Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This plan book was created to assist Grand Valley State Universitys Hauenstein Center
in creating a closer relationship with the student population and making more people aware of
what the center is initially about. Over the course of several weeks we have worked with and
studied different strategies and tactics that could work in helping the center with this issue, and
we have attempted in creating new ideas and events that could promote the center in a
student-oriented way.
Within the plan book there are student opinions of the center, a survey template that
served well when collecting information on the student body, the results from a very strong
focus group we conducted, the idea for a possible event that could be put on by the center,
along with a news release and invite for said event. The different mediums brought together in
this book are meant to help lead the center towards a more student filled future, where
GVSUs student body has an awareness and an appreciation for what the Hauenstein Center
brings to campus.
We are truly hoping that this asissts the center in making a stronger connection with
the student body, and helping the students even understand what they can learn even by simply
attending events or browsing the social media the center has. The purpose here is expand the
audience the Hauenstein Center already has, as well as making it more accessible to students
and making it so students feel as though its another place they can go to for any of their
RESEARCH
Secondary Research
References
Moderators Guide
Survey Report
Blank Survey
ACTION PLAN
Situation Analysis
Goal Statement
Objectives
Strategies
Tactics
Budget Table
Evaluation
COMMUNICATION
News Release
Event Invitation
EVALUATION
RESEARCH
Secondary Research.
and tried to navigate around the different links that they offered. The main
links being for their Common Ground Initiative, their Wheelhouse Talks, and
the Cook Leadership academy. All of these pages had very sturdy information
and answered many questions right off the bat, however, it felt very jumbled
available.
social media links and how they interacted with their followers. I felt that
their presence on social media was spread out over many popular mediums,
but I also felt as though they had a very rigid tone wheneve r they posted
their followers on their social media platforms either, which is something that
is extremely important with building relationships for future events and plans.
The listens and views regarding their podcasts were also very
inconsistent; some would have a great audience and discussion, while others
something that will hinder the growth of the cent er, people tend to flock
towards internet content that has more attention and can be applied to their
lives more than not. With that in mind, though, the way the Hauenstein
Center has organized their podcasts seems to have worked overall with how
everything else of theirs is laid out and presented, which keeps that form of
Common Ground Initiative - Hauenstein Center for Presidential Studies. (n.d.). Retrieved April
19, 2017, from http://hauensteincenter.org/common-ground-initiative/
Wheelhouse Talks - Hauenstein Center for Presidential Studies. (n.d.). Retrieved April 19,
2017, from http://hauensteincenter.org/wheelhouse/
Cook Leadership Academy - Hauenstein Center for Presidential Studies. (n.d.). Retrieved April
19, 2017, from http://hauensteincenter.org/cook-leadership-academy/
Center, H. (2017, March 30). Hauenstein Center (@HauensteinGVSU). Retrieved April 19,
2017, from https://twitter.com/HauensteinGVSU
Our focus group took place on Sunday, March 19th at 12:00 pm in the Mary Idema Pew
library, and lasted for approximately a half hour. We successfully had seven participants join us
and answer some questions we had prepared for them in advance, as well as give their opinions
on certain topics that we brought up. When we asked them if they had ever heard of or seen
things on campus related to the Hauenstein center; only two of the participants said that they
had and it was mainly because one was in fact a part of the fellowship program and very
involved with center already, and the other has a friend involved in the fellowship program and
discusses it frequently.
To kick off the questions we had prepared, we started by asking about their previous
knowledge of U.S. presidents and politics in general in the States. All of them agreed that
having intensive knowledge of past presidents accomplishments and policies is not necessary in
forming your own political opinion, but it is still an important aspect of U.S. history. When
answering the question about who they thought cared the most about modern politics the
majority decided that Political Science majors cared the most, even though people who are not
a part of that major are still exposed to politics every day on social media and in the news.
