Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WILLIE WATLINGTON
Plaintiff,
v.
TIM BROWNE
Defendant.
_______________________________________________________________________
the Civil Rights Litigation Group, PLLC, hereby states and alleges as follows:
INTRODUCTION
Police K-9 Officer for dog bite injuries suffered when the officer unjustifiably ordered
his police dog to viciously seize Plaintiff, without justification, as Plaintiff walked out of
local tavern. The dog repeatedly chomped down on Plaintiffs leg for 5-10 seconds, and
then clamped down and dragged him along the ground, during which time the officer
failed to intervene to prevent or stop the animal from attacking the innocent man.
2. At the time of the seizure, the officer was looking for a different suspect,
a middle-aged white man, who objectively looked nothing like Plaintiff. But upon seeing
Plaintiff, a young black man, leave the bar, Defendant overzealously ordered the police
1
Case 1:17-cv-02972-REB-KLM Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 8
economic injuries that he suffered, including temporary and permanent injuries from the
dog bite, scarring and deformation, emotional trauma, medical bills, and punitive
sanctions to punish the officer for his flagrant disregard of Plaintiffs rights and safety.
4. This action arises under the Constitution and laws of the United States,
resulting injuries to the Plaintiff giving rise to this action occurred in Colorado Springs,
Colorado.
PARTIES
7. Plaintiff Willie Watlington was at all times relevant to the claims set forth
herein a resident of the State of Colorado. At the time of the incident, Plaintiff
8. Defendant Tim Browne was, at all times relevant to the subject matter of
the claims in this action, employed as a K-9 Police Handler of a German Shephard
named Blitz by Colorado Springs Police Department, and acted under color of state
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
2
Case 1:17-cv-02972-REB-KLM Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 8
10. On December 11, 2015, Plaintiff was enjoying a night out at the Peak
11. The Defendant Officer arrived at the tavern, in full police uniform, with
approximately four to five other officers - all looking for an older, white, male suspect in
12. Four or five officers went into the tavern through the front door and the
13. Plaintiff finished his drink and exited the tavern through the back door,
which led almost immediately to an adjacent apartment complex, where Plaintiff lived.
14. Upon exiting the tavern, Plaintiff immediately headed toward his
apartment complex. In his peripheral vision, he saw a man or a vehicle about 40 yards
away, but did not take any particular notice as he walked toward his home.
15. Plaintiff heard some muffled shouts, but no indication that the man was a
16. Defendant Officer Browne saw Plaintiff leave the bar and yelled toward
him. Upon seeing Plaintiff continue to walk away, Defendant Browne ordered his K-9
17. Plaintiff turned toward the source of the yelling in time to see the officer
point toward him and the animal run in his direction. Plaintiff immediately dropped to
18. After about four to five seconds, the dog ran up to Plaintiff and chomped
3
Case 1:17-cv-02972-REB-KLM Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 8
down on Plaintiffs leg multiple times, for approximately 5-10 seconds, and then
clamped down and held/dragged Plaintiff along the ground, during which time the
officer did not attempt to command the animal to stop, physically intervene to prevent
19. Eventually, Defendant Officer Browne walked over and removed the dog
20. With the K-9 at Defendants side, Defendant Officer Browne, and other
officers who joined him, began asking Plaintiff questions and demanded Plaintiffs
drivers license. The officer ran Plaintiffs identification and Plaintiff heard the officers
21. EMTs eventually arrived on scene and provided medical attention. They
indicated that Plaintiff would need to be transported to the hospital and would need
wounds and one large gaping wound made by the K-9, as well as abrasions on both of
Cummings arrived and asked Plaintiff questions about the incident. He informed
Plaintiff that the officers had been looking for a white male in his 50s or 60s, and that
Plaintiff obviously did not fit the description. He acknowledged that the K-9 should not
have been used to bite him and that Defendant Browne had violated CSPD protocol.
