Professional Documents
Culture Documents
of Kicking a
Football
PETERJ.BRANCAZIO
T he game of American football is filled with illustrations of the principles of physics.
Typically, a substantial fraction of the students in any introductory physics course follow
college or professional football rather closely and are reasonably fimtiliar with the strategies
and techniques of play. An enlightened physics teacher can take effective advantage of this
interest by using game situations to clarify some of the concepts of physics. For example,
the shifty movements of a good running back can serve to demonstrate the concept of ac-
celeration, and various blocking and tackling situations can be used as dramatic examples
of the theory of two-body collisions. It is also instructive to consider the football as a projec-
tile. The trajectory of a football pass or kick illustrates not only the principles of projectile
motion, but also some basic concepts of aerodynamics.
the drag force in the form Fo = mKv2, where m is the mass of the 'VI'
0
projectile and K is the drag factor. By comparison with Eq. (1) we ~ 50
see that K = P AC o/2m. Taking into account the preceding esti- UJ
V
mates of the range of values for A and Co, we find that K ranges Z 1<: o. 001 FT- I
40
from 0.001 ft- I (football traveling nose-first) to 0.010 ft- I (football oc{
l-
traveling broadside). Theoretically, K ought to take on its minimum f/)
\
of K) can be most easily obtained graphically. Fig. 2 shows the D-T
curves for selected values of v0 and 90 at K = 0.003 ft-I. The cir- !. I I / / \/ \ "0
I
",5
cles and crosses represent selected kicks and punts taken from the ;;
:t -7--
10 ---( / /0
. . . '"\ /1\\ <
I \
'iii'
p
data in Table I. One can readily interpolate the corresponding launch-
I / / \/ \/ \
-?: ~
(,0
ing parameters for any given kick from the graph. This procedure UJ
f."...-I- -/....... / j\ \ '-50
can then be repeated for different values of K to establish a range U ('5 '1 / / . . . .1.... / ' I \ Y
of possible launching parameters for a given kick. Z S5 I / / / \ ~ \ /\
..-
tit
--
.-/"' -, /.............
I
I \ / \ f\/ \\
Results 0 So 60 1', / + '-< \/ \+\ 70.
K (ft- 1) Yo 80 Yo 80 Yo 80 Yo 80
0 51 61 57 52 61 71 62 62
0.001 55 60 62 50 66 70 67 60
0.002 58 58 68 48 71 68 74 58
0.003 62 56 76 46 77 67 82 56
0.004 68 55 84 44 84 65 92 54
0.005 71 53 95 42 92 64 102 52
Estimate Yo= 60 Yo = 70 Yo = 70 Vo = 70
of 80 = 57 8 0 = 47 80 = 69 8 0 = 59
Table II. Estimated Launching Parameters K = 0.0025 K= 0.002 K = 0.002 K= 0.0015
Parameters - Kickoffs and Punts
This range can be further narrowed by considering the cor- drop below 50 to gain more distance, or go as high as 70 to gain
responding values of the launching speed vo' The sports research more hang time. In general, it turns out that by launching a punt at
literature contains reports of actual measurements of the launching a 55 angle instead of45~ a punter sacrifices about five yards of dis-
speed of a kicked football. 4,5 Typically, these are obtained from tance in exchange for an extra 0.55 sec. of hang time.
cinematographic studies, in a laboratory setting, using one or more Finally, it is of interest to compare the estimated launching
kickers from the college football team. Generally, the top launching parameters with those calculated on the assumption that air resis-
speeds reported do not exceed 60 mph. On this basis, we might ex- tance can be neglected. Bartlett has described a "take-home experi-
pect the best professional punters to attain launching speeds around ment" in which students are asked to record distances and hang times
70 mph. On kickoffs, the kicker augments his launching speed by for kicks and punts, and then to calculate Vo and -9 0 using the stan-
running for about 10 yards prior to the kick. It is reasonable to expect dard projectile motion equations.6,7 This is, of course, a very admira-
that this maneuver will add about 10 mph to the kicker's stationary ble and creative way to familiarize students with simple measure-
launching speed. ment procedures as well as the fundamentals of kinematics. It should
With these restrictions on the maximum launching speed in be noted, however, that if air resistance is ignored the calculated
mind, I have made what I consider to be reasonable estimates of the launching speeds will be undervalued by about 10 to 20 mph, while
launching parameters (vo, 90 , K) for each of the kicks and punts the calculated launching angles will be consistently too large by about
listed in Thble II. On this basis, we can now come to some conclu- 5.
