Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Natural fnemies
James C. Cokendolpher and Plamen G. Mitov
lthough this chapter is titled ''Natural Enemies." it also covers some assnl'i<l -
A tions that arc neutral or potentia lly bcncHcialto Opilioncs. Predation. r; mni-
balism. disease-causing pathogens. and many parasites are dl!ilrly dltrimcntal
to dead or dying Opilioncs. It appears that the imparl of gregarin e p;~ra s i! cs and
phoretic riders is not life threatenin g. but they rnay reduce litn~.:ss. l.ikc wisl'. biiCh.ria .
seeds. and spores that me cmricd by Opilioncs (thro ugh no S[>ediil dTons of the
transmi lled) appear to be neutral except for a reduction in lit ness si mply by thl'l'Xtra
load the anima ls have to carry or waste energy trying to remove. Only inth1. raSl'S of
some miles. cyanobacteria. algae. <md li\'Crwons arc mutualistic rcl<llionshi ps sug
gcsted. In these cases the individuals might re<_.eive some assista nce from till' mit{'S as
they apparently groom the host. or the hosts might <~equ irL' ill'illlHIUIIiiJ.!C from till'
green coloring of the chloroplasts.
We know lill ie about the associations of Opiliones. Al though thlrc art ;q>prnxi-
matcly 6.000 described species in the nrdcr. there are l't11'L'I' than 1()() rcpnrtcd
species of pathogens and pt1rasiles. on ly slightly over 300 species of prLtl;Jtors. <llld
only about two dozen phoretic/endozok/cpizok assodHtions recorded workltl'idt
Part of th e prob lem is that the simple obscrV<llion ;md reporting of sud1 ti SStll'htlitHl S
are not considered of high scholarly vcdue. <IIHI therdnrt m;~n y l'l'l'lllS go llll -
recordcd. Furthermore. most p;~thol og i s ts illHl pantsitologist s canlHit id Lntil'y Opil -
iones even to order. and harvestml'll rl'Se t~rchcr s likcwisl' ran1wt ).!.l' lll'r; dly idLntil~
predators. parasites. or pathogens cxrept in \'cry general terms. Tlw llltlllhlr ul' assu-
ciation s is also underreporte{\ berause nr the dirticuhy in ohsLrving tlll'Sl' <H'Iil'itil'S.
Most harvestmen arc mxturn ttl or cryptic. and thertrure tlll'ir s tru ~g l t ICw lik ;..tn~s
essentially undetected by humans.
The beginnin g poin ts rnr the study or harwsl tllilll l'llCillkS <l l"t'l\\'ll d;~ ss k s tha t
ca me out in the same year (Bristowc. l lJ-!.lJ: Sankey. 19-!.lJbl. Sinn thai linll' nu -
merou s reports have lx:cn publ ished . hut nuuplhlted reviews tl pJX'i ll't'll until thl' mid-
1990s (Cokcndol pher. llJlJ 1: Mi tov. l9lJ'51. In Ihe IC 1IIowin~ disntssi1111S .~ rH.ri l il til' -
340 Natural Enem1es
tail ~ willlw hrid. l.i~t.s 1'1'ablc.s Y. I - Y. ~~arc supplied that detail species records and
tWrlilll'llllitewturt
l'<~n1 silism is <1 co mmon w;~y ol" Iiii... si nce owr hall" tlw known animals of the planet
<1 rc par;J.sitcs li\ lcdis & Hcnaud. 20011. His no surprise. then. t hat harvestmen arc
<1\Wcktd by lltlllH.'rnus species of par:1sites :md purasitoids (Figure 9 . .1 ). Few para-
sit()logists ;Jntr:lined as urachnologists. ;md thtrcforc many hosts arc not identified
btyond rlass or order in tlw litcmture. Sonll' records of ha rvestmen arc lost in the
more genenJIIists as "f\r<K"hni<l<l. whereas some records for long-legged spiders arc
misidclllilil'd <I S Opilioncs (<..'okcndolphcr. 1Y9 l). Similarly. arachnologists who dis-
cowr parasites often do not identify the agent beyond grega rine"' or nematode."
Cenerc1lly. thL pilr<ISite. if rl'taincd. is improperly preserved (wrong fixative or sta ge of
dewl,lpllll'llt J li1r furthLr idtntilkiltiOJl (for instructions sec Ch:1pter 1 5). Because of
till' h1l'k or gomltaxonumic characters in some groups (e.g.. Microsporida and juve-
niles of i\lcrmithidae). rolkctive groups llilVC been named and are used in Tabl e 9. J .
Sud1 groups or genen1 ol"tcn include species !hat probably arc no! related. This grou p
name is used .simply for "taxonomk conven ience" and includes species not readily
placed in known genera (possibly because a particular life stage is unknown ) and
spel'ics itt!"l'l"lm' scdis.
t\l lhough most purasites arc not fatal in Opilioncs. a ll the nematode parasites
tmd insect parasitoids will kill the harvestman host. In the few cases of pompilid
wusp.s t~llacking Opilioncs. it is not certain if it was parasitis m. predation. or mis-
taktn identity. The wasps were observed attacking harvestmen. but observations of
feeding or nest provision ing were not recorded {Evans. 1948). Most adult pompilids
feed almost cxdu.sivcly on nectar sources (Evans. 19 5 3). Only a l'cw species have also
bt'Cn observed feeding on hemolymph from C<l ptured spiders. but not harvestmen .
Anot her general characteristic of !his group is that all known species feed their
l<lrV<IC exclusively with spiders (Evnns. J 953). This suggests that wasps might mis-
takenly attack harvest men as a spider and later reject the prey. This still might result
in the death of the harvestmen. but such att acks would be very Infrequent.
The two most commonly reported parasites arc the endoparasilic gregarines and
the ectoparasitic mites (Table 9. 1 ). Both of these are large. easily observed parasites.
and for that reason they arc probably more often detected than the smal lcrendopar-
asitic species. The frequency of occurrence of both appears to Increase with the age
ami size of the harvestman host. It is not clear why this increase occurs. Perhaps it is
related to a longer period of exposu re (including the probability of reinfesting one-
self) or the higher biomass ava il ability. or both. Like many topics related to har-
vestman biology. !his is an area that needs detailed study.