4
Case 1:17-cv-02972-REB-KLM Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 8
Defendant Cummings apologized for Defendant Brownes and the dogs actions.
25. Plaintiff asked Defendant Browne for his first name, but Defendant
Browne vaguely and deceptively avoided providing a real answer, telling him only
Officer.
26. Afterward, Plaintiff went back to see physicians on three more occasions
for follow up treatment over the next two months and to get the stitches removed.
Plaintiff suffered physical pain and suffering, he endured emotional trauma from the
unexpected and violent attack, he was forced to walk on crutches for approximately six
to eight weeks, and he continues to tolerate ugly scars from the dog attack that remain to
this day.
27. Plaintiff hereby incorporate by reference, as though fully set forth herein,
each and every allegation contained in the preceding Paragraphs of this Complaint.
Plaintiff Watlington by ordering his K-9 unit, Blitz to attack and hold Plaintiff, outside
of the Peak Tavern, and then continued to detain, question, and hold Plaintiff against his
will, after the K-9 released him and the dog stood menacingly beside the officer, while
29. At the time Defendant seized, detained, and otherwise confined Plaintiff,
he did not have reasonable suspicion or probable cause to believe Plaintiff had engaged
5
Case 1:17-cv-02972-REB-KLM Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 8
in any crime, had no basis to arrest him, and no justification to inflict injury. From his
perspective, Plaintiff Watlington, had, at most, left the tavern, as any other patron might
do, and attempted to walk home while the officer was waiting for a different person.
Plaintiff Watlington obviously did not fit the description of the suspect the officer
sought, as Plaintiff was a young, 24-year-old, black man, and the suspect the officers
sought was a middle-aged white man. Thus, there was no legal basis to stop, detain,
30. During the encounter, Plaintiff was confined by the Defendant within a
limited space, and was not able to leave, enforced by violent acts and implicit threats,
31. The actions as described herein of Defendant officer, under color of state
law, deprived Plaintiff of the rights, privileges, liberties, and immunities secured by the
Constitution of the United States of America, including the right to freedom from
United States of America, made actionable pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, and were the
proximate cause of Plaintiffs injuries, including loss of liberty, physical and emotional
32. Plaintiff hereby incorporate by reference, as though fully set forth herein,
each and every allegation contained in the preceding Paragraphs of this Complaint.
6
Case 1:17-cv-02972-REB-KLM Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 8
K-9 Unit to attack and seize Plaintiff, and by failing to timely intervene to stop/prevent
the dog from chomping multiple times, dragging Plaintiff along the ground, and biting
Plaintiffs leg in a holding bite until the officer walked near. Defendant Browne did not
resorting to force.
34. The actions detailed above were performed without legal justification or
purpose; they were not necessary for any legally justifiable seizure. There was no legal
35. Even if the conduct described above were used in conjunction with a
legally cognizable stop or detention, the force used was wholly unnecessary and reached
a quantum above and beyond that needed to effectuate any legally recognizable
detention.
36. The actions as described herein of Defendant Browne, while acting under
color of state law, deprived Plaintiff of the rights, privileges, liberties, and immunities
secured by the Constitution of the United States of America, including the right to
7
Case 1:17-cv-02972-REB-KLM Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 8
1983, and was the motivating and proximate cause of Plaintiffs injuries, including
his favor and against all Defendants for compensatory damages, as referenced above, for
punitive damages, for interest as allowed by law, for costs, expert witness fees, and
reasonable attorney fees as allowed by statute or as otherwise allowed by law, and for
any other and further relief that this Court shall deem just and proper.
8
Case 1:17-cv-02972-REB-KLM Document 1-1 Filed 12/11/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
JS 44 (Rev. 06/17) CIVIL COVER SHEET
The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as
provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the
purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)
(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff County of Residence of First Listed Defendant
(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF
THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.
