You are on page 1of 34

Analysis of sample size

in consumer surveys

GfK Polonia, 2013, Poland


Agenda
1. Introduction
a. Theoretical aspects
b. Sample size in the DG ECFIN Consumer Survey

2. Quality measures vs. sample size


a. Sample size - analysis of impact
b. Effective sample size - analysis of impact
c. Additional analysis

3. Summary and conclusions

4. References.
November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia
2
1. Introduction

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


3
Sample size: Theoretical aspects

Main aspects of determining the size of a sample

the purpose of the study


population size
sampling error (the level of precision)
the confidence level
the degree of variability in the main measured attributes

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


4
Sample size: Theoretical aspects

Ways of determining the size of a sample

using or conducting a census survey


transfer a sample size from a similar study
using published tables
applying of formulas to calculate a sample size

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


5
Sample size: Theoretical aspects, formulas

Representative sample for proportions in large populations


(W. G. Cochran)

n0 - the sample size


Z2 - the abscissa of the normal curve that cuts off an area at the tails
e - the acceptable sampling error
p - the estimated proportion of an attribute that is present in the population

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


6
Sample size: Theoretical aspects, formulas

Finite population correction for proportions

n0 - the initial sample size


n - adjusted sample size
N - the population size.

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


7
Sample size: Theoretical aspects, formulas

Simplified formula for proportions*


(Taro Yamane)

n - the sample size


N - the population size
e - the acceptable sampling error

* 95% confidence level and p = 0.5 are assumed

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


8
Sample size: Theoretical aspects, formulas

Formula for sample size for the mean

n0 - the sample size


Z - the abscissa of the normal curve that cuts off an area at the tails
e - the acceptable sampling error
2 - the variance of an attribute in the population

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


9
Sample size: Theoretical aspects

Dependence of sampling error on sample size

Margin of sampling error was calculated for 95% confidence interval, 50% fraction and infinite population
November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia
10
Sample size in the DG ECFIN Consumer Survey

Sample sizes in the survey

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


11
Sample size in the DG ECFIN Consumer Survey

Effective sample sizes in the survey


Effective sample size
2500

2000

1500

1000

500

0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


12
2. Quality measures vs. sample size

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


13
Quality measures

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


14
Sample size - analysis of impact on quality measures

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


15
Sample size - analysis of impact on quality measures

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


16
Sample size - analysis of impact on quality measures

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


17
Sample size - analysis of impact on quality measures

Quality measures as moving averages for cumulated countries samples

correlation BCS with


ref.series MCD_1 MCD_2
sample size (moving average) (moving average) (moving average)

500 34.0 2.90 1.69


800, 500 33.3 2.49 1.47
1000, 800, 500 58.9 2.34 1.36
1020, 1000, 800 59.0 2.37 1.38
1200, 1020, 1000, 800 65.9 2.14 1.24
1500, 1200, 1020, 1000 63.6 2.29 1.30
1661, 1500, 1200, 1020 59.1 2.25 1.26
1850, 1661, 1500, 1200 54.1 2.19 1.22
2000, 1850, 1661, 1500 52.1 2.28 1.26
2100, 2000, 1850, 1661 56.4 2.09 1.17
2350, 2100, 2000, 1850 53.4 2.12 1.18
3300, 2350, 2100, 2000 59.9 2.08 1.17
November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia
18
Sample size - analysis of impact on quality measures

Tendency of changes in the quality of data along with the increase of


sample size

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


19
Sample size - analysis of impact on quality measures

Tendency of changes in the quality of data along with the increase of


sample size

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


20
Effective sample size - analysis of impact on quality measures

100
correlation BCS with reference series

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Effective sample size

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


21
Effective sample size - analysis of impact on quality measures

3.5

2.5
MCD 1

1.5

0.5

0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Effective sample size


November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia
22
Effective sample size - analysis of impact on quality measures

2.5

1.5
MCD 2

0.5

0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Effective sample size

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


23
Effective sample size - analysis of impact on quality measures

Tendency of changes in the quality of data along with the increase of


effective sample size
100

90
series

80
series
reference

70
reference

60

50
withwith

40
BCS BCS

30
correlation

20
correlation

10

0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Sample
Effective size (cumulated
sample size (movinggroups)
averages)

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


24
Effective sample size - analysis of impact on quality measures

Tendency of changes in the quality of data along with the increase of


effective sample size
3.0
MCD 1

2.5

2.0
MCD 2

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Effective sample size (moving averages)

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


25
Additional analysis

Sample size and correlation BCS with reference series for 3 types of
sampling frames

telephone SF individual SF not classified SF

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


26
Additional analysis

Sample size and MCD 1 for 3 types of sampling frames

telephone SF individual SF not classified SF

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


27
Additional analysis

Sample size and MCD 2 for 3 types of sampling frames

telephone SF individual SF not classified SF

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


28
3. Summary and conclusions

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


29
Main findings

Both sample size and effective sample size have moderate impact on
quality measures
Although tendencies are slight they are quite clear and coherent for all
MCD1 and MCD2 measures. Picture for correlation is not so clear.

Effect of sample size on data volatility and consistency with reference


series is clear as tendency
Impact of effective sample size on MCD1, MCD2 is achieved also as a
trend, and for the major part of the ESS range rather strong
the ESS impact on correlation BCS with reference series is also clear
except the behavior of few biggest samples. It should be probably
analyzed in connection with other factors that influence the quality

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


30
Recommendations

Revise the way of determining the sample size in the


survey
Verify the sampling error based on conducted sample
size
Consider possibility of increase of sample size in some
countries
Compare similar sample sizes and their likely effects on
data quality

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


31
4. References

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


32
References
1. Glossary of Statistical Terms OECD
2. Srndal, Carl-Erik; Swensson, Bengt; Wretman, (2003). Model assisted
survey sampling. Springer. (Retrieved 2 2011)
3. Israel, Glen D. (1992) Determining Sample Size, Agricultural Education and
Communication Department, University of Florida, IFAS Extension, PEOD6
(Reviewed 2013)
4. Turner, Anthony G. Sampling frames and master samples. United Nations
Secretariat. Retrieved 12/11/2012.
5. Data source: Metadata_checked_by_partners - Consumers.xlsx
6. Cochran, W. G. (1963). Sampling Techniques, 2nd Ed., New York: John
Wiley and Sons, Inc.
7. Kish, Leslie. (1965). Survey Sampling. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
8. Sudman, Seymour. (1976). Applied Sampling. New York: Academic Press.
9. Yamane, Taro. (1967). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis, 2nd Edition, New
York: Harper and Row.

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


33
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

November 2013 , Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys , GfK Polonia


34

You might also like