Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11187837
Article in The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care July 2002
DOI: 10.1080/ejc.7.2.96.99 Source: PubMed
CITATIONS READS
8 69
4 authors, including:
Sevgi zsoy
Adnan Menderes University
27 PUBLICATIONS 18 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Sevgi zsoy on 23 November 2015.
ABSTR ACT Objective The Billings ovulation method (BOM) is a medical model of a natural
procreation education method based on scientific observation of the changes in the cervical
mucus. In this study we examined Turkish womens interest in accurate usage of
cervical mucus changes in determining the ovulation time.
Method Fifteen regularly cycling women monitored their fertility patterns in 30 cycles
using the BOM and urine luteinizing hormone (LH) kits. At the end of each cycle, the cervical
mucus monitoring chart and LH kits were collected from the subjects and analyzed.
Results The cervical mucus symptoms defined a potential fertile period of 10 days average
length, with the peak mucus characteristic occurring at a mean of day 13.65 2.62 of
the cycle. The duration of the LH surge, as observed in early morning urine samples, averaged
5 days, with the peak occurring at a mean of day 13.40 2.58 of the cycle. Data indicated
that there was a strong correlation between LH in the urine and the peak in self-observed,
cervicalvaginal mucus (p = 0.001).
Conclusion This study proved that women can distinguish patterns of ovulation and
anovulation by self-detection of variations in cervical mucus characteristics, and that urinary
LH levels strongly correlate with ovulation.
Despite the introduction of countrywide education stronger predictor of method choice than is that of her
programs and easy accessibility of family planning husband1. The Billings ovulation method (BOM) is a
services that provide modern contraceptive methods, medical model of a natural procreation education
traditional natural contraception is still the most method, based on the scientific observation of changes
frequent method of contraception used in Turkey. in the cervical mucus, which becomes clear, slippery
There exists a positive association between the educa- and copious in the periovulatory period2,3. Women
tional level of both spouses and the use of can detect their approximate times of ovulation
contemporary contraceptive methods. Therefore, it through the self-observation of mucus.
would be a pragmatic approach to promote the use of The method has many uses. It is possible to prevent
the most reliable method of natural family planning pregnancy by avoiding intercourse during this period.
(NFP) in this country. A womans educational level is a The method can also help to combat various problems
Correspondence: Dr E. Attar, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul
Medical School, Istanbul University, P.O. 30 CAPA, 34272, Istanbul, Turkey
MS 2202
Received 111001
ORIGINAL AR TICLE 96 Accepted 23402
The Billings ovulation method Attar et al.
of childlessness. The woman becomes familiar with her of the LH monoclonal antibodies in the urine. The
body and its functions. In this study, we examined test used has a reported LH sensitivity of 30 mIU/ml4.
Turkish womens interest and accurate usage of The LH surge can be detected as early as 36 h before
cervical mucus changes in determining the time ovulation with 98100% accuracy. The reaction time
of ovulation. Urine luteinizing hormone (LH) kits of enzymes with the antibodies in the urine is about
were used to check the accuracy of the womens ability 6 min with ten drops of urine.
to judge ovulation by cervical mucus changes.
The present study may also play a role in promot-
R ESU LTS
ing the use of LH kits as an adjunctive device in
the education and use of NFP methods. The cervical mucus symptoms defined a potential
fertile period of 10 days average length, with the
M ATER I ALS AN D M ETHO DS
peak mucus symptom occurring at a mean of day
13.65 2.62 of the cycle. The duration of the LH
We evaluated 30 natural cycles from 15 subjects surge, as determined in early-morning urine samples,
who were selected from women who applied to the averaged 5 days, with the peak occurring at a mean
Women and Child Health Education and Research of day 13.40 2.58 of the cycle. These results are
Unit, Istanbul Medical School, Istanbul University, for summarized in Table 1. The data indicated that there
training in BOM. They were between the ages of was a strong correlation between the LH in the urine
25 and 43 years (average 32 years), had no known and the peak in self-observed cervicalvaginal mucus.
fertility problems and were not on any type of medica- Analysis of data from the women who used BOM and
tion affecting the cervical mucus pattern of the ovula- urinary LH kits revealed that Pearsons correlation
tion cycle. Their gynecological examination revealed coefficient (0.956) was significant at the 0.01 level
normal findings and no vaginal discharge was noted. (two-tailed) (p < 0.001). Urine LH levels were
These subjects had learned to monitor their fertility elevated from 1 day before to 2 days after the cervical
patterns using BOM. After participating in the educa- mucus peak, when they were particularly high. Mucus
tion program we introduced, all of the participants sensations and characteristics yielded a significant
became familiar with the cervical-mucus monitoring correlation when simultaneously evaluated with
charts and completed at least one cycle of cervical urinary LH levels. High fertility potential was also
mucus charting. Each subject was given a cervical indicated by pregnancies resulting from intercourse
mucus-monitoring chart to record the characteristics during or immediately after the cervical mucus
of cervical mucus, and a self-detection ovulation kit peak. One of the women achieved pregnancy in
(urine LH kit; Clearplan, Unipath, UK). This kit the first cycle of fertility-focused intercourse, and
included instructions for its use, and the women were two achieved pregnancy by the second cycle.
