
381 STANDARD. STANDARD 2.5 1.8 1.8
382 SC-MILL.SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 4.9
383 SC-MILL.SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 5.6
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 10
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

384 SC-MILL.SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 5.8

385 SC-MILL.SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 5.7
386
387 KHA-FOD.NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 15.4 1.0 1.0 16.0 1.0 15.0 1.0 0.5
388 KHA-FOD.PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 15.0 1.0 1.0 15.5 1.0 16.0 1.0 0.5
389 KHA-FOD.PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 16.0 1.0 1.0 16.0 1.5 15.0 1 0 0.5
390 KHA-FOD.PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 17.0 1.0 1.0 16.5 1.0 16.0 1.0 0.5
391 KHA-FOD.PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 16.0 1.0 1.2 15.5 1.5 17.0 1.2 0.5
392 KHA-FOD.SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD.STANDARD 10.7 2.0 6.3 2.0 2.0 6.3 2.0 2.0
393 KHA-FOD.SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 10.3 2.0 6.4 2.0 2.0 6.4 2.0 2.0
394 KHA-FOD.SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 11.3 2.0 8.7 2.0 2.0 5.8 2.0 2.0
395 KHA-FOD.SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD.STANOARD 11.3 2.0 8.7 2.0 2.0 5.8 2.0 2.0
396 KHA-FOD.SRWS.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARO 10.3 2.0 2.0 6.4 2.0 2.0
397
398 RAB-FOD.SRWN.BULLOCK. STANOARD. HEAVY 2.0 2.0 8.9 14.8 2.0 2.0
399 RAB-FOD.SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. HEAVY 2.0 2.0 10.7 18.3 2.0 2.0
400 RAB-FOD.SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. LIGHT 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.9 14.8 2.0 2.0
401 RAB-FOD.SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. LIGHT 2.0 2.0 2.0 10.7 18.3 2.0 2.0
402 RAB-FOO.SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. HEAVY 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
403 RAB-FOD.SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANOARO. HEAVY 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
404 RAB-FOD.SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
405 RAB-FOD.SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
406
407 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLDCK. LA-PLANT. HEAVY 4.6 4.6 38.4
408
409
WHEAT.
WHEAT.
PMW. BULLOCK.
PCW. BULLOCK.
LA-PLANT.
LA-PLANT.
HEAVY
HEAVY
4.0
4.8
4.0
4.8
27.1
39.2
....
~
410 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. HEAVY 4.7 4.7 37.9 N
411 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. HEAVY 4.5 4.5 17.2 12.9
412 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. HEAVY 5.4 31.2
413 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. HEAVY 5.5 33.4
414 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. HEAVY 2.9 3.0 32.3
415 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. HEAVY 3.1 3.1 31.6
416 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLDCK. LA-PLANT. JANUARY 4.6 4.6 38.4
417 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. JANUARY 4.0 4.0 27.1
418 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. JANUARY 4.8 4.8 39.2
419 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. JANUARY 4.7 4.7 37.9
420 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. JANUARY 4.5 4.5 17.2 12.9
421 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. JANUARY 5.4 31.2
422 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. JANUARY 5.5 33.4
423 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. JANUARY 2.9 3.0 32.3
424 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. JANUARY 3. 1 3.1 31.6
425 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. LIGHT 6.0 6.0 38.4
426 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. LIGHT 5.2 5.2 27. 1
427 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. LIGHT 6.3 6.3 39.2
428 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. LIGHT 6.1 6.1 37.9
429 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. LIGHT 5.9 5.9 17.2 12.9
430 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. LIGHT 7.2 31.2
431 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. LA PLANT. LIGHT 7.2 33.4
432 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. LIGHT 3.8 3.9 32.3
433 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. LIGHT 4.0 4. 1 31.6
434 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD 7. 1 7.0 38.4
435 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD 6.2 6. 1 27. 1
436 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD 7.4 7.4 39.2
437 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD 7.2 7.2 37.9
438 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD 6.9 6.9 17.2 12.9
439 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD 8.4 31.2
INDUS BASIN MOOEL REVISEO (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 11
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

440 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD 8.5 33.4

441 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD 4.5 4.6 32.3
442 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD 4.7 4.8 31.6
443 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. HEAVY 10.4 22.3 16.0
444 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. HEAVY 9.1 15.9 11.2
445 WHEAT. PCW. BUllOCK. QK-HARV. HEAVY 10.9 18.6 20.6
446 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. HEAVY 10.7 18.3 19.6
447 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. HEAVY 10.3 30.1
448 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. HEAVY 3.1 3. 1 17.5 13.7
449 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 18.3 15.1
450 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. HEAVY 6.7 13.4 18.9
451 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. HEAVY 7.0 13.7 17.9
452 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. JANUARY 10.4 22.3 16.0
453 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. JANUARY 9.1 15.9 11.2
454 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. JANUARY 10.9 18.6 20.6
455 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. JANUARY 10.7 18.3 19.6
456 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. JANUARY 10.3 30.1
457 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. JANUARY 3.1 3.1 17.5 13.7
458 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. JANUARY 3.2 3.2 18.3 15.1
459 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. JANUARY 6.7 13.4 18.9
460 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. JANUARY 7.0 13.7 17.9
461 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. LIGHT 13.6 22.3 16.0
462 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. LIGHT 11 .9 15.9 11.2
463 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. LIGHT 14.3 18.6 20.6
464
465
WHEAT.
WHEAT.
PSW. BULLOCK
PRW. BULLOCK.
QK-HARV.
QK-HARV.
LIGHT
LIGHT
13.9
13.4
18.3 19.6
30.1
..,.
I-'

w
466 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. LIGHT 4.1 4.0 17.5 13.7
467 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. LIGHT 4.1 4. 1 18.315.1
468 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. LIGHT 8.6 13.4 18.9
469 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. LIGHT 9.1 13.7 17.9
470 WHEAT. NWFP .BUllOCK. QK-HARV. STANDARD 16.0 22.3 16.0
471 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV STANDARD 14.0 15.9 11.2
472 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. STANDARD 16.8 18.6 20.6
473 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. STANDARD 16.4 18.3 19.6
474 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. STANDARD 15.8 30.1
475 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. STANDARD 4.7 4.8 17.5 13.7
476 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. STANDARD 4.7 4.8 18.3 15.1
477 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. STANDARD 10.3 13.4 18.9
478 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. STANDARD 10.8 13.7 17.9
479 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD. HEAVY 5.2 5.2 22.3 16.0
480 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. HEAVY 4.5 4.6 15.9 11.2
481 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. HEAVY 5.5 5.5 18.6 20.6
482 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARO. HEAVY 5.3 5.4 18.3 19.6
483 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. HEAVY 5.1 5.2 30.1
484 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. HEAVY 6.2 17.5 13.7
485 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. HEAVY 6.3 18.3 15.1
486 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. HEAVY 3.3 3.4 13.4 18.9
487 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. HEAVY 3.5 3.5 13.7 17.9
488 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD. JANUARY 5.2 5.2 22.3 16.0
489 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. JANUARY 4.5 4.6 15.9 11.2
490 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. JANUARY 5.5 5.5 18.6 20.6
491 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. JANUARY 5.3 5.4 18.3 19.6
492 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. JANUARY 5.1 5.2 30.1
493 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. JANUARY 6.2 17.5 13.7
494 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. JANUARY 6.3 18.3 15.1
495 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. JANUARY 3.3 3.4 13.4 18.9
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 12
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

496 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. JANUARY 3.5 3.5 13.7 17.9

497 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD. LIGHT 6.8 6.8 22.3 16.0
498 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. LIGHT 6.0 6.0 15.9 11.2
499 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. LIGHT 7. 1 7.1 18.6 20.6
500 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. LIGHT 6.9 7.0 18.3 19.6
501 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. LIGHT 6.7 6.7 30.1
502 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. LIGHT 8. 1 17.5 13.7
503 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. LIGHT 8.2 18.3 15.1
504 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. LIGHT 4.3 4.3 13.4 18.9
505 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. LIGHT 4.5 4.6 13.7 17.9
506 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 8.0 8.0 22.3 16.0
507 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 7.0 7.0 15.9 11.2
508 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 8.4 8.4 18.6 20.6
509 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 8.2 8.2 18.3 19.6
510 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. STANOARD. STANDARD 7.9 7.9 30.1
511 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 9.5 17.5 13.7
512 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 9.7 18.3 15.1
513 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STAI)lOARD 5. 1 5.2 13.4 18.9
514 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 5.4 5.4 13.7 17.9
515 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY 3.2 3.2
516 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY 3.6 3.6
517 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY 3.4 3.4
518 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY 3.2 3.2
519 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY 6.3 6.3
520 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY 5.4 .....
~
521 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.LA PLANT. HEAVY 5.5 ~
522 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY 2.9 3.0
523 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY 3.1 3. 1
524 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY 3.2 3.2
525 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY 3.6 3.6
526 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY 3.4 3.4
527 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY 3.2 3.2
528 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.LA PLANT. JANUARY 6.3 6.3
529 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY 5.4
530 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY 5.5
531 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY 2.9 3.0
532 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY 3.1 3.1
533 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT 4.1 4.2
534 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT 4.7 4.7
535 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT 4.4 4.4
536 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT 4.2 4.2
537 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT 8.2 8.3
538 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT 7.2
539 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT 7.2
540 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT 3.8 3.9
541 WHEAT SRWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT 4.0 4. 1
542 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD 4.9 4.9
543 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD 5.5 5.5
544 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD 5.2 5.2
545 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD 4.9 4.9
546 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD 9.7 9.7
547 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD 8.4
548 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD 8.5
549 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD 4.5 4.6
550 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD 4.7 4.8
551 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 7.3
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 13
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

552 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 8.2

553 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 7.7
554 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 7.3
555 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 7.2
556 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 3. 1 3.1
557 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 3.2 3.2
558 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 6.7
559 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 7.0
560 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 7.3
561 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 8.2
562 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 7.7
563 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 7.3
564 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 7.2
565 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 3. 1 3. 1
566 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 3.2 3.2
561 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 6.7
568 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 7.0
569 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 9.5
510 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 10.7
511 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 10.0
572 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 9.5
513 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 9.4
514 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 4. 1 4.0
515 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 4.1 4.1
516 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 8.6 ....
~
511 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 9.1 lJI
518 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 11.2
519 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 12.6
580 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 11.8
581 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 11.2
582 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 11. 1
583 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 4.7 4.8
584 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 4.7 4.8
585 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 10.3
586 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 10.8
587 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. HEAVY 3.6 3.7
588 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. HEAVY 4.1 4.1
589 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. HEAVY 3.8 3.8
590 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. HEAVY 3.6 3.7
591 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. HEAVY 3.6 3.6
592 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. HEAVY 6.2
593 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. HEAVY 6.3
594 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. HEAVY 3.3 3.4
595 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. HEAVY 3.5 3.5
596 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. JANUARY 3.6 3.7
591 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. JANUARY 4.1 4.1
598 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. JANUARY 3.8 3.8
599 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. JANUARY 3.6 3.7
600 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. JANUARY 3.6 3.6
601 WHEAT. SCWN. SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. JANUARY 6.2
602 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. JANUARY 6.3
603 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. JANUARY 3.3 3.4
604 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. JANUARY 3.5 3.5
605 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT 4.7 4.8
606 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT 5.4 5.3
607 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT 5.0 5.0
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 14
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

608 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT 4.7 4.8

609 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT 4.7 4.7
610 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT 8.1
611 WHEAT. SRWN. SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. LIGHT 8.2
612 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT 4.3 4.3
613 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT 4.5 4.6
614 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 5.6 5.6
615 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDtRD. STANDARD 6.3 6.3
616 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 5.9 .5.9
617 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 5.6 5.6
618 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 5.5 5.6
619 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 9.5
620 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 9.7
621 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 5.1 5.2
622 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 5.4 5.4
623 ORCHARD. (NWFP,PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW,SCWN,SCWS,
624 SRWN,SRWS).BULLOCK.STANDARD.STANDARD 5. 5. 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3 5 3.5 3.5 3.5
625 ORCHARD. (NWFP,PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW,SCWN,SCWS,
626 SRWN,SRWS).SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3. 3. 3. 2. 1. 2. 2. 2. 2.
627
628 CHILLI.(NWFP.PMW,PSW.PCW.PRW).SEMI-MECH.
629 STANDARD. STANDARD 16.
630 CHILLI.(SCWN.SCWS,SRWN,SRWS).SEMI-MECH.
631 STANDARD. STANDARD 8.
632
633
;
*- CONVERT BULLOCK PAIR HOURS TO BULLOCK HOURS
....
.f:
01
634 *&&Z ZONE1XXXXX(Z.C,T,S.W,M) = BULLOCKCC,Z.T.S,W.M)
635 BULLOCK(C,Z,T,S,W,M) = BULLOCK(C.Z.T,S.W,M)*2;
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 15
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

637 TABLE LABOR(C,Z,T,S,W,M) LABOR REQUIREMENTS FOR CROPS(MAN HOURS)

638
639 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
640 BASMATI.PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANOARD 29.1 88.78 65.9 5.6 5.6 47.9 17.6
641 BASMATI.PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 29.1 88.78 65.9 5.6 5.6 47.9 17.6
642 BASMATI.PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 26.9 94.9 74.7 6.2 3.1 50.9 19.4
643 BASMATI.PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 44.2 91.8 63.9 8.4 5.6 41.9 25.0
644 BASMATI.PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 8.4 71.6 65.9 5.6 5.6 47.4 16.1
645 BASMATI. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 8.4 71.6 65.9 5.6 5.6 47.4 16.1
646 BASMATI.PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 5.6 74.4 74.7 6.2 3.1 50.4 16.9
647 BASMATI.PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANOARD. STANDARD 11.0 67.7 63.9 8.4 5.6 41.4 22.5
648
649 RAB-FOD.SRWN.BULLOCK. STANOARD. HEAVY 27.9 23.4 9.1 19.7 19.2 24.8
650 RAB-FOD.SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. HEAVY 27.4 24.8 10.7 19.5 16.8 27.9
651 RAB-FOO.SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. LIGHT 27 .9 23.4 22.5 9.1 19.7 19.2 24.8
652 RAB-FOD.SRWS.BULLOCK. STANOARD. LIGHT 27.4 24.8 19.7 10.7 19.5 16.8 27.9
653 RAB-FOO.NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 42.8 42.1 32.6 24.6 10.9 8.0 14.3 17 .8 35.6
654 RAB-FOD.PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 29.3 37.1 36.6 28.1 9.7 13.35 16.5 34.5
655 RAB-FOO.PCW. BULLOCK. STANOARD. STANDARD 32.3 41.5 41 8 29.4 18.2 10.1 15.5 23.5 29.1
656 RAB-FOD.PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 31.9 39.8 41.7 28.6 13.4 8.7 15.7 28.7
657 RAB-FOO.PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 31.4 32.0 34.5 23.4 21.9 4.5 14.4 27.1
658 RAB-FOD.SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 28.0 24.8 24.0 14.3 9.6 21.5 19.2 24.5
659 RAB-FOD.SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 27.9 23.4 22.5 15.0 9.1 19.7 19.2 24.8
660 RAB-FOD.SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 29.0 23.1 19.8 17 .5 8.6 10.3 19.8 17.5 27.8
661 RAB-FOD.SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 27.4 24.8 19.7 18.8 9.3 10.7 19.5 16.8 27.9 ......
~
662 RAB-FOO.SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. HEAVY 27.9 23.4 1.0 8.7 19.2 24.8 ....,
663 RAB-FOO.SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANOARD. HEAVY 27.4 24.8 1.2 9.3 16.8 27.9
664 RAB-FOO.SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT 27.9 23.4 22.5 1.0 8.7 19.2 24.8
665 RAB-FOD.SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT 27.4 24.8 19.7 1.2 9.3 16.8 27.9
666 RAB-FOD.NWFP.SEMI-MECH STANDARD. STANDARD 42.2 43.5 31.2 22.0 9.5 2.05 8.02 16.29 33.0
667 RAB-FOD PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 28.6 36.4 35.6 27.5 8.3 2.17 7.96 24.08
668 RAB-FOD.PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 31.1 39.8 40.3 28.7 17.6 7.5 13.2 21.6 28.4
669 RAB-FOO PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANOARD. STANDARD 30.5 38.4 40.3 27.1 11 .9 7.3 12.7 26.4
670 RAB-FOD.PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 29.6 30.4 29.6 22.5 20.7 3.4 12.8 25.7
671 RAB-FOD.SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 26.5 21.4 22.8 12.7 1.2 8.8 17.5 22.8
672 RAB-FOD.SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 27.9 23.4 22.5 15.0 1.0 8.7 19.2 24.8
673 RAB-FOD.SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 29.0 23.1 19.8 17.5 8.6 1.2 8.9 17.5 27.8
674 RAB-FOD.SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 27.4 24.8 19.7 18.8 9.3 1.2 9.3 16.8 27.9
675
676 COTTON. PCW. BULLOCK. EL-PLANT. STANDARD 26.8 6.7 20.5 2.5 7.6 13.2 41.3 57.4 22.1
677 COTTON. PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 16.85 9.6 2.9 12.0 50.74 70.5 26.5
678 COTTON. PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 35.59 18.4 2.5 7.6 13.2 41.3 57.4 22.1
679 COTTON. PSW. BULLOCK STANDARD. STANDARD 10.2 19.32 2.5 3.9 11.0 40.1 52.9 16.3
680 COTTON. PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 22.3 20.28 6.7 10.6 40.1 57.1 21.0
681 COTTON. SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 7.4 23.5 7.0 2.0 2.0 17.5 39.4 66.2
682 COTTON. SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 31.2 2.0 7.0 2.0 2.0 38.6 80.4
683 COTTON. SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 9.5 23.8 7.0 2.0 2.0 28.5 84.1
684 COTTON. PCW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD 14.4 2.5 7.6 12.7 40.8 56.9 21.6
685 COTTON. PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 13.36 5.3 2.9 11.5 50.24 70.0 26.0
686 COTTON. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 4.99 9.42 2.5 7.6 12.7 40.8 56.9 21.6
687 COTTON. PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 4.41 9.28 2.5 3.9 10.5 39.6 52.4 15.8
688 COTTON. PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 1.45 9.04 6.7 10.1 39.6 56.6 20.5
689 COTTON. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 13.2 15.8 37.4 62.2
690 COTTON. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 12. 1 7.0 2.0 2.0 36.6 76.4
691 COTTON. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 12.4 7.0 2.0 2.0 28.5 83.2
692
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISEO (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 16
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

693 GRAM. NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 3.4 23.2 8.9 18.0

694 GRAM. PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 21.5 10.7 9. 1 1.9 2.5
695 GRAM. PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 21.7 10.8 8.9 0.7 2.5
696 GRAM. PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 2.5 22.3 10.2 8.6 0.8
697 GRAM. PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 2.5 22.6 10.3 8.5 0.7
698 GRAM. SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 23.5 9.2 6.4 12.0 1.0 1.0
699 GRAM. SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 23.5 9.2 6.4 12.0 1.0 1.0
700 GRAM. SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 24.8 10.3 7.1 13.4 1.0 1.0
701 GRAM. SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 24.8 10.3 7.1 13.4 1.0 1.0
702 GRAM. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 3.4 20.5 1.87 6.0
703 GRAM. PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 19.0 1.63 4.64 0.9 2.5
704 GRAM. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 20.0 1.62 4.41 0.7 2.5
705 GRAM. PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 2.5 21.4 1.54 4.39 0.8
706 GRAM. PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 2.5 21.9 1. 45 4.19 0.7
707 GRAM. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 21.4 5.5 0.81 3.4 1.0 1.0
708 GRAM. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 21.4 5.5 0.81 3.4 1.0 1.0
709 GRAM. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 22.7 9.1 0.96 3.6 1.0 1.0
710 GRAM. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 22.7 9.1 0.96 3.6 1.0 1.0
711
712 IRRI. PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 22.9 122.3 35.9 8.4 6.4 43.9 20.4
713 IRRI. PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 22.9 122.3 35.9 8.4 6.4 43.9 20.4
714 IRRI. PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 22.3 135.7 37.8 6.2 6.2 51.7 22.2
715 IRRI. PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 122.9 86.7 15.4 8.2 6.8 41.0 24.0
716 IRRI. SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 13.6 81.0 13.6 32.0 13.6 39.1 20.4
717 IRRI. SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 3.0 12.7 91.4 31.5 12.8 13.1 39.0 14.0 ....
~
718 IRRI. SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 9.1 10.3 57.9 13.4 35.3 13.3 41.4 16.7 (XI
719 IRRI. SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 19.0 58.5 13.2 34.5 13. 1 40.3 13.5 13.5
720 IRRI. PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 5.3 105.5 29.9 8.4 6.4 43.4 17.9
721 IRRI. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 5.3 105.5 29.9 8.4 6.4 43.4 17.9
722 IRRI. PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 7.9 119.2 28.8 6.2 6.2 51.2 19.7
723 IRRI. PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 71.0 80.4 13.7 8.2 6.8 41.5 21.5
724 IRRI. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 3.3 4.7 13.6 32.0 13.6 36.6 17.9
725 IRRI. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 3.0 8.7 13.4 31.5 12.8 13.1 36.6 14.0
726 IRRI. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 2.3 2.9 43.5 13.4 35.3 13.3 38.8 14.2
727 IRRI. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 5.0 43.7 13.2 34.5 13. 1 37.6 13.5 13.5
728
729 MAIZE. NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 43.4 38.6 0.7 2.7 46.1
730 MAIZE. PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 10.8 4.5 16.7 44.2 2.5 26.8 27.0
731 MAIZE. PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 10.2 4. 1 15.9 42.3 2.0 23.0 23.8
732 MAIZE. PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 10.2 4. 1 15.9 42.3 2.0 23.0 23.8
733 MAIZE. SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 18.65 27.4 3.2 3.2 3.2 57.4
734 MAIZE. SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 17.9 26.8 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 59.3
735 MAIZE. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 14.6 38.6 0.7 2.7 43.8
736 MAIZE. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 2.41 8.36 44.2 2.5 26.0 26.8
737 MAIZE. PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 2.24 8.06 42.3 2.5 22.0 22.5
738 MAIZE. PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 2.24 8.06 42.3 2.5 22.0 22.5
739 MAIZE. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 3.1 5.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 57.4
740 MAIZE. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 3.4 5.8 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 59.3
741
742 MUS+RAP.NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 8.9 10.5 18.0 14.6 23.0 23.0
743 MUS+RAP.PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 25.7 15.0 20.5 19.3 9.0 23.0
744 MUS+RAP.PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 21.75 20.5 6.0 10.8 13.6 13.9
745 MUS+RAP.PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 20.5 4.0 3.0 10.2 12.8 13.2 23.0
746 MUS+RAP.PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 3.5 3.0 19. 1 15.7 25.5 23.0
747 MUS+RAP.SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 1.5 1.5 1.5 15. 1 12.3 1.5 1.5
748 MUS+RAP.SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 1.5 1.5 1.5 15.2 12.7 1.5 1.5
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 17
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

749 MUS+RAP.SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 1.5 1.5 1.5 15.2 12.7 1.5 1.5
750 MUS+RAP.SCWS.BULLOCK. STANOARD. STANDARD 1.5 1.5 1.5 13.5 7.6 1.5 1.5
751 MUS+RAP.NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 1 87 3.45 6.0 14.6 23.0 23.0
752 MUS+RAP.PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 25.7 13.5 18.0 3.8 5.5 23.0
753 MUS+RAP.PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 21.75 20.25 6.0 1.62 5.08 13.9
754 MUS+RAP.PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 20.5 3.5 2.5 1. 54 4.9 13.2 23.0
755 MUS+RAP.PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 4.0 2.0 5.94 15.7 25.5 23.0
756 MUS+RAP.SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.7 2.8 1.0 1.0
757 MUS+RAP.SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 1.0 1.0 1.0 3. 1 2.5 1.0 1.0
758 MUS+RAP.SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.1 2.5 1.0 1.0
759 MUS+RAP.SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.3 2.9 1.0 1.0
760
761 SC-GUR. NWFP.BULLDCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 154.6 147 57.4 23.4 5.4 5.74 3.4 3.4 24.0 54.0 216 208.2
762 SC-GUR.(PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW).
763 BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 159 80.4 54.4 22.5 4.75 5.05 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.5 150.3 148.5
764 SC-GUR. SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 207.6 149.4 53.2 20.8 3.2 8.9 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 183.4 195.6
765 SC-GUR. SRWN. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 213.7 145.2 54.4 21.7 3.2 9.0 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 187.3 198
766 SC-GUR. SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 207.1 163.5 53.4 31.5 3.2 9.0 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 187.4 191.5
767 SC-GUR. SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 208.2 161.4 49.5 37.2 3.2 9.0 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 183.2 197.5
768 SC-GUR. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 143.1 144.1 50.15 23.4 5.4 5.74 3.4 3.4 17.5 54.0 216 201.9
769 SC-GUR.(PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW).
770 SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 151.2 80.62 48.92 22.5 4.75 5.05 3 0 3.0 3.0 1.5 148.3 142.3
771 SC-GUR. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 201.2 143.4 48.5 16 4 3.2 8.9 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 179.2 193.4
772 SC-GUR. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANOARD. STANDARD 209.4 139.8 51.4 18.6 3.2 9.0 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 184.3 193.7
773 SC-GUR. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 201.6 156.5 47.4 28.2 3.2 9.0 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 181.5 186.4 I-'
774 SC-GUR. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 203.5 153.4 44.5 32.6 3.2 9.0 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 179.8 191.6 .f'
775 \0
776 SC-MILL.NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 120 115 95.0 65.0 5.4 5.74 3.4 3.4 23.4 54.0 107 125
777 SC-MILL.PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 87.0 85.2 74.0 64.5 44.5 5.05 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.5 74.0 85.5
778 SC-MILL.PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 90.0 85.0 95.0 72.1 30.0 5.05 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.5 85.0 95.0
779 SC-MILL.PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 88.0 85.0 95.0 70.0 40.0 5.05 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.5 85.0 85.0
780 SC-MILL.PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 90.0 95.0 90.9 65.0 38.5 5.05 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.5 84.0 85.5
781 SC-MILL.SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 87.5 85.0 92.1 47.5 3.2 8.4 35.4 3.2 3.2 3.2 93.1 87.3
782 SC-MILL.SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 89.3 87.1 94.2 43.1 3.2 9.2 37 8 3.2 3.2 3.2 94.2 89.1
783 SC-MILL.SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 98.4 95.3 102.4 46.2 3.2 9.8 39.4 3.2 3.2 3.2 92.8 93.7
784 SC-MILL.SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 94.7 96.5 103.4 41.4 3.2 8.9 41.3 3.2 3.2 3 2 91.7 89.8
785 SC-MILL.NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANOARD 116 116 90.6 58.0 5.4 5.74 3.4 3.4 22.0 51.0 102 120
786 SC-MILL.PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 84.0 81.5 20.0 59.0 59.0 38.5 5.05 3.0 3.0 1.5 69.5 80.5
787 SC-MILL.PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 86.5 81.5 90.0 64.0 34.5 5.05 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.5 80.5 90.5
788 SC-MILL.PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 86.0 82.0 90.5 64.5 35.0 5.05 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.5 81.5 84.0
789 SC-MILL.PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 87.0 92.5 87.0 62.5 35.0 5.05 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.5 80.0 81.5
790 SC-MILL.SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 83.5 81.9 89.2 43.4 3.2 8.4 35.4 3.2 3.2 3.2 89.1 83.8
791 SC-MILL.SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 84.1 82.3 90.1 44.5 3.2 9.2 35.7 3.2 3.2 3.2 91.2 84.5
792 SC-MILL.SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 96.5 92.7 99.4 46.2 3.2 9.8 39.4 3.2 3.2 3.2 89.8 91.1
793 SC-MILL.SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 92.8 93.7 101 .8 39. 1 3.2 8.9 40.5 3.2 3.2 3.2 89.5 84.7
794
795 KHA-FOD.SRWS.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD 13.4 3.0 3.0 8.3 3.0 3.0
796 KHA-FOD.NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 18.5 2.5 3.0 17.5 2.0 18.0 3.0 1.5
797 KHA-FOD.PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 16.5 3.0 3.5 17.0 4.5 18.5 2.5 0.5
798 KHA-FOD.PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARO. STANDARD 18.5 2.0 3.0 18.7 4.0 18.0 3.0 1.0
799 KHA-FOD.PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 18.5 1.8 2.5 25.5 4.5 27.5 2.5 1.2
800 KHA-FOD.PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 17.0 1.5 2.5 20.0 4.0 18.5 3.0 1.5
801 KHA-FOD.SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 10.7 3.0 7.3 3.0 3.0 7.3 3.0 3.0
802 KHA-FOD.SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 13.4 3.0 8.2 3.0 3.0 8.3 3.0 3.0
803 KHA-FOD.SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 14.3 3.0 11.4 3.0 3.0 7.5 3.0 3.0
804 KHA-FOD.SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 14.3 3.0 11.4 3.0 3.0 7.5 3.0 3.0
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 18
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

R05 KHA-FOD.SRWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD 4.0 2.1 0.8 2.3 1.2 1.2

806 K~A-FOD.NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 7.0 1.0 2 5 5.0 3.5 7.0 3.0 1.5
807 KHA - FOD. PM~I . SEMI-MECH.5TANDARD. STANDARD 7.5 1.5 1.0 7.0 1.0 8.0 2.0 1.0
808 KHA-FOD.PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 6.0 1.3 4.5 6.5 4.2 5.5 2.0 1.5
809 KHA-FOD.PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 5.5 1.2 1.7 7.0 4.5 4 0 2.0 1.5
810 KHA-FOD.PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 6.0 1 5 2.0 8.5 3.8 5.5 2.2 1.5
811 KHA-FOD.SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 2.1 1.2 2.7 1.2 1.2 2.7 1.2 1.2
812 KHA-FOD.SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 2 0 1.2 2.8 1.2 1.2 2.9 1.2 1.2
813 KHA-FOD.SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 2.2 1.2 2. 1 1.2 1.2 2.3 1.2 1.2
814 KHA-FOD.SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 2.2 1.2 2. 1 1.2 1.2 2.3 1.2 1.2
815
816 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. HEAVY 5.8 3.7 3.7 38.3 14.2 43.6 3.7
817 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. HEAVY 3.4 2.9 1.7 36.3 12. 1 31.9 2.9
818 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. HEAVY 4.3 3.9 3.9 33.2 12.3 45.2 3.9
819 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. HEAVY 4.4 2.7 2.4 35.9 15.3 41.4 4.0
820 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. HEAVY 4.1 2.4 2.4 36.1 15.4 17.2 19.1
821 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 24.0 34.0 3.2
822 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 25.4 37.5 3.2
823 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 14.0 7.3 36.3 3.2
824 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 10.7 7.1 36.2 3.2
825 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. ~ANUARY 5.8 3.7 3.7 38.3 14.2 43.6 3.7
826 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. ~ANUARY 3.4 2.9 1.7 36.3 12.1 31.9 2.9
827 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. ~ANUARY 4.3 3.9 3.9 33.2 12.3 45.2 3.9
828 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. ~ANUARY 4.4 2.7 2.4 35.9 15.3 41.4 4.0
829 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. ~ANUARY 4.1 2.4 2.4 36.1 15.4 17.2 19.1
830 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. ~ANUARY 3.2 3.2 24.0 34.0 3.2 .....
VI
831 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. ~ANUARY 3.2 3.2 25.4 37.5 3.2 0
832 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. ~ANUARY 3.2 3.2 14.0 7.3 36.3 3.2
833 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. ~ANUARY 3.2 3.2 10.7 7. 1 36.2 3.2
834 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. LIGHT 5.8 3.7 3.7 50.1 18 5 43.6 3.7
835 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. LIGHT 3.4 2.9 1.7 47.5 15.8 31.9 2.9
836 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK LA-PLANT. LIGHT 4.3 3.9 3.9 43.4 16. 1 45.2 3.9
837 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. LIGHT 4.4 2.7 2.4 47.0 20.1 41.4 4.0
838 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. LIGHT 4.1 2.4 2.4 47.1 20.1 17.2 19.1
839 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 31.4 34.0 3.2
840 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 33.2 37.5 3.2
841 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 18.3 9.6 36.3 3.2
842 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 13.9 9.3 36.2 3.2
843 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD 5 8 3.7 3.7 59.0 21.8 43.6 3.7
844 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD 3.4 2.9 1.7 55.9 18.6 31.9 2.9
845 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD 4.3 3.9 3.9 51.4 18.9 45.2 3.9
846 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD 4 4 2.7 2.4 55.3 23.6 41.4 4.0
847 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD 4.1 2.4 2.4 55.5 23 7 17.2 19.1
848 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 37.0 34.0 3.2
849 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK LA-PLANT. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 39.1 37.5 3.2
850 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK LA-PLANT. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 21.5 11.3 36.3 3.2
851 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 16.4 10.9 36.2 3.2
852 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. HEAVY 5.8 3.7 3.7 59.8 22.3 21.2 3.7
853 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. HEAVY 3.4 2.9 1.7 55.1 15.9 16.0 2.9
854 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. HEAVY 4.3 3.9 3.9 57.3 18.6 23.9 3.9
855 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. HEAVY 4.4 2.7 2.4 58.4 18.3 23.1 4.0
856 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. HEAVY 4.1 2.4 2.4 58.6 33.9 2.4
857 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 19.2 8.3 18.9 15.1 3.2
858 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 19.3 9.6 20.2 17.3 3.2
859 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 24.2 16.2 20.1 3.2
860 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 22.3 16.5 19.7 3.2
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDI 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 19
CROP DATA GAMS 2 21 IBM CMS

861 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. JANUARY 5.8 3.7 3.7 59.8 22.3 21.2 3.7

862 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. ..JANUARY 3.4 2.9 1.7 55.1 15.9 16.0 2.9

863 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. ..JANUARY 4.3 3.9 3.9 57.3 18.6 23.9 3.9

864 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. ..JANUARY 4.4 2.7 2.4 58.4 18.3 23.1 4.0

865 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. ..JANUARY 4. 1 2.4 2.4 58.6 33.9 2.4

866 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. ..JANUARY 3.2 3.2 19.2 8.3 18.9 15. 1 3.2

867 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. ..JANUARY 3.2 3.2 19.3 9.6 20.2 17 .3 3.2

868 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. ..JANUARY 3.2 3.2 24.2 16.2 20.1 3.2

869 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLDCK. QK-HARV. ..JANUARY 3.2 3.2 22.3 16.5 19.7 3.2

870 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. LIGHT 5.8 3.7 3.7 78.2 22.3 21.2 3.7

871 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. LIGHT 3.4 2.9 1.7 72.0 15.9 16.0 2.9

872 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. LIGHT 4.3 3.9 3.9 74.9 18.6 23.9 3.9

873 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. LIGHT 4.4 2.7 2.4 76.3 18.3 23. 1 4.0

874 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. LIGHT 4. 1 2.4 2.4 76.6 33.9 2.4

875 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 25.1 10.8 18.9 15. 1 3.2

876 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 25.2 12.6 20.2 17.3 3.2

877 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 31.7 16.2 20.1 3.2

878 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 29 3 16.5 19.7 3.2

879 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. STANDARD 5.8 3.7 3.7 91.9 22.3 21.2 3.7

880 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. STANDARD 3.4 2.9 1.7 84.8 15.9 16.0 2.9

881 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. STANDARD 4.3 3.9 3.9 88.1 18.6 23.9 3.9

882 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. STANDARD 4.4 2.7 2.4 89.8 18.3 23. 1 4.0

883 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. QK-HARV. STANDARD 4.1 2.4 2.4 90.1 33.9 2.4

884 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 29.5 12.7 18.9 15. 1 3.2
~
885 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 29.7 14.8 20.2 17.3 3.2 VI
886 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. QK-HARV. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 37.3 16.2 20.1 3.2 ~

887 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK QK-HARV. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 34.3 16.5 19.7 3.2
888 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD. HEAVY 5.8 3.7 3.7 43.6 16.1 22.3 21.2 3.7
889 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. HEAVY 3.4 2.9 1.7 41.3 13.8 15.9 16.0 2.9
890 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. HEAVY 4.3 3.9 3.9 41.9 15.5 18.6 23.9 3.9
891 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. HEAVY 4.4 2.7 2.4 40.9 17.5 18.3 23.1 4.0
892 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. HEAVY 4.1 2.4 2.4 41.0 17.6 33.9 2.4
893 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 27.4 18.9 15. 1 3.2
894 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 28.9 20.2 17.3 3 2
895 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 15.9 8.3 16.2 20.1 3.2
896 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 14.2 8.0 16.5 19.7 3.2
897 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD . ..JANUARY 5.8 3.7 3 7 43.6 16. 1 22.3 21.2 3.7
898 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK STANDARD . ..JANUARY 3.4 2.9 1.7 41.3 13.8 15.9 16.0 2.9
899 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD . ..JANUARY 4.3 3.9 3.9 41.9 15.5 18.6 23.9 3.9
900 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK STANDARD . ..JANUARY 4.4 2.7 2.4 40.9 17.5 18.3 23.1 4.0
901 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD . ..JANUARY 4.1 2.4 2.4 41.0 17.6 33.9 2.4
902 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. ..JANUARY 3.2 3.2 27.4 18.9 15. 1 3.2
903 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD . ..JANUARY 3.2 3.2 18.9 20 2 17.3 3.2
904 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD . ..JANUARY 3.2 3.2 15.9 8.3 16.2 20.1 3.2
905 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD . ..JANUARY 3.2 3.2 14.2 8.0 16.5 19.7 3.2
906 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD. LIGHT 5.8 3.7 3.7 57.0 21.1 22.3 21.2 3.7
907 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. LIGHT 3.4 2.9 1.7 54.1 18.0 15.9 16.0 2.9
908 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. LIGHT 4.3 3.9 3.9 54.7 20.2 18.6 23.9 3.9
909 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. LIGHT 4.4 2.7 2.4 53.5 22.9 18.3 23.1 4.0
910 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. LIGHT 4. 1 2.4 2.4 53.6 23.0 33.9 2.4
911 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 35.9 18.9 15. 1 3.2
912 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 37.8 20.2 17.3 3.2
913 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 20.8 10.9 16.2 20.1 3.2
914 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 18.6 10.7 16.5 19.7 3.2
915 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 5.8 3.7 3.7 67.1 24.8 22.3 21.2 3.7
916 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 3.4 2.9 1.7 63.6 21.2 15.9 16.0 2.9
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 20
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

917 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 4.3 3.9 3.9 64.4 23.8 18.6 23.9 3.9
918 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 4.4 2.7 2.4 62.9 26.9 18.3 23.1 4.0
919 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 4.1 2.4 2.4 63.1 27.0 33.9 2.4
920 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 42.2 18.9 15. 1 3.2
921 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 44.5 20.2 17.3 3.2
922 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 24.5 12.8 16.2 20.1 3.2
923 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 21.9 12.4 16.5 19.7 3.2
924 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY 5.8 3.7 3.7 37.2 12.4 13.8 3.7
925 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY 3.4 2.9 1.7 33.1 11. 1 2.3 10.7
926 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY 4.3 3.9 3.9 34.3 11.2 8.0 11.5
927 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY 4.4 2.7 2.4 32.4 13.9 3.4 15.6
928 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY 4.1 2.4 2.4 32.3 13.8 11.9
929 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 22.4 3.1 9.1
930 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 25.4 2.9 9.6
931 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 14.0 7.3 3.2 11.0
932 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 10.7 7.1 3.2 11.0
933 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY 5.8 3.7 3.7 37.2 12.4 13.8 3.7
934 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY 3.4 2.9 1.7 33.1 11. 1 2.3 10.7
935 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY 4.3 3.9 3.9 34.3 11.2 8.0 11.5
936 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY 4.4 2.7 2.4 32.4 13.9 3.4 15.6
937 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY 4.1 2.4 2.4 32.3 13.8 11.9
938 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY 3.2 3.2 22.9 3 1 9.1
939 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY 3.2 3.2 25.4 2.9 9.6
940 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY 3.2 3.2 14.0 7.3 3.2 11.0
941 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY 3.2 3.2 10.7 7.1 ......
3.2 11.0 U1
942 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT 5.8 3.7 3.7 48.6 16.2 13.8 3.7 N
943 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT 3.4 2.9 1.7 43.3 14.4 2.3 10.7
944 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT 4.3 3.9 3.9 44.9 14.6 8.0 11.5
945 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT 4.4 2.7 2.4 42.4 18.2 3.4 15.6
946 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT 4.1 2.4 2.4 42.2 18.1 11.9
947 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 31.4 3.1 9.1
948 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 33.2 2.9 9.6
949 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 18.3 9.6 3.2 11.0
950 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 13.9 9.3 3.2 11.0
951 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD 5.8 3.7 3.7 57.2 19. 1 13.8 3.7
952 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD 3.4 2.9 1.7 51.0 17.0 2.3 10.7
953 WHEAT. pew. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD 4.3 3.9 3.9 52.8 17.2 8.0 11.5
954 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANOARD 4 4 2.7 2.4 49.4 21.4 3.4 15.6
955 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD 4.1 2.4 2.4 49.7 21.3 11.9
956 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 37.0 3.1 9.1
957 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 39.1 2.9 9.6
958 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 21.5 11.3 3.2 11. 0
959 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 16.4 10.9 3.2 11.0
960 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 5.8 3.7 3.7 56.4 4. 1 9.7 3.7
961 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 3.4 2 9 1.7 50.2 2.3 7.8 2.9
962 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 4.3 3.9 3.9 44.0 15.6 3.9
963 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 4.4 2.7 2.4 58.4 3.4 11.6 4.0
964 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 4. 1 2 4 2.4 52.4 9.5 2.4
965 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 19.2 8.2 9.0 3.2
966 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 19.3 9.6 9.3 3.2
967 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 24.2 11.0 3.2
968 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 22.3 11.0 3.2
969 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 5.8 3.7 3.7 56.4 4.1 9.7 3.7
970 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 3.4 2.9 1.7 50.2 2.3 7.8 2.9
971 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 4.3 3.9 3.9 44.0 15.6 3.9
972 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 4.4 2.7 2.4 58.4 3.4 11.6 4.0
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 21
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

973 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 4.1 2.4 2.4 52.4 9.5 2.4
974 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 3.2 3 2 19.2 8.2 9.0 3.2
975 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 3.2 3.2 19.3 9.6 9.3 3.2
976 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 3.2 3.2 24.2 11.0 3.2
977 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 3.2 3.2 22.3 11.0 3.2
978 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 5.8 3.7 3.7 73.8 4. 1 9.7 3.7
979 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 3.4 2.9 1.7 65.7 2.3 7.8 2.9
980 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 4.3 3.9 3.9 67.7 15.6 3.9
981 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 4.4 2.7 2.4 68.9 3.4 11.6 4.0
982 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 4.1 2.4 2.4 68.6 9.5 2.4
983 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 25.1 10.8 9.0 3.2
984 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 25.2 12.6 9.3 3.2
985 WHEAT SCWS.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 31.7 11.0 3.2
986 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 29.3 11.0 3.2
987 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 5.8 3.7 3.7 86.8 4.1 9.7 3.7
988 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 3.4 2.9 1.7 77.3 2.3 7.8 2.9
989 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 4.3 3.9 3.9 79.6 15.6 3.9
990 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 4.4 2.7 2.4 81.1 3.4 11.6 4.0
991 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 4.1 2.4 2.4 80.7 9.5 2.4
992 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 29.5 12.7 9.0 3.2
993 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 29.7 14.8 9.3 3.2
994 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 37.3 11.0 3.2
995 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 34.3 11.0 3.2
996 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. HEAVY 5.8 3.7 3.7 42.3 14. 1 4.1 9.7 3.7 I-'
997 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. HEAVY 3.4 2.9 1.7 37.7 12.5 2.3 7.8 2.9 UI
CJ.)
998 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. HEAVY 4.3 3.9 3.9 39.1 12.7 15.6 3.9
999 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. HEAVY 4.4 2.7 2.4 36.9 15.8 3.4 11.6 4.0
1000 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. HEAVY 4. 1 2.4 2.4 36.7 15.7 9.5 2.4
1001 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 27.4 9.0 3.2
1002 WHEAT. SRWN. SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 28.9 9.3 3.2
1003 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 15.9 8.3 11.0 3.2
1004 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. HEAVY 3.2 3.2 14.2 8.0 11.0 3.2
1005 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. JANUARY 5.8 3.7 3.7 42.3 14. 1 4. 1 9.7 3.7
1006 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. JANUARY 3.4 2.9 1.7 37.7 12.5 2.3 7.8 2.9
1007 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. JANUARY 4.3 3.9 3.9 39.1 12.7 15.6 3.9
1008 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. JANUARY 4.4 2.7 2.4 36.9 15.8 3.4 11.6 4.0
1009 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. JANUARY 4.1 2.4 2.4 36.7 15.7 9.5 2.4
1010 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. JANUARY 3.2 3.2 27.4 9.0 3.2
1011 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. JANUARY 3.2 3.2 28.9 9.3 3.2
1012 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. JANUARY 3.2 3.2 15.9 8.3 11.0 3.2
1013 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. JANUARY 3.2 3.2 14.2 8.0 11.0 3.2
1014 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT 5.8 3.7 3.7 55.3 18.4 4.1 9.7 3.7
1015 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT 3.4 2.9 1.7 49.3 16.4 2.3 7.8 2.9
1016 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT 4.3 3.9 3.9 51.1 16.6 15.6 3.9
1017 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT 4.4 2.7 2.4 48.3 20.7 3.4 11.6 4.0
1018 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT 4.1 2.4 2.4 48.0 20.6 9.5 2.4
1019 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 35.9 9.0 3.2
1020 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 37.8 9.3 3.2
1021 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 20.8 10.9 11.0 3.2
1022 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT 3.2 3.2 18.6 10.7 11.0 3.2
1023 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 5.8 3.7 3.7 65.1 21.7 4.1 9.7 3.7
1024 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 3.4 2.9 1.7 58.0 19.3 2.3 7.8 2.9
1025 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 4.3 3.9 3.9 60.1 19.5 15.6 3.9
1026 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 4.4 2.7 2.4 56.8 24.3 3.4 11.6 4.0
1027 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 4.1 2.4 2.4 56.5 24.2 9.5 2.4
1028 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 42.2 9.0 3.2
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 22
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

1029 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 44.5 9.3 3.2

1030 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 24.5 12.8 11.0 3.2
1031 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 3.2 3.2 21.9 12.4 11.0 3.2
1032
1033 ORCHARD. (NWFP.PMW.PCW.PSW,PRW).
1034 (BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD 41 41.8 17.3 14.5 14.5 22. 22. 50. 29. 39. 56.5 28.3
1035 ORCHARD. (SCWN.SCWS.SRWN.SRWS).
1036 (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD 31 31. 31. 31, 25. 22. 22. 22. 31. 31, 31, 31.
1037
1038 POTATOES.(SCWN.SCWS.SRWN.SRWS).
1039 SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 100 100 50 50 100 50
1040 POTATOES.(NWFP.PMW.PSW,PCW.PRW).SEMI-MECH.
1041 STANDARD. STANDARD 70 24 150 8
1042 ONIONS.(NWFP,PMW.PSW,PCW.PRW).SEMI-MECH.
1043 STANDARD. STANDARD 160 8 32 32 160
1044 ONIONS.(SCWN.SCWS,SRWN,SRWS).SEMI-MECH.
1045 STANDARD. STANDARD 160 160 8 32 32
1046 CHILLI.(NWFP,PMW,PCW.PSW,PRW).SEMI-MECH.
1047 STANDARD. STANDARD 100 2 20 10 20 10 20 8 8
1048 CHILLI. (SCWN,SCWS,SRWN,SRWS).SEMI-MECH.
1049 STANDARD. STANDARD 16 32 28 28 100

....VI
~
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 23
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

1051 TABLE WATER(C.Z,T,S,W,M) WATER REQUIREMENTS(ACRE FEET PER ACRE)

1052
1053 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUl AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
1054 BASMATI.(PMW,PCW,PSW).(BUllOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .37 .84 .93 .93 .47
1055 BASMATI.PRW.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .56 .84 .93 .93 .56
1056
1057 RAB-FOD. (PSW,PRW). (BUlLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDAR 0 .20 .30 .50 .60 .35 .25 15 .15
1058 RAB-FOD.(SCWS.SRWS).(BUlLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .27 .37 .53 .64 .21 .32 .27 .21
1059 RAB-FOD.SRWN.(BUllOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.HEAVY .20 .20 .25 15 .15
1060 RAB-FOD.SRWS.(BUllOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.HEAVY .27 .21 .32 .27 .21
1061 RAB-FOD.SRWN.(BULlOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.lIGHT .20 .30 .20 .25 .15 .15
1062 RAB-FOD.SRWS.(BULlOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.lIGHT .27 .37 .21 .32 .27 .21
1063 RAB-FOD.NWFP.(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .20 .25 .40 .45 .15 .20 .25 15 .15
1064 RAB-FOD.PMW.(BULlOCK,SEMI-MECH) STANDARD. STANDARD .20 .25 .40 .50 .10 .25 15 15
1065 RAB-FOD.PCW.(BULlOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .20 .30 .45 .55 .25 .20 .25 15 .15
1066 RAB-FOD.SCWN.(BUlLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .21 .32 .48 .59 .21 .27 16 .16
1067 RAB-FOD.SRWN.(BULlOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .20 .30 .45 .55 .20 .25 .15 .15
1068
1069 COTTON. PCW. BULLOCK. El-PlANT. STANDARD . 19 .09 .37 .33 .37 .47 .33 .09
1070 COTTON. (PMW,PSW.PRW).(BUlLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STAN DARD .19 .23 .28 .37 .37 .23 .09
1071 COTTON.PCW.(BUllOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD . 19 .28 .33 .37 .47 .33 .09
1072 COTTON. SCWN.BULlOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD .10 .20 .30 .40 .40 .40 .30
1073 COTTON.SCWS.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .20 .20 .30 .40 .40 .40 .20
1074 COTTON.SRWS.(BUllOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .20 .20 .30 .40 .40 .40 .15
1075 COTTON. PCW. SEMI-MECH.lA-PlANT. STANDARD .37 .33 .37 .47 .33 .09 ....
1.1\
1076 COTTON. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD .25 .35 .40 .40 .40 .30 1.1\
1077
1078 GRAM.NWFP.(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .10 .20 .10 .10 .05
1079 GRAM.PMW.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .05 .05 .20 .10 .10 15
1080 GRAM.PCW.(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .10 .05 .25 .15 .10 .10
1081 GRAM.(PSW.PRW).(BUllOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .10 .10 .20 .15 .10
1082 GRAM. (SCWN,SCWS). (BUllOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD . 11 .21 .21 .21 11
1083 GRAM. (SRWN.SRWS).(BULlOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .10 .20 .20 .20 .10
1084
1085 IRRI.PMW.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .37 .84 .93 .93 .47
1086 IRRI.PCW.(BUlLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .37 .84 .93 .93 .47
1087 IRRI.PSW.(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .33 .79 .89 .89 .47
1088 IRRI.PRW.(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .56 .84 .93 .93 .65
1089 IRRI.SCWN.(BULlOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .36 .90 1.01 1.01 .52
1090 IRRI.SRWN.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .78 .96 .96 .96 .45
1091 IRRI.SCWS.(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .20 .85 1.00 1.00 .75
1092 IRRI.SRWS.(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD . 20 1. 15 1. 15 1. 15 .75
1093
1094 MAIZE.NWFP.(BUlLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD . 15 .35 .30 .25 .20
1095 MAIZE. (PCW.PSW.PRW).BULlOCK. STANDARD. STANDARD .10 .10 .30 .30 .40 .20
1096 MAIZE.(PCW.PSW.PRW).SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. STANDARD . 15 .30 .30 .40 .25
1097 MAIZE.SCWN.(BUllOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .21 .32 .32 .43 .43 .21
1098 MAIZE.SCWS.(BULlOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .21 .21 .21 .32 .43 .32 .21
1099
1100 MUS+RAP.NWFP.(BUllOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .20 .20 .25 .25 .25
1101 MUS+RAP.PMW.(BULlOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .20 .20 .25 .20 .20
1102 MUS+RAP.PCW.(BULlOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .20 .15 .30 .20 .20
1103 MUS+RAP.PSW.(BUlLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .20 .20 .20 .20 .20 .20
1104 MUS+RAP.PRW.(BUllOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .20 .20 .20 .20 .20
1105 MUS+RAP.SCWN.(BUllOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .21 .21 .21 .21 .21 .21
1106 MUS+RAP.SRWN.(BULlOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .20 .20 .20 .20 .20 .20
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 24
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

1107 MUS+RAP.SRWS.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .20 .20 .20 .20 .20 .20

1108 MUS+RAP.SCWS.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD 11 11 .27 .21 .21 .27
1109
1110 SC-GUR.NWFP.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD 19 19 .28 .37 .37 .37 .28 .47 .47 .37 .19 .28
1111 SC-GUR. PMW. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD 14 .09 .23 .33 .33 .28 .23 .37 .37 .19 .09 19
1112 SC-GUR. PCW. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .09 14 .23 .37 .37 .33 .37 .47 .47 .28 .37 19
1113 SC-GUR. PSW. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .09 .09 .23 .33 .33 .33 .37 .47 .47 .23 .23 .09
1114 SC-GUR. PRW. (BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD 14 .19 .28 .37 .37 .28 .33 .37 .37 .28 .19 .19
1115 SC-GUR. SCWN.(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .25 .30 .40 .40 .40 .55 .60 .60 .50 .40 .30 .25
1116 SC-GUR. SRWN.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .23 .28 .37 .37 .37 .51 .56 .56 .47 .37 .28 .23
1117 SC-GUR. SCWS.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .25 .35 .40 .40 .40 .55 .65 .65 .60 .50 .35 .25
1118 SC-GUR. SRWS.(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .25 .35 .40 .40 .50 .55 .65 .65 .60 .50 .40 .20
1119
1120 SC-MILL.NWFP.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .19 19 .28 .33 .33 .37 .37 .47 .47 .37 .28 19
1121 SC-MILL.PMW.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .14 .09 .23 .33 .33 .28 .23 .37 .37 .19 .09 .19
1122 SC-MILL.PCW. (eULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .09 .14 .23 .37 .37 .33 .37 .47 .47 .28 .37 19
1123 SC-MILL.PSW. (BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .09 .09 .23 .33 .33 .33 .37 .47 .47 .23 .23 .09
1124 SC-MILL.PRW. (BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .14 19 .28 .37 .37 .28 .33 .37 .37 .28 .19 .19
1125 SC-MILL.SCWN.(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .25 .30 .40 .40 .40 .55 .60 .60 .50 .40 .30 .25
1126 SC-MILL.SRWN.(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .23 .28 .37 .37 .37 .51 .56 .56 .47 .37 .28 .23
1127 SC-MILL.SCWS.(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .25 .35 .40 .40 .40 .55 .65 .65 .60 .50 .35 .25
1128 SC-MILL.SRWS.(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .25 .35 .40 .40 .50 .55 .65 .65 .60 .50 .40 .20
1129
1130 KHA-FOD.SRWS.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).LA-PLANT.STANDARD .21 .27 .32 .32 . 16 . 11
1131 KHA-FOD.NWFP.(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .05 . 15 .20 .20 .25 .25 .05
1132 KHA-FOD.PMW. (BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .05 .05 .20 .20 .30 .25 .15
....
VI
1133 KHA-FOD.PCW. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .10 . 15 .25 .30 .40 .30 .20 0'1
1134 KHA-FOD.PSW. (BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD 15 .25 .35 .35 .30 .25 .20
1135 KHA-FOD.PRW. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .10 .20 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30
1136 KHA-FOD.SCWN.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD 11 . 11 .21 .21 .32 .32 .21 . 11
1137 KHA-FOD.SCWS.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD 11 .21 .21 .27 .32 .32 .16 .05
1138 KHA-FOD.SRWN.(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .21 .32 .27 .27 .32 .21 .32
1139 KHA-FOD.SRWS.(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .21 .32 .27 .27 .32 .21 .32
1140
1141 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. HEAVY .28 .25 .25
1142 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. HEAVY .22 .28 .16
1143 WHEAT. (pCW.PSW.SRWN).BULLOCK.LA-PLANT.HEAVY .28 .28 19
1144 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. HEAVY .28 .09 .28
1145 WHEAT.(SCWN.SRWS).BULLOCK.LA-PLANT.HEAVY .30 .30 .20
1146 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. HEAVY .30 .30 .35
1147 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. JANUARY .28 .25 .25
1148 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. JANUARY .28 .28 .16
1149 WHEAT. (pCW,PSW,SRWN).BULLOCK.LA-PLANT.JANUARY .28 .28 .19
1150 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. JANUARY .28 .09 .28
1151 WHEAT. (SCWN,SRWS).BULLOCK.LA-PLANT.JANUARY .30 .30 .20
1152 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. -LA-PLANT. JANUARY .30 .30 .35
1153 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. LA PLANT. LIGHT .22 .35 .25 .25
1154 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. LIGHT .22 .28 .28 .16
1155 WHEA T . (PCW . PSW) . BULLOCK.LA-PLANT.LIGHT .23 .37 .28 .19
1156 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. LIGHT .19 .33 .28 19
1157 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. LIGHT .23 .37 .09 .28
1158 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. LIGHT .20 .40 .30 .20
1159 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. LIGHT .25 .40 .30 .35
1160 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. LIGHT .20 .35 .30 .20
1161 WHEAT. NWFP.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD .22 .35 .41 .25 .25
1162 WHEAT. PMW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD .22 .28 .35 .28 16
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 25
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

1163 WHEAT. PCW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD .23 .37 .47 .28 .19
1164 WHEAT. PSW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD .23 .37 .42 .28 19
1165 WHEAT. PRW. BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD .23 .37 .47 .09 .28
1166 WHEAT. SCWN.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD .20 .40 .40 .30 .20
1167 WHEAT. SRWN.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD . 19 .33 .37 .28 .19
1168 WHEAT. SCWS.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD .25 .40 .50 .30 .35
1169 WHEAT. SRWS.BULLOCK. LA-PLANT. STANDARD .20 .35 .40 .30 .20
1170
1171 WHEAT.NWFP.BULLOCK.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).HEAVY .28 .19 16 16
1172 WHEAT.PMW. BULLOCK.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).HEAVY .22 19 16 .16
1173 WHEAT.PCW. BULLOCK.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).HEAVY .28 .19 .19 .19
1174 WHEAT.PSW. BULLOCK.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).HEAVY .28 19 19 .19
1175 WHEAT.PRW. BULLOCK.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).HEAVY .28 .19 .19
1176 WHEAT.SCWN.BULLOCK.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).HEAVY .30 .20 .20 .20
1177 WHEAT.SRWN.BULLOCK.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).HEAVY .28 19 19 .19
1178 WHEAT.SCWS.BULLOCK.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).HEAVY .30 .20 .30 .25
1179 WHEAT.SRWS.BULLOCK.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).HEAVY .30 .20 .20 .20
1180 WHEAT.NWFP.BULLOCK.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).uANUARY .28 19 16 .16
1181 WHEAT.PMW. BULLOCK.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).uANUARY .28 19 16 16
1182 WHEAT.PCW. BULLOCK.(QK-HARV,STANOARD).uANUARY .28 .19 19 .19
1183 WHEAT.PSW. BULLOCK.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).uANUARY .28 19 .19 19
1184 WHEAT.PRW. BULLOCK.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).uANUARY .28 .19 19
1185 WHEAT.SCWN.BULLOCK.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).uANUARY .30 .20 .20 .20
1186 WHEAT.SRWN.BULLOCK.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).uANUARY .28 19 19 .19
I-'
1187 WHEAT.SCWS.BULLDCK.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).uANUARY .30 .20 .30 .25 <U1
1188 WHEAT.SRWS.BULLOCK.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).uANUARY .30 .20 .20 .20 -...I
1189 WHEAT.NWFP.BULLOCK.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).LIGHT .22 .35 19 .16 16
1190 WHEAT.PMW. BULLOCK.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).LIGHT .22 .28 .19 .16 .16
1191 WHEAT.PCW. BULLOCK.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).LIGHT .23 .37 .19 .19 .19
1192 WHEAT.PSW. BULLDCK.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).LIGHT .23 .37 19 .19 19
1193 WHEAT.PRW. BULLOCK.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).LIGHT .23 .37 .19 .19
1194 WHEAT.SCWN.BULLOCK.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).LIGHT .20 .40 .20 .20 .20
1195 WHEAT.SRWN.BULLOCK.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).LIGHT .19 .33 19 .19 19
1196 WHEAT.SCWS.BULLOCK.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).LIGHT .25 .40 .20 .30 .25
1197 WHEAT.SRWS.BULLOCK.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).LIGHT .20 .35 .20 .20 .20
1198 WHEAT.NWFP.BULLOCK.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).STANDARD .22 .35 .41 19 .16 16
1199 WHEAT.PMW. BULLOCK.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).STANDARD .22 .28 .35 19 .16 16
1200 WHEAT.PCW. BULLOCK.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).STANOARD .23 .37 .47 .19 .19 19
1201 WHEAT.PSW. BULLOCK.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).STANDARD .23 .37 .42 19 .19 19
1202 WHEAT.PRW. BULLOCK (QK-HARV.STANDARD).STANDARD .23 .37 .47 .19 .19
1203 WHEAT.SCWN.BULLOCK.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).STANDARD .20 .40 .40 .20 .20 .20
1204 WHEAT.SRWN.BULLOCK.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).STANDARD .19 .33 .37 19 19 .19
1205 WHEAT.SCWS.BULLOCK.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).STANDARD .25 .40 .50 .20 .30 .25
1206 WHEAT.SRWS.BULLOCK.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).STANDARD .20 .35 _40 .20 .20 .20
1207
1208 WHEAT.NWFP.SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).HEAVY .28 .19 16 .16
1209 WHEAT.PMW. SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).HEAVY .22 19 .16 .16
1210 WHEAT.PCW. SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).HEAVY .28 .28 19
1211 WHEAT.PSW. SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).HEAVY .28 .19 .19 .19
1212 WHEAT.PRW. SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).HEAVY .28 .19 .19
1213 WHEAT.SRWN.SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).HEAVY .28 .28 .19
1214 WHEAT.SRWS.SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).HEAVY .30 .30 .30
1215 WHEAT.NWFP.SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).uANUARY .28 .19 .16 .16
1216 WHEAT.PMW. SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).uANUARY .28 .19 .16 16
1217 WHEAT.PCW. SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).uANUARY .28 .28 .19
1218 WHEAT.PSW. SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).uANUARY .28 .19 19 .19
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 26
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

1219 WHEAT.PRW. SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).JANUARY .28 19 19

1220 WHEAT.SRWN.SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).JANUARY .28 .28 .19
1221 WHEAT.SRWS.SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).JANUARY .30 .30 .30
1222 WHEAT.NWFP.SEMI-MECH. (QK-HARV,STANDARD). LIGHT .22 .35 . 19 16 .16
1223 WHEAT.PMW. SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).LIGHT .22 .28 .19 .16 .16
1224 WHEAT.PCW. SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).LIGHT .23 .37 .28 .19
1225 WHEAT.PSW. SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).LIGHT .23 .37 . 19 19 .19
1226 WHEAT.PRW. SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).LIGHT .23 .37 19 19
1227 WHEAT.SRWN.SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).LIGHT .19 .33 .28 .19
1228 WHEAT.SRWS.SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).LIGHT .20 .35 .30 .30
1229 WHEAT.NWFP.SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).STANDARD .22 .35 .41 .19 16 16
1230 WHEAT.PMW. SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).STANDARD .22 28 .35 .19 .16 .16
1231 WHEAT.PCW. SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).STANDARD .23 .37 .47 .28 .19
1232 WHEAT.PSW. SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).STANDARD .23 .37 .42 .19 .19 .19
1233 WHEAT.PRW. SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV.STANDARD).STANDARD .23 .37 .47 19 19
1234
1235 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY .30 .30 .20
1236 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY .30 .35 .30
1237 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY .30 .30 .20
1238 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY .30 .35 .30
1239 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT .20 .40 .30 .20
1240 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT .25 .40 .35 .30
1241 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD .20 .40 .40 .30 .20
1242 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD .19 .33 .37 .28 .19 I-'
1243 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD .25 .40 .50 .35 .30 VI
1244 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD .20 .35 .40 .30 .30 OJ
1245 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. HEAVY .30 .30 .25
1246 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. HEAVY .30 .40 .30
1247 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. JANUARY .30 .30 .25
1248 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. JANUARY .30 .40 .30
1249 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT .25 .40 .30 .25
1250 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. LIGHT .30 .40 .30 .30
1251 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD .20 .40 .50 .30 .20
1252 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD . 19 .33 .47 .28 .19
1253 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD .25 .45 .55 .30 .25
1254 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD .20 .40 .55 .20 .20
1255
1256 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY .28 .25 .25
1257 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY .22 .23 .23
1258 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY .28 .23 .23
1259 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY .28 .28 .19
1260 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY .28 .09 .28
1261 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY .30 .30 .25
1262 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY .28 .28 .19
1263 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY .30 .35 .30
1264 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. HEAVY .30 .20 .30
1265 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY .28 .25 .25
1266 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY .28 .23 23
1267 WHEAT. PC'oII. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY .28 .23 .23
1268 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY .28 .28 .19
1269 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY .28 .09 .28
1270 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY .30 .30 .25
1271 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY .28 .28 .19
1272 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY .30 .35 .30
1273 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. JANUARY .30 .20 .30
1274 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT .22 .35 .25 .25
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 27
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

1275 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT .22 .28 .23 .23

1276 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT .23 .37 .23 .23
1277 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT .23 .37 .28 .19
1278 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT .23 .37 .09 .28
1279 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT .20 .40 .30 .25
1280 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT .19 .33 .28 .19
1281 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT .25 .40 .35 .30
1282 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. LIGHT .20 .35 .20 .30
1283 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD .22 .35 .41 .25 .25
1284 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD .22 .28 .35 .23 .23
1285 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD .23 .37 .47 .23 .23
1286 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD .23 .37 .42 .28 .19
1287 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD .23 .37 .47 .09 .28
1288 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD .20 .40 .40 .30 .25
1289 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD .19 .33 .37 .28 .19
1290 WHEAT. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD .25 .40 .50 .35 .30
1291 WHEAT. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT. STANDARD .20 .35 .40 .20 .30
1292
1293 ORCHARD. NWFP.(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .08 .10 .19 .33 .46 .50 .55 .58 .49 .37 .19 .09
1294 ORCHARD. PMW. (BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .10 13 .23 .39 .53 .56 .60 .60 .59 .45 .23 11
1295 ORCHARD. PCW. (BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD 11 14 .30 .44 .54 .59 .57 .61 .58 .47 .23 12
1296 ORCHARD. PSW. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .08 .12 .24 .40 .49 .49 .46 .50 .51 .40 .18 10
1297 ORCHARD. PRW. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .08 12 .24 .40 .47 .47 .46 .50 .50 .39 .18 .10
1298 ORCHARD. SCWN.(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD 17 .17 .32 .45 .52 .54 .56 .60 .60 .45 .26 .14
1299 ORCHARD. SCWS.(BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD 18 .20 .38 .54 .61 .56 .56 .61 .62 .56 .32 .20 I-'
ORCHARD. VI
1300 SRWN.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD .15 16 .32 .45 .54 .52 .54 .59 .57 .47 .26 15 \0
1301 ORCHARD. SRWS (BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANOARD 19 .21 .39 .57 .61 .54 .55 .59 .63 .58 .33 .21
1302
1303 POTATOES. (SCWN,SCWS,SRWN.SRWS).
1304 SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. STANDARD .25 .667 .5 .25
1305 POTATOES. (NWFP.PMW.PCW.PSW,PRW).SEMI-MECH.
1306 STANDARD. STANDARD .25 .25 .5 .5
1307 ONIONS. (NWFP,PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW).SEMI-MECH.
1308 STANDARD. STANDARD .25 .25 .5 .5 .25
1309 ONIONS. (SCWN.SCWS,SRWN,SRWS).SEMI-MECH.
1310 STANDARD. STANDARD .25 .25 .25 .5 .5
1311 CHILLI. (NWFP.PMW.PSW,PCW,PRW).SEMI-MECH.
1312 STANDARD. STANDARD .167 .25 667 .667 .5 .5 .333 .333 .167
1313 CHILLI. (SCWN,SCWS,SRWN,SRWS).SEMI-MECH.
1314 STANDARD. STANDARD .5 .667 .667 .667 .25
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 28
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

1316 TABLE TRACTOR(C.Z,T.S,W,M) TRACTOR REQUIREMENTS (TRACTOR HOURS PER ACRE)

1317
1318 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
1319 BASMATI.PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 2.70 1. 70 1.50 0.50
1320 BASMATI.PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 2.70 1. 70 1.50 0.50
1321 BASMATI.PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.30 1. 80 1.50 0.50
1322 BASMATI.PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.10 2.00 1. 50 0.50
1323 RAB-FOD.SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.HEAVY 1.00 2.80
1324 RAB-FOD.SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.HEAVY 1. 50 2.50
1325 RAB-FOD.SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.LIGHT 1.00 2.80
1326 RAB-FOD.SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.LIGHT 1. 50 2.50
1327 RAB-FOD.NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1.50 1.50 1. 50 1. 50 1. 50 2.05 1.62 1.50 1. 50
1328 RAB-FOD.PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1.50 1. 50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.63 0.78 1.50
1329 RAB-FOD.PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.26 2.01 2.29 1.50
1330 RAB-FOD.PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.00 3.00 3.00 1. 50 1.50 1. 91 1. 23 1.50
1331 RAB-FOD.PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.50 1.50 1.49 1.05 1.57
1332 RAB-FOD.SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1.20 2.60
1333 RAB-FOD.SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1.00 2.80
1334 RAB-FOD.SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1. 50 2.40
1335 RAB-FOD.SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1. 50 2.50
1336 COTTON. PCW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.STANDARD 4.70 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1337 COTTON. PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.06 0.64 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1338 COTTON. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 2.49 2.22 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1339 COTTON. PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1. 66 1. 98 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1340 COTTON. PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1.45 1. 84 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1341 COTTON. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 12.10 1.00 1.00 2.00 I-'
0\
1342 COTTON. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 12.00 1.00 2.00 0
1343 COTTON. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 12.40 1.00 2.00
1344 GRAM. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.75 1. 37 2.00
1345 GRAM. PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.75 1. 27 0.78 0.90 2.50
1346 GRAM. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.75 1. 30 0.79
1347 GRAM. PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.75 1. 25 0.70
1348 GRAM. PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.75 1. 14 0.68
1349 GRAM. (SCWN,SCWS).SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.50 0.81 1. 29
1350 GRAM. (SRWN,SRWS).SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARO 3.80 0.96 1.39
1351
1352 IRRI. PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 2.60 2.20 1.00 0.50
1353 IRRI. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 2.60 2.20 1.00 0.50
1354 IRRI. PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 2.30 1.90 1.00 0.50
1355 IRRI. PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 4.90 1.50 1.00 o 50
1356 IRRI SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1. 70 2.30 1.00 0.50
1357 IRRI. SRWN.SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. STANDARD 4.30 1.00
1358 IRRI. SCWS. SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. STANDARD 2.10 2.30 3.50 1.00 0.50
1359 IRRI. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 4 20 2.50 1.00
1360
1361 MAIZE. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 5.40 2.50
1362 MAIZE. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1.77 1. 58 2.50
1363 MAIZE PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1.68 1.40 2.50
1364 MAIZE. PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1. 68 1.40 2.50
1365 MAIZE. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 2.60 4.30
1366 MAIZE. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 2.70 4.50
1367
1368 MUS+RAP.NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1. 37 0.75 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1369 MUS+RAP.PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.47 1.00 1.00
1370 MUS+RAP.PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 30 1. 26 1.00
1371 MUS+RAP.PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 25 1. 11 1.00 1.00
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 29
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

1372 MUS+RAP.PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1.00 1.00 1.82 1.00 1.00 1.00

1373 MUS+RAP.SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.80 1.90 0.50 0.50
1374 MUS+RAP.SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.40 1.80 0.50 0.50
1375 MUS+RAP.SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.40 1. 80 0.50 0.50
1376 MUS+RAP.SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.40 1.70 0.50 0.50
1317
1378 SC-GUR. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 2.50 0.37 1. 25 0.98
1379 SC-GUR.(PMW.PCW.PSW,PRW).SEMI-MECH.
1380 STANDARD. STANDARD 2.41 0.62 0.72 0.25
1381 SC-GUR. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1. 70 1.30 2 10
1382 SC-GUR. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1.80 1.20 2.10
1383 SC-GUR. SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1.90 1. 30 2.40
1384 SC-GUR. SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 2.00 1.50 2.30
1385 SC-MILL.NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 13.00 13.00 10.00 7.50 6.00 5.70 12.00 13.00
1386 SC-MILL.(PMW.PCW.PSW). SEMI-MECH.
1387 STANDARD. STANDARD 6.40 6.60 5.22 4.50 4.00 5.75 5.75
1388 SC-MILL.PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 6.50 7.00 6.22 4.50 3.00 5.70 5.75
1389 SC-MILL.SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANQARD.STANDARD 1.10 1.00 2.00
1390 SC-MILL.SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1. 10 1.00 2.00
1391 SC-MILL.SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 0.40 1.50 2.00
1392 SC-MILL.SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 0.50 1. 70 1.80
1393 KHA-FOD.SRWS.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.STANDARD 1. 20 0.50 0.50 0.90 0.50 0.50
1394 KHA-FOD.NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.00 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50
1395 KHA-FOD.PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.50 0.50 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50
1396 KHA-FOD.PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 2.50 0.50 1.80 1.00 2.20 1. 50 1.00 0.50 .....
1397 KHA-FOD.PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 2.00 0.50 1. 50 1.00 2.00 0\
1. 20 0.80 0.50 .....
1398 KHA-FOD.PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.00 0.80 1.50 1. 20 2.20 1.50 1.00 0.50
1399 KHA-FDD.SCWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1.10 0.50 0.90 0.50 0.50 0.90 0.50 0.50
1400 KHA-FOD.SCWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1. 20 0.50 0.90 0.50 0.50 0.90 0.50 0.50
1401 KHA-FOD.SRWN.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1. 30 0.50 0.90 0.50 0.50 0.80 0.50 0.50
1402 KHA-FOD.SRWS.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1.30 0.50 0.90 0.50 0.50 0.80 0.50 0.50
1403 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.HEAVY 0.40 0.40 8.60
1404
1405 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.HEAVY 0.40 0.50 2.30 3.00
1406 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.HEAVY 0.40 0.40 4.00 3.60
1407 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.HEAVY 0.80 0.80 3.10
1408 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.HEAVY 3.10 3.30
1409 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.HEAVY 2.90 3.00
1410 WHEAT. (SCWS.SRWS).SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.
1411 (HEAVY.JANUARY,LIGHT,STANDARD) 3.20 4.20
1412 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.JANUARY 0.40 0.40 8.60
1413 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.JANUARY 0.40 0.50 2.30 3.00
1414 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.JANUARY 0.40 0.40 4.00 3.60
1415 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.JANUARY 0.80 0.80 3.10
1416 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.JANUARY 3.10 3.30
1417 WHEAT. SRWN. SEMI-MECH. LA-PLANT. JANUARY 2.90 3.00
1418 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.LIGHT 0.50 0.60 8.60
1419 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.LIGHT 0.60 0.60 2.30 3.00
1420 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.LIGHT 0.50 0.60 4.00 3.60
1421 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.LIGHT 1.10 1. 10 3.10
1422 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.LIGHT 3.10 3.30
1423 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.LIGHT 2.90 3.00
1424 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.STANDARD 0.60 0.70 8.60
1425 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.STANDARD 0.70 0.70 2.30 3.00
1426 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.STANDARD 0.60 0.70 4.00 3.60
1427 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.STANDARD 1.30 1.30 3.10
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 30
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

1428 WHEAT. SCWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.STANDARD 3.10 3.30

1429 WHEAT. SRWN.SEMI-MECH.LA-PLANT.STANDARD 2.90 3.00
1430
1431 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 1.00 4.10 4.50
1432 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 1.00 2.30 3.00
1433 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 1.00 7.60
1434 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 0.90 3.40 3.00
1435 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. HEAVY 1.00 3.10
1436 WHEAT.SCWN.SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).
1437 (HEAVY,JANUARY,LIGHT,STANDARD) 6.40
1438 WHEAT.SRWN.SEMI-MECH.(QK-HARV,STANDARD).
1439 (HEAVY,JANUARY.LIGHT,STANDARD) 5.9
1440 WHEAT. (SCWS,SRWS).SEMI-MECH.
1441 (QK-HARV.STANDARD).
1442 (HEAVY. JANUARY ,LIGHT,STANDARD) 7.40
1443 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 1.00 4.10 4.50
1444 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 1.00 2.30 3.00
1445 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 1.00 7.60
1446 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 0.90 3.40 3.00
1447 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. JANUARY 1.00 3.10
1448 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 1.30 4.10 4.50
1449 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 1.40 2.30 3.00
1450 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 1.30 7.60
1451 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 1.20 3.40 3.00
1452 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. LIGHT 1.30 3.10 ......
0\
1453 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 1.50 4.10 4.50 N
1454 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 1.60 2.30 3.00
1455 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 1. 50 7.60
1456 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 1.40 3.40 3.00
1457 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.QK-HARV. STANDARD 1. 50 3.10
1458 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.HEAVY 0.50 0.50 4.10 4.50
1459 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.HEAVY 0.50 0.50 2.30 3.00
1460 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.HEAVY 0.50 0.50 7.60
1461 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.HEAVY 0.40 0.50 3.40 3.00
1462 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.HEAVY 0.50 0.50 3.10
1463 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.JANUARY 0.50 0.50 4.10 4.50
1464 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.JANUARY 0.50 0.50 2.30 3.00
1465 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.JANUARY 0.50 0.50 7.60
1466 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.JANUARY 0.40 0.50 3.40 3.00
1467 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.JANUARY 0.50 0.50 3.10
1468 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. LIGHT 0.60 0.70 4.10 4.50
1469 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.LIGHT 0.70 0.70 2.30 3.00
1470 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.LIGHT 0.60 0.70 7.60
1471 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.LIGHT 0.60 0.60 3.40 3.00
1472 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.LIGHT 0.60 0.70 3.10
1473 WHEAT. NWFP.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 0.70 0.80 4.10 4.50
1474 WHEAT. PMW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 0.80 0.80 2.30 3.00
1475 WHEAT. PCW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 0.70 0.80 7.60
1476 WHEAT. PSW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 0.70 0.70 3.40 3.00
1477 WHEAT. PRW. SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 0.70 0.80 3.10
1478 ORCHARD. (NWFP,PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW).SEMI-MECH.
1479 STANDARD. STANDARD .1 .2 1 .1 1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .2 .3
1480 ORCHARD. (SCWN,SCWS,SRWN,SRWS).SEMI-MECH.
1481 STANDARD.STANDARD .1 .3 .1 1 .1 .2 .1 .1 .1 .1 .3
1482 POTATOES. (SCWN,SCWS,SRWN,SRWS).
1483 SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. STANDARD 2. 2.
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 31
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

1484 POTATOES. (NWFP.PMW.PCW,PSW.PRW).SEMI-MECH.

1485 STANDARD. STANDARD 2. 2.
1486 ONIONS. (NWFP.PMW.PCW.PSW.PRW).SEMI-MECH.
1487 STANDARD. STANDARD 4.
1488 ONIONS. (SCWN.SCWS.SRWN.SRWS). SEMI-MECH.
1489 STANDARD. STANDARD 4.
1490 CHILLI.(NWFP,PMW,PCW.PSW,PRW).SEMI-MECH.
1491 STANDARD. STANDARD 1.
1492 CHILLI.(SCWN,SCWS,SRWN,SRWS). SEMI-MECH.
1493 STANDARD STANDARD 1.

I-'
0\
W
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 32
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

1495 TABLE SYLDS(C,Z,T,S,W,CI) STRAW YIELD AND SEED DATA

1496 STRAW-YLD SEED
1497 * (PROPORTI ON (KG)
1498 * BASMATI.(PMW,PCW,PRW).(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH). OF YIELD)
1499
1500 STANDARD. STANDARD 2.33 6.4
1501 BASMATI.PSW. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).
1502 STANDARD. STANDARD 2.12 6.4
1503
1504 RAB-FOD.(SRWN,SRWS).(BULLDCK,SEMI-MECH).
1505 STANDARD. (LIGHT,HEAVY) 6.0
1506 RAB-FOD.(NWFP,PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW).(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).
1507 STANDARD. STANDARD 2.0
1508 RAB-FOD.(SCWN,SRWN,SCWS,SRWS).(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).
1509 STANDARD. STANDARD 6.0
1510
1511 COTTON. PCW. BULLOCK. EL-PLANT. STANDARD 9.
1512 COTTON. PCW. SEMI-MECH. LA-PLANT. STANDARD 9.
1513 COTTON. (PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW,SCWN,SCWS,SRWN,SRWS).
1514 (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 9.
1515
1516 GRAM. NWFP.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 1.70 10.
1517 GRAM. (PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW).
1518 (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 1.52 14.
1519 GRAM. (SCWN,SCWS).(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH). ....
0\
1520 STANDARD. STANDARD 1.50 12.8 ~

1521 GRAM. (SRWN,SRWS).(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).

1522 STANDARD. STANDARD 2.00 12.0
1523
1524 IRRI. (PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW).(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).
1525 STANDARD.STANDARD 1.80 7.1
1526 IRRI. SCWN.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 1.34 4.5
1527 IRRI. (SRWN,SCWS,SRWS).(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).
1528 STANDARD. STANDARD 1.32 4.5
1529
1530 MAIZE. NWFP.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 2.09 14.2
1531 MAIZE. PCW. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 3.00 6. 1
1532 MAIZE. (PSW, PRW). (BULLOCK, SEMI -MECH) .
1533 STANDARD. STANDARD 2.50 6. 1
1534 MAIZE. ( SCWN , SCWS ) .
1535 (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 2.80 8.1
1536
1537 MUS+RAP.NWFP.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 0.50 1.8
1538 MUS+RAP.(PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW,SCWN,SRWN,SRWS,SCWS).
1539 (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 0.65 2.4
1540
1541 SC-GUR. NWFP.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 1.54 3238
1542 SC-GUR. PMW. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 1.81 3238
1543 SC-GUR. PCW. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 1.66 3238
1544 SC-GUR. PSW. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 1.54 3238
1545 SC-GUR. PRW. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 2.17 3238
1546 SC-GUR. SCWN.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 1.81 3238
1547 SC-GUR. SRWN.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 3.08 3238
1548 SC-GUR. SCWS.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 2.17 3238
1549 SC-GUR. SRWS.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 2.05 3238
1550
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 33
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

1551 SC-MILL.NWFP.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 0.12 3238

1552 SC-MILL PMW. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD STANDARD 0.14 3238
1553 SC-MILL.PCW. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 0.13 3238
1554 SC-MILL.PSW. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 0.10 3238
1555 SC-MILL.PRW. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 0.17 3238
1556 SC-MILL.SCWN.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 0.14 3238
1557 SC-MILL.SRWN (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 0.25 3238
1558 SC-MILL.SCWS.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 0.17 3238
1559 SC-MILL.SRWS.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).ST~~DARD. STANDARD 0.16 3238
1560
1561 KHA-FOO.SRWS.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).LA-PLANT. STANDARD 5.7
1562 KHA-FOD.NWFP.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 20.2
1563 KHA-FOD.(PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW).
1564 (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 27.3
1565 KHA-FOD.(SCWN,SCWS,SRWN,SRWS).
1566 (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD. STANDARD 5.7
1567
1568 WHEAT.NWFP.(BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).
1569 (STANDARD,LA-PLANT,QK-HARV).
1570 (STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY,JANUARY) 1.3 40.1
1571 WHEAT.PMW. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).
1572 (STANDARD,LA-PLANT,QK-HARV).
1573 (STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY,JANUARY) 1.3 34.8
1574 WHEAT.(PCW,PSW). (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).
1575
1576
(STANDARD,LA-PLANT,OK-HARV).
(STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY,JANUARY) 1.5 34.8
....
(J'I
1II
1577 WHEAT.PRW. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).
1578 (STANDARD,LA-PLANT,OK-HARV).
1579 (STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY,JANUARY) 1.6 34.8
1580 WHEAT. (SCWN,SRWN,SCWS,SRWS). (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).
1581 (STANDARD,LA-PLANT,OK-HARV).
1582 (STANDARD,LIGHT,HEAVY,JANUARY) 1.5 49.8
1583
1584
1585 ORCHARD. (NWFP,PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW,SCWN,SCWS,SRWN,SRWS).
1586 (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).STANDARD.STANDARD
1587
1588 POTATOES. (SCWN,SCWS,SRWN,SRWS).
1589 SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. STANDARD 1200
1590 POTATOES. (NWFP,PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW).
1591 SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. STANDARD 600
1592
1593 ONIONS. (NWFP,PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW,SCWN,SCWS,SRWN,SRWS).
1594 SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. STANDARD 3.
1595
1596 CHILLI. (NWFP,PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW,SCWN,SCWS,SRWN,SRWS).
1597 SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 5.
INDUS BASIN MDDEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 34
CROP DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

1599 TABLE FERT(P2,C,Z) FERTILIZER APPLICATIONS (KG PER ACRE)

1600 NWFP PCW PMW PRill PSW SCWN SCWS SRWN SRWS
1601
1602 NITROGEN. BASMA TI 26.6 26.6 21.9 23.4
1603 NITROGEN.IRRI 39.4 39.4 23.3 26.8 68.6 61.5 48.9 41.7
1604 NITROGEN. COT TON 26.7 42.3 30.0 30.0 19.7 55.0 54.9 39.6 39.6
1605 NITROGEN.MAI ZE 27.0 27.1 27.1 23.6 19.5 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0
1606 NITROGEN.KHA-FOD 21.0 25.3 18.1 19.2 18.4 49.0 49.0 49.0 49.0
1607 NITROGEN. WHEAT 46.8 40.9 36.5 32.2 33.3 54.9 53.5 29.5 39.8
1608 NITROGEN.RAB-FOD 10.0 25.3 18.1 19.2 18.4 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0
1609 NITROGEN. SC-MILL 83.4 44.8 63.2 33.9 33.9 65.1 65.1 65.1 65.1
1610 NITROGEN. SC-GUR 24.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0
1611 NITROGEN. ONIONS 60.6 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 70.7 70.7 70.7 70.7
1612 NITROGEN. POTATOES 48.6 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5 56.7 56.7 56.7 56.7
1613 NITROGEN.MUS+RAP 33.6 30.8 30.8 30.8 30.8 45.4 45.4 45.4 45.4
1614 NITROGEN. CHI LLI 48.6 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5 56.7 56.7 56.7 56.7
1615 NITROGEN. ORCHARD 60.0 47.5 47.5 47.5 47.5 70.0 70.0 70,0 70,0
1616
1617 PHOSPHATE.BASMATI 13.3 13.3 11.4 10.6 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1618 PHOSPHATE,IRRI 8.0 8.0 6.8 6.4 15.7 16.6 13.5 12,5
1619 PHOSPHATE . COTTON 26.2 11.3 5.2 7.0 7.0 12.8 14.4 13.0 13.0
1620 PHOSPHATE ,MAIZE 17.6 8.8 6.9 8.6 8.6 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7
1621 PHOSPHATE KHA FOD 25.9 11.4 11.4 11.4 11.4 15.3 15.3 15.3 15 3
1622 PHOSPHATE.WHEAT 12.3 12.8 8.8 11.4 10.9 15.1 15. 1 11.8 17.3
1623 PHOSPHATE.RAB FOD 5.4 7.6 5.4 5.8 5.6 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 I-'
1624 PHOSPHATE.SC-MILL 46.8 14.0 19.8 10.6 10.6 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 0\
0\
1625 PHOSPHATE.SC-GUR 10.4 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7
1626 PHOSPHATE.ONIONS 26.2 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3
1627 PHOSPHATE.POTATOES 42.0 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 24.9 24 9 24.9 24.9
1628 PHOSPHATE.MUS+RAP 25.9 13.3 13.3 13.3 13.3 17.9 17.9 17.9 17.9
1629 PHOSPHATE. CHI LLI 26.2 11.6 11.6 11.6 11.6 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.5
1630 PHOSPHATE.ORCHARD 13.0 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7
1631
1632 PARAMETER FERTGR(C) FERTILIZER APPLICATION GROWTH RATE PERCENT
1633
1634 /(BASMATI , IRRI, COTTON, RAB-FOD
1635 GRAM MAIZE. MUS+RAP, KHA-FOD
1636 SC-GUR SC-MILL.WHEAT ORCHARD) 3.
1637 (POTATOES. ONIONS. CHI LLI ) 2.4/
1638
1639
1640 *&&Z ZONE4XXXXX(Z.C,P2) = FERT(P2.C,Z)
1641
1642
1643 FERT(P2,C,Z) = FERT(P2.C.Z)*SUM(IS$ISR(IS).
1644 (1+FERTGR(C)/1oo)**(ORD(IS)+1979-BASEVEAR
1645
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 35
CROP YIELDS GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

1647 PARAMETER
1648 NATYIELD(C) NATIONAL CROP YIELDS 1988 FOR STANDARD TECHNOLOGIES (KGS)
1649 / BASMATI 457
1650 IRRI 880
1651 COTTON 695
1652 RAB FOD 15000
1653 GRAM 183
1654 MAIZE 534
1655 MUS+RAP 307
1656 KHA-FOD 10000
1657 SC-GUR 1270
1658 SC-MILL 15870
1659 WHEAT 780
1660 ORCHARD 3400
1661 POTATOES 3980
1662 ONIONS 4615
1663 CHILLI 567 /
1664
1665
1666 TABLE YLDPRPV(C,PV) PROVINCE YIELDS PROPORTION OF NATIONAL 1987-88
1667 * NOTE : USED 3-YEAR AVERAGE FROM LATEST ASP
1668
1669 NWFP PUNJAB SIND
1670
1671 WHEAT 0.926 0.978 1.103 .....
1672 BASMA TI 0 1 0 0\
.......
1673 IRRI 0 0.859 1.001
1674 COTTON 0 1.153 0.861
1675 SC-MILL 1.090 0.919 1. 190
1676 SC-GUR 1.090 0.919 1.190
1677 MAIZE 1.006 1.029 0.408
1678 MUS+RAP 0.622 1.192 0.842
1679 GRAM 0.911 0.937 1.465
1680 RAB-FOD .400 1.000 1.000
1681 KHA-FOD .770 1.000 1.300
1682 ORCHARD .936 1.070 1
1683 POTATOES .973 .960 .873
1684 ONIONS 1.172 1.085 0.843
1685 CHI LLI 0.786 1.167 0.952
1686
1687
1688 TABLE YLDPRZS(C,Z) ZONES YIELDS AS PROPORTION OF PROVINCE-STANDARD TECHNOLOGIES
1689
1690 NWFP PCW PMW PRW PSW SCWN SCWS SRWN SRWS
1691 WHEAT 1 0.96 0.84 1.06 1.13 0.96 1.07 0.82 1.30
1692 BASMATI 1 .83 0.00 1.26 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1693 IRRI 1 0.83 0.00 1. 26 0.00 1.06 0.91 1. 10 0.90
1694 COTTON 1 1. 10 0.71 0.70 0.80 1.09 0.96 0.78 0.78
1695 SC-MILL 1 1.04 0.93 0.93 0.98 0.95 1. 10 0.64 0.87
1696 SC-GUR 1 1.04 0.93 0.93 0.98 0.95 1. 10 0.64 0.87
1697 MAIZE 1 1.03 0.76 1.08 0.97 1.07 1.06 0.87 1.00
1698 MUS+RAP 1 1.03 0.76 1.08 0.97 1.07 1.06 0.87 1.00
1699 GRAM 1 1.03 0.76 1.08 0.97 1.07 1.06 0.87 1.00
1700 RAB-FOD 1 1. 23 0.81 1.17 1. 23 1. 1 1. 1.
1701 KHA FOD 1 .83 0.54 0.82 0.82 1. 1 1 1.00
1702 ORCHARD 1 1. 1. 1 1.0 1 1 1. 1.
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 36
CROP YIELDS GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

1703 POTATOES 1.03 0.76 1.08 0.97 1.07 1.06 0.87 1.00
1704 ONIONS 1.03 0.76 1.08 0.97 1.07 1.06 0.87 1.00
1705 CHILLI 1.03 0.76 1.08 0.97 1.07 1.06 0.87 1.00
1706
1707 PARAMETER YLDPRZO(C,S,W) YIELDS AS PROPORTION OF STANDARD TECHNOLOGIES
1708 /
1709 RAB-FOD.STANDARD.HEAVY 0.70
1710 RAB-FOD.STANDARD.LIGHT 0.80
1711 KHA-FOD.LA-PLANT.STANDARD 1.05
1712
1713 WHEAT. QK-HARV .STANDARD 1.00
1714 WHEAT. LA-PLANT. (HEAVY,JANUARY) 0.57
1715 WHEAT. LA-PLANT.LIGHT 0.75
1716 WHEAT. LA-PLANT.STANDARD 0.88
1717 WHEAT. (QK-HARV,STANDARD).(HEAVY,JANUARY) 0.65
1718 WHEAT. (QK-HARV,STANDARD).LIGHT 0.85
1719 /
1720 TABLE GROWTHCY(C,Z) GROWTH RATE OF CROP YIELDS FROM 1988 BASE (PERCENT)
1721
1722 (NWFP,PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW,SCWN,SCWS,SRWN,SRWS)
1723 COTTON 5.00
1724 MAIZE 0.73
1725 SC-GUR 2.29
1726 SC-MILL 2.29
1727 WHEAT 0.41 .....
01
1728 ONIONS 1.66 <Xl
1729
1730 TABLE WEEDY(Z,SEA,C) WEED YIELDS BY CROP (TONNS PER ACER)
1731 BASMATI IRRI COTTON GRAM MUS+RAP MAIZE SC-GUR SC-MILL WHEAT ORCHARD
1732 (NWFP,PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW).RABI .3 .3 .3 .3 .4 .3
1733 (SCWN,SCWS,SRWN,SRWS). RABI .3 .3 .3 .3 .4 .3
1734 (NWFP,PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW).KHARIF
1735 (SCWN,SCWS,SRWN,SRWS). KHARIF
1736
1737 TABLE GRAZ(Z,SEA) GRAZING FROM SLACK LAND (TONNS PER ACRE )
1738 RABI KHARIF
1739 PRW .15 .5
1740 PMW .1 .2
1741 (PSW,PCW) .2 .3
1742 (SCWN,SCWS,SRWN,SRWS) .2 .5
1743
1744 PARAMETER
1745 YIELD(C,T,S,W,Z) YIELD BY ZONE CROP TECHNOLOGY IN METRIC TONNS
1746 GROWTHCYF(C,Z) GROWTH FACTOR FOR CROP YIELDS USING GROWTHCY ;
1747
1748 * GROWTHCY(C,Z)$(GROWTHCY(C,Z) GT 3) = 3.0 ;
1749 YIELD(C,T,"STANDARD","STANDARD",Z) = SUM(PV$PVZ(PV,Z),
1750 NATYIELD(C)/1000 *YLDPRPV(C,PV) *YLDPRZS(C,Z) );
1751
1752 YIELD(C,T,S,W,Z)$YLDPRZO(C,S,W) =
1753 YIELD(C,T,"STANDARD","STANDARD",Z)*YLDPRZO(C,S,W) ;
1754
1755 GROWTHCYF(C,Z) =SUM(IS$ISR(IS),
1756 (1+GROWTHCY(C,Z)/100)**(ORD(IS)+1979-BASEYEAR;
1757 YIELD(C,T,S,W,Z) = YIELD(C,T,S,W,Z) * GROWTHCYF(C,Z) ;
1758 DISPLAY BASEYEAR, GROWTHCYF, FERT ;
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 37
CROP YIELDS GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

1759 * DISPLAY YIELD;

I-'
0\
\0
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 o1/23/~O 16:27:23 PAGE 38
CROP YIELDS GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

* REPORT ON INPUT DATA

SET IC CROP INPUTS ILAND, LABOR, BULLOCK, WATER, TRACTOR I
PARAMETER REP1.REP2 ;
REP1(Z.C.T.S,W."LAND",M) LANO(C,Z,T,S,W,M)
REP1(Z.C,T.S,W,"BULLOCK",M) BULLOCK(C,Z,T,S.W,M)
REP1(Z.C.T.S,W,"LABOR",M) LABOR(C.Z,T,S,W,M)
REP1(Z.C.T,S,W."WATER",M) WATER(C,Z,T,S,W,M)
REP1(Z.C.T,S.W."TRACTOR",M) TRACTOR(C,Z,T,S,W,M)

REP1(Z.C,T,S.W,IC."TOTAL") SUM(M, REP1(Z,C,T,S,W,IC,M

REP2(Z.C,T,S.W,IC) REP1(Z,C,T,S,W.IC,"TOTAL")
REP2(Z,C,T,S.W,CI) sylds(C,Z,T,S,W,CI)
REP2(Z,C,T,S.W,p2)$tech(z.c,t,s,w) = fert(p2,c,z)
REP2(Z.C,T,S,W,"YIELD") = Yield(c,t,s,w,z)
OPTIONS REP1:2:4:1. REP2:2:4:1 display rep1, rep2

I-'
......
o
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 39
LIVESTOCK DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

1780 TABLE IOLIVE(A.Z.*) LIVESTOCK INPUT OUTPUT COEFFICIENTS BY ZONES

1781 * MEAT AND MILK YEILDS ARE OF 1985.
1782 TON DP LABOR COW-MILK BUFF-MILK MEAT FIX-COST
1783 * (METRIC TONS/ SEASON) MAN HRS LITERS KGS
1784 * PER MONTH ( PER YEAR -- ) -
1785 COW. NWFP .68 .061 25.1 359 13.4 15
1786 COW. PMW .68 .061 25.1 284 13.4 15
1787 COW. PCW .68 .061 25.1 303 13.4 15
1788 COW. PSW .68 .061 25.1 268 13.4 15
1789 COW. PRW .68 .061 25.1 332 13.4 15
1790 COW. seWN .68 .046 23.5 460 10.5 17
1791 eOW.SRWN .68 .083 23.5 383 15.4 17
1792 COW. sews .68 .046 23.5 350 10.5 17
1793 eOW.SRWS .68 .083 23.5 468 15.4 17
1794
1795 BULLOCK. (NWFP.PMW.PCW,PSW,PRW) .635 .058 15. 1 14.3 50
1796 BULLOCK. (seWN,SRWN,seWS,SRWS) .635 .058 14.8 14.1 50
1797
1798 BUFFALO.NWFP 1.04 .095 33.6 602 17.3 50
1799 BUFF ALa. PMW 1.04 .095 33.6 653 17.3 50
1800 BUFFALO. pew 1.04 .095 33.6 652 17.3 50
1801 BUFFALO.PSW 1.04 .095 33.6 643 17.3 50
1802 BUFFALO.PRW 1.04 .095 33.6 590 17.3 50
1803 BUFFALO.seWN 1.04 .073 31.4 946 16.2 50
1804 BUFFALO.SRWN 1.04 .128 31.4 750 22.5 50 I-'
1805
1806
BUFFALO.SCWS
BUFFALO. SRWS
1.04
1.04
.073
.128
31.4
31.4
773
1018
16.2
22.5
50 "I-'
50
1807
1808 TABLE SeONV(NT,SEA,C) TON AND DP CONVERSION FACTOR FROM CROP STRAW
1809
1810 BASMATI COTTON RAB-FOD GRAM IRRI KHA-FOD MAIZE MUS+RAP se-MILL SC-GUR WHEAT
1811 TDN.KHARIF .6 .14 .5 .6
1812 DP. KHARIF .1 .019 .005 .005
1813 TDN.RABI .5 .14 .5 .5 .17 .17
1814 DP. RABI .005 .025 .005 .1 .005 .005
1815 ,
1816 SCALARS REPCO REPRODUCTIVE COEFFICIENT / 2.5 /
1817 GR REOUIRED PROPORTION OF GREEN FODDER IN TOTAL FODDER / 0.3 /
1818 GROWTHO GROWTH RATE OF MILK AND MEAT YIELDS (PERCENT) / 2.5 /
1819 PARAMETERS BP(M) DRAFT POWER AVAILABLE PER BULLOCK(HOURS PER MONTH)
1820
1821 BP(M)=96; BP("MAY") 77; BP("JUN")-77;
1822 *&&Z ZONE2XXXXX(Z,A,SET1) IOLIVE(A,Z,SET1);
1823 IOLIVE(A,Z,O) = IOLIVE(A,Z,O) * SUM(IS$ISR(IS), (1+GROWTHO/100)**(ORD(IS)+1979 -BASEYEAR) )
1824 OPTIONS IOLIVE:3; DISPLAY rOLIVE;
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 40
CANAL AND AGROCLIMATIC ZONE DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

1826 SET CNL IRRIGATION CANALS IN THE INDUS RIVER IRRIGATION SVSTEM/
1827 01-UD UPPER DIPALPUR
1828 02-CBD CENTRAL.BARI DOAB CANAL
1829 03-RAV RAVA CANAL
1830 04-UC UPPER CHENAB CANAL
1831 OS-MR MARA LA RAVI CANAL
1832 06-SAD SADIQIA CANAL
1833 07-FOR FORDWAH CANAL
1834 08-PAK UPPER PAKPATTAN+U-BAHAWAL+QAIM+U-MAILSI CANAL
1835 09-LD LOWER DIPALPUR CANAL
1836 10-LBD LOWER BARI DOAB CANAL
1837 11-JHA JHANG CANAL (LCC)
1838 12-GUG GUGERA BRANCH CANAL (LCC)
1839 13-UJ UPPER JEHLUM CANAL
1840 14-LJ LOWER JEHLUM CANAL
1841 15-BAH BAHAWAL CANAL
1842 16-MAI LOWER MAILSI+ LOWER PAKPATTAN CANAL
1843 17-SID SIDHNAI CANAL
1844 18-HAV HAVELI CANAL
1845 i9-RAN RANGPUR CANAL
1846 20-PAN PANJNAD CANAL
1847 2i-ABB ABBASIA CANAL
1848 22-USW UPPER SWAT CANAL
1849 23-LSW LOWER SWAT CANAL
1850 24-WAR WARSAK CANAL I-'
--..J
1851 2S-KAB KABUL RIVER CANAL N
1852 26-THA THAL CANAL
1853 27-PAH PAHARPUR CANAL
1854 28-MUZ MUZFFGARH CANAL
1855 29-DGK DERA GHAZI KHAN CANAL
1856 3i-P+D PAT PLUS DESERT CANAL
1857 32-BEG BEGARI CANAL
1858 33-GHO GHOTKI CANAL
1859 34-NW NORTH WEST CANAL
1860 3S-RIC RICE CANAL
1861 36-DAD DADU CANAL
1862 37-KW KHAIRPUR WEST CANAL
1863 38-KE KHAIRPUR EAST CANAL
1864 39-ROH ROHRI CANAL
1865 41-NAR NARA CANAL
1866 42-KAL KALRI CANAL
1867 43-LCH LINED CHANNEL
1868 44-FUL FULELI CANAL
1869 45-PIN PINVARI CANAL/
1870 PVCNL(PV,CNL) PROVINCE TO CANALS MAP /
1871 NWFP. (22-USW, 23-LSW. 24-WAR. 25-KAB)
1872 PUNJAB. (Ol-UD, 02-CBD. 03-RAV. 04-UC. OS-MR, 06-SAD, 07-FOR,
1873 08-PAK.09-LD. 10-LBD. l1-JHA. 12-GUG, 13-UJ, i4-LJ.
1874 1S-BAH, 16-MAI, 17-SIO, 18-HAV. 19-RAN, 20-PAN. 21-ABB.
1875 26-THA. 27-PAH. 28-MUZ, 29-DGK)
1876 * SIND CANALS INCLUDING BALUCHISTAN
1877 SIND. (31-P+D, 32-BEG. 33-GHO. 34-NW, 35-RIC. 36-DAD
1878 37-KW, 38-KE. 39-ROH. 41-NAR, 42-KAL. 43-LCH
1879 44-FUL. 45-PIN ) /
1880 GWFG(CNL.SA,G) SUBAREA IDENTIFICATION BV THE GROUNDWATER QUALITY
1881
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 41
CANAL COMMAND DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

