dsd Fac owned by t

The appellants were the owners of the house, worth P200.00, built on
and owned by them and situ the said municipality Lagangilang hem and
situated in the sa and owned by them and situ the said municipality
Lagangilang hem and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that
sometime in January 1957 appealed forcibly demolished the house, claiming
to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:

The appellants were the owners of the house, worth P200.00, built on
and owned by them and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that
sometime in January 1957 appealed forcibly owned by them and situated in
the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January 1957 appealed
forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:
and owned by them and situ the said municipality Lagangilang hem
and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January
1957 appealed forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:

The appellants were the owners of the house, worth P200.00, built on
and owned by them and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that
sometime in January 1957 appealed forcibly owned by them and situated in
the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January 1957 appealed
forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:
and owned by them and situ the said municipality Lagangilang hem
and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January
1957 appealed forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:

The appellants were the owners of the house, worth P200.00, built on
and owned by them and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that
sometime in January 1957 appealed forcibly owned by them and situated in

3
the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January 1957 appealed
forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:
and owned by them and situ the said municipality Lagangilang hem
and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January
1957 appealed forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:

The appellants were the owners of the house, worth P200.00, built on
and owned by them and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that
sometime in January 1957 appealed forcibly owned by them and situated in
the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January 1957 appealed
forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:
and owned by them and situ the said municipality Lagangilang hem
and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January
1957 appealed forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:

The appellants were the owners of the house, worth P200.00, built on
and owned by them and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that
sometime in January 1957 appealed forcibly owned by them and situated in
the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January 1957 appealed
forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:
and owned by them and situ the said municipality Lagangilang hem
and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January
1957 appealed forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:

The appellants were the owners of the house, worth P200.00, built on
and owned by them and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that

3
sometime in January 1957 appealed forcibly owned by them and situated in
the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January 1957 appealed
forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:
and owned by them and situ the said municipality Lagangilang hem
and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January
1957 appealed forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:

The appellants were the owners of the house, worth P200.00, built on
and owned by them and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that
sometime in January 1957 appealed forcibly owned by them and situated in
the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January 1957 appealed
forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:
and owned by them and situ the said municipality Lagangilang hem
and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January
1957 appealed forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:

The appellants were the owners of the house, worth P200.00, built on
and owned by them and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that
sometime in January 1957 appealed forcibly owned by them and situated in
the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January 1957 appealed
forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:
and owned by them and situ the said municipality Lagangilang hem
and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January
1957 appealed forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:

3
 The appellants were the owners of the house, worth P200.00, built on
and owned by them and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that
sometime in January 1957 appealed forcibly owned by them and situated in
the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January 1957 appealed
forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:
and owned by them and situ the said municipality Lagangilang hem
and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January
1957 appealed forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:

The appellants were the owners of the house, worth P200.00, built on
and owned by them and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that
sometime in January 1957 appealed forcibly owned by them and situated in
the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January 1957 appealed
forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:
and owned by them and situ the said municipality Lagangilang hem
and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January
1957 appealed forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:

The appellants were the owners of the house, worth P200.00, built on
and owned by them and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that
sometime in January 1957 appealed forcibly owned by them and situated in
the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January 1957 appealed
forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:
and owned by them and situ the said municipality Lagangilang hem
and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January
1957 appealed forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:

3
 The appellants were the owners of the house, worth P200.00, built on
and owned by them and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that
sometime in January 1957 appealed forcibly owned by them and situated in
the said municip owned by them and situ the said municipality Lagangilang
hem and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in
January 1957 appealed forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA ality Lagangilang; that sometime in January 1957 appealed
forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:
and owned by them and situ the said municipality Lagangilang hem
and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January
1957 appealed forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:

The appellants were the owners of the house, worth P200.00, built on
and owned by them and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that
sometime in January 1957 appealed forcibly owned by them and situated in
the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January 1957 appealed
forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:
id municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January 1957 appealed
forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:

The appellants were the owners of the house, worth P200.00, built on
and owned by them and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that
sometime in January 1957 appealed forcibly owned by them and situated in
the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January 1957 appealed
forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:

The appellants were the owners of the house, ated in the said
municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January 1957 appealed forcibly
owned by them and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang hem and
3
situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January 1957
appealed forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:

The appellants were the owners of the house, worth P200.00, built on
and owned by them and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that
sometime in January 1957 appealed forcibly owned by them and situated in
the said municipality Lagangilang; that sometime in January 1957 appealed
forcibly demolished the house, claiming to be the
sdss
6 SCRA 649, 651
(1 Facts:

The appellants were the owners of the house, worth P200.00, built on and
owned by them and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that
sometime in January 1957 appealed forcibly ts:

The appellants were the owners of the house, worth P200.00, built on
and
demolished the house, claiming to be the
983)

Ponente: Makalintal, J.:

Facts:

The appellants were the owners of the house, worth P200.00, built on
and owned by them and situated in the said municipality Lagangilang; that
sometime in January 1957 appealed forcibly demolished the house, claiming
to be the

The dismissal of the complaint was proper. A house is classified as

immovable property by reason of its adherence to the soil on which it is built
(Art. 415, par. 1, Civil Code). This classification holds true regardless of the
fact that the house may be situated on land belonging to a different owner.
But once the house is demolished, as in this case, it ceases to exist as such
and hence its character as an immovable likewise ceases.