Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HOT L e g a L i s s u e s i n p L a i n L a n g u a g e
Young people This is the seventy-third issue in the series Hot Topics:
legal issues in plain language, published by the Legal
Information Access Centre (LIAC). Hot Topics aims to
give an accessible introduction to an area of law that is
1 overview
What is juvenile justice? major juvenile justice legislation around
Australia international law Convention on the Rights of the
Child (CROC) age and criminal responsibility snapshot of NSW
young offenders juvenile justice in NSW.
AUTHOR NOTE: This issue has been co-written by:
7 police and young people Jenny Bargen, Adjunct lecturer, Sydney Law School; member,
Searches sniffer dogs for drug detection move-on directions Juvenile Justice Committee, Law Society of NSW; part time
arrest safeguards relating to police powers detention after arrest lecturer, UTS and Sydney Law School; formerly Director of
special protection for young people in police custody fines and Youth Justice Conferencing with the Department of Juvenile
Justice; writes and consults extensively on juvenile justice issues
young people special protection for young people during (Overview, Children in court, Diversionary schemes, Timeline);
police questioning. Jane Sanders Principal Solicitor for The Shopfront Youth
Legal Centre (Police and young people, Disadvantaged young
12 children in court people); Clare Blakemore Policy Officer, UnitingCare Burnside
The Childrens Court principles of juvenile justice Youth Drug (Juveniles on remand); Louise Sutherland Solicitor, Childrens
and Alcohol Court. Legal Service, Legal Aid NSW (Group offending) and Sarah
Crellin Solicitor, Childrens Legal Service, Legal Aid NSW
14 Diversionary schemes (Youth Drug and Alcohol Court).
Young Offenders Act (NSW) Youth Justice Advisory Committee Some material in this issue has been based on a previous issue,
warnings cautions youth justice conferences No. 49: Juvenile justice.
DESIGN: Bodoni Studio
17 Juveniles on remand PHOTOS: Cover image and p 6 DW Stock Photo Library;
Children and young people locked in the system Who are the pp 11 & 29 Fairfax Photos; p 13 Corbis Images; p 16 NSW
children and young people on remand? Why is this happening? Police Service; p 23 iStockphoto.
What are the consequences? other options/solutions.
22 group offending state Library of nsW
Joint criminal enterprise common purpose or extended joint cataloguing-in-publication data
criminal enterprise background to the Group Offending Project Title: Young people and crime/[Jenny Bargen ... [et al.];
Burn project. editor Cathy Hammer].
Publisher: Sydney, N.S.W.: Legal Information Access Centre, 2010.
25 Disadvantaged young people Subjects: Juvenile delinquency New South Wales
Indigenous young people newly-arrived young people young Juvenile delinquency Australia
women or girls and juvenile justice young people with intellectual Juvenile justice, Administration of New South Wales
disabilities young people with mental health issues homeless Juvenile justice, Administration of Australia
Youth Legal status, laws, etc. New South Wales
young people and children in need of care. Youth Legal status, laws, etc. Australia
30 timeline Other Authors/Contributors:
Bargen, Jenny
36 Further information Sanders, Jane
Blakemore, Clare
Hammer, Cathy
Legal Information Access Centre
Series: Hot topics (Sydney, N.S.W.); no. 73
Dewey Number: 345.99403
hot topics issn 1322- 4301, no. 73
Hot Topics is intended as an introductory guide only and should not be interpreted as legal advice. Whilst every effort is made to provide the most
accurate and up-to-date information, the Legal Information Access Centre does not assume responsibility for any errors or omissions. If you are
looking for more information on an area of the law, the Legal Information Access Centre can help see back cover for contact details. If you want
specific legal advice, you will need to consult a lawyer.
Copyright in Hot Topics is owned by the State Library of New South Wales. Material contained herein may be copied for the non-commercial purpose
of study or research, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth).
Overview
it is widely acknowledged in australia and Both the Police Force and Attorney Generals have
around the world that children and young people responsibility for adult offenders as well as young
should be subject to a system of criminal justice offenders. Only Juvenile Justice is solely responsible
that is separate from the adult system and that for young offenders those who have been referred to
a youth justice conference by either the police or the
recognises their inexperience and immaturity. as
Childrens Court, and those who are on community or
such, children are typically dealt with separately
custodial orders made by the Childrens Court.
from adults and treated less harshly than their
adult counterparts.1 No single piece of legislation regulates the juvenile justice
system in any Australian jurisdiction. Some legislation
applies only to children while other legislation applies to
WHAT IS JUVENILE JUSTICE? both children and adults. The following table shows the
variety of legislation applicable to children and young
Juvenile justice is a combination of rules, institutions
people in trouble with the law in all Australian states
and people involved in the control, punishment and
and territories.
rehabilitation of children and young people as suspects
and, most commonly, as offenders. The system of Apart from legislation, another defining boundary is
juvenile justice is primarily the responsibility of state the age at which a person allegedly commits an offence.
governments, with state legislation, and state departments Except in Queensland, where the cut-off age is 17, those
and facilities. Various Federal and local authorities, who are under 18 when they commit an offence are dealt
as well as a range of non-government agencies, also with in the juvenile justice system up until they turn
play a role in the operation of juvenile justice in each 21;2 those who are over 18 when they commit an offence
state and territory. International instruments, such as are dealt with in the adult criminal justice system. The
the UN International Covenant on Civil and Political one exception to this is in NSW where young people
Rights (ICCPR), the UN Convention on the Rights who are old enough to hold a drivers licence or permit
of the Child (CROC), the UN Standard Minimum are dealt with for traffic offences in the adult Local
Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (the Courts. However, where the young person has allegedly
Beijing Rules) and the UN Minimum Rules for the committed other offences related to the traffic offence/s,
Treatment of Children Deprived of their Liberty provide all offences may be dealt with in the Childrens Court.
useful benchmarks against which legislation, policy and
However, those under 18 who allegedly commit serious
practice in juvenile justice may be measured.
offences may be tried in the adult courts (in NSW, either
The laws, practices, policies and players who make up the District or Supreme Courts), and under certain
the system of juvenile justice can be called a system conditions may be transferred between Juvenile Justice
only in a very loose sense. In NSW, for example, Centres and adult Correctional Centres (gaols).
three government agencies play major roles in juvenile
The system is also closely linked to the welfare system
justice the NSW Police Force, the Attorney General
because many of the children who are in the child
in the Department of Justice and the Attorney General
protection system are also in the juvenile justice system.
(DJAG), and Juvenile Justice, in the Department of
Human Services. Corrective Services NSW (in DJAG) From the late 1980s juvenile justice has been the subject
also plays a part, with responsibility for the incarceration of considerable debate and change. One of the most
of some young offenders who are aged over 18 but have important changes in this period was the introduction
committed a serious offence when aged under 18 and of legislation that specifically regulates the diversion
have been sentenced to a term of imprisonment. of young offenders from both court and custody.