We then decided to ask our participants about leadership positions, what they think
makes a good leader, and if they themselves hold any sort of leadership type positions for any
organizations. One participant said they were running to become the station manager for
GVTV on campus, another said that they are going to run for the role of president for their
improv team, and another said that they hold a leadership position for some conferences that
their organization puts on sometimes. All agreed that learning skills to become a better leader
would benefit them in the long run and give them more confidence to do what they needed to
get done in their campaigns. When asked why they stayed with their student organizations for
the past couple years, all of the participants who are involved with something on campus said
that they initially joined a club for the purpose of being interested in it but stayed for the people
We then moved the discussion towards the area of going to speaker events and what
would make them interested to go, whether it be a cool looking flier posted on campus or by
word of mouth from someone they knew. Majority agreed that having an interesting flier helps
with getting people to go to an event; an example would be that one of the participants said
they saw a flier for a Christian retreat camp and their flier was styled like a vintage horror
movie, the participant said that they were not religious of any sort but if they were they would
have gone to that camp. Another participant mentioned that fliers dont exactly do the trick
for them because there are so many posted around campus. However, if someone they know
told them that the event would be beneficial they would consider going a little more than they
had before. The bigger motivator to get people to go to events is to tell them that they would
get something out of it; resume building experience, free food, etc.
To close our discussion on a balanced note we decided to ask about the Common
Ground Initiative, and if they enjoyed political discussion among their friend groups. Three of
the participants said yes while the remaining participants said they try to avoid political
discussion at all costs. The three who said they enjoy political discussion among friends
followed up by saying they all have different viewpoints from their friends but are still able to
have calm conversations, which is what makes it so appealing to them. Once it starts getting
into a political argument they begin to lose interest and find it to be too aggressive. The
remaining people who said they dislike any political discussion at all followed up by saying that
too many issues and too complicated, and that it is easier to find out new information by
themselves online. However, all participants found the basis of the Common Ground Initiative
to be appealing to them. Having a source where certain issues can be spoken about in a calm
I found that our focus group had a lot of diversity spread among it: people who were a
part of fraternities/sororities, people who were more driven by art or driven by science, people
who enjoyed politics and those who did not, as well as other varying factors. The participants
gave very clear answers as to what they would like to see on campus more and I feel as though
that was extremely beneficial to figure out how to cater to the mindset of GVSUs
campus. The center could one hundred percent benefit from having such a diverse and young
audience, the trick is being able to appeal to that sort of range of students. By creating events
that benefit students and give them a takeaway, as well as making interesting and aesthetically
pleasing fliers, I believe the Hauenstein Center would have a much bigger audience for the
The general disposition of political discussion in our participants was that they need to
be with the correct people and truly be at the civil discourse level of discussion. If the
Hauenstein Center capitalized more on telling students that they events they put on are more
of a discussion between two parties instead of a standard argument I feel as though that would
catch more peoples attentions, as well as even get more students involved with what the
center does. Students at GVSU do have an interest in politics and leadership roles in the
community, but they need someone to show them on a base level how they can get involved
and how it can be applied to their majors and/or life. I feel as though if the Hauenstein Center
can present itself in a way that is desirable to students it wont have any trouble getting to
recognition it deserves.
Our focus group elicited some more in depth questions for our survey that we created,
such as asking about interest in politics or the knowledge students have about current issues
happening in our world today. For the most part, however, our survey stays within similar
guidelines to how our moderator's guide was set up for our focus group because of how
successful our questions were for that specific task. We feel as though some people may also
be more comfortable answering these types of questions from behind a screen, rather than
talking directly to us face-to-face. Were hoping that at least half of the students we send our
survey out to will respond to us with useful information and well put together answers.
All in all, I feel as though my group did a good job of articulating the important parts
about the Hauenstein Center, briefly educating our participants on what the center is, making
them comfortable enough to answer honestly and give more in depth answers, and being open
to the idea of attending some of the events the center puts on. That within itself was a big part
of our focus group and continued to be a main theme throughout it and also throughout our
survey we created. I will stand by my conclusion that if the center promotes Common
Ground, leadership skills as something to take away from an event, and modernizing their ways
to reach out to students; they should be able to successfully create a younger audience
awareness and hopefully someday turn those audience members into donors.
