Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Processing TENCEL® LF /
Cotton Blends
Processing characteristics of TENCEL® LF /
cotton blends on Rieter’s 4 end spinning systems.
Rieter . Processing TENCEL® LF / Cotton Blends 3
The schematic diagram of the different spinning In the case of Com4®ring, Com4®compact and
processes clearly illustrates the spinning princi- Com4®compact-twin yarns, twist is imparted
ple. (Fig. 1). by means of the rotating spindle. The fiber ma-
terial is compacted further by a partial vacuum
in the compacting unit in the drafting system,
which drastically reduces the hairiness of the
yarn and increases yarn tenacity. In the case of
Com4®compact-twin yarn two rovings are fed
in together and twisted into a compacted, spun-
twisted yarn. This enables further reductions in
hairiness and increases in tenacity to be achieved.
20 000
18 000 when spun pure and in various blends, especially
16 000 with cotton.
14 000
12 000
10 000
8 000 Reflecting the expanding spheres of application
6 000
4 000 of these fibers, 50/50 and 67/33 TENCEL® LF /
2 000 cotton blends were used in this study (Fig. 4).
0
1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009
Years
Fig. 3
Fiber specifications
TENCEL® LF Cotton (CO)
bright natural white Yemen
Fig. 4
6 Rieter . Processing TENCEL® LF / Cotton Blends
Finishing
1.6
1.4 The staple length distribution of both raw ma-
1.2 terials shows that the mean staple length is in-
1.0 creased by the addition of TENCEL® (Fig. 7).
0.8 This will not only be reflected positively in the
0.6 physical yarn parameters, but also primarily in
the running behavior of the ring and air-jet spin-
Tencel Specimen 1 Tencel Specimen 2 Cotton Bale 39
ning process.
Cotton Bale 83 Cotton Bale 84
Fig. 7
35.0
30.0
25.0
20.0
3.0 6.0 9.0
Elongation
Yarn results
Fig. 11
Rieter . Processing TENCEL® LF / Cotton Blends 9
19.0
18.0 ity measurements and optical uniformity in the
17.0 fabric (Fig. 10).
16.0
15.0
14.0
13.0 YARN TENACITY AND ELONGATION
12.0 The structure of the air-jet-spun yarn consists of
11.0
10.0 core fibers without significant twist and covering
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 fibers with a genuine twist which ultimately pro-
Yarn count [tex]
duces the corresponding yarn tenacity. The specif-
Air-jet Ring Compact Rotor ic yarn structure results in a yarn tenacity between
Fig. 12
that of a ring-spun yarn and of a rotor-spun yarn.
The very high yarn tenacity of a compact yarn can-
not be achieved by any other spinning system due
Yarn quality – Elongation – Tensojet
TENCEL®LF/CO 50/50 % to its virtually total integration of fibers into the
7.0 yarn strand and the simultaneous, complete twist-
6.5 ing of the fibers (Fig. 11, 12).
6.0
Elongation [%]
5.5
Due to their yarn structure, air-jet-spun yarns
5.0
display good yarn elongation values equaling
4.5
4.0
those of ring-spun yarns, depending on yarn
3.5 count and raw material. The elongation of air-
3.0 jet-spun yarns are also reflected in a good pro-
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 cessing behavior of the yarns (Fig. 13, 14).
Yarn count [tex]
Fig. 13
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Yarn count [tex]
Fig. 14
10 Rieter . Processing TENCEL® LF / Cotton Blends
(Fig. 16).
3.0
5.0
4.0
Force [N]
3.0
2.0
0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Elongation [%]
Fig. 17
Rieter . Processing TENCEL® LF / Cotton Blends 11
22.0
20.0
18.0 Yarn abrasion is directly related to yarn hairi-
16.0 ness and the integration of the fibers in the yarn
14.0
12.0
10.0
strand. One advantage of air-jet-spun yarn be-
8.0 comes clearly apparent here. Lower abrasion
6.0
4.0 will result in significantly less soiling and less
2.0
0.0 fiber fly during downstream processing of the
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 yarns. Cleaning intervals on the machines could
Yarn count [tex]
therefore be extended (Fig. 19, 20).
