Welcome to the

2010 School Leaders Conference

August 26, 2010

UIC Forum
Budget Update
$300 M $400 M
Additional Legislative
State Cuts Pension
Relief

$700 M
$600 M $230 M
Reduced State Cuts

CPS FY11
$370 M
Deficit

Initial School-based Budget Book

Projections budgets Draft
January distributed August
April/May
 28% of reductions at schools
($30)
$370 ($24)
($19)
$340 $316 ($16)
$297 ($15)
$281 $266
Dollars in Millions

($266)
Remaining
Deficit

Beginning Class Size Bilingual Positions not Supplemental Charter Tuition

Deficit Programming supported by positions in Reduction
Enrollment Magnet
Formulas Programming
72% of reductions at central office or city-wide

$266 ($45)
($10)
$221 ($6) ($2)
$211 ($2)
Dollars in Millions

$205 $203 $200

($200)
$0
Remaining Administrative Transportation Administrative Supplemental Enrichment Delayed
Deficit Reductions Efficiencies Furlough Security Program Capital Plan &
after Reductions Draw
School Reserves
Reductions
 CO/CW Funding
Central Office/ Central Office/
City-Wide Services City-Wide Services
34.3% 27.6%

Areas 1.7%
Areas 0.5%

School-Based School-Based

School Funding
70.7%
65.2%

FY 10 FY 11
Net reduction of 1,250 non-classroom employees

FY11
February 2009 Change # Change %
Original

Central Office Units 1,625.6 1,231.2 (394.4) -24%

Citywide Units 3,363.0 2,694.2 (668.8) -20%

Area Offices 202.2 305.4 103.2 +51%

Facilities & Food Services Ops 5,040.0 4,750.0 (290.0) -6%

Total 10,230.8 8,980.8 (1,250.0) -12%

MAINTAIN ENSURE
± class size ± Culture of Calm
± special education ± Safe Passage

SUPPORT MEASURE
± Early childhood ± Assessments
± World language ± Performance mgmt
± IB and gifted
± Sports and arts
± After-school
Thank you
 New CAOs

Craig Benes (Area 6)

Amy Mims (Area 1)
Terence Patterson (New Schools)
Harrison Peters (Area 24)
Communications

More frequent
Better coordinated
Less noise
Interactive webinars and calls
Principal feedback panels
A single source for information
Online community and dialogue
Every student will graduate from
high school prepared to
succeed in college and the
global economy
1. Empower you to create a
culture of performance

2. Ensure our students are safe

and prepared to learn
Human capital

Instructional framework

Performance management
Human capital

Hiring the best teachers

Meaningful teacher evaluation

Human capital

Instructional framework

Performance management
What do we expect students The Common Core
to learn? Æ Standards

How will we know if they Interim and Annual

learned? Æ Assessments

How can we best teach what

we want them to learn? Æ The Instructional Framework

How will we respond when

WKH\GRQ¶WOHDUQ" Æ Response to Intervention
Chief Area Officer Working Group

Jen Cheatham
Don Fraynd
Denise Little
Shawn Smith
Adrian Willis
:KHUH:H¶YH%HHQ
:KHUH:H¶UH*RLQJ
Improve the quality of classroom instruction in order to
increase student achievement by:

Common Professional
Language Development Accountability
Need for Need for PD Need for
language that aligned to everyone to
describes effective understand
effective teaching expectations
teaching practices

Focus on what matters most: improved student outcomes

Existing Frameworks

Excellence In Teaching ± Charlotte Danielson

Framework

TAP

Fresh Start

Additional Frameworks from other urban districts

Performance Results-
Oriented
Management Planning

Strategic Teaching
Phase 1
Conduct Assessment &
Establish Goals
o Engage CAO working group to determine need and Started this
focus of framework Summer,
o Review relevant and recent research in the field ongoing
o Identify goals of framework and develop first draft
o Share with all CAOs , receive feedback and fine-tune
the framework

Phase 2
Initial Phase
Teacher &
o Finalize draft of framework
Principal focus
o Conduct multiple stakeholder focus groups
(principals, teachers, coaches) on the draft groups begin in
framework Sept.
o Revise framework based on stakeholder feedback
Phase 3
Field Test
o All Areas receive introduction to Framework Approx 5 focus
o Field test framework in select areas Areas for
SY 10-­11
o Collect feedback based on pilot
o Revise framework

