i: a man; claim Felix Romero trespass by way of filing false claims (see exhibit A), barratry,

malicious prosecution, fraud, extortion, unjust enrichment; unlawful incarceration; the trespass
did and does continue to cause harm; (as i am being unlawfully incarcerated due to the
trespasses; i am losing substantial amounts of income; being kept from my family which is also
causing them harm and financial loss; have not been afforded due process of law, etc.) i require
and demand immediate release from custody; i require compensation of twenty five million
dollars; i require a court of record; i require a trial by jury; i, say here, and will verify in open court,
that all herein be true – Michael Caezar Ricasio Jr.'

to some of you who are new to filing Notices into a prosecutor's case, and the reason WHY you
are filing the Notice, and WHAT the Notice is supposed to convey ;)

Reason: To make the case disappear before an actual hearing even takes place so you never
have to show up in THEIR court in the first place ;)

What: You're letting the prosecutor know if he doesn't make is silly and unverifiable complaint go
away, that you are going make him pay for filing false claims that neither HE, nor his imaginary
Plaintiff (the STATE) can take the stand and actually verify. Not only is his complaint without
merit, but it is a waste of your time having to even deal with it, therefore you WILL be requiring
compensation for his trespasses ;)

You claim should be short and sweet, but you can send a lengthier Notice to get your point
across BEFORE you have to actually file a claim. Many of you folks are filing Notices that have
no teeth; are incoherent; are insufficient of the correct content, and do not exude any confidence,
knowledge, or probability of making the prosecutor liable for his actions against his fellow man in
YOUR court.

Most of these prosecutors have no idea what common law is and don't give a shit, either. Your
little one or two line Notices aren't getting their attention because to them, you're speaking in
tongues; making a frivolous argument or incoherent rant that does NOTHING to put any fire
under their asses.

You want to lay it out for them in an easy to understand format so there is absolutely no
misunderstanding to what your Notice means. You want to let him know (long before the hearing
gets here) that it might be in his best financial interest to make this silly complaint of his to go
away, because if he doesn't, there is going to be repercussions for his actions, financially
speaking, out of HIS personal pocket, and possible jail time if a jury sees fit once you drag him
into YOUR court ;)

He's threatening to fine and imprison you, but what are you threatening to do back to him if he
cannot verify his complaint and cough up his imaginary plaintiff (the STATE or CITY OF***, or
UNITED STATES) without actually conveying a threat?

You want to give him something to REALLY think about long before the hearing date. There
needs to be some 'Risk vs Reward' for him to ponder with regards to his complaints against his
fellow man. Just writing a Notice telling him you're not the 'legal person', or requiring to cross
examine your accuser, etc. is gibberish to him. You might as well write Grandma a love letter
telling her you'll be home for Christmas ;)
The whole idea of a Notice is to put some heat under someone's ass and make them leave you
the hell alone. They need to know there are about to be some VERY SERIOUS repercussions for
their trespasses. Again, this is NOT a cookie cutter type Notice. Depending on your specific
situation, the wording and structure may need to be changed, but it'll give you an idea.

So, use the Notice if you feel it may be of benefit to you, or don't. It has worked in six cases so
far, but if you have a hard-headed prosecutor you're dealing with that's going to 'show you the
law', then you need to be ready to file the actual claim and 'show HIM the law' ;)