In the case of !he gregari nes. adult parasites (Figures 9.1A.B) pass gametocytes
in the harvestmen's feces (Figure 9.1C), which dehisce and release many thousands
of infective oocysts. The oocysts arc ingested by harvestmen and start the cycle over
Figure 9.1. Parasites of Opiliones. (A-C) Undetermined gregarine parasite from the sclerosomatid harvestman
Leiobunum nigripes. (A) Ventral view of dissected harvestman showing large trophozoites/sporonts in the abdomen
(sternites are removed). (B) Two gametocysts in feces of harvestman. (C) Closeup of trophozoite (photos: j. C
Cokendolpher). (D) Immature mermithid parasite emerging from the abdomen of the phalangud Phalangium opmo
(photo: G. Poinar). (E) The nemastomatid Paranemastoma radewi with transparent. jellylike masses flow ing from
the mouth and anus: masses active with variety of saprophage nematodes (photo: P. G. M1tov). (F) Corpse of
Phalangium opi/io (Phalangiidae) that was killed by the nematode Steinemema carpocapsae. Note developmg
nematodes adjacent to the opened body (photo: G. Poinar). (G) leiobwwm politttm (Sderosomatidae) wit h
immature, parasitic leptus mite attached to the abdomen (photo: j.C. Cokendolpher). (H) Adult , free-liv1ng leptus
mite that feeds uj)On the sclerosomatid Leiobunum rownsendi as an immature (photo: j. C. Cokendolpher)
342 Nilttllcll Enem1es
PHYLUM APICOMPLEXA:
CLASS SPOROZOAS IDA
Undetennnled greganne carinostoma omatum. Dicrano/asma scabrum, Cokendolpher. 1993, pers. obs.;
(Frgures9.1A-cJ Equitius doriae. Graecophalangium atticum. Lacinius Gruber, 1993; Mitov. 1993,
dentiger, L. ephippiatus. L. horridus. L. insularis , 2000a,b, 2003, 2004, pers. obs.;
Leiobunwn globosum. L manubriatum, L. nigripes, Mitov & Stoyanov, 2004
L. politum, L. rumelicum. Lophopilio palpinalis,
Metaplatybunus grandissimus. Mitopus mario,
Odie/Ius lendli, 0. pictus. Opilio dinaricvs. 0. ruzickai,
0. saxatilis. Paranemastoma aurigerum ryla. P. radewi,
Phalangium opilio, Pyza bOsnica, Rilaena balcanica.
R. cf. serbica, R. serbica, Trogulus tricarinatus.
zachaeus anatolicus. and z. crista
CLASS SPOROZOASIDA,
ORDER EUGREGARINORIDA
Actinocepha/us megabuni Megabunus diadema Cokendolpher, 1993
Allt/Jorhynchus longispora Leiobunum rotundum. Mitopus mario. Opilio parietinus. COkelldOiptler. 1993
and Platybunus bucephalus
Anthorhynclws sophiae Lacinius ephippiatus, Leiobunum b/ackwalli, L. rotundum. Cokendolpher, 1993
Mitopus moria. 0/igolophus tridens, Phalangium opi!io,
and Ri/aena triangularis
Arachnocystis arachnoidea Oppalnia sp Cokendolpher, 1993
Contospora opalniae Oppalnia sp Cokendolpher, 1993
cosmetophilus vonones vonones say; Cokendolpher, 1993
Doliospora repelini Leiobunum rotundum, Megabunus diadema. Mitopus Cokendolpher. 1993
mario, Oligolophus tridens. Opilio parietinus.
Phalangium opilio, and Platybunus bucepha/us
Doliospora troguli Trogulus tricarinatus Cokendolpher. 1993
Echinoocysta phalangii Oppalnia sp Cokendolpher, 1993
Sciadiophora sp. Leuronychus pacificus 1
Clopton, 2003
Sciadiophora caudata Phalangiidae, Mitopus moria, Odie/Ius spinosus, Cokendolpher. 1993
and Phalangium opilio
Sciadiophora c/aviformis Mitopus sp Cokendolpher. 1993
ScladiophOra fissidens Phalangiidae. Lophopilio palpinalis, Phalangium Cokendolpher, 1993
~crassum.~ and P. opilio
PHYLUM PLATYHELMINTHES:
CLASS CESTODA, ORDER
CYCLOPHYLLIDEA
Pseudhymeno/epis redonica Phalangium opilio Cokendolpher, 1993
PHYLUM NEMATODA
unspecified nematodes Synthetonychiidae and/or Triaenonychidae, Rilaena Cokendolpher, 1993; Karaman.
triangularis, and Siro minutus 1993
CLASS SECERNENTlA,
ORDER RHABDITIDA
Heterorhabditis bacteriOphOra Phafangium opilio Cokendolpher, 1993
HRhatxlitidHnematooes Lacinius horridus. Paranemastoma radewi, and Cokendolpher, 1993; Mitov. 2000b
Phalangium opi/io
Steinemema carpocapsae Phalangium opilio Cokendolpher. 1993
(Figure9.1F)
CLASS ADENOPHOREA,
ORDER MERMITHIOA
Undetermined/Agamomermis Phalangiidae, Gonyleptes fragilis. Lacinius denriger. Cokendolpher, 1993; Mitov. 2000b;
(Figure 9.1D) L. ephippiatus, L. horridus. Leiobunum globosum. Poinar et al., 2000
L. manubriatum. Lophopilio palpinalis, Mitopus mario,
Opilio parietinus, Paecilaemana quadripunctata,
Paranemastoma radewi, Phalangium opi/io,
Protoloptws sp., Rilaena balcanica, R. cf. serbica.
Thrasychirus sp., Togwoteeus biceps,
and zachaeus crista
Agamomermis phalangli Phalangium opilio Cokendolpher. 1993
Agamomermis truncatula Opilio sp. and Phalangium opilio Cokendolpller 1993; Poinar et al.
2000
Agamomermis HincertaH Mitopus mario Cokendolpher, 1993
HoO/IIIJ/Uoo/ 1
Table 9.1 contmued
PHYLUM ARTHROPODA
CLASS ARACHNIDA.