1883 TABLE COMDEF(IS.DC.CNL) CANAL COMMAND CHARACTERISTICS

1884 * CCA CULTURABLE COMMANDED AREA OF THE CANAL( MILLIONS OF ACRES)
1885 * CCAP CANAL CAPACITY AT THE CANAL HEAD(MILLIONS OF ACRE FEET)
1886 * CEFF CANAL EFFICIENCY FROM BARRAGE TO THE WATER COURSE HEAD
1887 * WCE-R WATER COURSE COMMAND EFFICINECY IN RABI SEASON
1888 * WCE-K WATER COURSE COMMAND EFFICINECY IN KHARIF SEASON
1889 * FLOE FIELD EFFICIENCY
1890 *
1891 * NOTE: CCAP FOR 05-MR, 24-WAR. 25-KAB ARE SET EQUAL TO POST TARBELA AVERAGE DIVERSION. ORIGINAL CAPACITIES WERE
1892 * .166 .044 .047
1893
1894 01-UD 02-CBD 03-RAY 04-UC 05-MR 06-SAD 07-FOR 08-PAK 09-LD 10-LBD ll-JHA
1895
1896 1980.CCA .36 .649 .424 1.017 .158 .969 .426 1.049 .615 1. 67 1. 168
1897 1980.CCAP .131 .163 11 .506 .282 .332 .204 .746 .244 .518 .41
1898 1980.CEFF .70 .80 .80 .76 .80 .72 .70 .61 .80 .72 .70
1899 1980.WCE-R .57 .57 .45 .57 .57 .51 .51 .57 .57 .57 .55
1900 1980.WCE-K .57 .57 .45 .57 .57 .51 .51 .57 .57 .57 .55
1901 1980. FLDE .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .80 .80 .90 .90 .90 .90
1902
1903 1988.CCA .36 .649 .424 1.017 .158 .969 .426 1.049 .615 1.67 1.168
1904 1988.CCAP .131 .163 11 .506 .282 .332 .204 .746 .244 .518 .41
1905 1988.CEFF .703 .811 .800 .760 .800 .728 .704 .621 .810 .722 .706
1906 1988.WCE-R .57 .573 .45 .57 .57 .522 .51 .575 .57 .57 .554
1907 1988.WCE-K .57 .573 .45 .57 .57 .522 .51 .575 .57 .57 .554 I-'
1908 1988.FLDE .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .80 .80 .90 .90 .90 .90 ......
U)
1909
1910 1993.CCA .36 .649 .424 1.017 .158 .969 .426 1.049 .615 1.67 1. 168
1911 1993.CCAP .131 .163 11 .506 .282 .332 .204 .746 .244 .518 .41
1912 1993.CEFF .705 .815 .808 .765 .800 .733 .708 .625 .810 .724 .713
1913 1993.WCE-R .58 .585 .46 .58 .58 .543 .53 .59 .58 .58 .564
1914 1993.WCE-K .58 .585 .46 .58 .58 .543 .53 .59 .58 .58 .564
1915 1993.FLDE .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .80 .80 .90 .90 .90 .90
1916
1917 2000.CCA .36 .649 .424 1.017 . 158 .969 .426 1.049 .615 1.67 1.168
1918 2000.CCAP . 131 .163 11 .506 .282 .332 .204 .746 .244 .518 .41
1919 2000.CEFF .705 .815 .808 .765 .800 .733 .708 .625 .810 .724 .713
1920 2000.WCE-R .59 .595 .47 .59 .59 .553 .54 .60 .59 .59 .574
1921 2000.WCE-K .59 .595 .47 .59 .59 .553 .54 .60 .59 .59 .574
1922 2000. FLOE .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .80 .80 .90 .90 .90 .90
1923
1924 + 12-GUG 13-UJ 14-LJ 15-BAH 16-MAI 17-S1O 18-HAV 19-RAN 20-PAN 21-ABB 22-USW
1925
1926 1980.CCA 1.866 .544 1.50 .605 .996 .869 . 179 .344 1.348 .154 .279
1927 1980.CCAP .433 .345 .464 .346 .362 .268 .068 .176 .671 .08 . 117
1928 1980.CEFF .74 .80 .64 .77 .77 .72 .77 .70 .72 .64 .75
1929 1980.WCE-R .55 .51 .51 .57 .57 .57 .57 .46 .57 .57 .52
1930 1980.WCE-K .55 .51 .51 .57 .57 .57 .57 .46 .57 .57 .52
1931 1980.FLDE .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .85 .80 .90 .90 .90
1932
1933 1988.CCA 1.866 .544 1.50 .605 .996 .869 .179 .344 1.348 .154 .279
1934 1988.CCAP .433 .345 .464 .346 .362 .268 .068 .176 .773 .08 . 117
1935 1988.CEFF .749 .800 .642 .782 .780 .721 .773 .700 .728 .640 .750
1936 1988.WCE-R .553 .51 .51 .57 .57 .57 .57 .46 .59 .59 .53
1937 1988.WCE-K .553 .51 .51 .57 .57 .57 .57 .46 .59 .59 .53
1938 1988.FLDE .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .85 .80 .90 .90 .90
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 42
CANAL COMMAND DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

1939
1940 1993.CCA 1.866 .544 1.500 .605 .996 .869 .179 .344 1.348 .154 .279
1941 1993.CCAP .433 .345 .464 .346 .362 .268 .068 .176 .773 .08 .132
1942 1993.CEFF .751 .808 .644 .783 .783 .727 .776 .706 .73 .641 .757
1943 1993.WCE-R .565 .52 .52 .58 .58 .58 .58 .48 .59 .59 .53
1944 1993.WCE-K .565 .52 .52 .58 .58 .58 .58 .48 .59 .59 .53
1945 1993.FLDE .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .85 .80 .90 .90 .90
1946
1947 2ooo.CCA 1.866 .544 1. 573 .605 .996 .869 .179 .344 1.348 .154 .326
1948 2ooo.CCAP .433 .345 .505 .346 .362 .268 .068 .176 .773 .08 .162
1949 2ooo.CEFF .751 .808 .644 .783 .783 .727 .776 .706 .73 .641 .757
1950 2ooo.WCE-R .575 .53 .53 .59 .59 .59 .59 .49 .60 .60 .53
1951 2ooo.WCE-K .575 .53 .53 .59 .59 .59 .59 .49 .60 .60 .53
1952 2ooo.FLDE .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .85 .80 .90 .90 .90
1953
1954 + 23-LSW 24-WAR 25-KAB 26-THA 27-PAH 28-MUZ 29-DGK 31-P+D 32-BEG 33-GHO 34-NW
1955
1956 1980.CCA .182 .119 .048 1.641 .104 .809 .909 1.075 1.002 .858 1.215
1957 1980.CCAP .06 .049 .047 .577 .037 .495 .529 .799 1. 155 .648 .566
1958 1980.CEFF .75 .80 .72 .65 .73 .70 .70 .83 .82 .76 .80
1959 1980.WCE-R .52 .52 .52 .48 .51 .46 .54 .55 .55 .45 .55
1960 1980.WCE-K 52 .52 .52 .48 .51 .46 .54 .60 .65 .45 .60
1961 1980.FLDE .90 .90 .90 .80 .85 .80 .85 85 .85 .85 .85
1962
1963 1988.CCA .182 .119 .048 1.641 .570 .809 .909 1.075 1.002 .858 1.215 I-'
1964 1988.CCAP .120 .049 .047 .577 330 .495 .529 .799 1. 155 .648 .566 -..J
~
1965 1988.CEFF .750 .800 .720 .663 .730 .720 .703 .830 .820 .763 .800
1966 1988.WCE-R .57 .57 .53 .48 .51 .46 .54 .55 .55 .45 .55
1967 1988.WCE-K .57 .57 .53 .48 .51 .46 .54 .60 .65 .45 .60
1968 1988.FLDE .90 .90 .90 .80 .85 .80 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85
1969
1970 1993.CCA .182 .119 .048 1.641 .570 .809 .909 1.075 1.002 .858 1.215
1971 1993.CCAP .120 .049 .047 .577 .330 .495 .529 .799 1.155 .648 .566
1972 1993.CEFF .751 .80 .723 .671 73 .725 .707 .831 .82 .765 .80
1973 1993.WCE-R .57 .60 .53 .49 .56 .47 .55 .56 .56 .47 .56
1974 1993.WCE-K .57 .60 .53 .49 .56 .47 .55 .61 .66 .47 .61
1975 1993.FLDE .90 .90 .90 .80 .85 .80 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85
1976
1977 2ooo.CCA .182 .119 .048 1.641 .570 .809 1.232 1.215 1.002 .858 1. 215
1978 2ooo.CCAP .120 .049 .047 .577 .330 .495 .731 .900 1. 155 .648 .566
1979 2000. CEFF .751 .80 .723 .671 .73 .725 .707 .831 .82 .765 .80
1980 2ooo.WCE-R .58 .61 .54 .50 .57 .48 .56 .594 .57 .48 .57
1981 2ooo.WCE-K .58 .61 .54 .50 .57 .48 .56 .65 .67 .48 .62
1982 2ooo.FLDE .90 .90 .90 .80 .85 .80 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85
1983
1984 + 35-RIC 36-DAD 37-KW 38-KE 39-ROH 41-NAR 42-KAL 43-LCH 44-FUL 45-PIN
1985
1986 1980.CCA .519 .584 .417 .373 2.561 2.176 .592 .502 .923 .758
1987 1980.CCAP .829 .319 . 157 .207 .981 .873 .546 .205 .894 .831
1988 1980.CEFF .85 .80 .74 .73 .80 .80 .80 .80 .80 .82
1989 1980.WCE-R 55 .55 .45 .45 .45 .45 .55 .55 .55 .55
1990 1980.WCE-K .75 .60 .45 .45 .45 .45 .60 .61 .65 .62
1991 1980.FLDE .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85
1992
1993 1988.eCA .519 .584 .417 .373 2.561 2.176 .592 .502 .923 .758
1994 1988.CCAP .829 .319 .157 .214 .981 .873 .546 .205 .894 .831
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 43
CANAL COMMAND DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

1995 1988.CEFF .850 .800 .748 .736 .807 .811 .800 .800 .800 .820
1996 1988.WCE-R .55 .55 .45 .455 .456 .45 .55 .55 .55 .55
1997 1988.WCE-K .75 .60 .45 .455 .456 .45 .60 .61 .65 .62
1998 1988.FLDE .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85
1999
2000 1993.CCA .519 .584 .411 .373 2.561 2.176 .592 .502 .923 .758
2001 1993.CCAP .829 .319 .157 .214 .981 1.041 .546 .205 .894 .831
2002 1993. CEFF .854 .804 .75 .738 .81 .816 80 .80 .80 .821
2003 1993.WCE-R .56 .56 .46 .465 .47 .469 .56 .56 .56 .56
2004 1993.WCE-K .74 .61 .46 .465 .47 .469 .61 .62 .65 .63
2005 1993.FLDE .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85
2006
2007 2ooo.CCA .519 .584 .417 .373 2.561 2.176 .592 .502 .923 .758
2008 2ooo.CCAP .829 .319 .157 .214 .981 1.041 .546 .205 .894 .831
2009 2ooo.CEFF .854 .804 .75 .738 811 .816 .80 .80 .80 .821
2010 2ooo.WCE-R .57 .57 .47 .475 .49 .479 .57 .57 .51 .57
2011 2ooo.WCE-K .75 .62 .47 .475 .49 .479 .61 .62 .65 .63
2012 2000. FLDE .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85
2013
2014 ** 1988 PARAMETERS ARE DERIVED CONSIDERING THE FOLLOWING PROJECTS;
2015 COMMAND WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT 50% COMPLETION
2016 * SCARP VI. SCARP MARDAN. KHAIRPUR TILE. FOURTH DRAINAGE, OFWMI AND II
2017 * IRRIGATION SYSTEM REHABLITATION PHASE I. CHASMA RIGHT BANK.
2018 *
2019
2020
....
-..J
1II
2021 TABLE SUBDEF(SA.CNL) SUB-AREA DEFINITION(PROPORTION OF CCA) BY CANALS
2022
2023 01-UD 02-CBD 03-RAY 04-UC 05-MR 06-SAD 01-FOR 08-PAK 09-LD 10-LBD ll-JHA
2024 S1 1 .5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .5 .32
2025 S2 .5 .5 .49
2026 S3 .19
2027
2028 + 12-GUG 13-UJ 14 -LJ 15-BAH 16-MAI 17-SID 18-HAV 19-RAN 20-PAN 21-ABB 22-USW
2029 S1 .26 1 .64 .8 .65 1 1 .1 1 1
2030 S2 .53 .36 .2 .35 .3
2031 S3 .21
2032
2033 + 23-LSW 24-WAR 25-KAB 26-THA 27-PAH 28-MUZ 29-DGK 31-P+D 32-BEG 33-GHO 34-NW
2034 Sl 1 1 1 .35 1 .25 1 1 .5 .5
2035 52 . 17 .75 .5 .5
2036 S3 .30
2037 S4 . 18
2038 + 35-RIC 36-DAD 37-KW 38-KE 39-ROH 41-NAR 42-KAL 43-LCH 44-FUL 45-PIN
2039 51 1 1 1 1 .39 .2 1 1 1 1
2040 S2 .20 .8
2041 53 . 16
2042 S4 .25
2043
INDU5 BA5IN MODEL REVI5ED (IBMR) FILENAME=W5I5D1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 44
CANAL COMMAND DATA GAM5 2.21 IBM CM5

2045 SET ZSA(Z,CNL.5A) CANAL-5UBAREA TO AGROCLIMATIC ZONE MAPPING /

2046
2047 NWFP. (22-U5W. 51. 23-L5W. 51, 24-WAR. 51, 25-KAB. 51)
2048 PMW. (26-THA. ( 5 1 .52, S3 S4 ) , 27-PAH. 51, 28-MUZ. s1)
2049 PCW. (01-UD. S 1, 02-CBD. S2, 06-5AD. S1. 07-FOR. S 1. OS-PAK. S1
2050 09-LD. 51, lO-LBD. (51 , S2) , 15-BAH. (S1,52), 16-MAI. (51 . S2) , 17-SID. S1
2051 19-RAN. S1, 20-PAN. (S 1 ,52) , 21-ABB. 51. 2S-MUZ. 52, 29-DGK. S1)
2052 PSW. (11-JHA. (52,53), 12-GUG. (52,53) , 13-UJ. 51, 14 LJ. (51 ,52) , 1S-HAV. 51)
2053 PRW. (02-CBD. S1, 03-RAY. 51, 04-UC. S 1, 05-MR. 51, 11-JHA. S 1, 12-GUG.51)
2054
2055 5CWN. (33-GHO. (S 1 , S2) , 37-KW. S1, 38-KE.51, 39-ROH. (51,52), 41-NAR sO
2056 5RWN. ( 3 1 - P+D . 5 1, 32-BEG. (51,52), 34-NW. 51, 35-RIC 51, 36-DAD. S1)
2057 SCW5. (39-ROH. (53.54 ), 41-NAR. 52 )
2058 5RW5. (42-KAL. 51, 43-LCH. 51, 44-FUL. 51, 45-PIN. 51 ) /
2059
2060 GWF(CNL,5A) SUBAREA5 WITH FRESH GROUND WATER /
2061 01-UD. 51, 02-CBD. ( 5 1 , S2 ) ,03 - RA Y. S 1 , 04-UC. 51, 05-MR. S1
2062 07 FOR. 51, OS-PAK. 51, 09-LD. S1. 10- LBO. (51 ,52) , 11-JHA. (51,52)
2063 12-GUG.(S1,52),13-UJ S1, 14-LJ. S1, 15-BAH. 51, 16-MAI. S1
2064 17 5ID. 51, 19-RAN. 51, 20-PAN. S1. 21-ABB. 51, 22-U5W. S1
2065 23 L5W. 51, 24-WAR. 51, 25-KAB. 51, 26-THA. (51,53), 27-PAH. 51
2066 2S-MUZ. 51, 29-DGK. 51, 31-P+D. S1, 32-BEG. 51, 33-GHO. S1
2067 37-KW. S1, 39-ROH. (51,53) /
2068
2069 I-'
2070 ......
2071 GWFG(CNL,SA,"5ALINE")SSUBDEF(SA,CNL) z YE5; 0\
2072 GWFG(CNL,5A,"SALINE")SGWF(CNL,5A) Z NO; GWFG(CNL,SA, "FRESH")$GWF(CNL,SA) YE5
2073 PARAMETER CAREA(CNL,*) CCA CLASSIFIED BY GROUNDWATER QUALITY FOR EACH CANAL
2074
2075
2076
2077
LOOP(I5R,
CAREA(CNL,G) = SUM(SASGWFG(CNL,5A,G), SUBDEF(SA,CNL)*COMDEF(ISR,"CCA",CNL)
CAREA(CNL,"TOTAL") = SUM(G, CAREA(CNL,G";
) ,;
2078 DI5PLAY CAREA ;
* REPORT AND CHECK ON ACZ DEFINITION

SET ZSA1(CNL,SA,Z);
PARAMETER REP3
REP4
,
REP3(I5,CNL,SA) SUBDEF(SA,CNL)*COMDEF(IS,"CCA",CNL) ;

REP3(IS,CNL,G) SUM(SA$GWFG(CNL,5A,G), SUBDEF(SA,CNL)*COMDEF(IS,"CCA",CNL)

REP3(IS,CNL."TOTAL") SUM(G, REP3(IS,CNL,G) )

REP3(I5,"TOTAL",T1) SUM(CNL, REP3(IS,CNL,T1

REP3(15,CNL,"CCA") COMDEF(IS,"CCA",CNL) ;

REP3(IS,"TOTAL","CCA")= 5UM(CNL, COMDEF(IS,"CCA",CNL

REP4(I5,Z,G) SUMCNL,5A)S(ZSA(Z,CNL,5A)$GWFG(CNL,SA,G, COMDEF(I5,"CCA",CNL)*SUBDEF(SA,CNL) );

REP4(I5,Z,"TOTAL") SUMCNL,5A)$ZSA(Z,CNL,SA), COMDEF(IS,"CCA",CNL)*SUBDEF(SA,CNL) );

REP4(IS,"TOTAL",T1)= SUM(Z, REP4(IS,Z,T1) )

Z5A1(CNL,5A,Z)SZSA(Z,CNL,SA) = YES;

DISPLAY ZSA1, GWF, GWFG, REP3, REP4 ;

2099 *
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 45
CLIMATIC DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM eMS

2101
2102 TABLE EVAP(CNL,M) PAN EVAPORATION(FEET)
2103 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
2104 01-UD .244 .314 .545 .786 .982 1.040 .913 .814 .729 .571 .357 .244
2105 02-CBD .200 .314 .529 .171 .968 .998 .829 .743 .686 .543 .329 .229
2106 03-RAY .200 .314 .514 .771 .951 .968 .812 .743 .671 .543 .326 .214
2107 04-UC .200 .283 .514 .171 .940 .998 .829 .743 .671 .543 .326 .214
2108 05-MR .200 .286 .529 .769 .942 .998 .829 .743 .671 .543 .326 .214
2109 06-SAD .286 .414 .648 .814 1.139 1.254 1.012 .940 .743 .629 .402 .286
2110 07-FOR .271 .400 .614 .786 1.083 1.196 .968 .893 .714 .564 .386 .286
2111 08-PAK .271 .343 .588 .829 1.012 1.056 .970 .885 .171 .614 .400 .288
2112 09-LD .243 .312 .586 .786 .969 1.056 .955 .871 .771 .586 .371 .286
2113 10-LBD .243 .314 .557 .786 .982 1.040 .925 .938 .745 .581 .360 .243
2114 11-JHA .229 .300 .514 .729 .990 1.012 .870 .757 .700 .486 .343 .217
2115 12-GUG .214 .312 .526 .769 .965 1.008 .826 .740 683 .555 .326 .226
2116 13-UJ .229 .300 .514 .729 .967 1.012 .870 .760 .700 .571 .343 .214
2117 14-LJ .257 .314 .557 .788 .982 1.026 .930 .843 .743 .600 .371 .260
2118 15-BAH .271 .360 .657 .860 1.069 1.098 1.011 .899 .171 .657 .400 .271
2119 16-MAI .271 .340 .629 .842 1.042 1.056 .940 .869 .757 .643 .400 .271
2120 17-SIO .257 .343 .588 .842 1.026 1.026 .940 .860 .757 .643 .414 .271
2121 18-HAV .271 .329 .571 .800 .982 1.025 .940 .857 .757 .600 .386 .271
2122 19-RAN .244 .314 .557 .786 .982 1.040 .913 .814 .729 .571 .357 .244
2123 20-PAN .200 .314 .529 .771 .968 1. 112 1.026 .913 .800 .543 .329 .457
2124 21-ABB .271 .338 .671 .858 1.085 1.098 1.026 .913 .788 .671 .400 .288
2125
2126
(22-USW.23-LSW.
24-WAR,25-KAB) .214 .257 .429 .643 .913 1.025 .969 .870 .657 .529 .329
........
.200 .....
2127 26-THA .260 .331 .517 .760 1.057 1.143 1.057 .899 .721 .631 .402 .245
2128 27-PAH .257 .329 .502 .729 1.094 1.225 1.154 .943 .829 .671 .357 .243
2129 28-MUZ .271 .340 .600 .870 1.056 1.039 .968 .885 .771 .657 .414 .271
2130 29-DGK .286 .357 .657 .885 1.082 1.098 1.011 .913 .798 .671 .414 .271
2131 31-P+D .371 .457 .758 .956 1.142 1. 126 1.026 .942 .830 .715 .486 .343
2132 (32-BEG.34-NW.
2133 35-RIC) .386 .474 .700 .870 1.068 .949 .943 .949 .757 .657 .457 .343
2134 33-GHO .429 .429 .700 .871 1.040 1.098 .998 .900 .800 .629 .457 .329
2135 36-DAD .357 .429 .700 .956 1.169 1.185 1.027 .940 .786 .700 .429 .357
2136 37-KW .386 .414 .674 .900 1.083 1 . 112 .998 .899 .786 .643 .429 .343
2137 38-KE .429 .443 .745 .926 1.152 1.154 1.025 .955 .829 .700 .486 .371
2138 39-ROH .371 .414 .700 .940 1.154 1.139 .982 .926 .757 .698 .457 .371
2139 41-NAR .457 .500 .843 1.054 1. 212 1.155 .999 .914 .829 .786 .557 .443
2140 42-KAL .529 .557 .857 .982 1.094 .970 .814 .757 .786 .800 .614 .529
2141 (43-LCH.44-FUL) .471 .529 .870 1.095 1.210 1. 111 .985 .886 .843 .814 .586 .471
2142 45-PIN .557 .586 .899 1.044 1.140 1.012 .843 .800 .829 .843 .643 .557
2143
2144 TABLE RAIN(CNL.M) RAIN (INCHES)
2145 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
2146 01-UD .170 .520 .660 .470 450 1.180 4.480 4.070 1.530 .160 .220 .360
2147 02-CBD .878 .700 .712 .510 .506 1.364 4.868 4.502 1.798 .192 .172 .404
2148 03-RAY 1.180 1.120 1.040 .740 .710 1.820 5.610 6.450 2.460 .230 .140 .490
2149 04-UC 1. 141 1.089 1.013 .724 .693 1.779 5.444 6.278 2.396 .224 .138 .478
2150 05-MR 1.180 1.120 1.040 .740 .710 1.820 5.610 6.450 2.460 .230 .140 .490
2151 (06-SAD.07-FOR) .500 .520 .520 .360 .310 .720 3.500 3.000 .860 .090 .110 .240
2152 08-PAK .505 .520 .523 .362 .313 .729 3.520 3.021 .873 .091 112 .242
2153 09-LD .689 .520 .618 .437 .408 1.042 4.186 3.749 1.329 .139 187 .324
2154 lO-LBD .564 .522 .543 .380 .360 .778 3.545 3.130 1.018 . 111 .122 .278
2155 l1-JHA .627 .686 .662 509 .465 1.239 3.286 4.035 1.564 .139 112 .315
2156 12-GUG .548 .624 .608 .476 .430 1.156 2.954 3.690 1.436 .126 .108 .290
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FIlENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 46
CLIMATIC DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

2157 13-UoJ 1.210 1.170 1.240 .850 .690 1.500 5.320 5.610 2.030 .230 .160 .480
2158 14-loJ .920 .889 .942 .646 .524 1. 140 4.043 4.264 1.543 .175 .122 .365
2159 15-BAH .230 .290 .380 .250 .170 .260 2.520 1.930 . 190 .020 .120 .130
2160 16-MAI .402 .434 .463 .316 .270 .553 3.020 2.530 .618 .068 .107 .208
2161 17-SIO .420 .435 .445 .305 .325 .495 2.570 2.265 .665 .085 .080 .245
2162 18-HAV .390 .500 .500 .410 .360 .990 2.290 3.000 1.180 .100 .100 .240
2163 19-RAN .370 .380 .400 .270 .330 .550 2.010 1.820 .540 .080 .060 .240
2164 20-PAN .220 .252 .296 .184 .140 .184 1.716 1.444 .152 .010 .108 .120
2165 21-ABB .221 .263 .326 .205 .143 .206 1.998 1.615 .163 .011 .102 . 121
2166 (22-USW,23 lSW.
2167 24-WAR.25-KAB) 1 440 1.530 2.440 1.760 .770 .310 1.260 2.030 .810 .230 .310 .670
2168 26-THA .610 .717 .882 .621 .448 .809 2.946 2.769 .944 .132 .130 .298
2169 27-PAH .450 .670 .960 .690 .390 .610 2.290 1.900 .630 .110 .150 .240
2170 28-MUZ .375 .400 .435 .298 .335 .555 2.028 1.825 .548 .083 .068 .240
2171 29-DGK .260 .330 .270 .220 .180 .380 .740 1.230 .310 .030 .070 .210
2172 (31-P+D,32-BEG) .199 .282 .204 .179 .100 .257 .447 .905 . 187 0.000 .097 .179
2173 33-GHO .210 .230 .250 .140 .120 .140 1.230 1.160 .130 0.000 .110 .110
2174 34-NW . 171 .336 .263 . 171 .100 .242 .612 .994 .330 0.000 .035 .173
2175 35-RIC 173 .341 .273 .173 .100 .251 .706 1.020 .346 0.000 .032 .163
2176 36-DAD .170 .335 .270 .170 .100 .275 1.330 1. 170 .400 0.000 .035 .130
2177 37-KW .190 .240 .200 .140 .100 .250 1.310 1. 210 .270 0.000 .090 .100
2178 38-KE .150 .200 .200 .100 .100 .250 1.350 1.450 .350 0.000 .050 .100
2179 39-ROH .138 .235 . 188 .143 .150 .368 2.297 1.876 .564 .034 .051 .095
2180 41-NAR .091 . 151 .119 .103 .159 .397 3.003 2.097 .658 .071 .056 .060
2181 (42-KAl.43-lCH, t->
2182 44-FUl,45-PIN) .140 .300 .120 .060 .140 .720 4.020 2.080 . 700 .060 .060
......
.120 (X)
2183
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 47
HISTORIC CANAL DIVERSIONS(MAF) GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

2185
2186 TABLE DIVPOST(CNL,Ml) AVERAGE(1976-77 TO 1987-88) CANAL DIVERSIONS(MAF)
2187 * SOURCE : INDUS BASIN IRRIGATIDN SYSTEM
2188 * HISTORIC RIVERS AND CANALS DISCHARGE OATA,
2189 * WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT. DIRECTORATE. WAPDA LAHORE
2190
2191 APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR RABI KHARIF ANNUAL
2192 01-UD .0238 .1028 .1091 .1155 .1183 .1263 .0730 .0236 .0072 .0100 .0186 .0343 .1668 .5958 0.7626
2193 02-CBD .1102 .1339 .1372 .1278 .1151 .1202 .1284 .1294 .1113 .0500 .0958 .1010 .6159 .7443 1.3602
2194 03-RAY .0025 .0370 .0884 .0902 .0820 .0855 .0473 .0025 .0020 .0005 .0024 .0007 .0553 .3856 0.4409
2195 04-UC .0984 .1829 .2771 .3155 .2713 .2577 .1928 .0822 .0343 .0428 .0631 .0566 .4719 1.4029 1.8747
2196 05-MR .0163 .0964 .1218 .2160 .2366 .1665 .0402 .0122 .0107 .0111 .0176 .0103 .1020 .8536 0.9556
2197 06-SAD .2686 .2865 .2838 .2762 .2677 .2693 .2538 .2851 .2719 .1106 .2329 .2796 1.4339 1.6522 3.0861
2198 07-FOR .0340 .1224 .1481 .1433 .1415 .1481 .1044 .0102 .0091 .0061 .0137 .0137 . 1572 .7375 0.8946
2199 08-PAK .2183 .3408 .3542 .3536 .3881 .3739 .2978 .2190 .2399 .1134 .1833 .2470 1.3003 2.0289 3.3292
2200 09-LD .0479 .1923 .2140 .2295 .2320 .2278 .1535 .0451 .0258 .0256 .0479 .0295 .3273 1.1436 1.4709
2201 10-LBD .4055 .4822 .4717 .4564 .4611 .4590 .4244 .4269 .3860 .1539 .3521 .4069 2.1503 2.7360 4.8862
2202 ll-JHA .2838 .3425 .3423 .3177 .3010 .3391 .3284 .3025 .2970 .1279 .1941 .2728 1.5227 1.9265 3.4492
2203 12-GUG .3186 .3845 .3843 .3567 .3379 .3807 .3687 .3396 .3334 .1436 .2179 .3063 1.7094 2.1626 3.8720
2204 13-UJ .0791 .1180.1285 .1486 .1294 .1305 .1117 .0884 .0732 .0461 .0457 .0462 .4114 .7341 1 . 1454
2205 14-LJ .2421 .3128 .3155 .3099 .2902 .2901 .2987 .2509 .2151 .1084 .2138 .2118 1.2988 1.7607 3.0594
2206 15-BAH .1205 .2033 .2293 .2448 .2282 .2359 .2008 .1238 .1212 .0958 .0827 .1475 .7718 1.2619 2.0337
2207 16-MAl .1441 .2961 .3286 .3163 .3375 .3478 .2875 .1336 .1392 .1309 .0897 .1643 .9452 1.7704 2.7156
2208 17-SID .1469 .2226 .2334 .2216 .2264 .2332 .2203 .1631 .1593 .0975 .1124 .1632 .9159 1.2841 2.2000
2209 18-HAV .0314 .0455 .0474 .0447 .0464 .0513 .0472 .0252 .0282 .0224 .0255 .0318 .1803 .2666 0.4469 ....
.....
2210 19-RAN .0314 .0809 .0904 .0823 .0689 .0817 .0663 .0174 .0147 .0206 .0076 .0242 .1507 .4356 0.5863 tD
2211 20-PAN .2684 .4531 .5359 .5554 .5569 .5577 .5056 .2296 .1913 .1355 .1759 .2235 1.4613 2.9275 4.3888
2212 21-ABB .0408 .0529 .0602 .0599 .0604 .0602 .0567 .0375 .0328 .0202 .0280 .0357 .2109 .3343 0.5453
2213 22-USW . 1025 . 1131 . 1101 . 1094 . 1028 .1048 .1052 .0876 .0802 .0631 .0654 .0869 .4884 .6426 1.1310
2214 23-LSW .0413 .0518 .0514 .0461 .0401 .0455 .0487 .0388 .0372 .0051 .0239 .0308 .1845 .2762 0.4607
2215 24-WAR .0377 .0441 .0436 .0385 .0307 .0412 .0454 .0436 .0406 .0021 .0145 .0263 .1725 2358 0.4083
2216 25-KAB .0339 .0434 .0466 .0440 .0366 .0425 .0434 .0392 .0328 .0017 .0177 .0341 . 1688 .2470 0.4158
2217 26-THA .3777 .4206 .3864 .4027 .3991 .4096 .4016 .3934 .3680 .1064 .3175 .3615 1.9483 2.3962 4.3445
2218 27-PAH .0269 .0340 .0355 .0363 .0307 .0340 .0348 .0301 .0315 .0045 .0259 .0288 .1556 .1976 0.3532
2219 28-MUZ .1041 .3154 .3886 .3937 .3812 .3749 .2665 .1312 .0745 .0707 .0920 .1057 .7407 1.9578 2.6985
2220 29-DGK .1874 .3408 .4056 .4062 .3455 .3699 .2960 .1787 .1091 .0935 .1275 .1580 .9629 2.0555 3.0183
2221 31-P+D .0020 .0812 .5064 .5786 .4625 .4169 .2224 .0942 .0700 .1628 .0665 .0632 .6791 2.0475 2.7266
2222 32-BEG .0017 .0798 .7547 1.0590 .6712 .5522 .1528 .0023 .0122 .1344 .0059 .0038 .3115 3.1186 3.4300
2223 33-GHO .0134 .2218 .4264 .4093 .4541 .4266 .3847 .2007 . 1010 2016 .0720 .1217 1.0817 1.9517 3.0334
2224 34-NW .0917 .1070 .3522 .4994 .4373 .3499 .3011 .2055 .1948 .0973 2070 .1844 1.1900 1.8375 3.0275
2225 35-RIC .0000 .1199 .5937 .5945 .4428 .3722 .1454 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .1454 2.1232 2.2686
2226 36-DAD .0775 .0820 .1964 .2978 .2643 .2269 .1894 .1350 .1378 .0620 .1494 .1400 .8137 1.1449 1.9587
2227 37-KW .0904 .1003 .1086 .1123 .1112 .1283 .1187 .1064 .1073 .0342 .0908 .0938 .5512 .6511 1.2024
2228 38-KE .1140 .1357 .1464 .1564 .1537 .1504 .1609 .1456 .1456 .0442 .1185 .1186 .7334 .8567 1.5901
2229 39-ROH .6860 .7981 .7821 .8123 .8474 .8517 .8026 .7187 .7404 .2608 .7123 .7525 3.9873 4.7776 8.7649
2230 41-NAR .6064 .6819 .6671 .6932 .6901 .6967 .6916 .6246 .6078 .2227 .5419 .5689 3.2576 4.0355 7.2931
2231 42-KAL .1342 .1644 .2888 .4046 .3561 .3739 .2843 .1374 .0777 .1522 .0963 .0861 .8340 1.7220 2.5559
2232 43-LCH .1155 .1476 .1645 .1671 .1421 . 1451 .1332 .0954 .0612 .0618 .0752 .0780 .5048 8819 1.3867
2233 44-FUL .1021 .3667 .6712 .6460 .4545 .4078 .2991 .1375 .0732 .1594 .1005 .0591 .8287 2.6483 3.4770
2234 45-PIN .0464 .1899 .4162 .5242 .4391 .3334 .2264 .1068 .0469 .1041 .0611 .0349 .5802 1.9493 2.5295
2235
INDUS BASIN MOOEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME;WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 48
GOVT. TUBEWELL PUMPAGE AND DEPTH TO WATER TABLE GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

2237 TABLE GWT(CNL.M) PUBLIC TUNEWELL PUMPAGE(Kkf)

2238 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
2239 01-UD 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0
2240 02-CBD 2 2 3 2 2 2 6 7 8 2 2 2
2241 03-RAY 15 29 41 45 40 50 30 17 48 43 19 7
2242 04-UC 39 49 49 30 49 49 55 58 58 16 36 15
2243 05-MR 3 6 20 17 9 11 8 6 12 9 5 2
2244 09-LD 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1
2245 10-LBD 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 1 2 2
2246 ll-JHA 38 42 49 57 57 57 50 54 60 57 48 32
2247 12-GUG 50 62 69 78 79 79 69 73 82 85 67 34
2248 l3-U.J 67 88 104 119 141 121 114 114 140 155 117 5
2249 l4-L.J 51 65 88 70 81 72 87 81 94 91 70 77
2250 15-BAH 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 2 2 0 1 1
2251 l8-HAV 6 6 8 6 7 7 6 6 6 5 7 7
2252 19-RAN 55 66 82 84 68 52 36 57 59 52 51 43
2253 20-PAN 6 6 8 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 6 6
2254 21-ABB 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2
2255 28-MUZ 114 114 159 147 109 89 80 90 94 45 79 119
2256 32-BEG 2 3 4 2 2 1 0 1 1 2 2 2
2257 37-KW 18 20 24 19 16 20 18 18 16 10 11 11
2258 39-RDH 6 7 8 6 5 7 6 48 42 3 4 4
2259
2260
2261 TABLE DEP1(CNL.IS. * ) DEPTH TO WATER TABLE (FEET) ....
(
2262 * 1980 DEPTH IS FROM IBM AND IRRGATION SUPPORTING REPORT OF RAP. o
2263 * YEAR 1993 AND 2000 DEPTHS ARE ESTIMATED CONSIDERING THE DRAINAGE
2264 * PRO.JECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION OR PLANNING.
2265 1980.DEPTH (1988. 1993.2ooo).DEPTH
2266 01-UD 17.0 17
2267 02-CBD 10.5 10
2268 (03-RAY.05-MR) 15.0 15
2269 04-UC 15.1 15
2270 06-SAD 5.5 7
2271 (07-FOR.22-USW.23-LSW
2272 24-WAR.25-KAB) 8.0 8
2273 08-PAK 19.9 15
2274 09-LD 17.9 17
2275 10-LBD 18.1 18
2276 11-JHA 13.6 14
2277 12-GUG 14.8 14
2278 13-UJ 10.0 10
2279 14-LJ 8.1 9
2280 (15-BAH.19-RAN.28-MUZ) 9.0 9
2281 (16-MAI.17-SID) 19.0 19
2282 18-HAV 10.1 10
2283 20-PAN 8.4 9
2284 21-ABB 8.2 9
2285 26-THA 8.7 8
2286 27-PAH 10.0 12
2287 29-DGK 7.8 8
2288 (31-P+D.32-BEG.36-DAD.39-ROH) 7
2289 (34-NW.35-RIC.42-KAL.43-LCH.
2290 44-FUL.45 PIN) 6
2291 33-GHO 5.5 7
2292 37-KW 5.6 7
INDUS
BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDI 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 49
GOVT.
TUBEWELL PUMPAGE AND DEPTH TO WATER TABLE GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

2293 38-KE 5.4 7

2294 41-NAR 4.9 7
2295
2296 TABLE DEP2(IS,CNL,M) DEPTH TO WATER TABLE (FEET)
2297 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
2298 1980. 31 - P+D 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 4.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 6.9
2299 1980. 32-BEG 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 6.6
2300 1980.(34-NW.35-RIC) 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.5 2 5 2.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 4.6
2301 1980. 36-DAD 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 4.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 5.6
2302 1980. 39-ROH 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.9 5.9 5.9
2303 1980.(42-KAL,43 LCH,44-FUL.45-PIN) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5 0 5.0 3.5 2.0 2.0 2.5 4.0 5.0 5.0
2304
2305 PARAMETERS
2306 DEPTH(CNL.M) DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (FEET)
2307 EFR( CNL, M) EFFECTIVE RAINFALL IN FEET
2308 EQEVAP(CNL,M) EVAPORATION FROM THE EQUAIFER (FEET)
2309 SUBIRR(CNL,M) WATER SUPPLIED BY CAPILLARY ACTION FROM THE AQUIFER
2310 SUBIRRFAC(Z) MAXIMUM SUB-IRRIGATION IN SALINE AREAS AS PROPORTION OF CROP REQ.(NET OF RAIN)
2311 /(NWFP. PMW.PCW.PSW.PRW,SRWN,SCWS) .4,
2312 SCWN .3,
2313 SRWS .1/
2314
2315 SCALARS DRC RUN-OFF PORTION OF RAINFALL /.15/
2316 THE1 PORTION OF EQUAIFER EVAPORATION USED BY CROPS /0.6/;
2317 I-'
2318 * SUB-IRRIGATION AND EFFECTIVE RAIN CALCULATIONS CXl
I-'
2319 LOOP(ISR,
2320 DEPTH(CNL,M) = DEP1(CNL.ISR."OEPTH");
2321 DEPTH(CNL,M)S(DEP2(ISR,CNL,M) NE 0 ) = DEP2(ISR,CNL,M)
2322 EFR(CNL,M) = (1.0 - DRC - (l-COMDEF(ISR. "FLDE" ,CNL)*
2323 RAIN(CNL,M)/12.0
2324 ) ;
2325 EQEVAP(CNL,M) MIN(l . 10.637/0EPTH(CNL,M)**2.558)*EVAP(CNL,M)
2326 SUBIRR(CNL,M) EQEVAP(CNL.M) * THE1
2327
2328 OPT IONS DEPTH: 1 ; DISPLAY DEPTH
2329
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 50
NETWORK NODES AND ARC DEFINITION GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

2331
2332 SET N NODES OF THE INDUS RIVER SYSTEM/
2333 ~~~~.-B SULEMANKI BARRAGE - SUTLEJ RIVER
2334 ISLAM-B ISLAM BARRAGE SUTLEJ RIVER
2335 PANJNAD-B PANJNAD BARRAGE PANJNAD RIVER
2336 RAVI-I RAVI INFLOW AT MADHOPUR RAVI RIVER
2337 BALLOKI-B BALLOKI BARRAGE RAVI RIVER
2338 SIDHNAI-B SIDHANI BARRAGE RAVI RIVER
2339 MARALA-B MARRA LA BARRAGE - CHENAB RIVER
2340 KHANKI-B KHANKI BARRAGE - CHENAB RIVER
2341 QADIRA-B QADIRABAD BARRAGE - CHENAB RIVER
2342 TRIMMU-B TRIMMU BARRAGE - CHENAB RIVER
2343 MANGLA-R MANGLA RESERVOIR - JEHLUM RIVER
2344 RASUL-B RASUL BARRAGE - JHELUM RIVER
2345 TARBELA-R TARBELA RESERVOIR INDUS RIVER
2346 AMANDA-H AMANDARA HEAD WORKS - SWAT RIVER
2347 MUNDA-H MUNDA HEAD WORKS - SWAT RIVER
2348 WARSAK-D WARSAK RESERVOIR - KABUL RIVER
2349 K-S-JCT KABUL AND SWAT RIVER JCT - KABUL RIVER
2350 KALABAGH-R KALABAGH RESERVOIR - INDUS RIVER
2351 CHASMA-R CHASMA RESERVOIR - INDUS RIVER
2352 TAUNSA-B TAUNSA BARRAGE - INDUS RIVER
2353 GUDU-B GUDU BARRAGE - INDUS RIVER
2354 SUKKUR-B SUKKUR BARRAGE - INDUS RIVER
I-'
2355 NARA-JCT NARA JUNCTION - NARA COMPLEX CO
2356 NARA-HEAD HEAD WORKS FOR IRRI. DIVERSION - NARA COMPLEX N
2357 CHOTIARI-R CHOTIARI RESERVOIR - NARA COMPLEX
2358 KOTRI-B KOTRI BARRAGE - INDUS RIVER
2359 A-SEA ARABIAN SEA
2360 A1 DIVERSION POINT FOR UJ UJ LINK AND R.P.C
2361 A2 DIV. FOR BRBD LINK UC LINK AND UC INT.
2362 A3 DIV. FOR MR CROSS LINK
2363 A4 MR CROSS TAIL AND BRBD LINK
2364 A5 DIV. FOR CBD AND UD CANALS
2365 A6 DIVERSION TO LCC FEEDER
2366 A7 DIV. FOR GUGERA AND JHANG CANALS
2367 A8 DIVESION POINT FOR MAILI+L PAKPATTAN CANALS
2368 A9 5MB LINK TO L-BAHAWL CANAL
2369 Al0 DIVERSION POINT FOR LJ
2370 /
2371 I SYSTEM INFLOWS /
2372 SWAT SWAT RIVER AT CHAKDARA
2373 KABUL KABUL RIVER AT WARSAK
2374 INDUS INDUS RIVER AT TARBELA
2375 HARO HARD RIVER AT GARIALL
2376 SOAN SOAN RIVER AT DHOK PATHAN
2377 JEHLUM JEHLUM.RIVER AT MANGLS
2378 CHENAB CHENAB RIVER AT MARRALA
2379 RAVI RAVI RIVER BELOW MADHOPUR
2380 SUTLEJ SUTLEJ RIVER BELOW FERDZPUR /
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 51
NETWORK NODES AND ARC DEFINITION GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

2382 NC(N.CNL) NODE TO CANAL MAP/

2383 SULEM-B. (06-SAD,07 FOR,08-PAK), A8. 16-MAI
2384 A9. 15-BAH PANJNAD-B. (20-PAN,21-ABB)
2385
2386 BALLOKI -B. (10-LBD, 09-LD) SIDHNAI-B. 17-5ID
2387
2388 MARALA-B. 05-MR A2. (04-UC,03-RAY)
2389 A5. (02-CBD.Ol-UD) A7. ( 11- JHA , 12 -GUG)
2390 TRIMMU-B. (19-RAN,18-HAV)
2391 A1. 13-UJ Al0. 14-LJ
2392 AMANDA-H. 22-USW MUNDA-H. 23-LSW
2393 WARSAK-D. 24-WAR WAR5AK-D. 25-KAB
2394 CHASMA-R. (26-THA.27-PAH)
2395 TAUNSA-B. (28-MUZ.29-DGK) . GUDU-B. (31-P+D,32-BEG.33-GHO)
2396 SUKKUR-B. (34-NW.35-RIC.36-DAD.37-KW.38-KE.39-ROH)
2397 NARA-HEAD. 41-NAR
2398 KOTRI-B. (42-KAL,43-LCH.44-FUL,45-PIN)/
2399

....
CD
IJ.)
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 lG:27:23 PAGE 52
NETWORK NODES AND ARC DEFINITION GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

2401 ALIAS (N.Nl);

2402 SET NN(N.Nl) WATER FLOW SYSTEM NODE TO NODE /
2403 *-- SUTLEJ RAVI SYSTEM
2404 SULEM-B. BALLOKI -B
2405 ISLAM-B. SULEM-B
2406 A9. (A8. ISLAM-B)
2407 A8. SIDHNAI-B
2408 PANJNAD-B. (TRIMMU-B.SIDHNAI-B. ISLAM-B. TAUNSA-B)
2409 *-- RAVI CHENAB SYSTEM
2410 RAVI-I. A3
2411 A3. MARALA-B
2412 A4. (A3.A2)
2413 A5. A4
2414 A2. MARALA-B
2415 BALLOKI-B. (RAVI-I. A2. AG)
2416 AG. QADIRA-B
2417 A7. (AG. KHANKI -B)
2418 SIDHNAI-B. (TRIMMU-B. BALLOKI-B)
2419 *-- CHENAB JEHLUM SYSTEM
2420 KHANKI-B. (A 1. MARALA-B)
2421 QADIRA-B. (RASUL-B. KHANKI -B)
2422 TRIMMU-B. (QADIRA-B. RASUL-B. CHASMA-R)
2423 A1. MANGLA-R
2424 RASUL-B. (MANGLA-R. Al0) I-'
2425 Al0. (RASUL-B. A1) 00
2426 *-- KABUL SWAT SYSTEM
~

2427 MUNDA-H. AMANDA-H

2428 K-S-JCT. (MUNDA-H. WARSAK-D) .....

2429 *-- INDUS RIVER

2430 KALABAGH-R. (K-S-JCT. TARBELA-R)

2431 CHASMA-R. KALABAGH-R

2432 TAUNSA-B. CHASMA-R

2433 GUDU-B. (PANJNAD-B.TAUNSA-B)

2434 SUKKUR-B. GUDU-B

2435 NARA-JCT. SUKKUR-B

2436 CHOTIARI-R. NARA-JCT

2437 NARA-HEAD. (NARA-JCT. CHOTIARI-R)

2438 KOTRI-B. SUKKUR-B

2439 A-SEA. KOTRI-B /

2440

2441 NI(N.I) NODE TO RIM STATION INFLOW MAP /

2442 AMANDA-H. SWAT WARSAK-D. KABUL.

2443 TARBELA-R. INDUS KALABAGH-R. HARO

2444 KALABAGH-R. SOAN MANGLA-R. JEHLUM

2445 MARALA-B. CHENAB RAVI-I. RAVI

2446 SULEM-B. SUTLEJ /

2447

2448 NB(N) NB(N) YES; NB("A-SEA")=NO;

INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSIS01 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 53

NETWORK NODES AND ARC DEFINITION GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

2450 * FLOW CAPACITIES

2451
2452 PARAMETER
2453 NCAP(N,N1) NODE TO NODE TRANSFER CAPACITY (MAF)/
2454 CHASMA-R. TRIMMU-B 1.307, TAUNSA-B. PANJNAO-B .724
2455 SUKKUR-B. NARA-JCT 1.190, NARA-JCT. NARA-HEAO 1.190
2456 NARA-uCT. CHOTIARI-R .416, CHOTIARI-R.NARA-HEAD .135
2457
2458 MANGLA-R. A1 .685, A1. AlO .199
2459 RASUL-B. AlO .328, A1. KHANKI-B .422
2460 RASUL-B. QADIRA-B 1.232.
2461
2462 MARALA-B. A3 .985, A3 A4 _199
2463 A3. RAVI-I . 938, MARALA-B . A2 .995
2464 A2. BALLOKI-B .698, A2. A4 .310
2465 A4. A5 .310
2466
2467 KHANKI-B. A7 .684, QAOIRA-B. A6 1.146
2468 A6. A7 .270, A6. BALLOKI-B .808
2469
2470 BALLOKI-B. SULEM-B 1.172, TRIMMU-B. SIDHNAI -B 1.03
2471 SIDHNAI-B. A8 . 662, A8 . A9 .640
2472 ISLAM-B. A9 .299 /
2473
2474 LLOSS(N,N1) LINK CANAL LOSS FACTORS / ....
(Xl
2475 CHASMA-R. TRIMMU-B .096, TAUNSA-B. PANJNAO-B .0615 VI
2476 SUKKUR-B. NARA-uCT .055, NARA-JCT. NARA-HEAD .0001
2477 NARA-JCT. CHOTIARI-R .001, CHOTIARI-R. NARA-HEAD .0001
2478
2479 A1. AlO .004 , A1. KHANKI-B .099
2480 RASUL-B. QADIRA-B .039 , MARALA-B. A3 .0705
2481 A3. A4 .0075, A2. BALLOKI-B .0705
2482 A2. A4 .097 A4. A5 .007
2483
2484 KHANKI -B. A7 .0435 , A6. BALLOKI-B .087
2485
2486 BALLOKI-B. SULEM-B . 0525, TRIMMU-B . SIDHNAI -B .075
2487 SIDHNAI-B. A8 .0495 /
2488 LCEFF(N,N1) LINK CANAL EFFICIENCY FROM HEAD TO TAIL
2489
2490 LCEFF(N,N1)$LLOSS(N,N1) = 1 - LLOSS(N,Nl)
2491
2492 * DISPLAY N,NC.NN, NI;
2493 * DISPLAY NCAP, LlOSS, LCEFF
INDUS
BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FIlENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 54
FLOW
ROUTING COEFFICINTS GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

2495
SET CD jC,Dj
2496
TABLE RIVERCD(N,CD) COEFFICIENTS FOR RIVER ROUTING
2497
C D
2498
RASUl-B 02732 .93766
2499
TRIMMU-B .15348
2500
KHANKI -B 2.2113
2501
BAllOKI-B
2502
SIDHNAI-B .14063 1.0024
2503
ISlAM-B 12294
2504
PANJNAD-B .08077
2505
GUDU-B .10947
2506
KAlABAGH-R .04856
2507
CHASMA-R .04526
2508
TAUNSA-B .07205
2509
SUKKUR-B .02218
2510
KOTRI -B .17054
2511

2512
TABLE RIVERB(N,N1) COEFFICIENTS FOR RIVER ROUTING
2513

2514
MANGlA-R RASUl-B OADIRA-B MARAlA-B RAVI-I BAllOKI-B
2515
RASUl-B 1.01841
2516
TRIMMU-B .82803 9068
2517
KHANKI-B .93361
2518
BALlOKI-B 1.2181
2519
SIDHNAI -B 70555 I-'
2520
CO
2521
+ SUlEM-B TRIMMU-B SIDHNAI-B ISlAM-B TAUNSA-B PANJNAD-B 0'1
2522
ISLAM-B .9086
2523
PANJNAD-B .81033 1.13626 .80359
2524
GUDU-B .94003 1.0
2525

2526
+ K-S-JCT TARBElA-R KAlABAGH-R CHASMA-R GUDU-B SUKKUR-B
2527

2528

2529
KAlABAGH-R 1.04621 1.08686
2530
CHASMA-R .9849
2531
TAUNSA-B .9497
2532
SUKKUR-B .9908
2533
KOTRI-B .70625
2534

2535

2536

2537
RIVERB(N,N1)$(RIVERB(N,N1) EO 0 ) 1;
2538
RIVERCD(N,"D")$(RIVERCD(N."D") EO 0) 1;
2539

2540

INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:21:23 PAGE 55

RIM STATION AND TRIBUTORY INFLOWS GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

2542 SET S58/50, 80 /

2543
2544 TABLE INFL5080(S58,I,Ml) SYSTEM INFLOWS MEASURED ATTHE RIM STATIONS (MAF)
2545
2546 * 50 - 50 % PROBABILITY FLOWS AND 80 ARE 80 % PROBABILITY FLOWS.
2541
2548
** SOURCE: WATER RESOUCE MANAGEMENT DIRECTORATE, WAPDA PUBLICATIONS AND
2549 * RAP IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE SUPPORTING REPORT
2550 * HISTORIC DATA USED: INDUS OCT 1936 - MARCH 1988
2551 * JEHLUM APRIL 1922 - MARCH 1988
2552 * CHENAB APRIL 1922 - MARCH 1988
2553 * RAVI AND SUTLEJ APRIL 1966 - MARCH 1988
2554 ALL OTHERS APRIL 1966 - MARCH 1916
2555
*
2556 APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP KHARIF
2551 50. INDUS 1.931 3.984 1.191 16.148 11.431 6.196 52.881
2558 50.JEHLUM 3.826 4.355 2.993 3.429 2.236 0.846 11.685
2559 50.CHENAB 1.361 2.281 4.036 5.219 5.091 2.540 20.594
2560 50.RAVI 0.226 0.161 o 038 1.089 1.132 0.841 4.088
2561 50.SUTLEJ 0.031 0.045 0.052 0.483 1.003 1.198 2.810
2562
2563 50.HARO 0.016 0.013 0.014 0.048 0.204 0.013 0.369
2564 50. SOAN 0.012 0.001 0.090 0.225 0.426 0.068 0.829
2565 50. SWAT 0.483 0.636 1.049 0.863 0.642 0.346 4.020
2566 50. KABUL 1.512 1.883 3.461 3.490 2.619 0.915 13.945 .....
Q)
2561 ......
2568 80. INDUS 1.811 3.160 9.634 13. 135 10.524 5.234 44.159
2569 80.JEHLUM 1.526 2.242 2.594 2.632 3.140 1.623 13.151
2510 80.CHENAB 1.120 2.064 3.133 4.515 3.531 2.844 11.213
2511 80.RAVI 0.049 0.020 0.011 0.696 1.346 0.313 2.434
2512 80. SUTLEJ 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.145 0.291 0.004 0.441
2513
2514 80.HARO 0.014 0.019 0.011 0.020 0.101 0.022 0.181
2515 80.S0AN 0.006 0.004 0.020 0.252 0.145 0.021 0.448
2516 80. SWAT 0.323 0.514 0.848 0.519 0.463 0.448 3.235
2511 80.KABUL 0.963 1.131 2.238 2.151 2.303 1.534 10.934
2518
2519 + OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR RABI
2580 50. INDUS 2.291 1. 219 1. 188 0.952 0.913 1.468 8.151
2581 50.JEHLUM 0.988 0.521 o 412 0.460 0.621 1.411 4.419
2582 50.CHENAB 0.128 0.481 0.401 0.480 0.111 1.019 3.891
2583 50.RAVI 0.188 0.134 0.131 0.090 0.026 0.455 1.023
2584 50.SUTLEJ 0.129 0.009 0.004 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.202
2585
2586 50.HARO 0.031 0.020 0.016 0.019 0.019 0.051 0.163
2581 50. SOAN 0.010 0.005 0.020 0.022 0.028 0.043 0.128
2588 50. SWAT 0.195 0.122 0.088 0.019 0.068 0.140 0.692
2589 50. KABUL 0.523 0.405 0.354 0.319 0.440 0.681 2.181
2590
2591 80.INOUS 2.133 1.281 1.060 0.898 0.835 1.025 1.232
2592 80.JEHLUM 0.405 0.210 0.309 0.306 0.526 1.514 3.331
2593 80.CHENAB 0.516 0.325 0.285 0.292 0.804 0.111 2.933
2594 80.RAVI 0.016 0.048 0.014 0.135 0.112 0.135 0.580
2595 80. SUTLEJ 0.004 0.002 0.004 0.005 0.002 0.000 0.011
2596
2591 80.HARO 0.024 0.016 0.018 0.011 0.018 0.018 0.112
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAM~WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 56
RIM STATION AND TRIBUTORY INFLOWS GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

2598 80. SOAN 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.010 0.019 0.031 0.091
2599 80.SWAT 0.103 0.070 0.061 0.064 0.085 0.212 0.597
2600 80.KABUL 0.273 0.420 0.354 0.331 0.429 0.359 2.167
2601
2602
2603 TABLE TRI(S58,Nl,N,Ml) TRIBUTARY INFLOWS (MAF)
2604 SOURCE: IRRIGATION DRAINAGE AND FLOOD MANAGEMENT SUPPORTING REPORT OF RAP. PLANNING DIVISION WAPDA.
2605 '" APR MAY vUN vUL AUG SEP KHARIF
2606 50.MARALA-B. KHANKI-B 0.004 0.006 0.023 0.120 0.240 0.056 0.449
2607 50.MANGLA-R. RASUL-B 0.120 0.180 0.lS0 0.170 0.320 0.210 1.lS0
2608 50.CHASMA-R. TAUNSA-B 0.051 0.013 0.021 0.048 0.021 0.012 0.166
2609 50.TARBELA-R.KALABAGH-R 0.041 0.087 0.182 o 350 0.602 0.180 1 442
2610 50.BALLOKI-B.SIDHNAI-B 0.000 0.001 0.009 0.096 0.206 0.041 0.353
2611 50. AMANDA-H. MUNDA-H 0.036 0.337 0.637 0.854 0.S44 0.062 2.470
2612 50.MUNDA-H. K-S-vCT 0.015 0.013 O.OOS 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.054
2613 50.WARSAK-D. K-S-JCT 0.126 0.102 0.059 0.070 0.056 0.056 0.469
2614
2615 80.MARALA-B. KHANKI-B 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.136 0.131 0.011 0.293
2616 80.MANGLA-R. RASUL-B 0.120 0.180 0.lS0 0.170 0.320 0.210 1.1S0
2617 80.CHASMA-R. TAUNSA-B 0.021 0.014 0.006 0.047 0.008 0.003 0.098
2618 80.TARBELA-R.KALABAGH-R 0.OS2 0.094 0.106 0.126 0.416 0.079 0.873
2619 80.BALLOKI-B.SIDHNAI-B 0.000 0.000 0.006 0.075 0.164 0.027 0.271
2620 80. AMANDA-H. MUNDA-H 0.121 0.410 0.161 0.132 0.000 0.019 0.844
2621 80.MUNDA-H. K-S-JCT 0.006 0.009 0.003 O.OOS O.OOS 0.004 0.031
2622
2623
80.WARSAK-D. K-S-JCT O.OSO 0.077 0.027 0.039 0.036 0.032 0.261 ....
00
2624 + OCT NOV DEC vAN FEB MAR RABI 00
262S 50.MARALA-B. KHANKI-B 0.017 0.007 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.007 0.052
2626 SO.MANGLA-R. RASUL-B 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.060
2627 50.CHASMA-R. TAUNSA-B 0.004 O.OOS 0.010 0.006 0.015 0.026 0.065
2628 SO.TARBELA-R.KALABAGH-R 0.100 0.064 0.038 0.055 0.OS2 0.130 0.439
2629 50.BALLOKI-B.SIDHNAI-B 0.002 0.003 0.008 O.OOS 0.007 0.006 0.030
2630 50. AMANDA-H. MUNDA-H 0.133 0.153 o 150 0.119 0.119 0.221 0.894
2631 50.MUNDA-H. K-S-vCT 0.003 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.009 0.028
2632 50.WARSAK-D. K-S-vCT 0.024 0.027 0.035 0.035 0.038 0.070 0.229
2633
2634 80.MARALA-B. KHANKI-B 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.003 0.011 0.006 0.039
2635 80.MANGLA-R. RASUL-B 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.060
2636 80.CHASMA-R. TAUNSA-B 0.009 0.006 0.010 0.006 0.008 0.011 O.OSO
2637 80.TARBELA-R.KALABAGH-R 0.088 0.039 0.041 0.040 0.042 0.04S 0.295
2638 80.BALLoKI-B.SIDHNAI-B 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.002
2639 80.AMANDA-H. MUNDA-H 0.090 0.075 0.045 0.047 0.019 0.121 0.397
2640 80.MUNDA-H. K-S-vCT 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.000 O.OOS 0.022
2641 80.WARSAK-D. K-S-vCT 0.020 0.016 o 020 0.020 0.027 0.06S 0.169
2642 ,
2643 PARAMETER INFLOW(I,M) INFLOWS FOR THIS RUN (MAF)
2644 TRIB(Nl,N,M) TRIBUTARY INFLOWS FOR THIS RUN (MAF)
2645 INFLOW(I,M) = INFL5080("SO",I,M); TRIB(Nl,N,M) = TRI("SO,Nl,N,M);
2646
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 57
RESERVOIR CHARACTERISTICS GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

2648 TABLE RRCAP(N,IS) LIVE STORAGE CAPACITY OF RESERVOIRS (MAF)

2649 *
2650 *
2651 1980 1988 2000
2652 MANGLA-R 5.053 4.881 4.617
2653 TARBELA-R 9.197 8.861 8.357
2654 KALABAGH-R 6.100
2655 CHASMA-R 0.571 .435 .231
2656 CHOTIARI-R 1.100
2657
2658 * STORAGE CAPACITIES ARE PROVIDED BY PLANNING DIVISION OF WAPDA.
2659 * 1988 CAPACITIES ARE FROM RECENT HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYS.
2660 *
2661
2662 TABLE RULELO(N,M) LOWER RULE CURVE
2663 * END OF MONTH CONTENTS AS PERCENT OF LIVE CAPACITY
2664
2665 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
2666 MANGLA-R 16 6 0 7 21 48 74 95 83 55 35 24
2667 TARBELA-R 43 30 14 4 0 10 46 100 100 64 59 53
2668 KALABAGH-R 55 49 34 28 0 0 24 70 100 96 78 61
2669 CHASMA-R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2670 CHOTIARI -R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2671
I-'
2672 TABLE RULEUP(N,M) UPPER RULE CURVE (0
2673 * END OF MONTH CONTENTS AS PERCENT OF LIVE CAPACITY \0
2674
2675 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
2676 MANGLA-R 39 28 19 31 42 59 87 100 100 90 68 49
2677 TARBELA-R 69 47 37 26 13 48 73 100 100 100 87 77
2678 KALABAGH-R 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
2679 CHASMA-R 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
2680 CHOTlARI-R 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
2681
2682 TABLE REVAPL(N,M) EVAPORATION LOSSES FROM RESERVOIRS (KAF)
2683
2684 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
2685 MANGLA-R 1 5 4 5 12 17 -1.9 -2.5 4 22 10 5
2686 TARBELA-R 1 5 7 9 16 28 10 1 12 29 12 5
2687 KALABAGH-R 1 4 6 9 12 5 9 1 9 24 9 5
2688 CHASMA-R 3 3 1 6 3 7 15 6 3
2689
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 58
RESERVOIR CHARACTERISTICS GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

2691 SET POW /R-ELE RESERVOIR ELEVATION (FEET FROM SPD)

2692 P-CAP INSTALLED CAPACITY OF THE POWER HOUSE AT R-ELE
2693 G-CAP GENERATION CAPABILITY (KWH PER AF) AT R-ELE
2694 R-CAP GROSS RESERVOIR CAPACITY (MAF) AT R-ELE/
2695 PN(N) NODES WITH POWER HOUSE /MANGLA-R,TARBELA-R/
2696 V /1*27/ ;
2697
2698 TABLE POWERCHAR(N,*,V) POWER GENERATION CHRACTERSITICS OF HRDRO STATIONS
2699
2700 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
2701 TARBELA-R.R-ELE 1300 1310 1320 1330 1340 1350 1360 1370 1380 1390 1400 1410 1420
2702 TARBELA-R.P-CAP 480 552 630 700 780 832 894 942 992 1052 11 14 1184 1266
2703 TARBELA-R.G-CAP 136 166 183 192 202 209 216 224 233 237 247 257 263
2704 TARBELA-R.R-CAP 1.313 1.439 1.571 1.707 1.848 1.995 2.236 2.486 2.745 3.014 3.297 3.631 3.977
2705
2706 MANGLA-R .R-ELE 1040 1050 1055 1060 1065 1070 1075 1080 1085 1090 1095 1100 1105
2707 MANGLA-R .P-CAP 384 424 440 464 488 504 528 544 568 584 608 632 648
2708 MANGLA-R .G-CAP 141 155 164 173 183 192 198 205 209 212 220 228 233
2709 MANGLA-R .R-CAP 0.417 0.509 0.555 0.6010.648 0.696 0.744 0.792 0.883 0.973 1.064 1.155 1.271
2710
2711
2712
2713 + 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
2714 TARBELA-R.R-ELE 1430 1440 1450 1460 1470 1480 1490 1500 1510 1520 1530 1540 1550 1550
2715 TARBELA-R. P-CAP 1308 1366 1416 1476 1530 1596 1678 1730 1792 1848 1908 1936 1952 1952 I-'
\0
2716 TARBELA-R.G-CAP 269 281 288 295 303 310 318 336 346 356 356 368 376 376 0
2717 TARBELA-R.R-CAP 4.334 4.705 5.095 5.520 5.960 6.412 6.882 7.369 7.865 8.381 8.917 9.478 10.063 20.000
2718
2719 MANGLA-R .R-ELE 1110 1115 1120 1130 1135 1140 1145 1155 1160 1165 1170 1180 1202 1202
2720 MANGLA-R .P-CAP 672 696 712 760 776 800 816 856 880 896 920 960 960 960
2721 MANGLA-R .G-CAP 237 247 252 263 263 269 275 281 288 295 303 318 356 356
2722 MANGLA-R .R-CAP 1.386 1.501 1.617 1.933 2.091 2.249 2.453 2.862 3.066 3.316 3.566 4.067 5.364 20.000
2723 ;
2724 * SEGMENT 27 WOULD BE USED IF THE
2725 * DAM IS RAISED TO CREATE ADDITIONAL STORAGE ON TOP OF THE EXISTING.
2726
2727 * SELECT CAPACITY AND ADJUST THE CAPACITY CURVE FOR SEDIMENT/DEAD STORAGE
2728 PARAMETER RCAP(N) LIVE CAPACITY OF RESRVOIRS (MAF);
2729 LOOP(ISR,
2730 RCAP(N) RRCAP(N.ISR) );
2731
2732 POWERCHAR(PN,"R-CAp,V) MAX(O, POWERCHAR(PN, "R-CAP",V)
2733 (POWERCHAR(PN,"R-CAP", "26") -RCAP(PN);
2734 POWERCHAR(PN,"R-CAP","1")= 0;
2735
2736 * $ONTEXT
2737 * REPORT ON THE INFLOWS ETC.
2738
2739 PARAMETER REP7
2740 REP8
2741
2742 REP7(I,M) = INFLOW(I,M);
2743 REP7(I,SEA1)=SUM(M$SEA1M(SEA1,M), INFLOW(I,M;
2744 REP7("TOTAL",M1) SUM(I, REP7(I,M1;
2745 DISPLAY SYSTEM INFLOWS AT RIM STATIONS (MAF) REP7;
2746
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDI 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 59
RESERVOIR CHARACTERISTICS GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

2747 *

2748 REP8(N,Nl.M)=TRIB(N,Nl,M);

2749 REP8(N,N1.SEA1) = SUM(M$SEA1M(SEA1,M).

TRI~(N,Nl.M;
2750 DISPLAY" TRIBUTORY INFLOW IN (MAF)",
REPS;
2751 REP8(N,N1,M1) = 0 ;

2752 REPS(PN,V,POW) = POWERCHAR(PN,POW,V) ;

2753 OPTION REP8:3: 1:1 ;

2754 DISPLAY RCAP
2755 "R-ELE RESERVOIR ELEVATION (FEET FROM SPD)
2756 "P-CAP INSTALLED CAPACITY OF THE POWER HOUSE AT R-ELE
2757 "G-CAP GENERATION CAPABILITY (KWH PER AF) AT R-ELE"
2758 "R-CAP LIVE RESERVOIR CAPACITY (MAF) AT R-ELE" REPS
2759 *
2760 * $OFFTEXT
2761

.....
10
.....
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME~WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 60
PRICES GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

2763 SET P3 /FINANCIAL,ECoNoMIC. EXPoRT,IMPoRT/

2764
2765 TABLE PRICES(PS,CO,P3) 1988 PRICES
2766
2767 FINANCIAL ECONOMIC EXPORT IMPORT
2768 87-88.BASMATI 6. 6. 4.8
2769 87-88.IRRI 2.9 2.4 2.3
2770 87-88.CoTToN 4.5 6. 4.5
2771 87-88.GRAM 3.9 3.8
2772 87-88.MAIZE 1.6 .6
2773 87-88.MUS+RAP 3.75 3.4
2774 87-88.SC-GUR 3.0 3.0
2775 87-88.SC-MILL .3 .21 .5
2776 87-88.WHEAT 2.0 2.2 2.0
2777 87-88.oRCHARD 4.8 4.3
2778 87-88.PoTAToES 2.6 2.6
2779 87-88.oNIoNS 2.9 2.9 2.8
2780 87 -88. CHI LLI 10. 10.
2781 87-88.CoW-MILK 5.4 2.46
2782 87-88.BUFF-MILK 5.4 3.24
2783 87-88.MEAT 13.8 14.4
2784
2785
2786 TABLE FINSDWTPR(C,PS,*) PRICES OF SEED(RS PER KG) AND WATER(RS PER ACRE )
2787
2788 87-88.SEED 87-88.WATER 87-88.MISCC ~
10
2789 BASMATI 5. 32. 15. N
2790 IRRI 2.5 32. 15.
2791 COTTON 5.5 34. 500.
2792 RAB-FoD 40. 11.
2793 GRAM 5.1 16.
2794 MAIZE 4. 14.
2795 MUS+RAP 4.3 22.
2796 KHA-FoD 2.5 14.
2797 SC-GUR .2 64 .
2798 SC-MILL .2 64 .
2799 WHEAT 2.9 22.
2800 ORCHARD 84.
2801 POTATOES 2.6 16. 1650.
2802 ONIONS 2.9 16. 1020.
2803 CHI LLI 10. 42. 525.
2804
INDUS
BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDI 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 61
PRICES
GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

2806
TABLE ECNSDWTPR(C,PS,*) PRICES OF SEED(RS PER KG) AND WATER(RS PER ACRE)
2807

2808
87-88.SEED 87-88.WATER 87-88.MISCC
2809
BASMATI 7. 16. 75.
2810
IRRI 3.7 16. 75.
2811
COTTON 6.7 14.4 500.
2812
RAB-FOD 36. 6.4
2813
GRAM 5. 1 8.
2814
MAIZE 7. 9.6
2815
MUS+RAP 5.9 12.
2816
KHA-FOD 2.25 6.4
2817
SC-GUR . 43 33 .
2818
SC-MILL .43 33.
2819
WHEAT 3.6 10.
2820
ORCHARD 64.
2821
POTATOES 2.6 12. 1650.
2822
ONIONS 2.9 12. 1020.
2823
CHILLI 10 32. 525.
2824

2825
* WAGES, FERTILIZER AND DTHER INPUT PRICES
2826
SET P1 1 NITROGEN, PHOSPHATE, PROTEIN, TWINVT. TRINVT,TWOPC,TROPCI
2827
P11 IFINANCIAL. ECONOMIC 1
2828

2829
TABLE PRI1(PS,Pl1,Pl) FERTILIZER TUBEWELL TRACTOR AND PROTEIN PRICES
2830
.....
2831
* FERTILIZER AND PROTEIN PRICES ARE IN RS/KG. TWINVT AND TRINVT ARE ID
I.
2832
* ANNUALIZED COST FOR A TUBEWELL AND TRACTOR (RUPEES)
2833
* TWOPC AND TROPC ARE COST OF TUBEWELL WATER(RS/ACRE FOOT) AND
2834
* COST OF TRACTOR (Rs/TRACTOR HOUR)
2835

2836

* NITROGEN PHOSPHATE PROTEIN TWINVT TRINVT TWOPC TROPC

2837
87-88. FINANCIAL 5.8 7.0 9. 10000 25000 225 45.
2838
87-88. ECONOMIC 8.3 10.9 9. 10000 25000 170 50.
2839

2840
TABLE WAGEPS(PS,P11,M) WAGE RATES RS PER MAN HOUR
2841

2842
.JAN FEB MAR APR MAY .JUN .JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
2843
87-88.FINANCIAL 3. 3. 3. 6. 6. 3. 3. 3. 3. 6. 6. 3.
2844
87-88. ECONOMIC 2.75 2.75 2.75 5. 5. 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 5. 5. 2.75
2845

2846

2847
* MISCELLANEOUS PARAMETRES
2848
SCALARS LSTD STANDARD LABOR LIMIT ( HOURS PER MONTH ) 1 200 1
2849
TRCAP TRACTOR CAPACITY IN TRACTOR HOURS PER MONTH 1 250 1
2850
TWCAP NAMEPLATE CAPACITY OF THE PRIVATE TUBEWELL( AF PER MONTH) 1 59.50411
2851
NTWUCAP EFFECTIVE CAPACITY OF NEW TUBEWELLS(AF PER MONTH)
2852
TWEFAC FACTOR TO CONVERT WC LOSSES TO FROM PRIVATE TUBEWELL LOSSES 1 0.5 1
2853
LABFAC FACTOR TO CONVERT WAGE TO THE RESERVATION WAGE 1 0.5 1
2854

2855
PARAMETER TWUTIL(*) EFFECTIVE CAPACITY OF TUBEWELLS(PROPORTION OF NAME PLATE CAPACITY)
2856
1 EXISTING .60
2857
NEW .75 I;
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 62
DEMAND AND CONSUMPTION DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

2859 TABLE TOTPROD(Z,CQ ) TOTAL PRODUCTION 1988 (OOO'S TONS)

2860
2861 SC-MILL IS TOTAL CANE PRODUCTION (INCLUDING THAT USED FOR GUR)
2862 SC-GUR IS REFINED PORTION OF TOTAL CANE - SAME AS CONSUMPTION
2863
2864 WHEAT BASMATI IRRI MAIZE SC-MILL SC-GUR COTTON MUS+RAP GRAM CHILLI POTATOES ONIONS
2865
2866 NWFP 161.8 0.0 0.0 42.1 2473.7 49.5 0.0 14.8 22.4 4.8 29.7 25.2
2867 PCW 4636.8 182.8 175.7 23.0 10885.2 217.7 3318.4 103.8 132.4 38.7 ,199 5 191.5
2868 PMW 747.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1364.8 27.3 153.6 7.5 50.6 7.1 36.8 35.1
2869 PRW 1720.1 636.0 279.6 5.6 1065.7 21.3 46.9 16.6 43.0 15.2 78.5 75.0
2870 PSW 2327.3 141.2 0.0 27.2 7148.6 143.0 397.0 14.6 36.4 21.6 110.8 106.2
2871 SCWN 830.1 0.0 18. 1 0.0 3030.7 60.6 485.5 17.4 16.7 5.9 33.7 27.8
2872 SCWS 847.7 0.0 157.3 0.0 4947.9 99.0 437.4 6.8 6.2 7.0 39.9 32.4
2873 SRWN 414.2 0.0 920.3 0.0 289.5 5.8 6.1 27.8 23.1 7.2 41.2 33.6
2874 SRWS 112.7 0.0 257.3 0.0 1832.0 36.6 18.9 3.4 10.1 2.2 12.3 10. 1
2875
2876 TABLE FARMCONS(Z,CQ ON-FARM CONSUMPTION 1988 (OOO'S TONS)
2877
2878 WHEAT BASMATI IRRI MAIZE SC-GUR MUS+RAP GRAM CHILLI POTATOES ONIONS
2879
2880 NWFP 110.0 18.9 49.5 6.7 10. 1 2.2 13.4 11 . 3
2881 PCW 3013.9 27.4 21.1 10.3 217.7 46.7 59.6 17.4 89.8 86.2
2882 PMW 485.6 27.3 3.4 22.8 3.2 16.6 15.8
2883 PRW 1118.1 95.4 33.6 21.3 7.5 19.4 6.8 35.3 33.7 .....
2884 PSW 1512.7 21.2 12.3 143.0 6.6 16.4 9.7 49.9 47.8 10
~
2885 SCWN 697.3 11.8 60.6 7.8 7.5 2.7 15.2 12.5
2886 SCWS 712. 1 102.2 99.0 3. 1 2.8 3. 1 18.0 14.6
2887 SRWN 347.9 171 . 1 5.8 12.5 10.4 2.9 16.8 13.5
2888 SRWS 94.6 27.1 36.6 1.5 4.5 1.3 7.4 6. 1
2889
2890 TABLE DEMAND(.,CQ ) MARKET DEMAND BY ZONE (000 TONS OR MILLION LITERS)
2891
2892 BASMATI & IRRI ADJUSTED FOR EXPECTED EXPORTS
2893
2894
SC-MILL ADJUSTED FOR EXPECTED IMPORTS OF REFINEO SUGAR

2895 WHEAT BASMATI IRRI MAIZE SC-MILL COTTON MUS+RAP GRAM CHILLI POTATOES ONIONS COW-MILK BUFF-MILK
2896
2897 NWFP 51.8 23. 1 2337.6 0.0 8.1 12.3 2.6 16.3 13.9 167 163
2898 PCW 1622.9 155.4 49.3 10286.5 3318.4 57.1 72.8 21.3 109.7 105.3 190 267
2899 PMW 261 5 1289.8 153.6 4.1 27.8 3.9 20.2 19.3 709 2298
2900 PRW 602.0 290.6 32.2 1007.1 9.1 23.7 8.3 43.2 41.2 260 1591
2901 PSW 814.5 120.2 15.0 6755.5 397.0 8.0 20.0 11.9 61.0 58.4 180 1142
2902 SCWN 132.8 6.3 2864.0 485.5 9.6 9.2 3.3 18.5 15.3 201 374
2903 SCWS 66.3 55.0 4675.8 437.4 3.8 3.4 3.8 22.0 17.8 110 216
2904 SRWN 18.03 171 2 273.5 15.3 12.7 3.9 22.7 18.5 187 469
2905 SRWS 28.0 27.1 1731.3 1.8 5.5 1.2 6.7 5.5 206 366
2906
2907
2908
2909 * ADUJUST THE DEMANDS FOR COW AND BUFFALO POPULATION IN THE IRRIGATED AREA
2910 .&&Z ZONE3XXXXX(Z,CQ, "DEMANO") = DEMAND(Z,CQ ) ;
2911 SCALAR
2912 COWF ADJUSTMENT FACTOR FOR COWS POPULATION IN THE IRRIGATED AREAS/.5/
2913 BUFF ADJUSTMENT FACTOR FOR BUFFLOES POP. IN THE IRRIGATED AREAS/.B/
2914
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 63
DEMAND AND CONSUMPTION OATA GAMS 2.2~ IBM CMS

2915
2916
2917 DEMAND(Z, "COW-MILK") DEMAND(Z, "COW-MILK" )*COWF;
2918 DEMAND(Z."BUFF-MILK") DEMAND( Z, "BUFF -MILK") *BUFF;
2919
2920
2921 PARAMETER ELAST(CQ ELASTICITY OF DEMAND FOR CROP AND LIVESTOCK COMODITIES
2922 /
2923 (BASMATI. IRRI) -.4
2924 COTTON - .9
2925 GRAM -.22
2926 MAIZE -.4
2927 MUS+RAP -.35
2928 SC-MILL -.7
2929 WHEAT -.23
2930 (POTATOES,ONIONS,CHILLI) .7
2931 (COW-MILK,BUFF-MILK) -.44
2932 /
2933
2934 GROWTHRD(CQ ) GROWTH RATE OF REFERENCE DEMAND (PERCENT)/
2935 BASMATl 4.5, IRRI 4.0, COTTON 5.0,
2936 GRAM 4.7, WHEAT 4.1, MUS+RAP 3.4,
2937 SC-MILL 5.5,
2938 COW-MILK 6.3. BUFF-MILK 6.3, MEAT 6.6 /
2939
I-'
2940 10
2941 TABLE CONSRATIO(Z,G) PROPORTION OF CONSUMPTION BY GROWUNDWATER TYPE lJt
2942
2943 FRESH
2944 NWFP 1
2945 PMW .85
2946 PCW .9
2947 PSW .83
2948 PRW 1
2949 SCWN .55
2950 SRWN .33
2951 SCWS .34
2952 SRWS 0
2953
2954 PARAMETER NATEXP(CQ) NATIONAL EXPORTS (000 TONS)
2955 /BASMATI 250. IRRI 1100, COTTON 700, ONIONS 10 /
2956 EXPLIMIT(Z,CQ) EXPORT LIMITS BY ZONE
2957 SCALAR EXPLIMITGR GROWTH RATE OF EXPORT LIMITS(PERCENT) /5 /
2958 ,
2959 TABLE EXPPV(PV,CQ) PROVINCIAL EXPORTS AS PROPORTION OF NATIONAL
2960
2961 BASMATI IRRI COTTON ONIONS
2962 NWFP 0.14
2963 PUN-.lAB 1.00 0.29 0.84 0.33
2964 SIND 0.71 0.16 0.53
2965
2966 TABLE EXPZO(Z,CQ) ZONAL EXPORTS AS PROPORTION OF PROVINCIAL
2967
2968 BASMATI IRRI COTTON ONIONS
2969 NWFP 1
2970 PCW 0.33 1.00 0.52
INDUS
BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME~WSIS01 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 64
DEMAND
AND CONSUMPTION DATA GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

2971 PRW 1.00 0.67 0.22

2972 PMW 0.09
2973 PSW 0.17
2974
2975 SCWN 0.74 0.41
2976 SRWN 0.74 0.30
2977 SCWS 0.26 0.22
2978 SRWS 0.26 0.08
2979
2980
2981 GROWTHRO(CQ)$(GROWTHRO(CQ) EQ 0) = 3.0 ;
2982 CONSRATIO(Z,"SALINE") = 1 - CONSRATIO(Z,"FRESH")
2983 EXPLIMIT(Z,CQ) NATEXP(CQ)*
2984 SUM(PV$PVZ(PV,Z), EXPPV(PV,CQ*EXPZO(Z,CQ)
2985 EXPLIMIT(Z,CQ) = SUM(IS$ISR(IS),(1+EXPLIMITGR/100'**
2986 (ORO(IS)+1979-BASEYEAR)*EXPLIMIT(Z,CQ
2987
2988 *&&Z ZONE3XXXXX(Z,CQ,"TOTPROO") TOTPROO(Z.CQ)
2989 *&&Z ZONE3XXXXX(Z,CQ, "FARMCONS") FARMCONS(Z,CQ)
2990 *&&Z ZONE3XXXXX(Z,CQ,"ELAST") ELAST(CQ)
2991 *&&Z ZONE3XXXXX(Z,CQ, "GROWTHRO") GROWTHRO(CQ)
2992 *&&Z ZONE3XXXXX(Z,CQ,"EXPLIMIT") EXPLlMIT(Z,CQ)
2993
2994
....
10
0\
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:21:23 PAGE 65
DATA TRANSFORMATION TO ZONES GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

2996 SET SRi (DC) /CCA. CCAP /

2997 ALIAS (G.G1)
2998 PARAMETER
2999 ZWT(Z,CNL.SA) WEIGHTING FACTOR TO MAP RAIN EVAP AND EFFICIENCIES TO ZONES
3000 EQEVAPZ(Z.M) EVAPORATION FROM THE EQUAIFER BY ACZ (FEET)
3001 SUBIRRZ(Z.M) SUBIRRIGATION BY ACZ (FEET)
3002 EFRZ(Z.M) EFFECTIVE RAIN BY ACZ (FEET)
3003 RESOURCE(Z.G.R1) ENDOWMENTS BY ACZ AND GROUNDWATER QUALITY
3004 CNEFF(CNL) CANAL EFFICIENCY FROM CANAL HEAD TO THE WATERCOURSE HEAD
3005 WCEFF(CNL,M) WATERCOURSE COMMAND DELIVERY EFFICIENCY
3006 TWEFF(CNL.M) DELIVERY EFFICIENCY FROM PRIVATE TUBEWELL TO THE ROOT ZONE
3007 CNEFFZ(Z) WEIGHTED CANAL DELIVERY EFFICIENCY FROM CANAL HEAD TO WATERCOURSE HEAD
3008 TWEFFZ(Z,M) WEIGHTED PRIVATE TUBEWELL DELIVERY EFFICIENCY BY ZONE
3009 WCEFFZ(Z,M) WEIGHTED WATER COURSE COMMAND DELIVERY EFFICIENCY BY ZONE
3010 FLEFFZ(Z) WEIGHTED FIELD EFFICIENCY BY ZONE
3011 CANALWZ(Z,G.M) CANAL WATER AVAILABLILITY AT THE CANAL HEAD(MAF)
3012 CANALWRTZ(Z,G,M) CANAL WATER AVAILABLILITY AT THE ROOT ZONE(MAF)
3013 GWTSA(CNL,SA.M) GOVERNMENT TUBEWELL PUMPAGE BY CANAL AND SUBAREA(KAF)
3014 GWT1(Z.G.M) PUBLIC TUBEWELL PUMPAGE AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)
3015 RATIOFS(Z,G) FRESH AND SALINE CCA AS A PROPORTION OFF TOTAL
3016
3017 LOOP(ISR.

3018 RESOURCE(Z.G.SR1) = SUMCNL,SA)$(ZSA(Z,CNL,SA),GWFG(CNL,SA,G, COMDEF(ISR,SR1,CNL) *SUBDEF(SA,CNL) );

3019 ZWT(Z,CNL,SA)$ZSA(Z,CNL,SA) COMDEF(ISR,"CCA",CNL)*SUBDEF(SA,CNL)/SUM(G,RESOURCE(Z.G,"CCA") );

3020 CNEFF(CNL) COMDEF(ISR,"CEFF",CNL);

.....
3021 WCEFF(CNL.M) SUM( WCESWCEM(WCE,M), COMDEF(ISR.WCE,CNL) ); 10
-...j
3022 TWEFF(CNL,M) (1- (1-WCEFF(CNL,M)/COMDEF(ISR."FLDE",CNL*TWEFAC)*COMDEF(ISR,"FLDE",CNL);
3023 CNEFFZ(Z) SUM( (CNL,SA), COMDEF(ISR,"CEFF",CNL)*ZWT(Z,CNL,SA) )
3024 FLEFFZ(Z) SUM( (CNL,SA), COMDEF(ISR,"FLDE",CNL)*ZWT(Z,CNL.SA ;
3025 CANALWRTZ(Z,G,M) SUM( (CNL,SA)$(ZSA(Z,CNL,SA)$GWFG(CNL,SA,G, DIVPOST(CNL,M)*SUBDEF(SA,CNL)*
3026 COMDEF(ISR,"CEFF",CNL)*WCEFF(CNL,M) );
3027 GWTSA(CNL,SA,M)$CAREA(CNL."FRESH")=SUBDEF(SA,CNL)$GWF(CNL.SA)*COMDEF(ISR,"CCA",CNL)/CAREA(CNL,"FRESH")*GWT(CNL,M)
3028 );
3029
3030 RATIOFS(Z,G) RESOURCE(Z,G,"CCA")/ SUM(G1, RESOURCE(Z,G1,"CCA") ) ;

3031 CANALWZ(Z,G,M) SUM( (CNL,SA)$(ZSA(Z,CNL,SA)'GWFG(CNL,SA,G, DIVPOST(CNL,M)*SUBDEF(SA,CNL) );

3032 EOEVAPZ(Z,M) SUM( (CNL,SA), EOEVAP(CNL,M)*ZWT(Z,CNL,SA

3033 SUBIRRZ(Z,M) SUM( (CNL,SA), SUBIRR(CNL,M)*ZWT(Z,CNL,SA

3034 EFRZ(Z,M) SUM( (CNL,SA), EFR(CNL,M)*ZWT(Z,CNL,SA) )

3035 TWEFFZ(Z,M) SUM( (CNL,SA), TWEFF(CNL,M)*ZWT(Z,CNL,SA) )

3036 WCEFFZ(Z,M) SUM( (CNL,SA), WCEFF(CNL,M)*ZWT(Z,CNL,SA) )

3031 GWT1(Z,"FRESH",M) = SUM( (CNL,SA)$ZSA(Z,CNL,SA), GWTSA(CNL,SA,M)*WCEFF(CNL,M)

3038
3039 DISPLAY WCEFF, TWEFF, GWTSA, GWT1
INDUS BASIN MOOEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 66
DATA TRANSFORMATION TO ZONES GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

* REPORT WATER COMPONENTS

SET CRT /CANAL, CANAL-RT,GOVT-TW, GWT-RT /
RAS /RAIN, SUBIRR, TOTAL /
PARAMETER REP5(Z,*,*)
REP51
REP6
REP5(Z,"RAIN",M) EFRZ(Z,M)*12
REP5(Z,"SUBIRR",M) SUBIRRZ(Z,M)*12 ; REP5(Z,"TOTAL",M) SUM(RAS, REP5(Z,RAS,M) )
REP5(Z,RAS,SEA1) SUM(M$SEA1M(SEA1,M), REP5(Z,RAS,M
REP51(Z,"CNLDELEFF",M)= CNEFFZ(Z)*WCEFFZ(Z,M)
REP51(Z,"WCDELEFF",M) WCEFFZ(Z,M);
REP51(Z,"TWDELEFF",M) = TWEFFZ(Z,M) ;
REP6(Z,G,"CANAL",M) CANALWZ(Z,G,M)
REP6(Z,"TOTAL","CANAL",M) SUM(G,CANALWZ(Z,G,M)
REP6(Z,G,"CANAL RT",M) CANALWRTZ(Z,G,M)
REP6(Z,"TOTAL","CANAL-RT",M) SUM(G, CANALWRTZ(Z,G,M ;
REP6(Z,"FRESH","GOVT-TW",M) SUM( (CNL,SA)$ZSA(Z,CNL,SA), GWTSA(CNL,SA,M) )/1000;
REP6(Z,"TOTAL","GOVT-TW",M) REP6(Z,"FRESH","GOVT TW",M);
REP6(Z,G,"GWT-RT",M) GWT1(Z,G,M)/1000;
REP6(Z,"TOTAL","GWT RT",M) GWT 1( Z, "FRESH" ,M) / 1000;
REP6(Z,T1,CRT,SEA1) SUM(M$SEA1M(SEA1,M), REP6(Z,Tl,CRT,M;
DISPLAY ZWT .....
DISPLAY "RAIN EFFECTIVE RAIN(INCHES) " 1.0
"SUBIRR WATER AVAILABLE TO THE CROPS BY CAPPILARY ACTION FROM THE GW(INCHES) " (I)

"TOTAL TOTAL WATER AVAILABLE FROM RAIN AND SUBIRR(INCHES) ", REP5 ;
DISPLAY "CNLDELEFF WEIGHTED CANAL DELIVERY EFFICIENCY FROM CANAL HEAD TO THE ROOT ZONE "
"WCDELEFF WEIGHTED WATERCOURSE COMMAND EFF. FROM CANAL HEAD TO THE ROOT ZONE ..
"TWDELEFF WEIGHTED PERIVATE TUBEWELL EFF. FROM CANAL HEAD TO THE ROOT ZONE" REP51
DISPLAY "CANAL CANAL WATER AVAILABLE AT THE CANAL HEAD (MAF)
"CANNAL-RT CANAL WATER AVAILABLE AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)
"GOVT-TW GOVERNMENT TUBEWELL PUMPAGE AT THE WATERCOURSE HEAD(MAF)"
"GWT-RT GOVERNMENT TUBEWELL PUMPAGE AT THE ROOT ZONE(MAF)", REP6 ;
DISPLAY EQEVAPZ ;
3079 *
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:21:23 PAGE 61
RESOURCE STOCKS GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3081 SET FTT(R1)/FARMPOP.FARMHH.TRACTORS.TUBEWELLS.BULLOCKS.COWS.BUFFALOS/;

3082
3083 TABLE RES88(R1 .Z) AVAILABLE RESOURCES 1988
3084
3085 * FARMPOP -- THOSAND WORKERS. FARMHH -- THOUSAND HOUSEHOLDS
3086 * BULLOCKS, COWS AND BUFFALOS ARE IN THOUSANDS
3081 * TUBEWELLS ARE 1 CFS TUBEWELLS
3088
3089 NWFP PMW PCW PSW PRW SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS
3090
3091 FARMPOP 311 418 2589 1441 1016 484 589 561 116
3092 FARMHH 174 226 1123 586 513 211 253 215 88
3093 TRACTORS 1465 12044 86811 45171 44564 8171 4154 8839 2102
3094 TUBEWELLS 2638 12265 109658 37952 49897 9513 4863 10348 3163
3095 BULLOCKS 151 332 1918 952 368 399 486 444 143
3096 COWS 505 736 2549 1055 590 442 510 630 256
3091 BUFFALOS 319 481 4146 2911 2219 584 581 557 249
3098
3099
3100 TABLE CROPAREA(Z.C) CROPPED AREA 1988 (OOO'S ACRES)
3101
3102 * SC-MILL AREA INCLUDES GUR AREA
3103
3104 WHEAT BASMATI IRRI MAIZE SC-MILL COTTON MUS+RAP GRAM CHILLI POTATOES ONIONS ORCHARD RAB-FOD KHA-FDD
3105 NWFP 224 0 0 18 143 52 132 9 8 6 21 41 14 I-'
3106 PCW 6324 396 211 41 722 3820 215 146 55 51 40 300 1114 1332 10
3101 PMW 1168 25 29 100 210 21 389 14 13 10 93 158 328 10
3108 PRW 2141 1189 212 9 19 18 42 233 21 19 15 56 506 314
3109 PSW 2688 391 42 51 495 614 41 218 33 30 24 242 615 698
3110 SCWN 1004 0 19 169 143 63 58 10 9 1 49 131 72
3111 SCWS 921 0 196 238 158 25 22 12 11 8 103 137 59
3112 SRWN 590 0 951 24 13 124 100 15 14 11 7 111 4
3113 SRWS 101 0 325 111 41 13 38 4 4 3 41 30 7
3114
3115 TABLE GROWTHRES(R1 .Z) GROWTH RATE OF FARM POPULATION TRACTORS AND TUBWELLS (PERCENT)
3116
3111 (NWFP.PMW.PCW,PSW.PRW) (SCWN.SCWS.SRWN.SRWS)
3118 FARMPOP
3119 FARMHH
3120 TRACTORS 3 3
3121 TUBEWELLS 1
3122 BULLOCKS 2.35 2.35
3123 COWS 1. 21 1. 21
3124 BUFFALDS 1. 21 1. 21
3125
3126 PARAMETER
3121 ORCHAREA(Z) AREA UNDER ORCHARDS BV ZONE (THOUSAND ACRES )
3128 ORCHGRDWTH(Z) GROWTH RATE OF ORCHARD AREA
3129 /(NWFP.PMW.PCW.PSW.PRW) 6.43
3130 (SCWN.SCWS.SRWN.SRWS) 2.591/
3131 ,
3132 DEMAND(Z,CQ) DEMAND(Z,CQ)* SUM(IS$ISR(IS).
3133 (1+GROWTHRD(CQ)/100)**(ORD(IS)+1919-BASEYEAR) );
3134 ORCHAREA(Z) CROPAREA(Z."ORCHARD")* SUM(IS$ISR(IS).
3135 (1+0RCHGROWTH(Z)/100)**(ORD(IS)+1919-BASEVEAR) );
3136 RESOURCE(Z.G,FTT) = RES88(FTT.Z)*RATIOFS(Z.G)*SUM(IS$ISR(IS).
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 68
RESOURCE STOCKS GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3137 (1+GROWTHRES(FTT,Z)/100)**(ORD(IS)+1979-BASEYEAR) );
3138
3139 NTWUCAP = TWUTIL("NEW")*TWCAP ;
3140 RESOURCE(Z,"FRESH", "TUBEWELLS")$RESOURCE(Z, "FRESH","CCA")
3141 SUM(G, RESOURCE(Z,G,"TUBEWELLS";
3142 RESOURCE(Z,"SALINE","TUBEWELLS")= 0 ;
3143 RESOURCE(Z,"FRESH","TWC")$RESOURCE(Z,"FRESH","CCA")
3144 RESOURCE(Z, "FRESH", "TUBEWELLS")*TWCAP*
3145 TWUTI L( "EXISTING") /1000
3146
3147 PARAMETER SCMILLCAP(Z) SUGARCANE MILL CAPACITY (THOUSAND TONNS PER YEAR)
3148 /NWFP 6937,
3149 PMW 5750, PCW 8550, PSW 12000. PRW 3600
3150 SCWN 6000. SCWS 8370, SRWN 3800, SRWS 3730 /;
3151 OPTION TOTPROD:1, FARMCONS:1, DEMAND: 1, CONSRATIO:2 ;
3152 DISPLAY RESOURCE, TOTPROD, FARMCONS,CONSRATIO. OEMAND,EXPLIMIT
3153 SET CNL1(CNL) CANALS EXCLUDING NWFP CANALS ;
3154 CNL1(CNL) = YES; CNL1(CNL)$PVCNL("NWFP",CNL) = NO ;
3155 PARAMETER POSTT AVERAGE CANAL DIVERSIONS BY SEASON
3156 PROT ARB DIVERSIONS AS PROPORTION OF TOTAL(PUNJAB AND SIND) OST TARBELA
3157
3158 POSTT(CNL,SEA) = SUM(M$SEAM(SEA,M), DIVPOST(CNL,M;
3159 POSTT(PV2,SEA) = SUM(CNL$PVCNL(PV2,CNL), POSTT(CNL,SEA;
3160 PROTARB(CNL1,SEA) = 0.999 * POSTT(CNL1,SEA)/ ( POSTT("PUNJAB",SEA) + POSTT("SIND",SEA ;
3161 PROTARB(PV2,SEA) - 0.999 * POSTT(PV2,SEA) / ( POSTT("PUNJAB",SEA) + POSTT("SINO",SEA N
3162 OPTION POSTT:5, PROTARB:5 ; o
o
3163 DISPLAY CNL1. PDSTT, PROTARB ;
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 69
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TYPE REFERENCES

A SET DECLARED 120 DEF INED 120 REF 1780 1823 CONTROL 1823
AI SET DECLARED 121 DEFINED 121
BASEYEAR PARAM DECLARED 134 DEFINED 134 REF 1644 1756 1758 1823 2986 3133 3135
3137
BP PARAM DECLARED 1819 ASSIGNED 3*1821
BUFF PARAM DECLARED 2913 DEFINED 2913 REF 2918
BULLOCK PARAM DECLARED 272 DEF INED 272 ASSIGNED 635 REF 635
C SET DECLARED 47 DEFINED 47 REF 63 64 152 268 269 272 635
637 1051 1316 1495 1599 1632 1643 1644 1648 1666 1688 1707
1720 1730 1745 1746 3*1750 1752 2* 1753 1756 2*1757 1808 2786 2806
3100 CONTROL 136 269 635 1643 1749 1752 1755 1757
CANALWRTZ PARAM DECLARED 3012 ASSIGNED 3025
CANALWZ PARAM DECLARED 3011 ASSIGNED 3031
CARE A PARAM DECLARED 2073 ASSIGNED 2076 2077 REF 2077 2078 2*3027
CC SET DECLARED 42 DEFINED 42
CD SET DECLARED 2495 DEFINED 2495 REF 2496
CF SET DECLARED 63 DEFINED 63 CONTROL 136
CI SET DECLARED 118 DEFINED 118 REF 119 1495
CNEFF PARAM DECLARED 3004 ASSIGNED 3020
CNEFFZ PARAM DECLARED 3007 ASSIGNED 3023
CNF SET DECLARED 64 ASSIGNED 2*136
CNL SET DECLARED 1826 DEFINED 1826 REF 1870 1880 1883 2021 2045 2060 2071
2*2072 2073 3*2076 2077 2102 2144 2186 2237 2261 2296 2306 2307 N
0
2308 2309 2320 2*2321 2322 2323 2*2325 2326 2382 2999 3004 3005 I-'
3006 3013 4*3018 3*3019 3020 3021 3*3022 2*3023 2*3024 4*3025 2*3026 6*3027
4*3031 2*3032 2*3033 2*3034 2*3035 2*3036 3*3037 3153 3154 3158 2*3159
CONTROL 2071 2*2072 2076 2077 2320 2321 2322 2325 2326 3018 3019
3020 3021 3022 3023 3024 3025 3027 3031 3032 3033 3034 3035
3036 3037 2*3154 3158 3159
CNL1 SET DECLARED 3153 ASSIGNED 2*3154 REF 3160 3163 CONTROL 3160
COMDEF PARAM DECLARED 1883 DEFINED 1883 REF 2076 2322 3018 3019 3020 3021 2*3022
3023 3024 3026 3027
CONSRATIO PARAM DECLARED 2941 DEFINED 2941 ASSIGNED 2982 REF 2982 3151 3152
COWF PARAM DECLARED 2912 DEF INED 2912 REF 2917
CQ SET DECLARED 36 DEFINED 37 REF 42 47 122 2765 2859 2876 2890
2921 2934 2954 2956 2959 2966 2981 2983 2*2984 2986 3132 3133
CONTROL 2981 2983 2985 3132
CROPAREA PARAM DECLARED 3100 DEFINED 3100 REF 3134
DC SET DECLARED 95 DEFINED 95 REF 103 1883 2996
DEMAND PARAM DECLARED 2890 DEF INED 2890 ASSIGNED 2917 2918 3132 REF 2917 2918 3132
3151 3152
DEPTH PARAM DECLARED 2306 ASSIGNED 2320 2321 REF 2325 2*2328
DEP1 PARAM DECLARED 2261 DEF INED 2261 REF 2320
DEP2 PARAM DECLARED 2296 DEFINED 2296 REF 2*2321
DIVPOST PARAM DECLARED 2186 DEFINED 2186 REF 3025 3031 3158
DRC PARAM DECLARED 2315 DEF INED 2315 REF 2322
ECNSDWTPR PARAM DECLARED 2806 DEF INED 2806
EFR PARAM DECLARED 2307 ASSIGNED 2322 REF 3034
EFRZ PARAM DECLARED 3002 ASSIGNED 3034
ELAST PARAM DECLARED 2921 DEFINED 2922
EQEVAP PARAM DECLARED 2308 ASSIGNED 2325 REF 2326 3032
EQEVAPZ PARAM DECLARED 3000 ASSIGNED 3032
EVAP PARAM DECLARED 2102 DEF INED 2102 REF 2325
EXPLIMIT PARAM DECLARED 2956 ASSIGNED 2983 2985 REF 2986 3152
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 70
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TYPE REFERENCES