sions about kicking strategy. Assuming that the average well-executed
professional kickoff is launched at a speed of about 70 mph, we find Conclusion
that the average kick is being launched at an angle of about 45. (It
also appears that the end-oyer-end motion of the football in flight This study demonstrates that it is possible to construct a con-
creates an effective drag factor of K = 0.003 ttl). Longer-than- sistent model of the trajectory of a football kick, using the laws of
average kickoffs are evidently the result of higher-than-average launch- projectile motion and basic aerodynamics. This model is able to de-
ing speeds. It seems clear then, that kickoff specialists have adopted termine within a fairly narrow range the launching angles used for
the strategy of kicking to maximize distance, by launching the kick- kickoffs and punts. We have seen that kickers and punters have de-
offs at about a 45 angle. One exception to this rule is presented in veloped distinctly different strategies: kickoffs are launched at an-
Thble II by the kickoff with the longest observed hang time (4.6 sec.), gles near 45 to maximize their distance, whereas punts are typi-
which was probably launched (inadvertently?) at about a 60 angle. cally launched at angles closer to 60~ thereby trading distance to
Punters, however, are more willing to sacrifice distance to gain gain additional hang time.
hang time. If we assume that punting launching speeds fall in the Are these the best strategies to use? Generally, the most sig-
60 to 70 mph range for well-executed punts, we see that the effective nificant statistical measure of success ought to be the net yardage
value of K is about 0.002 fe l . Accordingly, the typical launching an- gained on the kick or punt, i.e., the length of the kick minus the
gle for a punt is between 55 and 60. Some punters may on occasion runback. My own statistics show that on kickoffs, net yardage is in-
K (ft- l ) vo 80 vo 80 vo 80 vo 80
0 54 51 59 48 56 64 59 55
0.001 58 49 64 46 60 62 65 53
0.002 63 47 72 44 65 61 71 51
0.003 68 45 79 42 70 59 78 48
0.004 75 44 89 40 75 58 88 46
0.005 83 42 101 38 82 56 99 44
Best
Table II. Estimated Launching
Parameters - Kickoffs and Punts Estimate Vo = 70 Vo = 80 Vo = 70 Vo = 80
(Continued)
of 80 = 45 8 0 = 42 8 0 = 60 80 = 48
Parameters K = 0.003 K = 0.003 K = 0_003 K = 0.003
References
deed maximized by kicking for distance (specifically, by trying to 1. H. Rouse, Elementary Mechanics ofFluids (John Wiley & Sons, New York,
put the ball deep into the end zone). With regard to punts, the statis- (1946).
2. P. J. Brancazio, Phys. Teach. 23, 20 (1985).
tics show a strong correlation between hang time and net yardage
3. C. Frohlich, Am. J. Physics. 52, 325 (1984).
- indicating that it is effective to launch steeply-angled punts. Any 4. J. Kermond & S. Konz, Res. Q. (AAHPER) 49, 71 (1978).
further considerations, however, are best left to more knowledgea- 5. D. I. Miller, Res. Q. (AAHPER) 51, 219 (1980).
ble football analysts. 6. A. Bartlett, Phys. Teach. 22, 386 (1984).
7. T. R. Sandin, Phys. Tech. 23, 6 (1985).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Last month the initials "C. E." appeared in the box on page 371. For those of you who
may have wondered who "C. E." was-she is Carole Escobar, a relic from the Stony-
brook days. During this transitional period of time, we do have a few articles which have
been carried over.
M.A.H.