ORDER ACARI
Allotl!rombtwn clumaanense. Oplliones Raykov & RimskiyKorsakov, 1948;
A. fultgmoS!/111, and Cokendolpher. 1993
AI/Otllrombivm sp
A//othrombl!l/11 neapolnum P/Jalangium sp. and zachaeus crista Cokendolpher, 1993
C/Jarletonia englwffi Bvnochel1s canariana Cokendolpher, 1993
C/Jarletoma sourhcottl Metagagrella tenuipes Cokendolpher, 1993
Erythrae1dae Leiobunum b/ackwalli, L. rotundum, Mitopus morio, Gabrys, 1991; Cokendolpher. 1993
Ne/ima si/vatica, Oligolophus hanseni, a. tridens,
Opilio parietinus. Paroligolophus agrestis, Phatangium
opilio, and Rilaena triangularis
Leptus beroni Lophopilio palpinalis. Megabunus diadema. Mitopus Fain, 1991; Cokendolpher, 1993;
moria. OligoJophus hanseni. Opilio canestrinii, Fain & D'Amico, 1997
0 ruzickai, Opilio sp., Phatangium opilio, and
Rilaena triangularis
Leprus btcristatus, L jocquei. Cristina lettowi Cokendolpher, 1993
L.polyt/Jrix,and
L.puylaerti
Leptus gagrel/ae Gagrella sp Cokendolpher, 1993
Lepwsgyas Gyas titanus Fain & D'Amico, 1997
Leptus hidakai Opilio pentaspinu/atus Cokenclolpher, 1993
Leptus ignows Opiliones and Phalangium opilio Haitlinger. 1990; Fain & D'Amico,
1997
Leptus indianensis Leiobunum a/drichi, L calcar, L. formosum, Cokendolpher, 1993; McAloon &
L nigripes. Leiobunum sp., L. speciosum, Durden, 2000
and L ventricosum
Leptus kataallvs Mitopus mario Cokendolpher, 1993
Leptus lomani 5adocus funestus Cokendolpher, 1993
Leptus nearcticus Leiobunum a/drichi, L nigripes, and L vittatum Cokendolpher, 1993
Leptus oudemansi Cynorta sp Cokendolpher, 1993
Leptus Hpha/angii" Mitopus mario, Oligo/ophus tridens, Dahl et al., 1935; Stadler &
and Platybunus bucephatus Schenkel, 1940; pfeifer, 19S6;
Gabrys,1991
Leptus phuketicus Gagrellula niveata and Gagrel/ula sp southcott, 1994
Leptus stieglmayri Opiliones Cokendolpher, 1993
Leptus spp. (Figures 9.1G,H) Cynona roeweri, Dicranotasma scabrum, Egaenus MacKay et al., 1992:
convexus. Eumesosoma roeweri, Eumesosoma? Cokendolpher, 1993, pers. obs.;
sp., Eurybunus sp., Krusa sp., Lacinius ephippiatus. Gruber, 1993; Guffey, 1998;
Leiobunum aldrichi, L. aft. depressum, L. flavum, Prieto nueba & Bauza Ferre,
L. monranum montanum, L. nigripes, L rotundum, 1999; Toft, 2004;
Natural Enemies 345
Original source citations not li'Sted hefe are found in Cokenclolpher (1993)
1. This host genus does not occur in the region reported. There is no doubt that 11 IS m1slflent1hed
346 Naun al Ene1mes
(Microsporidium weiseri) has been observed (Silhav:Y. 1960) In Opilioncs. and little
is known about lt. Harvestmen are recorded to be intermediate hosts of a few
Platyhelminthes. but in no case are they the primary host of these flukes or tape-
PATHOGEN S
I'Jwre <~re relt~til dy fell' p;nhogens knO\\'n from Opiliones. and most of these are
recunblonly in 11nt: ur limited numbers of incidents IFigure 9.2). The majority of
recurd:-. <~rc ur p;nhogenic fungi - in nwny cases attacking eggs (Goodnight & Good-
night. l i.J7h: .\lonL li.J H/. 1<-.JI.JO: R;unircs & Giarella. 1994: Machado & Oliveira.
l ':J':JH. 21HJ2: Elpinu-C.unpus el <tl .. 21HJ I: .\I<Khado. 2002: Figures 9 .2C.D ). From
1he d<tSS J lyphumyce\l'S. there ilfl' records of H!JIIICIIOSli lllr l'ermcosn in fect ing pha-
l<~ngiitb 1.\ !;tins. llJ51J: Le<llhenla le. I Y70J. AkWrr/1i:iru11 m1isopline in Meynlopsalis
rumir/ol.\leyer- l{ochu\\' & Liddle. llJH X) . .\ 'onwrata tll!Jpico/a in Ll'iobunwn l'illnlllm
l( ;fl'l'll Stone et ;d.. l lJHX I. ;md l:ll.tJ!JOdoml!iwn amntarum infecting several species of
Opiliones ICkca rune & Campadelli. 19'JS). Gonyleptids and manaosbiids a re at-
tacked by pathogenic fung i of the class Pyrenumycetes that may cause the death of
th e individu;t ls (~vi O II c r. 191! I: Koval. IIJ 74: Figure 9.2B). Equally let hal is the zy-
gtunycete t>omlom plwhmyirida. which <II tacks individuals of Plwlm1giwn opilio (Lager-
heim. 1H'Jtl: Elli s. JI.J56: Le<ttherdalc. 195H. 19 70).
One species or fun gus. though. 1:'111omoplwya lmtkoi. is known to cause consid-
erable numbers or dea th s in European harvestmen . An epiwot ic (temporary in-
crease in the incidence of infection s) was observed during late summer by Batazy
l l9 7XJ. Keller I I YX 7) reported that this species of fungus was rather common from
l<ll e Ju ly to the middle of Sept ember and often ca used epizootics along the borders of
rorests and hedges. An infected harvestman will crawl up in the vegetation and die
while hanging onto a blade or grass or ot her plant part (Figure 9.2A). Similar be-
havior has been noted in some insect s. such as nics. grasshoppers, wasps, and cater-
pillars. which become lixed to an aboveground substrate when infected by other en-
topathogenic fungi /Keller, 1987)
No doubt pathogen s arc more numerous and widespread. Because most opilio-
nologists do not recognize diseased harvestmen. it is likely that most cases go unde-
tected. Only two species of pathogenic bacteria (Xenor/wbdus luminesce/Is and X. ne
matop/1ilus) have been recorded for harvestmen. both attacking the pha langiid
Plwhmyiwn opilio /Puinar & Thomas. 1985 ). Additionally. no rickettsial or viral dis-
ease has been diagnosed in harvestmen (Morel. 1978), but this may be more a case
of no one looking than an absence. Viral and rickeltsial diseases have been shown to
occur in as high as 5%-- 10% of a natural population in nonacarine arachnids
studied (Legendre & Morel. 1980: J. Haupt. 2000). Cory et al. (1988) recovered ac~
live Pano/is nuclear polyhcdrosis virus from the feces of harvestmen, but no disease
in the harvestma n was noted.