Phase 4
Full
Launch implementation
o Launch framework district-wide in 2011-2012 in SY 11-­12
 FROM TO

A  culture  of A  culture  of

Teaching  and  
Learning
Æ Teaching  for  
the  Purpose  
of  Learning
Human capital

Instructional framework

Performance management
 CEO CEdO

CAO CAO

CAO

P P P P

P P P P
ILT ILT ILT ILT

T T T T

T T T T

Teacher

Student

Student

Parent Teacher

Student Student
DATA
Provide a clear picture

QUESTIONS
Get to root causes

ACTION
Develop action plans

FOLLOW-UP
Reflect and follow up
School PM Support

Sarah Kremsner
Milan Sevak
Melinda Spooner
Didi Swartz
PM References
‡ PM White Paper
‡ Driven by Data
‡ PM Contact List

PM Toolkits
‡ Instructional Leadership Team Toolkit
‡ Teacher Team Toolkit

PM Reports
‡ Elementary Scorecard
‡ High School Scorecard
‡ Scantron Growth 2009-10
‡ ISAT Growth 2009-10

PM Data Resources
‡ PM Dashboard Upgrade Reference
‡ Growth Metric Overview
‡ Scantron Training Guide and Overview
PM References
PM Toolkits
PM Reports
PM Data Resources
Principal Hotline
773-553-4444
performancemanagement@cps.k12.il.us

School PM Assistance
773-553-2000
SchoolPM@cps.k12.il.us
2010 Results
ISAT Reading
Percent Meeting/Exceeding Percent Exceeding
68.3%
14.6%

67.8%

13.6%

66.7%
12.8%

2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010

ISAT 2010 Reading
Top 15 Schools Value-Added Performance

Laura Ward, Chopin and Howe are in the top 15 schools for both Math and Reading
ISAT Math
Percent Meeting/Exceeding Percent Exceeding
76.4%
18.1%
16.3%
14.8%
73.6%

70.5%

2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010

ISAT 2010 Math
Top 15 Schools Value-Added Performance

Laura Ward, Chopin and Howe are in the top 15 schools for both Math and Reading
ACT District Trend
Average Scale Score by Subject

17.7 17.7
17.6

17.3 17.3 17.3 17.3

17.2 17.2
17.1
17.0 17.0
16.8
16.6

16.2

08 09 10 08 09 10 08 09 10 08 09 10 08 09 10

Composite Reading Math Science English

ACT College Readiness Benchmarks
% Students Meeting Benchmarks by Subject
40.4%
38.9%
College Readiness Benchmarks 36.1%
Subject ACT Scale Score
Reading 21
Math 22
Science 24
English 18

22.4% 22.8%
21.1%

18.1%
15.4% 15.1%

8.7% 9.4%
7.8%

08 09 10 08 09 10 08 09 10 08 09 10
Reading Math Science English
PLAN-ACT
% Students Making Expected Gains by Subject
49.3% 50.0%
48.0% 48.9% 48.0%
47.0%
44.5%
42.9%
39.9%

34.8% 35.6%

29.8%

08 09 10 08 09 10 08 09 10 08 09 10
Reading Math English Science
PLAN-ACT Gains
Top 15 Schools in Reading and Math

READING MATH
% Making % Making
Expected Expected
School Name Principal Name Area N School Name Principal Name Area N
PLAN-ACT PLAN-ACT
Gains Gains

Northside Prep HS Barry Patrick Rodgers 54 298 76.8% Infinity HS Patricia Barrera Brekke 26 66 84.8%

Payton HS Ellen Clare Estrada 54 242 71.5% Northside Prep HS Barry Patrick Rodgers 54 298 82.9%
Noble Street Charter
Young HS Joyce Dorsey Kenner 54 490 69.0% William Olsen 52 105 82.9%
- Noble
Jones HS Dr. Paul J Powers 54 183 65.0% Jones HS Dr. Paul J Powers 54 183 77.6%

Lane HS Antoinette Lobosco 54 961 54.8% Payton HS Ellen Clare Estrada 54 242 73.1%