EXPLIMITGR PARAM DECLARED 2957 DEFINED 2957 REF 2985

EXPPV PARAM DECLARED 2959 DEFINED 2959 REF 2984
EXPZO PARAM DECLARED 2966 DEFINED 2966 REF 2984
FARMCONS PARAM DECLARED 2876 DEFINED 2876 REF 3151 3152
FERT PARAM DECLARED 1599 DEFINED 1599 ASSIGNED 1643 REF 1643 1758
FERTGR PARAM DECLARED 1632 DEFINED 1634 REF 1644
FINSDWTPR PARAM DECLARED 2786 DEFINED 2786
FLEFFZ PARAM DECLARED 3010 ASSIGNED 3024
FTT SET DECLARED 3081 DEFINED 3081 REF 3136 3137 CONTROL 3136
G SET DECLARED 76 DEFINED 76 REF 77 78 1880 2076 2077 2941 2997
3003 3011 3012 3014 3015 3018 3019 3025 3030 3031 3136 3141
CONTROL 2076 2077 3018 3019 3025 3030 3031 3136 3141
GF SET DECLARED 77 DEFINED 77
GR PARAM DECLARED 1817 DEFINED 1817
GRAZ PARAM DECLARED 1737 DEFINED 1737
GROWTHCY PARAM DECLARED 1720 DEFINED 1720 REF 1756
GROWTHCYF PARAM DECLARED 1746 ASSIGNED 1755 REF 1757 1758
GROWTHQ PARAM DECLARED 1818 DEF INED 1818 REF 1823
GROWTHRD PARAM DECLARED 2934 DEFINED 2934 ASSIGNED 2981 REF 2981 3133
GROWTHRES PARAM DECLARED 3115 DEFINED 3115 REF 3137
GS SET DECLARED 78 DEFINED 78
GWF SET DECLARED 2060 DEFINED 2060 REF 2*2072 3027
GWFG SET DECLARED 1880 ASSIGNED 2071 2*2072 REF 2076 3018 3025 3031 N
0
GWT PARAM DECLARED 2237 DEFINED 2237 REF 3027 N
GWTSA PARAM DECLARED 3013 ASSIGNED 3027 REF 3037 3039
GWTl PARAM DECLARED 3014 ASSIGNED 3037 REF 3039
Gl SET DECLARED 2997 REF 3030 CONTROL 3030
I SET DECLARED 2371 DEFINED 2371 REF 2441 2544 2643 2645 2742 2743 2744
CONTROL 2645 2742 2743 2744
INFLOW PARAM DECLARED 2643 ASSIGNED 2645 REF 2742 2743
INFL5080 PARAM DECLARED 2544 DEFINED 2544 REF 2645
IOLIVE PARAM DECLARED 1780 DEFINED 1780 ASSIGNED 1823 REF 1823 2*1824
IS SET DECLARED 127 DEFINED 127 REF 132 1643 1644 1755 1756 2*1823 1883
2261 2296 2648 2985 2986 3132 3133 3134 3135 3136 3137
CONTROL 1643 1755 1823 2985 3132 3134 3136
ISR SET DECLARED 132 DEFINED 132 REF 1643 1755 1823 2076 2320 2*2321 2322
2730 2985 3018 3019 3020 3021 2*3022 3023 3024 3026 3027 3132
3134 3136 CONTROL 2075 2319 2729 3017
LABFAC PARAM DECLARED 2853 DEF INED 2853
LABOR PARAM DECLARED 637 DEFINED 637
LAND PARAM DECLARED 152 DEFINED 152 REF 269
LCEFF PARAM DECLARED 2488 ASSIGNED 2490
LLOSS PARAM DECLARED 2474 DEFINED 2474 REF 2*2490
LSTD PARAM DECLARED 2848 DEFINED 2848
M SET DECLARED 106 DEFINED 106 REF 108 112 116 152 269 272 635
637 1051 1316 1819 2102 2144 2237 2296 2306 2307 2308 2309
2*2321 2323 2*2325 2326 2643 2644 2*2645 2662 2672 2682 2742 2*2743
2748 2*2749 2840 3000 3001 3002 3005 3006 3008 3009 3011 3012
3013 3014 3021 3022 3025 3026 3027 3031 3032 3033 3034 3035
3036 2*3037 2*3158 CONTROL 138 269 635 1821 2320 2321 2322 2325
2326 2*2645 2742 2743 2748 2749 3021 3022 3025 3027 3031 3032
3033 3034 3035 3036 3037 3158
MAX FUNCT REF 2732
MIN FUNCT REF 2325
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 71
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TYPE REFERENCES

M1 SET DECLARED 104 DEFINED 104 REF 106 111 2186 2544 2603 2744
CONTROL 2744 2751
N SET DECLARED 2332 DEFINED 2332 REF 2382 2401 2402 2441 2448 2453 2474
2488 2*2490 2496 2512 2537 2538 2603 2644 2645 2648 2662 2672
2682 2695 2698 2728 2730 2748 2749 CONTROL 2448 2490 2537 2538
2645 2730 2748 2749 2751
NATEXP PARAM DECLARED 2954 DEFINED 2955 REF 2983
NATYIELD PARAM DECLARED 1648 DEFINED 1649 REF 1750
NB SET DECLARED 2448 ASSIGNED 2*2448
NC SET DECLARED 2382 DEFINED 2382
NCAP PARAM DECLARED 2453 DEFINED 2453
NI SET DECLARED 2441 DEFINED 2441
NN SET DECLARED 2402 DEFINED 2402
NT SET DECLARED 125 DEFINED 125 REF 1808
NTWUCAP PARAM DECLARED 2851 ASSIGNED 3139
Nl SET DECLARED 2401 REF 2402 2453 2474 2488 2*2490 2512 2537 2603 2644
2645 2748 2749 CONTROL 2490 2537 2645 2748 2749 2751
ORCHAREA PARAM DECLARED 3127 ASSIGNED 3134
ORCHGROWTH PARAM DECLARED 3128 DEFINED 3129 REF 3135
PN SET DECLARED 2695 DEFINED 2695 REF 2732 2*2733 2752 CONTROL 2732 2734 2752
POSTT PARAM DECLARED 3155 ASSIGNED 3158 3159 REF 3159 3*3160 3*3161 3162 3163
POW SET DECLARED 2691 DEFINED 2691 REF 2752 CONTROL 2752
POWERCHAR PARAM DECLARED 2698 DEFINED 2698 ASSIGNED 2732 2734 REF 2732 2733 2752 N
0
PRICES PARAM DECLARED 2765 DEFINED 2765 w
PRI1 PARAM DECLARED 2829 DEFINED 2829
PROT ARB PARAM DECLARED 3156 ASSIGNED 3160 3161 REF 3162 3163
PS SET DECLARED 128 DEFINED 128 REF 2765 2786 2806 2829 2840
PV SET DECLARED 30 DEFINED 30 REF 31 32 33 1666 1749 1750 1870
2959 2*2984 CONTROL 1749 2984
PVCNL SET DECLARED 1870 DEF INED 1870 REF 3154 3159
PVZ SET DECLARED 33 DEF INED 33 ASSIGNED 137 REF 1749 2984
PVl SET DECLARED 31 DEFINED 31
PV2 SET DECLARED 32 DEFINED 32 REF 3159 3161 CONTROL 3159 3161
Pl SET DECLARED 2826 DEFINED 2826 REF 2829
P 11 SET DECLARED 2827 DEF INED 2827 REF 2829 2840
P2 SET DECLARED 119 DEF INED 119 REF 1599 1643 CONTROL 1643
P3 SET DECLARED 2763 DEFINED 2763 REF 2765
Q SET DECLARED 122 DEF INED 122 REF 1823 CONTROL 1823
RAIN PARAM DECLARED 2144 DEFINED 2144 REF 2323
RATIOFS PARAM DECLARED 3015 ASSIGNED 3030 REF 3136
RCAP PARAM DECLARED 2728 ASSIGNED 2730 REF 2733 2754
REPCO PARAM DECLARED 1816 DEFINED 1816
REP7 PARAM DECLARED 2739 ASSIGNED 2742 2743 2744 REF 2744 2745
REP8 PARAM DECLARED 2740 ASSIGNED 2748 2749 2751 2752 REF 2750 2753 2758
RESOURCE PARAM DECLARED 3003 ASSIGNED 3018 3136 3140 3142 3143 REF 3019 2*3030 3140
3141 3143 3144 3152
RES88 PARAM DECLARED 3083 DEFINED 3083 REF 3136
REVAPL PARAM DECLARED 2682 DEFINED 2682
RIVERB PARAM DECLARED 2512 DEFINED 2512 ASSIGNED 2537 REF 2537
RIVERCD PARAM DECLARED 2496 DEF INED 2496 ASSIGNED 2538 REF 2538
RRCAP PARAM DECLARED 2648 DEF INED 2648 REF 2730
RULELO PARAM DECLARED 2662 DEF INED 2662
RULEUP PARAM DECLARED 2672 DEFINED 2672
R1 SET DECLARED 80 DEFINED 80 REF 95 3003 3081 3083 3115
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISDl 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 72
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TYPE REFERENCES

S SET DECLARED 67 DEFINED 67 REF 152 268 269 272 635 637 1051
1316 1495 1707 1745 1752 1753 1757 CONTROL 269 635 1752 1757
SA SET DECLARED 102 DEFINED 102 REF 1880 2021 2045 2060 2071 2*2072 2*2076
2999 3013 3*3018 2*3019 3023 3024 3*3025 2*3027 3*3031 3032 3033 3034
3035 3036 2*3037 CONTROL 2071 2*2072 2076 3018 3019 3023 3024 3025
3027 3031 3032 3033 3034 3035 3036 3037
SCMILLCAP PARAM DECLARED 3147 DEFINED 3148
SCONV PARAM DECLARED 1808 DEFINED 1808
SEA SET DECLARED 111 DEFINED 111 REF 112 1730 1737 1808 3158 3159 3*3160
3*3161 CONTROL 3158 3159 3160 3161
SEAM SET DECLARED 112 DEFINED 112 REF 3158
SEAl SET DECLARED 115 DEFINED 115 REF 116 2743 2749 CONTROL 2743 2749
SEA1M SET DECLARED 116 DEFINED 116 ASSIGNED 138 REF 2743 2749
SRl SET DECLARED 2996 DEFINED 2996 REF 3018 CONTROL 3018
SUBDEF PARAM DECLARED 2021 DEFINED 2021 REF 2071 2076 3018 3019 3025 3027 3031
SUBIRR PARAM DECLARED 2309 ASSIGNED 2326 REF 3033
SUBIRRFAC PARAM DECLARED 2310 DEFINED 2311
SUBIRRZ PARAM DECLARED 3001 ASSIGNED 3033
SYLDS PARAM DECLARED 1495 DEFINED 1495
S58 SET DECLARED 2542 DEFINED 2542 REF 2544 2603
T SET DECLARED 66 DEFINED 66 REF 152 268 269 272 635 637 1051
1316 1495 1745 1753 1757 CONTROL 269 635 1749 1752 1757
TECH SET DECLARED 268 ASSIGNED 269 N
0
THEl PARAM DECLARED 2316 DEFINED 2316 REF 2326 .t:
TOTPROD PARAM DECLARED 2859 DEFINED 2859 REF 3151 3152
TRACTOR PARAM DECLARED 1316 DEFINED 1316
TRCAP PARAM DECLARED 2849 DEFINED 2849
TRI PARAM DECLARED 2603 DEFINED 2603 REF 2645
TRIB PARAM DECLARED 2644 ASSIGNED 2645 REF 2748 2749
TWCAP PARAM DECLARED 2850 DEFINED 2850 REF 3139 3144
TWEFAC PARAM DECLARED 2852 DEFINED 2852 REF 3022
TWEFF PARAM DECLARED 3006 ASSIGNED 3022 REF 3035 3039
TWEFFZ PARAM DECLARED 3008 ASSIGNED 3035
TWUTIL PARAM DECLARED 2855 DEFINED 2856 REF 3139 3145
Tl SET DECLARED 79 DEFINED 79
V SET DECLARED 2696 DEFINED 2696 REF 2698 2732 2752 CONTROL 2732 2752
W SET DECLARED 71 DEFINED 71 REF 152 268 2G9 272 635 637 1051
1316 1495 1707 1745 1752 1753 1757 CONTROL 269 635 1752 1757
WAGEPS PARAM DECLARED 2840 DEFINED 2840
WATER PARAM DECLARED 1051 DEFINED 1051
WCE SET DECLARED 103 DEFINED 103 REF 108 2*3021 CONTROL 3021
WCEFF PARAM DECLARED 3005 ASSIGNED 3021 REF 3022 3026 3036 3037 3039
WCEFFZ PARAM DECLARED 3009 ASSIGNED 3036
WCEM SET DECLARED 108 DEFINED 108 REF 3021
WEEDY PARAM DECLARED 1730 DEFINED 1730
YIELD PARAM DECLARED 1745 ASSIGNED 1749 1752 1757 REF 1753 1757
YLDPRPV PARAM DECLARED 1666 DEFINED 1666 REF 1750
YLDPRZO PARAM DECLARED 1707 DEFINED 1708 REF 1752 1753
YLDPRZS PARAM DECLARED 1688 DEFINED 1688 REF 1750
Z SET DECLARED 20 DEFINED 20 REF 33 152 268 269 272 635 637
1051 1316 1495 1599 1643 1688 1720 1730 1737 1745 1746 1749
1750 1753 1756 2*1757 1780 1823 2045 2310 2859 2876 2917 2918
2941 2956 2966 2982 2*2984 2986 2999 3000 3001 3002 3003 3007
3008 3009 3010 3011 3012 3014 3015 3018 2*3019 3023 3024 3025
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 73
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TYPE REFERENCES

2*3030 3031 3032 3033 3034 3035 3036 3037 3083 3100 3115 3127
3128 3132 3134 3135 2*3136 3137 3140 3141 3143 3144 3147
CONTROL 137 269 635 1643 1749 1752 1755 1757 1823 2917 2918
2982 2983 2985 3018 3019 3023 3024 3025 3030 3031 3032 3033
3034 3035 3036 3037 3132 3134 3136 3140 3142 3143
ZSA SET DECLARED 2045 DEFINED 2045 REF 3018 3019 3025 3031 3037
ZWT PARAM DECLARED 2999 ASSIGNED 3019 REF 3023 3024 3032 3033 3034 3035 3036

SETS

A ANIMAL TYPES
AI ANIMALS INPUT OUTPUT
C CROPS
CC CONSUMABLE COMODITIES
CD
CF FODDER CROPS
CI CROP INPUT OUTPUTS
CNF NON-FODDER CROPS
CNL IRRIGATION CANALS IN THE INDUS RIVER IRRIGATION SYSTEM
CNL1 CANALS EXCLUDING NWFP CANALS
CO CROP AND LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS
DC CHARACTERISTICS OF CANAL COMMAND N
o
FTT I.JI
G GROUND WATER QUALITY TYPES
GF FRESH GROUND WATER SUB-ZONE
GS SALINE GROUND WATER SUB-ZONE
GWF SUBAREAS WITH FRESH GROUND WATER
GWFG SUBAREA IDENTIFICATION BY THE GROUNDWATER QUALITY
G1 ALIASED WITH G
I SYSTEM INFLOWS
IS IRRIGATION SYSTEM SCENARIOS
ISR IRRIGATION SYSTEM SCENARIO FOR THIS RUN
M MONTHS
M1 MONTHS AND SEASONS
N NODES OF THE INDUS RIVER SYSTEM
NB
NC NODE TO CANAL MAP
NI NODE TO RIM STATION INFLOW MAP
NN WATER FLOW SYSTEM NODE TO NODE
NT NUTRIENTS FOR ANIMALS
N1 ALIASED WITH N
PN NODES WITH POWER HOUSE
POW
PS PRICE SECENARIOS
PV PROVINCES AND COUNTRY
PVCNL PROVINCE TO CANALS MAP
PVZ PROVINCE TO ZONE MAP
PV1 PROVINCES
PV2 PUNJAB AND SIND
P1
P 11
P2
P3
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 74
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SETS

Q LIVESTOCK COMODITIES
R1 RESOURCES
S SEQUENCE
SA SUBAREAS
SEA SEASONS
SEAM MAPPING FROM SEASONS TO MONTHS
SEAi
SEAiM
SRi
S58
T TECHNOLOGY
TECH TECHNOLOGY AVAILABILITY INDICATOR
Ti SUB ZONES BY GW QUALITY
V
W WATER STRESS LEVEL
WCE WATERCOURSE EFFECIENCIES
WCEM MAPPING FROM SEASON TO MONTHS FOR WATERCOURSE EFFICIENCES
Z AGROCLIMATIC ZONES
ZSA CANAL-SUBAREA TO AGROCLIMATIC ZONE MAPPING

PARAMETERS
N
BASEYEAR BASE YEAR FOR CROP YIELDS o
01
BP DRAFT POWER AVAILABLE PER BULLOCK(HOURS PER MONTH)
BUFF ADJUSTMENT FACTOR FOR BUFFLOES POP. IN THE IRRIGATED AREAS
BULLOCK BULLOCK POWER REQUIREMENTS(BULLOCK PAIR HOURS PER MONTH
CANALWRTZ CANAL WATER AVAILABLILITY AT THE ROOT ZONE(MAF)
CANALWZ CANAL WATER AVAILABLILITY AT THE CANAL HEAD(MAF)
CAREA CCA CLASSIFIED BY GROUNDWATER QUALITY FOR EACH CANAL
CNEFF CANAL EFFICIENCY FROM CANAL HEAD TO THE WATERCOURSE HEAD
CNEFFZ WEIGHTED CANAL DELIVERY EFFICIENCY FROM CANAL HEAO TO WATERCOURSE HEAD
COMDEF CANAL COMMAND CHARACTERISTICS
CONSRATIO PROPORTION OF CONSUMPTION BY GROWUNOWATER TYPE
COWF ADJUSTMENT FACTOR FOR COWS POPULATION IN THE IRRIGATED AREAS
CROP AREA CROPPED AREA 1988 (OOO'S ACRES)
DEMAND MARKET DEMAND BY ZONE (000 TONS OR MILLION LITERS)
DEPTH DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (FEET)
DEP1 DEPTH TO WATER TABLE (FEET)
DEP2 DEPTH TO WATER TABLE (FEET)
DIVPOST AVERAGE(1976-77 TO 1987-88) CANAL DIVERSIONS(MAF)
DRC RUN-OFF PORTION OF RAINFALL
ECNSDWTPR PRICES OF SEED(RS PER KG) AND WATER(RS PER ACRE )
EFR EFFECTIVE RAINFALL IN FEET
EFRZ EFFECTIVE RAIN BY ACZ (FEET)
ELAST ELASTICITY OF DEMAND FOR CROP AND LIVESTOCK COMODITIES
EQEVAP EVAPORATION FROM THE EQUAIFER (FEET)
EQEVAPZ EVAPORATION FROM THE EQUAIFER BY ACZ (FEET)
EVAP PAN EVAPORATION(FEET)
EXPLIMIT EXPORT LIMITS BY ZONE
EXPLIMITGR GROWTH RATE OF EXPORT LIMITS(PERCENT)
EXPPV PROVINCIAL EXPORTS AS PROPORTION OF NATIONAL
EXPZO ZONAL EXPORTS AS PROPORTION OF PROVINCIAL
FARMCONS ON-FARM CONSUMPTION 1988 (OOO'S TONS)
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 75
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

PARAMETERS

FERT FERTILIZER APPLICATIONS (KG PER ACRE)

FERTGR FERTILIZER APPLICATION GROWTH RATE PERCENT
FINSDWTPR PRICES OF SEED(RS PER KG) AND WATER(RS PER ACRE
FLEFFZ WEIGHTED FIELD EFFICIENCY BY ZONE
GR REQUIRED PROPORTION OF GREEN FODDER IN TOTAL FODDER
GRAZ GRAZING FROM SLACK LAND (TONNS PER ACRE )
GROWTHCY GROWTH RATE OF CROP YIELOS FROM 1988 BASE (PERCENT)
GROWTHCYF GROWTH FACTOR FOR CROP YIELDS USING GROWTHCY
GROWTHQ GROWTH RATE OF MILK AND MEAT YIELDS (PERCENT)
GROWTHRD GROWTH RATE OF REFERENCE DEMAND (PERCENT)
GROWTHRES GROWTH RATE OF FARM POPULATION TRACTORS AND TUBWELLS (PERCENT)
GWT PUBLIC TUNEWELL PUMPAGE(KAF)
GWTSA GOVERNMENT TUBEWELL PUMP AGE BY CANAL AND SUBAREA(KAF)
GWTl PUBLIC TUBEWELL PUMPAGE AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)
INFLOW INFLOWS FOR THIS RUN (MAF)
INFL5080 SYSTEM INFLOWS MEASURED ATTHE RIM STATIONS (MAF)
IOLIVE LIVESTOCK INPUT OUTPUT COEFFICIENTS BY ZONES
LABFAC FACTOR TO CONVERT WAGE TO THE RESERVATION WAGE
LABOR LABOR REQUIREMENTS FOR CROPS(MAN HOURS)
LAND LAND OCCUPATION BY MONTH
LCEFF LINK CANAL EFFICIENCY FROM HEAD TO TAIL
LLOSS LINK CANAL LOSS FACTORS
LSTD STANDARD LABOR LIMIT ( HOURS PER MONTH N
NATEXP NATIONAL EXPORTS (000 TONS) o....,
NATYIELO NATIONAL CROP YIELDS 1988 FOR STANDARD TECHNOLOGIES (KGS)
NCAP NODE TO NODE TRANSFER CAPACITY (MAF)
NTWUCAP EFFECTIVE CAPACITY OF NEW TUBEWELLS(AF PER MONTH)
ORCHAREA AREA UNDER ORCHARDS BY ZONE (THOUSAND ACRES )
ORCHGROWTH GROWTH RATE OF ORCHARD AREA
POSTT AVERAGE CANAL DIVERSIONS BY SEASON
POWERCHAR POWER GENERATION CHRACTERSITICS OF HRDRO STATIONS
PRICES 1988 PRICES
PRIl FERTILIZER TUBEWELL TRACTOR AND PROTEIN PRICES
PRDTARB DIVERSIONS AS PROPORTION OF TOTAL(PUNJAB AND SIND) OST TARBELA
RAIN RAIN (INCHES)
RATIOFS FRESH AND SALINE CCA AS A PROPORTION OFF TOTAL
RCAP LIVE CAPACITY OF RESRVOIRS (MAF)
REPCO REPRODUCTIVE COEFFICIENT
REP7
REP8
RESOURCE ENDOWMENTS BY ACZ AND GROUNDWATER QUALITY
RES88 AVAILABLE RESOURCES 1988
REVAPL EVAPORATION LOSSES FROM RESERVOIRS (KAF)
RIVERB COEFFICIENTS FOR RIVER ROUTING
RIVERCD COEFFICIENTS FOR RIVER ROUTING
RRCAP LIVE STORAGE CAPACITY OF RESERVOIRS (MAF)
RULELO LOWER RULE CURVE
RULEUP UPPER RULE CURVE
SCMILLCAP SUGARCANE MILL CAPACITY (THOUSAND TONNS PER YEAR )
SCONV TON AND DP CONVERSION FACTOR FROM CROP STRAW
SUBDEF SUB-AREA DEFINITION(PROPORTION OF CCA) BY CANALS
SUBIRR WATER SUPPLIED BY CAPILLARY ACTION FROM THE AQUIFER
SUBIRRFAC MAXIMUM SUB-IRRIGATION IN SALINE AREAS AS PROPORTION OF CROP REQ.(NET OF RAIN)
SUBIRRZ SUBIRRIGATION BY ACZ (FEET)
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISD1 01/23/90 16:27:23 PAGE 76
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

PARAMETERS
SYLDS STRAW YIELD AND SEED DATA
THE1 PORTION OF EQUAIFER EVAPORATION USED BY CROPS
TOT PROD TOTAL PRODUCTION 1988 (OOO'S TONS)
TRACTOR TRACTOR REQUIREMENTS (TRACTOR HOURS PER ACRE)
TRCAP TRACTOR CAPACITY IN TRACTOR HOURS PER MONTH
TRI TRIBUTARY INFLOWS (MAF)
TRIB TRIBUTARY INFLOWS FOR THIS RUN (MAF)
TWCAP NAMEPLATE CAPACITY OF THE PRIVATE TUBEWELL( AF PER MONTH)
TWEFAC FACTOR TO CONVERT WC LOSSES TO FROM PRIVATE TUBEWELL LOSSES
TWEFF DELIVERY EFFICIENCY FROM PRIVATE TUBEWELL TO THE ROOT ZONE
TWEFFZ WEIGHTED PRIVATE TUBEWELL DELIVERY EFFICIENCY BY ZONE
TWUTIL EFFECTIVE CAPACITY OF TUBEWELLS(PROPORTION OF NAME PLATE CAPACITY)
WAGEPS WAGE RATES RS PER MAN HOUR
WATER WATER REQUIREMENTS(ACRE FEET PER ACRE)
WCEFF WATERCOURSE COMMAND DELIVERY EFFICIENCY
WCEFFZ WEIGHTED WATER COURSE COMMAND DELIVERY EFFICIENCY BY ZONE
WEEDY WEED YIELDS BY CROP (TONNS PER ACER)
YIELD YIELD BY ZONE CROP TECHNOLOGY IN METRIC TONNS
YLDPRPV PROVINCE YIELDS PROPORTION OF NATIONAL 1987-88
YLDPRZO YIELDS AS PROPORTION OF STANDARD TECHNOLOGIES
YLDPRZS ZONES YIELDS AS PROPORTION OF PROVINCE-STANDARD TECHNOLOGIES
ZWT WEIGHTING FACTOR TO MAP RAIN EVAP AND EFFICIENCIES TO ZONES
N
o
00
**** FILE SUMMARY FOR USER KDAM
INPUT WSISD1 GAMS A
OUTPUT WSISD1 LISTING A
SAVE WSISD1 WORK* A
COMPILATION TIME 6.610 SECONDS VER: IBM-TB-003
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM1 01/23/90 16:27:46 PAGE 77
MODEL SETUP GAMS 2.21 IBM eMS

This file contains the equation and model specification. Set PSR and
PSR1 contains the prices scenarios for the model.
This file is excuted after the data setup (WSISD* ) setup as GAMS RESTART.

N
.,,; o
10
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM1 01/23/90 16:27:46 PAGE 78
MODEL SETUP GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3173 SETS
3174 PSR(PS) PRICE SCENARIO FOR THE MODEL(FINANCIAL PRICES) /87-88
3175 PSR1(PS) PRICE SCENARIO FOR REPORT(ECONOMIC PRICES) /87-88
3176 Zl(Z) ZONE SELECTION FOR THIS RUN
3177 / NWFP,PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW,SCWN.SCWS,SRWN.SRWS /
3178 *
3179 * TOTAL COMODITIES ARE 18.
3180 WITH ENDOGENOUS PRICES= 13, FIXED PRICES=2, FODDER=2
3181
* CONSUMPTION ONLY = 1
3182

*
3183 CN(CO) COMODITIES ENDOGENOUS PRICES

3184 /BASMATI. IRRI, COTTON.

3185 GRAM. MAIZE. MUS+RAP,

3186 SC-MILL. WHEAT, POTATOES,

3187 ONIONS. CHILLI.

3188 COW-MILK. BUFF-MILK /

3189 CCN(CO) CROP COMODITIES WITH ENDOGENOUS PRICES

3190 /BASMATI, IRRI, COTTON.

3191 GRAM, MAIZE, MUS+RAP.

3192 SC-MILL. WHEAT. POTATOES.

3193 ONIONS. CHILLI /

3194 ON(CO) LIVESTOCK COMODITIES ENDOGENOUS PRICES

3195 /CDW-MILK, BUFF-MILK/

3196 NCN(CO) CROPS WITH FIXED PRICES EXCLUDING FODDER

3197 /ORCHARD, MEAT /

N

3198 CECCO) EXPORTABLE COMODITIES .....

3199 / BASMATI, IRRI. COTTON,ONIONS.WHEAT / o

3200 CM(CO) COMODITIES WHICH COULD BE IMPORTED/SC-MILL/

3201

3202 EX(Z,G) TO CHECK FRESH OR SALINE AREA WITHIN A ZONE

3203 TECHC( Z, CO) COMODITIES BY ZONES

3204 ,

3205 EX(Z1.G)$RESOURCE(Z1,G,"CCA") = YES;

3206 DISPLAY CO,CN, CCN, ON. NCN,CE,CM,EX;

3207 DISPLAY FERT;

3208

3209 TABLE TEC(C.T.S,W.Z) CROP TECHNOLOGY DISABLED FOR 1988 RUN

3210 SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS

3211 WHEAT. (BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).LA-PLANT.(HEAVY,JANUARY) 1 1 1 1

3212 WHEAT. (BULLOCK.SEMI-MECH).(QK-HARV,STANDARD). HEAVY 1

3213 WHEAT. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).(OK-HARV,STANDARD).JANUARY 1

3214 WHEAT. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).(OK-HARV,STANDARD,LA-PLANT).LIGHT

3215

3216 SCALARS BIG BIG NUMBER USED FOR ARTIFICAL PRODUCTION /4000/

3217 PAWAT BIG NUMBER FOR ARTIFICIAL WATER /999999/

3218 PAFOD BIG NUMBER FOR ARTIFICAL FODDER /1000/

3219 PARAMETER

3220 DIVNWFP(M) MONTHY DIVERSION TO THE NWFP ZONE (MAF)

3221 /JAN .158, FEB .187, MAR .270. APR .184.

3222 MAY .232, JUN .325, JUL .333, AUG .333.

3223 SEP .332, OCT .200. NOV .063, DEC.133/

3224

3225 RVAL(N) VALUE OF WATER STORED IN THE RESERVOIRS

3226 /TARBELA-R 1. KALABAGH-R .8, MANGLA-R .6

3227 CHASMA-R .2. CHOTIARI-R .2, A-SEA .1/

3228 FSALEP(CO) FINANCIAL SALE PRICE FOR CROP AND LIVESTOCK COMODITIES (RS PER KG OR PER LITER)

.INOUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM1 01/23/90 16:27:46 PAGE 79

MODEL SETUP GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3229 PP FINANCIAL PURCHASE PRICE OF PROTEIN (RS PER KGS)

3230 MISC(*) FINANCIAL MISCELLENIOUS PRICES
3231 SEEOP(C) FINANCIAL SEED PRICE (RS PER KGS)
3232 WAGE(M) FINANCIAL WAGE RATES (RS PER MAN-HOUR)
3233 MISCCT(C) FINANCIAL WATER CHARGES AND MISCILLENIOUS COSTS(RS PER ACRE)
3234
3235 ESALEP(CO) ECONOMIC SALE PRICE FOR CROP AND LIVESTOCK COMODITIES (RS PER KG OR PER LITER)
3236 EPP ECONOMIC PRICE OF PROTEIN CONCENTRATE (RS PER KGS)
3237 EMISC(*) ECONOMIC MISCELLENIOUS PRICES
3238 ESEEDP(C) ECONOMIC SEED PRICE
3239 EWAGE(M) ECONOMIC WAGE RATE (RS PER MAN-HOUR)
3240 EMISCCT(C) ECONOMIC WATER CHARGES AND MISCILLENIOUS COSTS(RS PER ACRE)
3241
3242 IMPORTP(CQ) IMPORT PRICES FOR THE SCENARIO
3243 EXPORTP(CO) EXPORT PRICES FOR THE SCENARIO
3244
3245 WNR(C,Z,T,S,W,M) WATER REQUIREMENTS NET OF RAIN
3246
3247
3248 LOOP (PSR,
3249 FSALEP(CQ) PRICES(PSR,CQ,"FINANCIAL")
3250 PP PRI1(PSR,"FINANCIAL","PROTEIN");
3251
3252 MISC(P1) PRI 1(PSR, "FINANCIAL", P1)
FINSDWTPR(C,PSR,"SEED") N
3253
3254
SEEDP(C)
WAGE(M) WAGEPS(PSR, "FINANCIAL",M) ;
....
....
3255 MISCCT(C) FINSDWTPR(C,PSR,"WATER")+FINSDWTPR(C,PSR, "MISCC");
3256 IMPORTP(CQ) PRICES(PSR,CQ,"IMPORT")
3257 EXPORTP(CQ) PRICES(PSR,CQ, "EXPORT")
3258 );
3259 LOOP (PSR 1,
3260 ESALEP(CQ) PRICES(PSR1,CQ ,"ECONOMIC")
3261 EPP PRI1(PSR1,"ECONOMIC","PROTEIN")
3262
3263 EMISC(P1) PRI1(PSR1,"ECONOMIC",P1)
3264 ESEEDP(C) ECNSDWTPR(C,PSR1,"SEED")
3265 EWAGE(M) WAGEPS(PSR1, "ECONOMIC" ,M) ;
3266 EMISCCT(C) ECNSDWTPR(C,PSR1,"WATER")+ECNSDWTPR(C,PSR1,"MISCC")
3267 );
* Economic prices are set to finacial
ESALEP(cq) FSALEP(cq) ;
EMISC(P1 ) MISC(P1)
ESEEDP(C) SEEDP(C)
EPP PP
EWAGE(M) WAGE(M)
3276
3277 WNR(C,Z1,T,S,W,M) = MAX(O, (WATER(C,Z1,T,S,W,M)-EFRZ(Z1,M
3278 * SET COTON IN PRW TO NO
3279 TEC("COTTON",T,S,W,"PRW") 1
3280 TEC("MAIZE",T,S,W,"PRW") 1
3281
3282 TECH(Z1,C,T,S,W)$TEC(C,T,S,W,Z1) = NO ;
3283 TECHC(Z1,C)$SUM( (T.S,W), TECH(Z1,C,T,S,W) YES
3284 TECHC(Z1,CF)=NO; TECHC(Z1,Q) YES;
3285 * DISPLAY TECH;
3286 DISPLAY TECHC;
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM1 01/23/90 16:27:46 PAGE 80
MODEL SETUP GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3287
3288 * NOTE: INFLOWS FROM RAVI AND SUTLEJ RIVER ARE SET TO ZERO HERE.
3289 * INFLDW("RAVI",M) 0; INFLOW("SUTLEJ",M) = 0 ;
3290
3291 SCALARS
3292 TOLCNL ALLOWED DEVIATION FROM PROPORTIONAL ALLOCATION BY CANAL /0.0 /
3293 TOLPR ALLOWED DEVIATION FROM PROPORTIONAL ALLOCATION BY PROVINCE / 0.0 /
3294 TOLNWFP NWFP DIVERSION TOLERANCE / 0 /
3295
3296 *
3297 PARAMETER BETA(CQ,Z1) GRAOIENT COMOOITIES DEMAND CURVE
3298 ALPHA(CQ,ZI) DEMAND CURVE INTECEPT
3299 ,
3300 SCALAR BETAF BETA FACTOR /.5 / ;
3301 BETA(CN,ZI )$DEMAND(ZI ,CN) = FSALEP(CN) / DEMAND(ZI ,CN) / ELAST(CN) ;
3302 ALPHA(CN,Z1 ) = FSALEP(CN) - BETA(CN,ZI )*DEMAND(ZI ,CN)
3303
3304 *- LINEARIZATION OF THE DEMAND FUNCTION.
3305
3306 SET P GRID POINTS FOR LINEARIZATION / 1*20 /
3307 PARAMETER
3308 PMAX(CQ,Z1) MAXIMUM PRICE FOR SEGMENTS
3309 PMIN(CQ.Zl) MINIMUM PRICE FOR SEGMENTS
3310 QMAX(CQ.Zl) MAX NATIONAL CONSUMPTION
3311 QMIN(CQ,ZI) MIN NATIONAL CONSUMPTION
3312 INCR(CQ,ZI) INCREMENT ....
NI
NI
3313 WS(CQ,ZI,P) WELFARE SEGMENTS (MILLION RUPEES)
3314 RS(CQ,Z1,P) REVENUE DEFINITION (MILLION RUPEES)
3315 QS(CQ,ZI,P) QUANTITY OEFINITION(THOUSAND TONS OR MILLION LITERS)
3316
3317
3318
.
ENDPR(CQ,ZI,P) PRICE (RUPEES PER KGS OR LITER )

PMIN(CN,ZI) = 0.5*FSALEP(CN) ;
3319 PMAX(CN,ZI) = MIN(ALPHA(CN.Z1), 2*FSALEP(CN) ) ;
3320 * PMAX(CE,ZI) = MIN(ALPHA(CE,Z1 ).2*FSALEP(CE) ) ;
3321 * PMIN(CE.Zl) = FSALEP(CE); .
3322 QMIN(CN,Z1)$BETA(CN,Z1 ) = (PMAX(CN,Z1 )-ALPHA(CN,Z1 /BETA(CN,Z1 );
3323 QMAX(CN,ZI)$BETA(CN,Z1 ) = (PMIN(CN,Z1 )-ALPHA(CN,ZI /BETA(CN.Z1 );
3324 INCR(CN,ZI) (QMAX(CN,Z1 )-QMIN(CN,ZI /(CARD(P)-I);
3325
3326 QS(CN,ZI,P) = QMIN(CN,Z1) + INCR(CN,ZI)*(ORD(P)-I);
3327 WS(CN.Zl,P) = ALPHA(CN.Z1)*QS(CN,Z1,P) + BETAF*BETA(CN,Z1)*SQR(QS(CN,Z1,P
3328 RS(CN.Z1,P) = ALPHA(CN.Zl)*QS(CN,ZI,P) + BETA(CN,Z1)*SQR(QS(CN,Z1,P;
3329 ENDPR(CN.Zl,P)= ALPHA(CN,ZI) + BETA(CN,Z1)*QS(CN,Z1,P);
3330 DISPLAY PMAX. PMIN. QMAX, QMIN,INCR, QS, WS. RS, ENDPR ;
3331 *-
3332 DISPLAY ALPHA , BETA
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM1 01/23/90 16:27:46 PAGE 81
EQUATIONS AND VARIABLES GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3334 VARIABLES CPS CONSUMER PLUS PRODUCERS SURPLUS (MILLION RUPEES)

3335 POSITIVE VARIABLES
3336 ACOST(Z.G) FARM COST IN (MILLION RUPEES)
3337 PPC(Z.G.SEA) PURCHASES OF PROTEIN CONCENTRATES (THOUSAND METRIC TONS)
3338 X(Z.G,C.T.S,W) CROPPED AREA BY TECHNOLOGY (THOUSAND ACRES)
3339 ANIMAL(Z,G,A) PRODUCTION OF LIVESTOCK TYPE A (THOUSANDS)
3340 PRODT(Z,G.CQ) PRODUCTION (CROP COMMODITIES 000 METRIC TONS LIVESTOCK COMM MILL. KGS OR LITERS)
3341 PRODA(Z,G,CQ ) ARTIFICIAL SUPPLY
3342 IMPORT(Z ,CQ ) IMPORT OF COMODITIES (CROP COMM. 000 M. TONS LIVESTOCK MILL. KGS OR LITERS)
3343 EXPORT(Z ,CQ ) EXPORT OF COMODITIES (000 METRIC TONNS)
3344 CONSUMP(Z,G,CQ ON FARM CONSUMPTION (000 METRIC TONNS)
3345 FAMILYL(Z,G,M) FAMILY LABOR USED (MILLION MAN HOURS)
3346 HIREDL(Z.G,M) HIRED LABOR USED (MILLION MAN HOURS)
3347 ITW(Z) INVESTMENT IN INCREASED PRIVATE TUBEWELL CAPACITY (KAF PER MONTH)
3348 TW(Z,M) PRIVATE TUBEWELL WATER USED BY MONTH M (KAF)
3349 ITR(Z,G) INVESTMENT IN INCREASED TRACTOR CAPACITY (000 TRACTOR-HRS PER MONTH)
3350 TS(Z,G,M) PRIVATE TRACTOR SERVICES USE BY MONTH (THOUSAND HRS)
3351 F(N.N1,M) FLOW TO NODE N FROM NODE Nl (MAF)
3352 RCONT(N,M) END OF THE MONTH RESRVOIR CONTENTS (MAF)
3353 CANALDIV(CNL.M) CANAL DIVERSION AT THE CANAL HEAD (MAF)
3354 CNLDIVSEA(CNL.SEA) CANAL DIVERSION BY SEASON (MAF)
3355 PRSEA(PV2,SEA) CANAL DIVERSION BY PROVINCE (SIND AND PUNJAB) (MAF)
3356 TCDIVSEA(SEA) TOTAL CANAL DIVERSION IN SIND AND PUNJAB BY SEASON (MAF)
3357 WDIVRZ(Zl,G,M) SURFACE WATER DIVERSION AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)
3358 SLKLAND(Z,G.M) SLACK LAND (THOUSAND ACRES) N
I-'
3359 SLKWATER(Z,G,M) SLACK WATER AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF) W

3360 ARTFOD(Zl,G,SEA) ARTIFICIAL FODDER SUPPLY EQUAl VALENT OF RAB-FOD (000 TONNS)

3361 ARTWATER(Z,G,M) WATER FROM IMAGINARY SOURCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)

3362 ARTWATERND(N,M) WATER FROM IMAGINARY SOURCE AT NODES (MAF)

3363 NAT(CQ,Z,P) PROVINCIAL DEMAND LINEARIZED

3364 NATN(CQ,Z) PROVINCIAL DEMAND NON-LINEAR

3365
3366 EQUATIONS
3367 OBJZ OBJECTIVE FUNCTION FOR THE ZONE MODEL LINEAR VERSION (MILLION RUPEES)
3368 OBJZN OBJECTIVE FUNCTION FOR THE ZONE MODEL NON-LINEAR VERSION (MILLION RUPEES)
3369 OBJN OBJECTIVE FUNCTION FOR THE INDUS MODEL LINEAR VERSION (MI LLION RUPEES)
3370 OBJNN OBJECTIVE FUNCTION FOR THE INDUS MODEL NON-LINEAR VERSION (MILLION RUPEES)
3371 COST(Z,G) ANNUAL FARM COST (MILLION RUPEES)
3372 CONV(CQ,Z) CONVEX COMBINATION FOR AGGREGATE CONSUMPTION
3373 DEMNAT(CQ,Z) PROVINCIAL DEMAND BALANCE LINEAR (000 TONS OR MILLION LITERS)
3374 DEMNATN(CQ,Z) ZONAL DEMAND BALANCE NON-LINEAR (000 TONS OR MILLION LITERS)
3375 CCOMBAL(Z,G,C) COMMODITY BALANCES FOR CROPS (000 TONS)
3376 QCOMBAL(Z,G.Q) LIVESTOCK COMODITY BALANCES (000 TONS OR M LITERS)
3377 CONSBAL(Z.G,CQ) CONSUMPTION BALANCE (000 TONS OR M LITERS)
3378 LABORC(Z,G,M) MONTHLY LABOR CONSTRAINT (MILLION MAN HOURS)
3379 FODDER(Z.G,SEA) SEASONAL MAINTENANCE OF FODDER SUPPLIES (000 METRIC TONS)
3380 PROTEIN(Z.G,SEA) PROTEIN REQUIREMENTS OF LIVESTOCK BY SEASON (000 METRIC TONS)
3381 GRNFDR(Z,G.SEA) GREEN FODDER REQUIREMENTS (000 METRIC TONS)
3382 BDRAFT(Z.G.M) BULLOCK DRAFT POWER CONSTRAINT (MILLION BULLOCK HOURS)
3383 BREPCO(Z,G) BULLOCK REPRODUCTION CONSTRAINT
3384 BULLOCKC(Zl) BULLOCK POPULATION CONSTRAINT (000 BULLOCKS)
3385 TDRAFT(Z.G,M) TRACTOR DRAFT POWER BALANCE (000 TRACTOR HOURS)
3386 TRCAPC(Z,M) TRACTOR CAPACITY CONSTRAINT (000 TRACTOR HOURS)
3387 TWCAPC(Z.M) TUBEWELL CAPACITY CONSTRAINT (KAF)
3388 LANDC(Z.G.M) LAND CONSTRAINT (000 ACRES)
3389 ORCHAREAC(Z) ORCHARD AREA CONSTRAINT (000 ACRES)
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISEO(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM1 01/23/90 16:27:46 PAGE
82
EQUATIONS AND VARIABLES GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3390 SCMILLC(Z)
SUGAR CANE TO MILL CONSTRAINT (000 ACRES)

3391 WATERBALN(Z,G,M)
WATER BALANCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)

3392 WATALCZ(Z,G,M)
SURFACE WATER BY ZONE (KAF)

3393 SUBIRRC(Z,G,M)
SUBIRRIGATION CDNSTRAINT (KAF)

3394 NBAL(N,M)
WATER BALANCE AT A NODE (MAF)

3395 WATALCSEA(CNL,SEA)
WATER ALLOCATIDNS BY SEASON (MAF)

3396 DIVSEA(SEA)
TOTAL CANAL DIVERSIONS IN SIND AND PUNJAB (MAF)

3397 DIVCNLSEA(CNL,SEA)
CANAL DIVERSION BY SEASON (MAF)

3398 WATALCPRO(PV,SEA)
WATER ALLOCATION BY PROVINCE (MAF)

3399 PRSEAW(PV,SEA)
DIVERSIONS BY PROVINCE AND SEASON (MAF)

3400 NWFPALC(M)
WATER ALLOCATIONS TO THE NWFP ACZ (t<1AF)

3401

N
.....
~
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM1 01/23/90 16:27:46 PAGE 83
EQUATIONS AND VARIABLES GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3403 OB~Z..
3404 cPS =E=
3405 SUM(Zl, SUM(G$EX(Zl,G), SUM(NCN. FSALEP(NCN)*PRODT(Zl.G,NCN) )

3406 - ACOST(Zl.G) - SUM(SEA. ARTFOD(Zl,G.SEA*PAFOD

3407 - SUM(M. ARTWATER(Zl,G,M*PAWAT

3408 SUM(CQ$TECHC(Zl.CQ). PRODA(Zl,G,CQ )*BIG

3409 SUM( Zl , SUM(CM$1ECHC(Zl.CM), IMPORT(Zl,CM)*IMPORTP(CM

3410 + SUM(Zl, SUM(CE$TECHC(Zl,CE), EXPORT(Zl,CE)*EXPORTP(CE

3411 + SUM(Zl, SUM( (CN,P)$TECHC(Zl,CN), NAT(CN,Zl,P)*WS(CN,Zl ,P
3412
3413 OB~ZN ..
3414 CPS =E=
3415 SUM(Zl, SUM(G$EX(Zl,G), SUM(NCN, FSALEP(NCN)*PRODT(Zl,G.NCN) )
3416 - - ACOST(Zl,G) - SUM(SEA, ARTFOD(Zl,G,SEA*PAFOD
3417 SUM(M, ARTWATER(Zl,G,M*PAWAT .
3418 - SUM(CQ$TECHC(Zl,CQ). PRODA(Zl.G,CQ )*BIG
3419 - SUM( Z 1 , SUM(CM$TECHC(Zl.CM), IMPORT(Zl,CM)*IMPORTP(CM
3420 + SUM(Z 1, SUM(CE$TECHC(Zl,CE), EXPORT(Zl,CE)*EXPORTP(CE
3421 + SUM( Zl, SUM(CN$TECHC(Zl,CN), ALPHA(CN,Zl)*NATN(CN,Zl)
3422 + BETAF*BETA(CN,Zl)*SQR(NATN(CN,Zl
3423
3424 OB~N..
3425 CPS =E=
3426 SUM(Zl, SUM(G$EX(Zl,G), SUM(NCN, FSALEP(NCN)*PRODT(Zl,G,NCN) )
3427 - ACOST(Zl,G) - SUM(SEA, ARTFOD(Zl,G,SEA*PAFOD N
3428 - SUM(M, ARTWATER(Zl,G,M*PAWAT I-'
1II
3429 - SUM(CQ$TECHC(Zl,CQ), PRODA(Zl,G,CQ )*BIG
3430 - SUM(Zl, SUM(CM$TECHC(Zl,CM), IMPORT(Zl,CM) *IMPORTP(CM
3431 + SUM(Zl, SUM(CE$TECHC(Zl,CE), EXPORT(Zl,CE) *EXPORTP(CE
3432 + SUM(Zl, SUM( (CN,P)$TECHC(Zl,CN), NAT(CN,Zl,P)*WS(CN,Zl,P
3433 + SUMN,M), -ARTWATERND(N,M)*PAWAT + RVAL(N)*RCONT(N,M)$RCAP(N)
3434 + RVAL("A SEA")*F("A-SEA","KOTRI-B",M)
3435
3436 OB~NN..

3437 CPS =E=

3438 SUM(Zl, SUM(G$EX(Zl,G), SUM(NCN, FSALEP(NCN)*PRODT(Zl,G,NCN) )

3439 - ACOST(Zl,G) - SUM(SEA, ARTFOD(Zl,G,SEA*PAFOD

3440 - SUM(M, ARTWATER(Zl,G,M*PAWAT

3441 - SUM(CQ$TECHC(Zl,CQ), PRODA(Zl,G,CQ )*BIG

3442 - SUM(Zl, SUM(CM$TECHC(Zl,CM), IMPORT(Zl.CM)*IMPORTP(CM

3443 + SUM( Z 1 , SUM(CE$TECHC(Zl,CE), EXPORT(Zl.CE)*EXPORTP(CE
3444 + SUM(Z 1, SUM(CN$TECHC(Zl.CN), ALPHA(CN,Zl)*NATN(CN,Zl)
3445 + BETAF*BETA(CN,Zl)*SQR(NATN(CN.Z1 )
3446 + SUMN.M), -ARTWATERND(N.M)*PAWAT + RVAL(N)*RCONT(N,M)$RCAP(N)
3447 + RVAL("A-SEA")*F("A-SEA","KOTRI-B",M)
3448
3449
3450 COST(Zl,G)$EX(Zl,G).. ACOST(Zl,G) =E= (SUMC,T,S,W)$TECH(Zl,C,T,S,W), (SUM(P2, FERT(P2,C,Zl)*MISC(P2+
3451 MISCCT(C)+SEEDP(C)*SYLDS(C,Zl,T,S,W, "SEED") )*X(Zl,G,C,T,S,W) )+
3452 SUM(M, MISC("TWOPC")*TW(Zl,M)$GF(G) + MISC("TROPC")*TS(Zl,G,M) ) +
3453 MISC("TWINVT")*ITW(Zl)$GF(G) + MISC("TRINVT")*ITR(Zl,G) +
3454 SUM(A, IOLIVE(A, Zl, "FIX-COST" )*ANIMAL{Zl, G,A )/1000+
3455 SUM(SEA, PP*PPC(Zl,G,SEA +
3456 SUM(M, (FAMILYL(Zl,G,M)*LABFAC + HIREDL(Zl,G,M*WAGE(M)
3457 CONV(CN,Zl)$TECHC(Zl,CN).. SUM(P, NAT(CN,Zl,P =L= 1;
3458
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISMl 01/23/90 16:27:46 PAGE 84
EQUATIONS AND VARIABLES GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3459 DEMNAT(CQ.Z1 )$TECHC(Z1.CQ) ..

3460 SUM(G$EX(Z1.G).

3461 PRODT(Z1.G.CQ) - CONSUMP(Zl.G.CQ)$CC(CQ)+PRODA(Z1.G.CQ) )

3462 EXPORT(Z1,CQ)$CE(CQ) + IMPORT(Zl.CQ)$CM(CQ)

3463 =G= SUM(P. NAT(CQ,Zl,P)*QS(CQ.Z1 ,P$CN(CQ);

3464

3465 DEMNATN(CQ.Z1 )$TECHC(Zl.CQ) ..

3466 SUM(G$EX(Zl.G).

3467 PRODT(Zl,G.CQ) - CONSUMP(Zl.G,CQ)$CC(CQ)+PRODA(Zl.G.CQ) )

3468 EXPORT(Zl,CQ)$CE(CQ) + IMPORT(Zl.CQ)$CM(CQ)

3469 =G= NATN(CQ.Zl)$CN(CQ) ;

3470

3471 CCOMBAL(Zl.G,C)$(CNF(C)$EX(Zl.G .. SUMT.S.W)$TECH(Zl,C.T.S.W). YIELD(C.T,S.W.Z1)*X(Zl.G,C.T.S.W=E= PRODT(Zl.G.C);

3472

3473 QCOMBAL(Zl.G.Q)$EX(Zl.G) .. SUM(A. IOLIVE(A,Zl,Q)*ANIMAL(Zl,G,A) ) /1000 =E= PRODT(Zl.G.Q);

3474

3475 CONSBAL(Zl.G,CC)$(EX(Zl.G)$TECHC(Zl.CC) ) ..

3476 PRODT(Zl,G.CC) + PRODA(Zl.G.CC) =G= CONSUMP(Zl.G.CC) ;

3477

3478 LABORC(Zl.G.M)$EX(Zl,G).. (SUM( (C.T,S.W)$TECH(Zl.C.T.S.W). LABOR(C.Zl.T.S.W,M)*X(Zl.G.C.T.S.W) ) +

3479 SUM( A. IOLIVE(A.Z1. "LABOR" )*ANIMAL(Zl.G.A )/1000 =L= FAMILYL(Zl.G,M)+HIREDL(Zl.G.M);

3480

3481 FODDER(Zl,G.SEA)$EX(Zl.G) .. SUM(A, IOLIVE(A,Zl."TDN")*ANIMAL(Zl,G.A =L= SUM( (C.T.S.W)$TECH(Zl.C.T.S.W), (

3482 YIELD(C.T.S.W.Z1)*SYLDS(C.Zl.T.S.W,"STRAW-YLD")*SCONV("TDN".SEA.C) + WEEDY(Zl,SEA.C)*

3483 SCONV(TDN ... RABI"."RAB-FOD") ) * X(Zl.G.C,T,S.W) ) + !'oJ

I-'

3484 SUM(M$SEAM(SEA,M). SLKLAND(Zl.G.M*GRAZ(Zl,SEA)*SCONV("TDN"."RABI","RAB-FOD") + 0\

3485 ARTFOD(Zl.G.SEA)*SCONV("TDN"."RABI"."RAB-FOD");
3486
3487 PROTEIN(Zl,G,SEA)$EX(Zl.G) .. SUM(A, IOLIVE(A.Z1,"DP")*ANIMAL(Zl,G,A) ) =L= PPC(Zl.G.SEA)+
3488 SUM( (C,T.S.W)$TECH(Zl,C.T.S.W). (YIELD(C.T.S.W.Z1)*SYLDS(C.Z1.T,S.W,"STRAW-YLD")*
3489 SCONV("DP".SEA.C) + WEEDY(Zl,SEA.C)*SCONV("DP","RABI.RAB-FOD") )*X(Zl,G.C,T.S,W) )+
3490 SUM(M$SEAM(SEA.M), SLKLAND(Zl,G.M*GRAZ(Zl.SEA)*SCONV("Dp.RABI."RAB-FOD") +
3491 ARTFOD(Zl.G.SEA)*SCONV("DP",RABI ... RAB-FOD);
3492
3493 GRNFDR(Zl,G,SEA)$EX(Zl.G) .. GR*SUM(A. IOLIVE(A,Zl,"TDN)*ANIMAL(Zl.G,A) ) =L= SUM( (CF.T.S,W)$TECH(Zl.CF.T.S.W).
3494 YIELD(CF,T.S,W,Zl)*SCONV("TDN",SEA.CF)*X(Zl.G.CF.T.S.W) ) +
3495 SUM( (C,T.S.W)$TECH(Zl.C.T.S.W).
3496 WEEDY(Zl.SEA.C)*SCONV(TDN.RABI ... RAB-FOD")*X(Zl.G,C,T.S.W) ) +
3497 ARTFOD(Zl.G.SEA)*SCONV("TDN"."RABI"."RAB-FOD");
3498
3499 BDRAFT(Zl.G.M)$EX(Zl.G).. SUMC.T,S.W)$TECH(Zl.C.T,S.W). BULLOCK(C,Zl,T.S,W,M)*X(Zl.G.C.T,S,W) )/1000 =L=
3500 BP(M)*ANIMAL(Zl,G, "BULLOCK" )/1000
3501
3502 BREPCO(Zl,G)$EX(Zl.G) .. ANIMAL(Zl,G,"BULLOCK") =L= REPCO*ANIMAL(Zl,G,COW)
3503
3504 BULLOCKC(Zl) .. SUM(G$EX(Zl.G), ANIMAL(Zl,G.BULLOCK" =L= RES88("BULLOCKS".Zl)
3505
3506 TDRAFT(Zl,G,M)$EX(Zl.G) .. SUMC,T,S,W)$TECH(Zl,C,T,S,W). TRACTOR(C,Zl.T.S.W,M)*X(Zl,G,C.T,S,W) =E= TS(Zl,G.M)
3507
3508 TRCAPC(Zl,M).. SUM(G$EX(Zl,G). TS(Zl,G.M) ) =L= SUM(G$EX(Zl.G).
3509 (RESOURCE(Zl ,G. TRACTORS" )/1000 +ITR(Zl.G) )*TRCAP )
3510
3511 TWCAPC(Zl.M)$EX(Zl,FRESH) ..
3512
3513 TW(Zl.M) =L= RESOURCE(Zl,FRESH".TWC) + NTWUCAP*ITW(Zl)
3514
INDUS BASIN MOOEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM1 01/23/90 16:27:46 PAGE 85
EQUATIONS AND VARIABLES GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3515 LANDC(Z1,G.M)SEX(Z1.G) .. SUMC,T,S,W)STECH(Z1.C,T,S,W). LAND(C,Z1,T,S,W,M)*X(Z1,G,C,T,S,W + SLKLAND(Z1,G.M)=E=

3516 RESOURCE(Z1.G, "CCA" )*1000 ;
3517 ORCHAREAC(Z1) .. SUM( (G,T,S,W)SEX(Z1,G), X(Z1,G,"ORCHARD",T,S.W)STECH(Z1,"ORCHARD".T.S,W=L=ORCHAREA(Z1);
3518
3519 SCMILLC(Z1) .. SUM(G$EX(Z1,G). PRODT(Z1.G,"SC-MILL" =L= SCMILLCAP(Z1)
3520
3521
3522 WATERBALN(Z1,G.M)SEX(Z1,G) ..
3523 SUMC.T.S,W)STECH(Z1.C,T,S,W),
3524 MAX( (WNR(C,Z1,T,S,W,M)-SUBIRRZ(Z1,M)*LAND(C.Z1,T.S.W.M 0.0)*
3525 X(Z1,G.C.T.S.W+ SLKWATER(Z1.G.M) =E=
3526 TWEFFZ(Z1.M)*TW(Z1.M)SGF(G) + GWT1(Z1.G.M) +
3527 ARTWATER(Z1.G.M) + WDIVRZ(Z1.G,M) ;
3528
3529 WATALCZ(Z1,G.M)SEX(Z1,G) .. WDIVRZ(Z1,G.M) =E= SUM( (CNL,SA)S(ZSA(Z1.CNL,SA)$GWFG(CNL.SA,G) ),
3530 CNEFF(CNL)*WCEFF(CNL,M)*CANALDIV(CNL,M)*SUBDEF(SA,CNL)*1000
3531
3532 DIVCNLSEA(CNL,SEA) ..
3533 CNLDIVSEA(CNL,SEA) =E= SUM(MSSEAM(SEA.M). CANALDIV(CNL,M;
3534 PRSEAW(PV2.SEA) ..
3535 PRSEA(PV2.SEA) =E= SUM(CNL1SPVCNL(PV2,CNL1),
3536 CNLDIVSEA(CNL1,SEA
3537 DIVSEA(SEA) ..
3538 TCDIVSEA(SEA) =E= SUM(PV2, PRSEA(PV2,SEA)
3539 WATALCSEA(CNL1,SEA) .. N
3540 PROTARB(CNL1.SEA)*(1-TOLCNL)*TCDIVSEA(SEA) =L= I-'
.....,
3541 CNLDIVSEA(CNL1.SEA)
3542 WATALCPRO(PV2.SEA) ..
3543 PROTARB(PV2,SEA)*(1-TOLPR)*TCDIVSEA(SEA) =L=
3544 PRSEA(PV2,SEA)
3545
3546 NWFPALC(M) .. SUM(CNLSPVCNL("NWFP",CNL), CANALDIV(CNL,M=G=
3547 (1-TOLNWFP)*DIVNWFP(M)
3548
3549 SUBIRRC(Z1,G,M)S(EX(Z1.G)$GS(G .. WDIVRZ(Z1,G,M) =G=
3550 (1-SUBIRRFAC(Z1) )*SUMC.T.S,W)'TECH(Z1,C,T,S,W), WNR(C,Z1,T,S.W,M)*X(Z1,G,C,T,S,W
3551
3552 NBAL(N,M)$NB(N) ..
3553 SUM(ISNI(N,I), INFLOW(I,M +
3554 SUM(N1, RIVERCD(N, "O")*TRIB(N1,N.M)+RIVERCO(N,"C")*TRIB(N1,N.M--1) )+
3555 SUM(N1SNN(N,N1).
3556 F(N,N1,M)*LCEFF(N1,N)$LCEFF(N1,N) +
3557 (RIVERB(N,N1)*F(N,N1.M)+
3558 RIVERCO(N,"C")*F(N,N1.M--1) )S(LCEFF(N1.N) EQ 0) )
3559 SUM(N1,NN(N1,N) ,
3560 F(N1,N,M + ( RCONT(N,M--1) - RCONT(N,M) - REVAPL(N,M)/1000)$RCAP(N) -
3561 SUM(CNLSNC(N,CNL), CANALOIV(CNL.M + ARTWATERNO(N,M) =E= 0 ;
3562
3563 * BOUNOS FOR THE NETWORK LINK CANAL CAPACITIES.
3564 ARTWATERNO.LO(N,M) = 0 ;
3565 F.UP(N,N1,M) INF ;
3566 F.UP(N,N1,M)$( NCAP(N1,N) NE 0) NCAP(N1,N);
3567
3568 * BOUNDS ON FAMILY LABOR
3569 FAMILYL.UP(Z1,G,M) = RESOURCE(Z1,G, "FARMPOP" )*LSTO/1000
3570
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM1 01/23/90 16:27.46 PAGE 86
EQUATIONS AND VARIABLES GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3571 * CONSUMPTION BOUNDS

3572 CONSUMP.FX(Zl,G,CQ) = FARMCONS(Z1,CQ)*CONSRATIO(Z1,G)
3573 EXPORT.UP(Zl,CE) = EXPLIMIT(Z1,CE)
3574 ITR.FX(Zl,G)=O; ITW.FX(Z1) =0;
3575
3576 *MODEL WSISZ AGROCLIMATIC ZONES MODEL LINEAR OBJECTIVE /
3577
3578 OBJZ, COST, CONV, DEMNAT, CCOMBAL, QCOMBAL,
3579 CONSBAL, LABORC, FODDER, PROTEIN, GRNFDR, BDRAFT ,
3580 BREPCO, TDRAFT, TRCAPC, TWCAPC, LANDC, ORCHAREAC,
3581 SCMILLC, WATERBALN, WATALCZ, SUBIRRC /
3582
3583 MODEL WSISZN AGROCLIMATIC ZONES MODEL NON-LINEAR OBJECTIVE /

3584 OBJZN, COST, DEMNATN,

CCOMBAL, QCOMBAL,

3585 CONSBAL, LABORC, FODDER, PROTEIN,

GRNFDR, BDRAFT,

3586 BREPCO, TORAFT , TRCAPC, TWCAPC,

LANDC, ORCHAREAC,

3587 SCMILLC, WATERBALN, WATALCZ. SUBIRRC

/
3588 MODEL WSISN IBMR MODEL WITH WATER NETWORK LINEAR /
3589 OBJN, COST, CONV, DEMNAT. CCOMBAL. QCOMBAL,
3590 CONSBAL, LABORC, FODDER, PROTEIN, GRNFDR, BDRAFT,
3591 BREPCO, TORAFT , TRCAPC, TWCAPC, LANDC, ORCHAREAC,
3592 WATERBALN, WATALCZ, SUBIRRC,
3593 DIVCNLSEA, PRSEAW, DIVSEA, WATALCSEA. WATALCPRO, NWFPALC,
3594 NBAL /
3595 N
3596 MODEL WSISNN IBMR MODEL WITH WATER NETWORK NON-LINEAR / .....
CD
3597 OBJNN. COST, DEMNATN, CCOMBAL. QCOMBAL,
3598 CONSBAL, LABORC, FODDER,
PROTEIN, GRNFDR, BDRAFT,
3599 BREPCO, TDRAFT, TRCAPC,
TWCAPC, LANDC, ORCHAREAC,
3600 WATERBALN, WATALCZ. SUBIRRC,

3601 DIVCNLSEA, PRSEAW, DIVSEA, WATALCSEA, WATALCPRO.

NWFPALC,
3602 NBAL /
3603
3604 ,
3605 OPTION ITERLIM 25000; OPTION RESLIM 900
3606 OPTION LIMROW=O; OPTION LIMCOL=O
3607 OPTION LP=MPSX ;
3608 *
3609 * IRRIGATION CANAL CAPICITY BOUNDS
3610 CANALDIV.UP(CNL,M) SUM(ISR, COMDEF(ISR,"CCAP",CNL)
3611 CANALDIV.FX(CNL,M) = DIVPOST(CNL,M)
3612
3613 * RESERVOIR OPERATING RULE BOUNDS
3614 *
3615 RCONT.LO(N,M) RULELO(N,M)*RCAP(N)/100;
3616 RCONT.UP(N,M) RULEUP(N,M)*RCAP(N)/100
3617 * TOLNWFP
3618 1 ;
3619 * RIVER FLOW TESTS
3620 TRIB("CHASMA R","TAUNSA-B",M) =0 ;
3621 TRIB("TARBELA-R","KALABAGH-R",M) = 0 :
3622 INFLOW("HARO",M) 0; INFLOW("SOAN",M) 0
3623
3624 SOLVE WSISZ MAXIMIZING CPS USING LP
3625 * END OF SOURCE CODE
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM1 01/23/90 16:27:46 PAGE 87
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TYPE REFERENCES

A SET REF 3339 2*3454 2*3473 2*3479 2*3481 2*3487 2*3493 CONTROL 3454 3473 3479
3481 3487 3493
ACOST VAR DECLARED 3336 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3406 3416 3427 3439 3450
ALPHA PARAM DECLARED 3298 ASSIGNED 3302 REF 3319 3322 3323 3327 3328 3329 3332
3421 3444
ANIMAL VAR DECLARED 3339 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3454 3473 3479 3481 3487 3493 3500
2*3502 3504
ARTFOD VAR DECLARED 3360 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3406 3416 3427 3439 3485 3491 3497
ARTWATER VAR DECLARED 3361 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3407 3417 3428 3440 3527
ARTWATERND VAR DECLARED 3362 ASSIGNED 3564 REF 3433 3446 3561
BDRAFT EQU DECLARED 3382 DEF INED 3499 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3579 3585 3590 3598
BETA PARAM DECLARED 3297 ASSIGNED 3301 REF 3302 2*3322 2*3323 3327 3328 3329 3332
3422 3445
BETAF PARAM DECLARED 3300 DEF INED 3300 REF 3327 3422 3445
BIG PARAM DECLARED 3216 DEFINED 3216 REF 3408 3418 3429 3441
BP PARAM REF 3500
BREPCO EQU DECLARED 3383 DEF INED 3502 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3580 3586 3591 3599
BULLOCK PARAM REF 3499
BULLOCKC EQU DECLARED 3384 DEFINED 3504
C SET REF 3209 3231 3233 3238 3240 3245 3253 2*3255 3264 2*3266 3277
3282 3283 3338 3375 2*3450 4*3451 5*3471 3*3478 3481 4*3482 3483 3*3488
3*3489 3495 2*3496 3*3499 3*3506 3*3515 3523 2*3524 3525 3*3550 CONTROL 3253
3255 3264 3266 3277 3282 3283 3450 3471 3478 3481 3488 3495 N
3499 3506 3515 3523 3550 I-'
CANALDIV VAR DECLARED 3353 IMPL-ASN 3624 ASSIGNED 3610 3611 REF 3530 3533 3546 3561 10
CC SET REF 3461 3467 3475 3*3476 CONTRDL 3475
CCN SET DECLARED 3189 DEFINED 3190 REF 3206
CCOMBAL EQU DECLARED 3375 DEFINED 3471 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3578 3584 3589 3597
CE SET DECLARED 3198 DEF INED 3199 REF 3206 3*3410 3*3420 3*3431 3*3443 3462 3468
3573 CONTROL 3410 3420 3431 3443 3573
CF SET REF 3493 3*3494 CONTROL 3284 3493
CM SET DECLARED 3200 DEFINED 3200 REF 3206 3*3409 3*3419 3*3430 3*3442 3462 3468
CONTROL 3409 3419 3430 3442
CN SET DECLARED 3183 DEF INED 3184 REF 3206 4*3301 3*3302 3318 2*3319 4*3322 4*3323
2*3324 2*3326 4*3327 4*3328 3*3329 3*3411 3*3421 2*3422 3*3432 3*3444 2*3445 2*3457
3463 3469 CONTROL 3301 3302 3318 3319 3322 3323 3324 3326 3327
3328 3329 3411 3421 3432 3444 3457
CNEFF PARAM REF 3530
CNF SET REF 3471
CNL SET REF 3353 3354 3395 3397 2*3529 4*3530 2*3533 2*3546 2*3561 3610 3611
CONTROL 3529 3532 3546 3561 3610 3611
CNLDIVSEA VAR DECLARED 3354 REF 3533 3536 3541
CNL1 SET REF 3535 3536 3540 3541 CONTROL 3535 3539
CONDEF PAR AM REF 3610
CONSBAL EQU DECLARED 3377 DEFINED 3475 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3579 3585 3590 3598
CONSRATIO PARAM REF 3572
CONSUNP VAR DECLARED 3344 IMPL-ASN 3624 ASSIGNED 3572 REF 3461 3467 3476
CONV EQU DECLARED 3372 DEFINED 3457 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3578 3589
COST EQU DECLARED 3371 DEFINED 3450 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3578 3584 3589 3597
CPS VAR DECLARED 3334 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3404 3414 3425 3437 3624
CQ SET REF 3183 3189 3194 3196 3198 3200 3203 3206 3228 3235 3242
3243 3249 3256 3257 3260 3297 3298 3308 3309 3310 3311 3312
3313 3314 3315 3316 3340 3341 3342 3343 3344 3363 3364 3372
3373 3374 3377 2*3408 2*3418 2*3429 2*3441 3459 4*3461 4*3462 3*3463 3465
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM1 01/23/90 16:27:46 PAGE 88
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TVPE REFERENCES

4*3467 4*3468 2*3469 3572 CONTROL 3249 3256 3257 3260 3408 3418 3429
3441 3459 3465 3572
DEMAND PARAM REF 2*3301 3302
DEMNAT EQU DECLARED 3373 DEFINED 3459 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3578 3589
DEMNATN EQU DECLARED 3374 DEFINED 3465 REF 3584 3597
DIVCNLSEA EQU DECLARED 3397 DEFINED 3532 REF 3593 3601
DIVNWFP PARAM DECLARED 3220 DEFINED 3221 REF 3547
DIVPOST PAR AM REF 3611
DIVSEA EQU DECLARED 3396 DEFINED 3537 REF 3593 3601
ECNSDWTPR PARAM REF 3264 2*3266
EFRZ PARAM REF 3277
ELAST PARAM REF 3301
EMISC PARAM DECLARED 3237 ASSIGNED 3263
EMISCCT PARAM DECLARED 3240 ASSIGNED 3266
ENDPR PARAM DECLARED 3316 ASSIGNED 3329 REF 3330
EPP PARAM DECLARED 3236 ASSIGNED 3261
ESALEP PARAM DECLARED 3235 ASSIGNED 3260
ESEEDP PARAM DECLARED 3238 ASSIGNED 3264
EWAGE PARAM DECLARED 3239 ASSIGNED 3265
EX SET DECLARED 3202 ASSIGNED 3205 REF 3206 3405 3415 3426 3438 3450 3460
3466 3471 3473 3475 3478 3481 3487 3493 3499 3502 3504 3506
2*3508 3511 3515 3517 3519 3522 3529 3549
EXPLlMIT PARAM REF 3573 N
EXPORT VAR DECLARED 3343 IMPL-ASN 3624 ASSIGNED 3573 REF 3410 3420 3431 3443 3462 N
3468 0
EXPORTP PARAM DECLARED 3243 ASSIGNED 3257 REF 3410 3420 3431 3443
F VAR DECLARED 3351 ASSIGNED 3565 3566 REF 3434 3447 3556 3557 3558 3560
FAMILVL VAR DECLARED 3345 IMPL-ASN 3624 ASSIGNED 3569 REF 3456 3479
FARMCONS PARAM REF 3572
FERT PARAM REF 3207 3450
FINSDWTPR PARAM REF 3253 2*3255
FODDER EQU DECLARED 3379 DEFINED 3481 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3579 3585 3590 3598
FSALEP PARAM DECLARED 3228 ASSIGNED 3249 REF 3301 3302 3318 3319 3405 3415 3426
3438
G SET REF 3202 3205 3336 3337 3338 3339 3340 3341 3344 3345 3346
3349 3350 3357 3358 3359 3360 3361 3371 3375 3376 3377 3378
3379 3380 3381 3382 3383 3385 3388 3391 3392 3393 2*3405 2*3406
3407 3408 2*3415 2*3416 3417 3418 2*3426 2*3427 3428 3429 2*3438 2*3439
3440 3441 2*3450 3451 2*3452 2*3453 3454 3455 2*3456 3460 3*3461 3466
3*3467 3*3471 3*3473 3475 3*3476 2*3478 3*3479 2*3481 3483 3484 3485 3*3487
3489 3490 3491 2*3493 3494 3496 3497 2*3499 3500 3*3502 2*3504 3*3506
3*3508 2*3509 3*3515 3516 2*3517 2*3519 3522 2*3525 2*3526 2*3527 3*3529 3*3549
3550 3569 3572 CONTROL 3205 3405 3415 3426 3438 3450 3460 3466
3471 3473 3475 3478 3481 3487 3493 3499 3502 3504 3506 2*3508
3515 3517 3519 3522 3529 3549 3569 3572 3574
GF SET REF 3452 3453 3526
GR PARAM REF 3493
GRAZ PARAM REF 3484 3490
GRNFDR EOU DECLARED 3381 DEFINED 3493 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3579 3585 3590 3598
GS SET REF 3549
GWFG SET REF 3529
GWT1 PAR AM REF 3526
HIREDL VAR DECLARED 3346 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3456 3479
I SET REF 2*3553 CONTROL 3553
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM1 01/23/90 16:27:46 PAGE 89
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TYPE REFERENCES

IMPORT VAR DECLARED 3342 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3409 3419 3430 3442 3462 3468
IMPORTP PARAM DECLARED 3242 ASSIGNED 3256 REF 3409 3419 3430 3442
INCR PARAM DECLARED 3312 ASSIGNED 3324 REF 3326 3330
INFLOW PARAM ASSIGNED 2*3622 REF 3553
IOLIVE PARAM REF 3454 3473 3479 3481 3487 3493
ISR SET REF 3610 CONTROL 3610
ITR VAR DECLARED 3349 IMPL-ASN 3624 ASSIGNED 3574 REF 3453 3509
ITW VAR DECLARED 3347 IMPL-ASN 3624 ASSIGNED 3574 REF 3453 3513
LABFAC PARAM REF 3456
LABOR PARAM REF 3478
LABORC EQU DECLARED 3378 DEFINED 3478 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3579 3585 3590 3598
LAND PARAM REF 3515 3524
LANDC EQU DECLARED 3388 DEF INED 3515 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3580 3586 3591 3599
LCEFF PARAM REF 2*3556 3558
LSTD PARAM REF 3569
M SET REF 3220 3232 3239 3245 3254 3265 2*3277 3345 3346 3348 3350
3351 3352 3353 3357 3358 3359 3361 3362 3378 3382 3385 3386
3387 3388 3391 3392 3393 3394 3400 3407 3417 3428 2*3433 3434
3440 2*3446 3447 2*3452 3*3456 3478 2*3479 2*3484 2*3490 3499 3500 2*3506
3508 3513 2*3515 3*3524 3525 3*3526 2*3527 3529 2*3530 2*3533 3546 3547
3549 3550 3553 2*3554 3556 3557 3558 4*3560 2*3561 3611 3615 3616
CONTROL 3254 3265 3277 3407 3417 3428 3433 3440 3446 3452 3456
3478 3484 3490 3499 3506 3508 3511 3515 3522 3529 3533 3546 N
3549 3552 3564 3565 3566 3569 3610 3611 3615 3616 3620 3621 N
2*3622 .....
MAX FUNCT REF 3277 3524
MIN FUNCT REF 3319
MISC PARAM DECLARED 3230 ASSIGNED 3252 REF 3450 2*3452 2 .. 3453
MISCCT PARAM DECLARED 3233 ASSIGNED 3255 REF 3451
N SET REF 3225 3351 3352 3362 3394 4*3433 4"3446 3552 3553 4*3554 3555
3 .. 3556 2*3557 3 .. 3558 3559 5*3560 2*3561 2*3566 2*3615 2*3616 CONTROL 3433 3446
3552 3564 3565 3566 3615 3616
NAT VAR DECLARED 3363 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3411 3432 3457 3463
NATN VAR DECLARED 3364 REF 3421 3422 3444 3445 3469
NB SET REF 3552
NBAL EQU DECLARED 3394 DEFINED 3552 REF 3594 3602
NC SET REF 3561
NCAP PARAM REF 2*3566
NCN SET DECLARED 3196 DEFINED 3197 REF 3206 2*3405 2*3415 2*3426 2*3438 CONTROL 3405
3415 3426 3438
NI SET REF 3553
NN SET REF 3555 3559
NTWUCAP PARAM REF 3513
NWFPALC EQU DECLARED 3400 DEFINED 3546 REF 3593 3601
N1 SET REF 3351 2 .. 3554 3555 3"3556 2*3557 2*3558 3559 3560 2*3566 CONTROL 3554
3555 3559 3565 3566
OBJN EQU DECLARED 3369 DEFINED 3424 REF 3589
OBJNN EQU DECLARED 3370 DEFINED 3436 REF 3597
OBJZ EQU DECLARED 3367 DEFINED 3403 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3578
OBJZN EQU DECLARED 3368 DEFINED 3413 REF 3584
ORCHAREA PARAM REF 3517
ORCHAREAC EQU DECLARED 3389 DEF INED 3517 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3580 3586 3591 3599
P SET DECLARED 3306 DEFINED 3306 REF 3313 3314 3315 3316 3324 3326 2*3327
2*3328 3329 3363 2*3411 2*3432 3457 2*3463 CONTROL 3326 3327 3328 3329
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME;WSISMl 01/23/90 16:27:46 PAGE 90
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TYPE REFERENCES

3411 3432 3457 3463

PAFOD PARAM DECLARED 3218 DEFINED 3218 REF 3406 3416 3427 3439
PAWAT PARAM DECLARED 3217 DEFINED 3217 REF 3407 3417 3428 3433 3440 3446
PMAX PARAM DECLARED 3308 ASSIGNED 3319 REF 3322 3330
PMIN PARAM DECLARED 3309 ASSIGNED 3318 REF 3323 3330
PP PAR AM DECLARED 3229 ASSIGNED 3250 REF 3455
PPC VAR DECLARED 3337 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3455 3487
PRICES PARAM REF 3249 3256 3257 3260
PRI1 PARAM REF 3250 3252 3261 3263
PRODA VAR DECLARED 3341 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3408 3418 3429 3441 3461 3467 3476
PRODT VAR DECLARED 3340 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3405 3415 3426 3438 3461 3467 3471
3473 3476 3519
PROT ARB PARAM REF 3540 3543
PROTEIN EQU DECLARED 3380 DEF INED 3487 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3579 3585 3590 3598
PRSEA VAR DECLARED 3355 REF 3535 3538 3544
PRSEAW EQU DECLARED 3399 DEFINED 3534 REF 3593 3601
PS SET REF 3174 3175
PSR SET DECLARED 3174 DEFINED 3174 REF 3249 3250 3252 3253 3254 2*3255 3256
3257 CONTROL 3248
PSRl SET DECLARED 3175 DEFINED 3175 REF 3260 3261 3263 3264 3265 2*3266
CONTROL 3259
PV SET REF 3398 3399
PVCNL SET REF 3535 3546 N
PV2 SET REF 3355 2*3535 3538 3543 3544 CONTROL 3534 3538 3542 N
N
Pl SET REF 3252 3263 CONTROL 3252 3263
P2 SET REF 2*3450 CONTROL 3450
Q SET REF 3376 2*3473 CONTROL 3284 3473
QCOMBAL EQU DECLARED 3376 DEFINED 3473 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3578 3584 3589 3597
QMAX PAR AM DECLARED 3310 ASSIGNED 3323 REF 3324 3330
QMIN PARAM DECLARED 3311 ASSIGNED 3322 REF 3324 3326 3330
QN SET DECLARED 3194 DEFINED 3195 REF 3206
QS PARAM DECLARED 3315 ASSIGNED 3326 REF 2*3327 2*3328 3329 3330 3463
RCAP PARAM REF 3433 3446 3560 3615 3616
RCONT VAR DECLARED 3352 ASSIGNED 3615 3616 REF 3433 3446 2*3560
REPCO PARAM REF 3502
RESOURCE PARAM REF 3205 3509 3513 3516 3569
RES88 PARAM REF 3504
REVAPL PARAM REF 3560
RIVERB PARAM REF 3557
RIVERCD PARAM REF 2*3554 3558
RS PARAM DECLARED 3314 ASSIGNED 3328 REF 3330
RULELO PARAM REF 3615
RULEUP PARAM REF 3616
RVAL PARAM DECLARED 3225 DEFINED 3226 REF 3433 3434 3446 3447
S SET REF 3209 3245 3277 3282 3283 3338 3450 2*3451 3*3471 3*3478 3481
2*3482 3483 3*3488 3489 3493 2*3494 3495 3496 3*3499 3*3506 3*3515 2*3517
3523 2*3524 3525 3*3550 CONTROL 3277 3279 3280 3282 3283 3450 3471
3478 3481 3488 3493 3495 3499 3506 3515 3517 3523 3550
SA SET REF 2*3529 3530 CONTROL 3529
SCMILLC EQU DECLARED 3390 DEFINED 3519 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3581 3587
SCMILLCAP PARAM REF 3519
SCONV PARAM REF 3482 3483 3484 3485 2*3489 3490 3491 3494 3496 3497
SEA SET REF 3337 3354 3355 3356 3360 3379 3380 3381 3395 3396 3397
3398 3399 3406 3416 3427 3439 3455 2*3482 2*3484 3485 3487 2*3489
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM1 01/23/90 16:27:46 PAGE 91
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TYPE REFERENCES

2*3490 3491 3494 3496 3497 2*3533 3535 3536 2*3538 2*3540 3541 2*3543
3544 CONTROL 3406 3416 3427 3439 3455 3481 3487 3493 3532 3534
3537 3539 3542
SEAM SET REF 3484 3490 3533
SEEDP PARAM DECLARED 3231 ASSIGNED 3253 REF 3451
SLKLAND VAR DECLARED 3358 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3484 3490 3515
SLKWATER VAR DECLARED 3359 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3525
SQR FUNCT REF 3327 3328 3422 3445
SUBDEF PARAM REF 3530
SUBIRRC EQU DECLARED 3393 DEFINED 3549 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3581 3587 3592 3600
SUBIRRFAC PARAM REF 3550
SUBIRRZ PARAM REF 3524
SnDS PARAM REF 3451 3482 3488
T SET REF 3209 3245 3277 3282 3283 3338 3450 2*3451 3* 34 71 3*3478 3481
2*3482 3483 3*3488 3489 3493 2*3494 3495 3496 3*3499 3*3506 3*3515 2*3517
3523 2*3524 3525 3*3550 CONTROL 3277 3279 3280 3282 3283 3450 3471
3478 3481 3488 3493 3495 3499 3506 3515 3517 3523 3550
TCDIVSEA VAR DECLARED 3356 REF 3538 3540 3543
TORAFT EQU DECLARED 3385 DEFINED 3506 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3580 3586 3591 3599
TEC PARAM DECLARED 3209 DEFINED 3209 ASSIGNED 3279 3280 REF 3282
TECH SET ASSIGNED 3282 REF 3283 3450 3471 3478 3481 3488 3493 3495 3499
3506 3515 3517 3523 3550
TECHC SET DECLARED 3203 ASSIGNED 3283 2*3284 REF 3286 3408 3409 3410 3411 3418 N
3419 3420 3421 3429 3430 3431 3432 3441 3442 3443 3444 3457 N
3459 3465 3475 w
TOLCNL PARAM DECLARED 3292 DEFINED 3292 REF 3540
TOLNWFP PARAM DECLARED 3294 DEFINED 3294 ASSIGNED 3618 REF 3547
TOLPR PARAM DECLARED 3293 DEFINED 3293 REF 3543
TRACTOR PARAM REF 3506
TRCAP PARAM REF 3509
TRCAPC EQU DECLARED 3386 DEFINED 3508 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3580 3586 3591 3599
TRIB PARAM ASSIGNED 3620 3621 REF 2*3554
TS VAR DECLARED 3350 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3452 3506 3508
TW VAR DECLARED 3348 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3452 3513 3526
TWCAPC EQU DECLARED 3387 DEFINED 3511 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3580 3586 3591 3599
TWEFFZ PARAM REF 3526
W SET REF 3209 3245 3277 3282 3283 3338 3450 2*3451 3*3471 3*3478 3481
2*3482 3483 3*3488 3489 3493 2*3494 3495 3496 3*3499 3*3506 3*3515 2*3517
3523 2*3524 3525 3*3550 CONTROL 3277 3279 3280 3282 3283 3450 3471
3478 3481 3488 3493 3495 3499 3506 3515 3517 3523 3550
WAGE PARAM DECLARED 3232 ASSIGNED 3254 REF 3456
WAGEPS PARAM REF 3254 3265
WATALCPRO EQU DECLARED 3398 DEFINED 3542 REF 3593 3601
WATALCSEA EQU DECLARED 3395 DEFINED 3539 REF 3593 3601
WATALCZ EQU DECLARED 3392 DEFINED 3529 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3581 3587 3592 3600
WATER PARAM REF 3277
WATERBALN EQU DECLARED 3391 DEFINED 3522 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3581 3587 3592 3600
WCEFF PARAM REF 3530
WDIVRZ VAR DECLARED 3357 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3527 3529 3549
WEEDY PARAM REF 3482 3489 3496
WNR PARAM DECLARED 3245 ASSIGNED 3277 REF 3524 3550
WS PARAM DECLARED 3313 ASSIGNED 3327 REF 3330 3411 3432
WSISN MODEL DECLARED 3588 DEFINED 3588
WSISNN MODEL DECLARED 3596 DEFINED 3596
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM1 01/23/90 16:27-46 PAGE 92
SYMBOL LI STING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TYPE REFERENCES

WSISZ MODEL DECLARED 3577 DEFINED 3577 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3624
WSISZN MODEL DECLARED 3583 DEFINED 3583
X VAR DECLARED 3338 IMPL-ASN 3624 REF 3451 3471 3478 3483 3489 3494 3496
3499 3506 3515 3517 3525 3550
YIELD PARAM REF 3471 3482 3488 3494
Z SET REF 3176 3202 3203 3209 3245 3336 3337 3338 3339 3340 3341
3342 3343 3344 3345 3346 3347 3348 3349 3350 3358 3359 3361
3363 3364 3371 3372 3373 3374 3375 3376 3377 3378 3379 3380
3381 3382 3383 3385 3386 3387 3388 3389 3390 3391 3392 3393
ZSA SET REF 3529
Z1 SET DECLARED 3176 DEFINED 3177 REF 3205 2*3277 3282 3283 3297 3298 2*3301
2*3302 3308 3309 3310 3311 3312 3313 3314 3315 3316 3319 4*3322
4*3323 2*3324 2*3326 4*3327 4*3328 3*3329 3357 3360 3384 2*3405 2*3406 3407
2*3408 2*3409 2*3410 3*3411 2*3415 2*3416 3417 2*3418 2*3419 2*3420 3*3421 2*3422
2*3426 2*3427 3428 2*3429 2*3430 2*3431 3*3432 2*3438 2*3439 3440 2*3441 2*3442
2*3443 3*3444 2*3445 4*3450 2*3451 2*3452 2*3453 2*3454 3455 2*3456 2*3457 3459
3460 3*3461 2*3462 2*3463 3465 3466 3*3467 2*3468 3469 5*3471 4*3473 2*3475
3*3476 4*3478 4*3479 4*3481 3*3482 3483 2*3484 3485 4*3487 3*3488 2*3489 2*3490
3491 4*3493 2*3494 3495 2*3496 3497 4*3499 3500 3*3502 3*3504 5*3506 3*3508
2*3509 3511 3*3513 5*3515 3516 4*3517 3*3519 3522 3523 3*3524 2*3525 3*3526
2*3527 3*3529 2*3549 4*3550 3569 2*3572 3573 CONTROL 3205 3277 3282 3283
2*3284 3301 3302 3318 3319 3322 3323 3324 3326 3327 3328 3329
3405 3409 3410 3411 3415 3419 3420 3421 3426 3430 3431 3432
N
3438 3442 3443 3444 3450 3457 3459 3465 3471 3473 3475 3478 N
3481 3487 3493 3499 3502 3504 3506 3508 3511 3515 3517 3519 .po
3522 3529 3549 3569 3572 3573 2*3574

SETS

A ANIMAL TYPES
C CROPS
CC CONSUMABLE COMODITIES
CCN CROP COMODITIES WITH ENDOGENOUS PRICES
CE EXPORTABLE COMODITIES
CF FODDER CROPS
CM COMODITIES WHICH COULD BE IMPORTED
CN COMODITIES ENDOGENOUS PRICES
CNF NON-FODDER CROPS
CNL IRRIGATION CANALS IN THE INDUS RIVER IRRIGATION SYSTEM
CNL1 CANALS EXCLUDING NWFP CANALS
CQ CROP AND LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS
EX TO CHECK FRESH OR SALINE AREA WITHIN A ZONE
G GROUND WATER QUALITY TYPES
GF FRESH GROUND WATER SUB-ZONE
GS SALINE GROUND WATER SUB-ZONE
GWFG SUBAREA IDENTIFICATION BY THE GROUNDWATER QUALITY
I SYSTEM INFLOWS
ISR IRRIGATION SYSTEM SCENARIO FOR THIS RUN
M MONTHS
N NODES OF THE INDUS RIVER SYSTEM
NB
NC NOOE TO CANAL MAP
NCN CROPS WITH FIXED PRICES EXCLUDING FODDER
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM1 01/23/90 16:27:46 PAGE 93
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SETS
NI NODE TO RIM STATION INFLOW MAP
NN WATER FLOW SYSTEM NODE TO NODE
N1 ALIASED WITH N
P GRID POINTS FOR LINEARIZATION
PS PRICE SECENARIOS
PSR PRICE SCENARIO FOR THE MODEL(FINANCIAL PRICES)
PSR1 PRICE SCENARIO FOR REPORT(ECONOMIC PRICES)
PV PROVINCES AND COUNTRY
PVCNL PROVINCE TO CANALS MAP
PV2 PUNJAB AND SIND
P1
P2
Q LIVESTOCK COMODITIES
QN LIVESTOCK COMODITIES ENDOGENOUS PRICES
S SEQUENCE
SA SUBAREAS
SEA SEASONS
SEAM MAPPING FROM SEASONS TO MONTHS
T TECHNOLOGY
TECH TECHNOLOGY AVAILABILITY INDICATOR
TECHC COMODITIES BY ZONES
W WATER STRESS LEVEL
Z AGROCLIMATIC ZONES N
N
ZSA CANAL-SUBAREA TO AGROCLIMATIC ZONE MAPPING VI
Z1 ZONE SELECTION FOR THIS RUN

PARAMETERS
ALPHA DEMAND CURVE INTECEPT

BETA GRADIENT COMODITIES DEMAND CURVE

BETAF BETA FACTOR

BIG BIG NUMBER USED FOR ARTIFICAL PRODUCTION

BP DRAFT POWER AVAILABLE PER BULLOCK(HOURS PER MONTH)

BULLOCK BULLOCK POWER REQUIREMENTS(BULLOCK PAIR HOURS PER MONTH )

CNEFF CANAL EFFICIENCY FROM CANAL HEAD TO THE WATERCOURSE HEAD

COMDH CANAL COMMAND CHARACTERISTICS

CONSRATIO PROPORTION OF CONSUMPTION BY GROWUNDWATER TYPE

DEMAND MARKET DEMAND BY ZONE (000 TONS OR MILLION LITERS)

DIVNWFP MONTHY DIVERSION TO THE NWFP ZONE (MAF)

DIVPOST AVERAGE(1976-77 TO 1987-88) CANAL DIVERSIONS(MAF)

ECNSDWTPR PRICES OF SEED(RS PER KG) AND WATER(RS PER ACRE )

EFRZ EFFECTIVE RAIN BY ACZ (FEET)

ELAST ELASTICITY OF DEMAND FOR CROP AND LIVESTOCK COMODITIES

EMISC ECONOMIC MISCELLENIOUS PRICES

EMISCCT ECONOMIC WATER CHARGES AND MISCILLENIOUS COSTS(RS PER ACRE)

ENDPR PRICE (RUPEES PER KGS OR LITER )

EPP ECONOMIC PRICE OF PROTEIN CONCENTRATE (RS PER KGS)

ESALEP ECONOMIC SALE PRICE FOR CROP AND LIVESTOCK COMOOITIES (RS PER KG OR PER LITER)

ESEEDP ECONOMIC SEED PRICE

EWAGE ECONOMIC WAGE RATE (RS PER MAN-HOUR)

EXPLIMIT EXPORT LIMITS BY ZONE

EXPORTP EXPORT PRICES FOR THE SCENARIO

FARMCONS ON-FARM CONSUMPTION 1988 (OOO'S TONS)

INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM1 01/23/90 16:27:46 PAGE 94

SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

PARAMETERS
FERT FERTILIZER APPLICATIONS. (KG PER ACRE)
FINSDWTPR PRICES OF SEED(RS PER KG) AND WATER(RS PER ACRE )
FSALEP FINANCIAL SALE PRICE FOR CROP AND LIVESTOCK COMODITIES (RS PER KG OR PER LITER)
GR REQUIRED PROPORTION OF GREEN FODDER IN TOTAL FODDER
GRAZ GRAZING FROM SLACK LAND (TONNS PER ACRE )
GWT1 PUBLIC TUBEWELL PUMPAGE AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)
IMPORTP IMPORT PRICES FOR THE SCENARIO
INCR INCREMENT
INFLOW INFLOWS FOR THIS RUN (MAF)
IOLIVE LIVESTOCK INPUT OUTPUT COEFFICIENTS BY ZONES
LABFAC FACTOR TO CONVERT WAGE TO THE RESERVATION WAGE
LABOR LABOR REQUIREMENTS FOR CROPS(MAN HOURS)
LAND LAND OCCUPATION BY MONTH
LCEFF LINK CANAL EFFICIENCY FROM HEAD TO TAIL
LSTD STANDARD LABOR LIMIT ( HOURS PER MONTH )
MISC FINANCIAL MISCELLENIOUS PRICES
MISCCT FINANCIAL WATER CHARGES AND MISCILLENIOUS COSTS(RS PER ACRE)
NCAP NODE TO NODE TRANSFER CAPACITY (MAF)
NTWUCAP EFFECTIVE CAPACITY OF NEW TUBEWELLS(AF PER MONTH)
ORCHAREA AREA UNDER ORCHARDS BY ZONE (THOUSAND ACRES )
PAFOD BIG NUMBER FOR ARTIFICAL FODDER
PAWAT BIG NUMBER FOR ARTIFICIAL WATER fI.,)
PM AX MAXIMUM PRICE FOR SEGMENTS fI.,)
PMIN MINIMUM PRICE FOR SEGMENTS 0\
PP FINANCIAL PURCHASE PRICE OF PROTEIN (RS PER KGS)
PRICES 1988 PRICES
PRI1 FERTILIZER TUBEWELL TRACTOR AND PROTEIN PRICES
PROT ARB DIVERSIONS AS PROPORTION OF TOTAL(PUNJAB AND SIND) OST TARBELA
QMAX MAX NATIONAL CONSUMPTION
QMIN MIN NATIONAL CONSUMPTION
QS QUANTITY DEFINITION(THOUSAND TONS OR MILLION LITERS)
RCAP LIVE CAPACITY OF RESRVOIRS (MAF)
REPCO REPRODUCTIVE COEFFICIENT
RESOURCE ENDOWMENTS BY ACZ AND GROUNDWATER QUALITY
RES88 AVAILABLE RESOURCES 1988
REVAPL EVAPORATION LOSSES FROM RESERVOIRS (KAF)
RIVERB COEFFICIENTS FOR RIVER ROUTING
RIVERCD COEFFICIENTS FOR RIVER ROUTING
RS REVENUE DEFINITION (MILLION RUPEES)
RULELO LOWER RULE CURVE
RULEUP UPPER RULE CURVE
RVAL VALUE OF WATER STORED IN THE RESERVOIRS
SCMILLCAP SUGARCANE MILL CAPACITY (THOUSAND TONNS PER YEAR )
SCONV TON AND DP CONVERSION FACTOR FROM CROP STRAW
SEEDP FINANCIAL SEED PRICE (RS PER KGS)
SUSDEF SUB-AREA DEFINITION(PROPORTION OF CCA) BY CANALS
SUSIRRFAC MAXIMUM SUB-IRRIGATION IN SALINE AREAS AS PROPORTION OF CROP REQ.(NET OF RAIN)
SUBIRRZ SUBIRRIGATION BY ACZ (FEET)
SVLDS STRAW YIELD AND SEED DATA
TEC CROP TECHNOLOGY DISABLED FOR 1988 RUN
TOLCNL ALLOWED DEVIATION FROM PROPORTIONAL ALLOCATION BY CANAL
TOLNWFP NWFP DIVERSION TOLERANCE
TOLPR ALLOWED DEVIATION FROM PROPORTIONAL ALLOCATION BY PROVINCE
TRACTOR TRACTOR REQUIREMENTS (TRACTOR HOURS PER ACRE)
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM1 01/23/90 16:27:46 PAGE 95
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

PARAMETERS

TRCAP TRACTOR CAPACITY IN TRACTOR HOURS PER MONTH

TRIB TRIBUTARY INFLOWS FOR THIS RUN (MAF)
TWEFFZ WEIGHTED PRIVATE TUBEWELL DELIVERY EFFICIENCY BY ZONE

WAGE FINANCIAL WAGE RATES (RS PER MAN-HOUR)

WAGEPS WAGE RATES RS PER MAN HOUR

WATER WATER REQUIREMENTS(ACRE FEET PER ACRE)

WCEFF WATERCOURSE COMMAND DELIVERY EFFICIENCY

WEEDY WEED YIELDS BY CROP (TONNS PER ACER)

WNR WATER REQUIREMENTS NET OF RAIN

WS WELFARE SEGMENTS (MILLION RUPEES)

YIELD YIELD BY ZONE CROP TECHNOLOGY IN METRIC TONNS

VARIABLES

ACOST FARM COST IN (MILLION RUPEES)

ANIMAL PRODUCTION OF LIVESTOCK TYPE A (THOUSANDS)

ARTFOD ARTIFICIAL FODDER SUPPLY EQUAIVALENT OF RAB-FOD (000 TONNS)

ARTWATER WATER FROM IMAGINARY SOURCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)

ARTWATERND WATER FROM IMAGINARY SOURCE AT NODES (MAn

CANALDIV CANAL DIVERSION AT THE CANAL HEAD (MAF)

CNLDIVSEA CANAL DIVERSION BY SEASON (MAn

CONSUMP ON FARM CONSUMPTION (000 METRIC TONNS) I\)

CPS CONSUMER PLUS PRODUCERS SURPLUS (MILLION RUPEES) I\)

.....,
EXPORT EXPORT OF COMODITIES (000 METRIC TONNS)
F FLOW TO NODE N FROM NODE N1 (MAn
FAMILYL FAMILY LABOR USED (MILLION MAN HOURS)
HIREDL HIRED LABOR USED (MILLION MAN HOURS)
IMPORT IMPORT OF COMODITIES (CROP COMM. 000 M. TONS LIVESTOCK MILL. KGS OR LITERS)
ITR INVESTMENT IN INCREASED TRACTOR CAPACITY (000 TRACTOR-HRS PER MONTH)
ITW INVESTMENT IN INCREASED PRIVATE TUBEWELL CAPACITY (KAF PER MONTH)
NAT PROVINCIAL DEMAND LINEARIZED
NATN PROVINCIAL DEMAND NON-LINEAR
PPC PURCHASES OF PROTEIN CONCENTRATES (THOUSAND METRIC TONS)
PRODA ARTIFICIAL SUPPLY
PRODT PRODUCTION (CROP COMMOOITIES 000 METRIC TONS LIVESTOCK COMM MILL. KGS OR LITERS)
PRSEA CANAL DIVERSION BY PROVINCE (SIND AND PUNJAB) (MAF)
RCONT END OF THE MONTH RESRVOIR CONTENTS (MAF)
SLKLAND SLACK LAND (THOUSAND ACRES)
SLKWATER SLACK WATER AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)
TCDIVSEA TOTAL CANAL DIVERSION IN SINO AND PUNJAB BY SEASON (MAF)
TS PRIVATE TRACTOR SERVICES USE BY MONTH (THOUSAND HRS)
TW PRIVATE TUBEWELL WATER USED BY MONTH M (KAF)
WDIVRZ SURFACE WATER DIVERSION AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)
X CROPPED AREA BY TECHNOLOGY (THOUSAND ACRES)

EQUATIONS

BDRAFT BULLOCK DRAFT POWER CONSTRAINT (MILLION BULLOCK HOURS)

BREPCO BULLOCK REPRODUCTION CONSTRAINT

BULLOCKC BULLOCK POPULATION CONSTRAINT (000 BULLOCKS)

CCOMBAL COMMODITY BALANCES FOR CROPS (000 TONS)

CONSBAL CONSUMPTION BALANCE (000 TONS OR M LITERS)

INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM1 01/23/90 16:27:46 PAGE

96
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

EQUATIONS

CONV CONVEX COMBINATION FOR AGGREGATE CONSUMPTION

COST ANNUAL FARM COST (MILLION RUPEES)

DEMNAT PROVINCIAL DEMAND BALANCE LINEAR (000 TONS OR MILLION LITERS)

DEMNATN ZONAL DEMAND BALANCE NON-LINEAR (000 TONS OR MILLION LITERS)

DIVCNLSEA CANAL DIVERSION BY SEASON (MAF)

DIVSEA TOTAL CANAL DIVERSIONS IN SIND AND PUNJAB (MAF)

FODDER SEASONAL MAINTENANCE OF FODDER SUPPLIES (000 METRIC TONS)

GRNFDR GREEN FODDER REQUIREMENTS (000 METRIC TONS)

LABORC MONTHLY LABOR CONSTRAINT (MILLION MAN HOURS)

LANDC LAND CONSTRAINT (000 ACRES)

NBAL WATER BALANCE AT A NODE (MAF)

NWFPALC WATER ALLOCATIONS TO THE NWFP ACZ (MAF)

OBJN OBJECTIVE FUNCTION FOR THE INDUS MODEL LINEAR VERSION (MILLION RUPEES)

OBJNN OBJECTIVE FUNCTION FOR THE INDUS MODEL NON-LINEAR VERSION (MI LLION RUPEES)

OBJZ OBJECTIVE FUNCTION FOR THE ZONE MODEL LINEAR VERSION (MILLION RUPEES)

OBJZN OBJECTIVE FUNCTION FOR THE ZONE MODEL NON-LINEAR VERSION (MILLION RUPEES)

ORCHAREAC ORCHARD AREA CONSTRAINT (000 ACRES)

PROTEIN PROTEIN REQUIREMENTS OF LIVESTOCK BY SEASON (000 METRIC TONS)

PRSEAW DIVERSIONS BY PROVINCE AND SEASON (MAF)

QCOMBAL LIVESTOCK COMODITY BALANCES (000 TONS OR M LITERS)

SCMILLC SUGAR CANE TO MILL CONSTRAINT (000 ACRES)

SUBIRRC SUBIRRIGATION CONSTRAINT (KAF)

N
TORAFT TRACTOR DRAFT POWER BALANCE (000 TRACTOR HOURS) N

TRCAPC TRACTOR CAPACITY CONSTRAINT (000 TRACTOR HOURS) ClO

TWCAPC TUBEWELL CAPACITY CONSTRAINT (KAF)
WATALCPRO WATER ALLOCATION BY PROVINCE (MAF)
WATALCSEA WATER ALLOCATIONS BY SEASON (MAF)
WATALCZ SURFACE WATER BY ZONE (KAF)
WATERBALN WATER BALANCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)

MODELS
WSISN IBMR MODEL WITH WATER NETWORK LINEAR
WSISNN IBMR MODEL WITH WATER NETWORK NON-LINEAR
WSISZ AGROCLIMATIC ZONES MODEL LINEAR OBJECTIVE
WSISZN AGROCLIMATIC ZONES MODEL NON-LINEAR OBJECTIVE

**** FILE SUMMARY FOR USER KDAM

RESTART WSISD1 WORK* A
INPUT WSISM1 GAMS A
OUTPUT WSISM1 LISTING A
SAVE WSISM1 WORK* A
COMPILATION TIME 2.120 SECONDS VER: IBM-TB-003
 - 229

(This page is intentionally blank)

 - 230

(This page is intentionally blank)

