Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Strength training in old age has been effective for and humans.26,27,52,53 An increase in tendon stiffness
increasing muscle strength and size. Despite
6,1518,47 is likely to result in a faster rate of force development
numerous reports on the adaptations of skeletal and reduced shortening of the in-series contractile
muscles to strength training, so far no attention has component.19,27 However, to our knowledge, no
been paid to changes in tendon viscoelastic proper- studies have been performed to establish the extent
ties with regimens of increased loading in old age. to which similar responses would occur in tendons of
The primary role of tendons is the transmission elderly humans.
of contractile forces from muscle to bone, enabling Tendons of the knee and ankle extensors also act
movement to occur.8 In vitro studies suggest that the as springs that store and release elastic energy dur-
tensile stiffness of collagen tissues is reduced with ing locomotion, thus minimizing the metabolic en-
aging.43,44 Consistent with these ndings, recent in ergy required to displace the body forward.3,9 The
vivo observations have shown that the tendons of energy dissipated upon tendon recoil is an indica-
elderly humans are more compliant than those of tion of the internal damping of the tendon, known
young adults.34 An increased stiffness of tendon and as mechanical hysteresis. There is evidence from
aponeuroses by 9 57% has been reported in re- animal and human studies that tendons performing
sponse to periods of increased loading in animals different physiological functions have similar values
of mechanical hysteresis.41,45 However, other studies
have shown that tendons subjected to high physio-
Abbreviations: BF, biceps femoris; EMG, electromyographic; MRI, mag- logical loads display a reduced mechanical hysteresis
netic resonance imaging; RM, repetition maximum; RMS, root mean square;
VL, vastus lateralis compared with relatively low-stressed tendons.50,55,56
Key words: elderly; hysteresis; stiffness; strength training; tendon Consistent with these data, Kubo et al.26 found that
Correspondence to: N. Reeves; e-mail: n.reeves@mmu.ac.uk
exercise training reduces the mechanical hysteresis
2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
of adult human tendons. It is unknown whether
tendons of elderly humans would respond in a sim-
pletely upon a verbal signal. Preliminary measure- Statistical Analysis. Data were analyzed using a 2
ments demonstrated that complete relaxation from (group: training or control) 2 (time: pre or post)
a maximal contraction typically occurs within 500 factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) and followed
ms. A 7.5-MHz linear-array transducer was placed by post hoc test using the Scheffe procedure, where
over an echo-absorptive external marker xed on necessary. Baseline differences between the two
the skin with surgical tape and positioned in the groups were tested for all measured variables using
sagittal plane at the level of the patella tendon (Fig. independent-sample Students t-tests. Changes in
3). The transducer was secured by a custom-built 5-RM strength before and after training were ana-
external xator and held in position by the experi- lyzed using Students t-tests for paired samples. Data
menter. Ultrasound scanning was optimized for im- are presented as mean standard deviation.
age quality, while the sampling frequency remained
above 30 Hz. Ultrasound scans were recorded onto
RESULTS
S-VHS videotape at 50 Hz for subsequent analysis.
All measurements were synchronized with signals No differences (P 0.05) were found between the
captured by the acquisition system using an external two groups at baseline on any of the measured vari-
marker. The displacement of the apex of the patella ables. Body mass was unchanged (P 0.05) in either
was measured with respect to the line cast on the group following the training and control periods.
ultrasound image by the external marker (Fig. 3). The 5 RM for the leg-extension exercise increased
This displacement was assumed to represent the from 40.7 11.7 kg before training to 47.5 14.7 kg
elongation of the patella tendon. In trials where after training (17% increase, P 0.01). For the
movement of the line cast on the ultrasound image leg-press exercise, the 5 RM increased from 165
by the external marker occurred during contrac- 42.9 kg before training to 198.1 53.2 kg after
tionrelaxation, the data obtained were omitted training (20% increase, P 0.01).
from further analysis. Measurements of displace- Patella tendon stiffness increased from 1375.5
ment were analyzed at intervals of 20% of maximal 811.2 N.mm1 before training to 2256.1 1475.5
joint torque on both the loading and unloading N.mm1 after training (64%, P 0.01; Table 1).
phases, using digitizing software (NIH Image, ver- Before and after both the training and control peri-
sion 1.61, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, ods, the patella tendon loading unloading curves
MD). The mean of three measurements for each produced an open hysteresis loop (Figs. 4 and 5).
image was used for further analysis. However, the tendon returned to its original resting
position 341 109 ms after the knee-joint torque
Calculation of Patella Tendon Stiffness, Hysteresis, and had returned to zero, indicating that the tendon did
Rebound Resilience. Patella tendon stiffness not exceed its elastic limit. The tendon mechanical
(N.mm1) was calculated during the loading phase, hysteresis decreased from 32.7 4.7% before train-
from the gradient of the force elongation relation- ing to 23.5 4.1% after training (P 0.05; Fig. 4).
ship over the interval 60 100% of maximal force. Therefore, the tendon rebound resilience increased
from 67.3 4.7% before training to 76.5 4.1% The estimated maximal tendon force increased
after training (P 0.05). In contrast, no changes in from 2915.5 991.7 N before training to 3484.4
stiffness, mechanical hysteresis, or rebound resil- 1249.3 N after training (20% increase, P 0.01;
ience were observed after the control period (P Table 1). In the control group, the estimated maxi-
0.05; Table 1). mal tendon force decreased from 3374.6 1230.9 N
Table 1. Measured and estimated variables before and after the training and control periods.
Training group Control group
Pre Post Pre Post
Leg-extension 5 RM (kg) 40.7 (11.7) 47.5 (14.7)
Leg-press 5 RM (kg) 165 (42.9) 198.1 (53.2)
Stiffness (N.mm1) 1375.5 (811.2) 2256.1 (1475.5) 1167.7 (615.7) 847.9 (241)
Hysteresis (%) 32.7 (4.7) 23.5 (4.1)* 29.5 (9.5) 30.1 (4.5)
Rebound resilience (%) 67.3 (4.7) 76.5 (4.1)* 70.5 (9.5) 69.9 (4.5)
Maximum tendon force (N) 2915.5 (991.7) 3484.4 (1249.3) 3374.6 (1230.9) 2843.1 (933.5)
Coactivation (%) 33.1 (27.9) 35.6 (26.7) 34 (15) 32.6 (19.6)
VL EMG (mV.s) 5.012 (3.122) 7.322 (5.892) 0.102 (6.452) 7.542 (5.92)*
Data presented as mean (SD). EMG, electromyogram; RM, repetition maximum; VL, vastus lateralis.
*P 0.05 versus pretraining or control periods.
DISCUSSION