Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Problem Set 2
Due Thursday Feb 21 at 11.00AM
Assigned Reading:
(a) What is the dierence between phase velocity and group velocity? How do they
dier in gravity waves in the open ocean?
(b) Why do waves break on a beach? Waves seem to get taller as they approach a
beach is this accurate, or an optical illusion?
(c) A surfer is waiting for a wavepacket of ocean waves which is approaching a beach.
(For concreteness, let it be an innite linear beach with beautiful beige sand,
constant slope, warm air and little surf shacks and ceviche bars every few kilo
meters.) To the surfers frustration, the rst few waves appear to dissolve before
arriving. Is this accurate, or an illusion? Use the dierence between wave and
group velocity to explain why big waves tend to approach the beach in sets.
3. (5 points) Dimensions of
By denition,
(x) = dx P(x) x = dx |(x)|2 x.
Using the denition of expectation values of (powers of) the momentum operator,
The relation P(k) = |(k)|2 , as discussed in lecture, thus follows from the Born relation,
P(x) = |(x)|2 .
8.04: Problem Set 2 3
0 6 0
x=
(x) =
x=0
Lesson: Delta functions are magical beasts which help you solve any integral at a glance!
(b) Two expressions D1 (x) and D2 (x) involving delta functions are equal if, for any
smooth function f (x),
Z Z
dx D1 (x) f (x) = dx D2 (x) f (x)
1
See Problem 5 for practice with the function.
8.04: Problem Set 2 5
from problem 6, which is just a step function centered on the origin. On rst glance
this looks like a perfectly reasonable wavefunction: it is normalizable, x is nite, its
fourier transform is simple... However, since it has discontinuities at x = a2 , acting
on it with p = in x leads to divergences, and in particular to divergent expectation
values for the momentum. That doesnt seem very physical! Lets make this precise:
(a) Determine the normalization constant N and calculate the uncertainty x. How
does this compare with your estimate from the problem 6?
(b) Calculate (p) and (p2 ) by using the fourier transform you calculated in problem 6
and your results from problem 4. Notice that your result for (p2 ) is divergent!
What must be true of the large-k behavior of (k) to ensure that (p2 ) is nite?
2
Aside: We could alternatively compute (p2 ) via dx (x) (n2 x
R
2 )(x). Verifying
that this gives the same divergence is straightforward but involves delicate manipulations
involving derivatives of delta functions try it if youre up for a computational challenge.
As you have shown, the discontinuous wavefunction 7 (x) gives divergent values for
(p2 ) and so seems quite unphysical. You have also shown that its fourier transform
7 (k) falls o very slowly for large k. In this problem well explore the connection
between continuity, niteness of (p2 ) and the large-k behavior of .
(a) Sketch 7b (x) for various values of b to convince yourself that 7b (x) well approx
imates 7 (x) as b 0. Argue that, for b a, N is roughly independent of b.
Compute N when b 0.
(b) Show that the fourier transform of 7b (x) is,
b sin( ka
)
7b (k) = N 2
.
2 sinh( kb
2
)
(c) How does |7b (k)|2 behave for large values of k? Compare with |7 (k)|2 . What
does this imply about (p2 )?
(d) In the limit that b a (so that N is independent of b and you can use the value
you computed above), and without evaluating any integrals, show that
1
p .
ab
For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.