Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
The paper presents the results of tests carried out on selected membranes, SEPA (Osmonics Inc., USA). The
efficiency of membrane water softening was evaluated on the basis of permeate flux and the physicochemical analysis
of raw water and permeate. The transport-separation properties of the membranes were determined using (a) the model
solutions of NaCl and MgSO, and (b) the natural waters of high degree of hardness. The performed tests indicate that
the DSS-DK and DS3-SE membranes may be applied to the softening of water for drinking and household purposes.
The model based on the extended Nemst-Planck and the Donnan equations has been quantitatively fitted to the
experimental data. The obtained values of model parameters indicate that in the case of RO membranes a mechanism
other than the Donnan exclusion is responsible for the high retention of ions. The membrane filtration modelling will
be performed in the next stage of project.
1. Introduction
September 2000, item 937, drinking water and
A rising demand for high-quality water water for economic purposes should be charac-
observed recently has created a necessity of terised by hardness (CaCO,) 60-500 mg/dm3.
rationalisation of processes connected with The removing of excessive amounts of calcium
softening of hard and very hard water in Poland. and magnesium from drinking water would make
In accordance with the Decree of the Health and healthy feeding and healthy organism functioning
Social Welfare Minister, No. 82 dated 4th possible. At the same time it could ensure a long-
lasting operation of household equipment (pre-
*Corresponding author. venting scale deposits).
Presented at the International Congress on Membranes and Membrane Processes (ICOW, Toulouse, France,
July 7-12, 2002.
001 l-9164/02/$- See front matter 0 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved
PII: SO0 1 l-9 164(02)00430-7
322 M. Bodzek et al. /Desalination 145 (2002) 321-327
l
The effectiveness of a membrane water treat-
ment process was evaluated on the basis of - 9
5.0 -
permeate flux. The transport separation charac- z
.+ c 0.5% MgSO,
teristics of tested membranes were determined in
s - 0.5% NaCl
relation to the model solutions of NaCl and z
4.5 -
52
MgSO,. In the next stage of the experiment the r _ . - * . . . .
membrane filtration of natural hard water was . .
carried out and a physicochemical analysis ofraw 4.0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
water and permeate were made. The determi- 0 15 30 45 60 75 90105120135150165160195210
time[min]
nation of concentration of Mg2+, Ca2’ ions and of
b) *
16.0 - ' -
iz 16.0 -
"E
- Os%MgSO,
?
a 14.0 - ++ 0.5% NaCl
0
L
_) .z f - .
12.0 -
10.0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I(
0 15 30 45 60 75 SO 1051201351501651601Q5210
time[min]
filtration, whereas for DS-3-SE the situation is concentration of fixed charges. In that model the
opposite (Fig. 2). This phenomenon can be rejection mechanism of ions is based on the
explained (partly at least) by the different Donnan effect and their transport (the diffusion
osmotic pressure differences, AIT,ofthe feed and and convection parts of ENPE) is affected by the
permeate solutions developed during the filtra- so-called hindrance factors K,,d,K,,,, depending on
tion of NaCl and MgSO,. Using the layer model the ratio of solute to pore radius, ri/r,. Assuming
of concentration polarisation for the calculation the straight pores of radius rp = 1 nm for both
of the salt concentration near the surface of membranes, it was found that the ratio of the
membrane: active membrane layer to its porosity, 1,/V,, is
equal to 12 (DS-5-DK) and 44 pm (DS-3-SE). If
the VP of both membranes were the same, it
would mean that either the thickness of the active
layer of DS-5-DK was ca. four times smaller than
that of DS-3-SE or that the radius of the pores of
necessary for the calculation of ATC: DS-5-DK was twice that of DS-3-SE.