1. Juveniles contact with the criminal justice system in Australia, K Richards, Monitoring Report No. 7, Australian Institute of Criminology, 2009,
p 22; available at www.aic.gov.au
2. In NSW only see Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW), sections 5 and 28(1). In Victoria, the maximum age at which an adult
can be tried as a child is 19 see section 516(5), Children, Youth and Families Act 2005. In other jurisdictions, no exceptions are made so that
those over 18 (17 in Queensland) who commit offences when they are aged less than 18 but are not apprehended until after they turn 18 are
dealt with in the adult courts.
overview 1
MAJOR JUVENILE JUSTICE LEGISLATION AROUND AUSTRALIA 3
nsW Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987
3. Juveniles contact with the criminal justice system in Australia, K Richards, Monitoring Report No. 7, Australian Institute of Criminology, 2009,
4. Young Offenders Act 1993 (SA), Young Offenders Act 1994 (WA), Young Offenders Act 1997 (NSW).
5. Juvenile Justice Act 1994 (Qld), Youth Justice Act 1997 (Tas).
6. For a detailed analysis of diversionary legislation, see, Kids, cops, courts, conferencing and childrens rights, J Bargen in Children on the
agenda: The rights of Australias children, M Jones and L A Basser Marks (eds), Prospect Publishing, 2001.
7. Crimes (Restorative Justice) Act 2004 (ACT).
8. International instruments suggest but do not stipulate that the minimum age should be 10 years. Rather, State parties are encouraged to set
a higher age of criminal responsibility. In the UK, the age of criminal responsibility is 10, but in other European countries, the minimum
age is much higher for example, in Sweden the minimum age is 17. For discussion and information about the varying ages of criminal
responsibility for children, see The globalization of crime controlthe case of youth and juvenile justice: Neo-liberalism, policy convergence
and international conventions, J Muncie (2005) 9(1) Theoretical Criminology, pp 35-64.
overview 3
> All offences (except very serious offences) are heard SNAPSHOT OF NSW YOUNG OFFENDERS
in specialist Childrens (or Youth) Courts which are
Children and young people under the age of 18 who
usually closed to the public for privacy reasons, and
are involved in the juvenile justice system constitute
which are conducted with (arguably) less formality
a relatively small proportion of the child and youth
than adult criminal proceedings.
population of NSW. Juvenile Justice NSW records
> A child under the age of 16 years found guilty of an indicate that, in 2008-09, for every 1000 people aged
offence in the NSW Childrens Court cannot have 10-17 resident in NSW:
a conviction recorded against them.9 In contrast,
> 13.5 had a criminal matter finalised in the Childrens
in Victoria, whether or not a conviction is recorded
Court;
depends on the nature of the sentence imposed
by the Childrens Court. For lesser sentences such > 11 were convicted and/or sentenced in these finalised
as undertakings and good behaviour bonds, no matters;
conviction is recorded. For greater sentences, such > 3.3 were given sentences requiring the department to
as fines, probation and supervision, the court has supervise them in their community; and
a discretion whether or not to record a conviction. > 1.0 was sentenced to detention.
Where the sentence is a Youth Attendance Order or a
custodial order (either to a Youth Residential Centre The available data suggest that anywhere between one in
or a Youth Justice Centre) the court must record a 10 to one in four persons with whom police have contact
conviction.10 as alleged offenders are children aged between 10 and
17 years. Approximately one-fifth of all alleged young
offenders are female. The majority are male and aged
between 15 and 17 years.
12. See Juvenile Justice: Youth and Crime in Australia, C Cunneen and R White, 3rd ed, 2007 Oxford University Press, at p 56; and Youth &
society: exploring the social dynamics of youth experience, R White and J Wyn, Oxford University Press, 2nd ed., 2008, p 161.
13. Juveniles in Detention in Australia, 1981-2007, N Taylor, Monitoring Report No. 5, Australian Institute of Criminology, 2009, available at
www.aic.gov.au/publications/current%20series/mr.aspx
14. Juveniles contact with the criminal justice system in Australia, K Richards, Monitoring report no. 7, Australian Institute of Criminology, 2009.
15. All the right moves? Police move-on powers in Victoria, J Farrell, Alternative Law Journal 34 (1) January 2009; pp 21-26.
overview 5
However, the daily average number of children and While supervising young offenders, either in custody or
young people in custody is now on the rise, principally in the community, Juvenile Justice provides rehabilitation
due to the increasing remand numbers that have flowed programs aimed at reducing the risk of a young persons
from changes to bail laws, particularly in NSW (see re-offending behaviour and assist them in addressing
Juveniles on remand, page 17). their underlying issues.
The agency also provides funding to a number of
JUVENILE JUSTICE IN NSW community agencies that give assistance to juvenile
A wide variety of government and non-government offenders and their families. For more information and
agencies are engaged in juvenile justice work. In NSW, current data on the work of Juvenile Justice NSW see
the NSW Police Force is responsible for the apprehension www.djj.nsw.gov.au.
of alleged young offenders, diversion of eligible and
entitled young offenders under the Young Offenders
Act, and commencing proceedings against children in
the Childrens Court. Specially trained police act as
prosecutors in the Childrens Court. Police also operate
youth crime prevention programs in many parts of
NSW. The Attorney General has overall responsibility
for youth crime prevention, the management and
maintenance of the NSW Childrens Court, and is
also responsible for the overall operation of the Young
Offenders Act. Legal Aid NSW operates a specialist
Childrens Legal Service (CLS) in Metropolitan Sydney.
Lawyers from the CLS represent and advise children
appearing in criminal matters in the specialist Childrens
Courts at Parramatta, Bidura (Glebe), Campbelltown,
and Wollongong. They also provide legal advice to
young people in police custody through the free Youth
Hotline, and to children and young people in Juvenile
Justice Centres through the Visiting Legal Service,
which is partly funded by Juvenile Justice. Legal Aid
NSW also pays private lawyers to represent children
in specialist Childrens Courts and in all Local Courts
sitting as Childrens Courts in rural and regional NSW.
