Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Initial approach to the patient: performs hand hygiene, introduces him/herself, explains
what he/she will be doing, obtains consent, asks about pain, positions and exposes
patient correctly
General inspection: mentions posture, mentions any environmental aids/devices
presence/absence, walking aids, any focal neurological signs, abnormal movements
Closer inspection: mentions presence/absence of fasciculations, muscle wasting,
symmetry, scars, amputations, contractures
Drift analysis:
Mentions pronator drift
Tone
** compares “like with like”,
Power:
** compares “like with like”, attempts to isolate muscle groups where feasible, grade
out of 5
Coordination:
• Finger-nose test. Should be near full extension to correctly assess
• Rapidly alternating movements
Reflexes: like with like
• Biceps, triceps, brachioradialis.
• Uses reinforcement (Jendrassik) manoeuvre if indicated
Examiner: “What are your findings on examination”?
Presents a systematic description of findings
Questions:
0 1-2 3-4 ≥5
Overall approach to task including approach to patient and clinical acumen
>80% Excellent All criteria done well Outstanding performance for a 3rd
year medical student - Excellent
examination technique, excellent
summary of patient problems,
excellent related knowledge, and
excellent approach to patient
70% Very Good All criteria done adequately and at Excellent in most respects
least 3/4 done well
60% Good All criteria done adequately and at Good sound overall performance
least 1/2 criteria done well.
50% Adequate – Bare Pass All basic examination criteria done Just reaching acceptable pass
adequately or well, but standard in physical examination
limited/incorrect responses to
some of the questions concerning
findings, differential diagnosis and
additional knowledge
40% Poor - Fail 3-4 criteria poorly done or not Poor performance – the candidate
done including at least 1 basic may display some adequate attributes
examination criteria done poorly or but does not reach an acceptable
not done pass standard overall
<30% Very Poor – Clear Fail > 5 criteria poorly done or not The candidate’s performance is so
done poor in most/all areas that the
standard required is not even remotely
approached.