Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273424151
CITATION READS
1 1,246
4 authors, including:
Lolita Marheni
Pertamina University
2 PUBLICATIONS 1 CITATION
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Lolita Marheni on 11 March 2015.
Basins despite compelling evidence that good was terminated by increasing clastic input from the
source rocks should have generated and expelled west. During Miocene the sea regressed, due to the
large volumes of hydrocarbon (Mason et al.,1993). uplift of Schwaner core and the Meratus
Mountains. Clastic input resulted in the deposition
This basin had a long and disappointing of eastwards-prograding deltaic sediments of the
exploration history. The lack of successful Warukin Formation. In Late Miocene the Meratus
exploration is quite difficult to understand and Mountain re-emerged. Followed by isostatic
accept. Why has a basin with good source rocks, subsidence of the basin which was situated in a
good reservoirs, multiple trap forming tectonics foreland position in relation to the rising
events and a setting and history similar to more mountains. Sediments shed from this uplift were
prolific surrounding basins so far produced so little deposited in the subsiding basin, resulting in the
oil? This question called as Barito Dilemma. deposition of thousands of meters of the Warukin
Barito basin is the best example of the Formation. The uplift of Meratus Mountains
effects of tectonic interaction on hydrocarbon continued into the Pleistocene and resulted in
deposition of the molassic-deltaic sediments of
habitat. In this basin, tectonics controlled each
component of the hydrocarbon of the hydrocarbon Pliocene Dahor Formation. (Figure 2). These
habitat (petroleum system). structural and depositional regimes still exist today
(Satyana, 1999).
The center of the basin submerged rapidly, basin depocentre. The sealing rocks provided by
and uplift of both the continental core to the west the intraformational shales.
and the Proto Meratus range in the east, supplied
abundant sediment, which became the paralic and The Tertiary tectonic events, imply
deltaic sequences of Warukin and Dahor hydrocarbon behaviour in Barito basin, which were
Formations. An orogeny in plio-Pleistocene time generated, migrated, and entrapped since the Early
resulted in a strong westward movement of the Miocene. Extensional tectonics in the Early
meratus block, which folded and thrust tha basin Tertiary formed rifted basin, provided tanjung
fill into a series of tight anticlines that were, in part, shales and coals source rock deposition in lacustrin
controlled by basement features (Siregar and environment. Subsidence and submergence
Sunaryo, 1980 op cit R.E. Wiiliams et al, 1986) controlled the wide distribution of Middle Tanjung
reservoir rocks. Extensional fault became channel
The largest oil field in this basin is the which controlled hydrocarbon migration in deeper
Tanjung Field discovered in 1938, it had a graben areas.
cumulative production up to 100 million barrels
through January 1985. The oil is highly paraffinic The Hydrocarbon Accumulation in the
with 33 to 41API gravity and is produced from basin is mainly roled by tectonics during Neogene
predominantly fluvial sandstones and and Pleistocene. Basin inversion, associated with
conglomerates of the Eocene age Tanjung the Meratus Uplift to form asymmetric basin. The
Formation. Oil production is also obtained from Barito basin dipping gently in the NW towards the
fractured basements rocks. Barito Platform, and steeply in the SE against the
Meratus Uplift. Due to isostasy, the central part of
The Warukin and Tapian Timur Fields Barito Basin subsided rapidly, causing the Tanjung
produce oil from the regressive Warukin source rocks to be deeply buried, maintained the
formation. (Miocene). The oil is more asphaltic, depth at which hydrocarbon were generated
with a gravity of 25 to 27API, and cumulative (Satyana and Silitonga, 1994).
production of the two fields to January 1985 was
about 13.50 million barrels. Compressional tectonism has created
the basin inversion. Asymmetric anticlines were
created along the reverse faults, hence
hydrocarbons disposed to fill that traps. Meratus
STRUCTURAL SETTINGS uplift was continuous during the Late Miocene,
Recently, five fields are known through the Pliocene, and peaked in the Plio-
producing hydrocarbons. Those are the Tanjung, Pleistocene. Tanjung Source rocks were already
South Warukin, Tambikin, East Tapian, and mature by the Late Miocene. Protoinverted
Central Warukin Fields. All of them occur in structural traps formed in the early Miocene.
faulted anticlines dipping to the east. (Figure 3) Hydrocarbons filled the trap through the faults.