Communities NSW (formerly the Department of im age u n av aila ble
Community Services) works with many clients who
are also under the supervision of Juvenile Justice,
and a court can request Communities NSW to find
accommodation for these children when they appear in
court for criminal matters. Juvenile Justice NSW (now
in the amalgamated Department of Human Services) is
responsible for the operation of youth justice conferences,
and for the supervision of children on community and
control (detention) orders. Juvenile Justice works with a
wide range of other government and non-government
agencies in providing services to children and young
people in trouble with the law. The relevant government
agencies include Ageing, Disability and Home Care and
Aboriginal Affairs. Juvenile Justice NSW is the largest
juvenile justice agency in Australia, but one of the
smallest agencies in the NSW bureaucracy.
young people
Legislation introduced since the mid-1990s in some intelligence that they might be involved in some
nsW has significantly increased police powers unspecified offending, was not sufficient to justify the
in relation to public order. the issue is an police stopping them. Further, the fact that the young
important one for children and young people. men strongly objected to being searched did not give the
as significant users of public spaces, young police any reasonable grounds to suspect that they may
people are more likely to be subject to police be in possession of something illegal.18
intervention through increased police powers
Police may conduct a search without reasonable suspicion
and public order offences.
with the consent of the person. Consent is a particularly
tricky issue where young people are concerned, because
The difficult relationship between young people and
police will often ask a young person to submit to a
police has been well documented over the years. There is
search without telling them they have the right to refuse.
a wealth of research and literature on the subject.16
If a young person consents to a search in the belief that
Negative contact over the use of police powers can lead they are under compulsion, this may not be genuine
to police charging young people with further offences, consent and the search may be unlawful.
such as the three offences known colloquially as the
Depending on the situation, police may conduct different
trifecta:
types of searches,19 including:
> resist arrest;
> a frisk search, which involves patting down the person
> assault police; and
and may include running a metal detector over the
> offensive language. person and their belongings
Most police powers in NSW are now covered by the > an ordinary search which may include requiring
Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 a person to empty their pockets and remove outer
(LEPRA), which commenced in late 2005. clothing such as a hat or jacket
> asking the person to open their mouth or move or
SEARCHES shake their hair; or
Police may stop and search a person if they suspect on > a strip search, which should only be done if police
reasonable grounds that the person is carrying: believe it is necessary for the purpose of the search
and if required by the seriousness or urgency of the
> prohibited drugs;
circumstances.
> stolen goods;
> something about to be used to commit an offence; or Police must follow rules to protect a persons privacy and
> a knife or other dangerous implement.17 dignity during the search.
Reasonable suspicion can be difficult to define, but The NSW Ombudsmans Policing Public Safety report,
must be more than just a hunch or a general prejudice published in 1999, examined the use of police powers to
towards certain groups of people. search for knives and dangerous implements. The report
found that 42 per cent of people searched for knives or
As the NSW Supreme Court has said, there must be weapons were juveniles. The majority of these searches
some factual basis for the suspicion and it must not be were unproductive compared to searches of adults,
arbitrary. For example, the fact that some young men which were more likely to result in a knife or weapon
were driving a car late at night, and the police received being found.20
16. For a summary, see Juvenile Justice: Youth and Crime in Australia, C Cunneen and R White, 3rd ed, Oxford University Press, 2007, Chapter 9,
Policing the Young.
17. Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act, sections 2 and 27.
18. Streat v Bauer; Streat v Blanco, NSW Supreme Court, 16 March 1998.
19. Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act, sections including 21A and 30-33.
20. Policing Public Safety, NSW Ombudsman, November 1999; www.ombo.nsw.gov.au/show.asp?id=389
SUPPORT PERSON
> harassment or intimidation of other people;
seventeen year old Johnny phung was suspected > fear in other people (although it is not actually
of committing an armed robbery and fatal shooting. necessary for there to be anyone else present at the
police arrested him and conducted two interviews
time); and
while he was in custody. in these interviews phung
made admissions about his involvement in the > the selling or buying of illegal drugs.
offence.
The direction must be reasonable in the circumstances to
When phung was charged and brought to court, reduce or eliminate the problem behaviour. A direction
Justice Wood refused to admit the interview banning a person from an area for a short period, may
transcripts, finding that the police had acted be reasonable, but a direction banning a person from a
improperly by not providing an appropriate support
large area, or for a long period such as seven days, would
person for phung.
probably be unreasonable.
the support person in the first interview was
phungs 21 year-old cousin, who did not have When giving directions, police must provide certain
strong english, and was himself intimidated by the information and, unless the person is already complying
police. the second support person was a salvation with the direction, must warn the person that failure to
army officer, who was a stranger to phung and did comply may be an offence. It is an offence to disobey a
not have any opportunity to talk to him privately. reasonable direction without a reasonable excuse.
Justice Wood found that neither support person
The NSW Ombudsmans Policing Public Safety report,
had been able to properly support phung. in
published in 1999, examined the use of directions.
particular, they did not seem to appreciate the
seriousness of the charges and they did not give Among the findings were that 48 per cent of all
phung any advice or guidance about his right to directions were issued to people under 18, with the
remain silent or to obtain legal advice. peak age being 16. In the Ombudsmans opinion, about
R v Phung and Hunyh [2001] NSWSC 115; available at 50 per cent of the directions were issued for reasons
www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWSC/2001/115.html
outside the scope of the relevant legislation; for example,
21. Review of certain functions conferred on police under the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002, NSW Ombudsman, May 2009;
www.ombo.nsw.gov.au/show.asp?id=523
22. Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act, sections 145-150, formerly Police Powers (Drug Detection Dogs) Act 2001.
23. Review of the Police Powers (Drug Detection Dogs) Act 2001, NSW Ombudsman, June 2006; www.ombo.nsw.gov.au/show.asp?id=431
24. Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act, Part 14, formerly Summary Offences Act, section 28F.
NSW police officers questioning two youths in Macquarie Fields, Sydney in 2005. An accident involving a stolen car
which killed two young passengers sparked four days of riots in the suburb.
Kate Geraghty, Sydney Morning Herald
37. NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, summary of criminal court statistics, www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/bocsar/ll_bocsar.nsf/
pages/bocsar_lc_05
38. State Debt Recovery Office WDOs, http://www.sdro.nsw.gov.au/lib/docs/forms/sdr037.pdf
children in court 13
Diversionary
schemes
all australian states and territories now have all young people in police custody for 24 hours a day on
diversionary schemes (alternatives to court) for weekends and public holidays, and between 9am and
young offenders, although there are significant midnight on other days.
differences in the way each of these schemes
operate. 41 YOUTH JUSTICE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
A Youth Justice Advisory Committee was established
YOUNG OFFENDERS ACT (NSW) soon after the YOA became law in 1998. Members
were drawn from both government and community
In the 1980s and 90s, police and other agencies in New
organisations. YJAC was responsible for reporting to the
South Wales experimented with a number of informal
Attorney General on the way the Act was working, and
alternatives to court. In April 1998, the Young Offenders
for overseeing the evaluation of the first three years of
Act 1997 (YOA) became law. The YOA introduced a
the operation of the Act. The Committee was abolished
graded diversionary scheme of police warnings, formal
in 2008, when section 70 of the YOA was repealed.