Natural Enemies 34 9
Figure 9.2. Pathogens of Opiliones: {A) Diseased Oligolophus /fldell5 {Phalang1idae) hangu\g from a gra$S
blade. Harvestmen infected with Entomophaga bat(oi fungi clasp the upper pans of plants whe1e they d1e
(mod ified from Kell er. 1987). Sca le bar= 5 mm. (B) Corpse of a manaosbiid (?)harvestman from G\1Yill1,l
covered by the pathogenic fungus Torrubiel/a gonylepticida (photo:]. Spatafora). Scale b,u " 5 mm (C)
Corpse of the gonyleptid harvestman Acutisoma diSColor covered by an un,den!lfied fungus (phow G
Machado). Saprophytic and pathogemc fung1 are dtfftcult to separate by s1ght alone Scale bN = 10 mm. (Dl
Egg batch of the gonylept1d harvestman Acut,soma proxmwm att<lcked by fung i (photo BA Buz,ltto)
Sca le bar = 10mm
3 50 N<lt lll <l l Enem1es
PREDATORS
l'rldation of h;~ntstmcn is nunpkx in that the <Jge and reproductive state of both
tile prcd;~tor ;~nd prey have to he considered. lkc;mse of space limitation, we have
only intlic;llctl this in T:~bks Y.2 c1nd lJ. 3 as rega rds Opiliones: eggs versus frce-
nwving individu:~ls. The :~ge of th e harvestman is important primarily because of
the sin. mobilit y. und thickness of the cut ide of the harvest man. Some predators
:tre <~hit to sucrcssl'u lly prtdalt' on ly upon sma ller. softer-bod ied harvestmen.
1\'htre:Js otlll'rs only Cill !;1rgcr. more uclive prey. With some predators. juvenile
h:1rvestnwn escape not ire entirely. while the adults arc easily detected and red
upon. The time am! site of activity of the harvestman is also imporlanl. Predators
th:~t feed prinwrily by sight (e.g .. birds and Ji%ards) luke more prey that is larger. di-
unwl. Hnd more active, whereas predators that feed in the litter or soi l (such as in-
sectivorous llHimmals 1111d some nwrsupials) ol"ten take sma ller. less mobile prey
that they ctlll smell or hear moving. Other small generalist predators, such as ants,
spiders . Hnd assassin bugs (Figure 9.3 ), will take whatever they can catc h and
hold. The age of the predator is importcmt because smaller predators can only take
small prey.
Likewise. the reproductive state of the predator can alter the number of prey
taken. Vertebn1t es have been documented to alter th e number of harvestman prey
they tc1ke during difl"erent seasons. Part of this may be due to the increased per-
CL'ni<lge of harvestman prey available during certai n seasons. but in other cases it
appcc1rs to be related to the reproductive state of the predator or availability of other
foods. Examples are some of the bi rds. which take increased numbers of harvest men
when feeding their young. This is especially true of gra nivorous birds that lack a
food-storage organ. such as a crop. These birds feed large quantities of arthropods
(including harvestmen) to the nestlings (MacMillan & Pollock. 1985. and citations
therein)
Loca lity also appears to be importan t. as demonstrated by the toad Bufo mnrinus
(Bufonidae). In its native habitat in Puerto Rico, this species takes an insignificant
number of ha rvest men {Leonard. 1933). whereas in an introduced population in
Queensland. Australia. it feeds almost exclusively on harvestmen (R. J. Raven. pers.
comm.). Indi vid ual preferences or perh aps opportunity also resu lt in uneven cap-
tures of harvestmen within a population of predators. Examination of guts of 67
Cuban tree frogs, Osll!opilus scplelllrimwlis (Hylidae). from Tortola. British Virgin Is-
lands. West Indies. revealed that 6 frogs had eaten Metncynortoides obscurus (Cos-
mctidac): 1 ate a single harvestman. 3 ate 1 harvestmen. and 1 individual ate 9 har-
vestmen (J. C. Cokendolpher, pers. obs.). These data certainly recommend larger
sample sl%es when conducting experiments with predators/prey.
Some predators will drop a harvestman when exocrine gland chemicals are
first em itted (see Chapter 10). This ini tial response has been recorded in the litera
ture as "none feeding." However. other studies have revea led in the case of some
birds. mammals. and ants that they will repeatedly attack the harvestman until it
Natural Enemies 35 1
source
CLASS MAMMALIA, ORDER
CARNIVORA
cerdocyon thOus Opiliones (Laniatores) Facure, 1996
Me/esme/es Mitopus mario, Odie/Ius spinosus. Sankey, 1949b
Paroligo/ophus agrestis, and
Phalangium opilio
Mephites mephites Phalangium opilio Holmberg, 1970
Vu/pes vulpes Phalangium opilio Sankey, 1949b
,,,.,,,,./,
3 54 Ndlural Encm1es
Sorex mrnuws Oplliones, Paranemastoma sp., and Pernetta, 1976; Grainger & Fairley,
Paranemastoma radewi 1978; Butterfield et al., 1981;
Bauerova, 1982, 1984; Kuvikova,
1985a; Churchfield et al., 1991;
Mitov, 1995
original source citations for many of the birds are listed in Cramp et at. (1983-1994) .
t. Yadgar011 (1974) listed arachnids as components of the food of the lizatcl Ophisaurus apodus- "SCOrpionuy," "Falangi." "Paukl," "Kieshi," which translate
to scorpiones, Araneae. ACari" -but it is not clear if the name "Falangi" is Opiliones or SOtifugae. In older Russian merattKe on Arachnida ~Phalangi"
SOli fugae
2. oementjev et at. (1954) also listecl"ptlalang" as food of the bird Pastor roseus . This too could possibly refer to SOiifugae.