Air-jet Ring Compact Rotor
Fig. 19
22.0
20.0
18.0
16.0
14.0
12.0
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Yarn count [tex]
Fig. 20
12 Rieter . Processing TENCEL® LF / Cotton Blends
500
The abrasion resistance of air-jet-spun yarn in a
400 fiber blend of 50/50 TENCEL® / cotton is compa-
300 rable with that of a compact yarn (Fig. 22).
200
100
After establishing the maximum number of abra-
sion cycles until shortly before a yarn breakage,
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 visual appearance with regard to fiber slough-
Yarn breakages ing must also be observed. air-jet-spun yarns dis-
played the best results. Up to a maximum of 537
Air-jet Ring Compact Rotor
abrasion cycles virtually no fiber sloughing had oc-
Fig. 22
curred. Rotor-spun yarns also displayed no fiber
sloughing up to the conclusion of testing (Fig. 23).
Yarn quality – Yarn structure – Reutlinger Webtester
TENCEL®LF/CO 50/50 %, 20 tex
Fig. 23
Rieter . Processing TENCEL® LF / Cotton Blends 13
The different final spinning processes display the The variations in yarn structure between the dif-
following variations in yarn structure, taking the ferent final spinning processes are very clearly
50/50 TENCEL® LF / cotton blend as an example: apparent. Each spinning process displays specific
• The air-jet-spun yarn with its parallel core fib- advantages due to the different yarn structures
ers and its covering fibers resembling ring- (Fig. 26).
spun yarn, and its low hairiness.
• The ring-spun yarn with its completely twisted
fibers and conventional hairiness.
• The compact yarn with its completely twisted
fibers, lean yarn strand and reduced hairiness.
• The rotor-spun yarn with its greater yarn bulk
and belly bands which hold the fiber strand to-
gether, even with shorter fibers, and prevent
fiber sloughing.
Com4®jet
am 125
Com4®ring
am 110
Com4®compact
am 110
Com4®rotor
am 125
Fig. 26
Rieter . Processing TENCEL® LF / Cotton Blends 15
0.25
fected by the structure and diameter of a yarn.
0.23
A larger yarn diameter with the same yarn count
0.20
demonstrably exerts a positive influence on the
0.18
optical uniformity of the end product. In the case
0.15
of rotor-spun yarn, more bulky yarns and thus
0.13
larger yarn diameters are achieved by the ap-
0.10
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 propriate choice of technology components and
Yarn count [tex] settings, in particular rotor speed. Good density
of the fabric surface is therefore achieved in the
Air-jet Ring Compact Rotor
end product with rotor-spun yarns by means of
Fig. 27
larger yarn diameters, whereas with air-jet-spun
yarns this is achieved primarily via the typical
Yarn quality – Shape – UT4
yarn structure. High density of the surface in the
TENCEL® LF / CO 50/50 %
1.00 knitted fabric usually plays a significant role in the
positive evaluation of a knitted fabric (Fig. 27).
0.95
Fig. 28
16 Rieter . Processing TENCEL® LF / Cotton Blends
PRODUCING AND FINISHING KNITTED FABRICS Experience teaches us that conclusions regarding
The characteristics, i.e. properties of yarns influ- the appearance of a textile fabric can be drawn
ence the properties of the textiles. The relevant only to a limited extent from the results of meas-
yarn values measured are usually reflected in the urements such as yarn irregularity. It must also
textile fabric. Despite the many possible ways of not be forgotten that the properties of woven and
ascertaining yarn properties, the actual effects of knitted fabrics depend not only on yarn proper-
yarns on textile fabrics must be verified and con- ties, but that the structure of the end product and
firmed. Furthermore, not all yarn values relevant the processes used exert a significant influence.
for downstream processing of the yarn can be
measured. Nor is the sum of the yarn properties Past experience has shown us that the stand-
or their interaction always clearly predictable. ards imposed on the properties of textile fabrics
have risen continuously and are still rising. This
is true both for qualitative demands on the tex-
tile product and also for requirements in terms of
the functional features and wearability of the tex-
tile in question.