cautions, and youth justice conferences for young
offenders, designed to divert a significant majority of
young offenders from the courts. The only offences WARNINGS
that must go to court are those that cause death, sexual Under the YOA, police officers can decide to give young
assault offences, serious drug offences and a small people warnings for minor offences that do not involve
number of other offences.42 violence. A warning can be given at any time or place,
The YOA includes the principles that young people who and the young person does not have to admit the offence.
have committed an offence are entitled to be dealt with The police officer who gives the warning must record
in the least restrictive and most appropriate way, and the time, place, the offence, and the offenders name
that criminal proceedings should not be started if there and gender. The officer must ensure that the young
is an alternative and appropriate way of proceeding.43 person understands why he or she has been warned. The
fact that someone has previously been given a warning
By law, when police arrest a young person, they must does not automatically mean that they cannot be given
first consider whether a young person is eligible and another warning for a later offence.
entitled to be diverted. In practice, however, police often
decide not to use the YOA. Instead, an alleged young
HOT TIP
offender will be given strict bail conditions (see section
on bail) and sent to the Childrens Court. a warning is the least serious option for an
offence. Warnings are quick and informal, and
Police must tell young people that they are entitled to are issued on the spot. police use warnings for
obtain legal advice and where they can get that advice summary offences (minor offences), which dont
before they admit to an offence or agree to a caution involve violence. if you are given a warning you
or a youth justice conference. A Young Offenders dont get any penalty, or a criminal record, but the
Legal Hotline has been available for this purpose since police record your name and other details so that
if you commit a later offence they can find out if
December 1998. Lawyers from the Childrens Legal
youve already been given one or more warnings.
Service of NSW Legal Aid provide telephone advice to
41. See Restorative Justice and Conferencing in Australia, K Daly and H Hayes, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice Number 186,
Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, February 2001, for an overview of the use of restorative justice in all Australian jurisdictions.
See also Kids, courts, cops, conferencing and childrens rights a note on perspectives, J Bargen, in Children on the Agenda: the rights of
Australias children, M Jones and L A Basser Marks (eds), Prospect Media, Sydney, 2001.
42. See Young Offenders Act 1997 (NSW), section 8.
43. International instruments to which Australia is a signatory specify that court should be the option of last resort for young offenders: Article
37(b), UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Diversionary schemes 15
place at least a month after the referral has been received, evaluation
partly because of the extensive work the convenor must
Research has found that the YOA has reduced the number
do in preparation for the conference.
of young offenders appearing in court. Participants in
In keeping with their community-based philosophy youth justice conferences prefer conferences over court.
and purpose, youth justice conferences cannot be held Most conference participants consider that outcome
in police stations, court houses or Juvenile Justice plans are fair for victims.45
Community Offices.
Re-offending studies by the NSW Bureau of Crime
In addition to the convenor and the young person, their Statistics and Research found that youth justice
family, the victim/s and their supporters, professionals conferences are an effective way of reducing juvenile
who have a prior relationship with the young offender, crime. Re-offending rates for young people who are
interpreters, police officers, and the young persons cautioned are generally lower than for those who
lawyer may participate in a conference. participate in a conference, and both are lower than for
young people who go to court.46
The conference begins with introductions from everyone
and an explanation of how they have been affected by A Report on the Review of the Young Offenders Act 1997 by
the young persons offence. The victim and offender the NSW Attorney Generals department was tabled in
each tell their stories, after which the convenor will ask parliament on 24 June 2004.47 This report incorporates
for suggestions on how the offender can make good research on the operation of the Act by the NSW Bureau
the harm they have caused. An outcome plan for the of Crime Statistics and Research, and by Professor Janet
offender is discussed by everyone, and must be agreed Chan of the University of NSW.48
to by both the offender and victim/s. The outcome plan
Professor Chan found that the probability of an
can be creative, but must be realistic and achievable,
Aboriginal first offender being taken to court fell by
and no more severe than any order a court might have
almost 50 per cent between 1998 and 2001. However,
imposed for a similar offence in similar circumstances.
she also found that young Aboriginal offenders continue
Each outcome plan is different, but may include:
to remain significantly over-represented.
> unpaid work for the victim;
> counselling.
45. An Evaluation of the NSW Youth Justice Conferencing Scheme, L Trimboli, NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, Sydney, 2000.
46. Reducing Juvenile Crime: Conferencing versus Court, G Luke and B Lind, Crime and Justice Bulletin Number 69, NSW Bureau of Crime
Statistics and Research, April 2002; Reoffending among young people cautioned by police or who participated in a youth justice conference,
S Vignaendra and J Fitzgerald Crime and Justice Bulletin Number 103, NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, 2006.
47. See www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lap.nsf/files/Young_Offenders_Act_review.pdf/$FILE/Young_Offenders_Act_review.pdf
48. See Regulating police discretion: An assessment of the impact of the NSW Young Offenders Act 1997 J Chan, J Bargen, G Luke and G
Clancey, (2004) 28(2) Criminal Law Journal 72-92. See also Reshaping Juvenile Justice: the NSW Young Offenders Act, J B L Chan (ed), Sydney
Institute of Criminology, Sydney, 2005.
on remand
an increasing number of children and young sentence. This means that the vast majority of children
people in new south Wales are being held on and young people are spending time unnecessarily in a
remand in the states juvenile justice centres. detention centre.
This is due to current policies that make it unnecessarily WHO ARE THE CHILDREN AND
difficult for children and young people to access bail. YOUNG PEOPLE ON REMAND?
This results in children and young people remaining in
detention on remand when they should be on bail in the Children and young people in out-of-home care,
community. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and
young people, and children and young people from
HOT TIP regional areas are all over-represented in the juvenile
justice system.
What is remand?
a child or young person is considered to be on remand
> almost 50% of the children and young people on
when they are in detention but have not yet been remand are under 16.
sentenced. > around 80% of the children and young people on
remand are male.
What is bail?
> 1657 or 35.8% of the children and young people on
Bail is an agreement to attend court on a specific
remand in 2009 were Aboriginal or Torres Strait
day. this bail can either be set as unconditional or
conditional where the child or young person must
Islander.
abide by specific conditions. > 88% of the children and young people in custody
report symptoms consistent with mental illness (NSW
Department of Juvenile Justice 2009).
CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE
> 30% of young people in custody in 2003 were or had
LOCKED IN THE SYSTEM
been under the care of the Minister for Community
As the table indicates, the number of young people Services.50
admitted to custody on remand has been steadily
increasing. Currently, per day, the total remand HOT TIP: WHAT IS A CUSTODIAL
population is over 50 per cent of the total number of PENALTY?
young people in detention. a custodial penalty, also known as a custodial
control order, is when a young person is found
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
guilty of an offence and is ordered by the court to
Young people 3255 3444 3623 4263 5081 4634 serve their sentence in a juvenile justice centre.
admitted to
custody on
remand WHY IS THIS HAPPENING?