Natural Enemies 359
!lli~==.._' ____,____Opl
~llonesprey source
PHYLUM MOLLUSCA: CLASS
GASTROPODA. ORDER
STYLOMMATOPHORA
Polygyraalbolabris Leiobunum aldriehi Edgar, 1971
PHYLUM ptATYHELMINTHES:
ORDER TRICLADIDA
Cephaloflexa araucariana Gonyleptidae carbayo et at, 2002; carbayo &
Leai-Zanchet. 2003
PHYLUM ARTHROPODA:
CLASS CHILOPODA, ORDER
UTHOBIOMORPHA
UthObius forficarus Opiliones. Opilio parietinus, and Paroligolophus Sankey, 1949b; Spoek, 1964
agresris
Lithobius sp. Odie/Ius pictus and Phalangium opilio Holmberg, 1970
Lithobius vulgaris Leiobunum aldrich!, L. politum, and L. virrarum Edgar, 1960; Holmberg, 1970
SOUr<e
Jschyropsatis hellwigii Leiobunum sp.. Opilio parietirws ver11oeff. 1900; Kiistner. 1926
Lacinius dentiger Lacinius dentiger Mitov,1988
Lacinius ephippiatus Nemastoma lugubre Todd,1950
Lacinius horridus Opiliones Star~ga, 1976a
Laniatores Laniatores Mello-Leltiio. 1932
362 Nauual Enermes
CLASS ARACHNIDA,
ORDER SCORPIONES
Undetermined species Opiliones Cloudsley-Thompson, 1958
Natural Enemies 363
soun:e
CLASS INSECTA, ORDER
-
COLEOPTERA
carabiclae Opiliones Hillyard & sankey, 1989
carabus violaceus Opiliones and Oligolophus sp Sankey, 1949b; Spoek, 1964
Prerostichus oblongopunctatus Opiliones sergeeva & Grfinthal, 1988
Sepedophi/us sp. (larvae) Gonlosoma spelaeum (only eggs) Gnaspini, 1995
presumably expels all the defensive chemicals and then will be eaten (Holmberg.
1970: Machado et al.. 2005 ).
Because of the difficu lty in observing direct predation of harvestmen. most
records in the literature are based primarily on gut con tents or feces of predators.
eaten remains in or below webs of spiders. and feedings done \Vith captive animals.
Indeed. severa l of the predator/ prey records listed in Table 9.3 are based upon cap-
tive feedings. Some of these events would never take place in nature because the
predator and prey do not occur in the same habi tat (e.g .. the araneid spiders of the
genus Argiope and triaenonychid harvestmen of the genus Sdaolnums) or because
they are not a regular food item for the predator. For example. Argel-dc-Oliveira ct a]
( 1998) reported that a great kiskadee. Pilaugus su/plrumlrrs ('l'yrannidm:). offe red a
harvestman to a captive fled gl ing, but the item was refused. Some of the feeding
studies in the laborat ory can be misleading because a well-fed animal will not re-
spond the same as a hungry animal. Some young. well-fed mammals wil l "play"
wit h Opiliones rat her than cCJtthem U-C. Cokcndolphcr. pcrs. obs.)
From Tables 9.2 and 9.3 it uppears that p;;rsscrinc birds <r rc by far the most di-
verse group of predators on harvestmen. Frogs and toads (Figure 9AA). insectivo-
rous mammals. spiders. a nd other harvest men arc the other main documented pred-
a tors. However. the predomimmcc of one predator group over the other may be
misleadi ng because of the differences in the numbers of stud ies n.garding fonrging
habits of each taxonomic group. Preda tion on harvestmen certainly occurs more
often and by more predators than ;:rre reported herein. ~ l os t studies on prLxlators of
Opiliones are not int ensive or recorded over a long period of time. In many other L'X-
amples in Tables 9.2 and 9.3. harvestmen reportedly mad ~.: up tl very minor per-
centage of the prey it ems fou nd . In thcsentses it is often diftkult to ddermint il' tht
harvestmen prey were rare bccmrsc of the season when l<rrgcr mobik h;trwstmtn
a re rare or because they arc not a nonnal prey itern of a par tkul t~r predator. 1\t'caust
larger predatory lish strike at any tll"tivc arthropod on the W<tter"s surl';tce. the rarity
of lish eating harvestmen almost certainly is b~.:causc of the lack or lwrvestmen
falling into water rather th an the refusal of such food by aquatic prtxlators.
In some cases Opiliones were rttorcled in signilkcrnt numbers: 2 ~J:, of foodstuiTs
of the mouse ilpodt'IIIIIS}Javimllis (Mu rida el were Opilioncs (()brtcl. 1"J 7 41: 42':i. of
the prey examined fro m the s~:o rpionll y Billm'm nruslrillii (Bitttll"idm) IVl're Opiliones
(Iwasaki. 199~ ): and at:cording to Hci gvar ctml (')stbye 11 9/(,f. Opilionts were unt ol
the most important (based on fresh weight I food sou rns fo r meadow-pipits :\ullw .~
pmlmsis (Motacillid;:wl. The prevailing food so urces for 1'/wcllii'III"IIS odrnm1s yilmrl-
/arknsis (Turd id;tc) arc Opilinncs. i\ranca~.:. and inserts ll:lutz I'Oll Blutzlll'im &
Bau er. 19HSa ). l'halangiids, mainly P/utnlnuws hun'/llr11/11s. Wt'l"l' <HlHlll)!. the most
J'requent and abundant prty spe~.:ies recorded J'ur tht nut hatch (KriStin. llJ94l and
the collared llyc<llcher (KriStin. 20021. 'l'ht' high tX'fl't'tll<r)!.l' of this httn't'Stm;m
species in the food of these two birds corrcspondetl with its higlll'Sl ahund;ttH'l' ol
hilrvcstman species in fir-beech l'orcst !Kri.';tin. 2002). t\rcordin)!. to Buttlrlicld ct <tl.
( I ~X I J. Son'.\"lllillll/11 .~ (Sorkida ~.:) cHIS arthrupods (lwrvcstmcn. spitl l'rs. hVl'l ks. 11il'S
and CiJtcrpillars) almost exclu sively. Bcrucn,v{r ( llJ X21 <~ l so notl'd thl' importcull'l' 111"
366 N:mual Enem1es
Figure 9.4. {A) The toad Bufo ietericus {Bufonidae) feeding on the gonyleptid
harvestman Acutisoma proximum {photo: B. A. Buzatto). Note tips of two
harvestman legs sticking out of mouth (arrow). (B) The marsupial Philander
opossum {Oidelphidae) is a widespread predator of several species of South
American harvestmen, mainly those that live inside caves (photo: A.A. Giaretta).
Scalebars=Scm.
Natural Enemies 367
arachnids (espedally Opiliones) in the diet of this same shrew. Pcrnetta {1976)
ranked the foods of this shrew and Sorex amneus. with Opiliones being one of the
dominant components. Whereas the pigmy shrew ate mainly Nemastoma sp.. the
common shrew selected larger species of Opiliones. Examination of Pl!iltmckr
opossum (Didelphidae) feces revealed that a harvestman from caves in Brazil (Gonia-
soma spe/aeum) was an important food item. especially when foods on the surfa ce
(mainly fruits) were scarce (Pellegatti-Franco & Gnaspinl. 1996: Figure 9 .4B ). This
species of marsupial was observed to prey on up to 1 0 harvest men during a si ngle
visit to the cave. One of the major food items was also Opiliones for the opossum
Dide/pl!is aurila (Caceres & Monteiro-Filho. 200 I ).