Notice

" i: a man; require the STATE OF TEXAS to show up and verify his/her claim against me so i
may cross examine my accuser (the plaintiff must appear) and compensate him/her for any harm
i may have caused. If this man/woman that goes by the name 'STATE OF TEXAS' cannot show
up to verify his/her claim, i require this matter immediately discharged. It is my belief there is no
man/woman named 'STATE OF TEXAS' who can verify this claim by uttering with his/her voice
I've done wrong or caused him/her personal harm, injury, or loss, therefore pressing it upon the
record in open court. It is also my belief, that someone is filing complaints (false claims) on behalf
of this entity known as the 'STATE OF TEXAS' in an attempt to unjustly enrich themselves and
the 'STATE OF TEXAS' (whoever those individuals may be) and deprive me of my property
without due process of law. If this matter is not immediately discharged, i will be requiring leave
of court for 30 days so i may bring a proper and verifiable claim before the court to address this
trespass against me in the proper venue-a court of record (trespasses being: filing false claims,
barratry, malicious prosecution, unjust enrichment, fraud, extortion, theft, robbery, etc.), in which i
will be requiring compensation for the trespasses, as well as wasting my valuable time, money,
and resources having to deal with this complaint, as i do not have time to answer complaints
without compensation at this time. If there is an actual verifiable claim before the court, i will be
more than happy to show up free of charge and address any proper and verifiable claim against
me. i also require and order the immediate restoration of my property (see Exhibit A) and one
dollar per second from the commencement of the crime till my property is restored - your name
here.'
 Very rarely would you need to jump straight in with notices so why are folk doing it? What's wrong with a few good ol
fashioned letters trying to settle in private?

Dwaine Carrillo Probably the same reason the prosecutor's rarely (never) extend us the common courtesy of sending us a
letter offering to settle on the private side before dragging us into the public with their false claims.

I was just over here minding my business and along comes Billy the 'False Claim' Jones disrupting my life by filing
complaints against me in the public courthouse without sending me a personal letter, first.

I guess everyone has THEIR way of doing things. As for me, I don't want to engage in a letter writing party (that could last
for God knows how long), I just want him to go away and leave me the hell alone.

He didn't extend me the professional courtesy by first engaging in letter writing to settle this on the private side, why should
I go out of my way? I've work to do; I've got a life to live, and this guy just came along (without any warning or letter
writing of his own) and starts makes false claims against me, and not only is he attempting to extort money out me, but he's
trying to throw me in a cage, too ;)

you are the one creating controversy if you do not give him the chance to correct his mistake in private. Writing letters
creates a record that you tried to settle, this record is your evidence when you make a claim. So how you gonna make a claim
without them?

Larry McClurgGroup Admin unless you are there in some twisted way to recover stolen property, No need to warn the
thief to please return it.

I'm the one creating controversy? Really? I'm over here eating my pie and along comes this asshole with his false claims he's
filing into public courthouse that no one can take the stand and verify. He's filng false claims on behalf of this entity known
as the UNITED STATES that I've never even heard of heard. Where's HIS record of trying to settle with ME on the private
side, first?

He didn't send me a nice letter first; he just went for the throat with his tactics. He drew First Blood, not me.

Why didn't HE extend ME the common courtesy of sending ME a nice letter, first?

Like I said: Everyone has their way of doing things, but as for me personally, I really don't care to engage in two months
worth of back and forth letter writing with an UN-honorable man who failed to extend me the same courtesy. I just want him
to go away, and I want him to go away right now.

How is HE going to make a claim without his track record of first writing ME letters?

If he doesn't drop his frivolous complaint, not my problem. I wrote him the Notice and gave him the opportunity to do the
right thing before actually filing a claim against him, but he didn't care.

It might be different if it were and honest mistake, but we both know that is NOT the case

Larry McClurgGroup Admin so did you file the claim against him?
Dwaine Carrillo If he doesn't drop his criminal complaint before the hearing date, I'm going to do exactly what I stated I'd
do in the Notice and require leave of court for 30 days so I can file a claim against him. I'm actually being pretty nice; I
could file the claim right now, but I'm giving him an out with the Notice.

Larry McClurgGroup Admin ?? if it was me I wouldn't wait for their court to begin so I can require leave of court, I'd file
my claim as soon as I got the hearing date. Then you will have both case proceeding simultaneously in that one room. I think
if you wait, they will have already charged and convicted you by the time your case starts.

Dwaine Carrillo What if you're someone who just now came across this information (as the six cases the Notices worked
for) and didn't have time OR the knowledge to file a claim or hold your own court?