MODERATOR'S GUIDE
Hello everyone, my name is _____ and I will be the moderator for this focus group. We are
here today to talk about your awareness of The Hauenstein Center for Presidential Studies at
GVSU. This is a GVSU center that hosts several workshops with outside speakers, has a
leadership academy for student leaders, and works towards creating a common ground political
initiative. We are conducting this research for the fundamentals of Public Relations course at
Grand Valley, and hope to use the findings in order to develop a plan book with ideas of how
best the center can increase awareness for the center. I am not here to share information, or
to give you opinions as each of your experiences and opinions are what we hope to gather a
better understanding of. There are no right or wrong, desirable or undesirable answers. You
can disagree with one another, and you can change your mind. Please feel comfortable sharing
what you really think, how you really feel, and your personal interpretations or understanding.
Stephanie will be taking notes and tape recording the discussion so that we do not miss
anything you have to say. Everything is confidential. No one will know who said what. And this
the group without waiting to be called on but be respectful throughout the process. The
Let's start by having everyone share their name, their major, class standing, and if or when they
had first heard of The Hauenstein Center and if you have heard of it before what do you know
about it?
Presidential Knowledge
1. How much previous knowledge do you have about the men that have currently served
2. Do you think knowing about past presidents accomplishments and policies is necessary
3. What type of people do you believe are typically concerned with the history behind
4. Does anyone know what the Cook Leadership Academy is or have they heard of it
2. Has anyone or does anyone currently hold any leadership positions within an
Common Ground
1. Have you ever gone to any speaker event on campus/outside campus? Please describe
3. What do you think is the most important political issue at the moment?
4. Do you enjoy debating politics with your friends? Do they have similar views to yours?
5. How often to you expose yourself to news sources or outlets? Which do you prefer
and why?
7. What you drive you to learn more about political viewpoints that differ from your own?
Though there were many different responses concerning _______, it appears that _______.
Does anyone see it differently? It seems most of you agree that ______, but some think that
Is there any other information regarding your experiences with or following this experience
Thank you very much for spending your time with us today- it is very much appreciated and
Our survey results went very much hand in hand with our focus group results: not many
people knew about the Hauenstein Center, people had joined only a couple clubs/organizations
their freshman year and decided to stick with it, people did not attend events all the time at
GVSU, etc. In my opinion, having both sets of results so closely related is a good thing because
it definitely makes creating our action plans pretty simple. We each get to focus on our original
ideas and plans for the Center without having to change much because of the pretty large
overlap of responses. By having this overlap we can also see that many students feel the same
way about this topic, which also makes it simple to infer that the majority of the student body
I believe that because 58% of our respondents told us that they attend GVSU events less
than five times a semester we should focus a substantial portion of the action plan to convincing
and getting people interested in events on campus (mainly focusing on the Hauenstein Center
and how their lectures are extremely beneficial to students). Since our results for how many
years our respondents have attended GVSU, one to two years versus three to four years, we
can spend less time trying to figure out how to cater to each age group and have a more broad
spectrum of ideas. We can start the action plan by coming up with ways to appeal to the
general student and figuring out how to convince him or her why Hauenstein lectures would
affect them in the long run and why they should attend in the first place.
Students told us that they mainly attend GVSU events if they either fulfill a requirement
for a class or if a friend is attending as well and convinces them to go. This sort of situation is
not entirely ideal for the center because some, if not most, of the lectures do not count
towards any classes here on campus. This does not completely wipe out the idea of getting
students to attend more events, however, we do need to stress more heavily on what students
will get out of the Hauenstein Center's lectures. If students feel as if they are benefitting from a
speaker or discussion they are more likely to attend, and many of these lectures the center
organizes would largely benefit students if more of them were aware of the center in the first
place.
Pretty much all of the students who took our survey held some sort of leadership
position in the organization/club they were involved with on campus. This creates a perfect
opportunity to capitalize on telling students how attending Hauenstein lectures will improve
their leadership skills for the clubs they are a part of and in the future as well, this can also lead
to further involvement with the center on the students part if they do indeed find these
lectures to be valuable to their skill sets. From the sorts of students I know in real life, this will
be no trouble at all because almost all of them try to find new ways to become better leaders
for the people in their organizations. In our survey it looked as if many students held higher up
positions in clubs which works in our favor, because I know many students in those sorts of
positions want to do their best and improve any skills they have as a leader in order to make a
good impression on new members they pick up from Campus Life Night or elsewhere.