 Appendix A.3

Water Allocation Base Case, Including Report

File WSISM3 Page 233

File WSISR3 Page 234

 - 232

(This page is intentionally blank)

INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM3 01/23/90 16:29:01 PAGE 97
GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3627 * RESTART FROM WSISM1

3628 * POST TARBELA AVERAGE AS MINIMUM, EXTRA WATER ALLOCATED ACCORDING TO
3629 * SEASONAL SHARES BY CANAL
3630 * INVESTMENTS ARE ALLOWED
3631
3632 ITR.UP(Z1,G)= INF ;
3633 ITW.UP(Z1) = INF ;
3634 EXPORT.UP(Z1,"WHEAT") INF;
3635
3636 CANALDIV.UP(CNL,M) SUM(ISR. COMDEF(ISR,"CCAP".CNL)
3637 CANALDIV.LO(CNL.M) = DIVPOST(CNL,M) :
3638
3639 TOLNWFP= 0
3640 TOLCNL = 0
3641 TOLPR = 0
3642
3643 SOLVE WSISN MAXIMIZING CPS USING LP

N
....,
....,
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 486
REPORT ON THE SOLUTION GAMS 2 21 IBM CMS

3646 * $OFFSYMLIST OFFSYMXREF

3647 ** CONTINUEO FROM WSISM* GAMS ** *
3648
3649
3650
SETS
C2 IRABI, KHARIF, ANNUAL I

3651 C3
3652 SEAC(SEA,C) SEASON TO CROP MAP I
3653 RABI. (MUS+RAP. RAB-FOD, GRAM, WHEAT, POTATOES.
3654 ONIONS,SC-MILL, SC-GUR,ORCHARD)
3655 KHARIF. (BASMATI , IRRI,MAIZE. KHA-FOD, COTTON,
3656 SC-MILL. SC-GUR,ORCHARD) I
3657 RRl IGPV,VAL-ADDED,FARM-INC,FL-COST,HL-COST,SEED-COST.
3658 FERT-COST.MISCC-COST,TW-OPC,TR-OPC,TW-INVT,TR-INVT
3659 ANIML-COST.PROT-CDST, TOTAL-COSTI
3660 R9 ISEEP-RAIN. SEEP-PTW, SEEP-GTW, SEEP-CANAL,
3661 SEEP-WCFLD,SEEP-LINK.SEEP-RIVER,P-TUBWELL,G-TUBWELL
3662 TOT-INF, TDT-OUTF, INF-OUTF, P-EVAP-GW, EVAP-GW,BALANCE I
3663 R2(RR1) IFL-COST,HL-COST,SEED-COST,FERT-COST.MISCC-COST,
3664 TW-OPC,TR-OPC,TW-INVT.TR INVT,ANIML-COST,PROT-COST.
3665 TOTAL-COSTI
3666 R17(RR1) IHL-COST.SEED-COST,FERT-COST,TW-DPC.TR-OPC,ANIML-COST.
3667 PROT-COST I
3668 R18(RR1) IHL-COST,SEED-COST,FERT-COST,MISCC-COST,TW-OPC,TR-OPC,
3669 ANIML-COST,PROT-COST I
3670 R3 IWATER-REQ, RAIN, SUBIRR, CANAL, P-TUBEWELL, G-TUBEWELL, N
W
3671 ARTWATER, SLKWATER, TOT-SUPPLY I ~
3672 R4(R3) ICANAL, RAIN, SUBIRR, P-TUBEWELL. G-TUBEWELL, ARTWATER I
3673 R6(R9) ISEEP-RAIN, SEEP-PTW, SEEP-GTW. SEEP-CANAL, SEEP-WCFLD,
3674 SEEP-LINK,SEEP-RIVER I
3675 R7(R9) Ip-TUBWELL, G-TUBWELL I
3676 R8(RR1) IGPV, VAL-ADDED, FARM-INC, FL-COST, HL-COST, TOTAL-COST I
3677 Rl0 IM-NWFP,A-NWFP,M-PMW,A-PMW,M-PCW,A-PCW,M-PSW,A-PSW,M-PRW,A-PRW
3678 M-SCWN,A-SCWN.M-SRWN,A-SRWN,M-SCWS,A-SCWS,M-SRWS,A-SRWS I
3679 Rll(Rl0) IM-NWFP,M-PMW,M-PCW,M-PSW,M-PRW,M-SCWN,M-SCWS,M-SRWN,M-SRWS I
3680 R12(Rl0) IA-NWFP,A-PMW,A-PCW,A-PSW,A-PRW,A-SCWN,A-SCWS,A-SRWN,A-SRWS I
3681 Rl1Z(Rll,Z) IM-NWFP.NWFP, M-PMW.PMW, M-PCW.PCW. M-PSW.PSW, M-PRW.PRW
3682 M-SCWN.SCWN. M-SCWS.SCWS. M-SRWN.SRWN, M-SRWS.SRWS I
3683 R12Z(R12,Z) IA-NWFP.NWFP, A-PMW.PMW, A-PCW.PCW, A-PSW.PSW, A-PRW.PRW
3684 A-SCWN.SCWN. A-SCWS.SCWS, A-SRWN.SRWN. A-SRWS.SRWS I
3685 R13 IM-PUNvAB, A-PUNvABI
3686 R14 1M-SINO, A-SINDI
3687 R15 1M-PAKISTAN. A-PAKISTAN I
3688 R16 lIMP-COST. AFOD-COST, ARTWATER I
3689 INT IR-INT, K-INT, A-INT I
3690 INTC2(INT.C2) IR-INT.RABI. K-INT.KHARIF, A-INT.ANNUAL I
3691 R22(Rl0) IM-SCWN.M-SCWS,M-SRWN,M-SRWS I
3692 R23(RlO) IM-NWFP,M-PMW,M-PCW,M-PSW,M-PRW I
3693 R22A (R 10) IA-SCWN,A-SCWS,A-SRWN,A-SRWS I
3694 R23A(Rl0) IA-NWFP,A-PMW,A-PCW,A-PSW,A-PRW I
3695 R24
3696 R25 INWFP, MARALA, MANGLA. U-INDUS, L-INDUsl
3697 R26(R25,CNL) IMARALA. (Ol-UO, 02-CBD,03-RAY,04-UC ,05-MR)
3698 MANGLA. (06-SAD.07-FDR,08-PAK,09-LD .10-LBD
3699 ll-vHA.12-GUG,13-Uv ,14-Lv ,15-BAH)
3700 U-INDUS.(16-MAI,17-SID,18-HAV.19-RAN,20-PAN
3701 2l-ABB,26-THA,27-PAH,28-MUZ,29-DGK)1
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISEO (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 487
REPORT ON THE SOLUTION GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3702
3703 C3(CQ) = YES; C3(C2)" YES ;
3704 R24(R10) = YES; R24(R13)=YES; R24(R14)= YES; R24(R15)=YES;
3705 R26("NWFP",CNL) PVCNL("NWFP",CNL) ;
3706 R26("L-INDUS,CNL) PVCNL("SIND",CNL);
3707
3708 SCALAR
3709 SPFC PORTION OF CANAL LOSSES TO GROUNDWATER / 0.7 /
3710 SPFWF PORTION OF WATERCOURSE AND FIELD LOSSES TO GW / 0.8 /
3711 SPFRV PORTION OF RIVER SEEPAGE TO GROUND WATER / .25 /
3712
3713
3714 TABLE LNKSP(N1,N,Z) PROPORTION OF SEEPAGE FRDM LINK CANALS TO ACZ
3715
3716 PMW PCW PSW PRW
3717
3718 CHASMA-R. TRIMMU-B .6
3719 TAUNSA-B. PANJNAD-B
3720
3721 A1. KHANKI-B .6
3722 RASUL-B. QADIRA-B 1
3723
3724 MARALA-B. A3 .2
3725 A3. A4 1
3726 A2. BALLOKI -B 1 N
~
3727 A2. A4 1 1I1
3728 A4. A5
3729 KHANKI-B. A7
3730 QADIRA-B. A6
3731 A6. BALLOKI-B
3732 TRIMMU-B. SIDHNAI-B
3733
3734 BALLOKI-B. SULEM-B
3735 SIDHNAI-B. A8
3736 A8. A9
3737
3738 TABLE RIVSP(N1,N,Z) PROPORTION OF RIVER SEEPAGE TO GROUNDWATER IN ACZ
3739
3740 NWFP PMW PCW PSW PRW SCWN SRWN SCWS
3741
3742 SUKKUR-B.KOTRI-B .3 .2 . 1
3743 GUDU-B.SUKKUR-B .3 .3
3744 CHASMA-R.TAUNSA-B .4
3745 TAUNSA-B.GUDU-B .3
3746 PANJNAD-B.GUDU-B .2
3747 TRIMMU-B.PANJNAD-B .3 .3
3748 SIDHNAI-B.PANJNAO-B .3 .4
3749 ISLAM-B.PANJNAD-B 1
3750 SULEM-B.ISLAM-B 1
3751 BALLOKI-B.SIDHNAI-B .5 .5
3752 RAVI-I.BALLOKI-B
3753 QADIRA-B.TRIMMU-B .5
3754 KHANKI-B.QADIRA-B .4
3755 RASUL-B.TRIMMU-B .05 .5
3756 WARSAK-D.K-S-JCT .4
3757
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 488
REPORT ON THE SOLUTION GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3758 PARAMETER
3759 CA TOTAL CROPPED AREA (FRESH + SALINE THOUSAND ACRES)
3760 CAG CROPPED AREA BY GROUND WATER QUALITY(OOO ACRES)
3761 CAT CROPPED AREA BY TECHNOLOGY (THOUSAND ACRES)
3762 CAC
3763 CADIFF CROPPED AREA DIFFERENCE MODEL - ACTUAL
3764 WYC WEIGTHED YIELD (METRIC TONS)
3765 REP45
3766 REP46 SLACK LAND BY MONTH (THOUSAND ACRES)
3767 REP47 LAND USED BY MONTH (THOUSAND ACRES)
3768 REP48 FERTLIZER NUTRIENTS USED (THOUSAND TONNS)
3769 REP49A REPORT ON PRODUCTION(THOUSAND TONNS MILK IN MILLION LITERS)
3770 REP49B PRODUCTION COMPARISON (UNITS AS IN REP49A)
3771 REP49C CONSUMPTION (UNITS AS IN REP49A)
3772 REP49D IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (UNITS AS IN REP49A)
3773 REP50(*.RR1.*) REPORT ON TOTAL INCOME AND COST (FINANCIAL PRICES) (MILLION RUPEES)
3774 REP52(*.R8.*) REPORT ON INCOME AND COST PER ACRE OF CCA (RUPEES)
3775 REP54(*.R8.*) REPORT ON INCOME AND COST PER FARM HOUSEHOLD (RUPEES)
3776 REP56(*.RR1.*) REPORT ON INCOME AND COST BASED ON INTERNATIONAL PRICES (MILLION RUPEES)
3777 REP57(*,R8,*) REPORT ON INCOME AND COST PER ACRE OF CCA BASED ON INTERNATIONAL PRICES (RUPEES)
3778 REP58(*,R8,*) REPORT ON INCOME AND COST PER HOUSEHOLD BASED ON INTERERNATIONAL PRICES (RUPEES)
3779 REP59 REPORT ON LABOR UTILIZATION (MILLION MAN HOURS )
3780 REP60(*.*,R3,*) REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)
3781 REP70(*,*.R3,*) REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE WATERCOURSE HEAD (MAF)
3782 REP72 SURFACE WATER DIVERSIONS AT THE CANAL HEAD BY CANAL (MAF) N
w
3783 REP72A SURFACE WATER DIVERSIONS AT THE CANAL HEAO BY REGION(MAF) 01
3784 REP73 POST TARBELA DIVERSIONS AT THE CANAL HEAD BY CANAL (MAF)
3785 REP74 DIFFERENCE OF CANAL DIVERSIONS BY THE MODEL AND POST TARBELA (MAF)
3786 REP75 SURFACE WATER DIVERSION AT THE CANAL HEAD BY ZONE (MAF)
3787 REP77 SURFACE WATER FLOW TO NODE N FROM NODE Nl (MAF)
3788 REP80(*,*.R9) REPORT ON GROUNDWATER BALANCE (MAF)
3789 REP82 REPORT ON GROUNDWATER BALANCE (MAF)
3790 REP85 REPORT ON GROUNDWATER BALANCE PER ACRE OFF CCA (AF )
3791 REP90
3792 REP95
3793 CHILI(*.Tl,SEA)
3794 REP77A REPORT ON RIVER LOSSES AND GAINS
3795 LINKLOSS REPORT ON LOSSES IN THE LINK CANALS
3796 LOSSGAIN LOSSES AND GAINS BY RIVER REACH
3797 ENOPRICE
3798
3799
3800 DISPLAY PSR, Zl, ISR
3801 *
3802 REP45(G.Rl,Z) RESOURCE(Z,G,R1)
3803 REP45("TOTAL".Rl,Z) SUM(G, REP45(G,Rl,Z ;
3804 REP45(Tl,Rl,PV) SUM(Z$PVZ(PV,Z), REP45(Tl,Rl,Z)
3805
3806 REP46(Zl,G,M) SLKLAND.L(Zl,G,M) ; REP46(Zl,"TOTAL",M) = SUM(G, REP46(Zl,G,M) )
3807 REP46(PV,Tl,M) SUM(Zl$PVZ(PV,Zl). REP46(Zl,Tl,M) ) ;
3808 REP47(Zl, T1, M) REP45(Tl."CCA",Zl)*10oo - REP46(Zl.Tl.M)
3809 REP47(PV.T1,M) SUM(Zl$PVZ(PV.Zl), REP47(Zl,Tl,M) ) ;
3810
3811 REP48(G,P2,C,Zl) SUM( (T,S,W), X.L(Zl.G.C,T,S,W)*FERT(P2.C,Zl /1000
3812 REP48("TOTAL",P2,C,Zl) SUM(G. REP48(G,P2.C,Zl) );
3813 REP48(T1,P2,C,PV) SUM(Zl$PVZ(PV,Zl), REP48(Tl,P2,C,Zl;
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 489
REPORT ON THE SOLUTION GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3814 REP48(T1,P2,ffTOTAL".Z1)= SUM(C. REP48(T1.P2.C.Z1;

3815 REP48(T1,P2,ffTOTAL",PV)= SUM(Z1$PVZ(PV,Z1), REP48(T1,P2,"TOTAL".Z1;

3816

3817 CA T( G T , C Z 1 ) SUM( (S,W), X.L(Z1,G,C,T,S,W ;

3818 CAT(TOTAL,T,C.Z1) SUM(G, CAT(G,T,C,Z1) ) ;

3819 CAT(T1,T,C,PV) SUM(Z1$PVZ(PV,Z1), CAT(T1,T,C,Z1)

3820

3821 CAC(T1,C,Zl) = SUM(T, CAT(Tl,T,C,Z1;

3822 CAC(T1,C,PV) = SUM(T, CAT(Tl.T,C,PV;

3823 *- REPORT ON CROPPED AREA

3824 CAG(G,C,R11) SUM(Z1$R11Z(Rl1,Z1). CAC(G,C,Z1) );

3825 CAG("TOTAL,C,Rl1) SUM(G. CAG(G,C,Rl1) )

3826 CHILI(R22,T1,"RABI") CAG(Tl,"CHILLI,R22)

3827 CHILI(R23,T1,"KHARIF") CAG(T1,"CHILLI",R23) ;

3828 CAG(T1,SEA,R11) = SUM(C$SEAC(SEA,C), CAG(T1,C,R1l +CHILI(R11,T1,SEA);

3829 CAG(T1,"ANNUAL",R1l) = SUM(SEA. CAG(T1,SEA,R11) ) ;

3830

3831 *- TOTAL CROPPED AREA REPORT AND COMPARISION WITH ACTUAL

3832 CA(C3 ,R1l) CAG("TOTAL",C3,R11)

3833

3834

3835 CAlC ,R12) = SUM(Z$R12Z(R12,Z), CROPAREA(Z,C ;

3836 CA(SEA,R12) = SUM(C$SEAC(SEA,C), CA(C,R12

3837 CA("RABI",R22A) = CA("RABI",R22A) + CA("CHILLI",R22A)

3838 CA("KHARIF",R23A) = CA("KHARIF",R23A) + CA("CHILLI",R23A) N
3839
3840
CA("ANNUAL",R12) = SUM(SEA, CA(SEA.R12; ...,
I..<J

3841 CA(C3, "M-PUNJAB) SUM(Rl1$(SUM(Z$PVZ("PUNJAB,Z). R11Z(R11,Z ). CA(C3.R11) ..

3842 CA(C3,"A-PUNJAB)= SUM(R12$(SUM(Z$PVZ("PUNJAB",Z), R 12Z ( R 12 , Z ), CA(C3.R12)
3843 CA(C3. M-SINO) SUM(R11$(SUM(Z$PVZ("SINO",Z). RllZ(Rl1,Z ), CA(C3,Rll)
3844 CA(C3,A-SINO") SUM(R12$(SUM(Z$PVZ("SINO,Z), R12Z(R12.Z ), CA(C3.R12)
3845 CA(C3.M-PAKISTAN) SUM(Rl1, CA(C3,R1l) ) ;
3846 CA(C3,"A-PAKISTAN") SUM(R12. CA(C3,R12) ) ;
3847
3848 CA(INT ,R11 )$(SUM(Z$R11Z(R11 ,Z), REP45( TOTAL", "CCA" ,z) SUM(C2$INTC2(INT.C2), CA(C2,R11) / SUM(Z$R11Z(R11,Z),
3849 REP45("TOTAL","CCA,Z) )/1000*100 );
3850 CA(INT,R12)$(SUM(Z$R12Z(R12,Z), REP45("TOTAL", "CCA",Z) SUM(C2$INTC2(INT.C2). CA(C2,R12) / SUM(Z$R12Z(R12.Z),
3851 REP45( .. TOTAL ... CCA ... Z) )/1000*100 );
3852 CA (I NT , R 13 ) SUM(C2$INTC2(INT,C2), CA (C2. R13) /REP45 ( "TOTAL" , "CCA" . "PUNJAB ) / 1000* 100) ;
3853 CA(INT, R14) SUM(C2$INTC2(INT.C2), CA(C2,R14)/REP45("TOTAL. "CCA ... SINO .. )/1000*100 );
3854 CA (I NT ,R 15 ) SUM(C2$INTC2(INT.C2), CA(C2 ,R15 )/REP45( "TOTAL", "CCA", "PAKISTAN )/1()00* 100);
3855
3856 CA("SC-MILL",R24) CA("SC-MILL",R24) + CA("SC-GUR",R24)
3857 CA("SC-GUR", R24) o ;
3858
3859
3860 *- CROPPED AREA DIFFERENCE
3861 CADIFF(C3,Z) = SUM(R11$Rl1Z(R11,Z). CA(C3.R11) )
3862 SUM(R12$R12Z(R12.Z), CA(C3,R12) ) ;
3863 CAOIFF(C3,"PUNJAB") CA(C3,"M-PUNJAB") - CA(C3,"A-PUNJAB")
3864 CAOIFF(Ca, "SIND) CA(C3. u M-SINO") - CA(C3. "A-SIND") ;
3865 CAOIFF(C3,"PAKISTAN") = CA(Ca,UM-PAKISTAN") - CA(C3, "A-PAKISTAN")
3866
3867 *- REPORT ON WEIGHTED YIELD
3868 WYC(C,Z1)$CAC("TOTAL",C,Z1) SUM T , S, W) , YIELD (C, T , S. W, Z 1) *SUM( G. X. L( Z 1 , G. C, T S, W) ) /CAC ( "TOTAL" ,C, Z 1) ) ;
3869 WYC(C.PV)$CAC("TOTAL",C,PV) SUM(Z1$PVZ(PV,Z1), WYC(C,Zl)*CAC("TOTAL",C,Z1/CAC("TOTAL.C,PV);
INOUS BASIN MODEL REVISEO (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:5B PAGE 490
REPORT ON THE SOLUTION GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3870 * REPORT ON INCOME AND COST

3871 REP49A(G.Zl.CQ) = PRODT.L(Zl,G,CQ) ;
3872 REP49A(G.Zl,uSC-MILL") = REP49A(G,Zl, "SC-MILL") +
3873 REP49A(G,Zl,"SC-GUR" )*12.0
3874 REP49A("TOTAL",Zl,CQ) = SUM(G, REP49A(G,Zl,CQ;
3875 REP49A(Tl,PV,CQ) = SUM(Z1$PVZ(PV,Z1), REP49A(T1,Z1,CQ;
3876
3877 REP49B(CQ ,Rll) SUM(Zl$Rl1Z(Rl1,Z1), REP49A("TOTAL",Z1,CQ) );
3878 REP49B(CQ ,uM-PUNJAB") REP49A("TOTAL", "PUNJAB",CQ)
3879 REP49B(CQ ,uM-SINO") REP49A("TOTAL", "SINO",CQ)
3880 REP49B(CQ ,"M-PAKISTAN") REP49A("TOTAL", "PAKISTAN",CQ)
3881
3882 REP49B(CQ ,R12) SUM(Zl$R12Z(R12,Z1), TOTPROO(Z1,CQ :
3883 REP49B(CQ ,"A-PUNJAB") = SUM(Z1$PVZ("PUNJAB",Zl) ,TOTPROO(Z1,CQ
3884 REP49B(CQ ,"A-SINO" ) = SUM(Z1$PVZ("SINO",Zl) ,TOTPROO(Z1,CQ
3885 REP49B(CQ ,"A-PAKISTAN")- SUM(Z1$PVZ(uPAKISTAN",Z1),TOTPROO(Z1,CQ
3886 REP49B("TOTAL",R24) = SUM(CQ , REP49B(CQ ,R24 ;
3887 * CONSUMPTION IMPORT EXPORT REPORT
3888 REP49C(Zl,CQ) SUM(G, CONSUMP.L(Zl,G,CQ ;
3889 REP49C(PV,CQ ) = SUM(Zl$PVZ(PV,Z1), REP49C(Zl,CQ ) );
3890
3891 REP49D("IMPORTS",Zl,CQ ) IMPORT.L(Zl,CQ ) ;
3892 REP49D("IMPORTS",PV,CQ) SUM(Z1$PVZ(PV,Zl), REP49D("IMPORTS",Z1,CQ;
3893 REP49D("EXPORTS",Zl,CQ ) EXPORT.L(Zl,CQ ) ;
3894 REP49D("EXPORTS",PV,CQ) SUM(Z1$PVZ(PV.Zl), REP490("EXPORTS",Zl,CQ; N
l/.)
3895 Q)
3896 ENOPRICE(CN,Z1) SUM(P, NAT.L(CN,Zl,P)*ENOPR(CN,Z1,P
3897 * COST COMPONENTS
3898 REP50(G, "FL-COST" ,Z1) SUM(M, FAMILYL.L(Z1,G,M)*WAGE(M) )*LABFAC *1000
3899 REP50(G. "HL-COST" ,Z1) SUM(M, HIREDL.L(Z1,G,M) *WAGE(M))*1ooo
3900 REP50(G,"SEED-COST",Zl) SUM( (C,T,S,W),
3901 X.L(Z1,G,C,T,S,W)*SYLDS(C.Z1,T.S,W,"SEED")*SEEOP(C) );
3902 REP50(G,"FERT-COST",Z1) - SUM( (C,T,S,W,P2),
3903 X.L(Zl,G,C,T,S,W)*FERT(P2,C,Z1)*MISC(P2) )
3904 REP50(G, "MISCC-COST",Zl)= SUM(C, CAC(G,C,Zl)*MISCCT(C) )
3905 REP50("FRESH","TW-OPC",Z1) = SUM(M, TW.L(Zl,M)*MISC("TWOPC") )
3906 REP50("FRESH","TW-INVT".Z1)= ITW.L(Z1)*MISC("TWINVT")
3907 REP50(G."TR-OPC",Zl) SUM(M, TS.L(Zl,G,M)*MISC("TROPC"
3908 REP50(G."TR-INVT",Zl) ITR.L(Zl,G)*MISC("TRINVT");
3909 REP50(G,"ANIML-COST",Zl)- SUM(A, IOLIVE(A,Zl,"FIX-COST")*ANIMAL.L(Zl,G,A)
3910 REP50(G,"PROT-COST",Zl) - SUM(SEA, PP*PPC.L(Zl,G.SEA*looo
3911 REP50(G, "TOTAL-COST",Z1)= SUM(R2. REP50(G,R2,Z1) )
3912 * CONVERT ALL COSTS TO MILLIONS OF RUPEES
3913 REP50(G,R2,Zl) REP50(G,R2.Z1)/1000
3914 REP50(G. "GPV ,Zl)
3915 SUM(CQ , FSALEP(CQ )* PRODT.L(Zl,G,CQ) ) ;
3916 REP50(G, "FARM-INC",Z1) "REP50(G, "GPV",Z1) - SUM(R1B, REP50(G,R18,Z1)
3917 REP50("TOTAL",RR1,Z1) = SUM(G, REP50(G.RR1,Z1) ) :
3918 REP50(Tl.RR1,PV) SUM(Zl$PVZ(PV,Zl), REP50(Tl.RR1,Zl;
3919 * REPORT ON PER ACRE AND PER FARM HOUSEHOLD (RUPEES)
3920 REP52(Tl,R8.Z1)$REP45(T1,"CCA",Zl) = REPSO(Tl,R8,Zl) / REP45(T1,"CCA",Zl)
3921 REP52(Tl,R8.PV)$REP45(Tl,"CCA",PV) = REP50(T1,R8,PV) / REP45(T1, "CCA",PV)
3922 REP54(Tl, R8, Zl )$REP45(T1. "CCA" ,Zl) = REPSO(Tl,RB, Zl) * 1000/ REP45(T1, "FARMHH", Z 1)
3923 REP54(T1,R8,PV)$REP45(Tl,"FARMHH",PV) = REP50(Tl,RB.PV) *1000/ REP45(T1,"FARMHH",PV)
3924 * REPORT ON INCOME AT COST USING INTRNATIONAL PRICES
3925 * COST COMPONENTS
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 491
REPORT ON THE SOLUTION GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3926 REP56(G,"FL-COST",ZI) SUM(M, FAMILYL.L(ZI,G,M)*EWAGE(M *LABFAC

3927 REP56(G,"HL-COST",ZI) SUM(M, HIREDL.L(ZI,G,M) *EWAGE(M) )
3928 REP56(G,"SEED-COST",ZI) SUM( (C,T,S,W),
3929 X. L(Z I,G, c, T, S, W)*SYLDS(C, ZI, T, S, W, "SEED" )*ESEEDP(C) )/1000;
3930 REP56(G,"FERT-COST",ZI) = SUM( (C,T,S,W,P2),
3931 X.L(ZI,G,C.T,S,W)*FERT(P2,C,ZI)*EMISC(P2) )/1000 ;
3932 REP50(G,"MISCC-COST",ZI)= SUM(C, CAC(G,C,ZI)*EMISCCT(C) ) ;
3933 REP56(G,"TW-OPC",ZI) REP50(G,"TW-OPC",ZI)*EMISC("TWOPC")/MISC("TWOPC")
3934 REP56( G, "TW- INVT" ,Z 1) REP50( G, "TW- INVT" , Z 1 )*EMISC( "TWINVT" )/MISC( "TWINVT
3935 REP56(G,"TR-OPC",ZI) REP50(G,"TR-OPC",ZI)*EMISC("TROPC")/MISC("TROPC")
3936 REP56(G,"TR-INVT",ZI) REP50(G,"TR INVT",ZI)*EMISC("TRINVT")/MISC("TRINVT
3937 REP56(G,"ANIML-COST",ZI)= REP50(G, "ANIML-COST",ZI) ;
3938 REP56(G,"PROT-COST",ZI) = REP50(G,"PROT-COST",ZI)*EPP/PP
3939 REP56(G,"TOTAL-COST",ZI)= SUM(R2, REP56(G,R2,ZI) ) ;
3940 REP56(G,"GPV",ZI)
3941 SUM(CQ , ESALEP(CQ )* PRODT.L(ZI,G,CQ ;
3942 REP56(G,"VAL-ADDED",ZI) REP56(G,"GPV",Z1)- SUM(RI7, REP56(G,RI7,ZI
3943 REP56("TOTAL",RR1,ZI) SUM(G, REP56(G,RR1,ZI) ) ;
3944 REP56(Tl,RR1,PV) SUM(ZI$PVZ(PV,ZI), REP56(Tl,RR1,ZI;
3945 *- REPORT ON RS PER ACRE AND PER HOUSEHOLD WITH INTERNATIONAL PRICES
3946 REP57(T1,R8,ZI)$REP45(Tl,"CCA",ZI) = REP56(T1,R8,ZI) / REP45(Tl, "CCA",ZI)
3947 REP57(T1,R8,PV)$REP45(Tl,"CCA",PV) = REP56(Tl,R8,PV) / REP45(Tl,"CCA",PV)
3948 REP58(Tl,R8,ZI)$REP45(Tl,"CCA",ZI) REP56(Tl,R8,ZI)*1000/ REP45(Tl,"FARMHH",ZI)
3949 REP58(Tl,R8,PV)$REP45(Tl, "FARMHH" ,PV) = REP56(Tl,R8,PV) *1000/ REP45(Tl, "FARMHH" ,PV)
3950 N
3951 * REPORT ON LABOR USAGE c..>
\0
3952 REP59(G,M,"FAMILY-LAB",ZI) = FAMILYL.L(ZI,G,M); REP59(G,M,"HIRED-LAB",ZI) = HIREDL.L(ZI,G,M)
3953 REP59("TOTAL",M,"FAMILY-LAB",ZI) SUM(G, REP59(G,M,"FAMILY-LAB",ZI ;
3954 REP59(Tl,SEA,"FAMILY-LAB",ZI) SUM(MSSEAM(SEA.M), REP59(Tl,M, "FAMILY-LAB",ZI)
3955 REP59(Tl, "ANNUAL", "FAMILY-LAB" ,ZI) SUM(M, REP59(Tl,M, "FAMILY-LAB" ,ZI) )
3956 REP59(Tl,Ml,"FAMILY-LAB",PV) SUM(ZI$PVZ(PV,ZI), REP59(Tl,Ml,"FAMILY-LAB",ZI)
3957
3958 REP59("TOTAL",M,"HIRED-LAS",ZI) SUM(G, REP59(G,M,"HIRED-LAB",ZI) )
3959 REP59(Tl,SEA,"HIRED-LAB",ZI) SUM(M$SEAM(SEA,M), REP59(Tl,M,"HIRED-LAB",ZI)
3960 REP59(Tl,uANNUAL","HIRED-LAS",ZI) SUM(M, REP59(Tl,M,"HIRED-LAS",ZI) )
3961 REP59(Tl,Ml,uHIRED-LAB",PV) SUM(ZI$PVZ(PV,ZI), REP59(Tl,Ml,"HIRED-LAB",ZI)
3962
3963 *- REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE ROOT ZONE
3964 REP60(ZI,G,"WATER-REQ",M) SUM( (C,T,S,W), X.L(ZI,G,C,T,S,W)*WATER(C,ZI,T,S,W,M) );
3965 REP60(ZI,G,"RAIN",M) REP60(ZI,G,"WATER-REO",M)-SUM( (C,T,S,W), X.L(ZI,G,C,T,S,W)*WNR(C,ZI,T,S,W,M;
3966 REP60(ZI,G,"SUBIRR",M) SUM( (C,T,S,W), MIN( SUSIRRZ(ZI,M)*LAND(C,ZI,T,S,W,M), WNR(C,ZI,T,S,W,M *
3967 X.L(ZI,G,C,T,S,W;
3968 REP60(ZI,G,"CANAL",M) SUM( (CNL,SA)S(ZSA(ZI,CNL,SA)SGWFG(CNL,SA,G) ), CNEFF(CNL)*WCEFF(CNL,M)*
3969 CANALDIV.L(CNL,M)*SUSDEF(SA,CNL)*I000);
3970 REP60(ZI,"FRESH","P-TUBEWELL",M) = TW.L(ZI,M)*TWEFFZ(ZI,M)

3971 REP60(ZI,G,"G-TUSEWELL",M) GWT1(ZI,G,M)

3972 REP60(ZI,G,"ARTWATER",M) ARTWATER.L(ZI,G,M)

3973 REP60(ZI,G,"SLKWATER",M) SLKWATER.L(ZI,G,M) ;

3974 REP60(ZI,G, "TOT-SUPPLY" ,M) SUM(R4, REP60(ZI.G,R4,M) ) ;

3975 REP60(ZI,G,R3,SEA) SUM(MSSEAM(SEA,M), REP60(ZI,G,R3,M) )

3976 REP60(ZI,G,R3,"ANNUAL") SUM(SEA, REP60(ZI,G,R3,SEA

3977 REP60(ZI,G,R3,Ml) REP60(ZI,G,R3,Ml)/I000

3978 REP60(ZI,"TOTAL",R3,Ml) SUM(G, REP60(ZI,G,R3,Ml) )

3979 REP60(PV,Tl,R3,Ml) SUM(ZISPVZ(PV,ZI), REP60(ZI,Tl,R3,Ml)

3980 *- REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE WATERCOURSE ROOT ZONE (MAF)

3981 REP70(ZI,Tl,R3,M) = REP60(ZI,Tl,R3,M)/WCEFFZ(ZI,M)

INDUS
BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 492
REPORT
ON THE SOLUTION GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3982 REP70(Zl,T1,R3,SEA) = SUM(M$SEAM(SEA,M). REP70(Zl,T1,R3.M) )

3983 REP70(Zl,T1,R3."ANNUAL") = SUM(SEA. REP70(Zl,Tl,R3.SEA)
3984 REP70(PV,T1,R3,M1) = SUM(Zl$PVZ(PV,Zl), REP70(Zl,T1.R3,M1)
3985 * REPORT ON THE CANAL DIVERSIONS (MAF)
3986 REP72(CNL,M) CANALDIV.L(CNL,M)
3987 REP72(CNL,SEA1) = SUM(M$SEA1M(SEA1,M), CANALDIV.L(CNL,M)
3988 REP72(PV,M1) = SUM(CNL$PVCNL(PV,CNL), REP72(CNL,M1) )
3989 REP72("PAKISTAN",M1) = SUM(CNL, REP72(CNL,M1) ) ;
3990 REP72A(M1.R25) = SUM(CNL$R26(R25,CNL), REP72(CNL,Ml;
3991
3992 REP73(CNL,M) DIVPOST(CNL,M) ;
3993 REP73(CNL.SEA1) SUM(M$SEA1M(SEA1,M), REP73(CNL,M) ) ;
3994 REP73(PV ,Ml) SUM(CNL$PVCNL(PV,CNL), REP73(CNL,M1) );
3995 REP73("PAKISTAN",M1) SUM(CNL, REP73(CNL,M1;
3996 REP74(CNL,C2) REP72(CNL,C2) - REP73(CNL,C2) ;
3997 REP74(PV,C2) REP72(PV,C2) - REP73(PV,C2) ;
3998 REP75(G,Z1,M1) SUM( (CNL,SA)$(ZSA(Z1,CNL,SA)$GWFG(CNL,SA,G, REP72(CNL,M1)*SUBDEF(SA,CNL)
3999 REP75("TOTAL".Z1.M1) SUM(G. REP75(G,Z1,M1 ;
4000 REP75(Tl.PV,M1) SUM(Z1$PVZ(PV,Z1). REP75(T1.Z1.M1
4001 * REPORT ON RIVER FLOWS
4002
4003 REP77(N.N1,M) F.L(N.N1,M) ;
4004 REP77(N.Nl. SEA 1) SUM(M$SEA1M(SEA1,M), REP77(N.N1.M)
4005
4006 N
4007 LINKLOSS(Nl,N,M) LLOSS(Nl,N)*F.L(N,Nl.M); ..r::-
o
4008 LINKLOSS(Nl.N,SEA1) SUM(M$SEA1M(SEA1,M). LINKLOSS(N1,N.M ;
4009 LINKLOSS("TOTAL","TOTAL",M1) = SUM( (N,Nl), LINKLOSS(N1,N,M1 ;
4010
4011 LDSSGAIN(N,N1,M)$(LLOSS(N1.N) EO 0) F.L(N,Nl,M) +TRIB(N1.N,M) -
4012 RIVERCD(N,"D")*TRIB(Nl,N,M) -
4013 RIVERB(N,Nl )*F. L(N.N1,M) RIVERCD(N. "C" )*F. L(N.N1 ,M- -1)
4014 - TRIB(Nl.N.M--l)*RIVERCD(N,"C") ;
4015 LOSSGAIN(N,N1.SEA1) = SUM(M$SEA1M(SEA1,M), LOSSGAIN(N.N1.M
4016
4017 REP77A(N,M1) = SUM(N1, LOSSGAIN(N.N1,Ml
4018 REP77A(N,M1) = ROUND(REP77A(N,M1).5) ;
4019 REP77A("TOTAL",M1) = SUM(N. REP77A(N,M1;
4020
4021 * COMPUTE POWER GENRATION FROM HYDRO PLANTS
4022 * SET
4023 RPG/AVE-RCONT,R-ELE,R-OUTFLOW. P-CAP,G-CAP,ENERGY-G. ENERGY-S /
4024 RPG1(RPG)/R-OUTFLOW. ENERGY-G, ENERGY-S /
4025
4026
4027 PARAMETER REP79(PN,* ,RPG)
4028 TEST(V) ;
4029
4030 REP79(PN,M,"AVE-RCONT") (RCONT.L(PN,M) + RCONT.L(PN,M--1) )/2.
4031 REP79(PN,M,"R-OUTFLOW") = SUM(N, F.L(N,PN,M ;
4032
4033 LOOP( (PN,M),
4034
4035 TEST(V) 0;
4036 TEST(V) = (REP79(PN,M,"AVE-RCONT") GE POWERCHAR(PN,"R-CAP",V AND
4037 (REP79(PN,M,"AVE-RCONT") LT POWERCHAR(PN,"R-CAP",V+1 ;
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 493
REPORT ON THE SOLUTION GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4038 REP79(PN,M,"R-ELE") = SUM(V$TEST(V),

4039 (POWERCHAR(PN,"R-ELE",V)+(REP79(PN.M."AVE-RCONT")-POWERCHAR(PN,"R-CAP",V*
4040 (PQWERCHAR(PN,"R-ELE",V+1)-POWERCHAR(PN,"R-ELE",V/
4041 (PDWERCHAR(PN."R-CAP",V+1)-POWERCHAR(PN,"R-CAP",V ;
4042 REP79(PN,M,"P-CAP") SUM(V$TEST(V),
4043 (POWERCHAR(PN, "P-CAP",V)+(REP79(PN,M,"AVE-RCONT")-POWERCHAR(PN,"R-CAP",V*
4044 (PQWERCHAR(PN."P-CAP".V+1) POWERCHAR(PN."P-CAP",V/
4045 (PQWERCHAR(PN,"R-CAP",V+1)-POWERCHAR(PN,"R-CAP",V ;
4046 REP79(PN,M."G-CAP") = SUM(V$TEST(V).
4047 (POWERCHAR(PN, "G-CAP",V)+(REP79(PN.M,"AVE-RCONT")-POWERCHAR(PN,"R-CAP",V*
4048 (POWERCHAR(PN,"G-CAP",V+1)-POWERCHAR(PN,"G-CAP",V/
4049 (PQWERCHAR( PN, "R-CAP" ,V+ 1) -POWERCHAR( PN, "R-CAP" ,V
4050
4051
4052 REP79(PN,M,"ENERGY-G")
REP79(PN.M, "G-CAP" )*REP79(PN,M. "R-OUn'LOW" )/1000 ;

4053 REP79(PN.M."ENERGY-S")
MAX(O, REP79(PN,M. "ENERGY-G") - REP79(PN,M, UP-CAP" )*24*365/12*10**( -6

4054 REP79(PN.M, "ENERGY-G")

REP79(PN.M, "ENERGY-G")-REP79(PN,M. "ENERGY-S"):

4055 REP79(PN.SEA1,RPG1)
SUM(M$SEA1M(SEA1,M), REP79(PN,M,RPG1) ) ;

4056

4057 *- REPORT ON GROUNDWATER

INFLOWS AND OUTFLOWS (MAF)

4058 REP80(Z1.G, "SEEP-RAIN") "SUM( (CNL.SA,M), ZWT(Z1,CNL,SA)*RAIN(CNL.M /12*RESOURCE(Z1,G, OCCAM )*( 1-0RC)*
4059 (1-FLEFFZ(Z1*SPFWF
4060 REP80(Z1. "FRESH", "SEEP-PTW") "SUM(M.
4061 TW.L(Z1,r.O*( 1-TWEFFZ(Z1.M) ) )*SPFWF!1ooo :

4062 REP80(Z1.G,SEEP-GTW") SUM(M. REP70(Z1,G."G-TUBEWELL".M)*(1-WCEFFZ(Z1.M )*SPFWF ;

N
4063 REP80(Z1,G."SEEP-CANAL") SUM( (CNL,SA)$(ZSA(Z1.CNL.SA)$GWFG(CNL.SA,G) ), SUM(M, CANALDIV.L(CNL,M) )*
~
I-'
4064 (1-CNEFF(CNL*SUBDEF(SA.CNL) )*SPFC;
4065 REP80(Z1,G,"SEEP-WCFLO") SUM( (CNL,SA)$(ZSA(Z1.CNL.SA)$GWFG(CNL,SA,G) ), SUM(M, CANALOIV.L(CNL,M)*CNEFF(CNL)*
4066 (1-WCEFF(CNL,M )*SUBDEF(SA,CNL) ) *SPFWF
4067
4068 REP80(Z1,G,-SEEP-LINK") SUM( (N,NO,
4069 LINKLQSS(N1,N. "ANNUAL- )*LNKSP(N1.N.Z1)
4070 *RATIOFS(Z1.G)*SPFC
4071 REP80(Zl.G,"SEEP-RIVER") = SUM( (N,Nl).
4072 LOSSGAIN(N,Nl,uANNUAL")*RIVSP(N1,N.Z1
4073 *SPFRV*RATIOFS(Zl,G) ;
4074 REP80(Zl."FRESH","P-TUBWELL") = SUM(M. TW.L(Zl.M) )/1000 ;
4075 REP80(Z1,G, "G-TUBWELL" )$GF(G) .: SUM( (CNL,SA,M)$ZSA(Z1,CNL,SA). GWTSA(CNL, SA,M) )/1000
4076 REP80(Zl.G,"TOT-INF") SUM(R6, REP80(Z1,G,R6) )
4077 REP80(Z1.G, "TOT-OUTF") SUM(R7, REP80(Z1.G,R7) ) :
4078 REP80(Z1,G."INF-OUTF") = REP80(Z1.G."TOT-INF") REP80(Zl.G,"TOT-OUTF"):
4079 REP80(Zl.G."P-EVAP-GW") "SUM(M, EQEVAPZ(Z1,M *RESOURCE(Zl,G."CCA") ;
4080 REP80(Zl.G, "EVAP-GW") = MIN( REP80(Z1,G, "P-EVAP-GW"), REP80(Z1,G, "INF-OUTF") )
4081 REP80(Zl,G,"EVAP-GW")$(REP80(Z1,G,"EVAP-GW") LT 0 ) = REP80(Z1,G,"P-EVAP-GW")
4082 REP80( Z 1, G, "BALANCE" )
REP80( Z1, G, "INF -OUTF") -REP80( Z 1 ,G, "EVAP -GW" )
4083 REP80(Z1, "TOTAL",R9)
"SUM(G, REP80(Zl.G,R9) )
4084 *
4085
4086
REP82(T1,R9.Z1)

REP82(T1,R9,PV)

REP80(Z1. T1, R9)

SUM(Z1$PVZ(PV,Z1)
.
REP82(T 1, R9, Z 1 )

4087
*
4088 REP85(T1.R9,Z1)$REP45(T1,"CCA",Z1) REP82(T1,R9,Z1) / REP45(T1,"CCA".Zl)
4089 REP85(Tl.R9.PV)$REP45(T1,"CCA",PV) REP82(T1,R9,PV)/ REP45(T1,"CCA".PV)
4090 *
4091 OPTION
4092 REP45: 3 : 2: 1 REP46: 1 : 2: 1 REP47: 1 : 2: 1. CAG: 1: 2: 1,
4093 CA: 1 : 1 : 1 REP48: 1 : 2: 1 , REP49A: 1 : 2: 1. REP49B: 1 : 1: 1,
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FIlENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 494
REPORT ON THE SOLUTION GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4094 CAD IFF: 1 : 1 : 1 , WYC:3:1:1 , REP50:1:2:1,

4095 REP54: 1: 2: 1 REP56:1:2:1, REP58:1:2:1, REP59:1:2:2
4096 REP60:3:2:1 REP70:3:2:1, REP72:3:1:1, REP73: 3: 1 : 1,
4097 REP74:3:1:1 REP75:3:2:1, REP77:3:2:1, REP77A:3:1:1,
4098 REP79: 3: 1 : 1 , LINKlOSS:3:2:1, REP82:3:2:1, REP85:3:2:1;
4099
4100 OPTION EJECT ;
4101 DISPLAY "CCA - CUlTURABlE COMMANOEO AREA (MilliON ACRES)"
4102 "CCAP - CANAL CAPACITY AT THE CANAL HEAD (MAF/MONTH)"
4103 "POP - FARM POPULATION (THOUSANDS) "
4104 "TRACTORS - NUMBER OF EXISTING TRACTORS
4105 "TWC - EXISTNG PRIVATE TUBEWEll CAPACITY (KAF/MONTH)", REP45
4106 DISPLAY CAT ,REP46,REP47
4107 OPTION EJECT ;
4108 DISPLAY "CROPPED AREA(OOO ACRES) ", CAG;
4109 DISPLAY "CROPPED AREA COMPARISON( AREA 000 ACRES, INTENSITIES %"
4110 "SC-MIll IS SC-MIll + SC-GUR AREAS CA;
4111 DISPLAY CADIFF ;
4112 OPTION EJECT ;
4113 DISPLAY REP48 ;
4114 OPTION EJECT ;
4115 DISPLAY "WEIGHTED CROP YIELD (METRIC TONS) " WYC
4116 *
4117 OPTION EJECT ;
4118 DISPLAY "SC-MIll IS TOTAL CANE PRODUCSTION SC-MIll + SC-GUR*12" N
4119 REP49A, REP49B, REP49C, REP49D .",.
N
4120 OPTION EJECT ;
4121 DISPLAY "GPV - GROSS PRODUCTION VALUE (MilliON RUPEES) "
4122 "VAl-ADOED - VALUE AODED (MilliON RUPEES) "
4123 "FARM-INC - FARM INCOME (MilliON RUPEES) "
4124 "Fl-COST - COST OF FAMilY lABOR (MilliON RUPEES)"
4125 "Hl-COST - COST OF HIRED lABOR (MilliON RUPEES)"
4126 "SEEO-COST - COST OF SEEO USEO (MilliON RUPEES)"
4127 "FERT-COST - COST OF FERTIlIZER(NITROGEN AND PHOSPHOROUS) USED (MIllION RUPEES) "
4128 "MISCC-COST - COST OF CANAL WATER (MilliON RUPEES) "
4129 "TW-OPC - OPERATING COST OF PRIVATE TUBEWEllS (MillION RUPEES) "
4130 "TW-INVT - INVESTMENT IN PRIVATE TUBEWEllS (MilliON RUPEES) "
4131 "TR-OPC - OPERATING COST OF TRACTORS (MilliON RUPEES) "
4132 "TR-INVT - INVESTMENT IN PRIVATE TUBEWEllS (MilliON RUPEES) "
4133 "ANIMl-COST - FIXEO COST OF ANIMALS (MilliON RUPEES) "
4134 "PROT-COST - COST OF PRTEIN CONCENTRATE PURCHASED FOR ANIMALS (MilliON RUPEES)"
4135 EQUATION TO AVOID INFEASABIlITY
4136 "TOTAL-COST COST OFF All ACTIVITIES (MilliON RUPEES) REP50
4137
4138 * DISPLAY "GPV - GROSS PRODUCTION VALUE PER ACRE OF CCA (RUPEES) "
4139 * "FARM-INC - NET FARM INCOME PER ACRE OF CCA (RUPEES) "
4140 * "Fl-COST - COST OF FAMilY lABOR PER ACRE OF CCA (RUPEES) "
4141 * "Hl-COST - COST OF HIRED lABOR PER ACRE OF CCA (RUPEES) "
4142 * "TOTAL-COST COST OFF All ACTIVITIES PER ACRE OF CCA (RUPEES) " REP52
4143 OPTION EJECT ;
4144 DISPLAY "GPV - GROSS PRODUCTION VALUE PER FARM HOUSEHOlD(RUPEES) "
4145 "FARM-INC - NET FARM INCOME PER FARM HOUSEHOLD (RUPEES) "
4146 "Fl-COST - COST OF FAMilY lABOR PER HOUSEHOLD (RUPEES) "
4147 "Hl-COST - COST OF HIRED lABOR PER HOUSEHOLD (RUPEES) "
4148 "TOTAL-COST - TOTAL COST PER FARM HOUSEHOLD (RUPEES) " REP54
4149 * OPTION EJECT ;
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 495
REPORT ON THE SOLUTION GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4150 DISPLAY REP56, REP57, REP58

4151 OPTION EJECT ;
4152 DISPLAY REP59 ;
4153 OPTION EJECT ;
4154 DISPLAY "WATER-REQ - WATER REQUIREMNETS AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)
4155 "SUBI+RAIN - WATER REQUIREMNETS NET OF SUBIRR AND EFFECTIVE RAIN AT THE "
4156 THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)"
4157 "CANAL - CANAL WATER USED AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)"
4158 P-TUBEWELL - PRIVATE TUBEWELL PUMPAGE AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)"
4159 G-TUBEWELL - GOVERNMENT TUBEWELL PUMPAGE AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)"
4160 "ARTWATER WATER FROM IMMAGINARY AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)"
4161 "SLKWATER - SLACK WATER AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF) II
4162 TOT-SUPPLY - TOTAL SUPPLY OF WATER AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)", REP60
4163 OPTION EJECT ;
4164 DISPLAY " ALL FIGURES ARE REPRESENTED AT THE WATER COURSE HEAD USING II
4165 " WEIGHTED DELIVERY EFFICIENCIES (MAF) ", REP70 ;
4166 OPTION EJECT ;
4167 DISPLAY REP72, REP72A ;
4168 OPTION EJECT ;
4169 DISPLAY REP73, REP74;
4170 DISPLAY "REPORTS REP77, LINKLOSS, REP77A, RCONT.L AND REP79"
4171 ARE NOT APPLICABLE IN CASE OF ZONAL MODELS "
4172 REP77, LINKLOSS, REP77A;
4173 OPTION EJECT ;
4174 DISPLAY RCONT.L ; N
4175 DISPLAY "AVE-RCONT AVERAGE RESERVOIR CONTENTS DURING THE MONTH (MAF)" """
w
4176 "R ELE RESERVOIR ELEVETAION (FEET FROM SPD)"
4177 "R-OUTFLOW RESERVOIR OUTFLOW (MAF) "
4178 UP-CAP POWER CAPACITY AT R-ELE MW
4179 "G-CAP GENERATION CAPABILITY KWH/AF"
4180 "ENERGY-G ENERGY GENERATION BILLION KILOWATT HOURS(BKWH)
4181 "ENERGY-S ENERGY SPILLED (BKWH)", REP79 ;
4182 OPTION EJECT ;
4183 DISPLAY REP75
4184 OPTION EJECT ;
4185 DISPLAY "SEEP-RAIN - SEEPAGE FROM RAIN TO THE GROUNDWATER (MAF)"
4186 "SEEP-PTW SEEPAGE FROM THE PRIVATE TUBEWELL WATER (MAF)"
4187 "SEEP-GTW - SEEPAGE FROM THE GOVERNMENT TUBEWELL WATER (MAF)"
4188 "SEEP-CANAL - CANAL WATER SEEPAGE FROM MAIN AND BRANCH CANALS (MAF)"
4189 "SEEP-WCFLD - CANAL WATER SEEPAGE FROM WATERCOURSES AND FIELDS
4190 TO THE GROUDWATER (MAF) "
4191 "SEEP-LINK - SEEPAGE FROM LINK CANALS TO THE GW(MAF)"
4192 "SEEP-RIVER - SEEPAGE FROM RIVERS TO THE GW(MAF)"
4193 "P-TUBWELL - PRIVATE TUBEWELL PUMPAGE (MAF) "
4194 "G-TUBWELL GOVERNEMENT TUBEWELL PUMPAGE (MAF) "
4195 "TOT-INF - TOTAL INFLOW TO THE GROUNDWATER FROM ALL SOURCES (RAIN,"
4196 PRIVATE TUBEWELLS,GOVERNMENT TUBEWELL AND CANALWATER
4197 SEEPAGE FROM CANALS WATERCOURSES AND FIELDS (MAF)"
4198 "TOT-OUTF TOTAL OUFLOW FROM THE GROUNDWATER (PRIVATE AND GOVT. TUBEWELL"
4199 PUMPAGE AND EVAPORATION FROM GROUNWATER MAF ) "
4200 "INF-OUTF - DIFFERECE IN THE INFLOW AND OUTFLOW (MAF) "
4201 "P-EVAP-GW - POTENTIAL EVAP. FROM GW FOR THE GIVEN GW LEVEL (MAF)"
4202 "EVAP-GW EVAPORATION FROM GOUNDWATER (MAF) "
4203 "BALANCE - BALANCE AFTER THE EVAPORATION FROM GROUNDWATER(MAF) " , REP82, REP85
4204
4205 REP90(G,Q,Zl) = PRODT.L(Zl,G,Q)
INOUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 496
REPORT ON THE SOLUTION GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4206 REP90("TOTAL",O.Z1) SUM(T1. REP90(T1,O,Z1

4207 REP90(T1,O,PV) SUM(Z1$PVZ(PV,Z1), REP90(Tl,O,Zl)

4208
4209 REP95(G,A,R11) = SUM(Zl$R11Z(R11,Z1), ANIMAL.L(Zl,G,A) ) ;

4210 REP95("TOTAL","BULLOCK",R12) SUM(Z$R12Z(R12,Z), RES88("BULLOCKS",ZII ;

4211 REP95("TOTAL","BUFFALO,R12) = SUM(Z$R12Z(R12,Z), RES88("BUFFALOS",Z*BUFF

4212 REP95("TOTAL","COW",R12) = SUM(Z$R12Z(R12,Z), RES88("COWS",ZI)*cOWF;

4213
4214 REP95("TOTAL",A,Rl1) SUM(G, REP95(G,A,Rll) ;

4215 REP95(T1,A,"M-PUNJAB")= SUM(Rll$(SUM(Z$PVZ("PUNJAB",Z), Rl1Z(R11,Z), REP95(Tl,A,Rll)

4216 REP95(Tl,A,"A-PUNJAB")= SUM(R12$(SUM(Z$PVZ("PUNJAB",Z), R12Z(R12,Z I, REP95(T1,A,R121

4217 REP95(T1,A,"M-SIND"1 SUM(R1l$(SUM(Z$PVZ("SIND",Z), R11Z(R11,Z)) I, REP95(T1,A,R11l)

4218 REP95(T1,A,"A-SINO") SUM(R12$(SUM(Z$PVZ("SIND",Z). R12Z(R12,Z), REP95(T1,A,R12

4219 REP95(T1,A,"M-PAKISTAN") = SUM(R11, REP95(T1,A,R11) )

4220 REP95(Tl,A,"A-PAKISTAN"1 = SUM(R12, REP95(T1,A,R12) )

4221
4222 OPTION REP90:3:2:1, REP95 3:2:1;

4223 OPTION EJECT ;

4224 OISPLAY " ANIMALS ARE IN THOUSAND, MEET IN MILLION KGS AND

4225 MILK IN MILLION LITERS", REP95, REP90 ;

4226 OISPLAY FSALEP, PP,SEEOP, MISC, ESALEP, ESEEDP, EMISC, EPP,IMPORTP

4227 EXPORTP, EXPLIMIT

4228
4229 PARAMETER REP100 ARTIFICIAL WATER USED AT THE NODES (MAFI
4230 REP110 COST OF ARTIFICIAL WATER AT NODES (MILLION RUPEES) N
4231 REP120 COST OF IMPORTS ARTIFICIAL WATER AND FODDER (MILLION RUPEES) ~
~
4232 ,
4233 REP100(N,M) ARTWATERND.L(N,M) ;

4234 REP100(N,SEA) =SUM(M$SEAM(SEA,M), REP100(N,M

4235 REP100(N, "ANNUAL") SUM(SEA, REP100(N,SEA) I;

4236 REP100(HTOTAL",Ml) SUM(N, REP100(N,M11 I:

4237 REP 110(N) REP l00(N, "ANNUAL") *PAWAT:

4238 REPll0( "TOT AL" ) REP l00( "TOTAL", "ANNUAL") *PAWAT

4239 REP120("TOTAL", "IMP-COST") = SUM(CO ,

4240 REP49D("IMPORTS","PAKISTAN",CQ )*IMPORTP(CQ I);

4241 REP120(G,"AFOD-COST") SUMZ1,SEA). ARTFOD.L(Zl,G,SEA*PAFOD ;

4242 REP120(G, "ARTWATER") SUMM,Z1), ARTWATER.L(Z1,G,M)*PAWAT )/1000:

4243 OPTION REP100;3:1:1, REP110;3:

4244 OPTION EJECT ;

4245 DISPLAY REP100, REP110, REP120;

4246
4247 DISPLAY ENOPRICE ;
4248 * SYSTEM WATER BALANCE SUMMARY
4249
4250 SET R19/RIVER-INF, TRIB-INF, TOT INFLOW, RES-EVAP, LINK-LOSS,
4251 RIVER-LOSS, CANAL-DIV, TO-SEA, BALNCE /

4252 R20/RIVER-INF, TRIB-INF/

4253 R21/RES-EVAP, LINK LOSS, RIVER-LOSS, CANAL-DIV, TO-SEA /

4254
4255 PARAMETER REP130 REPORT ON SYSTEM INFLOWS AND OUTFLOWS(MAF)
4256
4257 REP130("RIVER-INF",M) SUM(I, INFLOW(I,M) );

4258 REP130("TRIB-INF" ,M) SUM( (Nl, N), TRIB(Nl ,N, M) )

4259 REP130("TOT-INFLOW",M) SUM(R20, REP130(R20,M) ) ;

4260
4261 REP130("RIVER-LOSS",M) REP77A("TOTAL",M)
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 497
REPORT ON THE SOLUTION GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4262 REP130(nLINK-LOSS",M) LINKLOSS("TOTAL","TOTAL",M);

4263 REP130( "RES-EVAP",M) SUM(N$RCAP(N), REVAPL(N,M) )/1000
4264 REP130("CANAL-DIV",M) REP72("PAKISTAN",M);
4265 REP130("TO-SEA",M) F.L("A-SEA","KOTRI-B",M) ;
4266 REP130("BALNCE",M) REP130("TOT-INFLOW",M)
4267 SUM(R21, REP130(R21,M)
4268 REP130(R19.SEA1) SUM(M$SEA1M(SEA1,M), REP130(R19,M ;
4269 OPTION REP130:3:1:1;
4270 OPTION EJECT ;
4271 DISPLAY "THIS REPORT IS MEANINGFUL WITH THE COMPLETE INDUS MODEL ONLY";
4272 DISPLAY REP130 ;
4273 DISPLAY PRODA.L;
4274 OPTION EJECT ;
4275 DISPLAY ARTWATER.L, ARTWATERND.L ,ARTFOD.L

N
~
VI
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 498
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBQ~ TYPE REFERENCES

A SET REF 2*3909 4209 4214 4215 4216 4217 4218 4219 4220 CONTROL 3909
4209 4214 4215 4216 4217 4218 4219 4220
ANIMAL VAR REF 3909 4209
ARTFOD VAR REF 4241 4275
ARTWATER VAR REF 3972 4242 4275
ARTWATERND VAR REF 4233 4275
BUFF PARAM REF 4211
C SET REF 3652 2 * 3811 3812 3813 3814 3817 3818 3819 3821 3822 3824
3825 2*3828 3835 2*3836 4*3868 4*3869 3*3901 2*3903 2*3904 3*3929 2*3931 2*3932
2*3964 2*3965 2*3966 3967 CONTROL 3811 3812 3813 3814 3817 3818 3819
3821 3822 3824 3825 3828 3835 3836 3868 3869 3900 3902 3904
3928 3930 3932 3964 3965 3966
CA PARAM DECLARED 3759 ASSIGNED 3832 3835 3836 3837 3838 3839 3841 3842 3843
3844 3845 3846 3848 3850 3852 3853 3854 3856 3857 REF 3836
2*3837 2*3838 3839 3841 3842 3843 3844 3845 3846 3848 3850 3852
3853 3854 2*3856 3861 3862 2*3863 2*3864 2*3865 4093 4110
CAC PARAM DECLARED 3762 ASSIGNED 3821 3822 REF 3824 2*3868 3*3869 3904 3932
CADIFF PARAM DECLARED 3763 ASSIGNED 3861 3863 3864 3865 REF 4094 4111
CAG PARAM DECLARED 3760 ASSIGNED 3824 3825 3828 3829 REF 3825 3826 3827 3828
3829 3832 4092 4108
CANALDIV VAR REF 3969 3986 3987 4063 4065
CAT PARAM DECLARED 3761 ASSIGNED 3817 3818 3819 REF 3818 3819 3821 3822 4106
CHILI PARAM DECLARED 3793 ASSIGNED 3826 3827 REF 3828 N
.l>
CN SET REF 2*3896 CONTROL 3896 0\
CNEFF PARAM REF 3968 4064 4065
CNL SET REF 3697 3705 3706 4*3968 2*3969 3986 3987 2*3988 3989 2*3990 3992
3993 2*3994 3995 2*3996 4*3998 2*4058 3*4063 2*4064 4*4065 2*4066 2*4075
CONTROL 3705 3706 3968 3986 3987 3988 3989 3990 3992 3993 3994
3995 3996 3998 4058 4063 4065 4075
CONSUMP VAR REF 3888
COWF PARAM REF 4212
CQ SET REF 3871 3874 3875 3877 3878 3879 3880 3882 3883 3884 3885
3886 3888 3889 3891 3892 3893 3894 2*3915 2*3941 2*4240 CONTROL 3703
3871 3874 3875 3877 3878 3879 3880 3882 3883 3884 3885 3886
3888 3889 3891 3892 3893 3894 3915 3941 4239
CROPAREA PARAM REF 3835
C2 SET DECLARED 3650 DEFINED 3650 REF 3690 2*3848 2*3850 2*3852 2*3853 2*3854 2*3996
2*3997 CONTROL 3703 3848 3850 3852 3853 3854 3996 3997
C3 SET DECLARED 3651 ASSIGNED 2*3703 REF 3832 3841 3842 3843 3844 3845 3846
3861 3862 2*3863 2*3864 2*3865 CONTROL 3832 3841 3842 3843 3844 3845
3846 3861 3863 3864 3865
DIVPOST PARAM REF 3992
DRC PARAM REF 4058
EMISC PARAM REF 3931 3933 3934 3935 3936 4226
EMISCCT PARAM REF 3932
ENDPR PARAM REF 3896
ENDPRICE PARAM DECLARED 3797 ASSIGNED 3896 REF 4247
EPP PARAM REF 3938 4226
EQEVAPZ PARAM REF 4079
ESALEP PARAM REF 3941 4226
ESEEDP PARAM REF 3929 4226
EWAGE PARAM REF 3926 3927
EXPLIMIT PARAM REF 4227
EXPORT VAR REF 3893
INDUS BASIN MOOEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 499
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TYPE REFERENCES

EXPORTP PARAM REF 4227

F VAR REF 4003 4007 4011 2*4013 4031 4265
FAMILYL VAR REF 3898 3926 3952
FERT PARAM REF 3811 3903 3931
FLEFFZ PARAM REF 4059
FSALEP PARAM REF 3915 4226
G SET REF 3802 3803 2*3806 3811 3812 3817 3818 3824 3825 3868 3871
3872 3873 3874 3888 3898 3899 3901 3903 3904 3907 3908 3909
3910 3911 3913 3915 2*3916 3917 3926 3927 3929 3931 3932 3933
3934 3935 3936 3937 3938 3939 3941 2*3942 3943 2*3952 3953 3958
3964 2*3965 3967 3968 3971 3972 3973 3974 3975 3976 3977 3978
3998 3999 4058 4062 4063 4065 4070 4073 4075 4076 4077 2*4078
4079 2*4080 2*4081 2*4082 4083 4205 4209 4214 4241 4242 CONTROL 3802
3803 2*3806 3811 3812 3817 3818 3824 3825 3868 3871 3872 3874
3888 3898 3899 3900 3902 3904 3907 3908 3909 3910 3911 3913
3914 3916 3917 3926 3927 3928 3930 3932 3933 3934 3935 3936
3937 3938 3939 3940 3942 3943 2*3952 3953 3958 3964 3965 3966
3968 3971 3972 3973 3974 3975 3976 3977 3978 3998 3999 4058
4062 4063 4065 4068 4071 4075 4076 4077 4078 4079 4080 4081
4082 4083 4205 4209 4214 4241 4242
GF SET REF 4075
GWFG SET REF 3968 3998 4063 4065
GWTSA PARAM REF 4075 N
GWTl PARAM REF 3971 .j::
""-J
HIREDL VAR REF 3899 3927 3952
I SET REF 4257 CONTROL 4257
IMPORT VAR REF 3891
IMPORTP PARAM REF 4226 4240
INFLOW PARAM REF 4257
INT SET OECLARED 3689 DEFINED 3689 REF 3690 3848 3850 3852 3853 3854
CONTROL 3848 3850 3852 3853 3854
INTC2 SET DECLARED 3690 DEFINED 3690 REF 3848 3850 3852 3853 3854
IOLIVE PARAM REF 3909
ISR SET REF 3800
ITR VAR REF 3908
ITW VAR REF 3906
LABFAC PARAM REF 3898 3926
LAND PARAM REF 3966
LINKLOSS PARAM DECLARED 3795 ASSIGNED 4007 4008 4009 REF 4008 4009 4069 4098 4172
4262
LLOSS PARAM REF 4007 4011
LNKSP PARAM DECLARED 3714 DEFINED 3714 REF 4069
LOSSGAIN PARAM DECLARED 3796 ASSIGNED 4011 4015 REF 4015 4017 4072
M SET REF 2*3806 3807 3808 3809 2*3898 2*3899 3905 3907 2*3926 2*3927 2*3952
3953 2*3954 3955 3958 2*3959 3960 3964 2*3965 3*3966 3968 3969 2*3970
3971 3972 3973 3974 2*3975 2*3981 2*3982 3986 2*3987 3992 2*3993 4003
2*4004 4007 2*4008 2*4011 4012 2*4013 4014 2*4015 2*4030 4031 4036 4037
4038 4039 4042 4043 4046 4047 2*4052 2*4053 2*4054 2*4055 4058 2*4061
2*4062 4063 4065 4066 4074 4075 4079 4233 2*4234 4242 4257 4258
4259 4261 4262 4263 4264 4265 4266 4267 2*4268 CONTROL 2*3806 3807
3808 3809 3898 3899 3905 3907 3926 3927 2*3952 3953 3954 3955
3958 3959 3960 3964 3965 3966 3968 3970 3971 3972 3973 3974
3975 3981 3982 3986 3987 3992 3993 4003 4004 4007 4008 4011
4015 4030 4031 4033 4052 4053 4054 4055 4058 4060 4062 4063
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 500
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TYPE REFERENCES

4065 4074 4075 4079 4233 4234 4242 4257 4258 4259 4261 4262
4263 4264 4265 4266 4268
MAX FUNCT REF 4053
MIN FUNCT REF 3966 4080
MISC PARAM REF 3903 3905 3906 3907 3908 3933 3934 3935 3936 4226
MISCCT PARAM REF 3904
M1 SET REF 3956 3961 3977 3978 3979 3984 3988 3989 3990 3994 3995
3998 3999 4000 4009 4017 4018 4019 4236 CONTROL 3956 3961 3977
3978 3979 3984 3988 3989 3990 3994 3995 3998 3999 4000 4009
4017 4018 4019 4236
N SET REF 3714 3738 4003 4004 2*4007 4008 4009 3*4011 2*4012 4*4013 2*4014
4015 4017 4018 4019 4031 2*4069 2*4072 4233 4234 4235 4236 4237
4258 2*4263 CONTROL 4003 4004 4007 4008 4009 4011 4015 4017 4018
4019 4031 4068 4071 4233 4234 4235 4236 4237 4258 4263
NAT VAR REF 3896
N1 SET REF 3714 3738 4003 4004 2*4007 4008 4009 3*4011 4012 3*4013 4014
4015 4017 2*4069 2*4072 4258 CONTROL 4003 4004 4007 4008 4009 4011
4015 4017 4068 4071 4258
P SET REF 2*3896 CONTROL 3896
PAFOD PARAM REF 4241
PAWAT PARAM REF 4237 4238 4242
PN SET REF 4027 2*4030 4031 2*4036 2*4037 4038 3*4039 2*4040 2*4041 4042 3*4043
2*4044 2*4045 4046 3*4047 2*4048 2*4049 2*4052 2*4053 2*4054 4055 CONTROL 4030 N
~
4031 4033 4052 4053 4054 4055 <Xl
POWERCHAR PARAM REF 4036 4037 2*4039 2*4040 2*4041 2*4043 2*4044 2*4045 2*4047 2*4048 2*4049
PP PARAM REF 3910 3938 4226
PPC VAR REF 3910
PRODA VAR REF 4273
PRODT VAR REF 3871 3915 3941 4205
PSR SET REF 3800
PV SET REF 3804 3807 3809 3813 3815 3819 3822 3*3869 3875 3889 3892
3894 3918 3*3921 3*3923 3944 3*3947 3*3949 3956 3961 3979 3984 3988
3994 2*3997 4000 4086 3*4089 4207 CONTROL 3804 3807 3809 3813 3815
3819 3822 3869 3875 3889 3892 3894 3918 3921 3923 3944 3947
3949 3956 3961 3979 3984 3988 3994 3997 4000 4086 4089 4207
PVCNL SET REF 3705 3706 3988 3994
PVZ SET REF 3804 3807 3809 3813 3815 3819 3841 3842 3843 3844 3869
3875 3883 3884 3885 3889 3892 3894 3918 3944 3956 3961 3979
3984 4000 4086 4207 4215 4216 4217 4218
P2 SET REF 3811 3812 3813 3814 3815 2*3903 2*3931 CONTROL 3811 3812 3813
3814 3815 3902 3930
Q SET REF 4205 4206 4207 CONTROL 4205 4206 4207
RAIN PARAM REF 4058
RATIOFS PARAM REF 4070 4073
RCAP PARAM REF 4263
RCONT VAR REF 2*4030 4174
REP100 PARAM DECLARED 4229 ASSIGNED 4233 4234 4235 4236 REF 4234 4235 4236 4237
4238 4243 4245
REP110 PARAM DECLARED 4230 ASSIGNED 4237 4238 REF 4243 4245
REP120 PARAM DECLAREO 4231 ASSIGNED 4239 4241 4242 REF 4245
REP130 PARAM DECLARED 4255 ASSIGNED 4257 4258 4259 4261 4262 4263 4264 4265 4266
4268 REF 4259 4266 4267 4268 4269 4272
REP45 PARAM DECLARED 3765 ASSIGNED 3802 3803 3804 REF 3803 3804 3808 3848 3849
3850 3851 3852 3853 3854 2*3920 2*3921 2*3922 2*3923 2*3946 2*3947 2*3948
 INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 501
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TYPE REFERENCES

2*3949 2*4088 2*4089 4092 4105

REP46 PARAM DECLARED 3766 ASSIGNED 2*3806 3807 REF 3806 3807 3808 4092 4106
REP47 PAR AM DECLARED 3767 ASSIGNED 3808 3809 REF 3809 4092 4106
REP48 PARAM DECLARED 3768 ASSIGNED 3811 3812 3813 3814 3815 REF 3812 3813 3814
3815 4093 4113
REP49A PARAM DECLARED 3769 ASSIGNED 3871 3872 3874 3875 REF 3872 3873 3874 3875
3877 3878 3879 3880 4093 4119
REP49B PARAM DECLARED 3770 ASSIGNED 3877 3878 3879 3880 3882 3883 3884 3885 3886
REF 3886 4093 4119
REP49C PAR AM DECLARED 3771 ASSIGNED 3888 3889 REF 3889 4119
REP49D PARAM DECLARED 3772 ASSIGNED 3891 3892 3893 3894 REF 3892 3894 4119 4240
REP50 PARAM DECLARED 3773 ASSIGNED 3898 3899 3900 3902 3904 3905 3906 3907 3908
3909 3910 3911 3913 3914 3916 3917 3918 3932 REF 3911 3913
2*3916 3917 3918 3920 3921 3922 3923 3933 3934 3935 3936 3937
3938 4094 4136
REP52 PARAM DECLARED 3774 ASSIGNED 3920 3921
REP54 PARAM DECLARED 3775 ASSIGNED 3922 3923 REF 4095 4148
REP56 PARAM DECLARED 3776 ASSIGNED 3926 3927 3928 3930 3933 3934 3935 3936 3937
3938 3939 3940 3942 3943 3944 REF 3939 2*3942 3943 3944 3946
3947 3948 3949 4095 4150
REP57 PARAM DECLARED 3777 ASSIGNED 3946 3947 REF 4150
REP58 PARAM DECLARED 3778 ASSIGNED 3948 3949 REF 4095 4150
REP59 PARAM DECLARED 3779 ASSIGNED 2*3952 3953 3954 3955 3956 3958 3959 3960 3961 !'oJ
~
REF 3953 3954 3955 3956 3958 3959 3960 3961 4095 4152 \0
REP60 PARAM DECLARED 3780 ASSIGNED 3964 3965 3966 3968 3970 3971 3972 3973 3974
3975 3976 3977 3978 3979 REF 3965 3974 3975 3976 3977 3978
3979 3981 4096 4162
REP70 PARAM DECLARED 3781 ASSIGNED 3981 3982 3983 3984 REF 3982 3983 3984 4062
4096 4165
REP72 PARAM DECLARED 3782 ASSIGNED 3986 3987 3988 3989 REF 3988 3989 3990 3996
3997 3998 4096 4167 4264
REP72A PARAM DECLARED 3783 ASSIGNED 3990 REF 4167
REP73 PARAM DECLARED 3784 ASSIGNED 3992 3993 3994 3995 REF 3993 3994 3995 3996
3997 4096 4169
REP74 PARAM DECLARED 3785 ASSIGNED 3996 3997 REF 4097 4169
REP75 PARAM DECLARED 3786 ASSIGNED 3998 3999 4000 REF 3999 4000 4097 4183
REP77 PARAM DECLARED 3787 ASSIGNED 4003 4004 REF 4004 4097 4172
REP77A PARAM DECLARED 3794 ASSIGNED 4017 4018 4019 REF 4018 4019 4097 4172 4261
REP79 PARAM DECLARED 4027 ASSIGNED 4030 4031 4038 4042 4046 4052 4053 4054 4055
REF 4036 4037 4039 4043 4047 2*4052 2*4053 2*4054 4055 4098 4181
REP80 PARAM DECLARED 3788 ASSIGNED 4058 4060 4062 4063 4065 4068 4071 4074 4075
4076 4077 4078 4079 4080 4081 4082 4083 REF 4076 4077 2*4078
2*4080 2*4081 2*4082 4083 4085
REP82 PARAM DECLARED 3789 ASSIGNED 4085 4086 REF 4086 4088 4089 4098 4203
REP85 PARAM DECLARED 3790 ASSIGNED 4088 4089 REF 4098 4203
. REP90 PARAM DECLARED 3791 ASSIGNED 4205 4206 4207 REF 4206 4207 4222 4225
REP95 PARAM DECLARED 3792 ASSIGNED 4209 4210 4211 4212 4214 4215 4216 4217 4218
4219 4220 REF 4214 4215 4216 4217 4218 4219 4220 4222 4225
RESOURCE PARAM REF 3802 4058 4079
RES88 PARAM REF 4210 4211 4212
REVAPL PARAM REF 4263
RIVERB PARAM REF 4013
RIVERCD PARAM REF 4012 4013 4014
RIVSP PARAM DECLARED 3738 DEFINED 3738 REF 4072
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 502
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TYPE REFERENCES

ROUND FUNCT REF 4018

RPG SET DECLARED 4023 DEFINED 4023 REF 4024 4027
RPGl SET DECLARED 4024 DEFINED 4024 REF 4055 CONTROL 4055
RR1 SET DECLARED 3657 DEFINED 3657 REF 3663 3666 3668 3676 3773 3776 3917
3918 3943 3944 CONTROL 3917 3918 3943 3944
R1 SET REF 3802 3803 3804 CONTROL 3802 3803 3804
RlO SET DECLARED 3677 DEFINED 3677 REF 3679 3680 3691 3692 3693 3694
CONTROL 3704
R11 SET DECLARED 3679 DEFINED 3679 REF 3681 3824 3825 2*3828 3829 3832 2*3841
2*3843 3845 3*3848 2*3861 3877 4209 4214 2*4215 2*4217 4219 CONTROL 3824
3825 3828 3829 3832 3841 3843 3845 3848 3861 3877 4209 4214
4215 4217 4219
R11 Z SET DECLARED 3681 DEFINED 3681 REF 3824 3841 3843 2*3848 3861 3877 4209
4215 4217
R12 SET DECLARED 3680 DEFINED 3680 REF 3683 3835 3836 3839 2*3842 2*3844 3846
3*3850 2*3862 3882 4210 4211 4212 2*4216 2*4218 4220 CONTROL 3835 3836
3839 3842 3844 3846 3850 3862 3882 4210 4211 4212 4216 4218
4220
R122 SET DECLARED 3683 DEFINED 3683 REF 3835 3842 3844 2*3850 3862 3882 4210
4211 4212 4216 4218
R13 SET DECLARED 3685 DEFINED 3685 REF 3852 CONTROL 3704 3852
R14 SET DECLARED 3686 DEFINED 3686 REF 3853 CONTROL 3704 3853
R15 SET DECLARED 3687 DEFINED 3687 REF 3854 CONTROL 3704 3854 N
R16 SET DECLARED 3688 DEFINED 3688 11I
0
R17 SET DECLARED 3666 DEFINED 3666 REF 3942 CONTROL 3942
R18 SET DECLARED 3668 DEFINED 3668 REF 3916 CONTROL 3916
R19 SET DECLARED 4250 DEFINED 4250 REF 4268 CONTROL 4268
R2 SET DECLARED 3663 DEFINED 3663 REF 3911 3913 3939 CONTROL 3911 3913 3939
R20 SET DECLARED 4252 DEFINED 4252 REF 4259 CONTROL 4259
R21 SET DECLARED 4253 DEFINED 4253 REF 4267 CONTROL 4267
R22 SET DECLARED 3691 DEFINED 3691 REF 3826 CONTROL 3826
R22A SET DECLARED 3693 DEFINED 3693 REF 2*3837 CONTROL 3837
R23 SET DECLARED 3692 DEFINED 3692 REF 3827 CONTROL 3827
R23A SET DECLARED 3694 DEFINED 3694 REF 2*3838 CONTROL 3838
R24 SET DECLARED 3695 ASSIGNED 4*3704 REF 2*3856 3886 CONTROL 3856 3857 3886
R25 SET DECLARED 3696 DEFINED 3696 REF 3697 3990 CONTROL 3990
R26 SET DECLARED 3697 DEFINED 3697 ASSIGNED 3705 3706 REF 3990
R3 SET DECLARED 3670 DEFINED 3670 REF 3672 3780 3781 3975 3976 3977 3978
3979 3981 3982 3983 3984 CONTROL 3975 3976 3977 3978 3979 3981
3982 3983 3984
R4 SET DECLARED 3672 DEFINED 3672 REF 3974 CONTROL 3974
R6 SET DECLARED 3673 DEFINED 3673 REF 4076 CONTROL 4076
R7 SET DECLARED 3675 DEFINED 3675 REF 4077 CONTROL 4077
R8 SET DECLARED 3676 DEFINED 3676 REF 3774 3775 3777 3778 3920 3921 3922
3923 3946 3947 3948 3949 CONTROL 3920 3921 3922 3923 3946 3947
3948 3949
1<9 SET DECLARED 3660 DEFINED 3660 REF 3673 3675 3788 4083 4085 4086 4088
4089 CONTROL 4083 4085 4086 4088 4089
S SET REF 3811 3817 2*3868 2*3901 3903 2*3929 3931 2*3964 2*3965 2*3966 3967
CONTROL 3811 3817 3868 3900 3902 3928 3930 3964 3965 3966
SA SET REF 2*3968 3969 3*3998 4058 2*4063 4064 2*4065 4066 2*4075 CONTROL 3968
3998 4058 4063 4065 4075
SEA SET REF 3652 3793 2*3828 3829 3836 3839 3910 3954 3959 3975 3976
3982 3983 4234 4235 4241 CONTROL 3828 3829 3836 3839 3910 3954
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 503
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TYPE REFERENCES

3959 3975 3976 3982 3983 4234 4235 4241

SEAC SET DECLARED 3652 DEFINED 3652 REF 3828 3836
SEAM SET REF 3954 3959 3975 3982 4234
SEAl SET REF 3987 3993 4004 4008 4015 4055 4268 CONTROL 3987 3993 4004
4008 4015 4055 4268
SEA1M SET REF 3987 3993 4004 4008 4015 4055 4268
SEEDP PARAM REF 3901 4226
SLKLAND VAR REF 3806
SLKWATER VAR REF 3973
SPFC PARAM DECLARED 3709 DEFINED 3709 REF 4064 4070
SPFRV PARAM DECLARED 3711 DEFINED 3711 REF 4073
SPFWF PARAM DECLARED 3710 DEFINED 3710 REF 4059 4061 4062 4066
SUBDEF PARAM REF 3969 3998 4064 4066
SUBIRRZ PARAM REF 3966
SYLDS PARAM REF 3901 3929
T SET REF 3811 3817 3818 3819 3821 3822 2*3868 2*3901 3903 2*3929 3931
2*3964 2*3965 2*3966 3967 CONTROL 3811 3817 3818 3819 3821 3822 3868
3900 3902 3928 3930 3964 3965 3966
TEST PARAM DECLARED 4028 ASSIGNED 4035 4036 REF 4038 4042 4046
TDTPRDD PARAM REF 3882 3883 3884 3885
TRIB PARAM REF 4011 4012 4014 4258
TS VAR REF 3907
TW VAR REF 3905 3970 4061 4074 N
TWEFFZ PARAM REF 3970 4061 V1
Tl SET REF 3793 3804 3807 2*3808 3809 3813 3814 3815 3819 3821 3822
.....
3826 3827 2*3828 3829 3875 3918 3*3920 3*3921 3*3922 3*3923 3944 3*3946
3*3947 3*3948 3*3949 3954 3955 3956 3959 3960 3961 3979 3981 3982
3983 3984 4000 4085 4086 3*4088 3*4089 4206 4207 4215 4216 4217
4218 4219 4220 CONTROL 3804 3807 3808 3809 3813 3814 3815 3819
3821 3822 3826 3827 3828 3829 3875 3918 3920 3921 3922 3923
3944 3946 3947 3948 3949 3954 3955 3956 3959 3960 3961 3979
3981 3982 3983 3984 4000 4085 4086 4088 4089 4206 4207 4215
4216 4217 4218 4219 4220
V SET REF 4028 4036 4037 4038 2*4039 2*4040 2*4041 4042 2*4043 2*4044 2*4045
4046 2*4047 2*4048 2*4049 CONTROL 4035 4036 4038 4042 4046
W SET REF 3811 3817 2*3868 2*3901 3903 2*3929 3931 2*3964 2*3965 2*3966 3967
CONTROL 3811 3817 3868 3900 3902 3928 3930 3964 3965 3966
WAGE PARAM REF 3898 3899
WATER PARAM REF 3964
WCEFF PARAM REF 3968 4066
WCEFFZ PARAM REF 3981 4062
WNR PARAM REF 3965 3966
WYC PARAM DECLARED 3764 ASSIGNED 3868 3869 REF 3869 4094 4115
X VAR REF 3811 3817 3868 3901 3903 3929 3931 3964 3965 3967
YIELD PARAM REF 3868
Z SET REF 3681 3683 3714 3738 3802 3803 2*3804 2*3835 2*3841 2*3842 2*3843
2*3844 3*3848 3849 3*3850 3851 3861 3862 2*4210 2*4211 2*4212 2*4215 2*4216
2*4217 2*4218 CONTROL 3802 3803 3804 3835 3841 3842 3843 3844 2*3848
2*3850 3861 4210 4211 4212 4215 4216 4217 4218
ZSA SET REF 3968 3998 4063 4065 4075
ZWT PARAM REF 4058
Z1 SET REF 3800 2*3806 2*3807 2*3808 2*3809 2*3811 3812 2*3813 3814 2*3815 3817
3818 2*3819 3821 2*3824 4*3868 3*3869 3871 3872 3873 3874 2*3875 2*3877
2*3882 2*3883 2*3884 2*3885 3888 2*3889 3891 2*3892 3893 2*3894 2*3896 3898
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59.58 PAGE 504
SYMBOL LI STING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TYPE REFERENCES

3899 2*3901 2*3903 3904 3905 3906 3907 3908 2*3909 3910 3911 3913
3915 2*3916 3917 2*3918 3*3920 3*3922 3926 3927 2*3929 2*3931 3932 3933
3934 3935 3936 3937 3938 3939 3941 2*3942 3943 2*3944 3*3946 3*3948
2*3952 3953 3954 3955 2*3956 3958 3959 3960 2*3961 2*3964 3*3965 3*3966
3967 3968 2*3970 3971 3972 3973 3974 3975 3976 3977 3978 2*3979
2*3981 3982 3983 2*3984 3998 3999 2*4000 2*4058 4059 2*4061 2*4062 4063
4065 4069 4070 4072 4073 4074 4075 4076 4077 2*4078 2*4079 2*4080
2*4081 2*4082 4083 4085 2*4086 3*4088 4205 4206 2*4207 2*4209 4241 4242
CONTROL 2*3806 3807 3808 3809 3811 3812 3813 3814 3815 3817 3818
3819 3821 3824 3868 3869 3871 3872 3874 3875 3877 3882 3883
3884 3885 3888 3889 3891 3892 3893 3894 3896 3898 3899 3900
3902 3904 3905 3906 3907 3908 3909 3910 3911 3913 3914 3916
3917 3918 3920 3922 3926 3927 3928 3930 3932 3933 3934 3935
3936 3937 3938 3939 3940 3942 3943 3944 3946 3948 2*3952 3953
3954 3955 3956 3958 3959 3960 3961 3964 3965 3966 3968 3970
3971 3972 3973 3974 3975 3976 3977 3978 3979 3981 3982 3983
3984 3998 3999 4000 4058 4060 4062 4063 4065 4068 4071 4074
4075 4076 4077 4078 4079 4080 4081 4082 4083 4085 4086 4088
4205 4206 4207 4209 4241 4242

SETS
N
A ANIMAL TYPES \JI
C CROPS N
CN COMODITIES ENDOGENOUS PRICES
CNl IRRIGATION CANALS IN THE INDUS RIVER IRRIGATION SYSTEM
CO CROP AND LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS
C2
C3
G GROUND WATER QUALITY TYPES
GF FRESH GROUND WATER SUB-ZONE
GWFG SUBAREA IDENTIFICATION BY THE GROUNDWATER QUALITY
I SYSTEM INFLOWS
INT
INTC2
ISR IRRIGATION SYSTEM SCENARIO FOR THIS RUN
M MONTHS
M1 MONTHS AND SEASONS
N NODES OF THE INDUS RIVER SYSTEM
N1 AlIASED WITH N
P GRID POINTS FOR LINEARIZATION
PN NODES WITH POWER HOUSE
PSR PRICE SCENARIO FOR THE MOOEL(FINANCIAL PRICES)
PV PROVINCES AND COUNTRY
PVCNl PROVINCE TO CANALS MAP
PVZ PROVINCE TO ZONE MAP
P2
o lIVESTOCK COMODITIES
RPG
RPG1
RR1
R1 RESOURCES
RiO
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME:WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 505
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SETS

R11
Rl1Z
R12
R12Z
R13
R14
R15
R16
R17
R18
R19
R2
R20
R21
R22
R22A
R23
R23A
R24
R25
R26
R3
t
R4 V1
R6 IP
R7
R8
R9
S SEQUENCE
SA SUBAREAS
SEA SEASONS
SEAC SEASON TO CROP MAP
SEAM MAPPING FROM SEASONS TO MONTHS
SEAl
SEA1M
T TECHNOLOGY
T1 SUB ZONES BY GW QUALITY
V
W WATER STRESS LEVEL
Z AGROCLIMATIC ZONES
ZSA CANAL-SUBAREA TO AGROCLIMATIC ZONE MAPPING
Zl ZONE SELECTION FOR THIS RUN

PARAMETERS

BUFF ADJUSTMENT FACTOR FOR BUFFLOES POP. IN THE IRRIGATED AREAS

CA TOTAL CROPPED AREA (FRESH + SALINE THOUSAND ACRES)
CAC
CADIFF CROPPED AREA DIFFERENCE MODEL - ACTUAL
CAG CROPPED AREA BY GROUND WATER QUALITY(OOO ACRES)
CAT CROPPED AREA BY TECHNOLOGY (THOUSAND ACRES)
CHILI
CNEFF CANAL EFFICIENCY FROM CANAL HEAD TO THE WATERCOURSE HEAD
COWF ADJUSTMENT FACTOR FOR CDWS POPULATION IN THE IRRIGATED AREAS
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 506
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

PARAMETERS

CROPAREA CROPPED AREA 1988 (OOO'S ACRES)

DIVPOST AVERAGE(1976-77 TO 1987-88) CANAL DIVERSIONS(MAF)
ORC RUN-OFF PORTION OF RAINFALL

EMISC ECONOMIC MISCELLENIOUS PRICES

EMISCCT ECONOMIC WATER CHARGES AND MISCILLENIOUS COSTS(RS PER ACRE)

ENDPR PRICE (RUPEES PER KGS OR LITER)

ENDPRICE
EPP ECONOMIC PRICE OF PROTEIN CONCENTRATE (RS PER KGS)

EQEVAPZ EVAPORATION FROM THE EQUAIFER BY ACZ (FEET)

ESALEP ECONOMIC SALE PRICE FOR CROP AND LIVESTOCK COMODITIES (RS PER KG OR PER LITER)

ESEEDP ECONOMIC SEED PRICE

EWAGE ECONOMIC WAGE RATE (RS PER MAN-HOUR)

EXPLIMIT EXPORT LIMITS BY ZONE

EXPORTP EXPORT PRICES FOR THE SCENARIO

FERT FERTILIZER APPLICATIONS (KG PER ACRE)

FLEFFZ WEIGHTED FIELD EFFICIENCY BY ZONE

FSALEP FINANCIAL SALE PRICE FOR CROP AND LIVESTOCK COMODITIES (RS PER KG OR PER LITER)

GWTSA GOVERNMENT TUBEWELL PUMPAGE BY CANAL AND SUBAREA(KAF)

GWT1 PUBLIC TUBEWELL PUMPAGE AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)

IMPORTP IMPORT PRICES FOR THE SCENARIO

INFLOW INFLOWS FOR THIS RUN (MAF)

IOUVE LIVESTOCK INPUT OUTPUT COEFFICIENTS BY ZONES

LABFAC FACTOR TO CONVERT WAGE TO THE RESERVATION WAGE

N
LAND LAND OCCUPATION BY MONTH lJ1
LINKLOSS
LLOSS
REPORT ON LOSSES IN THE LINK CANALS
LINK CANAL LOSS FACTORS

"'"

LNKSP PROPORTION OF SEEPAGE FROM LINK CANALS TO ACZ

LOSSGAIN LOSSES AND GAINS BY RIVER REACH

MISC FINANCIAL MISCELLENIOUS PRICES

MISCCT FINANCIAL WATER CHARGES AND MISCILLENIOUS COSTS(RS PER ACRE)

PAFOD BIG NUMBER FOR ARTIFICAL FODDER

PAWAT BIG NUMBER FOR ARTIFICIAL WATER

POWERCHAR POWER GENERATION CHRACTERSITICS OF HRDRO STATIONS

PP FINANCIAL PURCHASE PRICE OF PROTEIN (RS PER KGS)

RAIN RAIN (INCHES)

RATIOFS FRESH AND SALINE CCA AS A PROPORTION OFF TOTAL

RCAP LIVE CAPACITY OF RESRVOIRS (MAF)

REP100 ARTIFICIAL WATER USED AT THE NODES (MAF)

REP 110 COST OF ARTIFICIAL WATER AT NODES (MILLION RUPEES)

REP120 COST OF IMPORTS ARTIFICIAL WATER AND FODDER (MILLION RUPEES)

REP130 REPORT ON SYSTEM INFLOWS AND OUTFLOWS(MAF)

REP45
REP46 SLACK LAND BY MONTH (THOUSAND ACRES)

REP47 LAND USED BY MONTH (THOUSAND ACRES)

REP48 FERTLIZER NUTRIENTS USED (THOUSAND TONNS)

REP49A REPORT ON PRODUCTION(THOUSAND TONNS MILK IN MILLION LITERS)

REP49B PRODUCTION COMPARISON (UNITS AS IN REP49A)

REP49C CONSUMPTION (UNITS AS IN REP49A)

REP49D IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (UNITS AS IN REP49A)

REP50 REPORT ON TOTAL INCOME AND COST (FINANCIAL PRICES) (MILLION RUPEES)

REP52 REPORT ON INCOME AND COST PER ACRE OF CCA (RUPEES)

REP54 REPORT ON INCOME AND COST PER FARM HOUSEHOLD (RUPEES)

REP56 REPORT ON INCOME AND COST BASED ON INTERNATIONAL PRICES (MILLION RUPEES)

REP57 REPORT ON INCOME AND COST PER ACRE OF CCA BASED ON INTERNATIONAL PRICES (RUPEES)

INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 507
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

PARAMETERS

REP58 REPORT ON INCOME AND COST PER HOUSEHOLD BASED ON INTERERNATIONAL PRICES (RUPEES)

REP59 REPORT ON LABOR UTILIZATION (MILLION MAN HOURS )

REP60 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)

REP70 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE WATERCOURSE HEAD (MAF)

REP72 SURFACE WATER DIVERSIONS AT THE CANAL HEAD BY CANAL (MAF)

REP72A SURFACE WATER DIVERSIONS AT THE CANAL HEAD BY REGION(MAF)

REP73 POST TARBELA DIVERSIONS AT THE CANAL HEAD BY CANAL (MAF)

REP74 DIFFERENCE OF CANAL DIVERSIONS BY THE MODEL AND POST TARBELA (MAF)

REP75 SURFACE WATER DIVERSION AT THE CANAL HEAD BY ZONE (MAF)

REP77 SURFACE WATER FLOW TO NODE N FROM NODE Nl (MAF)

REP77A REPORT ON RIVER LOSSES AND GAINS

REP79
REP80 REPORT ON GROUNDWATER BALANCE (MAF)

REP82 REPORT ON GROUNDWATER BALANCE (MAF)

REP85 REPORT ON GROUNDWATER BALANCE PER ACRE OFF CCA (AF )

REP90
REP95
RESOURCE ENDOWMENTS BY ACZ AND GROUNDWATER QUALITY

RES88 AVAILABLE RESOURCES 1988

REVAPL EVAPORATION LOSSES FROM RESERVOIRS (KAF)

RIVERB COEFFICIENTS FOR RIVER ROUTING

RIVERCD COEFFICIENTS FOR RIVER ROUTING

RIVSP PROPORTION OF RIVER SEEPAGE TO GROUNDWATER IN ACZ N

VI
SHOP FINANCIAL SEED PRICE (RS PER KGS) VI

SPFC PORTION OF CANAL LOSSES TO GROUNDWATER

SPFRV PDRTION OF RIVER SEEPAGE TO GROUND WATER

SPFWF PORTION OF WATERCOURSE AND FIELD LOSSES TO GW

SUBDEF SUB-AREA DEFINITION(PROPORTION OF CCA) BY CANALS

SUBIRRZ SUBIRRIGATION BY ACZ (FEET)

SYLDS STRAW YIELD AND SEED DATA

TEST
TOT PROD TOTAL PRODUCTION 1988 (OOO'S TONS)

TRIB TRIBUTARY INFLOWS FOR THIS RUN (MAF)

TWEFFZ WEIGHTED PRIVATE TUBEWELL DELIVERY EFFICIENCY BY ZONE

WAGE FINANCIAL WAGE RATES (RS PER MAN-HOUR)

WATER WATER REQUIREMENTS(ACRE FEET PER ACRE)

WCEFF WATERCOURSE COMMAND DELIVERY EFFICIENCY

WCEFFZ WEIGHTED WATER COURSE COMMAND DELIVERY EFFICIENCY BY ZONE

WNR WATER REQUIREMENTS NET OF RAIN

WYC WEIGTHED YIELD (METRIC TONS)

YIELD YIELD BY ZONE CROP TECHNOLOGY IN METRIC TONNS

ZWT WEIGHTING FACTOR TO MAP RAIN EVAP AND EFFICIENCIES TO ZONES

VARIABLES

ANIMAL PRODUCTION OF LIVESTOCK TYPE A (THOUSANDS)

ARTFOD ARTIFICIAL FODDER SUPPLY EQUAIVALENT OF RAB-FOO (000 TONNS)

ARTWATER WATER FROM IMAGINARY SOURCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)

ARTWATERND WATER FROM IMAGINARY SOURCE AT NODES (MAF)

CANALDIV CANAL DIVERSION AT THE CANAL HEAD (MAF)

CONSUMP ON FARM CONSUMPTION (000 METRIC TONNS)

EXPORT EXPORT OF COMODITIES (000 METRIC TONNS)

F FLOW TO NODE N FROM NODE N1 (MAF)

INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 508
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

VARIABLES
FAMILYL FAMILY LABOR USED (MILLION MAN HOURS)
HIREDL HIRED LABOR USED (MILLION MAN HOURS)
IMPORT IMPORT OF COMOOITIES (CROP COMM. 000 M. TONS LIVESTOCK MILL. KGS OR LITERS)
ITR INVESTMENT IN INCREASED TRACTOR CAPACITY (000 TRACTOR-HRS PER MONTH)
ITW INVESTMENT IN INCREASED PRIVATE TUBEWELL CAPACITY (KAF PER MONTH)
NAT PROVINCIAL DEMAND LINEARIZED
PPC PURCHASES OF PROTEIN CONCENTRATES (THOUSANO METRIC TONS)
PRODA ARTIFICIAL SUPPLY
PRODT PRODUCTION (CROP COMMODITIES 000 METRIC TONS LIVESTOCK COMM MILL. KGS OR LITERS)
RCONT END OF THE MONTH RESRVOIR CONTENTS (MAF)
SLKLAND SLACK LAND (THOUSAND ACRES)
SLKWATER SLACK WATER AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)
TS PRIVATE TRACTOR SERVICES USE BY MONTH (THOUSAND HRS)
TW PRIVATE TUBEWELL WATER USED BY MONTH M (KAF)
X CROPPED AREA BY TECHNOLOGY (THOUSANO ACRES)

COMPILATION TIME 2.900 SECONDS VER: IBM-TB-002

I'J
U1
01
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 509
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3800 SET PSR PRICE SCENARIO FOR THE MODEL(FINANCIAL PRICES)

87-88

3800 SET Z1 ZONE SELECTION FOR THIS RUN

NWFP. PMW PCW PSW . PRW , SCWN, SRWN, SCWS. SRWS

3800 SET ISR IRRIGATION SYSTEM SCENARIO FOR THIS RUN

1988

N
I.JI
......
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 510
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4101 CCA - CULTURABLE COMMANDED AREA (MILLION ACRES)

CCAP - CANAL CAPACITY AT THE CANAL HEAD (MAF/MONTH)
POP - FARM POPULATION (THOUSANDS)
TRACTORS - NUMBER OF EXISTING TRACTORS
TWC - EXISTNG PRIVATE TUBEWELL CAPACITY (KAF/MONTH)

4101 PARAMETER REP45

NWFP PMW PCW PSW PRW SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS

FRESH .CCA 0.628 1.839 8.795 3.065 2.782 1.845 1.576 0.410
FRESH .CCAP 0.333 0.829 4.031 1.072 1.223 0.864 1.376 0.157
FRESH .FARMPOP 371.000 364.237 2024.993 1004.324 1016.000 248.423 211.209 83.250
FRESH .FARMHH 174.000 172.212 878.357 408.420 513.000 108.300 90.723 40.377
FRESH .TRACTORS 7465.000 9177.545 67904.130 31904.885 44564.000 4197.009 1489.580 1297.784
FRESH .TUBEWELLS 2638.000 12265.000 109658.000 37952.000 49897.000 9573.000 4863.000 10348.000
FRESH .TWC 94.183 437.891 3915.060 1354.980 1781.446 341.780 173.621 369.449
FRESH .BULLOCKS 151.000 252.984 1547.098 663.509 368.000 204.795 174.274 65.190
FRESH .COWS 505.000 560.833 1993.707 735.296 590.000 226.865 204.396 92.500
FRESH .BUFFALOS 319.000 371. 095 3242.804 2028.860 2279.000 299.750 210.492 81.781
SALINE. CCA 0.574 2.450 1.333 1.749 2.819 2.381 2.775
SALINE. CCAP 0.202 1. 131 0.404 0.909 2.291 0.944 2.476
SALINE. FARMPOP 113.763 564.007 436.676 235.577 377.791 483.750 176.000
SALINE. FARMHH 53.788 244.643 177.580 102.700 162.277 234.623 88.000
N
SALINE. TRACTORS 2866.455 18912.870 13872.115 3979.991 2664.420 7541.216 2702.000 U1
SALINE. BULLOCKS 79.016 430.902 288.491 194.205 311.726 378.810 143.000 Q)

SALINE. COWS 175.167 555.293 319.704 215. 135 365.604 537.500 256.000
SALINE .BUFFALOS 115.905 903.196 882.140 284.250 376.508 475.219 249.000
TOTAL .CCA 0.628 2.413 11.245 4.398 2.782 3.594 4.395 2.791 2.775
TOTAL .CCAP 0.333 1.031 5.162 1.476 1.223 1.772 3.668 1. 101 2.476
TOTAL .FARMPOP 371.000 478.000 2589.000 1441.000 1016.000 484.000 589.000 567.000 176.000
TOTAL .FARMHH 174.000 226.000 1123.000 586.000 513.000 211.000 253.000 275.000 88.000
TOTAL .TRACTORS 7465.000 12044.000 86817.000 45777.000 44564.000 8177.000 4154.000 8839.000 2702.000
TOTAL .TUBEWELLS 2638.000 12265.000 109658.000 37952.000 49897.000 9573.000 4863.000 10348.000
TOTAL .TWC 94. 183 437.891 3915.060 1354.980 1781.446 341.780 173.621 369.449
TOTAL .BULLOCKS 151.000 332.000 1978.000 952.000 368.000 399.000 486.000 444.000 143.000
TOTAL .COWS 505.000 736.000 2549.000 1055.000 590.000 442.000 570.000 630.000 256.000
TOTAL .BUFFALOS 319.000 487.000 4146.000 2911.000 2279.000 584.000 587.000 557.000 249.000

+ PUNJAB SIND PAKISTAN

FRESH .CCA 16.482 3.831 20.941

FRESH .CCAP 7.155 2.397 9.885
FRESH .FARMPOP 4409.553 542.881 5323.435
FRESH .FARMHH 1971. 990 239.400 2385.390
FRESH .TRACTORS 153550.561 6984.373 167999.934
FRESH .TUBEWELLS 209772.000 24784.000 237194.000
FRESH .TWC 7489.376 884.850 8468.409
FRESH .BULLOCKS 2831.591 444.259 3426.850
FRESH .COWS 3879.836 523.761 4908.597
FRESH .BUFFALOS 7921.759 592.023 8832.782
SALINE-CCA 4.357 9.724 14.081
SALINE.CCAP 1.737 6.620 8.357
SALINE. FARMPOP 1114.447 1273.119 2387.565
SALINE. FARMHH 476.010 587.600 1063.610
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FIlENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 511
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4101 PARAMETER REP45