also given a full explanation by the research team. Using BOM, none of the 30 cycles failed to detect
For their subsequent cycles they monitored their ovulation.
cervicalvaginal mucus and tested their urine for LH
with the urine LH kit. The urine LH kits were used
Table 1 The day of ovulation as predicted by the
from the beginning of cervical mucus discharge until Billings ovulation method (BOM) and measurement of
the color change on the kit disappeared. At the end of urine luteinizing hormone (LH). Results are presented
the womans menstrual cycle, the cervical mucus as mean SD
monitoring chart and LH kits were collected and Day of menstrual cycle when
analyzed. Method ovulation occurred
The LH surge in the urine was determined using an *p = 0.001, Pearsons correlation coefficient (0.956) is
ovulation self-test kit based on enzyme immunoassay significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed)
R EFER EN C ES
1. Koc I. Determinants of contraceptive use and method basis of a simple method of natural family planning.
choice in Turkey. J Biosoc Sci 2000;32:32942 Contraception 1999;60:35760
2. Billings JJ. Ovulation method of family planning. Lancet 14. Agarwal N, Deka D, Takkar D. Contraceptive status
1972;2:11934 and sexual behavior in women over 35 years of age in
3. Weissman MC, Foliaki L, Billings EL, Billings JJ. A trial India. Adv Contracept 1999;15:23544
of the ovulation method of family planning in Tonga. 15. Pyper CMM, Knight J. Fertility awareness methods of
Lancet 1972;2:81316 family planning: the physiological background,
4. Batzer F. Test kits for ovulation and pregnancy. Tech- methodology and effectiveness of fertility awareness
nology 1987. Contemp Obstet Gynecol 1986;28:716 methods. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2001;27:
5. Hilgers TW, Stanford JB. Creighton Model 10310
NaProEducation Technology for avoiding pregnancy. 16. Stanford JB, Smith KR. Characteristics of women asso-
Use effectiveness. J Reprod Med 1998;43:495502 ciated with continuing instruction in the Creighton
6. Hume K. Fertility awareness of the 1990s the Billings Model Fertility Care System. Contraception 2000;61:
Ovulation Method of natural family planning, its 1219
scientific basis, practical application and effectiveness. 17. Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD. Timing of
Adv Contracept 1991;7:30111 sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. Effects on
7. Fehring RJ, Gaska N. Evaluation of the Lady Free the probability of conception, survival of the preg-
Biotester in determining the fertile period. Contraception nancy, and sex of the baby. N Engl J Med 1995;333:
1998;57:3258 151721
8. Nulsen J, Wheeler C, Ausmanas M, Blasco L. Cervical 18. Wilcox AJ, Dunson D, Baird DD. The timing of the
mucus changes in relationship to urinary luteinizing fertile window in the menstrual cycle: day specific
hormone. Fertil Steril 1987;48:7836 estimates from a prospective study. Br Med J 2000;
9. Leader A, Wiseman D, Taylor PJ. The prediction of 321:125962
ovulation: a comparison of the basal body temperature 19. Jennings V, Sinai I. Further analysis of the theoretical
graph, cervical mucus score, and real time pelvic ultra- effectiveness of the Two-Day method of family
sonography. Fertil Steril 1985;43:3858 planning. Contraception 2001;64:14953
10. Guida M, Tommaselli GA, Palomba S, et al. Efficacy of 20. Dunson DB, Sinai I, Colombo B. The relationship
methods for determining ovulation in a natural family between cervical secretions and the daily probabilities of
planning program. Fertil Steril 1999;72:9004 pregnancy: effectiveness of the Two-Day Algorithm.
11. World Health Organization. Task force on methods for Hum Reprod 2001;16:227882
the determination of the fertile period. Am J Obstet 21. Sinai I, Jennings V, Arevalo M. The Two-Day
Gynecol 1980;138:38390 Algorithm: a new algorithm to identify the fertile time
12. Gross BA. Natural family planning indicators of of the menstrual cycle. Contraception 1999;60:6570
ovulation. Clin Reprod Fertil 1987;5:91117
13. Arevalo M, Sinai I, Jennings V. A fixed formula to
define the fertile window of the menstrual cycle as the