PRESENTATION ON

A Comparative Study of
Static and Response Spectrum
Analysis
of a RC Building
TAMEEM SAMDANEE 10.01.03.127

JOHINUL ALAM 10.01.03.036

MD. ZAHIDUL ISLAM 10.01.03.142

ABU SYED MD. TARIN 10.01.03.020

UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF

ZASIAH TAFHEEM
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, AUST
 To determine the natural period of vibrations for different mode shapes of
the comprehensive 3D using modal analysis techniques.

To determine the storey-displacements and storey-drifts for each storey of

a six storied building.

To determine the base shears of the building under seismic loading.

To determine the column shear forces and bending moments following the
Equivalent Static Force Method (BNBC93) and Response Spectrum
Analysis (Dynamic) using a comprehensive 3D finite element software
package ETABS v13.0

To make a comparative study of the results obtained from the static and
dynamic analysis.
 In this study, a 3D symmetric model of a six-
storied building has been created using ETABS
V-13.0

The structure has a constant stiffness and a

linear behavior of all material properties.

Equivalent Static Force Method (BNBC93) has

been used for static analysis.

Response Spectrum Method has been used for

dynamic analysis.
Earthquake is a series of vibrations induced
in the earths crust by the abrupt rupture and
rebound of rocks in which elastic strain has
been slowly accumulating.

The release of the energy results in vibratory

waves propagating through the surface in all
directions.
Factors affecting the earthquake performance
of reinforced concrete structure:

Ductility Capacity
Effects of Drifts
P-Delta effect
Effects of strong Beams and weak
Columns
 Static Analysis

Response
Spectrum Analysis

Time History
Method
 It assumes that the building responds in its
fundamental mode.

The building must be low-rise and must not

twist significantly when the ground moves.

Generally determines the shear acting due

to an earthquake as equivalent static base
shear.
 The basic mode superposition method.

Restricted to linearly elastic analysis.

Produces the complete time history

response of joint displacements and
member forces.

Involves the calculation of only the

maximum values of the displacements and
member forces.
 It is an analysis of the dynamic response
of the structure at each increment of time,
when its base is subjected to a specific
ground motion time history.
 Material Properties
Material Name Parameter Values Unit
Mass per unit volume 4.662 lb-s2/ft4

Weight per unit volume 150 lb/ft3

Modulus of Elasticity 3604996.5 psi

Concrete
Poissons ratio 0.2

Concrete compressive 3500 psi

strength,

Steel Steel yield strength, 60000 psi

 Section Properties
Section ID Section Size (inin)
Corner Column 1212
Ext. Column 1414

Int. Column 1717

Beam 1612
Grade Beam, GB 1612

Slab Properties
Section name Thickness Type
Membrane: 5"
Slab Shell
Bending: 5"
3D View of the building
Beam Layout
Column Layout
Deformed Shape (Static)
Due to EQX Load
Deformed Shape (Dynamic)
Due to Response Spectrum
 Mode Shapes
Mode Name Time Period Frequencies
Mode 1 2.436 0.41
Mode 2 2.34 0.42
Mode 3 2.29 0.43
Mode 4 0.704 1.42
Mode 5 0.679 1.47
Mode 6 0.657 1.52
Mode 7 0.374 2.67
Mode 8 0.359 2.78
Mode 9 0.351 2.84
Mode 10 0.245 4.08
Mode 11 0.233 4.29
Mode 12 0.231 4.32
 Mode Shapes
Mode- 1 Mode- 2
 Mode Shapes
Mode- 3 Mode- 4
 Mode Shapes
Mode- 5 Mode- 6
 Mode Shapes
Mode- 7 Mode- 8
 Mode Shapes
Mode- 9 Mode- 10
 Mode Shapes
Mode- 11 Mode- 12
Comparative Study
Storey Displacements
Comparative Study
Storey Drifts
 Comparative Study
Maximum Storey Displacement
Comparative Study
Base Shears
 Comparative Study
Shear Forces (Corner Columns)
 Comparative Study
Shear Forces (Exterior Columns)
 Comparative Study
Shear Forces (Interior Columns)
Comparative Study
Maximum Shear Forces
Comparative Study
Total Shear Forces
 Comparative Study
Bending Moments (Corner Columns)
 Comparative Study
Bending Moments (Exterior Columns)
 Comparative Study
Bending Moments (Interior Columns)
 Comparative Study
Maximum Column Bending Moments
 In the study of Maximum displacement of storey
comparison between static and dynamic, we find
dynamic is 276 percent of static analysis.
In the study of Storey drift comparison between
static and dynamic, we find dynamic is 301 percent
of static analysis.
In the study of Maximum Bending moment of
column, the percentage of dynamic is 204% for
corner, 239% for exterior, 210% for interior of
Static analysis.
In the study of Maximum shear forces of columns,
dynamic is almost 286 percent of static analysis for
all columns.
 Dynamic analysis may be done by other methods.
Structures of nonlinear materials may be
introduced for further analysis and design.
Irregular shaped structure may be introduced for
further analysis and design.
Dynamic analysis may be introduced for further
analysis and design.
Commercial buildings may be introduced for
further analysis and design.
THANK YOU