According to the model, the concentration of
fixed charges in the pore solution, C, for DS-5-
(2)
DK is 0.5 M as calculated from the NaCl data,
assuming rp = 1 nm, Z, = 50 pm. Using the
It has been estimated that for DS-3-SE An;is MgSO, data, however, the model calculations
equal to ca. 0.44 (NaCl) and 0.10 MPa (MgSO,), yield 100 times higher values of C,. These
whereas for DS-5-DK, An; = 0.08 (NaCl) and unexpectedly high values of C, mean that the
0.16 MPa (MgSO,). Thus, remembering that steric effect, larger for MgSO,, plays an
Ap = 2 MPa, the effective force (Ap- ATT)is important role here (the radii of ions calculated
substantially higher in the first case for MgSO,, from their mobilities are 0.348 (Mg”) vs. 0.184
than in the second case for NaCl. To characterise (Na’), 0.231 (SO:-) vs. 0.121 (Cl-) nm). In the
the membranes, the model based on the extended case of DS-3-SE for both electrolytes, the C,
Nernst-Planck equation (ENPE): calculated is also much too high (ca. 20 M). Here
for the explanation of salt rejection the surface
1
force-pore model of Matsuura and Sourirajan can
~..,Fdl
dc.
be applied [2,3].
dx “RTdx
Four types of water characterised by different
total hardness (H,,) were used in the experiment.
and on the Donnan equation: They were the well waters taken from Jaworzno
(H,,, =:500 mg CaC0,/dm3), Bedzin (H,,> 500 mg
- l/z, _ llZk l/Z, _llZk
a = f(feed), p (permeate) CaC03/dm3) and Gliwice (H,, > 600 mg CaCO,/
‘i,cc ‘k,a =cia , ,
Cka
dm3), and the tap water for comparison.
Fpr both DS-5-DK and DS-3-SE membranes,
ci - zici+a,F, = 0 (475) the highest J, is observed for tap water and the
well water from Gliwice, characterised by the
developed by Bowen et al. [ 11, has been applied. lowest total hardness H,,, (Fig. 3a and 3b).
In the above equations C,, c, denote the concen- It was observed that at the first tests both
tration of ion i in the pore solution and in the membranes showed slightly higher volume flux
external solution, respectively, and C, is the (J,,) then that after the repeated use of a given
324 M Boclzek et al. /Desalination 145 (2002) 321-327
a)
5.0 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300
0 30 60 90 120 150 160 210 240 270 300 time [min]
time [min]
Fig. 3. Time dependence ofvolume flux through: (a) membrane DS3-SE, (b) membrane DS-5-DK. Feed: well water from
Bedzin, Jaworzno and Gliwice.
Table 1
Time dependence of J,, J,=a log(t/min) + b, and the determination coefficient R* for membranes DS-3-SE, DS-5-DK
0.5% NaCl - 0.0333 log(t) + 4.42 0.687 -0.0490 log(t) +1s.39 0.911
0.5% MgSO, - 0.0909 log(t) + 5.57 0.914 -0.0946 l(t) + 12.65 0.989
Tap water -0.198 log(t) + 7.27 0.779 -0.736 log(t) + 23.00 0.827
Jaworzno -0.0514 log(t) + 6.25 0.946 - 0.224 log(t) + 15.07 0.951
Bedzin - 0.127 log(t) + 6.62 0.724 -0.528 log(t) + 15.53 0.94
Gliwice -0.0669 log(t) + 5.89 0.971 -0.671 log(t) + 16.84 0.955
membrane. This fact indicates a partial, irrevers- The highest values of retention coefficient of
ible blocking of pores (fouling) which slightly total hardness, Htot, were obtained while filtering
reduced the efficiency of water filtration. the hard waters through the DS-3-SE membrane
The dependence of volume flow on time can (Fig. 4).
be approximated by the logarithmic function J, = The rejection coefficient of ions contributing
a log(t) + b. The parameters of that function, to the total hardness exceeded 80% for municipal
including the determination coefficient R2, for the and well water from Jaworzno, whereas for the
investigated membrane systems are listed in well waters of Bqdzin and Gliwice it amounted to
Table 1. less than 70% (Fig. 4b). The high decrease of the
It has been found that during the process of temporary hardness (Fig. 6), the content of Ca2’
softening of natural waters, the retention coeffi- and Mg2’ ions, inorganic carbon and of the
cients of Cl- and Mg2+ ions were lower than those conductivity was observed for both tested mem-
obtained for the model solutions (0.5% NaCl and branes. In contrast to DS-5-DK, the DS-3-SE
MgSO,). This is due to the multicomponent membrane shows a good retention of all ions,
nature of the natural waters as well as different both mono- and divalent ones (R>90%,
concentrations of the ions in the treated waters Figs. 4aAa).
and the model solutions. The results of analytical determinations
M. Bodzek et al. /Desalination 145 (2002) 321-327 325
I 3.0
3.0
time [h]
time [hl
Fig. 4. Retention coefficients of I&,,: (a) membrane DS3-SE, (b) membrane DS+DK.
time (h]
Fig. 5. Retention coefficients of Cl- ions: (a) membrane DS-3SE, (b) membrane DSSDK.