As reviewed in Chapter 8. cannibalism is common among Opilioncs and their
eggs. Cannibalism occurs more often upon carlier-instar juveniles and during or
after molting. when the cuticle is soft and easi ly penetrated by the chelicerae of other
harvestmen. According to Edgar ( 1971) and Machado and Oliveira ( 1998 . .200.2).
cannibalism upon eggs is more common than upon juven iles an d adults (sec also
Chapter 12).
Phoretic, endozoic. and epizoic associations arc much marl' common than reported
in the literature. Possibly these arc the most common but unreport ed associations.
The dclinitions of these three interact ions arc often given as anything living/riding
in or on a n anima l. but for the purpose of this du1pter. we an using dl'linitions that
arc more restrictive. A phorctic association is Olll' in which <m org;mism receives n1r-
riage on the outside of a harvcstmcm. It docs not feed while riding on th t htlf-
vestman and only receives a means of transport. Th is tnll1$port may be ;1c ti v~o tsuch
S n insect riding a harvestman) or intJCtivc (s uch as fun!;(a l spores). t\n cndowk
nssodalion is one in which an orga ni:;m passes through the digestive systtm of the
Opiliones unharmed and thereby receives transport to a new location. We do not in-
clude internal parasitt.'S wi th this group beeau Sl' they \\"Cre coverLd earlier under pilf-
asitic associations. An epizoi c assodation is one in whit:h the extlrior of ;1 htl r-
vestman provides an orgcm ism with a substrate for li ving. suc h as <~lg;Jc growing on
the back of harvestmen . Because ex ternal pan1sites arc trc<1t ed undtr par<Jsitic aSSil-
ciations. they arc not treated in the discussion of epizoic tlSSo<."i<J tions.
Phoresy
Some phorctic and parasitic rclcllionships with ht~rws tmen arl' w ry old. Tlw
oldest records tlrc from 40 million years ago. prcserwd in 1\;dtil" amber. Wcitslh;Jt
and Wiclwrd {2002) show a fossi l pscudoscorpion phordk;d]y <lll<ll"ill'd to thllq.tol
a harvestman in ambcr.l.ikewisc. a piece of Baltic amber is known that l"tllltaillS liw
coll cmbohms holding on to the leg of ;1 \wrvestnwn (C. l'oinar. JXrs.rom m. l
Classica l examples or phorctiL: riders of Opilioncs <ll"l' lhl JlSL'UdO.~l"lll"pillllS. This
368 Nmurnl Enemes
~roup of ar;~ehnids is well known to ride <1 v e~rict y of arthropods (Poinar t!l al..
199X l. lntLrcs!ingly. only three: spel'iL~s of chc.:rnctid pseudoscorpions ICiu:/ifer can-
ac>i!lcs. /,mllpmdJ'~"~~'S llot.losus. and l'.~l'laji/Wdwrw.~ tlu/Jius) from Europe have lx.-cn
rcnwtbl fn1111 tlpililllll'S. incl tlding phalangiids and sclerosomatids (W. W. Spicer.
1l'\h/: Smory. I ~ ~X: Vachon . 1(j-J 7: Bdcr. 1()4~: Sankey. 1949b; Cloudsley-
Tillllllpson. 195(,; Spock. ]l)(,-J.: l'oi nar cl ;,I.. I ()9S).lt is dillicult lo understnnd why
thi s is thL case hl'L"ausc L"l\ern ctids and ll<lrvcst mcn arc plentiful in the sa me habitats
i11 tJthcr p;trls tlf till' world. ] >cr he~ps, as sta led by Muchmore ( 1971), "i l is ju s! that
our f<IUIHI h<1 s not been s tudil'd as intensively <IS th<1t of Europe and the <tssociation ,
onurri n ~ spor;~ di c;d ly. h;Js nut yel been ob$Crved by an interesled person ." Gruber
1 I lJlJ ~I <lstl n:ptlrted l"tlll cmbtJians riding on the earth-encrusted surface of some
soil-i nhah i t i n ~ harwstmt.n. Some mites and inscLt larv<te also receive ca rriage. In
tl ll'L"i!Sc ,,r solllL'IlliiL'S. it is not clear if the mit es arc simply riding on th e harvestmen
or actually benl'liting the Jwrwstman by groom ing il.
Hunt 11 Y/9) foun d at least two species of mites on the exoskeleton of the tri-
il eiHJilyrh id IHI!'\'eslnwn l:"tjllilius tlorim from southeastern Australia. While one of
thl s pcril's is pantsitic. l-luntll9 79) stated that the other species "may have a symbi-
otic rel<~tionship with the Jwr\'l'slman ."" Conccntnltions frequ ently occur on the
scutum ncar the orxni ngs of the odoriferous gla nds. and they may feed on non-
\'tllatile rtlmponen ts of their st.-cretions. Presu mably the mit es have some "immunity
to the <ll"ti\'C componen t.
r\ gonyleptid from Argent ina. Pod!!Jioidcllus lmthri. had numerous astigmatid
mlle dcutonymphs locat ed on its chelicerae a nd pcdipa lps lJ. C. Cokendolpher. pers.
obs.). Two species of mites \\"L're observed on the ncmastomatid OrtlwltiSIIIll kvipcs
from the western USt\ ~ J. C. Cokendolpher. pers. obs.). Some of th e mites were the hy-
popal stage of an t\ not:l idae. whereas the sc..<:ond Spt..'"<.'ies remains unidentilled. The
tlnnctids were observed to move about freely on the chelicerae and the mouth area of
the harvestmen. It seems odd that these mites would frequent an area where there
might be food scraps if they did not feed during transport (see also Mi tov. 1 997a:
Fi gure 9.5 1\ ). The sel~o nd species of mite was found on the dorsum of the abdomen.
These appeared to be Hgrazin g"' on the layer of dirt and fungi that is found on the sur-
fan: of many soil-dwelling nemastomatids. It is possible that both of these species
were feeding while in tran sporl and therefore should more properly be con sidered as
a form of cpizoism
Sc\'enl speci mens of Cyplwpl! /lwlmus a rf. leyrovski collected in a Yugoslavian
n tvc bad what appear to be arthropod eggs attached to their appendages (Figure
9.5B). Additional phot ographs show that the end of the structure was open. sug-
gesti ng that the eggs lmd hatched. Further research is needed to determine if this
was an accidental event or the species laying the eggs normally chooses harvestmen
to lay it s eggs u pon for transport Cyplwplulwfmus aff. teyrovski is a small harvestman
!lull is not hi ghly mobile. suggesting that this might have been more of a chance en-
counter.
