Higit Pa Susunod na Blog Bumuo ng Blog

Case Digest for the Shiftless

Thursday, May 26, 2016 Search This Blog

ADELIO C. CRUZ vs. QUITERIO L. DALISAY S

ADELIO C. CRUZ vs. QUITERIO L. DALISAY

Case Digests
Adm. Matter No. R-181-P July 31, 1987
2016 (56)
Facts: June 2016 (10)
1. Respondent sheriff attached and/or levied the money belonging to complainant Cruz when he was not May 2016 (27)
himself the judgment debtor in the final judgment of NLRC Case sought to be enforced but rather the EMILIO CANO ENTERPRISES,
company known as "Qualitrans Limousine Service, Inc.," a duly registered corporation. INC. vs. COURT OF INDUSTR...

2. Respondent Dalisay explained that when he garnished complainant's cash deposit at the Philtrust bank, Avelina G. Ramosoet. Al vs. Court of
Appeals
he was merely performing a ministerial duty. While it is true that said writ was addressed to Qualitrans
Limousine Service, Inc., yet it is also a fact that complainant had executed an affidavit before the TAN BOON BEE & CO., INC. vs.
THE HONORABLE HILARIO...
Pasay City assistant fiscal stating that he is the owner/president of said corporation and, because of
NATIONAL MARKETING
that declaration, the counsel for the plaintiff in the labor case advised him to serve notice of CORPORATION (NAMARCO)
garnishment on the Philtrust bank. vs. ASSOC...
ADELIO C. CRUZ vs. QUITERIO
Issue: L. DALISAY
Whether or not the act of Dalisay is justified LUXURIA HOMES, INC., and/or
AIDA M. POSADAS vs. HO...
Ruling: FRANCISCO MOTORS
CORPORATION vs. COURT OF
APPEALS
The tenor of the NLRC judgment and the implementing writ is clear enough. It directed
Qualitrans Limousine Service, Inc. to reinstate the discharged employees and pay them full BUENAFLOR C. UMALI vs. court
of appeals
backwages. Respondent, however, chose to "pierce the veil of corporate entity" usurping a power
TRADERS ROYAL BANK vs.
belonging to the court and assumed improvidently that since the complainant is the owner/president of COURT OF APPEALS
Qualitrans Limousine Service, Inc., they are one and the same. It is a well settled doctrine both in law ARB CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.,
and in equity that as a legal entity, a corporation has a personality distinct and separate from its and MARK MOLINA vs. CO...
individual stockholders or members. The mere fact that one is president of a corporation does not ADALIA B. FRANCISCO and
render the property he owns or possesses the property of the corporation, since the president, as MERRYLAND DEVELOPMENT
CORP...
individual, and the corporation are separate entities.
Lim vs. CA

Posted by hashy tags Case Digest at 1:06 AM PHILIPPINE LONG DISTANCE

TELEPHONE CO. [PLDT] vs. ...
Labels: ADELIO C. CRUZ vs. QUITERIO L. DALISAY, case digest, corporation law
Tatad vs. Garcia
COMETA and STATE
No comments: INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. vs.
COURT ...
ACME SHOE, RUBBER &
Post a Comment PLASTIC CORPORATION and
CHUA P...
WEST COAST LIFE INSURANCE
CO. vs. GEO. N. HURD
Enter your comment... PHILIPPINE COMMERCIAL
INTERNATIONAL BANK
(formerly...
SERGIO F. NAGUIAT vs.
NATIONAL LABOR
Comment as: Google Account RELATIONS COM...
PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK vs.
THE COURT OF APPEALS
Publish Preview
HARRY S. STONEHILL, ROBERT
P. BROOKS, JOHN J. BROO...
CHARLES W. MEAD vs. E. C.
McCULLOUGH, ET AL., and ...
Newer Post Home Older Post
CIR vs kudos
PIONEER INSURANCE &
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom) SURETY CORPORATION vs.
THE HON...
SAN JUAN STRUCTURAL AND
STEEL FABRICATORS, INC.
vs...
BIBIANO O. REYNOSO, IV vs.
HON. COURT OF APPEALS
PHILIPPINE STOCK EXCHANGE,
INC. vs. THE HONORABLE ...