Length - 7 %
Washing (60°C) DIN EN 26330
Width - 8 %
Visual appearance
According to Lenzing
after washing
Rieter . Processing TENCEL® LF / Cotton Blends 17
WASHING BLEACHING
For final evaluation of a new or alternative spin-
Pre-fixing 3.0 g/l sodium carbonate ning process it is therefore essential to conduct
45 seconds at 195°C 2.0 g/l Kieralon MFB a comprehensive qualitative assessment of the
1.5 g/l Prestogen PL textile fabrics which, for example, are manufac-
Pre-washing 0.4 g/l magnesium chloride tured from the yarns produced by a new spin-
1 g/l Kieralon JET 0.8 g/l Kappafos D11 ning process.
1 g/l sodium carbonate 1.0 g/l Persoftal L
1 g/l Albaflow FFA 3.0 ml/l hydrogen peroxide 50 %
Due to their product characteristics, knitted
1 g/l Persoftal L
Heating at 1°/min. up to 90°C - 45 minutes fabrics are an excellent medium for examining
20 minutes at 80°C Cooling at 2°/min. to 70°C the influences exerted by yarns and their im-
Rinsing hot and cold Rinsing hot and cold pact on properties of the end products in ques-
tion. The different types of yarns produced from
Fig. 29 Finishing knitted fabrics
TENCEL® / cotton blends were therefore pro-
cessed into single jersey fabrics. In single jer-
sey-based knitted fabrics even very small yarn
Dyeing formula: reactive dyeing (steaming off)*
irregularities disturb the appearance of the knit-
0.250 % Remazol Red 3B ted fabric. Faults in the fabric are therefore very
0.226 % Remazol Brilliant Blue BB 133 % easy to detect.
50 g/l sodium sulphate
1.5 g/l sodium carbonate 1 Yarns in counts of 20 dtex (Ne 30) were used in
3.5 g/l sodium carbonate 2 30` downstream processing. The yarns were proc-
1.0 g/l Albaflow FFA 60°C 10` 45`
essed on two different knitting machines. The
1.0 g/l Persoftal L sodium carbonate
1°/` 2
circular knitting machines are the current state
15` 20` 15` of the art in knitting machine design.
30°C 5` 15` 10` 10`
Pick-up: approx. 90 %
Drying out: 130°C
Curing: 45 sec. at 175°C
The knitted fabrics were then finished, i.e. washed, • dimensional stability after washing cycles
bleached, dyed and given a surface finishing treat- • stitch skew (twist)
ment (Fig. 29 - 31). • burst pressure
• pilling on the gray fabric, the finished fabric,
As we have already stated, in order to compare and after one washing cycle
different spinning technologies the textile fabrics • appearance after washing
should also be evaluated after finishing and with
respect to certain critical serviceability values DIMENSIONAL STABILITY AFTER WASHING
in addition to an evaluation of the yarns. In this In order to evaluate dimensional stability all knit-
specific case the following criteria, which are cus- ted fabrics were washed at a temperature of 60°C
tomary and typical in practice, were taken into using a household washing machine as stipulated
consideration for evaluating the knitted fabrics: in DIN EN ISO 26330 and then dried in a tumble
dryer. Dimensional stability was measured after
1, 5, 10, 15 and 25 washing cycles.
Dimensional stability of knitted fabric with various yarn structures
TENCEL®LF/CO 50/50 %, 20 tex, 150 g/m2 single jersey, finished
-10 In all knitted fabrics tested, irrespective of the
DIN EN 26330 test
-9 fiber blend used or the type of knitted fabric (e.g.
Washing shrinkage [%]
-8
plated), the rotor-spun yarn and the air-jet-spun
-7
-6 yarn displayed the best dimensional stability
-5 in the knitted fabric, in both the length and the
-4
width. This is true for dimensional stability both
-3
-2 after the first and after the 25th washing cycle
-1 (Fig. 32, 33).
