PROPOSAL

Appraisal Analysis of U-23 Coach Says

Ready to Take Responsibility if Match-fixing
Allegation True News
Lecturer : Drs. Sumani, M.M, M.Hum

By:

Aprilia Mayasari (6C/ 12321081)

English Teaching Department

Faculty of Letters and Arts
IKIP PGRI Madiun
2014/ 2015
 CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study

Mass media is a tool of social control of the most powerful. It can know
any motion pace of development in all fields, any criminal action until private
gossip of politicians and other public figures, without being afraid. It is become
the subject of news by reporters who would be be attractive commodity in the
world of mass media both print and electronic, from tabloid that is now rapidly
expanding to newspapers and magazines that have been established through radio
and television broadcasts even cyberspace (internet) were very effective for hunter
information.
In developing of jurnalism in Indonesia, the language that used have been
developed various of newspaper, magazine or online news. By Jakarta Post, the
researcher used appraisal analysis to know the words that used by publisher.
Appraisal analysis itself is concerned with evaluation. In apraisal analysis, there
are attitude, amplification, and source. Attitude itself has three part that are
attitude consist of affect (feeling), judgement (character), and appreciation
(value). Here, the researcher just analyze about affect (feeling), judgement
(character) in U-23 Coach Says Ready to Take Responsibility if Match-fixing
Allegation True News in Jakarta Post.

1.2 Scope and Limitation

The limitation in this research is limited toward judgement analysis and
affect analysis in U-23 Coach Says Ready to Take Responsibility if Match-fixing
Allegation true News.

1.3 Statements of the Problem

1. What are the word that included judgement analysis in the news?
2. What are the word that included affect analysis in the news?
1.4 Purpose of the study
The objectives of this study are:
1. To find words that included judgment in the news
2. To find words that included affect in the news
 CHAPTER 2
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

2.1 Definition of Appraisal

Appraisal is concerned with evaluation. Evaluation is a concept that
crosses discipline boundaries and has many diverse applications. Appraisal is
understood as [a] particular approach to exploring, describing and explaining the
way language is used to evaluate, to adopt stances, to construct textual personas
and to manage interpersonal positionings and relationships (White 2001: 1). The
kinds of attitudes that are negotiated in a text, the strenght of the feeling involved
and the ways in which values are sourced and readers aligned (J.R. Martin &
David Rose 2007).

2.2 Attitudinal positioning

The area of appraisal that is focused on in this paper is that of attitudinal
positioning. The subcategories in this system are
Affect which is understood as relating to the speakers emotional response
Judgement as their moral evaluation of behavior, and finally,
Appreciation as their aesthetic opinions of entities or processes.
As Martin points out these categories are interrelated in that at a general
level, all encode feeling (2000: 147). This is diagrammatically expressed in
Figure 1. The distinction between these three categories, as suggested earlier, is
primarily a semantic one, allowing for some degree of grammatical flexibility in
the forms included within each. The three pairs of examples given here give a
small indication of these types of appraisal.
(1) Affect
a. I was euphoric about expecting a baby with the man I loved. It was that
overwhelming feeling which made me focus on what I wanted from the
pregnancy.
b. I feared bringing into the world a small being who might end up as heart-
gouged and bewildered as I had been.
(2) Judgement
a. I am sure the doctors reasons were plausible, but it is completely wrong to
strip a baby of organs without the parents consent.
b. Shes on her very best behaviour.
(3) Appreciation
a. This coastline of legendary beauty, with warm blue seas, superb sandy
beaches and vibrant resorts, gives the South of France a special magnetism.
b. Her lips were inflated and she looked tired and a little drawn, very different
to her glamorous film appearances.

These examples indicate that AFFECT foregrounds the emotion

undergone by the speaker, whereas JUDGMENT centers on the social and moral
implications of the actions of individuals and APPRECIATION is to do with the
aesthetic attributes associated with an entity (including physical aspects of human
appearance). What even this very small sample also demonstrates is that further
degrees of delicacy are also possible in the analysis of APPRAISAL. A detailed
account of this may be found in Martin (2000) and Eggins and Slade (1997). For
the purposes of this article, I will draw attention to the areas of particular
relevance to the fairly broad analysis presented later. First, emotions, moral
behavior and aesthetics may be of many types. Thus, within each category, further
semantic subdivisions are possible. These are summarized in Figure 2. Second, for
each of these subdivisions, the APPRAISAL may be expressed on a positive or
negative polarity, relative to the cultural values of speaker and listener, shown in
the contrast in each of the pairs in examples (1) to (3). So these distinctions
recognize that emotive responses and opinions may be of many different kinds,
both in terms of type and negative/positive values, but as Hunston and Thompson
(2000: 143) put it, ultimately reduced to small number of basic options.

Third, any instance of APPRAISAL can be presented with more or less

intensity. The resources that speakers might use to grade their attitudes towards
events or people are referred to as AMPLIFICATION (Eggins and Slade 1997).3
While they simply represent this as a separate system of choices alongside the
other attitudinal categories, it is important to note that in fact these strategies for
either intensifying the APPRAISAL (ENRICHMENT or AUGMENTING) or
playing down an opinion (MITIGATION) may exist in combination with choices
from the categories of AFFECT, JUDGMENT and APPRECIATION. Thus, in
example (2a), the JUDGMENT wrong is AUGMENTED by the intensifier
completely. Again, these strategies are summarized in Figure 2.
 CHAPTER 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Source of Data
The researcher take the data from the website of The Jakarta Post that
published in Jakarta, June 17 2015 at 3:09 pm. The website is
m.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/06/17/u-23-coach-says-ready-take-
responsibility-if-match-fixing-allegation-true.html.

3.2 Data Collection Technique

The researcher use observation to analyze the words that include
judgement and affect by marking 10 words. Then, the reasearcher identify the
amplication and source of the words.

3.3 Data Analysis

In this step the researcher collect the data by use appraisal. As we know,
aprraisal consists three basic options which are attitude, amplification, and source.
Then, the reseacher divide the data in the news into three part of attitude which
are judgement, affect, and appreciation. In here, the researcher only found data
which are affect and judgement in the news. So, the first data is about judgement
analysis. The second data is about affect analysis.

3.4 Validity Technique

The researcher uses three dictionaries to strength the validity because to
make valid the data the researcher gets the grade of each word,
The researcher also use observation technique to divided the word in the
news into affect, judgement and appreciation.
 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Hornby, A.S., Turnbull, J., Lea, D., Parkinson, D., Philips, P., & Ashby, M. (n.d.).
Oxford advanced learners dictionary of current English. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.

Martin, J. R.. (2002) Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English. In

Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of
Discourse, S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds.), 142175. Oxford: OUP.

Martin, J. R., David, R. (2007). Working with Discourse.

Page, E, R. (2003). An analysis of APPRAISAL in childbirth narratives with

special consideration of gender and storytelling style. Retrieved
from:
http://community.hciresearch.org/sites/community.hciresearch.org/files/te
xt.2003.009 .pdf

The Merriam-Webster dictionary. (2004). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.

Walter, E. (2010). Cambridge advanced learners Dictionary. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

White, P. (2001). Appraisal. Retrieved from:

http://www.grammatics.com/appraisal/AppraisalGuide