Professional Documents
Culture Documents
017
12 1
1. 710049
2. 350002
career growth 1989 Ragins Sundstrom
[1]20 90
[2-5][6][7][89][10]
[11]
Chay Aryee
[12]
Adams Ellstrom
[1314] Choy Savery
[15]TharenouMetzGaravan
[16-18]
2009-05-11
20100471617 70121001
71032002 70772109 70872034
1
Graen [19]Graen
Firkola
[20]
1
career development
[21]
Super
1
[22]
[23]
Arthur
[24]
[25]
[25]
2
1
SCI/SSCI career growth ca
reer advancementcareer progresscareer opportunities
[1216-1826] 1
Carmeli
[27]career mobilitycareer prospects
Carmeli
[28] [29]
[27]
Chay Aryee1999 Career growth
Nkereuwem1996 Career advancement prospects
Garavan 2006 Career Advancement
Metz Tharenou2001 Managerial advancement
Tharenou1999 Career advancement
[23]
1980-1994 75
[30] 2
Nicholson De Waal
[31]
Nicholson De Waal
[31]
2
1 AMJ Seibert 2001[10]
2 JAP Cable Derue2002[32]
3 JCD Allen 2006[33]
4 JCD Murphy Ensher2001[34]
5 JCD Blake-Beard1999[35]
6 JM Kirchmeyer1998[36]
7 JM Judge Bretz1994
8 JMS Aryee 1996[37]
9 JOB Wayne 1999[11]
10 JVB Byrne 2008[38]
11 JVB Valcour Ladge2008[39]
12 JVB Schneer Reitman1997[40]
AMJ-Academy of Management Journal JCD-Journal of Career Development JAP-Journal of Applied Psychology JMS-Journal of Management Stud-
ies JM-Journal of Management JSP-Journal of Social Psychology JOB-Journal of Organizational Behavior JVB-Journal of Vocational Behavior
3
Van Veldhoven Career opportunities[4142]
3 Van Veldhoven 1994 Career possi
bilityOpportunities to learn 2008
Van Veldhoven Meijman1994
Van Veldhoven Dorenbosch2008
4
[43]Ference
[43]
Bardwick
[44]
Joseph
[45]
5
//
Tharenou Metz
[1617]
20 10
100 82
5 15 3
18
5 18
260 213
0.40
15 Likert 5 5 4
3 2 1
1
1
15
4
10-25
1200 1109 961 108
636 67.7
304 22.3
11.24 97 10.09 101
223 23.2
10.51 86 8.95 70 7.28 281 29.3
101 10.51 113 11.76 81 360 37.5
8.43 204 21.23 76 7.9
25 251 26.8
425 44.2
26-30 319 34.0
536 55.8
31-45 226 24.1
4 45 142 15.1
2 86 9.2
138 14.8
253 27.2
SPSS13.0 105 11.3
LISREL8.70 348 37.4
t r t r
1 16.836*** .683*** 0.75 9 25.648*** .557*** 0.87
2 17.361*** .755*** 0.82 10 21.617*** .516*** 0.83
3 11.251*** .656*** 0.75 11 18.358*** .527*** 0.89
4 28.789*** .697*** 0.85 12 21.421*** .489*** 0.84
5 17.325*** .703*** 0.82 13 24.352*** .587*** 0.81
6 21.632*** .710*** 0.79 14 19.586*** .612*** 0.73
7 28.442*** .719*** 0.82 15 18.135*** .608*** 0.77
8 14.124*** .688*** 0.88
2
961
n=480n=481
Bartlett 3069.063p=0.000
KMO 0.872
6
Q1 .869 .143 .186 .126
Q2 .856 .212 .018 .025
Q3 .779 .247 .025 .063
Q4 .755 .193 .264 .114
Q5 .209 .843 .173 .128
Q6 .169 .821 .249 .019
Q7 .189 .704 .016 .167
Q8 .124 .835 .021 .192
Q9 .087 .096 .827 .245
Q10 .168 .009 .668 .239
Q11 .027 .209 .602 .297
Q12 .006 .105 .712 .267
Q13 .138 .126 .238 .872
Q14 .032 .175 .215 .754
Q15 .068 .064 .193 .826
% 26.8 20.3 17.5 10.4
3
481
2/dfRMSEAGFI AGFI
NNFI CFI
PNFI PGFI2/df 10 5.0
3 RMSEA 0.1
RMSEA 0.08 0.05
RMSEA 0.05
GFI
AGFI
NNFI
CFI 0 1
1
PNFI PGFI 0 1 0.50 [4950]
7 2/df 1.505 RMSEA
0.064 0.05 GFI=0.93
AGFI=0.91 0.90
NNFI=0.97CFI=0.98 0.9 PNFI 0.81
PGFI 0.72
2/df RMSEA GFI AGFI NNFI NFI CFI PNFI PGFI IFI
1.505 0.064 0.93 0.91 0.97 0.94 0.98 0.81 0.72 0.98
2
0.6 1 t p<0.001 0.6
Greenhaus [51]
8
Alderson
0.3-0.5 0.267
0.483 0.3-0.5 [52]
8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1.