Opiliones presumably carry many species of bacteria. fungal cleistothecia/spores.
and planl pollen and seeds. which they pick up while crawling through their environ-
Figure 9.5. Epizoics of Opiliones. (A) Phoretic mite Anoetus sp. (Anoetidae) on the anal operculum of the won1d
harvestman Siro sp. {photo: P.G. Mitov). (B) Unidentified arthropod egg on the sironid harvestman Cypl!ophiiJrllmus
all. reyrovski (photo: I.M. Karaman). (C) Fern sporangia (Polysticlwm sp.) epizoically attached to the leg tarsus of the
phalangiid harvestman Leptobunus parvulus (photo: J. C. Cokendolpher). (D) Phol'etk Mallophaga attach('d to thE."
leg tarsus of the sderosomatid harvestman Leiobunum rumelicum (photo: P.G. Mitov)
370 Nauuat Enern1es
llll'lll l i\l;idi<ldo L'l a l. . 1000: l\li tuv. l lJlJl). Much of their grooming removes these
ilt'llls. hlll t111!y <tt"tl-r tlll'Y t r<lllSptlrl tlw1n Stlme distance. Bet:ausc such transport gcn-
L'rtdly l'ill l only lx obst:rwd with ;1 wmpou nd microscope, only a few fern
SJ"ltll'<ln~i<t / spores <IIlli fu n~ill ddstolhct'i;J hilve been rq>orted in the lilcruture to be
carried by hilr\'l'Slrnen tl'okemlolpher. !lJH)b: Figure 9.5C). Phoretic Ma llophaga
haw <Jiso been l'l'l"lmled tFigurL' lJ. 5D).
Endozoism
l lnlikl nwny <lfilchnids. Opilioncs h1ck <I pu mpin g sto mach, and therefore they
dll'w thei r fuud ISL'e L'lmpll'rs 1 <111<1 XI ;:md often consume oocysts. spores. and other
l'Olll<t min tlnt s on their foods. The frequent groomin g of the legs by the harvestmen
may <J iso lead to the ing..stion of otlll'r microorga nisms
,\!though it is unrLportcd in thl literature. there is no doubt thnt ha rvestmen
l"ilfr)' many spt,:des of barteria. yeast. mul fun ga l sporcs as t hey pass through t he di-
gest in system. Exa mination of thl gu t con ten t of many harvestmen reveals the
preseJKl' of a variety of yeasts and fungal spores and hyphae a nd bacteria (J. C. Cok-
cndulpher. pcrs. nbs. I. It is u nknown if thl'SC enter via food (contaminates on foods)
ur <~s li1m!. or if they arl' in gested ucddcntally during groomi ng. Digestion docs not
Sl'em to kill some of theSl' organisms. and thl'Y remai n active nft er being passed in
thc fcccs t ). l' . l'uken dolph cr. pers. obs)
Epizoism
Earlier under t he heHdi ng "" Phorcsy."" collcmbolans and severa l mites were men-
tioned tlwtm ight be more corrcctly listed here. Furthcr study wou ld have to be done
to see if thcsl' uninHl ls were actua lly feed ing. In the cases of photosynthetic
cyanobartcria. <dgae. 11m\ li verworts reported from Opi liones (Gruber. 199 3:
Machado & Vit<Jl. 20t JI ), there is no doubt that these organisms nrc using the sur-
fare of the harvestmen as a substrate for living (sec also Figure 9.SC). Saprophytic
fun gi are a lso observed on harvestmen that are from very humid conditions. The
mil l'S may be bcnclkialto the harvestmen by grooming them. whereas the photo-
synthctir organisms possibly provide camouOage
GENERAL PATTERNS
Bcnmse of the great vmicty in habits ;:md morphologies of Opiliones nnd the diverse
habitats they occupy. it is no wonder that they arc allacked by and associated with a
wide variety of organisms. Most harvestmen share some characteristics that make
them vulnerable to attack by certain enemies. Unlike most arachnids. all harvestmen
masticate their food. ingestin g particles rather thnn using a pumping stomach to cat
liquefied diets. Because of this. they are exposed to parasites and pathogens that
might ot herwise be filt ered out by the feeding mechanism of most other arachnids.
Natural Enemies 37 1
This is especially true of the gregarines. which are abundan t in harvestmen and un -
common in other arachnids. The omnivorous feeding habits of many harvestmen
place them in proximity to contaminated materials that could result in contact with
pathogens or infective stages of some parasites (sec Chapter 8). Although harvestmen
occur in arid regions. most seem to prefer moister environments (sec Chapter 7).
Living in moist, dark situations provides suitable habitat for exposure to some
pathogens such as fungi. as well as infective stages of some nemat od es. Because of the
activity of some harvestmen. they arc exposed to detection by predators that hunt by
sight or sound . Highly mobile harvestmen also seem to travel more and appear to be
more vulnerable to attack by parasitic mites. Higher mobility is linked to lon ger legs.
so this also results in greater exposu re to aboveground predators and parasites.
Harvestmen a lso share some characteristics that seem to prevent atl<lck by some
enem ies. As already mentioned. a preference for moist habittlls can be detrimenta l.
but this detriment also occurs for other arthropods that might be preda tors or panl-
sitoids of harvest men. This preference can a lso be positive in that such environments
generally offer complex habitats that provide a suitable substmtc for hiding from
some predators. Diurnal huntin g predat ors arc not as successful tlt hunting hcl r-
vestmen as other arthropods because most harvestmen are nocturnc1 l or cryptic
living under coveri ng objects or within the tiller (sec Chapter 101. Whereas some
morphologica l traits such as hardened cu ticle and spines deter some predators. tht
use of exocri ne secretions may have a dual result. Some exocrine Sl't'rel ion s arl' t~n
timicrobial in nature and could help rid the har vestmen of externa l p<Jthogcns <llld
parasites. as well as servi ng as a defensive agen t <J ga inst larger Cit tackers (Sl'C Chapter
10). Fina lly. a ll harvestmen arc free-li vin g Cllld thercli 1re lwvc not hosttd or tr:m s-
mitted the various rickettsial and viral discasts that have dcvclnpl'd in p<~rasi t il"
arachnids {mites and ticks).