(Figures from NSW Auditor-General 2009) A number of factors are contributing to the rise in
However, only one in five, or 21 per cent of children and children and young people held in detention on remand.
young people on remand will go on to receive a custodial These include current difficulties in finding suitable
penalty at sentencing.49 Therefore, in 2009 there were accommodation for children and young people awaiting
approximately 3700 children and young people who finalisation of their court matters, changes to the Bail
were placed on remand in a juvenile justice centre that Act 1978 and restrictive bail conditions that are closely
a court judged were not required to serve a custodial monitored by police.
Juveniles on remand 17
As a result of these factors, many children and young
CASE STUDY SAMANTHA
people on remand are held there simply because they are
in 2005, while under the care of the department,
homeless, they do not have family supports that are close
i went into custody [on remand] at a Juvenile
by, their family home is not safe or they find it difficult Detention centre in sydney. i was granted bail
to meet their bail conditions. however i was not allowed to leave because Docs
[now known as community services] did not have a
Lack of suitable accommodation suitable placement for me. i told Docs i could stay
at my partners house but Docs wouldnt let me
When a child or young person who is homeless or in
and gave me no reason. While i was in jail i had no
need of care is charged with a criminal offence they are contact from Docs. i stayed in jail this time for about
often given an order as part of their bail conditions to 3-4 months until i went to court. By this time i had
reside as directed by Community Services.*51 turned 18. i was again given bail. i walked out of jail
* Note: Community Services was previously known as the and had nowhere to go and no support from Docs.
Department of Community Services (DoCS). It is now ace aftercare placed me into a motel for a week
located within the Department of Human Services. until a vacancy was available in a womens refuge.
This means that the court believes that the young person this was not the first time i was in this situation
will be unable to meet bail conditions if they return to while in care, it happened about 10 times from the
their usual place of residence, either because they are age of 14 until i turned 18 years old and left care.
homeless, or have accommodation which is unstable or these experiences were not only confusing for me
unsafe. The court therefore requests that Community but made me feel horrible and that i had no rights
Services find appropriate accommodation for the child at all.
or young person. The court is not proposing that the
child or young person be remanded in custody.
However, in many cases the reside as directed order new restrictions in the Bail act and a stretched
effectively turns into an order to remain on remand Legal aid system
as Community Services is frequently unable to find
NSW Attorney-General, John Hatzistergos,
acceptable placements for these children and young
acknowledges that New South Wales has the toughest
people.52 The Children and Young Persons (Care and
bail laws in Australia.54 In 2007 the Bail Act 1978 was
Protection) Act 1998 makes it clear that Community
amended with the introduction of section 22A. Under
Services has responsibilities to these children and young
the Bail Act children and young people can only apply
people who are homeless or in need of care. Section 9(e)
once for bail except under particular circumstances. If
of the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection)
bail is not granted during the first application they may
Act 1998 states:
only apply again if they were not legally represented
If a child or young person is temporarily or permanently during the first application or if the court is satisfied that
deprived of his or her family environment, or cannot new facts or circumstances have arisen since the first
be allowed to remain in that environment in his or application.
her own best interests, the child or young person is
A recent report by the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics
entitled to special protection and assistance from the
and Research demonstrates that these changes have
State.
directly impacted on the increase in remandees in
However, despite Community Services clear custody as children and young people are remaining on
responsibility to these children and young people, the remand for a longer period of time, unable to reapply
lack of suitable accommodation options results in a for bail.55
high rate of remand for children and young people who
Exacerbating these new amendments is a stretched Legal
should be out on bail in the community.
Aid system where on a bad day one magistrate and one
Statistics from the Department of Juvenile Justice duty solicitor may be dealing with 50 bail cases.56 In
demonstrate that 95 per cent of children and young this situation, a child or young person is not guaranteed
people on remand during a three-month period in sufficient representation by the duty solicitor despite it
2006/07 had a court order to reside as directed.53 being their only opportunity to access bail.
51. Homes for homeless children, M Dambach, Alternative Law Journal, vol 32, no.3 September 2007.
52. Homes for homeless children, M Dambach, Alternative Law Journal, vol 32, no.3 September 2007; Report 104 (2005) Young offenders,
NSW Law Reform Commission.
53. Special Commission of Inquiry into Child Protection Services in NSW 2008.
54. Attorney-General Mr Hatzistergos, Legislative Council Second Reading Speech, Hansard, Parliament of NSW, 17 October 2007.
55. Recent trends in legal proceedings for breach of bail, juvenile remand and crime, S Vignaendra, S Moffatt, D Weatherburn and E Heller, NSW
Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, Contemporary issues in crime and justice no.128, 2009.
56. New Bail Laws 2008 s.22A Bail Act 1978, A Haesler SC, a seminar paper presented to the NSW Criminal Defence Lawyers Association,
16 April 2008 available at www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/pdo/ll_pdo.nsf/pages/PDO_newbaillaws2008
50
[i]n one location in 52% of decisions where bail was
granted a condition of that bail was the defendant 0
2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 2006- 2007- 2008
leave the town and not return until they were 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
required to appear at court. This was specifically the Average daily number of young people in custody
case for juvenile defendants. (NSW Department of Juvenile Justice 2006;
NSW Department of Juvenile Justice 2009)
Report 104 (2005) Young offenders, p 253.
The NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research In 2009, the media in NSW released several articles
found that in 66 per cent of cases where children and reporting on safety concerns and overcrowding, including
young people are remanded back to a Juvenile Justice a 30 per cent increase on the number of assaults on staff
Centre after breaching their bail restrictions, their and young people and up to four young people being
breach as simple as not complying with a curfew order or housed together in an overflow room.60
not being in the company of a parent.58
57. Report 104 (2005) Young offenders, NSW Law Reform Commission.
58. See footnote 55.
59. Annual Report 2007-2008, NSW Ombudsman, Chapter 6 Juvenile Justice at p 120, available at http://www.ombo.nsw.gov.au/publication/
PDF/annualreport/AR_Ombo_07-08.pdf
60. For example, Juvenile detention assaults blamed on overcrowding, A Clennell, SMH, 10 April 2009; Crowded juvenile injustice: young
450Crowding blamed for alleged rape at juvenile jail, A Clennell & D
offenders crisis, J Hildebrand, Daily Telegraph, 30 March 2009; and
Welch, SMH, 12 March 2009. 2008-2009
400
350 2007-2008
Juveniles on remand 19
300 2006-2007
250
2005-2006
Another concern is the impact that the proportion of OTHER OPTIONS/SOLUTIONS
children and young people on remand compared to the
In early 2009, a group of peak organisations and service
proportion on a custodial order can have on program
providers from the community sector held a roundtable
development within the juvenile justice centres. As
discussion in order to develop solutions to the issues
previously mentioned, the total number of children and
identified above. Two papers Locked into Remand and
young people on remand per day is over 50 per cent of
Releasing the Pressure on Remand, were developed by
the total number of children and young people in the
UnitingCare Burnside as part of this process.