April 2016 (2)

January 2016 (17)

2015 (6)
2014 (47)

About Me

hashy tags Case Digest

View my complete profile

anything you want Labels

us to digest?
108811
 1967
Unsupported
1978
feature:
[analytics] 1983

1984

1987

1988

199

1990

1991
Total Pageviews 1992

1994

1997
39,847 1999

2003

2004

2005

2007

2008

2010

2011

2012

2014

2014 ]

ABSCBN
BROADCASTIN
CORPORATION
HONORABLE C
OF APPEALS

ACAIN vs. HON

INTERMEDIAT
APPELLATE CO

ACME SHOE vs
COURT OF APP

ACQUITTED

ADALIA B.
FRANCISCO an
MERRYLAND
DEVELOPMEN
CORPORATION
RITA C. MEJIA

ADELIO C. CRU
QUITERIO L.
DALISAY

Adonis Aradillos
Albino Galabo vs
of Appeals

ALBINO JOSEF
OTELIO SANTO

alhambra cigar v

ALVIN JOSE vs.

PEOPLE OF TH
PHILIPPINES

and LUISA DE L
ROSA MENDOZ

and MARK MOL

vs. COURT OF
APPEALS

and THE PHILIP

ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTIO
COMPANY

and/or AIDA M.
POSADAS vs.
HONORABLE C
OF APPEALS

ANDREW HARV

APOLINARIO
GONZALES vs.
HONORABLE C
OF APPEALS

ARB
CONSTRUCTIO

article 1332

article 1345

Avelina G. Ramo
Al vs. Court of A

AVELINO
CASUPANAN a
ROBERTO CAP
vs. MARIO LLA
LAROYA

AZNAR vs.
CHRISTENSEN
DUNCAN

balite vs lim

BANCO DE OR
REPUBLIC OF T
PHILIPPINES

benjamin dacana

BIBIANO O.
REYNOSO

borjal vs ca

Brunet vs guaren

BUENAFLOR C
UMALI vs. cour
appeals

carmelo vs peopl

case digest

case igest

cases

casupan vs. laroy

cebu contractors

CECILIO MEND
vs. THE HONOR
COURT OF APP

CHAN SAU WA
FU YAN FUN vs
MARTINIANO V

CHARLES W. M
vs. E. C.
McCULLOUGH

CILIA T. MORIN
HUSBAND vs. C
OF APPEALS an
ABDON GILIG
No. 108532 Marc

CIR vs kudos cas

digest

civil code

civil law

code of professio
responsibility

COMETA and ST
INVESTMENT T

cometa vs ca

conflict of law

conflict of laws

constitution

constitutional law

constitutional rig

CONSUELAO T
SANTOS-GUER
and ANDRES
GUERRERO

contract

contract of adhes

contracts

corporation law

Cresencio vs peo

criminal aw

criminal case

criminal due proc

criminal law

Criminal law cas

criminal procedu

criminal procedu

CRISOLOGO

DE PEREZ vs.
GARCHITOREN

deed of sale

dela cruz vs sison

deoble jeopardy

Dizon vs cabucan

DIZON-RIVERA
ESTELA DIZON

Dominguez vs ag

double jeopardy

election law

EMILIO CANO
ENTERPRISES

ENRIQUE
SALAFRANCA
PHILAMLIFE
(PAMPLONA)
VILLAGE

ESTEBAN MOR
ET AL

ET AL.

