Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HDFS 421
Introduction
The C-TRF Assessment was done on Alex, on September 27th, 2011. Alex is a female
child, who was approximately 26 months old at the time of the assessment. The assessment was
done following Alexs teachers concerns about her behavior. The C-TRF Assessment measures
the childs internal and external behaviors with scores from 0 to 2, and then compares these
scores with other children of the same gender who have not been diagnosed with a disability.
The purpose of the assessment is to determine which behaviors of Alexs are most concerning,
and whether or not these behaviors are at or above the clinical range.
Data Summary
Raw 4 8 9 6 12 10 24
Score
Total 27 22 24
Raw
Score
T-Score 71 63 N/A
1
Alexs raw scores came from the number of check marks for each category. The T scores
came from a separate column which compared Alexs raw score to the raw scores of other
children given this assessment, and the percentiles were then found using the T scores on the
graph of Alexs scores. See Figure 1 in the Appendix for more details.
Interpretation
Alexs scores indicate that she is above the borderline clinical range in three areas:
anxiousness/depression, somatic complaints, and attention problems. Alex is just below the
clinical range in emotional reactivity, and in the withdrawn category. For the sole reason that it
is extremely far above the clinical range; Alexs level for somatic complaints is of the utmost
concern.
Alexs T-score for somatic complaints is approximately 85. This means that Alex is over
three standard deviations above the median of her peers in this category. This is a major cause
for concern, because Alex is far beyond the level of the majority of her peers in this category.
Furthermore, it is quite possible and also probable that any issue that causes these somatic
complaints to be so high would also impact the other categories that also had very high scores.
The scores that are of little concern are Alexs level of aggression, emotional reactivity,
and being withdrawn. Though in the withdrawn category and emotionally reactivity category
Alexs scores are close to the borderline range, they are both within one standard deviation of the
median. Both T-scores are between 40 and 60, which indicate that they are within one standard
deviation (10) of the median (50). These scores are within the normal range for Alexs peers.
Alexs score for aggressive behavior is significantly below the borderline clinical range; which is
positive because it means that Alex exhibits too little aggressive behavior to be considered
borderline clinical.
Recommendation
It is recommended that Alex is further tested for an impairment or disability related to her
somatic complaints. Alexs somatic complaints are high above the clinical range, and high
above the median of her peers. It is possible that Alex may have a physical illness or disability
that is causing her distress. If this is the case, it needs to be diagnosed and treated posthaste. It is
also possible that any illness or disability that Alex has is affected other areas of her life; causing
other behavioral problems (such as lack of attention, shyness, etc.), or negatively impacting her
ability to learn.
Alex should be taken to see a pediatrician, as a first step. If this is not possible, her
somatic complaints (specifically aches, headaches, nausea, and vomiting) should be closely
monitored and recorded while she is at school. If necessary and if possible, ABC records
regarding any instances of the above somatic complaints should be recorded. This would be
beneficial in providing insight into what leads up to these complaints, and what happens
afterwards. This information could show if Alex is having a reaction to something in her
Reflection
In this assignment, I learned about the C-TRF assessment and its uses, terminology, and
application. I also had to interpret and critically evaluate the data from Alexs data sheet and
translate it into different data. Then, I used this data to form conclusions and make
recommendations for the child. In all honesty, I still struggle with the concept of T-scores. I
often confuse them with z scores. However, in this assignment, the T-scores were clearly given
and their meaning was clearly explained in the manual. This was helpful for my learning. I
worked individually on this assignment, which was a challenge. Its possible that in a lab group
I may have found help with interpreting T-scores. However, in a lab group, I likely would have
just let someone else do the T-scores, and I would not have had to push myself to learn them. I
Appendix