Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HDFS 421
Dr. Vallotton
25 November 2017
Introduction
This assignment features interviews of two early childhood professionals on their use of
assessment in their classroom. Both Mrs. Graham and Mrs. Schmidt, the two professionals
interviewed, are currently working with children younger than 3rd grade. The purpose of this
assignment was to gain a better understanding of how assessment is used in early childhood
classrooms. It gave the interviewer a better understanding of how types of assessment that have
been taught in the classroom can be implemented by a teacher. Likewise, it gave the interviewer
a better understanding of the types of assessments available and other professionals opinions on
these assessments.
Mrs. Graham currently works at the East Lansing Child Development Center in the 24 to
32 month old classroom. Mrs. Graham has twenty-five years of experience in education. This
includes experience with young children, early elementary, and college students. The reason I
chose to interview Mrs. Graham is because she is new to the child development center and so I
thought she could bring new perspective on the assessments they use there. Similarly, Mrs.
She has been teaching Kindergarten for more than fifteen years, with an overall background in
teaching of almost thirty years. I chose Mrs. Schmidt to interview because she is my current
mentor teacher for my elementary education classes and she has an incredible amount of
experience working with young children. She has become one of my role models throughout the
semester as she has given me a lot of knowledge about assessments, teaching practices,
classroom management, and how to make connections with students and their families.
Summary of Interviews
1. What types of assessments do you use in your work with young children?
Mrs.Graham: ASQ (screener) for parents, COR advantage, PQA (environment assessment)
Mrs. Schmidt: Formal, informal, summative, national (dibbles)
2. How often do you assess children?
Mrs.Graham: Once a year for the ASQ for monitoring purposes. COR goes by three periods in
one year and is something we do everyday with anecdotes and PQA is twice a year.
Mrs. Schmidt: Progress monitoring happens weekly, formal assessments are done every 6
weeks, and national assessments are done 3 times a year.
3. How do you use the assessment information that you collect?
Mrs.Graham: For COR you look at the children's development and try to move them further
along, but I also allow children to be at their own level. We are always setting goals and trying to
improve. It also changes and tells us what to do for planning and the environment.
Mrs. Schmidt: It drives your instruction, and it drives your planning; it helps you create groups
of children that have intensive/strategic academic needs, and gives you an understanding of who
is at benchmark.
After reading through the summaries of the two interviews, there are many similarities
between Mrs. Graham and Mrs. Schmidts responses. For example, both professionals mention
in the second question that certain assessments are for monitoring progress of the children, which
happen more frequently than other assessments. While the assessments done may be different,
they each fit into a specific type (formative, summative, etc.) that dictates how often they are
administered. Additionally, the third question that asks about how the professionals use the
information found in assessments fostered answers quite similar to each other. Mrs. Schmidt
explains how these results help her to find where students are at, how she can improve her
instruction, and where students may need additional support. Mrs. Graham also mentioned how
assessments such as COR help to find out where children are at and how she can further structure
the environment to support further development of skills. Both professionals answers also seem
to agree when it came to their biggest challenges being the time given to complete assessments.
While it may not be surprising to many that teachers are given very minimal time to complete
assessments with their students, it was actually surprising that an early childhood professional
would say the same for her practices. This was a learnable moment when noting the similarities
and differences between the answers as it broke the assumption that early child care centers have
more leniency with time for assessments. While these two professionals happen to share a lot of
common information about assessment, they each gave some differing responses as well. For
example, while Mrs. Graham has used online tools frequently for assessing children, Mrs.
Schmidt notes that she does not see much technology incorporated into assessments at this grade
level. This may be because of the lack of accessibility to technology when assessing an entire
class of students, whereas in Mrs. Grahams room she is often focusing on individualized
assessments and this may warrant more opportunities for technology to be present. Additionally,
when we asked each professional one of our own written questions about individualizing
assessments to cater to their own beliefs/teaching, Mrs. Graham noted that she prefers to observe
and take notes of things children do rather than test them. While Mrs. Schmidts response is
similar to this, she also notes that her administration does not care whether she does portfolios
for each student. While she finds it valuable, her school does not enforce this type of assessment,
so she does it mainly because she feels it will benefit the child, the parents, and her own teaching
to see where there are still areas for growth. Overall, Mrs. Graham and Mrs. Schmidt gave very
similar responses to our questions, which leads us to believe that their beliefs and opinions of
assessments come from their strong backgrounds in teaching young children and the decades of
experience they have in the field. Comparing and contrasting their answers side by side has
helped us to see where the age differences and environment differences may change their
Reflection
As mentioned above, it was surprising to see how many of the responses we received
from each professional ended up being very similar. While Mrs. Graham is currently the head
teacher of a 24-32 month classroom and Mrs. Schmidt is a Kindergarten teacher, they each
shared similar beliefs, experiences, and facts about their knowledge of assessment. Ms. Potter
was surprised by the cohesion of what assessments to use and how theyre used by the teachers
at the CDL. She was thinking that Mrs. Graham would have more of a differentiated view about
assessment since she has just started working at the CDL, but she seemed to have the same view
of what assessment is her favorite as the other teachers who have been working there for a while.
This tells Ms. Potter a lot about how the people and environment around you influence your
work style, which is important for future endeavours as a teacher in terms of how she wants her
classroom to operate. Additionally, both of us were surprised to see the difference between
assessments done on Mrs. Schmidt by her superiors versus Mrs. Grahams experiences. It seems
that Mrs. Schmidt is assessed more formally for her ability to get her students at benchmark, as
well as for her professionalism as a teacher. Ms. Cohen was expecting assessments to be similar
in this aspect, so it was interesting to see the large difference between these settings and how it
affects the way these professionals are assessed. The assessments done on Mrs. Graham seem to
be more informal, while the assessments done on Mrs. Schmidt are more formal and happen
more frequently as she is responsible for evaluating students growth throughout the year to see
if they will be ready to move to the next grade. Having the opportunity to interview two early
childhood professionals who have extensive experience in their fields was helpful in building our
understanding of the benefits and challenges when working with assessments. As we decide what
age we would like to teach and what setting we will be teaching in, we can refer back to these
important conversations to remind ourselves of what will be expected of us and how we can best
accommodate for the assessments that will be done on us and our students.