0
Length Width Length Width
After 1 washing cycle After 25 washing cycles STITCH SKEW
The skew of stitch courses depends in principle
Air-jet Ring Compact Rotor
on the twist factor of the yarns and the number
Fig. 32 of systems used in knitting. The higher the twist
factor of the yarns and the higher the number of
Dimensional stability of knitted fabric with various yarn structures systems, the more pronounced the stitch skew
TENCEL®LF/CO 49/49 % + 2 % elastane, 20 tex, 150 g/m2 single jersey, finished in the knitted fabric.
-10
DIN EN 26330 test
-9
The tendency of the yarns to produce skewed
Washing shrinkage [%]
-8
-7 stitches can be reduced by a steaming process.
-6 On knitting machines with a high number of sys-
-5
-4 tems the tendency to produce skewed stitch-
-3 es cannot be eliminated completely, even by a
-2 steaming process.
-1
0
Length Width Length Width
After 1 washing cycle After 25 washing cycles
Fig. 33
Rieter . Processing TENCEL® LF / Cotton Blends 19
Another method of reducing stitch skew is to ing the measuring results. As is to be expected,
process yarns with different directions of twist burst pressure is influenced by yarn tenacity
(S/Z) together. However, this involves consid- and thus by the specific spinning process used.
erable logistical effort in procuring and storing Higher yarn tenacity thus also results in higher
yarns. burst pressure. Burst pressure is also influenced
by the raw material.
BURST PRESSURE
Burst pressure is measured as stipulated in DIN Knitted fabrics with a higher TENCEL® content of
EN ISO 13938-2. In practice, measurements are 67 % display higher yarn tenacity and correspond-
not always made as stipulated in this standard. ingly higher burst pressure in the fabric compared
This leads to widely differing absolute measur- to knitted fabrics made from a 50/50 TENCEL® /
ing results and thus to confusion when evaluat- cotton blend. The addition of a higher proportion
of TENCEL® results in higher burst pressure due to
the higher fiber tenacity of TENCEL® compared to
Burst pressure and height of different yarn structures
cotton.
TENCEL®LF/CO 50/50 %, 20 tex, 150 g/m2 single jersey, finished
500 20
450 DIN EN 13938-2 test
19 Summarizing, the following can be stated:
400 379 382 18 • The compact yarns display the highest yarn te-
Burst pressure [kPa]
370
Burst height [mm]
350 331 17
310
300 284 16
250 15
200 14
150 13
100 12
50 11
0 10
Burst pressure Burst height
Fig. 35
20 Rieter . Processing TENCEL® LF / Cotton Blends
225 210
200 190 180
structure on burst pressure is reduced by plating
175 170
150
(Fig. 34, 35).
125
100 In tests with a fabric weight per unit area of
75
50 110 g/m2, the burst pressure also indicated very
25 clearly the differences arising between the un-
0
Air-jet Ring Compact Rotor
finished and the finished material. Unfortunate-
ly, textile finishing usually results in a signifi-
50/50% Tencel/CO 67/33% Tencel/CO cant loss in tenacity of the yarns and the textile
Fig. 36
end product due to chemical stresses. In these
products burst pressure declined by approx.
30 kPa in ring-spun and rotor-spun yarns, and
Burst pressure as a function of the spinning process by as much as 40 kPa in air-jet-spun yarns as a
TENCEL® LF/CO, 20 tex, 110 g/m2 single jersey, finished
result of the finishing process (Fig. 36, 37).
300
275
250 This is an indication that the manufacturing
250
Burst pressure [kPa]
Fig. 37
Rieter . Processing TENCEL® LF / Cotton Blends 21
ISO standard
DIN EN ISO 12945-1, BS 5811 DIN EN ISO 12945-2
Fig. 38
22 Rieter . Processing TENCEL® LF / Cotton Blends
3.5
3 No differences could be detected between the
2.5 other three spinning systems when analyzing
2 the finished material. As we have already said,
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
the pilling behavior of knitted fabrics can be im-
Time [min]
proved significantly by means of correspondingly
Air-jet finished Compact finished Air-jet washed Compact washed complicated finishing processes.