Larry McClurgGroup Admin That would mean they had already been to trial. In that case I would file my claim. But
chances are someone who is that unaware, to let themselves be dragged into court like that, wouldnt know how to file a
claim in 30 days.

Dwaine Carrillo If a prosecutor files a complaint against you, you're going to be scheduled a first hearing (and possibly
more) before a trial ever takes place.

If you're someone who has NEVER heard of Karl, or never heard of anything 'common law', and you've been studying on
the internet in a last ditch effort to find SOMETHING that may help you and you're down to the last 4 days before your first
hearing, you don't have time (nor the knowledge) to file a claim or hold your own court.

You're looking for something to work RIGHT NOW! That is where the Notice (written as it is above) just might save your
ass like it did the other six people who used it.

You're assuming everyone who has legal problems has spent the last three years studying common law and already know
how to file claims; act as a man, and hold their own court.

Larry McClurgGroup Admin "Notice (written as it is above) just might save your ass" . If the notices have worked for
people Im glad. I havent been in that desperate situation. By the time I was threatened by officials, I knew just enough to
notice them right back and stop their nonsense. I've never had to go to court since I learned a little of Karl's method.
Hopefully I never will. I have bigger fish to fry. if I do something that gets me accused by the agents, I will start noticing
whoever immediately. I wont go to a hearing. I probably wont threaten a suit until they dishonor me by not responding, and
then I might not even do that. A threat thru the mail is a felony. I might just sue them without further notice and let the cards
fall. Right now its all hypothetical.
Larry McClurgGroup Admin he didnt extend a professional courtesy to you because you are not a professional, not in his
club/society.
What he did not do is act with honor. And who would ever expect a lawyer to act with honor?
Bert is saying what Karl says, dont start by saying you will sue, probably because they know they can be sued and had better
try ro settle. If they ignore you, then they dishonor you.
Unless it is a matter of exclusive stolen property start with a simple notice of the problem and try to settle it privately.
This isnt possible with stolen property. Jump right in.
But for other matters, it is honorable to notice to wrongdoer once or twice before taking action. And you wouldnt even
necessarily "threaten" action, you would just do it after they were warned.

Dwaine Carrillo Yeah, the Notice is a not a cookie cutter Notice. If some guy named Bob (city code enforcer) send you a
letter stating you need to mow your grass according to code A2e49hs-H or be fined, then of course you could send Bob a
nice letter and attempt to settle it that way first.

But if the police arrest you for possession of an automatic weapon without a tax stamp, and some guy (prosecutor) from the
CITY OF*** files a criminal complaint against you for illegal possession without a tax stamp and he's trying to take your
life, liberty, and property, ultimately putting you in a cage for 20 years, then there is no sense (nor is there the time) in trying
to be nice and write him letters.

This is when a Notice like the written above might come in handy. Each situation is different.

Larry McClurgGroup Admin wait a minute, tax stamp? are you in the US or the UK or canada. Ive never heard of a tax
stamp for buying a weapon. Here in the US, as far as I know, in a store, a background check is done, you pay your money,
get a receipt, take the rifle and go home

Dwaine Carrillo I'm in the US ... If you want to own an automatic weapon (legally not lawfully speaking), you must obtain
a class III weapons permit. Takes a lot of time, plus about $200 cash, and an Act of Congress ;)
Dwaine Carrillo You don't need a permit to buy a firearm UNLESS it is an Automatic, Silencer, or anything the goobermint
thinks you shouldn't have without their permission.
Dwaine Carrillo But those statutes of not being able to own an automatic weapon or a silencer, or silenced weapon without
a tax stamp are only enforceable on gov't employees. You and I may own anything we please without buying the statutorily
required stamp (permit). I don’t tell them what I own
I always wondered about that because I thought lawyers were supposed to decide what is relevant or not and
then letting the client know. Apparently there is a lot of struggling lawyers who need to make stuff up is the way I
have always seen it. Maybe someone could clarify so I can be more educated.