Evangeline Lado
People of the
Philippines

February 17

Figueras vs jimen

FLORANTE F.
MANACOP vs. C
OF APPEALS an
MERCANTILE

FRANCISCO
MOTORS
CORPORATION
COURT OF APP

freedom of expre

freedom of the pr

G.R. No. 100468

G.R. No. 107199

G.R. No. 108811

G.R. No. 117890

September 18

G.R. No. 123298

November 27

G.R. No. 126466

g.r. No. 128096

G.R. No. 132537

October 14

G.R. No. 134787

G.R. No. 141882

G.R. No. 144463

January 14

G.R. No. 145391

G.R. No. 162052

January 13

G.R. No. 164584

G.R. No. 165060

November 27

G.R. No. 168660

G.R. No. 172263

G.R. No. 172697

September 25

G.R. No. 174016

G.R. No. 179859

G.R. No. 181701

January 18

G.R. No. 185920

20

G.R. No. 189328

February 21

g.r. No. 190175

G.R. No. 191721

January 12

G.R. No. 198756

G.R. No. 205015

G.R. No. 50720 M

26

G.R. No. 71092

G.R. No. 72706

G.R. No. 81756

G.R. No. 82544 J

G.R. No. 86355 M

G.R. No. 88232

G.R. No. 93239 M

18

G.R. No. 95902

February 4

G.R. No. 97898 A

11

G.R. No. L-1387

G.R. No. L-1955

G.R. No. L-2219

30

G.R. No. L-2310

24

G.R. No. L-2344

G.R. No. L-2436

G.R. No. L-2456

G.R. No. L-2715

18
G.R. No. L-3170

G.R. No. L-4197

G.R. No. L-4779

G.R. No. L-5784

G.R. No.135619
15

G.R. Nos. 14037

Gr 102485

Gr 128574

Gr 133643

Gr 3580

gr no 110672

Gr no 163770

gr no l-55201

gr no l-65366

GR no. 141066

Grace Christian H
School vs. CA

HARRY S.
STONEHILL

in behalf of the A
BASES COALIT
(ABC) vs. RAMO
BAGATSING G.
L-65366 Novemb

INC

INC.

INC. and JORGE

RAGUTANA

INC. vs. COURT

APPEALS

INC. vs. COURT

INDUSTRIAL
RELATIONS

INC. vs. THE

HONORABLE
HILARION U.
JARENCIO

innocent purchas

IV vs. HON. CO
OF APPEALS

J.L.T. AGRO

JOHN J. BROOK
KARL BECK vs
JOSE W. DIOKN

JOHN SHERMA
ADRIAAN VAN
ELSHOUT vs.
HONORABLE
COMMISSIONE
MIRIAM DEFEN
SANTIAGO

JOSE B.L. REYE

JOSE MODEQU
vs. HON. AUGU
BREVA FRANC
SALINAS

JOSE TANEO

jose vs people

JR.