Preda tors of harvestmen arc in general the samt as tiHlSe th;1 t at1;1ck spiders. As
wit h other arachn ids. predators of har vest men orten show <t prl'fcrcncc for sizt. o1s
well as time and site of activity. However. many major groups of pa rasites and p<lra-
sitoids of spiders and h arvestmen differ. Crcgarines arc conlllHlllly tncnunt t'fl'd in
harvestm en. but not in spiders (Levine. I IJH5L Ectopar:lsilic mil t'S <l l"l' ronmwn on
ha rvestm en. but much less so on spiders (Sou thl"tllt. I 'JlJ I: l'<,ke ll d{llphcr. llJlJ 3.
Foeli x. 199()). Par<Jsitoids of eggs t~nd t~d u lt spiders. sud 1 <IS IJipll'I"<L ll ymenoptl't"<l.
and Man tispidac. arc unknown li-tm1 Opilioncs. Like scorpion:> !i\kl'ormil"k l'\; l'oli s.
1990). solifu gcs IPunzo. 199H). and spidtrs (1-'oelix. llJlJh). h<~rws t men <l fl' predii -
tors u pon you n ger members of their own spedes. :1s well as ot her splcies of tlll'ir
order (sec Clmpter 81.
The general lack of harvestman parasi toi(ls is inlncslilll! bn"H USl't hty a re rl'la-
tively common in other groups of c1rm:h nids (especia lly spiders!. llarwstnwn tc1dul ts
and eggs) a rc not exploited by wasps. whercc1s spiders <l rl' illlill"kttl by ;1 ~re<ll
num ber of parasitoids of eggs und mlult s. includ in g represl'n1atin-s of the fc11nilil's
lchncumonidac. Sphccidac. l1ompil ith1c. ;1ml Scclionid<IL'. as ll'l'il ns of 1hl' stlpl'l"-
family Chalcidoidca (S haw. JlJlJ4: (;ibson ct ;1l .. 1997: (J" Nl'ill. 2! Ill 1 l. S(llllL' (If tlll'se
372 N;lturat Enelll ies
para~ituids also L'x ploit SU illl' insects. butnotlwrvcstmen. The sa me si tu a lion appar-
l'lltly lk.'l'Urs with till' diptl'ran t'gg predators {Chloropidae. Phoridae. and Ephy-
llridal'\. 'l'lll' rl'asuntsl why harwst mL'Il a rL' not oli cn att;u,;kcd by parasitoids is un -
cert:li n. but ll'l' might SJK't'Ulil tc here. Most lw rvcstmen prefer moist and shady
lwhitats. Possibly thL' pan1silnids prefe r more open conditions, which arc possibly
h~.:tter for hunting and present fewe r pa thogenic fun gi tlwt m ight attack the wasps or
Ilks. ~lust ha rwst men ha\'<' a small body size. This is a n adva nt age that allows its oc-
l'lll'l't'lll'l' in spatia lly rl'stricted soi l a nd litter m i1.: rohabi tats where il is not readily dis-
nrnihk hy many predators ;md p11rasitoids. Possibly the smaller biomass of these
sm;d l species is not en ough fo r full dcvclopmL'Ill of parasitoid larvae. The long legs of
11111st surfacL-act iVL'll<lrwstml'n 1\'tlll ld probably also be an obstacle for wasps to suc-
cessfu lly <I tt ark the hndy or to m;m ipu lat c the host. l'v lost harvestmen arc noct urnal ,
and soml' arc altil'l' durin g otlll'r low-light ev~.: nt s (cloud s. mornings. evenings). Al-
th ough harvcstmL'Il <U'l' capublc of n1pid movclnl!nl. me my wil l move over the land-
SC <IPL' slow ly. possibly not ac ti va tin g the Clllm:k bdwvior of the W<ISps. Possibly the
ansi\'L'r is also in the exocrine glc111d l'lll!ln k al s cmd integumentary morphology
!thick cuticle and hard urm<~mcnt ) of harvcst ll ll!ll. Mor~.:over. many hc1rvcstmcn arc
cryptie. liv ing in Sllil. under stones. and on tree trunks (sec Chapt er 7). Some of them
arc covered with soil frugmcnts tmd so arc well protectl!d (sec Chapter 10). The
eggshells tlf har vcst mc11 arl! th ick. unlikl' th e thin shdl of spiders, a nd better defend
th e embryos. Har\'l'slmcn eggs arc also g~.: n e rally pl<Kt.'<l in a jelly mass or are de-
posed in soils. umkr stoncs. in plant st~.:m s. or in voids such as empty gastro!XJ<I
shells ISL'l' Chapt er l l).
CONCLUDING REMARK S
Studies of enemies and phorct ic and cndozoic/epizoie associations. not mere listing of
new pamsitc or predator rcmrds. constitute prolitable Jiclds for future research. Besides
basic understanding of these interactions { lif~.: cycles and recognit ion of new species of
parasites). studies of the impact of enemies and associates on harvestman individuals
tllld populat ions arc highly desirable. The relative case of laboratory culture of har-
vestmen (sec Chapter I 5) suggests the potential for detailed laboratory studies on para-
sites and pat hog~.:ns. but these would be less in forma tive about predators.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Dr. S. Keller and F. Gschmeidler of Ferdinand Berger und Sohne GMBH
Verlag, Horn, for allowing the reproduction of Figure 9.2A: B. A. Buzatto, J. Warfel.
and Drs. I~ Gnaspini. G. Machado. and J. Spatafora for providing other photographs:
Dr. G. Poinar fo r his photographs. literature. comments, and identi6cations of var-
ious pat hogens and parasites: Dr. I. M. Karama n ror providing Figure 9.58, as well as
new records and literature: J. Owen and Dr. G. Perry for allowing access to Cuban
Natural Enemies 373
tree frog data and gut contents: Dr. A. A. Giarelta for providing data on the diet of a
leptodactylid frog: Dr. M. Prysby for sending living. parasitized Opiliones that appear
in Figures 9.1A--C: Drs. C. Delchev, A. Gyonova, and T. Lyubomirov for identifying
some spiders. ants. and wasps reported herein: A. Perez Gonzfi lez for identification of
the host in Figure 9.2B: D. Palmer for observations and photographs of mites on Eu-
rybwws harvestmen: Drs. T. Blick. J. Gruber. R. Holmberg. A. KriStin. G. Machado. R.
Madas-Ord6ii.ez. T. Michev. I. Mih<'i.l. P. H. Pache. R. J. Raven, W. Reeves. and \ Z
RUZiCka for information. records. and literature (some very difficult to obtain) on
harvestmen enemies: and Dr. B. P. Nikolov for his great effort in checking over J .000
publications on the foods of birds-his help made our coverage on th is topic very
complete.