2. 0.681
3. 0.607 0.670
4. 0.533 0.615 0.722
5. 0.433 0.505 0.515 0.528
6. 0.380 0.448 0.377 0.378 0.470
7. 0.248 0.246 0.084 0.259 0.398 0.447
8. 0.382 0.422 0.368 0.510 0.337 0.333 0.267
9. 0.351 0.391 0.384 0.422 0.333 0.453 0.268 0.483
_ 0.001
5
Cronbachs spearman
0.783 0.6
Cronbachs 0.8600.848
0.7960.783 9
4
4
74.961% 4
0.70
career growth
:
[1] Ragins, B. R., Sundstrom, E. Gender and Power in Organizations[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1989,105(1):51-88
[2] Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., Barrick, M. R. The Big Five Personality Traits, General Mental Ability, and Career
Success Across the Life Span[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1999,52(3):621-652
[3] Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. M., Kraimer, M. L. Proactive Personality and Career Success[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999,84(3):
416-427
[4] Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L. The Five-Factor Model of Personality and Career Success[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2001,58
(1):1-21
[5] Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., Crant, J. M. What Do Proactive People Do? A Longitudinal Model Linking Proactive Personality and
Career Success[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2001,54:845-873
[6] Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. K. How Similarity to Peers and Supervisor Influences Organizational Advancement in Different Cultures
[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002,45(6):1120-1136
[7] Markham, W. T., Harlan, S. L., Hackett, E. J. Promotion Opportunity in Organizations: Causes & Consequences[A]. In Rowland, K.,
& Ferris, G. (Eds) Research in Personnel & Human Resource Management[C]. 1987,5:223-287
[8] Judiesch, M. K., Lyness, K. S. Left Behind? The Impact of Leaves of Absence on ManagersCareer Success[J]. Academy of Manage
ment Journal, 1999,42(6):641-651
[9] Schneer, J. A., Reitman, F. Effects of Employment Gaps on the Careers of M. B. A.S: More Damaging for Men than for Women?[J].
Academy of Management Journal, 1990,33(2):391-406
[10] Seibert, S. E., Maria L.K., Robert C. L. A Social Capital Theory of Career Success[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001,44(2):
219-238
[11] Wayne S. J., Liden, R. C., Kraimer, M. L., Graf, I. K. The Role of Human Capital, Motivation and Supervisor Sponsorship in Pre
dicting Career Success[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1999,20(5):577-595
[12] Chay, Y., Aryee, S. Potential Moderating Influence of Career Growth Opportunities on Careerist Orientation and Work Attitudes:
Abstract: The study structures and tests a four-dimensional structure model of career growth, and develops a measurement scale of
career growth. Based on the reviewing and generalizing of the correlated literature, it analyzes the links and differences between career
growth and other related concepts. The original data is acquired through interviews and semi-structured questionnaire. By reference to
the related research scales, the initial career growth scale is made through several steps, including cataloguing, summarizing and
revising. The formal scale is constructed through the research methods of the items analysis, exploratory factor test and so forth.
Confirmatory factor analysis approach is adopted to verify the four-dimensional structure model of career growth. The results indicate
that career growth is a four-dimension concept, including career goal progress, professional ability development, promotion speed and
remuneration growth. Two directions for the future researches of career growth theory are put forward.
Key words: career growth, employee, career development, career success, scale