+ PUN,JAB SIND PAKISTAN

SALINE. TRACTORS 35651.439 16887.627 52539.066

SALINE .BULLOCKS 798.409 1027.741 1826.150
SALINE .COWS 1050.164 1374.239 2424.403
SALINE .BUFFALOS 1901.241 1384.977 3286.218
TOTAL .CCA 20.839 13.555 35.022
TOTAL .CCAP 8.892 9.017 18.242
TOTAL .FARMPOP 5524.000 1816.000 7711.000
TOTAL .FARMHH 2448.000 827.000 3449.000
TOTAL .TRACTORS 189202.000 23872.000 220539.000
TOTAL .TUBEWELLS 209772.000 24784.000 237194.000
TOTAL .TWC 7489.376 884.850 8468.409
TOTAL .BULLOCKS 3630.000 1472.000 5253.000
TOTAL . COWS 4930.000 1898.000 7333.000
TOTAL .BUFFALOS 9823.000 1977 .000 12119.000

4106 PARAMETER CAT CROPPED AREA BY TECHNOLOGY (THOUSAND ACRES)

INDEX FRESH

NWFP PMW PCW PSW PRW SCWN SRWN SCWS PUN,JAB N

lJ1
10
BULLOCK .BASMATI 465.570 336.860 311.316 1113.747
BULLOCK .IRRI 112.152 300.244 347.961 68.238 412.396
BULLOCK .COTTON 2503.610 613.683 130.493 2503.610
BULLOCK .RAB-FOD 231.985 356.659 459.628 25.484 6.339 1048.272
BULLOCK .GRAM 148.713 746.930 81.839 104.158 48.865 14.114 3.350 1082.240
BULLOCK .MAIZE 19.516 16.319 215.611 291.990
BULLOCK .MUS+RAP 35.087 10.391 276.952 15.432 44.159 49.580 18.342 3.841 347.534
BULLOCK .KHA-FOD 54.505 338.210 145.950 420.582 3.569 31 . 145 904.802
BULLOCK .SC-MIlL 131.624 554.961 52.157 206.684 81.742 607.724
BULLOCK .SC-GUR 21.379 161.417 103.769 19.624 23.215 1.919 20.247 306.188
BULLOCK .WHEAT 13.121 329.239 3214.052 481.981 885.648 716.328 951.306 120.513 4916.920
BULLOCK .ORCHARD 300.000 2.891 7.000 20.521 300.000
SEMI-MECH.BASMATI 111.402 894.130 1005.532
SEMI-MECH.IRRI 6.951 27.032
SEMI-MECH.COTTON 314.731 2829.914 853.953 5.861 3998.598
SEMI-MECH.RAB-FOD 68.349 503.958 81.401 503.958
SEMI-MECH.GRAM 86.664
SEMI -MECH. MAl Z E 179.548
SEMI-MECH.KHA-FOD 18.103 18.103
SEMI-MECH.SC-GUR 35.158
SEMI-MECH.WHEAT 211.070 497.082 2518.215 1587.057 998.069 130.991 21.638 142.493 5600.423
SEMI-MECH.ORCHARD 27.000 93.000 242.000 56.000 391.000
SEMI-MECH.POTATOES 9.143 10.406 58.168 29.156 19.195 2.249 1.834 1.662 118.125
SEMI-MECH.ONIONS 5.817 9.893 42.938 24.516 16.651 1.652 1.316 1.204 93.998
SEMI -MECH. CHI lLl 11.200 13.301 22.911 36.549 23.911 10.284 13 249 1.842 96.144
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 512
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4106 PARAMETER CAT CROPPED AREA BY TECHNOLOGY (THOUSAND ACRES)

INDEX 1 = FRESH
+ SIND PAKISTAN

BULLOCK . BASMATI 1113.747

BULLOCK .IRRI 416.198 828.594
BULLOCK . COTTON 744.176 3247.846
BULLOCK .RAB-FOO 31.824 1080.096
BULLOCK . GRAM 66.929 1149.169
BULLOCK .MAIZE 311.506
BULLOCK . MUS+RAP 71.769 454.390
BULLOCK .KHA-FOD 34.713 994.020
BULLOCK .SC-MILL 294.426 1039.774
BULLOCK .SC-GUR 45.441 351.629
BUllOCK . WHEAT 1794.147 6724.788
BULLOCK . ORCHARD 30.412 330.412
SEMI-MECH.BASMATI 1005.532
SEMI-MECH.IRRI 33.982 33.982
SEMI-MECH.COTTON 5.861 4004.458
SEMI-MECH.RAB-FOD 81.401 653.708
SEMI-MECH.GRAM 86.664
SEMI -MECH.MAIZE 179.548
SEMI-MECH.KHA-FOD 78.103 N
<J\
SEMI-MECH.SC-GUR 35.758 0
SEMI-MECH.WHEAT 301.122 6112.615
SEMI-MECH.ORCHARD 418.000
SEMI-MECH.POTATOES 5.744 133.012
SEMI-MECH.ONIONS 4.171 103.987
SEMI -MECH. CHILLI 25.376 133.321

INDEX 1 = SALINE

PMW PCW PSW SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS PUNJAB SINO

BULLOCK .BASMATI 59.483 9.983 69.466

BULLOCK .IRRI 3.363 510.992 117.758 331. 335 3.363 960.086
BULLOCK . COTTON 308.664 381.135 426.690 308.664 807.825
BULLOCK .RAB-FOD 48.893 18.264 124.587 160.190 49.517 119.399 67.158 453.693
BULLOCK .GRAM 26.244 33.746 16.762 11.765 90.314 15.835 39.201 76.751 157.114
BULLOCK .MAIZE 1.820 3.923 5.743
BULLOCK .MUS+RAP 1.834 12.390 3.161 12.690 104.021 16.482 12.638 17.384 145.830
BULLOCK .KHA-FOD 43.219 39.899 42.374 44.091 98.228 27.140 71.776 125.492 241.236
BULLOCK .SC-MILL 210.657 193.455 25.546 79.897 113.137 404.112 218.580
BULLOCK .SC-GUR 3.773 17.935 21.254 18.994 4.018 39.304 27.836 42.962 90.152
BULLOCK . WHEAT 39.283 274.337 92.969 361.305 291.522 558.865 423.061 406.588 1634.753
BULLOCK . ORCHARD 46.109 82.479 41.000 169.588
SEMI-MECH.IRRI 13.783 99.064 112.847
SEMI-MECH.COTTON 216.044 216.044
SEMI-MECH.RAB-FOD 92.441 92.441
SEMI-MECH.KHA-FOD 34.011 34.011
SEMI-MECH.WHEAT 123.374 137.215 328.839 34.346 127.007 156.122 589.428 317.474
SEMI-MECH.POTATOES 0.857 2.282 2.289 7.733 11.786 8.649 4.307 5.428 32.475
SEMI-MECH.ONIONS 0.623 1.671 1.673 6.835 10.521 8.446 3.585 3.967 29.388
SEMI-MECH.CHILLI 0.954 44.744 2.569 2.104 4.137 10.340 5.164 48.268 21.745
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 513
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4106 PARAMETER CAT CROPPED AREA BY TECHNDLOGY (THOUSAND ACRES)

INDEX 1 SALINE

+ PAKISTAN

BULLOCK .BASMATI 69.466

BULLOCK .IRRI 963.449
BULLOCK . COTTON 1116.489
BULLOCK .RAB-FOD 520.851
BULLOCK .GRAM 233.866
BULLOCK .MAIZE 5.743
BULLOCK .MUS+RAP 163.215
BULLOCK .KHA-FOD 366.728
BULLOCK .SC-MILL 622.692
BULLOCK .SC-GUR 133.113
BULLOCK .WHEAT 2041.341
BULLOCK . ORCHARD 169.588
SEMI-MECH.IRRI 112.847
SEMI-MECH.COTTON 216.044
SEMI-MECH.RAB-FOD 92.441
SEMI-MECH.KHA-FOD 34.011
SEMI-MECH.WHEAT 906.902
SEMI-MECH.POTATOES 37.903
SEMI-MECH.ONIONS 33.355 N
01
SEMI-MECH.CHILLI 70.012 ....
INDEX 1 TOTAL

NWFP PMW PCW PSW PRW SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS

BULLOCK .BASMATI 525.053 346.843 311.316

BULLOCK .IRRI 115.515 300.244 858.953 185.996 331.335
BULLOCK .COTTON 2812.333 994.818 557.183
BULLOCK .RAB-FOD 280.879 374.923 459.628 124.587 185.675 55.857 119.399
BULLOCK . GRAM 174.957 780.676 98.601 104.758 60.630 105.028 19.185 39.201
BULLOCK .MAIZE 19.516 18.199 279.534
BULLOCK . MUS+RAP 35.087 12.225 289.341 18.593 44.759 62.270 122.363 20.328 12.638
BULLOCK .KHA-FOD 54.505 381.489 39.899 188.325 420.582 47.660 129.372 27.140 71.776
BULLOCK .SC-MILL 137.624 765.624 246.212 206.684 25.546 167.639 113.137
BULLOCK .SC-GUR 25. 151 179.352 125.023 19.624 42.208 5.996 59.551 27.836
BULLOCK . WHEAT 13.721 368.522 3488.388 580.950 885.648 1077.632 1248.827 679.379 423.061
BULLOCK . ORCHARD 300.000 49.000 7.000 103.000 41.000
SEMI-MECH.BASMATI 111.402 894.130
SEMI-MECH.IRRI 20.734 126.095
SEMI-MECH.COTTON 314.731 3045.958 853.953 5.861
SEMI-MECH.RAB-FOD 68.349 596.399 81.401
SEMI-MECH.GRAM 86.664
SEMI-MECH.MAIZE 179.548
SEMI-MECH.KHA-FOD 112.113
SEMI -MECH. SC-GUR 35.758
SEMI-MECH.WHEAT 211.070 620.456 2655.430 1915.896 998.069 165.336 154.645 298.615
SEMI-MECH.ORCHARD 27.000 93.000 242.000 56.000
SEMI-MECH.POTATOES 9.143 11.263 60.450 32.045 19.795 9.981 13.620 10.310 4.307
SEMI-MECH.ONIONS 5.817 10.516 44.609 26.189 16.651 8.487 11.837 9.650 3.585
SEMI -MECH. CHILLI 11.200 14.261 67.722 39.118 23.911 12.388 17.387 12. 182 5.164
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 514
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4106 PARAMETER CAT CROPPED AREA BY TECHNOLOGY (THOUSAND ACRES)

INDEX 1 = TOTAL

+ PUNJAB SIND PAKISTAN

BULLOCK . BASMATI 1183.212 1183.212

BULLOCK .IRRI 415.759 1376.284 1792.043
BULLOCK . COTTON 2812.333 1552.002 4364.335
BULLOCK .RAB-FOD 1115.429 485.517 1600.946
BULLOCK .GRAM 1158.992 224.043 1383.035
BULLOCK .MAIZE 297.733 317.249
BULLOCK .MUS+RAP 364.919 217.599 617.605
BULLOCK .KHA-FOD 1030.294 275.949 1360.748
BULLOCK .SC-MILL 1011.836 513.006 1662.466
BULLOCK .SC-GUR 349.150 135.592 484.742
BULLOCK .WHEAT 5323.508 3428.900 8766.129
BULLOCK .ORCHARD 300.000 200.000 500.000
SEMI-MECH.BASMATI 1005.532 1005.532
SEMI-MECH.IRRI 146.829 146.829
SEMI-MECH.COTTON 4214.641 5.861 4220.502
SEMI-MECH.RAB-FOD 596.399 81.401 746.149
SEMI-MECH.GRAM 86.664
SEMI-MECH.MAIZE 179.548
SEMI-MECH.KHA-FOD 112.113 112.113 N
0\
SEMI-MECH.SC-GUR 35.758 N
SEMI-MECH.WHEAT 6189.851 618.596 7019.517
SEMI-MECH.ORCHARD 391.000 418.000
SEMI-MECH.POTATOES 123.553 38.219 170.915
SEMI-MECH.ONIONS 97.965 33.559 137.342
SEMI-MECH.CHILLI 145.012 47.120 203.333

4106 PARAMETER REP46 SLACK LAND BY MONTH (THOUSAND ACRES)

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

NWFP .FRESH 32.9 32.9 81.1 315.0 252.6 127.8 127.8 116.3
NWFP .TOTAL 32.9 32.9 81.1 315.0 252.6 127.8 127.8 116.3
PMW .FRESH 214.8 214.8 202.0 674.4 980.1 980.1 980.1 1113.9
PMW SALINE 285.9 285.9 246.8 284.3 437.9 492.4 492.4 492.4 517.9
PMW .TOTAL 500.8 500.8 246.8 486.3 1112.4 1472.5 1472.5 1472.5 1631.8
PCW .FRESH 689.9 689.9 678.4 3522.5 2147.6 1836.6 1828.5 1828.5 1339.0
PCW SALINE 1710.6 1710.6 1668.3 1897.8 1581.2 1548.1 1547.1 1547.1 1525.8
PCW .TOTAL 2400.5 2400.5 2346.7 5420.3 3728.8 3384.7 3375.6 3375.6 2864.8
PSW .FRESH 83.5 83.5 203.9 1500.5 1044.3 906.4 979.4 971.7
PSW SALINE 654.1 654.1 633.2 656.2 1083.5 1061.2 1059.2 1080.4 1078.8
PSW .TOTAL 737.6 737.6 633.2 860.0 2584.0 2105.4 1965.7 2059.8 2050.5
PRW .FRESH 177.5 199.9 129.1 1996.3 756.6 756.6 756.6 922.1
PRW .TOTAL 177 .5 199.9 129.1 1996.3 756.6 756.6 756.6 922.1
SCWN .FRESH 570.7 572.3 597.6 1216.8 987.8 987.8 989.6 987.8 882.5
SCWN SALINE 1122.9 1129.8 1121. 8 1346.0 1245.3 1245.3 1267.3 1245.3 1156.7
SCWN .TOTAL 1693.6 1702.1 1719.4 2562.9 2233.1 2233.1 2256.9 2233.1 2039.2
SRWN .FRESH 507.1 508.5 503.9 1525.7 1348.4 1160.9 1160.9 1160.9 1123.9
SRWN -.SALINE 1989.9 2000.5 2175.3 2738.3 2386.2 2081.2 2081.2 2081.2 1858.0
SRWN .TOTAL 2497.1 2508.9 2679.2 4264.0 3734.6 3242.0 3242.0 3242.0 2981.9
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 515
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4106 PARAMETER REP46 SLACK LAND BY MONTH (THOUSAND ACRES)

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

sews .FRESH 1.2 2.9 106.4 75.1 76.7 76.7 76.7 68.7
sews SALINE 1355. 1 1363.6 1358.6 1625.5 1595.4 1607.8 1621. 4 1607.8 1558. 1
sews .TOTAL 1355. 1 1364.8 1361. 5 1732.0 1670.5 1684.4 1698.0 1684.4 1626.7
SRWS SALINE 1985.7 1989.3 2119.3 2590.4 2189.9 2189.9 2189.9 2189.9 2102.0
SRWS .TOTAL 1985.7 1989.3 2119.3 2590.4 2189.9 2189.9 2189.9 2189.9 2102.0
PUNJAB . FRESH 1165.7 1188. 1 678.4 4057.5 6318.8 4617.6 4471.6 4544.6 4346.8
PUNJAB SALINE 2650.7 2650.7 2548.4 2838.4 3102.6 3101.6 3098.8 3119.9 3122.5
PUNJAB .TOTAL 3816.4 3838.8 3226.7 6895.8 9421.5 7719.3 7570.4 7664.5 7469.3
SIND .FRESH 1077 .8 1082.0 1104.3 2849.0 2411.3 2225.3 2227.1 2225.3 2075.1
SIND SALINE 6453.7 6483.0 6775. 1 8300.3 7416.8 7124. 1 7159.8 7124. 1 6674.8
SIND .TOTAL 7531.4 7565.0 7879.4 11149.3 9828.0 9349.5 9386.9 9349.5 8749.9
PAKISTAN. FRESH 2276.4 2302.9 1782.7 6987.5 9045.1 7095.6 6826.5 6897.7 6538.2
PAKISTAN. SALINE 9104.3 9133.7 9323.4 11138.6 10519.4 10225.8 10258.5 10244.1 9797.3
PAKISTAN. TOTAL 11380.7 11436.6 11106.1 18126.2 19564.5 17321.3 17085.0 17141.8 16335.4

+ OCT NOV DEC

NWFP .FRESH 112.7 12.7

NWFP .TOTAL 112.7 12.7
PMW .FRESH 500.5 434.7 235.1
PMW SALINE 401.6 360.3 287.4 N
PMW .TOTAL 902.0 795.0 522.5 0\
w
PCW .FRESH 101.0 782.8
PCW SALINE 1334.9 1465.2 1713.7
PCW .TOTAL 1334.9 1566.2 2496.5
PSW .FRESH 573.1 97.8
PSW .SALINE 1068.8 918.7 656.1
PSW .TOTAL 1641. 9 1016.5 656.1
PRW .FRESH 410.1 391.0 213.9
PRW .TOTAL 410.1 391.0 213.9
SCWN .FRESH 446.8 269.0 570.7
SCWN SALINE 912.0 933.4 1122.9
SCWN .TOTAL 1358.8 1202.4 1693.6
SRWN FRESH 620.5 326.3 507.1
SRWN SALINE 1558.6 1687.0 1989.9
SRWN .TOTAL 2179. 1 2013.2 2497.1
SCWS .FRESH 0.9
SCWS SALINE 1229.4 1360.3 1355. 1
SCWS .TOTAL 1229.4 1361.2 1355. 1
SRWS SALINE 1799.3 1988.3 1985.7
SRWS .TOTAL 1799.3 1988.3 1985.7
PUNJAB .FRESH 1483.7 1024.5 1231. 9
PUNJAB SALINE 2805.3 2744.2 2657.2
PUNJAB .TOTAL 4289 0 3768.7 3889.0
SIND .FRESH 1067.3 596.1 1077 .8
SIND SALINE 5499.3 5968.9 6453.7
SIND .TOTAL 6566.6 6565.1 7531.4
PAKISTAN. FRESH 2551.0 1733.3 2322.4
PAKISTAN. SALINE 8304.6 8713.2 9110.8
PAKISTAN. TOTAL 10855.6 10446.4 11433.2
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 516
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4106 PARAMETER REP47 LAND USED BY MONTH (THOUSAND ACRES)

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

NWFP FRESH 595.1 595.1 628.0 546.9 313.0 375.4 500.2 500.2 511.7
NWFP .TOTAL 595.1 595.1 628.0 546.9 313.0 375.4 500.2 500.2 511.7
PMW .FRESH 1624.1 1624.1 1838.9 1636.9 1164.5 858.8 858.8 858.8 725.0
PMW SALINE 288.4 288.4 327.5 290.0 136.4 82.0 82.0 82.0 56.5
PMW .TOTAL 1912.5 1912.5 2166.4 1926.9 1300.9 940.7 940.7 940.7 781.4
pew .FRESH 8105.6 8105.6 8117.1 5273.0 6647.9 6958.9 6967.0 6967.0 7456.5
PCW SALINE 739.1 739.1 781.4 551.9 868.6 901.7 902.6 902.6 924.0
PCW .TOTAL 8844.7 8844.7 8898.6 5824.9 7516.4 7860.6 7869.7 7869.7 8380.5
PSW .FRESH 2981.8 2981.8 3065.3 2861.4 1564.8 2021.0 2158.9 2085.9 2093.6
PSW SALINE 678.7 678.7 699.6 676.6 249.3 271.6 273.6 252.4 254.0
PSW .TOTAL 3660.4 3660.4 3764.9 3538.0 1814.1 2292.6 2432.4 2338.2 2347.5
PRW .FRESH 2604.9 2582.6 2782.4 2653.3 786.1 2025.8 2025.8 2025.8 1860.3
PRW .TOTAL 2604.9 2582.6 2782.4 2653.3 786.1 2025.8 2025.8 2025.8 1860.3
seWN .FRESH 1274.1 1272.5 1247.2 628.0 857.0 857.0 855.2 857.0 962.3
seWN SALINE 626.5 619.6 627.6 403.4 504.1 504.1 482.1 504.1 592.7
seWN .TOTAL 1900.6 1892. 1 1874.8 1031. 3 1361. 1 1361. 1 1337.3 1361.1 1555.0
SRWN .FRESH 1068.9 1067.5 1072.1 50.3 227.6 415.1 415.1 415.1 452.1
SRWN SALINE 829.1 818.5 643.7 80.7 432.8 737.8 737.8 737.8 961.0
SRWN .TOTAL 1897.9 1886.1 1715.8 131.0 660.4 1153.0 1153.0 1153.0 1413.1
sews .FRESH 409.8 408.6 406.9 303.3 334.7 333.1 333.1 333.1 341. 1
SCWS SALINE 1025.9 1017.5 1022.4 755.5 785.6 773.3 759.7 773.3 823.0
N
sews .TOTAL 1435.7 1426.0 1429.3 1058.8 1120.3 1106.4 1092.8 1106.4 1164. 1 0
SRWS SALINE 789.3 785.7 655.7 184.6 585.1 585.1 585.1 585.1 673.0 ~

SRWS .TOTAL 789.3 785.7 655.7 184.6 585.1 585.1 585.1 585.1 673.0
PUNJAB .FRESH 15316.4 15294.0 15803.7 12424.7 10163.3 11864.5 12010.5 11937.5 12135.3
PUNJAB SALINE 1706.2 1706.2 1808.5 1518.5 1254.2 1255.3 1258. 1 1236.9 1234.4
PUNJAB TOTAL 17022.6 17000.2 17612.3 13943.2 11417.5 13119.7 13268.6 13174.5 13369.7
SIND .FRESH 2752.8 2748.6 2726.2 981.6 1419.3 1605.2 1603.4 1605.2 1755.4
SIND SALINE 3270.8 3241. 4 2949.4 1424.2 2307.7 2600.3 2564.7 2600.3 3049.7
SINO .TOTAL 6023.6 5990.0 5675.6 2405.7 3727.0 4205.5 4168.1 4205.5 4805.1
PAKISTAN. FRESH 18664.3 18637.7 19158.0 13953.2 11895.6 13845.1 14114.2 14043.0 14402.5
PAKISTAN. SALINE 4977.0 4947.6 4757.9 2942.7 3561 9 3855.6 3822.8 3837.3 4284.0
PAKISTAN.TOTAL 23641. 3 23585.4 23915.9 16895.8 15457.5 17700.7 17937.0 17880.2 18686.6

+ OCT NOV DEC

NWFP .FRESH 628.0 515.3 615.3

NWFP .TOTAL 628 0 515.3 615.3
PMW .FRESH 1338.4 1404.2 1603.8
PMW SALINE 172.8 214.1 286.9
PMW . TOTAL 1511.2 1618.3 1890.7
pew .FRESH 8795.5 8694.5 8012.7
pew SALINE 1114.9 984.5 736.1
pew .TOTAL 9910.4 9679.0 8748.8
PSW .FRESH 2492.2 2967.5 3065.3
PSW SALINE 263.9 414.0 676.7
PSW .TOTAL 2756.1 3381.6 3742.0
PRW .FRESH 2372.3 2391.4 2568.5
PRW . TOTAL 2372.3 2391.4 2568.5
seWN .FRESH 1398.0 1575.8 1274.1
seWN SALINE 837.4 816.0 626.5
seWN .TOTAL 2235.4 2391.8 1900.6
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 517
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4106 PARAMETER REP47 LAND USED BY MONTH (THOUSAND ACRES)

+ OCT NOV DEC

SRWN .FRESH 955.5 1249.7 1068.9

SRWN SALINE 1260.4 1132.0 829.1
SRWN .TOTAL 2215.9 2381.8 1897.9
SCWS .FRESH 409.8 408.8 409.8
SCWS SALINE 1151.6 1020.8 1025.9
SCWS .TOTAL 1561.4 1429.6 1435.7
SRWS SALINE 975.7 786.7 789.3
SRWS .TOTAL 975.7 786.7 789.3
PUNJAB .FRESH 14998.4 15457.6 15250.3
PUNJAB SALINE 1551.6 1612.7 1699.7
PUNJAB .TOTAL 16550.0 17070.3 16950.0
SIND . FRESH 2763.2 3234.4 2752.8
SIND SALINE 4225.2 3755.5 3270.8
SIND .TOTAL 6988.4 6989.9 6023.6
PAKISTAN. FRESH 18389.7 19207.4 18618.3
PAKISTAN. SALINE 5776.8 5368.2 4970.5
PAKISTAN. TOTAL 24166.4 24575.6 23588.8

N
0\
VI
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME:WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 518
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4108 CROPPED AREA(OOO ACRES)

4108 PARAMETER CAG CROPPED AREA BY GROUND WATER QUAlITY(Ooo ACRES)

M-NWFP M-PMW M-PCW M-PSW M-PRW M-SCWN M-SRWN M-SCWS M-SRWS

FRESH . BASMA TI 465.6 448.3 1205.4

FRESH . I RRI 112.2 300.2 7.0 375.0 68.2
FRESH .COTTON 314.7 5333.6 854.0 613.7 136.4
FRESH .RAB-FOD 68.3 504.0 232.0 356.7 459.6 81.4 25.5 6.3
FRESH .GRAM 86.7 148.7 746.9 81.8 104.8 48.9 14.7 3.3
FRESH .MAIZE 199.1 16.4 275.6
FRESH .MUS+RAP 35.1 10.4 277.0 15.4 44.8 49.6 18.3 3.8
FRESH .KHA-FOD 54.5 416.4 146.0 420.6 3.6 31. 1
FRESH .SC-MIll 137.6 555.0 52.8 206.7 87.7
FRESH .SC-GUR 35.8 21.4 161. 4 103.8 19.6 23.2 2.0 20.2
FRESH .WHEAT 224.8 826.3 5732.3 2075.0 1883.7 847.3 984.9 263.0
FRESH .ORCHARD 27.0 93.0 300.0 242.0 56.0 2.9 7.0 20.5
FRESH .POTATOES 9.1 10.4 58.2 29.8 19.8 2.2 1.8 1.7
FRESH .ONIONS 5.8 9.9 42.9 24.5 16.7 1.7 1.3 1.2
FRESH .CHILLI 11.2 13.3 23.0 36.5 23.9 10.3 13.2 1.8
FRESH RABI 630.2 1624.1 8105.6 2981.8 2604.9 1274.1 1068.9 409.8
FRESH .KHARIF 465.2 858.8 6967.0 2158.9 2025.8 857.0 415.1 333.1
FRESH .ANNUAl 1095.4 2482.8 15072.7 5140.6 4630.7 2131. 1 1484.0 742.9 N
C\
SALINE .BASMATI 59.5 10.0 C\
SALINE. IRRI 3.4 13.8 610.1 117.8 331. 3
SALINE. COTTON 524.7 381.1 426.7
SALINE. RAB-FOD 92.4 48.9 18.3 124.6 160.2 49.5 119.4
SALINE .GRAM 26.2 33.7 16.8 11 .8 90.3 15.8 39.2
SALINE .MAIZE 1.8 3.9
SALINE. MUS+RAP 1.8 12.4 3.2 12.7 104.0 16.5 12.6
SALINE. KHA -FOD 77.2 39.9 42.4 44.1 98.2 27.1 71.8
SALI NE . SC -MI LL 210.7 193.5 25.5 79.9 113. 1
SALINE. SC-GUR 3.8 17.9 21.3 19.0 4.0 39.3 27.8
SALINE.WHEAT 162.7 411.6 421.8 395.7 418.5 715.0 423.1
SALINE. ORCHARD 46.1 82.5 41.0
SALINE .POTATOES 0.9 2.3 2.3 7.7 11.8 8.6 4.3
SAL! NE . ON IONS 0.6 1.7 1.7 6.8 10.5 8.4 3.6
SALI NE . CHI LLI 1.0 44.7 2.6 2.1 4.1 10.3 5.2
SALINE. RABI 288.4 739.1 678.7 626.5 829.1 1025.9 789.3
SALINE. KHARI F 82.0 902.6 273.6 504.1 737.8 773.3 585.1
SALINE. ANNUAL 370.4 1641.7 952.2 1130.6 1566.9 1799.2 1374.4
TOTAL .BASMATI 525.1 458.2 1205.4
TOTAL .IRRI 115.5 300.2 20.7 985.0 186.0 331.3
TOTAL . COTTON 314.7 5858.3 854.0 994.8 563.0
TOTAL .RAB-FOD 68.3 596.4 280.9 374.9 459.6 206.0 185.7 55.9 119.4
TOTAL .GRAM 86.7 175.0 780.7 98.6 104.8 60.6 105.0 19.2 39.2
TOTAL .MAIZE 199. 1 18.2 279.5
TOTAL . MUS+RAP 35.1 12.2 289.3 18.6 44 8 62.3 122.4 20.3 12.6
TOTAL .KHA-FOD 54.5 493.6 39.9 188.3 420.6 47.7 129.4 27.1 71.8
TOTAL .SC-MIlL 137.6 765.6 246.2 206.7 25.5 167.6 113.1
TOTAL .SC-GUR 35.8 25.2 179.4 125.0 19.6 42.2 6.0 59.6 27.8
TOTAL .WHEAT 224.8 989 0 6143.8 2496.8 1883.7 1243.0 1403.5 978.0 423.1
TOTAL .ORCHARD 27.0 93.0 300.0 242.0 56.0 49.0 7.0 103.0 41.0
TOTAL .POTATOES 9.1 11.3 60.4 32.0 19.8 10.0 13.6 10.3 4.3
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 519
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4108 PARAMETER CAG CROPPED AREA BY GROUND WATER QUALITY(OOO ACRES)

M-NWFP M,.PMW M-PCW M-PSW M-PRW M-SCWN M-SRWN M-SCWS M-SRWS

TOTAL .ONIONS 5.8 10.5 44.6 26.2 16.7 8.5 11.8 9.7 3.6
TOTAL .CHILLI 11.2 14.3 67.7 39.1 23.9 12.4 17.4 12.2 5.2
TOTAL .RABI 630.2 1912.5 8844.7 3660.4 2604.9 1900.6 1897.9 1435.7 789.3
TOTAL .KHARIF 465.2 940.7 7869.7 2432.4 2025.8 1361 . 1 1153.0 1106.4 585.1
TOTAL . ANNUAL 1095.4 2853.2 16714.4 6092.8 4630.7 3261.7 3050.9 2542. 1 1374.4

4109 CROPPED AREA COMPARISON( AREA 000 ACRES. INTENSITIES %

SC-MILL IS SC-MILL + SC-GUR AREAS

4109 PARAMETER CA TOTAL CROPPED AREA (FRESH + SALINE THOUSAND ACRES)

M-NWFP A-NWFP M-PMW A-PMW M-PCW A-PCW M-PSW A-PSW M-PRW A-PRW

BASMATI 25.0 525.1 396.0 458.2 391.0 1205.4 1189.0

IRRI 29.0 115 5 277.0 42.0 300.2 272.0
COTTON 314.7 270.0 5858.3 3820.0 854.0 614.0 78.0
RAB-FOD 68.3 47.0 596.4 158.0 280.9 1174.0 374.9 675.0 459.6 506.0
GRAM 86.7 132.0 175.0 389.0 780.7 746.0 98.6 218.0 104.8 233.0
MAIZE 199.1 78.0 18.2 41.0 279.5 N
51.0 9.0 0\
MUS+RAP 35.1 52.0 12.2 27.0 289.3 275.0 18.6 41.0 44.8 42.0
KHA-FOD 54.5 14.0 493.6 328.0 39.9 1332.0 188.3 698.0 420.6 374.0 "
SC-MILL 173.4 143.0 25.2 100.0 945.0 722.0 371.2 495.0 19.6 79.0
WHEAT 224.8 224.0 989.0 1168.0 6143.8 6324.0 2496.8 2688.0 1883.7 2141.0
ORCHARD 27.0 27.0 93.0 93.0 300.0 300.0 242.0 242.0 56.0 56.0
POTATOES 9.1 8.0 11.3 13.0 60.4 51.0 32.0 30.0 19.8 19.0
ONIONS 5.8 6.0 10.5 10.0 44.6 40.0 26.2 24.0 16.7 15.0
CHILLI 11.2 9.0 14.3 14.0 67.7 55.0 39.1 33.0 23.9 21.0
RABI 630.2 639.0 1912.5 1958.0 8844.7 9632.0 3660.4 4413.0 2604.9 3091.0
KHARIF 465.2 271.0 940.7 859.0 7869.7 6943.0 2432.4 2566.0 2025.8 2078.0
ANNUAL 1095.4 910.0 2853.2 2817 .0 16714.4 16575.0 6092 8 6979.0 4630.7 5169.0
R-INT 100.4 101.8 79.2 81 . 1 78.7 85.7 83.2 100.3 93.6 111. 1
K-INT 74.1 43.2 39.0 35.6 70.0 61.7 55.3 58.3 72.8 74.7
A-INT 174.4 144.9 118.2 116.7 148.6 147.4 138 5 158.7 166.4 185.8

+ M-SCWN A-SCWN M-SRWN A-SRWN M-SCWS A-SCWS M-SRWS A-SRWS M-PUNJAB A-PUNJAB

BASMATI 2188.7 2001.0

IRRI 20.7 19.0 985.0 951.0 186.0 196.0 331.3 325.0 415.8 620.0
COTTON 994.8 743.0 13.0 563.0 758.0 41.0 7027.0 4782.0
RAB-FOD 206.0 131.0 185.7 117.0 55.9 137.0 119.4 30.0 1711.8 2513.0
GRAM 60.6 58.0 105.0 100.0 19.2 22.0 39.2 38.0 1159.0 1586.0
MAIZE 297.7 101.0
MUS+RAP 62.3 63.0 122.4 124.0 20.3 25.0 12.6 13.0 364.9 385.0
KHA-FOD 47.7 72.0 129.4 4.0 27.1 59.0 71.8 7.0 1142.4 2732.0
SC-MILL 248.9 169.0 31.5 24.0 227.2 238.0 141.0 111.0 1361.0 1396.0
WHEAT 1243.0 1004.0 1403.5 590.0 978.0 921.0 423.1 101.0 11513.4 12321.0
ORCHARD 49.0 49.0 7.0 7.0 103.0 103.0 41.0 41.0 691.0 691.0
POTATOES 10.0 9.0 13.6 14.0 10.3 11.0 4.3 4.0 123.6 113.0
ONIONS 8.5 7.0 11 . e 11.0 9.7 8.0 3.6 3.0 98.0 89.0
CHILLI 12.4 10.0 17.4 15.0 12.2 12.0 5.2 4.0 145.0 123.0
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 520
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4109 PARAMETER CA TOTAL CROPPED AREA (FRESH + SALINE THOUSAND ACRES)

+ M-SCWN A-SCWN M-SRWN A-SRWN M-SCWS A-SCWS M-SRWS A-SRWS M-PUNJAB A-PUNJAB

RABI 1900.6 1500.0 1897.9 1002.0 1435.7 1477 .0 789.3 345.0 17022.6 19094.0
KHARIF 1361.1 1052.0 1153.0 999.0 1106.4 1354.0 585.1 525.0 13268.6 12446.0
ANNUAL 3261.7 2552.0 3050.9 2001.0 2542.1 2831.0 1374.4 870.0 30291.2 31540.0
R-INT 52.9 41.7 43.2 22.8 51.4 52.9 28.4 12.4 81.7 91.6
K-INT 37.9 29.3 26.2 22.7 39.6 48.5 21.1 18.9 63.7 59.7
A-INT 90.7 71.0 69.4 45.5 91.1 101. 4 49.5 31.4 145.4 151.4

+ M-SIND A-SIND M-PAKISTAN A-PAKISTAN

BASMATI 2188.7 2001.0

IRRI 1523. 1 1491 .0 1938.9 2111.0
COTTON 1557.9 1555.0 8584.8 6337.0
RAB-FOD 566.9 415.0 2347.1 2975.0
GRAM 224.0 218.0 1469.7 1936.0
MAIZE 496.8 179.0
MUS+RAP 217.6 225.0 617.6 662.0
KHA-FOD 275.9 142.0 1472.9 2888.0
SC-MILL 648.6 542.0 2183.0 2081.0
WHEAT 4047.5 2616.0 15785.6 15161.0
ORCHARD 200.0 200.0 918.0 918.0
POTATOES 38.2 38.0 170.9 159.0 N
ONIONS 33.6 29.0 137.3 124.0 01
<XI
CHILLI 47.1 41.0 203.3 173.0
RABI 6023.6 4324.0 23676.4 24057.0
KHARIF 4205.5 3930.0 17939.3 16647.0
ANNUAL 10229.1 8254.0 41615.7 40704.0
R-INT 44.4 31.9 67.6 68.7
K-INT 31.0 29.0 51.2 47.5
A-INT 75.5 60.9 118.8 116.2

4111 PARAMETER CADIFF CROPPED AREA DIFFERENCE MODEL - ACTUAL

NWFP PMW PCW PSW PRW SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS PUNJAB

BASMATI -25.0 129.1 67.2 16.4 187.7

IRRI -29.0 -161.5 -42.0 28.2 1.7 34.0 -10.0 6.3 -204.2
COTTON 44.7 2038.3 240.0 -78.0 251.8 -13.0 -195.0 -41.0 2245.0
RAB-FOD 21.3 438.4 -893. 1 -300.1 -46.4 75.0 68.7 -81 . 1 89.4 -801. 2
GRAM -45.3 -214.0 34.7 -119.4 -128.2 2.6 5.0 -2.8 1.2 -427.0
MAIZE 121 . 1 -22 8 228.5 -9.0 196.7
MUS+RAP -16.9 -14.8 14.3 -22.4 2.8 -0.7 -1.6 -4.7 -0.4 -20.1
KHA-FOD 40.5 165.6 -1292.1 -509.7 46.6 -24.3 125.4 -31.9 64.8 -1589.6
SC-MILL 30.4 -74.8 223.0 -123.8 -59.4 79.9 7.5 -10.8 30.0 -35.0
WHEAT 0.8 -179.0 -180.2 - 191 .2 -257.3 239.0 813.5 57.0 322.1 -807.6
ORCHARD -1.0004E -11 -3.5527E-15
POTATOES 1.1 -1.7 9.4 2.0 0.8 1.0 -0.4 -0.7 0.3 10.6
ONIONS -0.2 0.5 4.6 2.2 1.7 1.5 0.8 1.7 0.6 9.0
CHILLI 2.2 0.3 12.7 6.1 2.9 2.4 2.4 0.2 1.2 22.0
RABI -8.8 -45.5 -787.3 752.6 -486. 1 400.6 895.9 -41.3 444.3 2071.4
KHARIF 194.2 81.7 926.7 -133.6 -52.2 309.1 154.0 -247.6 60.1 822.6
ANNUAL 185.4 36.2 139.4 -886.2 -538.3 709.7 1049.9 -288.9 504.4 -1248.8
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 521
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4111 PARAMETER CADIFF CROPPED AREA DIFFERENCE MODEL - ACTUAL

+ SIND PAKISTAN

BASMATI 187.7
IRRI 32.1 -172.1
COTTON 2.9 2247.8
RAB-FDD 151. 9 -627.9
GRAM 6.0 -466.3
MAIZE 317.8
MUS+RAP -7.4 -44.4
KHA-FOD 133.9 -1415.1
SC-MILL 106.6 102.0
WHEAT 1431.5 624.6
ORCHARD -1.0008E-11 1.0061E-11
POTATOES 0.2 11.9
ONIONS 4.6 13.3
CHILLI 6.1 30.3
RABI 1699.6 -380.6
KHARIF 275.5 1292.3
ANNUAL 1975.1 911 7

N
0'1
10
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 522
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4113 PARAMETER REP48 FERTLIZER NUTRIENTS USED (THOUSAND TONNS)

INDEX 1 = FRESH

NWFP PMW PCW PSW PRW SCWN SRWN SCWS PUNJAB

NITROGEN .BASMATI 12.4 10.5 26.4 49.3
NITROGEN .IRRI 4.4 7.0 0.5 18.3 4.2 11.4
NITROGEN .COTTON 9.4 225.6 16.8 33.8 7.5 251.9
NITROGEN .RAB-FOD 0.7 9.1 5.9 6.6 8.8 2.3 0.7 0.2 30.4
NITROGEN .MAIZE 5.4 0.4 5.4 5.8
NITROGEN .MUS+RAP 1.2 0.3 8.5 0.5 1.4 2.3 0.8 0.2 10.7
NITROGEN .KHA-FOD 1.1 7.5 2.7 8.1 0.2 1.5 18.3
NITROGEN .SC-MILL 11.5 24.9 1.8 13.5 5.7 26.7
NITROGEN .SC-GUR 0.9 0.4 3.1 2.0 0.4 0.75.540760E-2 0.6 5.8
NITROGEN .WHEAT 10.5 30.2 234.4 69.1 60.7 46.5 29.1 14. 1 394.4
NITROGEN .ORCHARD 1.6 4.4 14.2 11.5 2.7 0.2 0.5 1.4 32.8
NITROGEN .POTATOES 0.4 0.4 2.2 1.1 0.8 0.1 0.1 9.421744E-2 4.5
NITROGEN .ONIONS 0.4 0.5 2.1 1.2 0.8 0.1 9.305690E-2 8.510323E-2 4.5
NITROGEN .CHILLI 0.5 0.5 0.9 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.8 0.1 3.7
NITROGEN . TOTAL 34.2 62.8 539.1 130.5 117.8 100.6 52.0 34.1 850.2
PHOSPHATE.BASMATI 6.2 4.8 13.7 24.7
PHOSPHATE. IRRI 0.9 2.0 0.1 5. 1 1.1 2.9
PHOSPHATE.COTTON 1.6 60.3 6.0 7.9 2.0 67.9
PHOSPHATE.RAB-FOD 0.4 2.7 1.8 2.0 2.7 0.6 0.2 4.881351E-2 9. 1 N
PHOSPHATE.MAIZE ......
3.5 0.1 2.4 2.5 0
PHOSPHATE.MUS+RAP 0.9 0.1 3.7 0.2 0.6 0.9 0.3 6.885529E-2 4.6
PHOSPHATE.KHA-FOD 1.4 4.7 1.7 4.8 5.459870E-2 0.5 11.2
PHOSPHATE.SC-MILL 6.4 7.8 0.6 3.8 1.6 8.3
PHOSPHATE.SC-GUR 0.4 0.1 0.9 0.6 0.1 0.2 1.523709E-2 0.2 1.7
PHOSPHATE.WHEAT 2.8 7.3 73.4 22.6 21.5 12.8 11.6 4.0 124.7
PHOSPHATE.ORCHARD 0.4 0.5 1.7 1.4 0.3 2.226073E-2 5.390000E-2 0.2 3.9
PHOSPHATE. POTATOES 0.4 0.2 1.1 0.6 0.4 5.599181E-2 4.566737E-2 4.137591E 2 2.2
PHOSPHATE.ONIONS 0.2 6.925237E-2 0.3 0.2 0.1 1.535934E-2 1.224087E-2 1.119463E-2 0.7
PHOSPHATE.CHILLI 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 2.855265E-2 1.1
PHOSPHATE. TOTAL 17.0 17.6 158.4 43.3 46.5 26.6 18.0 9.2 265.7
+ SIND PAKISTAN

NITROGEN .BASMATI 49.3

NITROGEN .IRRI 23.0 34.4
NITROGEN .COTTON 41.2 293.1
NITROGEN .RAB-FOD 3.2 34.2
NITROGEN . MAl ZE 11.2
NITROGEN .MUS+RAP 3.3 15. 1
NITROGEN .KHA-FOD 1.7 21 . 1
NITROGEN .SC-MILL 19.2 57.3
NITROGEN . SC-GUR 1.3 7 9
NITROGEN . WHEAT 89.6 494.5
NITROGEN .ORCHARD 2. 1 36.6
NITROGEN .POTATOES 0.3 5.3
NITROGEN . ONIONS 0.3 5.2
NITROGEN .CHILLI 1.4 5.7
NITROGEN .TOTAL 186.7 1071 . 1
PHOSPHATE.BASMATI 24.7
PHOSPHA TE . I RR I 6.3 9.2
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 523
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4113 PARAMETER REP48 FERTLIZER NUTRIENTS USED (THOUSAND TONNS)

INDEX 1 = FRESH

+ SIND PAKISTAN

PHOSPHATE.COTTON 9.8 77.7

PHOSPHATE.RAB-FOD 0.9 10.4
PHOSPHATE. MAIZE 6.0
PHOSPHATE.MUS+RAP 1.3 6.8
PHOSPHATE.KHA-FOD 0.5 13. 1
PHOSPHATE.SC-MILL 5.4 20.2
PHOSPHATE.SC-GUR 0.3 2.5
PHOSPHATE.WHEAT 28.4 155.9
PHOSPHATE.ORCHARD 0.2 4.5
PHOSPHATE.POTATOES 0.1 2.7
PHOSPHATE.ONIONS 3.879483E-2 0.8
PHOSPHATE.CHILLI 0.4 1.8
PHOSPHATE. TOTAL 53.8 336.5

INDEX 1 = SALINE
PMW PCW PSW SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS PUNJAB SIND

NITROGEN .BASMATI 1.6 0.2 1.8 N

NITROGEN .IRRI 0.1 0.9 29.8 7.2 13.8 0.1 51.8 ......
I-'
NITROGEN .COTTON 22.2 21.0 23.4 22.2 44.4
NITROGEN .RAB-FOD 1.7 1.2 0.3 3.5 4.5 1.4 3.3 3.2 12.7
NITROGEN .MAIZE 4.931882E-2 7.649980E-2 0.1
NITROGEN .MUS+RAP 5.647974E-2 0.4 9.735476E-2 0.6 4.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 6.6
NITROGEN .KHA-FOD 1.4 1.0 0.8 2.2 4.8 1.3 3.5 3.2 11.8
NITROGEN .SC-MILL 9.4 6.6 1.7 5.2 7.4 16.0 14.2
NITROGEN .SC-GUR 7.168121E-2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.1 1.1 0.8 0.8 2.5
NITROGEN . WHEAT 5.9 16.8 14.0 21.7 12.3 38.3 16.8 36.8 89.2
NITROGEN .ORCHARD 3.2 5.8 2.9 11.9
NITROGEN .POTATOES 3.301355E-2 8.785076E-2 8.812196E-2 0.4 0.7 0.5 0.2 0.2 1.8
NITROGEN . ONIONS 2.989335E-2 8.022502E-2 8.030542E-2 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.2 2. 1
NITROGEN .CHILLI 3.674806E-2 1.79.891354E-2 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.3 1.9 1.2
NITROGEN . TOTAL 9.2 55.1 22.8 54.7 59.6 86.1 49.9 87.1 250.3
PHOSPHATE.BASMATI 0.8 0.1 0.9
PHOSPHATE.IRRI 2.690410E-2 0.2 8.2 2.0 4.1 2.690410E-2 14.5
PHOSPHATE.COTTON 5.9 4.9 6.1 5.9 11.0
PHOSPHATE.RAB-FOD 0.5 0.4 0.1 1.0 1.2 0.4 0.9 1.0 3.5
PHOSPHATE. MAIZE 1.601497E-2 3.373837E-2 4.975334E-2
PHOSPHATE.MUS+RAP 2.438898E 2 0.2 4.203956E-2 0.2 1.9 0.3 0.2 0.2 2.6
PHOSPHATE.KHA-FOD 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.5 0.4 1.1 1.8 3.7
PHOSPHATE.SC-MILL 2.9 2.1 0.5 1.5 2.1 5.0 4.0
PHOSPHATE.SC-GUR 2. 150436E-2 0.1 0.1 0.1 3.093591E-2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.7
PHOSPHATE.WHEAT 1.4 5.3 4.6 6.0 4.9 10.8 7.3 11.3 29.0
PHOSPHATE.ORCHARD 0.4 0.6 0.3 1.3
PHOSPHATE.POTATOES 1.586365E-2 4.221400E-2 4.234432E-2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.8
PHOSPHATE.ONIONS 4.359446E-3 1.169948E-2 1.171121E-2 6.356645E-2 9.784449E-2 7.855181E-2 3.334469E-2 2.777014E-2 0.3
PHOSPHATE. CHI LLI 1.107214E-2 0.5 2.980252E-2 3.260650E-2 6.413059E-2 0.2 8.003981E-2 0.6 0.3

PHOSPHATE. TOTAL 2.9 16.6 7.6 13.7 18.7 22.9 16.5 27.2 71.9

INDUS BASIN MDDEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 524
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4113 PARAMETER REP48 FERTLIZER NUTRIENTS USED (THDUSAND TDNNS)

INDEX 1 SALINE

+ PAKISTAN

NITROGEN .BASMATI 1.8

NITROGEN .IRRI 52.0
NITROGEN .COTTON 66.6
NITROGEN .RAB-FOD 15.9
NITROGEN . MAIZE 0.1
NITROGEN .MUS+RAP 7.2
NITROGEN .KHA-FOD 15.0
NITROGEN .SC-MILL 30.2
NITROGEN .SC-GUR 3.3
NITROGEN . WHEAT 126.0
NITROGEN .ORCHARD 11.9
NITROGEN .POTATOES 2. 1
NITROGEN .ONIONS 2.3
NITROGEN . CHI LLI 3. 1
NITROGEN . TOTAL 337.4
PHOSPHATE.BASMATI 0.9
PHOSPHATE.IRRI 14.6
PHOSPHATE.COTTON 17.0
PHOSPHATE.RAB-FOD 4.5 N
.....
PHOSPHATE.MAIZE 4.975334E-2 N
PHOSPHATE.MUS+RAP 2.8
PHOSPHATE.KHA-FOD 5.5
PHOSPHATE.SC-MILL 9.0
PHOSPHATE.SC-GUR 0.9
PHOSPHATE.WHEAT 40.3
PHOSPHATE.ORCHARD 1.3
PHOSPHATE. POTATOES 0.9
PHOSPHATE.ONIONS 0.3
PHOSPHATE. CHILLI 0.9
PHOSPHATE. TOTAL 99.0

INDEX 1 = TOTAL

NWFP PMW PCW PSW PRW SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS

NITROGEN .BASMATI 14.0 10.7 26.4

NITROGEN .IRRI 4.6 7.0 1.4 48.2 11.4 13.8
NITROGEN .COTTON 9.4 247.8 16.8 54.7 30.9
NITROGEN .RAB-FOD 0.7 10.8 7.1 6.9 8.8 5.8 5.2 1.6 3.3
NITROGEN .MAIZE 5.4 0.5 5.5
NITROGEN .MUS+RAP 1.2 0.4 8.9 0.6 1.4 2.8 5.6 0.9 0.6
NITROGEN .KHA-FOD 1.1 8.9 1.0 3.5 8.1 2.3 6.3 1.3 3.5
NITROGEN .SC-MILL 11 .5 34.3 8.3 13.5 1.7 10.9 7.4
NITROGEN .SC-GUR 0.9 0.5 3.4 2.4 0.4 1.2 0.2 1.7 0.8
NITROGEN . WHEAT 10.5 36.1 251. 3 83.1 60.7 68.2 41.4 52.3 16.8
NITROGEN .ORCHARD 1.6 4.4 14.2 11.5 2.7 3.4 0.5 7.2 2.9
NITROGEN .POTATOES 0.4 0.4 2.3 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.2
NITROGEN .ONIONS 0.4 0.5 2.1 1.3 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.3
NITROGEN .CHILLI 0.5 0.5 2.6 1.5 0.9 0.7 1.0 0.7 0.3
NITROGEN . TOTAL 34.2 72.0 594.2 153.3 117.8 155.2 111. 6 120.2 49.9
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 525
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM eMS

4113 PARAMETER REP48 FERTLIZER NUTRIENTS USED (THOUSAND TONNS)

INDEX 1- = TOTAL

NWFP PMW PCW PSW PRW seWN SRWN sews SRWS

PHOSPHATE.BASMATI 7.0 4.9 13.7

PHOSPHATE.IRRI 0.9 2.0 0.3 13.3 3.1 4.1
PHOSPHATE . COTTON 1.6 66.2 6.0 12.7 8.1
PHOSPHATE.RAB-FOD 0.4 3.2 2.1 2.1 2.7 1.6 1.4 0.4 0.9
PHOSPHATE .MAlZE 3.5 0.2 2.4
PHOSPHATE.MUS+RAP 0.9 0.2 3.8 0.2 0.6 1.1 2.2 0.4 0.2
PHOSPHATE.KHA-FOD 1.4 5.6 0.5 2.1 4.8 0.7 2.0 0.4 1. 1
PHOSPHATE.SC-MILL 6.4 10.7 2.6 3.8 0.5 3.1 2.1
PHOSPHATE.SC-GUR 0.4 0.1 1.0 0.7 0.1 0.3 4.617300E-2 0.5 0.2
PHOSPHATE. WHEAT 2.8 8.7 78.6 27.2 21.5 18.8 16.6 14.8 7.3
PHOSPHATE.ORCHARD 0.4 0.5 1.7 1.4 0.3 0.4 5.390OOOE-2 0.8 0.3
PHOSPHATE.POTATOES 0.4 0.2 1.1 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.1
PHOSPHATE.ONIONS O. 2 7. 36118 1E - 2 0.3 0.2 0.1 7.892579E-2 0.1 8.974644E-2 3.334469E-2
PHOSPHATE.CHILLI 0.3 0.2 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 8.oo3981E-2
PHOSPHATE. TOTAL 17.0 20.5 175.0 50.9 46.5 40.3 36.7 32.1 16.5

+ PUNJAB SIND PAKISTAN

NITROGEN .BASMATI 51.1 51.1

N
......
NITROGEN .IRRI 11.5 74.8 86.4
t.)
NITROGEN .COTTON 274.1 85.6 359.7

NITROGEN .RAB-FOD 33.6 15.9 50.2

NITROGEN .MAIZE 5.9 11.3

NITROGEN .MUS+RAP 11.2 9.9 22.3

NITROGEN .KHA-FOD 21.5 13.5 36.2

NITROGEN .SC-MILL 42.6 33.4 87.5

NITROGEN .SC-GUR 6.6 3.8 11. 3

NITROGEN . WHEAT 431.2 178.8 620.5

NITROGEN .ORCHARD 32.8 14.0 48.4

NITROGEN .POTATOES 4.8 2.2 7.4

NITROGEN .ONIONS 4.7 2.4 7.4

NITROGEN .CHILLI 5.6 2.7 8.8

NITROGEN . TOT AL 937.3 437.0 1408.5

PHOSPHATE.BASMATI 25.6 25.6

PHOSPHATE.IRRI 3.0 20.9 23.8

PHOSPHATE.COTTON 13.8 20.8 94.7

PHOSPHATE.RAB-FOD 10.1 4.4 14.9

PHOSPHATE.MAIZE 2.6 6.1

PHOSPHATE.MUS+RAP 4.9 3.9 9.7

PHOSPHATE.KHA-FOD 13.0 4.2 18.7

PHOSPHATE.SC-MILL 13.3 9.5 29.3

PHOSPHATE.SC-GUR 2.0 1.0 3.4

PHOSPHATE.WHEAT 136.0 57.4 196.2

PHOSPHATE. ORCHARD 3.9 1.5 5.8

PHOSPHATE. POTATOES 2.3 1.0 3.6

PHOSPHATE.ONIONS 0.7 0.3 1.2

PHOSPHATE.CHILLI 1.7 0.7 2.7

PHOSPHATE. TOTAL 292.9 125.7 435.5

INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 526
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4115 WEIGHTED CROP YIELD (METRIC TONS)

4115 PARAMETER WYC WEIGTHED YIELD (METRIC TONS)

NWFP PMW PCW PSW PRW SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS PUNJAB

BASMATI 0.319 0.361 0.516 0.484

IRRI 0.621 0.952 0.934 0.969 0.802 0.193 0.862
COTTON 0.569 0.881 0.641 0.652 0.514 0.838
RAB-FOO 6.000 12. 150 18.450 18.450 11.550 15.000 11.118 15.000 10.500 16.013
GRAM 0.167 0.130 0.111 0.166 0.185 0.281 0.233 0.284 0.268 0.110
MAIZE 0.537 o 566 0.533 0.535
MUS+RAP 0.191 0.218 0.311 0.355 0.395 0.211 0.225 0.214 0.258 0.315
KHA-FOD 1.100 5.400 8300 8.200 8.200 13.000 13 000 13.000 13.650 6.994
SC-MILL 11.298 15.168 14.293 11.941 12.081 20.114 16.430 14.955
SC-GUR 1.384 1.085 1. 214 1.144 1.085 1.436 0.961 1.662 1.315 1.112
WHEAT 0.117 0.609 0.132 0.819 0.809 0.815 0.103 0.180 1. 118 0.153
ORCHARD 3.182 3.638 3.638 3.638 3.638 3.400 3.400 3.400 3.400 3.638
POTATOES 3.813 2.904 3.935 3.106 4.126 3.118 3.023 3.683 3.475 3.813
ONIONS 5.409 3.806 5.151 4.857 5.408 4.163 3.385 4.124 3.890 4.975
CHILLI 0.446 0.503 0.682 0.642 0.115 0.578 0.470 0.512 0.540 0.659

+ SIND PAKISTAN
N
-..j
BASMATI 0.484
IRRI 0.910 0.900 """
COTTON 0.624 0.799
RAB-FOO 12.781 14.941
GRAM 0.258 0.183
MAIZE 0.536
MUS+RAP 0.246 0.319
KHA-FOD 13. 169 8.171
SC-MILL 18.242 16.163
SC-GUR 1.490 1.210
WHEAT 0.800 0.165
ORCHARD 3.400 3.513
POTATOES 3.433 3.731
ONIONS 3.848 4.118
CHILLI 0.532 0.618
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 527
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4118 SC-MILL IS TOTAL CANE PRODUCSTION = SC-MILL + SC-GUR*12

4118 PARAMETER REP49A REPORT ON PRODUCTION(THOUSAND TONNS MILK IN MILLION LITERS)

BASMATI IRRI COTTON GRAM MAIZE MUS+RAP SC-MILL SC-GUR WHEAT

FRESH .NWFP 14.4 106.9 6.7 2974.7 49.5 161. 2

FRESH .PMW 179.1 19.4 2.9 278.5 23.2 529.5
FRESH .PCW 176.6 70.4 4701. 4 131. 9 9.3 104.4 10768.9 195.9 4197.9
FRESH .PSW 161.8 547.4 13.6 146.9 5.5 2178.3 118.7 1788.7
FRESH .PRW 694.1 286.0 19.4 17.7 255.6 21.3 1523.2
FRESH .SCWN 6.5 400.3 14.0 13.7 4108.1 33.3 699.8
FRESH .SRWN 363.4 3.4 4.1 23.0 1.9 694.9
FRESH .SCWS 54.7 78.3 1.0 1.1 2226.7 33.7 242.1
FRESH .PUNJAB 1032.6 356.3 5427.9 184.3 156.2 130.4 13481. 2 359.1 8039.3
FRESH .SIND 424.5 478.6 18.4 18.9 6357.7 68.9 1636.8
FRESH .PAKISTAN 1032.6 780.9 5906.5 217.2 263.1 156.0 22813.6 477 .5 9837.2
SALINE. PMW 3.4 0.5 49.1 4.1 72.8
SALINE. PCW 22.6 2.1 462.5 6.0 1.0 4.7 3456.5 21.8 301. 4
SALINE .PSW 3.6 2.8 2. 1 1.1 3056.7 24.3 257.2
SALINE. SCWN 12.9 248.6 3.4 3.5 327.2 27.3 313.8
SALINE. SRWN 591.1 21.1 23.4 355.4 3.9 292.0
SALINE. SCWS 94.4 245.1 4.5 4.5 2443.8 65.3 521.0
SALINE. SRWS 262.7 10.5 3.3 2298.1 36.6 473.2 N
SALINE.PUNJAB
SALINE. SIND
26.2 2.1
961. 1
462.5
493.7
12.2
39.4
3.1 6.3
34.7
6562.3
5424.5
50.2
133.1
631.4
1600.0
"
VI

SALINE. PAKI STAN 26.2 963.2 956.2 51.6 3. 1 41.0 11986.9 183.3 2231 .4
TOTAL .NWFP 14.4 106.9 6.7 2974.7 49.5 161. 2
TOTAL .PMW 179.1 22.8 3.4 327.6 27.3 602.3
TOTAL .PCW 199.2 72.5 5163.9 137.9 10.3 109.1 14225.3 217.7 4499.3
TOTAL .PSW 165.4 547.4 16.4 149.0 6.6 5235.1 143.0 2045.9
TOTAL .PRW 694.1 286.0 19.4 17.7 255.6 21.3 1523.2
TOTAL .SCWN 19.4 648.9 17.4 17.2 4435.3 60.6 1013.6
TOTAL .SRWN 954.5 24.5 27.5 378.4 5.8 986.9
TOTAL .SCWS 149. 1 323.4 5.5 5.6 4670.5 99.0 763.2
TOTAL .SRWS 262.7 10.5 3.3 2298.1 36.6 473.2
TOTAL . PUNJAB 1058.7 358.4 5890.4 196.5 159.3 136.7 20043.6 409.3 8670.7
TOTAL .SIND 1385.6 972.3 57.9 53.6 11782.3 202.0 3236.8
TOTAL .PAKISTAN 1058.7 1744.1 6862.7 268.8 266.2 197.0 34800.5 660.8 12068.7

+ ORCHARD POTATOES ONIONS CHILLI COW-MILK BUFF-MILK MEAT

FRESH .NWFP 85.9 35.4 31.5 5.0 46.8 73.0 4.8

FRESH .PMW 338.3 30.2 37.6 6.7 15.6 514.9 16.3
FRESH .PCW 1091.4 228.9 221.5 15.7 209.1 29.8 34.7
FRESH .PSW 880.4 110.3 119. 1 23.5 43.9 712.9 26.2
FRESH .PRW 203.7 81.7 90.0 17.1 91.3 978.0 42.2
FRESH .SCWN 9.8 8.4 6.9 5.9 55.9 131. 4 7.8
FRESH .SRWN 23.8 5.5 4.5 6.2 62.2 8.2
FRESH .SCWS 69.8 6.1 5.0 1.1 12.0 25.8 2.1
FRESH .PUNJAB 2513.9 451.1 468.2 62.9 359.9 2235.6 119.5
FRESH .SIND 103.4 20.0 16.3 13.2 130.1 157.2 18.1
FRESH .PAKISTAN 2703.2 506.5 516.0 81.1 536.8 2465.8 142.4
SALINE. PMW 2.5 2.4 0.5 2.0 112.2 3.3
SALINE. PCW 9.0 8.6 30.5 22.5 230.8 9.8
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 528
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4118 PARAMETER REP49A REPORT ON PRODUCTION(THOUSAND TONNS MILK IN MILLION LITERS)

+ ORCHARD POTATOES ONIONS CHI LLI COW-MILK BUFF-MILK MEAT

SALINE. PSW 8.5 8.1 1.6 9.6 116. 1 4.9

SALINE. SCWN 156.8 28.7 28.5 1.2 66.1 233.6 8.3
SALINE. SRWN 35.6 35.6 1.9 51.9 451.1 19.5
SALINE.SCWS 280.4 31.9 34.8 5.9 49.4 185.0 9.1
SALINE. SRWS 139.4 15.0 13.9 2.8 125.1 357.2 15.3
SALINE. PUNJAB 20.0 19.1 32.6 34.1 459.2 18.0
SALINE. SIND 516.6 111. 2 112.8 11.9 293.6 1233.6 52.3
SALINE .PAKISTAN 576.6 131.1 132.0 44.5 321.1 1692.8 10.3
TOTAL .NWFP 85.9 35.4 31.5 5.0 46.8 73.0 4.8
TOTAL .PMW 338.3 32.1 40.0 7.2 17.6 621.2 19.1
TOTAL .PCW 1091.4 231.9 230.1 46.2 231.6 260.6 44.5
TOTAL .PSW 880.4 118.8 121.2 25.1 53.5 829.0 31. 1
TOTAL .PRW 203.7 81.1 90.0 11. 1 91.3 978.0 42.2
TOTAL .SCWN 166.6 37.1 35.3 7.2 122.6 365.0 16.1
TOTAL .SRWN 23.8 41.2 40.1 8.2 114. 1 451.1 21.8
TOTAL .SCWS 350.2 38.0 39.8 7.0 61.4 210.8 11.2
TOTAL .SRWS 139.4 15.0 13.9 2.8 125.1 357.2 15.3
TOTAL .PUNJAB 2513.9 411.1 481.3 95.5 394.0 2694.8 137.5
TOTAL .SINO 680.0 131.2 129.1 25.1 423.7 1390.8 10.4
TOTAL .PAKISTAN 3279.8 631.1 641.9 125.6 864.5 4158.6 212.1
N
"-I
01
4118 PARAMETER REP49B PRODUCTION COMPARISON (UNITS AS IN REP49A)

M-NWFP A-NWFP M-PMW A-PMW M-PCW A-PCW M-PSW A-PSW M-PRW A-PRW

BASMATI 199.2 182.8 165.4 141. 2 694.1 636.0

IRRI 72.5 115.1 286.0 219.6
COTTON 119.1 153.6 5163.9 3318.4 541.4 391.0 46.9
GRAM 14.4 22.4 22.8 50.6 137.9 132.4 16.4 36.4 19.4 43.0
MAIZE 106.9 42.1 10.3 23.0 149.0 21.2 5.6
MUS+RAP 6.1 14.8 3.4 1.5 109.1 103.8 6.6 14.6 11.1 16.6
SC-MILL 2914.1 2413.1 321.6 1364.8 14225.3 10885.2 5235.1 1148.6 255.6 1065.1
SC-GUR 49.5 49.5 21.3 21.3 211.1 211.1 143.0 143.0 21.3 21.3
WHEAT 161.2 161.8 602.3 141.1 4499.3 4636.8 2045.9 2327.3 1523.2 1120.1
ORCHARD 85.9 338.3 1091.4 880.4 203.1
POTATOES 35.4 29.1 32.1 36.8 237.9 199.5 118.8 110.8 81.1 18.5
ONIONS 31.5 25.2 40.0 35.1 230.1 191. 5 127.2 106.2 90.0 15.0
CHILLI 5.0 4.8 1.2 1.1 46.2 38.1 25.1 21.6 11. 1 15.2
COW-MILK 46.8 11.6 231.6 53.5 91.3
BUFF-MILK 13.0 621.2 260.6 829.0 978.0
MEAT 4.8 19.1 44.5 31 . 1 42.2
TOTAL 3595.8 2824.0 2245.2 2429.9 26111.3 20105.5 10313.9 10413.9 4321.3 4003.5

+ M-SCWN A-seWN M-SRWN A-SRWN M-SCWS A-SCWS M-SRWS A-SRWS M-PUNJAB A-PUNJAB

BASMATI 1058.1 960.0

IRRI 19.4 18. 1 954.5 920.3 149. 1 157.3 262.7 251.3 358.4 455.3
COTTON 648.9 485.5 6.1 323.4 431.4 18.9 5890.4 3915.9
GRAM 17.4 16.1 24.5 23. 1 5.5 6.2 10.5 10.1 196.5 262.4
MAIZE 159.3 55.8
MUS+RAP 11.2 17.4 21.5 21.8 5.6 6.8 3.3 3.4 136.1 142.5
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 529
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4118 PARAMETER REP49B PRODUCTION COMPARISON (UNITS AS IN REP49A)

+ M-SCWN A-SCWN M-SRWN A-SRWN M-SCWS A-SCWS M-SRWS A-SRWS M-PUNJAB A-PUNJAB

SC-MILL 4435.3 3030.7 378.4 289.5 4670.5 4947.9 2298.1 1832.0 20043.6 20464.3
SC-GUR 60.6 60.6 5.8 5.8 99.0 99.0 36.6 36.6 409.3 409.3
WHEAT 1013.6 830.1 986.9 414.2 763.2 847.7 473.2 112.7 8670.7 9431.3
ORCHARD 166.6 23.8 350.2 139.4 2513.9
POTATOES 37.1 33.7 41.2 41.2 38.0 39.9 15.0 12.3 471.1 425.6
ONIONS 35.3 27.8 40.1 33.6 39.8 32.4 13.9 10. 1 487.3 407.8
CHILLI 7.2 5.9 8.2 7.2 7.0 7.0 2.8 2 2 95.5 82.6
COW-MILK 122.6 114. 1 61.4 125.7 394.0
BUFF-MILK 365.0 457.7 210.8 357.2 2694.8
MEAT 16.1 27.8 11.2 15.3 137.5
TOTAL 6962.4 4526.5 3090.3 1768.8 6734.5 6581.6 3753.6 2295.6 43717.7 37012.8

+ M-SIND A-SIND M-PAKISTAN A PAKISTAN

BASMATI 1058.7 960.0

IRRI 1385.6 1353.0 1744.1 1808.3
COTTON 972.3 947.9 6862.7 4863.8
GRAM 57.9 56.1 268.8 340.9
MAIZE 266.2 97.9
MUS+RAP 53.6 55.4 197.0 212.7
SC-MILL 11782.3 10100.1 34800.5 33038.1 N
'oJ
SC-GUR 202.0 202.0 660.8 660.8 'oJ
WHEAT 3236.8 2204.7 12068.7 11797.8
ORCHARD 680.0 3279.8
POTATOES 131. 2 127. 1 637.7 582.4
ONIONS 129. 1 103.9 647.9 536.9
CHILLI 25.1 22.3 125.6 109.7
COW-MILK 423.7 864.5
BUFF-MILK 1390.8 4158.6
MEAT 70.4 212.7
TOTAL 20540.8 15172.5 67854.3 55009.3

4118 PARAMETER REP49C CONSUMPTI ON (UNITS AS IN REP49A)

BASMATI IRRI GRAM MAIZE MUS+RAP SC-GUR WHEAT POTATOES ONIONS CHI LLI

NWFP 10.100 18.900 6.700 49.500 110.000 13.400 11.300 2.200

PMW 22.800 3400 27.300 485.600 16.600 15.800 3.200
PCW 27.400 21.100 59.600 10.300 46.700 217.700 3013.900 89.800 86.200 17.400
PSW 21.200 16.400 12.300 6.600 143.000 1512.700 49.900 47.800 9.700
PRW 95.400 33.600 19.400 7.500 21.300 1118.100 35.300 33.700 6.800
SCWN 11.800 7.500 7.800 60.600 697.300 15.200 12.500 2.700
SRWN 171.100 10.400 12.500 5.800 347.900 16.800 13.500 2.900
SCWS 102.200 2.800 3.100 99.000 712.100 18.000 14.600 3.100
SRWS 27.100 4.500 1.500 36.600 94.600 7.400 6.100 1.300
PUNJAB 144.000 54.700 118.200 22.600 64.200 409.300 6130.300 191.600 183.500 37.100
SIND 312.200 25.200 24.900 202.000 1851.900 57.400 46.700 10.000
PAKISTAN 144.000 366.900 153.500 41. 500 95.800 660.800 8092.200 262.400 241.500 49.300
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 530
E X F CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4118 PARAMETER REP49D IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (UNITS AS IN REP49A)

BASMATI IRRI COTTON SC-MILL WHEAT ONIONS

IMPORTS.PMW 672.054
IMPORTS.PSW 0.902
IMPORTS.PRW 524.752
IMPORTS.PUNJAB 1197.708
IMPORTS. PAKISTAN 1197.708
EXPORTS.NWFP 1.400
EXPORTS.PMW 0.297
EXPORTS.PCW 588.000 1.716
EXPORTS.PSW 0.561
EXPORTS.PRW 250.000 213.730 0.726
EXPORTS.SCWN 82.880 182.704 2.173
EXPORTS.SRWN 577.940 620.843 1.590
EXPORTS.SCWS 1.166
EXPORTS.SRWS 203.060 350.400 0.424
EXPORTS. PUNJAB 250.000 213.730 588.000 3.300
EXPORTS.SIND 781.000 82.880 1153.947 5.353
EXPORTS.PAKISTAN 250.000 994.730 670.880 1153.947 10.053

N
......
(Xl
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 531
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4121 GPV -
GROSS PRODUCTION VALUE (MILLION RUPEES)
VAL-ADDED -
VALUE ADDED (MILLION RUPEES)
FARM-INC -
FARM INCOME (MILLION RUPEES)
FL-COST -
COST OF FAMILY LABOR (MILLION RUPEES)
HL-COST -
COST OF HIRED LABOR (MILLION RUPEES)
SEED-COST -
COST OF SEED USED (MILLION RUPEES)
FERT-COST -
COST OF FERTILIZER(NITROGEN AND PHOSPHDROUS) USED (MILLION RUPEES)
MISCC-COST -
COST OF CANAL WATER (MILLION RUPEES)
TW-OPC -
OPERATING COST OF PRIVATE TUBEWELLS (MILLION RUPEES)
TW-INVT -
INVESTMENT IN PRIVATE TUBEWELLS (MILLION RUPEES)
TR-OPC OPERATING COST OF TRACTORS (MILLION RUPEES)
TR-INVT - INVESTMENT IN PRIVATE TUBEWELLS (MILLION RUPEES)
ANIML-COST - FIXED COST OF ANIMALS (MILLION RUPEES)
PROT-COST - COST OF PRTEIN CONCENTRATE PURCHASED FOR ANIMALS (MILLION RUPEES)
EQUATION TO AVOID INFEASABILITY
TOTAL-COST COST OFF ALL ACTIVITIES (MILLION RUPEES)

4121 PARAMETER REP50 REPORT ON TOTAL INCOME AND COST (FINANCIAL PRICES) (MILLION RUPEES)

NWFP PMW PCW PSW PRW SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS

FRESH .GPV 2796.2 6989.7 43251.3 17444.4 16225. 1 5805.5 3131.1 2259.7
FRESH .FARM-INC 1942.5 4900.4 26664.7 13375.8 12227.1 3651.4 2082.0 1334. 1
FRESH .FL-COST 660.9 1374.2 6193.8 2981.5 3394.7 865.1 624.4 307.6 N
....,
FRESH .HL-COST 172.4 1957.0 290.7 1.8 75.2 \0
FRESH .SEED-COST 178.0 210.5 1497.0 467.8 353.2 332.9 161.9 122.5
FRESH .FERT-COST 317 .0 487.3 4235.2 1059.7 1009.0 769.5 427 .5 262.2
FRESH .MISCC-COST 40946.3 218939.0 3061057.2 623284.9 230496.7 345255.7 56973.6 89000.7
FRESH .TW-OPC 34.2 365.5 3611 .2 893.5 1478.2 306.1 344.0 301.3
FRESH .TR-OPC 244.3 546.5 1904.9 837.1 503.7 54.5 14.9 52.0
FRESH .TW-INVT 1.3 45.6
FRESH .ANIML-COST 11.3 47.1 98.9 74.9 121.4 24.2 23.1 6.5
FRESH .PROT-COST 16.5 15.5 48.5 246.5 6.0
FRESH .TOTAL-COST 1515.9 3463.6 22780.4 7050.0 7392.7 3019.2 1719.1 1233.2
SALINE. GPV 854.4 5747.7 2265.0 4550.6 5809.5 6127.6 6024.4
SALINE. FARM- INC 625.0 4583.2 1773.8 3670.6 4938.2 4839.5 4978.0
SALINE. FL -COST 231. 3 1134.6 577.7 690.5 1065.6 935.9 791.2
SALINE. HL -COST 39.4 329.1
SALINE.SEED-COST 35.0 232.8 191.5 144.3 170.6 244.1 202.3
SALINE.FERT-COST 73.8 436.0 185.6 413.0 476.9 659.6 405.2
SALINE.MISCC-COST 5668.4 318731.9 19771.4 227247.7 97051.8 276232 8 57081.3
SALINE. TR-OPC 102.0 124.1 67.8 16.0 61.5 55.5 1.7
SALINE.ANIML-COST 9.6 28.1 14.0 24.8 46.0 27.6 33.9
SALINE. TOTAL-COST 460.6 2299.1 1068.9 1570.5 1936.9 2223.9 1837 6
TOTAL .GPV 2796.2 7844.1 48999.1 19709.4 16225. 1 10356.1 8940.6 8387.2 6024.4
TOTAL .FARM-INC 1942.5 5525.4 31247.9 15149.7 12227.1 7322. 1 7020.3 6173.6 4978.0
TOTAL .FL-COST 660.9 1605.5 7328.4 3559.2 3394.7 1555.6 1690.1 1243.5 791.2
TOTAL .HL-COST 172.4 1957.0 330.1 1.8 75.2 329.1
TOTAL .SEED-COST 178.0 245.5 1729.8 659.2 353.2 477 .2 332.5 366.6 202.3
TOTAL .FERT-COST 317.0 561. 1 4671.2 1245.3 1009.0 1182.5 904.4 921.8 405.2
TOTAL .MISCC-COST 52.4 253.5 3625.8 719.4 285.9 618.6 191. 9 401.1 74.3
TOTAL .TW-OPC 34.2 365.5 3611.2 893.5 1478.2 306.1 344.0 301.3
TOTAL .TR-OPC 244.3 648.5 2029.1 904.9 503.7 70.5 76.5 107.5 1.7
TOTAL .TW-INVT 1.3 45.6
TOTAL .ANIML-COST 11 .3 56.7 127.0 89.0 121.4 49.0 69.1 34.1 33.9
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 532
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4121 PARAMETER REP50 REPORT ON TOTAL INCOME AND COST (FINANCIAL PRICES) (MILLION RUPEES)

NWFP PMW PCW PSW PRW SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS

TOTAL .PROT-COST 16.5 15.5 48.5 246.5 6.0

TOTAL .TOTAL-COST 1515.9 3924.3 25079.6 8118.9 7392.7 4589.7 3656.0 3457.1 1837.6

+ PUNJAB SINO PAKISTAN

FRESH .GPV 83910.6 11196.3 97903.1

FRESH .FARM-INC 57168.0 7067.6 66178.1
FRESH .FL-COST 13944.2 1797.2 16402.2
FRESH .HL-COST 2129.5 367.7 2497.2
FRESH . SEED-COST 2528.5 617.3 3323.9
FRESH .FERT-COST 6791. 2 1459.2 8567.4
FRESH .MISCC-COST 4499.9 551.8 5104.1
FRESH .TW-OPC 6348.4 951.4 7334.0
FRESH .TR-OPC 3792.3 121. 5 4158.1
FRESH .TW-INVT 45.6 46.9
FRESH .ANIML-COST 342.3 53.8 407.4
FRESH .PROT-COST 310.5 6.0 332.9
FRESH .TOTAL-COST 40686.8 5971.5 48174.2
SALINE.GPV 8867.1 22512.0 31379.2
SALINE. FARM-INC 6982.1 18426.3 25408.4
SALINE. FL-COST 1943.6 3483.2 5426.8 N
(XI
SALINE. HL -COST 368.5 368.5 o
SALINE. SEED-COST 459.3 761.3 1220.6
SALINE. FERT-COST 695.4 1954.8 2650.2
SALINE.MISCC-COST 384.7 734.1 1118.8
SALINE. TR-OPC 293.9 134.8 428.7
SALINE.ANIML-COST 51.7 132.3 184.0
SALINE. TOTAL-COST 3828.7 7568.9 11397.5
TOTAL .GPV 92777.7 33708.3 129282.3
TOTAL .FARM-INC 64150.1 25493.9 91586.5
TOTAL .FL-COST 15887.8 5280.3 21829.0
TOTAL .HL-COST 2129.5 736.3 2865.7
TOTAL .SEED-COST 2987.8 1378.6 4544.5
TOTAL .FERT-COST 7486.6 3414.0 11217.5
TOTAL .MISCC-COST 4884.6 1285.9 6222.9
TOTAL .TW-OPC 6348.4 951.4 7334.0
TOTAL .TR-OPC 4086.2 256.2 4586.8
TOTAL .TW-INVT 45.6 46.9
TOTAL .ANIML-COST 394.0 186.0 591.4
TOTAL .PROT-COST 310.5 6.0 332.9
TOTAL .TOTAL-COST 44515.5 13540.3 59571.7
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 533
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4144 GPV - GROSS PRODUCTION VALUE PER FARM HOUSEHOLD(RUPEES)

FARM-INC NET FARM INCOME PER FARM HOUSEHOLD (RUPEES)
FL-COST - COST OF FAMILY LABOR PER HOUSEHOLD (RUPEES)
HL-COST - COST OF HIRED LABOR PER HOUSEHOLD (RUPEES)
TOTAL-COST - TOTAL COST PER FARM HOUSEHOLD (RUPEES)

4144 PARAMETER REP54 REPORT ON INCOME AND COST PER FARM HOUSEHOLD (RUPEES)

NWFP PMW PCW PSW PRW SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS

FRESH .GPV 16070.3 40588.0 49241.2 42711.8 31627.9 53606.1 34512.6 55964.3
FRESH .FARM-INC 11163.6 28455.3 30357.5 32750.1 23834.6 33715.9 22949.4 33042.0
FRESH .FL-COST 3798.1 7979.9 7051.6 7300.0 6617.4 7987.8 6883.0 7619.3
FRESH .HL-COST 1001.3 2228. 1 2684.4 20.1 1861.9
FRESH .TOTAL-COST 8712.0 20112.6 25935.3 17261.7 14410.7 27877.9 18949.0 30541.6
SALINE.GPV 15884.5 23494.4 12754.8 44309.4 35799.7 26116.6 68459.5
SALINE.FARM-INC 11620.2 18734.3 9989.0 35741.3 30430.9 20626.7 56568.0
SALINE. FL-COST 4299.5 4637.8 3253.4 6723.7 6566.7 3988.8 8990.4
SALINE. HL -COST 383.9 3740.0
SALINE. TOTAL-COST 8563.8 9397.9 6019.2 15291.8 11935.6 9478.7 20881.9
TOTAL .GPV 16070.3 34708.6 43632.3 33633.8 31627.9 49081.1 35338.2 30499.0 68459.5
TOTAL .FARM-INC 11163.6 24448.6 27825.4 25852.7 23834.6 34701.7 27748.1 22449.5 56568.0
TOTAL .FL-COST 3798.1 7104.0 6525.7 6073.7 6617 4 7372.5 6680.1 4521.8 8990.4
TOTAL .HL-COST 763.0 1742.7 1564.7 7.2 273.4 3740.0 N
Q)
TOTAL .TOTAL-COST 8712.0 17364.0 22332.7 13854.8 14410.7 21751.9 14450.5 12571.3 20881.9 .....
+ PUNJAB SIND PAKISTAN

FRESH .GPV 42551.2 46768.1 41042.8

FRESH .FARM-INC 28990.0 29522.2 27743.1
FRESH .FL-COST 7071.1 7507.0 6876. 1
FRESH .HL-COST 1079.9 1536.0 1046.9
FRESH .TOTAL-COST 20632.4 24943.5 20195.5
SALINE.GPV 18628.0 38311. 9 29502.5
SALINE. FARM- INC 14667.9 31358.6 23888.8
SALINE. FL -COST 4083.1 5927.8 5102.2
SALINE. HL -COST 627.2 346.5
SALINE. TOTAL-COST 8043.2 12881.0 10715.9
TOTAL .GPV 37899.4 40759.8 37484.0
TOTAL .FARM-INC 26205.1 30827.0 26554.5
TOTAL .FL-COST 6490.1 6384.9 6329.1
TOTAL .HL-COST 869.9 890.3 830.9
TOTAL .TOTAL-COST 18184.4 16372.9 17272.2

4150 PARAMETER REP56 REPORT ON INCOME AND COST BASED ON INTERNATIONAL PRICES (MILLION RUPEES)

NWFP PMW PCW PSW PRW SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS

FRESH .GPV 2168.2 6043.9 49087.2 16311.8 13921.2 5754.4 2896.8 2109.1
FRESH .VAL-ADDED 1053.7 3999.4 34084.0 12378.2 9967.3 3530.6 1769.0 1149. 1
FRESH .FL-COST 575.4 1194.2 5329.2 2580.0 2957.8 751.6 543.7 269.1
FRESH .HL-COST 143.7 1630.9 245.0 1.5 64.9
FRESH .SEED-COST 320.7 241.9 2227.9 650.4 424.5 538.2 199.0 213.8
FRESH .FERT-COST 468.6 712.8 6200.5 1554.6 1485.0 1124.6 627.7 383.4
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 534
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4150 PARAMETER REP56 REPORT ON INCOME AND COST BASEO ON INTERNATIONAL PRICES (MILLION RUPEES)

NWFP PMW PCW PSW PRW SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS

FRESH .TW-OPC 25.8 276.2 2728.5 675.1 1116.9 231.3 259.9 227.6
FRESH .TR-OPC 271.5 607.3 2116.6 930.1 559.7 60.6 16.6 57.8
FRESH .TW-INVT 1.3 45.6
FRESH .ANIML-COST 11.3 47.1 98.9 74.9 121.4 24.2 23.1 6.5
FRESH .PROT-COST 16.5 15.5 48.5 246.5 6.0
FRESH .TOTAL-COST 1691.1 3238.6 20332.4 6513.6 6911. 7 2975.4 1717.2 1229.1
SALINE. GPV 622.0 5651.1 1788.8 4204.0 4404.7 5721.3 4616.7
SALINE. VAL -AODED 350 6 4427.8 1065.8 3352.1 3384.9 4306.2 3378.6
SALINE. FL -COST 201.5 981.9 502.0 598.2 933.0 814.2 693.2
SALINE. HL -COST 32.9 287.2
SALINE. SEED-COST 40.3 418.7 361.3 173.3 206.3 361.7 320.7
SALINE. FERT-COST 108.1 638.7 272.3 603.2 699.0 964.0 594.5
SALINE TR-OPC 113.3 137.9 75.3 17.8 68.4 61.7 1.8
SALINE.ANIML-COST 9.6 28.1 14.0 24.8 46.0 27.6 33.9
SALINE. TOTAL-COST 472.8 2205.3 1225.0 1450.2 1952.8 2229.3 1931.2
TOTAL .GPV 2168.2 6665.9 54738.3 18100.6 13921 .2 9958.4 7301. 5 7830.4 4616.7
TOTAL .VAL-ADDED 1053.7 4350. 1 38511. 7 13444.0 9967 3 6882.7 5153.9 5455.3 3378.6
TOTAL . FL-COST 575.4 1395.7 6311.1 3082.0 2957.8 1349.8 1476.8 1083.3 693.2
TOTAL .HL-COST 143.7 1630.9 277 .8 1.5 64.9 287.2
TOTAL .SEED-COST 320.7 282.2 2646.6 1011.7 424.5 711.5 405.3 575.5 320.7
TOTAL .FERT-COST 468.6 821.0 6839.2 1826.9 1485.0 1727.8 1326.7 1347.4 594.5 N
(X)
TOTAL .TW-DPC 25.8 276.2 2728.5 675.1 1116.9 231.3 259.9 227.6 N
TOTAL .TR-OPC 271.5 720.5 2254.5 1005.5 559.7 78.4 85 0 119.5 1.8
TOTAL .TW-INVT 1.3 45.6
TOTAL .ANIML-COST 11.3 56.7 127.0 89.0 121.4 49.0 69.1 34.1 33.9
TOTAL .PROT-COST 16.5 15.5 48.5 246.5 6.0
TOTAL .TOTAL-COST 1691.1 3711.4 22537.7 7738.6 6911.7 4425.6 3669.9 3458.4 1931.2

+ PUN.JAB SINO PAKISTAN

FRESH .GPV 85364.1 10760.3 98292.6

FRESH .VAL-ADDED 60428.8 6448.6 67931.2
FRESH .FL-COST 12061.2 1564.4 14201.0
FRESH .HL-COST 1774.6 311.4 2086.0
FRESH .SEED-COST 3544.7 951.0 4816.4
FRESH .FERT-COST 9952.9 2135.7 12557.2
FRESH .TW-DPC 4796.6 718.9 5541.3
FRESH .TR-OPC 4213.7 135.0 4620.1
FRESH .TW-INVT 45.6 46.9
FRESH .ANIML-COST 342.3 53.8 407.4
FRESH .PROT-COST 310.5 6.0 332.9
FRESH .TOTAL-COST 36996.4 5921.7 44609.2
SALINE .GPV 8061.9 18946.7 27008.6
SALINE. VAL-ADDED 5844.2 14421.9 20266.1
SALINE. FL-COST 1685.4 3038.6 4724.0
SALINE .HL-COST 320.1 320.1
SALINE. SEED-COST 820.3 1062.0 1882.3
SALINE. FERT-COST 1019. 1 2860.8 3879.9
SALINE. TR-OPC 326.6 149.7 476.3
SALINE.ANIML-COST 51.7 132.3 184.0
SALINE. TOTAL-COST 3903.1 7563.4 11466.5
TOTAL .GPV 93426.0 29707.0 125301.2
INDUS BASIN MOOEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 535
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4150 PARAMETER REP56 REPORT ON INCOME AND COST BASED ON INTERNATIONAL PRICES (MILLION RUPEES)

+ PUNJAB SIND PAKISTAN

TOTAL .VAL-AODED 66273.1 20870.5 88197.3

TOTAL .FL-COST 13746.6 4603.0 18925.0
TOTAL .HL-COST 1774.6 631.5 2406. 1
TOTAL .SEED-COST 4365.0 2013.0 6698.7
TOTAL .FERT-COST 10972.0 4996.4 16437.1
TOTAL .TW-OPC 4796.6 718.9 5541.3
TOTAL .TR-OPC 4540.2 284.7 5096.4
TOTAL .TW-INVT 45.6 46.9
TOTAL .ANIML-COST 394.0 186.0 591.4
TOTAL .PROT-COST 310.5 6.0 332.9
TOTAL .TOTAL-COST 40899.5 13485.2 56075.7

4150 PARAMETER REP57 REPORT ON INCOME AND COST PER ACRE OF CCA BASED ON INTERNATIONAL PRICES (RUPEES)

NWFP PMW PCW PSW PRW SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS

FRESH .GPV 3452.523 3286.673 5580.945 5321.440 5003.266 3119.269 1838.082 5147.240
FRESH .VAL-AODEO 1677.911 2174.913 3875.159 4038.162 3582.225 1913.798 1122.459 2804.315
FRESH .FL-COST 916.196 649.413 605.901 841.681 1063.027 407.419 344.991 656.676
FRESH .HL-COST 78. 144 185.420 132.787 0.962 158.467 N
00
FRESH .TOTAL-COST 2692.807 1761.173 2311.687 2124.959 2484.068 1612.890 1089.563 2999.601 w
SALINE.GPV 1082.952 2306.820 1342.143 2403.128 1562.494 2402.827 1663.683
SALINE.VAL-AOOED 610.513 1807.430 799.711 1916.142 1200.762 1808.524 1217.525
SALINE. FL-COST 350.752 400.826 376.668 341.970 330.985 341. 945 249.785
SALINE HL-COST 18.781 103.510
SALINE. TOTAL-COST 823.191 900.216 919.099 828.956 692.717 936.249 695.944
TOTAL .GPV 3452.523 2762.191 4867.685 4115.567 5003.266 2770.701 1661.317 2805.775 1663.683
TOTAL .VAL-ADDED 1677 911 1802.588 3424.710 3056.792 3582.225 1914.939 1172.683 1954.731 1217.525
TOTAL .FL-COST 916.196 578.332 561.226 700.765 1063.027 375.563 336.008 388.155 249.785
TOTAL .HL-COST 59.546 145.027 77.297 0.345 23.267 103.510
TOTAL .TOTAL-COST 2692.807 1537.935 2004.201 1759.539 2484.068 1231. 326 835.022 1239.200 695.944

+ PUNJAB SIND PAKISTAN

FRESH .GPV 5179.192 2809.086 4693.861

FRESH .VAL-ADDED 3666.327 1683.478 3243.985
FRESH .FL-COST 731.775 408.398 678.152
FRESH .HL-COST 107.666 81.298 99.614
FRESH .TOTAL-COST 2244.639 1545.917 2130.267
SALINE. GPV 1850.385 1948.354 1918.042
SALINE.VAL-AODED 1341.382 1483.052 1439.218
SALINE. Fl-COST 386.835 312.474 335.482
SALINE. HL-COST 32.916 22.732
SALINE. TOTAL-COST 895.839 777.776 814.306
TOTAL .GPV 4483.227 2191.591 3577.785
TOTAL .VAL-ADDED 3180.243 1539.691 2518.340
TOTAL .FL-COST 659.657 339.581 540.374
TOTAL .HL-COST 85.156 46.589 68.702
TOTAL .TOTAL-COST 1962.641 994.847 1601.157
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 536
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4150 PARAMETER REP58 REPORT ON INCOME AND COST PER HOUSEHOLD BASED ON INTERERNATIONAl PRICES (RUPEES)

NWFP PMW PCW PSW PRW SCWN SRWN SCWS . SRWS

FRESH .GPV 12460.8 35095.4 55885.2 39938.8 27136.8 53133.9 31930.3 52236.3
FRESH .VAl-ADDED 6055.9 23223.9 38804.2 30307.4 19429.3 32599.8 19498.8 28459.3
FRESH .Fl-COST 3306.7 6934.5 6067.2 6317.0 5765.7 6940.0 5993.0 6664.2
FRESH .HL-COST 834.4 1856.7 2261.9 16.7 1608.2
FRESH .TOTAl-COST 9718.9 18806.0 23148.3 15948.4 13473.1 27474.1 18927.4 30441.2
SALINE. GPV 11563.9 23099.5 10073.1 40935.1 27142.9 24384.9 52462 7
SAlINE.VAL-ADDED 6519. 1 18098.8 6002.0 32639.7 20859.1 18353.6 38393.5
SALINE.FL-COST 3745.4 4013.7 2827.0 5825.1 5749.7 3470.2 7876.8
SALINE .Hl-COST 319.9 3264.1
SALINE. TOTAL-COST 8790.1 9014.4 6898.1 14120.5 12033.6 9501.4 21945.9
TOTAL .GPV 12460.8 29494.9 48743.0 30888.4 27136.8 47196.3 28859.6 28474.1 52462.7
TOTAL .VAL-ADDED 6055.9 19248.2 34293.6 22942.0 19429.3 32619.2 20371.3 19837.4 38393.5
TOTAL .Fl-COST 3306.7 6175.5 5619.9 5259.4 5765.7 6397.4 5837.0 3939.2 7876.8
TOTAL .HL-COST 635.8 1452.2 1316.7 6.0 236.1 3264.1
TOTAL . TOTAL-COST 9718.9 16422.2 20069.2 13205.8 13473.1 20974.5 14505.6 12575.9 21945.9

+ PUNJAB SIND PAKISTAN

FRESH .GPV 43288.3 44947.2 41206.1

FRESH .VAL-ADDED 30643.6 26936.7 28478.0
FRESH .FL-COST 6116.3 6534.6 5953.3 N
ex)
FRESH .HL-COST 899.9 1300.8 874.5 -Il'
FRESH .TOTAl-COST 18761.0 24735.7 18701.0
SALINE.GPV 16936.4 32244.2 25393.3
SALINE. VAL-ADDED 12277.6 24543.7 19054.1
SALINE.FL-COST 3540.7 5171.3 4441.5
SALINE .HL-COST 544.7 301.0
SALINE. TOTAL-COST 8199.5 12871.8 10780.7
TOTAL .GPV 38164.2 35921.4 36329.7
TOTAL .VAL-ADDED 27072.3 25236.4. 25571. 9
TOTAL .FL-COST 5615.4 5565.9 5487.1
TOTAL .HL-COST 724.9 763.6 697.6
TOTAL . TOTAL-COST 16707.3 16306.1 16258.5
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 537
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4152 PARAMETER REP59 REPORT ON LABOR UTILIZATION (MILLION MAN HOURS )

FAMILY-LAB FAMILY-LAB FAMILY-LAB FAMILY-LAB FAMILY-LAB FAMILY-LAB FAMILY-LAB FAMILY-LAB FAMILY-LAB

NWFP PMW PCW PSW PRW SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS

FRESH .JAN 37.1 57.0 181. 9 104.6 105.0 40.3 15.0 16.6
FRESH .FEB 34.5 56.8 157.0 90.2 96.9 37.9 14.7 16.6
FRESH .MAR 29.0 63.3 165.2 90.2 107.8 49.7 41.2 16.6
FRESH .APR 38.1 72.8 405.0 199.1 203.2 39.2 25.7 13.4
FRESH .MAY 16.5 57.6 230.7 111 .4 134.4 27.0 11.5 5.0
FRESH .JUN 14.5 40.2 144.4 77.1 143.5 18. 1 14.7 9.5
FRESH .JUL 17.9 33.9 122.6 97.2 191.6 20.5 42.2 8.3
FRESH .AUG 11.9 42.6 137.8 104.7 165.5 14.0 22.0 6.6
FRESH .SEP 14.8 39.2 139.9 78.7 89.8 24.9 15.9 10.7
FRESH .OCT 30.1 58.8 353.1 110.9 88.7 49.7 35.4 16.6
FRESH .NOV 37.0 72.8 405.0 190.6 189.8 49.7 42.2 16.6
FRESH .DEC 37.5 59.2 292.8 120.9 130.8 40.3 21.0 16.6
FRESH .RABI 205.2 367.8 1555.0 707.4 719.0 267.5 169.5 99.9
FRESH .KHARIF 113.6 286.3 1180.4 668.2 928.0 143.6 132.0 53.5
FRESH .ANNUAL 318.9 654.1 2735.4 1375.6 1647.0 411. 2 301.5 153.4
SALINE. JAN 10.2 42.4 31.7 26.2 38.3 39.4 35.2
SALINE .FEB 10.4 39.9 28.4 23.6 35.6 36.0 35.2
SALINE.MAR 11.7 47.3 31.1 31.6 45.1 50.7 35.2
SALINE .APR 16.2 69.2 40.9 25.7 34.9 38.0 28.3
SALINE.MAY 9.3 37.2 24.0 24.7 29.3 19.9 29.5 N
(II)
SALINE .JUN 7.2 28.4 10.8 18.2 34.2 27.6 35.2 VI
SALINE. JUL 6.5 25.3 10.2 16.3 75.6 22.3 31. 1
SALINE .AUG 7.3 26.5 11.0 16.7 46.3 22.2 34.2
SALINE. SEP 6.7 26.4 9.4 25.5 40.4 38.4 29.6
SALINE .OCT 7.2 45.5 11.5 41.5 46.9 67.8 35.2
SALINE.NOV 9.4 80.6 33.9 47.1 64.0 49.0 35.2
SALINE .DEC 9.8 55.2 32.0 24.4 44.8 37.8 35.2
SALINE. RABI 58.8 310.8 168.7 194.4 274.7 280.7 211. 2
SALINE.KHARIF 53.2 213.0 106.2 127.0 260.6 168.4 188.0
SALINE. ANNUAL 112.0 523.9 274.9 321.4 535.3 449.2 399.2
TOTAL .JAN 37.1 67.2 224.3 136.3 105.0 66.5 53.2 56.1 35.2
TOTAL .FEB 34.5 67.2 196.9 118.6 96.9 61.5 50.3 52.6 35.2
TOTAL .MAR 29.0 75.0 212.5 121. 3 107.8 81.3 86.3 67.4 35.2
TOTAL .APR 38.1 89.0 474.2 240.1 203.2 64.9 60.6 51.4 28.3
TOTAL .MAY 16.5 66.8 267.9 135.4 134.4 51.6 40.8 24.9 29.5
TOTAL .JUN 14.5 47.4 172.8 87.9 143.5 36.2 48.9 37.1 35.2
TOTAL .JUL 17.9 40.4 147.9 107.4 191.6 36.8 117.8 30.6 31.1
TOTAL .AUG 11.9 49.9 164.3 115.6 165.5 30.7 68.3 28.8 34.2
TOTAL .SEP 14.8 45.9 166.3 88.0 89.8 50.5 56.3 49.1 29.6
TOTAL .OCT 30.1 66.0 398.6 122.4 88.7 91.2 82.3 84.4 35.2
TOTAL .NOV 37.0 82.3 485.6 224.5 189.8 96.8 106.3 65.7 35.2
TOTAL .DEC 37.5 69.0 348.0 153.0 130.8 64.7 65.7 54.4 35.2
TOTAL .RABI 205.2 426.6 1865.9 876.1 719.0 461.9 444.1 380.6 211. 2
TOTAL .KHARIF 113.6 339.5 1393.4 774.4 928.0 270.6 392.6 221.9 188.0
TOTAL .ANNUAL 318.9 766.2 3259.2 1650.5 1647.0 732.6 836.8 602.6 399.2
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 538
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4152 PARAMETER REP59 REPORT ON LABOR UTILIZATION (MILLION MAN HOURS )

+ FAMILY-LAB FAMILY-LAB FAMILY LAB HIRED LAB HIRED-LAB HIRED-LAB HIRED-LAB HIRED-LAB HIRED-LAB
PUNuAB SIND PAKISTAN PMW PCW SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS

FRESH .uAN 448.5 71.9 557.6 1.4

FRESH .FEB 400.9 69.3 504.7
FRESH .MAR 426.5 107.5 563.0 10.8 7.2
FRESH .APR 880.2 78.2 996.5 27.5 139.5
FRESH .MAY 534.1 43.5 594 1
FRESH .uUN 405.2 42.3 462.0
FRESH .uUL 445.3 71.0 534.2
FRESH .AUG 450.6 42.6 505.1
FRESH .SEP 347.6 51.5 413.9
FRESH .OCT 611.4 101.8 743.3 2.9 3.5
FRESH .NOV 858.2 108.6 1003.8 1.2 186.7 40.2 0.3 4.5
FRESH .DEC 603.7 77.9 719.0 0.5
FRESH .RABI 3349.3 536.9 4091.4 1.2 186.7 53.8 0.3 17. 1
FRESH .KHARIF 3062.9 329.1 3505.7 27.5 139.5
FRESH .ANNUAL 6412.2 866.1 7597.1 28.7 326.2 53.8 0.3 17. 1
SALINE. ...IAN 84.3 139. 1 223.4 9. 1
SALINE.FEB 78.7 130.4 209.1 7.2
SALINE. MAR 90.0 162.6 252.6 15.6
SALINE. APR 126.4 126.9 253.3
SALINE. MAY 70.4 103.4 173.8 N
00
SALINE. uUN 46.5 115. 1 161. 6 7.4 0\
SALINE.uUL 42.0 145.2 187.2
SALINE. AUG 44.7 119.4 164. 1
SALINE. SEP 42.5 134.0 176.4
SALINE .OCT 64.2 191.4 255.6 11 1
SALINE .NOV 124.0 195.4 319.3 6.6 17.8
SALINE.DEC 97.0 142. 1 239.2 12.6
SALINE.RABI 538.3 961.0 1499.3 6.6 73.4
SALINE.KHARIF 372.4 744.0 1116.5 7.4
SALINE. ANNUAL 910.8 1705.0 2615.8 6.6 80.8
TOTAL . ...IAN 532.8 211.0 781.0 1.4 9. 1
TOTAL . FEB 479.6 199.7 713.8 7.2
TOTAL .MAR 516.6 270.1 815.6 10.8 7.2 15 6
TOTAL .APR 1006.5 205.2 1249.8 27.5 139.5
TOTAL .MAY 604.6 146.9 768.0
TOTAL .uUN 451.7 157.4 623.6 7.4
TOTAL .uUL 487.2 216.3 721.4
TOTAL .AUG 495.3 162.0 669.2
TOTAL .SEP 390.0 185.4 590.3
TOTAL .OCT 675.7 293.1 999.0 2.9 3.5 11. 1
TOTAL .NOV 982.2 304.0 1323. 1 1.2 186.7 46.8 0.3 4.5 17.8
TOTAL .DEC 700.7 220.0 958.2 0.5 12.6
TOTAL .RABI 3887.6 1497.9 5590.7 1.2 186.7 60.4 0.3 17.1 73.4
TOTAL .KHARIF 3435.3 1073.2 4622.1 27 .5 139.5 7.4
TOTAL . ANNUAL 7322.9 2571.1 10212.9 28.7 326.2 60.4 0.3 17. 1 80.8
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 539
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4152 PARAMETER REP59 REPORT ON LABOR UTILIZATION (MILLION MAN HOURS )

+ HIRED-LAB HIRED-LAB HIRED-LAB

PUNJAB SIND PAKISTAN

FRESH .JAN 1.4 1.4

FRESH .MAR 18.0 18.0
FRESH .APR 167.0 167.0
FRESH .OCT 6.3 6.3
FRESH .NOV 188.0 45.0 232.9
FRESH .DEC 0.5 0.5
FRESH .RABI 188.0 71.3 259.2
FRESH .KHARIF 167.0 167.0
FRESH .ANNUAL 354.9 71.3 426.2
SALINE. JAN 9.1 9.1
SALINE. FEB 7.2 7.2
SALINE. MAR 15.6 15.6
SALINE. JUN 7.4 7.4
SALINE. OCT 11. 1 11. 1
SALINE .NOV 24.3 24.3
SALINE. DEC 12.6 12.6
SALINE. RABI 80.0 80.0
SALINLKHARIF 7.4 7.4
SALINE. ANNUAL 87.4 87.4
TOTAL .JAN 10.5 10.5 N
TOTAL . FEB 7.2 7.2 (lO