When we asked people how they felt about discussing/hearing about politics our
answers varied very greatly; 47% of people said sometimes and only 16% said yes. I believe
that if we show how the Hauenstein Center has established their Common Ground Initiative
more students will see that as an opportunity to hear a civil discourse about various political
issues, which is very interesting to a lot of people. Personally, I also find it difficult to talk about
politics sometimes so the Common Ground Initiative that the center has established is very
interesting to me, and I have no doubt it will sound interesting to other students around
campus and possibly in the downtown area as well. By having more students aware of this
initiative it will increase positive awareness for the center and bring more interested students
into their lectures and discussions, and hopefully at some point their donor program as well.
I believe that by focusing on getting students more interested in on campus events and speakers
that it will improve the audience demographic for the Hauenstein Center in the long run. Re-
vamping announcement fliers may help catch the attention of some students, but I also feel that
the center should try and connect with students on a personal level. How will this benefit
them, personally? What will they get out of it that will help them in their own lives? Even by
simply targeting the E-boards of certain clubs could be enough to motivate those students to
attend a lecture done by the center. Stemming from our results we can guess that a lot of
students from all sorts of majors and programs would be interested in these sorts of lectures
and discussions, the center needs to know its demographic a little bit better in order to appeal
All in all, I believe that our survey results stayed true to our focus group and to the
information we were trying to convey in the first place. We had one hundred respondents and
came up with varied answers, diverse people with varying opinions, and enough information to
give us a basis on what we should do to help the Hauenstein Center reach the student
population, With the results we gathered our action plans will reflect how we decided to use
our information, and I believe the best way is to focus on personally connecting with the
students so they can build a bond with the center while at GVSU.
DRAFT SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
1 Thank you for agreeing to take part in this survey that measures student awareness about the GVSU
Hauenstein Center for Presidential Studies! A group of students in CAP 220 (Fundamentals of Public
Relations) course will be gathering your responses in order to develop a plan to increase student
awareness of the center in the future. This survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete!
Condition: I do not attend GVSU Is Selected. Skip To: Thank you so much for contributing yo....
None (1)
One (2)
Two (3)
Three (4)
Four+ (5)
Condition: None Is Selected. Skip To: Have you heard of the Cook Leadership....
7 What organizations are you a part of and what year did you join them?
8 Have you in the past, or do you currently hold any leadership roles?
No (1)
Yes (1)
No (2)
10 How often do you attend GVSU events? i.e. lectures, meetings, seminars, etc.
Never (1)
11 How do you typically hear about events that you have attended on campus or off? (1- Most Often; 7-
Least Often)
12 What influences you to attend an event? (1- Large Influence; 7- Small Influence)
______ The event has been promoted by an organization you are a part of. (4)
Yes (1)
Sometimes (2)
No (3)
Yes (1)
No (2)
Condition: No Is Selected. Skip To: Thank you so much for contributing yo....
E-Mail (1)
Mail (2)
In class (4)
16 Thank you so much for contributing your time and energy into taking this survey! We know your
There is a need for more student awareness, interaction, and interest in what the
Hauenstein Center does at the university. Many students are unaware that there is such an
incredible resource for them on campus, and are failing to utilize the many facets it brings to
Grand Valley. The Hauenstein Center is in need of a reboot in how they attempt to get their
information across to the student body and truly get the attention of students who could
The center itself has been working towards achieving more student awareness, but
falling short in some areas for reasons unknown. This has proved frustrating for some, because
of the intellectual benefits in offers to GVSUs campus. So many students are unaware of what
Goal Statement.
We want to make students aware of what the center does for the school and what they
offer to the student body by providing ways for them to interact with the staff and feel as
though they can ask any sort of questions they have about what the Hauenstein Center truly is
about.
Objectives.
Getting more of the student body aware of the center by the end of 2017.
Trying to get 25% more students involved with the events the center puts on.
Strategies.
o Creating visuals that attract students is important in having them feel as though
the center understands what theyre going through and how they talk to one
another.
o Getting students to open these types of emails is tricky because of the sheer
amount of emails they receive already, however, making it about an event where
their voice can be heard has a good chance of catching their interest.
o Having an event such as Coffee With Gleaves can get the center published in
Tactics.