Ring finished Rotor finished Ring washed Rotor washed
APPEARANCE AFTER WASHING
Fig. 39
The washing process, the mechanics of the wash-
Martindale pilling test
ing processes and the detergents used in each
TENCEL® LF/CO, 20 tex, 150 g/m2 single jersey, finished without synthetic resin case have a clear influence on changes in the sur-
5 face of a knitted fabric and its appearance. The
4.5 appraisal by Lenzing of the surface of textiles
4 before and after washing seeks to make a visu-
Grade
Fig. 40
4.0
Grade
3.0
2.0
125 500 1 000 2 000 5 000 7 000
Cycles
Fig. 41
Rieter . Processing TENCEL® LF / Cotton Blends 23
Appearance of knitted fabric, white lining after washing, various yarn structures As with pilling evaluation, the changes were grad-
TENCEL® LF/CO 50/50 %, 20 tex, 150 g/m2 single jersey, finished ed on a scale of 1 to 5. In this evaluation grade 1
6 signifies a large change, while grade 5 indicates a
5 minimal change in the textile surface.
Grade White Lining
4
The evaluation criteria are defined as follows:
3
• Change in the surface due to napping and the
2 formation of creases from washing.
1 • Pilling after washing.
0
• Change in color, for example due to a change
after 1 wash after 25 washes after 1 wash after 25 washes after 1 wash after 25 washes after 1 wash after 25 washes in hairiness on the surface.
Air-jet Ring Compact Rotor
Air-jet Ring Compact Rotor Changes in fabric appearance between the un-
Fig. 43
washed state and after 25 washing cycles are
also clearly recognizable in microscopic images
of the 67/33 blend without elastane. It can be
Appearance of knitted fabric, color after washing, various yarn structures stated that items made from ring-spun or com-
TENCEL® LF/CO 66/32 % +2 % elastane, 20 tex, 150 g/m2 single jersey, finished pact yarns displayed a clearer change in the ap-
6 pearance of the textile fabric in all test criteria
5 than knitted fabrics produced from air-jet-spun
and rotor-spun yarns (Fig. 45 - 52).
Grade fuzzyness
0
after 1 wash after 25 wash after 1 wash after 25 wash after 1 wash after 25 wash after 1 wash after 25 wash
Fig. 44
24 Rieter . Processing TENCEL® LF / Cotton Blends
Fig. 45 Fig. 46
Fig. 47 Fig. 48
Rieter . Processing TENCEL® LF / Cotton Blends 25
Fig. 51 Fig. 52
26 Rieter . Processing TENCEL® LF / Cotton Blends
The appropriate sphere of application of air-jet An estimate of the potential sphere of application
spinning depends on the following influencing of air-jet-spun yarns already made in the year
factors: 2 000 has remained valid to this day. This dia-
• yarn tenacity, dependent on yarn structure gram shows that this new spinning process can
• raw material, dependent on fiber length and purity cover a feasible yarn count range of 10-30 tex
• quality of fiber preparation, dependent on (Ne 20-60) in technological and economic terms.
optimum coordination and condition of the However, this technological study is not in a po-
individual process stages sition to make a statement on the future market
• economics, dependent on yarn manufacturing share of this new spinning process (Fig. 53). Yarn
costs manufacturing costs are lower than for the ring
spinning process due to the higher delivery speed
Yarn count range of the air-jet spinning system. Depending on yarn
Potential use of existing spinning processes for air-jet spinning count, manufacturing costs lower than for the ro-
100 tor spinning process are also possible. Economic
Ring spinning considerations do not, of course, take into ac-
Ring spindle equivalents [%]
Fig. 53
System size medium system size of 690 kg/h with optimum machine utilization
Location Indonesia
Rieter . Processing TENCEL® LF / Cotton Blends 27
d
addition to upstream processing, largely depend
be
com
ed
Yarn manufacturing costs [CHF/kg yarn]
b
d
d
2.4
com
be
d
act
de
be
com
car
mp
om
Rin bed
tor
d
Co
tor
gc
be
2
act
Ro
d
om
com
be
be
om
Ro
mp
d
tc
om
be
be
de
gc
act
Co
-je
d
om
om
tc
car
1.6
be
Rin
tor
Air
mp
-je
Air d
tc
gc
de
tor
Ro
Co
-je
Rin
car
Ro
tor
Air
1.2
tor
Ro
Ro
Summary
www.rieter.com