TOTAL .MAR
TOTAL .APR 167.0
33.6 33.6
167.0 '"
TOTAL .JUN 7.4 7.4
TOTAL .OCT 17.5 17.5
TOTAL .NOV 188.0 69.3 257.3
TOTAL .DEC 13. 1 13. 1
TOTAL .RABI 188.0 151. 3 339.2
TOTAL .KHARIF 167.0 7.4 174.3
TOTAL .ANNUAL 354.9 158.6 513.5
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 540
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4154 WATER-REQ - WATER REQUIREMNETS AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)

SUBI+RAIN - WATER REQUIREMNETS NET OF SUBIRR AND EFFECTIVE RAIN AT

THE
THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)
CANAL - CANAL WATER USED AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)
P-TUBEWELL - PRIVATE TUBEWELL PUMPAGE AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)
G-TUBEWELL - GOVERNMENT TUBEWELL PUMPAGE AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)
ARTWATER - WATER FROM IMMAGINARY AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)
SLKWATER - SLACK WATER AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)
TOT-SUPPLY - TOTAL SUPPLY OF WATER AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)

4154 PARAMETER REP60 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)

INDEX 1 .. NWFP

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

FRESH. WA TER-REQ O. 111 0.135 0.183 0.107 0.098 0.126 0.169 0.183 0.202
FRESH. RAIN 0.053 0.049 0.079 0.034 0.016 0.009 0.039 0.063 0.033
FRESH.SUBIRR 0.004 0.004 0.007 0.006 0.009 0.012 0.015 0.014 0.011
FRESH. CANAL 0.065 0.079 0.111 0.089 0.104 0.135 0.138 0.138 0.138
FRESH.P-TUBEWELL 0.004 o 020
FRESH.SLKWATER 0.012 0.015 0.022 0.031 0.030 0.024 0.032
FRESH. TOT-SUPPLY 0.122 0.135 0.197 0.128 0.129 0.156 0.193 0.215 0.202
TOTAL. WATER-REQ O. 111 0.135 0.183 0.107 0.098 0.126 0.169 0.183 0.202 N
(Xl
TOTAL.RAIN 0.053 0.049 0.079 0.034 0.016 0.009 0.039 0.063 0.033 (Xl
TOTAL.SUBIRR 0.004 0.004 0.007 0.006 0.009 0.012 0.015 0.014 0.011
TOTAL.CANAL 0.065 0.079 0.111 0.089 0.104 0.135 0.138 0.138 0.138
TOTAL.P-TUBEWELL 0.004 0.020
TOTAL.SLKWATER 0.012 0.015 0.022 0.031 0.030 0.024 0.032
TOTAL.TOT SUPPLY 0.122 0.135 0.197 0.128 0.129 0.156 0.193 0.215 0.202

+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

FRESH.WATER-REQ 0.195 0.117 0.095 0.836 0.885 1.720

FRESH. RAIN 0.012 0.012 0.025 0.230 0.196 0.426
FRESH.SUBIRR 0.010 0.005 0.004 0.034 0.066 0.100
FRESH. CANAL 0.100 0.086 0.079 0.520 0.741 1.261
FRESH.P-TUBEWELL 0.072 0.014 0.090 0.020 0.110
FRESH.SLKWATER 0.012 0.039 0.138 0.176
FRESH. TOT-SUPPLY 0.195 0.117 0.107 0.874 1.023 1.897
TOTAL.WATER-REQ 0.195 0.117 0.095 0.836 0.885 1.720
TOTAL. RAIN 0.012 0.012 0.025 0.230 0.196 0.426
TOTAL.SUBIRR 0.010 0.005 0.004 0.034 0.066 0.100
TOTAL.CANAL 0.100 0.086 0.079 0.520 0.741 1. 261
TOTAL.P-TUBEWELL 0.072 0.014 0.090 0.020 0.110
TOTAL.SLKWATER 0.012 0.039 0.138 0.176
TOTAL. TOT-SUPPLY 0.195 0.117 0.107 0.874 1.023 1.897
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 541
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4154 PARAMETER REP60 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)

INDEX 1 = PMW

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

FRESH .WATER-REQ 0.309 0.386 0.550 0.324 0.261 0.223 0.280 0.291 0.276
FRESH .RAIN 0.049 0.061 0.090 0.036 0.032 0.035 0.128 0.117 0.046
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.011 0.014 0.021 0.017 0.032 0.025 0.023 0.020 0.014
FRESH .CANAL 0.084 0.083 0.102 0.160 0.147 0.130 0.129 0.126 0.138
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 0.113 0.176 0.264 0.044 0.034
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.052 0.052 0.073 0.068 0.050 0.041 0.037 0.041 0.043
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.009 0.037 0.013
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 0.309 0.386 0.550 0.324 0.261 0.231 0.318 0.304 0.276
SALINE.WATER-REO 0.051 0.044 0.052 0.052 0.027 0.017 0.025 0.021 0.019
SALINE. RAIN 0.008 0.007 0.010 0.006 0.004 0.003 0.012 0.011 0.005
SALINE. SUBIRR 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001
SALINE. CANAL 0.041 0.035 0.040 0.064 0.058 0.046 0.045 0.044 0.046
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.021 0.039 0.034 0.035 0.036 0.033
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.051 0.044 0.052 0.073 0.066 0.051 0.059 0.058 0.052
TOTAL .WATER-REO 0.360 0.430 0.602 0.376 0.288 0.240 0.305 0.312 0.294
TOTAL .RAIN 0.057 0.068 0.100 0.042 0.036 0.038 0.140 0.128 0.051
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.013 0.016 0.023 0.019 0.036 0.028 0.026 0.022 0.015
TOTAL .CANAL 0.126 0.118 0.142 0.224 0.205 0.176 0.174 0.170 0.184
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 0.113 0.176 0.264 0.044 0.034 N
Q)
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.052 0.052 0.073 0.068 0.050 0.041 0.037 0.041 0.043 10
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.021 0.039 0.043 0.072 0.050 0.033
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 0.360 0.430 0.602 0.397 0.327 0.283 0.377 0.362 0.328
+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL
FRESH .WATER-REO 0.423 0.279 0.252 2.199 1.655 3.855
FRESH .RAIN 0.013 0.014 0.025 0.252 0.394 0.647
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.019 0.014 0.010 0.089 0.131 0.220
FRESH .CANAL 0.123 0.107 0.094 0.593 0.831 1.424
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 0.248 0.107 0.068 0.975 0.078 1.054
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.021 0.036 0.055 0.290 0.280 0.570
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.060 0.060
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 0.423 0.279 0.252 2.199 1.715 3.914
SALINE.WATER-REQ 0.049 0.048 0.047 0.291 0.160 0.451
SALINE. RAIN 0.002 0.002 0.004 0.033 0.042 0.075
SALINE. SUBIRR 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.011 0.014 0.026
SALINE. CANAL 0.045 0.044 0.041 0.246 0.303 0.550
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.199 0.199
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.049 0.048 0.047 0.291 0.359 0.650
TOTAL .WATER-REQ 0.472 0.327 0.299 2.490 1.815 4.305
TOTAL .RAIN 0.015 0.016 0.029 0.285 0.436 0.721
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.021 0.017 0.012 0.100 0.145 0.246
TOTAL .CANAL 0.168 0.151 0.135 0.840 1.134 1.973
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 0.248 0.107 0.068 0.975 0.078 1.054
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.021 0.036 0.055 0.290 0.280 0.570
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.259 0.259
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 0.472 0.327 0.299 2.490 2.074 4.564
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 542
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4154 PARAMETER REP60 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)

INDEX 1 = PCW

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

FRESH .WATER-REO 1.618 2.437 3.108 0.552 1.524 2.138 2.695 3.047 3.800
FRESH .RAIN 0.217 0.214 0.199 0.025 O. 117 0.257 1.210 1.071 0.347
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.035 0.048 0.071 0.018 O. 115 0.129 0.113 0.103 0.094
FRESH .CANAL 0.423 0.483 0.983 0.722 1.253 1.550 1.346 1.250 1. 231
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 0.911 1.656 1.808 0.170 0.587 2.093
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.032 0.037 0.047 0.045 0.039 0.031 0.025 0.036 0.036
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.259
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 1. 618 2.437 3.108 0.811 1.524 2.138 2.695 3.047 3.800
SALINE. WATER-REO 0.132 0.203 0.281 0.129 0.237 0.288 0.349 0.395 0.454
SALINE. RAIN 0.020 0.020 0.022 0.007 0.016 0.033 0.157 0.139 0.043
SALINE.SUBIRR 0.003 0.004 0.007 0.005 0.015 0.017 0.015 0.013 0.012
SALINE. CANAL 0.109 0.180 0.252 0.265 0.346 0.405 0.375 0.345 0.400
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.147 0.140 0.167 0.198 0.102
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.132 0.203 0.281 0.277 0.377 0.455 0.547 0.497 0.454
TOTAL . WATER-REO 1.750 2.640 3.389 0.681 1.761 2.425 3.044 3.442 4.255
TOTAL .RAIN 0.237 0.233 0.221 0.033 0.133 0.290 1.367 1.209 0.390
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.038 0.052 0.078 0.022 0.130 0.145 0.128 0.117 0.105
TOTAL .CANAL 0.532 0.663 1.235 0.987 1.598 1.954 1.721 1.594 1.630
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 0.911 1.656 1.B08 0.170 0.587 2.093 N
10
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.032 0.037 0.047 0.045 0.039 0.031 0.025 0.036 0.036 0
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.406 0.140 0.167 0.198 0.102
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 1.750 2.640 3.389 1.087 1.901 2.592 3.241 3.544 4.255

+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

FRESH .WATER-REO 3.251 2.302 1.455 14.171 13.756 27.926

FRESH . RAIN 0.054 0.091 0.113 0.889 3.028 3.917
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.089 0.053 0.040 0.335 0.571 0.906
FRESH .CANAL 1.033 0.640 0.553 4.116 7.351 11.468
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 2.046 1.486 0.721 8.627 2.850 11.477
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.029 0.031 0.027 0.203 0.214 0.417
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.259 0.259
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 3.251 2.302 1.455 14. 171 14.014 28.185
SALINE. WATER-REO 0.355 0.243 0.136 1.352 1.852 3.203
SALINE. RAIN 0.006 0.009 0.010 0.086 0.395 0.481
SALINE. SUBIRR 0.011 0.006 0.004 0.036 0.076 0.112
SALINE. CANAL 0.339 0.228 0.179 1.287 2.135 3.422
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.057 0.057 0.754 0.811
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.355 0.243 0.193 1.409 2.606 4.014
TOTAL .WATER-REO 3.607 2.545 1. 591 15.522 15.608 31.130
TOTAL .RAIN 0.060 0.100 0.123 0.975 3.423 4.398
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.100 0.059 0.044 0.370 0.647 1.018
TOTAL .CANAL 1.372 0.869 0.732 5.403 9.486 14.889
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 2.046 1.486 0.721 8.627 2.850 11.477
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.029 0.031 0.027 0.203 0.214 0.417
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.057 0.057 1.012 1.069
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 3.607 2.545 1.648 15.579 16.620 32.199
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 543
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4154 PARAMETER REP60 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)

INDEX 1 = PSW
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

FRESH .WATER-REO 0.607 0.943 1.199 0.420 0.539 0.636 0.875 1.065 1.057
FRESH .RAIN 0.142 0.147 0.154 0.035 0.056 0.162 0.457 0.558 0.211
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.011 0.013 0.023 0.010 0.022 0.030 0.025 0.024 0.022
FRESH .CANAL 0.114 0.197 0.208 0.231 0.299 0.297 0.291 0.338 0.263
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 0.249 0.470 0.673 0.391
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.091 0.115 0.140 0.144 0.162 0.147 0.145 0.145 0.170
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.042
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 0.607 0.943 1.199 0.420 0.539 0.636 0.916 1.065 1.057
SALINE. WATER-REO 0.074 0.130 0.109 0.094 0.094 0.091 0.102 0.123 0.121
SALINE. RAIN 0.021 0.029 0.019 0.010 0.009 0.020 0.062 0.071 0.027
SALI NE . SUB I RR 0.002 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003
SALINE. CANAL 0.051 0.099 0.087 0.101 0.141 0.138 O. 121 0.130 0.115
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.020 0.059 0.071 0.084 0.080 0.023
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.074 0.130 0_109 0.114 0.153 0.163 0.186 0.204 0.145
TOTAL .WATER-REO 0.681 1.073 1.308 0.514 0.633 0.727 0.977 1. 188 1. 178
TOTAL .RAIN 0.163 0.176 0.173 0.045 0.065 0.182 0.518 0.629 0.238
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.012 0.016 0.026 0.013 0.026 0.034 0.028 0.026 0.025
TOTAL .CANAL 0.165 0.296 0.295 0.331 0.439 0.435 0.411 0.469 0.378
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 0.249 0.470 0.673 0.391 N
\0
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL
TOTAL .SLKWATER
0.091 0.115 0.140 0.144
0.020
0.162
o 059
0.147
0.071
0.145
0.126
0.145
0.080
0.170
0.023
....
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY o 681 1.073 1.308 0.534 0.692 0.798 1.103 1.269 1.202

+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

FRESH .WATER-REO 1. 165 0.681 0.512 5.107 4.591 9.698

FRESH .RAlN 0.044 0.031 0.063 0.581 1.480 2.061
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.021 0.014 0.010 0.093 0.132 0.225
FRESH .CANAL 0.252 0.281 0.205 1.257 1.718 2.975
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 0.672 0.219 0.169 2.452 0.391 2.843
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.176 0.136 0.065 0.724 0.912 1.636
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.042 0.042
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 1. 165 0.681 0.512 5.107 4.633 9.740
SALINE. WATER-REO 0.120 0.148 0.106 0.687 0.626 1. 314
SALINE. RAIN 0.005 0.005 0.014 0.094 0.199 0.293
SALINE. SUBIRR 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.014 0.019 0.033
SALINE. CANAL O. 112 0.141 0.089 0.579 0.746 1.325
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.337 0.337
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.120 0.148 0.106 0.687 0.963 1.651
TOTAL .WATER-REO 1.285 0.829 0.618 5.794 5.217 11.012
TOTAL .RAIN 0.050 0.036 0.077 0.675 1.678 2.354
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.023 0.016 0.013 0.106 0.151 0.258
TOTAL .CANAL 0.365 0.422 0.294 1.837 2.464 4.300
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 0.672 0.219 0.169 2.452 0.391 2.843
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.176 0.136 0.065 0.724 0.912 1.636
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.379 0.379
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 1.285 0.829 0.618 5.794 5.597 11.391
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 544
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM eMS

4154 PARAMETER REP60 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)

INDEX 1 .. PRW

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

FRESH. WATER-REO 0.561 0.865 1.198 0.404 0.341 1.017 1.435 1.574 1.579
FRESH. RAIN 0.154 0.146 0.157 0.039 0.037 0.197 0.593 0.663 0.267
FRESH.SUBIRR 0.004 0.006 0.011 0.005 0.006 0.016 0.013 0.010 0.010
FRESH. CANAL 0.083 0.133 0.173 0.169 0.252 0.507 0.412 0.389 0.330
FRESH.P-TUBEWELL 0.271 0.514 0.775 0.116 0.213 0.342 0.441 0.880
FRESH.G-TUBEWELL 0.049 0.065 0.082 0.074 0.078 0.084 0.075 0.071 0.092
FRESH.SLKWATER 0.033
FRESH. TOT-SUPPLY 0.561 0.865 1.198 0.404 0.374 1.017 1.435 1.574 1.579
TOTAL.WATER-REQ 0.561 0.865 1.198 0.404 0.341 1.017 1.435 1.574 1.579
TOTAL.RAIN 0.154 0.146 0.157 0.039 0.037 0.197 0.593 0.663 0.267
TOTAL. SUBIRR 0.004 0.006 0.011 0.005 0.006 0.016 0.013 0.010 0.010
TOTAL.CANAL 0.083 0.133 0.173 0.169 0.252 0.507 0.412 0.389 0.330
TOTAL.P-TUBEWELL 0.271 0.514 0.775 0.116 0.213 0.342 0.441 0.880
TOTAL.G-TUBEWELL 0.049 0.065 0.082 0.074 0.078 0.084 0.075 0.071 0.092
TOTAL.SLKWATER 0.033
TOTAL. TOT-SUPPLY 0.561 0.865 1.198 0.404 0.374 1.017 1.435 1.574 1.579

+ OCT NOV OEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

I\)
10
FRESH.WATER-REQ 1.050 0.469 0.466 4.609 6.349 10.959 I\)
FRESH.RAIN 0.027 0.022 0.067 0.573 1.797 2.370
FRESH.SUBIRR 0.009 0.004 0.005 0.040 0.060 0.099
FRESH. CANAL 0.230 0.158 0.119 0.896 2.058 2.954
FRESH.P-TUBEWELL 0.723 0.230 0.248 2.761 1.992 4.753
FRESH.G-TUBEWELL 0.062 0.055 0.027 0.340 0.475 0.815
FRESH.SLKWATER 0.033 0.033
FRESH. TOT-SUPPLY 1.050 0.469 0.466 4.609 6.382 10.991
TOTAL. WATER-REO 1.050 0.469 0.466 4.609 6.349 10.959
TOTAL.RAIN 0.027 0.022 0.067 0.573 1.797 2.370
TOTAL. SUBIRR 0.009 0.004 0.005 0.040 0.060 0.099
TOTAL. CANAL 0.230 0.158 0.119 0.896 2.058 2.954
TOTAL. P-TUBEWELL 0.723 0.230 0.248 2.761 1.992 4.753
TOTAL.G-TUBEWELL 0.062 0.055 0.027 0.340 0.475 0.815
TOTAL.SLKWATER 0.033 0.033
TOTAL. TOT-SUPPLY 1.050 0.469 0.466 4.609 6.382 10.991

INDEX 1 = SCWN

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

FRESH .WATER REO 0.266 0.462 0.478 0.210 0.217 0.315 0.392 0.393 0.398
FRESH .RAIN 0.012 0.016 0.014 0.007 0.007 0.015 0.096 0.081 0.024
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.023 0.024 0.037 0.026 0.042 0.043 0.037 0.035 0.033
FRESH .CANAL 0.123 0.188 0.207 0.166 0.186 0.247 0.249 0.255 0.305
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 0.099 0.223 0.207 0.016
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.010 0.011 0.013 0.010 0.009 0.011 0.010 0.024 0.021
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.027
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 0.266 0.462 0.478 0.210 0.244 0.315 0.392 0.393 0.398
SALINE. WATER-REO 0.125 0.218 0.205 0.146 0.117 0.164 0.216 0.220 0.245
SALINE-RAIN 0.006 0.008 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.009 0.056 0.047 0.016
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 545
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4154 PARAMETER REP60 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)

INDEX 1 = SCWN

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

SALINE. SUBIRR 0.011 0.012 0.016 0.017 0.024 0.025 0.021 0.020 0.020
SALINE .CANAL 0.108 0.199 0.183 0.158 0.206 0.265 0.260 0.254 0.298
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.033 0.117 0.135 O. 121 0.102 0.089
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.125 0.218 0.205 0.179 0.234 0.299 0.337 0.322 0.334
TOTAL .WATER-REO 0.390 0.680 0.683 0.356 0.334 0.479 0.609 0.613 0.644
TOTAL .RAIN 0.017 0.024 0.020 0.012 0.010 0.023 0.152 0.128 0.040
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.034 0.036 0.053 0.042 0.066 0.068 0.058 0.055 0.053
TOTAL .CANAL 0.231 0.386 0.390 0.324 0.392 0.512 0.509 0.509 0.602
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 0.099 0.223 0.207 0.016
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.010 0.011 0.013 0.010 0.009 0.011 0.010 0.024 0.021
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.033 0.144 0.135 0.121 0.102 0.089
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 0.390 0.680 0.683 0.389 0.478 0.614 0.730 0.715 0.732

+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

FRESH .WATER-REO 0.469 0.288 o 260 2.223 1.926 4.150

FRESH .RAIN 0.002 0.005 0.007 0.056 0.229 0.285
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.042 0.026 0.021 0.172 0.215 0.388
FRESH .CANAL 0.221 0.173 0.160 1.071 1.408 2.480 N
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 0.198 0.077 0.067 0.871 0.016 0.886 \0
lJJ
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.005 0.006 0.006 0.053 0.085 0.138
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.027 0.027
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 0.469 0.288 0.260 2.223 1.953 4.176
SALINE. WA TER-REO 0.273 0.133 0.120 1.073 1.108 2. 181
SALINE. RAIN 0.001 0.003 0.003 0.027 0.137 0.164
SALINE. SUBIRR 0.025 0.013 0.010 0.087 0.128 0.214
SALINE. CANAL 0.246 0.193 0.165 1.093 1.441 2.534
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.076 0.058 0.134 0.597 0.731
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.273 0.208 0.179 1.207 1.705 2.912
TOTAL .WATER-REO 0.742 0.421 0.380 3.296 3.035 6.331
TOTAL .RAIN 0.004 0.008 0.011 0.083 0.365 0.449
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.067 0.039 0.031 0.259 0.343 0.602
TOTAL .CANAL 0.467 0.366 0.325 2.165 2.849 5.014
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 0.198 0.077 0.067 0.871 0.016 0.886
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.005 0.006 0.006 0.053 0.085 0.138
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.076 0.058 0.134 0.624 0.758
TOTAL TOT-SUPPLY 0.742 0.496 0.439 3.430 3.658 7.088

INDEX 1 SRWN

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

FRESH .WATER-REO 0.206 0.350 0.394 0.037 0.013 0.306 0.375 0.365 0.381
FRESH .RAIN 0.011 0.019 0.015 8.044644E-4 2.340537E-4 0.006 0.016 0.022 0.007
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.021 0.026 0.039 0.002 0.002 0.022 0.021 0.019 0.018
FRESH .CANAL 0.105 0.039 0.074 0.032 0.062 0.541 0.704 0.409 0.355
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 0.067 0.264 0.264
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 6.500000E-4 6.500000E-4 6.500000E-4
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.053 0.264 0.366 0.086
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 0.206 0.350 0.394 0.037 0.066 0.570 0.740 0.451 0.381
INDUS BASIN MOOEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 546
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4154 PARAMETER REP60 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)

INDEX 1 = SRWN

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

SALINLWATER-REO 0.153 0.188 0.178 0.045 0.037 0.517 0.634 0.602 0.679
SALINE.RAIN 0.009 0.012 0.007 0.001 7.454515E-4 0.011 0.028 0.037 0.016
SALI NE . SUB I RR 0.016 0.016 0.018 0.004 0.007 0.039 0.037 0.032 0.038
SALINE. CANAL 0.128 0.161 0.153 0.082 0.188 0.977 1.069 0.798 0.993
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.042 0.159 0.510 0.501 0.264 0.369
SALINE.TOT-SUPPLY 0.153 0.188 0.178 0.087 0.196 1.027 1.134 0.866 1.048
TOTAL .WATER-REO 0.359 0.538 0.572 0.082 0.050 0.823 1.008 0.967 1.060
TOTAL .RAIN 0.020 0.031 0.022 0.0029.795052E-4 0.017 0.043 0.058 0.024
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.037 0.042 0.057 0.006 0.010 0.061 0.059 0.051 0.056
TOTAL .CANAl 0.232 0.199 0.227 0.114 0.250 1.518 1.773 1.207 1.348
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELl 0.067 0.264 0.264
TOTAL .G-TUBEWElL 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 6.500000E-4 6.500000E-4 6.500000E-4
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.042 0.212 0.774 0.866 0.349 0.369
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 0.359 0.538 0.572 0.124 0.262 1.597 1.875 1. 317 1.429

+ OCT NOV OEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

FRESH .WATER-REO 0.379 0.204 0.202 1.735 1.476 3.211

FRESH .RAIN 0.004 0.011 0.060 0.052 0.112 N
10
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.034 0.025 0.019 0.165 0.085 0.250 ~
FRESH .CANAL 0.136 0.044 0.035 0.432 2.103 2.534
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 0.208 0.130 0.136 1.070 1.070
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.008 0.005 0.013
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.768 0.768
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 0.379 0.204 0.202 1.735 2.244 3.979
SALINE.WATER-REQ 0.462 0.173 0.149 1.303 2.514 3.818
SALINE.RAIN 0.003 0.008 0.039 0.093 0.132
SALINE. SUB1:RR 0.044 0.020 0.015 0.129 0.157 0.286
SALINE.CANAL 0.417 0.150 0.149 1.158 4.108 5.266
SALINE. SlKWATER 0.023 0.023 1.844 1.867
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.462 0.173 0.172 1.326 4.359 5.685
TOTAL .WATER-REQ o 841 0.377 0.351 3.038 3.991 7.029
TOTAL .RAIN 0.007 0.019 0.099 0.145 0.244
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.078 0.045 0.034 0.294 0.242 0.536
TOTAL .CANAL o 553 0.194 0.184 1.590 6.210 7.800
TOTAL .P-TUBEWEll 0.208 0.130 0.136 1.070 1.070
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.008 0.005 0.013
TOTAL .SlKWATER 0.023 0.023 2.612 2.635
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 0.841 0.377 0.374 3.061 6.603 9.664

INDEX 1 = SCWS

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

FRESH .WATER-REO 0.100 0.152 0.187 0.087 0.097 0.170 0.204 0.205 0.186
FRESH .RAIN 0.003 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.008 0.053 0.039 0.013
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.008 0.008 0.014 0.012 0.017 0.017 0.015 0.013 0.012
FRESH .CANAL 0.031 0.058 0.044 0.055 0.047 0.047 0.056 0.057 0.058
FRESH .P-TUBEWElL 0.058 0.080 0.124 0.017 0.029 0.098 0.080 0.089 0.098
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 7.959273E-4 9.285818E-4 0.001 7.959273E-4 6.632727E-4 9.285818E-4 7.959273E-4 0.006 0.006
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 547
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4154 PARAMETER REP60 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)

INDEX SCWS

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 0.100 0.152 0.187 0.087 0.097 0.170 0.204 0.205 0.186
SALINE.WATER-REO 0.141 0.332 0.260 0.222 0.213 0.347 0.421 0.425 0.405
SALINE. RAIN 0.004 0.011 0.005 0.005 0.007 0.017 0.123 0.091 0.031
SALINE. SUBIRR 0.011 0.021 0.020 0.031 0.040 0.039 0.033 0.031 0.029
SALINE. CANAL 0.126 0.301 0.235 0.280 0.328 0.291 0.290 0.303 0.345
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.094 0.163 0.026
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.141 0.332 0.260 0.316 0.376 0.347 0.447 0.425 0.405
TOTAL .WATER-REO 0.241 0.484 0.447 0.309 0.309 0.517 0.625 0.630 0.591
TOTAL .RAIN 0.006 0.015 0.008 0.007 0.010 0.025 0.117 0.130 0.044
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.019 0.029 0.033 0.043 0.058 0.056 0.048 0.045 0.041
TOTAL .CANAL 0.158 0.358 0.280 0.335 0.375 0.337 0.347 0.360 0.403
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 0.058 0.080 0.124 0.017 0.029 0.098 0.080 0.089 0.098
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 7.959273E-4 9.285818E-4 0.001 7.959273E-4 6.632727E-4 9.285818E-4 7.959273E-4 0.006 0.006
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.094 0.163 0.026
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 0.241 0.484 0.447 0.403 0.472 0.517 0.652 0.630 0.591

+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

FRESH .WATER-REO 0.122 0.135 0.108 0.804 0.950 1.754 N

\0
FRESH .RAIN 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.015 O. 117 0.132 01
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.011 0.009 0.007 0.058 0.086 0.144
FRESH .CANAL o 047 0.042 0.044 0.267 0.320 0.586
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 0.062 0.082 0.055 0.461 0.411 0.872
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 3.979636E-4 5.306182E-4 5.306182E-4 0.004 0.015 0.019
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 0.122 0.135 0.108 0.804 0.950 1.754
SALINE.WATER-REO 0.335 0.319 0.258 1.645 2.032 3.678
SALINE. RAIN 0.004 0.003 0.004 0.031 0.275 0.306
SALINE. SUBIRR 0.034 0.023 0.019 0.128 0.204 0.331
SALINE. CANAL 0.296 0.293 0.246 1.497 1.838 3.334
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.010 0.010 0.284 0.294
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.335 0.319 0.269 1.656 2.316 3.972
TOTAL .WATER-REO 0.457 0.454 0.367 2.449 2.982 5.431
TOTAL .RAIN 0.006 0.004 0.006 0.046 0.392 0.438
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.046 0.033 0.026 0.186 0.290 0.476
TOTAL .CANAL 0.343 0.335 0.289 1.763 2.157 3.921
TOTAL .P-TUBEWEll 0.062 0.082 0.055 0.461 0.411 0.872
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 3.979636E-4 5.306182E-4 5.306182E-4 0.004 0.015 0.019
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.010 0.010 0.284 0.294
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 0.457 0.454 0.317 2.460 3.266 5.726

INDEX 1 = SRWS

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

SALINE. WATER-REO 0.170 0.220 0.245 0.083 0.117 0.500 0.518 0.520 0.400
SALINE. RAIN 0.006 0.012 0.004 6.549810E-4 0.005 0.025 0.137 0.071 0.030
SALINE. SUBIRR 0.026 0.024 0.035 0.013 0.045 0.040 0.035 0.032 0.036
SALINE. CANAL 0.211 0.187 0.217 0.289 0.597 0.780 1.026 0.700 0.726
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.074 0.003 0.011 0.219 0.470 0.344 0.679 0.283 0.392
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.244 0.223 0.256 0.302 0.647 0.844 1.198 0.803 0.792
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 548
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4154 PARAMETER REP60 REPORT ON WATER 8ALANCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)

INDEX 1 = SRWS

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

TOTAL .WATER-REO 0.170 0.220 0.245 0.083 0.177 0.500 0.518 0.520 0.400
TOTAL .RAIN 0.006 0.012 0.004 6.549810E-4 0.005 0.025 0.137 0.071 0.030
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.026 0.024 0.035 0.013 0.045 0.040 0.035 0.032 0.036
TOTAL .CANAL 0.211 0.187 0.217 0.289 0.597 0.780 1.026 0.700 0.726
TOTAL . SLKWATER 0.074 0.003 0.011 0.219 0.470 0.344 0.679 0.283 0.392
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 0.244 0.223 0.256 0.302 0.647 0.844 1.198 0.803 0.792

+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

SALINE. WATER-REO 0.239 0.201 0.157 1.232 2.198 3.430

SALINE.RAIN 0.003 0.003 0.006 0.034 0.268 0.301
SALINE. SUBIRR 0.034 0.031 0.026 0.176 0.200 0.376
SALINE. CANAL 0.417 0.211 0.136 1.380 4.118 5.498
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.216 0.044 0.011 0.358 2.388 2.746
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.455 0.245 0.168 1.590 4.586 6.176
TOTAL .WATER-REO 0.239 0.201 0.157 1.232 2.198 3.430
TOTAL .RAIN 0.003 0.003 0.006 0.034 0.268 0.301
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.034 0.031 0.026 0.176 0.200 0.376
TOTAL .CANAL 0.417 0.211 0.136 1.380 4.118 5.498 N
\0
TOTAL . SLKWATER 0.216 0.044 0.011 0.358 2.388 2.746 0\
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 0.455 0.245 0.168 1.590 4.586 6.176

INDEX 1 = PUNJAB

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

FRESH .WATER-REO 3.095 4.631 6.055 1.700 2.665 4.013 5.285 5.976 6.712
FRESH .RAIN 0.563 0.568 0.600 0.135 0.243 0.651 2.389 2.410 0.871
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.060 0.081 0.126 0.049 0.175 0.200 0.174 0.156 0.139
FRESH .CANAL 0.704 0.896 1.466 1.282 1.950 2.484 2.178 2.102 1.961
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 1.543 2.816 3.520 0.161 0.383 0.342 1.027 3.399
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.224 0.270 0.342 0.331 0.330 0.303 0.282 0.294 0.341
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.259 0.033 0.009 0.079 0.013
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 3.095 4.631 6.055 1.959 2.698 4.022 5.364 5.989 6.712
SALINE. WATER-REO 0.257 0.378 0.442 0.275 0.358 0.396 0.476 0.539 0.594
SALINE. RAIN 0.049 0.056 0.051 0.023 0.028 0.057 0.231 0.220 0.075
SALINE.SUBIRR 0.006 0.009 0.012 0.010 0.022 0.023 0.020 0.018 0.015
SALINE. CANAL 0.201 0.314 0.380 0.430 0.545 0.588 0.541 0.520 0.560
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.188 0.238 0.272 0.317 0.219 0.056
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.257 0.378 0.442 0.463 0.595 0.669 0.792 0.758 0.650
TOTAL .WATER-REO 3.352 5.009 6.498 1.976 3.023 4.409 5.760 6.516 7.306
TOTAL .RAIN 0.612 0.624 0.651 0.159 0.271 0.708 2.620 2.630 0.946
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.067 0.090 0.138 0.059 0.198 0.223 0.195 0.174 0.155
TOTAL .CANAL 0.905 1.210 1.846 1.712 2.495 3.072 2.719 2.622 2.522
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 1.543 2.816 3.520 0.161 0.383 0.342 1.027 3.399
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.224 0.270 0.342 0.331 0.330 0.303 0.282 0.294 0.341
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.447 0.271 0.281 0.396 0.232 0.056
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 3.352 5.009 6.498 2.422 3.294 4.690 6.156 6.748 7.362
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 549
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4154 PARAMETER REP60 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)

INDEX 1 = PUNJAB

+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

FRESH .WATER-REO 5.890 3.731 2.685 26.086 26.351 52.437

FRESH .RAIN 0.139 0.157 0.268 2.295 6.699 8.995
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.137 0.086 0.065 0.556 0.894 1.450
FRESH .CANAL 1.638 1. 186 0.972 6.862 11.958 18.821
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 3.688 2.042 1.205 14.815 5.312 20.127
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.288 0.259 0.174 1.557 1.881 3.438
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.393 0.393
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 5.890 3.731 2.685 26.086 26.745 52.831
SALINE. WATER-REO 0.524 0.440 0.289 2.330 2.638 4.968
SALINE.RAIN 0.013 0.016 0.029 0.213 0.635 0.848
SALINE. SUBIRR 0.015 0.010 0.008 0.061 0.109 0.170
SALINE. CANAL 0.496 0.414 0.309 2. 113 3.184 5.296
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.057 0.057 1.290 1.347
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.524 0.440 0.346 2.387 3.928 6.315
TOTAL .WATER-REO 6.414 4.170 2.973 28.416 28.990 57.405
TOTAL .RAIN 0.152 0.173 0.298 2.509 7.334 9.843
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.153 0.096 0.073 0.617 1.004 1.620
TOTAL .CANAL 2.133 1.600 1.281 8.975 15.142 24.117
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 3.688 2.042 1.205 14.815 5.312 20.127 N
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.288 0.259 0.174 1.557 1.881 3.438 \0
......
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.057 0.057 1.683 1.740
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 6.414 4.170 3.030 28.473 30.673 59.145

INDEX 1 " SIND

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

FRESH .WATER-REO 0.572 0.964 1.059 0.333 0.327 0.791 0.972 0.964 0.966
FRESH .RAIN 0.026 0.040 0.032 0.010 0.010 0.028 0.164 0.142 0.044
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.051 0.058 0.090 0.040 0.062 0.081 0.073 0.067 0.063
FRESH .CANAL 0.259 0.284 0.325 0.253 0.295 0.834 1.009 0.721 0.717
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 0.224 0.567 0.596 0.017 0.029 0.098 0.080 0.089 O. 114
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.012 0.014 0.017 0.013 0.011 0.013 0.011 0.031 0.027
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.080 0.264 0.366 0.086
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 0.572 0.964 1.059 0.333 0.406 1.055 1.337 1.050 0.966
SALINE. WATER-REO 0.588 0.958 0.887 0.496 0.544 1.529 1.789 1.766 1.729
SALINE .RAIN 0.025 0.042 0.022 0.012 0.016 0.062 0.345 0.246 0.093
SALINE.SUBIRR 0.064 0.072 0.088 0.064 0.117 0.143 0.126 0.115 0.123
SALINE. CANAL 0.573 0.847 0.788 0.809 1.320 2.312 2.646 2.055 2.362
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.074 0.003 0.011 0.388 0.909 0.989 1 328 0.649 0.850
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.662 0.961 0.898 0.884 1.453 2.517 3.117 2.416 2.579
TOTAL .WATER-REO 1.160 1.922 1.947 0.830 0.870 2.319 2.761 2.731 2.695
TOTAL .RAIN 0.050 0.082 0.054 0.022 0.026 0.090 0.509 0.387 0.137
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.116 0.130 0.178 0.104 0.178 0.225 0.199 0.182 0.186
TOTAL .CANAL 0.832 1 . 131 1 . 113 1.062 1.615 3.147 3.655 2.776 3.080
TOTAL .P~TUBEWELL 0.224 0.567 0.596 0.017 0.029 0.098 0.080 0.089 0.114
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.012 0.014 0.017 0.013 0.011 0.013 0.011 0.031 0.027
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.074 0.003 0.011 0.388 0.989 1.253 1.693 0.735 0.850
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 1.234 1.925 1.958 1. 218 1.859 3.572 4.454 3.465 3.544
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 550
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4154 PARAMETER REP60 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)

INDEX 1 = SIND

+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

FRESH .WATER-REO 0.970 0.627 0.570 4.762 4.352 9.115

FRESH .RAIN 0.004 0.010 0.019 0.131 0.398 0.529
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.087 0.061 0.047 0.395 0.386 0.782
FRESH .CANAL 0.404 0.259 0.238 1.770 3.831 5.600
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 0.468 0.289 0.258 2.401 0.427 2.829
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.007 0.008 0.008 0.065 0.105 0.170
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.795 0.795
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 0.970 0.627 0.570 4.762 5.147 9.909
SALINE. WATER-REO 1.308 0.826 0.685 5.253 7.853 13.106
SALINE. RAIN 0.009 0.012 0.022 0.131 0.773 0.904
SALlNE.SUBIRR 0.138 0.087 0.070 0.519 0.689 1.208
SALINE. CANAL 1.377 0.847 0.696 5.128 11.504 16.632
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.216 0.119 0.102 0.525 5.113 5.638
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 1.524 0.946 0.788 5.778 12.966 18.744
TOTAL . WATER-REO 2.278 1.453 1.255 10.016 12.205 22.221
TOTAL .RAIN 0.012 0.022 0.041 0.262 1.171 1.432
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.226 0.148 0.117 0.914 1.075 1.990
TOTAL .CANAL 1.781 1.106 0.934 6.898 15.335 22.233
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 0.468 0.289 0.258 2.401 0.427 2.829 N
\0
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.007 0.008 0.008 0.065 0.105 0.170 00
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.216 0.119 0.102 0.525 5.907 6.432
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 2.494 1.572 1.358 10.541 18.113 28.653

INDEX 1 = PAKISTAN

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

FRESH .WATER-REO 3.777 5.729 7.297 2.141 3.090 4.929 6.425 7.123 7.879
FRESH .RAIN 0.642 0.656 0.711 0.180 0.269 0.688 2.593 2.615 0.948
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.115 0.144 0.223 0.095 0.246 0.293 0.262 0.237 0.213
FRESH .CANAL 1.028 1.259 1.903 1.625 2.349 3.453 3.325 2.961 2.817
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 1.768 3.387 4. 116 0.178 0.029 0.481 0.421 1 . 117 3.533
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.236 0.284 0.359 0.344 0.340 0.316 0.292 0.324 0.368
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.012 0.015 0.280 0.143 0.303 0.469 0.131
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 3.789 5.729 7.312 2.421 3.233 5.232 6.894 7.254 7.879
SALINE. WATER-REO 0.845 1.336 1.330 0.772 0.902 1.925 2.265 2.306 2.323
SALlNE.RAIN 0.074 0.098 0.073 0.035 0.045 0.119 0.575 0.466 0.168
SALINE. SUBIRR 0.071 0.081 0.100 0.074 0.139 0.167 0.147 0.133 0.138
SALINE. CANAL 0.775 1.161 1.167 1.239 1.865 2.901 3.187 2.575 2.923
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.074 0.003 0.011 0.576 1.147 1.261 1.644 0.868 0.906
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.919 1.339 1.340 1.348 2.049 3.186 3.909 3.174 3.229
TOTAL .WATER-REO 4.623 7.066 8.627 2.912 3.992 6.854 8.690 9.429 10.202
TOTAL .RAIN 0.716 0.754 0.784 0.214 0.314 0.807 3.168 3.081 1.116
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.186 0.224 0.323 0.169 0.385 0.460 0.409 0.370 0.351
TOTAL .CANAL 1.802 2.420 3.070 2.863 4.214 6.354 6.512 5.536 5.739
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 1.768 3.387 4. 116 0.178 0.029 0.481 0.421 1. 117 3.533
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.236 0.284 0.359 0.344 0.340 0.316 0.292 0.324 0.368
TOTAL . SLKWATER 0.085 0.003 0.025 0.856 1.290 1.564 2.113 0.999 0.906
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 4.708 7.068 8.652 3.769 5.282 8.418 10.803 10.428 11.108
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 551
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4154 PARAMETER REP60 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)

INDEX 1 = PAKISTAN

+ OCT NOV OEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

FRESH .WATER-REO 7.055 4.475 3.350 31.684 31.588 63.272

FRESH .RAIN 0.155 0.180 0.312 2.657 7.293 9.950
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.235 0.152 0.116 0.985 1.347 2.332
FRESH .CANAL 2.142 1.532 1.289 9.152 16.530 25.682
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 4.228 2.344 1.463 17.306 5.759 23.066
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.295 0.267 0.182 1.622 1.986 3.608
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.012 0.039 1.326 1.364
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 7.055 4.475 3.362 31.722 32.914 64.636
SALINE.WATER-REO 1.832 1.266 0.974 7.583 10.491 18.075
SALINE. RAIN 0.022 0.028 0.051 0.344 1.408 1.752
SALINE. SUBIRR 0.154 0.097 0.078 0.580 0.798 1.378
SALINE .CANAL 1.873 1.260 1.005 7.241 14.688 21.929
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.216 O. 119 0.159 0.582 6.402 6.984
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 2.048 1.385 1.133 8.165 16.894 25.059
TOTAL .WATER-REO 8.887 5.741 4.324 39.267 42.080 81.347
TOTAL .RAIN 0.177 0.207 0.363 3.001 8.701 11 702
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.389 0.249 0.194 1.565 2.145 3.710
TOTAL .CANAL 4.015 2.792 2.294 16.393 31.218 47.610
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 4.228 2.344 1.463 17.306 5.759 23.066 I"l
0.267 0.182 1.622 1.986 \0
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.295 3.608 \0
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.216 0.119 0.172 0.621 7.728 8.349
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 9.103 5.860 4.495 39.888 49.808 89.695
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 552
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4164 ALL FIGURES ARE REPRESENTED AT THE WATER COURSE HEAD USING
WEIGHTED DELIVERY EFFICIENCIES (MAF)

4164 PARAMETER REP70 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE WATERCOURSE HEAD (MAF)

INDEX 1 = NWFP

"AN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

FRESH.WATER-REQ 0.201 0.246 0.332 0.194 0.179 0.229 0.308 0.333 0.367
FRESH. RAIN 0.097 0.089 0.144 0.062 0.030 0.016 0.072 0.116 0.060
FRESH.SUBIRR 0.007 0.007 0.013 0.010 0.016 0.022 0.028 0.025 0.019
FRESH.CANAL 0.119 0.143 0.202 0.161 0.189 0.245 0.251 0.251 0.251
FRESH.P-TUBEWELL 0.007 0.037
FRESH.SLKWATER 0.021 0.027 0.039 0.056 0.054 0.043 0.058
FRESH. TOT-SUPPLY 0.223 0.246 0.359 0.234 0.235 0.284 0.351 0.392 0.367
TOTAL. WATER-REQ 0.201 0.246 0.332 0.194 0.179 0.229 0.308 0.333 0.367
TOTAL. RAIN 0.097 0.089 0.144 0.062 0.030 0.016 0.072 0.116 0.060
TOTAL. SUBIRR 0.007 0.007 0.013 0.010 0.016 0.022 0.028 0.025 0.019
TOTAL. CANA L 0.119 0.143 0.202 0.161 0.189 0.245 0.251 0.251 0.251
TOTAL.P-TUBEWELL 0.007 0.037
TOTAL.SLKWATER 0.021 0.027 0.039 0.056 0.054 0.043 0.058
TOTAL. TOT-SUPPLY 0.223 0.246 0.359 0.234 0.235 0.284 0.351 0.392 0.367
w
0
+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL 0

FRESH.WATER-REQ 0.355 0.213 0.173 1.521 1. 611 3.132

FRESH.RAIN 0.023 0.022 0.045 0.420 0.356 0.776
FRESH.SUBIRR 0.019 0.010 0.007 0.062 0.120 0.182
FRESH.CANAL 0.182 0.157 0.144 0.947 1.349 2.296
FRESH.P-TUBEWELL 0.132 0.025 0.164 0.037 0.200
FRESH.SLKWATER 0.022 0.070 0.251 0.321
FRESH. TOT-SUPPLY 0.355 0.213 0.195 1.592 1.862 3.454
TOTAL.WATER-REQ 0.355 0.213 0.173 1.521 1. 611 3.132
TOTAL. RAIN 0.023 0.022 0.045 0.420 0.356 0.776
TOTAL.SUBIRR 0.019 0.010 0.007 0.062 0.120 0.182
TOTAL.CANAL 0.182 0.157 0.144 0.947 1.349 2.296
TOTAL.P-TUBEWELL 0.132 0.025 0.164 0.037 0.200
TOTAL.SLKWATER 0.022 0.070 0.251 0.321
TOTAL. TOT-SUPPLY 0.355 0.213 0.195 1.592 1.862 3.454

INDEX 1 = PMW

"AN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

FRESH .WATER-REQ 0.638 0.795 1. 134 0.668 0.538 0.459 0.578 0.599 0.568
FRESH .RAIN 0.102 0.125 0.186 0.074 0.066 0.072 0.264 0.241 0.095
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.022 0.029 0.043 0.035 0.066 0.052 0.048 0.041 0.028
FRESH .CANAL 0.173 0.171 0.210 0.330 0.303 0.268 0.267 0.259 0.285
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 0.232 0.362 0.544 0.091 0.070
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.108 0.108 0.151 0.139 0.103 0.084 0.076 0.085 0.089
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.018 0.077 0.027
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 0.638 0.795 1. 134 0.668 0.538 0.477 0.655 0.627 0.568
SALINE.WATER-REQ 0.105 0.091 0.107 0.107 0.055 0.035 0.051 0.044 0.038
SALINE.RAIN 0.016 0.015 0.020 0.012 0.008 0.007 0.025 0.023 0.010
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 553
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4164 PARAMETER REP70 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE WATERCOURSE HEAD (MAF)

INDEX 1 = PMW

,JAN FEB MAR APR MAY ,JUN ,JUL AUG SEP

SALINE. SUBIRR 0.004 0.003 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.002
SALINE .CANAL 0.085 0.073 0.083 0.132 0.120 0.094 0.092 0.092 0.094
SALINE. SLKWA TER 0.043 0.081 0.071 0.072 0.075 0.068
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.105 0.091 0.107 0.150 0.136 0.106 0.122 0.119 0.106
TOTAL .WATER-REO 0.743 0.886 1.240 0.775 0.593 0.494 0.628 0.643 0.607
TOTAL . RAIN 0.118 0.140 0.206 0.086 0.075 0.079 0.289 0.264 0.106
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.026 0.032 0.047 0.040 0.073 0.057 0.053 0.045 0.031
TOTAL .CANAL 0.259 0.244 0.293 0.462 0.423 0.362 0.359 0.350 0.379
TOTAL P-TUBEWELL 0.232 0.362 0.544 0.091 0.070
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.108 0.108 O. 151 0.139 0.103 0.084 0.076 0.085 0.089
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.043 0.081 0.089 0.149 0.102 0.068
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 0.743 0.886 1.240 0.818 0.674 0.583 0.777 0.745 0.675

+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

FRESH .WATER-REO 0.872 0.574 0.519 4.531 3.410 7.941

FRESH .RAIN 0.027 0.029 0.051 0.520 0.813 1.332
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.038 0.030 0.021 0.183 0.270 0.453
FRESH .CANAL 0.253 0.221 0.194 1.222 1.711 2.933 ~
0
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 0.511 0.220 0.140 2.009 0.162 2.171 I-'
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.043 0.075 0.113 0.597 0.577 1.174
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.123 0.123
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 0.872 0.574 0.519 4.531 3.533 8.064
SALINE. WA TER - REO 0.100 0.099 0.097 0.599 0.330 0.929
SALINE. RAIN 0.003 0.004 0.009 0.068 0.086 0.154
SALINE. SUBIRR 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.024 0.029 0.053
SALINE. CANAL 0.092 0.090 0.084 0.508 0.625 1.132
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.410 0.410
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.100 0.099 0.097 0.599 0.740 1.339
TOTAL .WATER-REO 0.972 0.673 0.616 5.130 3.740 8.870
TOTAL .RAIN 0.030 0.033 0.060 0.587 0.899 1.486
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.043 0.034 0.025 0.207 0.299 0.506
TOTAL .CANAL 0.345 0.311 0.278 1.730 2.336 4.066
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 0.511 0.220 0.140 2.009 0.162 2. 171
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.043 0.075 0.113 0.597 0.577 1.174
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.533 0.533
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 0.972 0.673 0.616 5.130 4.273 9.402

INDEX 1 = PCW

,JAN FEB MAR APR MAY ,JUN ,JUL AUG SEP

FRESH .WATER-REO 2.914 4.390 5.599 0.994 2.746 3.851 4.854 5.489 6.847
FRESH .RAIN 0.392 0.385 0.358 0.046 0.211 0.463 2.181 1.929 0.625
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.062 0.086 0.128 0.032 0.208 0.232 0.203 0.186 0.168
FRESH .CANAL 0.763 0.870 1.771 1.301 2.257 2.792 2.425 2.251 2.217
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 1.641 2.983 3.257 0.307 1.057 3.770
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.057 0.066 0.085 0.081 0.071 0.057 0.046 0.066 0.066
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.466
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 2.914 4.390 5.599 1.460 2.746 3.851 4.854 5.489 6.847
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 554
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4164 PARAMETER REP70 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE WATERCOURSE HEAD (MAF)

INDEX 1 = PCW
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP
SALINE. WATER-REO 0.238 0.367 0.507 0.233 0.426 0.518 0.629 0.711 0.818
SALINE.RAIN 0.036 0.035 0.039 0.013 0.028 0.060 0.283 0.250 0.078
SALINE. SUBIRR 0.006 0.008 0.013 0.008 0.027 0.030 0.026 0.024 0.021
SALINE. CANAL 0.196 0.324 0.455 0.477 0.623 0.729 0.676 0.621 o 720
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.265 0.252 0.301 0.356 0.184
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.238 0.367 0.507 0.498 0.678 0.819 0.985 0.895 0.818
TOTAL .WATER-REO 3.152 4.757 6.106 1.227 3.173 4.369 5.483 6.200 7.665
TOTAL .RAIN 0.427 0.421 0.398 0.059 0.239 0.523 2.463 2.179 0.703
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.068 o 094 O. 141 0.040 0.235 0.262 0.230 0.210 0.189
TOTAL .CANAL 0.959 1. 194 2.225 1.779 2.880 3.521 3.101 2.872 2.937
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 1.641 2.983 3.257 0.307 1 057 3.770
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.057 0.066 0.085 0.081 0.071 0.057 0.046 0.066 0.066
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.731 0.252 0.301 0.356 0.184
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 3.152 4.757 6.106 1.959 3.425 4.670 5.839 6.384 7.665

+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

FRESH .WATER-REO 5.857 4.147 2.622 25.528 24.781 50.310

FRESH .RAIN 0.098 0.164 0.204 1.602 5.455 7.057 w
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.160 0.096 0.072 0.603 1.029 1.632 0
FRESH .CANAL 1.861 1.153 0.997 7.415 13.243 20.659 N
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 3.685 2.677 1.300 15.542 5.134 20.676
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.053 0.056 0.049 0.366 0.385 0.752
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.466 0.466
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 5.857 4.147 2.622 25.528 25.247 50.776
SALINE.WATER-REO 0.640 0.438 0.245 2.435 3.336 5.771
SALINE. RAIN 0.011 0.016 0.019 0.155 0.711 0.866
SALINE. SUBIRR 0.020 0.011 0.007 0.064 0.137 0.201
SALINE. CANAL 0.610 0.412 0.322 2.318 3.846 6.164
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.103 0.103 1.358 1.460
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.640 0.438 0.348 2.538 4.694 7.231
TOTAL .WATER-REO 6.497 4.585 2.866 27.963 28. 117 56.081
TOTAL .RAIN 0.109 0.180 0.222 1.757 6.166 7.923
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.179 0.107 0.079 0.667 1.166 1.833
TOTAL .CANAL 2.471 1.565 1.319 9.734 17.090 26.823
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 3.685 2.677 1.300 15.542 5.134 20.676
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.053 0.056 0.049 0.366 0.385 0.752
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.103 0.103 1.824 1.927
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 6.497 4.585 2.969 28.066 29.941 58.007

INDEX 1 PSW

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

FRESH .WATER-REO 1. 137 1.766 2.246 0.787 1.009 1.190 1.638 1.995 1.980
FRESH .RAIN 0.267 0.275 0.289 0.066 0.106 0.303 0.855 1.046 0.396
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.020 0.025 0.044 0.019 0.042 0.056 0.046 0.044 0.041
FRESH .CANAL 0.213 0.369 0.390 0.433 0.560 0.556 0.544 0.634 0.492
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 0.466 0.881 1.261 0.733
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL O. 171 0.216 0.262 0.271 0.303 0.275 0.271 0.271 0.318
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 555
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4164 PARAMETER REP70 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE WATERCOURSE HEAD (MAF)

INDEX 1 = PSW

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

FRESH .SLKWATER 0.079
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 1.137 1.766 2.246 0.787 1.009 1.190 1.717 1.995 1.980
SALINE. WATER-REO 0.138 0.244 0.204 0.176 0.176 0.171 O. 191 0.231 0.227
SALINE. RA IN 0.040 0.054 0.036 0.019 0.016 0.038 0.116 0.132 0.050
SALINE. SUBIRR 0.003 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.007 0.008 0.007 0.005 0.005
SALINE. CANAL 0.095 0.185 0.163 0.188 0.263 0.259 0.226 0.244 0.216
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.037 0.110 0.133 0.157 0.151 0.044
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.138 0.244 0.204 0.213 0.286 0.304 o 349 0.381 0.271
TOTAL .WATER-REO 1.275 2.010 2.450 0.963 1.186 1.362 1.829 2.225 2.207
TOTAL .RAIN 0.306 0.329 0.325 o 085 0.122 0.341 0.971 1. 178 0.446
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.023 0.030 0.049 0.024 0.048 0.063 0.053 0.049 0.046
TOTAL . CANAL 0.309 0.554 0.553 0.621 0.823 0.815 0.771 0.878 0.707
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 0.466 0.881 1.261 0.733
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL O. 171 0.216 0.262 0.271 0.303 0.275 0.271 0.271 0.318
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.037 0.110 0.133 0.236 0.151 0.044
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 1.275 2.010 2.450 1.000 1.296 1.495 2.065 2.376 2.251
+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL
w
0
FRESH .WATER-REO 2.182 1.275 0.959 9.565 8.599 18.165 w
FRESH .RAIN 0.083 0.057 O. 118 1.088 2.771 3.860
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.039 0.027 0.019 0.174 0.247 0.421
FRESH .CANAL 0.472 0.526 0.384 2.355 3.218 5.573
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 1.258 0.410 0.316 4.592 0.733 5.325
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.330 0.255 0.122 1.356 1.709 3.065
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.079 0.079
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 2.182 1.275 0.959 9.565 8.678 18.243
SALINE.WATER-REO 0.225 0.278 0.198 1.288 1.173 2.461
SALINE .RAIN 0.010 0.010 0.027 0.177 0.372 0.549
SALI NE . SUB I RR 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.026 0.036 0.062
SALINE .CANAL 0.211 0.265 0.166 1.085 1.396 2.482
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.631 0.631
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.225 0.278 0.198 1.288 1.805 3.092
TOTAL .WATER-REO 2.408 1.553 1.157 10.853 9.773 20.625
TOTAL .RAIN 0.094 0.067 0.145 1.265 3.143 4.408
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.043 0.031 0.024 0.199 0.283 0.483
TOTAL .CANAL 0.683 0.790 0.550 3.440 4.615 8.055
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 1.258 0.410 0.316 4.592 0.733 5.325
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.330 0.255 0.122 1.356 1.709 3.065
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.710 0.710
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 2.408 1.553 1.157 10.853 10.483 21.335
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 556
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4164 PARAMETER REP70 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE WATERCOURSE HEAD (MAF)

INDEX 1 " PRW

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY .JUN .JUL AUG SEP

FRESH. WATER-REO 1.026 1.581 2.191 0.738 0.623 1.860 2.624 2.877 2.886
FRESH. RAIN 0.282 0.268 0.287 0.072 0.068 0.361 1.085 1. 213 0.488
FRESH.SUBIRR 0.008 0.011 0.020 0.009 0.011 0.029 0.025 0.017 0.018
FRESH. CANAL 0.151 0.243 0.316 0.309 0.461 0.926 0.753 0.711 0.603
FRESH.P-TUBEWElL 0.496 0.939 1.418 0.213 0.389 0.625 0.806 1.610
FRESH.G-TUBEWEll 0.089 0.120 0.150 0.136 0.143 0.154 0.136 0.130 0.168
FRESH.SlKWATER 0.060
FRESH. TOT-SUPPLY 1.026 1.581 2. 191 0.738 0.683 1.860 2.624 2.877 2.886
TOTAl. WATER-REQ 1.026 1.581 2. 191 0.738 0.623 1.860 2.624 2.877 2 886
TOTAL. RAIN 0.282 0.268 0.287 0.072 0.068 0.361 1.085 1.213 0.488
TOTAl. SUBIRR 0.008 0.011 0.020 0.009 0.011 0.029 0.025 0.017 0.018
TOTAl. CANAL 0.151 0.243 0.316 0.309 0.461 0.926 0.753 0.711 0.603
TOTAl.P-TUBEWEll 0.496 0.939 1.418 0.213 0.389 0.625 0.806 1.610
TOTAl. G- TUBEWE lL 0.089 0.120 0.150 0.136 0.143 0.154 0.136 0.130 0.168
TOTAl. SlKWA TER 0.060
TOTAL. TOT-SUPPLY 1.026 1.581 2.191 0.738 0.683 1.860 2.624 2.877 2.886

+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

w
FRESH.WATER-REQ 11.608 0
1.920 0.858 0.851 8.427 20.036
FRESH.RAIN 0.049 0.040 0.123 1.048 3.286 4.334 """
FRESH.SUBIRR 0.017 0.008 0.008 0.072 0.109 0.182
FRESH. CANAL 0-420 0.289 0.218 1.638 3.763 5.401
FRESH.P-TUBEWEll 1.321 0.421 0.453 5.048 3.642 8.690
FRESH.G-TUBEWELL 0.114 o 101 0.049 0.622 0.868 1.489
FRESH.SlKWATER 0.060 0.060
FRESH. TOT-SUPPLY 1.920 0.858 0.851 8.427 11.669 20.096
TOTAL. WATER-REO 1.920 0.858 0.851 8.427 11.608 20.036
TOTAL.RAIN 0.049 0.040 0.123 1.048 3.286 4.334
TOTAL.SUBIRR 0.017 0.008 0.008 0.072 0.109 0.182
TOTAL.CANAL 0.420 0.289 0.218 1.638 3.763 5.401
TOTAl.P-TUBEWELL 1.321 0.421 0.453 5.048 3.642 8.690
TOTAL.G-TUBEWELL O. 114 0.101 0.049 0.622 0.868 1.489
TOTAL.SLKWATER 0.060 0.060
TOTAL. TOT-SUPPLY 1.920 0.858 0.851 8.427 11.669 20.096

INDEX 1 " SCWN

.JAN FEB MAR APR MAY .JUN .JUl AUG SEP

FRESH .WATER-REO 0.587 1.020 1.055 0.463 0.479 0.696 0.866 0.868 0.879
FRESH .RAIN 0.026 0.036 0.030 0.016 0.015 0.032 0.211 0.178 0.053
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.050 0.053 0.082 0.057 0.093 0.094 0.083 0.076 0.073
FRESH .CANAl 0.271 0.414 0.457 0.367 0.411 0.545 0.550 0.562 0.673
FRESH .P-TUBEWElL 0.219 0.492 0.457 0.035
FRESH .G-TUBEWEll 0.022 0.025 0.030 0.023 0.019 0.025 0.022 0.052 0.046
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.059
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 0.587 1.020 1.055 0.463 0.538 0.696 0.866 0.868 0.879
SALINE. WATER-REO 0.275 0.482 0.452 0.323 0.258 0.362 0-477 0.485 0.541
SALINE.RAIN 0.012 0.017 0.013 0.011 0.008 0.019 0.124 0.105 0.035
INDUS BASIN MaDEL REVISED (IBMR) FIlENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 557
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4164 PARAMETER REP70 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE WATERCOURSE HEAD (MAF)

INDEX 1 = SCWN
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUl AUG SEP

SALINE. SUBIRR 0.024 0.026 0.035 0.036 0.054 0.055 0.047 0.045 0.045
SALINE. CANAL 0.238 0.439 0.403 0.348 0.455 0.585 0.574 0.561 0.657
SALINE. SlKWATER 0.072 0.258 0.297 0.268 0.226 0.195
SAlINE.TOT-SUPPlY 0.275 0.482 0.452 0.395 0.517 0.659 0.745 0.711 0.737
TOTAL .WATER-REQ 0.862 1.501 1.507 0.786 0.737 1.058 1. 343 1.353 1.421
TOTAL .RAIN 0.038 0.053 0.043 0.027 0.023 0.051 0.336 0.282 0.088
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.074 0.079 0.117 0.093 0.146 0.149 0.129 0.121 0.118
TOTAL .CANAL 0.509 0.853 0.860 0.715 0.866 1.130 1. 124 1.123 1.330
TOTAL .P-TUBEWEll 0.219 0.492 0.457 0.035
TOTAL .G-TUBEWEll 0.022 0.025 0.030 0.023 0.019 0.025 0.022 0.052 0.046
TOTAL .SlKWATER 0.072 0.318 0.297 0.268 0.226 0.195
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPlY 0.862 1.501 1.507 0.858 1.055 1.355 1 .611 1. 579 1.616

+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

FRESH .WATER-REQ 1.036 0.636 0.574 4.907 4.252 9.159

FRESH .RAIN 0.005 0.011 0.016 0.124 0.505 0.629
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.093 0.058 0.045 0.381 0.475 0.856
FRESH .CANAL 0.488 0.383 0.353 2.365 3.109 5.474 w
0
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 0.437 0.170 0.147 1.921 0.035 1.956 lit
FRESH .G-TUBEWELl 0.012 0.014 0.014 0.116 0.188 0.304
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.059 0.059
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 1.036 0.636 0.574 4.907 4.311 9.219
SALINE. WATER-REO 0.602 0.293 0.265 2.368 2.446 4.814
SALINE.RAIN 0.003 0.006 0.008 0.060 0.302 0.361
SALI NE . SUB I RR 0.056 0.028 0.022 0.191 0.282 0.473
SALINE. CANAL 0.543 0.425 0.364 2.413 3.180 5.592
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.167 0.129 0.296 1. 317 1.613
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.602 0.460 0.394 2.664 3.763 6.427
TOTAL .WATER-REO 1.637 0.928 0.839 7.275 6.698 13.974
TOTAL .RAIN 0.008 0.017 0.023 0.183 0.807 0.990
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.149 0.086 0.068 0.572 0.757 1.329
TOTAL .CANAl 1.031 0.808 0.717 4.778 6.289 11.067
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 0.437 0.170 0.147 1.921 0.035 1.956
TOTAL .G-TUBEWEll 0.012 0.014 0.014 0.116 0.188 0.304
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.167 0.129 0.296 1.377 1.672
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPlY 1.637 1.095 0.968 7.571 8.075 15.646

INDEX 1 = SRWN

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

FRESH .WATER-REO 0.374 0.636 0.717 0.058 0.~1 0.486 0.596 0.581 0.606
FRESH .RAIN 0.021 0.035 0.027 0.001 3.720379E-4 0.010 0.025 0.035 0.012
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.039 0.047 0.071 0.004 0.004 0.035 0.033 0.030 0.029
FRESH .CANAL 0.190 0.071 0.135 0.051 0.098 0.860 1. 119 0.650 0.564
FRESH .P-TUBEWElL 0.123 0.480 0.480
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.084 0.420 0.581 0.136
FRESH .TOT-SUPPlY 0.374 0.636 0.717 0.058 0.104 0.905 1. 177 0.717 0.606
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 558
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4164 PARAMETER REP70 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE WATERCOURSE HEAD (MAF)

INDEX 1 = SRWN
.JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP
SALINE. WATER-REO 0.278 0.342 0.323 0.072 0.060 0.822 1.007 0.957 1.079
SALINE. RAIN 0.016 0.021 0.013 0.002 0.001 0.017 0.044 0.058 0.026
SALINE. SUBIRR 0.030 0.029 0.032 0.006 0.012 0.062 0.060 0.050 0.061
SALINE. CANAL 0.232 0.292 0.278 0.130 0.300 1.553 1.700 1.268 1.579
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.066 0.253 0.810 0.796 0.420 0.587
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.278 0.342 0.323 0.138 0.312 1.633 1.803 1.377 1.665
TOTAL .WATER-REO 0.652 0.978 1.040 0.130 0.080 1.308 1.603 1.538 1.684
TOTAL .RAIN 0.037 0.056 0.040 0.003 0.002 0.027 0.068 0.093 0.038
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.068 0.076 0.103 0.010 0.015 0.097 0.093 0.081 0.089
TOTAL .CANAL 0.423 0.362 0.413 0.181 0.398 2.413 2 819 1.919 2.143
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 0.123 0.480 0.480
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.066 0.336 1.230 1.377 0.556 0.587
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 0.652 0.978 1.040 0.196 0.417 2.538 2.980 2.093 2.271

+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

FRESH .WATER-REO 0.689 0.371 0.367 3.155 2.347 5.501

FRESH .RAIN 0.007 0.019 0.109 0.083 0.192 w
0
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.061 0.046 0.035 0.299 0.135 0.434 0\
FRESH .CANAL 0.247 0.079 0.063 0.785 3.342 4.127
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 0.379 0.236 0.248 1.946 1.946
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.015 0.007 0.022
FRESH .SLKWATER 1.220 1.220
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 0.689 0.371 0.367 3.155 3.567 6.722
SALINE.WATER-REO 0.839 0.315 0.272 2.369 3.997 6.366
SALINE. RAIN 0.006 0.015 0.071 0.149 0.219
SALINE. SUBIRR 0.081 0.036 0.027 0.234 0.250 0.485
SALINE. CANAL 0.759 0.273 0.271 2.106 6.530 8.636
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.041 0.041 2.932 2.973
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.839 0.315 0.313 2.411 6.929 9.339
TOTAL .WATER-REO 1.529 0.686 0.639 5.524 6.343 11.868
TOTAL .RAIN 0.013 0.034 0.180 0.231 0.411
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.142 0.082 0.062 0.534 0.385 0.919
TOTAL .CANAL 1.006 0.352 0.334 2.891 9.872 12.763
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 0.379 0.236 0.248 1.946 1.946
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.015 0.007 0.022
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.041 0.041 4.152 4.194
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 1.529 0.686 0.680 5.566 10.496 16.061

INDEX 1 = SCWS
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY .JUN JUL AUG SEP

FRESH .WATER-REO 0.221 0.336 0.414 0.192 0.214 0.375 0.452 0.454 0.412
FRESH .RAIN 0.006 0.010 0.007 0.004 0.007 0.017 0.118 0.087 0.028
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.017 0.019 0.031 0.026 0.039 0.037 0.032 0.030 0.027
FRESH .CANAL 0.069 0.128 0.098 0.121 0.104 0.103 0.125 0.126 0.128
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 0.128 0.178 0.275 0.038 0.063 0.217 0.176 0.198 0.218
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.014 0.012
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 559
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4164 PARAMETER REP70 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE WATERCOURSE HEAD (MAF)

INDEX 1 = SCWS

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 0.221 0.336 0.414 0.192 0.214 0.375 0.452 0.454 0.412
SALINE. WA TER-REQ 0.312 0.734 0.574 0.491 0.470 0.768 0.930 0.940 0.896
SALINE.RAIN 0.008 0.024 0.011 0.011 0.016 0.039 0.273 0.201 0.069
SALINE. SUBIRR 0.024 0.046 0.043 0.068 0.089 0.086 0.073 0.069 0.064
SALINE.CANAL 0.279 0.664 0.520 0.620 0.726 0.643 0.642 0.670 0.763
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.209 0.361 0.058
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.312 0.734 0.574 0.699 0.831 0.768 0.989 0.940 0.896
TOTAL .WATER-REO 0.534 1.070 0.988 0.683 0.684 1.143 1.383 1.394 1.308
TOTAL .RAIN 0.014 0.033 0.018 0.015 0.022 0.055 0.391 0.287 0.097
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.041 0.064 0.074 0.095 0.128 0.124 0.105 0.099 0.090
TOTAL .CANAL 0.349 0.792 0.618 0.741 0.830 0.746 0.767 0.796 0.891
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 0.128 0.178 0.275 0.038 0.063 0.217 0.176 0.198 0.218
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.014 0.012
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.209 0.361 0.058
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 0.534 1.070 0.988 0.891 1.045 1.143 1.441 1.394 1.308
+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

FRESH .WATER-REO 0.269 0.299 0.239 1.778 2.100 3.878 w

FRESH .RAIN 0.003 0.003 0.004 0.032 o 259 0.292 0
.....
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.025 o 021 0.017 0.128 0.191 0.319
FRESH .CANAL 0.104 0.094 0.096 0.590 0.707 1".296
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 0.136 0.180 0.121 1.018 0.910 1.928
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 8.799494E-4 0.001 0.001 0.009 0.033 0.043
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 0.269 0.299 0.239 1.778 2.100 3.878
SALINE.WATER-REO 0.740 0.706 0.571 3.638 4.494 8.132
SALINE.RAIN 0.010 0.007 0.010 0.069 0.608 0.677
SALINE. SUBIRR 0.076 0.051 0.041 0.282 0.451 0.733
SALINE. CANAL 0.655 0.647 0.543 3.309 4.063 7.373
SALINE. SLKWA TER 0.023 0.023 0.628 0.650
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.740 0.706 0.594 3.661 5.122 8.782
TOTAL .WATER-REO 1.010 1.004 0.811 5.416 6.593 12.009
TOTAL .RAIN 0.013 0.010 0.014 0.102 0.867 0.969
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.101 0.072 0.058 0.410 0.641 1.052
TOTAL .CANAL 0.759 0.741 0.639 3.899 4.770 8.669
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 0.136 0.180 O. 121 1.018 0.910 1.928
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 8.799494E-4 0.001 0.001 0.009 0.033 0.043
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.023 0.023 0.628 0.650
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 1.010 1.004 0.833 5.439 7.221 12.660

INDEX 1 = SRWS

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

SALINE. WA TER-REQ 0.309 0.400 0.446 0.133 0.283 0.802 0.831 0.833 0.641
SALINE. RA IN 0.012 0.021 0.008 0.001 0.008 0.039 0.220 0.114 0.047
SALINE. SUBIRR 0.047 0.043 0.063 0.020 0.071 0.064 0.056 0.051 0.057
SALINE. CANAL 0.384 0.341 0.394 0.463 0.958 1.249 1.644 1.122 1.164
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.134 0.005 0.020 0.351 0.753 0.552 1.089 0.453 0.628
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.443 0.405 0.465 0.485 1.037 1.353 1.919 1.287 1.269
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 560
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4164 PARAMETER REP70 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE WATERCOURSE HEAD O.4AF)

INDEX 1 = SRWS

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

TOTAL .WATER-REO 0.309 0.400 0.446 0.133 0.283 0.802 0.831 0.833 0.641
TOTAL .RAIN 0.012 0.021 0.008 0.001 0.008 0.039 0.220 0.114 0.047
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.047 0.043 0.063 0.020 0.071 0.064 0.056 0.051 0.057
TOTAL .CANAL 0.384 0.341 0.394 0.463 0.958 1.249 1.644 1.122 1.164
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.134 0.005 0.020 0.351 0.753 0.552 1.089 0.453 0.628
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 0.443 0.405 0.465 0.485 1.037 1.353 1.919 1.287 1.269

+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

SALINE.WATER-REO 0.435 0.366 0.286 2.240 3.523 5.763

SALINE. RAIN 0.005 0.005 0.010 0.061 0.429 0.490
SALINE. SUBI RR 0.063 0.057 0.047 0.320 0.320 0.641
SALINE. CANAL 0.759 0.384 0.248 2.510 6.600 9.110
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.392 0.080 0.020 0.651 3.827 4.478
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.827 0.445 0.306 2.891 7.350 10.241
TOTAL . WATER-REO 0.435 0.366 0.286 2.240 3.523 5.763
TOTAL .RAIN 0.005 0.005 0.010 0.061 0.429 0.490
TOTAL .SUBIRR
TOTAL .CANAL
0.063
0.759
0.057
0.384
0.047
0.248
0.320
2.510
0.320
6.600
0.641
9.110
...,
0
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.392 0.080 0.020 0.651 3.827 4.478 (X)

TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 0.827 0.445 0.306 2.891 7.350 10.241

INDEX 1 = PUNJAB

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

FRESH .WATER-REQ 5.714 8.532 11.169 3.188 4.917 7.359 9.694 10.960 12.281
FRESH .RAIN 1.041 1.053 1.120 0.257 0.451 1.199 4.385 4.429 1.604
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.112 0.151 0.234 0.094 0.326 0.370 0.322 0.289 0.256
FRESH .CANAL 1.300 1.654 2.688 2.373 3.580 4.543 3.988 3.855 3.597
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 2.835 5.165 6.479 0.304 0.696 0.625 1.863 6.183
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.425 0.510 0.648 0.627 0.621 0.570 0.529 0.552 0.641
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.466 0.060 0.018 0.156 0.027
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 5.714 8.532 11.169 3.654 4.977 7.378 9.850 10.987 12.281
SALINE. WA TER-REO 0.481 0.702 0.818 0.516 0.658 0.725 0.871 0.986 1.084
SALINE. RAIN 0.092 0.104 0.095 0.044 0.053 0.105 0.424 0.405 0.138
SALINE.SUBIRR 0.012 0.016 0.022 0.019 0.041 0.043 0.038 0.033 0.028
SALINE. CANAL 0.377 0.581 0.700 0.798 1.006 1.081 0.995 0.957 1.029
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.345 0.443 0.504 0.585 0.409 0.112
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.481 0.702 0.818 0.861 1.101 1.229 1.456 1.395 1.196
TOTAL .WATER-REO 6.195 9.235 11.987 3.704 5.575 8.084 10.565 11.946 13.364
TOTAL .RAIN 1.133 1.157 1.215 0.301 0.504 1.304 4.809 4.834 1.742
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.125 0.167 0.257 0.113 0.367 0.412 0.360 0.322 0.284
TOTAL .CANAL 1.677 2.235 3.388 3.171 4.586 5.625 4.983 4.812 4.626
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 2.835 5.165 6.479 0.304 0.696 0.625 1.863 6.183
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.425 0.510 0.648 0.627 0.621 0.570 0.529 0.552 0.641
TOTAL . SLKWATER 0.811 0.503 0.523 0.741 0.437 0.112
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 6.195 9.235 11.987 4.516 6.078 8.607 11.306 12.382 13.476
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 561
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4164 PARAMETER REP70 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE WATERCOURSE HEAD (MAF)

INDEX 1 = PUNJAB

+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

FRESH .WATER-REO 10.832 6.854 4.951 48.052 48.399 96.451

FRESH .RAIN 0.257 0.290 0.496 4.257 12.325 16.582
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.254 0.160 0.121 1.032 1.656 2.688
FRESH .CANAL 3.006 2.189 1.793 12.630 21.936 34.566
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 6.776 3.729 2.208 27. 191 9.671 36.862
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.539 0.487 0.333 2.941 3.539 6.480
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.728 0.728
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 10.832 6.854 4.951 48.052 49.127 97.178
SALINE. WATER-REO 0.965 0.816 0.540 4.322 4.839 9.161
SALINE. RAIN 0.024 0.030 0.055 0.400 1. 169 1.569
SALINE. SUBI RR 0.029 0.019 0.015 O. 114 0.202 0.315
SALINE .CANAL 0.913 0.766 0.573 3.911 5.867 9.778
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.103 0.103 2.399 2.502
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 0.965 0.816 0.643 4.424 7.238 11.662
TOTAL .WATER-REO 11.797 7.670 5.491 52.373 53.238 105.611
TOTAL .RAIN 0.281 0.319 0.551 4.657 13.494 18.151
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.282 0.179 0.136 1. 146 1.858 3.004
TOTAL .CANAL 3.919 2.955 2.366 16.541 27.803 44.344
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 6.776 3.729 2.208 27.191 9.671 36.862 ....0
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.539 0.487 0.333 2.941 3.539 6.480 10
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.103 0.103 3.127 3.229
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 11.797 7.670 5.593 52.476 56.365 108.841

INDEX 1 = SIND

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

FRESH .WATER-REO 1.183 1.991 2 186 0.714 0.713 1. 557 1.914 1.903 1.897
FRESH .RAIN 0.052 0.081 0.064 0.022 0.022 0.059 0.354 0.299 0.093
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.105 0.119 0.184 0.087 0.135 0.166 0.148 0.136 0.128
FRESH .CANAL 0.530 0.612 0.690 0.540 0.613 1.508 1.794 1.339 1.365
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 0.469 1. 149 1.213 0.038 0.063 0.217 0.176 0.198 0.253
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.026 0.030 0.036 0.027 0.023 0.028 0.024 0.067 0.059
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.143 0.420 0.581 0.136
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 1.183 1.991 2.186 0.714 0.856 1.977 2.495 2.039 1.897
SALINE. WATER-REO 1.174 1.957 1.795 1.018 1.071 2.753 3.245 3.215 3.157
SALINE. RAIN 0.048 0.084 0.045 0.025 0.033 0.114 0.661 0.477 0.177
SALINE. SUBI RR 0.125 0.143 0.174 0.131 0.226 0.268 0.235 0.215 0.227
SALINE. CANAL 1.134 1.736 1.596 1.561 2.438 4.030 4.560 3.621 4.163
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.134 0.005 0.020 0.699 1.625 1.659 2.211 1.099 1.410
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 1. 308 1.963 1.815 1.717 2.697 4.413 5.456 4.313 4.567
TOTAL .WATER-REO 2.357 3.949 3.981 1.732 1.784 4.311 5.160 5. 118 5.054
TOTAL .RAIN 0.101 0.164 0.109 0.046 0.054 0.173 1.015 0.776 0.270
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.231 0.262 0.357 0.218 0.361 0.434 0.383 0.352 0.355
TOTAL .CANAL 1.665 2.348 2 286 2.101 3.051 5.538 6.354 4.959 5.528
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 0.469 1.149 1.213 0.038 0.063 0.217 0.176 0.198 0.253
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.026 0.030 0.036 0.027 0.023 0.028 0.024 0.067 0.059
TOT AL . SLKWA TE R 0.134 0.005 0.020 0.699 1.768 2.079 2.792 1.235 1.410
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 2.491 3.954 4.001 2.431 3.553 6.390 7.951 6.353 6.464
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 562
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4164 PARAMETER REP70 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE WATERCOURSE HEAD (MAF)

INDEX 1 " SIND

+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

FRESH .WATER-REO 1.994 1.305 1 . 181 9.840 8.698 18.538

FRESH .RAIN 0.008 0.021 0.039 0.265 0.847 1 . 112
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.179 0.124 0.097 0.808 0.801 1.609
FRESH .CANAL 0.840 0.555 0.512 3.740 7.158 10.897
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 0.952 0.587 0.516 4.886 0.944 5.830
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.015 0.017 0.017 0.141 0.228 0.369
FRESH .SLKWATER 1.280 1.280
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 1.994 1.305 1. 181 9.840 9.978 19.818
SALINE. WATER-REO 2.616 1.679 1.394 10.615 14.460 25.075
SALINE. RAIN 0.018 0.023 0.042 0.261 1.487 1.748
SALINE. SUB I RR 0.275 0.172 0.138 1.028 1.303 2.331
SALINE.CANAL 2.715 1.730 1.426 10.338 20.373 30.711
SALINE. SLKWATER 0.392 0.247 0.213 1 .011 8.703 9.714
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 3.008 1.926 1.607 11 .626 23.163 34.790
TOTAL .WATER-REO 4.611 2.984 2.575 20.455 23.158 43.614
TOTAL .RAIN 0.026 0.045 0.081 0.526 2.334 2.860
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.454 0.297 0.235 1.836 2.104 3.940
TOTAL .CANAL 3.555 2.285 1.938 14.077 27.531
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 0.952 0.587 0.516 4.886 0.944
41.608
5.830
...,
I-'
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.015 0.017 0.017 0.141 0.228 0.369 0
TOTAL . SLKWATER 0.392 0.247 0.213 1.011 9.983 10.994
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPLY 5.003 3.231 2.788 21.466 33. 141 54.608

INDEX 1 " PAKISTAN

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

FRESH .WATER-REO 7.098 10.770 13.687 4.096 5.809 9.146 11.916 13.196 14.545
FRESH .RAIN 1 . 191 1.222 1.328 0.340 0.503 1.274 4.810 4.844 1.757
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.224 0.277 0.431 0.191 0.477 0.558 0.498 0.450 0.403
FRESH .CANAL 1.949 2.409 3.579 3.074 4.382 6.296 6.033 5.445 5.212
FRESH .P-TUBEWELL 3.304 6.322 7.692 0.342 0.063 0.913 0.801 2.061 6.472
FRESH .G-TUBEWELL 0.451 0.539 o 684 0.654 0.644 0.598 0.553 0.619 0.700
FRESH .SLKWATER 0.021 0.027 0.506 0.259 0.492 0.780 0.222
FRESH .TOT-SUPPLY 7.119 10 770 13.714 4.602 6.068 9.638 12.696 13.418 14.545
SALINE. WATER-REO 1.655 2.659 2.613 1.534 1.729 3.478 4. 116 4.200 4.240
SALI NE. RAIN 0.140 0.188 0.140 0.069 0.086 0.219 1.085 0.882 0.315
SALINE SUBIRR 0.138 0.160 0.196 0.151 0.267 0.311 0.273 0.249 0.255
SALINE.CANAL 1. 511 2.317 2.296 2.359 3.444 5. 112 5.555 4.578 5.193
SALI NE . SLKWA TER 0.134 0.005 0.020 1.044 2.068 2.164 2.796 1.508 1.522
SALINE. TOT-SUPPLY 1.789 2.665 2.632 2.578 3.797 5.642 6.912 5.709 5.763
TOTAL . WATER-REO 8.753 13.429 16.300 5.631 7.539 12.624 16.032 17.397 18.786
TOTAL .RAIN 1.331 1.410 1.468 0.409 0.588 1.493 5.895 5.726 2.072
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.362 0.437 0.627 0.342 0.744 0.868 0.771 0.698 0.658
TOTAL . CANAL 3.460 4.727 5.876 5.433 7.826 11.408 11.588 10.023 10.405
TOTAL .P-TUBEWELL 3.304' 6.322 7.692 0.342 0.063 0.913 0.801 2.061 6.472
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELL 0.451 0.539 0.684 0.654 0.644 0.598 0.553 0.619 0.700
TOTAL .SLKWATER 0.155 0.005 0.046 1.550 2.327 2.656 3.576 1.730 1.522
TOTAL TOT-SUPPLY 8.908 13.435 16.347 7.180 9.865 15.280 19.608 19.127 20.308
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FIlENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 563
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4164 PARAMETER REP70 REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE WATERCOURSE HEAD (MAF)

INDEX 1 PAKISTAN

+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

FRESH .WATER-REQ 13.181 8.372 6.304 59.413 58.708 118.121

FRESH .RAIN 0.288 0.333 0.580 4.942 13.528 18.470
FRESH .SUBIRR 0.452 0.294 0.224 1.902 2.577 4.479
FRESH .CANAl 4.028 2.901 2.449 17.316 30.442 47.759
FRESH .P-TUBEWEll 7.860 4.340 2.724 32.241 10.652 42.893
FRESH .G-TUBEWEll 0.554 0.504 0.350 3.082 3.767 6.849
FRESH .SlKWATER 0.022 0.070 2.259 2.329
FRESH .TOT-SUPPlY 13.181 8.372 6.326 59.483 60.967 120.450
SALINE .WATER-REQ 3.582 2.495 1.934 14.937 19.299 34.236
SALINE.RAIN 0.042 0.053 0.097 0.661 2.656 3.317
SALINE. SUBIRR 0.303 0.192 0.153 1.142 1.505 2.647
SALINE. CANAL 3.628 2.496 1.999 14.248 26.241 40.489
SALINE. SlKWATER 0.392 0.247 0.316 1 . 1 14 11.102 12.216
SAlINE.TOT-SUPPlY 3.974 2.741 2.250 16.051 30.402 46.452
TOTAL .WATER-REQ 16.763 10.867 8.238 74.350 78.007 152.358
TOTAL .RAIN 0.330 0.386 0.677 5.603 16. 184 21.787
TOTAL .SUBIRR 0.756 0.486 0.378 3.044 4.082 7.126
TOTAL .CANAl 7.656 5.398 4.448 31.564 56.683 88.248
TOTAL .P-TUBEWEll 7.860 4.340 2.724 32.241 10.652 42.893 w
TOTAL .G-TUBEWELl 0.554 0.504 0.350 3.082 3.767 6.849 I-'
TOTAL .SlKWATER 0.392 0.247 0.338 1.184 13.361 14.545 I-'
TOTAL .TOT-SUPPlY 17. 155 11.114 8.576 75.534 91.368 166.902
INDUS BASIN MOOEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 564
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4167 PARAMETER REP72 SURFACE WATER DIVERSIONS AT THE CANAL HEAD BY CANAL (MAF)

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT

NWFP 0.158 0.187 0.270 0.215 0.252 0.325 0.333 0.333 0.332 0.243
PUNJAB 2.327 3.104 4.678 4.422 6.366 7.759 6.846 6.618 6.403 5.424
SIND 2.074 2.933 2.865 2.633 3.781 6.748 7.758 6.090 6.781 4.441
PAKISTAN 4.559 6.224 7.813 7.270 10.399 14.832 14.937 13.041 13.516 10.107
01-UD 0.010 0.019 0.057 0.027 0.131 0.131 0.131 0.131 0.126 0.073
02-CBD 0.072 0.096 0.163 0.110 0.134 0.163 0.163 0.155 0.120 0.128
03-RAY 5.000000E-4 0.002 0.008 0.033 0.037 0.110 0.090 0.082 0.085 0.047
04-UC 0.043 0.063 0.121 0.098 0.183 0.468 0.315 0.271 0.258 0.193
05-MR 0.011 0.018 0.024 0.016 0.096 0.282 0.244 0.237 0.166 0.040
06-SAD 0.118 0.297 0.328 0.332 0.332 0.328 0.285 0.268 0.332 0.307
07-FOR 0.006 0.014 0.035 0.034 0.167 0.204 0.143 0.141 0.148 0.104
08-PAK 0.113 0.183 0.423 0.218 0.341 0.630 0.354 0.388 0.374 0.298
09-LD 0.026 0.048 0.074 0.095 0.244 0.244 0.244 0.244 0.228 0.153
10-LBD 0.334 0.352 0.518 0.518 0.518 0.518 0.518 0.518 0.518 0.424
11-JHA 0.213 0.290 0.287 0.284 0.342 0.410 0.403 0.410 0.339 0.328
12-GUG 0.144 0.356 0.306 0.426 0.384 0.433 0.399 0.433 0.381 0.369
13-UJ 0.046 0.046 0.102 0.079 0.126 0.128 0.149 0.221 0.130 0.112
14-LJ 0.108 0.214 0.212 0.242 0.464 0.339 0.310 0.355 0.290 0.299
15-BAH 0.096 0.083 0.252 0.120 0.298 0.306 0.245 0.228 0.236 0.201
16-MAI 0.131 0.090 0.293 0.201 0.362 0.362 0.362 0.362 0.362 0.287
17-SIO 0.117 0.112 0.268 0.147 0.268 0.268 0.268 0.268 0.240 0.220
w
I-'
18-HAV ,0.022 0.048 0.032 0.031 0.061 0.068 0.045 0.046 0.051 0.047 N
19-RAN 0.021 0.008 0.045 0.031 0.081 0.150 0.082 0.069 0.082 0.066
20-PAN 0.135 0.176 0.261 0.268 0.453 0.773 0.707 0.557 0.567 0.614
21-ABB 0.020 0.028 0.064 0.041 0.058 0.080 0.080 0.060 0.060 0.057
22-USW 0.063 0.065 0.117 0.102 0.113 0.117 0.117 0.117 0.117 0.105
23-LSW 0.005 0.055 0.093 0.041 0.052 0.112 0.120 0.120 0.120 0.049
24-WAR 0.049 0.049 0.026 0.038 0.044 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.045
25-KAB 0.041 0.018 0.034 0.034 0.043 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.046 0.043
26-THA 0.371 0.317 0.361 0.577 0.523 0.410 0.403 0.399 0.410 0.402
27-PAH o 004 0.026 0.050 0.054 0.034 0.035 0.036 0.031 0.034 0.035
28-MUZ 0.071 0.092 0.106 0.250 0.315 0.389 0.394 0.381 0.495 0.324
29-DGK 0.093 0.127 0.289 0.187 0.411 0.529 0.476 0.362 0.370 0.296
31-P+D 0.163 0.082 0.140 0.064 0.081 0.506 0.795 0.462 0.417 0.222
32-BEG 0.134 0.006 0.046 0.002 0.080 1.083 1.155 0.671 0.552 0.153
33-GHO 0.202 0.072 0.268 0.013 0.222 0.470 0.409 0.454 0.648 0.385
34-NW 0.097 0.207 0.184 0.092 0.107 0.386 0.499 0.437 0.566 0.463
35-RIC 0.005 0.120 0.594 0.594 0.443 0.661 0.160
36-DAD 0.124 0.149 0.140 0.077 0.082 0.260 0.298 0.264 0.319 0.237
37-KW 0.034 0.102 0.157 0.090 0.100 0.157 0.124 O. 111 0.157 0.119
38-KE 0.044 0.184 0.119 0.114 0.136 0.214 0.205 0.154 0.150 0.195
39-ROH 0.533 0.981 0.752 0.932 0.798 0.790 0.957 0.970 0.981 0.803
41-NAR 0.265 0.720 0.569 0.667 0.873 0.747 0.693 0.732 0.873 0.762
42-KAL 0.152 0.188 0.108 0.196 0.164 0.289 0.405 0.356 0.546 0.284
43 LCH 0.062 0.075 0.146 0.115 0.205 0.164 0.205 0.142 0.170 0.133
44-FUL 0.159 0.100 0.122 0.102 0.479 0.671 0.894 0.454 0.408 0.299
45 PIN 0.104 0.061 0.114 0.168 0.333 0.416 0.524 0.439 0.333 0.226
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 565
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4167 PARAMETER REP72 SURFACE WATER DIVERSIONS AT THE CANAL HEAD BY CANAL (MAF)

+ NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

NWFP 0.209 0.191 1.258 1.791 3.048

PUN,JAB 4.124 3.287 22.943 38.414 61. 357
SIND 2.862 2.426 17.601 33.791 51.392
PAKISTAN 7.194 5.903 41.802 73.996 115.797
01-UD 0.024 0.007 0.189 0.677 0.866
02-CBD 0.129 0.111 0.699 0.846 1.545
03-RAY 0.002 0.002 0.063 0.438 0.501
04-UC 0.082 0.034 0.536 1.594 2.130
05-MR 0.012 0.011 0.116 1.042 1.158
OS-SAD 0.307 0.272 1.628 1.877 3.505
07-FOR 0.010 0.009 0.179 0.838 1.016
08-PAK 0.219 0.240 1.477 2.305 3.782
09-LD 0.045 0.026 0.372 1.299 1.671
10-LBD 0.427 0.386 2.442 3.108 5.550
11-,JHA 0.314 0.297 1.729 2.188 3.918
12-GUG 0.433 0.333 1.941 2.457 4.398
13-U,J 0.088 0.073 0.467 0.834 1.301
14-L,J 0.427 0.215 1.475 2.000 3.475
15-BAH 0.124 0.121 0.876 1.434 2.310
16-MAI 0.134 0.139 1.073 2.011 3.085
17-SID 0.163 0.159 1.040 1.459 2.499 w
18-HAV 0.068 0.028 0.245 0.303 0.548
....
w
19-RAN 0.017 0.015 0.171 0.495 0.666
20-PAN 0.283 0.191 1.660 3.326 4.985
21-ABB 0.037 0.033 0.240 0.380 0.619
22-USW 0.088 0.080 0.518 0.684 1.202
23-LSW 0.039 0.037 0.277 0.565 0.842
24-WAR 0.044 0.041 0.254 0.278 0.532
25-KAB 0.039 0.033 0.208 0.264 0.472
26-THA 0.393 0.368 2.213 2.722 4.935
27-PAH 0.030 0.031 0.177 0.224 0.401
28-MUZ 0.175 0.074 0.841 2.224 3.065
29-DGK 0.179 0.109 1.093 2.335 3.428
31-P+D 0.094 0.070 0.771 2.326 3.097
32-BEG 0.002 0.012 0.354 3.543 3.896
33-GHO 0.201 0.101 1.228 2.217 3.445
34-NW 0.205 0.195 1.352 2.087 3.439
35-RIC 0.165 2.412 2.577
36-DAD 0.135 0.138 0.924 1. 301 .2.225
37-KW 0.106 0.107 0.626 0.740 1.366
38-KE 0.146 0.146 0.833 0.973 1.806
39-ROH 0.719 0.740 4.528 5.427 9.956
41-NAR 0.776 0.608 3.699 4.584 8.284
42-KAL 0.137 0.078 0.947 1.956 2.903
43-LCH 0.095 0.061 0.573 1.002 1.575
44-FUL 0.137 0.123 0.941 3.008 3.950
45-PIN 0.107 0.047 0.659 2.214 2.873
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FIlENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 566
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4167 PARAMETER REP72A SURFACE WATER DIVERSIONS AT THE CANAL HEAD BY REGION(MAF)

NWFP MARAlA MANGlA U-INDUS l-INDUS

JAN 0.158 0.136 1.205 0.986 2.074

FEB 0.187 0.197 1.882 1.024 2.933
MAR 0.270 0.373 2.537 1.768 2 865
APR 0.215 0.285 2.349 1.789 2.633
MAY 0.252 0.581 3.217 2.568 3.781
JUN 0.325 1.154 3.541 3.064 6.748
JUl 0.333 0.944 3.049 2.853 7.758
AUG 0.333 0.876 3.207 2.535 6.090
SEP 0.332 0.756 2.976 2.670 6.781
OCT 0.243 0.482 2.595 2.348 4.441
NOV 0.209 0.250 2.395 1.479 2.862
DEC 0.191 0.165 1.973 1.149 2.426
RABI 1.258 1.603 12.587 8.753 17.601
KHARIF 1.791 4.596 18.339 15.479 33.791
ANNUAL 3.048 6.200 30.926 24.232 51.392

IJ)
.....
"""
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 567
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4169 PARAMETER REP73 POST TARBELA DIVERSIONS AT THE CANAL HEAD BY CANAL (MAF)

.JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT

NWFP 0.072 0.121 0.178 0.215 0.252 0.252 0.238 0.210 0.234 0.243
PUN.JAB 1.748 2.784 3.461 3.629 5.600 6. 117 6.221 6.053 6. pl 5.206
SIND 1.697 2.297 2.305 2.081 3.276 6.075 6.955 5.926 5.432 4.113
PAKISTAN 3.517 5.202 5.944 5.925 9.129 12.444 13.413 12.190 11.797 9.562
01-UD 0.010 0.019 0.034 0.024 0.103 0.109 O. 115 0.118 0.126 0.073
02-CBD 0.050 0.096 0.101 0.110 0.134 0.137 0.128 0.115 0.120 0.128
03-RAY 5.000000E-4 0.002 7.000000E-4 0.002 0.037 0.088 0.090 0.082 0.085 0.047
04-UC 0.043 0.063 0.057 0.098 0.183 0.277 0.315 0.271 0.258 0.193
05-MR 0.011 0.018 0.010 0.016 0.096 0.122 0.216 0.237 0.166 0.040
OS-SAD 0.111 0.233 0.280 0.269 0.286 0.284 0.276 0.268 0.269 0.254
07-FOR 0.006 0.014 0.014 0.034 0.122 0.148 0.143 0.141 0.148 0.104
08-PAK O. 113 0.183 0.247 0.218 0.341 0.354 0.354 0.388 0.374 0.298
09-LD 0.026 0.048 0.029 0.048 0.192 0.214 0.229 0.232 0.228 0.153
10-LBD 0.154 0.352 0.407 0.405 0.482 0.472 0.456 0.461 0.459 0.424
1'-.JHA 0.128 0.194 0.273 0.284 0.342 0.342 0.318 0.301 0.339 0.328
12-GUG 0.144 0.218 0.306 0.319 0.384 0.384 0.357 0.338 0.381 0.369
13-U.J 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.079 O. 118 0.128 0.149 0.129 0.130 0.112
14-LJ 0.108 0.214 0.212 0.242 0.313 0.315 0.310 0.290 0.290 0.299
15-BAH 0.096 0.083 0.147 0.120 0.203 0.229 0.245 0.228 0.236 0.201
16-MAI O. 131 0.090 0.164 0.144 0.296 0.329 0.316 0.337 0.348 0.287
17-S10 0.097 0.112 0.163 0.147 0.223 0.233 0.222 0.226 0.233 0.220 \.f.)