Considering that in the early Pliocene the Tanjung
Middle Tanjung Sands (Middle Eocene) and source rocks had small capability to generate
in the Lower and Middle Warukin sands (Middle hydrocarbon (Satyana, 1998). Gas was generated
Miocene) provide good reservoir for hydrocarbons instead at those times.
formed, while Lower and Middle Tanjung coals
and carbonaceous shale, and Lower Warukin Plio Pleistocene tectonism imply on
carbonaceous shales generated hydrocarbons as Barito Basin inversion. Former traps were
well. The main kitchen is located in the present destructed and replaced by new traps. Hence
hydrocarbons may remigrated there. At this time,
PROCEEDINGS PIT IAGI SEMARANG 2009
The 38th IAGI Annual Convention and Exhibition
Semarang, 13 14 October 2009
Tanjung source rocks had to generate gas, instead Tanjung source rock in this area had exhausted
of generate oil. But, the Lower Warukin Shales their liquid hydrocarbon generating capabilities
reached the oil window in the peak episode of (Figure 5). Gas was generated and expelled, filling
tectonism during the time. Oil generated, started to the existing traps (Satyana, 1994).
migrate and accumulated in structural traps within
Warukin sands, made possibility for Warukin and Warukin formation was also have a
East Tapian Fields recharged. potencies to become source rock. This layer reach
maturity especially in Paringin Towards the center
Thus, how tectonics mainly controlled of the basin during Plio-Pleistocene. Maturity was
the oil distribution. Farther tectonics period also related with Plio-Pleistocene tectonism.
destroyed pre-existing traps, provided new (Figure 6). Lower Tanjung source rocks had
hydrocarbons pathwat to accumulate in newly ceased to generate oil and gas in the depocenter
formed traps. since the section was by now firmly within the dry
gas window.
(Satyana, 1994). In Late Miocene, Tanjung area 1. Tertiary tectonics occurs in Barito Basin very
was uplifted due to the Proto meratus uplift, complex. Start with rifting, inversion,
forming structural traps. Hydrocarbon migration compressional, and others activity.
pathways to these trap were up the fault planes
along permeable layers. 2. Barito Basin has a good potencial of source rock,
in maturity, and richness as the result of tectonics
New inversion traps could have been activity.
formed caused by Plio-Pleistocene tectonism. The
tectonism also caused the whole of the Barito Basin 3. Tectonic activities that occur in this basin
tobe uplifted, folded, and faulted (rotinsulu, 1993). influence petroleum system (trap and migration).
These structures also destroyed some existing trap. For example, inversion destroyed the old trap and
The hydrocarbon probably remigrated from old creates news traps, and the hydrocarbon remigrate
trap that are tilted or breached to newly formed into a new trap.
structures.
Figure 2. Stratigraphic chart of the Barito Basin showing major formations, their paleofacies, and coeval
tectonic episodes (Satyana, 1994)
PROCEEDINGS PIT IAGI SEMARANG 2009
The 38th IAGI Annual Convention and Exhibition
Semarang, 13 14 October 2009
Figure 4. Lower Tanjung graben fill facies. Productive sand bodies in Tanjung Field are indicated.
(Satyana 1995)
PROCEEDINGS PIT IAGI SEMARANG 2009
The 38th IAGI Annual Convention and Exhibition
Semarang, 13 14 October 2009
Figure 5. retrodeformable sections across east barito basin showing the evolution of inversion
structures and associated petroleum indication. (Satyana, 1993)
PROCEEDINGS PIT IAGI SEMARANG 2009
The 38th IAGI Annual Convention and Exhibition
Semarang, 13 14 October 2009
Figure 6. Restored section of barito basin and the hydrocarbon generation (Rotinsulu et al., 1993)
PROCEEDINGS PIT IAGI SEMARANG 2009
The 38th IAGI Annual Convention and Exhibition
Semarang, 13 14 October 2009
Figure 7. Hydrocarbon Generation and Migration Pattern Map of Tanjung Formation (Rotinsulu
et al., 1993)
PROCEEDINGS PIT IAGI SEMARANG 2009
The 38th IAGI Annual Convention and Exhibition
Semarang, 13 14 October 2009
Figure 8. Hydrocarbon generation and migration pattern map of warukin formation (Rotinsulu at al., 1993)
PROCEEDINGS PIT IAGI SEMARANG 2009
The 38th IAGI Annual Convention and Exhibition
Semarang, 13 14 October 2009
Figure 9. Cross Section of Tanjung Field. Picture Shows Anticlinal Structure In This Field.
Figure 10. Cross Section of Tapian Field. Picture Shows Anticlinal Structure In This Field.
PROCEEDINGS PIT IAGI SEMARANG 2009
The 38th IAGI Annual Convention and Exhibition
Semarang, 13 14 October 2009
Figure 11. Cross Section of Warukin Field. Picture Shows Anticlinal Structure In This Field.