Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Justice
Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case.
Sincerely,
Donna Carr
Chief Clerk
Enclosure
Panel Members:
Grant, Edward R.
Userteam: Docket
Cite as: Ruben Masson-Orta, A025 408 267 (BIA Nov. 9, 2017)
U.S. Department of Justice Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Executive Office for Immigration Review
MOTION
APPLICATION: Reopening
This case was last before us on July 17, 2002, when we dismissed the respondent's appeal from
the Immigration Judge's March 9, 2000, decision. The respondent has now filed an untimely
motion to reopen proceedings on March 27, 2017. See 8 C.F.R. 1003.2(c). The Department of
Homeland Security (OHS) opposes the motion, which will be granted.
In his motion, the respondent requests a remand to pursue adjustment of status pursuant to
section 245(a) of the Act. He argues that, pursuant to Lanier v. U.S. Attorney General, 631 F.3d
1361 (11th Cir. 2011), he is now eligible for adjustment of status in conjunction with a waiver of
inadmissibility pursuant to section 212(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. 8 U.S.C.
1182(h). He argues that the Eleventh Circuit's recent decision represents a "compelling and
fundamental change in law." warranting sua sponte reopening pursuant to Matter ofG-D-, 22 I&N
Dec. 1132 (BIA 1999). Given the respondent's argument, the Eleventh Circuit's Lanier decision,
and our own recent precedent decisions touching on the issues involved in the respondent's current
motion, we will remand the record for further proceedings regarding the respondent's eligibility
for adjustment of status. See generally Matter of J-H-J-, 26 l&N Dec. 563, 564 (BIA 2015); see
also Matter of Vella, 27 I. & N. Dec. 138, 141 (BIA 2017). As such, the following order will be
entered.
ORDER: The record is remanded to the gration Court for further proceedings consistent
with the foregoing decision.
Cite as: Ruben Masson-Orta, A025 408 267 (BIA Nov. 9, 2017)