18-HAV 0.022 0.025 0.032 0.031 0.045 0.047 0.045 0.046 0.051 0.047 ....
VI
19-RAN 0.021 0.008 0.024 0.031 0.081 0.090 0.082 0.069 0.082 0.066
20-PAN 0.135 0.176 0.223 0.268 0.453 0.536 0.555 0.557 0.558 0.506
21-ABB 0.020 0.02B 0.036 0.041 0.053 0.060 0.060 0.060 0.060 0.057
22-USW 0.063 0.065 0.087 0.102 O. 113 0.110 0.109 0.103 0.105 0.105
23-LSW 0.005 0.024 0.031 0.041 0.052 0.051 0.046 0.040 0.045 0.049
24-WAR 0.002 0.014 0.026 0.038 0.044 0.044 0.038 0.031 0.041 0.045
25-KAB 0.002 0.018 0.034 0.034 0.043 0.047 0.044 0.037 0.042 0.043
26-THA 0.106 0.317 0.361 0.378 0.421 0.386 0.403 0.399 0.410 0.402
27-PAH 0.004 0.026 0.029 0.027 0.034 0.035 0.036 0.031 0.034 0.035
28-MUZ 0.071 0.092 0.106 0.104 0.315 0.389 0.394 0.381 0.375 0.266
29-DGK 0.093 0.127 0.158 0.187 0.341 0.406 0.406 0.345 0.370 0.296
31-P+D 0.163 0.066 0.063 0.002 0.081 0.506 0.579 0.462 0.417 0.222
32-BEG 0.134 0.006 0.004 0.002 0.080 0.755 1.059 0.671 0.552 0.153
33-GHO 0.202 0.072 0.122 0.013 0.222 0.426 0.409 0.454 0.427 0.385
34-NW 0.097 0.207 0.184 0.092 0.107 0.352 0.499 0.437 0.350 0.301
35-RIC 0.120 0.594 0.594 0.443 0.372 0.145
36-DAD 0.062 0.149 0.140 0.077 0.082 0.196 0.298 0.264 0.227 0.189
37-KW 0.034 0.091 0.094 0.090 0.100 0.109 O. 112 O. 111 0.128 0.119
38-KE 0.044 0.118 0.119 O. 114 0.136 0.146 0.156 0.154 0.150 0.161
39-ROH 0.261 0.712 0.752 0.686 0.798 0.782 0.812 0.847 0.852 0.803
41-NAR 0.223 0.542 0.569 0.606 0.682 0.667 0.693 0.690 0.697 0.692
42-KAL 0.152 0.096 0.086 0.134 0.164 0.289 0.405 0.356 0.374 0.284
43-LCH 0.062 0.075 0.078 0.115 0.148 0.164 0.167 0.142 0.145 0.133
44-FUL 0.159 0.100 0.059 0.102 0.367 0.671 0.646 0.454 0.408 0.299
45-PIN 0.104 0.061 0.035 0.046 0.190 0.416 0.524 0.439 0.333 0.226
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 568
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4169 PARAMETER REP73 POST TARBELA DIVERSIONS AT THE CANAL HEAD BY CANAL (MAF)
+ NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

NWFP 0.209 0.191 1.014 1.402 2.416

PUN,JAB 3.681 3.287 20.167 33.751 53.918
SIND 2.710 2.376 15.498 29.745 45.244
PAKISTAN 6.600 5.853 36.680 64.898 101.578
01-UD 0.024 0.007 0.167 0.596 0.762
02-CBD 0.129 0.111 0.616 0.744 1.360
03-RAY 0.002 0.002 0.055 0.386 0.441
04-UC 0.082 0.034 0.472 1.403 1.875
05-MR 0.012 0.011 0.102 0.854 0.956
OS-SAO 0.285 0.272 1.434 1.652 3.086
07-FOR 0.010 0.009 0.157 0.737 0.895
08-PAK 0.219 0.240 1.300 2.029 3.329
09-LD 0.045 0.026 0.327 1. 143 1.471
10-LBD 0.427 0.386 2.150 2.736 4.886
l'-,JHA 0.302 0.297 1.523 1.926 3.449
12-GUG 0.340 0.333 1.709 2.163 3.872
13-U..J 0.088 0.073 0.411 0.734 1.145
14-L..J 0.251 0.215 1.299 1.761 3.059
15-BAH 0.124 0.121 0.772 1.262 2.034
16-MAI 0.134 0.139 0.945 1.770 2.716
17-510 0.163 0.159 0.916 1.284 2.200 w
18-HAV 0.447
.....
0.025 0.028 0.180 0.267 0\
19-RAN 0.017 0.015 0.151 0.436 0.586
20-PAN 0.230 0.191 1.461 2.927 4.389
21-ABB 0.037 0.033 0.211 0.334 0.545
22-USW 0.088 0.080 0.488 0.643 1 . 131
23-LSW 0.039 0.037 0.184 0.276 0.461
24-WAR 0.044 0.041 0.172 0.236 0.408
25-KAB 0.039 0.033 0.169 0.247 0.416
26-THA 0.393 0.368 1.948 2.396 4.344
27-PAH 0.030 0.031 0.156 0.197 0.353
28-MUZ 0.131 0.074 0.741 1.958 2.698
29-DGK 0.179 0.109 0.963 2.055 3.018
31-P+D 0.094 0.070 0.679 2.048 2.727
32-BEG 0.002 0.012 0.311 3.119 3.430
33-GHO 0.201 0.101 1.082 1.952 3.033
34-NW 0.205 0.195 1.190 1.837 3.028
35-RIC 0.145 2.123 2.268
36-DAD 0.135 0.138 0.814 1.145 1.958
37-KW 0.106 0.107 0.551 0.651 1.202
38-KE 0.146 0.146 0.733 0.857 1.590
39-ROH 0.719 0.740 3.987 4.778 8.765
41-NAR 0.625 0.608 3.257 4.035 7.293
42-KAL 0.137 0.078 0.834 1.722 2.556
43-LCH 0.095 0.061 0.505 0.882 1.387
44 FUL 0.137 0.073 0.829 2.648 3.477
45-PIN 0.107 0.047 0.580 1.949 2.529
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 569
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4169 PARAMETER REP74 DIFFERENCE OF CANAL DIVERSIONS BY THE MODEL AND POST TARBELA (MAF)

RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

NWFP 0.243 0.389 0.632

PUNJAB 2.776 4.663 7.439
SIND 2.102 4.046 6.148
PAKISTAN 5.122 9.097 14.219
01-UD 0.023 0.081 0.104
02-CBD 0.084 0.101 0.185
03-RAY 0.008 0.052 0.060
04-UC 0.064 0.191 0.255
05-MR 0.014 0.188 0.202
06-SAD 0.195 0.225 0.419
07-FOR 0.021 0.100 0.122
08-PAK 0.176 0.276 0.452
09-LD 0.044 0.156 0.200
10-LBD 0.292 0.372 0.664
11-JHA 0.207 0.262 0.469
12-GUG 0.232 0.294 0.526
13-UJ 0.056 0.100 0.156
14-LJ 0.176 0.239 0.416
is-BAH 0.105 0.172 0.276
16-MAl 0.128 0.241 0.369
W
17-SID 0.124 0.175 0.299 I-'
18-HAV 0.065 0.036. 0.101 .....
19-RAN 0.020 0.059 0.080
20-PAN 0.198 0.398 0.596
21-ABB 0.029 0.045 0.074
22-USW 0.030 0.041 0.071
23-LSW 0.093 0.289 0.382
24-WAR 0.081 0.042 0.123
25-KAB 0.039 0.017 0.056
26-THA 0.264 0.326 0.590
27-PAH 0.021 0.027 0.048
28-MUZ 0.100 0.266 0.367
29-DGK 0.131 0.280 0.410
31-P+D 0.092 0.278 0.371
32-BEG 0.042 0.424 0.466
33-GHO 0.147 0.265 0.412
34-NW 0.161 0.250 0.411
35-RIC 0.020 0.289 0.308
36-DAD 0.110 0.156 0.266
37-KW 0.075 0.089 0.163
38-KE 0.099 0.117 0.216
39-ROH 0.541 0.650 1. 191
41-NAR 0.442 0.549 0.991
42-KAL 0.113 0.234 0.347
43-LCH 0.068 0.120 0.188
44-FUL 0.112 0.360 0.473
45-PIN 0.079 0.265 0.344

4170 REPORTS REP77, LINKLOSS, REP77A, RCONT.L AND REP79

ARE NOT APPLICABLE IN CASE OF ZONAL MODELS
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 570
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4170 PARAMETER REP77 SURFACE WATER FLOW TO NODE N FROM NODE Nl (MAF)

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

SULEM-B .BALlOKI-B 0.280 0.521 1.122 0.684 1. 171 1.172 0.600
ISlAM-B SULEM-B 0.087 0.278 0.095 0.315 0.269 0.206 0.344
PANJNAD-B .ISLAM-B 0.102
PANJNAD-B .SIDHNAI-B 0.704 0.678 0.384 0.660 0.318 0.032 1.333 2.649 1.774
PANJNAD-B .TRIMMU-B 0.217 1.327 0.904 2.817 2.784 0.098
RAVI-I .A3 0.313 0.468 0.637 0.915 0.916 0.899 0.899 0.907 0.916
BALLOKI-B .RAVI-I 0.403 0.494 1.092 1 . 141 1.077 0.937 1.988 2.639 1.757
BALLOKI-B .A2 0.480 0.107 0.279 0.332
BAllOKI-B .A6 0.163 0.350 0.421 0.193 0.759
SIDHNAI -B .BALLOKI-B 0.092 1.320 2.761 1.394
SIDHNAI-B .TRIMMU-B 1.030 1.030 1.030 1.030 1.030 1.030 1.030 1.030 1.030
KHANKI-B .MARALA-B 0.076 0.205 1.774 3.055 2.880 0.770
KHANKI-B A1 0.083 0.422 0.358 0.422 0.304
QADIRA-B .KHANKI-B 1.108 2.561 2.621 0.373
QADIRA-B .RASUL-B 0.544 0.646 1.083 1. 232 1. 232 1.232 1.232 0.677
TRIMMU-B .QADIRA-B 0.089 0.350 0.914 0.721 1.263 3.475 2.351 0.754
TRIMMU-B .RASUl-B 0.516 1.963 0.718 0.627 1.410
TRIMMU-B .CHASMA-R 1.097 1.185 0.873
RASUl-B .MANGLA-R 0.605 0.822 1.246 1.807 3.240 2.007 1.916 1.356 0.711 I
RASUL-B .Al0 0.220 O. 114 0.116 0.086 0.018 0.038
MUNDA-H .AMANDA-H 0.016 0.003 0.023 0.380 0.523 0.932 0.746 0.525 0.229 ~
K-S-JCT .MUNDA-H 0.130 0.067 O. 151 0.375 0.808 1.457 1.480 o 949 0.171 Q)
K-S-JCT .WARSAK-D 0.289 0.373 0.627 1.440 1.795 3.371 3.394 2.523 0.880
KAlABAGH-R.TARBELA-R 2.453 2 652 2 879 0.859 5.120 4.062 13.923 15.044 6.184
KAlABAGH-R.K-S-JCT 0.458 0.482 0.857 1.957 2.719 4.892 4.952 3.535 1 . 114
CHASMA-R .KALABAGH-R 3.276 3.528 4.178 3.162 8.546 9.913 20.748 20.965 8.789
TAUNSA-B .CHASMA-R 1.455 2.526 2.989 2.237 8.002 9.705 20.438 21.155 9.154
GUDU-B .PANJNAD-B 0.697 0.623 0.166 0.648 0.996 0.049 3.086 4.984 1.988
GUDU-B .TAUNSA-B 1.336 2.284 2.626 1.902 7.034 8.875 19.240 20.820 9.353
SUKKUR-B .GUDU-B 1.690 2.833 2.498 2.663 7.504 7.211 19.789 25.412 11.988
NARA JCT .SUKKUR-B 0.280 0.762 0.602 0.706 0.924 0.790 0.734 0.774 0.924
NARA-HEAD .NARA-JCT 0.265 0.720 0.569 0.667 0.873 0.747 0.693 0.732 0.873
KOTRI-B .SUKKUR-B 0.610 0.454 0.584 0.683 5.227 4.120 16.355 22.463 8.683
A-SEA .KOTRI-B 2.627 2.261 10.226 17.262 8.507
Al .MANGLA-R 0.130 0.468 0.460 0.501 0.566 0.140 0.149 0.248 0.130
A2 .MARAlA-B 0.043 0.065 0.155 0.284 0.995 0.995 0.995 0.995 0.618
A3 .MARALA-B 0.426 0.628 0.900 0.985 0.985 0.985 0.985 0.985 0.985
A4 .A2 0.027 0.152 0.295 0.310 0.310 0.310 0.275
A4 .A3 0.083 0.116 0.1994.269550E-4 0.016 0.016 0.008
A5 .A4 0.082 0.115 0.221 0.138 0.267 0.296 0.296 0.288 0.248
A6 .QADIRA-B 0.433 0.620 0.691 0.270 0.463 1.029 0.270 0.270 0.270
A7 .KHANKI-B 0.091 0.393 0.338 0.460 0.478 0.599 0.557 0.599 0.470
A7 .A6 0.270 0.270 0.270 0.270 0.270 0.270 0.270 0.270 0.270
A8 .SIDHNAI-B 0.138 0.170 0.308 0.212 o 381 0.662 0.381 0.389 0.381
A9 .ISLAM-B 0.096 0.011 0.252 0.120 0.298 0.039 0.245 0.220 0.236
A9 .A8 0.072 0.267 0.008
A10 .RASUL-B 0.328 0.328 0.328 0.328 0.328 0.328 0.328 0.328 0.328
Ala A1 0.137 0.011 0.027
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 571
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4170 PARAMETER REP77 SURFACE WATER FLOW TO NODE N FROM NODE Nl (MAF)

+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

SULEM-B .BALLOKI-B 0.612 0.557 0.686 3.778 3.627 7.406
ISLAM-B .SULEM-B 0.133 0.498 1.230 1.728
PAN~NAD-B .ISLAM-B 0.102 0.102
PAN~NAD-B .SIDHNAI-B 0.467 0.522 0.655 3.411 6.766 10.176
PAN~NAD-B .TRIMMU-B 8.146 8.146
RAVI-I .A3 0.183 0.105 0.214 1.920 5.452 7.372
BALLOKI-B .RAVI-I 0.371 0.239 0.345 2.944 9.539 12.483
BALLOKI-B .A2 1.198 1. 198
BALLOKI-B . A6 0.808 0.808 0.742 3.293 0.952 4.244
SIDHNAI-B .BALLOKI-B 5.567 5.567
SIDHNAI-B .TRIMMU-B 1.030 1.030 1.030 6.180 6.180 12.360
KHANKI-B .MARALA-B 0.031 0.110 0.141 8.760 8.901
KHANKI-B . A1 0.422 0.422 0.399 2.106 0.726 2.831
QADIRA-B .KHANKI-B 6.662 6.662
QADIRA-B .RASUL-B 1.122 1.122 1.053 5.569 5.605 11. 174
TRIMMU-B .QADIRA-B 0.439 9.477 9.916
TRIMMU-B .RASUL-B 5.234 5.234
TRIMMU-B .CHASMA-R 1.137 1.234 1.187 6.714 6.714
RASUL-B .MANGLA-R 1.314 1.386 1.208 6.580 11.036 17.617
RASUL-B .AlO 0.029 0.113 0.592 0.142 0.734
MUNDA-H .AMANDA-H 0.090 0.034 0.008 0.173 3.335 3.509 U>
I-'
K-S-~CT .MUNDA-H 0.174 0.149 O. 121 0.791 5.240 6.031 10
K-S-~CT .WARSAK-D 0.434 0.322 0.281 2.326 13.404 15.730
KALABAGH-R.TARBELA-R 2.268 3.218 2.248 15.718 45. 191 60.909
KALABAGH-R.K-S-~CT 0.635 0.501 0.440 3.373 19. 168 22.541
CHASMA-R .KALABAGH-R 3.484 4.163 3.085 21.713 72.122 93.835
TAUNSA-B .CHASMA-R 2 241 3.029 1.637 13.878 70.691 84.569
GUDU-B .PAN~NAD-B 0.020 0.311 0.563 2.380 11.749 14. 130
GUDU-B .TAUNSA-B 2.168 2.685 1.590 12.689 67.225 79.915
SUKKUR-B . GUDU-B 2.540 2.777 2.202 14.541 74.567 89. 107
NARA-~CT .SUKKUR-B 0.806 0.821 0.643 3.915 4.852 8.767
NARA-HEAD .NARA-~CT 0.762 0.776 0.608 3.700 4.585 8.284
KOTRI-B .SUKKUR-B 0.676 0.274 2.597 57.533 60.130
A-SEA .KOTRI-B 0.538 0.538 40.882 41.420
Al .MANGLA-R 0.534 0.610 0.472 2.673 1.734 4.407
A2 .MARALA-B 0.246 0.085 0.036 0.631 4.882 5.513
A3 .MARALA-B 0.411 0.280 0.360 3.004 5.910 8.914
A4 .A2 0.006 0.032 1.652 1.685
A4 .A3 0.199 0.155 0.120 0.872 0.041 0.914
A5 .A4 0.203 0.154 0.119 0.895 1.533 2.428
A6 .QADIRA-B 1.078 1.078 1.012 4.913 2.572 7.484
A7 .KHANKI-B 0.447 0.498 0.377 2.144 3.163 5.307
A7 .A6 0.270 0.270 0.270 1.620 1.620 3.240
A8 .SIDHNAI-B 0.469 0.271 0.146 1.502 2.406 3.908
A9 . ISLAM-B 0.042 0.121 0.522 1. 158 1.680
A9 .A8 0.159 0.124 0.354 0.275 0.630
AlO .RASUL-B 0.328 0.328 0.328 1.968 1.968 3.936
Al0 . A1 0.099 0.099 0.175 0.274
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FIlENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 572
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4170 PARAMETER LINKlOSS REPORT ON LOSSES IN THE lINK CANALS

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUl AUG SEP

TOTAL .TOTAl 0.298 0.429 0.466 0.358 0.459 0.465 0.362 0.290 0.292
BAllOKI-B.SUlEM-B 0.015 0.027 0.059 0.036 0.062 0.062 0.031
SIDHNAI-B.A8 0.007 0.008 0.015 0.010 0.019 0.033 0.019 0.019 0.019
MARAlA-B .A3 0.030 0.044 0.063 0.069 0.069 0.069 0.069 0.069 0.069
KHANKI-B .A7 0.004 0.017 0.015 0.020 0.021 0.026 0.024 0.026 0.020
TRIMMU-B .SIDHNAI-B 0.077 0.077 0.077 0.077 0.077 0.077 0.077 0.077 0.077
RASUl-B .QADIRA-B 0.021 0.025 0.042 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.026
CHASMA-R .TRIMMU-B 0.105 0.114 0.084
SUKKUR-B .NARA-JCT 0.015 0.042 0.033 0.039 0.051 0.043 0.040 0.043 0.051
NARA-JCT .NARA-HEAD 2.649416E-5 7.202256E-5 5.689569E-5 6.667066E-5 8.730873E-5 7.468247E-5 6.932693E-5 7.317235E-5 8.730873E-5
Al .KHANKI-B 0.008 0.042 0.035 0.042 0.030
Al .Al0 5.461847E-4 4.438433E-5 1.080371E-4
A2 .BAllOKI-B 0.034 0.008 0.020 0.023
A2 .A4 0.003 0.015 0.029 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.027
A3 .A4 6.205976E-4 8.705777E-4 0.001 3.202163E-6 1.219837E-4 1.219837E-4 6.371580E-5
A4 .A5 5.748803E-48.064451E-4 0.002 9.638755E-4 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
A6 .BAlLOKI-B 0.014 0.030 0.037 0.017 0.066

+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

1.,0)
TOTAL . TOTAL 0.494 0.483 0.458 2.630 2.224 4.854 N
BAllOKI-B.SUlEM-B 0.032 0.029 0.036 0.198 0.190 0.389 0
SlDHNAI -B. A8 0.023 0.013 0.007 0.074 0.119 0.193
MARAlA-B .A3 0.029 0.020 0.025 0.212 0.417 0.628
KHANKI-B .A7 0.019 0.022 0.016 0.093 0.138 0.231
TRIMMU-B .SIDHNAI-B 0.077 0.077 0.077 0.463 0.463 0.927
RASUl-B .QADIRA-B 0.044 0.044 0.041 0.217 0.219 0.436
CHASMA-R .TRIMMU-B 0.109 0.118 0.114 0.645 0.645
SUKKUR-B .NARA-JCT 0.044 0.045 0.035 0.215 0.267 0.482
NARA-JCT .NARA-HEAD 7.615801E-5 7.762063E-5 6.078608E-5 3.699771E-4 4.584699E-4 8.284470E-4
Al .KHANKI-B 0.042 0.042 0.039 0.208 0.072 0.280
Al .Al0 3.979003E-4 3.979003E-4 6.986061E-4 0.001
A2 .BALlOKI-B 0.084 0.084
A2 .A4 5.706391E-4 0.003 0.160 0.163
A3 .A4 0.001 0.001 9.017784E-4 0.007 3.108853E-4 0.007
A4 .A5 0.001 0.001 8.353474E-4 0.006 0.011 0.017
A6 .BAllOKI-B 0.070 0.070 0.065 0.286 0.083 0.369

4170 PARAMETER REP77A REPORT ON RIVER LOSSES AND GAINS

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

TOTAL -0.850 -0.862 -1.022 -0.982 1.087 -1. 824 2.978 -1.483 -8.963
ISLAM-B -0.008 -0.011 0.025 -0.025 0.017 -0.039 0.025 -0.014 0.006
PANJNAD-B -0.149 -0.149 -0.107 -0.080 0.137 0.034 0.277 -0.168 -0.642
BALLOKI-B -0.088 -0.108 -0.238 -0.249 -0.235 -0.204 -0.434 -0.576 -0.383
SIDHNAI-B -0.001 -7.20000E-4 -0.001 0.026 -0.013 -1.60000E-4 0.387 0.613 -0.007
KHANKI-B -0.008 -0.007 -0.008 2.000000E-4 0.006 0.090 0.057 -0.099 -0.017
TRIMMU-B 0.008 -0.014 0.033 0.120 0.185 -0. 171 0.128 -0.168 -0.507
RASUl-B -0.047 -0.038 -0.049 -0.063 -0.103 -0. 121 -0.084 -0.062 -0.046
KALABAGH-R -0.365 -0.394 -0.442 -0.346 -0.707 -0.959 - 1 .873 -2.387 1.491
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 573
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4170 PARAMETER REP77A REPORT ON RIVER LOSSES AND GAINS

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

CHASMA-R -0.090 -0.095 -0.097 -0.141 -0.014 -0.237 -0.135 -0.622 -0.B16
TAUNSA-B -0.045 0.022 -0.032 -0.103 0.241 -0.OB8 0.329 -0.408 -1.064
GUDU-B -0.156 -0.086 -0. 161 -0.192 0.143 -0.347 0.177 -1 195 -2.264
SUKKUR-B -0.033 -0.011 -0.040 -0.031 0.010 -0.100 0.022 -0.205 -0.453
KOTRI-B 0.132 0.029 0.094 0.101 1.419 0.319 4.102 3.809 - 1 .280

+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

TOTAL -5.037 -0.685 1.247 -9.702 -9.18B -18.890

ISLAM-B -0.042 0.012 -0.024 -0.031 -0.054
PAN..JNAD-B -0.223 -0.109 -0.131 -0.869 -0.441 -1.310
BALLOKI-B -0.081 -0.052 -0.075 -0.642 -2.080 -2.723
SIOHNAI -B -0.202 -2.90000E-4 -4.4ooooE-4 -0.205 1.007 0.801
KHANKI-B -0.019 -0.001 -0.010 -0.054 0.038 -0.016
TRIMMU-B -0.116 -0.088 -0.413 -0.501
RASUL-B -0.047 -0.064 -0.060 -0.304 -0.479 -0.783
KALABAGH-R -0.581 -0.444 -0.396 -2.621 -7.763 -10.385
CHASMA-R -0.345 -0.095 -0.142 -0.864 -1.966 -2.830
TAUNSA-B -0.547 -0.009 -0.136 -0.746 -1.093 -1.839
GUDU-B -1.112 -0.078 -0.233 -1.825 -3.678 -5.503
U)
SUKKUR-B -0.243 -0.031 -0.041 -0.399 -0.757 -1. 157 N
KOTRI-B - 1 .481 0.198 -0.035 -1.061 8.470 7.409 ....
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 574
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4174 VARIABLE RCONT.L END OF THE MONTH RESRVOIR CONTENTS (MAF)

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

MANGLA-R 0.966 0.293 1.513 2.050 2.880 4.246 4.881 4.881

TARBELA-R 4.342 2.658 1.241 2.304 1.152 4.253 6.469 8.861 8.861
CHASMA-R 0.435 0.435 0.435 0.435 0.435 0.435 0.435

+ OCT NOV DEC

MANGLA-R 4.000 2.515 1.242

TARBELA-R 8.861 6.910 5.844
CHASMA-R 0.435

4175 AVE-RCONT AVERAGE RESERVOIR CONTENTS DURING THE MONTH (MAF)

R-ELE RESERVOIR ELEVETAION (FEET FROM SPD)
R-OUTFLOW RESERVOIR OUTFLOW (MAF)
P-CAP POWER CAPACITY AT R-ELE MW
G-CAP GENERATION CAPABILITY KWH/AF
ENERGY-G ENERGY GENERATION BILLION KILOWATT HOURS(BKWH)
ENERGY-S ENERGY SPILLED (BKWH)

W
4175 PARAMETER REP79 N
N
INDEX 1 = MANGLA-R

R-ELE P-CAP G-CAP AVE-RCONT R-OUTFLOW ENERGY-G ENERGY-S

JAN 1118.712 707.878 250.712 1. 104 0.735 0.184

FEB 1097.669 620.811 224.270 0.630 1.289 0.289
MAR 1063.024 478.517 179.049 0.146 1.706 0.305
APR 1103.645 643.663 231.645 0.757 2.308 0.470 0.065
MAY 1140.381 801. 221 269.458 1.782 3.806 0.585 0.441
JUN 1157.106 866. 106 283.948 2.465 2.146 0.609
JUL 1179.583 958.334 317.375 3.563 2.064 0.655
AUG 1196.618 960.000 346.705 4.564 1.604 0.556
SEP 1202.000 960.000 356.000 4.881 0.842 0.300
OCT 1194.524 960.000 343.087 4.440 1.847 0.634
NOV 1173.475 933.902 308.213 3.257 1.996 0.615
DEC 1142.753 808.811 272.304 1.878 1.680 0.457
RABI 9.253 2.485
KHARIF 12.770 3.175 0.505
ANNUAL 22.023 5.660 0.505

INDEX 1 TARBELA-R

R-ELE P-CAP G-CAP AVE-RCONT R-OUTFLOW ENERGY-G ENERGY-S

JAN 1477.413 1578.927 308.189 5.093 2.453 0.756

FEB 1439.924 1365.561 280.909 3.500 2.652 0.745
MAR 1394.856 1082. 106 241.856 1.949 2.879 0.696
APR 1388.520 1043.123 236.408 1.772 0.859 0.203
MAY 1386.873 1033.241 235.749 1.728 5.120 0.754 0.453
JUN 1417.908 1248.843 261.745 2.703 4.062 0.912 0.151
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12'59:58 PAGE 575
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4175 PARAMETER REP79

INDEX 1 TARBELA-R

R-ELE P-CAP G-CAP AVE-RCONT R-OUTFLOW ENERGV-G ENERGV-S

oJUL 1483.211 1622.328 312.569 5.361 13.923 1.184 3.168

AUG 1529.063 1902.377 356.000 7.665 15.044 1.389 3.967
SEP 1550.000 1952.000 376.000 8.861 6.184 1.425 0.900
OCT 1550.000 1952.000 376.000 8.861 2.268 0.853
NOV 1533.035 1916.498 359.642 7.885 3.218 1.157
DEC 1504.230 1756.225 340.230 6.377 2.248 0.765
RABI 15.718 4.972
KHARIF 45.191 5.867 8.639
ANNUAL 60.909 10.839 8.639

w
N
w
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 516
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM eMS

4183 PARAMETER REP75 SURFACE WATER DIVERSION AT THE CANAL HEAD BY ZDNE (MAF)

wAN FEB MAR APR MAY wUN wUL AUG SEP

FRESH .NWFP 0.158 0.187 0.210 0.215 0.252 0.325 0.333 0.333 0.332
FRESH .PNW 0.263 0.255 0.311 0.491 0.453 0.399 0.396 0.385 0.424
FRESH .pew 1.033 1. 187 2.429 1.169 3.077 3.856 3.304 3.061 3.021
FRESH .PSW 0.296 0.514 0.541 0.599 0.795 0.776 0.156 0.819 0.684
FRESH .PRW 0.196 0.316 0.406 0.405 0.593 1.185 0.964 0.911 0.171
FRESH .seWN 0.343 0.521 0.585 0.460 0.522 0.700 0.102 0.116 0.864
FRESH .SRWN 0.230 0.085 0.163 0.065 0.121 1.048 1.313 0.198 0.693
FRESH .sews 0.085 0.157 0.120 0.149 0.128 0.126 0.153 0.155 0.151
FRESH .PUN.JAB 1.188 2.212 3.687 3.264 4.918 6.217 5.420 5.242 4.912
FRESH .SIND 0.658 0.163 0.868 0.674 0.771 1.874 2.228 1.610 1.114
FRESH .PAKISTAN 2.604 3.222 4.824 4.153 5.942 8.416 7.981 1.245 6.958
SALINE. PNW 0.130 0.111 0.121 0.202 0.183 0.144 0.141 0.140 0.143
SALINE. pew 0.277 0.466 0.638 0.695 0.891 1.040 0.968 0.893 1.041
SALINE .PSW 0.132 0.255 0.221 0.262 0.374 0.359 0.311 0.343 0.300
SALINE. seWN 0.305 0.560 0.517 0.440 0.581 0.757 0.740 0.121 0.845
SALINE. SRWN 0.289 0.364 0.341 0.170 0.349 1.781 1.969 1.480 1.822
SALINE. sews 0.345 0.821 0.643 0.766 0.898 0.795 0.794 0.828 0.944
SALINE. SRWS 0.471 0.424 0.490 0.582 1. 182 1.541 2.028 1.392 1.457
SALINE. PUNwAB 0.539 0.832 0.991 1.159 1.448 1.542 1.426 1.316 1. 491
SALINE. SIND 1.416 2.110 1.991 1.958 3.009 4.813 5.531 4.421 5.068
SALINE. PAKISTAN 4.457 c..:I
1.955 3.003 2.989 3.117 6.415 6.956 5.196 6.558 N
TOTAL .NWFP 0.158 0.187 0.210 0.215 0.252 0.325 0.333 0.333 0.332 ,f:
TOTAL .PNW 0.393 0.366 0.438 0.693 0.636 0.543 0.531 0.525 0.561
TOTAL .pew 1.310 1.653 3.067 2.463 3.968 4.896 4.212 3.960 4.014
TOTAL .PSW 0.428 0.768 0.767 0.861 1.169 1.135 1.073 1.222 0.984
TOTAL .PRW 0.196 0.316 0.406 0.405 0.593 1.185 0.964 0.911 0.711
TOTAL .seWN 0.647 1.081 1. 102 0.901 1.103 1.457 1.442 1.438 1.109
TOTAL .SRWN 0.519 0.449 0.510 0.235 0.470 2.829 3.342 2.278 2.515
TOTAL .sews 0.430 0.978 0.764 0.915 1.026 0.921 0.947 0.983 1.101
TOTAL .SRWS 0.471 0.424 0.490 0.582 1.182 1.541 2.028 1.392 1.457
TOTAL .PUNwAB 2.321 3.104 4.678 4.422 6.366 1.759 6.846 6.618 6.403
TOTAL .SINO 2.074 2.933 2.865 2.633 3.781 6.748 7.158 6.090 6.781
TOTAL .PAKISTAN 4.559 6.224 7.813 7.270 10.399 14.832 14.937 13.041 13.516

+ OCT NOV DEe RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

FRESH .NWFP 0.243 0.209 0.191 1.258 1.791 3.048

FRESH .PMW 0.377 0.329 0.289 1.825 2.550 4.375
FRESH .PCW 2.534 1.570 1.361 10.113 18.100 28.213
FRESH .PSW 0.659 0.745 0.533 3.287 4 488 1.716
FRESH .PRW 0.545 0.375 0.284 2.123 4.836 6.958
FRESH .SCWN 0.624 0.481 0.447 3.006 3.965 6.911
FRESH .SRWN 0.299 0.095 0.076 0.948 4.091 5.046
FRESH .SCWS 0.128 0.115 0.118 0.725 0.868 1.593
FRESH .PUNvAB 4.115 3.019 2.468 17.348 29.973 47.321
FRESH .SIND 1.051 0.691 0.641 4.679 8.931 13.609
FRESH .PAKISTAN 5.409 3.926 3.300 23.284 40.695 63.979
SALINE. PMW 0.141 0.138 0.129 0.714 0.953 1.127
SALINE. PCW 0.814 0.595 0.458 3.308 5.533 8.841
SALINE .PSW 0.295 0.312 0.232 1. 513 1.955 3.461
SALINE. SCWN 0.700 0.545 0.466 3.093 4.084 1.171
SALINE. SRWN 0.936 0.342 0.339 2.617 1.571 10.189
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 577
E X E e UTI N G GAMS 2.21 IBM eMS

4183 PARAMETER REP75 SURFACE WATER DIVERSION AT THE CANAL HEAD BY ZONE (MAF)

+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

SALINE. SCWS 0.810 0.801 0.671 4.092 5.024 9.116

SALINE. SRWS 0.943 0.477 0.309 3. 121 8. 181 11.301
SALINE. PUNJAB 1.309 1.105 0.819 5.595 8.441 14.036
SALINE. SIND 3.389 2.164 1.785 12.922 24.860 37.782
SALINE. PAKI ST AN 4.698 3.269 2.604 18.517 33.301 51.818
TOTAL .NWFP 0.243 0.209 0.191 1.258 1.791 3.048
TOTAL .PMW 0.517 0.467 0.418 2.600 3.502 6.102
TOTAL .PCW 3.408 2.165 1.819 13.421 23.633 37.054
TOTAL .PSW 0.954 1 . 117 0.765 4.800 6.443 11.243
TOTAL .PRW 0.545 0.375 0.284 2.123 4.836 6.958
TOTAL .seWN 1.324 1.032 0.912 6.099 8.049 14. 148
TOTAL .SRWN 1.235 0.437 0.415 3.566 11.669 15.234
TOTAL . sews 0.938 0.916 0.790 4.816 5.893 10.709
TOTAL .SRWS 0.943 0.477 0.309 3.121 8. 181 11 .301
TOTAL .PUNJAB 5.424 4.124 3.287 22.943 38.414 61.357
TOTAL .SIND 4.441 2.862 2.426 17.601 33.791 51.392
TOTAL .PAKISTAN 10. 107 7.194 5.903 41.802 73.996 115.797

f..o)
N
l.n
INDUS BASIN MDDEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 578
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4185 SEEP-RAIN - SEEPAGE FROM RAIN TO THE GROUNDWATER (MAF)

SEEP-PTW - SEEPAGE FROM THE PRIVATE TUBEWELL WATER (MAF)
SEEP-GTW - SEEPAGE FROM THE GOVERNMENT TUBEWELL WATER (MAF)
SEEP-CANAL - CANAL WATER SEEPAGE FROM MAIN AND BRANCH CANALS (MAF)
SEEP-WCFLD - CANAL WATER SEEPAGE FROM WATERCOURSES AND FIELDS
TO THE GROUDWATER (MAF)
SEEP- LINK - SEEPAGE FROM LINK CANALS TO THE GW(MAF)
SEEP-RIVER - SEEPAGE FROM RIVERS TO THE GW(MAF)
P-TUBWELL - PRIVATE TUBEWELL PUMPAGE (MAF)
G-TUBWELL - GOVERNEMENT TUBEWELL PUMP AGE (MAF)
TOT-INF - TOTAL INFLOW TO THE GROUNDWATER FROM ALL SOURCES (RAIN,
PRIVATE TUBEWELLS,GOVERNMENT TUBEWELL AND CANALWATER
SEEPAGE FROM CANALS WATERCOURSES AND FIELDS (MAF)
TOT-OUTF - TOTAL OUFLOW FROM THE GROUNDWATER (PRIVATE AND GOVT. TUBEWELL
PUMPAGE AND EVAPORATION FROM GROUNWATER MAF )
INF-OUTF - DIFFERECE IN THE INFLOW AND OUTFLOW (MAF)
P-EVAP-GW - POTENTIAL EVAP. FROM GW FOR THE GIVEN GW LEVEL (MAF)
EVAP-GW - EVAPORATION FROM GOUNDWATER (MAF)
BALANCE - BALANCE AFTER THE EVAPORATION FROM GROUNDWATER(MAF)

4185 PARAMETER REP82 REPORT ON GROUNDWATER BALANCE (MAF)

NWFP PMW PCW PSW PRW SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS w

N
FRESH .SEEP-RAIN 0.048 0.205 0.567 0.259 0.289 0.082 0.045 0.023 0\
FRESH .SEEP-PTW 0.033 0.457 3.658 0.902 1.453 0.379 0.367 0.374
FRESH .SEEP-GTW 0.483 0.268 1.143 0.540 0.133 0.008 0.019
FRESH .SEEP-CANAL 0.525 0.983 5.550 1.544 1.151 1.051 0.614 0.215
FRESH .SEEP-WCFLD 0.831 1.238 7.053 2.076 1.888 2.391 1.307 0.559
FRESH .SEEP-LINK 0.206 0.328 0.747 0.686
FRESH . SEEP-RIVER -1. 1935E-16 -0.139 -0.300 -0.081 -0.681 0.241 0.102 0.027
FRESH .P-TUBWELL 0.152 1.625 16.050 3.971 6.570 1.360 1.529 1.339
FRESH .G-TUBWELL 1.239 0.865 3.130 1.525 0.305 0.022 0.042
FRESH .TOT-INF 1.437 3.432 17.124 6.590 5.327 4.278 2.443 1.218
FRESH .TOT-OUTF 0.152 2.864 16.915 7.101 8.094 1.665 1.551 1.382
FRESH . I NF -OUTF 1.285 0.569 0.209 -0.512 -2.767 2.613 0.892 -0.164
FRESH .P-EVAP-GW 0.230 0.638 1.971 0.553 0.262 1. 211 1.201 0.283
FRESH .EVAP-GW 0.230 0.569 0.209 0.553 0.262 1. 211 0.892 0.283
FRESH .BALANCE 1.055 -1.064 -3.029 1.402 -0.447
SALINE.SEEP-RAIN 0.064 0.158 0.113 0.078 0.081 0.135 0.201
SALINE. SEEP-CANAL 0.407 1.640 0.716 1.108 1.309 1. 213 1.542
SALINE.SEEP-WCFLD 0.476 2.462 0.896 2.448 2.442 3.239 2.880
SALINE. SEEP-LINK 0.064 0.091 0.325
SALINE.SEEP-RIVER -0.043 -0.084 -0.035 0.228 0.182 0.158
SALINE.TOT-INF 0.969 4.267 2.014 3.863 4.014 4.745 4.623
SALINE.INF-OUTF 0.969 4.267 2.014 3.863 4.014 4.745 4.623
SALINE. P- EVAP-GW 0.199 0.549 0.240 1.149 2.148 1.646 2.931
SALINE. EVAP-GW 0.199 0.549 0.240 1.149 2.148 1.646 2.931
SALINE .BALANCE 0.769 3.718 1.773 2.714 1.867 3.098 1.692
TOTAL .SEEP-RAIN 0.048 0.269 0.725 0.372 0.289 0.161 0.127 0.158 0.201
TOTAL .SEEP-PTW 0.033 0.457 3.658 0.902 1.453 0.379 0.367 0.374
TOTAL .SEEP-GTW 0.483 0.268 1.143 0.540 0.133 0.008 0.019
TOTAL .SEEP-CANAL 0.525 1.390 7.190 2.260 1.151 2.159 1.923 1.428 1.542
TOTAL . SEEP-WCFLD 0.831 1.714 9.515 2.971 1.888 4.840 3.749 3.798 2.880
TOTAL . SEEP-LINK 0.271 0.419 1.072 0.686
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME~WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 579
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4185 PARAMETER REP82 REPORT ON GROUNDWATER BALANCE (MAF)

NWFP PMW PCW PSW PRW SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS

TOTAL .SEEP-RIVER -1.1935E-16 -0.183 -0.384 -0.117 -0.681 0.469 0.284 0.185
TOTAL .P-TUBWELL 0.152 1.625 16.050 3.971 6.570 1.360 1.529 1.339
TOTAL .G-TUBWELL 1.239 0.865 3.130 1.525 0.305 0.022 0.042
TOTAL .TOT-INF 1.437 4.401 21.392 8.603 5.327 8. 141 6.457 5.962 4.623
TOTAL .TOT-OUTF 0.152 2.864 16.915 7. 101 8.094 1.665 1.551 1.382
TOTAL .INF-OUTF 1.285 1.537 4.477 1.502 -2.767 6.476 4.906 4.580 4.623
TOTAL .P-EVAP-GW 0.230 0.837 2.520 0.793 0.262 2.360 3.348 1.929 2.931
TOTAL .EVAP-GW 0.230 0.768 0.758 0.793 0.262 2.360 3.039 1.929 2.931
TOTAL .BALANCE 1.055 0.769 3.718 0.709 -3.029 4. 115 1.867 2.651 1.692

+ PUNJAB SIND PAKISTAN

FRESH .SEEP-RAIN 1.321 0.151 1.520

FRESH .SEEP-PTW 6.471 1.120 7.624
FRESH .SEEP-GTW 2.434 0.159 2.593
FRESH .SEEP-CANAL 9.228 1.881 11.633
FRESH .SEEP-WCFLD 12.254 4.258 17.343
FRESH .SEEP-LINK 1.968 1.968
FRESH .SEEP-RIVER - 1 .201 0.370 -0.832
FRESH .P-TUBWELL 28.215 4.229 32.596
U>
FRESH .G-TUBWELL 6.759 0.369 7.128 N
FRESH .TOT-INF 32.474 7.938 41.849 ......,
FRESH .TOT-OUTF 34.974 4.598 39.724
FRESH.INF-OUTF -2.501 3.341 2.125
FRESH .P-EVAP-GW 3.423 2.695 6.349
FRESH .EVAP-GW 1.593 2.386 4.210
FRESH .BALANCE -4.094 0.954 -2.084
SALINE. SEEP-RAIN 0.335 0.495 0.830
SALINE. SEEP-CANAL 2.763 5.172 7.935
SALINE.SEEP-WCFLO 3.834 11.010 14.843
SALINE. SEEP- LINK 0.481 0.481
SALINE.SEEP-RIVER -0.162 0.568 0.406
SALINE. TOT- INF 7.250 17.244 24.494
SALINE.INF-OUTF 7.250 17.244 24.494
SALINE. P-EVAP-GW 0.989 7.873 8.862
SALINE. EVAP-GW 0.989 7.873 8.862
SALINE-BALANCE 6.261 9.371 15.632
TOTAL .SEEP-RAIN 1.655 0.646 2.350
TOTAL .SEEP-PTW 6.471 1.120 7.624
TOTAL .SEEP-GTW 2.434 0.159 2.593
TOTAL .SEEP-CANAL 11.991 7.052 19.568
TOTAL .SEEP-WCFLD 16.088 15.268 32.186
TOTAL . SEEP-LINK 2.448 2.448
TOTAL .SEEP-RIVER -1.364 0.938 -0.426
TOTAL .P-TUBWELL 28.215 4.229 32.596
TOTAL .G-TUBWELL 6.759 0.369 7.128
TOTAL .TOT-INF 39.723 25.183 66.343
TOTAL .TOT-OUTF 34.974 4.598 39.724
TOT AL . I NF -OUTF 4.749 20.585 26.619
TOTAL .P-EVAP-GW 4.412 10.569 15.211
TOTAL .EVAP-GW 2.581 10.260 13.072
TOTAL .BALANCE 2.168 10.325 13.548
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 580
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4185 PARAMETER REP85 REPORT ON GROUNDWATER BALANCE PER ACRE OFF CCA (AF

NWFP PMW PCW PSW PRW SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS

FRESH .SEEP-RAIN 0.077 0.111 0.064 0.085 0.104 0.045 0.029 0.057
FRESH .SEEP-PTW 0.053 0.248 0.416 0.294 0.522 0.206 0.233 0.912
FRESH .SEEP-GTW 0.263 0.030 0.373 0.194 0.072 0.005 0.046
FRESH .SEEP-CANAL 0.836 0.534 0.631 0.504 0.414 0.570 0.390 0.525
FRESH .SEEP-WCFLD 1.322 0.673 0.802 0.677 0.678 1.296 0.829 1.365
FRESH . SEEP-LINK 0.112 0.037 0.244 0.247
FRESH .SEEP-RIVER -1.9005E-16 -0.076 -0.034 -0.027 -0.245 0.130 0.065 0.066
FRESH .P-TUBWELL 0.242 0.883 1.825 1.295 2.361 0.737 0.970 3.268
FRESH .G-TUBWELL 0.674 0.098 1.021 0.548 0.165 0.014 0.104
FRESH .TOT-INF 2.288 1.866 1.947 2.150 1.915 2.319 1.550 2.971
FRESH .TOT-OUTF 0.242 1.557 1.923 2.317 2.909 0.903 0.984 3.372
FRESH.INF-OUTF 2.046 0.309 0.024 -0.167 -0.995 1.416 0.566 -0.400
FRESH .P-EVAP-GW 0.366 0.347 0.224 0.180 0.094 0.657 0.762 0.691
FRESH .EVAP-GW 0.366 0.309 0.024 0.180 0.094 0.657 0.566 0.691
FRESH .BALANCE 1.680 -0.347 -1.089 0.760 -1.092
SALINE. SEEP-RAIN 0.111 0.064 0.085 0.045 0.029 0.057 0.072
SALINE. SEEP-CANAL 0.709 0.669 0.537 0.633 0.464 0.509 0.556
SALINE.SEEP-WCFLD 0.829 1.005 0.672 1.400 0.866 1.360 1.038
SALINE.SEEP-LINK 0.112 0.037 0.244
SALINE.SEEP-RIVER -0.076 -0.034 -0.027 0.130 0.065 0.066 I.J)
SALINE.TOT-INF 1.687 1.742 1. 511 2.208 1.424 1.993 1.666 N
SALI NE. INF -OUTF 1.687 1.742 1 .511 2.208 1.424 1.993 1.666 (XI

SALINE.P-EVAP-GW 0.347 0.224 0.180 0.657 0.762 0.691 1.056

SALINE. EVAP-GW 0.347 0.224 0.180 0.657 0.762 0.691 1.056
SALINE. BALANCE 1.340 1.518 1.330 1.551 0.662 1. 301 0.610
TOTAL .SEEP-RAIN 0.077 0.111 0.064 0.085 0.104 0.045 0.029 0.057 0.072
TOTAL .SEEP-PTW 0.053 0.189 0.325 0.205 0.522 0.106 0.083 0.134
TOTAL .SEEP-GTW 0.200 0.024 0.260 0.194 0.037 0.002 0.007
TOTAL .SEEP-CANAL 0.836 0.576 0.639 0.514 0.414 0.601 0.438 0.512 0.556
TOTAL .SEEP-WCFLD 1.322 0.710 0.846 0.676 0.678 1.347 0.853 1.361 1.038
TOTAL .SEEP-LINK 0.112 0.037 0.244 0.247
TOTAL .SEEP-RIVER -1.9005E-16 -0.076 -0.034 -0.027 -0.245 0.130 0.065 0.066
TOTAL .P-TUBWELL 0.242 0.673 1.427 0.903 2.361 0.379 0.348 0.480
TOTAL .G-TUBWELL 0.513 0.077 0.712 0.548 0.085 0.005 0.015
TOTAL .TOT-INF 2.288 1.824 1.902 1.956 1. 915 2.265 1.469 2.136 1.666
TOTAL .TOT-OUTF 0.242 1.187 1.504 1.615 2.909 0.463 0.353 0.495
TOTAL .INF-OUTF 2.046 0.637 0.398 0.342 -0.995 1.802 1 . 116 1.641 1.666
TOTAL .P-EVAP-GW 0.366 0.347 0.224 0.180 0.094 0.657 0.762 0.691 1.056
TOTAL .EVAP-GW 0.366 0.318 0.067 0.180 0.094 0.657 0.692 0.691 1.056
TOTAL .BALANCE 1.680 0.319 0.331 0.161 -1.089 1. 145 0.425 0.950 0.610

+ PUNJAB SIND PAKISTAN

FRESH . SEEP-RAIN 0.080 0.039 0.073

FRESH . SEEP-PTW 0.393 0.292 0.364
FRESH . SEEP-GTW 0.148 0.042 0.124
FRESH .SEEP-CANAL 0.560 0.491 0.556
FRESH .SEEP-WCFLD 0.743 1.112 0.828
FRESH . SEEP-LINK 0.119 0.094
FRESH .SEEP-RIVER -0.073 0.096 -0.040
FRESH .P-TUBWELL 1.712 1.104 1.557
FRESH .G-TUBWELL 0.410 0.096 0.340
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 581
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4185 PARAMETER REP85 REPORT ON GROUNDWATER BALANCE PER ACRE OFF CCA (AF )

+ PUN..JAB SIND PAKISTAN

FRESH .TOT-INF 1.910 2.012 1.998

FRESH .TOT-OUTF 2.122 1.200 1.891
FRESH .INF-OUTF -0.152 0.812 0.101
FRESH .P-EVAP-GW 0.208 0.104 0.303
FRESH .EVAP-GW 0.091 0.623 0.201
FRESH .BALANCE -0.248 0.249 -0.100
SALINE. SEEP-RAIN 0.011 0.051 0.059
SALINE.SEEP-CANAL 0.634 0.532 0.563
SALINE.SEEP-WCFLD 0.880 1.132 1.054
SALINE. SEEP-LINK 0.110 0.034
SALINE.SEEP-RIVER -0.031 0.058 0.029
SALINE. TOT INF 1.664 1.113 1.139
SALINE.INF-OUTF 1.664 1.113 1.139
SALINE. P- EVAP -GW 0.221 0.810 0.629
SALINE. EVAP -GW 0.221 0.810 0.629
SALINE. BALANCE 1.431 0.964 1. 110
TOTAL . SEEP-RAIN 0.019 0.048 0.061
TOTAL .SEEP-PTW 0.311 0.083 0.218
TOTAL .SEEP-GTW O. 111 0.012 0.014
TOTAL .SEEP-CANAL 0.515 0.520 0.559
TOTAL .SEEP-WCFLD 0.112 1.126 0.919 W
N
TOTAL . SEEP-LINK O. 111 0.010 \0
TOTAL .SEEP-RIVER -0.065 0.069 -0.012
TOTAL .P-TUBWELL 1.354 0.312 0.931
TOTAL .G-TUBWELL 0.324 0.021 0.204
TOTAL .TOT-INF 1.906 1.858 1.894
TOTAL . TOT-OUTF 1.618 0.339 1.134
TOTAL .INF-OUTF 0.228 1.519 0.160
TOTAL .P-EVAP-GW 0.212 0.180 0.434
TOTAL .EVAP-GW 0.124 0.151 0.313
TOTAL .BALANCE 0.104 0.162 0.381
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 582
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4224 ANIMALS ARE IN THOUSAND, MEET IN MILLION KGS AND

MILK IN MILLION LITERS

4224 PARAMETER REP95

M-NWFP A-NWFP M-PMW A-PMW M-PCW A-PCW M-PSW A-PSW M-PRW

FRESH .BULLOCK 66.270 137.186 1725.599 340.629 687.274

FRESH .COW 130.251 54.874 690.240 163.987 274.910
FRESH .BUFFALO 121.302 788.562 45.636 1108.645 1657.706
SALINE. BULLOCK 18.035 185.282 89.346
SALINE. COW 7.214 74.113 35.738
SALINE. BUFFALO 171.867 354.045 180.580
TOTAL .BULLOCK 66.270 151.000 155.221 332.000 1910.882 1978.000 429.975 952.000 687.274
TOTAL .COW 130.251 252.500 62.088 368.000 764.353 1274.500 199.725 527.500 274.910
TOTAL .BUFFALO 121.302 255.200 960.429 389.600 399.681 3316.800 1289.225 2328.800 1657.706

+ A-PRW M-SCWN A-SCWN M-SRWN A-SRWN M-SCWS A-SCWS M-SRWS A-SRWS

FRESH .BULLOCK 303.703 405.877 85.779

FRESH .COW 121 .481 162.351 34.312
FRESH .BUFFALO 138.899 33.335
SALINE.BULLOCK 199.499 263.840 264.537 235.023
SALINE .COW 145.062 135.482 141.027 268.504 w
SALINE .BUFFALO 246.962 610.325 239.390 350.900 w
TOTAL .BULLOCK 368.000 503.203 399.000 669.717 486 000 350.316 444.000 235.023 143.000 0
TOTAL .COW 295.000 266.543 221.000 297.833 285.000 175.338 315.000 268.504 128.000
TOTAL .BUFFALO 1823.200 385.860 467.200 610.325 469 600 272.724 445.600 350.900 199.200

+ M-PUNJAB A-PUNJAB M-SIND A-SIND M-PAKISTAN A-PAKISTAN

FRESH .BULLOCK 2890.688 795.359 3752.318

FRESH .COW 1184. Oil 318.144 1632.405
FRESH .BUFFALO 3600.549 172.233 3894.085
SALI NE . BULLOCK 292.663 962.899 1255.563
SALINE .COW 117.065 690.075 807.141
SALINE. BUFF ALO 706.492 1447.577 2154.069
TOTAL .BULLOCK 3183.352 3630.000 1758.259 1472.000 5007.880 5253.000
TOTAL .COW 1301.076 2465.000 1008.219 949.000 2439.546 3666.500
TOTAL .BUFFALO 4307.041 7858.400 1619.810 1581.600 6048.153 9695.200

4224 PARAMETER REP90

NWFP PMW PCW PSW PRW SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS

FRESH .COW-MILK 46.760 15.584 209.143 43.948 91.270 55.881 62. 180 12.009
FRESH .BUFF-MILK 73.024 514.931 29.755 712.859 978.046 131.398 25.768
FRESH .MEAT 4.792 16.339 34.715 26.248 42.190 7.808 8.223 2.110
SALINE .COW-MI LK 2.049 22.456 9.578 66.729 51.890 49.359 125.660
SALINE.BUFF-MILK 112.229 230.837 116.113 233.626 457.744 185.048 357.216
SALINE. MEAT 3.328 9.768 4.881 8.337 19.539 9.089 15.344
TOTAL .COW-MILK 46.760 17.633 231.599 53.526 91.270 122.610 114.070 61.368 125.660
TOTAL .BUFF-MILK 73.024 627.160 260.592 828.972 978.046 365.024 457.744 210.816 357.216
TOTAL .MEAT 4.792 19.667 44.482 31.129 42.190 16.145 27.762 11.199 15.344
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 583
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4224 PARAMETER REP90

+ PUN..JAB SIND PAKISTAN

FRESH .COW-MILK 359.945 130.071 536.776

FRESH .BUFF-MILK 2235.591 157.166 2465.781
FRESH .MEAT 119.492 18.141 142.424
SALINE. COW-MI LK 34.083 293.638 327.720
SALINE. BUFF -MI LK 459.179 1233.634 1692.814
SALINE . MEAT 17.976 52.309 70.285
TOTAL .COW-MILK 394.028 423.708 864.497
TOTAL .BUFF-MILK 2694.770 1390.800 4158.594
TOTAL .MEAT 137.468 70.449 212.709

4226 PARAMETER FSALEP FINANCIAL SALE PRICE FOR CROP AND LIVESTOCK COMODITIES (RS PER KG OR PER LITER)

BASMATI 6.000, IRRI 2.900, COTTON 4.500, GRAM 3.900, MAIZE 1.600, MUS+RAP 3.750
SC-MILL 0.300, SC-GUR 3.000, WHEAT 2.000, ORCHARD 4.800, POTATOES 2.600, ONIONS 2.900
CHILLI 10.000, COW-MILK 5.400, BUFF-MILK 5.400, MEAT 13.800

4226 PARAMETER PP 9.000 FINANCIAL PURCHASE PRICE OF PROTEIN (RS PER KGS)
w
W
4226 PARAMETER SEEDP FINANCIAL SEED PRICE (RS PER KGS) I-'

BASMATI 5.000, IRRI 2.500, COTTON 5.500, RAB-FOD 40.000, GRAM 5.700, MAIZE 4.000
MUS+RAP 4.300, KHA FOD 2.500, SC-MILL 0.200, SC-GUR 0.200, WHEAT 2.900, POTATOES 2.600
ONIONS 2.900, CHILLI 10 000

4226 PARAMETER MISC FINANCIAL MISCELLENIOUS PRICES

NITROGEN 5.800, PHOSPHATE 7.000, PROTEIN 9.000, TWINVT 10000.000, TRINVT 25000.000
TWOPC 225.000, TROPC 45.000

4226 PARAMETER ESALEP ECONOMIC SALE PRICE FOR CROP AND LIVESTOCK COMODITIES (RS PER KG OR PER LITER)

BASMATI 6.000, IRRI 2.400. COTTON 6.000, GRAM 3.800, MAIZE 0.600, MUS+RAP 3.400
SC-MILL 0.210, SC-GUR 3.000, WHEAT 2.200, ORCHARD 4.300, POTATOES 2.600, ONIONS 2.900
CHILLI 10.000, COW-MILK 2.460, BUFF-MILK 3.240, MEAT 14.400

4226 PARAMETER ESEEDP ECONOMIC SEED PRICE

BASMATI 7.000, IRRI 3.700, COTTON 6.700, RAB-FOD 36.000, GRAM 5.100, MAIZE 7.000
MUS+RAP 5.900, KHA-FOD 2.250, SC-MILL 0.430, SC-GUR 0.430, WHEAT 3.600, POTATOES 2.600
ONIONS 2.900, CHILLI 10.000
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 584
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4226 PARAMETER EMISC ECONOMIC MISCELLENIOUS PRICES

NITROGEN 8.300, PHOSPHATE 10.900, PROTEIN 9.000, TWINVT 10000.000. TRINVT 25000.000
TWOPC 170.000, TROPC 50.000

4226 PARAMETER EPP 9.000 ECONOMIC PRICE OF PROTEIN CONCENTRATE (RS PER KGS)

4226 PARAMETER IMPORTP IMPORT PRICES FOR THE SCENARIO

SC-MILL 0.500

4226 PARAMETER EXPORTP EXPORT PRICES FOR THE SCENARIO

BASMATI 4.800, IRRI 2.300, COTTON 4.500, WHEAT 2.000, ONIONS 2.800

4226 PARAMETER EXPLIMIT EXPORT LIMITS BY ZONE

BASMATI IRRI COTTON ONIONS

NWFP 1.400
PMW 0.297 U)
U)
PCW 105.270 588.000 1.716 N
PSW 0.561
PRW 250.000 213.730 0.126
SCWN 82.880 2.113
SRWN 511.940 1.590
SCWS 29.120 1. 166
SRWS 203.060 0.424
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 585
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4245 PARAMETER REP100 ARTIFICIAL WATER USED AT THE NODES (MAF)

ALL ZERO

4245 PARAMETER REP110 COST OF ARTIFICIAL WATER AT NODES (MILLION RUPEES)

ALL ZERO

4245 PARAMETER REP120 COST OF IMPORTS ARTIFICIAL WATER AND FODDER (MILLION RUPEES)

IMP-COST

TOTAL 598.854

4241 PARAMETER ENDPRICE

NWFP PMW pew PSW PRW SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS

BASMATI 4.421 3.000 3.000

IRRI 2.595 1.450 1.450 1.450 3.968 1.450
COTTON 3.611 2.605 2.605 3.671 5.803
(N
GRAM 3.535 2.566 2.566 1.950 7.800 2.258 (N
MAIZE 0.800 0.800 (N
MUS+RAP 2.163 2.467 3.941 3.941 1.500 3.941
SC-MILL 0.292 0.505 0.245 0.505 0.505 0.114 0.245 0.409 0.268
WHEAT 2.105 2.319 2.731 3.400 3.496 1.941 1. 941 4.000 1.947
POTATOES 1.300 3.353 1.300 2.121 2.326 1.916 2.326 2.942 2.121
ONIONS 1.450 1. 908 1.450 1.450 1.450 1.450 1.450 1.450 1.450
CHILLI 8.941 9.731 5.000 5.189 6.579 5.000 5.000 9.731 6.519
COW-MILK 10.800 0.959 2.100 10.374 9.056 2.100 2.100 3.919 2.100
BUFF -MI LK 10.800 6.519 2.100 6.537 8.242 2.100 2.100 2.100 2.100
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 586
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4271 THIS REPORT IS MEANINGFUL WITH THE COMPLETE INDUS MODEL ONLY

4272 PARAMETER REP130 REPORT ON SYSTEM INFLOWS AND OUTFLOWS(MAF)

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP

RIVER-INF 2.500 2.839 5.246 9.370 13.345 18.826 30.781 30.766 12.942
TRIB-INF 0.170 0.174 0.313 0.301 0.639 0.883 1.318 1.373 0.432
TOT-INFLOW 2.670 3.013 5.559 9.671 13.984 19.709 32.099 32.139 13.374
RES-EVAP 0.005 0.013 0.012 0.014 0.028 0.045 0.014 0.001 0.023
LINK-LOSS 0.298 0.429 0.466 0.358 0.459 0.465 0.362 0.290 0.292
RIVER-LOSS -0.850 -0.862 -1.022 -0.982 1.087 -1.824 2.978 -1.483 -8.963
CANAL-DIV 4.559 6.224 7.813 7.270 10.399 14.832 14.937 13.041 13.516
TO-SEA 2.627 2.261 10.226 17.262 8.507
BALNCE -1. 343 -2.792 1 .711 3.011 -0.615 3.931 3.582 3.027 3.856251E-6

+ OCT NOV DEC RABI KHARIF ANNUAL

RIVER-INF 5.048 2.957 2.584 21.174 116.030 137.204

TRIB-INF 0.239 0.193 0.205 1.294 4.946 6.240
TOT-INFLOW 5.287 3.150 2.789 22.468 120.976 143.444
RES-EVAP 0.066 0.028 0.013 0.137 0.126 0.263
LINK-LOSS 0.494 0.483 0.458 2.630 2.224 4.854
RIVER-LOSS -5.037 -0.685 -1.247 -9.702 -9. 188 -18.890 lJ.)
lJ.)
CANAL-DIV 10.107 7.194 5.903 41.802 73.996 115.797 p
TO-SEA 0.538 0.538 40.882 41.420
BALNCE -0.881 -3.871 -2.338 -12.936 12.936 -4.30396E-5

4273 VARIABLE PRODA.L ARTIFICIAL SUPPLY

ALL ZERO
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISR3 11/21/89 12:59:58 PAGE 587
E X E CUT I N G GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

4275 VARIABLE ARTWATER.L WATER FROM IMAGINARY SOURCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)

ALL ZERO)

4275 VARIABLE ARTWATERND.L WATER FROM IMAGINARY SOURCE AT NODES (MAF)

ALL ZERO

4275 VARIABLE ARTFOO.L ARTIFICIAL FODDER SUPPLY EQUAl VALENT OF RAB-FOD (000 TONNS)

ALL ZERO

**** FILE SUMMARY FOR USER KDAM

RESTART WSISM3 WORK* A

INPUT WSISR3 GAMS A
OUTPUT WSISR3 LISTING A

EXECUTION TIME 16.220 SECONDS VER: IBM-TB-002

w
w
VI
 - 336

(This page is intentionally blank)

 Appendix A.4

Water Allocation Models

File WSISM4 Page 339

File WSISMS Page 340

File WSISM6 Page 341

File WSISM7 Page 342

 - 338

(This page is intentionally blank)

INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM4 01/23/90 16:29:08 PAGE 102
GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3645 * RESTART FROM WSISM3

3646 * POST TARBELA AVERAGE AS MINIMUM. EXTRA WATER ALLOCATED OPTIMALLY
3647 * WITHIN PROVINCIAL SHARES (DETERMINED BY SEASON)
3648 * INVESTMENTS ARE ALLOWED
3649
3650
3651 TOLCNL=1;
3652 TOLPR =0;
3653
3654 SOLVE WSISN MAXIMIZING CPS USING LP

w
W
10
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM5 01/23/90 16:29: 19 PAGE 102
GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3645 * RESTART FROM WSISM3

3646 * 80 % OF POST TARBELA AVERAGE AS MINIMUM, REST OF THE WATER IS
3647 * ALLOCATED OPTIMALY.
3648 * INVESTMENTS ARE ALLOWED
3649
3650 CANALDIV.LO(CNL,M) = .8*DIVPOST(CNL,M)
3651
3652 TOLCNL~1;
3653 TOLPR =1:
3654
3655 SOLVE WSISN MAXIMIZING CPS USING LP

w
~
o
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM6 01/23/90 16:29:35 PAGE 102
GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3645 * RESTRTA FROM WSISM3

3646 * 80 % OF POST TARBELA AVERAGE AS MINIMUM, EXTRA WATER
3647 * ALLOCATED OPTIMALY WITHIN THE PROVINCE
3648 * INVESTMENTS ARE ALLOWED
3649
3650 CANALDIV.LO(CNL,M) = .8*DIVPOST(CNL.M)
3651
3652 TOLCNL= 1;
3653 TOLPR = 0 ;
3654
3655 SOLVE WSISN MAXIMIZING CPS USING LP

t.)
.c:
....
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM7 01/23/90 16:29:44 PAGE 102
GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3645 * RESTART FROM WSISM3

3646 * POST TARBELA AVERAGE AS MINIMUM, EXTRA WATER ALLOCATED OPTIMALLY
3647 * INVESTMENTS ARE ALLOWED
3648
3649 TOLCNL=l;
3650 TOLPR =1;
3651
3652 CANALDIV.LO(CNL,M) .8*DIVPOST(CNL,M)
3653
3654 * RULE CURVE RELAXED.
3655 RCONT. LO(N, M) 0; RCONT. L(N, "AUG") RCAP(N)
3656 RCONT.UP(N,M) = RCAP(N) ;
3657
3658 SOLVE WSISN MAXIMIZING CPS USING LP

U)
.l!
N
 Appendix A.5

Raised Mangla Models

File WSISMll Page 345

File WSISM12 Page 366
File WSISMl3 Page 367
File WSISM14 Page 368
 - 344

(This page is intentionally blank)

INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM11 01/23/90 16:30:22 PAGE 77
MODEL SETUP GAMS 2.21 IBM eMS

This file contains the equation and model specification. Set PSR and
PSR1 contains the prices scenarios for the model.
This file is excuted after the data setup (WSISD* ) setup as GAMS RESTART.

...,
"'"
V1
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM11 01/23/90 16:30:22 PAGE 78
MODEL SETUP GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3173 SETS
3174 PSR(PS) PRICE SCENARIO FOR THE MODEL(FINANCIAL PRICES) /87-88 /
3175 PSR1(PS) PRICE SCENARIO FOR REPORT(ECONOMIC PRICES) /87-88 /
3176 Z1(Z) ZONE SELECTION FOR THIS RUN
3177 / NWFP,PMW,PCW,PSW,PRW,SCWN.SCWS,SRWN,SRWS /
3178 *
3179 * TOTAL COMODITIES ARE 18,
3180 * WITH ENDOGENOUS PRICES= 13, FIXED PRICES=2, FODDER=2
3181 * CONSUMPTION ONLY = 1
3182
3183 CN(CO) COMODITIES ENDOGENOUS PRICES
3184 /BASMATI, IRRI. COTTON.
3185 GRAM, MAIZE, MUS+RAP.
3186 SC-MILL, WHEAT. POTATOES.
3187 ONIONS, CHI LLI ,
3188 COW-MILK. BUFF-MILK /
3189 CCN(CO) CROP COMODITIES WITH ENDOGENOUS PRICES
3190 /BASMATI, IRRI, COTTON,
3191 GRAM, MAIZE. MUS+RAP,
3192 SC-MILL, WHEAT, POTATOES.
3193 ONIONS, CHILLI /
3194 ON(CO) LIVESTOCK COMODITIES ENDOGENOUS PRICES
3195 /COW-MILK, BUFF-MILK/
3196 NCN(CO) CROPS WITH FIXED PRICES EXCLUDING FODDER
3197 /ORCHARD, MEAT / Vol
.po.

3198 CECCO) EXPORTABLE COMODITIES 0\

3199 / BASMATI, IRRI, COTTON,ONIONS,WHEAT /

3200 CM(CO) COMODITIES WHICH COULD BE IMPORTED/SC-MILL/

3201

3202 EX(Z,G) TO CHECK FRESH OR SALINE AREA WITHIN A ZONE

3203 TECHC(Z,CO) COMODITIES BY ZONES

3204 ,

3205 EX(Z1.G)$RESOURCE(Z1,G,"CCA") = YES;

3206 DISPLAY CO,CN, CCN, ON, NCN,CE,CM,EX;

3207 OISPLAY FERT;

3208

3209 TABLE TEC(C,T,S,W,Z) CROP TECHNOLOGY DISABLED FOR 1988 RUN

3210 SCWN SRWN SCWS SRWS

3211 WHEAT. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).LA-PLANT.(HEAVY.JANUARY) 1 1 1 1

3212 WHEAT. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).(OK-HARV,STANDARD). HEAVY 1 1

3213 WHEAT. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).(OK-HARV,STANDARD).JANUARY 1 1

3214 WHEAT. (BULLOCK,SEMI-MECH).(OK-HARV,STANDARD,LA-PLANT).LIGHT 1

3215 ,

3216 SCALARS BIG BIG NUMBER USED FOR ARTIFICAL PRODUCTION /4000/

3217 PAWAT BIG NUMBER FOR ARTIFICIAL WATER /999999/

3218 PAFOD BIG NUMBER FOR ARTIFICAL FODDER /1000/

3219 PARAMETER

3220 DIVNWFP(M) MONTHY DIVERSION TO THE NWFP ZONE (MAF)

3221 /JAN .158, FEB .187, MAR .270, APR .184.

3222 MAY .232, JUN .325, JUL .333, AUG .333.

3223 SEP .332, OCT .200, NOV .063, DEC .133 /

3224

3225 RVAL(N) VALUE OF WATER STORED IN THE RESERVOIRS

3226 /TARBELA-R 1. KALABAGH-R .8, MANGLA-R .6

3227 CHASMA-R .2. CHOTIARI R .2. A SEA .1/

3228 FSALEP(CO) FINANCIAL SALE PRICE FOR CROP AND LIVESTOCK COMODITIES (RS PER KG OR PER LITER)

INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM11 01/23/90 16:30:22 PAGE 79

MODEL SETUP GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3229 PP FINANCIAL PURCHASE PRICE OF PROTEIN (RS PER KGS)

3230 MISC(*) FINANCIAL MISCELLENIOUS PRICES
3231 SEEDP(C) FINANCIAL SEED PRICE (RS PER KGS)
3232 WAGE(M) FINANCIAL WAGE RATES (RS PER MAN-HOUR)
3233 MISCCT(C) FINANCIAL WATER CHARGES AND MISCILLENIOUS COSTS(RS PER ACRE)
3234
3235 ESALEP(CO) ECONOMIC SALE PRICE FOR CROP AND LIVESTOCK COMODITIES (RS PER KG OR PER LITER)
3236 EPP ECONOMIC PRICE OF PROTEIN CONCENTRATE (RS PER KGS)
3237 EMISC(*) ECONOMIC MISCELLENIOUS PRICES
3238 ESEEDP(C) ECONOMIC SEED PRICE
3239 EWAGE(M) ECONOMIC WAGE RATE (RS PER MAN-HOUR)
3240 EMISCCT(C) ECONOMIC WATER CHARGES AND MISCILLENIOUS COSTS(RS PER ACRE)
3241
3242 IMPORTP(CO) IMPORT PRICES FOR THE SCENARIO
3243 EXPORTP(CO) EXPORT PRICES FOR THE SCENARIO
3244
3245 WNR(C,Z,T,S.W.M) WATER REOUIREMENTS NET OF RAIN
3246
3247
3248 LOOP (PSR,
3249 FSALEP(CO) PRICES(PSR.CO, "FINANCIAL")
3250 PP PRI 1 (PSR, "F INANCIAL n , "PROTE IN" ) ;
3251
3252 MISC(P1) PRI1(PSR."FINANCIAL",P1)
3253 SEEDP(C) FINSOWTPR(C.PSR,"SEED") IP
..f;>
3254 WAGE(M) WAGEPS(PSR."FINANCIAL",M) ; -..J
3255 MISCCT(C) FINSDWTPR(C.PSR."WATER")+FINSDWTPR(C,PSR,"MISCC");
3256 IMPORTP(CO) PRICES(PSR,CO,"IMPORT")
3257 EXPORTP(CO) PRICES(PSR,CO,"EXPORT")
3258 );
3259 LOOP (PSR1,
3260 ESALEP(CO) PRICES(PSR1.CO ,"ECONOMIC")
3261 EPP PRI1(PSR1,"ECONOMIC", "PROTEIN")
3262
3263 EMISC(P1) PRI 1(PSR1, "ECONOMIC", P1)
3264 ESEEDP(C) ECNSDWTPR(C,PSR1,"SEED")
3265 EWAGE(M) WAGEPS(PSR1,"ECONOMIC".M) ;
3266 EMISCCT(C) ECNSDWTPR(C,PSR1,"WATERn)+ECNSDWTPR(C,PSR1,"MISCC")
3267 );
* Economic prices are set to finacial
ESALEP(cq) FSALEP(cq) ;
EMISC(P1 ) MISC(P1)
ESEEDP(C) SEEDP(C)
EPP PP
EWAGE(M) WAGE(M)
3276
3277 WNR(C.Z1.T,S.W,M) = MAX(O, (WATER(C,Zl,T,S,W.M)-EFRZ(Zl,M
3278 * SET CaTON IN PRW TO NO
3279 TEC("COTTON",T.S.W,"PRW") = 1
3280 TEC("MAIZE",T,S,W,"PRW") = 1
3281
3282 TECH(Z1,C.T.S,W)$TEC(C.T,S.W.Z1) = NO :
3283 TECHC(Zl,C)$SUM( (T,S,W), TECH(Z1,C,T,S,W) YES
3284 TECHC(Z1.CF)=NO; TECHC(Z1.0) = YES;
3285 * DISPLAY TECH;
3286 DISPLAY TECHC;
INDUS
BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM11 01/23/90 16:30:22 PAGE 80
MODEL
SETUP GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3287
3288 SCALARS
3289 TOLCNL ALLOWED DEVIATION FROM PROPORTIONAL ALLOCATION BY CANAL /0.0 /
3290 TOLPR ALLOWED DEVIATION FROM PROPORTIONAL ALLOCATION BY PROVINCE / 0.0 /
3291 TOLNWFP NWFP DIVERSION TOLERANCE / 0 /
3292
3293 *
3294 PARAMETER BETA(CQ,Zl) GRADIENT COMODITIES DEMAND CURVE
3295 ALPHA(CQ,Zl) DEMAND CURVE INTECEPT
3296 ,
3297 SCALAR BETAF BETA FACTOR /.5 / ;
3298 BETA(CN,Z1 )$DEMAND(Z1 ,CN) FSALEP(CN) / DEMAND(Z1 ,CN) / ELAST(CN) ;
3299 ALPHA(CN,Z1 ) = FSALEP(CN) - BETA(CN,Z1 )*DEMAND(Zl ,CN)
3300
3301 * LINEARIZATION OF THE DEMAND FUNCTION.
3302
3303 SET P GRID POINTS FOR LINEARIZATION / 1*20 /
3304 PARAMETER
3305 PMAX(CQ,Zl) MAXIMUM PRICE FOR SEGMENTS
3306 PMIN(CQ,Zl) MINIMUM PRICE FOR SEGMENTS
3307 QMAX(CQ.Z1) MAX NATIONAL CONSUMPTION
3308 QMIN(CQ.Z1) MIN NATIONAL CONSUMPTION
3309 INCR(CQ,Z1) INCREMENT
3310 WS( CQ. Z 1, P) WELFARE SEGMENTS (MILLION RUPEES)
3311 RS(CQ,Zl.P) REVENUE DEFINITION (MILLION RUPEES) w
.j:l
3312 QS(CQ,Zl,P) QUANTITY DEFINITION(THOUSAND TONS OR MILLION LITERS) Q)
3313 ENDPR(CQ.Z1,P) PRICE (RUPEES PER KGS OR LITER )
3314
3315 PMIN(CN,Zl) = 0.5*FSALEP(CN) ;
3316 PMAX(CN,Zl) = MIN(ALPHA(CN,Zl), 2*FSALEP(CN) ) ;
3317 * PMAX(CE,Zl) = MIN(ALPHA(CE.Z1 ),2*FSALEP(CE) ) ;
3318 * PMIN(CE.Z1) = FSALEP(CE);
3319 QMIN(CN,Zl)$BETA(CN.Z1 ) = (PMAX(CN,Zl )-ALPHA(CN,Z1 /BETA(CN,Zl );
3320 QMAX(CN,Zl)$BETA(CN.Z1 ) = (PMIN(CN,Zl )-ALPHA(CN,Z1 /BETA(CN.Z1 );
3321 INCR(CN,Zl) (QMAX(CN.Z1 )-QMIN(CN.Z1 /(CARD(P)-l);
3322
3323 QS(CN.Z1,P) = QMIN(CN,Zl) + INCR(CN.Z1)*(ORD(P)-1);
3324 WS(CN.Z1,P) = ALPHA(CN,Zl)*OS(CN.Z1.P) + BETAF*BETA(CN,Z1)*SQR(QS(CN.Z1,P
3325 RS(CN,Zl,P) = ALPHA(CN,Zl)*QS(CN.Z1,P) + BETA(CN,Zl)*SQR(QS(CN,Zl,P;
3326 ENDPR(CN,Zl,P)= ALPHA(CN,Z1) + BETA(CN.Z1)*QS(CN.Z1.P);
3327 *DISPLAY PMAX. PMIN. QMAX, QMIN,INCR, QS, WS. RS, ENDPR ;
3328 *-
3329 *DISPLAY ALPHA , BETA
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM11 01/23/90 16:30:22 PAGE 81
EQUATIONS AND VARIABLES GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3331 VARIABLES CPS CONSUMER PLUS PRODUCERS SURPLUS (MILLION RUPEES)

3332 POSITIVE VARIABLES
3333 ACOST(Z,G) FARM COST IN (MILLION RUPEES)
3334 PPC(Z,G,SEA) PURCHASES OF PROTEIN CONCENTRATES (THOUSAND METRIC TONS)
3335 X(Z,G,C,T,S,W) CROPPED AREA BY TECHNOLOGY (THOUSAND ACRES)
3336 ANIMAL(Z,G,A) PRODUCTION OF LIVESTOCK TYPE A (THOUSANDS)
3337 PRODT(Z,G,CQ) PRODUCTION (CROP COMMODITIES 000 METRIC TONS LIVESTOCK COMM MILL. KGS OR LITERS)
3338 PRODA(Z,G,CQ ) ARTIFICIAL SUPPLY
3339 IMPORT(Z .CQ ) IMPORT OF COMODITIES (CROP COMM. 000 M. TONS LIVESTOCK MILL. KGS OR LITERS)
3340 EXPORT(Z ,CQ ) EXPORT OF COMODITIES (000 METRIC TONNS)
3341 CONSUMP(Z,G,CQ ON FARM CONSUMPTION (000 METRIC TONNS)
3342 FAMILYL(Z,G.M) FAMILY LABOR USED (MILLION MAN HOURS)
3343 HIREDL(Z,G,M) HIRED LABOR USED (MILLION MAN HOURS)
3344 ITW(Z) INVESTMENT IN INCREASED PRIVATE TUBEWELL CAPACITY (KAF PER MONTH)
3345 TW(Z,M) PRIVATE TUBEWELL WATER USEO BY MONTH M (KAF)
3346 ITR(Z ,G) INVESTMENT IN INCREASED TRACTOR CAPACITY (000 TRACTOR-HRS PER MONTH)
3347 TS(Z,G,M) PRIVATE TRACTOR SERVICES USE BY MONTH (THOUSAND HRS)
3348 F(N,N1,M) FLOW TO NODE N FROM NODE N1 (MAF)
3349 RCONT(N,M) END OF THE MONTH RESRVOIR CONTENTS (MAF)
3350 CANALDIV(CNL,M) CANAL DIVERSION AT THE CANAL HEAD (MAF)
3351 CNLDIVSEA(CNL,SEA) CANAL DIVERSION BY SEASON (MAF)
3352 PRSEA(PV2,SEA) CANAL DIVERSION BY PROVINCE (SIND AND PUNJAB) (MAF)
3353 TCDIVSEA(SEA) TOTAL CANAL DIVERSION IN SIND AND PUNJAB BY SEASON (MAF)
3354 WDIVRZ(Zl,G,M) SURFACE WATER DIVERSION AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)
3355 SLKLAND(Z,G,M) SLACK LAND (THOUSAND ACRES)
w
",..

3356 SLKWATER(Z,G.M) SLACK WATER AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF) 10

3357 ARTFOD(Zl,G, SEA) ARTIFICIAL FOOOER SUPPLY EQUAIVALENT OF RAB-FOD (000 TONNS)

3358 ARTWATER(Z.G.M) WATER FROM IMAGINARY SOURCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)

3359 ARTWATERND(N,M) WATER FROM IMAGINARY SOURCE AT NODES (MAF)

3360 NAT(CQ,Z,p) PROVINCIAL DEMAND LINEARIZED

3361 NATN(CQ,Z) PROVINCIAL DEMAND NON-LINEAR

3362
3363 EQUATIONS
3364 OB.JZ OBJECTIVE FUNCTION FOR THE ZONE MODEL LINEAR VERSION (MI LLION RUPEES)
3365 OBJZN OBJECT! VE FUNCTION FOR THE ZONE MODEL NON-LINEAR VERSION (MILLION RUPEES)
3366 OBJN OBJECTIVE FUNCTION FOR THE INDUS MODEL LINEAR VERSION (MILLION RUPEES)
3367 OBJNN OBJECTIVE FUNCTION FOR THE INDUS MODEL NON-LINEAR VERSION (MILLION RUPEES)
3368 COST(Z,G) ANNUAL FARM COST (MILLION RUPEES)
3369 CONV(CQ,Z) CONVEX COMBINATION FOR AGGREGATE CONSUMPTION
3370 DEMNAT(CQ,Z) PROVINCIAL DEMAND BALANCE LINEAR (000 TONS OR MILLION LITERS)
3371 DEMNATN(CQ,Z) ZONAL DEMAND BALANCE NON-LINEAR (000 TONS OR MILLION LITERS)
3372 CCOMBAL(Z,G,C) COMMODITY BALANCES FOR CROPS (000 TONS)
3373 QCOMBAL(Z,G.Q) LIVESTOCK COMODITY BALANCES (000 TONS OR M LITERS)
3374 CONSBAL(Z.G.CQ) CONSUMPTION BALANCE (000 TONS OR M LITERS)
3375 LABORC(Z,G,M) MONTHLY LABOR CONSTRAINT (MILLION MAN HOURS)
3376 FODDER(Z,G,SEA) SEASONAL MAINTENANCE OF FODDER SUPPLIES (000 METRIC TONS)
3377 PROTEIN(Z,G,SEA) PROTEIN REQUIREMENTS OF LIVESTOCK BY SEASON (000 METRIC TONS)
3378 GRNFDR(Z.G,SEA) GREEN FODDER REQUIREMENTS (000 METRIC TONS)
3379 BDRAFT(Z.G,M) BULLOCK DRAFT POWER CONSTRAINT (MILLION BULLOCK HOURS)
3380 BREPCO(Z,G) BULLOCK REPRODUCTION CONSTRAINT
3381 BULLOCKC(Zl) BULLOCK POPULATION CONSTRAINT (000 BULLOCKS)
3382 TDRAFT(Z,G,M) TRACTOR DRAFT POWER BALANCE (000 TRACTOR HOURS)
3383 TRCAPC(Z,M) TRACTOR CAPACITY CONSTRAINT (000 TRACTOR HOURS)
3384 TWCAPC(Z,M) TUBEWELL CAPACITY CONSTRAINT (KAF)
3385 LANDC(Z,G,M) LAND CONSTRAINT (000 ACRES)
3386 ORCHAREAC(Z) ORCHARD AREA CONSTRAINT (000 ACRES)
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM11 01/23/90 16:30:22 PAGE B2

EQUATIONS AND VARIABLES GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3387 SCMILLC( Z)
SUGAR CANE TO MILL CONSTRAINT (000 ACRES)

338B WATERBALN(Z,G,M)
WATER BALANCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)

3389 WATALCZ(Z,G,M)
SURFACE WATER BY ZONE (KAF)

3390 SUBIRRC(Z.G,M)
SUBIRRIGATION CONSTRAINT (KAF)

3391 NBAL(N,M)
WATER BALANCE AT A NODE (MAF)

3392 WATALCSEA(CNL.SEA)
WATER ALLOCATIONS BY SEASON (MAF)

3393 DIVSEA(SEA)
TOTAL CANAL DIVERSIONS IN SIND AND PUNJAB (MAF)

3394 DIVCNLSEA(CNL,SEA)
CANAL DIVERSION BY SEASON (MAF)

3395 WATALCPRO(PV,SEA)
WATER ALLOCATION BY PROVINCE (MAF)

3396 PRSEAW(PV,SEA)
DIVERSIONS BY PROVINCE AND SEASON (MAF)

3397 NWFPALC(M)
WATER ALLOCATIONS TO THE NWFP ACZ (MAF)

3398

w
VI
o
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISMll 01/23/90 16:30:22 PAGE 83
EQUATIONS AND VARIABLES GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3400 OBJZ ..
3401 CPS =E=
3402 SUM(Z1, SUM(G$EX(Zl,G), SUM(NCN, FSALEP(NCN)*PRODT(Z1,G,NCN) )
3403 ACOST(Z1,G) SUM(SEA, ARTFOD(Z1,G,SEA*PAFOD

3404 - SUM(M. ARTWATER(Z1,G,M*PAWAT

3405 - SUM(CQ$TECHC(Z1,CQ), PRODA(Z1,G,CQ )*BIG

3406 - SUM( Z 1, SUM(CM$TECHC(Z1,CM), IMPORT(Z1,CM)*IMPORTP(CM

3407 + SUM( Zl , SUM(CE$TECHC(Z1,CE), EXPORT(Z1,CE)*EXPORTP(CE
3408 + SUM( Z1, SUM( (CN,P)$TECHC(Zl,CN), NAT(CN,Zl,P)*WS(CN,Z1 ,P
3409
3410 OBJZN ..
3411 CPS =E=
3412 SUM(Z1, SUM(G$EX(Zl,G), SUM(NCN, FSALEP(NCN)*PRODT(Zl,G,NCN) )

3413 - ACOST(Zl,G) - SUM(SEA, ARTFOD(Zl.G,SEA*PAFDD

3414 - SUM(M, ARTWATER(Z1,G,M*PAWAT

3415 - SUM(CQ$TECHC(Zl.CQ), PRDDA(Zl,G,CQ )*BIG

3416 - SUM(Zl, SUM(CM$TECHC(Z1,CM), IMPORT(Zl,CM)*IMPORTP(CM

3417 + SUM(Z 1, SUM(CE$TECHC(Zl,CE), EXPORT(Zl,CE)*EXPORTP(CE
3418 + SUM( Z 1, SUM(CN$TECHC(Zl,CN), ALPHA(CN,Zl)*NATN(CN,Zl)
3419 + BETAF*BETA(CN,Z1)*SQR(NATN(CN,Z1
3420
3421 DBJN ..
3422 CPS =E=
3423 SUM(Z1, SUM(G$EX(Z1,G), SUM(NCN, FSALEP(NCN)*PRODT(Zl,G,NCN) )
3424 - ACOST(Z1,G) SUM(SEA, ARTFOD(Z1,G,SEA*PAFOD 1,.0.)
3425 - SUM(M, ARTWATER(Zl,G,M*PAWAT VI
3426 - SUM(CQ$TECHC(Z1,CQ), PRODA(Zl,G,CQ )*BIG ....
3427 - SUM(Z1, SUM(CM$TECHC(Zl,CM), IMPORT(Zl,CM) *IMPORTP(CM
3428 + SUM(Z1, SUM(CE$TECHC(Zl,CE), EXPORT(Zl,CE) *EXPORTP(CE
3429 + SUM(Z1, SUM( (CN,P)$TECHC(Zl,CN), NAT(CN,Zl,P)*WS(CN,Zl,P
3430 + SUMN,M), -ARTWATERND(N,M)*PAWAT + RVAL(N)*RCONT(N,M)$RCAP(N)
3431 + RVAL("A-SEA")*F("A-SEA","KOTRI-B",M)
3432
3433 OBJNN ..

3434 CPS =E=

3435 SUM(Zl, SUM(G$EX(Zl,G), SUM(NCN, FSALEP(NCN)*PRODT(Zl,G,NCN) )

3436 - ACOST(Zl,G) - SUM(SEA, ARTFOD(Zl,G,SEA*PAFOD

3437 SUM(M, ARTWATER(Z1,G,M*PAWAT

3438 - SUM(CQ$TECHC(Z1,CQ), PRODA(Zl,G,CQ )*BIG

3439 - SUM( Z1, SUM(CM$TECHC(Z1,CM), IMPORT(Z1,CM)*IMPORTP(CM

3440 + SUM( Zl, SUM(CE$TECHC(Zl,CE), EXPORT(Zl,CE)*EXPORTP(CE

3441 + SUM( Z1, SUM(CN$TECHC(Z1,CN), ALPHA(CN,Zl)*NATN(CN,Z1)
3442 + BETAF*BETA(CN,Z1)*SQR(NATN(CN,Zl )
3443 + SUMN,M), -ARTWATERND(N,M)*PAWAT + RVAL(N)*RCONT(N,M)$RCAP(N)
3444 + RVAL("A-SEA")*F("A-SEA","KOTRI-B",M)
3445
3446
3447 COST(Z1,G)$EX(Zl,G).. ACOST(Z1,G) =E= (SUMC,T,S,W)$TECH(Z1,C,T,S,W), (SUM(P2, FERT(P2,C,Zl)*MISC(P2+
3448 MISCCT(C)+SEEDP(C)*SYLDS(C,Zl,T,S,W,"SEED") )*X(Z1,G,C,T,S,W) )+
3449 SUM(M, MISC("TWOPC")*TW(Zl,M)$GF(G) + MISC("TROPC")*TS(Zl,G,M) ) +
3450 MISC("TWINVT")*ITW(Z1)$GF(G) + MISC("TRINVT")*ITR(Z1,G) +
3451 SUM(A, IOLIVE (A, Z 1, "F IX -COST" )*ANIMAL( Z 1, G, A) ) )/1000+
3452 SUM(SEA, PP*PPC(Z1,G,SEA +
3453 SUM(M, (FAMILYL(Zl,G,M)*LABFAC + HIREDL(Zl,G,M*WAGE(M)
3454 CONV(CN,Zl)$TECHC(Zl,CN).. SUM(P, NAT(CN,Zl,P =L= 1;
3455
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISMII 01/23/90 16:30:22 PAGE 84
EQUATIONS AND VARIABLES GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3456 OEMNAT(CQ,Zl )$TECHC(ZI,CO) ..

3451 SUM(G$EX(Zl.G).

3458 PROOT(Zl.G.CO) - CONSUMP(Z1,G,CO)$CC(CQ)+PROOA(Zl.G,CO) )

3459 EXPORT(Zl.CO)$CE(CO) + IMPORT(Zl,CO)$CM(CQ)

3460 =G= SUM(P, NAT(CO,Zl,P)*QS(CO.Zl ,P$CN(CQ);

3461

3462 OEMNATN(CO.Zl )$TECHC(ZI,CQ) ..

3463 SUM(G$EX(Zl.G),

3464 PROOT(Zl,G,CO) - CONSUMP(Zl,G.CO)$CC(CO)+PROOA(Zl.G,CQ) )

3465 EXPORT(Zl.CQ)$CE(CO) + IMPORT(Zl.CQ)$CM(CQ)

3466 =G= NATN(CO.Zl)$CN(CQ) ;

3461

3468 CCOMBAL(Zl,G,C)$(CNF(C)$EX(Zl,G .. SUMT,S,W)$TECH(Zl,C,T,S,W), YIELD(C,T,S,W,Zl)*X(Zl,G,C.T,S,W=E PROOT(Z1,G,C);

3469

3410 OCOMBAL(Z1,G,O)$EX(Zl,G) .. SUM(A, IOlIVE(A,Zl,O)*ANIMAl(Zl,G,A) ) /1000 =E PROOT(Zl,G,Q);

3411

3412 CONSBAl(Zl,G,CC)$(EX(Zl,G)$TECHC(Zl,CC) ) ..

3413 PROOT(Zl,G,CC) + PRODA(Z1,G,CC) =G= CONSUMP(Z1,G,CC) ;

3414

3415 lABORC(ZI,G,M)$EX(Zl,G).. (SUM( (C,T,S,W)$TECH(ZI,C,T,S,W), lABOR(C,ZI,T,S,W,M)*X(ZI,G,C,T,S.W) ) +

3416 SUM( A. IOlIVE(A,Zl,"lABOR")*ANIMAl(ZI,G,A)/looo =l= FAMIlYl(ZI,G,M)+HIREOl(ZI,G,M);

3411

3418 FODOER(ZI,G,SEA)$EX(Zl,G) .. SUM(A. IOlIVE(A,ZI,"TON")*ANIMAl(ZI.G,A =l= SUM( (C,T,S,W)$TECH(ZI,C,T,S,W), (

3419 YIElD(C,T,S,W,ZI)*SYlOS(C,ZI,T.S,W."STRAW-YlO")*SCONV("TON",SEA,C) + WEEOY(ZI,SEA,C)*

3480 SCONV("TON","RABI","RAB-FOO") ) * X(ZI,G,C,T,S,W) ) + VJ

V\

3481 SUM(M$SEAM(SEA,M). SlKlANO(ZI,G,M*GRAZ(ZI,SEA)*SCONV("TON","RABI","RAB-FOO") + N

3482 ARTFOO(Zl,G,SEA)*SCONV("TON","RABI", "RAB-FOO");

3483

3484 PROTEIN(Z1,G,SEA)$EX(ZI,G) .. SUM(A, IOlIVE(A,Z1,"OP")*ANIMAl(ZI,G,A) ) =l= PPC(ZI,G,SEA)+

3485 SUM( (C,T,S,W)$TECH(Zl,C,T,S,W), (YIElO(C.T,S,W,ZI)*SYlDS(C,ZI,T,S,W,"STRAW-YlO")*

3486 SCONV("OP",SEA,C) + WEEOY(Zl,SEA,C)*SCONV("OP","RABI","RAB-FOO") )*X(ZI,G,C,T,S,W) )+

3481 SUM(M$SEAM(SEA,M), SlKlANO(ZI.G,M*GRAZ(ZI,SEA)*SCONV("OP","RABI","RAB-F00") +

3488 ARTFOO(Zl,G.SEA)*SCONV("OP","RABI","RAB-FOO");

3489

3490 GRNFOR(Zl,G,SEA)$EX(ZI,G) .. GR*SUM(A, IOlIVE(A,Z1,"TON")*ANIMAl(Zl,G,A =l= SUM( (CF,T,S,W)$TECH(ZI,CF,T,S,W),

3491 YIElO(CF,T,S,W,Z1)*SCONV("TON",SEA,CF)*X(Zl,G,CF,T,S,W) ) +

3492 SUM( (C,T,S,W)$TECH(ZI,C,T,S,W),

3493 WEEOY(ZI,SEA,C)*SCONV("TON","RABI","RAB-FOO")*X(ZI,G,C,T,S,W) ) +

3494 ARTFOO(Zl,G,SEA)*SCONV("TON","RABI", "RAB-FOO");

3495

3496 BORAFT(ZI,G,M)$EX(ZI,G).. SUMC,T,S,W)$TECH(Z1,C,T,S,W), BUllOCK(C,ZI,T,S,W,M)*X(Zl,G,C,T,S,W) )/1000 =l=

3491 BP(M)*ANIMAl(ZI,G, "BUllOCK" )/1000

3498

3499 BREPCO(Z1,G)$EX(ZI,G) .. ANIMAl(ZI,G,"BUllOCK") =l= REPCO*ANIMAl(ZI,G,"COW")

3500

3501 BULLOCKC(ZI) .. SUM(G$EX(ZI,G), ANIMAl(Zl,G,"BUllOCK" =l= RES88("BUllOCKS",Zl)

3502

3503 TDRAFT(ZI,G,M)$EX(ZI, G) .. SUMC,T,S,W)$TECH(ZI,C,T,S,W), TRACTOR(C,Z1,T,S,W,M)*X(Zl,G,C,T,S,W) =E= TS(Zl,G,M)

3504

3505 TRCAPC(Zl,M).. SUM(G$EX(ZI,G), TS(ZI,G,M) ) =l= SUM(G$EX(ZI,G),

3506 (RESOURCE(Z l,G, "TRACTORS" )/1000 +ITR(ZI ,G) )*TRCAP )

3501

3508 TWCAPC(Zl,M)$EX(ZI,"FRESH") ..

3509

3510 TW(ZI,M) =L= RESOURCE(ZI,"FRESH","TWC") + NTWUCAP*ITW(ZI)

3511

INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM11 01/23/90 16:30:22 PAGE 85

EQUATIONS AND VARIABLES GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3512 LANDC(Zl,G,M)$EX(Z1,G) .. SUMC,T,S,W)$TECH(Zl,C,T,S,W), LAND(C,Zl,T,S,W,M)*X(Zl,G,C,T.S,W + SLKLANO(Zl,G.M)=E=

3513 RESOURCE(Zl.G."CCA")*1000;
3514 ORCHAREAC(Zl) .. SUM( (G,T.S,W)$EX(Zl,G), X(Z1.G,"ORCHARD",T,S,W)$TECH(Zl,"ORCHARD",T,S,W=L=ORCHAREA(Z1);
3515
3516 SCMILLC(Zl) .. SUM(G$EX(Zl ,G), PRODT(Zl ,G, "SC-MILL") ) "'L= SCMILLCAP(Zl)
3517
3518
3519 WATERBALN(Zl,G,M)$EX(Zl,G) ..
3520 SUMC,T,S,W)$TECH(Zl,C,T,S.W),
3521 MAX( (WNR(C,Zl,T,S,W.M)-SUBIRRZ(Zl.M)*LAND(C,Zl.T,S,W.M , 0.0)*
3522 X(Z1,G.C,T,S.W+ SLKWATER(Z1,G.M) =E=
3523 TWEFFZ(Zl.M)*TW(Zl.M)$GF(G) + GWT1(Zl,G,M) +
3524 ARTWATER(Zl,G,M) + WDIVRZ(Zl,G,M) ;
3525
3526 WATALCZ(Zl.G.M)$EX(Z1.G) .. WDIVRZ(Zl.G.M) =E= SUM( (CNL.SA)$(ZSA(Zl,CNL.SA)$GWFG(CNL.SA.G) ).
3527 CNEFF(CNL)*WCEFF(CNL,M)*CANALDIV(CNL.M)*SUBDEF(SA,CNL)*1000
3528
3529 DIVCNLSEA(CNL,SEA) ..
3530 CNLDIVSEA(CNL,SEA) E= SUM(M$SEAM(SEA,M). CANALOIV(CNL.M;
3531 PRSEAW(PV2.SEA) ..
3532 PRSEA(PV2.SEA) =E= SUM(CNL1$PVCNL(PV2.CNL1).
3533 CNLDIVSEA(CNL1.SEA
3534 DIVSEA(SEA) ..
3535 TCDIVSEA(SEA) =E= SUM(PV2. PRSEA(PV2,SEA)
3536 WATALCSEA(CNL1.SEA) .. W
\JI
3537 PROTARB(CNL1,SEA)*(1-TOLCNL)*TCDIVSEA(SEA) =L= W
3538 CNLDIVSEA(CNL1,SEA)
3539 WATALCPRO(PV2.SEA) ..
3540 PROTARB(PV2,SEA)*(1-TOLPR)*TCDIVSEA(SEA) =L=
3541 PRSEA(PV2,SEA)
3542
3543 NWFPALC(M).. SUM(CNL$PVCNL(HNWFp,CNL), CANALDIV(CNL.M=G=
3544 (l-TOLNWFP)*DIVNWFP(M)
3545
354e SUBIRRC(Z1,G,M)$(EX(Zl,G)$GS(G .. WDIVRZ(Zl,G,M) =G=
3547 (l-SUBIRRFAC(Zl) )*SUMC,T,S,W)$TECH(Zl.C,T,S,W), WNR(C,Z1,T.S,W,M)*X(Z1,G,C,T,S,W
3548
3549 NBAL(N,M)$NB(N) ..
3550 SUM(I$NI(N,I). INFLOW(I,M +
3551 SUM(N1, RIVERCD(N,"D")*TRIB(N1,N,M)+RIVERCD(N,"C")*TRIB(N1.N.M--1) )+
3552 SUM(N1$NN(N,N1),
3553 F(N.N1,M)*LCEFF(N1.N)$LCEFF(N1.N) +
3554 (RIVERB(N,N1)*F(N.N1.M)+
3555 RIVERCD(N,C)*F(N,N1,M--l) )$(LCEFF(Nl.N) EQ 0) )
3556 SUM(N1$NN(Nl.N).
3557 F(N1.N.M + ( RCONT(N,M--l) - RCONT(N.M) - REVAPL(N.M)/1000)$RCAP(N) -
3558 SUM(CNL$NC(N,CNL). CANALDIV(CNL,M + ARTWATERND(N,M) =E= 0 ;
3559
3560 * BOUNDS FOR THE NETWORK LINK CANAL CAPACITIES.
3561 ARTWATERND.LO(N.M) '" 0 ;
3562 F.UP(N.N1.M) = INF ;
3563 F.UP(N,N1.M)$( NCAP(N1,N) NE 0 ) = NCAP(Nl.N);
3564
3565 * BOUNDS ON FAMILY LABOR
3566 FAMILYL.UP(Zl.G,M) = RESOURCE(Zl ,G. "FARMPOP" )*LSTD/l000
3567
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM11 01/23/90 16:30:22 PAGE 86
EQUATIONS AND VARIABLES GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3568 * CONSUMPTION BOUNDS

3569 CONSUMP.FX(Z1,G,CQ) = FARMCONS(Z1.CQ)*CONSRATIO(Z1,G)
3570 EXPORT.UP(Z1.CE) = EXPLIMIT(Z1.CE)
3571 ITR.FX(Z1,G)=0; ITW.FX(Z1) =0;
3572
3573 *
3574 MODEL WSISZ AGROCLIMATIC ZONES MODEL LtNEAR OBJECTIVE /

3575 OBJZ, COST, CONV, DEMNAT, CCOMBAL, QCOMBAL,

3576 CONSBAL. LABORC, FODDER, PROTEIN, GRNFDR, BDRAFT,

3577 BREPCO, TDRAFT, TRCAPC, TWCAPC. LANDC, ORCHAREAC.

3578 SCMILLC, WATERBALN, WATALCZ, SUBIRRC /

3579
3580 MODEL WSISZN AGROCLIMATIC ZONES MODEL NON-LINEAR OBJECTIVE /

3581 OBJZN. COST, DEMNATN, CCOMBAL. QCOMBAL,

3582 CONSBAL, LABORC, FODDER, PROTEIN, GRNFDR, BDRAFT ,

3583 BREPCO. TDRAFT , TRCAPC, TWCAPC, LANDC. ORCHAREAC,

3584 SCMILLC. WATERBALN. WATALCZ, SUBIRRC /

3585 MODEL WSISN IBMR MODEL WITH WATER NETWORK LINEAR /

3586 OBJN. COST. CONV, DEMNAT. CCOMBAL. QCOMBAL,

3587 CONSBAL. LABORC. FODDER, PROTEIN, GRNFOR, BDRAFT ,

3588 BREPCO. TDRAFT, TRCAPC, TWCAPC, LANDC, ORCHAREAC,

3589 WATERBALN, WATALCZ, SUBIRRC.

3590 DIVCNLSEA, PRSEAW, DIVSEA, WATALCSEA. WATALCPRO, NWFPALC,

3591 NBAL /

3592 w
VI
3593 MODEL WSISNN IBMR MODEL WITH WATER NETWORK NON-LINEAR / .t:
3594 OBJNN, COST, DEMNATN, CCOMBAL, QCOMBAL.
3595 CONSBAL. LABORC, FODDER, PROTEIN, GRNFDR, BDRAFT .
3596 BREPCO, TDRAFT , TRCAPC. TWCAPC, LANDC, ORCHAREAC,
3597 WATERBALN, WATALCZ, SUBIRRC,

3598 DIVCNLSEA, PRSEAW, DIVSEA, WATALCSEA, WATALCPRO. NWFPALC.

3599 NBAL /

3600
3601 ,
3602 OPTION ITERLIM 25000; OPTION RESLIM 900

3603 OPTION LIMROW=O: OPTION LIMCOL=O ;

3604 OPTION LP=MPSX :

3605
3606 *- RIVER FLOW TESTS
3607 TRIB("CHASMA-R","TAUNSA-B",M) = 0 :
3608 TRIB("TARBELA-RM,"KALABAGH-R",M) = 0 :
3609 INFLOW("HARO,M) = 0; INFLOW("SOAN",M) 0
3610
3611
3612
*
* YEAR 2000 RUN
3613 * RESTART FROM WSISD2
3614 * DIVERSIONS PROPORTIONAL TO POST TARBELA AVERAGE (SHARES BY SEASON)
3615 * INVESTMENTS ARE ALLOWED
3616
3617 * NOTE: INFLOWS FROM RAVI AND SUTLEJ RIVER ARE SET TO ZERO HERE.
3618 INFLOW("RAVI",M) = 0; INFLOW("SUTLEJ,M) = 0 ;
3619
3620 *
3621 * IRRIGATION CANAL CAPICITY BOUNDS
3622 CANALDIV.UP(CNL,M) = SUM(ISR, COMDEF(ISR, "CCAP",CNL)
3623
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM11 01/23/90 16:30:22 PAGE 87
EQUATIONS AND VARIABLES GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3624 * RESERVOIR OPERATING RULE BOUNDS

3625 *
3626 RCAP("KALABAGH-R") 0 ;
3627 RCONT.LO(N,M) = RULELO(N,M)*RCAP(N)/100;
3628 RCONT.UP(N,M) = RULEUP(N,M)*RCAP(N)/100
3629 ITR.UP(Z1,G)= INF ;
3630 ITW.UP(Z1) = INF ;
3631 EXPLIMIT (Z 1, "WHEAT) = INF ;
3632 EXPORT.UP(Z1,CE) = EXPLIMIT(Z1,CE)
3633
3634 CANALDIV.UP(CNL,M) = SUM(ISR, COMDEF(ISR,"CCAP",CNL)
3635
3636 TOLNWFP= 0
3637 TOLCNL = 0
3638 TOLPR = 0
3639
3640 SOLVE WSISN MAXIMIZING CPS USING LP
3641
3642 * END OF PROGRAM

I..IJ
VI
VI
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM11 01/23/90 16:30:22 PAGE 88
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TYPE REFERENCES

A SET REF 3336 2*3451 2*3470 2*3476 2*3478 2*3484 2*3490 CONTROL 3451 3470 3476
3478 3484 3490
ACOST VAR DECLARED 3333 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3403 3413 3424 3436 3447
ALPHA PARAM DECLARED 3295 ASSIGNED 3299 REF 3316 3319 3320 3324 3325 3326 3418
3441
ANIMAL VAR DECLARED 3336 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3451 3470 3476 3478 3484 3490 3497
2*3499 3501
ARTFOD VAR DECLARED 3357 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3403 3413 3424 3436 3482 3488 3494
ARTWATER VAR DECLARED 3358 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3404 3414 3425 3437 3524
ARTWATERND VAR DECLARED 3359 IMPL-ASN 3640 ASSIGNED 3561 REF 3430 3443 3558
BDRAFT EQU DECLARED 3379 DEFINED 3496 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3576 3582 3587 3595
BETA PARAM DECLARED 3294 ASSIGNED 3298 REF 3299 2*3319 2*3320 3324 3325 3326 3419
3442
BETAF PARAM DECLARED 3297 DEFINED 3297 REF 3324 3419 3442
BIG PARAM DECLARED 3216 DEFINED 3216 REF 3405 3415 3426 3438
BP PARAM REF 3497
BREPCD EQU DECLARED 3380 DEFINED 3499 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3577 3583 3588 3596
BULLOCK PARAM REF 3496
BULLOCKC EQU DECLARED 3381 DEFINED 3501
C SET REF 3209 3231 3233 3238 3240 3245 3253 2*3255 3264 2*3266 3277
3282 3283 3335 3372 2*3447 4*3448 5*3468 3*3475 3478 4*3479 3480 3*3485
3*3486 3492 2*3493 3*3496 3*3503 3*3512 3520 2*3521 3522 3*3547 CONTROL 3253 I,,)
3255 3264 3266 3277 3282 3283 3447 3468 3475 3478 3485 3492 VI
3496 3503 3512 3520 3547 0\
CANALDIV VAR DECLARED 3350 IMPL-ASN 3640 ASSIGNED 3622 3634 REF 3527 3530 3543 3558
CC SET REF 3458 3464 3472 3*3473 CONTROL 3472
CCN SET DECLARED 3189 DEFINED 3190 REF 3206
CCOMBAL EQU DECLARED 3372 DEFINED 3468 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3575 3581 3586 3594
CE SET DECLARED 3198 DEFINED 3199 REF 3206 3*3407 3*3417 3*3428 3*3440 3459 3465
3570 3632 CONTROL 3407 3417 3428 3440 3570 3632
CF SET REF 3490 3*3491 CONTROL 3284 3490
CM SET DECLARED 3200 DEFINED 3200 REF 3206 3*3406 3*3416 3*3427 3*3439 3459 3465
CONTROL 3406 3416 3427 3439
CN SET DECLARED 3183 DEFINED 3184 REF 3206 4*3298 3*3299 3315 2*3316 4*3319 4*3320
2*3321 2*3323 4*3324 4*3325 3*3326 3*3408 3*3418 2*3419 3*3429 3*3441 2*3442 2*3454
3460 3466 CONTROL 3298 3299 3315 3316 3319 3320 3321 3323 3324
3325 3326 3408 3418 3429 3441 3454
CNEFF PARAM REF 3527
CNF SET REF 3468
CNL SET REF 3350 3351 3392 3394 2*3526 4*3527 2*3530 2*3543 2*3558 3622 3634
CONTROL 3526 3529 3543 3558 3622 3634
CNLDIVSEA VAR DECLARED 3351 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3530 3533 3538
CNLl SET REF 3532 3533 3537 3538 CONTROL 3532 3536
COMDEF PARAM REF 3622 3634
CONSBAL EQU DECLARED 3374 DEFINED 3472 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3576 3582 3587 3595
CONSRATIO PARAM REF 3569
CONSUMP VAR DECLARED 3341 IMPL-ASN 3640 ASSIGNED 3569 REF 3458 3464 3473
CONV EQU DECLARED 3369 DEFINED 3454 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3575 3586
COST EQU DECLARED 3368 DEFINED 3447 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3575 3581 3586 3594
CPS VAR DECLARED 3331 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3401 3411 3422 3434 3640
CO SET REF 3183 3189 3194 3196 3198 3200 3203 3206 3228 3235 3242
3243 3249 3256 3257 3260 3294 3295 3305 3306 3307 3308 3309
3310 3311 3312 3313 3337 3338 3339 3340 3341 3360 3361 3369
3370 3371 3374 2*3405 2*3415 2*3426 2*3438 3456 4*3458 4*3459 3*3460 3462
INDUS BASIN MOOEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM11 01/23/90 16:30:22 PAGE 89
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TYPE REFERENCES

