Professional Documents
Culture Documents
001173377
teacher. As teaching philosophies develop and individual assessment styles emerge, the one
commonality that all absolutely must aim for is utilizing assessments fairly. Understanding the
issues surrounding fair assessments is something that every teacher should be aware of in order
to make informed decisions in their classrooms. How they will tackle those issues and create
equitable opportunities for learning depends on a thorough understanding on what issues arise
Before exploring this issue in depth, my beliefs of what constitutes a fair assessment were
not very well formed. Fairness felt like a very general, abstract idea that would be difficult to
ensure was present in my classroom. Delving into the issues around this topic challenged my
ideas of fairness because it required me to consider it as a concrete tool that I have control over
also looking just as thoroughly at ways to combat these issues. I feel that by looking at both the
realistic and achievable ways to incorporate fairness into my class. This includes knowing when
to use formative assessments and when to use summative ones, as well as being aware of the
emerging in our presentation: the fairness that was incorporated directly into the assessments
themselves, and the fairness with which teachers presented these assessments to their students in
differentiation was that both addressed the two types of fairness noted above. The fact that fair
assessments are not simply a product of validity and reliability, but also developed through their
integration into the classroom, was something that challenged and expanded my understandings
of assessment. I was also surprised at how much teachers can use differentiation even within
standardization, using the strengths of differentiation in fairness to strengthen the weaker aspects
of standardization in fairness. For example, the belief that standardized tests can be too uniform
can be made more equitable by differentiating the seating plan, time constraints, as well as
accommodating individual student needs. While this only partially tackles the issue of
standardization being too uniform (it is really only accomplishable on an individual classroom
While prior to exploring this issue, I may not have had the proper terminology for
validity and reliability issues, I feel that the concepts and their relation to fairness were an
descriptions of each type of validity and reliability. On the standardized assessment page of our
weebly, under the high stakes testing cartoon, I actually had to go back and add in the correct
terminology after learning it. The descriptions of both construct and content validity were
already present, but were affirmed by the definitions given in class that exactly complemented
my research.
My personal theory of teaching and learning is still new, and will surely evolve and
change as I learn more about the assessment process. Working fair assessment practices into this
framework is valuable to me because it will factor into how I assess my future students and will
be integral to creating the classroom environment that I want to see in my class. Fairness will not
only be seen in the construction of the assignment, but also in the presentation of it, and I will be
able to better assess authentic student learning. Which, ultimately, is the true goal of creating a
fair assessment.