Plan a casual event for students to get to know the center on a non-committal basis.
o Coffee With Gleaves is meant to be an event that has the student bodys
interests and concerns in mind: coffee and being able to freely express questions
be inclined to actually read what the email has to say in the first place.
o A news release is a classic way in getting information out to the public as soon as
Budget Table:
Overall, the action plan stated above is one of small scale research; however, it can be
applied to a larger scale and influence many other types of people. The different aspects of the
action plan are to assist in planning various events, dates, workshops, etc. Tactics and
strategies are bullet points any person can lengthen or sway in any type of direction, the
The objectives stated in the action plan are listed to guide the center in a certain
direction, they play a key role in progressing the success and overall awareness of center. Each
objective is unique in its own way and should be evaluated as such. In order to properly
identity the methods to evaluate each objective, strategy, and tactic people will have to create a
Strategies and tactics should be looked over to see if they have been met completely, or
even just a small percentage. These two ways of fulfilling the objectives are what serve the true
purpose of putting together this plan book, and using them to cater to the student body. The
details of this entire section are few and far between since the theme of this book is very
similar and consistent throughout, the center truly needs to take action on the issues they face.
In the next segment of this plan book, we will find our tactics planned out in their
physical forms and how these could affect student perceptions of the center. We are hoping
that these ideas can help redesign the student appeal of the Hauenstein Center and that more
(616) 331-2770
hc@gvsu.edu
Gleaves Whitney will be hosting a coffee social in order to connect with students and
answer any questions they have regarding the Hauenstein Center. This event will be a major
play off of the Ask Gleaves seminars the center holds every month. The event will take place
on September 30th, 2017 in the Grand River Room of Kirkhoff Center at 10 a.m. and will go
until 1 p.m.
This causal spin on their otherwise serious seminars will be a chance for students to find
out details about the center and even ask questions about politics. Coffee and snacks will be
provided by the Grand Rapids coffee house, Common Ground. Students will be encouraged to
Tweet, Snapchat, and Instagram the event with the hashtag: #CoffeeWithGleaves.
The Hauenstein Center is a Grand Valley organization that focuses on political matters
and presidential studies; their center is divided into the Common Ground Initiative, the Cook
Leadership Academy, and the Wheelhouse Lectures. Their most present goal is to raise
effective leaders with political and ethical understanding of the world around them.
This news release is meant to be a simple and informative way to get the idea of the event out into the
student body, and explain how it could potentially benefit students to attend.
The event invite is a lighthearted and casual way to catch the students attention
and make them feel a sense of community and drive to attend; its goal purpose is
to act as a creative outlet for the center.
This email template for the event is a warm way to invite students to
attend and to come with any sorts of questions theyve had related to the
center and/or politics themselves. It lets students know about what is to
be expected as well as what is to be provided.
Evaluation.
If the tools provided are in fact used by the center, measuring the effects and success of
the campaign are necessary in discovering if these tactics did serve as useful. By asking the
questions: did we increase student awareness? Are more students involved with what we do?
Have we made more students interested in the events that we put on as a center? By
measuring those sorts of statistics, we can truly delve into the answers of whether or not we
were successful.
Our first objective is to get more students aware and involved with the center by the
end of 2017. In order to calculate if we succeeded in this area, we need to look at how many
students are interested in the different services provided. How many have emailed/called/met
with someone about the Cook Leadership Academy? Have views risen in the podcasts
The second objective is to boost the amount of students that attend events the center
puts on by 25%. This is the easiest objective to measure because all we need to look for is that
rise in student numbers during a lecture/debate/etc. In order to truly measure whether or not
there was an increase, considering a sign in chart for certain events where people need to state
what year they are or already graduated would benefit the center in identifying their main
crowd.
If the objectives are not met and there is not a significant rise in student awareness or
activity with the center, different approaches should be taken in editing these tactics/strategies.
We need to create new and improved event ideas for students to be interested in, offer a more
beneficial takeaway for students, and really target that sense of community the center is striving