4*3464 4*3465 2*3466 3569 CONTROL 3249 3256 3257 3260 3405 3415 3426
3438 3456 3462 3569
DEMAND PARAM REF 2*3298 3299
DEMNAT EQU DECLARED 3370 DEFINED 3456 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3575 3586
DEMNATN EQU DECLARED 3371 DEFINED 3462 REF 3581 3594
DIVCNLSEA EQU DECLARED 3394 DEFINED 3529 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3590 3598
DIVNWFP PARAM DECLARED 3220 DEF INED 3221 REF 3544
DIVSEA EQU DECLARED 3393 DEFINED 3534 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3590 3598
ECNSDWTPR PARAM REF 3264 2*3266
EFRZ PARAM REF 3277
ELAST PARAM REF 3298
EMISC PARAM DECLARED 3237 ASSIGNED 3263
EMISCCT PARAM DECLARED 3240 ASSIGNED 3266
ENDPR PARAM DECLARED 3313 ASSIGNED 3326
EPP PARAM DECLARED 3236 ASSIGNED 3261
ESALEP PARAM DECLARED 3235 ASSIGNED 3260
ESEEDP PARAM DECLARED 3238 ASSIGNED 3264
EWAGE PARAM DECLARED 3239 ASSIGNED 3265
EX SET DECLARED 3202 ASSIGNED 3205 REF 3206 3402 3412 3423 3435 3447 3457
3463 3468 3470 3472 3475 3478 3484 3490 3496 3499 3501 3503
2*3505 3508 3512 3514 3516 3519 3526 3546
EXPLlMIT PARAM ASSIGNED 3631 REF 3570 3632 w
EXPORT VAR DECLARED 3340 IMPL-ASN 3640 ASSIGNED 3570 3632 REF 3407 3417 3428 3440 l/1
3459 3465 --..I
EXPORTP PARAM DECLARED 3243 ASSIGNED 3257 REF 3407 3417 3428 3440
F VAR DECLARED 3348 IMPL-ASN 3640 ASSIGNED 3562 3563 REF 3431 3444 3553 3554
3555 3557
FAMILYL VAR DECLARED 3342 IMPL-ASN 3640 ASSIGNED 3566 REF 3453 3476
FARMCONS PARAM REF 3569
FERT PARAM REF 3207 3447
FINSDWTPR PARAM REF 3253 2*3255
FODDER EQU DECLARED 3376 DEFINED 3478 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3576 3582 3587 3595
FSALEP PARAM DECLARED 3228 ASSIGNED 3249 REF 3298 3299 3315 3316 3402 3412 3423
3435
G SET REF 3202 3205 3333 3334 3335 3336 3337 3338 3341 3342 3343
3346 3347 3354 3355 3356 3357 3358 3368 3372 3373 3374 3375
3376 3377 3378 3379 3380 3382 3385 3388 3389 3390 2*3402 2*3403
3404 3405 2*3412 2*3413 3414 3415 2*3423 2*3424 3425 3426 2*3435 2*3436
3437 3438 2*3447 3448 2*3449 2*3450 3451 3452 2*3453 3457 3*3458 3463
3*3464 3*3468 3*3470 3472 3*3473 2*3475 3*3476 2*3478 3480 3481 3482 3*3484
3486 3487 3488 2*3490 3491 3493 3494 2*3496 3497 3*3499 2*3501 3*3503
3*3505 2*3506 3*3512 3513 2*3514 2*3516 3519 2*3522 2*3523 2*3524 3*3526 3*3546
3547 3566 3569 CONTRDL 3205 3402 3412 3423 3435 3447 3457 3463
3468 3470 3472 3475 3478 3484 3490 3496 3499 3501 3503 2*3505
3512 3514 3516 3519 3526 3546 3566 3569 3571 3629
GF SET REF 3449 3450 3523
GR PARAM REF 3490
GRAZ PARAM REF 3481 3487
GRNFDR EQU DECLARED 3378 DEFINED 3490 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3576 3582 3587 3595
GS SET REF 3546
GWFG SET REF 3526
GWT1 PARAM REF 3523
HIREDL VAR DECLARED 3343 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3453 3476
I SET REF 2*3550 CONTROL 3550
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM11 01/23/90 16:30:22 PAGE 90
SYMBOL USTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TYPE REFERENCES

IMPORT VAR DECLAREO 3339 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3406 3416 3427 3439 3459 3465
IMPORTP PARAM DECLARED 3242 ASSIGNED 3256 REF 3406 3416 3427 3439
INCR PARAM DECLARED 3309 ASSIGNED 3321 REF 3323
INFLOW PARAM ASSIGNED 2*3609 2*3618 REF 3550
IOUVE PARAM REF 3451 3470 3476 3478 3484 3490
ISR SET REF 3622 3634 CONTROL 3622 3634
ITR VAR DECLARED 3346 IMPL-ASN 3640 ASSIGNED 3571 3629 REF 3450 3506
ITW VAR DECLARED 3344 IMPL-ASN 3640 ASSIGNED 3571 3630 REF 3450 3510
LABFAC PARAM REF 3453
LABOR PARAM REF 3475
LABORC EQU DECLARED 3375 DEFINED 3475 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3576 3582 3587 3595
LAND PARAM REF 3512 3521
LANDC EQU DECLARED 3385 DEFINED 3512 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3577 3583 3588 3596
LCEFF PARAM REF 2*3553 3555
LSTD PARAM REF 3566
M SET REF 3220 3232 3239 3245 3254 3265 2*3277 3342 3343 3345 3347
3348 3349 3350 3354 3355 3356 3358 3359 3375 3379 3382 3383
3384 3385 3388 3389 3390 3391 3397 3404 3414 3425 2*3430 3431
3437 2*3443 3444 2*3449 3*3453 3475 2*3476 2*3481 2*3487 3496 3497 2*3503
3505 3510 2*3512 3*3521 3522 3*3523 2*3524 3526 2*3527 2*3530 3543 3544
3546 3547 3550 2*3551 3553 3554 3555 4*3557 2*3558 3627 3628
CONTROL
3475
3254
3481
3265
3487
3277
3496
3404
3503
3414
3505
3425
3508
3430
3512
3437
3519
3443
3526
3449
3530
3453
3543
...,
VI
3546 3549 3561 3562 3563 3566 3607 3608 2*3609 2*3618 3622 3627 0)
3628 3634
MAX FUNCT REF 3277 3521
MIN FUNCT REF 3316
MISC PARAM DECLARED 3230 ASSIGNED 3252 REF 3447 2*3449 2*3450
MISCCT PARAM DECLARED 3233 ASSIGNED 3255 REF 3448
N SET REF 3225 3348 3349 3359 3391 4*3430 4*3443 3549 3550 4*3551 3552
3*3553 2*3554 3*3555 3556 5*3557 2*3558 2*3563 2*3627 2*3628 CONTROL 3430 3443
3549 3561 3562 3563 3627 3628
NAT VAR DECLARED 3360 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3408 3429 3454 3460
NUN VAR DECLARED 3361 REF 3418 3419 3441 3442 3466
NB SET REF 3549
NBAL EQU DECLARED 3391 DEFINED 3549 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3591 3599
NC SET REF 3558
NCAP PARAM REF 2*3563
NCN SET DECLARED 3196 DEFINED 3197 REF 3206 2*3402 2*3412 2*3423 2*3435 CDNTROL 3402
3412 3423 3435
NI SET REF 3550
NN SET REF 3552 3556
NTWUCAP PARAM REF 3510
NWFPALC EQU DECLARED 3397 DEF INED 3543 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3590 3598
Nl SET REF 3348 2*3551 3552 3*3553 2*3554 2*3555 3556 3557 2*3563 CONTROL 3551
3552 3556 3562 3563
OBJN EQU DECLARED 3366 DEFINED 3421 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3586
OBJNN EQU DECLARED 3367 DEFINED 3433 REF 3594
OBJZ EQU DECLARED 3364 DEFINED 3400 REF 3575
OBJZN EQU DECLARED 3365 DEFINED 3410 REF 3581
ORCHAREA PARAM REF 3514
ORCHAREAC EQU DECLARED 3386 DEFINED 3514 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3577 3583 3588 3596
P SET DECLARED 3303 DEFINED 3303 REF 3310 3311 3312 3313 3321 3323 2*3324
2*3325 3326 3360 2*3408 2*3429 3454 2*3460 CONTROL 3323 3324 3325 3326
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM11 01/23/90 16:30:22 PAGE 91
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TYPE REFERENCES

3408 3429 3454 3460

PAFOD PARAM DECLARED 3218 DEFINED 3218 REF 3403 3413 3424 3436
PAWAT PARAM DECLARED 3217 DEFINED 3217 REF 3404 3414 3425 3430 3437 3443
PMAX PARAM DECLARED 3305 ASSIGNED 3316 REF 3319
PMIN PARAM DECLARED 3306 ASSIGNED 3315 REF 3320
PP PARM' DECLARED 3229 ASSIGNED 3250 REF 3452
PPC VAR DECLARED 3334 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3452 3484
PRICES PARAM REF 3249 3256 3257 3260
PRI1 PARAM REF 3250 3252 3261 3263
PRaDA VAR DECLARED 3338 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3405 3415 3426 3438 3458 3464 3473
PRODT VAR DECLARED 3337 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3402 3412 3423 3435 3458 3464 3468
3470 3473 3516
PROTARB PARAM REF 3537 3540
PROTEIN EQU DECLARED 3377 DEF INED 3484 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3576 3582 3587 3595
PRSEA VAR DECLARED 3352 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3532 3535 3541
PRSEAW EQU DECLARED 3396 DEF INED 3531 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3590 3598
PS SET REF 3174 3175
PSR SET DECLARED 3174 DEFINED 3174 REF 3249 3250 3252 3253 3254 2*3255 3256
3257 CONTROL 3248
PSR1 SET DECLARED 3175 DEFINED 3175 REF 3260 3261 3263 3264 3265 2*3266
CONTROL 3259
PV SET REF 3395 3396
PVCNL SET REF 3532 3543 w
lJ1
PV2 SET REF 3352 2*3532 3535 3540 3541 CONTROL 3531 3535 3539 \D
P1 SET REF 3252 3263 CONTROL 3252 3263
P2 SET REF 2*3447 CONTROL 3447
Q SET REF 3373 2*3470 CONTROL 3284 3470
QCOMBAL EQU DECLARED 3373 DEFINED 3470 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3575 3581 3586 3594
QMAX PARAM DECLARED 3307 ASSIGNED 3320 REF 3321
QMIN PAR AM DECLARED 3308 ASSIGNED 3319 REF 3321 3323
QN SET DECLARED 3194 DEFINED 3195 REF 3206
QS PARAM DECLARED 3312 ASSIGNED 3323 REF 2*3324 2*3325 3326 3460
RCAP PARAM ASSIGNED 3626 REF 3430 3443 3557 3627 3628
RCONT VAR DECLARED 3349 IMPL-ASN 3640 ASSIGNED 3627 3628 REF 3430 3443 2*3557
REPCO PARAM REF 3499
RESOURCE PARAM REF 3205 3506 3510 3513 3566
RES88 PARAM REF 3501
REVAPL PARAM REF 3557
RIVERB PAR AM REF 3554
RIVERCD PARAM REF 2*3551 3555
RS PARAM DECLARED 3311 ASSIGNED 3325
RULELO PARAM REF 3627
RULEUP PARAM REF 3628
RVAL PARAM DECLARED 3225 DEF INED 3226 REF 3430 3431 3443 3444
S SET REF 3209 3245 3277 3282 3283 3335 3447 2*3448 3*3468 3*3475 3478
2*3479 3480 3*3485 3486 3490 2*3491 3492 3493 3*3496 3*3503 3*3512 2*3514
3520 2*3521 3522 3*3547 CONTROL 3277 3279 3280 3282 3283 3447 3468
3475 3478 3485 3490 3492 3496 3503 3512 3514 3520 3547
SA SET REF 2*3526 3527 CONTROL 3526
SCMILLC EQU DECLARED 3387 DEFINED 3516 REF 3578 3584
SCMILLCAP PARAM REF 3516
SCONV PARAM REF 3479 3480 3481 3482 2*3486 3487 3488 3491 3493 3494
SEA SET REF 3334 3351 3352 3353 3357 3376 3377 3378 3392 3393 3394
3395 3396 3403 3413 3424 3436 3452 2*3479 2*3481 3482 3484 2*3486
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM11 01/23/90 16:30:22 PAGE 92
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TYPE REFERENCES

2*3487 3488 3491 3493 3494 2*3530 3532 3533 2*3535 2*3537 3538 2*3540
3541 CONTROL 3403 3413 3424 3436 3452 3478 3484 3490 3529 3531
3534 3536 3539
SEAM SET REF 3481 3487 3530
SEEDP PARAM DECLARED 3231 ASSIGNED 3253 REF 3448
SLKLAND VAR DECLARED 3355 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3481 3487 3512
SLKWATER VAR DECLARED 3356 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3522
SQR FUNCT REF 3324 3325 3419 3442
SUBDEF PARAM REF 3527
SUBIRRC EQU DECLARED 3390 DEFINED 3546 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3578 3584 3589 3597
SUBIRRFAC PARAM REF 3547
SUBIRRZ PARAM REF 3521
SYLDS PARAM REF 3448 3479 3485
T SET REF 3209 3245 3277 3282 3283 3335 3447 2*3448 3*3468 3*3475 3478
2*3479 3480 3*3485 3486 3490 2*3491 3492 3493 3*3496 3*3503 3*3512 2*3514
3520 2*3521 3522 3*3547 CONTROL 3277 3279 3280 3282 3283 3447 3468
3475 3478 3485 3490 3492 3496 3503 3512 3514 3520 3547
TCDIVSEA VAR DECLARED 3353 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3535 3537 3540
TDRAFT EQU DECLARED 3382 DEFINED 3503 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3577 3583 3588 3596
TEC PARAM DECLARED 3209 DEFINED 3209 ASSIGNED 3279 3280 REF 3282
TECH SET ASSIGNED 3282 REF 3283 3447 3468 3475 3478 3485 3490 3492 3496
3503 3512 3514 3520 3547
U)
TECHC SET DECLARED 3203 ASSIGNED 3283 2*3284 REF 3286 3405 3406 3407 3408 3415 0\
3416 3417 3418 3426 3427 3428 3429 3438 3439 3440 3441 3454 0
3456 3462 3472
TOLCNL PARAM DECLARED 3289 DEFINED 3289 ASSIGNED 3637 REF 3537
TOLNWFP PARAM DECLARED 3291 DEFINED 3291 ASSIGNED 3636 REF 3544
TOLPR PARAM DECLARED 3290 DEFINED 3290 ASSIGNED 3638 REF 3540
TRACTOR PARAM REF 3503
TRCAP PARAM REF 3506
TRCAPC EQU DECLARED 3383 DEFINED 3505 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3577 3583 3588 3596
TRIB PARAM ASSIGNED 3607 3608 REF 2*3551
TS VAR DECLARED 3347 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3449 3503 3505
TW VAR DECLARED 3345 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3449 3510 3523
TWCAPC EQU DECLARED 3384 DEFINED 3508 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3577 3583 3588 3596
TWEFFZ PAR AM REF 3523
W SET REF 3209 3245 3277 3282 3283 3335 3447 2*3448 3*3468 3*3475 3478
2*3479 3480 3*3485 3486 3490 2*3491 3492 3493 3*3496 3*3503 3*3512 2*3514
3520 2*3521 3522 3*3547 CONTROL 3277 3279 3280 3282 3283 3447 3468
3475 3478 3485 3490 3492 3496 3503 3512 3514 3520 3547
WAGE PARAM DECLARED 3232 ASSIGNED 3254 REF 3453
WAGEPS PARAM REF 3254 3265
WATALCPRO EQU DECLARED 3395 DEFINED 3539 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3590 3598
WATALCSEA EQU DECLARED 3392 DEFINED 3536 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3590 3598
WATALCZ EQU DECLARED 3389 DEFINED 3526 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3578 3584 3589 3597
WATER PARAM REF 3277
WATERBALN EQU DECLARED 3388 DEFINED 3519 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3578 3584 3589 3597
WCEFF PARAM REF 3527
WDIVRZ VAR DECLARED 3354 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3524 3526 3546
WEEDY PARAM REF 3479 3486 3493
WNR PARAM DECLARED 3245 ASSIGNED 3277 REF 3521 3547
WS PARAM DECLARED 3310 ASSIGNED 3324 REF 3408 3429
WSISN MODEL DECLARED 3585 DEFINED 3585 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3640
WSISNN MODEL DECLARED 3593 DEFINED 3593
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM11 01/23/90 16:30:22 PAGE 93
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SYMBOL TYPE REFERENCES

WSISZ MODEL DECLARED 3574 DEFINED 3574

WSISZN MODEL DECLARED 3580 DEFINED 3580
X VAR DECLARED 3335 IMPL-ASN 3640 REF 3448 3468 3475 3480 3486 3491 3493
3496 3503 3512 3514 3522 3547
YIELD PARAM REF 3468 3479 3485 3491
Z SET REF 3176 3202 3203 3209 3245 3333 3334 3335 3336 3337 3338
3339 3340 3341 3342 3343 3344 3345 3346 3347 3355 3356 3358
3360 3361 3368 3369 3370 3371 3372 3373 3374 3375 3376 3377
3378 3379 3380 3382 3383 3384 3385 3386 3387 3388 3389 3390
ZSA SET REF 3526
Zl SET DECLARED 3176 DEFINED 3177 REF 3205 2*3277 3282 3283 3294 3295 2*3298
2*3299 3305 3306 3307 3308 3309 3310 3311 3312 3313 3316 4*3319
4*3320 2*3321 2*3323 4*3324 4*3325 3*3326 3354 3357 3381 2*3402 2*3403' 3404
2*3405 2*3406 2*3407 3*3408 2*3412 2*3413 3414 2*3415 2*3416 2*3417 3*3418 2*3419
2*3423 2*3424 3425 2*3426 2*3427 2*3428 3*3429 2*3435 2*3436 3437 2*3438 2*3439
2*3440 3*3441 2*3442 4*3447 2*3448 2*3449 2*3450 2*3451 3452 2*3453 2*3454 3456
3457 3*3458 2*3459 2*3460 3462 3463 3*3464 2*3465 3466 5*3468 4*3470 2*3472
3*3473 4*3475 4*3476 4*3478 3*3479 3480 2*3481 3482 4*3484 3*3485 2*3486 2*3487
3488 4*3490 2*3491 3492 2*3493 3494 4*3496 3497 3*3499 3*3501 5*3503 3*3505
2*3506 3508 3*3510 5*3512 3513 4*3514 3*3516 3519 3520 3*3521 2*3522 3*3523
2*3524 3*3526 2*3546 4*3547 3566 2*3569 3570 3632 CONTROL 3205 3277 3282
3283 2*3284 3298 3299 3315 3316 3319 3320 3321 3323 3324 3325
3326 3402 3406 3407 3408 3412 3416 3417 3418 3423 3427 3428 w
3429 3435 3439 3440 3441 3447 3454 3456 3462 3468 3470 3472 0
I-'
3475 3478 3484 3490 3496 3499 3501 3503 3505 3508 3512 3514
3516 3519 3526 3546 3566 3569 3570 2*3571 3629 3630 3631 3632

SETS

A ANIMAL TYPES
C CROPS
CC CONSUMABLE COMODITIES
CCN CROP COMODITIES WITH ENDOGENOUS PRICES
CE EXPORTABLE COMODITIES
CF FODDER CROPS
CM COMODITIES WHICH COULD BE IMPORTED
CN COMODITIES ENDOGENOUS PRICES
CNF NON-FODDER CROPS
CNL IRRIGATION CANALS IN THE INDUS RIVER IRRIGATION SYSTEM
CNL1 CANALS EXCLUDING NWFP CANALS
CQ CROP AND LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS
EX TO CHECK FRESH OR SALINE AREA WITHIN A ZONE
G GROUND WATER QUALITY TYPES
GF FRESH GROUND WATER SUB-ZONE
GS SALINE GROUND WATER SUB-ZONE
GWFG SUBAREA IDENTIFICATION BY THE GROUNDWATER QUALITY
I SYSTEM INFLOWS
ISR IRRIGATION SYSTEM SCENARIO FOR THIS RUN
M MONTHS
N NODES OF THE INDUS RIVER SYSTEM
NB
NC NODE TO CANAL MAP
NCN CROPS WITH FIXED PRICES EXCLUDING FODDER
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME~WSISM11 01/23/90 16:30:22 PAGE 94
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

SETS
NI NODE TO RIM STATION INFLOW MAP
NN WATER FLOW SYSTEM NODE TO NODE
N1 ALIASED WITH N
P GRID PDINTS FOR LINEARIZATION
PS PRICE SECENARIOS
PSR PRICE SCENARIO FOR THE NODEL(FINANCIAL PRICES)
PSR1 PRICE SCENARIO FOR REPORT(ECONOMIC PRICES)
PV PROVINCES AND COUNTRY
PVCNL PROVINCE TO CANALS MAP
PV2 PUNJAB ANO SIND
P1
P2
Q LIVESTOCK COMODITIES
QN LIVESTOCK COMODITIES ENDOGENOUS PRICES
S SEQUENCE
SA SUBAREAS
SEA SEASONS
SEAM MAPPING FROM SEASONS TO MONTHS
T TECHNOLOGY
TECH TECHNOLOGY AVAILABILITY INDICATOR
TECHC COMODITIES BY ZONES
W WATER STRESS LEVEL
Z AGROCLIMATIC ZONES Vol
ZSA CANAL-SUBAREA TO AGROCLIMATIC ZDNE MAPPING 0\
N
Z1 ZONE SELECTION FOR THIS RUN

PARAMETERS
ALPHA DEMAND CURVE INTECEPT

BETA GRADIENT COMODITIES DEMAND CURVE

BETAF BETA FACTOR

BIG BIG NUMBER USED FOR ARTIFICAL PRODUCTION

BP DRAFT POWER AVAILABLE PER BULLOCK(HOURS PER MONTH)

BULLOCK BULLOCK POWER REQUIREMENTS(BULLOCK PAIR HOURS PER MONTH )

CNEFF CANAL EFFICIENCY FROM CANAL HEAD TO THE WATERCOURSE HEAD

COMDEF CANAL COMMAND CHARACTERISTICS

CONSRATIO PROPORTION OF CONSUMPTION BY GROWUNDWATER TYPE

DEMAND MARKET DEMAND BY ZONE (OOD TONS OR MILLION LITERS)

DIVNWFP MONTHY DIVERSION TO THE NWFP ZONE (MAF)

ECNSDWTPR PRICES OF SEED(RS PER KG) AND WATER(RS PER ACRE )

EFRZ EFFECTIVE RAIN BY ACZ (FEET)

ELAST ELASTICITY OF OEMAND FOR CROP AND LIVESTOCK COMODITIES

EMISC ECONOMIC MISCELLENIOUS PRICES

EMISCCT ECONOMIC WATER CHARGES AND MISCILLENIOUS COSTS(RS PER ACRE)

ENDPR PRICE (RUPEES PER KGS OR LITER )

EPP ECONOMIC PRICE OF PROTEIN CONCENTRATE (RS PER KGS)

ESALEP ECONOMIC SALE PRICE FOR CROP AND LIVESTOCK COMODITIES (RS PER KG OR PER LITER)

ESEEDP ECONOMIC SEED PRICE

EWAGE ECONOMIC WAGE RATE (RS PER MAN-HOUR)

EXPLIMIT EXPORT LIMITS BY ZONE

EXPORTP EXPORT PRICES FOR THE SCENARIO

FARMCONS ON-FARM CONSUMPTION 1988 (OOO'S TONS)

FERT FERTILIZER APPLICATIONS (KG PER ACRE)

INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM11 01/23/90 16:30:22 PAGE 95

SYMBOL LI STING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

PARAMETERS

FINSDWTPR PRICES OF SEED(RS PER KG) AND WATER(RS PER ACRE )

FSALEP FINANCIAL SALE PRICE FOR CROP AND LIVESTOCK COMODITIES (RS PER KG OR PER LITER)
GR REQUIRED PROPORTION OF GREEN FODDER IN TOTAL FODDER
GRAZ GRAZING FROM SLACK LAND (TONNS PER ACRE )
GWT1 PUBLIC TUBEWELL PUMPAGE AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)
IMPORTP IMPORT PRICES FOR THE SCENARIO
INCR INCREMENT
INFLOW INFLOWS FOR THIS RUN (MAF)
IOLIVE LIVESTOCK INPUT OUTPUT COEFFICIENTS BY ZONES
LABFAC FACTOR TO CONVERT WAGE TO THE RESERVATION WAGE
LABOR LABOR REQUIREMENTS FOR CROPS(MAN HOURS)
LAND LAND OCCUPATION BY MONTH
LCEFF LINK CANAL EFFICIENCY FROM HEAD TO TAIL
LSTD STANDARD LABOR LIMIT ( HOURS PER MONTH )
MISC FINANCIAL MISCELLENIOUS PRICES
MISCCT FINANCIAL WATER CHARGES AND MISCILLENIOUS COSTS(RS PER ACRE)
NCAP NODE TO NODE TRANSFER CAPACITY (MAF)
NTWUCAP EFFECTIVE CAPACITY OF NEW TUBEWELLS(AF PER MONTH)
ORCHAREA AREA UNDER ORCHARDS BY ZONE (THOUSAND ACRES )
PAFOD BIG NUMBER FOR ARTIFICAL FODDER
PAWAT BIG NUMBER FOR ARTIFICIAL WATER
PMAX MAXIMUM PRICE FOR SEGMENTS
PMIN MINIMUM PRICE FOR SEGMENTS
Ul
PP FINANCIAL PURCHASE PRICE OF PROTEIN (RS PER KGS) 01
PRICES 1988 PRICES Ul
PRIl FERTILIZER TUBEWELL TRACTOR AND PROTEIN PRICES
PROTARB DIVERSIONS AS PROPORTION OF TOTAL(PUNJAB AND SIND) OST TARBELA
QMAX MAX NATIONAL CONSUMPTION
QMIN MIN NATIONAL CONSUMPTION
QS QUANTITY DEFINITION(THOUSAND TONS OR MILLION LITERS)
RCAP LIVE CAPACITY OF RESRVOIRS (MAF)
REPCO REPRODUCTIVE COEFFICIENT
RESOURCE ENDOWMENTS BY ACZ AND GROUNDWATER QUALITY
RES88 AVAILABLE RESOURCES 1988
REVAPL EVAPORATION LOSSES FROM RESERVOIRS (KAF)
RIVERB COEFFICIENTS FOR RIVER ROUTING
RIVERCD COEFFICIENTS FOR RIVER ROUTING
RS REVENUE DEFINITION (MILLION RUPEES)
RULELO LOWER RULE CURVE
RULEUP UPPER RULE CURVE
RVAL VALUE OF WATER STORED IN THE RESERVOIRS
SCMILLCAP SUGARCANE MILL CAPACITY (THOUSAND TONNS PER YEAR )
SCONV TDN AND DP CONVERSION FACTOR FROM CROP STRAW
SEEDP FINANCIAL SEED PRICE (RS PER KGS)
SUBDEF SUB-AREA DEFINITION(PROPORTION OF CCA) BY CANALS
SUBIRRFAC MAXIMUM SUB-IRRIGATION IN SALINE AREAS AS PROPORTION OF CROP REQ.(NET OF RAIN)
SUBIRRZ SUBIRRIGATION BY ACZ (FEET)
SYLDS STRAW YIELD AND SEED DATA
TEC CROP TECHNOLOGY DISABLED FOR 1988 RUN
TOLCNL ALLOWED DEVIATION FROM PROPORTIONAL ALLOCATION BY CANAL
TOLNWFP NWFP DIVERSION TOLERANCE
TOLPR ALLOWED DEVIATION FROM PROPORTIONAL ALLOCATION BY PROVINCE
TRACTOR TRACTOR REQUIREMENTS (TRACTOR HOURS PER ACRE)
TRCAP TRACTOR CAPACITY IN TRACTOR HOURS PER MONTH
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM11 01/23/90 16:30:22 PAGE 96
SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

PARAMETERS
TRIB TRIBUTARY INFLOWS FOR THIS RUN (MAF)

TWEFFZ WEIGHTED PRIVATE TUBEWELL DELIVERY EFFICIENCY BY ZONE

WAGE FINANCIAL WAGE RATES (RS PER MAN-HOUR)

WAGEPS WAGE RATES RS PER MAN HOUR

WATER WATER REQUIREMENTS(ACRE FEET PER ACRE)

WCEFF WATERCOURSE COMMAND DELIVERY EFFICIENCY

WEEDY WEED YIELDS BY CROP (TONNS PER ACER)

WNR WATER REQUIREMENTS NET OF RAIN

WS WELFARE SEGMENTS (MILLION RUPEES)

YIELD YIELO BY ZONE CROP TECHNOLOGY IN METRIC TONNS

VARIABLES
ACOST FARM COST IN (MILLION RUPEES)

ANIMAL PRODUCTION OF LIVESTOCK TYPE A (THOUSANDS)

ARTFOD ARTIFICIAL FODDER SUPPLY EQUAIVALENT OF RAB-FOD (000 TONNS)

ARTWATER WATER FROM IMAGINARY SOURCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)

ARTWATERND WATER FROM IMAGINARY SOURCE AT NODES (MAF)

CANALDIV CANAL DIVERSION AT THE CANAL HEAD (MAF)

CNLDIVSEA CANAL DIVERSION BY SEASON (MAF)

CONSUMP ON FARM CONSUMPTION (000 METRIC TDNNS)

CPS CONSUMER PLUS PRODUCERS SURPLUS (MILLION RUPEES)

W
EXPORT EXPORT OF COMODITIES (000 METRIC TONNS) 0'1

F FLOW TO NODE N FROM NOOE N1 (MAF) ~

FAMILYL FAMILY LABOR USED (MILLION MAN HOURS)

HIREDL HIRED LABOR USED (MILLION MAN HOURS)

IMPORT IMPORT OF COMODITIES (CROP COMM. 000 M. TONS LIVESTOCK MILL. KGS OR LITERS)

ITR INVESTMENT IN INCREASED TRACTOR CAPACITY (000 TRACTOR-HRS PER MONTH)

ITW INVESTMENT IN INCREASED PRIVATE TUBEWELL CAPACITY (KAF PER MONTH)

NAT PROVINCIAL DEMAND LINEARIZED

NATN PROVINCIAL DEMAND NON-LINEAR

PPC PURCHASES OF PROTEIN CONCENTRATES (THOUSAND METRIC TONS)

PROD A ARTIFICIAL SUPPLY

PRODT PRODUCTION (CROP COMMODITIES 000 METRIC TONS LIVESTOCK COMM MILL. KGS OR LITERS)

PRSEA CANAL DIVERSION BY PROVINCE (SIND AND PUNJAB) (MAF)

RCONT END OF THE MONTH RESRVOIR CONTENTS (MAF)

SLKLAND SLACK LAND (THOUSAND ACRES)

SLKWATER SLACK WATER AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)

TCDIVSEA TOTAL CANAL DIVERSION IN SIND AND PUNJAB BY SEASON (MAF)

TS PRIVATE TRACTOR SERVICES USE BY MONTH (THOUSAND HRS)

TW PRIVATE TUBEWELL WATER USED BY MONTH M (KAF)

WDIVRZ SURFACE WATER DIVERSION AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)

X CROPPED AREA BY TECHNOLOGY (THOUSAND ACRES)

EQUATIONS
BDRAFT BULLOCK DRAFT POWER CONSTRAINT (MILLION BULLOCK HOURS)

BREPCO BULLOCK REPRODUCTION CONSTRAINT

BULLOCKC BULLOCK POPULATION CONSTRAINT (000 BULLOCKS)

CCOMBAL COMMODITY BALANCES FOR CROPS (000 TONS)

CONSBAL CONSUMPTION BALANCE (000 TONS OR M LITERS)

CONV CONVEX COMBINATION FOR AGGREGATE CONSUMPTION

INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED(IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM11 01/23/90 16:30:22 PAGE 97

SYMBOL LISTING GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

EQUATIONS
COST ANNUAL FARM COST (MILLION RUPEES)
DEMNAT PROVINCIAL DEMANO BALANCE LINEAR (000 TONS OR MILLION LITERS)
DEMNATN ZONAL DEMAND BALANCE NON-LINEAR (000 TONS OR MILLION LITERS)
DIVCNLSEA CANAL DIVERSION BY SEASON (MAF)
DIVSEA TOTAL CANAL DIVERSIONS IN SIND AND PUNJAB (MAF)

FODDER SEASONAL MAINTENANCE OF FODDER SUPPLIES (000 METRIC TONS)

GRNFDR GREEN FODDER REQUIREMENTS (000 METRIC TONS)

LABORC MONTHLY LABOR CONSTRAINT (MILLION MAN HOURS)

LANDC LAND CONSTRAINT (000 ACRES)

NBAL WATER BALANCE AT A NODE (MAF)

NWFPALC WATER ALLOCATIONS TO THE NWFP ACZ (MAF)

OBJN OBJECTIVE FUNCTION FOR THE INDUS MODEL LINEAR VERSION (MILLION RUPEES)

OBJNN OBJECTIVE FUNCTION FOR THE INDUS MODEL NON-LINEAR VERSION (MI LLION RUPEES)

DBJZ OBJECTIVE FUNCTION FOR THE ZONE MOOEL LINEAR VERSION (MILLION RUPEES)

OBJZN OBJECTIVE FUNCTION FOR THE ZONE MODEL NON-LINEAR VERSION (MILLION RUPEES)

ORCHAREAC ORCHARD AREA CONSTRAINT (000 ACRES)

PROTEIN PROTEIN REQUIREMENTS OF LIVESTOCK BY SEASON (000 METRIC TONS)

PRSEAW OIVERSIONS BY PROVINCE AND SEASON (MAF)

QCOMBAL LIVESTOCK COMODITY BALANCES (ooo'TONS OR M LITERS)

SCMILLC SUGAR CANE TO MILL CONSTRAINT (000 ACRES)

SUBIRRC SUBIRRIGATION CONSTRAINT (KAF)

TDRAFT TRACTOR DRAFT POWER BALANCE (000 TRACTOR HOURS)

TRCAPC TRACTOR CAPACITY CONSTRAINT (000 TRACTOR HOURS) W

TWCAPC TUBEWELL CAPACITY CONSTRAINT (KAF) 0\

WATALCPRO WATER ALLOCATION BY PROVINCE (MAF) Vi

WATALCSEA WATER ALLOCATIONS BY SEASON (MAF)
WATALCZ SURFACE WATER BY ZONE (KAF)
WATERBALN WATER BALANCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)

MODELS
WSISN IBMR MODEL WITH WATER NETWORK LINEAR
WSISNN IBMR MODEL WITH WATER NETWORK NON-LINEAR
WSISZ AGROCLIMATIC ZONES MODEL LINEAR OBJECTIVE
WSISZN AGROCLIMATIC ZONES MODEL NON-LINEAR OBJECTIVE

**** FILE SUMMARY FOR USER KDAM

RESTART WSISD2 WORK* A
INPUT WSISM11 GAMS A
OUTPUT WSISM11 LISTING A
SAVE WSISM11 WORK* A
COMPILATION TIME 2.090 SECONDS VER: IBM-TB-003
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM12 01/23/90 16:30:40 PAGE 98
GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3644 * CONTINUED FROM WSISM11 GAMS -*

3645 * PARETO OPTIMAL ALLOCATIONS
3646 *
3647 *
3648 PARAMETER LOBND LOWER BOUNDS BY SEASON FROM PROPOTIONAL ALLOCATIONS
3649 ;
3650 LOBND(CNL1,SEA) = CNLDIVSEA.L(CNL1.SEA) ;
3651 LOBND(PV2.SEA) = SUM(CNL1$PVCNL(PV2.CNL1). LOBND(CNL1.SEA;
3652 CNLDIVSEA.LO(CNL1.SEA) = LOBND(CNL1.SEA) ;
3653
3654 TOLNWFP= 0 ;
3655 TOLCNL = 1 ;
3656 TOLPR 1;
3657
3658 SOLVE WSISN MAXIMIZING CPS USING LP
3659 * END OF SOURCE CODE

U>
0\
0\
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM13 01/23/90 16:30:45 PAGE 98
GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3644 * CONTINUED FROM WSISM11 GAMS *

3645 * PROPORTIONAL ALLOCATIONS WITH
3646 * WITH RAISED MANGLA.
3647 *
3648 * RAISED MANGLA 3.6 MAF OF ADDITIONAL LIVESTORAGE.
3649 RCAP("MANGLA-R") RCAP("MANGLA-R") + 3 6
3650 RCONT.LO(N,M) RULELO(N,M)*RCAP(N)/l00;
3651 RCONT.UP(N,M) ~ RULEUP(N,M)*RCAP(N)/l00 ;
3652
3653 * ADJUST HRDRO-POWER CURVES FOR NEW CAPACITY
3654 * ONE ADDITIONAL POWER UNIT WITH RAISED MANGLA, ORIGNALY 8
3655 * GENERATION PER AF IS SAME
3656 *
3657
3658 POWERCHAR("MANGLA-R","R-CAP","27") RCAP("MANGLA-R") ;
3659 POWERCHAR("MANGLA-R","R-ELE","27") 1250 ;
3660 POWERCHAR("MANGLA-R","P-CAP","27") POWERCHAR("MANGLA-R" , "P-CAp,"27")*9/8;
3661
3662 SOLVE WSISN MAXIMIZING CPS USING LP
3663 * END OF SOURCE CODE

W
01
..."
INDUS BASIN MODEL REVISED (IBMR) FILENAME=WSISM14 01/23/90 16:30:53 PAGE 98
GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3644 * CONTINUED FROM WSISM11 GAMS -*

3645 * PARETO OPTIMAL ALLOCATIONS
3646 * WITH RAISED MANGLE
3647 *
3648 PARAMETER LOBND LOWER BOUNDS BY SEASON FROM PROPOTIONAL ALLOCATIONS
3649
3650 LOBND(CNL1.SEA) = CNLDIVSEA.L(CNL1.SEA) ;
3651 LOBND(PV2.SEA) = SUM(CNL1$PVCNL(PV2.CNL1). LOBND(CNL1.SEA;
3652 CNLDIVSEA.LO(CNL1.SEA) = LOBND(CNL1.SEA) ;
3653
3654 TOLNWFP= 0
3655 TOLCNL 1
3656 TOLPR 1
3657
3658 * RAISED MANGLA 3.6 MAF OF ADDITIONAL LIVESTORAGE.
3659
3660 RCAP("MANGLA-R") = RCAP("MANGLA-R") + 3.6
3661 RCONT.LO(N.M) RULELO(N.M)*RCAP(N)/100;
3662 RCONT.UP(N.M) = RULEUP(N.M)*RCAP(N)/100 ;
3663
3664 * ADJUST HRDRO-POWER CURVES FOR NEW CAPACITY. NEW LAVEL 1250 FEET
3665 * ONE ADDITIONAL POWER UNIT WITH RAISED MANGLA. ORIGNALY 8
3666 * GENRATION PER AF IS SAME
3667
3668 POWERCHAR("MANGLA-R"."R-CAP"."27") RCAP("MANGLA-R") ;
W
3669 POWERCHAR("MANGLA-R"."R-ELE"."27") 1250 ; 0"1
3670 POWERCHAR("MANGLA-R"."P-CAP"."27") POWERCHAR("MANGLA-R"."P-CAP". "27")*9/8; CO
3671
3672 SOLVE WSISN MAXIMIZING CPS USING LP
3673 * END OF SOURCE CODE
 Appendix A.6

Jalalpur Canal Extension Models

File JALALI Page 371

File JALAL2 Page 384

File JALALRI Page 385

 - 370

(This page is intentionally blank)

JALALPUR CANAL PROJECT (WITHOUT PROJECT FILE= JALAL1) 01/08/90 16:36:42 PAGE
GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

3 * JAN 2 , 1990 *
4 SETS
5 CQ CROP AND LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS

6 /BASMATI, IRRI. COTTON. RAB-FOD.

7 GRAM. MAIZE. MUS+RAP, KHA-FOD,

8 WHEAT

9 COW-MILK, BUFF-MILK, MEAT /

10 C(CQ) CROPS /

11 BASMATI RICE CROP

12 IRRI RICE CROP

13 COTTON

14 RAB-FOD FODDER CROP

15 GRAM

16 MAIZE

17 MUS+RAP

18 KHA-FOD FODDER CROP

19 WHEAT /

20 CF(C) FODDER CROPS /RAB-FOD. KHA-FOD /

21 CNF(C) NON-FODDER CROPS

22 RF(C) RAINFED CROPS /RAB-FOD,GRAM,MAIZE,MUS+RAP,KHA-FOD,WHEAT/

23

24 T TECHNOLOGY /BULLOCK, SEMI-MECH /

25 S SEQUENCE /STANOARO STANDARD SEQUENCE /

26 W WATER STRESS LEVEL /STANDARD, RAINFED/

27 G GROUND WATER QUALITY TYPES/FRESH, SALINE/

w
28 GF(G) FRESH GW AREA /FRESH/ .....
29 T1 SUB ZONES BY GW QUALITY/ FRESH, SALINE, TOTAL / ......
30 R1 RESOURCES /

31 CCA CULTURABLE COMMANDED AREA OF THE CANAL

32 CCAP CANAL CAPACITY AT THE CANAL HEAD

33 CEFF CANAL EFFICIENCY FROM BARRAGE TO THE WATER COURSE HEAD

34 WCE-R WATER COURSE COMMAND EFFICINECY IN RABI SEASON

35 WCE-K WATER COURSE COMMAND EFFICINECY IN KHARIF SEASON

36 FLOE FIELD EFFICIENCY

37 FARMPOP FARM POPULATION IN THE IRRIGATED

38 FARMHH NUMBER OF AGRICULTURAL HOUSEHOLDS

39 TRACTORS TRACTOR POPULATION IN THE IRRIGATED AREA

40 TUBEWELLS NUMBER OF TUBEWELLS

41 TWC EXISTING PRIVATE TUBEWELL CAPACITY

42 BULLOCKS

43 COWS

44 BUFFALOS /

45 DC(R1) CHARACTERISTICS OF CANAL COMMAND /

46 CCA CULTURABLE COMMANDED AREA OF THE CANAL

47 CCAP CANAL CAPACITY AT THE CANAL HEAD

48 CEFF CANAL EFFICIENCY FROM BARRAGE TO THE WATER COURSE HEAD

49 WCE-R WATER COURSE COMMAND EFFICINECY IN RABI SEASON

50 WCE-K WATER COURSE COMMAND EFFICINECY IN KHARIF SEASON

51 FLOE FIELD EFFICIENCY /

52 SA SUBAREAS /S1*S4/

53 WCE(DC) WATERCOURSE EFFECIENCIES /WCE-R, WCE-K /

54 M1 MONTHS AND SEASONS /JAN,FEB,MAR,APR,MAY,JUN,

55 JUL,AUG,SEP,OCT,NOV,DEC,RABI,KHARIF,ANNUAL/

56 M(M1) MONTHS /JAN,FEB,MAR,APR,MAY,JUN

57 JUL,AUG,SEP,OCT,NOV,DEC/

58 WCEM(WCE,M) MAPPING FROM SEASON TO MONTHS FOR WATERCOURSE EFFICIENCES /

JALALPUR CANAL PROJECT (WITHOUT PROJECT FILE= JALALi) 01/08/90 16:36:42 PAGE 2
GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

59 WCE-R. (OCT,NOV,DEC,JAN,FEB,MAR)
60 WCE-K. (APR,MAY,JUN,JUL,AUG,SEP)/
61 SEA(M1) SEASONS /RABI, KHARIF /
62 SEAM(SEA,M) MAPPING FROM SEASONS TO MONTHS/
63 RABI. (OCT,NOV.DEC.JAN.FEB.MAR)
64 KHARIF.(APR.MAY,JUN.JUL,AUG,SEP)/
65 SEAl /RABI, KHARIF. ANNUAL/
66 SEA1M(SEA1,M) /RABI. (OCT,NOV.OEC.JAN,FEB.MAR)
67 KHARIF.(APR.MAY.JUN.JUL.AUG.SEP)/
68 CI CROP INPUT OUTPUTS / STRAW-YLO. SEED /
69 P2 / NITROGEN. PHOSPHATE /
70 A ANIMAL TYPES / COW. BULLOCK, BUFFALO /
71 AI ANIMALS INPUT OUTPUT /TON, OP. LABOR, COW-MILK, BUFF-MILK, MEAT /
72 Q(CQ) LIVESTDCK COMODITIES /COW-MILK MILK FROM CATTLE COW

73 BUFF-MILK MILK FROM BUFFALE COW

74 MEAT FROM COWS BUFFALOES AND BULLOCKS/

75 NT NUTRIENTS FOR ANIMALS /TDN TOTAL DIGESTABLE NUTRIENTS

76 DP DIGESTABLE PROTEIN /

77 IS IRRIGATION SYSTEM SCENARIOS /1980*2000 /

78 PS PRICE SECENARIOS / 87-88 /

79 *-
80 * CHANGE THE SET ISR TO SETUP DATA FOR DESIRED YEAR.
81 *
82 ISR(IS) IRRIGATION SYSTEM SCENARIO FOR THIS RUN /1988 /

83 PSR(PS) PRICE SCENARIO FOR FINACIAL PRICES /87-88/ loR

84 PSR1(PS) PRICE SCENARIO FOR ECONOMIC PRICES /87-88/ .....

!'I;)
85 ,
86 SCALAR BASEYEAR BASE YEAR FOR CROP YIELDS /1988/;
87
88 CNF(C) YES; CNF(CF) NO ;

89 SEA1M("ANNUAL-,M) = YES;

90
91
92 SET Z AGROCLIMATIC ZONE OF THE PROJECT AREA
93 /PSW PUNJAB SUGARCANE WHEAT /
94 CNL IRRIGATION CANAL NAME /JALALPUR/
95 GWFG(SA,G) GW TYPE FOR SUBAREAS / Sl.FRESH. S2.SALINE/
96


JALALPUR CANAL PROJECT (WITHOUT PROJECT FILE= JALAL1) 01/08/90 16:36:42 PAGE 3
GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

98 TABLE LAND(C,T,S,W,M) LAND OCCUPATION BY MONTH

99
100 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
101 BASMATI .BULLDCK .STANDARD.STANDARD 1 1. 1. 1. 1. 0.5
102 BASMATl . SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. STANDARD 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 0.5
103 IRRI .BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 0.5
104 IRRI .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 0.5
105 COTTON .BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 0.5
106 COTTON . SEMI-MECH.STANDARD. STANDARD 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 0.5
107 RAB-FDD .BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 1. 1. 1. 1. 0.5 1. 1. 1.
108 RAB-FDD .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1. 1. 1. 1. 0.5 0.25 1. 1.
109 GRAM .BULLDCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 1. 1. 1. 0.5 1. 1.
110 GRAM .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1. 1. 1. 0.25 1. 1.
111 MAIZE .BULLDCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 0.5 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 0.5
112 MAIZE .SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. STANDARD 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 0.5
113 MUS+RAP .BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 1. 1. 0.5 0.5 1. 1. 1.
114 MUS+RAP .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1. 1. 0.5 0.5 1. 1. 1.
115 KHA-FOD .BULLOCK .STANDARD.STANDARD 0.5 0.5 0.5 1. 1. 0.5 0.5
116 KHA-FDD .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 0.5 0.5 0,5 1. 1. 0.5 0.5
117 WHEAT . BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 1. 1. 1. 1. 0.5 1.
118 WHEAT .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1. 1. 1. 1. 0.5 1.
119
120 TABLE BULLOCK(C.T.S,W,M) BULLOCK POWER REQUIREMENTS (BULLOCK HRS)
121
122 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
123 BASMATI.BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 22.6 17.3 2. 17.4
w
......
124 BASMATI.SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 15.4 w
125 IRRI .BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 16.3 18.4 1.5 20.2
126 IRRI .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 18.2
127 COTTON .BULLDCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 9. 13. 1. 1. 1. 1.
128 RAB-FOD.BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 4. 4. 4. 2. 2. 16.5 9.7 2.
129 GRAM . BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 7. 10.2 5.2
130 MAIZE .BULLOCK .STANDARD.STANDARD 10.2 4.1 13.4 5.
131 MAIZE . SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.
132 MUS+RAP.BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 1. 1. 1 10.2 9.3 1. 1.
133 KHA-FOD.BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 17. 1. 1. 16.5 1. 16. 1. 0.5
134 WHEAT .BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 8.2 8.2 18.3 19.6
135 WHEAT .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 5.6 5.6
136
137 TABLE LABOR(C,T,S,W,M) LABOR REQUREMENTS FOR CROPS(MAN HOURS)
138
139 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
140 BASMATI .BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 26.9 94.9 74.7 6.2 3.1 50.9 19.4
141 BASMATl .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 5.6 74.4 74.7 6.2 3.1 50.4 16.9
142 IRRI .BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 22.3 135.7 37.8 6.2 6.2 51.7 22.2
143 IRRI .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 7.9 119.2 28.8 6.2 6.2 51.2 19.7
144 COnON . BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 10.2 19.32 2.5 3.9 11. 40.1 52.9 16.3
145 COnON .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 4.41 9.28 2.5 3.9 10.5 39.6 52.4 15.8
146 RAB-FOD .BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 31.9 39.8 41.7 28.6 13.4 8.7 15.7 28.7
147 RAB-FOD .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 30.5 38.4 40.3 27.1 11.9 7.3 12.7 26.4
148 GRAM .BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 2.5 22.3 10.2 8.6 0.8
149 GRAM .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 2.5 21.4 1. 54 4.39 0.8
150 MAIZE . BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 10.2 4.1 15.9 42.3 2. 23. 23.8
151 MAIZE . SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 2.24 8.06 42.3 2.5 22. 22 5
152 MUS+RAP .BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 20.5 4. 3. 10.2 12.8 13.2 23.
153 MUS+RAP .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 20.5 3.5 2.5 1.54 4.9 13.2 23.
JALALPUR CANAL PROJECT (WJTHOUT PROJECT FILE: JALAL1) 01/08/90 16:36:42 PAGE 4
GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

154 KHA-FOD .BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 18.5 1.8 2.5 25.5 4.5 27.5 2.5 1.2
155 KHA-FOD .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 5.5 1.2 1 7 7. 4.5 4. 2. 1.5
156 WHEAT . BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 4.4 2.7 2.4 62.9 26.9 18.3 23.1 4.
157 WHEAT .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 4.4 2.7 2.4 56.8 24.3 3.4 11.6 4.
158
159 TABLE WATER(C,T.S,W,M) WATER REQUIREMENTS(ACER FT PER ACRE)
160
161 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
162 BASMATI .BULLOCK .STANDARD.STANDARD 0.37 0.84 0.93 0.93 0.47
163 BASMATI .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 0.37 0.84 0.93 0.93 0.47
164 IRRI .BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 0.33 0.79 0.89 0.89 0.47
165 IRRI .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 0.33 o 79 0.89 0.89 0.47
166 COTTON .BULLOCK .STANDARD.STANDARD 0.19 0.23 0.28 0.37 0.37 0.23 0.09
167 COTTON .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 0.19 0.23 0.28 0.37 0.37 0.23 0.09
168 RAB-FOD .BULLOCK .STANDARD.STANDARD 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.35 0.25 0.15 0.15
169 RAB-FOD .SEMI-MECH STANDARD. STANDARD 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.35 0.25 0.15 0.15
170 GRAM .BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.15 0.1
171 GRAM .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.15 0.1
172 MAIZE .BULLDCK .STANDARD.STANDARD 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.2
173 MAIZE SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. STANDARD 0.15 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.25
174 MUS+RAP .BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
175 MUS+RAP .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
176 KHA-FOD .BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 0.15 0.25 0.35 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2
177 KHA-FOD .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 0.15 0.25 0.35 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2
178 WHEAT .BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 0.23 0.37 0.42 0.19 0.19 0.19 w
......
179 WHEAT .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 0.23 0.37 0.42 0.19 0.19 0.19 .j::

180
181 TABLE TRACTOR(C,T,S,W,M) TRACTOR REQUIREMENTS(HRS PER ACRE)
182
183 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
184 BASMATI .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.3 1.8 1.5 0.5
185 IRRI .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 2.3 1.9 1. 0.5
186 COTTON .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1.66 1.98 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
187 RAB-FOD .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3. 3. 3. 1.5 1.5 1. 91 1. 23 1.5
188 GRAM .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 3.75 1.25 0.7
189 MAIZE .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1.68 1.4 2.5
190 MUS+RAP .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1. 1. 1. 1.25 1. 11 1. 1
191 KHA-FOD .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 2. 0.5 1.5 1. 2. 1.2 0.8 0.5
192 WHEAT .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 0.7 0.7 3.4 3.
193
194 TABLE SYLDS(C,T,S,W.CI) STRAW YIELD (PROPORTION OF YLD) AND SEED INPUT(KG) PER ACRE
195
196 STRAW-YLD SEED
197 BASMATI .BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 2.12 6.40
198 BASMATI .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 2.12 6.40
199 IRRI .BULLOCK .STANDARD.STANDARD 1.80 7.10
200 IRRI .SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. STANDARD 1.80 7.10
201 COTTON . BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 9.00
202 COTTON .SEMI-MECH. STANDARD. STANDARD 9.00
203 RAB-FOD .BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 1.00 2.00
204 RAB-FOD .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1.00 2.00
205 GRAM .BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 1.52 14.00
206 GRAM .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1. 52 14.00
207 MAIZE .BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 2.50 6.10
208 MAIZE .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 2.50 6.10
209 MUS+RAP .BULLOCK .STANDARD.STANDARD 0.65 2.40

-
 --. --,..
JALALPUR CANAL PROJECT (WITHOUT PROJECT FILE= JALAL1)
-"---
01/08/90 16:36:42
GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS
PAGE 5

210 MUS+RAP .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 0.65 2.40

211 KHA-FOD .BULLOCK . STANDARD. STANDARD 1.00 27.30
212 KHA-FOD .SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1.00 27.30
213 WHEAT .BULLOCK .STANDARD.STANDARD 1. 50 34.80
214 WHEAT SEMI-MECH.STANDARD.STANDARD 1.50 34.80
215
216 TABLE FERT(C,W,P2) FERTILIZER USE BY (KGS)
217
218 STANDARD.NITROGEN STANDARD. PHOSPHATE
219 BASMATI 23.4 10.6
220 IRRI 26.8 6.4
221 COTTON 19.7 7.0
222 RAB-FOD 18.4 5.6
223 MAIZE 19.5 8.6
224 MUS+RAP 30.8 13.3
225 KHA-FOD 18.4 11.4
226 WHEAT 33.3 10.9
227
228 TABLE NATYIELD(C.* CROP YIELDS
229
230 * NATYIELD AVE RAG NATIONAL YIELD FOR STANDARD TECHNOLOGY
231 * YLDPRPV PROVINCIAL YIELD AS PROPORTION OF NATIONAL
232 * YLDPRZS YIELDS IN THE PROJECT AREA AS PROPORTION OF
233 * PROVICIAL YIELDS.
l
234 ....,
235 NATYIELD YLDPRPV YLDPRZS VI
236 BASMATI 457.000 1.000 0.790
237 IRRI 880.000 0.859
238 COTTDN 695.000 1.153 0.800
239 RAB-FOD 15000.000 1.000 1.230
240 GRAM 183.000 0.937 0.970
241 MAIZE 534.000 1.029 0.970
242 MUS+RAP 307.000 1.192 0.970
243 KHA-FOD 10000.000 1.000 0.820
244 WHEAT 780.000 0.978 1.130
245
246 TABLE GROWTH1(C,*) CRDP YIELDS AND FERTILIZER GROWTH(PERCENT)
247
248 FERTGR GROWTHCY
249 BASMATI 3.00
250 IRRI 3.00
251 COTTON 3.00 5.00
252 RAB-FOD 3.00
253 GRAM 3.00
254 MAIZE 3.00 0.73
255 MUS+RAP 3.00
256 KHA-FOD 3.00
257 WHEAT 3.00 0.41
258
259
260 TABLE WEEDY(*,SEA) WEED YIELD AND GRAZING FROM SLACK LAND (TONS PER ACRE)
261
262 RABI KHARIF
263 BASMATI 1.000
264 IRRI 1.000
265 COTTON 1.000
JALALPUR CANAL PROJECT (WITHOUT PROJECT FILE= JALAL1) 01/08/90 16:36:42 PAGE 6
GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

266 GRAM 0.300

267 MAIZE 1.000
268 MUS+RAP 0.300
269 WHEAT 0.400
270 GRAZ 0.200 0.300
271
272
273 TABLE IOLIVE(A,*) INPUT OUTPUT COEFFICIENTS FOR LIVESTOCK
274
275 COW-MILK BUFF-MILK MEAT TDN DP LABOR FIX-COST
276 BULLOCK 14.300 0.635 0.058 15.100 50.000
277 COW 268.000 13.400 0.680 0.061 25.100 15.000
278 BUFFALO 643.000 17.300 1.040 0.095 33.600 50.000
279
280
281 TABLE SCONV(C,NT.SEA) TDN AND DP CONVERSION FACTOR FOR CROP STRAW
282
283 TDN.RABI TDN.KHARIF DP.RABI DP.KHARIF
284 BASMATI 0.500 0.005
285 IRRI 0.500 0.005
286 RAB-FOD 0.140 0.025
287 GRAM 0.600 0.100
288 MAIZE 0.500 0.100
289 MUS+RAP 0.500 0.005
290 KHA-FOD 0.140 0.019 \.oJ
291 WHEAT 0.600 0.005 -..j
0\
292
293
294 TABLE COMDEF(IS,DC) CANAL COMMAND CHRACTERISTICS
295
296 CCA CCAP CEFF WCE-R WCE-K FLDE
297 1988 .15937 0.0822 0.642 0.510 0.510 0.900
298
299 PARAMETER SUBDEF(SA) SUB-AREA DEFINITION(PROPORTION OF CCA)
300 /Sl .456, S2 .544 /
301 DEPTH(M) DEPTH TO WATER TABLE (FEET);
302 DEPTH(M) = 15;
303
304 TABLE ER(*,M) EVAPORATION AND RAIN DATA
305 * EVAP PAN EVAPORATION (FEET)
306 * RAIN RAIN (INCHES)
307
308 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
309 EVAP 0.257 o 314 0.557 0.788 0.982 1.026 0.930 0.843 0.743 0.600 0.371 0.260
310 RAIN 0.920 0.889 0.942 0.646 0.524 1.140 4.043 4.264 1.543 0.175 0.122 0.365
311
312
313 TABLE CANALWATER(G,M) CANAL WATER ALLOCATION
314
315 * MONTHLY MAF COMPUTED USING 605.75 CFS FOR FRESH AREA AND 776.25 CFS
316 * FOR SALINE AREA.
317 * ONE CFS IS 1.98347 AF PER DAY
318
319 APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT
320
321 FRESH 0.0360 0.0372 0.0360 0.0372 0.0372 0.0360 0.0372

Ir ..
. ,.
 '"
JALALPUR CANAL PROJECT (WITHOUT PROJECT FILE= JALAL1) 01/08/90 16:36:42 PAGE 1
GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

322 SALINE 0.0462 0.0411 0.0462 0.0411 0.0411 0.0462 0.0411

323
324
325 TABLE RES88(*,*) RESOUCES DATA 1988
326
321 RES88 GROWTHRES
328 FARMPOP 282.0
329 FARMHH
330 TRACTORS 895.0
331 TUBEWELLS 140.0
332 BULLOCKS
333 COWS
334 BUFFALOS
335
336 SET P3 /FINANCIAL, ECONOMIC, EXPORT,IMPORT/
331
338 TABLE PRICES(PS,CQ,P3) 1988 PRICES
339
340 FINANCIAL ECONOMIC EXPORT IMPORT
341 81-88.BASMATI 6. 6. 4.8
342 81-88.IRRI 2.9 2.4 2.3
343 81-88. COTTON 4.5 6. 4.5
344 81-88.GRAM 3.9 3.8
345 81-88.MAIZE 1.6 .6
346 81-88.MUS+RAP 3.15 3.4 w
341 87-88.WHEAT 2.0 2.2 2.0
348
349
81-88.COW-MILK
81-88.BUFF-MILK
5.4
5.4
2.46
3.24
""
350 81-88.MEAT 13.8 14.4
351
352 TABLE FINSDWTPR(C,PS,*) PRICES OF SEED(RS PER KG) AND WATER(RS PER ACRE)
353
354 81-88. SEED 81-88.WATER 81-88.MISCC
355 BASMATI 5. 32. 15.
356 IRRI 2.5 32. 15.
357 COTTON 5.5 34. 500.
358 RAB-FOD 40. 11
359 GRAM 5.1 16.
360 MAIZE 4. 14.
361 MUS+RAP 4.3 22.
362 KHA-FOO 2.5 14.
363 WHEAT 2.9 22.
364
365 TABLE ECNSDWTPR(C,PS,*) PRICES OF SEED(RS PER KG) AND WATER(RS PER ACRE)
366
361 81-88.SEED 81-88.WATER 81-88.MISCC
368 BASMATI 1. 16. 15.
369 IRRI 3.1 16. 15.
310 COTTON 6.1 14.4 500.
311 RAB-FOD 36. 6.4
312 GRAM 5. 1 8.
313 MAIZE 1. 9.6
314 MUS+RAP 5.9 12.
315 KHA-FOD 2.25 6.4
316 WHEAT 3.6 10.
317
JALALPUR CANAL PROJECT (WITHOUT PROJECT FILE= JALAL1) 01/08/90 16:36:42 PAGE 8
GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

378
* WAGES. FERTILIZER AND OTHER INPUT PRICES
379
SET P1 / NITROGEN. PHOSPHATE. PROTEIN. TWINVT. TRINVT,TWOPC.TROPC/
380
P11 /FINANCIAL. ECONOMIC /
381

382
TABLE PRI1(PS.P11.P1) FERTILIZER TUBEWELL TRACTOR AND PROTEIN PRICES
383

384
* FERTILIZER AND PROTEIN PRICES ARE IN RS/KG. TWINVT AND TRINVT ARE
385
* ANNUALIZED COST FOR A TUBEWELL AND TRACTOR (RUPEES)
386
* TWOPC AND TROPC ARE COST OF TUBEWELL WATER(RS/ACRE FOOT) AND
387
* COST OF TRACTOR (RS/TRACTOR HOUR)
388
*
389
NITROGEN PHOSPHATE PROTEIN TWINVT TRINVT TWOPC TROPC

390
87-88. FINANCIAL 5.8 7.0 9. 10000 25000 225 45.

391
87-88. ECONOMIC 8.3 10.9 9. 10000 25000 170 50.

392

393
TABLE WAGEPS(PS.P11,M) WAGE RATES RS PER MAN HOUR
394

395
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
396
87-88.FINANCIAL 3. 3. 3. 6. 6. 3. 3. 3. 3. 6. 6. 3.
397
87-88.ECONOMIC 2.75 2.75 2.75 5. 5. 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 5. 5. 2.75
398

399
* MISCELLANEOUS PARAMETRES
400
SCALARS
401
LSTD STANDARD LABOR LIMIT ( HOURS PER MONTH ) /200 /
402
TRCAP TRACTOR CAPACITY IN TRACTOR HOURS PER MONTH /250 / W
403
TWCAP NAMEPLATE CAPACITY OF THE PRIVATE TW(AF PER MONTH) /59.5041/ -..J
Q)
404
NTWUCAP EFFECTIVE CAPACITY OF NEW TUBEWELLS(AF PER MONTH)
405
ETWUCAP EFFECTIVE CAPACITY OF NEW TUBEWELLS(AF PER MONTH)
406
TWEFAC FACTOR TO CONVERT WC LOSSES TO FROM PRIVATE TW LOSSES / 0.5 /
407
LABFAC FACTOR TO CONVERT WAGE TO THE RESERVATION WAGE / 0.5 /
408
REPCO REPRODUCTIVE COEFFICIENT / 2.5 /
409
GR REQUIRED PROPORTION OF GREEN FODDER IN TOTAL FODDER / 0 /
410
GROWTHQ GROWTH (PERCENT) FOR LIESTOCK COMODITIES /2.5 /
411
COWF ADJUSTMENT FACTOR FOR COWS POPULATION IN THE IRRIGATED AREAS/.5/
412
BUFF ADJUSTMENT FACTOR FOR BUFFLOES POP. IN THE IRRIGATED AREAS/.8/
413
DRC RUN-OF PORTION OF RAINFALL /.15/
414
THE1 PORTION OF EQUAIFER EVAPORATION USED BY CROPS / .6 /
415

416

417
PARAMETER

418
BP(M) DRAFT POWER PER BULLOCK(HRS PER MONTH)

419
YIELD(C,T,S,W) CROP YIELDS

420

421

422
* CHANGE BULLOCK REQUIREMENTS FROM BULLOCK PAIR TO BULLOCKS
423
BP(M)=96; BP("MAY")=77; BP("JUN")=77;
424
BULLOCK(C.T,S,W,M) = 2*BULLOCK(C,T.S.W,M) ;
425

426
FERT(C.W.P2) = FERT(C,W.P2)*SUM(IS$ISR(IS),

427
( 1+GROWTH 1(C. "FERTGR" ) / 100) ** (ORD(I S)+ 1979 -BASEY EAR ) );

428

429
YIELD(C. T. "STANDARD". "STANDARD") = NATVIELD(C, "NATYIELD" )/1000

430
*NATYIELD(C, "YLDPRPV")*NATYIELD(C, "YLDPRZS");

431

432
YIELD(C,T,S,W) YIELD(C.T,S.W)* SUM(IS$ISR(IS).

433
( 1+GROWTH 1(C. "GROWTHCY" ) /100) ** (ORD(I S)+ 1979 -BASE YEAR ) )

II>
~ALALPUR CANAL PRO~ECT (WITHOUT PRO~ECT FILE= JALAL1) 01/08/90 16:36:42 PAGE 9
GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

434 IOLIVE(A,Q) = IOLIVE(A,Q) * SUM(IS$ISR(IS),

435 (1+GROWTHQ/100)**(ORo(IS)+1979-BASEYEAR
);

436 SETS
437 FTT(R1) /FARMPOP,FARMHH,TRACTORS,TUBEWELLS,TWC,BULLOCKS,COWS,BUFFALOS/
438 SR1(oC) /CCA, CCAP /
439 ,
440 PARAMETER
441 RESOURCE(G,R1) ENDOWMENTS BY ACZ AND GROUNDWATER QUALITY
442 EQEVAPZ(M) EVAPORATION FROM THE EQUAIFER BY ACZ (FEET)
443 SUBIRRZ(M) SUBIRRIGATION BY ACZ (FEET)
444 EFRZ(M) EFFECTIVE RAIN BY ACZ (FEET)
445 CNEFF CANAL EFF. FROM CANAL HEAD TO THE W-C HEAD
446 WCEFF(M) WATERCOURSE COMMAND DELIVERY EFFICIENCY
447 TWEFFZ(M) WEIGHTED PRIVATE TUBEWELL DELIVERY EFFICIENCY BY ZONE
448 RATIOFS(G) FRESH AND SALINE CCA AS A PROPORTION OFF TOTAL
449 ,
450 LOOP(ISR,
451
452 RESOURCE(G,SR1) = SUM(SA$GWFG(SA,G), COMDEF(ISR,SR1)*SUBDEF(SA) );
453 EFRZ(M) = (1.0 - DRC - (1-COMDEF(ISR,"FLDP)*ER("RAIN",M)/12.0;

454 CNEFF COMDEF(ISR,"CEFF");

455 WCEFF(M) SUM( WCE$WCEM(WCE,M), COMoEF(ISR,WCE) );

456 TWEFFZ(M) (1- (1-WCEFF(M)/COMDEF(ISR,"FLDE"*TWEFAC)*

457 COMDEF (ISR, .. FLOE")

458 ); w
.....,
459 \0
460 EQEVAPZ(M) MIN(1., 10.637/0EPTH(M)**2.558)*ER("EVAP",M);

461 SUBIRRZ(M) EQEVAPZ(M)*THE1 ;

462 RATIOFS(G) RESOURCE(G,"CCA")/

463 (RESOURCE("FRESH","CCA")+RESOURCE("SALINE","CCA";
464
465 RESOURCE(G,FTT) = RES88(FTT,"RES88")*RATIOFS(G)*

466 SUM(IS$ISR(IS), ( 1+RES88( FTT, "GROWTHRES")/ 100) **

467 (ORO(IS)+1979-BASEYEAR;

468 NTWUCAP = .75 *TWCAP ; ETWUCAP = .60 *TWCAP ;

469 RESOURCE("FRESH","TUBEWELLS")$RESOURCE("FRESH","CCA") =

470 SUM(G, RESOURCE(G,"TUBEWELLS") ) ;

471 RESOURCE("SALINE","TUBEWELLS") = 0 ;

472 RESOURCE("FRESH","TWC") = RESOURCE("FRESH"."TUBEWELLS")*ETWUCAP/1000

473
474 * INPUTS ANO YIELOS FOR RAINFEO TECHNOLOGIES
475 *
476 LANO(RF,T.S,"RAINFEO",M) LANO(RF,T,S,"STANOARO",M) ;

477 BULLOCK(RF,T,S,"RAINFEO",M) BULLOCK(RF,T,S, "STANOARO",M)

478 LABOR(RF,T,S,"RAINFED",M) LABOR(RF,T,S,"STANDARO",M);

479 WATER(RF,T,S, "RAINFEO",M) 0 :

480 TRACTOR(RF,T,S, "RAINFEo",M) TRACTOR(RF,T,S, "STANOARo",M)

481 FERT(RF,"RAINFEO",P2) FERT(RF,"STANOARO",P2)/3.:

482 YIELD(RF.T,S."RAINFEO") YIELO(RF,T,S,"STANOARO")/2. ;

483 SYLoS(RF,T,S,"RAINFEo",CI) SYLOS(RF,T,S,"STANoARO",CI);

484 OPTION FERT:3: 1:2, YIELo:3:1,3, SYLOS:3:2:3 ;

485 DISPLAY RESOURCE, SUBIRRZ, EFRZ, CNEFF, WCEFF, TWEFFZ, RATIOFS, FERT, YIELD, SYLOS;

486
JALALPUR CANAL PROJECT (WITHOUT PROJECT FILE= JALALi) 01/08/90 16:36:42 PAGE 10
MODEL SETUP GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

488 SETS

489 TECH(C.T.S.W) TECHNOLOGY AVAILABILITY INDICATOR

490 TECHC(CQ) COMODITIES IN THE ZONES

491
492
493 PARAMETER
494
495 FSALEP(CQ FINANCIAL SALE PRICE FOR CROP AND LIVESTOCK COMODITIES (RS PER KG OR PER LITER)

496 PP FINANCIAL PURCHASE PRICE OF PROTEIN (RS PER KGS)

497 SEEDP(C) FINANCIAL SEED PRICE (RS PER KGS)

498 MISC(*) FINANCIAL MISCELLENIOUS PRICES

499 MISCCT(C,W) FINANCIAL MISCILLENIOUS COSTS(RS PER ACRE)

500 CANALCOST(C.W) FINANCIAL MISCILLENIOUS COSTS(RS PER ACRE)

501 WAGE(M) FINANCIAL WAGE RATES (RS PER MAN-HOUR)

502
503 ESALEP(CQ ECONOMIC SALE PRICE FOR CROP AND LIVESTOCK COMODITIES (RS PER KG OR PER LITER)

504 EPP ECONOMIC PRICE OF PROTEIN CONCENTRATE (RS PER KGS)

505 ESEEDP(C) ECONOMIC SEED PRICE

506 EMISC(*) ECONOMIC MISCELLENIOUS PRICES

507 EMISCCT(C,W) ECONOMIC MISCILLENIOUS COSTS(RS PER ACRE)

508 ECANALCOST(C,W) ECONOMIC MISCILLENIOUS COSTS(RS PER ACRE)

509 EWAGE(M) ECONOMIC WAGE RATE (RS PER MAN-HOUR)

510 ,
511 LOOP (PSR,
\.0)
512 FSALEP(CQ PRICES(PSR,CQ,"FINANCIAL") ; CD
513 PP PRI1(PSR,"FINANCIAL","PROTEIN"); o
514
515 MISC(P1) PRI1(PSR,"FINANCIAL",P1)

516 SEEDP(C) FINSOWTPR(C,PSR,"SEED"),

517 MISCCT(C,"STANOARD") FINSOWTPR(C,PSR,"MISCC");

518 MISCCT(C,"RAINFEO") = FINSDWTPR(C,PSR,"MISCC")/3.;

519 CANALCOST(C,"STANOARO") = FINSDWTPR(C,PSR,"WATER");

520 CANALCOST(C, "RAINFED") = 0;

521 WAGE(M) WAGEPS(PSR,"FINANCIAL",M) :

522 );
523 LOOP (PSR1,

524 ESALEP(CQ PRICES(PSR1,CQ ,"ECONOMIC")

525 EPP PRI1(PSR1,"ECONOMIC","PROTEIN")

526
527 EMISC(P1) PRI1(PSR1,"ECONOMIC",P1)

528 ESEEOP(C) ECNSOWTPR(C,PSR1,"SEEO") ;

529 EMISCCT(C,"STANOARO") ECNSOWTPR(C,PSR1,"MISCC");

530 EMISCCT(C,"RAINFEO") = ECNSDWTPR(C,PSR1,"MISCC")/3.;

531 ECANALCOST(C,"STANOARO") = ECNSDWTPR(C,PSR1,"WATER");

532 ECANALCOST(C,"RAINFEO") = 0 ;

533 EWAGE(M) WAGEPS(PSR1,"ECONOMIC",M)

534 ) ;
535
536 TECH(C,T,S,W)$SUM(M, LANO(C,T,S,W,M YES

537 TECHC(C)$SUM( (T,S,W), TECH(C,T,S,W YES

538 TECHC(CF)=NO: TECHC(Q)= YES;

539 OISPLAY TECHC

540 *

JALALPUR CANAL PROJECT (WITHOUT PROJECT FILE= JALAL1) 01/08/90 16:36:42 PAGE 11
EQUATIONS AND VARIABLES GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

542 VARIABLES CPS CONSUMERS PLUS PRODUCERS SURPLUS (MILLION RUPEES)

543 POSITIVE VARIABLES
544 ACOST(G) FARM COST IN (MILLION RUPEES)
545 PPC(G,SEA) PURCHASES OF PROTEIN CONCENTRATES (THOUSAND METRIC TONS)
546 X(G,C.T,S,W) CROPPED AREA BY TECHNOLOGY (THOUSAND ACRES)
547 ANIMAL(G,A) PRODUCTION OF LIVESTOCK TYPE A (THOUSANDS)
548 PRODT(G,CQ) PRODUCTION (CROP COMMODITIES 000 METRIC TONS LIVESTOCK COMM MILL. KGS OR LITERS)
549 FAMILYL(G.M) FAMILY LABOR USED (MILLION MAN HOURS)
550 HIREDL(G,M) HIRED LABOR USED (MILLION MAN HOURS)
551 ITW INVESTMENT IN INCREASED PRIVATE TUBEWELL CAPACITY (KAF PER MONTH)
552 TW(M) PRIVATE TUBEWELL WATER USED BY MONTH M (KAF)
553 ITR(G) INVESTMENT IN INCREASED TRACTOR CAPACITY (000 TRACTOR-HRS PER MONTH)
554 TS(G,M) PRIVATE TRACTOR SERVICES USE BY MONTH (THOUSAND HRS)
555 WDIVR(G,M) SURFACE WATER DIVERSION AT CANAL HEAD (MAF)
556 SLKLAND(G,M) SLACK LAND (THOUSAND ACRES)
557 SLKWATER(G,M) SLACK WATER AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)
558
559 EQUATIONS
560 OBJF FIXED PRICE OBJ
561 COST(G) ANNUAL FARM COST (MILLION RUPEES)
562 CCOMBAL(G,C) COMMODITY BALANCES FOR CROPS (THOUSAND METRIC TONS)
563 QCOMBAL(G,Q) LIVESTOCK COMODITY BALANCES (THOUSAND KGS OR LITERS)
564 LABORC(G,M) MONTHLY LABOR CONSTRAINT (MILLION MAN HOURS)
565 FODDER(G,SEA) SEASONAL MAINTENANCE OF FODDER SUPPLIES (THOUSAND METRIC TONS)
566 PROTEIN(G,SEA) PROTEIN REQUIREMENTS OF LIVESTOCK BY SEASON (THOUSAND METRIC TONS) w
0)
567 GRNFDR(G.SEA) GREEN FODDER REQUIREMENTS (THOUSAND METRIC TONS) .....
568 BDRAFT(G,M) BULLOCK DRAFT POWER CONSTRAINT (MILLION BULLOCK HOURS)

569 BREPCO(G) BULLOCK REPRODUCTION CONSTRAINT

570 BULLOCKC BULLOCK POPULATION CONSTRAINT (THOUSAND BULLOCKS)

571 TDRAFT(G,M) TRACTOR DRAFT POWER BALANCE (THOUSAND TRACTOR HOURS)

572 TRCAPC(M) TRACTOR CAPACITY CONSTRAINT (THOUSAND TRACTOR HOURS)

573 TWCAPC(M) TUBEWELL CAPACITY CONSTRAINT (KAF)

574 LANDC(G,M) LAND CONSTRAINT (THOUSAND ACRES)

575 WATERBALN(G.M) WATER BALANCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (KAF)

576
577
578
579 OBJF .. CPS =E= SUM(G, SUM(CQ, FSALEP(CQ)*PRODT(G,CQ ACOST(G;
580
581 COST(G).. ACOST(G) =E=

582 (SUMC,T,S.W)$TECH(C,T,S,W).

583 (SUM(P2, FERT(C,W,P2)*MISC(P2+CANALCOST(C,W)+

584 MISCCT(C,W)+SEEDP(C)*SYLDS(C,T,S,W,"SEED") )*X(G,C.T,S.W) )+

585 SUM(M, MISC("TWOPC")*TW(M)$GF(G) + MISC("TROPC")*TS(G,M) ) +

586 MISC("TWINVT")*ITW$GF(G) + MISC("TRINVT")*ITR(G) +

587 SUM( A, IOLIVE(A," FIX -COST" ) *ANIMAL (G, A) ) )/1000+

588 SUM(SEA, PP*PPC(G,SEA +

589 SUM(M. (FAMILYL(G,M)*LABFAC + HIREDL(G,M*WAGE(M) )

590
591 CCOMBAL(G,C)$CNF(C) ..

592 SUMT,S.W)$TECH(C,T.S,W),

593 YIELD(C,T,S,W)*X(G,C,T,S,W =E=PRODT(G,C);

594
595 QCOMBAL(G.Q).. PRODT(G,Q) =E=

596 SUM(A. IOLIVE(A,Q)*ANIMAL(G,A) ) /1000

597
JALALPUR CANAL PROJECT (WITHOUT PROJECT FILE= JALAL1) 01/08/90 16:36:42 PAGE 12
EQUATIONS AND VARIABLES GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

598 LABORC(G,M) ..
599 (SUM( (C,T,S,W)$TECH(C,T,S,W), LABOR(C,T,S.W.M)*X(G.C.T.S.W) ) +
600 SUM( A, IOLIVE (A, "LABOR" )*ANIMAL(G. A)/ 1000 =L=
601 FAMILYL(G.M)+HIREDL(G.M);
602
603 FODDER(G,SEA) .. SUM(A, IOLIVE(A,"TDN")*ANIMAL(G,A =L=
604 SUM( (C,T,S,W)$TECH(C,T,S,W), (
605 YIELD(C,T,S,W)*SYLDS(C,T,S,W,"STRAW-YLD")*SCONV(C,"TDN",SEA) + WEEDY(C,SEA)*
606 SCONV( .. RAB-FOD ..... TDN" ... RABI .. ) ) * X(G.C.T.S.W) ) +
607 SUM(M$SEAM(SEA.M). SLKLAND(G.M)*WEEDY("GRAZ".SEA*SCONV("RAB-FOD"."TDN"."RABI")
608
609 PROTEIN(G.SEA) .. SUM(A. IOLIVE(A,"DP")*ANIMAL(G.A =L=
610 PPC(G,SEA)+
611 SUM( (C,T,S.W)$TECH(C.T.S.W). (YIELD(C.T,S,W)*SYLDS(C,T,S,W,"STRAW-YLD")*
612 SCONV(C,"DP",SEA) + WEEDY(C,SEA)*SCONV("RAB-FOD","DP","RABI") )*X(G,C,T,S,W) )+
613 SUM(M$SEAM(SEA.M). SLKLAND(G.M)*WEEDY("GRAZ",SEA*SCONV("RAB-FOD","DP", " RABI")
614
615 GRNFDR(G,SEA) .. GR*SUM(A, IOLIVE(A,"TDN")*ANIMAL(G,A =L=
616 SUM( (CF,T,S,W)$TECH(CF,T,S,W),
617 YIELD(CF.T.S.W)*SCONV(CF."TDN".SEA)*X(G,CF.T,S,W) ) +
618 SUM( (C,T,S,W)$TECH(C,T,S,W),
619 WEEDY(C,SEA)*SCONV("RAB-FOD","TDN","RABI")*X(G,C,T,S,W) );
620
621 BDRAFT(G,M) ..
622 SUMC,T.S,W)$TECH(C,T,S,W), BULLOCK(C,T,S.W.M)*X(G,C,T.S,W) )/1000 lJ,)
CO
623 =L= BP(M)*ANIMAL(G, "BULLOCK" )/1000 ; N
624
625 BREPCO(G) .. ANIMAL(G,"BULLOCK") =L= REPCO*ANIMAL(G, "COW .. )
626
627 BULLOCKC .. SUM(G, ANIMAL(G,"BULLOCK") )=L= RES88("BULLOCKS","RES88");
628
629 TDRAFT(G,M) ..
630 SUMC,T.S,W)$TECH(C,T,S,W),
631 TRACTOR(C,T,S,W,M)*X(G,C,T,S,W) =E= TS(G,M) ;
632
633 TRCAPC(M).. SUM(G, TS(G,M =L= SUM(G,
634 (RESOURCE(G, "TRACTORS")/loo0 + ITR(G*TRCAP ) ;
635
636 TWCAPC(M)$GF("FRESH") .. TW(M) =L= RESOURCE("FRESH", "TWC")+NTWUCAP*ITW;
637
638 LANDC(G,M) ..
639 SUMC,T,S,W)$TECH(C,T,S,W),
640 LAND(C,T,S,W,M)*X(G,C,T,S,W + SLKLAND(G,M)=E=
641 RESOURCE (G, "CCA" ) * 1000
642
643 WATERBALN(G,M) ..
644 SUMC,T.S,W)$TECH(C,T,S,W).
645 MAX( (WATER(C,T.S.W,M)-EFRZ(M)-SUBIRRZ(M)*LAND(C,T,S,W,M) ),0.)
646 *X(G,C,T,S,W+SLKWATER(G,M) =E=
647 TWEFFZ(M)*TW(M)$GF(G) + WDIVR(G,M)*CNEFF*WCEFF(M)*1000
648
649 * BOUNDS ON FAMILY LABOR
650 FAMILYL.UP(G,M) = RESOURCE(G, "FARMPOP")*LSTD/l000
651
652 * WITHOUT PROJECT CASE - SET DIVERSIONS, WATER CHARGES AND
653 * INVESTMENTS TO ZERO

..

JALALPUR CANAL PROJECT (WITHOUT PROJECT FILE= JALAL1) 01/08/90 16:36:42 PAGE 13
EQUATIONS AND VARIABLES GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

654 WDIVR.FX(G,M) = 0 ;
655 CANALCOST(C,W) = 0 ;
656 ECANALCOST(C,W) = 0 ;
657 ITR.FX(G)= 0 ; ITW.FX 0
658 *
659 MODEL WSISF JALALPUR CANAL PROJECT - FIXED PRICE MODEL /
660 OBJF, COST, CCOMBAL, QCOMBAL,
661 LABORC. FODDER, PROTEIN, GRNFDR,
662 BDRAFT, BREPCO, TDRAFT, TRCAPC,
663 TWCAPC, LANDC, WATERBALN /
664
665 OPTION ITERLIM = 25000; OPTION RESLIM 900
666 OPTION LIMROW=O; OPTION LIMCOL=O
667 *
668 SOLVE WSISF MAXIMIZING CPS USING LP
669 * END OF SOURCE CODE

COMPILATION TIME 1.000 SECONDS VER: IBM-TB-003

w
0)
w
JALALPUR CANAL PROJECT (WITH PROJECT FILE=JALAL2) 01/08/90 16:37:09 PAGE 30
GAMS 2.21 IBM eMS

671 * RESTART FROM JALALi

672
673 ITR.UP(G)= INF; ITW.UP = INF ;
674 WDIVR.FX(G,M) = CANALWATER(G.M);
675
676 SOLVE WSISF MAXIMIZING CPS USING LP
677 * END OF SOURCE CODE

COMPILATION TIME 0.150 SECONDS VER: IBM-TB-003

w
(I)
.::
JALALPUR CANAL PROJECT (WITHOUT PROJECT FILE= JALAL1) 01/08/90 16:36:56 PAGE 30
COM P I L A T ION GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

670
SETS
671
SEAC(SEA,C) SEASON TO CROP MAP I

672
RABI. (MUS+RAP, RAB-FOD, GRAM, WHEAT)

673
KHARIF.(BASMATI, IRRI, MAIZE, KHA-FOD, COTTON) I

674
RRl IGPV,VAL-ADDED,FARM-INC,FL-COST,HL-COST,SEED-COST,

675
FERT-COST,MISCC-COST,CNL-W-COST,TW-OPC,TR-OPC,TW-INVT,TR INVT

676
ANIML-COST,PROT-COST, TOTAL-COSTI

677
R9 ISEEP-RAIN, SEEP-PTW, SEEP-GTW, SEEP-CANAL,

678
SEEP-WCFLD,SEEP-LINK,SEEP-RIVER,P-TUBWELL,G-TUBWELL

679
TOT-INF, TOT-OUTF, INF-OUTF, P-EVAP-GW, EVAP-GW,BALANCE I

680
R2(RR1) IFL-COST,HL-COST,SEED-COST,FERT-COST,MISCC-COST,CNL-W-COST

681
TW-OPC,TR-OPC,TW-INVT,TR-INVT,ANIML-COST,PROT-COST,

682
TOTAL-COSTI

683
R17(RR1) IHL-COST,SEED-COST,FERT-COST,MISCC-COST,CNL-W-COST,TW-OPC,TR-OPC,

684
ANIML-COST,PROT-COST I

685
R18(RR1) IHL-COST,SEED-COST,FERT-COST,MISCC-COST,CNL-W-COST,TW-OPC,TR-OPC,

686
ANIML-COST,PROT-COST I

687
R3 IWATER-REQ, RAIN, SUBIRR, CANAL, P-TUBEWELL, G-TUBEWELL,

688
SLKWATER, TOT-SUPPLY I

689
R4(R3) ICANAL, RAIN, SUBIRR, P-TUBEWELL, G-TUBEWELL I

690
R6(R9) ISEEP-RAIN, SEEP-PTW, SEEP-GTW, SEEP-CANAL, SEEP-WCFLD,

691
SEEP-LINK,SEEP-RIVER I

692
R7(R9) Ip-TUBWELL, G-TUBWELL I

693
R8(RR1) IGPV, VAL-ADDED, FARM-INC, FL-COST, HL-COST, TOTAL-COST I

694
, w
Q)
695
SCALAR lJ1

696
SPFC PORTION OF CANAL LOSSES TO GROUNDWATER I 0.7 I

697
SPFWF PORTION OF WATERCOURSE AND FIELD LOSSES TO GW I 0.8 I

698

699
PARAMETER
700
CAT CROPPED AREA BY TECHNOLOGY(OOO ACRES)
701
CAC CROPPED AREA (000 ACRES)
702
REP45
703
REP48 FERTILIZER USE BY CROP (000 TONNS)
704
REP47
705
REP49
706
REP60
707
REP72, WYC
708
FLEFFZ WEIGHTED FIELD EFFICIENCY BY ZONE
709

710
FLEFFZ SUM(ISR, COMDEF (I SR, .. FLOE")

711

712
REP45(G,R1) RESOURCE(G,R1) ;

713
REP45("TOTAL",R1) SUM(G, REP45(G, Rl)

714

715
REP48(C.G ,P2) SUM( (T,S,W), X.L(G,C,T,S,W)*FERT(C,W,P2/1000

716
REP48(C, "TOTAL",P2) SUM(G, REP48(C,G,P2) );

717
REP48("TOTAL",T1,P2) SUM(C, REP48(C,Tl,P2) );

718

719
CAT(G,C,T,W) SUM (S, X.L(G.C,T,S,W) );

720
CAT("TOTAL",C,T,W) SUM (G. CAT(G,C.T,W ;

721
CAT(T1,C,"TOTAL","TOTAL") SUM ( (T,W), CAT(Tl,C,T,W

722
CAC(C,T1) CAT(Tl,C,"TOTAL","TOTAL") ;

723
CAC(SEA,T1) SUM(C$SEAC(SEA,C). CAC(C,Tl) );

724
CAC("ANNUAL",Tl) SUM(SEA, CAC(SEA,T1

725
REP47(M,G) SLKLAND.L(G,M);

JALALPUR CANAL PROJECT (WITHOUT PROJECT FILE~ JALAL1) 01/08/90 16:36:56 PAGE 31
COM P I L A T ION GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

726 REP47(M,-TOTAL") SUM(G, REP47(M,G;

727
728 OPTION CAT:3:1:2.CAC:1, REP48:1:1:2, REP41:1;

729 DISPLAY Z ;

730 DISPLAY REP45, CAT. CAC;

731 DISPLAY SLACK LAND 000 ACRES ", REP41

732
733 REP47(M,T1) = REP45(T1,"CCA")*1ooo REP47(M,T1)

734 DISPLAY "LAND USE BY MONTH 000 ACRES", REP47 ;

735
736 WYC(C)$CAC(C,"TOTAL") = SUM ( (T,S,W), YIELD(C,T,S,W)*
737 SUM(G, X.L(G,C,T,S,W/CAC(C,"TOTAL")
738
'739 DISPLAY "WEIGHTED YIELD (METRIC TONNS)", WYC ;

740 DISPLAY REP48 ;

741
742 REP47(M,T1) = 0.0 ;

743 REP47(A,G) = ANIMAL L(G,A); REP47(A,"TOTAL") SUM(G, REP47(A,G;

744 DISPLAY "LIVESTOCK IN THOUSANDS ", REP47 ;

745 REP41(A,T1)~0;
746
747 REP47(CO,G) = PRODT.L(G,CO) ;
748 REP47(CO,"TOTAL") = SUM(G, REP47(CO,G ;
749 DISPLAY "PRODUCTION; 000 TONS, MILK MILLION LITERS", REP47;
~
750 CO
751 * INCOME AND COST REPORT WITH FINACIAL PRICES 0\
752 * COST COMPONENTS
753 REP47(CQ,T1) = 0 ;
754 REP47("FL-COST" ,G) SUM(M, FAMILYL L(G,M)*WAGE(M) )*LABFAC*1000 ;
755 REP41("HL-COST" ,G) SUM(M, HIREDL.L(G,M) *WAGE(M*1ooo
756 REP47("SEED-COST" ,G) SUM( (C,T,S,W),
757 X.L(G,C,T,S,W)*SYLDS(C,T,S,W,"SEED")*SEEDP(C) );
758 REP47("FERT-COST" ,G) ~ SUM( (C,T,S,W,P2),X.L(G,C,T,S,W)*FERT(C,W,P2)*MISC(P2;
759 REP41("MISCC-COST",G) ~ SUM( (C,T,W), CAT(G,C,T,W)*MISCCT(C,W) );
760 REP47("CNL-W-COST",G) = SUMC,W), SUM(T, CAT(G,C,T,W*CANALCOST(C,W;
761 REP47("TW-OPC" ,"FRESH") = SUM(M, TW.L(M) *MISC("TWOPC"
762 REP47("TW-INVT u ,"FRESH") = ITW.L*MISC("TWINVT")
763 REP47("TR-OPC" ,G) SUM(M, TS.L(G,M)*MISC("TROPC"
764 REP47("TR-INVT" ,G) ITR.L(G)*MISC("TRINVT");
165 REP47C"ANIML-COST",G) = SUM(A, IOLIVE(A,"FIX-COST")*ANIMAL.L(G,A)
766 REP47C-PROT-COST" ,G) = SUM(SEA, PP*PPC.L(G,SEA*1000
767 REP47C"TOTAL-COST",G) = SUM(R2, REP47(R2,G) ) ;
768 * CONVERT ALL COSTS TO MILLIONS OF RUPEES

769 REP47(R2,G) REP47(R2,G)/1ooo;

770 REP47("GPV,G) SUM(CO, FSALEP(CQ)*PRODT.L(G,CO;

771 REP47(-FARM-INC",G) REP47("GPV",G) - SUM(R18, REP47(R18,G)

772 REP47(RR1, "TOTAL") SUM(G, REP47(RR1,G) ) ;

773 DISPLAY "INCOME AND COST(FINANCIAL PRICES MILLION RUPEES)", REP47

774
775 *- REPORT ON PER ACRE AND PER FARM HOUSEHOLD (RUPEES)

776 OPTION REP49:1;

777 REP49(R8,T1)$REP45(T1,"CCA") = REP47(R8,T1)/REP45(T1,"CCA") ,

778 DISPLAY "INCOME AND COST PER ACRE OF CCA(FINACIAL PRICES RUPEES)",REP49;

779
780 REP49(R8,T1) = 0 ;

781 REP49(R8,T1)$REP45(T1,"FARMHH") REP47(R8,T1)*1000/REP45(T1,"FARMHH");

.
 .. ..

JALALPUR CANAL PROJECT (WITHOUT PROJECT FILE: JALAL1) 01/08/90 16:36:56 PAGE 32
COM P I L A T ION GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

782 DISPLAY "INCOME AND COST /FARM HOUSEHOLD(FlNACIAL PRICES RUPEES)" ,REP49;
783 REP49(R8,T1)" 0 ;
784
785 * INCOME AND COST REPORT WITH ECONOMIC PRICES
786 * COST COMPONENTS
787 REP47(CQ,Tt)" 0 ;
788 REP47( HFL-COST" ,G) SUM(M, FAMI LYL. L( G. M)*EWAGE (M) ) *LABFAC* 1000 ;
789 REP47( HHL-COST" ,G) SUM(M, HIREDL. L(G.M) *EWAGE(M) )*1000
790 REP47("SEED-COST" ,G) SUM( (C,T,S,W), X.L(G,C,T,S.W)*
791 SYLDS(C,T,S,W,"SEED")*ESEEDP(C) );
792 REP47("FERT-COST" ,G) SUMC,T,S,W,P2),X.L(G,C,T.S,W)*FERT(C,W,P2)*EMISC(P2;
793 REP47(HMISCC-COST",G) SUM( (C,T,W', CAT(G,C,T,W'*EMISCCT(C,W) );
794 REP47("CNL-W-COST",G) SUM( (C,T,W), CAT(G,C,T,W)*ECANALCOST(C,W;
795 REP47(uTW-OPC" ,"FRESH") = SUM(M, TW.L(M)*EMISC("TWOPC"
796 REP47("TW-INVT" ,"FRESH")" ITW.L*EMISC(uTWINVT")
797 REP47("TR-OPC" ,G) SUM(M. TS.L(G,M)*EMISC("TROPC"
798 REP47("TR-INVT" ,G) ITR.L(G)*EMISC("TRINVT");
799 REP47("ANIML-COST",G) = SUM(A, IOLIVE(A,"FIX-COST")*ANIMAL.L(G,A)
800 REP47("PROT-COST" ,G) " SUM(SEA, EPP*PPC.L(G,SEA*1000
801 REP47("TOTAL-COST" ,G) " SUM(R2. REP47(R2,Gi ) ;
802 * CONVERT ALL COSTS TO MILLIONS OF RUPEES
803 REP47(R2,G) REP47(R2,G)/1oo0;
804 REP47( "GPV" ,G) SUM(CO, ESALEP(CO'*PRODT. L(G,CO) ) ;
805 REP47("VAL-ADDED" ,G, = REP47("GPV",G) -SUM(R17, REP47(R17,G;
lo)
806 REP47(RR1,"TOTAL") SUM(G, REP47(RR1,G)'; Q>
807 DISPLAY "INCOME AND COST(ECONOMIC PRICES MILLION RUPEES)", REP47 .....,
808
809 * REPORT ON PER ACRE AND PER FARM HOUSEHOLD (RUPEES)
810 OPTION REP49:1;
811 REP49(R8,T1)$REP45(T1,"CCA") = REP47(R8,T1)/REP45(T1,"CCA") ,
812 OISPLAY "INCOME AND COST PER ACRE OF CCA(ECONOMIC PRICES RUPEES)",REP49;
813
814 REP49(R8,T1)" 0 ;
815 REP49(R8,T1)$REP45(T1,"FARMHH") = REP47(R8,T1)*1000/REP45(T1,"FARMHH");
816 DISPLAY "INCOME AND COST PER FARM HOUSEHOLD(ECONOMIC RUPEES)", REP49;
817 REP49(R8,T1) = 0 ;
818
819 REP49(M,G) = FAMILYL.L(G,M) ; REP49(M,"TOTAL") " SUM(G, REP49(M,G;
820 REP49(SEA1,T1)" SUM(M$SEA1M(SEA1,M), REP49(M,T1 ;
821 DISPLAY "FAMILY LABOR (MILLION HOURS)", REP49 ;
822
823 REP49(M,G)" HIREDL.L(G,M) ; REP49(M,"TOTAL", = SUM(G. REP49(M,G;
824 REP49(SEA1,T1, = SUM(M$SEA1M(SEA1,M). REP49(M,T1
825 DISPLAY "HIRED LABOR (MILLION HOURS)", REP49 ;
826
827 * REPORT ON WATER BALANCE AT THE ROOT ZONE
828 REP60(G,"WATER-REO",M) = SUM( (C,T,S,W), X.L(G,C,T,S,W)*WATER(C,T,S,W,M) );
829 REP60(G, "RAIN",M) - SUM( (C,T,S,W), MIN(WATER(C,T,S,W,M),EFRZ(M
830 *X.L(G,C,T,S,W) , ;
831 REP60(G,"SUBIRR",M, SUM( (C,T,S,W),
832 MIN( MAX( (WATER(C,T,S,W,M)-EFRZ(M ,0),
833 SUBIRRZ(M)*LAND(C,T,S,W,M) )* X.L(G,C,T,S,W) ) ;
834
835 REP60(G, "CANAL" ,M) " WDIVR.L(G,M)*CNEFF*WCEFF(M)*l000
836 REP60("FRESH","P-TUBEWELL",M," TW.L(M)*TWEFFZ(M)
837 REP60(G,"SLKWATER",M) "SLKWATER.L(G,M)
JALALPUR CANAL PROJECT (WITHOUT PROJECT FILE~ JALALi) 01/08/90 16:36:56 PAGE 33
COM P I L A T ION GAMS 2.21 IBM CMS

838 REP60(G,"TOT-SUPPLY",M) SUM(R4. REP60(G,R4,M) ) ;

839 REP60(G,R3,SEA1) SUM(M$SEA1M(SEA1,M), REP60(G,R3,M)
840 REP60(G.R3,M1) REP60(G,R3,M1)/1ooo
841 REP60(uTOTAL",R3,M1) SUM(G, REP60(G,R3,M1)
842
843 OPTION REP60:3:1:1 ;
844 DISPLAY "WATER BALANCE AT THE ROOT ZONE (MAF)", REP60 ;
845
846 REP60(T1,R3,M) = REP60(T1.R3.M)/WCEFF(M) :
847 REP60(T1,R3,SEA1) = SUM(M$SEA1M(SEA1,M). REP60(T1,R3,M
848
849 DISPLAY "WATER BALANCE AT THE WATERCOURSE HEAD(MAF)"
850 "ROOT ZONE FIGURES ARE REPRESNTED AT THE W/C HEAD USING"
851 "AVERAGE W/C EFFICIENCIES", REP60 ;
852 DISPLAY "AVERAGE WATERCOURSE COMMAND EFFICIENCY", WCEFF;
853 * REPORT ON CANAL DIVERSIONS
854 REP72(M.G) = WDIVR.L(G,M) ;
855 REP72(SEA1.G) = SUM(M$SEA1M(SEA1,M), REP12(M,G :
856 REP72(M1,"TOTAL") = SUM(G, REP12(M1,G ;
857 DISPLAY CANAL WATER FOR PROJECT AT THE CANAL HEAD(MAF)" , REP12
858
859
860 REP47(RR1,T1) =0 ;
861 U)
862 REP47("SEEP-RAIN",G) = SUM(M. ER("RAIN",M)/12)* C
863 RESOURCE(G,"CCA")*(1-DRC)*(1-FLEFFZ)*SPFWF: C
864 REP41("SEEP-PTW","FRESH") = SUM(M, TW.L(M) *(1-TWEFFZ(M) *SPFWF/1ooo
865 REP47("SEEP-GTW,G) = SUM(M, REP60(G."G-TUBEWELL",M)*
866 (1-WCEFF(M )*SPFWF;
867 REP47(SEEP-CANAL",G) = SUM(M, WDIVR.L(G,M)*(1-CNEFF)*SPFC);
868 REP47 ( "SEEP-WCFLD", G) = SUM(M. WDIVR. L( G,M)*CNEFF* ( 1-WCEFF (M *SPFWF) ;
869 REP47( P-TUBWELL", "FRESH") = SUM(M, TW. L(M) )/1000
870 REP47("TOT-INF",G) SUM(R6, REP41(R6,G) )
871 REP47( "TOT-OUTF" ,G) SUM(R1. REP41(R1.G) )
872 REP41("INF-OUTF",G) = REP41("TOT-INF",G) - REP47("TOT-OUTF",G);
873 REP41("P-EVAP-GW",G) = SUM(M, EQEVAPZ(M *RESOURCE(G,"CCA") ;
874 REP41( "EVAP-GW" ,G) MIN( REP47( "P-EVAP-GW" ,G). REP47( "INF-OUTF" ,G) )
875 REP41("EVAP-GW",G)$(REP41("EVAP-GW".G) LT 0 ) = REP47("P-EVAP-GW",G)
876 REP47("BALANCE".G) REP47("INF-OUTF".G) -REP41("EVAP-GW",G)
877 REP47(R9,"TOTAL") = SUM(G. REP47(R9,G) )
878 *
879 OPTION REP47:3;
880 DISPLAY "GROWNDWATER BALANCE(MAF)", REP47
881 REP41(R9,T1) = 0 ;
882
883 OPTION REP41:1
8B4 DISPLAY "OTHER COSTS (MILLION RUPEES.) REP47

COMPILATION TIME 0.490 SECONDS VER: IBM-TB-003

. "

MAP SECTION

11

Arohion
'OfQ' S e 0

\ . HUBDAM

HUB
KARACHI
.,
,I:...
"

,
;
A
,