King HS Jeffrey Wright 54 197 53.8% Young HS Joyce Dorsey Kenner 54 491 73.1%

Lincoln Park HS Michael Joseph Boraz 54 386 52.6% Lindblom HS Alan Wesley Mather 54 169 72.2%
Noble Street Charter
Brooks HS Dushon Angela Brown 54 171 51.5% Pablo Sierra 52 117 71.8%
- Pritzker
Noble Street Charter
Morgan Park HS Beryl Petreulia Shingles 24 279 48.0% Joe Tenbusch 52 99 71.7%
- Rowe-Clark
Noble Street Charter
Chicago Academy Erin A Clarkin 28 92 47.8% Eric W. Thomas 52 115 71.3%
- Rauner
Taft HS Arthur N Tarvardian 26 347 46.1% Lane HS Antoinette Lobosco 54 962 71.2%

Kenwood Elizabeth Anne Kirby 21 240 45.4% Phoenix Military HS Ferdinand Wipachit 26 76 65.8%
UChicago Charter
Lindblom HS Alan Wesley Mather 54 169 45.0% Shayne Evans 52 65 64.6%
-Woodlawn
Rickover HS Michael Jerome Biela 26 78 44.9% Von Steuben HS Pedro Rafael Alonso 21 379 63.3%
Noble Street Charter Nobel Street Charter
William Olsen 52 105 44.8% Stephanie Stewart 52 118 60.2%
- Noble - Golder
PLAN-ACT Gains
Excluding Selective Enrollment

READING MATH
% Making % Making
Expected Expected
School Name Principal Name Area N School Name Principal Name Area N
PLAN-ACT PLAN-ACT
Gains Gains

Lincoln Park HS Michael Joseph Boraz 54 386 52.6% Infinity HS Patricia Barrera Brekke 26 66 84.8%

Morgan Park HS Beryl Petreulia Shingles 24 279 48.0% Noble Street Charter ± Noble William Olsen 52 105 82.9%

Chicago Academy HS Erin A Clarkin 28 92 47.8% Noble Street Charter ± Pritzker Pablo Sierra 52 117 71.8%
Noble Street Charter -Rowe
Taft HS Arthur N Tarvardian 26 347 46.1% Joe Tenbusch 52 99 71.7%
Clark
Kenwood Elizabeth Anne Kirby 21 240 45.4% Noble Street Charter ± Rauner Eric W. Thomas 52 115 71.3%

Rickover HS Michael Jerome Biela 26 78 44.9% Phoenix Military HS Ferdinand Wipachit 26 76 65.8%

Noble Street Charter ± Noble William Olsen 52 105 44.8% University of Chicago. Charter -
Shayne Evans 52 65 64.6%
Wooodlawn
Marine Military HS Leonard Harris 26 83 44.6% Von Steuben HS Pedro Rafael Alonso 21 379 63.3%
Chicago Ag. HS William Edwin Hook 54 129 44.2% Noble Street Charter ± Golder Stephanie Stewart 52 118 60.2%
Von Steuben HS Pedro Rafael Alonso 21 379 43.8% Lake View HS Scott Feaman 54 333 59.2%
Noble Street Charter ± Beryl Petreulia
Eric W. Thomas 52 115 40.9% Morgan Park HS 24 280 58.6%
Rauner Shingles
Phoenix Military HS Ferdinand Wipachit 26 76 40.8% Lincoln Park HS Michael Joseph Boraz 54 386 58.3%
Noble Street Charter ±
Stephanie Stewart 52 118 40.7% Rickover HS Michael Jerome Biela 26 78 57.7%
Golder
Noble Street Charter -Rowe Chicago Math and Science
Joe Tenbusch 52 99 40.4% Ali Yilmaz 52 59 57.6%
Clark Academy HS
*  Includes  schools  with  at  least  40  students  taking  
Youth Connection Charter Sheila Venson PLAN  &  ACT  in  consecutive  
52 63 years  
39.7% Taft HS Arthur N Tarvardian 26 348 56.9%
Scantron
Reading Scores by Grade Level

Fall Winter Spring

2787
2769
2746
2709
2691
2663
2618
2582
2557
2515
2476
2435
2385
2347
2295
2222
2165
2090