NSW Juvenile Justice Centres. This proportion is higher
in some centres as it varies between locations. A higher The roundtable members agreed that while children and
number of children and young people on remand than young people are responsible for their actions and should
on custodial order has the potential to shift the focus face the penalty for any illegal actions, the current
in Juvenile Justice Centres away from programs and system has the potential to increase the risk factors for
development towards security warehousing as more re-offending and does not always provide the support
resources are directed towards the remandees.61 children and young people need.
Unnecessary detention also increases the challenges that Young people can be successfully supported in making
children and young people face and potentially creates changes at any point in their engagement with the
social problems. The NSW Law Reform Commission juvenile justice system. However, in order to effectively
expressed its concern with the effect of remand on a divert young people from the juvenile justice system, a
child or young person: range of support services must be available.
Children report feeling isolated and frustrated by These support services should have a stronger focus on
the experience, particularly as they often do not have keeping these children and young people connected with
access to the same programs as detainees serving a the community, engaged with education and ultimately
sentence. In addition, placing a child on remand can out of the juvenile justice system, and in turn, the adult
put stress on family relationship and disrupts the prison system.
childs education. Young people on remand feel that These support services should fall into four main areas:
Furthermore, a recent report by the National Indigenous > during court; and
Drug and Alcohol Committee (2009) expressed concerns > after court.
Juvenile justice centres should not be used as a form of This section on Juveniles on remand was written by Clare Blakemore of
UnitingCare Burnside. Burnside is a member of the Children, Young People
crisis accommodation for children and young people. and Families service group of UnitingCare NSW/ACT and part of the Uniting
Alternate accommodation options should be available Church in Australia. Burnside is a leading child and family organisation in NSW,
with services for users in metropolitan, regional and rural communities.
for those children and young people who are granted bail
Burnsides purpose is to provide innovative high-quality programs and
but held on remand due to insufficient accommodation advocacy to break the cycle of disadvantage that affects vulnerable children,
options. Support should also be available for children young people and their families in NSW. Burnside has a strong history of social
justice and advocating for policy change and recently celebrated 15 years of
and young people and their families who need social justice advocacy.
monetary assistance in order to meet bail conditions (ie
transportation costs).
Juveniles on remand 21
Group Offending
Richie Bowden
65. Section 3 & Regulation 4 Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW) outline the definition of a Serious Childrens Indictable Offence.
66. Department of Juvenile Justice Annual Report 2006-07, page 18 Daily figures in custody indicates a steady increase over the last 5 years.
67. Increases in detention centre numbers may be associated with increases in the numbers of young people on remand, rather than those
sentenced to periods of detention.
68. R v Taufahema [2007] HCA 11; also see page 54 of the LIAC Crime Guide www.legalanswers.sl.nsw.gov.au ; McAuliffe [1995] HCA 37;
available at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1995/37.html and Tangye (1997) 92 A Crim R 545.
young people
Young people with one or more parents who had been imprisoned 27% 43%
Young people with one or more parents currently in prison 5% 11%
Young people with a history of being placed in care 24% 28%
Young people not living in family home 36% 33% (prior to custody)
Young people who were parents of one or more children 6% 10%
Young people with low, moderate or severe levels of abuse or 72% 68%
neglect in their childhood
Young people with a IQ scores consistent with a possible 12% 10%
intellectual disability
Young people leaving school before commencing Year 10 56% 75%
Young people who has been suspended from school 89% 91%
Young people with a IQ scores consistent with a possible 12% 10%
intellectual disability
Young people reporting symptoms on the Adolescent 40% 88%
Psychopathology Scale consistent with a clinical disorder
69. 2003 NSW Young People in Custody Health Survey, NSW Department of Juvenile Justice, http://www.djj.nsw.gov.au/pdf_htm/publications/g
eneral/2003YoungPeopleInCustody.pdf and D T Kenny, P Nelson, T Butler, C Lennings, M Allerton and U Champion. (2006) NSW Young
People on Community Orders Health Survey 2003-2006, University of Sydney, http://www.justicehealth.nsw.gov.au/pubs/YPCO_Report.pdf
70. See Diversion of Indigenous juvenile offenders, L Snowball, Trends and Issues in Criminal Justice No. 355, Australian Institute of Criminology,
Canberra, 2008
71. Juveniles contact with the criminal justice system in Australia, K Richards, Monitoring report no. 7, Australian Institute of Criminology, 2009.
72. Based on average daily number of young people in custody statistics in NSW Juvenile Justice Annual Report 2008/09.
73. Overcoming Indigenous disadvantage: key indicators 2009, Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision, Productivity
Commission.
74. Indigenous-specific alcohol and other drug interventions, D Gray, A Stearne, M Wilson & M Doyle, at p 80, National Indigenous Drug and
Alcohol Committee, Australian National Council on Drugs, 2010.
75. Summary of Indigenous womens health, J Burns, C M Maling, N Thomson, 2010; www.healthinfonet.ecu.edu.au/population-groups/women/
reviews/our-review
76. Preventing crime and promoting rights for Indigenous young people with cognitive disabilities and mental health issues, p 18, Australian Human
Rights Commission, 2008, available at http://www.hreoc.gov.au/social_justice/publications/preventing_crime/index.html
77. Multicultural youth in Australia: settlement and transition, Australian Research Alliance for Children & Youth October 2007; www.aracy.org.
au/publicationDocuments/TOP_Multicultural_Youth_in_Australia_Settlement_and_Transition_2007.pdf
78. Isma: Listen Experiences of discrimination, vilification and prejudice http://www.hreoc.gov.au/racial_discrimination/isma/report/chap2.
html#2_1
84. 2003 NSW Young People in Custody Health Survey, NSW Department of Juvenile Justice, http://www.djj.nsw.gov.au/pdf_htm/publications/
general/2003YoungPeopleInCustody.pdf
85. NSW Young People on Community Orders Health Survey 2003-2006, University of Sydney, http://www.justicehealth.nsw.gov.au/pubs/
YPCO_Report.pdf
86. 2003 NSW Young People in Custody Health Survey, NSW Department of Juvenile Justice, http://www.djj.nsw.gov.au/pdf_htm/publications/
general/2003YoungPeopleInCustody.pdf
87. NSW Young People on Community Orders Health Survey 2003-2006, University of Sydney, http://www.justicehealth.nsw.gov.au/pubs/
YPCO_Report.pdf
88. See, for example, Community Services Commission, Just Solutions wards and juvenile justice, 1999; Community Services Commission,
The drift of children in care into the juvenile justice system, 1996; and of course the Burdekin report itself. In its 1996 report the Community
Services Commission noted that homelessness is a significant contributor towards involvement of young people in the juvenile justice system.