JR. and DORIS A

KELLEY vs.
PLANTERS
PRODUCTS

JUANITA TRINI
RAMOS vs. DAN
PANGILINAN

Lacson vs. Execu

secretary

LAND BANK O
PHILIPPINES V

land titles and de

LAUREANO
INVESTMENT &
DEVELOPMEN
CORPORATION
THE HONORAB
COURT OF APP
and BORMAHE

legal ethics

LEONARDO
CADEMAS AND
DOMINADOR
SORELA

Lim vs ca

Lim vs. CA

Loyola Grand vs
LUXURIA HOM

MA. MIMIE
CRESCENCIO V
PEOPLE OF TH
PHILIPPINES

MANINANG vs
COURT OF APP

MARY JOSEPH
GOMEZ and EU
SOCORRO C.
GOMEZ-SALCE
ROEL

MATTHEWS vs
TAYLOR

MEAD vs. E. C.
McCULLOUGH

naguit vs nlrc

NATIONAL
MARKETING
CORPORATION
(NAMARCO) vs
ASSOCIATED
FINANCE COM

NENA T. CATUB
and HUSBAND

NERI

NESTOR MEDIC

NICANOR T. SA
vs. COURT OF
APPEALS

Nicodemes Silva
Presiding Judge

NOEL and JANN

BEVERLY STA.
and HINAHON S
INES

November 12

November 15

November 19

NUGUID vs. NU

obligation and co

obligations and c

October 21

Ons vs delos san

ORENDAIN vs.
TRUSTEESHIP
THE ESTATE O
MARGARITA
RODRIGUEZ

PABLITO TANE

PCIB vs CA

PEOPLE OF TH
PHILIPPINES

PEOPLE OF TH
PHILIPPINES an
IMELDA CARA

PEOPLE OF TH
PHILIPPINES vs
ARNOLD PELIS

PEOPLE OF TH
PHILIPPINES vs
RODRIGUEZA

PEOPLE OF TH
PHILIPPINES vs
EDISON SUCRO

PEOPLE OF TH
PHILIPPINES vs
EDUARDO
DOLLENDO AN
NESTOR MEDIC

PEOPLE OF TH
PHILIPPINES V
EDWIN CABRE
G.R. No. 190175

PEOPLE OF TH
PHILIPPINES vs
FRANCISCO L.
CALPITO

People of the
Philippines vs. R
Villanueva y Mar

PEOPLE OF TH
PHILIPPINES vs
ROGELIO DOL
y ESTRADA

People vs cabrera

people vs cabrera
digest

people vs eduarte

people vs tampal

people vs. marti

People vs. Rodrig

persons and fami

relation

petition for revie

certiorari

PHILIPPINE
COMMERCIAL
INTERNATIONA
BANK) vs. COU
APPEALS

PHILIPPINE LO
DISTANCE
TELEPHONE C
[PLDT] vs. THE
NATIONAL
TELECOMMUN
ONS COMMISS
AND CELLCOM

PHILIPPINE
NATIONAL BAN
THE COURT OF
APPEALS

PIONEER
INSURANCE &
SURETY
CORPORATION
THE HON. COU
APPEALS

pioneer vs ca

PISONARCEO
AGRICULTURA
DEVELOPMEN
CORPORATION
NLRC and NATI
FEDERATION O
SUGAR
WORKERSFOO
GENERAL TRA

Pita vs ca

PLAINTIFF-
APPELLEE

PMI COLLEGES
vs.NLRC

pnb vs ca

property

PSE vs. CA

ra 9165

resume practice o

Reyes vs bagatsin

reyes vs bagatsin
digest

reynoso vs ca

ROBERT P. BRO

Romeo Posadas v

ROMULO
VILLAROJO

Ruiz vs ca

Rural bank of sta

vs ca

sale

SAN JUAN
STRUCTURAL
STEEL FABRIC

san juan structura

vs ca

SANTIAGO vs.
SANTIAGO

sarming vs dy

SEANGIO vs. R

search and seizur

SENATOR ROB
JAWORSKI vs.
PHILIPPINE
AMUSEMENT A
GAMING
CORPORATION
SPORTS AND G
ENTERTAINME
CORPORATION

September 30

SERGIO F. NAG
vs. NATIONAL
LABOR RELAT
COMMISSION

SEVERINO C.
BALTAZAR vs.
PEOPLE OF TH
PHILIPPINES an
ARMANDO C.
BAUTISTA

Social weather st
comelec

social weather sta

comelec case dig
 SOLANO vs. TH
COURT OF APP

SORIANO MAT
HON. JOSEPHIN
BAYONA

SPOUSES AUTH
KELLEY

stonehill vs diokn

succession

SY vs. Tyson.
corporation law

TAN BOON BEE

CO.

Tatad vs. Garcia

taxation

THE PEOPLE O
PHILIPPINES vs
NORMANDO D
ROSARIO Y LO
G.R. No. 109633
20

TRADERS ROY
BANK vs. COUR
APPEALS

ugdoracion vs co

universal robina

vs. AKUTIN

VS. ANACLETO
OLVIS

VS. ANTONIO
BALANSAG

vs. DR. MANUE

SINGSON

WEST COAST L
INSURANCE CO
GEO. N. HURD

Ethereal theme. Theme images by Jason Morrow. Powered by Blogger.