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

Scantron
Math Scores by Grade Level
Fall Winter Spring

2665
2644
2610

2580
2576
2522

2515
2475
2453

2411
2402
2344

2323
2295
2224
2212
2147
2054

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

Scantron Pilot
Top 15 Schools in Reading and Math

READING MATH
% Meeting % Meeting
School Name Principal Name Area N Growth School Name Principal Name Area N Growth
Target Target

Lenart Joanna Darcella Theodore 14 192 66.7% Leland Loretta Brown-Lawrence 3 40 75.0%

Gillespie Michelle Renee Willis 17 265 64.2% Lenart Joanna Darcella Theodore 14 191 74.3%

Altgeld Vera Frances Williams-Willis 14 357 62.7% Hendricks Juliana Louise Perisin 13 125 71.2%

Key Sandra Banger 3 231 58.9% Beethoven Dyrice Garner 13 224 65.6%

Marshall Middle Paul J. Flaherty 1 611 54.7% Gillespie Michelle Renee Willis 17 260 65.4%

Kershaw Veronica Nash 14 100 53.0% Reed Dina Linne Everage 14 124 64.5%

De Priest Minnie Lee Watson 3 322 52.5% Calhoun North Cynthia Maria Hughes-Hannah 7 180 63.3%

Hurley Dolores Cupp 11 224 51.3% Kershaw Veronica Nash 14 98 63.3%

Oglesby Rolland Christopher Jasper 14 254 49.2% Kinzie School Martin William Mcgreal 9 389 60.9%

Edisor RGC Saundra Anne Gray 1 171 49.1% Sherwood Alice Buzanis 13 186 60.8%

Goodlow Magnet Patricia Lewis 14 288 48.6% McCorkle Janet Cooper house 13 98 60.2%

Tonti Gerardo Arriaga 11 69 47.8% Bond Valesta Cobbs 14 145 60.0%

Logandale Dennis Michael Sweeney 6 238 47.5% McNair Academy Shirley Ann Dillard 3 245 59.6%

Wadsworth Velma Elese Cooksey 15 97 47.4% Earle Lori Ann Campbell 14 173 59.5%

Randolph Michelle Smith 13 404 47.3% Parkman Sonja Lynette James 13 135 59.3%
1. Empower you to create a
culture of performance

2. Ensure our students are safe

and prepared to learn
Food services

More frequent
Higher standards
Healthier for students
 182
breakfast-in-the-classroom schools

5 million
additional breakfasts served this year
SEPTEMBER DECEMBER AUGUST
2009 2009 2010
Nutrition CPS finalizes All CPS menus
standards new nutrition exceed
working group standards HealthierUS
convened Challenge
Requirements
OCTOBER FEBRUARY
2009 2010
Institute of First Lady
Medicine Michelle Obama
releases national announces HealthierUS
school lunch Challenge to combat
recommendations childhood obesity
Safety and security