89. Community Services Commission, Just Solutions wards and juvenile justice, 1999, pp.17-18.
90. NSW Young People in Custody Health Survey, Department of Juvenile Justice, 2003; NSW Young People on Community Orders Health Survey,
Department of Juvenile Justice, 2006, www.djj.nsw.gov.au/publications.htm#research
91. NSW Young People in Custody Health Survey, Department of Juvenile Justice, 2003; NSW Young People on Community Orders Health Survey,
Department of Juvenile Justice, 2006, www.djj.nsw.gov.au/publications.htm#research
Early 1800s Children were treated like adults, held responsible for their offences and punished accordingly.
Mid-1800s Reduction of penalties and establishment of separate prisons for children.
Late 1800s A separate Childrens Court in NSW was established in 1905.
Early to mid-1900s Separate system of justice for young people but no distinction between children as offenders and
children who were neglected.
1960s Attempts to secure greater protection of legal rights and accountability for children.
Mid-1980s Green and White Papers published recommending new legislation for childrens criminal
matters.
1985
United Nations (UN) released UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of
Juvenile Justice (Beijing Rules).
1987 Government introduced cognate package of childrens criminal legislation: the Childrens Court
Act 1987, the Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987, the Children (Community Service Orders)
Act 1987, and the Children (Detention Centres) Act 1987.
1988
Australian Law Reform Commission and Commonwealth Youth Bureau published Sentencing
Young Offenders, a review of the laws, policies and procedures for sentencing young offenders in
all Australian states and territories.
1990 Youth Justice Coalition produced report Kids in Justice: a blueprint for the 90s with over 200
recommendations relating to the failure to address social and economic dimensions of juvenile
crime; inadequate legal frameworks, and high level of violence and abuse from police.
Australia became a signatory to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
UN released Minimum Rules for Non-Custodial Measures (Tokyo Rules).
UN released Guidelines for the Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency (Riyadh Guidelines).
UN released Rules for the Protection of Children Deprived of their Liberty.
1991
Government created separate Office of Juvenile Justice (a Kids in Justice recommendation).
1991-1995 Wagga Wagga police trialled extended police cautioning involving young offenders and
victims, drawing from Professor John Braithwaites 1989 theories of crime, shame and
reintegration.
1992
NSW Standing Committee on Social Issues released report Juvenile Justice in New South Wales.
Minister for Justice, the Hon Wayne Merton established the first Juvenile Justice Advisory
Council (JJAC) as an independent committee with members appointed by the Minister and
drawn from government, community and the academy (a Kids in Justice recommendation).
JJAC released Green Paper Future Directions for Juvenile Justice in New South Wales by, with
over 400 recommendations relating to juvenile crime prevention, including community-based
alternatives to court processing, and imprisonment.
92. For a list of all reports by the Legislative Council Standing Committee on Social Issues, see http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/
committee.nsf/V3ListReports?open&vw=V3AllReportsByCttee&vwCat=Social+Issues
timeline 31
1997 High level inter-departmental committee presented a scathing report to Premier Carr that was
highly critical of the Children (Protection and Parental Responsibility) Act 1994. The Committee
recommended that the Act be repealed.
Premier Carr announced expansion of legislation under the Children (Protection and Parental
Responsibility) Act 1997 as the basis of the government's new approach to crime prevention.
Traffic Amendment (Street and Illegal Drag Racing) Act 1997 became law, giving police the power
to impound a vehicle they suspect to have been involved in drag racing within the previous
10 days.
Crimes Amendment (Detention after Arrest) Act 1997 became law, specifying police powers to
hold a person in custody following arrest for investigation. The Act included specific provisions
for dealing with children as vulnerable persons.
University of NSW Faculty of Law published Anh Hai: Young Asian Background Peoples
Perceptions and Experiences of Policing, by Lisa Maher and others. The report portrayed
problematic relationships between police and young people of Asian backgrounds.
Australian Human Rights Commission and Australian Law Reform Commission published
Seen and Heard: Priority for Children in the Legal Process.
Australian Human Rights Commission published Bringing them Home: National Inquiry into the
Separation of Aboriginal Children from Their Families. The report characterised the continuing
over-representation of Aboriginal children in juvenile justice as a continuation of earlier removal
policies through a process of criminalisation, that new legislation had done little to confront the
issues affecting Indigenous young people or to reduce the levels of police and detention centre
custody, and that the underlying issues that substantially contribute to Indigenous offending
levels had not been addressed.
1998 Young Offenders Act 1997 became law, introducing a new integrated hierarchical scheme of
police warnings, cautions and youth justice conferences as alternatives to court for certain
offences (see page 14).
Crimes Legislation Amendment (Police and Public Safety) Act 1998 became law, amending the
Summary Offences Act 1988 to give police powers to search for dangerous implements, and ask
for names and addresses.
Attorney General declared Moree and Ballina as operational areas under the Children
(Protection and Parental Responsibility) Act 1997.
Legal Aid Commission of NSW launched Young Offenders Hotline, to support the operation of
the Young Offenders Act through the provision of telephone legal advice to children in police
custody between 9 am and midnight on week days and 24 hours on weekends and public
holidays.
Legislative Council Standing Committee on Law and Justice published Crime Prevention
Through Social Support.
1999 The Community Law and Legal Research Centre (University of Technology Sydney) and the
Youth Justice Coalition released Youth Street Rights: a policy and legislation review. The report
presented a review of developments in policy and legislation since the release of Kids in Justice
in 1990. The authors identified contradictory trends in legislation and policy, with some
legislation, such as the Young Offenders Act, that was consistent with treaty obligations under
the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, and other legislation, such as the Children
(Protection and Parental Responsibility) Act, that was in contravention of Australias international
human rights obligations. The authors argued that these contradictory trends reflect[ed]
genuinely different and contradictory views on the rights and responsibilities of young people.
National Crime Prevention (Commonwealth Attorney Generals Department) published
Pathways to Prevention: Developmental and Early Intervention Approaches to Crime in Australia.
timeline 33
2004 Department of Juvenile Justice published report 2003 NSW Young People in Custody Health
Survey (available at www.djj.nsw.gov.au/publications.htm).
Young Offenders Regulations 2000 amended to include mandatory provisions for content of
outcome plans for young offenders participating in a youth justice conference for bush fire/arson
offences.
Juvenile Offenders Legislation Amendment Act 2004 introduced to facilitate the transfer of
responsibility for the Kariong Juvenile Justice Centre from the Department of Juvenile Justice
to the Department of Corrective Services, and to rename the centre as the Kariong Juvenile
Correctional Centre.