(c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) Attorneys (If Known)
II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an X in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an X in One Box for Plaintiff
(For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant)
1 U.S. Government 3
Federal Question PTF DEF PTF DEF
Plaintiff (U.S. Government Not a Party) Citizen of This State 1 1 Incorporated or Principal Place 4 4
of Business In This State
2 U.S. Government 4 Diversity Citizen of Another State 2 2 Incorporated and Principal Place 5 5
Defendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) of Business In Another State
VII. REQUESTED IN CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION DEMAND $ CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint:
COMPLAINT: UNDER RULE 23, F.R.Cv.P. JURY DEMAND: Yes
No
VIII. RELATED CASE(S)
(See instructions):
IF ANY JUDGE DOCKET NUMBER
DATE SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD
The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the filings and service of pleading or other papers as
required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is
required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. Consequently, a civil cover sheet is submitted to the Clerk of
Court for each civil complaint filed. The attorney filing a case should complete the form as follows:
I.(a) Plaintiffs-Defendants. Enter names (last, first, middle initial) of plaintiff and defendant. If the plaintiff or defendant is a government agency, use
only the full name or standard abbreviations. If the plaintiff or defendant is an official within a government agency, identify first the agency and
then the official, giving both name and title.
(b) County of Residence. For each civil case filed, except U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county where the first listed plaintiff resides at the
time of filing. In U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county in which the first listed defendant resides at the time of filing. (NOTE: In land
condemnation cases, the county of residence of the "defendant" is the location of the tract of land involved.)
(c) Attorneys. Enter the firm name, address, telephone number, and attorney of record. If there are several attorneys, list them on an attachment, noting
in this section "(see attachment)".
II. Jurisdiction. The basis of jurisdiction is set forth under Rule 8(a), F.R.Cv.P., which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an "X"
in one of the boxes. If there is more than one basis of jurisdiction, precedence is given in the order shown below.
United States plaintiff. (1) Jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1348. Suits by agencies and officers of the United States are included here.
United States defendant. (2) When the plaintiff is suing the United States, its officers or agencies, place an "X" in this box.
Federal question. (3) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1331, where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendment
to the Constitution, an act of Congress or a treaty of the United States. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintiff or defendant code takes
precedence, and box 1 or 2 should be marked.
Diversity of citizenship. (4) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1332, where parties are citizens of different states. When Box 4 is checked, the
citizenship of the different parties must be checked. (See Section III below; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversity
cases.)
III. Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. This section of the JS 44 is to be completed if diversity of citizenship was indicated above. Mark this
section for each principal party.
IV. Nature of Suit. Place an "X" in the appropriate box. If there are multiple nature of suit codes associated with the case, pick the nature of suit code
that is most applicable. Click here for: Nature of Suit Code Descriptions.
VI. Cause of Action. Report the civil statute directly related to the cause of action and give a brief description of the cause. Do not cite jurisdictional
statutes unless diversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statute: 47 USC 553 Brief Description: Unauthorized reception of cable service
VII. Requested in Complaint. Class Action. Place an "X" in this box if you are filing a class action under Rule 23, F.R.Cv.P.
Demand. In this space enter the actual dollar amount being demanded or indicate other demand, such as a preliminary injunction.
Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded.
VIII. Related Cases. This section of the JS 44 is used to reference related pending cases, if any. If there are related pending cases, insert the docket
numbers and the corresponding judge names for such cases.
Date and Attorney Signature. Date and sign the civil cover sheet.
Case 1:17-cv-02972-REB-KLM Document 1-2 Filed 12/11/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
)
)
Plaintiff
)
v. ) Civil Action No.
)
)
Defendant
)
Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) or 60 days if you
are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.
P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney,
whose name and address are:
If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.
You also must file your answer or motion with the court.
CLERK OF COURT
Date:
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Case 1:17-cv-02972-REB-KLM Document 1-2 Filed 12/11/17 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
PROOF OF SERVICE
(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))
I left the summons at the individuals residence or usual place of abode with (name)
, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,
on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individuals last known address; or
Other (specify):
.
Date:
Servers signature
Servers address