Sustainable culture transformation

More students served
More schools served
 1
Identify students at risk

2
Create a school culture of calm

3
Create safe passage to and from school
 - 45 - 40 -5

Students Shot Aggravated Battery Homicides by

290 w/ Firearm Firearm
245 258
218

Homicides  By  Firearm

32 27

SY 2008-­2009 SY 2009-­2010 SY 2008-­2009 SY 2009-­2010 SY 2008-­2009 SY 2009-­2010

 CULTURE
SAFE
OF MENTORING
PASSAGE
CALM
Yes / Start
SCHOOL Pilot / Focus Yes / No
No Date
1 Robeson Pilot Y Y 8/9/10
2 Clemente Pilot Y Y 9/7/10
3 Harlan Pilot Y Y 9/7/10
4 Julian Pilot Y Y 9/7/10
5 Farragut Pilot Y Y 10/1/10
6 Manley Pilot Y Y 10/1/10
7 Crane Focus Y Y 9/7/10
8 Harper Focus Y Y 9/7/10
9 Hyde Park Focus Y Y 9/7/10
10 Chicago Vocational Focus Y Y 10/1/10
11 Marshall Focus Y Y 10/1/10
12 South Shore - SOA Focus Y Y 10/1/10
13 South Shore - SOE Focus Y Y 10/1/10
14 South Shore - SOL Focus Y Y 10/1/10
15 South Shore - SOT Focus Y Y 10/1/10
16 Kelly Focus Y N
17 Corliss Focus N Y 8/9/10
18 Morgan Park Focus N Y 8/9/10
19 Bowen - B.E.S.T. Focus N Y 9/7/10
Bowen - Chicago
20 Discovery Focus N Y 9/7/10
21 Bowen - Global Visions Focus N Y 9/7/10
22 Bowen - New Millennium Focus N Y 9/7/10
23 Dunbar Focus N Y 9/7/10
 CULTURE
SAFE
OF MENTORING
PASSAGE
CALM
Yes / Start
Pilot / Focus Yes / No
SCHOOL No Date
24 Fenger Focus N Y 9/7/10
25 Tilden Focus N Y 9/7/10
26 Douglass Focus N Y 10/1/10
27 Dyett Focus N Y 10/1/10
28 Gage Park Focus N Y 10/1/10
29 ORR HS Focus N Y 10/1/10
30 Phillips Focus N Y 10/1/10
31 Bogan Focus N N
32 Clark Focus N N
33 Foreman Focus N N
34 Hirsch Focus N N
35 Hope Focus N N
36 Hubbard Focus N N
37 Kelvyn Park Focus N N
38 Little Village - Infinity Focus N N
39 Little Village - Multicultural Arts Focus N N
40 Little Village - Social Justice Focus N N
41 Little Village - World Language Focus N N
42 Richards Focus N N
43 Simeon Focus N N
44 Sullivan Focus N N
45 TEAM Focus N N
46 Washington Focus N N
47 Wells Focus N N
Mentoring for more than 1,500 students

Organization High School #  of  students Organization High School #  of  students

100  BMC Harper  /  Crane 100 Enlace Farragut 100

A  Knock  at  Midnight Harper 50 Gads  Hill  Center Kelly 100
Alliance  for  Community   Crane 50 Liberated  Inc Robeson 100
Peace
New  Life  Family  Services Clemente 50
Aspira Clemente 50
Phalanx Julian 100
Better  Boys Marshall 80
SGA CVCA 100
Black  Star CVCA 100
UCAN Harlan  /  Marshall 100
Build  Inc Manley 80
Woodlawn Hyde  Park 100
Chicago Urban  League Hyde  Park  /  Harper 100
Youth  Guidance Harlan,  Manley,   100
Chicago  Youth  Centers South  Shore 50
Julian,  South  
CNE/KLEO Robeson 100 Shore,  Harper
 Attendance Serious misconducts

5% 12%

9% 13%
% students with Out-of-School
Ds & Fs suspension days
Community watch at 23 schools
Phase 1 Phase 2
Community High School Community High School
South Chicago Bowen East Garfield Park Marshall
West Town Clemente Bronzeville Phillips
Pullman Corliss (Aug 9) Gage Park/
Gage Park
Near West Crane Brighton Park
Roseland Fenger Little Village Farragut
Chatham Harlan Washington Park Dyett
West Englewood Harper Garfield Park Orr
Hyde Park Hyde Park South Chicago CVCA
Washington Hghts Julian South Shore South Shore
Morgan Park Morgan Park North Lawndale Manley
Englewood Robeson (Aug 9) Austin Douglas
New City Tilden (Aug 9)
Douglass/
Dunbar
Bronzeville
Goal: 50% reduction in students shot
Category SY 2008-2009 SY 2009-2010 SY 2010-2011
(projected)
Intervention 0 students 250 students 1,750 students

Culture of Calm 0 schools 6 schools 38 campuses

Safe Passage 0 schools, 0 0 schools, 0 23 schools, 500+

community watch community watch community watch
workers workers workers

# students shot 290 students 245 students 145 students

% change vs. 16% 50%
2008-2009
More learning time

Match our urban peers

Enhance access to technology
More time on task
 4 fewer years than Houston students

1400 1350
1286 1279 1275 1260 1243
1200
1020 978
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Extending the day
More time, more achievement

9:00 AM

Traditional school
day

(5 hrs 45 mins)

2:45 PM
Recess & Snack Additional Learning Time adds
‡ 90 minutes a day
Online Reading ‡ 255 hrs/year or 25% more time
‡ 3.5 more years over K-12 career
Online Math
4:15 PM
 Welcome to the
2010 School Leaders Conference

August 26, 2010

UIC Forum