2005 NSW Ombudsman published report, Working with Local Communities: Audit of the
implementation of the Police Aboriginal Strategic Direction (2003-2006). The Ombudsman found
mixed compliance with the Young Offenders Act by Police Local Area Commands, but praised
the positive relationships established between some Police Youth Liaison Officers and Aboriginal
young people.
Legislative Council Select Committee on Juvenile Offenders tabled Report on the Inquiry into
Juvenile Offenders. The report considered many issues around the operation of the Kariong
Juvenile Justice Centre and considered whether incarcerating juveniles in juvenile correctional
centres achieves reduced recidivism, rehabilitation and compliance with human rights
obligations.
Sydney Institute of Criminology published Chan (ed) Reshaping Juvenile Justice: The Young
Offenders Act 1997 (NSW).
2006 NSW Government published response to Legislative Council Select Committee on Juvenile
Offenders Report on the Inquiry into Juvenile Offenders.
Department of Juvenile Justice released NSW Young People on Community Orders Health
Survey 20032006, a report prepared by Professor Dianne Kenny of the University of Sydney
in association with the Department of Juvenile Justice (available at www.djj.nsw.gov.au/
publications.htm).
Legislative Council Standing Committee on Social Issues tabled in Parliament its report, Inquiry
into Public Disturbances at Macquarie Fields. This report highlighted the need for appropriate
and adequate facilities to meet the needs of the local young people.
NSW Sentencing Council published their interim report, The Effectiveness of Fines as a
Sentencing Option: Court-imposed fines and penalty notices. The Council recommended, amongst
other things, that alternative sentencing options to fines should be used for vulnerable offenders
(including young people) and that improvements needed to be made to the arrangements for
time to pay and alternatives to payment of fines.
2007 Bail Act 1978 amended to limit number of applications to court for bail but no special
provisions were included to minimise the negative impacts of the amendments on children
and young people. Attorney General announced that NSW now has the toughest bail laws in
Australia.
NSW Law Society published third edition of Representation Principles for Childrens Lawyers.
NSW Law Reform Commission published its 2005 report, Young Offenders. The report
examined the two main laws relating to the sentencing of young offenders and forming the basis
of juvenile justice policy in NSW the Young Offenders Act 1997 and the Children (Criminal
Proceedings) Act 1987.
The Evidence (Audio and Audio Visual Links) Act 1998 amended to permit children on remand
to give evidence in bail hearings by way of an Audio Visual Link from a Juvenile Justice Centre
(JJC). Main justification for this change to save the time and expense of transporting children
from JJCs to court.
timeline 35
Further information
The Legal information Access Centre (LIAC) in the State Library offers a free service to help you find
information about the law, including cases and legislation. See the back cover for opening hours and contact
details for the Centre.
You will find the Legal Studies Research guide under the HSC legal studies tab.
Use our HSC Legal Studies News Watch blog to find the latest information:
http://blog.sl.nsw.gov.au/hsc_legal_studies/
Get Street Smart: Under 18? Know your Legal Rights NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research
a wallet-size guide explaining young peoples rights on (BOCSAR)
the street and with the police.
Produces useful publications and statistics on crime and
court outcomes in NSW.
NSW Department of Juvenile Justice
www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au
Information available includes Annual Reports,
policies, research reports and general information Youth Action and Policy Association (YAPA)
about the department. Also available are a guide is the peak body for youth organisations in NSW.
to Youth Justice conferencing (pamphlet) and The YAPA site contains a lot of useful information
Joes Conference (video) explain the youth justice about legal and policy issues, including some very
conferencing system. useful fact sheets for youth workers and a newsletter
www.djj.nsw.gov.au updated every two months YapRap.
www.yapa.org.au
National Childrens and Youth Law Centre
www.ncylc.org.au Parliament of NSW
Website includes links to: Website has research publications on various topics, many
> Whats up cRoc? information about the human of which are relevant to young people (eg. gangs, bail law
rights of young people in Australia and practice, young offenders and diversionary options,
> Lawstuff Australia-wide legal information for law and order legislation). See under Resources tab.
young people which provides answers to common www.parliament.nsw.gov.au
legal questions for each state.
> Lawmail individual email advice for young people. PUBLICATIONS
The law handbook, 11th edition, 2009, Thomson
Australian Institute of Criminology
Reuters.
Website contains a variety of publications including
A comprehensive guide to the law in NSW; see Chapter
conference papers and Trends and issues in crime
8: Children and young people. Tool Kit title available in
and criminal justice. See for example, Juveniles in
all NSW public libraries.
detention in australia, 1981 to 2006, Technical
and background paper No 26, Natalie Taylor. Youth Justice: Your guide to cops and courts
www.kids.nsw.gov.au/kids/resources/publications/
See section on Young people and juvenile justice, by
informationsheets.cfm
C Cunneen. Available in many public libraries.
Order Form
Hot Topics is produced by the Legal information access centre
(Liac). Liac is a state-wide service providing free access to
legal information for the community. it is based in the state
Library of nsW in sydney and operates through public libraries
across nsW (nearly 400 locations).
cuRRent issues
73 Young people and crime
Young people are dealt with separately from
the adult criminal justice system. However,
2010 annual subscription (pre-paid) $82.50 increasing numbers of young people in NSW
are being held on remand in juvenile justice
2009 issues nos. 68-71 $82.50 centres. This issue examines the juvenile
justice system including interaction with
police, court, diversionary schemes, bail and
second subscription for the same year $55.00
remand. Covers issues such as disadvantaged
groups, fines and group offending. Timeline of
individual issues no. 51 onwards $22.00 policies and legislation included.
72 consumer credit
Back issues up to & including issue 50 $16.50 The National Consumer Credit Protection
Act takes effect on 1 July 2010. The
All prices include GST total $ Commonwealth will now take over regulation
of consumer credit from the states and
territories. This issue looks at the lead up to
Please specify Topic title/s below: this important change, and the implications
of the new legislation. Plans for further
..................................................................................................................................................................
amendments are discussed and case studies are
included.
..................................................................................................................................................................
71 courts
Provides an overview of Australias court
system, federal and state, and how it fits
within the legal system. It covers the areas
Organisation .........................................................................................................................................
70 cyberlaw
Cyberlaw is a term used to describe an
Email ......................................................................................................................................................
paY M e n t o p t i o n s
otheR issues
Card no. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
legal system, 59 Drugs, 58 Terrorism,
Expiry date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
54 Bill of rights, 53 Same-sex families,
Name on card . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
title, 46 You and your lawyer, 45 Privacy,
40 Discrimination, 39 Intellectual
Signature. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
elections, 33 Reconciliation (out of print),