4 100 w 100
T L
E 75 L 75
g
.s
! 50 0 5.
p
5 25 wshrtliwice j 25 water GWii
‘g P,
0 0
15 3.0 5.0
15 3.0 5.0
time [hl
time [h]
Fig. 6. Retention coeffkients of H,: (a) membrane DS3-SE, (b) membrane DS-5-DK.
(Table 2) allow to state that the well waters after Analysing the parameters of the hard waters
the membrane filtration, using the DS-5-DK after the filtration through the DS-3-SE mem-
membrane, meet the requirements of the Decree brane, one can state that none of them meets the
of the Minister of Health concerning the well requirements of the Decree because of the low
water use for consumption aims. Eventually, a concentration of Ca*’ and Mg*+ ions. In order to
soft water (Jaworzno), a light hard water make this water potable, it might be mixed with
(Bedzin) and a medium hard one (Gliwice) have the water treated by other (e.g., conventional)
been obtained. methods.
326 M. Bodzek et al. /Desalination 145 (2002) 321-327
Table 2
Results of water softening applying DS-3-SE and DS-5-DK membranes
H,,,, mg CaC0,/dm3 Tap water 90 12.0 10.0 8.0 144 18.0 20.0 22.0
Jaworzno 504 10.0 10.0 10.0 498 88.0 72.0 80.0
Bedzin 532 12.0 12.0 10.0 572 172 196 190
Gliwice 596 8.0 12.0 12.0 596 300 244 194
Cl-, mg Cll/dm3 Tap water 35.4 14.2 14.2 14.2 35.4 28.3 28.3 28.3
Jaworzno 163 21.2 14.2 14.2 184 127 113 120
Bedzin 92 7.1 7.1 7.1 92.0 70.8 70.8 70.8
Gliwice 347 35.4 28.3 28.3 347 297 283 269
Mg*+, mg Mg2+/dm3 Tap water 6.3 1.0 1.5 1.0 8.7 0.5 1.0 0.5
Jaworzno 58.3 0 0.5 0.5 56.9 8.7 6.8 7.8
B&dzin 46.6 1.0 1.9 1.5 43.7 15.6 21.4 21.9
Gliwice 12.6 0 1.0 1.0 29.2 24.3 20.4 16.0
Ca*‘, mg Ca*‘/dm’ Tap water 25.6 3.2 1.6 1.6 43.2 6.4 6.4 8.0
Jaworzno 106 4.8 3.2 3.2 106 20.8 17.6 19.2
Bedzin 136 3.2 1.6 1.6 157 43.2 43.2 40.0
Gliwice 218 3.2 3.2 3.2 190 80.0 64.0 51.2
H,, mg CaCO,/dm’ Tap water 70.0 10.0 10.0 7.5 105 15.0 20.0 20.0
Jaworzno 265 10.0 10.0 10.0 270 85.0 70.0 80.0
Bedzin 315 10.0 10.0 10.0 360 145 155 155
Gliwice 395 7.5 10.0 10.0 395 220 200 180
Conductivity, mS/cm Tap water 0.20 0.022 0.021 0.021 0.282 0.068 0.075 0.083
Jaworzno 1.26 0.046 0.042 0.043 1.231 0.541 0.524 0.539
Bedzin 1.09 0.039 0.035 0.033 0.986 0.502 0.577 0.558
Gliwice 1.98 0.054 0.062 0.062 2.12 1.39 1.29 1.20
Inorganic carbon, Tap water 15.5 1.83 1.89 1.82 24.5 7.29 8.11 8.88
mg/dm3 Jaworzno 62.5 1.91 1.71 1.79 80.1 34.5 33.9 33.4
Bedzin 72.6 2.26 1.97 1.92 87.0 35.9 39.2 36.4
Gliwice 97.4 3.1 2.92 2.61 103 54.8 48.2 42.5
The presented data show that the retention of modelling of the filtration of multi-ionic solu-
a given ion depends on the composition of the tions (natural well waters) will be presented.
solution to be filtered. In the next paper the
M. Bodzek et al. /Desalination 145 (2002) 321-327 327